1: \begin{abstract}

2: We revisit the problem of parameter estimation of gravitational-wave 

3: chirp signals from inspiralling non-spinning compact binaries in the 

4: light of the  recent extension of the post-Newtonian (PN) phasing 

5: formula to order $(v/c)^7$ beyond the leading Newtonian order. 

6: We study in detail the implications of higher post-Newtonian orders 

7: from 1PN up to 3.5PN in steps of 0.5PN ($\sim v/c$), and examine 

8: their convergence. In both initial and advanced detectors the estimation 

9: of the chirp mass (${\cal M}$) and symmetric mass ratio ($\eta$) 

10: improve at higher PN orders but oscillate with every half-a-PN order.  

11: In initial LIGO, for a $10 M_\odot$-$10M_\odot$ binary 

12: at a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 10, the improvement in the estimation of 

13: ${\cal M}$ ($\eta$) at 3.5PN relative to 2PN is $\sim 19\%$ ($ 52\%$). 

14: We compare parameter estimation in different 

15: detectors and assess their relative performance in two different 

16: ways: at a {\it fixed SNR,} with the aim of 

17: understanding how the bandwidth improves parameter estimation, and 

18: for a {\it fixed source}, to gauge the importance of sensitivity.  

19: Errors in parameter estimation at a fixed SNR are smaller for VIRGO 

20: than for both initial and advanced LIGO. This is because of the 

21: larger bandwidth over which it observes the signals.  

22: However, for sources at a fixed distance it is advanced LIGO

23: that achieves the lowest errors owing to its greater sensitivity.

24: Finally, we compute the amplitude corrections due to the

25: `frequency-sweep' in the Fourier domain representation of the

26: waveform within the stationary phase approximation 

27: and discuss its implication on parameter estimation. 

28: We find that the amplitude corrections change the 

29: errors in ${\cal M}$ and ${\eta}$ by less than 10\% 

30: for initial LIGO at a signal-to-noise ratio of 10. Our 

31: analysis makes explicit the significance of higher PN order 

32: modelling of the inspiralling compact binary on parameter estimation.

33: \end{abstract}

34: