1: \begin{abstract}

2: To reduce the time-to-market of future aircraft, it is crucial to predict the flight envelope accurately before building prototypes for flight tests. The High-Lift Prediction Workshop (HLPW) series aims to assess the numerical prediction capability of current CFD technology considering NASA's high-lift version of the Common Research Model (CRM-HL).

3: The present work contributes to these collaborative efforts, quantifying sensitivities for RANS-based steady, unsteady, and hybrid RANS/LES scale-resolving approaches. Uncertainties associated with the choice of turbulence model, initialization strategies, grid resolution, and iterative convergence at free-air conditions are covered.

4: Near stall%($C_{L,max}\approx2.5$)

5: , a large spread of RANS results was observed for different turbulence models %($\Delta C_L=0.27$) 

6: and initialization strategies%($\Delta C_L=0.24$)

7: , while iterative convergence appeared less crucial for the present simulations.

8: Steady and unsteady RANS simulations were unable to predict the correct flow physics near $C_{L,max}$, even for large grids. 

9: Delayed Detached Eddy Simulations (DDES), however, showed good accuracy compared with wind-tunnel experiments and predicted $C_{L,max}$ with an error of around $5\%$. Compared to steady RANS, the computational cost of DDES was a factor of ten higher. Lessons learned and potential best-practice strategies are shared to aid future studies. While warm-started RANS simulations using SA models are recommended at lower angles of attack, scale-resolving methods %- such as hybrid RANS/LES - 

10: are required near stall.

11: \end{abstract}

12: