1: \begin{abstract}

2: %Resolving rumour 

3: Analysing how people react to rumours associated with news in social media is an important task to prevent the spreading of misinformation, which is nowadays widely recognized as a dangerous tendency. 

4: %, since social media is full of false claims. 

5: In social media conversations, users show different stances and attitudes towards rumourous stories. Some users take a definite stance, supporting or denying the rumour at issue, while others just comment it, or ask for additional evidence related to the veracity of the rumour. On this line, a new 

6: %stance classification 

7: shared task has been proposed at SemEval-2017 (Task 8, SubTask A), which is focused on rumour stance classification in English tweets. The goal is predicting user stance towards emerging rumours in Twitter, in terms of supporting, denying, querying, or commenting the original rumour, looking at the conversation threads originated by the rumour. This paper describes a new approach to this task, where the use of conversation-based and affective-based features, covering different facets of affect, has been explored. 

8: %our effort in improving the system's performance to classify stance in SemEval-2017 Task 8 SubTask A. 

9: %Feature engineering becomes our main contribution in %this work. 

10: %We propose two groups of feature including %conversational-based and affective-based features. 

11: Our classification model outperforms the best-performing systems for stance classification at SemEval-2017 Task 8,

12: %and the state of the art, 

13: showing the effectiveness of the feature set proposed.

14: \end{abstract}

15: