1: \begin{abstract}

2: We perform a detailed comparison of the phase-space density traced by

3: the particle distribution in {\tt Gadget} simulations to the result

4: obtained with a spherical Vlasov solver using the splitting

5: algorithm. The systems considered are apodized H\'enon spheres with

6: two values of the virial ratio, $R \simeq 0.1$ and $0.5$. After

7: checking that spherical symmetry is well preserved by the $N$-body

8: simulations, visual and quantitative comparisons are performed. In

9: particular we introduce new statistics, correlators and entropic

10: estimators, based on the likelihood of whether $N$-body simulations

11: actually trace randomly the Vlasov phase-space density. When taking

12: into account the limits of both the $N$-body and the Vlasov codes,

13: namely collective effects due to the particle shot noise in the first

14: case and diffusion and possible nonlinear instabilities due to finite

15: resolution of the phase-space grid in the second case, we find a

16: spectacular agreement between both methods, even in regions of

17: phase-space where nontrivial physical instabilities develop. However,

18: in the colder case, $R=0.1$, it was not possible to prove actual

19: numerical convergence of the $N$-body results after a number of

20: dynamical times, even with $N=10^8$ particles.

21: \end{abstract}

22: