1: \begin{abstract}

2: The accurate characterization of nonequilibrium strongly-correlated

3: quantum systems has been a longstanding challenge in many-body physics.

4: Notable among them are quantum impurity models, which appear in various

5: nanoelectronic and quantum computing applications. Despite their seeming

6: simplicity, they feature correlated phenomena, including small emergent

7: energy scales and non-Fermi-liquid physics, requiring renormalization

8: group treatment. This has typically been at odds with the description

9: of their nonequilibrium steady-state under finite bias, which exposes

10: their nature as open quantum systems. We present a novel numerically-exact

11: method for obtaining the nonequilibrium state of a general quantum

12: impurity coupled to metallic leads at arbitrary voltage or temperature

13: bias, which we call ``RL-NESS'' (Renormalized Lindblad-driven NonEquilibrium

14: Steady-State). It is based on coherently coupling the impurity to

15: discretized leads which are treated exactly. These leads are furthermore

16: weakly coupled to reservoirs described by Lindblad dynamics which

17: impose voltage or temperature bias. Going beyond previous attempts,

18: we exploit a hybrid discretization scheme for the leads together with

19: Wilson's numerical renormalization group, in order to probe exponentially

20: small energy scales. The steady-state is then found by evolving a

21: matrix-product density operator via real-time Lindblad dynamics, employing

22: a dissipative generalization of the time-dependent density matrix

23: renormalization group. In the long-time limit, this procedure successfully

24: converges to the steady-state at finite bond dimension due to the

25: introduced dissipation, which bounds the growth of entanglement. We

26: thoroughly test the method against the exact solution of the noninteracting

27: resonant level model. We then demonstrate its power using an interacting

28: two-level model, for which it correctly reproduces the known limits,

29: and gives the full $I$-$V$ curve between them.

30: \end{abstract}

31: