1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %
3: \usepackage{epsfig}
4: %
5: % Monica's local definitions:
6: %
7: \newcommand{\etal}{et~al.}
8: \newcommand{\hii}{\mbox{\ion{H}{2}}}
9: \newcommand{\lya}{\mbox{Ly$\alpha$}}
10: \newcommand{\lyb}{\mbox{Ly$\beta$}}
11: \newcommand{\taulyc}{\mbox{$\tau_{LyC}$}}
12: \newcommand{\alphaalpha}{\mbox{$\alpha^{eff}_{H\alpha}$}}
13: \newcommand{\alphaB}{\mbox{$\alpha_{B}$}}
14: \newcommand{\kms}{\mbox{$\,$km s$^{-1}$}}
15: \newcommand{\thC}{$\theta^1\,$C~Ori}
16: \newcommand{\thA}{$\theta^2\,$A~Ori}
17: \newcommand{\subsun}{M$_{\hbox{$\odot$}}$}
18: \newcommand{\peryr}{yr$^{-1}$}
19: \newcommand{\HST}{{\em HST\/}}
20: \newcommand{\Av}{A_V}
21: \newcommand{\tevap}{t_{\rm e}}
22: \newcommand{\tdyn}{t_{\rm d}}
23: \newcommand{\rcrit}{r_{\rm cr}}
24: \newcommand{\smy}{\mbox{M}_\odot \, \mbox{yr}^{-1}}
25: \newcommand{\Ha}{H$\alpha$}
26: \newcommand{\Hb}{H$\beta$}
27: \newcommand{\SII}{[\ion{S}{2}]\ 6731\AA}
28: \newcommand{\NII}{[\ion{N}{2}]\ 6583\AA}
29: \newcommand{\OI}{[\ion{O}{1}]\ 6300\AA}
30: \newcommand{\HeI}{\ion{He}{1}\ 5676\AA}
31: \newcommand{\OIII}{[\ion{O}{3}]\ 4959\AA}
32: \newcommand{\SIII}{[\ion{S}{3}]\ 6312\AA}
33: \newcommand{\SIIshort}{[\ion{S}{2}]}
34: \newcommand{\NIIshort}{[\ion{N}{2}]}
35: \newcommand{\OIshort}{[\ion{O}{1}]}
36: \newcommand{\HeIshort}{\ion{He}{1}}
37: \newcommand{\OIIIshort}{[\ion{O}{3}]}
38: \newcommand{\SIIIshort}{[\ion{S}{3}]}
39: \newcommand{\mysec}[2]{$#1\mbox{$^{\rm ''}\mskip-7.6mu.\,$}#2$}
40: \newcommand{\inthms}[3]{$#1^{\rm h}#2^{\rm m}#3^{\rm s}$}
41: \newcommand{\dechms}[4]{$#1^{\rm h}#2^{\rm m}#3\mbox{$^{\rm s}\mskip-7.6mu.\,$}#4$}
42: \newcommand{\intdms}[3]{$#1^{\circ}#2'#3''$}
43: \newcommand{\decdms}[4]{$#1^{\circ}#2'#3\mbox{$''\mskip-7.6mu.\,$}#4$}
44: \newcommand{\msec}[2]{$#1\mbox{$''\mskip-7.6mu.\,$}#2$}
45: \newcommand{\mdeg}[2]{$#1\mbox{$^\circ \mskip-7.6mu.\,$}#2$}
46: \newcommand{\mtsec}[2]{$#1\mbox{$^{\rm s}\mskip-7.6mu .\,$}#2$}
47: \newcommand{\tmb}{\mbox{T$_{\rm mb}$}}
48: \newcommand{\HII}{\mbox{H\,{\sc ii}}}
49: \newcommand{\dtco}{D$_{2}$CO}
50: \newcommand{\Htwo}{H$_{2}$}
51: \newcommand{\hdco}{HDCO}
52: \newcommand{\htco}{H$_{2}$CO}
53: \newcommand{\httco}{H$_{2}$$^{13}$CO}
54: \newcommand{\dttco}{D$_{2}$$^{13}$CO}
55: \newcommand{\nhtd}{NH$_{2}$D}
56: \newcommand{\ndth}{ND$_{2}$H}
57: \newcommand{\nht}{NH$_{3}$}
58: \newcommand{\kmps}{km s$^{-1}$}
59: \newcommand{\Lsun}{L$_{\odot}$}
60: \newcommand{\Msun}{M$_{\odot}$}
61: \newcommand{\Rsun}{R$_{\odot}$}
62: \newcommand{\tp}[2]{#1$\times$10$^{-{#2}}$}
63: \newcommand\lax{${_<\atop^{\sim}}$}
64: \newcommand\gax{${_>\atop^{\sim}}$}
65: \newcommand{\dcop}{DCO$^+$}
66: \newcommand{\hcop}{HCO$^+$}
67: \newcommand{\htcop}{H$^{13}$CO$^+$}
68: \newcommand{\val}[3]{$#1\mskip3mu_{-#2}\mskip-30mu^{+#3}$}
69: \newcommand{\vall}[3]{$#1\mskip3mu_{-#2}\mskip-37mu^{+#3}$}
70: \newcommand{\valll}[3]{$#1\mskip3mu_{-#2}\mskip-44mu^{+#3}$}
71: \newcommand{\frii}{FR{\sc \,ii}}
72: %
73: % Ron's definitions
74: %
75: \newcommand{\note}[1]{\textbf{\textit{(#1)}}} % for notes to authors
76: \newcommand{\HI}{\mbox{H\,{\sc i}}}
77: %\newcommand{\HII}{\mbox{H\,{\sc ii}}}
78:
79: %\slugcomment{\textbf{DRAFT of \today} (for private circulation)}
80:
81: \shorttitle{}
82: \shortauthors{}
83:
84: \received{} % added by the ApJ editor
85:
86: \begin{document}
87:
88: \title{A comparison between anomalous 6-cm \htco\ absorption and CO(1-0) emission in the L1204/S140 region}
89:
90: \author{M\'onica Ivette Rodr\'{\i}guez$^{1,2}$\\
91: Tommy Wiklind$^{1,3}$ \\
92: Ronald J. Allen$^{1}$ \\
93: Vladimir Escalante$^{2}$ \\
94: Laurent Loinard$^{2}$ \\[0.2in]}
95:
96: \affil{$^{1}$Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive,
97: Baltimore, MD 21218, USA \\ monica, rjallen, wiklind@stsci.edu}
98:
99: \affil{$^{2}$Centro de Radiostronom\'{\i}a y
100: Astrof\'{\i}sica, Universidad Nacional Aut\'onoma de M\'exico,
101: Apartado Postal 72 - 3, C.P. 58091, Morelia, Michoac\'an,
102: M\'exico\\ m.rodriguez, l.loinard, v.escalante@astrosmo.unam.mx
103: }
104:
105: \affil{$^{3}$Affiliated with the Space Sciences Department of the European Space Agency}
106:
107:
108: \begin{abstract} We report observations of the dust cloud L1204 with
109: the Onsala 25-m telescope in the 6 cm (1$_{11}$-1$_{10}$) transition
110: of \htco. The observed region includes the
111: S140 H${\alpha}$ arc. This spectral line is seen here in absorption
112: against the cosmic microwave background, indicating the presence of
113: widespread warm molecular gas at intermediate densities. Overall, the
114: distributions of \htco\ and CO (taken from the literature) are fairly
115: similar, though significant differences exist at small scales. Most
116: notably, while the CO peak is nearly coincident with the S140
117: H${\alpha}$ arc, the maximum \htco\ absorption is clearly separated
118: from it by a full 10$'$ beam ($\sim$ 3 pc). We argue that these
119: differences result from differing abundances and excitation
120: requirements. The CO(1-0) line is more optically thick and more
121: biased towards warm gas than the \htco\ 6 cm line. On the other hand,
122: formaldehyde is more easily photodissociated and is, therefore, a
123: poorer tracer of the molecular gas located immediately behind Photon
124: Dominated Regions. \end{abstract}
125:
126: \keywords{ISM: clouds --- ISM: molecules -- radio lines: ISM -- stars: formation -- galaxies: ISM}
127:
128:
129: \section{Introduction}
130: \label{sec:introduction}
131:
132:
133: Since \Htwo\ --the most abundant molecule in space-- lacks a permanent
134: dipole moment, its rotational transitions are prohibited. Although
135: the quadrupolar transitions exist, they are of little use for the
136: syudy of the bulk of molecular gas in the ISM because they require
137: high temperature to be excited. Instead, the structure and properties of
138: cold molecular clouds in the interstellar medium are usually studied
139: using low-energy rotational transitions of simple non-symmetric polar
140: molecules. For practical reasons, the first rotational transition (J =
141: 1$\rightarrow$0) of carbon monoxide (CO), at 115.27 GHz has been the
142: most popular choice. This transition, however, has long been known to
143: be nearly always optically thick, so --for a given filling factor--
144: its intensity is expected to increase monotonically with the kinetic
145: temperature of the emitting gas. Clearly, this could have adverse
146: effects on efforts to establish the distribution of molecular gas in
147: the ISM from CO observations alone, because very low temperature gas
148: might go unnoticed in sensitivity-limited CO observations while warm
149: regions ($\gtrsim$ 20 K) will stand out even if they are not those
150: with the highest molecular content. The sources where these effects
151: might be most noticeable are those with large temperature gradients;
152: for instance in molecular clouds located in the immediate vicinity of
153: hot stars.
154:
155: While all molecular emission tracers share this temperature dependance
156: to some degree, {\em absorption} lines can be detected even in very
157: cold gas, provided sufficiently bright background continuum sources
158: are available. The scarcity of such sources at the wavelength of the
159: common molecular tracers, however, has limited the usefulness of
160: absorption measurements in the study of specific Galactic molecular
161: clouds (e.g Evans et al. 1980). The 6-cm (1$_{10}$-1$_{11}$)
162: transition of ortho formaldehyde (\htco) offers an interesting
163: alternative. Owing to collisions with neutral particles that
164: selectively overpopulate the lower energy level, the excitation
165: temperature of the 1$_{10}$ $\rightarrow$ 1$_{11}$ transition lies
166: below 2.7 K \citep{toch69}. This allows the transition to be observed
167: in absorption against the cosmic microwave background (CMB)
168: \citep{syn69}, and makes it a potentially powerful tracer of molecular
169: gas in any direction of the sky. The excitation requirements are such
170: the the 6 cm \htco\ line is a good indicator of the presence of cool
171: to warm molecular gas (T $\gtrsim$ 10 K) at intermediate densities
172: (10$^3$ cm$^{-3}$ $\leq$ n $\leq$ 10$^5$cm$^{-3}$). Unfortunately, the
173: absorption line is weak, so very large amounts of telescope time are
174: required to map large areas of the sky.
175:
176: Recently, \citet{r06} conducted a blind search for \htco\ absorption
177: and compared CO emission and \htco\ absorption profiles towards the
178: Galactic anticenter. They found a rough, large-scale correlation
179: between these two tracers, and concluded that both lines
180: preferentially trace warm and dense molecular gas. Here, we will
181: examine this relation between CO and H$_2$CO at a somewhat smaller
182: scale using observations of the well-known, nearby star-forming region
183: Sharpless 140 (S140 --Sharpless 1959) associated with the dark dust
184: cloud Lynds 1204 (L1204 --Lynds 1962). L1204 is centered at $l$ =
185: \mdeg{107}{47}, $b$ = +\mdeg{4}{82} and covers an area of 2.5 square
186: degrees (Lynds 1962). At its southwest edge lies S140, a prominent
187: compact arc-shaped \HII\ region with an angular size of $\sim$ 2$'$
188: $\times$ 6$'$. The ionization of S140 is maintained by the nearby B0V
189: star HD211880 \citep{bl78}. The distance of S140/L1204 deduced from
190: the brightness of the exciting star is 910 pc \citep{c74}. S140 has
191: been the subject of many observational studies, that have usually
192: focused on the Photon Dominated Region (PDR) on the edge of L1204, and
193: on the embedded infrared sources located right behind it (e.g.,
194: Preibisch et al. 2001; Hayashi \& Murata 1992; Preibisch \& Smith
195: 2002; Bally et al. 2002). Remarkably, while the dust cloud is seen as
196: an extended dark feature covering more than two square degrees, the CO
197: emission peaks immediately behind the H$\alpha$ arc (Heyer et
198: al. 1996; Evans et al. 1987; Blair et al. 1978), while only relatively
199: faint emission extends deep within the dust cloud \citep{hb97}. The
200: 6-cm line of \htco\ was detected in absorption against the CMB in
201: L1204 near S140 by \citet{bl78} with the NRAO 43 m telescope, and
202: unexpectedly by \citet{e87} during VLA observations of the bright
203: condensation just northwest of S140. However neither of those studies
204: provided a extensive mapping of the \htco\ CMB absorption in L1204,
205: and the exact extension of the gas traced by \htco\ remains
206: unclear. In this article, we will present such a extensive mapping of
207: the 6 cm CMB absorption of \htco\ over most of the large dust complex
208: L1204, and compare our results with existing CO observations taken
209: from the literature.
210:
211: \section{Data}
212: \label{sec:observations}
213:
214: The \htco\ observations were obtained during two sessions (January and
215: September-October 2004, respectively) with the 25.6-m telescope of the
216: {\em Onsala Space Observatory} (OSO) in Sweden. At 6 cm, the angular
217: resolution is 10$'$, and our pointing precision was always better than
218: 20$''$. Frequency-switching, with a frequency throw of 0.4 MHz was
219: used, and both polarizations of the incoming signal were recorded
220: simultaneously in two independent units of the autocorrelation
221: spectrometer. Each of these units provided 800 2 kHz-wide channels. At
222: the observed frequency of 4829.660 MHz, this setup provided a total
223: bandwidth of 99 km s$^{-1}$ and a (Hanning-smoothed) velocity
224: resolution of 8 kHz $\equiv$ 0.49 km s$^{-1}$. The spectrometer was
225: centered at the systemic velocity of S140, V$_{LSR}$ = $-$8.0 km
226: s$^{-1}$. Daily observations of the supernova remnant Cas A were used
227: to check the overall performance of the system. The system temperature
228: during our observations varied from 33 to 36 K.
229:
230: In order to map the entire region behind S140, we observed 72
231: positions on a regular square grid with a 10$'$ spacing, centered at
232: $l$ = \mdeg{107}{0}, $b$ = +\mdeg{5}{3}; the resulting map uniformly
233: covers a \mdeg{1}{0} $\times$ \mdeg{1}{8} rectangular region (Fig.\ 1)
234: . The off-line data reduction was done with the CLASS program of the
235: GILDAS software package \citep{gf89}, and involved only the
236: subtraction of (flat) baselines from individual integrations and the
237: averaging of all spectra taken at the same pointing position. The
238: total integration time for each of these positions was about 10 hours,
239: yielding a typical final noise level of 3 mK (T$^*_A$).
240:
241: The distribution of radio continuum sources in the region of L1204 has
242: been studied in detail by Allen Machalek \& Jia (in preparation), using data from the Canadian
243: Galactic Plane Survey. Fairly bright continuum emission is associated
244: with the H$\alpha$ arc and the embedded massive protostars located
245: behind it --but, as we will see momentarily no formaldehyde was
246: detected from either of these regions. In addition, a number of
247: extragalactic background sources as well as diffuse emission
248: associated with the dust cloud L1204 itself contribute to the overall
249: radio continuum. The typical brightness temperature average over the
250: Onsala beam at 6 cm, however, is only about 0.2 K, except towards the
251: H$\alpha$ arc and the embedded massive protostars (where again, no
252: absorption was detected). Since the brightness temperature is so
253: small, any \htco\ absorption profiles features detected must be
254: absorption of the cosmic microwave background radiation at 2.7 K.
255:
256: In the analysis of our new observations, we will also make use of
257: $^{12}$CO(1-0) observations of L1204/S140 kindly provided by Dr.\
258: Tamara Helfer, and published in Heyer et al.\
259: (1996), and Helfer \& Blitz (1997). These data were obtained with the
260: 14-m telescope of the {\em Five College Radio Astronomy Observatory}
261: (FCRAO) in Amherst (MA), and have an intrinsic angular resolution of
262: 45$''$. For comparison with our formaldehyde data, we have
263: smoothed the CO(1-0) observations to 10$'$, and resampled them on our
264: observing grid.
265:
266: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccr}
267: \tablewidth{0pt}
268: \tablecaption{Source positions.
269: \label{table:positions}}
270: \tablecolumns{5}
271: \tablehead{
272: \colhead{Source} &
273: \colhead{Position (\textit{l}, \textit{b})} &
274: \colhead{Size ($\Delta\alpha, \Delta\delta$)} &
275: \colhead{$\alpha$(J2000.0), $\delta$(J2000.0)} &
276: \colhead{Reference}
277: }
278: \startdata
279: L1204 & \mdeg{107}{37}, +\mdeg{4}{87} & \mdeg{1}{0} $\times$ \mdeg{2}{5} & \dechms{22}{26}{41} +\decdms{63}{15}{36}& Lynds (1962) \\
280: S140(H$_\alpha$) & \mdeg{106}{8}, +\mdeg{5}{3} & 2$'$ $\times$ 6$'$ &\dechms{22}{19}{23}+\decdms{63}{18}{16}& Sharpless (1959) \\
281: Our survey & \mdeg{107}{0}, +\mdeg{5}{3} & \mdeg{1}{0} $\times$ \mdeg{1}{8} & \dechms{22}{20}{52} +\decdms{63}{24}{49}& This paper \\
282: \enddata
283: %\tablecomments{}
284: %\tablerefs{}
285: \end{deluxetable}
286:
287: \begin{figure*}[ht!]
288: \epsscale{0.5}
289: \plotone{f1.eps}
290: \caption{This figure shows a sketch of the L1204/S140 region, with our observed
291: positions shown as "+" symbols. The correspondence between Galactic
292: coordinates (used throughout the paper) and equatorial coordinates
293: (that have usually been preferred for observations of S140) is
294: indicated. The circle represents the \mdeg{2}{5} size of the dust
295: cloud L1204 as reported by Lynds (1962). The central positions of
296: L1204 and S140 are shown as "\*" symbols. The contour represents
297: the lowest value of the \htco\ absorption.
298: \label{fig:sketch}}
299: \end{figure*}
300:
301:
302: \section{Results}
303: \label{sec:results}
304:
305: Formaldehyde absorption was detected in at least 16 of our 72 observed
306: positions (see Fig.\ \ref{fig:mosaic}). The maximum absorption is
307: located 10$'$ arcmin behind the S140 \HII\ region at a LSR velocity of $-$8.0 km
308: s$^{-1}$, similar to that of the CO emission detected in that area. A
309: second spatio-kinematical structure is detected towards the
310: north-east (here, and in the rest of the paper, north and all other directions refer to
311: Galactic coordinates), at $V_{LSR}$ $\sim$ $-$11 km s$^{-1}$. Both components are
312: presumably associated with L1204, and have clear CO counterparts
313: (Fig.\ \ref{fig:mosaic} -- Blair et al. 1978; Evans et al. 1987;
314: Sugitani \& Fukui 1987; Park \& Minh 1995). There is also an isolated
315: absorption feature towards the southeast, at $V_{LSR}$ $\sim$ $-$2.5
316: km s$^{-1}$. Given its low LSR velocity, this feature is likely
317: unrelated to L1204, and is probably a local cloud along the line of
318: sight. Thus, while \citet{sf87} identified three molecular components
319: associated with L1204 in their $^{13}$CO observations, we only find
320: two in our formaldehyde data. We do find evidence, however, for a
321: systematic velocity gradient across the cloud. \citet{pm95} argued
322: that this complex overall spatio-kinematical morphology was created
323: when S140 and L1204 were swept up by an expanding shell associated
324: with the Cepheus bubble. Our data do not illuminate this assertion any
325: further, and a more thorough study is necessary to understand the
326: detailed structure of this region.
327:
328: \begin{figure*}[ht!]
329: \epsscale{0.6}
330: \plotone{f2.eps}
331: \caption{(a) Mosaic of \htco\ CMB absorption spectra observed in the
332: L1204/S140
333: region. The (0,0) position corresponds to $l$ = \mdeg{107}{0}, $b$ =
334: \mdeg{5}{3}, about 12$'$ east of S140, and about 40$'$
335: north-west of the nominal center of L1204 (Lynds 1962). (b)
336: Corresponding CO(1-0) observations smoothed to 10$'$ (see
337: text). Note that the CO emission is located a full 10$'$ west of
338: the maximum H$_2$CO absorption.
339: \label{fig:mosaic}}
340: \end{figure*}
341:
342: \begin{figure*}[ht!] \epsscale{0.6} \plotone{f3.eps} \caption{All
343: panels show a grey-scale version of the DSS-red image of the region
344: around \textit{l} = \mdeg{107}{0}, \textit{b} = \mdeg{5}{4}. The
345: H$_{\alpha}$ arc of S140 is clearly visible on these (red) images near
346: \textit{l} = \mdeg{106}{8}, \textit{b} = \mdeg{5}{3}. In the three
347: left panels (a1--a3), CO contours taken from the smoothed CO data of
348: \citet{he96} are overlaid on top of the DSS image, whereas in the
349: three right panels (b1--b3), our \htco\ contours are overlaid. The
350: contours in the top two panels (a1--b1) include the entire velocity
351: range associated with L1204 (from -12 to -5 K km s$^{-1}$), whereas in
352: the middle two (a2--b2) and bottom two (a3--b3) panels, the contours
353: correspond only to the -11 K km s$^{-1}$ and the -8 K km s$^{-1}$
354: components, respectively. The asterisks correspond to the position of
355: the peak \htco\ absorption for each component. \label{fig:2comp}}
356: \end{figure*}
357:
358: \section{Comparison with other molecular tracers}
359: \label{sec:comparison}
360:
361: The S140/L1204 region has been observed in many different molecular
362: tracers (e.g.\ Tafalla et al.\ 1993, Zhou et al. 1993, Park \& Minh
363: 1995), but most of these observations have focused either on the S140
364: PDR or on the embedded infrared sources located just behind S140,
365: while only a few observations covered the entire dust cloud. Indeed,
366: the first CO observations of S140 \citep{bl78} only covered a limited part
367: of the region. To our knowledge, the only existing
368: large-scale CO map of L1204 is that obtained in the 90s with the FCRAO
369: telescope (see \S 2) and published by Heyer et al.\ (1996) and Helfer
370: \& Blitz (1997)\footnote{The region lies on the edge of, and is only
371: partly covered by, the CfA Galactic plane survey of Dame et al.\
372: (2001).}. As mentioned earlier, we will use a smoothed version of that
373: dataset here in order to compare with our formaldehyde observations.
374:
375: In general, the CO emission and \htco\ absorption morphologies in this
376: region are quite similar (Fig.\ \ref{fig:2comp}). This was already
377: noticed by \citet{bl78} in their 6$'$ observations. It is also in good
378: agreement with the results obtained towards the Galactic anticenter by
379: Rodr\'{\i}guez et al.\ (2006), and towards the Orion molecular complex
380: by Cohen et al. (1983). There are, however, several noteworthy
381: differences between the CO emission and \htco\ absorption in S140. The
382: first difference is the fact that the CO peak and the \htco\
383: absorption maximum are not located at the same position. The CO
384: integrated intensity map (Fig.\ \ref{fig:2comp}, see also Fig.\
385: \ref{fig:mosaic}) shows that the maximum CO emission occurs just
386: behind the S140 H$\alpha$ arc at the western edge of L1204, while only
387: comparatively fainter emission extends to greater longitudes. The
388: maximum \htco\ absorption, however, is located about 10$'$ eastward of
389: the CO peak. A second notable difference between the CO and \htco\
390: profile is the existence of a CO emission "tail" in the
391: south/southeast part of the main cloud with little or no \htco\
392: counterpart (Figs. 2 and 3).
393:
394: \begin{figure*}[ht!] \plotone{f4.eps} \epsscale{1.0}
395: \caption{Correlation between the \htco\ absorption line intensity and
396: the $^{12}$CO(1-0) emission line intensity at corresponding points in
397: L1204. The squares correspond to data from Table \ref{table:mom}, the
398: open circles correspond to \htco\ upper limits and the triangles
399: correspond to the Galactic anticenter data previously published in
400: \citet{r06}. The horizontal and vertical lines show the ``best case''
401: detection limit. The dashed line is the least-squares fit for the
402: L1204/S140 region data, and the dash-dotted line is the least-squares
403: fit for the Galactic anticenter data from Rodr\'{\i}guez et
404: al. (2006). Note that the fits do not pass through the (0,0) point, suggesting that the
405: relation is not linear at low intensity values.
406: \label{fig:intensityratio}} \end{figure*}
407:
408: In order to study the relation between \htco\ absorption and CO(1-0)
409: emission in a more quantitative way, we have computed the moments of
410: the profiles shown in Fig.\ \ref{fig:mosaic}. The results are listed
411: in Table \ \ref{table:mom} (Appendix B). When two velocity components
412: are visible at a given pointing, the moments for each were computed
413: separately. Intensities above $3\sigma$ are shown as squares in Fig.\
414: \ref{fig:intensityratio}, and were used to make least-square fits (see
415: below). The two spatio-kinematical components that we identified in
416: our formaldehyde dataset behave quite similarly with respect to the
417: CO-\htco\ relation, and are plotted together in Fig.\
418: \ref{fig:intensityratio}. The best least-squares fit to a straight line for
419: the entire L1204 dataset yields:
420:
421: \begin{equation}
422: I(H_2CO) = (4.4 \pm 1.1) \times 10^{-3} ~~ I(CO) + (34 \pm 16) \times 10^{-3} \mbox{~K km s$^{-1}$}.\label{eq:relation1}
423: \end{equation}
424:
425: \noindent
426: We shall see momentarily that the CO emission near S140 may be
427: particularly bright because of local heating. Ignoring the pointings
428: very near S140, however, yields a fairly similar relation between CO
429: and \htco:
430:
431: \begin{equation}
432: I(H_2CO) = (3.8 \pm 0.9 ) \times 10^{-3} ~~ I(CO) + (31 \pm 9) \times 10^{-3} \mbox{~K km s$^{-1}$}.\label{eq:relation2}
433: \end{equation}
434:
435: \noindent
436: The small difference between these relations presumably reflects the
437: differing excitation requirements for the two lines. The relation
438: between CO and \htco\ given by Eqs.\ \ref{eq:relation1} and
439: \ref{eq:relation2} for the L1204 region is almost identical to that
440: found towards the Galactic anticenter by Rodr\'{\i}guez et al.\
441: (2006):
442:
443: \begin{equation}
444: I(H_2CO) = (4.1 \pm 0.5 ) \times 10^{-3} ~~ I(CO) + (34 \pm 13) \times 10^{-3} \mbox{~K km s$^{-1}$}.\label{eq:relation3}
445: \end{equation}
446:
447: It is important to note, however, that, in spite of the agreement
448: between the fits to the Galactic anticenter and S140 data, there is
449: very significant scatter in the CO-\htco\ relation, some points lying
450: nearly 10$\sigma$ away from the linear relation. This situation was
451: already noticed by \citet{r06} in their study of the Galactic
452: anticenter. This lack of a detailed correspondence between CO emission
453: and \htco\ absorption presumably reflects differences in the
454: excitation conditions of the two tracers, as we will now discuss in
455: the next section.
456:
457: \section{Discussion}
458: \label{sec:discussion}
459:
460: The comparison between \htco\ absorption and CO(1-0) emission profiles in
461: the Galactic Anticenter and in the L1204/S140 region has led us to three important
462: observational conclusions:
463:
464: \begin{enumerate}
465:
466: \item Qualitatively, the morphology of CO and \htco\ are quite similar, and
467: quantitatively, the line integrated intensities correlate quite well
468: with one another.
469:
470: \item The scatter in the CO-\htco\ relation is, however, significantly
471: larger than the observational errors.
472:
473: \item In the specific case of S140, the CO emission peak is offset by
474: about 3 pc from the locus of the deepest formaldehyde absorption, and
475: there is a region south of the main cloud where significant CO
476: emission is detected with little or no \htco\ counterpart.
477:
478: \end{enumerate}
479:
480: From the general large-scale correspondance between the CO(1-0) and
481: \htco\ 6 cm integrated maps (Fig.\ \ref{fig:2comp}), and from the fair
482: correlation between their line intensities (Fig.\
483: \ref{fig:intensityratio}), we conclude that the physical conditions
484: needed for the excitation of both lines are quite similar. The
485: calculations presented in the Appendix A, indeed show that both lines
486: preferentially trace warm gas at intermediate densities (10$^{3.6}$$<$
487: n $<$ 10$^{5}$ for \htco; n $>$ 10$^{2.8}$ for CO). In this scheme,
488: the offset between the CO(1-0) peak and the \htco\ maximum absorption
489: may seem puzzling. Note that a similar trend is seen at higher
490: resolution: while the CO peak in the full-resolution CO map published
491: by Heyer et al.\ (1996) and Helfer \& Blitz (1997) is at $l$ = 106$^{o}$.8, $b$
492: = +5$^{o}$.3, the \htco\ absorption feature seen in the high-resolution VLA
493: images published by Evans et al.\ (1987) is centered around $l$ = 106$^{o}$.9, $b$
494: = +5$^{o}$.3, again a few arcminutes to the east.
495:
496: We suggest that a combination of two effects may explain this puzzling
497: result. First, it can be seen from the excitation analysis presented
498: in Appendix A that the \htco\ absorption strength "saturates" for $T
499: \gtrsim 30$ K, whereas the temperature of the CO emission continues to
500: rise at higher kinetic temperature (Fig.\ 5). For example, while the
501: \htco\ line strength increases by only about 30\% when the kinetic
502: temperature goes from 20 to 40 K, the CO(1-0) line intensity increases
503: by more than a factor of two. According to \citet{pm95}, the CO
504: brightness temperature is about 40 K at the peak and 20 K for the rest
505: of the cloud. Thus, the strong CO peak behind S140 may well be largely
506: due to enhanced kinetic temperatures related to local heating (by the
507: external star providing the ionization of S140, and/or by the infrared
508: sources embedded in the cloud). As one progresses into the cloud, the
509: local heating diminishes, and the CO line intensity fades. Also, it
510: should be pointed out that the formaldehyde calculations presented in
511: the Appendix show that the 6-cm line should be seen in emission rather
512: than absorption when the density exceeds 10$^5$ cm$^{-3}$. The fact
513: that this is not the case near the CO peak (neither in our low-resolution data,
514: nor in the high-resolution VLA data presented by Evans 1978) suggests that
515: the gas density there is lower than 10$^5$ cm$^{-3}$.
516: Other effects that could explain the offset between the CO and the H$_2$CO
517: peaks are the lower dissociation energy, and the lower abundance
518: (and, therefore, lower self-shielding) of formaldehyde
519: compared to CO (see Appendix A.3). In a photo-dissociated region, these
520: effects should combine to create a stratified distribution where CO survives nearer
521: the source of the UV photons than H$_2$CO.
522: This stratification, combined with the heating of the CO, would
523: naturally lead to the offset between H$_2$CO and CO seen in the
524: present data.
525:
526: Finally, the origin of the other main difference between CO and \htco\
527: in S140, namely the existence of CO emission at the south of L1204
528: with no or little formaldehyde counterpart, is likely related to
529: another aspect of the excitation differences between the 6 cm line of
530: formaldehyde and the 1-0 transition of carbon monoxide. Fig.\ 6 of the
531: Appendix A.2 shows that the density detection limit for \htco\ line is
532: $\sim$10 times larger than the density limit for the CO(1-0) line. We
533: therefore suggest that the gas traced by the CO emission to the south
534: of L1204 is of relatively very low density. It is interesting to note,
535: indeed, that classical high-density molecular tracers (e.g.\ CS or
536: NH$_3$) have only been detected around the CO peak behind S140, and
537: not in the southern region of the cloud.
538:
539: Thus, we conclude that the CO(1-0) and \htco\ 6 cm lines both tend
540: to preferentially trace warm gas at intermediate densities. There are,
541: however, significant differences related either to differing excitation
542: requirements or to differing abundances. These differences can easily
543: explain the large scatter in the CO--H$_2$CO relation.
544:
545: \section{Conclusions}
546: \label{sec:conclusions}
547:
548: The main conclusions of this work are the following:
549:
550: \begin{enumerate}
551:
552: \item We have mapped a large region (70$'$ $\times$ 110$'$) around
553: L1204/S140 in the 6 cm line of formaldehyde, observing a total of 72
554: regularly-spaced positions every 10$'$ on a regular grid. The center
555: of our map was at $l$ = \mdeg{107}{0}, $b$ = +\mdeg{5}{3}, and
556: formaldehyde was detected against the cosmic microwave background in
557: at least 16 of our 72 positions (Fig.\ 2).
558:
559: \item
560: The formaldehyde emission can be separated in three spatio-kinematical
561: components (Fig.\ 3): two (at $V_{LSR}$ $\sim$ --11 km s$^{-1}$ in the northeast
562: part of the cloud, and at $V_{LSR}$ $\sim$ --8 km s$^{-1}$ just behind S140) are
563: clearly associated with L1204, whereas the other (an isolated component at
564: $V_{LSR}$ $\sim$ --2.5 km s$^{-1}$ towards the southeast) is most likely a local
565: foreground cloud unrelated to S140/L1204.
566:
567: \item
568: Both qualitatively and quantitatively, the CO(1-0) emission and the
569: formaldehyde 6 cm absorption lines correlate fairly well. An
570: excitation analysis shows that both preferentially trace warm gas at
571: intermediate densities.
572:
573: \item
574: There are, however, notable differences between the CO and \htco\
575: lines, that can be traced to differing excitation requirements and
576: abundances. Those differences are most likely the origin of the
577: large scatter in the CO-\htco\ intensity correlation.
578:
579: \end{enumerate}
580:
581: \acknowledgements
582:
583: We thank Professor Roy Booth, director (retired) of the radio
584: observatory at Onsala, for generous allocations of telescope time and
585: for his warm hospitality during our several visits to the
586: observatory. We are also grateful to the observatory technical and
587: administrative staff for their capable assistance with our observing
588: program. We thank Tamara Helfer for supplying us with the CO data cube of S140. We
589: acknowledge the financial support of the \textit{Direcci\'on General de
590: Asuntos del Personal Acad\'emico} (DGAPA), \textit{Universidad Nacional
591: Aut\'onoma de M\'exico} (UNAM) and \textit{Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y
592: Tecnolog\'{\i}a} (CONACyT), in M\'exico, and the Director's
593: Discretionary Research Fund at the Space Telescope Science
594: Institute. The Digitized Sky Surveys were produced at the Space
595: Telescope Science Institute under U.S. Government grant NAG
596: W-2166. The images of these surveys are based on photographic data
597: obtained using the Oschin Schmidt Telescope on Palomar Mountain and
598: the UK Schmidt Telescope. The plates were processed into the present
599: compressed digital form with the permission of these institutions.
600:
601:
602: \appendix
603:
604: \section{Model calculations}
605: \label{sec:model}
606:
607: \subsection{Collisional pumping}
608: \label{subsec:collisional}
609:
610: Observations of \htco\ in dark clouds show that the anomalous
611: absorption of the 6 and 2~cm lines is due to collisions with \Htwo\
612: that selectively overpopulate the lower levels of the lines
613: \citep{e75}. We calculated the non--LTE equilibrium populations of
614: the first 40 levels of ortho--\htco\ assuming excitation by the 2.7~K
615: background and collisions with \Htwo. \citet{gr91} has calculated
616: excitation rates of these levels for collisions with He taking
617: advantage of the spherical symmetry of the He potential for kinetic
618: temperatures $T=10$ to 300~K. According to \citet{gr91}, excitation
619: rates by \Htwo\ collisions could be 2.2 times higher than those by He
620: because of the smaller reduced mass and differences in the interaction
621: potentials. We will show the results of the calculations under the
622: assumption that the \Htwo--\htco\ collisional rates are the same as
623: the He--\htco\ rates. Probabilities for the radiative transitions were
624: taken from \citet{jarus86}.
625:
626: The optical depths of the transitions involved in the pumping mechanism
627: are generally larger than 1 at high densities and a radiative transfer
628: calculation is required. Two limiting approximations in the radiation transport are often
629: considered in molecular clouds: the large velocity gradient (LVG)
630: model and the microturbulent model \citep{leli76}. The LVG model
631: assumes that the line profile is dominated by systematic motion of the
632: gas while the microturbulent model assumes that the turbulent velocity
633: is much larger than any systematic motion. S 140 is likely to have
634: several velocity components, but the existence of large systematic
635: motions in molecular clouds and the validity of the LVG model has not
636: been well established in other molecular clouds (e.g. \citet{e75},
637: \citet{zue97}, \citet{z90}). We therefore use the microturbulent model, and for simplicity we will
638: use the escape probability formalism to account for photon trapping in a turbulent medium in
639: plane-parallel slab of mean total optical depth $\tau_t$ that is
640: perpendicular to the line of sight. In this case the A--value of a
641: transition in the equations of statistical equilibrium is multiplied
642: by a ``loss probability'' $P(\tau,\tau_t)$ that depends on the mean
643: optical depth $\tau$ in the slab. There are many different ways to
644: define $P(\tau,\tau_t)$, which can differ by several orders of
645: magnitude for large optical depths. We will use the form suggested by
646: \citet{hust92} for a uniform medium with no continuum absorption:
647: \begin{equation}
648: P(\tau,\tau_t)=\onehalf[K_2(\tau)+K_2(\tau_t-\tau)]\ ,
649: \label{escape}
650: \end{equation}
651: where
652: \begin{equation}
653: K_2(\tau)=\int_{-\infty}^\infty dx\,\phi(x)E_2[\tau\phi(x)]\ ,
654: \end{equation}
655: and $E_2$ is the second exponential integral function.
656: The function $K_2(\tau)$ can be calculated from
657: fits by \citet{hu81} for a normalized Doppler profile,
658: $\phi(x)=\exp(-x^2)/\sqrt{\pi}$.
659:
660: Equation~(\ref{escape}) can be viewed as the single flight escape
661: probability through either side of the slab averaged over the line
662: profile. The probability that a photon of an isotropic background
663: reaches optical depth $\tau$ in this slab is also given by
664: equation~(\ref{escape}), and the blackbody continuum is thus
665: attenuated by a factor $P(\tau,\tau_t)$. The mean optical thickness
666: is given by
667: \begin{equation}
668: d\tau={\sigma_{lu}\over\Delta\nu_{D}}n_l\left(1-{n_u/g_u\over n_l/g_l}\right)dz\ ,
669: \label{tau}
670: \end{equation}
671: where $\sigma_{lu}$ is the absorption cross section of the transition
672: and $\Delta\nu_{D}$ is the Doppler width. We assumed a Doppler width
673: of 2\kms\ (FWHM = $2 \sqrt{ \ln 2} \Delta\nu_{D}$ = 3.3\kms). The level population
674: and its statistical weight are given by $n$ and $g$ respectively with subindex $u$ for
675: the upper and $l$ for the lower level.
676:
677: The emergent line brightness temperature with subtracted
678: background $T_0$ is found by direct integration of the
679: source function throughout the slab as
680: \begin{eqnarray}
681: \Delta T_b &=& T_b-T_0 \nonumber \\
682: &=&T_0\big[\exp(-{\cal T})-1\big] \nonumber \\ &+&{h\nu\over k}
683: \int_0^{{\cal T}}\exp(-{\cal T}+\tau)
684: \left({n_l/g_l\over n_u/g_u}-1\right)^{-1}\,d\tau \ ,
685: \label{tb}
686: \end{eqnarray}
687:
688: where
689:
690: \begin{equation}
691: \tau_t=\int_0^L {\sigma_{lu}\over\Delta\nu_D}n_l
692: \left(1-{n_u/g_u\over n_l/g_l}\right)\,dz \ ,\label{totaltau}
693: \end{equation}
694: is the total mean optical depth of a slab of thickness $L$
695: and ${\cal T}=\tau_t\phi(0)$ is the line--center total optical
696: depth.
697:
698: Equation~\ref{tb} gives the correct asymptotic limits: $T_b\to T_0$ when the
699: density goes to 0 and $T_b\to T$ for high densities. The population densities
700: and the optical depths as a function of position in the slab in
701: equations~(\ref{escape}) and~(\ref{tau}) were calculated iteratively. A
702: convergence of $10^{-3}$~K in $T_b$ was achieved after a few
703: iterations for $T\leq 40$~K and \Htwo\ densities $n({\rm
704: H_2})<10^6\,{\rm cm^{-3}}$. For higher densities and temperatures the
705: procedure becomes unstable. Fig.\ \ref{fig:tbvsn} shows the calculated
706: $\Delta T_b$ for a 1~pc--thick slab as a function of the
707: \Htwo\ density and a constant \htco\ abundance of $2\times10^{-9}$
708: with respect to \Htwo\ (\citet{ha92}, \citet{le84}). The assumed
709: thickness of the slab has an important effect in the anomalous
710: absorption as shown in Fig.\ \ref{fig:tbvsn}. As the thickness of the
711: slab decreases, the effectiveness of the pumping mechanism that cools
712: the line decreases.
713:
714:
715: \begin{figure*}[ht!]
716: \plotone{f5.eps}
717: \epsscale{0.8}
718: \caption{(a) Brightness temperature minus background continuum vs. density for
719: different kinetic temperatures $T$ of a 1--pc thick slab. (b) Contour intervals are
720: 0.2~K from $\Delta T_b=-1$ to 1~K. (c) Brightness temperature minus background
721: continuum vs. density for different slab thicknesses at
722: T = 40~K.
723: \label{fig:tbvsn}}
724: \end{figure*}
725:
726:
727: \citet{g75} identified some transitions,
728: like $1_{11}\to 3_{12}$, that produce selection effects in the
729: excitation of some levels that cool the \htco\ doublets. We have
730: tested our model for possible variations of the collision rates. An
731: overall increase of collisional rates by a factor of 2.2 decreases
732: $\Delta T_b$ in figure~\ref{fig:tbvsn} by 0.3 to 0.5~K for $T\geq20$~K
733: and $n({\rm H_2})>1.6\times10^4\,{\rm cm^{-3}}$. For lower $T$ and
734: $n({\rm H_2})$ there is very little variation in the predicted $T_b$.
735:
736:
737: \subsection{A PDR model for CO}
738:
739: The UV field has a higher influence on the CO brightness temperature
740: than on the \htco\ brightness temperature. Both molecules are quickly
741: photodissociated near the edge of clouds, but the larger abundance of
742: the CO molecule makes its chemistry and interaction with radiation
743: more complex. In order to take into account the variation of CO
744: abundance along the line of sight, we used the Meudon PDR code to
745: calculate the CO brightness temperature of a plane--parallel slab
746: irradiated by a UV field \citep{leb93}. A detailed description of a
747: revised version of the code is given by \citet{lep06}.
748:
749: The sharp separation between the molecular, atomic and ionized
750: emissions suggests that the L1204/S140 interface is a PDR viewed
751: nearly edge--on \citep{hm92} irradiated by HD~211880. The angle of
752: incidence of the star's radiation on the PDR boundary is an unknown
753: parameter but appears to be more-or-less perpendicular. Furthermore,
754: the infrared embedded sources are probably young stars that may also
755: enhance the radiation field \citep{e89}.
756:
757: We ran the code with its parameters set to represent a plane--parallel
758: slab irradiated from one side by a UV field with an enhancement factor
759: $\chi=200$ with respect to the \citet{dr78} average interstellar
760: radiation field. In a PDR, the gas is heated by the
761: photoelectric emission from grains and PAH's, \Htwo\ formation in
762: grains, UV pumping in the Lyman and Werner bands, gas--grain
763: collisions, photoionization, and photodissociation. As the UV radiation
764: is absorbed deeper into the cloud, other processes like cosmic rays
765: and chemical reaction energies become important. Cooling is produced
766: by fine--structure and molecular line emission. Shocks and turbulence
767: can keep a PDR away from isobaric equilibrium. However in our model
768: the temperature and density of the PDR were kept constant in order to
769: compare the results with our \htco\ model in Fig.\
770: \ref{fig:comparison}. We used the chemical network given for S140 by
771: the Meudon group at its Internet
772: site\footnote{http://aristote.obspm.fr/MIS/pdr/exe.html}, which does
773: not include \htco. Thus the CO and \htco\ calculations represent
774: different models, and Fig.~\ref{fig:comparison} is given only as
775: indication of the local conditions that produce the emission and
776: absorption for each molecule.
777:
778: \begin{figure*}[ht!]
779: \plotone{f6.eps}
780: \caption{Brightness temperature minus background continuum vs. density for
781: different kinetic temperatures $T$ for both the $^{12}$CO(1-0) line and the 6 cm
782: \htco\ line (Note that $\Delta$T$_b$(k) is plotted "negative" compared to Figure \ref{fig:tbvsn}).
783: \label{fig:comparison}}
784: \end{figure*}
785:
786: \subsection{Photodissociation of \htco}
787: \label{subsec:photo}
788:
789: The \htco\ molecule is quickly photodissociated into CO and \Htwo\ or
790: H in the average UV interstellar radiation field with a rate of $1.0
791: \times10^{-9}\exp(-1.7A_V)\,{\rm s^{-1}}$ \citep{vand88}.
792: \citet{ke85} estimated that far--ultraviolet radiation (FUV)
793: from the star HD211880 will have an enhancement factor of
794: $G_0=150$ with respect to the average interstellar field
795: \citep{h68} at the ionization front, although \citet{sp97}
796: found that a more intense radiation field may be needed to
797: explain the \Htwo\ rotational emission.
798: \htco\ has a dissociation energy of 3.61 $\pm$ 0.03 eV \citep{su86}, and
799: a photodissociation rate of 1.0 $\times$ 10$^{-9}$ sec$^{-1}$ in the
800: interstellar field \citep{vand88} while for CO the values are 11.2 eV
801: and 2.0 $\times$ 10$^{-10}$ sec$^{-1}$ respectively. Thus it is possible
802: that the \htco\ will be selectively photodissociated near the S140
803: ionization front and the bright PDR region, where the CO emission
804: peaks. Detailed PDR model calculations by \citet{li02} show that at
805: 20$'$ from the ionization front, where we observe the \htco\ maximum,
806: $G_0\leq20$ and $A_V\sim15$.
807:
808: We added 62 reactions involving $\rm H_2CO$ and $\rm H_2CO^+$
809: taken from the UMIST data base (Woodall et al., 2007)
810: \footnote{http://www.udfa.net/} to the chemical network of
811: the Meudon group mentioned above and ran a PDR model with
812: $G_0=200$, $T=40$K and constant density of $\rm 10^3\,cm^{-3}$.
813: We found that $\rm H_2CO$ has significant abundance only at depths
814: of $A_v>7$ while CO becomes important at $A_v>4$, which shows that
815: photodestruction could explain the offset between the CO and
816: the H$_2$CO peaks.
817:
818: \section{Profile moments in detail}
819:
820: \begin{deluxetable}{rrrrrc}
821: %\tablecolumns{6}
822: \tablewidth{0pt}
823: \tablecaption{Profile moments for each position of Fig. \ref{fig:mosaic}. The upper limits
824: correspond to $3 \sigma$. The symbol ``\ldots'' indicates no data were
825: available, while ``nf'' indicates that data were available but no
826: reliable fit could be made. Values marked with ``yes''
827: in column 6 are
828: plotted as squares in Fig.\ \ref{fig:intensityratio}, and were
829: used for the least square fits.
830: \label{table:mom}}
831: \tablehead{
832: \colhead{Offset (\textit{l,b})} &
833: \colhead{$1000 \times$ I(\htco)} & \colhead{$\langle V \rangle$} &
834: \colhead{I(CO)} & \colhead{$\langle V \rangle$} & \colhead{Included in} \\
835: \colhead{arcmin} &
836: \colhead{K \kmps} & \colhead{\kmps} &
837: \colhead{K \kmps} & \colhead{\kmps} & \colhead{fits}
838: }
839: \startdata
840: 40, -70 & $<$ -24.3 & nf & \ldots & \ldots \\
841: 30, -70 & $<$ -18.9 & nf & \ldots & \ldots \\
842: 20, -70 & $<$ -25.8 & nf & \ldots & \ldots \\
843: 10, -70 & $<$ -23.4 & nf & 4.1 $\pm$ 0.7 & -7.6 $\pm$ 1.3 \\
844: 0, -70 &-42.1 $\pm$ 8.4 & -7.5 $\pm$ 1.5 & 3.5 $\pm$ 0.6 &-8.7 $\pm$ 1.5 & yes \\
845: -10, -70 & -30.3 $\pm$ 7.1 & -6.2 $\pm$ 1.5 & 8.6 $\pm$ 0.8 & -8.3 $\pm$ 0.8 & yes \\
846: -20, -70 & $<$ -21.6 & nf & $<$ 2.1 & nf & \\
847: \tableline
848: 40, -60 & $<$ -22.5 & nf & \ldots & \dots \\
849: 30, -60 & $<$ -24.0 & nf & \ldots & \ldots \\
850: 20, -60 & $<$ -26.7 & nf & 5.9 $\pm$ 0.8 & -7.0 $\pm$ 1.1 \\
851: 10, -60 & $<$ -23.7 & nf & 5.1 $\pm$ 0.6 & -8.3 $\pm$ 1.0 \\
852: 0, -60 & $<$ -19.2 & nf & $<$ 1.8 & nf \\
853: -10, -60 & -27.9$\pm$ 7.1 & -6.7 $\pm$ 0.5 & $<$ 2.1 & nf \\
854: -20, -60 & $<$ -28.8 & nf & $<$ 1.5 & nf \\
855: \tableline
856: 40, -50 & $<$ -25.5 & nf & \ldots & \ldots \\
857: 30, -50 & -109.3 $\pm$ 8.9 &-2.6 $\pm$ 0.2 & 14.8 $\pm$ 1.1 & -1.8 $\pm$ 0.2 & yes \\
858: 20, -50 & $<$ -25.2 & nf & 10.5 $\pm$ 0.8 & -5.0 $\pm$ 0.4 \\
859: 10, -50 & $<$ -21.6 & nf & 8.2 $\pm$ 0.6 & -7.0 $\pm$ 0.5 \\
860: 0, -50 & $<$ -18.9& nf & $<$ 2.4 & nf \\
861: -10, -50 & $<$ -16.5 & nf & $<$ 2.4 & nf \\
862: -20, -50 & $<$ -24.6 & nf & $<$ 4.8 & nf \\
863: \tableline
864: 40, -40 & $<$ -23.1 &nf & \ldots & \ldots \\
865: 30, -40 & $<$ -22.8 &nf & 3.1 $\pm$ 0.6 & -6.2 $\pm$ 1.2 \\
866: 20, -40 & $<$ -22.2 & nf & 7.2 $\pm$ 0.8 &-7.2 $\pm$ 0.9 \\
867: 10, -40 & $<$ -23.1 & nf & 4.5 $\pm$ 0.5 & -8.8 $\pm$ 1.1 \\
868: 0, -40 & $<$ -22.5 & nf & $<$ 2.7 & nf \\
869: -10, -40 & $<$ -26.1 & nf & $<$ 2.7 & nf \\
870: -20, -40 & $<$ -18.6 & nf & $<$ 3.0 & nf \\
871: \tableline
872: 40, -30 & $<$ -22.5 & nf & 3.4 $\pm$ 0.5 & -9.0 $\pm$ 1.5 \\
873: 30, -30 & $<$ -22.8 & nf & 4.0 $\pm$ 0.7 & -8.9 $\pm$ 1.5 \\
874: 20, -30 & $<$ -25.5 & nf & $<$ 1.8 & nf \\
875: 10, -30 & $<$ -30.9 & nf & 5.2 $\pm$ 0.6 &-8.6 $\pm$ 1.0 \\
876: 0, -30 & $<$ -20.1 & nf & $<$ 4.2 & nf \\
877: -10, -30 & $<$ -26.7 & nf & $<$ 1.8 & nf \\
878: -20, -30 & $<$ -22.2 & nf & $<$ 2.1 &nf \\
879: \tableline
880: 40, -20 & \ldots & \ldots & $<$ 2.7 & nf \\
881: 30, -20 & $<$ -30.9 &nf & 3.5 $\pm$ 0.7 &-9.4 $\pm$ 1.9 \\
882: 20, -20 & $<$ -24.0 & nf & $<$ 2.7 & nf \\
883: 10, -20 & -31.6 $\pm$ 6.0 &-8.2 $\pm$ 1.6 & 8.2 $\pm$ 1.1 & -8.9 $\pm$ 1.2 & yes \\
884: 0, -20 & $<$ -29.1 & nf & 8.5 $\pm$ 1.4 & -9.5 $\pm$ 1.7 \\
885: -10, -20 & $<$ -19.5 & nf & 6.8 $\pm$ 0.3 & -8.7 $\pm$ 0.9 \\
886: -20, -20 & $<$ -22.2 & nf & $<$ 1.5 & nf \\
887: \tableline
888: 40, -10 & \ldots & \ldots & $<$ 1.8 & nf \\
889: 30, -10 & $<$ -35.7 & nf &$<$ 2.4 &nf \\
890: 20, -10 & $<$ -16.8 & nf & $<$ 3.0 & nf \\
891: 10, -10 &-43.1 $\pm$ 8.2 & -8.1 $\pm$ 1.6 & 4.7 $\pm$ 1.1 & -10.3 $\pm$ 2.8 & yes \\
892: 0, -10 & -76.2 $\pm$ 13.8 & -9.5 $\pm$ 1.8 & 11.7 $\pm$ 0.8 &-9.0 $\pm$ 0.6 & yes \\
893: -10, -10 & -82.7 $\pm$ 7.7 & -8.1 $\pm$ 0.8 & 18.6 $\pm$ 0.6 & -8.2 $\pm$ 0.3 & yes \\
894: -20, -10 & $<$ -24.3 & nf & $<$ 2.7 & nf \\
895: \tableline
896: 40, 0 & $<$ -33.0 & nf & 2.8 $\pm$ 0.5 & -11.6 $\pm$ 2.3 \\
897: 30, 0 & $<$ -28.8 &nf & $<$ 3.3 & nf \\
898: 20, 0 & -63.8 $\pm$ 7.8 & -7.8 $\pm$ 0.9 & 3.8 $\pm$ 1.1 &-8.9 $\pm$ 3.0 & yes \\
899: 10, 0 &-93.7 $\pm$ 11.3 & -8.7 $\pm$ 1.1 & 9.4 $\pm$ 0.7 & -9.9 $\pm$ 0.8 & yes \\
900: 0, 0 & -272.6 $\pm$ 9.8 &-7.8 $\pm$ 0.3 & 21.6 $\pm$ 0.7 & -8.0 $\pm$ 0.3 & yes \\
901: -10, 0 & -159.8 $\pm$ 8.6 &-8.0 $\pm$ 0.4 & 46.5 $\pm$ 1.6 & -7.8 $\pm$ 0.3 & yes \\
902: -20, 0 & $<$ -24.0 & nf & 10.2 $\pm$ 0.7 & -7.7 $\pm$ 0.6 \\
903: \tableline
904: 40,+10 & \ldots & \ldots & $<$ 1.7 & nf \\
905: 30, +10 & $<$ -28.8 & nf & $<$ 0.9 & nf \\
906: 20, +10 & -52.0 $\pm$ 8.2 &-8.7 $\pm$ 1.4 & 5.3 $\pm$ 0.4 &-9.1 $\pm$ 0.7 & yes \\
907: 10, +10 & -114.1 $\pm$ 9.7 &-6.2 $\pm$ 0.6 & 11.1 $\pm$ 1.3 & -7.1 $\pm$ 0.9 & yes \\
908: & -70.3 $\pm$ 7.7 & -10.3 $\pm$ 1.2 & 13.5 $\pm$ 1.1 & -10.6 $\pm$ 1.0 & yes \\
909: 0, +10 & -247.0 $\pm$ 10.1 & -7.6 $\pm$ 0.3 & 22.8 $\pm$ 1.6 &-8.5 $\pm$ 0.6 & yes \\
910: -10, +10 &-118.9 $\pm$ 9.2 & -8.1 $\pm$ 0.6 & 22.3 $\pm$ 2.0 &-8.6 $\pm$ 0.8 & yes \\
911: -20, +10 & $<$ -19.2 & nf & $<$ 0.9 & nf \\
912: \tableline
913: 40, +20 & \ldots & \ldots & $<$ 1.2 &nf \\
914: 30, +20 & $<$ -25.2 & nf & 3.1 $\pm$ 0.4 & -8.3 $\pm$ 1.7 \\
915: 20, +20 & -42.3 $\pm$ 9.3 & -7.1 $\pm$ 1.6 & 6.7 $\pm$ 0.7 & -9.9 $\pm$ 1.0 &yes \\
916: &-82.0 $\pm$ 7.4 & -11.3 $\pm$ 1.1 & nf & nf \\
917: 10, +20 & -49.8 $\pm$ 6.9 &-6.9 $\pm$ 1.0 & 7.0 $\pm$ 1.2 & -8.0 $\pm$ 1.4 &yes \\
918: &-63.1 $\pm$ 5.5 & -10.8 $\pm$ 1.0 & 8.3 $\pm$ 0.9 &-11.0 $\pm$ 1.4 & yes \\
919: 0, +20 &-68.3 $\pm$ 9.7 & -8.9 $\pm$ 1.3 & 6.1 $\pm$ 0.7 & -10.8 $\pm$ 1.3 &yes \\
920: -10, +20 &-56.4 $\pm$ 6.8 &-8.6 $\pm$ 1.1 & 5.5 $\pm$ 0.5 & -10.8 $\pm$ 1.1 & yes \\
921: -20, +20 & $<$ -29.7 & nf & $<$ 2.7 & nf \\
922: \tableline
923: 40, +30 & \ldots & \ldots & $<$ 1.6 & nf \\
924: 30, +30 & $<$ -27.9 &nf & $<$ 1.6 &nf \\
925: 20, +30 & $<$ -19.5 & nf & 3.4 $\pm$ 0.8 & -11.4 $\pm$ 2.7 \\
926: 10, +30 & -54.1 $\pm$ 8.8 & -9.3 $\pm$ 1.6 & 5.6 $\pm$ 0.7 & -10.3 $\pm$ 1.2 & yes \\
927: 0, +30 & $<$ -18.0 & nf & 5.0 $\pm$ 0.6 & -11.1 $\pm$ 1.3 \\
928: -10, +30 &$<$ -27.0 &nf& 2.0 $\pm$ 0.4 & -10.2 $\pm$ 2.2 \\
929: -20, +30 & $<$ -23.4 & nf & $<$ 3.0 & nf \\
930: \enddata
931: %\tablecomments{}
932: \end{deluxetable}
933:
934: \clearpage
935:
936: \begin{thebibliography}{dummytext}
937: \bibitem[dummy(2006)]{d06}
938: \bibitem[Bally et al.(2002)]{b02}
939: Bally, J., Reipurth, B., Walawender, J., \& Armond, T., 2002, \aj, 124, 2152
940: \bibitem[Blair et al.(1978)]{bl78}
941: Blair, G. N., Evans, N. J., Vanden Bout, P. A., \& Peters W. L., 1978, \apj, 219, 893-913
942: \bibitem[Crampton \& Fisher(1974)]{c74}
943: Crampton, D., \& Fisher, W. A., 1974, Pub. Dom. Astrophys. Obs., 14, 283
944: \bibitem[Cohen et al.(1983)]{c83}
945: Cohen, R. J., Matthews, N., Few, R. W., \& Booth, R. S., 1983, \mnras, 203, 1123
946: \bibitem[Dame, Hartmann \& Thaddeus (2001)]{dht01}
947: Dame, T. M., Hartmann, D., \& Thaddeus, P., 2001, \apj, 547, 792
948: \bibitem[Draine(1978)]{dr78}
949: Draine, B. T., 1978, \apjs, 36, 595.
950: \bibitem[Evans et al.(1975)]{e75}
951: Evans, N. J., II, Zuckerman, B., Sato, T., \& Morris, G. 1975, \apj, 199, 383.
952: \bibitem[Evans et al.(1980)]{e80}
953: Evans, N. J., II, Rubin, R. H., \& Zuckerman, B. 1980, \apj 239, 839
954: \bibitem[Evans et al.(1987)]{e87}
955: Evans, N. J., II, Kutner, M. L., \& Mundy, L. G., 1987, \apj, 323, 145
956: \bibitem[Evans \etal(1989)]{e89}
957: Evans, N. J., II, Mundy, L. G., Kutner, M. L.; Depoy, D. L., 1989, \apj, 346, 212.
958: \bibitem[Garrison et al.(1975)]{g75}
959: Garrison, B. J., Lester, W. A., Jr., Miller, W. H., \& Green, S., 1975, \apjl, 200, L175.
960: \bibitem[Green(1991)]{gr91}
961: Green, S. 1991, \apjs, 76, 979.
962: \bibitem[Guilloteau \& Forveille(1989)]{gf89}
963: Guilloteau S., \& Forveille T.~1989, \textit{Grenoble Image and Line Data
964: Analysis System (GILDAS)}, IRAM, http://www.iram.fr/IRAMFR/GILDAS
965: \bibitem[Habing(1968)]{h68}
966: Habing, H. J., 1968, Bull.~Astron.~Inst.~Netherlands, 19, 421.
967: \bibitem[Hasegawa et al.(1992)]{ha92}
968: Hasegawa, T. I., Herbst, E., \& Leung, C. M., 1992, \apjs, 82, 167.
969: \bibitem[Hayashi \& Murata(1992)]{hm92}
970: Hayashi M., \& Murata Y., 1992, PASJ, 44, 391
971: \bibitem[Hayashi \& Murata (1993)]{hay93}
972: Hayashi, M. \& Murata, Y., 1992, \pasj, 44, 391.
973: \bibitem[Helfer \& Blitz(1997)]{hb97}
974: Helfer, T. T., \& Blitz, L., 1997, \apj, 478, 233
975: \bibitem[Heyer et al.(1996)]{he96}
976: Heyer, M. H., Carpenter, J. M., \& Ladd, E. F., 1996, \apj, 463, 630
977: \bibitem[Hummer(1981)]{hu81}
978: Hummer, D. G., 1981, \jqsrt, 26, 187.
979: \bibitem[Hummer \& Storey(1992)]{hust92}
980: Hummer, D. G., \& Storey, P. J., 1992, \mnras, 254, 277.
981: \bibitem[Jaruschewski et al.(1986)]{jarus86}
982: Jaruschewski, S., Chandra, S., Varshalovich, D. A., \& Kegel, W. H. 1986, \aaps, 63, 307.
983: \bibitem[Keene et al.(1985)]{ke85}
984: Keene, J., Blake, G. A., Phillips, T. G., Huggins, P. J., \& Beichman, C. A., 1985, \apj, 299, 967.
985: \bibitem[Le Bourlot \etal(1993)]{leb93}
986: Le Bourlot, J., Pineau Des Forets, G., Roueff, E. \& Flower, D. R., 1993, \aa, 267, 233.
987: \bibitem[Le Petit \etal(2006)]{lep06}
988: Le Petit, F., Nehm\'e, C., Le Bourlot, J. \& Roueff, E., 2006, \apjs, 164, 506.
989: \bibitem[Le Teuff et al.(2000)]{lete00}
990: Le Teuff Y. H., Millar T. J., \& Markwick A. J., 2000, \aaps, 146, 157.
991: \bibitem[Leung \& Liszt(1976)]{leli76}
992: Leung, C. M., \& Liszt, H. S., 1976, \apj, 208, 732.
993: \bibitem[Leung et al.(1984)]{le84}
994: Leung, C. M., Herbst, E., \& Huebner, W. F., 1984, \apjs, 56, 231.
995: \bibitem[Li et al.(2002)]{li02}
996: Li, W., Evans, N. J., II, Jaffe, D. T., van Dishoeck, E. F., \& Thi, W. F., 2002, \apj, 568, 242.
997: \bibitem[Lynds(1962)]{lyn62}
998: Lynds, B. T., 1962, \apjs, 7, 1
999: \bibitem[Park \& Minh(1995)]{pm95}
1000: Park, Y., \& Minh Y., 1995, JKAS, 28, 255
1001: \bibitem[Preibisch et al.(2001)]{pr01}
1002: Preibisch, T., Balega, Y. Y., Schertl, D., Smith, M. D., \& Weigelt, G., 2001, A\&A, 378, 539
1003: \bibitem[Preibisch \& Smith(2002)]{prsm02}
1004: Preibisch, T., \& Smith, M. D, 2002, A\&A, 383, 540
1005: \bibitem[Rodr\'{\i}guez et al.(2006)]{r06}
1006: Rodr\'{\i}guez, M. I., Allen, R., Loinard, L., \& Wiklind, T., 2006, \apj, 652, 1230
1007: \bibitem[Sharpless(1959)]{s59}
1008: Sharpless, S., 1959 , \apjs, 4, 257
1009: \bibitem[Snyder et al.(1969)]{syn69}
1010: Snyder, L. E., Buhl, D., Zuckerman, B., Palmer, P., 1969, PhRvL, 22, 679
1011: \bibitem[Spaans et al.(1997)]{sp97} Spaans, M \& van Dishoeck, E. F., 1997, \aa, 323, 953
1012: \bibitem[Sugitani \& Fukui(1987)]{sf87}
1013: Sugitani, K., \& Fukui, Y., 1987, IAUS, 115, 75
1014: \bibitem[Suto, Wang \& Lee 1986]{su86}
1015: Suto, M., Wang, X., \& Lee, L.C., 1986, JChPh, 85, 4228
1016: \bibitem[Thaddeus(1972)]{t72}
1017: Thaddeus, P., 1972, \apj, 173, 317
1018: \bibitem[Tafalla et al.(1993)]{ta93}
1019: Tafalla, M., Bachiller, R., \& Martin-Pintado, J., 1993, \apj, 403, 175
1020: \bibitem[Timmermann et al.(1996)]{tim96}
1021: Timmermann, R., Bertoldi, F., Wright, C. M., Drapatz, S., Draine, B. T., Haser, L.,\& Sternberg, A.,
1022: 1996, A\&A, 315L, 281
1023: \bibitem[Townes \& Cheung(1969)]{toch69}
1024: Townes, C. H., \& Cheung, A. C., 1969, \apj, 157L, 103
1025: \bibitem[Ungerechts et al.(1986)]{un86}
1026: Ungerechts, H., Winnewisser, G., Walmsley, C. M., 1986, A\&A, 157, 207
1027: \bibitem[van Dishoeck(1988)]{vand88}
1028: van Dishoeck, E. F. 1988, Rate Coefficients in Astrochemistry, Millar, T. J. \& Williams, D. A. (ed.), Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1988, p.~49.
1029: \bibitem[Vanden Bout et al.(1983)]{va83}
1030: Vanden Bout, P. A., Snell, R. L., \& Wilson, T. L., 1983, A\&A, 118, 337
1031: \bibitem[Zhou et al.(1990)]{z90}
1032: Zhou, S., Evans, N. J. II, Butner, H. M., Kutner, M. L., Leung, C. M., \& Mundy, L. G., 1990, \apj, 363, 168.
1033: %\bibitem[Zhou et al.(1993)]{z93}
1034: %Zhou, S., Evans, N. J., II, Mundy, L. G., \& Kutner, M. L., 1993, \apj, 417, 613
1035: \bibitem[Zuckerman \& Evans(1974)]{zue97}
1036: Zuckerman, B., Evans, N. J., II 1974, \apjl, 192, L149.
1037: \end{thebibliography}
1038:
1039: \end{document}
1040:
1041:
1042:
1043:
1044:
1045:
1046:
1047:
1048: