1: %\documentstyle[psfig,aas2pp4]{article}
2: %\documentstyle[psfig,aasms4]{article}
3: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
4: %\pagestyle{empty}
5: %\documentclass{aastex}
6: \begin{document}
7:
8: \title{{\ion{H}{1}} velocity dispersion in NGC 1058}
9: \author{A. O. Petric}
10: \affil{Astronomy Department, Columbia University, New York, NY USA \\
11: andreea@astro.columbia.edu}
12: \author{M. P. Rupen}
13: \affil{National Radio Astronomy Observatory, P.O. Box O, Socorro, NM,
14: 87801, USA \\
15: mrupen@aoc.nrao.edu}
16: \begin{abstract}
17: We present excellent resolution and high sensitivity Very Large Array (VLA)
18: observations of the 21cm {\ion{H}{1}} line emission from the face-on galaxy
19: NGC 1058, providing the first reliable study of the {\ion{H}{1}} profile shapes
20: throughout the entire disk of an external galaxy. Our observations show an
21: intriguing picture of the interstellar medium; throughout this galaxy velocity--
22: dispersions range between 4 to 15 km $\rm{s} ^{-1}$ but are not correlated
23: with star formation, stars or the gaseous spiral arms. The velocity
24: dispersions decrease with radius, but this global trend has a large
25: scatter as there are several isolated, resolved regions of high dispersion.
26: The decline of star light with radius is much steeper than that of the velocity
27: dispersions or that of the energy in the gas motions.
28: \end{abstract}
29:
30: \keywords{galaxies: kinematics and dynamics --- individual:NGC 1058; galaxies:ISM}
31:
32: \section{Introduction}
33: Observations of {\ion{H}{1}} velocities perpendicular to the disk ($v _{z}$) are
34: necessary for studies of both the interstellar medium (ISM) (McKee \& Ostriker 1977, Kulkarni \& Heiles 1988, Braun 1992, 1997)
35: and disk dynamics (Oort 1932; Rupen 1987; Lockman \& Gehman 1991; Merriefield 1993; Malhotra 1994, 1995;
36: Olling 1995) because they set a direct upper limit on the thermal and kinetic temperature of the gas.
37: Hence the {\ion{H}{1}} velocities
38: perpendicular to the disk are an important dynamical tracer and as such can be used to constrain,
39: both the gas mass distribution in the plane and its vertical structure (i.e., density as a
40: function of height-$z$ above the plane)(van der Kruit \& Shostak 1982,1984, Lockman \& Gehman 1991, Malhotra 1995).
41:
42: The behavior of the velocity dispersions as a function of
43: galactic radius is important for determinations of the shape of dark matter halos. To date
44: even the most sophisticated methods (e.g. Olling 1995, 1996) assume either a constant or an
45: azimuthally symmetric velocity dispersion. Our measurements can therefore be used with studies of
46: edge-on systems to determine radial variations in the mass to light (M/L) ratio.
47:
48: Processes associated with star formation,such as stellar
49: winds and multiple supernova explosions are thought to put energy into the ISM in the form of mechanical
50: energy, starlight (which leads to photoelectric emission from dust grains), and cosmic rays. The velocity dispersion in the
51: $z$ direction is intimately connected to the forces holding the gas against gravitational instabilities
52: and hence to star-formation in the disk (e.g. Mac Low \& Klessen 2004, Li, Mac Low \& Klessen 2005).
53: Measuring the degree of correlation between
54: the locations of star-forming regions and those of high dispersion is a good method to investigate
55: the relation between star-related energy sources and {\ion{H}{1}} bulk motions.
56:
57:
58: The face-on spiral galaxy NGC 1058 (e.g. Eskridge et al. 2002) is ideal for studies of {\ion{H}{1}}
59: $v_z$ dispersions. Its low inclination (4\arcdeg--11\arcdeg) (Lewis 1987, van der Kruit \& Shostak 1984)
60: means that the gradient in rotational velocity is small across the beam and therefore it does not significantly
61: corrupt measurements of velocities perpendicular to the disk.
62:
63: Single dish studies of NGC 1058 (Allen \& Shostak 1979, Lewis 1975, Lewis 1984) lack the resolution
64: to trace the dispersion across the disk but through modeling of the rotational component these authors
65: estimate it to range between 7 and 9 km/sec.
66: In a series of papers (1982-1984) van der Kruit \& Shostak analyze {\ion{H}{1}} emission profiles in a number of
67: face-on galaxies and determine that the velocity dispersions in NGC 1058 range only between 7 to 8 km/sec at all radii
68: with very little variation. Dickey, Hanson, \& Helou (1990) find the that velocity dispersion in NGC 1058 decreases with optical surface brightness but that in the extended gas disk, beyond the Holmberg radius the velocity dispersion is {5.7 km/sec} everywhere, that is no variations with spiral phase or {\ion{H}{1}} surface density are found.
69:
70: All previous determinations of the {\ion{H}{1}} velocity dispersion in NGC 1058 have
71: been hindered by low spatial (e.g., Lewis 1984) and/or
72: spectral (e.g., van der Kruit \& Shostak 1984) resolution
73: as well as by relatively poor sensitivity, requiring
74: smoothing over large sections of the galactic disk, or missing
75: up to 40$\% $ of the total flux (Dickey, Hanson, \& Helou
76: 1990). These trade-offs have led to significantly
77: different conclusions about the {\ion{H}{1}} velocity dispersion.
78: Our sensitive observations at high spatial and velocity resolution as
79: well as recovery of the entire single dish flux, allowed us to accurately
80: measure the profile widths even in the outskirts of the {\ion{H}{1}} disk,
81: to resolve the arm from the interarm regions, and to analyze in detail the
82: {\ion{H}{1}} profile shapes, not just their breadths throughout the {\ion{H}{1}} disk.
83:
84: \section{Observations and Data Reductions}
85: The 21cm line of neutral hydrogen in NGC 1058 was observed
86: with the VLA in the C and CS\footnote{The CS (shortened C)
87: configuration moves two antennas from intermediate
88: stations in the standard C configuration to the center of the array. The resulting short
89: spacings significantly increase the sensitivity of the array to extended structure,
90: while maintaining the same spatial resolution (Rupen 1997). }configurations.
91: The C configuration data was taken on 14 and 15 June 1993 for a total time on-source of 12.23
92: hours. The D configuration observation were performed on 7 and 8 November 1993 for a total time
93: on source of 2.67 hours, and CS configuration data was collected on January 3, 1995 for a
94: total time on-source of 5.42 hours. Rupen (1997,1998) gives a detailed account of the UV coverage
95: in each of the configurations, compares the merits of each configuration, and discusses the benefits
96: of combining them.
97:
98: Both the C and CS configurations have a
99: maximum baseline of 3.6~km, while the D configuration has a maximum baseline 1~km). The minimum baseline,
100: which determines the size of the most extended feature
101: which can be observed by the VLA, is 35~m.
102: All observations were taken in dual polarization mode and Hanning
103: smoothing was applied on-line; resulting in
104: 127 independent spectral channels with a velocity width of 2.58 km/sec.
105: We followed the normal AIPS calibration
106: procedures and used the same flux (3C48) and phase
107: (0234+285) calibrators throughout. The continuum emission was approximated as a
108: linear fit to visibilities in 20 line-free channels on each side of the signal, and
109: this fit was then subtracted from the {\it {uv}}-data in all the channels.
110: Rupen (1999), gives a detailed description
111: of the bandpass calibration and continuum subtraction.
112:
113: The data cube presented here was deconvolved using the CLEAN algorithm as implemented
114: by AIPS task IMAGR.{\footnote{A description of IMAGR can be found in the AIPS cookbook
115: available online at $http://www.aoc.nrao.edu/aips/cook.html$.}}, iterated until the residuals
116: were nearly zero and the flux density in the CLEAN model was
117: stable. The cube was tapered to a resolution of $30\arcsec \times 29\arcsec $, or
118: $1.3\,\times\,1.3$ kpc at a distance of
119: 10 Mpc (Ferguson et al. 1998). Rupen (1997), presents a detailed comparison of several
120: cleaning algorithms and motivates the use of the CLEAN algorithm for this data.
121: A more general discussion of CLEAN as implemented in AIPS is given in chapter 5, of the AIPS
122: cookbook as well as in Cornwell, Braun, \& Briggs 1999. A more specific examination of
123: deconvolution algorithms as applied on our NGC 1058 data is presented in Rupen (1997,1999).
124:
125: The RMS noise level in the line channels
126: of the cube was 0.5 and mJy/beam, corresponding to a column density of $1.6 \times 10^{18} $
127: cm$^{-2}$ per channel. The {\ion{H}{1}} integrated line profile agrees with those obtained in
128: single dish studies (Allen $\& $ Shostak 1979) after both the single dish and the VLA data are
129: corrected for primary beam response.
130:
131: Figure 1 presents the frames of the 30\arcsec ~data cube. Each image (traditionally called a channel
132: map) in this figure represents the 21 cm line emission at a certain velocity, the abscisa and ordinate
133: axis are the RA and Dec coordinates. The lack of artifacts in these images (such as a negative bowl around
134: the galaxy) also suggests that the images have been correctly deconvolved.
135:
136: \section{Results and Analysis}
137: The general properties of NGC 1058 are presented in Table 1.
138: Figure~\ref{fig:M1contM0grey} shows intensity weighted mean velocity
139: contours atop the {\ion{H}{1}} intensity map and presents
140: the {\ion{H}{1}} spiral structure of NGC 1058. Figure~\ref{fig:M1contM0grey}
141: also illustrates the superb sensitivity and resolution of these studies,
142: which allowed us to measure the {\ion{H}{1}} emission at distances of
143: approximatively 10~kpc from the center of the disk and to differentiate between the arms and the inter-arms. We characterize the widths
144: of the {\ion{H}{1}} profiles by the relative dispersions $\sigma _{\rm{v}}$
145: of the best Gaussian fit \footnote{ The FWHM is often use to characterize
146: the \ion{H}{1} line widths. This {\it{tradition}} is based upon the
147: fact that \ion{H}{1} profiles are modeled by one or multiple
148: Gaussians, where the flux as a function of velocity $v$ is given by $$f(v)={1\over{\sigma\sqrt{2\pi}}}exp\left
149: [-\left(1\over{2{\sigma _\mathrm{v}}^2}\right){(v-v_0)}^2\right
150: ]$$ and $v_0$ is the velocity at associated with the peak flux.}; the fits
151: were done using a least squares minimization algorithm.
152:
153: Figures ~\ref{fig:prof45_1058} and ~\ref{fig:prof30_1058}, show the observed profiles
154: for a few pixels throughout NGC~1058 from the 45\arcsec ~and
155: the 30\arcsec ~data sets respectively. The single Gaussians
156: which best approximate the shapes of these profiles, as well as their residuals are also
157: shown. Note, that each of the profiles is representative of
158: the remainder of the spectra, it is not a {\it{best find} } or
159: the result of averaging over large areas of the disk or
160: velocity space.
161:
162: While the residual patterns suggest that a
163: single Gaussian is not a good functional description of the
164: \ion{H}{1} profiles in NGC 1058, the FWHM and $\sigma_v$
165: derived from the single Gaussian fits track well the
166: intrinsic width of the \ion{H}{1} spectrum. This proportionality allows
167: us to describe the widths of the profile in terms of the results of our
168: least squares fitting. The general characteristics of the velocity
169: dispersion will be discussed in terms of the 45\arcsec and 30\arcsec ~cubes.
170:
171: \section{General Characteristics of the Velocity Dispersion }
172: Figure~\ref{fig:SigCont1058c30} presents the distribution of velocity dispersions
173: across the disk of NGC 1058. Unlike previous observers of NGC 1058, we find a wide range of dispersions from
174: $~4$ to 14 km sec$^{-1}$ in addition to a few extremely narrow profiles with $\sigma _v ~\sim ~3.5$~
175: km sec$^{-1}$. These narraow profiles are found in regions of relatively low column density at
176: radii greater than $300\arcsec $ or 13~kpc.
177: There are three regions of high dispersion which stand out in Figure~\ref{fig:SigCont1058c30}:
178: one in the center (labeled C and $\sim 4.5$ kpc across) and two others symmetric about the center
179: in the North-West (N $\sim 3$ kpc) and South-East (S $\sim ~3\times 5$ kpc) of the center.
180: We find no obvious correlation between high {\ion{H}{1}} velocity dispersion and
181: stars or star formation tracers such as $H_{\alpha}$ (Figure~\ref{fig:Halpha_on_Sig}), radio contiuum, SNe except in the central region C.
182: The most probable explanation for the observed highest dispersions outside the central region
183: (i.e. in N and S) are small scale ($\leq 0.7$~kpc) bulk motions (see section 7 below).
184: In the southern, part the disk could be warping
185: (van der Kruit \& Shostak 1984, Shen \& Sellwood 2006) leading to the observed broad profiles.
186: Figure~\ref{fig:asym} shows that {\ion{H}{1}} profiles from N and S are also assymmetric. However, a
187: similar explanation for region N would suggest rather impressive small-scale structure in
188: the warp as it would requiere the inclination to change $\sim$~3 degrees over a region smaller
189: than 0.7 kpc in diameter, if we assume from Tully Fisher
190: an intrinsic rotation velocity of 150 km s$^{-1}$~. A more exciting alternative explanation for
191: the bulk motions observed in N is that they are caused by the infall of gas left over from galaxy formation.
192: However, this is somewhat difficult to reconcile with the relatively low column density in these regions.
193:
194: Two global trends are evident from the derived dispersions: a radial fall-off,
195: shown in Figure~\ref{fig:SigvsR1058c30}, and a predominance of the broadest profiles
196: in the inter-arm regions of the galaxy (Figure~\ref{fig:SigonM0c30}).
197: Ferguson et al. (1998) used deep $H\alpha$ observations to reveal
198: the presence of \ion{H}{2} regions in the central 6 kpc of NGC
199: 1058. There are several knots of high dispersion (12 to 13.5 km/sec) in
200: region C, with most of the profiles measuring between 7.5 and 11
201: km/sec. However, none of the star formation sites outside the central
202: $\sim$2~kpc discovered in that study seem to affect the width of
203: the profiles. Also, regions N and S are located in the inter-arm regions and are not associated
204: with sufficiently strong star formation to be detected in the Ferguson et al. (1998) study.
205: Therefore we find that the dispersions do not correlate with star formation as shown from the overlay of Feruson et al (1998)'s H$\alpha$ map atop contours of velocity dispersion Figure~\ref{fig:Halpha_on_Sig}.
206:
207: Figure~\ref{fig:ecomp} shows the kinetic energy in the gas associated with motions perpendicular
208: to the disk. Because only a qualitative behaviour was of interest here,
209: the kinetic energy in vertical motions at a certain pixel location was roughly
210: approximated as the product of total intensity times the square of the velocity dispersion.
211: Approximated as such, the kinetic energy in vertical motions does not follow
212: the decline in star light which drops with radius as $\sim \rm{exp}^{-{{r}\over{30\arcsec}}}$.
213: Figure~\ref{fig:SigonM0c30} shows that, the broadest profiles seem to be found in relatively low
214: column density areas between the spiral arms (as traced by \ion{H}{1}). As such we do not find
215: a correlation between the velocity dispersion of stars in the disk or the {\ion{H}{1}} column density.
216:
217: The dissimilarity
218: between stars, star-formation, {\ion{H}{1}} intensity, and the kinetic energy in the gas
219: implies that processes other than those directly associated with stars put energy into the ISM.
220: Sellwood $\&$ Balbus (1999) suggested that magnetic fields with strengths of a few micro-gauss
221: in these extended disks allow energy to be
222: extracted from galactic differential rotation through MHD-driven turbulence. While that
223: mechanism predicted a uniform dispersion outside of the optical disk, in an attempt to explain
224: lower quality data on NGC 1058, a similar mechanism has the potential of explaining the level and
225: behaviour of the velocity dispersions as a function of radius (Sellwood, private communication). The
226: Sellwood \& Balbus (1999) paper
227: generated significant work on numerical models that predict the occurance of the magnetorotational
228: instability in galactic disks (e.g. Dziourkevitch, Elstner, \& Rudiger 2004, Pionteck \& Ostriker 2004).
229:
230:
231:
232:
233: \section {Profile Shapes}
234: Any model that would explain how energy is put into the ISM must account for the shape of
235: the profiles in NGC 1058. A single Gaussian least-squares fitting routine was run on
236: the 30\arcsec ~and 45\arcsec ~data sets. In both cases, we found that while the signal to noise for most
237: profiles was excellent the chisq per degree of freedom was larger than a few,
238: the residuals also suggested that the wings were broader than those of a Gaussian.
239:
240: To understand whether how the {\ion{H}{1}} line shapes varied throughout the galaxy,
241: the profiles were normalized by flux, aligned so that their peaks were at the
242: same central velocity. These were plotted in units of FWHM (2.354$\sigma _{v}$),
243: using the parameters from the single Gaussian fits to control the
244: scaling. This was done to reveal only the difference in the line shapes and not other differences
245: such as the width of peak intensity. While stacking up the 45\arcsec ~profiles it became clear
246: that almost all profiles appeared to have the same shape. Figure~\ref{fig:UPfid45} suggests that despite it being
247: non-Gaussian, the shapes of the line profiles are identical throughout most of the galaxy when
248: scaled by $\sigma _v$ and their peak flux and aligned so that their peaks occur at the same
249: velocity.
250:
251: For the 45\arcsec ~data, median shapes from profiles within different width and peak
252: intensity ranges were compared and found to be identical within the error-bars. The method
253: used to derive such median line shapes is fairly straightforward.
254: After the pixel selection (by FWHM, location in the galaxy,
255: etc.) the profiles corresponding to every pixel were normalized in
256: intensity dividing by the peak flux. A grid of 63 channels for the
257: 45\arcsec \,\,data and 108 for the 30\arcsec \,\, data was set up to replace the
258: velocity axis from units of km/sec to units of FWHM. For example
259: suppose that the velocity corresponding to the peak of a certain
260: profile (in the 45\arcsec ~cube) is $V_{cen}$\,km\,s$^{-1}$ and that
261: its FWHM is {$FW$\,km s$^{-1}$}. Only the channels between
262: {$V_{cen}\,-\,3\times FW$} and {$V_{cen}\,+\,3\times FW$} were used in
263: deriving the median shape. The normalized
264: fluxes corresponding to these channels were then
265: resampled onto a grid where each bin (i.e.; channel) is 6\,$FW$ divided by the
266: number of channels. Each bin therefore contains a certain number
267: distribution of normalized fluxes; these fluxes were then sorted and
268: the middle value is taken as the median.
269:
270: Median profiles were also derived and compared from various areas throughout
271: the disk and the line shapes appeared similar everyhwere except in N and S, where
272: the profiles where more asymmetric as previously discussed. For brevity we present just
273: two of these tests in Figure~\ref{fig:up45test}. The same
274: median comparison tests were done on the 30\arcsec ~data. At the 30\arcsec ~resolution
275: median profiles derived for certain ranges of peak flux
276: and from various areas throughout the galaxy were also identical. However,
277: the median profiles derived for various ranges of FWHM appeared to vary in the shape of their wings,
278: perhaps because of the lower signal to noise in this data set, and to the smaller number of
279: broad ($\sigma _v \geq 10 km ~s^{-1}$) than that of narrow lines.
280:
281: Throughout our analysis we assumed that the noise characteristic in each profile is
282: random and that the rms noise is the same regardless of the strengh of the
283: signal. This assumption need not be true as deconvolution algorithms
284: seem to produce noise that is proportional in a non-linear fashion
285: with signal (Rupen 97). However different noise for different flux levels will hardly
286: lead to a universal, non-Gaussian line shape. A double Gaussian (a narrow and a broad component)
287: as shown in Figure~\ref{fig:UP2G} is
288: a good fit to the median profile derived from the 45\arcsec ~data.
289:
290: \section{Kinetic Energy Distribution}
291: The uniformity of the profile shape in NGC 1058 suggests that on scales
292: of 2.5~kpc, the neutral gas is
293: being stirred into the same distribution of energy per unit mass and that
294: this distribution is different than that for other galaxies (e.g. the
295: Milky Way). Figure~\ref{fig:UPenergy} shows the normalized kinetic
296: energy (KE) distribution for the
297: Milky Way and for NGC 1058. This comparison is only qualitative. The term ``normalized''
298: in the case of the Milky Way refers to the fact that the KE distribution was
299: obtained from a model (i.e. double Gaussian fit) of the \ion{H}{1}
300: emission at the North Galactic Pole; this model was presented in
301: Kulkarni \& Fich (1985), hereafter KF85, and it only includes ``normal'' emission, i.e.
302: it does not include emission from the
303: \ion{H}{1} falling into the disk. These authors
304: corrected for the infalling emission by assuming that the huge bump on one side of the profile
305: represented infalling gas. To remove the bump they reflected the
306: profile about the velocity corresponding to the peak flux and obtained
307: the profile shown in Figure~\ref{fig:UPenergy}. The units of the KF
308: plot are Kelvin$^2$ km$^2$ s$^{-2}$. The units for the NGC~1058 are
309: arbitrary, and the term ``normalized'' in this case means that instead of
310: flux or temperature, we use flux divided by peak flux, and bin numbers instead of
311: velocities. To compare those qualitatively we
312: aligned the KF profile with the NGC~1058 median
313: profile from the entire 45\arcsec ~data set. The aligning
314: was done by fitting a single Gaussian to the KF85 profile and to the
315: NGC 1058 median profile. We require and that the limits of the KF85 and the NGC 1058 profiles
316: span an equal number of FWHM.
317:
318: The striking feature in the Galactic energy distribution, also noted
319: by Kulkarni \& Fich (1985) is the almost constant kinetic energy for about
320: 50\,km/sec. In contrast, NGC 1058's KE curve is more centrally
321: peaked. Presumably the KE distribution is set both by the galactic
322: potential as well as explosive ISM events (such as SNe, star
323: formation, and infalling gas). It is not perfectly clear how these factors have
324: shaped the energy distribution as a function of velocity of either the Milky Way or NGC 1058.
325: function of velocity.
326:
327: \section{ Beam Smearing and Bulk Motions}
328: An accurate study of the profile shapes throughout the galaxy require us to understand the effect of beam smearing on our measurements. Consider a round spiral disk with gas moving in circular orbits at a velocity $v_{circ}$; attaching polar coordinates to this disk ($r_d , \theta$) and letting the angle
329: between the normal to the plane of the galaxy and line-of sight be referred to as the
330: inclination angle ($i$) the observed radial velocity on a set of sky-coordinates ($x,y$) will
331: be
332: $$v_z(x,y)~=~v_z(r_d,\theta)cos(i)~+~v_{circ}(r_d)~sin(i)cos(\theta) + v_{red}$$ where $v_{red}$ is
333: the velocity of the galaxy for which with respect to the observer. Obviouosly a smaller $i$ is
334: (a more face-on) makes it easier to measure the true $v_{z}$ distribution. A
335: gradient in the $v_{circ}(r_d)sin(i)cos(\theta)$ across the resolution element (beam) will
336: increase the width of the profile and confuse the measurements of the velocities perpendicular to the disk.
337: This problem is known as beam smearing.
338:
339: Two tests were performed using our highest resolution (15\arcsec) data to quantify the
340: effect of beam smearing on our measurements of $\sigma _v$. First, we determined the maximum
341: in-plane velocity difference within a beam which would contribute to the width of the line
342: profile at a certain position in the galaxy (i.e. at a pixel). This was done by finding
343: the maximum difference (hereafter $\rm{M_{diff}}$) between the central velocity $\rm{v_{cen}}$
344: (i.e. the velocity associated with the peak flux as derived from the single
345: Gaussian fit to the 15\arcsec ~data) of the {\ion{H}{1}} pixel and the central velocities
346: of all the pixels within a square with 32\arcsec ~sides centered on that pixel.
347: Figure~\ref{fig:beam_smear1} shows the map of these maximum difference.
348: This method is based on the assumption that differences in $\rm{v_{cen}}$ are due to gas motions
349: in the plane of the galaxy. This test shows that $\sigma _v$ is correlated with $\rm{M_{diff}}$.
350: The correlation between $\sigma _v$ and $\rm{M_{diff}}$
351: suggests the exitence of bulk motions on scales smaller and equal to those probed by our highest resolution data 15\arcsec ~(0.7 kpc).
352:
353: Finding $\rm{M_{diff}}$ across NGC 1058's disk gives an upper limit to
354: the broadening of the {\ion{H}{1}} profiles. To better understand the effect
355: of beam smearing on our observations we constructed a simple model of how {\ion{H}{1}} in NGC 1058
356: would appear if it was an infinitely
357: cold disk; we then convolved this model with a 30\arcsec ~beam and ran our Gaussian
358: least squares fitting routine on the resulting {\ion{H}{1}} profiles. The widths of these
359: final model profiles were significantly smaller than those measured in NGC 1058
360: (Figure~\ref{fig:beam_smear2}) suggesting that beam smearing does not have a significant impact on our observations.
361:
362: \section{Summary and Conclusions}
363: Excellent resolution and high sensitivity \ion{H}{1} observations of NGC 1058 show
364: an intriguing picture of the interstellar medium
365: throughout this galaxy: the velocity dispersion ranges
366: from 4 to 14 km/sec but is not correlated with star
367: formation or the spiral arms, which is another major ISM regulator.
368: Global trends such as a radial fall-off must be explained in the
369: context of significant local effects; most notable among
370: these are isolated, resolved regions of high velocity dispersions as
371: well as significant scatter in the dispersion at a given
372: radius. In summary unlike some previous studies, we find
373: that the dispersion is not constant and it does not simply
374: decline with radius. we also find that there is no tight correlation between the width of
375: the profiles and the spiral arms.
376:
377: The most probable source for the highest dispersions observed
378: outside the central regions are small scale ($\leq$0.7 kpc) bulk
379: motions. The energy sources supporting such motions are not
380: entirely clear. The disk is warped in the southern part (van der
381: Kruit \& Shostak 1984, Shen \& Sellwood 2006),
382: leading to the observed broad profiles: however, a similar
383: explanation for region N would suggest a rather impressive
384: small-scale structure in the warp, as it would require the
385: inclination to change by $\sim $ 3 degrees over a size
386: smaller than 0.7~kpc.
387:
388: There is no obvious correlation with stars or star
389: formation tracers such as H$\alpha$, radio continuum, SNe except in region
390: C; nor is it clear what role, if any, is played by spiral
391: arms in driving the observed small scale bulk motions. Some of the measured
392: velocity dispersions are higher than the {10 km~$s^{-1}$}
393: canonical sound speed in the ISM, but since we
394: cannot easily measure directly the pressure and
395: {3-dimensional} density structure of the gas, we cannot determine the
396: exact sound speed to know if we are indeed seeing supersonic
397: motions.
398:
399: The shapes of the {\ion{H}{1}} profiles in NGC 1058 are non-Gaussian and
400: hence cannot be explained as emission from single temperature gas. Therefore, it is not
401: clear whether these narrow profiles are evidence of a lower thermal balance point between
402: heating and cooling mechanisms in NGC 1058's outskirts as compared to the rest of the galaxy.
403:
404: A double Gaussian description of the \ion{H}{1} profile is far from a
405: complete surprise. The surprise is the constancy between the broad
406: and narrow components throughout NGC~1058's \ion{H}{1} disk. In previous
407: studies (e.g. Mebold 1972, Young \& Lo 1996) it was found that some of the
408: \ion{H}{1} profiles were well described by double Gaussians, and these
409: associated the narrow Gaussians with the CNM and the broad with the
410: WNM. Young \& Lo (1996) found that the narrow component existed only in
411: regions of high \ion{H}{1} column density, next to areas with active
412: star formation. It is unlikely that the universal profile in NGC 1058
413: can be explained as a combination of cold and warm medium for the
414: narrow and broad component respectively, because it seems difficult to
415: have the same ratio of warm to cold gas in regions associated with
416: stars and star fromation and at radii three times the optical
417: $R_{25}$. Also, high resolution observations in
418: other galaxies (Braun 1998) showed that the CNM
419: dissappears at the edges of the optical disk.
420:
421: Further quests on the observational front such as (at what resolution will this universality break down, is
422: this spatial scale particular to NGC 1058, can we see the same shape and/or its
423: universality in other systems), as well as theoretical efforts to
424: model mechanisms of injecting energy into the ISM, and
425: determine how that energy dissipates throughout a fractal
426: ISM are necessary to understand the full significance of the universal profile in our
427: 45\arcsec ~data cube.
428:
429: A.P. would like to thank Jacqueline van Gorkom for invaluable help in
430: designing the experiment, as well as during during the analysis process
431: and in editing this document. A.P. would also like to thank
432: Liese van Zee, Mordecai Mac-Low and Jennifer Donovan for their helpfull suggestions and discussions.
433: The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the National Science Foundation
434: operated under cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc..
435:
436: \begin{thebibliography}{}
437: \bibitem[Allen and Shostak 1979]{all79} Allen, R. J., and Shostak, G. S. 1979, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 35, 163
438: \bibitem[Braun and Walterbros (1992)]{br92} Braun, R. and Walterbros R. A. M. , 1992 \apj, 386, 120
439: \bibitem[Braun (1997)]{br97} Braun, R., 1997 \apj 484, 637
440: \bibitem[Braun (1998)]{br98} Braun, R., astro-ph/9804320 Interstellar Turbulence, Proceedings of the 2nd Guillermo Haro Conference.
441: Edited by Jose Franco and Alberto Carraminana. Cambridge University Press, 1999., p.12
442: \bibitem[Dickey and Lockman 1990]{DL90} Dickey, J.M. and Lockman,
443: F.J., 1990, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 28, 215
444: \bibitem[Dickey, et al. 2000]{D00} Dickey, J.M., Mebold, U.,
445: Stanimirovic, S., Staveley-Smith L., 2000, \apj, 536. 756D
446: \bibitem[Dziourkevitch et al. 2004]{DZ04} Dziourkevitch, N., Elstner, D., \& Rudiger, G., 2004, A\& A, 423, L29
447: \bibitem[Eskridge et al. 2002]{E02} Eskridge, P. B., Frogel, J. A., Pogge, R. W., Quillen, A. C., et al. 2002, ApJS, 143, 73
448: \bibitem[Ferguson 1998]{Fe98} Ferguson, A., Wyse, R. F. G., Gallagher,
449: J.S., Hunter, D.A., 1998 \apjl 506, 19
450: \bibitem[Ferguson, Gallagher \& Wyse 1998]{FGW98} Ferguson, A., Gallagher,
451: J. S., Wyse, R. F. G., \aj, 116, 673
452: \bibitem[Kulkarni \& Fich 1985]{KF85} Kulkarni, S.R. and Fich, M., 1985 \apj 289, 792
453: \bibitem[Kulkarni and Heiles 1988]{KH87} Kulkarni, S.R. and Heiles,
454: C., 1988 in Galactic and Extragalactic Radio Astronomy,
455: ed. G.L. Verschuur{\&} K. I. Kellermann (New York: Springer Verlag),
456: 95
457: \bibitem[Lewis (1984)]{Lew84} Lewis, B.M., 1984 \apj 285, 453
458: \bibitem[Lewis (1987)]{Lew87b}Lewis, B.M., 1987 \apjs 63, 515
459: \bibitem[Lewis (1987)]{Lew87} Lewis, B.M., 1987 Obs. 107, 201L
460: \bibitem[Li et al. 2005]{Li05}Li, Y., Mac Low, M.M., \& Klessen, R.S., 2005, ApJ, 620, L19
461: \bibitem[Lockman 1984]{Loc84} Lockman, F. J., 1984, \apj, 283, 90
462: \bibitem[Lockman and Gehman (1991)]{loc91}Lockman, F. J. and Gehman, C. S., 1991, \apj, 382, 182
463: \bibitem[Mac Low \& Klessen 2004]{Mac04} Mac Low, M.M., \& Klessen, R. S., 2004, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 125
464: \bibitem[Malhotra(1994)]{mal94} Malhotra, S., 1994, \apj, 433, 687
465: \bibitem[Malhotra 1995]{Mal95} Malhotra, S., 1995 \apj, 448, 132
466: \bibitem[McKee & Ostriker 77]{MO77} McKee, C.F.,Ostriker, J.P. 1977, ApJ, 218, 148
467: \bibitem[Mebold 1972]{Meb72} Mebold, U., 1972, A\& A, 19, 13
468: \bibitem[Merrifield(1993)]{mer93} Merrifield, M. R., 1993, \mnras, 261, 233
469: \bibitem[Olling 1995]{Ol95} Olling, R., 1995, PhD Thesis
470: \bibitem[Olling 1996]{Ol96} Olling, R., 1996, AJ 112, 457
471: \bibitem[Oort(1932)]{oor32}Oort, J. H., 1932,
472: Bull. Astron. Inst. Netherlands, 6, 349
473: \bibitem[Piontek \& Ostriker 2004]{PO04} Piontek, R. A., \& Ostriker, E. C., 2004, ApJ 601, 905
474: \bibitem[van der Kruit and Shostak 1982]{vKS82} van der Kruit, P.C.,
475: Shostak, G.S., 1982 \aap, 115, 293S
476: \bibitem[Rupen(1987)]{rup87} Rupen, M. P., 1987 PhD thesis
477: \bibitem[Rupen (1997)]{rup97} Rupen, M. P., 1997, VLA Scientific Memorandum, No. 172: A Test of the CS (Shortened C) Configuration available at $http://www.vla.nrao.edu/memos/sci$
478: \bibitem[Rupen (1998)]{rup98} Rupen, M. P., 1998, VLA Scientific Memorandum, No. 172: A Test of the CS (Shortened C) Configuration available at $http://www.vla.nrao.edu/memos/sci/175/cstest2/$
479: \bibitem[Rupen (1999)]{rup99} Rupen, M.P., 1999, {\it{ Spectral Line Observing II: Calibration and Analysis}}
480: in ASP Conf. Ser.,180, Synthesis Imaging in Radio Astronomy II ed. by Taylor, G.B., Carilli, C.L., \& Perley, R.A. pg. 229
481: \bibitem[van der Kruit \& Shostak 1984]{vKS84} van der Kruit, P.C.,
482: Shostak, G.S., 1984 \aap, 134, 258V
483: \bibitem[Shen \& Sellwood 2006]{shse06} Shen, J. \& Sellwood, J. A., MNRAS, 2006 370, 2
484: \bibitem[Sellwood and Balbus 1999]{sel99} Sellwood, J. A. \& Balbus, S.A., ApJ 1999, 511, 660
485: \bibitem[Shostak and van der Kruit 1984]{SvK84} Shostak, G.S., van
486: der Kruit, P.C., 1984 \aap, 132, 20S
487: \bibitem[Young \& Lo 1996]{Y96} Young, L.M., Lo, K.Y. 1996 \apj, 462, 203
488: \bibitem[Young \& Lo 1997]{Y97a} Young, L.M., Lo, K.Y. 1997 \apj, 476, 127
489: \bibitem[Young \& Lo 1997]{Y97b} Young, L.M., Lo, K.Y. 1997 \apj, 490, 710
490: \end{thebibliography}
491:
492: \begin{deluxetable}{lc}
493: \tablecolumns{2}
494: \tablecaption{General Properties\label{tab:Gen_Prop_Gal}}
495: \tablehead{ \colhead{} & \colhead{NGC 1058}}
496: \startdata
497: R.A.(B1950) & 02 40 23.2\\
498: Dec (B1950) &+37 07 48.0\\
499: Morphological type &Sc \\
500: V$_\mathrm{sys}$\,[km/sec] & 518\\
501: L$_B$\,[L$_{\odot}$] &$1.5 \times 10^9$\\
502: M$_{\sc{HI}}$[M$_{\odot}$] &$2.3\times 10^9$\\
503: SFR\,[M$_{\odot}$\,yr$^{-1}$]\tablenotemark{a} &$3.5\times 10^{-2}$ \\
504: D$_{25}\times$d$_{25}$\,[arcmin]\tablenotemark{b} &$3.0\times 2.8$\\
505: Distance[Mpc]\tablenotemark{c} &10\\
506: Physical equivalent of 1\arcsec &48.5\,pc \\
507: Inclination\tablenotemark{d} &4--11$^{\circ}$\\
508: Environment\tablenotemark{e} &member of the NGC 1023 Group\\
509: \enddata
510: \tablenotetext{a}{SFR stands for Star Formation Rate, it was calculated
511: from H$\alpha$ fluxes by Ferguson, Gallagher \& Wyse (1998)}
512: \tablenotetext{b}{NASA/IPAC extragalactic database (NED)}
513: \tablenotetext{c}{Ferguson, Gallager, \& Wyse (1998) }
514: \tablenotetext{d}{van der Kruit \& Shostak (1984) }
515: \tablenotetext{e}{~Lewis (1975)}
516: \end{deluxetable}
517: \clearpage
518: \begin{figure}
519: \resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{
520: \rotatebox{-90}{%\epsscale{5cm}
521: \plotone{f1.eps}}}
522: \caption[Sample channel maps for NGC 1058]
523: {\label{fig:ch_map_1058}Sample channel maps for NGC 1058--Each square image
524: represents the \ion{H}{1} 21\,cm line emission within a velocity
525: range of {2.58\,km\,s$^{-1}$} where the central velocity of that
526: range is given on the upper left corner of each image. The x and y
527: axis of every channel map gives the Right Ascension (RA) and
528: Declination (Dec) coordinates,and are identical to these in Figure 2. Such sample channel maps can be
529: assembled together in the same way the frames of a movie are put
530: together to make what is refered to as a data cube.}
531: \end{figure}
532: \clearpage
533:
534: \begin{figure}
535: % \resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{
536: \epsscale{.8}
537: \plotone{f2.eps}%}
538: \epsscale{1}
539: \caption{Intensity weighted mean velocity contours atop \ion{H}{1}
540: intensity map for NGC 1058
541: \label{fig:M1contM0grey}Intensity weighted mean velocity contours atop \ion{H}{1}
542: intensity map (grey) for NGC 1058---This figure was made using the
543: 15\arcsec ~data cube with a sensitivity of 0.5 mJy/beam corresponding to a column density of
544: ${1.6~\times 10^{18}~\rm{cm}^{-2}}$. The physical resolution of this image is
545: 0.7\,kpc and the velocity contours range between 500 and 558 km/sec in 2 km/sec increments.
546: The \ion{H}{1} disk in NGC 1058 extends to a
547: diameter of more than 20\,kpc.}
548: \end{figure}
549:
550: \begin{figure}
551: \resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{
552: \plotone{f3.eps}}
553: \vspace{-3cm}
554: \caption[Sample \ion{H}{1} profiles from the 45\arcsec NGC
555: 1058 data cube]
556: {\small \label{fig:prof45_1058}Four sample of
557: {\ion{H}{1}} profiles (crosses), the Gaussian fit (solid
558: line) and the residual pattern (red) with $\sigma _v$ from
559: the Gaussian fit: 12.7\,km/sec (upper left, pixel from a region of high dispersion), 5.95\,km/sec
560: (upper right, pixel from a region of low dispersion), 7.6\, km/sec (lower left pixel from an interarm region),
561: 9.3\,km/sec (lower right, pixel from an arm region).
562: The $x$ axis is in km/sec and the $y$ axis represents {\ion{H}{1}} intensity
563: in mJy/beam. The shown residuals indicate that a single Gaussian function does not
564: adequately describe
565: the line shapes. However the width of the Gaussian does
566: track the breadth of the {\ion{H}{1}} profile. This figure is
567: based on the 45\arcsec ~data cube and the single Gaussian
568: fits done for that cube.}
569: \end{figure}
570: \clearpage
571: \begin{figure}
572: \resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{
573: \rotatebox{-90}{%\epsscale{5cm}
574: \plotone{f4.eps}}}
575: \caption[Sample \ion{H}{1} profiles from the 30\arcsec NGC
576: 1058 data cube]
577: {\label{fig:prof30_1058} Three samples of {\ion{H}{1}}
578: profiles (solid line), the Gaussian fit (squares) and the residual pattern
579: (dashed) with $\sigma _v$ from the Gaussian fit: 3.8, 7.6,
580: and 13.2 respectively. Figure based on the 30\arcsec ~data
581: cube and the single Gaussian fits done for that cube. The $x$ axis is in km/sec and the $y$ axis represents {\ion{H}{1}} intensity
582: in mJy/beam.}
583: \end{figure}
584: \clearpage
585:
586: \begin{figure}
587: \resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{
588: \plotone{f5.eps}}
589: \caption[Distribution of dispersions throughout the
590: galaxy]
591: {\label{fig:SigCont1058c30} Distribution of dispersions
592: throughout NGC~1058; the regions
593: of highest dispersion are labeled N, C, and S. The $x$
594: and $y$ axis are the RA and Dec in B1950 coordinates. This
595: figure is based on the results of the single Gaussian fit
596: performed on the 30\arcsec ~data. The contours are in km/sec
597: and start in steps of 0.5 km/sec. Black is used for dispersions between 5.5 to 7, cyan
598: for 7.5 to 9, green for 9.5 to 11, red for 11.5 to 13, and magenta for 13.5 to 15 km/sec.}
599: \end{figure}
600: \clearpage
601:
602: \begin{figure}
603: \resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{
604: \plotone{f6.eps}}
605: \vspace{-2cm}
606: \caption[Four sample profiles in the regions with highest asymmetries
607: (of order few percent).]{\label{fig:asym}Four sample profiles in the regions with highest asymmetries
608: (of order few percent); The $x$ axis of each of the four plots represents velocity and is in units of {km s$^{-1}$} and the $y$ axis represents {\ion{H}{1}} intensity in mJy/beam, where the beam refers to the
609: point spread function of the observations. The upper left is from region N, upper right from C, lower left from S, and lower right from a region West of S. Regions N,C, and S are shown and labeled in Figure 3.}
610: \end{figure}
611: \clearpage
612:
613: \begin{figure}
614: \resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{
615: \plotone{f7.eps}}
616: \vspace{-3cm}
617: \caption[Radial dependence of NGC~1058 $\sigma_v$]
618: {\label{fig:SigvsR1058c30} Radial dependece of NGC~1058's
619: $\sigma _v$s---The $x$ axis (in arcseconds) gives the
620: radius while the $y$ axis (in km/sec) gives the $\sigma_v$
621: as derived from single Gaussian least squares fits to the
622: 30\arcsec ~data cube. The filled
623: circles represent
624: points with error bars,less than 12.5\% of $\sigma_v$, the
625: empty circles -- points with error bars between 12.5\% and 25\%
626: and the dots-- points with errors greater than
627: 25\%. Despite a few high $\sigma_v$ regions (N,S in Figure~\ref{fig:SigCont1058c30},
628: the radial falloff is evident.}
629: \end{figure}
630: \clearpage
631:
632: \begin{figure}
633: \resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{
634: \plotone{f8.eps}}
635: \caption[Qualitative behavior with radius of the kinetic energy in the gas (black) and the
636: luminosity of NGC 1058 (green).]{\label{fig:ecomp} The energy in the neutral gas
637: was roughly approximated as the product of the total \ion{H}{1} intensity and the square of the
638: velocity dispersion. Both the green and the black lines represent azimuthal averages of concentric
639: rings around the center of NGC 1058. The black error bars show the rms in each of these rings. The
640: red line shows the exponential fit to the stellar data. The energy in the gas falls off
641: with radius much slower than the stellar luminosity suggesting that processes other than
642: those associated with star input energy are responsible for heating the gas at large radiae.}
643: \end{figure}
644:
645: \clearpage
646: \begin{figure}
647: \resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{
648: \rotatebox{-90}{%\epsscale{5cm}
649: \plotone{f9.eps}}}
650: \caption[$\sigma _v$ contours atop an {\ion{H}{1}} total
651: intensity map]
652: {\label{fig:SigonM0c30}$\sigma _v$ contours atop of an {\ion{H}{1}} total
653: intensity map---The contours range from 4 to 14 km/sec in
654: steps of 0.5 km/sec and are based on the single Gaussian
655: fit to the 30\arcsec , NGC~1058 data cube. Note that regions N and S of high $\sigma _v$
656: are located in the inter-arms.}
657: \end{figure}
658: \clearpage
659:
660: \begin{figure}
661: \resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{
662: \plotone{f10.eps}}
663: \caption[]
664: {\label{fig:Halpha_on_Sig} H$_{\alpha}$ greyscale from Ferguson, Gallager, \& Wyse 1998, atop dispersion contours as in Figure 5.}
665: \end{figure}
666: \clearpage
667:
668:
669: \begin{figure}
670: \resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{
671: \plotone{f11.eps}}
672: \caption[Map of Maximum Beam Smear at 32\arcsec ~resolution]
673: {\label{fig:beam_smear1} Contours of maximum potential beam smearing in km s$^{-1}$. Black is used for dispersions maximum
674: beam smearing effect of 1, 2, and 3 km/sec, cyan for 4,5,6, green for 7,8,9, red for 10, 11, and 12,
675: and magenta for values of 30 km/sec and above.
676: 5.5 to 7, cyan for 7.5 to 9, green for 9.5 to 11, red for 11.5 to 13, and magenta for 13.5 to 15 km/sec.
677: The magenta contours are regions where the \ion{H}{1} emssion was very
678: faint or non-existent. As such the Gaussian fitting routine employed produced spurious results. The
679: square shape of some of the contours is an artifact of the method employed in determining the maximum
680: beam smearing. This figure is based on the 15\arcsec ~data cube. Note that the
681: highest velocity gradients are found in regions N and S and south-west of C. Regions N, S, and C are
682: shown and labeled in Figure 5.}
683: \end{figure}
684: \clearpage
685:
686:
687:
688:
689: \begin{figure}
690: \resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{
691: \plotone{f12.eps}}
692: \vspace{-2cm}
693: \caption[]
694: {\label{fig:beam_smear2} Effect of beam smearing on $\sigma _{v}$ measurements at 30\arcsec
695: ~resolution. The $x$ axis in in km/sec and the $y$ axis is in mJy/beam. The connected squares represent the observed profile. The narrow profiles
696: were obtained by modeling the velocity profiles associated with an infinitely
697: cold disk and then convolving that model with a 30\arcsec ~beam, and running the Gaussian least squares
698: fitting routine on the convolved cube.}
699: \end{figure}
700: \clearpage
701:
702: \begin{figure}
703: \resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{
704: \plotone{f13.eps}}
705: \caption[Median profile atop all \ion{H}{1} profiles from NGC~1058
706: 45\arcsec data cube]
707: {\label{fig:UPfid45}Median Profile (red) atop all \ion{H}{1} profiles from
708: NGC~1058 45\arcsec ~data cube. The $x$ axis is flux/peak flux and the $y$ axis is
709: velocity minus the central velocity and divided by the FWHM.}
710: \end{figure}
711:
712: \begin{figure}
713: \resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{
714: {\plottwo{f14a.eps}{f14b.eps}}}
715: \caption[]
716: {\label{fig:up45test} Median profiles derived for certain FWHM
717: ranges (left pannel);and for peak flux ranges (right pannel) from the 45\arcsec
718: ~NGC~1058 data set. The $x$ axis is not in [km/sec] but represents
719: the grid (bin number) on which the profiles were set. Please refer to text for a detailed
720: explanation. The $y$ axis is the flux divided by peak flux. In the left pannel black is used for
721: median profiles with widths (FWHM) between 14 to 18 km/sec, cyan for 18 to 22 km/sec, green
722: 22 and red for 26 to 30 km/sec. In the right pannel a solid line is used for profiles
723: with peak fluxes between 10 and 25 mJy/beam, a dotted line is used for profiles
724: with peaks between 25 and 40 mJy/beam, short dash for 40 to 55, and long dash for
725: 55 to 70 mJy/beam. }
726: \end{figure}
727: \clearpage
728:
729: \begin{figure}
730: \resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{
731: \plotone{f15.eps}}
732: \vspace{-2cm}
733: \caption[Double Gaussian Fit to the Universal Profile in NGC~1058]
734: {\label{fig:UP2G}Double Gaussian Fit to the Universal Profile --- The $x$
735: axis is in bins as described in the text and the $y$ axis is the
736: flux normalized to the peak intensity. The two
737: Gaussian components used to fit the Median profile and their sum
738: are shown in dotted lines. The residuals are shown in red. Error
739: bars based on the rms in each bin are
740: also given. The ratio between the areas of the broad and narrow
741: components is 1.35 while that between their FWHM is 2.09.}
742: \end{figure}
743: \clearpage
744:
745: \begin{figure}
746: \resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{
747: \plotone{f16.eps}}
748: \vspace{-5cm}
749: \caption[Normalized Kinetic Energy distributions for the Milky Way and
750: NGC 1058 and corresponding \ion{H}{1} profiles]
751: {\label{fig:UPenergy} Normalized Kinetic Energy distributions for
752: the Milky Way (top) and NGC 1058 (bottom) and corresponding \ion{H}{1} profiles.
753: The top figure was obtained from a double Gaussian decomposition of the
754: North Galactic Pole \ion{H}{1} emission, from Kulkarni \& Fich (1985).
755: For the top figure, the $x$ axis represents
756: velocity in units of {km\,s$^{-1}$ and the $y$ axis is the normalized energy
757: in units of {Kelvin km$^2$ s$^{-2}$}}. The inset upper right figure
758: shows the \ion{H}{1} profile from which the normalized energy curve
759: for the Milky Way's North Galactic Pole emission was estimated.
760: The bottom figure shows the qualitative behaviour of the kinetic
761: energy distribution with velocity in NGC 1058. Here
762: the $x$ axis represents a bin number (ref.to text) while the
763: $y$ axis represents the qualitative behaviour of the kinetic energy
764: distribution in NGC 1058. This figure suggests that the kinetic energy
765: in the Galactic North Galactic Pole emission is
766: more evenly distributed in velocity than that in NGC 1058.
767: }
768: \end{figure}
769: \clearpage
770: \end{document}
771: