1: \documentclass[twocolumn,nofootinbib,amsmath,amssymb,a4paper]{revtex4}
2:
3: \usepackage{graphicx}
4: \usepackage{dcolumn}
5: \usepackage{bm}
6:
7: \newcommand\babar{\mbox{\slshape B\kern-0.1em{\small A}\kern-0.1em
8: B\kern-0.1em{\small A\kern-0.2em R}}}
9: \newcommand{\brhoks}{$B \rightarrow \rho {K^*}$}
10: \newcommand{\brhozkp}{$B^+ \rightarrow \rho^0 {K^*}^+$}
11: \newcommand{\brhomkp}{$B^0 \rightarrow \rho^- {K^*}^+$}
12: \newcommand{\brhopkz}{$B^+ \rightarrow \rho^+ {K^*}^0$}
13: \newcommand{\brhozkz}{$B^0 \rightarrow \rho^0 {K^*}^0$}
14: \newcommand{\bfzks}{$B \rightarrow f_0(980) {K^*}$}
15: \newcommand{\bfzkp}{$B^+ \rightarrow f_0(980) {K^*}^+$}
16: \newcommand{\bfzkz}{$B^0 \rightarrow f_0(980) {K^*}^0$}
17: \newcommand{\bomks}{$B \rightarrow \omega {K^*}$}
18: \newcommand{\bomkz}{$B^0 \rightarrow \omega {K^*}^0$}
19: \newcommand{\bomkp}{$B^+ \rightarrow \omega {K^*}^+$}
20: \newcommand{\bomrh}{$B \rightarrow \omega \rho$}
21: \newcommand{\bomrz}{$B^0 \rightarrow \omega \rho^0$}
22: \newcommand{\bomrp}{$B^+ \rightarrow \omega \rho^+$}
23: \newcommand{\bomom}{$B^0 \rightarrow \omega \omega$}
24: \newcommand{\bomph}{$B^0 \rightarrow \omega \phi$}
25: \newcommand{\bomfz}{$B^0 \rightarrow \omega f_0(980)$}
26: \newcommand{\rkp}{$\rho K \pi$}
27: \newcommand{\BB}{$B\bar{B}$}
28: \newcommand{\mpp}{${\rm m}_{\pi \pi}$}
29: \newcommand{\mkp}{${\rm m}_{K \pi}$}
30: \newcommand{\Mpp}{${\rm M}(\pi^+ \pi^0)$}
31: \newcommand{\Mkp}{${\rm M}(K^+ \pi^-)$}
32: \newcommand{\mbc}{${\rm M}_{\rm bc}$}
33: \newcommand{\mes}{${\rm m}_{\rm ES}$}
34: \newcommand{\DE}{$\Delta \rm{E}$}
35: \newcommand{\fL}{$f_L$}
36: \newcommand{\Acp}{${\cal A}_{CP}$}
37:
38: \begin{document}
39:
40: \title{\brhoks\ decays and other rare vector-vector modes
41: \footnote{Presented at the $4^{th}$ International Workshop
42: on the CKM Unitariry Triangle, Nagoya, Japan, December 12-16, 2006.
43: Preprint DAPNIA-06-601.}}
44:
45: \author{G. Vasseur}
46: \email{georges.vasseur@cea.fr}
47: \affiliation{DSM/DAPNIA/SPP, CEA/Saclay,
48: F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France}
49:
50: \begin{abstract}
51: The recent analyses of the following rare vector-vector decays of the $B$ meson
52: are presented:
53: $\rho K^*$, $\omega K^*$, $\omega \rho$, $\omega \omega$, and $\omega \phi$
54: charmless final states.
55: The latest results indicate that the fraction of longitudinal polarization
56: is about 0.5 in penguin-dominated modes
57: and close to 1 for tree-dominated modes.
58: \end{abstract}
59:
60: \maketitle
61:
62: \section{Motivation}
63: The search for rare charmless hadronic decays of the $B$ meson
64: to vector-vector final states has become a quite active field
65: in the experiments at the $B$ factories, Belle at KEK and \babar\ at SLAC.
66: As a lot of these decays have not yet been seen,
67: the first goal of these studies is to observe such modes
68: and measure their branching fraction.
69: The measurements can then be compared to theoretical predictions.
70:
71: The direct CP-violation asymmetry in these modes can also be measured.
72: It is defined as
73: ${\cal A}_{\rm CP} = (\Gamma^- - \Gamma^+)/(\Gamma^- + \Gamma^+)$,
74: where the superscript on the total width $\Gamma$ indicates the sign of
75: the $b$-quark charge in the $B$ meson.
76: Some modes can be used for further CP studies.
77: In fact, the result on \brhopkz\ has already been used
78: to constrain the effect of the penguin amplitude
79: on the measurement of the angle $\alpha$ of the unitarity triangle
80: from $B^0 \to \rho^+ \rho^-$ using SU(3) flavor symmetry~\cite{bib:beneke}.
81:
82: \begin{figure}
83: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{helicity}
84: \caption{\label{fig:angles}Definition of the helicity angles
85: in the case of the vector-vector \brhopkz\ decay.}
86: \end{figure}
87:
88: A hot topic is the measurement of the fraction of longitudinal polarization.
89: The helicity angles $\theta_1$ and $\theta_2$ of the two vector mesons
90: are defined
91: as the angles between the vector meson direction in the $B$ meson rest frame
92: and the direction of one of its decay product in the vector meson rest frame,
93: as illustrated on one example in Fig.~\ref{fig:angles}.
94: Integrating over the $\phi$ angle
95: between the decay planes of the two vector mesons,
96: the fraction of longitudinal polarization \fL\ can be extracted
97: from the angular dependence of the decay rate, which is proportional to
98: \begin{equation}
99: \frac{1}{4}
100: (1-f_L)\sin^2\theta_{1}\sin^2\theta_{2} +
101: f_L \cos^2\theta_{1}\cos^2\theta_{2} . \nonumber
102: \label{eq:helicity}
103: \end{equation}
104:
105: A value of \fL\ close to unity of order $(1 - O(\frac{{m_V}^2}{{m_B}^2}))$
106: is expected for light vector mesons from helicity conservation.
107: This is expected to be true for both tree and penguin diagrams.
108: However the experimental situation is more complex.
109: If \fL\ has indeed been measured close to 1
110: in the tree-dominated $B \to \rho \rho$ modes~\cite{bib:somov},
111: it is surprisingly close to 0.5
112: in the penguin-dominated $B \to \phi K^*$ modes~\cite{bib:chen}.
113: This effect is not yet understood.
114: There are several possible explanations, either within the Standard Model,
115: such as rescattering in the final state,
116: contribution from annihilation or electroweak penguin diagrams,
117: and transverse gluon~\cite{bib:hou},
118: or in new physics outside the Standard Model.
119: To have a better picture, it is important to measure other vector-vector modes,
120: both tree-dominated, like \bomrh\ and \bomom,
121: and penguin-dominated like \brhoks\ and \bomks.
122:
123: The recent studies of the \brhoks\ modes are reviewed in section~\ref{sec:rk},
124: the ones involving an $\omega$ meson in section~\ref{sec:om}.
125: Charge-conjugate modes are implied throughout.
126:
127: \section{\brhoks\ modes}
128: \label{sec:rk}
129:
130: \subsection{Introduction}
131:
132: The \brhoks\ charmless decays proceed through dominant gluonic penguin loops
133: and doubly Cabibbo-suppressed tree processes, as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:diag}.
134: The external tree diagram is only possible with a $K^{*+}$,
135: and the color-suppressed internal tree diagram with a $\rho^0$.
136: Hence \brhopkz\ is pure penguin.
137:
138: According to isospin symmetry, the two modes with a charged $\rho$
139: are expected to have a branching fraction twice as large
140: as the two modes with a neutral $\rho$.
141:
142: \begin{figure}[h]
143: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{diag}
144: \caption{\label{fig:diag}Feynmann diagrams for the \brhoks\ decay:
145: gluonic penguin, external tree and internal tree diagrams.}
146: \end{figure}
147:
148: \subsection{Results from Belle}
149:
150: \begin{figure}[h]
151: \includegraphics[width=0.2\textwidth]{fig_1a.ps}
152: \includegraphics[width=0.2\textwidth]{fig_1b.ps}
153: \caption{\label{fig:belle_mbcde}Projections of \mbc\ for events in the
154: \DE\ signal region (left) and of \DE\ in the \mbc\ signal region (right).
155: The solid curves show the results of the fit.
156: The dashed curve is the signal contribution.
157: The hatched histograms represent the continuum background.
158: The sum of the $b\to c$ and continuum background component is shown
159: as dot-dashed lines.}
160: \end{figure}
161:
162: \begin{figure}[h]
163: \includegraphics[width=0.2\textwidth]{fig_2a.ps}
164: \includegraphics[width=0.2\textwidth]{fig_2b.ps}
165: \caption{\label{fig:belle_mppmkp}Signal yields obtained
166: from the \mbc-\DE\ distribution in bins of \Mpp\ (left)
167: for events in the $K^{*0}$ region and in bins of \Mkp\ (right)
168: for events in the $\rho^+$ region.
169: The points with error bars show the data.
170: Solid curves show the results of the fit.
171: Hatched histograms are for the nonresonant component.}
172: \end{figure}
173:
174: Belle was the first experiment in 2005 to publish a result
175: on the observation of the \brhopkz\ mode~\cite{bib:belle},
176: on a sample of 275 millions of \BB\ pairs.
177: A signal of $B^+ \to \pi^+ \pi^0 K^+ \pi^-$ is extracted
178: from the $e^+ e^- \to q \bar{q}$ continuum and \BB\ backgrounds
179: in an extended unbinned maximum-likelihood fit using
180: the $B$ meson beam-constrained mass \mbc\ and energy difference \DE,
181: as shown in Fig~\ref{fig:belle_mbcde}.
182:
183: The \brhopkz\ signal is extracted by fits to \mbc\ and \DE\
184: in bins of the vector meson masses \Mpp\ and \Mkp,
185: as shown in Fig~\ref{fig:belle_mppmkp}.
186: This is necessary because there is a large nonresonant \rkp\ background,
187: which gives a continuum in the distribution of \Mkp.
188: Nethertheless there is a clear \brhopkz\ signal of $85\pm16$ events
189: with a significance of 5.2 $\sigma$.
190:
191: As for \fL, it is obtained by fitting simultaneously
192: the signal yields obtained from \mbc-\DE\ fits in bins of
193: the two helicity angles,
194: assuming an S-wave $K \pi$ system in the \rkp\ background.
195: The results for the branching fraction and \fL\ in \brhopkz\ are:
196: \begin{eqnarray}
197: {\cal B} &=& (8.9\pm1.7\pm1.2) \, 10^{-6}, \nonumber \\
198: f_L &=& 0.43\pm0.11^{+0.05}_{-0.02}. \nonumber
199: \end{eqnarray}
200: The value found for \fL\ is similar to the one found in $\phi K^*$
201: and its error is about twice as large as in $\phi K^*$.
202:
203: \subsection{Results from \babar}
204:
205: \begin{figure}[h]
206: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{mpipi}
207: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{mkapi}
208: \caption{\label{fig:mv_rhokst}
209: sPlots for the $\pi \pi$ (top) and $K \pi$ (bottom) invariant masses
210: in the \brhopkz\ (left) and \brhozkz/\bfzkz\ (right) analyses.
211: The points with error bars show the data.
212: The solid curve shows the signal and nonresonant background contribution,
213: the dashed curve is the nonresonant background contribution
214: (\rkp\ except for the top right plot where it represents the sum
215: of $f_0(1370) K^*$, $\pi \pi K^*$, and $\pi \pi K \pi$).
216: The arrows show the standard mass windows used in the final fit.}
217: \end{figure}
218:
219: More recently \babar\ published
220: an anlysis of all four \brhoks\ modes~\cite{bib:babarrhoks},
221: performed on a sample of 232 millions of \BB\ pairs.
222: It is based on an unbinned maximum-likelihood fit,
223: using seven variables: the $B$ meson energy-substituted mass \mes\
224: and energy difference \DE,
225: a neural network output or a Fischer discriminant
226: combining several event shape variables,
227: the two vector meson masses, and the two helicity angle cosines.
228: The fit allows the simultaneous extraction of the branching ratio
229: and the fraction of longitudinal polarization.
230:
231: \begin{table*}
232: \caption{\label{tab:rhoks}
233: Results from \babar\ on the \brhoks\ modes:
234: signal yield with its statistical uncertainty,
235: significance (systematic uncertainties included), branching fraction
236: (90\% confidence level upper limit in parentheses),
237: fraction of longitudinal polarization and direct CP asymmetry.
238: (The numbers in brackets are not quoted as measurements.)}
239: \begin{ruledtabular}
240: \begin{tabular}{lrcccr}
241: Mode & Signal yield & Significance ($\sigma$) & {\cal B}($\times 10^{-6}$) &
242: \fL\ & \Acp\ \\
243: \hline
244: \brhozkp & $ 51\pm24$ & 2.5 & $<6.1 \, (3.6\pm1.7\pm0.8)$ & $[0.9\pm0.2]$ & \\
245: \brhomkp & $ 60\pm24$ & 1.6 & $<12.0 \, (5.4\pm3.6\pm1.6)$ & & \\
246: \brhopkz & $194\pm29$ & 7.1 & $9.6\pm1.7\pm1.5$ & $0.52\pm0.10\pm0.04$ &
247: $-0.01\pm0.16\pm0.02$ \\
248: \brhozkz & $185\pm30$ & 5.3 & $5.6\pm0.9\pm1.3$ & $0.57\pm0.09\pm0.08$ &
249: $0.09\pm0.19\pm0.02$ \\
250: \end{tabular}
251: \end{ruledtabular}
252: \end{table*}
253:
254: \begin{figure}[ht]
255: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{mes_rhokst}
256: \caption{\label{fig:mes_rhokst}Projections of \mes\
257: of events passing a signal likelihood threshold for
258: (a) \brhozkp, (b) \brhopkz, (c) \brhomkp, (d) \brhozkz,
259: (e) \bfzkp, and (f) \bfzkz.
260: The points with error bars show the data.
261: The solid curve is the fit function,
262: the dashed curve is the total background contribution,
263: and the dotted curve is the continuum background contribution.}
264: \end{figure}
265:
266: The major challenge in the analysis comes from the nonresonant backgrounds,
267: which share the same final state as the signal.
268: They are studied by enlarging the vector meson mass windows,
269: as illustrated in Fig.~\ref{fig:mv_rhokst}.
270: As in Belle, a large \rkp\ background is seen in the \mkp\ distribution
271: in the \brhopkz\ mode.
272: The $K \pi$ system in this background is measured to be mostly S-wave.
273: The situation is even more complex in the \brhozkz\ mode,
274: since in addition to the \rkp\ background there are several contributions
275: seen in the \mpp\ distribution for a $\rho^0$
276: in contrast to the one for a $\rho^+$.
277: The $f_0(980)$ can be seen clearly.
278: In fact \bfzks, which is a scalar-vector mode, is considered
279: as another signal to be measured in the same maximum-likelihood fit.
280: Also present are contributions from the $f_0(1370)$
281: and nonresonant $\pi \pi$.
282: The yields of the nonresonant backgrounds are fitted
283: in the enlarged mass windows, then extrapolated to the standard ones
284: and fixed in the final fit with the standard mass windows.
285:
286: The projection plots in the $B$ mass shown
287: in Fig.~\ref{fig:mes_rhokst} illustrate the extraction of the signal
288: from the continuum and \BB\ backgrounds
289: in the four \brhoks\ channels and the two \bfzks\ modes.
290: Table~\ref{tab:rhoks} summarizes the results.
291: No significant enough signals are observed for \brhomkp\ and \brhozkp,
292: where upper limits at the 90 \% confidence level are set on the branching ratios.
293: For the latter a related signal \bfzkp\ is observed
294: with a significance of 5.0~$\sigma$
295: and a measured branching fraction of
296: $(5.2\pm1.2\pm0.5) \, 10^{-6}$.
297: In \brhopkz, the result is in very good agreement with the result from Belle,
298: with a similar precision.
299: The \brhozkz\ mode is observed for the first time.
300: The ratio between the branching fractions in these two modes is compatible
301: with the factor 2 expected from isospin symmetry.
302:
303: The value of \Acp\ is measured in the two significant modes
304: to be compatible with 0,
305: as expected since there is one dominant diagram.
306: Finally \fL\ is found close to 0.5 in these two modes.
307: It is compatible with the measurement from Belle
308: and has about the same precision.
309: It is again similar to the value found for $\phi K^*$.
310:
311: \section{Modes with $\omega$}
312: \label{sec:om}
313:
314: \begin{figure}[ht]
315: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{demes_omega}
316: \caption{\label{fig:demes_omega}Projections of \DE\ (left) and \mes\ (right)
317: of events passing a signal likelihood threshold for, from top to bottom,
318: \bomkz, \bomkp, \bomrz, \bomrp, \bomom, \bomph, and \bomfz.
319: The points with error bars show the data.
320: The solid curve is the fit function,
321: the dashed curve is the signal contribution,
322: and the dot-dashed curve is the background contribution.}
323: \end{figure}
324:
325: \begin{table*}[ht]
326: \caption{\label{tab:omega}
327: Results from \babar\ on modes involving an $\omega$ meson:
328: signal yield with its statistical uncertainty,
329: significance (systematic uncertainties included), branching fraction
330: (90\% confidence level upper limit in parentheses),
331: fraction of longitudinal polarization and direct CP asymmetry.
332: (The numbers in brackets are not quoted as measurements.)
333: }
334: \begin{ruledtabular}
335: \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
336: Mode & Signal yield & Significance ($\sigma$) & {\cal B}($\times 10^{-6}$) &
337: \fL\ & \Acp\ \\
338: \hline
339: \bomkz & $ 55\pm20$ & 2.4 & $<4.2 \, (2.4\pm1.1\pm0.7)$ & $[0.71\pm0.25]$ & \\
340: \bomkp & $ 8\pm16$ & 0.4 & $<3.4 \, (0.6\pm1.3\pm1.0)$ & & \\
341: \bomrz & $-18\pm16$ & 0.6 & $<1.5 \, (-0.6\pm0.7^{+0.8}_{-0.3})$ & & \\
342: \bomrp & $156\pm32$ & 5.7 & $10.6\pm2.1^{+1.6}_{-1.0}$ & $0.82\pm0.11\pm0.02$
343: & $0.04\pm0.18\pm0.02$ \\
344: \bomom & $ 48^{+24}_{-19}$ & 2.1 & $<4.0 \, (1.8^{+1.3}_{-0.9}\pm0.4)$ &
345: $[0.71\pm0.25]$ & \\
346: \bomph & $3.1\pm^{+4.4}_{-8.5}$ & 0.3 & $<1.2 \, (0.1\pm0.5\pm0.1)$ & & \\
347: \end{tabular}
348: \end{ruledtabular}
349: \end{table*}
350:
351: \begin{figure}[ht]
352: \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{hel_omega}
353: \caption{\label{fig:hel_omega}Projections of the helicity-angle cosines
354: for $\omega$ (left) and $\rho^+$ (right) of events passing
355: a signal likelihood threshold from the fit for \bomrp\ decays.
356: The points with error bars show the data.
357: The solid curve is the fit function,
358: the dashed curve is the signal contribution,
359: and the dot-dashed curve is the background contribution.}
360: \end{figure}
361:
362: On the same sample of 232 millions of \BB\ pairs,
363: \babar\ has also recently published a search for several vector-vector modes
364: involving an $\omega$ meson~\cite{bib:babaromega}:
365: \bomkz, \bomkp, \bomrz, \bomrp, \bomom, and \bomph.
366: The related vector-scalar mode \bomfz\ was also searched for.
367: An earlier search for \bomks\ and \bomrh\ on 89 millions of \BB\ pairs
368: resulted in the first observation of the \bomrp\ channel~\cite{bib:oldomega}.
369:
370: The analysis is also based on an extended unbinned maximim-likelihood fit
371: using the same seven variables as in the previous section.
372: Nonresonant $\pi \pi$ and $K \pi$ backgrounds are fixed in the fit
373: as determined from extrapolations from higher-mass regions.
374: The projection plots of \DE\ and \mes\ of Fig.~\ref{fig:demes_omega} illustrate
375: the extraction of the signal
376: from the continuum and \BB\ backgrounds in all these modes.
377: In most of them, no significant enough signal is seen.
378: The only channel where a significant signal is observed is \bomrp.
379: Its measured branching fraction is about 2 standard deviations smaller
380: than the one of $B^+ \to \rho^+ \rho^0$~\cite{bib:somov},
381: while these two branching fractions are naively expected to be equal.
382: Table~\ref{tab:omega} summarizes the results in all the modes.
383: To calculate the branching fraction,
384: \fL\ is left free in the fit for the three modes
385: with a signal significance greater than 2$\sigma$ and is fixed otherwise.
386: Upper limits at the 90 \% confidence level are set on the branching fractions for the modes other than \bomrp.
387:
388: The maximum-likelihood fit also provides the value of \fL\ in \bomrp,
389: which is found to be $0.82\pm0.11$,
390: a high value expected for this tree-dominated mode.
391: This is illustrared in the projection plots of the helicity angle cosines
392: shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:hel_omega}.
393: The direct CP asymmetry is also measured and found to be compatible with 0.
394:
395: \section{Conclusion}
396: In summary, improved analyses
397: with explicit consideration of nonresonant backgrounds have been performed
398: on several charmless hadronic vector-vector decays of the $B$ meson.
399: The \bomrp, \brhopkz, and \brhozkz\ modes have been observed
400: and measured in the past few years.
401: Improved upper limits have been set on the branching fraction
402: of other vector-vector modes.
403:
404: The recent results on vector-vector modes have also brought
405: more pieces to the polarization puzzle.
406: The penguin-dominated \brhopkz\ and \brhozkz\ modes have
407: a fraction of longitudinal polarization of about 0.5 like $\phi K^*$,
408: while the tree-dominated \bomrp\ mode has one closer to 1 like $\rho \rho$.
409: As a lot of charmless vector-vector modes have not yet been observed,
410: new results can be expected with more data.
411:
412: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
413: \bibitem{bib:beneke}
414: M.~Beneke {\it et al.}, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 638}, 68 (2006).
415:
416: \bibitem{bib:somov}
417: A.~Somov, contribution to this conference.
418:
419: \bibitem{bib:chen}
420: K.F.~Chen, contribution to this conference.
421:
422: \bibitem{bib:hou}
423: G.W.S.~Hou, contribution to this conference.
424:
425: \bibitem{bib:belle}
426: J.~Zhang {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 95}, 141801 (2005).
427:
428: \bibitem{bib:babarrhoks}
429: B.~Aubert {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 97}, 201801 (2006).
430:
431: \bibitem{bib:babaromega}
432: B.~Aubert {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 74}, 051102 (2006).
433:
434: \bibitem{bib:oldomega}
435: B.~Aubert {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 71}, 031103 (2005).
436:
437: \end{thebibliography}
438:
439: \end{document}
440: