1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'ms.tex'
3: %%
4: %%
5: %% J.Setiawan et al.
6:
7: %% The command below calls the preprint style
8: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
9: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
10: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
11: %%
12: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
13:
14: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
15:
16: %%\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
17: %%\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
18:
19: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
20:
21: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
22:
23: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
24: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
25: %% use the longabstract style option.
26:
27: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
28:
29: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
30:
31: \slugcomment{}
32:
33: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
34: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
35: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
36: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
37: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
38: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
39:
40: \shorttitle{Planetary companion around a nearby young star}
41: \shortauthors{J. Setiawan et al.}
42:
43: \begin{document}
44:
45: \title{Evidence for a planetary companion around a nearby young star}
46:
47: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
48: %% author and affiliation information.
49: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
50: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
51: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
52: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
53:
54: \author{J. Setiawan, P. Weise, Th. Henning, R. Launhardt, A. M\"uller}
55: \affil{Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Astronomie, K\"onigstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany}
56: \email{setiawan@mpia-hd.mpg.de}
57:
58: \author{J. Rodmann}
59: \affil{(European Space Agency, ESTEC/SCI-SA, Keplerlaan 1, 2201 AZ Noordwijk, The Netherlands)}
60:
61: %% \and
62:
63: %% \author{Author 3}
64: %% \affil{Affiliation 3}
65:
66: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
67: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
68: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
69: %% affiliation.
70:
71: %% \altaffiltext{1}{Visiting Astronomer, Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory.
72: %% CTIO is operated by AURA, Inc.\ under contract to the National Science
73: %% Foundation.}
74: %% \altaffiltext{2}{Society of Fellows, Harvard University.}
75: %% \altaffiltext{3}{present address: Center for Astrophysics,
76: %% 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138}
77: %% \altaffiltext{4}{Visiting Programmer, Space Telescope Science Institute}
78: %% \altaffiltext{5}{Patron, Alonso's Bar and Grill}
79:
80: \begin{abstract}
81: We report evidence for a planetary companion around the nearby young star \mbox{HD 70573}.
82: The star is a G type dwarf located at a distance of 46 pc with age estimation between 20 and 300 Myrs.
83: We carried out spectroscopic observations of this star with FEROS at the 2.2~m MPG/ESO telescope at La Silla.
84: Our spectroscopic analysis yields a spectral type of G1-1.5V and an age of about 100 Myrs.
85: Variations in stellar radial velocity of \mbox{HD 70573} have been monitored since December 2003 until January 2007.
86: The velocity accuracy of FEROS within this period is about 10 m/s.
87: \mbox{HD 70573} shows a radial velocity variation with a period of 852($\pm$12) days and a semi-amplitude of 149($\pm$6) m/s.
88: The period of this variation is significantly longer than its rotational period,
89: which is 3.3 days. Based on the analysis of the Ca II K emission line, H$\alpha$ and $T_\mathrm{eff}$ variation as
90: stellar activity indicators as well as the lack of a correlation between the bisector velocity span and
91: the radial velocity, we can exclude the rotational modulation and non-radial pulsations as the source of
92: the long-period radial velocity variation.
93: Thus, the presence of a low-mass companion around the star provides the best explanation
94: for the observed radial velocity variation.
95: Assuming a primary mass $m_{1}= 1.0 \pm 0.1$ M$_{\mathrm{Sun}}$ for the host star,
96: we calculated a minimum mass of the companion $m_{2}\sin{i}$ of 6.1 M$_{\mathrm{Jup}}$,
97: which lies in the planetary mass regime, and an orbital semi-major axis of 1.76 AU.
98: The orbit of the planet has an eccentricity of $e= 0.4$.
99: The planet discovery around the young star \mbox{HD 70573} gives an important input for the study
100: of debris disks around young stars and their relation to the presence of planets.
101: \end{abstract}
102:
103: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
104: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
105: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
106: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
107:
108: \keywords{stars: general --- stars: individual: HD 70573 --- stars: planetary systems --- techniques: radial velocities}
109:
110: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
111: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
112: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
113: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
114: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
115: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
116: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
117: %% each reference.
118:
119:
120: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
121: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so by tagging
122: %% their objects with \objectname{} or \object{}. Each macro takes the
123: %% object name as its required argument. The optional, square-bracket
124: %% argument should be used in cases where the data center identification
125: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper. The text appearing
126: %% in curly braces is what will appear in print in the published paper.
127: %% If the object name is recognized by the data centers, it will be linked
128: %% in the electronic edition to the object data available at the data centers
129: %%
130: %% Note that for sources with brackets in their names, e.g. [WEG2004] 14h-090,
131: %% the brackets must be escaped with backslashes when used in the first
132: %% square-bracket argument, for instance, \object[\[WEG2004\] 14h-090]{90}).
133: %% Otherwise, LaTeX will issue an error.
134:
135: \section{Introduction}
136:
137: Precise radial velocity (RV) measurements are a well established technique
138: in detecting extrasolar planets around non-active stars,
139: like solar-type stars with similar masses and ages to our Sun (see e.g., Butler et al. 2006).
140: This technique has been also applied in the late 1980's for planet
141: searches around cool evolved stars (Cochran \& Hatzes 1989).
142: However, the number of extrasolar planets around such non solar-type stars
143: is still very small compared to planets around solar-like stars.
144: The situation for young stars is similar,
145: where practically no convincing case is known so far.
146: Planet detections around young and active stars are indeed much
147: more difficult than those around evolved and quiet solar-like stars.
148: % In particular, it still remains a challenge to find a relation between
149: % the presence of planets and other studies of young stars, like the
150: % existence of debris disks around young stars (Moro-Mart\'in et al. 2007).
151:
152: Many young stars possess high levels of stellar activity
153: and are also known as fast rotators. Spectroscopically this is indicated
154: by strong line broadening and the presence of emission line features,
155: in particular H$\alpha$ ($\lambda$6536 \AA), Ca II H ($\lambda$3967 \AA) and K ($\lambda$3934 \AA).
156: Within the same spectral class the stellar activity of young stars is considerably higher
157: than for older stars. The rotational velocity of F-, G- and K-type young stars can be as
158: high as a few hundreds km/s which can be observed by strong line broadening.
159: This makes precise RV measurements very difficult.
160: Intrinsic stellar activity, like non-radial pulsations and rotational modulation,
161: manifests itself in RV variation.
162: %In order to distinguish the sources of
163: %RV variation in active stars, the spectral line profiles have to
164: %be investigated carefully, for instance, via the bisector analysis
165: %(e.g., Hatzes~1996) to avoid a misinterpretation of the observed RV variation.
166: %This kind of analysis is indispensable for planet searches around active young stars.
167: %In addition to the stellar activity check via the bisector analysis, the Ca II H \& K emission
168: %can be used as proxies of magnetic activity which is related to the presence of
169: %starspots in the stellar chromosphere, which in turn can produce rotational modulation of the
170: %measured RV.
171: In order to distinguish the sources of RV variation in active stars, the stellar spectra have to
172: be investigated carefully, for instance, via the bisector analysis (e.g., Hatzes~1996)
173: and stellar activity indicators, like Ca II H \& K emission lines and variation in H$\alpha$ line, to avoid a misinterpretation of the observed RV variation.
174: This kind of analysis is indispensable for planet searches around active young stars.
175: %In addition to the stellar activity check via the bisector analysis, the Ca II H \& K emission
176: %can be used as proxies of magnetic activity which is related to the presence of
177: %starspots in the stellar chromosphere, which in turn can produce rotational modulation of the
178: %measured RV.
179:
180: The search for young planetary systems by the RV technique is indeed limited to
181: young stars which do not show a high activity level. Such a high stellar activity affects
182: the accuracy of the RV method, like in stars with high rotational velocity ($v\sin{i}>20$ km/s).
183: Nevertheless, in comparison to other young planet search methods,
184: like the direct imaging techniques, the RV method is more sensitive to
185: planetary companions with closer orbits, i.e., less than 10~AU to the parent stars.
186: A further advantage compared to direct imaging is, that the RV method is not strongly
187: limited by distance. It can be applied to planet searches in nearby young moving groups (30--70 pc)
188: and star-forming regions at $>$\,100\,pc (e.g., the Taurus-Auriga region at 140 pc),
189: for which direct imaging methods are not possible.
190:
191: This work reports the discovery of a planetary companion
192: around the nearby young star \mbox{HD 70573}.
193: Our RV measurements of \mbox{HD 70573} show a periodic variation on a time scale which is much longer than
194: the stellar rotational period.
195: This excludes rotational modulation as the source of RV variation.
196: We will show that the bisector technique allows us to distinguish
197: intrinsic stellar activity (non-radial pulsations or
198: stellar rotational modulation due to starspots) from variability due to
199: companions.
200: By measuring the bisector velocity spans we detected rotational modulation
201: in other young stars of our sample (Setiawan et al., in preparation).
202: The planet detection around \mbox{HD 70573} is concluded by the lack of the
203: correlation between the observed RVs and stellar activity indicators (Sect.~4).
204:
205: \section{HD 70573: A nearby young star}
206: \mbox{HD 70573} was identified by Jeffries (1995) as a Lithium rich star.
207: He predicted an age of this star to be substantially younger than 300 Myrs.
208: In a study of young stellar kinematic groups by Montes et al. (2001a), \mbox{HD 70573}
209: has been classified as a member of the Local Association (Pleiades moving group) with an age range between
210: 20 and 150 Myrs. Later, Lop\'ez-Santiago et al.~(2006) classified \mbox{HD 70573} as a member of the Hercules-Lyra association,
211: a group of stars comoving in space towards the constellation of Hercules.
212: This moving group has an estimated age of $\sim$200 Myrs.
213: By comparing the equivalent width of Li $\lambda$6708 \AA~ versus the spectral
214: type diagram (Fig.~2 in Montes et al. 2001b), we derived an age within the Pleiades age regime (78--125 Myrs).
215: % The determination of precise ages for young objects remains a challenge and a detailed discussion of this issue
216: % is beyond the scope of this paper.
217:
218: \begin{table}
219: \begin{center}
220: \caption{Stellar parameters of \mbox{HD 70573}.\label{tbl-1}}
221: \begin{tabular}{lll}
222: \tableline
223: \tableline
224: Spectral type & G1-1.5V & \\
225: $M_{V}$ & 0.4 & mag \\
226: distance & 45.7 & pc \\
227: $m$ & 1.0 $\pm$0.1 & M$_{\sun}$ \\
228: $T_{\mathrm{eff}}$ & 5737 $\pm$70 & K \\
229: $[Fe/H]$ & -0.18 $\pm$0.2 & [Fe/H]$_{\sun}$ \\
230: $\log{g}$ & 4.59 $\pm$0.1 & \\
231: $EW$(Li) & 156 $\pm$20 & m\AA \\
232: Age & 78--125 & Myrs \\
233: $v \sin{i}$ & 14.7 $\pm$1.0 & km/s \\
234: $P_{\mathrm{rot}}$ & 3.296 & days \\
235: \tableline
236: \tableline
237: \end{tabular}
238: %% Any table notes must follow the \end{tabular} command.
239: %% \tablenotetext{a}{Sample footnote for table~\ref{tbl-2} that was
240: %% generated with the \LaTeX\ table environment}
241: %% \tablenotetext{b}{Yet another sample footnote for table~\ref{tbl-2}}
242: %% \tablenotetext{c}{Another sample footnote for table~\ref{tbl-2}}
243: %% \tablecomments{We can also attach a long-ish paragraph of explanatory
244: %% material to a table.}
245: \end{center}
246: \end{table}
247:
248: The stellar parameters of \mbox{HD 70573} are compiled in Table~1.
249: We measured the equivalent widths (EW) of neutral and ionized lines as
250: described in Gray (1992). By comparing our EW measurements with the EWs of standard stars
251: adopted from Cayrel de Strobel (2001) and by using the relation between EWs and temperature
252: we derive the spectral type of G1-1.5V for \mbox{HD 70573}.
253: The stellar parameters $T_{\mathrm{eff}}$, [Fe/H], $\log{g}$ have been calculated
254: by using the TGV model (Takeda et al. 2002), which computes the stellar parameters from the EW
255: of FeI and Fe II.
256:
257: The absolute visual magnitude has been calculated from the visual brightness $m_{V}=8.70$ mag
258: and the distance $d=$ 45.7 pc (Lop\'ez-Santiago et al. 2006).
259: % We derived an effective temperature of T$_{\mathrm{eff}}=$\mbox{5737$\pm$63 K} and a metalicity of [Fe/H]=-0.18$\pm$0.1
260: % which are in good agreement with the values reported by Nordstr\"om et al.~(2004).
261: % The stellar mass, effective temperature and metalicity were taken from Nordstorm et al.~(2004)
262: Henry et al.~(2005) has measured photometric variations of \mbox{HD 70573} and found a
263: period of 3.296 days, which corresponds to the rotational period of the star.
264: We measured the projected rotational velocity $v \sin{i}$ from the spectral lines
265: by using a cross-correlation method (Benz \& Mayor~1981) with the instrumental
266: calibration from Setiawan et al.~(2004). Our measured value (see Table\,1) is slightly higher than the value published by
267: Henry et al.~(1995), who derived $v\sin{i}=11$ km/s.
268:
269: \section{Observations and results}
270:
271: We are carrying out a RV survey of a sample of young stars with
272: FEROS at the \mbox{2.2~m MPG/ESO} telescope located at ESO La Silla Observatory, Chile.
273: The spectrograph has a resolution of \mbox{$R=$ 48\,000} and a wavelength coverage of
274: 3600--9200 \AA~ (Kaufer \& Pasquini 1998).
275:
276: \begin{figure}[t]
277: \includegraphics[width=16.0cm, height=12.0cm]{f1.ps}
278: %\includegraphics[width=8.0cm, height=6.0cm]{f1.ps}
279: \caption{RV measurements of \mbox{HD 70573}. We observed a
280: long-period RV variation of 852 days and short-period variation
281: of few days (see text).}
282: \end{figure}
283:
284: The data reduction has been performed by using the online pipeline, which
285: produces 39 orders of one-dimensional spectra.
286: The RVs have been measured with the simultaneous calibration
287: mode of FEROS and a cross-correlation technique (Baranne et al.~1996).
288: During the period of three years we obtained a long-term stability of FEROS
289: that is about 10 m/s.
290:
291: RV measurements of \mbox{HD 70573} are shown in Fig.~1.
292: We observed a long-term RV variation with a period of 852$\pm$12 days,
293: which is much longer than the period of the photometric variability.
294: The semi-amplitude of the RV variation is 149$\pm$16 m/s.
295: A Lomb-Scargle periodogram (Scargle 1982) of the RVs show the highest peak in the power,
296: which corresponds to the long-period RV variation.
297: On a smaller time scale of several days we also detected short-term RV variations.
298: In the Lomb-Scargle periodogram we also found a lower peak in the power,
299: which corresponds to a period of $\sim$ 2.6 days. This is comparable to the
300: period in the photometric variation detected by Henry et al.~(1995).
301: The False Alarm Probability (FAP) of the peaks are $1.1 \times 10^{-3}$
302: for the long-period RV variation and $3.5 \times 10^{-2}$ for the short-period one.
303: Additional RV measurements, taken with interval of few hours in several consecutive days,
304: may increase the power in the frequency region that corresponds to the period of $\sim$3 days.
305:
306: \begin{figure}[t]
307: \includegraphics[width=16.0cm, height=12.0cm]{f2.ps}
308: %\includegraphics[width=8.0cm, height=6.0cm]{f2.ps}
309: \caption{Lomb-Scargle Periodogram of the RV variation of HD 70573}
310: \end{figure}
311:
312: \begin{figure}[t]
313: \includegraphics[width=16.0cm, height=12.0cm]{f3.ps}
314: %\includegraphics[width=8.0cm, height=6.0cm]{f3.ps}
315: \caption{Bisector velocity span vs. RV of HD~70573. The figure shows no
316: correlation between both quantities. This favors the presence of a low-mass companion
317: rather than stellar activity as the source of RV variation.}
318: \end{figure}
319: %% In this section, we use the \subsection command to set off
320: %% a subsection. \footnote is used to insert a footnote to the text.
321:
322: %% Observe the use of the LaTeX \label
323: %% command after the \subsection to give a symbolic KEY to the
324: %% subsection for cross-referencing in a \ref command.
325: %% You can use LaTeX's \ref and \label commands to keep track of
326: %% cross-references to sections, equations, tables, and figures.
327: %% That way, if you change the order of any elements, LaTeX will
328: %% automatically renumber them.
329:
330: %% This section also includes several of the displayed math environments
331: %% mentioned in the Author Guide.
332:
333: \section{Testing the stellar activity}
334:
335: As detected in many surveys, young stars show high stellar activity,
336: characterized by strong X-ray, H$\alpha$, Ca II H and K emission.
337: In addition, they are also known as fast rotators.
338: For example, large surveys of young stars in star-forming regions such as NGC 2264 (Lamm et al. 2004)
339: show that the objects are often fast rotators with periods between 0.2 and 15 days.
340: Stellar magnetic activity manifests itself by starspots and granulation, as observed in the Sun.
341: Pulsations have also been observed in young stars
342: (e.g., Marconi et al. 2000).
343:
344: To measure the stellar activity of \mbox{HD 70573} we investigated the variation of the
345: Ca II K emission line ($\lambda$3934~\AA~) and H$\alpha$.
346: We did not use of the Ca II H ($\lambda$3967~\AA)~ to avoid the blend which can be
347: caused by the H$\epsilon$ line of the Balmer series.
348: Similar to the method used by Santos et al.~(2000), we computed an activity index
349: by measuring the intensity of the Ca II K relative to the intensities of 2~\AA~ windows located
350: in the blue and red part of the spectra, which are close to the Ca II K region and do not
351: have strong absorption features. Our measurements do not show any long period variation which
352: might be correlated with the RV variation.
353: The relative rms of the $S$-index variation is 4.5\% of the mean value.
354: In addition, we also measured the equivalent width (EW) variation of the H$\alpha$ line and $T_\mathrm{eff}$ variation
355: by using the line-ratio technique (e.g., Catalano et al.~2002) to search for the stellar activity.
356: The EW measurements of the H$\alpha$ line give a value of 961$\pm$45 m\AA.
357: The rms of 45 m\AA~corresponds to 4.7\% variation in the EW, that is similar to the variation
358: observed in the Ca II K emission line.
359: We observed a short-term $T_\mathrm{eff}$ variation with a peak-to-peak value of $\sim$220 K
360: and a period of few days, which is close to the stellar rotational period.
361: This result means an approximately 4\% variation in $T_\mathrm{eff}$ (Table 1) and thus in good agreement
362: with other stellar activity indicators.
363: However, we did not find any long-term periodicity. The equivalent width variation of the H$\alpha$ line
364: also does not show any long period variation.
365:
366: The stellar activity will leave imprints on the spectral line profile.
367: Another possibility to characterize the stellar activity in the spectra
368: is by using the bisector or the bisector velocity span (Hatzes 1996),
369: which measures the asymmetry of the spectral line profile.
370: Equivalently, the bisector velocity span method can be applied
371: to the cross-correlation function used for the RV
372: computation (Queloz et al.~2001).
373: A correlation between bisector velocity spans and RVs should be expected,
374: if the activity is responsible for the RV variation.
375: In contrast to non-active solar-like stars, the bisector
376: velocity spans of active stars are not constant.
377: The scatter in the velocity spans may provide information about the activity level
378: of the star.
379:
380: \begin{table}[h]
381: \begin{center}
382: \caption{Orbital parameters of \mbox{HD 70573} b\label{tbl-2}}
383: \begin{tabular}{lll}
384: \tableline
385: \tableline
386: $P$ & 851.8 $\pm$ 11.6 & days \\
387: $K_{1}$ & 148.5 $\pm$ 16.5 & m/s \\
388: $e$ & 0.4 $\pm$ 0.1 & \\
389: $\omega$ & 269.6 $\pm$ 14.3 & deg \\
390: $JD_{0}-2450000$ & 2106.54 $\pm$ 25.72 & days \\
391: reduced $\chi^{2}$ & 1.34 & \\
392: $O-C$ & 18.7 & m/s\\
393: $m_{1}$ & 1.0 $\pm$ 0.1 & M$_{\sun}$ \\
394: $m_{2} sin{i}$ & 6.1 $\pm$ 0.4 & M$_{\mathrm{Jup}}$ \\
395: $a$ & 1.76 $\pm$ 0.05 & AU \\
396: \tableline
397: \tableline
398:
399: \end{tabular}
400: %% Any table notes must follow the \end{tabular} command.
401: %% \tablenotetext{a}{Sample footnote for table~\ref{tbl-2} that was
402: %% generated with the \LaTeX\ table environment}
403: %% \tablenotetext{b}{Yet another sample footnote for table~\ref{tbl-2}}
404: %% \tablenotetext{c}{Another sample footnote for table~\ref{tbl-2}}
405: %% \tablecomments{We can also attach a long-ish paragraph of explanatory
406: %% material to a table.}
407: \end{center}
408: \end{table}
409:
410: In \mbox{HD 70573} we found no correlation between the bisector velocity spans and
411: RVs (Fig.~3). Thus, based on the results of our analysis of the Ca II K emission lines,
412: H$\alpha$, temperature variation and bisector velocity spans as stellar activity indicators
413: we conclude that the observed long-period RV variation of \mbox{HD 70573}
414: is most likely due to the presence of a low-mass (substellar) companion.
415:
416: \section{Discussion}
417:
418: We computed an orbital solution for the RV data of \mbox{HD 70573}
419: by using a standard Keplerian fit with $\chi^{2}$ minimization.
420: The orbital parameters are listed in Table~2. \mbox{HD 70573 b} is probably
421: the youngest extrasolar planet detected so far with the RV technique (Fig.~4).
422:
423: \begin{figure}[h]
424: \includegraphics[width=16.0cm, height=12.0cm]{f4.ps}
425: %\includegraphics[width=8.0cm, height=6.0cm]{f4.ps}
426: \caption{A histogram of the ages of exoplanets as of November 2006. \mbox{HD 70573 b} is the youngest planet
427: detected so far by the RV method.}
428: \end{figure}
429:
430: Planet discoveries around young stars provide important constraints for theories
431: of planet formation. An example is the migration process of planets occurring in
432: the gas-rich phases of protoplanetary disks.
433: The detection of young planets will also allow us to study the relation
434: between extrasolar planets and the structure of debris disks (Moro-Mart\'in et al. 2006).
435: Since \mbox{HD 70573} is part of the young star sample of the SPITZER/FEPS legacy program
436: (Meyer et al. 2004), the detection of a planetary companion around this star is of great
437: interest for the study of the relation between debris disks and planets.
438: With a spectral type of G1-1.5V and an age of only 3--6 \% of the age of the Sun,
439: the planetary system around \mbox{HD 70573} could resemble the young Solar system.
440: % However, it already has a giant planet on a close-in orbit with a
441: % relatively high eccentricity.
442:
443: More planet discoveries around young stars will certainly improve our understanding
444: of planetary systems in their early evolutionary stages.
445: Since planet searches around young stars via the RV method are restricted
446: to the visual wavelength region and are strongly affected by stellar activity,
447: other detection techniques like, e.g., NIR direct imaging or astrometry,
448: are gaining importance and will most likely soon deliver more discoveries.
449: Astrometric measurements with a precision level of few tens of $\mu$as, for example,
450: will be able to detect the astrometric signal of the planet around \mbox{HD 70573},
451: which is $\sim$0.23 mas.
452:
453: Finally, with the detection of a planetary companion around the young star \mbox{HD 70573}
454: we have shown, that the RV technique is still potentially profitable for
455: the planet search programs.
456:
457: %% If you wish to include an acknowledgments section in your paper,
458: %% separate it off from the body of the text using the \acknowledgments
459: %% command.
460:
461: %% Included in this acknowledgments section are examples of the
462: %% AASTeX hypertext markup commands. Use \url without the optional [HREF]
463: %% argument when you want to print the url directly in the text. Otherwise,
464: %% use either \url or \anchor, with the HREF as the first argument and the
465: %% text to be printed in the second.
466:
467: \acknowledgments
468:
469: We thank the La Silla Observatory team for the assistance during
470: the observations at the 2.2~m MPG/ESO telescope.
471:
472: %% To help institutions obtain information on the effectiveness of their
473: %% telescopes, the AAS Journals has created a group of keywords for telescope
474: %% facilities. A common set of keywords will make these types of searches
475: %% significantly easier and more accurate. In addition, they will also be
476: %% useful in linking papers together which utilize the same telescopes
477: %% within the framework of the National Virtual Observatory.
478: %% See the AASTeX Web site at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX
479: %% for information on obtaining the facility keywords.
480:
481: %% After the acknowledgments section, use the following syntax and the
482: %% \facility{} macro to list the keywords of facilities used in the research
483: %% for the paper. Each keyword will be checked against the master list during
484: %% copy editing. Individual instruments or configurations can be provided
485: %% in parentheses, after the keyword, but they will not be verified.
486:
487: {\it Facilities:} \facility{FEROS}, \facility{2.2~m MPG/ESO}.
488:
489: %% Appendix material should be preceded with a single \appendix command.
490: %% There should be a \section command for each appendix. Mark appendix
491: %% subsections with the same markup you use in the main body of the paper.
492:
493: %% Each Appendix (indicated with \section) will be lettered A, B, C, etc.
494: %% The equation counter will reset when it encounters the \appendix
495: %% command and will number appendix equations (A1), (A2), etc.
496:
497: %% \appendix
498:
499:
500:
501: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.
502: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.
503: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of
504: %% curly braces. If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error
505: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".
506: %%
507: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite
508: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a
509: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds
510: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).
511: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the
512: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain
513: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in
514: %% place of the \cite commands.
515:
516: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.
517: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.
518: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.
519:
520: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly
521: %% different from previous examples. The natbib system solves a host
522: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly
523: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.
524: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.
525:
526: \begin{thebibliography}{}
527:
528: %% \bibitem[Djorgovski \& King(1984)]{djo84} Djorgovski, S.,
529: %% \& King, I. R. 1984, \apjl, 277, L49
530: \bibitem[Baranne (1996)]{bar96} Baranne, A., Queloz, D., Mayor, M., et al. 1996, A\&AS, 119, 373
531:
532: \bibitem[Benz \& Mayor (1981)]{ben81} Benz, W. \& Mayor, M. 1981, A\&A, 93, 235
533:
534: \bibitem[Butler et al. 2006]{but06} Butler, R. P., Wright, J. T., Marcy, G. W., et al. 2006, ApJ, 646, 505
535:
536: \bibitem[Catalano et al.(2002)]{cat02} Catalano, S., Biazzo, K., Frasca, A. et al. 2002, A\&A, 394, 1009
537:
538: \bibitem[Cayrel de Strobel et al.(2001)]{cay01} Cayrel de Strobel, G., Soubiran, C., \& Ralite, N. 2001, A\&A, 373, 159
539:
540: \bibitem[Cochran \& Hatzes (1989)]{cah89} Cochran, W. D. \& Hatzes, A. P. 1989, BAAS, 21, 114
541:
542: \bibitem[Gray (1992)]{gra92} Gray, D. F., 1992, The Observation and Analysis of Stellar Photosphere, Cambridge
543: University Press
544:
545: \bibitem[Hatzes (1996)]{hat96} Hatzes, A. P. 1996, PASP, 108, 839
546:
547: \bibitem[Henry et al. (1995)]{hen95} Henry, G. W., Fekel, F. C., \& Hall, D. S. 1995, AJ, 110, 2926
548:
549: \bibitem[Jeffries (1995)]{jef95} Jeffries, R. D. 1995, MNRAS, 273, 559
550:
551: \bibitem[Lamm (2004)]{lam04} Lamm, M., Mundt, R., Bailer-Jones, C. et al. 2004, A\&A, 417, 557
552:
553: \bibitem[Lop\'ez-Santiago et al.]{lop06} Lop\'ez-Santiago, J., Montes, D., Crespo-Chacon, L. \& Fernandez-Figueroa,
554: M.J. 2006, ApJ, 643, 1160
555:
556: \bibitem[Kaufer \& Pasquini 1998]{kau98} Kaufer, A., \& Pasquini, L. 1998, The Messenger, 95
557:
558: \bibitem[Marconi et al. 2000]{mar00} Marconi, M., Ripepi, V., Alcal\'a, J.M. et al. 2000, A\&A, 355, L35
559:
560: \bibitem[Meyer et al. 2004]{mey04} Meyer, M. R., Hillenbrandt, L. A., Bachman, D. E. et al. 2004, ApJS, 154,
561: 422
562:
563: \bibitem[Montes et al. (2001a)]{mon01a} Montes D., Lop\'ez-Santiago, J., Galvez, M. C. et al. 2001, MNRAS, 328, 45
564:
565: \bibitem[Montes et al. (2001b)]{mon01b} Montes D., Lop\'ez-Santiago, J., Fern\'andez-Figueroa, M. J. et al.
566: 2001, A\&A, 379, 976
567:
568: \bibitem[Moro-Martin et al. 2006]{mor07} Moro-Mart\'in, A., Carpenter, J. M., et al. 2006, Astro-ph/0612242
569:
570: %\bibitem[Neuh\"auser (2005)]{neu05} Neuh\"auser, R., G\"unther, E.W., Wuchterl, G. et al. 2005, A\&A, 435, 13
571:
572: %\bibitem[Nordstr\"om et al. (2004)]{nor04} Nordstr\"om, B., Mayor, M., Andersen, J. et al. 2004, A\&A, 418, 989
573:
574: \bibitem[Queloz et al. (2001)]{que05} Queloz, D., Henry, G. W., Sivan, J. P., et al. 2001, A\&A, 379, 279
575:
576: \bibitem[Santos et al. (2000)]{san00} Santos, N.C., Major, M., Naef, D. et al., 2000, A\&A, 361, 265
577:
578: \bibitem[Scargle J. D.]{sca82} Scargle, J. D. 1982, ApJ, 263, 835
579:
580: \bibitem[Setiawan et al. (2004)]{set04} Setiawan J., Pasquini, L., da Silva, L. et al., 2004, A\&A, 421, 241
581:
582: \bibitem[Takeda et al. (2002)]{tak02} Takeda, Y., Ohkubo, M. \& Sadakane, K. 2002, PASJ, 54, 451
583:
584: %\bibitem[Setiawan et al. (2005)]{set05} Setiawan J., von der L\"uhe, O. da Silva, L. et al., 2005, in 13th
585: %Cambridge Workshop ob Cool Stars "Stellar Systems and the Sun", ESA SP-560, 2005, 963
586:
587: %\bibitem[Weise et al. (2007)]{wei07} Weise, P., Setiawan, J. \& Henning, Th., in "Precision Spectroscopy in
588: %Astrophysics", held in in Aveiro, Portugal, 11-15 September 2006, in press.
589:
590: %\bibitem[Stock \& Stock]{sto99} Stock, J. \& Stock, J.M., 1999, RMxAA, 35, 143
591:
592: \end{thebibliography}
593:
594: \clearpage
595:
596: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
597: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
598: %% To embed the sample graphics in
599: %% the file, uncomment the \plotone, \plottwo, and
600: %% \includegraphics commands
601: %%
602: %% If you need a layout that cannot be achieved with \plotone or
603: %% \plottwo, you can invoke the graphicx package directly with the
604: %% \includegraphics command or use \plotfiddle. For more information,
605: %% please see the tutorial on "Using Electronic Art with AASTeX" in the
606: %% documentation section at the AASTeX Web site,
607: %% http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX.
608: %%
609: %% The examples below also include sample markup for submission of
610: %% supplemental electronic materials. As always, be sure to check
611: %% the instructions to authors for the journal you are submitting to
612: %% for specific submissions guidelines as they vary from
613: %% journal to journal.
614:
615: %% This example uses \plotone to include an EPS file scaled to
616: %% 80% of its natural size with \epsscale. Its caption
617: %% has been written to indicate that additional figure parts will be
618: %% available in the electronic journal.
619:
620: %% \begin{figure}
621: %% \epsscale{.80}
622: %% \plotone{scargle70573.ps}
623: %% \caption{Scargle periodogram of radial velocity measurements of HD 70573\label{fig1}}
624: %% \end{figure}
625:
626: \clearpage
627:
628: %% Here we use \plottwo to present two versions of the same figure,
629: %% one in black and white for print the other in RGB color
630: %% for online presentation. Note that the caption indicates
631: %% that a color version of the figure will be available online.
632: %%
633:
634: %% \begin{figure}
635: %% \plottwo{f2.eps}{f2_color.eps}
636: %% \caption{A panel taken from Figure 2 of \citet{rudnick03}.
637: %% See the electronic edition of the Journal for a color version
638: %% of this figure.\label{fig2}}
639: %% \end{figure}
640:
641: %% This figure uses \includegraphics to scale and rotate the still frame
642: %% for an mpeg animation.
643:
644: %% If you are not including electonic art with your submission, you may
645: %% mark up your captions using the \figcaption command. See the
646: %% User Guide for details.
647: %%
648: %% No more than seven \figcaption commands are allowed per page,
649: %% so if you have more than seven captions, insert a \clearpage
650: %% after every seventh one.
651:
652: %% Tables should be submitted one per page, so put a \clearpage before
653: %% each one.
654:
655: %% Two options are available to the author for producing tables: the
656: %% deluxetable environment provided by the AASTeX package or the LaTeX
657: %% table environment. Use of deluxetable is preferred.
658: %%
659:
660: %% Three table samples follow, two marked up in the deluxetable environment,
661: %% one marked up as a LaTeX table.
662:
663: %% In this first example, note that the \tabletypesize{}
664: %% command has been used to reduce the font size of the table.
665: %% We also use the \rotate command to rotate the table to
666: %% landscape orientation since it is very wide even at the
667: %% reduced font size.
668: %%
669: %% Note also that the \label command needs to be placed
670: %% inside the \tablecaption.
671:
672: %% This table also includes a table comment indicating that the full
673: %% version will be available in machine-readable format in the electronic
674: %% edition.
675:
676: %% \clearpage
677: %%
678: %% \begin{deluxetable}{ccrrrrrrrrcrl}
679: %% \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
680: %% \rotate
681: %% \tablecaption{Sample table taken from \citet{treu03}\label{tbl-1}}
682: %% \tablewidth{0pt}
683: %% \tablehead{
684: %% \colhead{POS} & \colhead{chip} & \colhead{ID} & \colhead{X} & \colhead{Y} &
685: %% \colhead{RA} & \colhead{DEC} & \colhead{IAU$\pm$ $\delta$ IAU} &
686: %% \colhead{IAP1$\pm$ $\delta$ IAP1} & \colhead{IAP2 $\pm$ $\delta$ IAP2} &
687: %% \colhead{star} & \colhead{E} & \colhead{Comment}
688: %% }
689: %% \startdata
690: %% 0 & 2 & 1 & 1370.99 & 57.35 & 6.651120 & 17.131149 & 21.344$\pm$0.006 & 2
691: %% 4.385$\pm$0.016 & 23.528$\pm$0.013 & 0.0 & 9 & - \\
692: %% 0 & 2 & 2 & 1476.62 & 8.03 & 6.651480 & 17.129572 & 21.641$\pm$0.005 & 2
693: %% 3.141$\pm$0.007 & 22.007$\pm$0.004 & 0.0 & 9 & - \\
694: %% 0 & 2 & 3 & 1079.62 & 28.92 & 6.652430 & 17.135000 & 23.953$\pm$0.030 & 2
695: %% 4.890$\pm$0.023 & 24.240$\pm$0.023 & 0.0 & - & - \\
696: %% 0 & 2 & 4 & 114.58 & 21.22 & 6.655560 & 17.148020 & 23.801$\pm$0.025 & 2
697: %% 5.039$\pm$0.026 & 24.112$\pm$0.021 & 0.0 & - & - \\
698: %% 0 & 2 & 5 & 46.78 & 19.46 & 6.655800 & 17.148932 & 23.012$\pm$0.012 & 2
699: %% 3.924$\pm$0.012 & 23.282$\pm$0.011 & 0.0 & - & - \\
700: %% 0 & 2 & 6 & 1441.84 & 16.16 & 6.651480 & 17.130072 & 24.393$\pm$0.045 & 2
701: %% 6.099$\pm$0.062 & 25.119$\pm$0.049 & 0.0 & - & - \\
702: %% 0 & 2 & 7 & 205.43 & 3.96 & 6.655520 & 17.146742 & 24.424$\pm$0.032 & 2
703: %% 5.028$\pm$0.025 & 24.597$\pm$0.027 & 0.0 & - & - \\
704: %% 0 & 2 & 8 & 1321.63 & 9.76 & 6.651950 & 17.131672 & 22.189$\pm$0.011 & 2
705: %% 4.743$\pm$0.021 & 23.298$\pm$0.011 & 0.0 & 4 & edge \\
706: %% \enddata
707: %% %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before
708: %% %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark
709: %% %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.
710: %% \tablecomments{Table \ref{tbl-1} is published in its entirety in the
711: %% electronic edition of the {\it Astrophysical Journal}. A portion is
712: %% shown here for guidance regarding its form and content.}
713: %% \tablenotetext{a}{Sample footnote for table~\ref{tbl-1} that was generated
714: %% with the deluxetable environment}
715: %% \tablenotetext{b}{Another sample footnote for table~\ref{tbl-1}}
716: %% \end{deluxetable}
717: %%
718: %% %% If you use the table environment, please indicate horizontal rules using
719: %% %% \tableline, not \hline.
720: %% %% Do not put multiple tabular environments within a single table.
721: %% %% The optional \label should appear inside the \caption command.
722: %%
723: %% \clearpage
724: %%
725: %%
726: %% If the table is more than one page long, the width of the table can vary
727: %% %% from page to page when the default \tablewidth is used, as below. The
728: %% %% individual table widths for each page will be written to the log file; a
729: %% %% maximum tablewidth for the table can be computed from these values.
730: %% %% The \tablewidth argument can then be reset and the file reprocessed, so
731: %% that the table is of uniform width throughout. Try getting the widths
732: %% %% from the log file and changing the \tablewidth parameter to see how
733: %% %% adjusting this value affects table formatting.
734: %%
735: %% %% The \dataset{} macro has also been applied to a few of the objects to
736: %% %% show how many observations can be tagged in a table.
737:
738:
739: %% \input{table}
740:
741: %% The following command ends your manuscript. LaTeX will ignore any text
742: %% that appears after it.
743:
744: \end{document}
745:
746: %%
747: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
748: