1: %
2: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3:
4: %\usepackage{epsfig}
5: \documentclass{emulateapj}
6:
7: \begin{document}
8:
9: \title{The Kilodegree Extremely Little Telescope (KELT): A Small Robotic
10: Telescope for Large-Area Synoptic Surveys}
11: \author
12: {Joshua Pepper\altaffilmark{1}, Richard W. Pogge\altaffilmark{1},
13: D.~L. DePoy\altaffilmark{1}, J.~L. Marshall\altaffilmark{1}, K.~Z. Stanek\altaffilmark{1},
14: Amelia M. Stutz\altaffilmark{2}, Shawn Poindexter\altaffilmark{1}, Robert
15: Siverd\altaffilmark{1}, Thomas P. O'Brien\altaffilmark{1},
16: Mark Trueblood\altaffilmark{3}, \& Patricia Trueblood\altaffilmark{3}}
17: \altaffiltext{1}{The Ohio State University Department of Astronomy,
18: 4055 McPherson Lab, 140 West 18th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210-1173}
19: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Astronomy, University of Arizona, 933 N. Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721-0065}
20: \altaffiltext{3}{Winer Observatory, P.\ O.\ Box 797, Sonoita, AZ 85637-0797 }
21: \email{pepper@astronomy.ohio-state.edu}
22:
23: \begin{abstract}
24: The Kilodegree Extremely Little Telescope (KELT) project is a survey for
25: planetary transits of bright stars. It consists of a small-aperture,
26: wide-field automated telescope located at Winer Observatory near
27: Sonoita, Arizona. The telescope surveys a set of 26\degr$\times$26\degr\
28: fields, together covering about 25\% of the Northern sky, targeting stars in the
29: range of $8<V<10$ mag, searching for transits by close-in Jupiters. This paper describes the system hardware and software
30: and discusses the quality of the observations. We show that KELT is able to
31: achieve the necessary photometric precision to detect planetary transits
32: around solar-type main sequence stars.
33: \end{abstract}
34: \keywords{Astronomical Instrumentation}
35:
36: \section{Introduction} \label{sec:intro}
37:
38: The scientific value of planetary transits of bright stars is well known -- for
39: a comprehensive review see \citet{char07}. These transits
40: provide the opportunity to study the internal structure of
41: planets \citep{g05}, their atmospheric composition \citep{char02}, spin-orbit
42: alignment \citep{gw07}, and the presence of rings or
43: moons \citep{bf04}. Radial-velocity (RV) surveys have searched the
44: brightest stars in the sky for planets and are probing increasingly
45: fainter stars. Even with significant multiplexing, however, RV surveys
46: are not able to search large numbers of stars fainter than $V\sim8$ mag. To
47: find planets around fainter stars, transit surveys are more suitable, and
48: a number of such surveys are underway. These surveys typically have wide
49: fields of view and small apertures to simultaneously monitor tens or
50: hundreds of thousands of stars. These surveys have so far
51: discovered six planets transiting bright stars
52: \citep{alonso04,bakos07,cam07,mc06,od06}. In
53: order to discover more such scientifically valuable systems, we have
54: begun a survey to discover transiting planets.
55:
56: The Kilodegree Extremely Little Telescope (KELT) is designed to meet the
57: objectives described in \citet{pep03} for a wide field, small-aperture
58: survey for planetary transits of bright stars. That paper derives a model
59: for the ability of a given transit survey to detect close-in giant planets (i.e. ``Hot Jupiters''), and determines
60: an optimal survey configuration for targeting $8<V<10$ mag main-sequence stars. Based on
61: the model of \citet{pep03}, we expect to detect roughly four transiting planets
62: with the KELT survey.
63:
64: The KELT system has two
65: different observing configurations. The
66: primary configuration is a ``Survey Mode'' designed for wide area
67: coverage, either in large strips or an all-sky survey, with the
68: goal of covering broad sections of the sky with a large field of
69: view, at a cadence of a few minutes
70: on a nightly basis throughout most of the observing year. This mode
71: implements the primary scientific driver of KELT and gives this telescope
72: a wider field of view and targets a brighter magnitude range than other
73: transit surveys of its kind. The second
74: configuration is a ``Campaign Mode'' that uses a smaller field of view
75: and is designed to conduct short duration intensive observing campaigns
76: on specific fields. In Campaign Mode we have undertaken a 74-day
77: campaign towards the Praesepe open cluster.
78:
79: In this paper, we describe the instrumentation, deployment, and operations of
80: KELT (\S \ref{sec:overview}); we characterize the performance of the different
81: components and the overall system in the field (\S \ref{sec:performance}); we
82: show how precise our photometry is (\S \ref{sec:relphot}); and we provide
83: examples of lightcurves for variable stars and transit-like
84: events (\S \ref{sec:lcurves}).
85:
86: \section{KELT System Overview} \label{sec:overview}
87:
88: \subsection{Instrument} \label{sec:instr}
89:
90: KELT consists of an optical assembly (CCD detector, medium-format camera
91: lens, and filter) mounted on a robotic telescope mount. A dedicated
92: computer is used to control the telescope, camera, observation
93: scheduling, and data archiving system tasks. One goal in assembling
94: KELT was to use as many off-the-shelf components and software packages
95: as possible to speed the development.
96:
97: The KELT detector is an Apogee
98: Instruments\footnote{http://www.ccd.com} AP16E thermoelectrically cooled
99: CCD camera. This camera uses the Kodak KAF-16801E front-side
100: illuminated CCD with $4096 \times 4096$ $9\mu$m pixels (36.88 $\times$
101: 36.88\,mm detector area) and has peak quantum efficiency of $\sim$65\% at
102: 600nm. The AP16E uses a PCI card and cable to control the camera and
103: thermoelectric cooler (TEC). According to the camera specifications and
104: confirmed by laboratory testing, the camera is operated at a conversion
105: gain of 3.6\,electrons/ADU and delivers a measured readout noise of
106: $\sim$15\,e$^-$. The device is read out at 14-bit resolution
107: at 1.3\,MHz, which gives a full-frame readout time of $\sim$30\,seconds. The
108: CCD specifications claim a full-well depth of $\sim$100,000\,e$^-$, but
109: the 14-bit ADC saturates at 16383 ADU ($\sim$59,000 e$^-$). The TEC can cool the
110: device to $\sim$30\degr\,C below the ambient air temperature. Nominal
111: dark current is $0.1-0.2$\,e$^{-}$\,pixel$^{-1}$\,sec$^{-1}$ at an
112: operating temperature of $-10$\degr\,C (typical for $20$\degr\,C ambient
113: air temperature).
114:
115: We use two different lenses with KELT. For the wide-angle survey mode,
116: we use a Mamiya 645 80\,mm f/1.9 medium-format manual-focus lens with a
117: 42\,mm aperture. This lens provides a roughly 23\arcsec\,pix$^{-1}$
118: image scale and a 26\degr$\times$26\degr\ field of view. To
119: provide a narrow-angle campaign mode, we use a Mamiya 645 200\,mm f/2.8
120: APO manual-focus telephoto lens with a 71\,mm aperture.
121: This provides a roughly 9\farcs5 pix$^{-1}$ image scale and effective
122: 10\fdg8$\times$10\fdg8 field of view. Both lenses
123: have some vignetting at the corners, and the image quality declines
124: toward the outer part of the field, so the effective field of view is
125: circular (see \S \ref{sec:datared} and \S \ref{sec:imqual} for details).
126:
127: To reject the mostly-blue background sky without greatly diminishing the
128: sensitivity to stars (which are mostly redder than the night sky), we
129: use a Kodak Wratten \#8 red-pass filter with a 50\% transmission point
130: at $\sim$490\,nm (the filter looks yellow to the eye), mounted in
131: front of the KELT lens. The calculated
132: response function of the KELT CCD and filter is shown in
133: Figure\,\,\ref{fig:bpass}. The transmission function for the Wratten \#8
134: filter is taken from the Kodak Photographic Filters Handbook
135: \citep{kodak98}, and the quantum efficiency curve for the Kodak
136: KAF-16801E CCD was provided by the Eastman Kodak Company. The
137: effect of atmospheric transmission on this bandpass is estimated for
138: 1.2 airmasses at the altitude of Winer Observatory (1515\,m) using the
139: Palomar monochromatic extinction coefficients \citep{hl75}, which are for an
140: altitude of 1700\,m. We did not estimate
141: in detail the atmospheric water vapor or O$_2$ extinction terms, as
142: these are not important for our application. The effective wavelength of
143: the combined Filter+CCD response function (excluding atmospheric effects)
144: is 691nm, with an effective width of 318nm, computed following the
145: definition of \citet{sch83}. This results in an effective bandpass that is
146: equivalent to a very broad R-band filter.
147:
148: The optical assembly (camera+lens+filter) is mounted on a Paramount ME
149: Robotic Telescope Mount manufactured by Software
150: Bisque\footnote{http://www.bisque.com}. The Paramount is a
151: research-grade German Equatorial Mount designed specifically for robotic
152: operation with integrated telescope and camera control. According to
153: manufacturer's ratings the periodic tracking error of the mount before
154: correction is $\pm5$\arcsec. That is smaller than the large pixels of
155: the KELT camera and therefore does not affect our observations. The mount
156: can carry an instrument
157: payload of up to 75\,kg, more than sufficient for the KELT camera, which
158: weighs approximately 9\,kg. The
159: Paramount is installed on a stock 91\,cm high steel pier using a stock
160: base adapter plate. The Paramount provides us with a robust, complete
161: mounting solution for our telescope. The optical assembly is mated to
162: the Paramount using a custom mounting bracket that mounts directly on
163: the Paramount's Versa-Plate mounting surface.
164:
165: The CCD camera and mount are controlled by a PC computer located at the
166: observing site that runs the Windows XP Professional operating system
167: and the Bisque Observatory Software Suite from Software Bisque. There
168: are three main applications that we use for KELT: {\tt TheSky} to
169: operate the Paramount ME (pointing and tracking); {\tt CCDSoft} CCD
170: camera control software to operate the AP16E camera; and {\tt Orchestrate}
171: scripting and automation software to integrate the operation of {\tt
172: TheSky} and {\tt CCDSoft}. {\tt Orchestrate} provides a simple
173: scripting interface that lets us control all aspects of a night's
174: observing with a single command script. This software lets us prepare
175: an entire night's observing schedule and upload it to the KELT control
176: computer during the afternoon. A scheduled task on the computer starts up
177: the system at sunset and loads the observing script into {\tt
178: Orchestrate}, after which the system runs unattended for the entire
179: night, weather permitting.
180:
181: The observing site provides AC power and Internet connectivity. To
182: ensure clean AC power for the KELT telescope and control computer at the
183: observing site (\S\ref{sec:site}) we use a 1500VA Powerware 9125
184: Uninterruptable Power Supply (UPS). This filters the line power and
185: protects the system against surges or brief power outages. The control
186: computer is connected to the Internet through the observing site's
187: gateway, and its internal clock is synchronized with the network time
188: servers at the Kitt Peak National Observatory using the {\tt Dimension
189: 4} network time protocol (NTP) client\footnote{v5.0 from Thinking Man Software
190: (www.thinkman.com/dimension4/)}.
191: This ensures sufficiently accurate timing for telescope pointing and
192: time-series photometry. Since we observe at few-minute cadences, we can
193: tolerate few-second timing precision, which is easily within the typical
194: performance of {\tt Dimension 4} on the available T1 connection.
195:
196: \subsection{Observatory Site} \label{sec:site}
197:
198: The KELT telescope has been installed at the Irvin M. Winer Memorial
199: Mobile Observatory\footnote{http://www.winer.org} near Sonoita, Arizona.
200: Located at N 31\degr39\arcmin53\arcsec, W 110\degr36\arcmin03\arcsec, approximately
201: 50 miles southeast of Tucson at an elevation of 4970\,feet
202: (1515\,meters), Winer Observatory has a dedicated observing
203: building with a 25$\times$50-foot (7.6$\times$15-meter) roll-off enclosure and provides site
204: and maintenance services. Winer currently hosts four robotic
205: telescopes, including KELT. The KELT
206: telescope pier is bolted to the concrete floor, and its control cables
207: are run into a nearby telescope control room that houses the control
208: computer and UPS. Winer also provides Internet access (currently via a dedicated
209: DS/T1 line, but early in the project the site used a slower ISDN link), that allows
210: us to remotely login to the control computer via a secure gateway.
211:
212: The weather conditions at Winer Observatory are roughly as good as comparable
213: sites in southern Arizona; about $60\%$ of all observing time is usable,
214: with half of that time being measurably photometric. Since our PSFs are
215: between 2 and 3 pixels, and the pixel scales are 9\farcs5 and 23\arcsec \,(for
216: the 200\,mm and 80\,mm lenses, respectively), atmospheric seeing variations
217: (which are on the scale of arcseconds) are not a factor in our observations.
218:
219: \subsection{Observing Operations}\label{sec:operations}
220:
221: Observations with KELT are carried out each non-clouded night using command
222: scripts for pre-programmed, robotic operation; we do not undertake any
223: remote real-time operations. The nightly observing scripts are created at Ohio State
224: University (OSU) using a script-generation program written in Perl, and then uploaded to
225: Winer Observatory where they are used by {\tt Orchestrate} to direct the
226: telescope to observe the specified fields for each night. Each night has a
227: different script, and we generally upload scripts in 3-4 week batches
228: during the main survey season, or more frequently during pointed-target
229: campaigns.
230:
231: The suite of software programs we use to control the telescope mount and
232: camera works well, but has several limitations. Most
233: importantly, the {\tt Orchestrate} scripting package does not provide
234: the built-in ability to program control loops or conditional branching, which is
235: why we use a Perl program to create the {\tt Orchestrate} scripts we
236: upload to the control computer.
237:
238: The scripts start the telescope each night based on the
239: local clock time. On nights when the weather is judged to be good
240: enough for observing, the observatory control computer automatically opens the roof of the
241: observatory at nautical (12\degr) twilight and the telescope begins observations on schedule.
242: If the weather is not suitable for observing, on-site personnel
243: abort the command script. If the weather appears good at first but degrades during
244: the night, the observatory computer closes the roof and the personnel abort the script. All
245: data acquired are archived automatically at the
246: end of the night.
247:
248: When the script is loaded into {\tt Orchestrate}, it first waits until
249: one hour before astronomical (18\degr) twilight. At that point the telescope takes
250: five dark images and five bias images, with the exposure times for the
251: dark frames the same as the exposure times of the observations for the night.
252: Once these calibration data are taken, the telescope goes back to sleep
253: until astronomical twilight, at which point it slews to the first target
254: field and begins the nightly observing sequence. Unless the weather turns bad,
255: prompting the roof to close, observations continue until astronomical dawn. At this
256: time the telescope is slewed to its stowed position, and five dark
257: images and five bias images are acquired, ending observing for the
258: night. (See \S \ref{sec:datared} for a discussion of KELT flatfields.)
259:
260: We have so far used KELT in two distinct operating modes: campaign
261: mode, using the 200\,mm lens, and survey mode, using the 80\,mm
262: lens. In campaign mode, the telescope intensively observes
263: a single target field for an entire night. In survey mode, the telescope
264: observes a number of fields that are equally spaced around the sky at
265: 2$^h$ intervals of Right Ascension centered
266: on Declination +31\degr 39\arcmin\, (the latitude of Winer).
267:
268: In campaign mode, the observing script instructs the telescope to wait
269: until the target field is above 2 airmasses, and to then observe the
270: field continuously until it sinks below 2 airmasses or astronomical
271: dawn, whichever happens first. In survey mode, the telescope begins
272: observing after astronomical twilight, tiling between two fields at a
273: time. New fields are observed as they rise above 1.4 airmasses.
274: Provisions for Moon avoidance are built into the scripts to prevent
275: observations of any survey field when it is within 45\degr\ (two field
276: widths from field center) of the Moon.
277:
278: An operational complication arises because the KELT mount is a German
279: Equatorial design. This means that fields observed East of the Meridian
280: are rotated by 180\degr\ relative to fields observed West of the
281: Meridian. The practical effect is that we
282: must separately reduce photometry for fields taken in East and West
283: orientations, especially when we use difference-imaging photometry. To
284: avoid the complication of creating two separate data pipelines to reduce
285: data taken in survey mode, we instead observe only fields in the Eastern
286: part of the sky. We lose some observation time due to periods when
287: the Moon is within 45\degr\ of all fields in the East
288: above 1.4 airmasses, leading to downtime when no field is available that
289: meets the observing criteria. In those situations, the scripts instruct
290: the telescope to pause observing until the next field becomes available.
291: Overall, the loss to Moon avoidance reduces the total amount of data acquired by
292: $\sim$10\%.
293:
294: \subsection{Data Handling and Archiving}\label{sec:datahandle}
295:
296: Data acquired by the camera are immediately written to a hard drive in
297: the control computer, logged, and then copied to one of two 250\,GB
298: external hard drives attached to the control computer by a USB
299: interface. At the end of the night, all new images are automatically
300: duplicated onto the other external hard drive. During long
301: winter nights, the telescope can take as many as 500-600 images per
302: night, depending on the exposure time, filling the drives every two
303: weeks. Normally, however, bad
304: weather and downtime due to Moon avoidance reduce the actual observing
305: rate, so it typically takes 3-4 weeks for both storage drives to reach
306: capacity.
307:
308: Data quality is monitored daily using automated scripts running on the
309: Windows observing computer at Winer. At the end of the night, a Perl
310: script selects three images from the beginning, middle, and end of the
311: night and uploads them to a computer at OSU. These sample images are
312: analyzed for basic statistics: mean, median, and modal sky value and the
313: mean FWHM of stars measured across the images, and then visually
314: inspected to ensure that the camera and mount are operating correctly.
315:
316: When the external drives approach full capacity, they are disconnected
317: from the computer. One of the drives is a hardened
318: drive made by Olixir Technologies (their Mobile DataVault) that serves
319: as the transport drive. This drive is shipped via FedEx to the OSU
320: Astronomy Department in Columbus, Ohio, in a cushioned transport
321: box, as bandwidth limitations at Winer Observatory preclude online data transfer. The
322: second drive is a conventional external USB drive without special
323: mobile packaging made by Maxtor Corporation which serves as the backup
324: drive and which is stored at Winer Observatory. Until the transport
325: drive arrives at OSU and its data have been successfully copied and
326: verified, the backup drive at Winer is stored and left idle. In
327: the event a transport drive arrives damaged, data from the backup drive
328: will be copied to another transport drive and shipped. In the meantime,
329: the removed drives are replaced with two others of each type and operations
330: continue. At any given time, we have four external disk drives in use:
331: two drives in operation, one in transit, and one stored as a backup. For
332: transferring hundreds of gigabytes of images every few weeks
333: during the prime observing season, this procedure has proven to be very
334: reliable and efficient. To date, out of dozens of drive shipments, we
335: have lost only two drives to damage
336: in transit, with no loss of data (both arrived damaged at Winer after
337: their data were retrieved and copied at OSU).
338:
339: When a transport drive arrives at OSU, the drive is connected to our main
340: data storage computer and all of the images are copied and run though a
341: series of data quality checks. The image files are renamed, replacing
342: the cumbersome default file name created by the {\tt CCDSoft}
343: application with a name indicating the field observed, the UTC date, and
344: an image number. The images are then analyzed to measure image quality
345: (modal sky and mean FWHM). If the modal sky value is above 800 ADU (due
346: to moonlight, cloud cover, or other ambient light sources), the image is
347: discarded. The cutoff at 800 ADU was determined using two months of
348: representative data showing that images compromised by excessive light
349: contamination consistently had sky values above that level and were
350: unsuitable for photometry. The cutoff is high, with many poor images
351: well below the cutoff, but we choose to be conservative about eliminating
352: images early in the reduction process. The images that pass the initial
353: filter on sky values, and the trimmed sections of the bad images, are
354: stored on a multi-terabyte RAID storage array at OSU, providing data
355: redundancy and fast access for data reduction and analysis.
356:
357: \subsection{Data Reduction}\label{sec:datared}
358:
359: Here we describe the data reduction process in brief, for the purposes
360: of evaluating the performance of the KELT camera. Detailed
361: descriptions of the reduction process will be included in an upcoming paper on the
362: scientific results of KELT observing campaigns (J. Pepper, in preparation).
363:
364: The data reduction pipeline consists of three steps. First, we
365: process the images by subtracting dark frames and dividing by a flatfield. Second, we
366: identify all the stars in the field and determine their instrumental
367: magnitudes. Third, we obtain the photometry on all images using
368: difference image analysis.
369:
370: Dark images are created for each night by median-combining 10 dark
371: images -- five from the beginning and end of each
372: night. In early testing we determined that we can treat our dark frames
373: as combined dark+bias. We take bias frames separately to monitor their
374: stability, but do not incorporate them into the reduction process because
375: the bias has been extremely stable. In
376: cases where dark frames were not taken or
377: there were problems with the images, we use good dark frames from nights
378: bracketing the observations to create a substitute dark frame. We confirmed
379: that using dark images from nearby nights did not significantly affect the statistics
380: of the subtracted images -- our dark images are quite stable from night to night.
381:
382: The KELT system is challenging to accurately flatfield. For the 200\,mm lens
383: there is a combined decrease in flux of $\sim$18\% between the center of the
384: image and the edges, and a decrease of up to $\sim$26\% between the center and
385: the corners. For the 80\,mm lens, the decrease is $\sim$23\% from
386: the center to the edge, and $\sim$35\% from the center to the corners. Because
387: of the large KELT field of view (10\fdg8 and 26\degr\ for the 200\,mm
388: and 80\,mm lenses, respectively), twilight flats are not useful for flatfielding
389: since the twilight sky is not uniform on those scales. Dome flats using a
390: diffuse screen produced reasonable results with high signal-to-noise
391: ratio. The flats are sufficiently repeatable that we do not need to regularly
392: take dome flats. For relative photometry, the dome flats work adequately, and
393: we are able to absolutely flatfield our images to $\sim 5\%$ accuracy.
394:
395: Once images have been dark-subtracted and flatfielded, we can then
396: create catalogs of images and measure the brightnesses of stars on the
397: images. This photometric analysis is done in two basic steps. The
398: first is to create a high-quality reference image for a field by
399: combining a few dozen of the best images and then use the
400: DAOPHOT software package \citep{stet87} to identify all of the stars in
401: the field down to a faint magnitude limit and measure their
402: approximate instrumental magnitudes. See \S\ref{sec:relcalib} for the
403: details on how the instrumental magnitudes are calibrated to standard photometry.
404:
405: Once a template and DAOPHOT star catalog with baseline instrumental
406: magnitudes have been created, the second step is to process the images
407: with the ISIS image subtraction package \citep{al98,alard00}. Our reduction
408: process is similar to that of \citet{hart04}. The ISIS
409: package first spatially registers all of the images to align them with
410: the reference image. The reference image is convolved with a kernel for
411: each image and subtracted, creating a difference image. The flux for
412: each star identified on the reference image is then measured on each
413: subtracted image using PSF-fitting photometry. Image
414: subtraction has been shown in limited tests to
415: be equal to or better than other photometric methods for the purposes of
416: transit searches \citep{bak06}. In section \S \ref{sec:relphot} below, we
417: provide additional information about the reduction process to obtain relative
418: photometry.
419:
420: \section{Instrument Performance}\label{sec:performance}
421:
422: In this section we quantify the performance of the KELT system by assessing in turn the
423: telescope mount, the astrometric quality (geometric image quality), the
424: image quality (position-dependent PSF), and photometric sensitivity.
425:
426: \subsection{Telescope Performance}\label{sec:mount}
427:
428: Since the telescope was installed at Winer in October 2004, the hardware
429: has performed up to specifications. There have been no significant
430: problems with the mount or the control software. The pointing has not
431: been perfect: our fields are so large
432: that minor pointing errors do not significantly affect our scientific
433: results, but during normal operations the typical intra-night drift is
434: $\sim$25\arcmin\ in Declination and $\sim$9\arcmin\ in Right Ascension.
435: We believe the drift is due to a slight non-perpendicularity between the
436: orientation of the camera and the axis of the mount. While the magnitude of
437: the drift seems large, it represents a movement of $\sim$65 pixels, less
438: than 2\% of the size of the field. It does not cause stars to move across
439: large portions of the detector, and therefore does not lead to significant
440: changes in the PSFs of individual stars. Since our reduction method utilizes
441: image subtraction, we do lose the ability to take good photometry at the edges
442: of a field. However, because of PSF distortions and other
443: effects (see \S \ref{sec:imqual}), we already have degraded sensitivity in
444: those regions. Therefore the loss of coverage and sensitivity due to drift
445: is quite small. Future alignment of the telescope will attempt to reduce or
446: eliminate the drift.
447:
448: \subsection{Astrometric Performance}\label{sec:astrometry}
449:
450: Measurements of the positions of stars from the Tycho-2 Catalog
451: \citep{hog00} are used to determine the conversion between pixel
452: coordinates and celestial coordinates on the KELT images. We use the
453: {\tt Astrometrix}\footnote{\url{http://www.na.astro.it/$\sim$radovich/wifix.htm}}
454: package to compute polynomial astrometric solutions for our images
455: following the procedure described by \citet{cg02}. To avoid stars that
456: are saturated on the KELT images, we consider Tycho-2 stars with
457: magnitudes $9.0 \leq V_{Tyc} \leq 10.0$. From these we select up to
458: 1000 stars per image. A first attempt to
459: compute a global astrometric solution for the entire 4096$\times$4096
460: image produced large residuals for most of the outer parts of the
461: detector, with discrepancies between the predicted and actual positions of
462: Tycho-2 stars of many tens of pixels. Since our primary goal
463: is to convert pixel coordinates
464: into celestial coordinates on a star-by-star basis, a global solution is
465: not required. We instead divide the image into 25 subimages on a
466: 5$\times$5 grid and perform a separate astrometric solution for each
467: subimage. A third-order polynomial astrometric fit is computed for
468: each subimage using {\tt Astrometrix}. The individual subimage fits
469: give much better results, with offsets between predicted and measured
470: positions of catalog stars at the subpixel level except at the extreme
471: corners of the field. The subframes overlap by a few tens of pixels, and
472: fits to stars common to adjacent subimages are consistent at the
473: arcsecond level. For the 200\,mm lens, the typical RMS residuals are
474: $\pm$0\farcs8, or $<10\%$ of the average pixel size of
475: $\sim$9\farcs5. The 80\,mm lens has slightly worse RMS
476: residuals, $\pm5$\arcsec or $\sim$20\% of a pixel size of
477: 22\arcsec, but still well within tolerances for our
478: purposes.
479:
480: Having a good astrometric fit to the images permits a quantitative
481: assessment of the geometric performance of the KELT optics; specifically,
482: variation in pixel size and shape across the field. Since this is
483: a commercial lens with proprietary optical designs, there is no way to
484: determine these propoerties a priori. This analysis will therefore be useful
485: for anyone contemplating using ssimilar systems, and has implicatons for
486: the potential use of theis setup - for example, such a camera/lens
487: combination cannot be used to construct large-scale image mosaics.
488: Furthermore, while sky subtraction deals with this effect, flatfielding does not.
489:
490: For the 200\,mm lens, the effective pixel size decreases by about 1\% from
491: center-to-edge from 9\farcs537 near the center to
492: 9\farcs450 at the edges of the field
493: ($\sim$9\farcs40 at the corners). Contours of constant
494: effective pixel scale are circular and centered on the intersection of
495: the optical axis of the 200\,mm camera lens and the CCD detector, as
496: shown in Figure\,\,\ref{fig:pscale200}. The square CCD pixels do not
497: perfectly project onto squares on the sky, but slowly distort
498: systematically away from the center, showing the characteristic
499: signature of $\sim$0.5\% pincushion distortion, expected for the
500: manufacturer's typical claims for their telephoto lenses. As
501: Figure\,\,\ref{fig:pscale80} shows, for the
502: 80\,mm lens the effective pixel size decreases by about 3.5\% from
503: center-to-edge, from 23\farcs19 near the center to
504: 22\farcs40 at the edges of the field (and
505: $\sim$21\farcs8 at the corners). This effect is larger than the one
506: seen with the 200\,mm lens, consistent with $\sim$2\% pincushion
507: distortion in this lens, typical of short focal-length wider-angle
508: lenses. Contours of constant effective pixel scale are also circular
509: and centered on the CCD detector.
510:
511: The effect of the optical distortion is that pixels project onto smaller
512: effective areas on the sky moving radially outward from the center
513: of the CCD, making the sky appear non-flat (center-to-edge) at the
514: $\sim$1.5\% level for the 200\,mm lens and at the $\sim$6\% level for
515: the 80\,mm lens. There are two effects that act together to decrease the background sky
516: level per pixel as you go radially outward from the center of the image:
517: the decreasing pixel scale, and hence decreasing pixel
518: area on the sky, with radius, and increasing vignetting with
519: radius.
520:
521: \subsection{Image Quality}\label{sec:imqual}
522:
523: As expected for such an optically fast system, the image PSF varies
524: systematically as a function of position. The
525: small physical pixel size ($9\mu$m)
526: implies that the lens optics dominate the PSF, and we are insensitive to changes in
527: atmospheric seeing. For both lenses, the systematic patterns in both the image
528: full-width at half maximum (FWHM) and more refined measures of image
529: quality (i.e. the 80\% encircled energy diameter $D_{80}$) can be used
530: to quantitatively assess the position-dependent image quality.
531:
532: For the 200\,mm lens, typical image PSFs have FWHM of
533: $\sim$1.8--2.9\,pixels, and 80\% encircled energy diameters of
534: $D_{80}$\,=\,4.7-9\,pixels. The 80\,mm lens has a similar range of FWHM for
535: stellar image PSFs, and the 80\% encircled energy diameters range from
536: $D_{80}$\,=\,6-10\,pixels. There are significant changes in the
537: detailed PSF shape across each image from the center to the extreme edges of
538: the detector. Figure\,\,\ref{fig:200mmpsf} shows representative stellar
539: PSFs for a 5$\times$5 grid across the CCD for the 200\,mm lens. The 80\,mm lens shows more
540: pronounced distortions, as shown in Figure\,\,\ref{fig:80mmpsf}. Therefore,
541: the 80\,mm lens has a roughly $24^{\circ}$ diameter effective field of view
542: with reasonably good images and little vignetting, whereas the 200\,mm
543: lens works well over most of the CCD detector except at the extreme
544: corners.
545:
546: Figures\,\,\ref{fig:fwhm200} and\,\,\ref{fig:fwhm80} show maps of the
547: image FWHM as a function of position for the 200\,mm and 80\,mm lenses,
548: respectively, derived from measurements of unsaturated, bright field
549: stars in representative images. The most obvious
550: feature in both is the strong vertical trend in increasing FWHM, with
551: nearly no differences horizontally. Because this is seen with both
552: lenses, which are of very different design, we believe this is because
553: the CCD is tilted relative to the optical axis. Because the lens
554: designs are proprietary, we do not know precisely how much the detector
555: is tilted, nor the origin of the tilt at present. This effect could be due to how the
556: detector is mounted inside the camera, or to the camera/lens mounting
557: plate. This apparent field tilt also affects the maps of the 80\%
558: encircled-energy diameter $D_{80}$, shown in Figures\,\,\ref{fig:ee200} and
559: \,\ref{fig:ee80}.
560:
561: The 80\,mm lens has very stable imaging performance over time. The FWHM
562: and $D_{80}$ maps derived for images of the same field over a 11-month
563: period show no significant changes. We have, however,
564: periodically adjusted the focus when working with the telescope, which
565: my cause some discontinuities in the data for the survey images. We
566: will explore such effects in upcoming papers.
567:
568: Unfortunately, the PSF is not stable across the image over time for
569: the 200\,mm lens. While intranight variations in the
570: FWHM maps are quite small, there are significant changes from
571: night to night that have no apparent correlation with hour angle,
572: CCD temperature, or any other physical or environmental parameter for which
573: we have measurements. The effect of the changes we see is for the
574: region of best FWHM (the base of the trough seen in the FWHM map in
575: Figure\,\,\ref{fig:fwhm200}) to move vertically on the CCD by many
576: hundreds of pixels. We do not yet know the cause. The main effect
577: is to complicate the difference-imaging reductions of the data. We will
578: discuss these complications and their mitigation in the subsequent paper
579: describing our results for the 200\,mm lens Praesepe cluster observing
580: campaign.
581:
582: \subsection{Photometric Sensitivity}\label{sec:abcalib}
583:
584: Given the nature of the KELT bandpass (see Figure\,\,\ref{fig:bpass}), we
585: calibrate our instrumental magnitudes to the $R$ band. We do so by rescaling
586: our instrumental magnitudes by a constant, such that
587: \begin{equation} \label{equ:pcalib1}
588: R_K \equiv -2.5\,{\rm log(ADU/sec)} + R_{K,0}\,
589: \end{equation}
590: where the instrumental ADU/sec
591: is measured using aperture photometry with IRAF, $R_K$ is defined as an approximate
592: KELT $R$ magnitude, and $R_{K,0}$ is the zero-point. We find that the $R_K$ magnitudes
593: are within a few tenths of a magnitude of
594: standard $R$ band photometry, with the uncertainty dominated by the color
595: term. Since we do not have $V-I$ colors for all our stars, we quote
596: observed magnitudes in $R_K$, which can be considered equivalent to Johnson $R$,
597: modulo a color term defined by
598: \begin{equation} \label{equ:pcalib2}
599: V = R_K + C_{VI}(V-I)
600: \end{equation}
601: where $C_{VI}$ is the $(V-I)$ color coefficient, and $V/I$ are in the
602: Johnson/Cousins system. Since we do not have previously measured $R$ magnitudes
603: of large numbers of stars in our fields in our magnitude range, we relate $R_K$ to
604: known magnitudes by matching stars from our observations to the Hipparcos
605: catalog, selecting only stars with measured $V$ and $I$ colors in Hipparcos. We take
606: the mean instrumental magnitude from a set of high-quality images, and match
607: the known magnitudes to the mean instrumental magnitudes, using
608: Equations \ref{equ:pcalib1} and \ref{equ:pcalib2}.
609:
610: For the cluster observations with the 200\,mm lens, we select 22 calibration
611: stars, and measure their instrumental magnitudes on 76 high-quality images,
612: resulting in a magnitude zero-point of $R_{K,0} = 16.38\pm0.06$ mag,
613: and $C_{VI}=0.55\pm0.2$. For the survey observations with the 80\,mm lens, we use 59
614: stars on 77 images, resulting in a magnitude zero-point
615: of $R_{K,0} = 15.15\pm0.07$ mag, and $C_{VI}=0.5\pm0.3$. Since the Hipparcos
616: stars we use to calibrate our data have $(V-I)$ colors mostly between 0 and 1, we
617: expect our calibrations to be less accurate for redder stars. These measured
618: zero-point uncertainties suggest that the flatfield corrections are good to
619: within $\sim5\%$ in absolute accuracy.
620:
621: Tying together the full calibration process, we find that a fiducial $R = 10$ mag
622: star at the field center with $(V-I) = 0$ has a
623: flux of 356 counts per second with the 200\,mm lens,
624: and 115 counts per second with the 80\,mm lens. Scaling those numbers by the
625: different aperture sizes of the lenses (71\,mm aperture for the 200\,mm lens and
626: 42\,mm aperture for the 80\,mm lens), we find that the 200\,mm lens is about 8\% more
627: efficient than the 80\,mm lens.
628:
629: \section{Relative Photometry}\label{sec:relphot}
630:
631: KELT was designed primarily for precision time-series relative
632: photometry (see \citet{eh01} for background). The crucial test for our instrument
633: is the ability to obtain long-term lightcurves with low noise and minimal
634: systematics. A simple test of KELT's photometric performance is to
635: examine the root-mean-squared (RMS) of the magnitudes of an ensemble of
636: lightcurves as a function of magnitude. We apply the ISIS image
637: subtraction package to samples of our data to obtain relative
638: photometry, and measure the statistics of the resulting lightcurves. Our
639: criteria for the ability to detect planetary transits is the presence
640: of substantial numbers of stars for which the RMS of the lightcurves are
641: below the 2\% and 1\% levels.
642:
643: \subsection{Difference Imaging Performance}\label{sec:relcalib}
644:
645: The instrumental magnitudes for the KELT lightcurves are produced through
646: a combination of ISIS and DAOPHOT photometry. This process involves
647: some careful conversion between DAOPHOT and ISIS flux measurements --
648: see Appendix B of \citet{hart04} for the details of the conversion. First,
649: we create a reference image by combining a number of high-quality images.
650: DAOPHOT measures the instrumental magnitude of the stars on the reference
651: image $m_i({\rm ref})$ based on PSF fitting photometry, with the magnitude
652: of each star $i$ calculated from the flux
653: by $m_i({\rm ref}) \equiv 25 - 2.5\log[f_i({\rm ref})] + C_{ap}$, where $f_i$
654: is the flux measured by DAOPHOT and $C_{ap}$ is an aperture correction
655: to ensure that $m_i({\rm ref}) = 25 - 2.5\log(c_i)$, where $c_i$ is the
656: counts per second from the star in ADU. ISIS then creates an ensemble of
657: subtracted images for the whole data set using the reference. To derive
658: the full light curve, ISIS fits a PSF for each star on each
659: subtracted image $j$, to obtain a flux $f_i(j)$. The DAOPHOT-reported
660: instrumental magnitudes for the reference images serve as the magnitude
661: baseline for the conversion of ISIS fluxes to magnitudes, where the
662: magnitude of the $i$th star on the $j$th image is $m_i(j) = m_i({\rm
663: ref}) - 2.5\log[1 - f_i(j)/f_i({\rm ref})]$.
664:
665: We then calculate the RMS variation of all the detected stars in both
666: the Praesepe data set and for a sample of the survey data. Because of
667: the night-to-night variations in the position of the best image quality
668: on the detector with the 200\,mm lens described at the
669: end of \S \ref{sec:imqual}, we calculate the RMS for the Praesepe data
670: from a single night of observations, to better demonstrate the intrinsic
671: instrumental performance. In Figure\,\,\ref{fig:crms} we plot the
672: distribution of RMS versus $R_K$ magnitude for 67,674 stars on 32 images
673: with 60-second exposures from one night. With this lens and exposure
674: time, we obtain photometry of stars in the magnitude
675: range $R_K = 8-16$ mag. For stars brighter than about $R_K = 9.5$\,mag,
676: systematics begin to dominate the light curves, mostly due to
677: saturation. Out of the 67,674 stars,
678: 4,281 have RMS\,$<0.02$\,mag, and 1,369 have RMS\,$<0.01$\,mag.
679:
680: We perform the same analysis for one of the regular survey fields observed
681: with the 80\,mm lens using 239 observations over 8 nights with 150-second
682: exposures. We obtain photometry on 49,376 stars in the range $R_K = 6-14$ mag, and
683: plot the data in Figure\,\,\ref{fig:srms}. We find 14,333 stars with
684: RMS\,$<0.02$\,mag, and 3,822 stars with RMS\,$<0.01$\,mag, with systematics dominating
685: for stars brighter than $R_K = 7.5$\,mag.
686:
687: Overall, the RMS performance is mostly as expected from Poisson statistics
688: except at the bright end. The best precision just reaches the theoretical
689: noise limit, with a spread of RMS values above that limit due to
690: real-world effects. For the brightest stars in our data we see a floor in
691: which the RMS no longer decreases as the stars get brighter, and instead becomes
692: roughly constant at RMS = 0.004 magnitudes. The RMS floor is indicative of
693: a fixed pattern noise component, caused by
694: intrapixel sensitivity on the CCD. The Kodak KAF-E series CCDs
695: are 2-phase front-side illuminated devices in which the second poly-gate
696: electrode on each pixel is a transparent gate made of Indium-Tin-Oxide
697: (ITO) to boost the overall quantum efficiency of the device
698: \citep{meisenzahl2k}. Over much of the wavelength regime of interest for
699: KELT, the ITO material is $\sim$2 times more transparent than the
700: regular silicon oxide material used on the first poly-gate. The result
701: is significant pixel substructure in which the quantum efficiency varies
702: stepwise across each 9\,$\mu$m pixel, which introduces a component of fixed-pattern
703: noise that produces the observed RMS floor. We note that more recent models of
704: commercial CCD cameras with the Kodak KAF-16801 detector are using a
705: newer version of this device that incorporate a front-surface microlens
706: array that mitigates the intrapixel step in transmission, but persons
707: contemplating similar systems to our own should be aware of the issue
708: and take it into account.
709:
710: We do not expect to obtain high-precision photometry for the very
711: brightest stars in our data, but the RMS floor is well below the 1\% level and
712: it should not significantly affect our ability to detect transits. We plot
713: noise models in Figures\,\,\ref{fig:crms} and \,\,\ref{fig:srms}, which include
714: photon noise and sky noise, along with the RMS floor. In the future we will
715: choose a lens focus that makes slightly larger FWHM images to minimize these effects.
716:
717: \section{Representative Results} \label{sec:lcurves}
718:
719: The RMS plots shown in Figures\,\,\ref{fig:crms} and\,\,\ref{fig:srms}
720: demonstrate that our telescope can obtain precision relative
721: photometry, with large numbers of stars measured at the 1\% level.
722: However, simply looking at the RMS information does not
723: prove that the data set can yield the consistent quality with low
724: systematics necessary for a transit search. To illustrate that we can fulfill
725: that requirement, we show in Figure\,\,\ref{fig:vars} the lightcurves of
726: three sample variable stars we have discovered using the 200\,mm lens
727: while observing the field of Praesepe. Even with the night-to-night variations discussed
728: in \S \ref{sec:imqual}, we are able to achieve the consistent data quality
729: that transit detection requires, and are able to clearly see features
730: in the phased lightcurves of a few percent or less.
731:
732: An even better example of our ability to detect transits can be seen
733: in Figure\,\,\ref{fig:dips}. Here we show two objects we detected in our
734: data from the Praesepe field which exhibit transit-like dips in their
735: lightcurves. These effects can be clearly seen at the level of a few
736: percent. These objects are not planetary: follow-up spectroscopy indicates that
737: the top object is an F star with a transiting M dwarf companion, and the bottom
738: object is a grazing eclipsing binary \citep{latham07}. However, they
739: demonstrate that we can confidently detect
740: transit-like behavior at the 1\%-2\% level with our telescope. A full catalog
741: of the variable stars and transit candidates from the KELT observations of the
742: Praesepe field will appear in a forthcoming paper (J. Pepper, in preparation).
743:
744:
745: \section{Summary and Discussion}
746:
747: The KELT project has been acquiring data since October 2004. We observed the
748: field of the Praesepe open cluster with the 200\,mm lens for two months in
749: early 2005, and have spent the rest of the time using the 80\,mm lens for a
750: survey of 13 fields around the Northern sky.
751:
752: The KELT telescope, used in ``Survey Mode'' with the 80\,mm lens, reflects the
753: design specifications called for in the theoretical paper \citet{pep03}. The
754: performance of the telescope as described in this paper provides a real-world
755: evaluation of the potential for this telescope to detect transiting planets. In
756: addition to the lightcurves and RMS plots that show the telescope's abilities, we
757: find that the total number of photons acquired from a fiducial $V=10$ mag star
758: over an entire observing run is well above the number assumed in \citet{pep03}
759: with the parameter $gamma_0$.
760:
761: This paper has described the KELT instrumentation and performance, with
762: both the 200\,mm lens used for observing clusters and the 80\,mm lens
763: used for conducting the all-sky survey. It is the widest-field
764: instrument that is currently being employed to search for transiting
765: planets, and we observe brighter stars than other wide field surveys. The
766: performance metrics demonstrate that it is capable of
767: detecting signals at the $\sim$1\% level needed to detect Jupiter size planets
768: transiting solar-type stars. Further refinements of our reduction process
769: promise to expand our sensitivity to transits, such as applying detrending
770: algorithms of the sort developed by \citet{tamuz05}. We also plan to conduct
771: a full analysis of red noise (i.e. temporally correlated systematic
772: noise, see \citet{pont06} for a full description) for all KELT data.
773:
774: To date, we have detected over 100 previously unknown variable stars in our
775: observations towards Praesepe, and we have identified several lightcurves with
776: transit-like behavior, of which we show two in Figure\,\,\ref{fig:dips}. Future
777: papers will report on the success in discovering variable stars and searching
778: for planets in Praesepe, along with the full transit search for the all-sky survey.
779:
780:
781: \acknowledgments
782:
783: We would like to thank the many people who have helped with this research,
784: including Scott Gaudi, Andrew Gould, Christopher Burke, and
785: Jerry Mason. We would also like to
786: thank Apogee Instruments and Software Bisque for supplying the camera and
787: mount for the telescope and for excellent service for the hardware. This
788: work was supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
789: under Grant No. NNG04GO70G issued through the Origins of Solar Systems program.
790:
791:
792: \begin{thebibliography}{}
793:
794: \bibitem[Alard \& Lupton(1998)]{al98} Alard, C. \& Lupton, R.H. 1998, \apj, 503, 325
795:
796: \bibitem[Alard(2000)]{alard00} Alard, C. 2000, \aap, 144, 363
797:
798: \bibitem[Alonso et al.(2004)]{alonso04} Alonso, R., et al.\ 2004, ApJ, 613, L153
799:
800: \bibitem[Bakos(2006)]{bak06} Bakos, G. A. 2006, private communication
801:
802: \bibitem[Bakos et al.(2007)]{bakos07} Bakos, G. A. 2006, \apj, 656, 552
803:
804: \bibitem[Barnes \& Fortnoy(2004)]{bf04} Barnes, J. W. \& Fortnoy, J. J. 2004, \apj, 616, 1193
805:
806: \bibitem[Calabretta \& Greisen(2002)]{cg02} Calabretta, M.R., \&
807: Greisen, E.W. 2002, \aa, 395, 1077
808:
809: \bibitem[Cameron et al.(2007)]{cam07} Cameron, A. C., et al.\ 2007, \mnras, 375, 951
810:
811: \bibitem[Charbonneau et al.(2002)]{char02} Charbonneau, D., Brown, T. M., Noyes, R. W., \& Gilliland, R. L. 2002, \apj, 568, 377
812:
813: \bibitem[Charbonneau et al.(2007)]{char07} Charbonneau, D., Brown, T. M., Burrows, A., \& Laughlin, G. 2007, in Protostars \& Planets V, ed. B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, \& K. Keil (Tucson: University of Arizona Press), in press (astro-ph/0603376)
814:
815: \bibitem[Everett \& Howell(2001)]{eh01} Everett, M. E. \& Howell, S. B. 2001, \pasp, 113, 1428
816:
817: \bibitem[Gaudi \& Winn(2007)]{gw07} Gaudi B. S. \& Winn, J. N. 2007, \apj, 655, 550
818:
819: \bibitem[Guillot(2005)]{g05} Guillot, T. 2005, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 33, 493
820:
821: \bibitem[Hartman et al.(2004)]{hart04} Hartman, J. D., Bakos, G., Stanek, K. Z., \& Noyes, R. W. 2004, \aj, 128, 1761
822:
823: \bibitem[Hayes \& Latham(1975)]{hl75} Hayes, D.~S. \& Latham, D.~W. 1975, \apj, 197, 593
824:
825: \bibitem[H\o g et al.(2000)]{hog00} H\o g, E., et al. 2000, \aap, 355, L27
826:
827: \bibitem[Kodak(1998)]{kodak98} Kodak Photographic Filters Handbook, Publication No. B-3
828: Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, New York (1998)
829:
830: \bibitem[Latham(2007)]{latham07} Latham, D. 2007, private communication
831:
832: \bibitem[McCullough et al.(2006)]{mc06} McCullough, P. R., et al. 2006, \apj, 648, 1228
833:
834: \bibitem[Meisenzahl et al.(2000)]{meisenzahl2k} Meisenzahl, E., Chang, W.,
835: DesJardin, W., Kosman, S., Shepherd, J., Stevens, E., \& Wong, K. 2000,
836: Proc. SPIE, 3965, 92
837:
838: \bibitem[O'Donovan et al.(2006)]{od06} O'Donovan, F. T., et al. 2006, \apj, 651L, 61
839:
840: \bibitem[Pepper, Gould, \& DePoy(2003)]{pep03} Pepper, J., Gould, A., \& Depoy, D.~L.,\ 2003, Acta Astron, 53, 213
841:
842: \bibitem[Pont, Zuker, \& Queloz(2006)]{pont06} Pont, F., Zuker, S., \& Queloz, D. 2006, \mnras, 373, 231
843:
844: \bibitem[Schneider, Gunn, \& Hoessel(1983)]{sch83} Schneider, D.~P., Gunn, J.~E., \& Hoessel, J.G. 1983, \apj, 264, 337
845:
846: \bibitem[Stetson(1987)]{stet87} Stetson, P. B. 1987, \pasp, 99, 191
847:
848: \bibitem[Tamuz, Mazeh, \& Zuker(2005)]{tamuz05} Tamuz, O., Mazeh, T., \& Zuker, S. 2005, \mnras, 356, 1466
849:
850: \bibitem[Udalski et al.(2004)]{udalski04} Udalski, A., Szymanski,
851: M.~K., Kubiak, M., Pietrzynski, G., Soszynski, I., Zebrun, K., Szewczyk,
852: O., \& Wyrzykowski, L.\ 2004, Acta, 54, 313
853:
854:
855: \end{thebibliography}
856:
857: \clearpage
858:
859: \begin{figure}
860: \plotone{f1.ps}
861: \caption{Calculated response function of the KELT CCD camera
862: and Kodak \#8 Wratten filter. The dashed curve is the response function
863: including atmospheric transmission at Winer Observatory for 1.2
864: airmasses. This response function does not include the transmission of
865: the camera lenses.}
866: \label{fig:bpass}
867: \end{figure}
868:
869: \clearpage
870:
871: \begin{figure}
872: \plotone{f2.ps}
873: \caption{Effective pixel scale in arcseconds\,pixel$^{-1}$ for the KELT 200\,mm
874: camera. Contours show curves of constant effective pixel scale. The cross
875: (+) marks the optical center of the field, where the pixel scale is
876: 9\farcs537\,pix$^{-1}$.}
877: \label{fig:pscale200}
878: \end{figure}
879:
880: \clearpage
881:
882: \begin{figure}
883: \plotone{f3.ps}
884: \caption{Effective pixel scale in arcseconds\,pixel$^{-1}$ for the KELT 80\,mm
885: camera. Contours show curves of constant effective pixel scale. The cross
886: (+) marks the optical center of the field, where the pixel scale is
887: 21\farcs68\,pix$^{-1}$.}
888: \label{fig:pscale80}
889: \end{figure}
890:
891: \clearpage
892:
893: \begin{figure}
894: \plotone{f4.ps}
895: \caption{Representative stellar PSFs from the 200\,mm telephoto
896: lens, shown as intensity contours of bright, unsaturated stars taken
897: with a 5$\times$5 grid pattern on the CCD; the position of the center of each box, relative
898: to the center of the image, is indicated in mm.
899: Each box is 15\,pixels (135mm)
900: on a side. The scale-bar in the center panel indicates 50\,$\mu$m on
901: the detector (5.5\,pixels). Contours show levels of
902: (5,10,15,20,25,30,40,50,60,70,80,90,100)\% of the peak intensity.}
903: \label{fig:200mmpsf}
904: \end{figure}
905:
906: \clearpage
907:
908: \begin{figure}
909: \plotone{f5.ps}
910: \caption{Representative stellar PSFs from the 80\,mm wide-angle
911: lens, displayed in the same format as in Figure \ref{fig:200mmpsf}. The images
912: are more severely distorted at the extreme edges of the field than with the 200\,mm lens.}
913: \label{fig:80mmpsf}
914: \end{figure}
915:
916: \clearpage
917:
918: \begin{figure}
919: \plotone{f6.ps}
920: \caption{Contours of constant FWHM for stellar images in a
921: representative 200\,mm lens KELT image, with FWHM given in pixels. Contours are based
922: on a smooth polynomial surface fit to measurements of $\sim$1200 bright,
923: unsaturated stars distributed across the image. Contour spacing is every 0.1 pixels,
924: with particular contour level
925: values in pixels as indicated.}
926: \label{fig:fwhm200}
927: \end{figure}
928:
929: \clearpage
930:
931: \begin{figure}
932: \plotone{f7.ps}
933: \caption{Contours of constant FWHM for stellar images in a
934: representative 80\,mm lens KELT image, with FWHM given in pixels. Format is
935: the same as in Figure \ref{fig:fwhm200}. Contours are based on measurements
936: of $\sim$2100 bright, unsaturated stars.}
937: \label{fig:fwhm80}
938: \end{figure}
939:
940: \clearpage
941:
942: \begin{figure}
943: \plotone{f8.ps}
944: \caption{Contours of constant 80\% Encircled-Energy Diameter ($D_{80}$) in
945: pixels for stellar images in a representative 200\,mm lens KELT image.
946: Contours are based on a smooth polynomial surface fit to measurements of
947: $\sim$1200 bright, unsaturated stars distributed across the image.}
948: \label{fig:ee200}
949: \end{figure}
950:
951: \clearpage
952:
953: \begin{figure}
954: \plotone{f9.ps}
955: \caption{Contours of constant 80\% Encircled-Energy Diameter ($D_{80}$) in
956: pixels for stellar images in a representative 80\,mm lens KELT image.
957: Contours are based on measurements of
958: $\sim$2100 bright, unsaturated stars.}
959: \label{fig:ee80}
960: \end{figure}
961:
962: \clearpage
963:
964: \begin{figure}
965: \plotone{f10.ps}
966: \caption{RMS plot for one night of data from the 200\,mm lens. Data are
967: shown for 67,674 stars. The dashed lines show the limits for 1\% and 2\% RMS. The
968: solid line represents a noise model including photon noise and sky noise, along with
969: an RMS floor of 0.004 magnitudes.}
970: \label{fig:crms}
971: \end{figure}
972:
973: \clearpage
974:
975: \begin{figure}
976: \plotone{f11.ps}
977: \caption{RMS plot for eight nights of data from the 80\,mm lens. Data are
978: shown for 49,376 stars. The dashed lines show the limits for 1\% and 2\% RMS. The
979: solid line represents a noise model including photon noise and sky noise, along with
980: an RMS floor of 0.004 magnitudes.}
981: \label{fig:srms}
982: \end{figure}
983:
984: \clearpage
985:
986: \begin{figure}
987: \plotone{f12.ps}
988: \caption{Three variable stars discovered with the 200\,mm lens in the
989: field of the Praesepe open cluster.}
990: \label{fig:vars}
991: \end{figure}
992:
993: \clearpage
994:
995: \begin{figure}
996: \plotone{f13.ps}
997: \caption{Two transit candidates discovered with the 200\,mm lens in the field of
998: the Praesepe open cluster. The lower panel of each plot shows the data binned
999: in 10-minute bins. Follow-up spectroscopy indicates that object (a) is an F star
1000: with a transiting K dwarf companion, and object (b) is a grazing eclipsing binary.}
1001: \label{fig:dips}
1002: \end{figure}
1003:
1004:
1005:
1006: \end{document}
1007:
1008: % LocalWords: Stutz DePoy Pogge Trueblood Sonoita HD PGD KAF Wratten XP TheSky
1009: % LocalWords: CCDSoft cpsf spsf VRI alard tamuz Lupton Binney Merrifield Bakos
1010: % LocalWords: Stanek Kaluzny Krockenberger Sasselov Tonry Depoy Astron Mazeh
1011: % LocalWords: Zuker alonso udalski crms al ph Szymanski gzip Kitt DS ee mc od
1012: % LocalWords: Kubiak Pietrzynski Soszynski Zebrun Szewczyk Wyrzykowski Tycho
1013: % LocalWords: Astrometrix Tyc subimage DAOPHOT psf srms Gunn Hoessel Nyquist
1014: % LocalWords: TEC kodak bpass Paramount's Gruber Powerware TPoint KPNO ntp gw
1015: % LocalWords: Firewire internet subimages superflat unflatfielded ap
1016: % LocalWords: Calabretta Greisen pre Olixir DataVault UTC terabyte bakos VBI
1017: % LocalWords: radovich intranight Hipparcos SNR CCDs poly meisenzahl Siverd hl
1018: % LocalWords: NNG Kosman Proc SPIE fwhm PCI bak IRAF Charbonneau Laughlin Keil
1019: % LocalWords: Reipurth Jewitt DesJardin O'Donovan Latham USB latham ISDN pont
1020: % LocalWords: Fortnoy Gilliland Guillot flatfields flatfielded Queloz KELT's
1021: % LocalWords: flatfielding fwhmrms undersampling
1022: