1: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
2: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3:
4: \def\subsun{\mbox{$_{\odot}$}}
5: \def\lesssim{\mathrel{\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{%
6: \lower4pt\hbox{$\sim$}}}\hbox{$<$}}}}
7: \def\gtrsim{\mathrel{\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{%
8: \lower4pt\hbox{$\sim$}}}\hbox{$>$}}}}
9:
10: \shorttitle{First to Second Stars}
11: \shortauthors{Smith \& Sigurdsson}
12:
13: \begin{document}
14:
15: \title{The Transition from the First Stars to the Second Stars in the Early Universe}
16:
17: \shorttitle{First to Second Stars}
18:
19: \author{Britton D. Smith and Steinn Sigurdsson}
20: \affil{525 Davey Laboratory,
21: Department of Astronomy \& Astrophysics,
22: The Pennsylvania State University,
23: University Park, PA, 16802}
24: \email{britton@astro.psu.edu,steinn@astro.psu.edu}
25:
26: \begin{abstract}
27: We observe a sharp transition from a singular, high-mass mode of star formation, to
28: a low-mass dominated mode, in numerical simulations, at a metallicity of 10$^{-3}$ Z$\subsun$.
29: We incorporate a new method for including the radiative
30: cooling from metals into adaptive mesh-refinement hydrodynamic simulations.
31: Our results illustrate how metals, produced by the first stars, led to a
32: transition from the high-mass star formation mode of Pop III stars, to the low-mass mode
33: that dominates today. We ran hydrodynamic simulations with cosmological initial
34: conditions in the standard $\Lambda$CDM model, with
35: metallicities, from zero to 10$^{-2}$ Z$\subsun$,
36: beginnning at redshift, z = 99. The simulations were run until a dense core
37: forms at the center of a 5 $\times$ 10$^{5}$ M$\subsun$ dark matter halo, at z
38: $\sim$ 18. Analysis of the central 1 M$\subsun$ core reveals that
39: the two simulations with the lowest metallicities, Z = 0 and 10$^{-4}$ Z$\subsun$,
40: contain one clump with 99\% of the mass, while the two with
41: metallicities, Z = 10$^{-3}$ and 10$^{-2}$ Z$\subsun$, each contain two clumps that share
42: most of the mass. The Z = 10$^{-3}$ Z$\subsun$ simulation also produced
43: two low-mass proto-stellar objects with masses between 10$^{-2}$ and 10$^{-1}$ M$\subsun$.
44: Gas with Z $\ge$ 10$^{-3}$ Z$\subsun$ is able to cool to the temperature of the
45: CMB, which sets a lower limit to the minimum fragmentation mass.
46: This suggests that the second generation stars produced a spectrum of lower mass stars, but
47: were still more massive on average than stars formed in the local universe.
48: \end{abstract}
49:
50: \keywords{stars: formation}
51:
52: \section{Introduction}
53:
54: Numerical simulations have shown that the very first stars invariably formed in isolation
55: and were much more massive than the sun, due mainly to the inability of primordial gas to
56: efficiently cool at low temperatures
57: \citep{2002Sci...295...93A,2002ApJ...564...23B,2006ApJ...652....6Y}.
58: \citet{2004ApJ...612..602T} have suggested that the Pop III IMF was not dominated by
59: very massive stars (M $>$ 140 M$\subsun$), but instead by stars with M = 8--40 M$\subsun$.
60: Even this IMF, though, is still remarkably distinct from that observed for the local universe,
61: which peaks at less than one solar mass
62: \citep{1979ApJS...41..513M,2002Sci...295...82K,2003PASP..115..763C}.
63:
64: The deaths of the first stars produced and distributed copious amounts of metals into their
65: surroundings, through either core-collapse (M $\gtrsim$ 10 M$\subsun$)
66: or pair-instability (M $\gtrsim$ 140 M$\subsun$) supernovae \citep{2002ApJ...567..532H}.
67: These metals provide additional avenues for radiative cooling of the ambient gas, through
68: fine-structure and molecular transitions, as well as continuum emission from dust formed from
69: the supernova ejecta, permitting the gas that will form the next generation of stars to
70: reach temperatures lower than what is possible for metal-free gas. Fragmentation of collapsing
71: gas will continue so long as the gas can keep decreasing in temperature as the density increases
72: \citep{2005MNRAS.359..211L}, or until the gas becomes optically thick to its own emission
73: \citep{1976MNRAS.176..367L}. The minimum fragment mass is determined by the local Jeans mass,
74: \begin{equation} \label{eqn:mj}
75: M_{J} \simeq 700 \textrm{ M}\subsun (T/200 K)^{3/2} (n/10^{4} cm^{-3})^{-1/2} (\mu/2)^{-2},
76: \end{equation}
77: where T, n, and $\mu$ are the temperature, number density, and mean molecular weight, at the
78: halt of fragmentation \citep{2005MNRAS.359..211L}. For metal-free gas, a minimum temperature
79: of $\sim$ 200 K is reached at n $\simeq$ 10$^{4}$ cm$^{-3}$ when H$_{2}$ cooling becomes
80: inefficient, yielding a Jeans mass, M$_{J}$ $\simeq$ 10$^{3}$ M$\subsun$
81: \citep{2002Sci...295...93A,2002ApJ...564...23B}. At some certain chemical abundance, it is
82: conjectured that metals provide sufficient cooling, so that the temperature
83: of the gas continues to decrease as the density increases past the stalling point for metal-free
84: gas, allowing the collapsing gas-cloud to undergo fragmentation and form smaller and smaller
85: clumps. The enrichment of gas to some critical metallicity,
86: Z$_{cr}$, will trigger the formation of the first low-mass (Pop II) stars in
87: the universe, as the gas can cool to lower temperatures at higher metallicity, in general.
88: The value of Z$_{cr}$ can be estimated by calculating the metallicity required to
89: produce a cooling rate equal to the rate of adiabatic compression heating at a given
90: temperature and density. This has been carried out for individual alpha elements,
91: such as C and O, by \citet{2003Natur.425..812B}, and C, O, Si, Fe, as well as solar
92: abundance patterns by \citet{2006ApJ...643...26S}, yielding roughly, 10$^{-3.5}$ Z$\subsun$
93: $\lesssim$ Z$_{cr}$ $\lesssim$ 10$^{-3}$ Z$\subsun$.
94:
95: Aside from the minimum clump mass, however, not much more can be said about the
96: spectrum of clump masses produced during fragmentation. \citet{2005ApJ...626..627O}
97: use one-zone models with very sophisticated chemical networks to follow the evolution
98: of temperature and density in the center of a collapsing gas cloud, for a range of
99: metallicities. The predictions of fragmentation from this work, though, are based
100: solely on statistical arguments of elongation in prestellar cores and do not capture
101: the complex processes of interaction and accretion associated with the formation of
102: multiple stars \citep{2003MNRAS.339..577B}. \citet{2006ApJ...642L..61T} simulate the
103: high density (n $\ge$ 10$^{10}$ cm$^{-3}$) evolution of extremely low-metallicity
104: gas (Z $<$ 10$^{-4}$ Z$\subsun$), but the conclusions of
105: this work are limited by the fact that the simulations are initialized at an extremely
106: late phase in the evolution of the prestellar core. The numerical simulations by
107: \citet{2001MNRAS.328..969B}, which use cosmological initial conditions, show
108: fragmentation in gas with Z = 10$^{-3}$ Z$\subsun$, but a mass resolution of
109: 100 M$\subsun$ prevents this study from saying anything conclusive about the
110: formation of sub-stellar mass objects.
111:
112: In this paper, we present the results of three-dimensional hydrodynamic simulations of
113: metal-enriched star-formation. These simulations are similar in nature to those of
114: \citet{2001MNRAS.328..969B}, but with vastly improved numerical methods and updated physics.
115: We describe the setup of our simulations in \S\ref{sec:setup}, with the
116: results in \S\ref{sec:results} and a discussion of the consequences of this work in
117: \S\ref{sec:discussion}.
118:
119: \section{Simulation Setup} \label{sec:setup}
120:
121: We perform a series of four simulations, with constant metallicities, Z = 0 (metal-free),
122: 10$^{-4}$ Z$\subsun$, 10$^{-3}$ Z$\subsun$, and 10$^{-2}$ Z$\subsun$,
123: using the Eulerian adaptive mesh refinement
124: hydrodynamics/N-body code, Enzo \citep{1997WSAMRGMBryan,2004CWAMROShea}.
125: The metallicity is held constant throughout each simulation in order to isolate the role
126: of heavy element concentration in altering the dynamics of collapse compared to the
127: identical metal-free case. In reality, metals will be injected over time into star forming
128: gas by Pop III supernova blast waves, and the mixing of those metals with the gas will not
129: be completely uniform. Here we focus on an idealized approximation in order to capture
130: the essential physics of collapse and fragmentation.
131:
132: Each simulation begins at z = 99, in a cube, 300 h$^{-1}$ kpc comoving per side, in a
133: $\Lambda$CDM universe, with the following cosmological parameters: $\Omega_{M}$ = 0.3,
134: $\Omega_{\Lambda}$ = 0.7, $\Omega_{B}$ = 0.04, and Hubble constant, h = 0.7, in units of
135: 100 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$. We initialize all the simulations identically, with a power
136: spectrum of density fluctuations given by \citet{1999ApJ...511....5E}, with $\sigma_{8}$
137: = 0.9 and n = 1. The computation box consists of a top grid, with 128$^{3}$ cells, and
138: three static subgrids, refining by a factor of 2 each. This gives the central refined
139: region, which is 1/64 the total computational volume, an effective top grid resolution
140: of 1024$^{3}$ cells. The grid is centered on the location of a $\sim$ 5 $\times$ 10$^{5}$
141: M$\subsun$ dark matter halo that is observed to form at z $\sim$ 18 in a prior
142: dark-matter-only simulation, as is done similarly in \citet{2002Sci...295...93A,
143: 2005ApJ...628L...5O}. Refinement occurs during the simulations whenever the
144: gas, or dark matter, density is greater than the mean density by a factor of 4,
145: or 8, respectively. We also require that the local Jeans length be resolved by at least
146: 16 grid cells at all times in order to avoid artificial fragmentation as prescribed by
147: \citet{1997ApJ...489L.179T}.
148:
149: To include the radiative cooling processes from the heavy elements, we use the method
150: described in Smith, Sigurdsson, \& Abel (2007), in preparation. The nonequilibrium
151: abundances and cooling rates of H, H$^{+}$, H$^{-}$, He, He$^{+}$, He$^{++}$, H$_{2}$,
152: H$_{2}^{+}$, and e$^{-}$ are calculated internally, as in
153: \citet{2002Sci...295...93A,1997NewA....2..209A}. Meanwhile,
154: the metal cooling rates are interpolated from large grids of values, precomputed with
155: the photoionization software, CLOUDY \citep{1998PASP..110..761F}. We ignore the cooling
156: from dust and focus only on the contribution of gas-phase metals in the optically-thin
157: limit.
158: Unlike other studies of the formation of the first metal-enriched structures, we do not
159: assume the presence of an ionizing UV background. In our model, the singular pop III star
160: that was associated with the dark matter halo in which our stars form has already
161: died in a supernova. We also assume any other Pop III stars are too distant to affect the
162: local star-forming region and that QSOs have yet to form. We use the
163: \texttt{coronoal equilibrium} command when
164: constructing the cooling data in CLOUDY to simulate a gas where all ionization is
165: collisional.
166: The metal cooling data
167: was created using the Linux cluster, Lion-xo, run by the High Performance Computing Group
168: at The Pennsylvania State University.
169: As a consequence of our choice to ignore any external radiation, we do not observe the
170: fine-structure emission of [C \textsc{ii}] (157.74 $\mu$m) that was reported by
171: \citet{2006ApJ...643...26S} to be important. Instead, cooling from C comes in the form
172: of fine-structure lines of [C \textsc{i}] (369.7 $\mu$m, 609.2 $\mu$m). The cooling from
173: [C \textsc{i}] in our study dominates in the same range of densities and temperatures as
174: the cooling from [C \textsc{ii}] in \citet{2006ApJ...643...26S}.
175: We observe the contributions of the other coolants studied by \citet{2006ApJ...643...26S},
176: [O \textsc{i}], [Si \textsc{ii}], and [Fe \textsc{ii}], to be in agreement with their work.
177: In addition, we find that emission from [S \textsc{i}] (25.19 $\mu$m) dominates the
178: cooling from metals at n $\sim$ 10$^{7}$ cm$^{-3}$ and T $\sim$ 1--3 $\times$ 10$^{3}$ K.
179: The absence of UV radiation in our simulations also allows H$_{2}$ to form, differentiating
180: this study from \citet{2001MNRAS.328..969B}. This allows for a more direct comparison
181: between the metal-free and metal-enriched cases.
182:
183: The simulations are run until one or more dense cores form at the center of the dark
184: matter halo and a maximum refinement level of 28 is reached for the first time, giving us
185: a dynamic range of greater than 10$^{10}$. Only the simulation with Z = 10$^{-2}$ Z$\subsun$
186: reached 28 levels of refinement. The three other simulations were stopped after reaching 27
187: refinement levels, since their central densities were already higher than the simulation with
188: Z = 10$^{-2}$ Z$\subsun$. Table 1 summarizes the final state of each simulation,
189: where z$_{col}$ is the collapse redshift, l$_{max}$ is the highest level of refinement,
190: $n_{max}$ is the maximum gas density within the box, and $\Delta$t$_{col}$ is the time
191: difference to collapse from the metal-free simulation.
192:
193: \section{Results} \label{sec:results}
194:
195: As can be seen in Table 1, the runs with higher metallicities reach the runaway
196: collapse phase faster. The relationship between metallicity relative to solar and
197: $\Delta$t$_{col}$ is well fit by a power-law with index, n $\simeq$ 0.22. Gas-clouds with
198: more metals are able to radiate away their thermal energy more quickly, and thus, collapse
199: faster.
200: An inverse relation between metallicity and the number of grids and grid-cells exists
201: because the low-density, background gas evolves at roughly the same rate in all
202: simulations, yet has more time, in the runs with lower metallicities, with which to
203: collapse to higher density, requiring additional refinement.
204:
205: Our simulations, shown in Figure 1, display a qualitative transition in
206: behavior between metallicities of 10$^{-4}$ Z$\subsun$ and 10$^{-3}$ Z$\subsun$. In the
207: runs with the highest metallicities (Figure 1C and 1D), the central core is extremely
208: asymmetric, and multiple density maxima are clearly visible.
209: All four runs display similar large-scale density profiles (Figure 2A).
210: Radiative cooling from H$_{2}$ becomes extremely inefficient below T $\sim$ 200 K, creating
211: the effective temperature floor, visible in Figure 2B for the
212: metal-free case \citep{2002Sci...295...93A,2002ApJ...564...23B}. At n $\simeq$ 10$^{4}$
213: cm$^{-3}$, the rotational levels of H$_{2}$ are populated according to LTE, reducing the
214: cooling efficiency and causing the temperature to increase
215: \citep{2002Sci...295...93A,2002ApJ...564...23B}. In the isothermal collapse model of
216: \citet{1977ApJ...214..488S}, the accretion rate is proportional to the cube of the sound
217: speed. The increase in temperature leads to an increase in the accretion rate, causing the
218: density, and thus, the enclosed mass (Figure 2C), to be slightly higher inside
219: the central $\sim$ 0.1 pc
220: in the metal-free case. A similar situation occurs further within for the Z = 10$^{-4}$
221: Z$\subsun$ and, later, the 10$^{-3}$ Z$\subsun$ cases, as the metal cooling is overwhelmed
222: by adiabatic compression heating and the temperature begins to rise with density. The
223: presence of metals at the level of 10$^{-4}$ Z$\subsun$ enhances the cooling enough to
224: lower the gas temperature to $\sim$ 75 K. Metallicities greater than 10$^{-3}$ Z$\subsun$
225: provide sufficient cooling to bring the gas down to the temperature of the cosmic microwave
226: background, where T$_{CMB}$ $\simeq$ 2.7 K (1 + z). The gas temperatures are in
227: general agreement with the calculations of \citet{2005ApJ...626..627O} that include a CMB
228: spectrum at z = 20. Fragmentation requires that the cooling time be less than the dynamical
229: time. Figure 2D shows that this criterion is essentially never met
230: in the zero metallicity case, and only marginally in the Z = 10$^{-4}$ Z$\subsun$ case.
231: However, the fragmentation criterion is more than satisfied in the Z = 10$^{-3}$ Z$\subsun$
232: and 10$^{-2}$ Z$\subsun$ cases over a wide mass-range.
233:
234: In order to locate fragments within our simulations, we employ an
235: algorithm, based on \citet{1994ApJ...428..693W}, that works by identifying isolated density
236: countours. Before we search for clumps, we smooth the density field by assigning each
237: grid-cell the mass-weighted mean density of the group of cells including itself and its
238: neighbors within one cell-width. This serves to eliminate small density perturbations
239: that would be misidentified as clumps by the code. In order to directly compare the
240: fragmentation from each simulation, we limit the search for clumps to the 1 M$\subsun$ of
241: gas surrounding the cell with the highest density. On larger
242: scales, all of the runs display a filamentary structure that is qualitatively similar.
243: No other region in any of the simulation boxes has collapsed to densities comparable to
244: those found within the region where the clump search is performed.
245: The results are shown in Figure 3. A single clump exists in the metal-free and 10$^{-4}$
246: Z$\subsun$ simulations, containing 99.7\% of the total mass within the region of
247: interest. In the simulation with Z = 10$^{-3}$ Z$\subsun$, 91\% of the mass is shared
248: between two clumps with 0.52 M$\subsun$ and 0.39 M$\subsun$. In the same simulation, we also
249: find two smaller clumps 0.06 M$\subsun$ and 0.02 M$\subsun$. Finally, in the Z = 10$^{-2}$
250: Z$\subsun$ simulation, we see two clumps with 0.79 M$\subsun$ and 0.21 M$\subsun$.
251:
252: \section{Discussion} \label{sec:discussion}
253:
254: We have shown, through three-dimensional hydrodynamic simulations, that fragmentation
255: occurs in collapsing gas with metallicities, Z $\ge$ 10$^{-3}$ Z$\subsun$.
256: Our results indicate that star-formation occurs in exactly the same manner at metallicity,
257: Z = 10$^{-4}$ Z$\subsun$, as it does at zero metallicity. The similarities between the
258: simulations with metallicities, Z = 10$^{-3}$ Z$\subsun$ and 10$^{-2}$ Z$\subsun$, suggest
259: that the transition to low-mass star-formation is complete by 10$^{-3}$ Z$\subsun$, implying
260: that the entire transition occurs over only one order of magnitude in metal abundance. More
261: simulations, bracketing the metallicity range, 10$^{-4}$ to 10$^{-3}$ Z$\subsun$, will test
262: how abrupt the transition truly is.
263: We will also explore the effect of non-solar
264: abundances on the low metallicity IMF. It has been recently argued that dust cooling
265: at high densities (n $\ge$ 10$^{13}$ cm$^{-3}$) can induce fragmentation for metallicities
266: as low as 10$^{-6}$ Z$\subsun$ \citet{2006MNRAS.369.1437S}. In light of the work by
267: \citet{2007astro.ph..1395F}, who note the absence of stars with
268: D$_{trans}$ $<$ -3.5, where D$_{trans}$ is a measure of the combined logarithmic
269: abundance of C and O, it seems unlikely that Z$_{cr}$ is this low. While the fragmentation
270: mode discussed in \citet{2006MNRAS.369.1437S}, and also \citet{2005ApJ...626..627O}, may
271: truly exist, it is possible that metal yields from Pop III supernovae overshoot this
272: metallicity, for realistic mixing scenarios,
273: leaving almost no star-forming regions with such a low concentration of heavy elements.
274: Similar to our results, \citet{2005ApJ...626..627O} note that only high-mass fragments are
275: produced when Z = 10$^{-4}$ Z$\subsun$. If Pop III supernovae are able to immediately
276: enrich the local universe to Z = 10$^{-4}$ Z$\subsun$, the high-density dust cooling fragmentation
277: mode would be skipped altogether, and the high-mass stars that formed via the mode observed
278: at 10$^{-4}$ Z$\subsun$ would leave no record in the search for low-metallicity stars in
279: the local universe.
280:
281: We have limited the search for fragments to the dense 1 M$\subsun$ core at the center of each
282: simulation. Within this region, it is unlikely that any more fragments will form in any of the
283: simulations. In all of the cases presented, the cooling has begun to be overwhelmed by
284: compression heating such that the central temperature is now increasing with increasing density,
285: which was indicated by \citet{2005MNRAS.359..211L} to be the end of hierarchical fragmentation.
286: Fragmentation may continue in the surrounding lower density gas in the cases of Z = 10$^{-3}$
287: Z$\subsun$ and 10$^{-2}$ Z$\subsun$. The final stellar masses of these objects will also
288: be affected interaction and accretion that will occur in later stages of evolution.
289: In the two lowest metallicity cases, the gas immediately
290: surrounding the central core evolves slowly enough that it will not have sufficient time to
291: reach high densities before the UV radiation from the central, massive star dissociates all of
292: the H$_{2}$. As was shown by \citet{2001MNRAS.328..969B}, clouds with metallicities, Z
293: $\le$ 10$^{-4}$ Z$\subsun$ are unable to collapse without the aid of H$_{2}$ cooling.
294:
295: In the two simulations in which significant fragmentation is observed, Z = 10$^{-3}$ and
296: 10$^{-2}$ Z$\subsun$, the gas is able to cool rapidly to the temperature of the CMB.
297: \citet{2005ApJ...629..615W} predict that the rate of Pop III supernovae
298: peaks at a redshift, z $\sim$ 20, and then drops off sharply, implying that metal production
299: from Pop III stars is effectively finished at this point. In this epoch, the characteristic
300: mass-scale for metal-enriched star formation will be regulated by the CMB, as is predicted in
301: \citet{2003Natur.425..812B}. Thus, the first Pop II stars will be considerably more
302: massive, on average,
303: than stars observed today, as was suggested by \citet{1998MNRAS.301..569L}. Observations of
304: low-mass prestellar cores in the local universe reveal them to have
305: temperatures of about 8.5 K \citep{1999ARA&A..37..311E}, implying that the IMF may not
306: become completely 'normal' until z $<$ 3 when the CMB fell below this temperature.
307:
308: \acknowledgments
309: We thank Tom Abel, Greg Bryan, Mike Norman, Brian O'Shea, and Matt Turk for useful
310: discussions. BDS also thanks Michael Kuhlen for providing an update to some useful
311: analysis tools. We are also very grateful for insightful comments from an anonymous referee.
312: This work was made possible by Hubble Space Telescope Theory
313: Grant HST-AR-10978.01, and an allocation from the San Diego Supercomputing Center.
314:
315: \begin{thebibliography}{30}
316: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
317:
318: \bibitem[{{Abel} {et~al.}(2002){Abel}, {Bryan}, \&
319: {Norman}}]{2002Sci...295...93A}
320: {Abel}, T., {Bryan}, G.~L., \& {Norman}, M.~L. 2002, Science, 295, 93
321:
322: \bibitem[{{Anninos} {et~al.}(1997){Anninos}, {Zhang}, {Abel}, \&
323: {Norman}}]{1997NewA....2..209A}
324: {Anninos}, P., {Zhang}, Y., {Abel}, T., \& {Norman}, M.~L. 1997, New Astronomy,
325: 2, 209
326:
327: \bibitem[{{Bate} {et~al.}(2003){Bate}, {Bonnell}, \&
328: {Bromm}}]{2003MNRAS.339..577B}
329: {Bate}, M.~R., {Bonnell}, I.~A., \& {Bromm}, V. 2003, \mnras, 339, 577
330:
331: \bibitem[{{Bromm} {et~al.}(2002){Bromm}, {Coppi}, \&
332: {Larson}}]{2002ApJ...564...23B}
333: {Bromm}, V., {Coppi}, P.~S., \& {Larson}, R.~B. 2002, \apj, 564, 23
334:
335: \bibitem[{{Bromm} {et~al.}(2001){Bromm}, {Ferrara}, {Coppi}, \&
336: {Larson}}]{2001MNRAS.328..969B}
337: {Bromm}, V., {Ferrara}, A., {Coppi}, P.~S., \& {Larson}, R.~B. 2001, \mnras,
338: 328, 969
339:
340: \bibitem[{{Bromm} \& {Loeb}(2003)}]{2003Natur.425..812B}
341: {Bromm}, V. \& {Loeb}, A. 2003, \nat, 425, 812
342:
343: \bibitem[{{Bryan} \& {Norman}(1997)}]{1997WSAMRGMBryan}
344: {Bryan}, G. \& {Norman}, M.~L. 1997, in {Workshop on Structured Adaptive Mech
345: Refinement Grid Methods}, ed. N.~{Chrisochoides}, {IMA Volumes in Mathematics
346: No. 117} ({Springer-Verlag})
347:
348: \bibitem[{{Chabrier}(2003)}]{2003PASP..115..763C}
349: {Chabrier}, G. 2003, \pasp, 115, 763
350:
351: \bibitem[{{Eisenstein} \& {Hu}(1999)}]{1999ApJ...511....5E}
352: {Eisenstein}, D.~J. \& {Hu}, W. 1999, \apj, 511, 5
353:
354: \bibitem[{{Evans}(1999)}]{1999ARA&A..37..311E}
355: {Evans}, II, N.~J. 1999, \araa, 37, 311
356:
357: \bibitem[{{Ferland} {et~al.}(1998){Ferland}, {Korista}, {Verner}, {Ferguson},
358: {Kingdon}, \& {Verner}}]{1998PASP..110..761F}
359: {Ferland}, G.~J., {Korista}, K.~T., {Verner}, D.~A., {Ferguson}, J.~W.,
360: {Kingdon}, J.~B., \& {Verner}, E.~M. 1998, \pasp, 110, 761
361:
362: \bibitem[{{Frebel} {et~al.}(2007){Frebel}, {Johnson}, \&
363: {Bromm}}]{2007astro.ph..1395F}
364: {Frebel}, A., {Johnson}, J.~L., \& {Bromm}, V. 2007, ArXiv Astrophysics
365: e-prints
366:
367: \bibitem[{{Heger} \& {Woosley}(2002)}]{2002ApJ...567..532H}
368: {Heger}, A. \& {Woosley}, S.~E. 2002, \apj, 567, 532
369:
370: \bibitem[{{Kroupa}(2002)}]{2002Sci...295...82K}
371: {Kroupa}, P. 2002, Science, 295, 82
372:
373: \bibitem[{{Larson}(1998)}]{1998MNRAS.301..569L}
374: {Larson}, R.~B. 1998, \mnras, 301, 569
375:
376: \bibitem[{{Larson}(2005)}]{2005MNRAS.359..211L}
377: ---. 2005, \mnras, 359, 211
378:
379: \bibitem[{{Low} \& {Lynden-Bell}(1976)}]{1976MNRAS.176..367L}
380: {Low}, C. \& {Lynden-Bell}, D. 1976, \mnras, 176, 367
381:
382: \bibitem[{{Miller} \& {Scalo}(1979)}]{1979ApJS...41..513M}
383: {Miller}, G.~E. \& {Scalo}, J.~M. 1979, \apjs, 41, 513
384:
385: \bibitem[{{Omukai} {et~al.}(2005){Omukai}, {Tsuribe}, {Schneider}, \&
386: {Ferrara}}]{2005ApJ...626..627O}
387: {Omukai}, K., {Tsuribe}, T., {Schneider}, R., \& {Ferrara}, A. 2005, \apj, 626,
388: 627
389:
390: \bibitem[{{O'Shea} {et~al.}(2005){O'Shea}, {Abel}, {Whalen}, \&
391: {Norman}}]{2005ApJ...628L...5O}
392: {O'Shea}, B.~W., {Abel}, T., {Whalen}, D., \& {Norman}, M.~L. 2005, \apjl, 628,
393: L5
394:
395: \bibitem[{{O'Shea} {et~al.}(2004){O'Shea}, G., {Bordner}, {Norman}, {Abel},
396: {Harknes}, \& {Kritsuk}}]{2004CWAMROShea}
397: {O'Shea}, B.~W., G., B., {Bordner}, J., {Norman}, M.~L., {Abel}, T., {Harknes},
398: R., \& {Kritsuk}, A. 2004, in {Lecture Notes in Computational Science and
399: Engineering}, Vol.~41, {Adaptive Mesh Refinement - Theory and Applications},
400: ed. T.~{Plewa}, T.~{Linde}, \& V.~G. {Weirs}
401:
402: \bibitem[{{Santoro} \& {Shull}(2006)}]{2006ApJ...643...26S}
403: {Santoro}, F. \& {Shull}, J.~M. 2006, \apj, 643, 26
404:
405: \bibitem[{{Schneider} {et~al.}(2006){Schneider}, {Omukai}, {Inoue}, \&
406: {Ferrara}}]{2006MNRAS.369.1437S}
407: {Schneider}, R., {Omukai}, K., {Inoue}, A.~K., \& {Ferrara}, A. 2006, \mnras,
408: 369, 1437
409:
410: \bibitem[{{Shu}(1977)}]{1977ApJ...214..488S}
411: {Shu}, F.~H. 1977, \apj, 214, 488
412:
413: \bibitem[{{Truelove} {et~al.}(1997){Truelove}, {Klein}, {McKee}, {Holliman},
414: {Howell}, \& {Greenough}}]{1997ApJ...489L.179T}
415: {Truelove}, J.~K., {Klein}, R.~I., {McKee}, C.~F., {Holliman}, II, J.~H.,
416: {Howell}, L.~H., \& {Greenough}, J.~A. 1997, \apjl, 489, L179+
417:
418: \bibitem[{{Tsuribe} \& {Omukai}(2006)}]{2006ApJ...642L..61T}
419: {Tsuribe}, T. \& {Omukai}, K. 2006, \apjl, 642, L61
420:
421: \bibitem[{{Tumlinson} {et~al.}(2004){Tumlinson}, {Venkatesan}, \&
422: {Shull}}]{2004ApJ...612..602T}
423: {Tumlinson}, J., {Venkatesan}, A., \& {Shull}, J.~M. 2004, \apj, 612, 602
424:
425: \bibitem[{{Williams} {et~al.}(1994){Williams}, {de Geus}, \&
426: {Blitz}}]{1994ApJ...428..693W}
427: {Williams}, J.~P., {de Geus}, E.~J., \& {Blitz}, L. 1994, \apj, 428, 693
428:
429: \bibitem[{{Wise} \& {Abel}(2005)}]{2005ApJ...629..615W}
430: {Wise}, J.~H. \& {Abel}, T. 2005, \apj, 629, 615
431:
432: \bibitem[{{Yoshida} {et~al.}(2006){Yoshida}, {Omukai}, {Hernquist}, \&
433: {Abel}}]{2006ApJ...652....6Y}
434: {Yoshida}, N., {Omukai}, K., {Hernquist}, L., \& {Abel}, T. 2006, \apj, 652, 6
435:
436: \end{thebibliography}
437:
438: \clearpage
439:
440: \begin{tabular}{ccccccc}
441: \multicolumn{7}{c}
442: {\rule[-3mm]{0mm}{8mm}Table 1}\\
443: \multicolumn{7}{c}
444: {\rule[-3mm]{0mm}{8mm}Simulation Final States}\\
445: \hline
446: \hline
447: Z (Z$\subsun$) &
448: z$_{col}$ &
449: l$_{max}$ &
450: Grids &
451: Cells &
452: $n_{max}$ (cm$^{-3}$) &
453: $\Delta$t$_{col}$ (Myr)\\
454: \hline
455: 0 & 18.231519 & 27 & 8469 & 4.82 $\times 10^{7}$ & 4.11 $\times 10^{13}$ & -\\
456: 10$^{-4}$ & 18.838816 & 27 & 8060 & 4.64 $\times 10^{7}$ & 3.90 $\times 10^{13}$ & 9.19\\
457: 10$^{-3}$ & 19.336557 & 27 & 7911 & 4.56 $\times 10^{7}$ & 1.65 $\times 10^{13}$ & 16.21\\
458: 10$^{-2}$ & 20.032518 & 28 & 7521 & 4.42 $\times 10^{7}$ & 1.50 $\times 10^{13}$ & 25.33\\
459: \hline
460: \end{tabular}
461:
462: \clearpage
463:
464: \begin{figure}
465: \plotone{f1.eps}
466: \caption{Slices through gas density for the final output of simulations with Z = 0
467: (A), 10$^{-4}$ Z$\subsun$ (B), 10$^{-3}$ Z$\subsun$ (C), and
468: 10$^{-2}$ Z$\subsun$ (D). Each slice intersects the grid-cell with the
469: highest gas density and has a width of 2 $\times$ 10$^{-8}$ of the computation box,
470: corresponding to a proper size of $\sim$4 $\times$ 10$^{-4}$ pc (84 AU). The color-bar
471: at bottom ascends logarithmically, from left to right, spanning exactly four orders of
472: magnitude in density.}
473: \end{figure}
474:
475: \clearpage
476:
477: \begin{figure}
478: \includegraphics[width=6in,height=6in,angle=-90]{f2.eps}
479: \caption{Radially averaged, mass-weighted quantities for the final output each
480: simulation: Z = 0 (red), 10$^{-4}$ Z$\subsun$ (green), 10$^{-3}$ Z$\subsun$ (blue),
481: and 10$^{-2}$ Z$\subsun$ (purple).
482: A: Number density vs. radius. B: Temperature vs. enclosed mass. C: Enclosed gas
483: mass vs. radius. D: Ratio of crossing time to cooling time vs. enclosed mass.
484: The classical criterion for fragmentation is met when the ratio of the crossing
485: time to the cooling time is greater than 1.}
486: \end{figure}
487:
488: \clearpage
489:
490: \begin{figure}
491: \includegraphics[width=6in,height=6in,angle=-90]{f3.eps}
492: \caption{Masses of clumps found within the final output of each simulation. The
493: location on the x and y axes corresponds to the log of the clump mass and the
494: metallicity of the simulation. Colors are the same as in Figure 2.
495: The radii of the circles are proportional to the masses of the clumps they represent.
496: A factor of 10 in mass is equivalent to a factor of 2 in radius. The search for
497: clumps is limited to the 1 M$\subsun$ surrounding the grid cell with the highest gas
498: density. Only clumps with at least 1000 cells are plotted.}
499: \end{figure}
500:
501: \end{document}
502: