1: %%
2: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3: \documentclass{emulateapj}
4:
5: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
6: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
7:
8: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
9:
10: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
11:
12:
13: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
14: \newcommand{\myemail}{kalas@astron.berkeley.edu}
15:
16: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
17:
18: \slugcomment{Submitted to ApJ Letters December 18, 2006; Accepted April 04, 2007}
19: \shorttitle{Extreme Debris Disk Asymmetries}
20: \shortauthors{Kalas, Fitzgerald, Graham.}
21:
22: \begin{document}
23:
24: \title{Discovery of extreme asymmetry in the debris disk surrounding HD 15115}
25:
26:
27: \author{Paul Kalas\altaffilmark{1,2}, Michael P.
28: Fitzgerald\altaffilmark{1,2}, James R. Graham\altaffilmark{1,2}}
29: \affil{}
30:
31: \altaffiltext{1}{Astronomy Department and Radio Astronomy Laboratory,
32: 601 Campbell Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720}
33: \altaffiltext{2}{National Science Foundation Center for Adaptive Optics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064}
34:
35: \begin{abstract}
36: We report the first scattered light detection of a dusty debris disk surrounding the F2V star
37: HD 15115 using the {\it Hubble Space Telescope} in the optical, and Keck adaptive
38: optics in the near-infrared. The most remarkable property of the HD 15115 disk relative
39: to other debris disks is its extreme length asymmetry.
40: The east side of the disk is detected to $\sim$315 AU radius, whereas the west side of the
41: disk has radius $>$550 AU. We find a blue optical to near-infrared scattered light color relative
42: to the star that indicates grain scattering properties similar to the AU Mic debris disk.
43: The existence of a large debris disk surrounding HD 15115 adds further evidence for membership
44: in the $\beta$ Pic moving group, which was previously argued based
45: on kinematics alone. Here we hypothesize that the extreme disk asymmetry is due to
46: dynamical perturbations from HIP 12545, an M star 0.5$\degr$ (0.38 pc) east of HD 15115
47: that shares a common proper motion vector, heliocentric distance, galactic space velocity,
48: and age.
49: \end{abstract}
50: \keywords{stars: individual(\objectname{HD 15115}) - circumstellar matter}
51:
52: \section{Introduction}
53: Volume-limited, far-infrared surveys of the solar neighborhood suggest that $\sim$15\% of
54: main sequence stars have excess thermal emission indicative of circumstellar grains \citep{aumann85, bap93, meyer07}.
55: Direct imaging of dust scattered light reveals the geometry of the grain population relative
56: to the star, which further elucidates the origin of dust. In some cases, a circumstellar nebulosity may be
57: amorphous with asymmetric striated features produced when stellar radiation pressure deflects
58: interstellar dust \citep{kalas02}. In other cases, such as $\beta$ Pictoris and Fomalhaut, the
59: geometry of dust is consistent with a circumstellar disk or belt related to the formation of
60: planetesimals \citep{smith84, kalas05}. Though larger bodies such as comets and asteroids
61: are not directly observed, they most likely exist as a reservoir for injecting fresh debris
62: into the system over the lifetime of the star. Furthermore, circumstellar debris disks display
63: significant structure and asymmetry that may be linked, in principle, to dynamical perturbations from a
64: planetary system \citep{roques94, liou99, moro02}. Unfortunately, only $\sim$10\% of stars with excess thermal emission
65: have detected scattered light disks due to the high contrast between the host star
66: and the low surface brightness nebulosity at optical and near-infrared wavelengths.
67: Fortunately, the observational capabilities
68: have improved in recent years due to instrument upgrades on the Hubble Space
69: Telescope (HST) and the implementation of adaptive optics (AO) on large, ground-based
70: telescopes.
71:
72: Here we show new scattered light images of a debris disk surrounding HD 15115, an F2 star at 45 pc (Table 1),
73: first reported as a source of thermal excess emission by \citet{silverstone00}. The spectral energy
74: distribution is consistent with a single temperature dust
75: belt at $\sim$35 AU radius with an estimated dust mass of 0.047 M$_{\earth}$ \citep{zuck04, williams06}.
76: Recently, \citet{moor06} identified HD 15115 as a candidate for membership
77: in the 12 Myr-old $\beta$ Pic moving group (BPMG), based on new radial velocity measurements
78: that resulted in galactic kinematics similar to those of the BPMG.
79:
80: \section{Observations \& Data Analysis}
81: We first detected the HD 15115 disk in scattered light using the HST ACS High Resolution Camera (HRC)
82: on 2006 July 17. We used the F606W broadband filter and the 1.8$\arcsec$ diameter occulting
83: spot to artificially eclipse the star.
84: Three flatfielded frames of 700 seconds each from standard pipeline processing of the HST data archive
85: were median combined for cosmic ray rejection.
86: The point spread function was then subtracted iteratively using five other stars of similar
87: spectral type obtained from the HST archive. The relative intensity scaling between images was iteratively
88: adjusted until the residual image showed a mean radial profile equal to zero
89: intensity perpendicular to the circumstellar disk.
90: The images were then corrected for geometric distortion, giving a 25 mas pixel$^{-1}$ scale.
91:
92: The resulting optical images revealed a needle-like feature projecting westward from the star to the
93: edge of the field, but with almost no counterpart to the east. Given the high degree of asymmetry
94: that could conceivably arise from instrumental scattering, we endeavored to confirm the disk
95: using the Keck II telescope with AO on 2006 October 07 and 2007 January 26. Utilizing the near-infrared
96: camera NIRC2, a 0.4$\arcsec$ radius occulting spot and a 10 mas pixel scale, we confirmed the
97: existence of the disk in J (1.2 $\mu$m), H (1.6 $\mu$m), and K$^\prime$ (2.2 $\mu$m). PSF subtraction
98: is accomplished by allowing the sky to rotate relative to the detector, thereby separating the stellar
99: PSF from the disk.
100: The observing procedure and data reduction procedure are fully described in
101: \citet{fitz07}. Due to poor observing conditions in October, including intermittent cirrus clouds, we used only
102: the best fraction of data by visually selecting frames of relatively constant intensity and PSF sharpness.
103: The resulting effective integration times
104: are 450 s, 980 s, and 600 s for J, H, and K$^\prime$, respectively. Standard star observations
105: were obtained under similar, non-photometric conditions and processed in a similar manner.
106: In January 2007 we re-observed HD 15115 (1930 s cumulative integration time) and two standard
107: stars under photometric conditions from Keck using the same instrumentation with the H broadband filter.
108: However, the observations were made after meridian transit
109: and the limited rotation of the sky relative to the instrumental PSF causes disk emission to be included
110: in the PSF estimate, resulting in disk self-subtraction at small radii. Our analysis of the 2007 January
111: data therefore yields a detection of the west ansa in the region 1.3$\arcsec - 3.3\arcsec$ radius.
112: The photometry in this second epoch agrees well with that of the first epoch (on average, the
113: 2007 January disk photometry is 0.13 mag arcsec$^{-2}$ fainter than 2006 October), suggesting that our
114: frame selection technique for the first epoch of cloudy conditions effectively filtered out non-photometric data.
115:
116: \section{Results}
117: Fig. 1 shows the PSF-subtracted images of HD 15115 with HST and with Keck.
118: The west side of the disk in the optical HST data has PA $= 278\degr.5 \pm 0.5$ and
119: is detected from the edge of the occulting spot at 1.5$\arcsec$ (67 AU) radius
120: to the edge of the field at 12.38$\arcsec$ (554 AU) radius. The east midplane
121: is detected as far as $\sim$7$\arcsec$ (315 AU) radius. At this radius the east midplane
122: begins to intersect the outer portion of the coronagraph's 3.0$\arcsec$ occulting spot.
123: Further east, past the spot and to the edge of the field, no nebulosity is detected 9.0$\arcsec - 14.9\arcsec$ radius.
124: The appearance of the disk is more symmetric in the 2006 October Keck data, which
125: show the disk between 0.7$\arcsec$ (31 AU) - 2.5$\arcsec$ (112 AU).
126:
127: Optical surface brightness contours (Fig. 2) reveal a sharp midplane morphology for the
128: west extension that indicates an edge-on orientation to the line of sight. The west midplane is qualitatively
129: similar to that of $\beta$ Pic's northeast midplane, including a characteristic
130: width asymmetry \citep{kalas95, goli06}. The northern side of the west midplane is more vertically
131: extended than the southern side. For example, the full-width at half-maximum
132: across the disk midplane at 2$\arcsec$ radius is 0.19$\arcsec \pm 0.10\arcsec$
133: in both the optical and NIR data. However, the vertical cuts are not
134: symmetric about the midplane when measuring the half-width at quarter-maximum (HWQM).
135: The HWQM north of the west midplane is $1.6\pm 0.1$ times greater than that of the HWQM south of the west midplane.
136: This width asymmetry is
137: confirmed in the Keck data. If the width asymmetry is found to be in the opposite direction in
138: the opposite midplane, then \citet{kalas95} refer to such a feature as the butterfly asymmetry.
139: The butterfly asymmetry is evident in the morphology of $\beta$ Pic, that \citet{goli06} recently related
140: to the presence of a second disk midplane tilted relative to the main disk midplane.
141: However, our detection of HD 15115's east midplane has insufficient signal
142: to noise to confirm the presence of a width asymmetry here.
143:
144: We note that none of the surface brightness
145: profiles show evidence for significant flattening inward toward the star (Fig. 3).
146: All four surface brightness profiles
147: are well-represented by a single power law decrease
148: with radius. If there is an inner dust depletion, then it resides within 40 AU radius.
149: This constraint is consistent with model fits of the spectral energy distribution
150: that place the dominant emitting dust component at $\sim$35 AU radius
151: \citep{zuck04, williams06}.
152:
153: The color of the disk may be estimated in the $2.0\arcsec - 3.3 \arcsec$ region
154: where the H-band and V-band data overlap (Fig. 3). At face value, $\Sigma_V - \Sigma_H \approx -0.6$ mag arcsec$^{-2}$
155: at 2$\arcsec$ radius, increasing to $-1.9$ mag arcsec$^{-2}$ at 3.3$\arcsec$ radius for the West disk
156: extension. The east ansa has similar blue scattering at 2$\arcsec$ radius,
157: but the V-band surface brightness profile is steeper in the east than in the west, giving a roughly
158: constant blue color with increasing radius in the east.
159:
160: In a future paper we will present a detailed model of dust scattering and thermal emission properties,
161: which requires a more complicated treatment of the obvious disk asymmetry.
162: However, for isotropically scattering grains in an edge-on disk, an analytic approach
163: shows that the grain number density distribution as a function of radius within the disk
164: midplane follows a power-law with index equivalent to one
165: minus the sky-projected radial midplane power-law index. From the Keck data in Fig. 3, we estimate that
166: the disk number density distribution decreases with disk radius as $r^{-3}$ in the inner region
167: up to $\sim$3.3$\arcsec$ radius for both sides of the disk. At $>3.3\arcsec$ radius, the optical data show that
168: this profile continues for the east extension, but that
169: the disk number density profiles flattens for the west extension,
170: as described in Fig. 3. A precise measurement of the color and polarization of the disk scattered light is
171: necessary to further constrain the grain size distribution, the corresponding scattering phase
172: function and albedo, and the effect on the disk number density profile.
173:
174: \section{Discussion}
175: Asymmetric disk structure is evident in the majority of debris disks,
176: and most authors invoke planetary perturbations as the likely origin.
177: Secular perturbations may offset the center of global disk symmetry from the
178: location of the star, though this effect may also be produced by
179: an external perturber \citep{wyatt99}. The edge-on debris disk surrounding $\beta$
180: Pic displays a variety of radial and vertical asymmetries on large scales \citep{kalas95}
181: that may be most relevant to the study of HD 15115. In the deepest optical images
182: of the $\beta$ Pic disk, the northeast and southwest disk midplanes are traced to
183: 1835 AU and 1450 AU, respectively, giving a ratio of 1.27 \citep{larwood01}. In the
184: case of HD 15115 the corresponding ratio is $>$1.75. This ratio is a lower limit given that the 550 AU extent
185: of the west midplane is limited only by our field of view.
186:
187: A single stellar flyby, or a periodic flyby by a bound companion on an eccentric
188: orbit, has been studied as a potential mechanism for producing
189: $\beta$ Pic's large-scale asymmetry \citep{larwood01}. However, in a kinematic study
190: of $Hipparcos$-detected stars with published radial velocities, \citet{kalas01}
191: did not find any perturbers that approached closer than 0.6 pc of $\beta$ Pic, though
192: the sample was estimated as only 20\% complete.
193: In the case of HD 15115, \citet{moor06} noted that another $\beta$ Pic
194: moving group member, HIP 12545, is located relatively nearby in sky position.
195:
196: Table 1 summarizes the observed properties of both stars.
197: Their projected separation is 0.51$\degr$, which
198: translates to 0.38 pc at a mean heliocentric distance of 43 pc.
199: Within the uncertainties, the proper motion vectors, the ($U,V$) galactic space motions,
200: and heliocentric distance are identical. Furthermore,
201: the eastward location of HIP 12545 is in the direction of the truncated
202: side of the HD 15115 debris disk. This geometry is consistent with
203: the dynamical simulation of a disk disrupted by a stellar flyby in \citet{larwood01}.
204: Specifically, in their Fig. 18, the long end of a highly perturbed disk is located
205: in the direction of periastron. The perturber follows a parabolic trajectory such
206: that in a later epoch it is located in the direction opposite of periastron, or in
207: the direction of the truncated side of the disk. Periastron in these models
208: is $\sim$700 AU, with an initial disk radius of $\sim$500 AU.
209: Overall, the ensemble of evidence favors further consideration
210: of HD 15115 and HIP 12545 as a possible wide-separation
211: multiple system with a highly eccentric orbit ($e > 0.95$).
212:
213: If the heliocentric distances are in fact nearly
214: equivalent, then the projected sky separation
215: approximates the true separation. \citet{kalas01} discuss the
216: Roche radius, $a_t$, of a star as containing the volume within which
217: the stellar potential dominates the Galactic tidal field. Using
218: their Eq. 2 and the stellar mass estimates in our Table 1,
219: we find $a_t$ = 1.1 pc and $a_t $= 0.7 pc for HD 15115 and HIP 12545,
220: respectively. Therefore, for a small body gravitationally bound to
221: HD 15115, the potential well of HIP 12545 exerts a more significant
222: perturbing force than the Galactic tidal field at the current epoch.
223: This is not the case if we
224: take the $Hipparcos$ parallaxes at face value. These give a line-of-sight
225: separation between the stars of $\sim$4 pc, and we derive
226: a 3-D separation of 5.1$\pm$2.8 pc. We further calculate that
227: closest approach will occur $\sim$1 Myr in the $future$. Therefore, improving
228: the parallax measurements for both stars is a critical task for
229: future work that would examine their possible physical association.
230:
231: A prediction of the \citet{larwood01} model is that the perturber may capture
232: disk material, and display a tenuous and highly asymmetric tail of escaping
233: material pointing away from the mother disk. To test the hypothesis that
234: HD 15115 suffered a close encounter with HIP 12545, high-contrast observations of HIP 12545
235: should reveal circumstellar nebulosity due to captured material.
236: Since this is captured material, the nebulosity may not resemble a disk, and any tail should
237: point away from the mother disk (eastward).
238:
239: To futher investigate this hypothesis, we examined ACS/HRC
240: coronagraphic observations of HIP 12545 obtained by program GO-10487
241: (Principal Investigator David Ardila). The observing technique is similar
242: to that described here for HD 15115. After PSF subtraction, we do not
243: detect nebulosity in the vicinity of HIP 12545. Therefore the possibility
244: that the extreme disk asymmetry of HD 15115 is created by dynamical
245: interactions with HIP 12545 does not have further supporting evidence
246: at the present time.
247:
248:
249: Finally, we note that among the four debris disks imaged in scattered
250: light in the BPMG, the dust appears depleted for HD 15115.
251: The values of dust optical depth in 10$^{-4}$ units
252: are given as 24.3$\pm$1.1, 4.9$\pm$0.4,
253: 29.3$\pm$1.6 and 4.0$\pm$0.3 for $\beta$ Pic (A5V),
254: HD 15115 (F2V), HD 181327 (F5.5V) and AU Mic (M2V), respectively \citep{moor06}.
255: The factor of $\sim$five smaller optical depth for HD 15115 compared
256: to $\beta$ Pic and HD 181327 suggests a different evolutionary
257: path for the disk. Though a stellar flyby is one possibility, migration and dynamical
258: instabilities within a hypothetical planetary system may also
259: play a role in the rapid diminution of dust parent bodies around
260: HD 15115 \citep[e.g.][]{morbidelli97}.
261:
262: \section{Summary}
263:
264: Optical and near-infrared coronagraphic images of the F2 star
265: HD 15115 reveal a highly asymmetric debris disk with an edge-on
266: orientation. We describe the morphological and photometric
267: properties of the disk, deferring a detailed model of scattering and
268: thermal emission of grains to future work. The blue scattered
269: light color may indicate grain properties most similar to those of the
270: AU Mic debris disk, where $\Sigma_V - \Sigma_H \approx -1$ mag arcsec$^{-2}$
271: relative to the star \citep{fitz07},
272: and less like those of $\beta$ Pic, which is predominantly red scattering
273: \citep{goli06}. A key follow-up measurement would be
274: polarization, which in the case of AU Mic revealed highly porous
275: macroscopic grains \citep{graham07}.
276:
277:
278: With outer optical radius $>$550 AU, HD 15115 possesses the
279: second largest debris disk next to $\beta$ Pic. However, the length asymmetry
280: between its west and east midplanes greatly exceeds that of $\beta$ Pic
281: and other disks. HD 15115 is now the fourth debris disk discovered in
282: scattered light among the $\beta$ Pic moving group members. Future work should test
283: our hypothesis that extreme asymmetries are due to dynamical perturbations
284: from the nearby M star HIP 12545.
285: \acknowledgements
286: {\bf Acknowledgements:} Support for GO-10896 was provided by NASA through a grant from STScI
287: under NASA contract NAS5-26555.
288:
289: \begin{thebibliography}{}
290:
291: \bibitem[Augereau et al.(1999)]{aug99}
292: Augereau, J. C., Lagrange, A. M., Mouillet, D., Papaloizou, J. C. B. \& Grorod, P.A.
293: 1999, \aap, 348, 557
294:
295: \bibitem[Aumann(1985)]{aumann85}
296: Aumann, H.H. 1985, \pasp, 97, 885
297:
298: \bibitem[Backman \& Paresce(1993)]{bap93}
299: Backman, D. E. \& Paresce, F. 1993, in {\it Protostars and Planets III},
300: eds. E. H. Levy \& J. I. Lunine, (Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson), p. 1253
301:
302: \bibitem[Fitzgerald et al.(2007)]{fitz07}
303: Fitzgerald, M. P., Kalas, P., Duchene, G., Pinte, C. and Graham, J. R. 2007, \apj, submitted.
304:
305: \bibitem[Golimowski et al.(2006)]{goli06}
306: Golimowski, D.A., Ardila, D.R., Krist, J.R., et al., \aj, 131, 3109.
307:
308: \bibitem[Graham et al.(2007)]{graham07}
309: Graham. J.R., Kalas, P. \& Matthews, B. 2007, \apj, 654, 595.
310:
311: \bibitem[Kalas \& Jewitt(1995)]{kalas95}
312: Kalas, P. \& Jewitt, D. 1995, \aj,110, 794
313:
314: \bibitem[Kalas et al.(2001)]{kalas01}
315: Kalas, P. , Deltorn, J.-M. and Larwood, J. 2001, \apj, 533, 410
316:
317: \bibitem[Kalas et al.(2002)]{kalas02}
318: Kalas, P., Graham, J.R., Beckwith, S.V.W., Jewitt, D.C. \& Lloyd, J.P. , 2002, \apj, 567, 999
319:
320: \bibitem[Kalas et al.(2005)]{kalas05}
321: Kalas, P., Graham. J.R. \& Clampin, M.C. 2005, Nature, 435, 1067
322:
323: \bibitem[Larwood \& Kalas(2001)]{larwood01}
324: Larwood, J. D. \& Kalas, P. 2001, \mnras, 323, 402
325:
326: \bibitem[Liou \& Zook(1999)]{liou99}
327: Liou, J. -C. \& Zook, H. A. 1999, \aj, 118, 580
328:
329: \bibitem[Meyer et al.(2007)]{meyer07}
330: Meyer, M.R., Backman, D.E., Weinberger, A. J. \& Wyatt, M. 2007, in {\it Protostars and Planets V},
331: in press.
332:
333: \bibitem[Mo{\'o}r et al.(2006)]{moor06}
334: Mo{\'o}r, A., Abraham, P., Derekas, A., et al. 2006, \apj, 644, 525
335:
336: \bibitem[Morbidelli \& Valsecchi(1997)]{morbidelli97}
337: Morbidelli, A. \& Valsecchi, G. B. 1997, Icarus, 128, 464
338:
339: \bibitem[Moro-Mart{\'i}n \& Malhotra(2002)]{moro02}
340: Moro-Mart{\'i}n, A. \& Malhotra, R. 2002, \aj, 124, 2305
341:
342: \bibitem[Roques et al.(1994)]{roques94}
343: Roques, F. , Scholl, H., Sicardy, B. \& Smith, B.A. 1994, Icarus, 108, 37
344:
345: \bibitem[Silverstone (2000)]{silverstone00}
346: Silverstone, M.D., Ph.D. thesis
347:
348: \bibitem[Song et al.(2003)]{song03}
349: Song, I., Zuckerman, B., and Bessel, M.S. 2003, \apj, 599, 342
350:
351: \bibitem[Smith \& Terrile(1984)]{smith84}
352: Smith, B.A. \& Terrile, R. J. 1984, Science, 226, 1421
353:
354: \bibitem[Strubbe \& Chiang(2005)]{strubbe05}
355: Strubbe, L. E. \& Chiang, E. I. 2005, \apj, 648, 652
356:
357: \bibitem[Williams \& Andrews(2006)]{williams06}
358: Williams, J. P. \& Andrews, S. M. 2006, \apj, 653, 1480
359:
360: \bibitem[Wyatt et al.(1999)]{wyatt99}
361: Wyatt, M. C., Dermott, S.F., Telesco, C.M., et al.
362: 1999, \apj, 527, 918
363:
364: \bibitem[Zuckerman \& Song(2004)]{zuck04}
365: Zuckerman, B. \& Song, I. 2004, \apj, 603, 738
366:
367:
368:
369: \end{thebibliography}
370:
371:
372: \clearpage
373:
374: \begin{figure}
375: \plotone{f1.eps}
376: \epsscale{0.2}
377: \caption{
378: False-color, log scale images of the HD 15115 disk as originally
379: discovered using the ACS/HRC F606W ($\lambda_c$= 591 nm, $\Delta\lambda$ = 234 nm)
380: [LEFT] and confirmed in H-band with Keck II adaptive optics [RIGHT; 2006 October 26 data].
381: North is up, east is left and the scale bars span 5$\arcsec$.
382: In the HST image we use gray fields over the occulting bar and 3.0$\arcsec$
383: occulting spot located to the left of HD 15115, as well as a gray disk covering PSF-subtraction
384: artifacts surrounding HD 15115 itself. If the HD 15115 disk were a symmetric structure, then
385: the east side of the disk would have been detected within the rectangular box, shown below
386: the ACS/HRC occulting finger. The NIR data [RIGHT] show a more symmetric disk within
387: 2$\arcsec$ radius, with asymmetry becoming more apparent beyond 2$\arcsec$ radius.
388: Due to poor observing conditions, the field is contaminated by residual noise due to the
389: diffraction pattern of the telescope (e.g. at 2 o'clock and 7 o'clock relative to HD 15115).
390: However, whereas the residual diffraction pattern noise of the telescope rotates relative to the sky
391: orientation over a series of exposures, the image of the disk remains fixed and it is
392: confirmed as real.
393: \label{fig1}}
394: \end{figure}
395:
396: \begin{figure}
397: \epsscale{0.5}
398: \plotone{f2.eps}
399: \caption{
400: Surface brightness isocontours for the HD 15115 debris disk converted from F606W to
401: Johnson V-band (derived using STSDAS/SYNPHOT with a Kurucz model atmosphere and
402: the appropriate observatory parameters).
403: The disk was rotate by 8$\degr$ clockwise such that the midplane
404: lies along a horizontal line. The bottom
405: frame is the east extension, transposed across the vertical axis, and the gray region
406: marks the area occupied by the ACS/HRC occulting finger and 3.0$\arcsec$ occulting spot.
407: The left edge of the frame corresponds to 2$\arcsec$ radius from
408: the star. The innermost contour (bold) is 19.0 mag arcsec$^{-2}$
409: and the outermost contour represents 23.0 mag arcsec$^{-2}$,
410: with a contour interval of 0.5 mag arcsec$^{-2}$.
411: \label{fig2}}
412: \end{figure}
413:
414:
415: \begin{figure}
416: \epsscale{0.5}
417: \plotone{f3.eps}
418: \caption{
419: Radial surface brightness (mag arcsec$^{-2}$) distribution along the west and east midplanes of HD 15115.
420: We plot the difference between the measured disk surface brightness and the stellar
421: magnitudes of H=5.86 and V=6.80.
422: Disk photometry was extracted from boxes 0.25$\arcsec \times 0.25\arcsec$ centered
423: on the midplane. We plot a representative sample of error bars that gives the
424: standard deviation of the background residuals as a function of radius.
425: The aperture corrections derived from point source photometry
426: are 0.48 and 0.57 for the H-band data in the 2006 October and 2007 January
427: observations, respectively, and 0.70 for the V band data.
428: The H-band radial profiles between 0.7$\arcsec$ and 2.3$\arcsec$ radius
429: may be described by power-laws with indices
430: -3.7 and -4.4 for the west and east disk extensions, respectively.
431: In the V band, the east midplane profile may be fit by a power-law
432: with index -4.0 between 2.0$\arcsec$ and 6.0$\arcsec$ radius.
433: Thus, our data do not show a significant color gradient as a function
434: of radius for the east ansa. The west midplane profile in V band may be fit by a single
435: power-law with index -3.0 between 2.0$\arcsec$ and 10.0$\arcsec$ radius. This
436: profile is significantly shallower than the H band profile, resulting in a blue
437: color gradient as a function of radius for the west ansa.
438: \label{fig3} }
439: \end{figure}
440:
441:
442: \clearpage
443:
444: \begin{deluxetable}{lllll}
445: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
446: \tablecaption{Stellar Properties\label{tbl-1}}
447: \tablewidth{0pt}
448: \tablehead{
449: \colhead{} & \colhead{HD 15115} & \colhead{HIP 12545} & \colhead{Ref.}
450: }
451: \startdata
452: Spectral Type & F2 & M0 & Hipparcos\\
453: $m_V$ (mag) & 6.79 & 10.28 & Hipparcos\\
454: Mass (M$_\odot$) &1.6 & 0.5 & Astrophys. Quant.\\
455: Distance (pc) & $44.78^{+2.22}_{-2.01}$ & $40.54^{+4.38}_{-3.61}$ &Hipparcos\\
456: RA (ICRS) & 02 26 16.2447 & 02 41 25.89 & Hipparcos\\
457: DEC (ICRS) & +06 17 33.188 & +05 59 18.41&Hipparcos \\
458: $\mu_\alpha$(mas/yr) &$86.09 \pm 1.09$ & $82.32 \pm 4.46$ &Hipparcos \\
459: $\mu_\delta$ (mas/yr) &$-50.13 \pm 0.71$ & $-55.13 \pm 2.45$ &Hipparcos\\
460: $\mu_\alpha$(mas/yr) &$87.1 \pm 1.2$ & $82.3 \pm 4.3$ &Tycho-2\\
461: $\mu_\delta$ (mas/yr) &$-50.9 \pm 1.2$ & $-55.1 \pm 2.7$ &Tycho-2\\
462: U (km / s) &$-13.2\pm1.9$ & $-14.0 \pm 0.5$& a \\
463: V (km / s) &$-17.8 \pm 1.2$ & $-16.7 \pm 0.9$& a\\
464: W (km / s) &$-6.0 \pm 2.3$ & $-10.0 \pm 0.5$& a \\
465: \enddata
466: \tablenotetext{a}{Galactic kinematics for HD 15115 and HIP 12545 from
467: \citet{moor06} and \citet{song03}, respectively
468: }
469: \end{deluxetable}
470: %
471: %
472: \clearpage
473: %
474:
475: \end{document}
476:
477: