1: \documentclass{pasj00}
2: \draft
3:
4: \def\simlt{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel < \over \sim \;$}}
5: \def\simgt{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel > \over \sim \;$}}
6: \def\cm3{{\rm cm^{-3}}}
7: \def\kms{km s$^{-1}$}
8: \def\msol{{M$_\odot$}}
9: \def\boone{B0104$-$72.3}
10: \def\eoone{B0104$-$72.3}
11: \def\akari{{\em AKARI}}
12: \def\tex{T_{\rm ex}}
13: \def\nh2{N({\rm H}_2)}
14: \def\um{$\mu$m}
15:
16: \begin{document}
17: \SetRunningHead{Author(s) in page-head}{Running Head}
18: \Received{2007/2/}%{yyyy/mm/dd}
19: \Accepted{2007/3/}%{yyyy/mm/dd}
20:
21: \title{{\em AKARI} Detection of the Infrared-Bright Supernova Remnant \boone\ in the
22: Small Magellanic Cloud}
23:
24: %\title{Bright Infrared Emission from \boone\ Supernova Remnant in the
25: %Small Magellanic Cloud}
26:
27: %%% begin:list of authors
28: % Do NOT capitalize all letters in "textsc".
29: \author{Bon-Chul \textsc{Koo}\altaffilmark{1}
30: Ho-Gyu \textsc{Lee}\altaffilmark{1}
31: Dae-Sik \textsc{Moon}\altaffilmark{2}
32: Jae-Joon \textsc{Lee}\altaffilmark{1}
33: Ji Yeon \textsc{Seok}\altaffilmark{1}
34: Hyung Mok \textsc{Lee}\altaffilmark{1}
35: Seung Soo \textsc{Hong}\altaffilmark{1}
36: Myung Gyoon \textsc{Lee}\altaffilmark{1}
37: Hidehiro \textsc{Kaneda}\altaffilmark{3}
38: Yoshifusa \textsc{Ita}\altaffilmark{3}
39: Woong-Seob \textsc{Jeong}\altaffilmark{3}
40: Takashi \textsc{Onaka}\altaffilmark{4}
41: Itsuki \textsc{Sakon}\altaffilmark{4}
42: Takao \textsc{Nakagawa}\altaffilmark{3}
43: Hiroshi \textsc{Murakami}\altaffilmark{3}
44: }
45: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul
46: 151-742, KOREA}
47: \email{koo@astrohi.snu.ac.kr; hglee@astro.snu.ac.kr; jjlee@astro.snu.ac.kr;
48: jyseok@astro.snu.ac.kr; hmlee@astro.snu.ac.kr; sshong@astro.snu.ac.kr;
49: mglee@astro.snu.ac.kr}
50: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Toronto,
51: Toronto, ON M5S 3H4, CANADA}
52: \email{moon@astro.utoronto.ca}
53: \altaffiltext{3}{Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Japan Aerospace
54: Exploration Agency, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229-8510, JAPAN}
55: \email{kaneda@ir.isas.jaxa.jp; yita@ir.isas.jaxa.jp; jeongws@ir.isas.jaxa.jp;
56: nakagawa@ir.isas.jaxa.jp; hmurakam@ir.isas.jaxa.jp}
57: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Astronomy, Graduate School of Science,
58: University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0003, JAPAN}
59: \email{onaka@astron.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp; isakon@maitta.astron.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp}
60:
61: %%% Please use the following style in case that sorting by
62: %%% affilation is impossible.
63: %
64: % \author{%
65: % D-Firstname \textsc{D-Familyname}\altaffilmark{1}
66: % E-Firstname \textsc{E-Familyname}\altaffilmark{1,2}
67: % and
68: % F-Firstname \textsc{F-Familyname}\altaffilmark{2}}
69: % \altaffiltext{1}{Address of Institute}
70: % \email{ddddd@xxx.xxx.xx.xx}
71: % \email{eeeee@xxx.xxx.xx.xx}
72: % \altaffiltext{2}{Address of Institute}
73:
74: %% `\KeyWords{}' always has to be placed before `\maketitle'.
75: \KeyWords{ISM: individual (\eoone) -- Magellanic Clouds -- supernova remnants} %Do NOT move this preamble from here!
76:
77: \maketitle
78:
79: \begin{abstract}
80:
81: We present a serendipitous detection of the infrared-bright
82: supernova remnant (SNR) \boone\ in the Small Magellanic Cloud
83: by the Infrared Camera (IRC) onboard \akari.
84: An elongated, partially complete shell
85: is detected in all four observed IRC bands covering 2.6--15 \um.
86: The infrared shell surrounds radio, optical, and X-ray emission
87: associated with the SNR and is probably a radiative SNR shell.
88: This is the {\em first} detection of a SNR shell in
89: this near/mid-infrared waveband in the Small Magellanic Cloud.
90: The IRC color indicates that the infrared emission might be
91: from shocked H$_2$ molecules with some possible contributions from
92: ionic lines. We conclude that \boone\ is a middle-aged SNR
93: interacting with molecular clouds, similar to the
94: Galactic SNR IC 443.
95: %We discuss the progenitor type of \boone.
96: Our results highlight the potential of \akari\ IRC observations
97: in studying SNRs, especially for diagnosing SNR shocks.
98:
99: \end{abstract}
100:
101: \section{Introduction}
102:
103: The Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) has about twenty known SNRs.
104: They have been identified and studied
105: mostly in radio, X-ray, and optical bands
106: (\cite{mat84, hey04, fil05} and references therein).
107: Infrared studies are very limited in spite of
108: their advantages in understanding the interstellar medium of
109: this nearby, metal-poor irregular galaxy
110: as well as in understanding the nature of SNRs.
111:
112: In this paper, we report the detection of the SNR
113: \boone\ (J010619$-$720527; IKT 25; hereafter \eoone) in the SMC
114: in the 2.6--15 \um\ range by the Infrared Camera (IRC) onboard \akari.
115: This is the {\em first} SNR detected in this IR band in the SMC.
116: The only other SNR detected in mid-infrared waveband
117: in the SMC is the radio/X-ray bright SNR B0102.2$-$72.19, which was
118: observed by \citet{sta05} using the
119: {\it Spitzer Space Telescope} and detected only at 24 \um.
120: \eoone\ is the faintest radio SNR in the SMC,
121: located in the northwestern area of the ``wing'' close to the ``bar''.
122: It is small ($100''$ or 29 pc at the distance of 60 kpc), and its radio structure is
123: not well resolved \citep{mat84, fil05}.
124: The faintness together with its relatively small spatial extent
125: led \citet{mat84} to suggest that it is possibly a
126: Balmer-dominated Type Ia SNR.
127: On the other hand, the remnant has a flat
128: radio spectrum with a spectral index
129: $\alpha=0.19\pm 0.28$ ($S_\nu\propto \nu^\alpha$; \cite{fil05}),
130: which suggests a possibility of Crab-like SNR or `plerion'.
131: The remnant has been studied in X-rays using {\it ROSAT} and {\it XMM}.
132: \citet{hug94}
133: showed that the X-ray emission is composed of a
134: diffuse emission extending along the north-south direction and
135: a point-like source at the southern end.
136: They tentatively identified the point-like source as a
137: Be/X-ray binary system and proposed a core-collapse SN origin for
138: the remnant. \citet{hey04} obtained an X-ray spectrum of the remnant
139: using the {\it XMM-Newton} observatory and showed that the
140: Fe abundance is enhanced
141: with respect to the mean O, Ne and Mg abundance values.
142: They concluded that the X-ray emission is possibly from ejecta remains of
143: Type Ia. In summary, the radio and X-ray observations do not
144: yield a coherent picture on the nature of the remnant.
145: We show that \eoone\ has a well defined
146: IR shell surrounding the radio, optical, and X-ray emissions and that
147: \eoone\ is probably interacting with molecular clouds. We discuss
148: the nature of the SNR based on \akari\ observations.
149:
150: \section{Serendipitous Detection}
151:
152: \eoone\ was detected serendipitously
153: during the pointed observation of
154: the oxygen-rich SNR B0103$-$72.6 (DEM S125; \cite{park03}) in the SMC
155: using the \akari\ IRC on November 8, 2006.
156: The IRC is equipped with three waveband channels
157: with 10$'$ $\times$ 10$'$ field-of-view (FOV),
158: which operate simultaneously at any exposure time (\cite{ona07}).
159: Among them the NIR and MIR-S channels share the same FOV,
160: while the MIR-L channel has FOV 25$'$ away from them.
161: \eoone\ happened to be in the NIR/MIR-S FOV
162: when B0103$-$72.6 was centered at the MIR-L FOV.
163: We used the two-filter mode (IRC02), which
164: gave two band images at each channel:
165: N3 and N4 in NIR, and S7 and S11 in MIR-S.
166: N3, N4, S7, and S11 images have isophotal wavelengths of
167: 3.19, 4.33, 7.12 and 10.45 $\mu$m with effective bandwidths of
168: 0.87, 1.53, 1.75 and 4.12 $\mu$m, respectively.
169: The pixel sizes of the NIR and MIR-S channels are
170: $1.''46$ and $2.''34$, respectively.
171: The angular resolutions are
172: %(in-flight average FWHM) are
173: $4.''0$, $4.''2$, $5.''1$, and $4.''8$
174: in N3, N4, S7, and S11, respectively \citep{ona07}.
175: The total on-source integration times were
176: 178 s for NIR and 196 s for MIR-S.
177: The basic calibration and data handling
178: including dark subtraction, linearity fitting, distortion correction,
179: flat fielding, and image combining were processed using the
180: standard IRC Imaging Data Reduction Pipeline version 070104
181: \citep{ita07}.
182: We, however, used our own flat images derived from
183: the North Ecliptic Pole data around our observing date for the MIR-S,
184: %(from October 8 to December 8)
185: because the IRC MIR-S flats have noticeable ``dark pattern''
186: and, if we use the provided superflats, it
187: leaves an artifact even after the flat-fielding (see IRC Data User's Manual).
188: The astrometric solutions were obtained by matching with
189: the coordinates of 2MASS stars in the field using
190: the Pipeline process {\it putwcs}.
191: The resulting positional uncertainty ($1\sigma$) is $\le 0.''4$ for
192: N3, N4, S7, and $1''$ for S11.
193:
194: \begin{figure}
195: \begin{center}
196: \FigureFile(110mm,110mm){fig1_xv.eps}
197: %%% \FigureFile(width,height){filename}
198: \end{center}
199: \caption{\akari\ images of the SNR \boone\ in N3, N4, S7, and S11 bands.
200: Contour levels are linearly spaced
201: starting at 0.18, 0.30, 3.90, and 16.4 MJy sr$^{-1}$
202: with steps of 0.04, 0.04, 0.06, and 0.1 MJy sr$^{-1}$ in
203: N3, N4, S7, and S11 images, respectively.
204: The N3 and N4 images show trails of pixels with enhanced brightness,
205: which is a detector artifact called
206: multiplexer bleed, or ``muxbleed'' (IRC Data User's Manual).
207: The black cross marks the geometrical center of the shell
208: at (01$^{\rm h}$ 06$^{\rm m}$ 18.$^{\rm s}$3,$-72^\circ$ 05$'$ 37$''$).
209: The white crosses mark the peak positions in the S7 band.
210: The scale bar in the S7 image represents an angular size of $1'$.
211: North is up and east is to the left.}\label{fig:fig1}
212: \end{figure}
213:
214: Fig. 1 shows \akari\ images of \eoone.
215: A partially-complete shell structure is apparent in all four bands.
216: The shell is elongated along the northeast-southwest direction and
217: has a bright, well-defined circular
218: northeastern portion (hereafter the IR-NE shell).
219: The brightness of the IR-NE shell is not uniform, and there is a
220: prominent bright spot at the southern end which is
221: marked by a white cross.
222: The maximum, background-subtracted brightness of
223: the spot is $\sim 0.11$, 0.17, 0.41, and 0.42 MJy sr$^{-1}$ in
224: N3, N4, S7, and S11, respectively.
225: The rest part of the shell
226: is mostly missing, but, to the southwest,
227: a small segment of the shell (the IR-SW shell), which
228: has a curvature opposite to the IR-NE shell, is visible.
229: Some faint, filamentary emission is also visible
230: between the two shell parts.
231: These IR-NE and IR-SW shells
232: surround the radio emission neatly (see next section),
233: so that they are likely to be parts of the SNR shell.
234: The extent of the SNR determined from Fig. 1 is
235: $100''\times 65''$ (or 29 pc $\times$ 19 pc).
236:
237: \section{Comparison with Other Waveband Images}
238:
239: \begin{figure}
240: \begin{center}
241: \FigureFile(110mm,110mm){fig2_xv.eps}
242: %%% \FigureFile(width,height){filename}
243: \end{center}
244: \caption{\akari\ three-color image generated from N4 (B), S7 (G), and S11 (R).
245: White contours show the 843 MHz radio map of \citet{mat84} while
246: yellow contours show the {\it ROSAT} HRI 0.5--2.0 keV map.
247: }\label{fig:fig2}
248: \end{figure}
249:
250: Fig. 2 is our three-color image representing the N4 (B), S7 (G), and S11 (R)
251: emission of \eoone. The white contours represent the
252: 843 MHz radio map (FWHM=$43''$)
253: from the Molonglo Observatory Synthesis Telescope
254: \citep{mat84}. The radio emission is elongated along the
255: northeast-southwest direction and almost perfectly
256: fits into the IR shell.
257: It has the maximum inside the IR-NE shell and
258: an extended `plateau' to southwest, which is confined
259: to a relatively narrow region.
260: The 2.37 GHz map (FWHM=$40''$) of \citet{fil05} obtained by using
261: the Australian Telescope Compact Array shows essentially
262: the same radio morphology.
263: It is possible that the remnant has a shell structure in the radio too but
264: is smeared because of the poor resolutions of
265: these interferometric observations.
266: We have simulated how the remnant would appear with a large beam
267: if the radio brightness is proportional to that of the IR shell.
268: We convolved the S7 image, where the shell is most prominent,
269: with a Gaussian beam of FWHM=$43''$.
270: The simulated map also
271: shows a centrally brightened remnant, but its
272: peak occurs close to the IR-NE shell,
273: $\sim 15''$ north to the peak of the 843 MHz emission.
274: Another difference between the simulated and the observed radio maps
275: is that, in the former, there is a separate peak at the position
276: of the IR-SW shell while, in the latter, the intensity decreases
277: smoothly toward the southwest.
278: The above comparison leads us to conclude that the radio
279: brightness distribution should be
280: different from the IR brightness distribution.
281: The radio emission
282: may peak inside the IR-NE shell and have some
283: extended emission toward the southwest.
284:
285: The yellow contours in Fig. 2 are
286: the 0.5--2.0 keV {\it ROSAT} High-Resolution Imager (HRI) data provided
287: by {\it SkyView}
288: and show that X-rays are distributed across the central part of the remnant
289: along the southeast-northwest direction (see also Fig. 3 of \cite{hug94}).
290: There is no apparent X-ray emission associated with the IR shell.
291: Toward the northwest,
292: the X-ray emission extends beyond the boundary connecting the
293: IR NE and SW shells.
294: The bright, compact X-ray source near the southeastern
295: boundary of the remnant is the source
296: identified as a Be/X-ray binary system by \citet{hug94}.
297: \citet{hey04} showed that the X-ray spectrum of the
298: diffuse emission can be fitted by a
299: thermal plasma model at 0.6 keV.
300:
301: In the optical, \eoone\ has a complex morphology \citep{mat84}.
302: We can see optical filaments coincident with the IR shells in
303: the H$\alpha$ and [S II] $\lambda\lambda$ 6717/6731 images
304: of \citet{mat84}.
305: The bright spot in the IR-NE shell appears bright in the optical
306: too, but the rest of the shell is generally faint.
307: Instead there is brighter, filamentary optical
308: emission all over the southwestern area
309: and also in the northeastern area of the remnant.
310: These optical emission features seem to correspond to the
311: faint IR filamentary features in the N4/S7 images of Fig. 1,
312: although the comparison is limited by the resolution and sensitivity.
313: (We can also identify some corresponding
314: filaments in their [O III] $\lambda$ 5007 image but
315: only tentatively due to poor S/N ratio of the image.)
316: In short, the IR shells have associated optical emission
317: but this emission is
318: faint. Instead there are bright optical filaments associated
319: with faint IR features.
320:
321: \section{IRC Colors and the Origin of IR Emission}
322:
323: In this section, we derive IRC colors of the
324: IR shells and explore the origin of the IR emission.
325: We derive the IRC fluxes of the shells
326: by summing all signals inside an ellipse surrounding
327: each of them.
328: Point sources are excluded by putting masks
329: on them. The same areas are masked out in all bands even if
330: they are visible only in the NIR bands.
331: The background
332: contribution is estimated from surrounding annulus and is subtracted.
333: The contamination due to the muxbleed in the bands N3 and N4
334: is also estimated and subtracted.
335: % which is 13\% and 3\% respectively.
336: The conversion to astronomical fluxes is performed by
337: using the conversion factors in the IRC Data Users Manual,
338: which were derived from standard stars.
339: The fluxes are not extinction-corrected because the extinction is small.
340: \citet{hey04} obtained an H nuclei column density of
341: $4.8\pm 1.7 \times 10^{21}$~cm$^{-2}$ toward the source,
342: while the Galactic hydrogen column density toward the SMC is
343: $6.1 \times 10^{20}$~cm$^{-2}$ according to the Galactic neutral
344: hydrogen calculator COLDEN from Chandra X-ray center.
345: This will give an extinction of 0.04 mag at 3.2~\um\
346: using the extinction cross sections in the Milky Way and SMC provided by
347: \citet{wei01}\footnote{
348: Data available at http://www.astro.princeton.edu/~draine/dust/dustmix.html.}.
349: The results are summarized in Table 1.
350: Table 1 shows that the IRC colors of the IR-NE shell is
351: (N3/N4, N4/S7, S7/S11)$\sim (0.7, 0.4, 0.8)$.
352: For comparison, we have derived
353: the fluxes of the bright spot in the IR-NE shell and they
354: are listed in Table 1 too. Its IRC colors agree well with those of
355: the IR-NE shell.
356:
357: The fluxes in Table 1 are the fluxes within ellipses excluding the areas occupied
358: by point sources, which amount to a significant portion (15--35\%) of
359: the ellipses,
360: so that they represent rough estimates for the fluxes of the sources.
361: The colors, however, should be relatively accurate because they are
362: the ratios of fluxes of the same areas. The errors are due to uncertainties in
363: the flux calibration and background subtraction.
364: The absolute flux calibration of the IRC
365: array for a point source is accurate to 5--6\% \citep{ona07}.
366: The flux calibration for an extended source is different
367: from a point source,
368: because the incident lights are scattered in the IRC array and
369: this diffuse scattered light is not included in the point source
370: flux calibration but is partly included for an extended source
371: (e.g., \cite{coh07}). According to \citet{sak07}, 4--5\% of the incident light
372: of a bright source is lost as scattered light spread in
373: horizontal direction in S7 and S11.
374: But the correction factor
375: depends on the brightness distribution of the source and wavelength,
376: and has not been fully studied yet.
377: For the IR shells, which are not truly extended sources,
378: we consider that 10\% is a reasonable number for the error in color
379: associated with this extended-source correction.
380: Then, including the uncertainties in the background subtraction,
381: we estimate that the uncertainties in the colors in Table 1 are
382: $\simlt 15$\% for the bright spot and $\simlt 30$\% for
383: the IR shells.
384:
385: \begin{table}
386: \caption{IRC Fluxes and Colors of the SNR \boone.}\label{tab:first}
387: \begin{center}
388: \begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
389: \hline
390: & Area$^a$ & \multicolumn4{c}{Flux} & \multicolumn3{c}{Color} \\
391: & & N3 & N4 & S7 & S11 & N3/N4 & N4/S7 & S7/S11 \\
392: \hline
393: IR-NE shell & $84''\times 66''$ & 2.4 & 3.2 & 7.8 & 9.5 & 0.75 & 0.41 & 0.82 \\
394: Bright spot$^b$ & $30''\times 30''$ & 0.34 & 0.49 & 1.2 & 1.4 & 0.68 & 0.42 & 0.87 \\
395: IR-SW shell & $43''\times 27''$ & 0.31 & 0.41 & 0.78 & 0.84& 0.75 & 0.53 & 0.93 \\
396: \hline
397: RCW 103 (Fast $J$ shock)$^c$ & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... & 0.01 & 0.30 & 0.65 \\
398: IC 443 (Molecular shock)$^d$ & ... & ... & ... & ... & ... & 1.1 & 0.44 & 1.1 \\
399: \hline
400: \end{tabular}
401: \end{center}
402: Note. --- Fluxes are the values (in mJy) at reference wavelengths
403: when $F_\nu\propto \nu^{-1}$. The reference wavelengths for
404: the N3, N4, S7, and S11 bands are 3.2, 4.1, 7.0, and 11.0~\um.
405: The fluxes are rough estimates of the total fluxes of the sources.
406: The uncertainties in the colors are $\simlt 15$\% for the bright spot
407: while it is 30\% for the IR shells (see text for details).
408: For comparison, the expected IRC colors of the Galactic SNRs
409: RCW 103 and IC 443 are listed.\hfill\break
410: %IR-NE shell & 2.42 3.22 7.95 9.62 0.75 0.41 0.83
411: %Bright spot & 0.335 0.491 1.20 1.45 0.68 0.41 0.83
412: %IR-SW shell & 0.307 0.408 0.812 1.200 0.75 0.50 0.68
413: $^a$ Major and minor axes of elliptical areas used for the flux calculation.
414: The areas occupied by point sources are excluded, which amounts to
415: 15\%, 35\%, and 28\% for the IR-NE shell, Bright spot, and IR-SW shell.\hfill\break
416: $^b$ The bright spot in the IR-NE shell at
417: (01$^{\rm h}$ 06$^{\rm m}$ 24.$^{\rm s}$1, $-72^\circ$ 05$'$ 39$''$). \hfill\break
418: $^c$ Calculated IRC colors of a bright optical filament in RCW 103
419: based on the ISO spectrum of \citet{oli99}. \hfill\break
420: $^d$ Calculated IRC colors of shocked molecular gas in IC 443
421: based on the two temperature model of \citet{rho01}. (See text for
422: details.)
423:
424: \end{table}
425:
426: %%%
427:
428: The NIR/MIR emission of SNRs could be generally composed of
429: ionic forbidden lines, rotational and ro-vibrational
430: lines of H$_2$ molecule, PAH (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon) bands,
431: or continuum emission from hot dust (e.g., see \cite{rea06}).
432: Synchrotron emission is usually negligible except for young
433: Crab-like SNRs. In \eoone, the radio continuum is faint and
434: the IR brightness distribution is considered to be different
435: from that of radio continuum (\S~3), so that the synchrotron emission
436: contribution should be negligible.
437: The absence of an associated X-ray emission indicates
438: that it is probably not the thermal emission from
439: collisionally-heated dust in X-ray emitting hot plasma.
440: Also, the ``flat'' IRC color cannot be achieved
441: unless the plasma density is unacceptably high
442: for usual grain size distribution (see \cite{dra81, dwe86, dwe96}).
443: The abundance of PAH molecules may be enhanced
444: in SNR shells because shocks can convert a
445: significant fraction of mass in large grains into
446: small grains or PAHs \citep{jon96}.
447: %\citet{rea06} identified several Galactic SNRs with
448: But the strong PAH bands are at
449: 3.3, 6.2, 7.7, 8.6, and 11.3 \um, so that we expect the IRC N4
450: band much fainter than the other bands.
451: The IRC color of \eoone\ is not consistent with the PAH emission.
452: We therefore consider that the observed NIR/MIR emission from
453: \eoone\ is either forbidden ionic lines or H$_2$ lines, or both,
454: from shock-heated gas.
455:
456: The existence of the optical filaments associated with the IR shells
457: indicates that the IR emission could be at least partly forbidden
458: ionic lines and/or H recombination lines from
459: fast, ionizing $J$-type shocks
460: (hereafter fast $J$ shocks; see \cite{mck84} for
461: classification of interstellar shocks) because
462: there are optical filaments associated with the IR shells.
463: Fig. 3 (top) shows an example of IR spectra
464: from fast $J$ shocks dominated by
465: ionic lines where we overlay the
466: spectral throughput of four IRC bands.
467: It is an ISO spectrum toward a bright optical
468: filament in the Galactic SNR RCW 103.
469: The strongest lines are [Fe II] 5.34 \um\ (N4), [Ar II] 6.99 \um\ (S7),
470: [Ne II] 12.81 \um\ (S11), and [Ne III] 15.56 \um.
471: These are also generally the strongest ionic lines
472: in this NIR/MIR band (2.0--17.0 \um)
473: in other SNRs \citep{dou01a,dou01b,wil06}.
474: In the band N4, Br$\alpha$ 4.05 \um\ line can be as strong as or even stronger
475: than [Fe II] 5.34 \um\ line in principle (e.g., \cite{hol89}).
476: But previous NIR observations showed that the ratio of
477: Br$\gamma$ 2.166 \um\ to [Fe II] 1.644 \um\ line is usually
478: much less ($\sim 1/50$) than theoretical expectations in SNR shocks
479: \citep{gra87, oli89, koo07}, which
480: suggests that the ratio of Br$\alpha$ to [Fe II] 5.34 \um\ line might
481: be much less than the theoretical expectation too.
482: Note that there are no strong lines in the N3 band (2.6 to 3.8 \um).
483: Hydrogen Pf series ($n=8$-11 $\rightarrow$ 5) fall
484: in this band, but the total intensity would be
485: $\sim 30$\% of Br$\alpha$ line based on the result on
486: Case B nebula \citep{hum87}.
487: Therefore, if the emission is dominated by ionic lines, then
488: the flux in N3 should be much weaker than the other three bands.
489: The IRC colors of RCW 103, for example, would be
490: (N3/N4, N4/S7, S7/S11)$=(0.01, 0.30, 0.65)$
491: (Table 1). The observed IRC colors of the IR shells are
492: not consistent with a fast $J$ shock dominated by ionic lines
493: and require H$_2$ molecular lines.
494:
495: \begin{figure}
496: \begin{center}
497: \FigureFile(140mm,100mm){fig3_xv.eps}
498: %%% \FigureFile(width,height){filename}
499: \end{center}
500: \caption{(top) An ISO spectrum toward a bright optical filament of
501: RCW 103 (\cite{oli99}). The throughput of the four IRC bands,
502: N3, N4, S7, and S11 from left to right,
503: are overlaid. (bottom) A synthesized spectrum of molecular
504: shock in IC 443 (see text for an explanation).
505: }\label{fig:fig3}
506: \end{figure}
507:
508: Fig. 3 (bottom) shows a sample spectrum from shocked
509: molecular gas dominated by H$_2$ lines.
510: It is a synthesized spectrum of IC 443 which is a
511: prototypical SNR interacting with molecular clouds. The
512: spectrum is based on the empirical, two-temperature
513: model of \citet{rho01} who showed that the observed
514: NIR/MIR spectrum of IC 443
515: \citep{ric95, ces99}
516: can be fitted well by two components;
517: one at $\tex=870$ K with H$_2$ column density
518: of $1.3\times 10^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$
519: and the other at $\tex=2970$ K with $4.0 \times 10^{18}$~cm$^{-2}$.
520: The spectrum is dominated by ro-vibrational lines in N3, and
521: by pure rotational lines in N4, S7, and S11.
522: The expected IRC colors of IC 443 are
523: (N3/N4, N4/S7, S7/S11)$=(1.1, 0.44, 1.1)$ (Table 1), which
524: are not very different from those of \eoone.
525: One might be able to fit the observed color of \eoone\ by a shock
526: model where the shock is slow ($\simlt 40$--50~\kms) and
527: molecules are not or partially dissociated
528: as in IC 443 (e.g., \cite{ric95, ces99}).
529: Such numerical studies, however, is beyond the scope of this paper.
530: We simply conclude that the observed IR emission is consistent with
531: a molecular shock, i.e., a shock propagating into molecular gas,
532: although we cannot rule out
533: some possible contribution from ionic lines.
534:
535: \section{Discussion}
536:
537: The \akari\ result shows that
538: \eoone\ has a SNR shell bright in IR.
539: According to our analysis,
540: the IR emission is probably from shocked molecular gas, which
541: indicates that \eoone\ is interacting with
542: molecular clouds (MCs).
543: The centrally-filled thermal X-rays
544: support this conclusion because many of the Galactic
545: SNRs interacting with MCs do show such X-ray characteristics,
546: e.g., \citet{rho98}, \citet{koo03}.
547: The faint optical filaments
548: associated with the IR shells are not unexpected, because molecular
549: clouds are clumpy and shocks propagating through diffuse
550: interclump medium could be fast $J$ shocks. Most of
551: the observed IR emission, however, might be from slow ($\simlt 40$~\kms)
552: non-dissociative, or partially dissociative shocks propagating
553: into dense clumps. Such multiple shocks of different natures
554: are expected and
555: have been observed in several Galactic SNRs interacting
556: with molecular clouds (e.g., \cite{che99}, \cite{rea00},
557: \cite{sne05} and references therein).
558: A prototypical one is IC 443 (G189.1+3.0; \cite{lee07}).
559: IC 443 is interacting with both atomic and molecular gas,
560: so that, in the optical, its northeastern shell that is
561: interacting with diffuse atomic gas is bright, while, in the MIR,
562: e.g., in the Midcourse Space Experiment (MSX)
563: 8.28 \um\ band, the southern shell interacting with molecular gas is bright.
564: Its extent (20 pc) is somewhat smaller than \eoone.
565: It also has faint optical filaments over the entire remnant.
566: X-rays are bright inside the remnant, which is of
567: thermal origin ($\sim 1$ keV; \cite{kaw02}).
568: Therefore, \eoone\ is quite similar to IC 443 and
569: might be a
570: middle-aged ($\simgt 10^4$~yrs) SNR expanding in a multiphase
571: interstellar medium.
572:
573: The interaction with MCs suggests that \eoone\ is
574: possibly a core-collapse SNR with a massive progenitor star.
575: Our analysis indicates that the radio nebula is
576: probably inside the IR shell, and it could be
577: a pulsar wind nebula (PWN) considering its flat spectrum.
578: The radio nebula appears too large for a
579: middle-aged PWN, but it is possible that the nebula can be
580: rejuvenated through the interaction with
581: the SNR shell as in the Galactic SNR CTB 80 \citep{fes88, koo90}.
582: CTB 80 is another SNR where the SNR shell is detected in IR,
583: i.e., in an IRAS 60 to 100 \um\ color map.
584: It is an old ($\sim 1\times 10^5$~yr)
585: SNR where apparently its pulsar is interacting with the SNR shell
586: to produce a large ($\sim 40$ pc) synchrotron nebula.
587: The flux of \eoone\ ($\sim 13$ mJy at 1 GHz) is
588: an order of magnitude less than that of CTB 80, which
589: would be $\sim 130$~mJy if it were in the SMC.
590:
591: On the other hand, there have been suggestions that
592: \eoone\ is a Type Ia SNR \citep{hug94, hey04}.
593: It is not impossible for a Type Ia SNR to be interacting
594: with MCs, e.g., Tycho \citep{lee04}.
595: The radio nebula may have a morphology similar
596: to the optical image rather than the IR image
597: as in IC 443, although its spectral index is
598: rather unusual for a shell-type SNR.
599: A multiwavelength study with high-resolution radio observations
600: is needed to resolve the issue.
601:
602: \section{Conclusion}
603:
604: \eoone\ is the first SNR detected in the 2.6--15 \um\ bands in the SMC.
605: It is the faintest known SMC SNR in the radio and
606: is not particularly bright in X-rays.
607: The brightest two SMC SNRs in X-rays are
608: SNRs B0102$-$72.3 (IKT 22) and B0103$-$72.6 (IKT 23),
609: which are both young oxygen-rich SNRs \citep{hey04}.
610: B0102$-$72.3 is also one of the brightest radio SNRs.
611: %while B0103$-$72.6 is a moderately-bright radio SNR.
612: B0102$-$72.3 was observed by
613: \citet{sta05} using the {\it Spitzer Space Telescope} and
614: was detected at 24 \um\ (80 mJy), but neither at 8 nor 70 \um,
615: which was interpreted as thermal emission from hot dust
616: at $\sim 120$ K.
617: The $1\sigma$ upper limit at 8 \um\ was 3 mJy.
618: B0103$-$72.6 was observed by us using \akari\
619: (see \S~2), but
620: no NIR/MIR emission associated with the SNR shell
621: was detected. The discovery of \eoone\
622: shows that IR bright SNRs are not necessarily
623: radio or X-ray bright ones, or vice versa.
624:
625: \eoone\ is bright in the IR probably because it is
626: interacting with MCs.
627: If \eoone\ were in our Galaxy, say at a distance of 1.5 kpc, its flux would be
628: $\sim 16$~Jy in the S7/S11 bands. For comparison,
629: the flux of IC 443, which is at the same distance,
630: estimated from the MSX data is $\sim 50$ Jy at 8.28 \um.
631: Therefore, \eoone\ would
632: be a bright, but not an exceptionally bright SNR in the Galaxy.
633: It is also significantly fainter than
634: the brightest NIR/MIR SNRs in the
635: Large Magellanic Cloud, e.g.,
636: N49 and N63A, whose fluxes are 32--41 mJy and
637: 130--300 mJy in the {\it Spitzer} IRAC 3.6/4.5 and
638: 5.8/8.0 \um\ bands, respectively (\cite{wil06}).
639: N49 is also known to be interacting with MCs \citep{ban97}.
640: Whether or not \eoone\ is the brightest NIR/MIR SNR in the SMC
641: needs to be answered.
642:
643: Our work shows that
644: the \akari\ IRC colors can be used for shock diagnosis.
645: In particular, the brightness of
646: N3 relative to the other bands is a good
647: indicator that distinguishes between ionic and molecular shocks.
648: A careful analysis of IRC colors might enable us to
649: constrain the shock parameters.
650:
651: We would like to thank all the members of the \akari\ project
652: for their dedicated work.
653: \akari\ is a JAXA project with the participation of ESA.
654: This work was supported by the Korea Research
655: Foundation (grant No. R14-2002-058-01003-0).
656:
657: %%%
658: \begin{thebibliography}{}
659: \bibitem[Banas et al.(1997)]{ban97} Banas, K. R., Hughes, J. P., Bronfman, L., \&
660: Nyman, L.-\AA\ 1997, ApJ, 480, 607
661: \bibitem[Cesarsky et al.(1999)]{ces99} Cesarsky, D., Cox, P., Pineau des
662: Forets, G., van Dishock, E. F., Boulanger, F., \& Wright, C. M.\ 1999,
663: A\&A, 348, 945
664: \bibitem[Cohen et al.(2007)]{coh07} Cohen, M. et al.\ 2007, MNRAS, 374, 979
665: \bibitem[Chevalier(1999)]{che99} Chevalier, R. A.\ 1999, ApJ, 511, 798
666: \bibitem[Draine(1981)]{dra81} Draine, B. T.\ 1981, ApJ, 245, 880
667: \bibitem[Douvion et al.(2001a)]{dou01a} Douvion, T., Lagage, P. O., Cesarsky, C. J., Dwek, E.\ 2001, A\&A, 373, 28
668: \bibitem[Douvion, Lagage, \& Pantin(2001b)]{dou01b} Douvion, T.,
669: Lagage, P. O., Pantin, E.\ 2001, A\&A, 369, 589
670: \bibitem[Dwek(1986)]{dwe86} Dwek, E.\ 1986, ApJ, 302, 363
671: \bibitem[Dwek, Foster, \& Olaf(1996)]{dwe96} Dwek, E., Foster, S. M., \& Olaf, V.\ 1996, ApJ, 457, 244
672: \bibitem[Fesen, Shull, \& Saken(1988)]{fes88} Fesen, R. A., Shull, J. M., Saken, J. M.\ 1988, Nature, 334, 229
673: \bibitem[Filipovi\'c et al.(2005)]{fil05}
674: Filipovi\'c, M. D., Payne, J. L., Reid, W., Danforth, C. W.,
675: Staveley-Smith, L., Jones, P. A., White, G. L.\ 2005, MNRAS, 364, 217
676: \bibitem[Graham, Wright, \& Longmore(1987)]{gra87}
677: Graham, J. R., Wright, G. S., \& Longmore, A. J.\ 1987, ApJ, 313, 847
678: \bibitem[Hollenbach \& McKee(1989)]{hol89} Hollenbach, D. \& McKee, C. F.\ 1989,
679: ApJ, 342, 306
680: %\bibitem[Hollenbach, Chernoff, \& McKee(1989)]{hol89} Hollenbach, D., Chernoff, D. F.,
681: %\& McKee, C. F.\ 1989, in Infrared Spectroscopy in Astronomy, ed., B. H.
682: %Kaldeich (ESA SP-290), 245
683: \bibitem[Hughes et al.(1994)]{hug94} Hughes, J. P., Smith, R. C.\ 1994, AJ, 107, 1363
684: \bibitem[Hummer \& Storey(1987)]{hum87} Hummer, D. G. \& Storey, P. J.\ 1987, MNRAS, 224, 801
685: %\bibitem[IRC Data User's Manual(2007)]{irc07} IRC Data User's Manual\ 2007
686: \bibitem[Ita \& Pearson(2007)]{ita07} Ita, Y. \& Peason, C.\ 2007,
687: IRC Imaging Data Reduction Pipeline User Manual
688: %\bibitem[Lazendic \& Slane(2006)]{laz06} Lazendic, J. S. \& Slane, P. O.\ 2006,
689: %ApJ, 647, 350
690: \bibitem[Jones, Tielens, \& Hollenbach(1996)]{jon96} Jones, A. P., Tielens, A. G. G. M.,
691: \& Hollenbach, D. J.\ 1996, ApJ, 469, 740
692: \bibitem[Kawasaki et al.(2002)]{kaw02} Kawasaki, M., Ozaki, M., Nagase, F., Masai, K.,
693: Ishida, M., \& Petre, R.\ 2002, ApJ, 572, 897
694: \bibitem[Koo(2003)]{koo03} Koo, B.-C.\ 2003, in
695: The Proceedings of the IAU 8th Asian-Pacific Regional Meeting
696: (ASP Conference Proceedings v. 289), ed Ikeuchi, S., Hearnshaw, J. \&
697: Hanawa, T.\ (San Francisco: ASP), page 199
698: \bibitem[Koo et al.(1990)]{koo90} Koo, B.-C., Reach, W. T., Heiles, C., Fesen, R. A., \&
699: Shull, J. M.\ 1990, ApJ, 364, 178
700: \bibitem[Koo et al.(2007)]{koo07} Koo, B.-C., Moon, D.-S., Lee, H.-G., Lee, J.-J.,
701: \& Mathews, K.\ 2007, ApJ, 657, 308
702: \bibitem[Lee et al.(2004)]{lee04} Lee, J.-J., Koo, B.-C., \& Tatematsu, K.\ 2004, ApJL,
703: 605, 113
704: \bibitem[Lee et al.(2007)]{lee07} Lee, J.-J., Koo, B.-C., Yun, M. S.,
705: Stanimirovi\'c, S., Heiles, C., Heyer, M.\ 2007, AJ, submitted
706: \bibitem[Mathewson et al.(1984)]{mat84}
707: Mathewson, D. S., Ford, V. L., Dopita, M. A., Tuohy, I. R., Mills, B. Y.,
708: Turtle, A. J.\ 1984, ApJS, 55, 189
709: \bibitem[McKee et al.(1984)]{mck84} McKee, C. F., Chernoff, D. F., \& Hollenbach,
710: D. J.\ 1984, in Galactic and Extragalactic Infrared Spectroscopy, ed. Kessler, M. F.
711: \& Phillips, J. P.\ (Dordrecht: D. Reidel), page 103
712: \bibitem[Oliva, Moorwood, \& Danziger(1989)]{oli89} Oliva, E., Moorwood, A. F. M., \& Danziger, I. J.\ 1989, A\&A, 214, 307
713: \bibitem[Oliva et al.(1999)]{oli99} Oliva, E., Moorwood, A. F. M., Drapatz, S., Lutz, D., \& Sturm, E.\ 1999, A\&A, 343, 943
714: \bibitem[Onaka et al.(2007)]{ona07} Onaka, T. et al.\ 2007, in this volume
715: \bibitem[Park et al.(2003)]{park03} Park, S., Hughes, J. P., Burrows, D. N., Slane, P. O.,
716: Nousek, J. A., \& Garmire, G. P.\ 2003, ApJL, 598, L95
717: \bibitem[Reach \& Rho(2000)]{rea00} Reach, W. T., \& Rho, J.\ 2000, ApJ, 544, 843
718: \bibitem[Reach et al.(2006)]{rea06} Reach, W. T. et al.\ 2006, AJ, 131, 1479
719: \bibitem[Rho \& Petre(1998)]{rho98} Rho, J. \& Petre, R.\ 1998, ApJL, 503, L167
720: \bibitem[Rho et al.(2001)]{rho01} Rho, J., Jarrett, T. H., Cutri, R. M., \& Reach, W. T.\ 2001, ApJ, 547, 885
721: \bibitem[Richter, Graham, \& Wright(1995)]{ric95} Richter, M. J.,
722: Graham, J. R., \& Wright, G. S.\ 1995, ApJ, 454, 277
723: \bibitem[Sakon et al.(2007)]{sak07} Sakon, I. et al.\ 2007, in this volumne
724: \bibitem[Snell et al.(2005)]{sne05} Snell, R. L., Hollenbach, D., Howe, J. E.,
725: Neufeld, D. A., Kaufman, M. J., Melnick, G. J., Bergin, E. A., \& Wang, Z.\ 2005,
726: ApJ, 620, 758
727: \bibitem[Stanimirovi\'c et al.(2005)]{sta05}
728: Staminirovic\', S., Bolatto, A. D., Sandstrom, K., Leroy, A. K., Simon, J. D.,
729: Gaensler, B. M., Shah, R. Y., Jackson, J. M.\ 2005, ApJ, 632, L103
730: \bibitem[van der Heyden et al.(2004)]{hey04}
731: van der Heyden, K. J., Bleeker, J. A. M., Kaastra, J. S.\ 2004, A\&A, 421, 1031
732: \bibitem[Weingartner \& Draine(2001)]{wei01} Weingartner, J.C. \& Draine, B.T.\ 2001,
733: ApJ, 548, 296
734: \bibitem[Williams, Chu, \& Guendl(2006)]{wil06}Williams, R. M., Chu, Y.-H., \& Gruendl, R.\ 2006, ApJ, 132,1877
735:
736: \end{thebibliography}
737: % Books
738: %\bibitem[Aauthor \& Author(2001a)]{key-2}
739: % Aauthor, A., Author, B.\ 2001, Name of Book(Publisher, Tokyo) ch0
740: % Books
741: %\bibitem[Aauthor \& Bauthor(2001b)]{key-3}
742: % Aauthor, A., Bauthor, B.\ 2001, Name of Book(Publisher, Tokyo) page0
743: %......
744:
745: \end{document}
746:
747: