1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\pagestyle{plain}
3:
4:
5: \begin{document}
6:
7: \title{Extragalactic Radio Sources and the WMAP Cold spot}
8: \author{Lawrence Rudnick \footnote{larry@astro.umn.edu}, Shea Brown\footnote{brown@astro.umn.edu}, Liliya R. Williams\footnote {llrw@astro.umn.edu}}
9: \affil{Department of Astronomy, University of Minnesota\\ 116 Church St. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455}
10:
11: \begin{abstract}
12: We detect a dip of 20-45$\%$ in the surface brightness and number counts of NVSS sources smoothed to a few degrees at the location of the WMAP cold spot. The dip has structure on scales of $\sim$ 1$^\circ$ to 10$^\circ$. Together with independent all-sky wavelet analyses, our results suggest that the dip in extragalactic brightness and number counts and the WMAP cold spot are physically related, i.e., that the coincidence is neither a statistical anomaly nor a WMAP foreground correction problem. If the cold spot does originate from structures at modest redshifts, as we suggest, then there is no remaining need for non-Gaussian processes at the last scattering surface of the CMB to explain the cold spot. The late integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect, already seen statistically for NVSS source counts, can now be seen to operate on a single region. To create the magnitude and angular size of the WMAP cold spot requires a $\sim$~140 Mpc radius completely empty void at z$\leq$1 along this line of sight. This is far outside the current expectations of the concordance cosmology, and adds to the anomalies seen in the CMB.
13:
14: \end{abstract}
15: \keywords{large-scale structure of the universe -- cosmic microwave background -- radio continuum: galaxies}
16: %\clearpage
17:
18: \section{Introduction}
19:
20: The detection of an extreme ``cold spot'' \citep{v04} in the foreground-corrected WMAP images was an exciting but unexpected finding. At 4$^\circ$ resolution, Cruz et al. (2005) determine an amplitude of -73~$\mu$K, which reduces to -20~$\mu$K at $\sim$10$^\circ$ scales \citep{cruz07}. The non-gaussianity of this extreme region has been scrutinized, (Cayon, Jun \& Treaster 2005; Cruz et al. 2005, 2006, 2007) concluding that it cannot be explained by either foreground correction problems or the normal Gaussian fluctuations of the CMB. Thus, the cold spot seems to require a distinct origin -- either primordial or local. Across the whole sky, local mass tracers such as the optical Sloan Digital Sky Survey \citep[SDSS,][]{york} and the radio NRAO VLA Sky Survey
21: \citep[NVSS,][]{nvss} are seen to correlate with the WMAP images of the CMB \citep{piet06,cabre06}, probably through the late integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect \citep[ISW,][]{crit1}.
22:
23:
24: \cite{MCE} extended the study of radio source/CMB correlations by performing a steerable wavelet analysis of NVSS source counts and WMAP images. They isolated 18 regions that, as a group, contributed a significant fraction of the total NVSS-ISW signal. Three of those 18 regions were additionally robust to the choice of wavelet form. The centroid of one of those three robust correlated regions, (\#16), is inside the 10$^\circ$ cold spot derived from WMAP data alone \citep{cruz07}, although \cite{MCE} did not point out this association.
25:
26: The investigations reported here were conducted independently and originally without knowledge of the \cite{MCE} analysis. However, our work is {\it a posteriori} in nature, because we were specifically looking for the properties in the direction of the cold spot. These results thus support and quantify the NVSS properties in the specific direction of the cold spot, but should be considered along with the \cite{MCE} analysis for the purposes of an unbiased proof of a WMAP association.
27:
28: \section{Analysis and Characterization of the NVSS ``dip''}
29:
30: We examined both the {\it number counts} of NVSS sources in the direction of the WMAP cold spot and their {\it smoothed brightness distribution}. The NVSS 21~cm survey covers the sky above a declination of -40$^\circ$ at a resolution of 45''. It has an rms noise of 0.45 mJy/beam and is accompanied by a catalog of sources stronger than 2.5 mJy/beam. Because of the short interferometric observations that went into its construction, the survey is insensitive to diffuse sources greater than $\approx$ 15' in extent. Convolution of the NVSS images to larger beam sizes, as done here, shows the integrated surface brightness of small extragalactic sources; this is very different than what would be observed by a single dish of equivalent resolution. In the latter case, the diffuse structure of the Milky Way Galaxy dominates (e.g, \cite{haslam81}), although it is largely invisible to the interferometer.
31:
32:
33: To explore the extragalactic radio source population in the direction of the WMAP cold spot, we first show in Figure 1 the 50$^\circ\times$50$^\circ$ region around the cold spot convolved to a resolution of 3.4$^\circ$. Here, the region of the cold spot is seen to be the faintest region on the image (minimum at l$_{II}$,b$_{II}$~=~ 207.8$^\circ$,~-56.3$^\circ$). At minimum, its brightness is 14~mK below the mean, with an extent of $\approx$5$^\circ$.
34: The WMAP cold spot thus picks out a special region in the NVSS -- at least within this 2500$^\square$ region.
35:
36: We examined the smoothed brightness distribution across the whole NVSS survey using another averaging technique that reduces the confusion from the brightest sources. We first pre-convolved the images to 800'', which fills all the gaps between neighboring sources, and then calculated the {\it median} brightness in sliding boxes 3.4$^\circ$ on a side. The resulting image is shown in Figure \ref{allsky} which is in galactic coordinates centered at l$_{II}$=180$^\circ$. The dark regions near the galactic plane are regions of the NVSS survey that were perturbed by the presence of very strong sources. Note that the galactic plane itself, which dominates single dish maps, is only detectable here between -20$^\circ < l_{II} < $ 90$^\circ$, where there is a local increase in the number of small sources detectable by the interferometer.
37:
38: To evaluate the NVSS brightness properties of the cold spot, we compared it with the distribution of median brightnesses in two strips from this all sky map. The first strip was in the north, taking everything above a nominal galactic latitude of 30$^\circ$ (More precisely, we used the horizontal line in the Aitoff projection tangent to the 30$^\circ$ line at l$_{II}$=180$^\circ$.) The second strip was in the south, taking everything below a nominal galactic latitude of -30$^\circ$, but only from 10$^\circ < l_{II}< $180$^\circ$, to avoid regions near the survey limit of $\delta$=-40$^\circ$. The minimum brightness in the cold spot region ($\approx$~20~mK) is equal to the lowest values seen in the 16,800 square degree area of the two strips, and is $\approx$~30\% below the mean (Figure \ref{coldcum}).
39:
40: Formally, the probability of finding this weakest NVSS spot within the $\approx$10$^\circ$ (diameter) region of the WMAP cold spot is 0.6\%. This {\it a posteriori} analysis thus is in agreement with the statistical conclusions of \cite{MCE} that the NVSS properties in this region are linked to those of WMAP. We also note that the magnitude of the NVSS dip is at the extreme, but not an outlier of the overall brightness distribution. We thus expect that less extreme NVSS dips would also individually correlate with WMAP cold regions, although it may be more difficult to separate those from the primordial fluctuations.
41:
42:
43: The NVSS brightness dip can be seen at a number of resolutions, and there is probably more than one scale size present. At resolutions of 1$^\circ$, 3.4$^\circ$, and 10$^\circ$, we find that the dip is $\approx$ 60\%, 30\% and 10\% of the respective mean brightness. At 10$^\circ$ resolution, the NVSS deficit overlaps with another faint region about 10$^\circ$ to the west, while the average dip in brightness then decreases from -14~mK (at 3.4$^\circ$) to -4~mK.
44:
45: The dip in NVSS brightness in the WMAP cold spot region is not due to some peculiarity of the NVSS survey itself. In Figure 4, we compare the 1$^\circ$ convolved NVSS image with the similar resolution, single dish 408 MHz image of \cite{haslam81}. This 408 MHz all sky map is dominated in most places by galactic emission, and was usedby \cite{1year03} as a template for estimating the synchrotron contribution in CMB observations. On scales of 1$^\circ$, the {\it fluctuations} in brightness are a combination of galactic (diffuse) and extragalactic (smeared small source) contributions. In the region of the cold spot, we can see the extragalactic contribution at 408 MHz by comparison with the smoothed NVSS 1.4 GHz image. Note that although there is flux everywhere in the NVSS image, this is the ``confusion'' from the smoothed contribution of multiple small extragalactic sources in each beam, whereas the 408 MHz map has strong diffuse galactic emission as well. Strong brightness dips are seen in both images in the region of the WMAP cold spot - with the brightness dropping by as much as 62\% in the smoothed NVSS; in the 408 MHz map, this is diluted by galactic emission.
46:
47: To look more quantitatively at the source density in the cold spot region, we measured the density of NVSS sources (independent of their fluxes) as a function of distance from the cold spot. Figure 5 shows the counts in equal area annuli around the WMAP cold spot down to two different flux limits.
48: With a limit of 5 mJy, there is a 45$\pm$8\% decrease in counts in the 1$^\circ$ radius circle around the WMAP cold spot centroid. At the survey flux limit of 2.5 mJy, the decrease is 23$\pm$3\%. This reduction in number counts is what is measured by \cite{MCE} in their statistical all-sky analysis.
49:
50:
51:
52: \section{Foreground Corrections}
53:
54: Several studies have claimed that the properties of the cold spot are most likely an effect of incorrect foreground subtraction
55: \citep{cn04,coles05,lz05,toj06}. This possibility has been investigated in detail for both the first year
56: \citep{v04,c05,c06} and third \citep{cruz07}
57: year WMAP data. The arguments {\it against} foreground subtraction
58: errors can be summarized in three main points -- 1) The region of the
59: spot shows no spectral dependence in the WMAP data. This is
60: consistent with the CMB and inconsistent with the known spectral
61: behavior of galactic emission (as well as the SZ effect). The flat
62: (CMB-like) spectrum is found both in temperature and kurtosis, as well
63: as in real and wavelet space. 2) Foreground emission is found to be
64: low in the region of the spot, making it unlikely that an
65: over-subtraction could produce an apparent non-Gaussianity. 3)
66: Similar results are found when using totally independent methods to
67: model and subtract out the foreground emission \citep{c06}, namely the
68: combined and foreground cleaned Q-V-W map \citep{1year03} and the
69: weighted internal linear combination analysis \citep{teg03}.
70:
71: Now that we know that there is a reduction in the extragalactic radio source contribution in the direction of the cold spot, we can re-examine this issue. We ask whether a 20-30\% decrement in
72: the local brightness of the extragalactic synchrotron emission could
73: translate into a foreground subtraction problem that could generate
74: the WMAP cold spot. We are not re-examining the foreground question
75: {\it ab initio}, simply examining the plausibility that the deficit of
76: NVSS sources could complicate the foreground calculations in this
77: location. The characteristic brightness in the 3.4$^\circ$ convolved
78: NVSS image around the cold spot is $\sim$ 51 mK at
79: 1.4 GHz; the brightness of the cold spot is $\sim$ 37 mK. This
80: difference of 14 mK in brightness (4~mK at 10$^\circ$ resolution)
81: represents the extragalactic population contribution only, as the NVSS
82: is not sensitive to the large scale galactic synchrotron emission. By
83: contrast, the single dish 1.4 GHz brightness within a few degrees of the
84: cold spot is $\sim$ 3.4~K, as measured using the Bonn Stockert 25~m
85: telescope \citep{bonn}. Therefore the total synchrotron contribution at 1.4 GHz is
86: $\sim$~0.7~K above the CMB, 50 times larger than the localized extragalactic deficit.
87:
88: One way to create the cold spot would be if the universal spectral
89: index used for the normal galactic (plus small extragalactic)
90: subtraction was incorrect for the {\it extra} brightness temperature contribution
91: of the NVSS dip,~ $\delta$T (-14~mK at L band, 1.4 GHz). We make
92: an order of magnitude estimate of this potential
93: error. Following the first year data analysis \citep{1year03}, and the
94: similar exercise performed by \citet{c06}, we consider fitting a
95: synchrotron template map at some reference frequency $\nu_{ref}$, and
96: extrapolating the model, (F($\nu$)$_{model}$), with a spectral index of $\beta= -3$ to the Q,
97: V, and W bands. This spectral index is consistent with those of \cite{c06}
98: and the average spectral index observed in the WMAP images
99: \citep{1year03,3year06}. Under the null hypothesis that the spectral index of $\delta$T
100: is the same as that of the mean brightness T$_0$, we then
101: calculate in the region of the deficit,
102:
103: \begin{equation}F(\nu)_{model} = \left[T_0(\nu_{ref})+\delta~T(\nu_{ref})\right]\left(\nu/\nu_{ref}\right)^{-3}.\end{equation}
104:
105: However, if the actual spectrum of $\delta$T is ~ -$\alpha$ (from L
106: band through W band) instead of -3, then the true foreground
107: subtraction, F$(\nu)_{true}$, should have been
108:
109: \begin{equation}
110: F(\nu)_{true}=T_0\left(\nu_{ref}\right)\left(\nu/\nu_{ref}\right)^{-3}+\delta T(\nu_{ref})\left(\nu/\nu_{ref}\right)^{-\alpha}.
111: \end{equation}
112:
113: The foreground subtraction would then be in error as a function of frequency as follows, expressed in terms of the L band temperatures :
114:
115:
116:
117: \begin{equation}
118: \delta F\left(\nu\right) \equiv F(\nu)_{true}-F(\nu)_{model} = \delta T(\nu_L) (\nu_L/\nu)^{\alpha}\left[1-(\nu_{ref}/\nu)^{3-\alpha}\right].
119: \end{equation}
120:
121: Three different reference frequencies have been used for synchrotron extrapolation -- the \citet{haslam81} 408
122: MHz map \citep{1year03}, the \cite{rhodes98} 2326 MHz Rhodes/HartRAO survey \citep{c06}, and the internal K
123: and Ka band WMAP images \citep{3year06}.
124: %23 GHz. \cite{1year03} used the 408 MHz Haslam map
125: %\citep{haslam81} as a synchrotron template, \cite{c06} used the
126: %Rhodes/HartRAO 2326 MHz radio survey \cite{rhodes98} as a template for
127: %their foreground analysis of the spot, and \cite{3year06} used the
128: %WMAP K and Ka bands as a starting point for their foreground template
129: %subtraction (though they allow the fitted spectral index to vary with
130: %frequency).
131: Since the foreground subtraction errors would be worst extrapolating from the lowest frequency template, we start at 408~MHz and look at the problems caused by a spectral index for $\delta$T that is different than the assumed -3.
132:
133: We obtain a rough measure of the spectral index of the dip by comparing the 1$^\circ$ resolution maps (Figure 4) at 408~MHz and 1400~MHz. At
134: l$_{II}$,b$_{II}$~=~207$^\circ$,-55$^\circ$ , we find $\delta$T~=~2.6$\pm$0.75~K (30$\pm$12~mK) at 408 (1400) MHz, yielding a spectral index of -3.6$\pm$0.5. Using Equation (3), this would actually lead to a WMAP ``hot spot'' if a spectral index of -3.0 had been assumed for the extrapolation. Within the errors, the worst foreground extrapolation mistakes would then be hot spots that range from +0.5 to +4.6~$\mu$K at Q band, 1$^\circ$ resolution, ($\approx$ +0.25 to +2.3~$\mu$K at 4$^\circ$ resolution). Our derived spectral index for the dip is steeper than expected for extragalactic sources, so we also do the calculation assuming the flattest reasonable extragalactic spectrum of -2.5 . This would lead to a spurious cold spot of -2.9~$\mu$K at 4$^\circ$ resolution . In either case, this is far below the -73~$\mu$K observed at this resolution in WMAP, and we thus conclude that the deficit of NVSS sources does not lead to a significant foreground subtraction error of either sign.
135:
136:
137:
138: \section{Discussion}
139:
140: The WMAP cold spot could have three origins: a) at the last scattering
141: surface ($z\sim 1000$), b) cosmologically local ($z<1$), or c) galactic.
142: Because the spot corresponds to a significant deficit of flux (and source
143: number counts) in the NVSS, we have argued here that the spot is
144: cosmologically local and hence, a localized manifestation of the late ISW effect.
145:
146:
147: \cite{c05,cruz07} derived a temperature deviation for the cold
148: spot of $\sim-20\mu$K
149: and a diameter of $10^\circ$ using the WMAP 3 year data; on scales
150: of $4^\circ$ the
151: average temperature is lower, $\sim-73~\mu$K. Using these two data
152: points we derive
153: an approximate relation between the temperature deviation and the
154: corresponding size of
155: the cold spot: $\theta(\Delta T/T)\approx 4.5\times 10^{-5}$, where
156: $\theta$ is the radius
157: of the cold spot in degrees. We now perform an order of magnitude
158: calculation to see if the
159: late ISW can produce such a spot, assuming that the entire effect comes
160: from the ISW.
161:
162:
163: The contribution of the late ISW along a given line of sight is given by
164: $(\Delta~T/T)\vert_{ISW}~=-2\int\dot\Phi~d\eta$, where the dot represents
165: differentiation with respect to
166: the conformal time $\eta$, $d\eta=dt/a(t)$, and $a$ is the scale factor.
167: The integrand will be non-zero only at late times (z$<$1) when the
168: cosmological
169: constant becomes dynamically dominant.
170:
171: We start with the Newtonian potential given by
172: \begin{equation}
173: \Phi=GM/r\approx {{4\pi G}\over{3}}r^2\;\rho_b\;\delta.
174: \label{dphi}\end{equation}
175: The proper size $r$ and the background density $\rho_b$ scale as $a$ and
176: $a^{-3}$,
177: respectively. The growth of the fractional density excess, $\delta(a)$ in
178: the linear regime
179: is given by $D(a)=\delta(a)/\delta(a_0)$, and $D(a)$ is the linear growth
180: factor. For
181: redshifts below $\sim 1$ in $\Lambda$CDM, this factor can be
182: approximated as
183: $\delta(a)\approx a\delta(a_0)(3-a)/2$. Assuming that the region is
184: spherical, its
185: comoving radius is $r_c=0.5\Delta z(c/H)$, and $\Delta z$ is the line of
186: sight diameter
187: of the region. The change in the potential over $d\eta$ can be
188: approximated by
189: \begin{equation}
190: \Delta\Phi\sim{{4\pi G}\over{3}}r_{c}^2\;\rho_{c}\;\delta\;(\Delta z),
191: \end{equation}
192: where subscript $c$ refers to the average comoving size of the void and the
193: comoving background density. In $\Lambda$CDM the Hubble parameter is
194: roughly
195: given by $H^2=H_0^2(1+2z)$, for redshifts below $\sim 1$. Incorporating
196: these
197: approximations we get the following relation between the size of the region, its
198: redshift and the temperature deviation from the late ISW:
199: \begin{equation} \label{dphi2}
200: \Delta\Phi\approx -{\Omega_m\over 2} \Bigl({{r_c}\over{c/H_0}}\Bigr)^3
201: % (1+2z)^{1/2}\;\delta\approx {1\over 2}{{\Delta
202: (1+2z)^{1/2}(1+z)^{-2}\;\delta\approx {1\over 2}{{\Delta
203: T}\over T}
204: \end{equation}
205: %\begin{equation} \label{dphi2}
206: %\Delta\Phi\approx -{\Omega_m\over 4} \Bigl({{r_c}\over{c/H_0}}\Bigr)^3
207: % (1+2z)^{1/2}\;\delta\approx {1\over 2}{{\Delta
208: %T}\over T}
209: %\end{equation}
210: %This is the relation between the size of the region, its redshift and
211: %the temperature
212: %deviation it will produce through late ISW.
213:
214: We now ask under what conditions this expression is
215: consistent with the observed relation between the size and temperature
216: of the cold spot
217: derived earlier, $\theta(\Delta T/T)\approx 4.5\times 10^{-5}$. For
218: $\Omega_m\sim 0.3$
219: and $\delta=-1$ (i.e. a completely empty region) this leads to the
220: simplified relation,
221: $\theta(1+z)\approx 6$, where $\theta$ is in degrees, as before. Since the spot's association with the NVSS
222: places it at
223: $z\sim 0.5-1$, this leads to a self-consistent value of the radius of $\sim 3 - 4^\circ$ for the observed spot. For
224: $c/H_0=4000$~Mpc,
225: the comoving radius of the void region is 120-160~Mpc.
226:
227: How likely is such a large underdense region in a concordance cosmology?
228: Suppose
229: there is only one such large underdense region in the whole volume up to z=1.
230: The corresponding void frequency is then the ratio of the comoving volume
231: of the
232: void to the comoving volume of the Universe to z=1, which is roughly
233: $3\times 10^{-5}$.
234: Is this consistent with $\Lambda$CDM?
235: Void statistics have been done for a number of optical galaxy surveys,
236: as well as numerical structure formation simulations. Taking the most
237: optimistic
238: void statistics (filled dots in Fig.~9 of Hoyle \& Vogeley, 2004) which
239: can be
240: approximated by $\log P=-(r/{\rm Mpc})/15$, a 140~Mpc void would occur with a
241: probability
242: of $5\times 10 ^{-10}$, considerably more rare than our estimate for our
243: Universe
244: ($3\times 10^{-5}$) based on the existence of the cold spot.
245: One must keep in mind, however, that observational and numerical void probability
246: studies are limited to $r_c\sim 30$~Mpc; it is not yet clear how these
247: should be extrapolated to $r_c > 100$~Mpc.
248:
249: We note that \cite{in6a,in6b} had already suggested that
250: anomalous temperature anisotropies in the CMB, such as the cold spot,
251: may be explained by the ISW effect. In contrast to our calculation
252: described above, their analysis considers the linear ISW plus the
253: second order effects due to an expanding compensated void, partially
254: filled with pressureless dust, embedded in a standard CDM (Inoue and Silk
255: 2006a) or $\Lambda$CDM (Inoue and Silk 2006b) background. It is
256: reassuring that the size of the void indicated by their analysis---about
257: 200 Mpc if located at $z\sim 1$---is roughly the same as what we get here
258: using linear ISW.
259:
260: The need for an extraordinarily large void to explain the cold spot would add to the list of anomalies
261: associated with the CMB. (See \cite{hol6a,hol6b} for a theory that
262: predicts such large voids based on a particular landscape model.) These include
263: the systematically higher strength of the late ISW correlation measured for a variety of
264: mass tracers, compared to the WMAP predictions \citep[see Fig. 11 of][]{gian06}, and the
265: alignment and planarity of the quadrupole and the octopole \citep{oliv,land}. We can,
266: however, conclude that models linking the cold spot with the larger scale anomalies, such as
267: the anisotropic Bianchi Type VII$_h$ model of Jaffe et al. (2005), are no longer necessary.
268: While we suggest that the cold spot is a local effect, low order global anisotropic models \citep[e.g.,][]{pel06} may still be needed for the low$-\ell$ anomalies.
269:
270: \section{Concluding Remarks}
271:
272: We have detected a significant dip in the average surface brightness and number counts of radio sources from the NVSS survey at 1.4 GHz in the direction of the WMAP cold spot. The deficit of extragalactic sources is also seen in a single dish image at 408 MHz. Together with previous work, we rule out instrumental artifacts in WMAP due to foreground subtraction. A fuller examination of the statistical uncertainties associated with our combination of the \cite{MCE} wavelet results and our own {\it a posteriori} analysis should be performed. With this caveat, we conclude that the cold spot arises from effects along the line of sight, and not at the last scattering surface itself. Any non-gaussianity of the WMAP cold spot therefore would then have a local origin.
273:
274: A 140~Mpc radius, completely empty void at z$\le$1 is sufficient to create the magnitude and angular size of the cold spot through the late integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect. Voids this large currently seem improbable in the concordance cosmology, adding to the anomalies associated with the CMB.
275:
276: We suggest that a closer investigation of all mass tracers would be useful to search for significant contributions from isolated regions. Also, if our interpretation of the cold spot is correct, it might be possible to detect it indirectly using Planck, through the lack of lensing-induced
277: polarization $B$ modes \citep{zald}.
278:
279:
280: \noindent{\bf ACKNOWLEDGMENTS}
281: \indent We thank Eric Greisen, NRAO, for improvements in the AIPS FLATN routine, which allows us to easily stitch together many fields in a flexible coordinate system. The 408 MHz maps were obtained through {\it SkyView}, operated under the auspices of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center. We appreciate discussions with M. Peloso, T. J. Jones and E. Greisen regarding this work, and useful criticisms from the anonymous referee. LR acknowledges the inspiration from his thesis adviser, the late David T. Wilkinson, who would have appreciated the notion of deriving information from a hole. At the University of Minnesota, this work is supported in part, through National Science Foundation grants AST~03-07604 and AST~06-07674 and STScI grant AR-10985.
282:
283:
284:
285:
286:
287:
288: \begin{thebibliography}
289:
290: \bibitem[Bennett et al. (2003)]{1year03}
291: Bennett, C.L., et al. 2003, ApJS 148, 1
292:
293: \bibitem[Cabre et al. (2006)]{cabre06}
294: Cabre, A., Gaztanaga, E., Manera, M., Fosalba, P. Castander, F. 2006, MNRAS 372, 23
295:
296: \bibitem[Cayon, Jun \& Treaster (2005)]{cjt1}
297: Cayon, L., Jin J., Treaster, A. 2005, MNRAS 362, 826
298:
299: \bibitem[Chiang \& Naselsky (2004)]{cn04}
300: Chiang, L.-Y., Naselsky, P.D. 2006, IJMPD 15,1283C
301:
302: \bibitem[Coles (2005)]{coles05}
303: Coles, P. 2005, Nature 433, 248
304:
305: \bibitem[Condon et al. (1998)]{nvss}
306: Condon, J. J., Cotton, W. D., Greisen, E. W., Yin, Q. F., Perley, R. A., Taylor, G. B., Broderick, J. J. 1998, AJ 115, 1693
307:
308: \bibitem[Crittenden \& Turok (1996)]{crit1}
309: Crittenden, R. G., Turok, N. 1996, PRL 76, 575
310:
311: \bibitem[Cruz et al. (2005)]{c05}
312: Cruz, M., Martinez-Gonzalez, E., Vielva, P., Cayon, L. 2005, MNRAS 356, 29
313:
314: \bibitem[Cruz et al. (2006)]{c06}
315: Cruz, M., Tucci, M., Martinez-Gonzalez, E., Vielva, P. 2006, MNRAS 369, 57
316:
317: \bibitem[Cruz et al. (2007)]{cruz07}
318: Cruz, M., Cayon, L., Martinez-Gonzalez, E., Vielva, P., Jin, J. 2007, ApJ 655, 11
319:
320: \bibitem[de Oliveira-Costa et al. (2004)]{oliv}
321: de Oliveira-Costa A., et al. 2004, PhRevD 69, 3516
322:
323: \bibitem[Giannantonio et al. (2006)]{gian06}
324: Giannantonio, T. et al. 2006, PhRvD 74, 352
325:
326: \bibitem[Gumrukcuoglu, Contaldi \& Peloso (2006)]{pel06}
327: Gumrukcuoglu, A. E., Contaldi, C. R. \& Peloso, M. 2006, astro-ph/0608405
328:
329: \bibitem[Haslam et al. (1981)]{haslam81}
330: Haslam, C. G. T., Klein, U., Salter, C. J., Stoffel, H., Wilson, W.E., Cleary, M.N., Cooke, D.J., \& Thomasson, P. 1981, A\&A, 100,209
331:
332:
333: \bibitem[Hinshaw et al. (2006)]{3year06}
334: Hinshaw, G., et al. 2006, ApJ, submitted
335: (astro-ph/0603451)
336:
337:
338: \bibitem[Holdman, Mersini-Houghton \& Takahashi (2006a)]{hol6a}
339: Holman, R.; Mersini-Houghton, L.; Takahashi, Tomo, 2006,
340: hep-th/0611223
341:
342: \bibitem[Holdman, Mersini-Houghton \& Takahashi (2006b)]{hol6b}
343: Holman, R.; Mersini-Houghton, L.; Takahashi, Tomo, 2006,
344: hep-th/0612142
345:
346: \bibitem[Hoyle \& Vogeley (2004)]{hoyle}
347: Hoyle, F., Vogeley, M. S. 2004, ApJ 607, 751
348:
349:
350: \bibitem[Inoue \& Silk (2006a)]{in6a}
351: Inoue, K. T., Silk, J. 2006, ApJ, 648, 23
352:
353: \bibitem[Inoue \& Silk (2006b)]{in6b}
354: Inoue, K. T., Silk, J. 2006, astro-ph/0612347
355:
356: \bibitem[Jaffe et al. (2005)]{jaffe}
357: Jaffe, T. R., Banday A. J., Eriksen, H. K., Forski, K. M, Hansen, F. K. 2005, ApJ 629, L1
358:
359:
360: \bibitem[Jonas, Baart \& Nicolson (1998)]{rhodes98}
361: Jonas, J., Baart, E. E., Necolson, G. D. 1998, MNRAS, 297, 997
362:
363: \bibitem[Land \& Magueijo (2005)]{land}
364: Land, K., Magueijo, J.,2005, PRL 95,071301
365:
366: \bibitem[Liu \& Zhang (2005)]{lz05}
367: Liu, X., \& Zhang, S. N. 2005, ApJ, 633,542
368:
369: \bibitem[McEwen et al. (2007)]{MCE}
370: McEwen, J. D., Vielva, P., Hobson, M. P., Martinez-Gonzalez, E., \& Lasenby, A. N. 2007, MNRAS, in press
371:
372:
373: \bibitem[Pietrobon, Balbi \& Marinucci (2006)]{piet06}
374: Pietrobon, D., Balbi, A., Marinucci, D. 2006, PhysRevD 74, 352
375:
376: \bibitem[Reich and Reich (1986)]{bonn}
377: Reich, W. and Reich, P. 1986, A\&A Suppl. 63, 205
378:
379: \bibitem[Tegmark et al. (2003)]{teg03}
380: Tegmark, M., de Oliveira-Costa, A., Hamilton
381: A. 2003, Phys.Rev. D68, 123523.
382:
383: \bibitem[Tojeiro et al. (2006)]{toj06}
384: Tojeiro, R., Castro, P.G., Heavens, A.G.,
385: Gupta, S. 2006, MNRAS,365,265
386:
387: \bibitem[Vielva et al. (2004)]{v04}
388: Vielva, P., Martinez-Gonzalez, E., Varreiro, R. B., Sanz, J. L., Cayon, L. 2004, ApJ 609, 22
389:
390: \bibitem[York et al. (2000)]{york}
391: York, D. G. et al. 2000, AJ 120, 1579
392:
393: \bibitem[Zaldarriaga \& Seljak (1997)]{zald}
394: Zaldarriaga, M. \& Seljak, U. 1997, PhRvD 55, 1830
395:
396: \end{thebibliography}
397:
398: \clearpage
399: \begin{figure}[t]
400: \begin{center}
401: \plotone{f1.eps}
402: \caption{ 50$^\circ$ field from smoothed NVSS survey at 3.4$^\circ$ resolution, centered at l$_{II}$, b$_{II}$ = 209$^\circ$, -57$^\circ$. Values range from black: 9.3 mJy/beam to white: 21.5 mJy/beam. A 10$^\circ$ diameter circle indicates the position and size of the WMAP cold spot.}
403: \label{cold3.4}\
404: \end{center}
405: \end{figure}
406:
407:
408: \begin{figure}[t]
409: \begin{center}
410: \plotone{f2.eps}
411: \end{center}
412: \caption{Aitoff projection of NVSS survey, centered at l$_{II}$, b$_{II}$ = 180$^\circ$, 0$^\circ$, showing the median brightness in sliding boxes of 3.4$^\circ$. The WMAP cold spot is indicated by the black box. Closer to the plane, large dark patches arise from sidelobes around strong NVSS sources. }
413: \label{allsky}
414: \end{figure}
415:
416: \begin{figure}[t]
417: \begin{center}
418: \includegraphics[scale=0.21]{f3.eps}
419: \end{center}
420: \caption{The cumulative distribution, normalized to 1000, of median brightness levels (mK) in 3.4$^\circ$ sliding boxes of the NVSS images in two strips above $\vert$b$_{II} \vert>~$30$^\circ$ (see text). The minimum brightness (which is from the cold spot region) is indicated by a vertical line. }
421: \label{coldcum}
422: \end{figure}
423:
424:
425: \begin{figure}[t]
426: \begin{center}
427: \plottwo{f4a.eps}{f4b.eps}
428: %\includegraphics[width=5cm]{FIGS/cold408_1d.ps}
429: %\includegraphics[width=5cm]{FIGS/cold_1d.ps}
430: %\includegraphics[width=5cm]{FIGS/cold_3.4.ps}
431:
432: \end{center}
433: \caption{18$^\circ$ fields, with 1$^\circ$ resolution, centered at l$_{II}$, b$_{II}$ = 209$^\circ$, -57$^\circ$. Left: 408 MHz \citep{haslam81}. Right: 1.4 GHz \citep{nvss}. A 10$^\circ$ diameter circle indicates the position and size of the WMAP cold spot.}
434: \label{1d}
435: \end{figure}
436:
437:
438:
439:
440: \begin{figure}[t]
441: \begin{center}
442: %\includegraphics[width=8cm]{FIGS/diffcounts.ps}
443: \plotone{f5.eps}
444: \end{center}
445: \caption{Number of NVSS sources in 3.14 square degree annuli as a function of distance from the cold spot. The counts axis refers to the results for counts of sources with S$>$5mJy; the grey line refers to counts for S$>$2.5mJy with those counts multiplied by 0.56. Each bin is independent. }
446: % Left: differential number per unit area (independent points). Right: cumulative number per unit area.}
447: \label{density}
448: \end{figure}
449:
450: \end{document}
451: