1: %%

2: %% Beginning of file 'g541-chandra.tex'

3: %%

4: %% Modified 03 Jan 01

5: %%

6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the

7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.

8: 

9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document

10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore

11: %% any data that comes before this command.

12: 

13: %% The command below calls the preprint style

14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.

15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use

16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.

17: 

18: %\documentclass[apj]{emulateapj}

19: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

20: %\usepackage{psfig}

21: 

22: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:

23: 

24: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}

25: 

26: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:

27: 

28: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}

29: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so

30: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before

31: %% the \begin{document} command.

32: %%

33: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts

34: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing

35: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide

36: %% for information.

37: 

38: %\newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}

39: %\newcommand{\myemail}{lufj@flamingo.astro.umass.edu}

40: 

41: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.

42: %% The later two line can be used to check the length of the paper.

43: %\documentclass{aastex}

44: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}

45: %\usepackage{graphics}

46: %\usepackage{psfig}

47: 

48: %\newcommand\rcw{\hbox{RCW\hspace{1.5pt}103}}

49: \newcommand\xte{{\it RXTE\/}}

50: \newcommand\XTE{{\it RXTE\/}}

51: \newcommand\einstein{{\it Einstein}}

52: \newcommand\ginga{{\it Ginga}}

53: \newcommand\GINGA{{\it Ginga}}

54: \newcommand\Ginga{{\it Ginga}}

55: \newcommand\sax{{\it Beppo}SAX\/}

56: \newcommand\SAX{{\it Beppo}SAX\/}

57: \newcommand\ASCA{{\it ASCA\/}}

58: \newcommand\EGRET{{\it EGRET\/}}

59: \newcommand\egret{{\it egret\/}}

60: \newcommand\asca{{\it ASCA\/}}

61: \newcommand\ROSAT{{\it ROSAT\/}}

62: \newcommand\rosat{{\it ROSAT\/}}

63: \newcommand\chandra{{\it Chandra}}

64: \newcommand\Chandra{{\it Chandra}}

65: \newcommand\xmm{{\it XMM-Newton}}

66: \newcommand\XMM{{\it XMM-Newton}}

67: 

68: \def\s{\phantom{1}}

69: \def\xray{\hbox{X-ray}}

70: \def\nh{\hbox{$N_{\rm H}$}}

71: \def\etal{et~al.}

72: 

73: \def\snr{\hbox{G54.1$+$0.3}}

74: \def\psr{\hbox{PSR~J1930$+$1852}}

75: \def\src{\hbox{CXOU~J193030.13$+$185214.1}}

76: 

77: \newcommand\degree{ .\!^{\circ} }

78: \def\simlt{\mathrel{\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{\lower4pt\hbox{$\sim$}}}\hbox{$<$}}}}

79: \def\simgt{\mathrel{\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{\lower4pt\hbox{$\sim$}}}\hbox{$>$}}}}

80: \newcommand{\loe}{\stackrel{<}{\sim}}

81: \newcommand{\goe}{\stackrel{>}{\sim}}

82: 

83: \slugcomment{draft version of Feb. 19 2007}

84: 

85: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although

86: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.

87: %% The left head contains a list of authors,

88: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.).  The right

89: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.  Running heads

90: %% will not print in the manuscript style.

91: 

92: \shorttitle{X-ray Observations of \psr}

93: \shortauthors{Lu et al.}

94: 

95: %% This is the end of the preamble.  Indicate the beginning of the

96: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.

97: 

98: \begin{document}

99: 

100: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than

101: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if

102: %% you desire.

103: 

104: \title{X-ray Timing Observations of \psr\ in the Crab-like 

105: SNR \snr}

106: 

107: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format

108: %% author and affiliation information.

109: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command

110: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address

111: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.

112: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.

113: 

114: \author{Fangjun Lu\altaffilmark{1,2}, Q.Daniel Wang\altaffilmark{2}, E. V. Gotthelf\altaffilmark{3}, and Jinlu Qu\altaffilmark{1}}

115: 

116: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which

117: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name.  Specify alternate

118: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each

119: %% affiliation.

120: 

121: \altaffiltext{1}{Laboratory of Particle Astrophysics, 

122: Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS, Beijing 100039, P.R. China; 

123: lufj@mail.ihep.ac.cn; qujl@mail.ihep.ac.cn}

124: 

125: \altaffiltext{2}{Astronomy Department, University of Massachusetts,

126:     Amherst, MA 01003; wqd@astro.umass.edu}

127: 

128: \altaffiltext{3}{Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory, Columbia University, 550 West 120th Street, New York, NY 10027; eric@astro.columbia.edu}

129: 

130: \begin{abstract}

131: We present new X-ray timing and spectral observations of \psr, the

132: young energetic pulsar at the center of the non-thermal supernova

133: remnant \snr. Using data obtained with the {\it Rossi} X-ray Timing

134: Explorer (\xte) and \chandra\ X-ray observatories we have derived an

135: updated timing ephemeris of the 136~ms pulsar spanning 6 years. During

136: this interval, however, the period evolution shows significant

137: variability from the best fit constant spin-down rate of $\dot P =

138: 7.5112(6) \times 10^{-13}$~s~s$^{-1}$, suggesting strong timing noise and/or

139: glitch activity.  The X-ray emission is highly pulsed ($71\pm5\%$

140: modulation) and is characterized by an asymmetric, broad profile

141: ($\sim 70\%$ duty cycle) which is nearly twice the radio width. The

142: spectrum of the pulsed emission is well fitted with an absorbed power

143: law of photon index $\Gamma = 1.2\pm0.2$; this is marginally harder

144: than that of the unpulsed component.  The total $2-10$~keV flux of the

145: pulsar is $1.7 \times 10^{-12}$~erg~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$. These results

146: confirm \psr\ as a typical Crab-like pulsar.

147: \end{abstract}

148: 

149: \keywords{ISM: individual (G54.1+0.3)---ISM: jets and outflows---radiation mechanisms: 

150: non-thermal---stars:neutron (PSR J1930+1852)---

151: supernova remnants---X-rays: ISM}

152: 

153: \section{Introduction}

154: 

155: Young rotation-powered pulsars typically radiate a

156: large fraction of their spin-down energy at X-ray energies.

157: Observations in this band are thus important to the study of 

158: the spin-down evolution of such pulsars and their emission mechanism(s).

159: The study also helps to understand the mechanical energy output of the

160: pulsars into their surroundings, manifested as pulsar wind

161: nebulae (PWNe). To this end, one needs to monitor the spin-down at

162: various evolutionary stages of young pulsars and to measure their

163: energy spectra, both pulsed and unpulsed, with various viewing

164: angles.  However, only a dozen or so of young pulsars with PWNe have been

165: identified and studied in detailed so far.

166: 

167: The recently discovered 136~ms pulsar \psr\ at the center of the

168: supernova remnant (SNR) \snr\ is the latest example of a Crab-like

169: pulsar (Camilo et al. 2002).  Known as the ``Bulls-Eye'' pulsar, \psr\

170: is surrounded by a bright symmetric ring of emission (Lu et al. 2002)

171: similar to the toroidal and jet-like structure associated with the

172: Crab pulsar, but viewed nearly face-on. Based on the initial timing

173: parameters, \psr\ is the eighth most energetic pulsar known, with a

174: rotational energy loss rate of $\dot E = 1.2 \times

175: 10^{37}$~erg~s$^{-1}$, well above the empirical threshold for

176: generating a bright pulsar wind nebula ($\dot E \simgt 4 \times

177: 10^{36}$~erg~s$^{-1}$, Gotthelf 2004).

178: Such young pulsars are often embedded in observable shell-type

179: remnant which have yet to dissipate. However, like the Crab, G54.1+0.3

180: lacks evidence for a thermal remnant in any waveband (Lu et

181: al. 2002). Most likely, the SN ejecta in these two remnants are still

182: expanding into a very low density medium.

183: 

184: In this paper we present the first dedicated X-ray timing and

185: spectral follow-up observations of \psr\ since discovery. Previous

186: X-ray results were based on archival data of limited quality. We use

187: the new data to characterize the pulse shape and energy spectrum and

188: provide a long term ephemeris.  Throughout the paper, the

189: uncertainties (statistical fluctuation only) are quoted at the 68\%

190: confidence level.

191:  

192: \section{Observations and Data Analysis}

193: 

194: The pulsar \psr\ was observed twice with \xte\ on 2002 September 12 --

195: 14 and on 2002 December 23 -- 25 using a combination of event and

196: instrument modes. For consistency, we analyze the data taken with the

197: proportional counter array (PCA) in the Good~Xenon mode. PCA has a 

198: field of view of 1$\degr$ (FWHM), total collecting area 

199: of about 6500 cm$^2$, time resolution of 1 $\mu$s, and spectral 

200: resolution of $\leq18\%$ at 6 keV. The data are

201: reduced and analyzed using the {\sl ftools} software package version

202: v5.2. We filter the data using the standard \xte\ criteria,

203: selecting time intervals for which parameters ${\tt Elevation\_Angles}

204: <10\degr$, ${\tt Time\_Since\_SAA} \geq 30$ min, ${\tt

205: Pointing\_Offsets} < 0.02 \degr$, and the background 

206: electron rate ${\tt Electron2} < 0.1$.  The effective exposure 

207: time after this filtering is 31.7~ks and

208: 41.7~ks for the September and December observations.  Since the background

209: of \xte\ is high and the spectral resolution is relatively low,

210: the \xte\ data

211: is used herein exclusively for timing analysis, selecting photons

212: detected from PCA PHA channels $0-35$ ($\sim 2-15$~keV). This results

213: in a total of $\sim 1$ and $\sim 1.6$ million counts in the

214: two observations for the subsequent analysis. The photon arrival 

215: times are corrected

216: to the Solar system barycenter, based on the DE200 Solar ephemeris time

217: system and the \chandra\ J2000 coordinates of J193030.13+185214.1 

218: (Lu et al. 2002).

219: 

220: SNR \snr\ was also observed with \chandra\ on 2003 June 30 for a total

221: of 58.4 ks. The pulsar was placed at the aim-point of the

222: front-illuminated ACIS-I detector. The CCD chip I3 was operated in

223: continuous-clocking mode (CC-mode), providing a time resolution of

224: 2.85~ms and an one-dimensional imaging, in which the \hbox{2-D} CCD image is

225: integrated along the column direction in each CCD readout cycle. The

226: photon arrival times are post-processed to account for the spacecraft 

227: dithering and SIM motion prior to the barycenter correction. 

228: The spectral data are corrected for the effects of CTI (Charge

229: Transfer Inefficiency). However, the spectral gain is not well

230: calibrated in the CC-mode, requiring adjustment in the fitting

231: process (details are given in \S 3). Spectral response matrices are

232: generated for the ACIS-I aimpoint, the location of the pulsar in this

233: observation.  After filtering the data using the standard criteria,

234: the remaining effective exposure is 57.2~ks.  Reduction and analysis

235: of the \chandra\ data are all based on the standard software package

236: {\sl CIAO} (v3.2) and {\sl CALDB} (v3.0.0).

237: 

238: Figure~1 presents the geometry of the CC-mode observation overlaid on

239: an archival \chandra\ X-ray image of SNR~G54.1+0.3.  The CCD image is

240: summed along the dimension perpendicular to the marked line which is

241: orientated with a position angle $P.A. = 19\degr$ East of North. The

242: count distribution along this dimension is shown in Figure~2. The

243: central peak corresponds to the presence of the pulsar, which

244: significantly contributes to the six adjacent pixels, as denoted by

245: the upper horizontal bar. The neighboring four pixels (two on each

246: side of the pulsar region), marked by the two lower horizontal bars,

247: show the nearly same intensity level in the ACIS-I3 image-mode data with the

248: pulsar excised. We therefore select counts

249: falling in the inner six pixels for both our pulsar timing and

250: spectral analysis of the pulsar, while those counts in the outer four

251: pixels are used to estimate the background from the surrounding

252: nebula.

253: 

254: \begin{figure}

255: \plotone{f1.eps}

256: \caption{Geometry of the \chandra\ ACIS-I3 CCD continuous-clocking

257: (CC-mode) observation of \psr\ presented herein. The dashed line gives

258: the orientation of the CC-mode observation shown overlaid on an

259: archival \chandra\ broadband ($0.3-10$~keV) X-ray image of SNR G54.1+0.3.

260: \label{fig1}}

261: \end{figure}  

262: 

263: \begin{figure}

264: %\epsscale{0.5}

265: \plotone{f2.ps}

266: \caption{Source and background region determination for the \chandra\

267: CC-mode observation of \psr. The \hbox{1-D} count distribution of

268: SNR~G54.1+0.3 as observed in CC-mode using ACIS-S3 ({\it solid line}),

269: compared with the distributions constructed from the collapsed

270: \chandra\ ACIS-I3 image-mode data, with ({\it dashed line}) and

271: without ({\it dotted}) the pulsar excised. All data is restricted to

272: the $0.3-10$~keV energy band. The on-pulsar (central) thick horizontal bar

273: denotes the 6 pixels that contains significant pulsar emission, while

274: the two adjacent off-pulsar (outer) thick horizontal bars mark the pixels

275: that are used to estimate the local nebula background (see \S2 for

276: details).

277: \label{fig2}}

278: \end{figure}

279: 

280: \section{Results}

281: 

282: \subsection{Pulsar Timing}

283: 

284: For each observation, we search for the periodic signal of \psr\ by

285: folding events around the period extrapolated from the early radio

286: ephemeris of Camilo et al (2002). For each period folding with a

287: period $P$, a $\chi^2$ is calculated from the fit to the pulse profile

288: with a constant count rate. The null hypothesis of no periodic signal can be

289: ruled out when a significant peak is seen in the resultant

290: ``periodogram'' ($\chi^2$ vs. $P$), which is the case for each of the

291: X-ray observations at a high confidence ($\chi^2 > 300$ for 10 phase

292: bins). We further fit the peak shape with a Gaussian profile to

293: maximize the accuracy of our pulsar period determination (Figure~3).

294: The centroid of this Gaussian is then taken as the best estimate of

295: the pulsar period. The light curves derived of the \xte\ and \chandra\

296: observations folded at the measured periods are shown in Figures.~4--5.

297: 

298: To estimate the uncertainties in the period measurements, we use the

299: bootstrap technique of Diaconis \& Efron (1983). This is done as the

300: following: (1) constructing a new data set of the same total 

301: number of counts by re-sampling with replacement from the observed events;

302: (2) determining the period with this re-sampled data set in the exactly 

303: same way as with the original data; (3) repeating the above two

304: steps for 500 times to produce a period distribution; (4) Using the

305: dispersion of this distribution as an estimate of the 1$\sigma$ period

306: uncertainty.  The distributions produced for the three observations

307: are shown in the right column of Figure~3, while the estimated

308: uncertainties are included in Table~1.

309: 

310: \begin{figure}[b]

311: \plotone{f3.eps}

312: \caption{Period and period uncertainty of \psr\ at three epochs. {\it

313: Left} -- The periodograms of PSR J1930+1852 constructed from the

314: September 2002, December 2002, and June 2003 observations and together

315: with the respective best-fit Gaussian profiles for the central

316: peaks. {\it Right} -- The

317: distribution of the 500 periods from the bootstrapped data for each

318: observations. The Gaussian $1\sigma$ width gives an estimate of the period

319: uncertainty. The P$_0$ values are given in Table 1.

320: \label{fig3}} 

321: \end{figure}

322: 

323: \begin{figure}[b]

324: \plotone{f4.ps}

325: \caption{The pulse shape of \psr\ in the $2 - 15$ keV band as

326: obtained with \xte\ on 2002 September 12 (solid) and December

327: 23 (dashed). Phase zero is arbitrary; two cycles are shown for clarity.

328: The December light curve is shifted upward by 0.002.

329: \label{fig4}}

330: \end{figure}

331: 

332: To compute the pulsed fraction of the X-ray emission from 

333: \psr, we used the \chandra\

334: observation.  We extracted a total of 5506 counts

335: in the $0.3-10$ keV band from the on-pulsar pixels of the \hbox{1-D} count 

336: distribution (the solid curve in Figure~2).

337: After subtracting the local nebular contribution estimated

338: from the neighboring off-pulsar pixels, the remaining 

339: 3560$\pm$92 counts are considered as the net total emission from the pulsar. 

340: This emission can be further divided into

341: the pulsed  and persistent components. To determine the  persistent component,

342: we construct a \hbox{1-D} distribution of the persistent emission from 

343: the off-pulse counts, defined to be in the phase interval $0.1 - 0.3$ (Figure~5).

344: The same on-pulsar pixels as shown in Figure~2 now contain a total of 598 counts,

345: Corrected for the off-pulse phase fraction (1/5), the total 

346: number of  persistent counts

347: over the entire phase is then 598$\times$5.  

348: Therefore, the net number of the pulsed counts is 

349: (5506-598$\times$5)=2516$\pm$143. This results in a pulsed fraction 

350: of $f_p \equiv ( {\rm pulsed/total\ counts}) = 71\pm5\%$.

351: 

352: \begin{figure}

353: \plotone{f5.ps}

354: \caption{The pulse shape and its hardness ratio of \psr\  in the 

355: $0.3-10$~keV band as measured with \chandra\ on 2002 June 30.  The

356: pulse shape ({\it Top Panel}) is folded at the period given in Table~1

357: and the phase bin size is chosen so that each bin contains almost the same

358: counts. The hardness ratio {(\it Bottom Panel)} is as defined in the

359: text (\S3.2); the background, as defined in \S2, has been subtracted.

360: \label{fig5}}

361: \end{figure}

362: 

363: \begin{deluxetable}{lccc}

364: \tablewidth{0pt}

365: \tablecaption{Timing Results for PSR J1930+1852}

366: \tablehead{

367: \colhead{Date} & \colhead{Obs. Type} & \colhead{Epoch} &  \colhead{Period} \\

368: \colhead{(UT)} & &\colhead{(MJD[TDB])} &  \colhead{(s)}}

369: \startdata

370: 1997 Apr 27 &ASCA & 50566  & 0.13674374(5){\tablenotemark{a}} \\

371: 2002 Jan 17 &Radio & 52280  & 0.136855046957(9){\tablenotemark{a}} \\

372: 

373: 2002 Sep 12 &RXTE  & 52530  & 0.136871312(4) \\

374: 2002 Dec 23 &RXTE  &  52632  & 0.136877919(3) \\

375: 2003 Jun 30 &Chandra &52820  &  0.136890130(5) \\

376: 

377: \enddata

378: \tablenotetext{a}{\footnotesize Taken from Camilo et al. (2002)}

379: \label{timetable}

380: \end{deluxetable}

381: 

382: 

383: \subsection{Pulsed Emission Spectral Characteristics}

384: 

385: To check for phase-dependent spectral variations across the pulse

386: profile we compute the hardness ratio in each phase bin, 

387: defined as

388: ${\rm HR} = N_h/N_s$, where $N_s$ and $N_h$ are the counts selected

389: from the $0.3-3$~keV and $3-10$~keV energy bands, respectively.  The

390: pulsar counts (pulsed and unpulsed) are extracted from the 6 pixel

391: source region as discussed in \S2 and the background from the

392: neighboring 4 pixels.  The calculated  ${\rm HR}$ is 

393: shown in the lower panel of Figure~5. Fitting these ${\rm HR}$ 

394: data points  assuming a constant  ${\rm HR}$ value resulted 

395: in a $\chi^2$ of 17.94 for 9 degrees of freedom, which means 

396: that the hardness ratio changes with phase at a confidence level 

397: of 96.4$\%$. Further more, it appears that the ${\rm HR}$ values of the 

398: on pulse emission are higher than those of the off-pulse 

399: emission. In order to quantify this, we computed the mean ${\rm HR}$

400: for the off-pulse emission (bins 1, 2 3 and 10 in the panel) 

401: as ${\rm HR} = 0.77\pm0.08$ and the on-pulse bins (4 to 9) as

402: ${\rm HR} = 0.95\pm0.04$.  Therefore, the on-pulse emission is harder than

403: the off-pulse emission at a confidence level of $\sim 2 \sigma$, or 98$\%$.

404: 

405: Next, we study the \chandra\ spectrum of PSR J1930+1852 using the same

406: sources and background counts as extracted above. For the pulsed

407: spectrum, the phase width corrected off-pulse counts are subtracted

408: from the on-pulse counts in each spectral bin. Figure~6a presents the

409: best fit absorbed power-law model using the standard response

410: matrix. Although the overall $\chi^2$ is acceptable (34.4 for 35

411: degree-of-freedom), the residuals to this fit display characteristic

412: feature, indicating that the gain of the response function is not

413: properly calibrated for the CC-mode. Following the method suggested by

414: Kaaret et al. (2001) we calibrate the gain offset and scale in {\sl

415: XSPEC} by comparing the overall CC-mode spectra of \psr\ to that

416: determined by the ACIS-S3 imaging data. The latter is characterized by

417: the same model with the absorption column density

418: $N_H=1.6\times10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$ and a photon index $\alpha=1.35$

419: (Camilo et al. 2002).  The resulting gain scale and offset are found

420: to be 0.90 and -0.18, respectively. Fixing this gain correction and

421: $N_H$ to the above values, we re-fit the pulsed emission spectrum to

422: obtain a photon index of $1.2\pm0.2$ (see Figure~6b). The new $\chi^2$ value

423: is 17.7 for 34 degree-of-freedom, significantly better than without

424: the gain correction. The pulsed flux

425: measured in the $2-10$~keV energy band is $1.2\times10^{-12}$ ergs

426: cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$. When compared to the overall $2-10$~keV flux of

427: $1.7\times10^{-12}$ ergs cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ (Camilo et al. 2002), this

428: implies that $\sim 70\%$ of the total emission from the pulsar is

429: pulsed, consistent with the estimate in Section 3.1.

430: 

431: \begin{figure*}

432: \plotone{f6.eps}

433: \caption{The pulsed X-ray spectrum of \psr\ obtained with \chandra\

434: ACIS-I3 in continuous-clocking mode: {\it Left Panel:} fitting with an

435: absorbed power-law model with the gain scale and offset fixed as 1 and

436: 0;  {\it Right Panel:} fitting with the same model but with the

437: gain scale and offset of 0.90 and -0.18.

438: \label{fig6}}

439: \end{figure*}

440: 

441: \section{Discussion}

442: The properties of \psr\ are most similar to those found for other

443: examples of young, energetic pulsars. The power-law spectral index of

444: the pulsar emission is consistent with its spin-down energy according

445: to the empirical law of Gotthelf (2003) for energetic rotation powered

446: pulsars with $\dot E > 4 \times 10^{36}$~erg~s$^{-1}$. The power law

447: index is also consistent with that of the pulsed emission, as found

448: for other high $\dot E$, Crab-like pulsars (Gotthelf 2003). As with

449: most X-ray detected radio pulsars, the X-ray pulse morphology differs

450: from that of the radio pulse. The full width at half

451: maximum (FWHM) of the X-ray pulse is 0.4 phase compared to 0.15 phase

452: in radio. Notably, the X-ray pulse has a steep rise and slow decline,

453: whereas the radio pulse is inverted, with a slow rise and steep decay

454: instead.

455: 

456: The unpulsed component of \psr\ is most likely nonthermal in nature as

457: the thermal emission from the cooling surface of the neutron star

458: should be negligible.  According to the standard theoretical cooling

459: curves, the surface temperature of a 1.4 M$\sun$ neutron star is about

460: 0.13 keV at the age of \psr\ (about 3,000 years; Page 1998). Assuming

461: a radius of 12 km the neutron star should have an absorbed $0.2-10$

462: keV flux of $\sim 8 \times 10^{-15}$~erg~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$, which

463: accounts for $\sim$ 0.4\% of our detected total $0.2-10$~keV X-ray

464: flux or 1.4\% of the unpulsed flux. Tennant et al.  (2001) detected

465: the X-ray emission of the Crab pulsar at its pulse minimum, though

466: accounting for only a tiny fraction of the total or unpulsed flux.

467: Tennant et al. (2001) further suggested that this component is

468: nonthermal.  The unpulsed X-ray emission from \psr\ may be of the same

469: nature as that of the Crab pulsar.

470:  

471: Together with the previous X-ray and radio periods, the three timing

472: measurements obtained herein provide an opportunity to study the pulsar

473: period evolution. 

474: A linear fit to these periods yields a $\dot{P}$ of 7.5116(6)$\times

475: 10^{-13}$~s~s$^{-1}$ with a reduced $\chi^2_{\nu}$ of 3.6 (see Figure~7).

476:  The large

477: $\chi^2_{\nu}$ value and the scattered residuals show that the period

478: of \psr\ evolves in a more complicated than a simply constant spin down.

479:  The period derivative obtained here is

480: also significantly ($9\sigma$) different from that obtained by Camilo

481: et al. (2002). This suggests that \psr\ has experienced periods

482: of timing noise and/or glitches - not unepxected for a young

483: pulsar (e.g., Zhang et al. 2001; Wang, et al. 2001; Crawford \& Demia\'nsky

484: 2003). Arzoumanian et al. (1994) 

485: defined a quantity $\Delta_8$ to 

486: represent the stability of a pulsar. They found an  empirical relation

487: between $\Delta_8$ and $\dot{P}$, which predicts a high

488: $\Delta_8$ of -0.67 for PSR J1930+1852. This value is higher than 

489: those measured for most ordinary pulsars and is consistent with the

490: variability in spin-down rate observed for this pulsar. 

491: 

492: 

493: \begin{figure}

494: \plotone{f7.ps}

495: \caption{The period residuals of PSR J1930+1852 in different epochs.

496: \label{fig7}}

497: \end{figure}

498: 

499: Indeed, \psr\ shares other interesting properties with PSR~B0540-69. 

500: For example, the

501: pulsed X-ray emission of PSR~B0540-69 has probably a harder spectrum,

502: with a photon index of $1.83\pm0.13$, than the steady component whose

503: photon index is ($2.09\pm0.14$; Kaaret et al.  2001), whereas \psr\

504: also has a harder pulsed emission than the steady emission. Furthermore,

505: the pulse width of PSR~B0540-69 is about

506: 0.4 and its pulsed fraction $f_p = 71.0\pm5\% $, both nearly identical

507: to the respective values measured herein for \psr.

508: Based on these X-ray emission similarities, the X-ray emission

509: regions of the two pulsars may have the similar overall structures and

510: viewing geometries.

511: 

512: 

513: \acknowledgments The project is partially supported by NASA/SAO/CXC through

514: grant GO5-6057X. FJL and JLQ also acknowledge support from the National

515: Natural Science Foundation of China.

516: 

517: 

518: \begin{thebibliography}{}

519: \bibitem[Arzoumanian(1994)]{ar94}Arzoumanian, Z., Nice, D.J., Taylor, J.H., \& Thorestt, S.E. 1994, \apj, 422, 671

520: \bibitem[Camilo(2002)]{ca02}Camilo, F., Lorimer, D.R., Bhat, N.D.R., Gotthelf, E.V., 

521: Halpern, J.P., Wang, Q.D., Lu, F.J., \& Mirabal, N. 2002, \apj, 574, L71

522: \bibitem[Crawford(2003)]{cr03}Crawford, F., \& Demia\'nski, M. 2003, \apj, 595, 1052

523: \bibitem[Diaconis(1983)]{di83}Diaconis, P., \& Efron, B. 1983, Scientific American, May P96

524: \bibitem[Gotthelf(2003)]{go03}Gotthelf, E. V. 2003, \apj, 591, 361

525: \bibitem[Gotthelf(2004)]{go04}Gotthelf, E. V. 2004, in ``Young Neutron Stars and Their Environments'', IAU Symp. 218. Ed. F. Camilo \& B. M. Gaensler (S.F. CA.: ASP) 2004, 218, 225

526: \bibitem[Kaaret(2001)]{ka01}Kaaret, P., et al. 2001, \apj, 546, 1159

527: \bibitem[Lu(2002)]{lu02}Lu, F.J., Wang, Q.D., Aschenbach, B., Durouchoux, P., \& Song, L.M. 2002, \apj, 568, L49

528: \bibitem[Mi(2002)]{Mi02} Middleditch, J., et al.  2006, ApJ, 652, 1531

529: \bibitem[Page(1998)]{pa98}Page, D. 1998, in The Many Faces of Neutron Stars ed. R. Buccheri, 

530: J. van Paradijs, \& M.A. Alpar (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 539

531: \bibitem[Tennant(2001)]{te01}Tennant, A.F., et al. 2001, \apj, 554, L173

532: \bibitem[Wang(2001)]{wa01}Wang, N., Wu, X.J., Manchester, R.N., et al. 2001, Chin. J. Astron. Astrophys., 1, 195

533: \bibitem[Zhang(2001)]{zh01}Zhang, W., Marshall, F.E., Gotthelf, E.V., Middleditch, J., \& Wang, Q.D. 2001, \apj, 554, L177

534: \end{thebibliography}

535: 

536: \end{document}

537: 

538: 

539: