1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \begin{document}
4:
5: \title{{\it{FUSE}} Observations of the Dwarf Novae UU Aql, BV
6: Cen, and CH UMa in Quiescence\altaffilmark{1}}
7:
8: \author{Edward M. Sion, Patrick Godon\altaffilmark{2},
9: Fuhua Cheng}
10: \affil{Astronomy and Astrophysics, Villanova University, \\
11: 800 Lancaster Avenue, Villanova, PA 19085, USA}
12: \email{edward.sion@villanova.edu,
13: patrick.godon@villanova.edu,
14: fcheng@ast.vill.edu}
15:
16: \author{Paula Szkody}
17: \affil{Department of Astronomy,
18: University of Washington,
19: Seattle, WA 98195, USA}
20: \email{szkody@astro.washington.edu}
21:
22: \altaffiltext{1}
23: {Based on observations made with the NASA-CNES-CSA Far Ultraviolet
24: Spectroscopic
25: Explorer. {\it{FUSE}} is operated for NASA by the Johns
26: Hopkins University under NASA contract NAS5-32985}
27: \altaffiltext{2}{Visiting at the
28: Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA; godon@stsci.edu}
29:
30: %\clearpage
31:
32: \begin{abstract}
33:
34: We report on {\it{FUSE}} spectra of three U Gem-type, long period,
35: dwarf novae,
36: UU Aql, BV Cen and CH UMa taken during their quiescence intervals. We
37: discuss the line identifications in their spectra and attempt to
38: characterize the source(s) of their FUV flux distribution.
39: Archival {\it{IUE}} spectrum of CH UMa and BV Cen in quiescence
40: were identified as having a matching flux level with the {\it{FUSE}} spectra
41: and these were combined with each {\it{FUSE}} spectrum
42: to broaden the wavelength coverage and further
43: constrain model fits. Multi-component synthetic spectral fits from our
44: model grids, consisting of single temperature white dwarfs,
45: two-temperature white dwarfs, accretion disks and white dwarfs plus
46: accretion disks, were applied to the {\it{FUSE}} spectra alone and to the
47: combined {\it{FUSE}} + {\it{IUE}} spectra. We present the results of
48: our model analyses and their implications.
49:
50: \end{abstract}
51:
52: \keywords{accretion, accretion disks - novae, cataclysmic variables
53: - stars: dwarf novae - stars: individual (UU Aql, BV Cen, CH UMa)
54: - white dwarfs}
55:
56:
57:
58: \section{Introduction}
59:
60: Dwarf novae (DNe) are close interacting binaries in which a Roche-lobe
61: filling main sequence-like dwarf transfers matter with angular momentum
62: through a disk onto a white dwarf (WD). The rapid disk accretion during
63: outburst, due to a thermal instability that causes cyclic changes of the
64: accretion rate, releases gravitational potential energy identified as the
65: DN outburst. The high accretion rate ($\sim 10^{-8}$ to $10^{-9}$
66: $M_{\odot}$/yr) outburst phase (which lasts a few days to weeks) is
67: preceded and followed by a low accretion rate ($\sim 10^{-11}
68: M_{\odot}$/yr) quiescence stage. This DN behavior is believed to be
69: punctuated every few
70: thousand years or more by episodes of catastrophically unstable
71: thermonuclear burning, the classical nova explosion. Perhaps the least
72: understood topic in CV/DN research (along with what drives the wind
73: outflow in outburst) is the state and structure of the boundary layer and
74: accretion disk during quiescence and the physics of how long term
75: accretion of mass, angular momentum and energy affects the WD. Our
76: studies with archival {\it{IUE}}, and {\it{HST}}/STIS have found
77: that $\sim$50\% of the
78: DNe in quiescence are dominated (i.e., $>$ 60\% of UV flux) by a
79: component of FUV
80: flux other than the WD called the "accretion disk"; $\sim$25\% are dominated
81: by the WD and $\sim$25\% have nearly equal contribution of WD and accretion
82: disk (40-60\% each) \citep{urb06}.
83:
84: A number of studies \citep{ara03,sio91,sio99,urb06}
85: have shown that CV WDs above the gap are typically
86: on-average ~ 10,000K hotter than CV WDs below the period gap (almost
87: certainly a consequence of higher time-averaged accretion rates of systems
88: above the gap but possibly with system total age also being a factor).
89: Since the white dwarf surface temperature is crucial for understanding CV
90: evolution and whether CVs evolve across the period gap, the use of
91: cooling ages and long term evolutionary model sequences with accretion
92: (including the effects of nova explosions, \citet{tow03})
93: must rely on the empirical WD temperature of the photosphere in
94: equilibrium with
95: long term compressional heating from accretion. The work of
96: \citet{tow02,tow03} allows measured T$_{eff}$'s of CV WDs to be
97: converted to the accretion rate per unit WD surface area averaged over the
98: thermal time of the WD envelope.
99:
100: Unfortunately, there are far fewer systems with reliably known WD
101: properties above the period gap compared with below the gap,
102: thus impeding detailed comparisons between the two groups. For example,
103: among CVs below the gap, there are now roughly 20 systems with reliable WD
104: temperatures but only 5 systems above the gap with reliable WD
105: temperatures. The primary reason for this disparity is that in long period
106: CVs with higher mass transfer rates, the disks may remain optically thick
107: even during quiescence, making the disk contribution to the total flux
108: typically larger in systems above the gap. Hence, it is more difficult to
109: disentangle the white dwarf flux contribution from that of the accretion
110: disk.
111:
112: As part of our effort to increase the sample of CV degenerates with known
113: properties above the gap, we have used {\it{FUSE}}
114: and {\it{IUE}} archival spectra to
115: analyze three long period dwarf novae, UU Aql, BV Cen, and CH UMa. For UU
116: Aql, system properties were adopted from \citet{rit03}
117: and from \citet{szk87}.
118: For BV Cen parameters were adopted from \citet{rit03}.
119: For CH UMa, we adopted values from \citet{fri90}.
120: For all three systems, the distances were the same as those in
121: \citet{urb06} where the \citet{war95} and \citet{har04}
122: M$_{v(max)}$ versus P$_{orb}$ relations, calibrated with trigonometric
123: parallaxes, were used. The reddening values were the same as those quoted
124: in \citet{urb06} which were from \citet{ver87}, \citet{lad91}
125: and \citet{bru94}.
126:
127: The dwarf nova systems analyzed in this work are UU Aql, BV Cen, and CH
128: UMa. In Table 1, the observed properties of these dwarf novae are
129: summarized by column as follows: (1) system name; (2) dwarf nova subclass
130: with UG denoting a U Gem-type system; (3)
131: orbital period in days; (4) the recurrence time of dwarf nova outbursts in
132: days; (6) the apparent
133: magnitude at minimum (quiescence); (7) the apparent magnitude in
134: outburst; (8) secondary spectral type; (9) orbital inclination in degrees;
135: (10) white dwarf mass in solar masses; (11) secondary star mass in solar
136: masses; (12) adopted reddening value and ; (13) distance in parsecs.
137:
138: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
139:
140: The instrumental setup and exposure details of
141: the {\it{FUSE}} spectra of BV Cen,
142: CH UMa and UU Aql in quiescence are provided in Table 2. The LWRS was used
143: in all cases since it is least prone to slit losses due to the
144: misalignment of the four {\it{FUSE}} telescopes.
145: All the spectra were obtained in time tag (TTAG) mode, and each one of them
146: consists of 7 individual exposures (corresponding to 7 {\it{FUSE}} orbits).
147: It is clear that the relatively
148: poor {\it{FUSE}} spectral quality of the spectra speaks to the requirement for
149: more observing time. Nevertheless, we deemed that there was sufficient S/N
150: to warrant a first attempt multi-component FUV analysis of each system
151:
152: All the data were reduced using CalFUSE version 3.0.7.
153: In this version of CalFUSE the data are maintained as a photon
154: list: the intermediate data file - IDF.
155: Bad photons are flagged but not discarded, so the user can examine
156: and combined data without re-running CalFUSE.
157: For each target, we combined the individual exposures (using the IDF
158: files) and channels to create a time-averaged spectrum
159: weighted in the flux in each output datum by the exposure time
160: and sensitivity of the input exposure and channel of origin. The details
161: are given here. The spectral regions
162: covered by the spectral channels overlap, and these overlap regions are
163: then used to renormalize the spectra in the SiC1, LiF2, and SiC2 channels
164: to the flux in the LiF1 channel. We then produce a final spectrum that
165: covers almost the full {\it{FUSE}} wavelength range $905-1182$\AA. The low
166: sensitivity portions of each channel are discarded. In most channels there
167: exists a narrow dark stripe of decreased flux in the spectra running in
168: the dispersion direction. This stripe has been affectionately known as the
169: ''worm'' and it can attenuate as much as 50\% of the incident light in
170: the affected portions of the spectrum. The worm has been observed to move
171: as much as 2000 pixels during a single orbit in which the target was
172: stationary. The "worm" appears to be present in every exposure and, at
173: this time, there is no explanation for it. Because of the temporal changes
174: in the strength and position of the worm, CalFUSE cannot correct target
175: fluxes for its presence. Here we take particular care to discard the
176: portion of the spectrum where the so-called \textit{worm} 'crawls', which
177: deteriorates LiF1 longward of 1125\AA\ . Because of this the $1182 -
178: 1187$\AA\ region is lost.
179: We then rescale and combine the spectra. When we combine, we weight
180: according to the area and exposure time for that channel and then rebin
181: onto a common wavelength scale with a
182: $0.1$\AA , $0.2$\AA , and $0.5$\AA\ resolution.
183:
184: In the observing log given in Table 2, the entries are by column: (1)
185: gives the target, (2) {\it{FUSE}} spectral data ID,
186: (3) the aperture used, (4) the
187: date and time of observation, (5) the (good)
188: exposure time in seconds, (6) central wavelength,
189: and (7) S/N.
190:
191: The {\it{FUSE}} spectra for the three systems, UU Aql, BV Cen and CH Uma are
192: displayed in Figures 1, 2, and 3 respectively.
193: A quantitative
194: sense of the relative data quality is provided by the signal to noise
195: for the three {\it{FUSE}} spectra. We binned the data by 0.1\AA\ for which
196: the S/N of UU Aql, BV Cen, and CH UMa is 5.15, 5.9, and 3.6, respectively.
197:
198: For UU Aql, Fig. 1 reveals
199: a rich line spectrum with numerous lines of molecular hydrogen,
200: interstellar species and possible accretion disk or photospheric
201: absorption features. The spectrum reveals a downturn in the continuum
202: shortward of 1000\AA . The spectrum does not exhibit any evidence of emission
203: lines from the source, the only emission lines are from air glow and
204: heliocoronal (e.g. sharp emissions lines from
205: C\,{\sc iii} (around 977\AA ) and the O\,{\sc vi} doublet).
206:
207: In figure 2, the {\it{FUSE}} spectrum of BV Cen has a variety
208: of interstellar and stellar features but has a continuum shape distinctly
209: different from UU Aql. The broad C\,{\sc iii}
210: absorption feature around 1175\AA\
211: is definitely from the source, and the C\,{\sc iii} (around 977\AA )
212: and the O\,{\sc vi} doublet broad emission features could also possibly be
213: associated with one of the FUV components in BV Cen.
214: All the other sharp emission
215: features are either heliocoronal or geocoronal in origin.
216:
217: In figure 3, CH UMa reveals numerous absorption
218: lines due to highly ionized and singly ionized metals. It has a continuum
219: energy distribution similar to UU Aql. There are definitely some broad emission
220: lines from the source itself. The most prominent one is the O\,{\sc vi}
221: doublet (the right component being strongly
222: attenuated by molecular hydrogen sharp absorption
223: lines), C\,{\sc iii} (both around 977\AA\ and 1175\AA) which also
224: seems to be in emission and
225: a tentative identification of N\,{\sc iv}
226: emission in the short wavelengths. The source is
227: also contaminated with sharp emission lines due to air glow. Here too the
228: N\,{\sc i} \& N\,{\sc ii}
229: are geocoronal in origin, and the sharp peaks on top of
230: the broad C\,{\sc iii} (977\AA) and O\,{\sc vi}
231: emissions are heliocoronal in origin.
232: We note that ISM molecular hydrogen absorption
233: is affecting the continuum.
234:
235: Since the wavelength range covered by {\it{FUSE}}
236: overlaps with {\it{HST}}/STIS or {\it{IUE}}
237: in the region of C\,{\sc iii}
238: between 1170\AA\ and 1180\AA, a much broader FUV
239: wavelength coverage is afforded by combining the spectra when the flux
240: levels of the two spectra in the wavelength overlap region match closely
241: enough. We found archival {\it{IUE}} spectra matching the {\it{FUSE}}
242: spectra of two
243: of the three systems (CH UMa and BV Cen) but unfortunately no {\it{HST}}
244: spectra exist for the three systems.
245:
246: The {\it{FUSE}} + {\it{IUE}} combination of spectra
247: rests on the assumptions that (1)
248: differences between the two spectra in orbital phase and (2) in time
249: after the last outburst can be ignored. Given the long exposure times of
250: the {\it{FUSE}} and {\it{IUE}} spectra, the questionable
251: reliability of the orbital ephemerides, including UU Aql's and (3) the limited
252: S/N of the quiescent spectra, the influence of phase-dependent variations
253: is not considered. However, the time since the last outburst as well
254: as the brightness state of the system at the
255: times of the {\it{FUSE}} and {\it{IUE}}
256: observations for the three systems is considered in detail using AAVSO
257: archival light curve data. For UU Aql, the {\it{FUSE}} spectrum was obtained
258: approximately 50 days after its last major dwarf nova outburst,
259: however, the {\it{IUE}} spectrum was obtained during the transition
260: to a brightening that appeared not to be a major outburst. Therefore,
261: we have excluded the {\it{IUE}} spectrum from use in combination with the
262: {\it{FUSE}} data for UU Aql. For BV Cen both
263: the {\it{FUSE}} and {\it{IUE}} spectra were
264: obtained during quiescence but the {\it{FUSE}}
265: spectrum was acquired approximately
266: 159 days after the last outburst while the {\it{IUE}} spectrum was taken
267: roughly 50 days after the last outburst. Thus, the {\it{FUSE}} spectrum
268: probably recorded a greater degree of white dwarf cooling than the
269: {\it{IUE}} spectrum obtained closer to the last outburst. Likewise for CH UMa,
270: both the {\it{FUSE}} and {\it{IUE}} spectra
271: were obtained during quiescence but the {\it{FUSE}}
272: spectrum appears to have been obtained roughly 125 days after the last
273: outburst while the {\it{IUE}} spectra were acquired about 83 days after the
274: last outburst. Since the e-folding times for white dwarf cooling in
275: both of these systems following the outburst
276: heating episode is typically shorter than the above two post-outburst
277: intervals, it is probably acceptable to
278: combine the {\it{FUSE}} and {\it{IUE}} spectra for BV Cen and CH UMa.
279:
280: In Table 3 we present the observing log of {\it{IUE}} observations which
281: matched the {\it{FUSE}} flux level in the wavelength overlap region of these
282: two systems. The entries by column are (1) the target name,
283: (2) the observation ID, (3) aperture, (4) dispersion mode, (5) date of
284: the observation, (6) time of mid-exposure, and (6) the exposure time in
285: seconds.
286:
287: Thus, our analysis was carried out first for
288: the {\it{FUSE}} spectra of the three
289: systems and then separately for the combined
290: {\it{FUSE}} plus {\it{IUE}} data of BV Cen
291: and CH UMa.
292:
293:
294: \section{Multi-Component Synthetic Spectral Fitting}
295:
296: Our data analysis and modeling involves the full
297: suite of multi-component (accretion disk, white dwarf photosphere,
298: accretion belt) synthetic spectral codes,
299: which we have utilized in
300: our spectral fitting of {\it{FUSE}} and {\it{IUE}} data. Based upon our
301: expectation that the accreting white dwarf is an important source of FUV
302: flux in these systems during quiescence, we carried out a high gravity
303: photosphere synthetic spectral analysis first. The model atmosphere
304: (TLUSTY200; \citet{hub88}), and spectrum synthesis codes
305: (SYNSPEC48 and ROTIN4 \citet{hub95}) and details of
306: our $\chi^{2}_{\nu}$ ($\chi^2$ per degree of freedom) minimization fitting
307: procedures are discussed in detail in \citet{sio95} and will not be
308: repeated here. To estimate physical parameters, we generally took the
309: white dwarf photospheric temperature T$_{eff}$, log $g$, and rotational
310: velocity $v_{rot}$ and chemical abundances as free parameters.
311:
312: We normalize our fits to 1 solar radius and 1 kiloparsec such that the
313: distance of a source is computed from $d =
314: 1000(pc)*(R_{wd}/R_{\sun})/\sqrt{S}$, or equivalently the scale factor $S
315: = \left( \frac{R_{wd}}{R_{\odot}} \right)^{2} \left( \frac{d}{kpc}
316: \right)^{-2}$, is the factor by which the theoretical flux (integrated
317: over the entire wavelength range) has to be multiplied to equal the observed
318: (integrated) flux.
319:
320: The grid of WD models extended over the following range of parameters: log $g
321: = 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0$; T$_{eff}/1000$ (K) = 22, 23, ..., 75; Si =
322: 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 5.0; C = 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 5.0; and
323: $v_{rot} \sin{i}$ (km~s$^{-1}$) = 100, 200, 400, 600, 800.
324:
325: For the synthetic accretion disk models, we used the latest
326: accretion disk models from the optically thick disk model grid
327: of \citet{wad98}. The range of disk model parameters varies as follows:
328: WD mass (in solar units) value of 0.35, 0.55, 0.80, 1.03, and 1.21;
329: orbital inclination (in degrees) of 18, 41, 60, 75 and 81.
330: The accretion rate ranges from $10^{-10.5}M_{\odot}$yr$^{-1}$ to
331: $10^{-8.0}M_{\odot}$yr$^{-1}$ by increments of 0.5 in $log{\dot{M}}$.
332:
333: For each dwarf nova, we adopted the following procedure. First, we
334: masked out all of the obvious emission features
335: and artifacts in both the {\it{FUSE}}
336: and {\it{IUE}} spectra of each object.
337: Second, we carried out synthetic spectral
338: fits using and/or combining model components in this order: a white dwarf
339: model alone, accretion disk model alone, combination white dwarf plus
340: accretion disk model, and two-temperature white dwarf model (the latter to
341: simulate a hotter equatorial region as well as a cooler photosphere at
342: higher latitudes). For accretion disk fits, we "fine-tuned" the
343: derived accretion rate of the best-fitting disk model by changing the
344: accretion rate in increments of 0.1 over the range 0.1 to 10, on the
345: assumption
346: that the disk fluxes scale linearly over that range.
347:
348: In Table 4, we indicate where we masked any strong emission features,
349: artifacts, or negative fluxes in the {\it{FUSE}} and {\it{IUE}} spectra of each object.
350:
351: \section{Synthetic Spectral Fitting Results}
352:
353: The noise level of the {\it{FUSE}} spectra precludes the opportunity to extract
354: reliable parameters for the accreting white dwarfs in these three systems.
355: This is especially true for deriving rotational velocities which rely on
356: well-resolved, strong absorption lines arising in the photosphere. The
357: rotational velocity is also affected by underlying emission filling of
358: absorption features and by the chemical abundances one uses. With these
359: caveats in mind, we proceeded to apply our grid of WD photosphere models
360: (keeping the chemical abundance fixed at solar) and accretion disk
361: synthetic spectra.
362:
363: For any dwarf nova in quiescence, a single
364: temperature white dwarf model should be
365: a reasonable first approximation as the source
366: of the FUV flux. For UU Aql, we adopted
367: two possible distances, 150 pc and 350 pc and carried out detailed fits
368: for both values. For a distance of 350 pc, the best-fit WD model to the
369: {\it{FUSE}} spectrum gave T$_{eff} = 27,000$K, R$_{wd}$/R$_{\sun} = 1.13 \times
370: 10^{-2}$ and a $\chi^{2} = 0.963$. This best-fitting model is shown in
371: figure 4. The continuum of the model gives a fair representation of the
372: observed continuum down to about 1060\AA\ but there is a shortfall of model
373: flux relative to the data at wavelengths shorter than 1030\AA. For the same
374: distance, an accretion disk alone yielded a best fit with $\chi^{2} =
375: 1.14$, an accretion rate of $5\times 10^{-11} M_{\sun}$/yr and inclination
376: $i = 41$ degrees, M$_{wd} = 0.8 M_{\sun}$. This disk fit is shown in
377: figure 5. The model disk continuum, unlike the WD, fails to match the flux
378: level of the data between about 1090\AA\ and 1180\AA\ and the solar abundance
379: accretion disk model fails to provide a sharp absorption features.
380:
381: A combination white dwarf plus accretion disk yielded a modest improvement
382: with $\chi^{2} = 0.71$, $\dot{M} = 1.6 \times 10^{-11} M_{\sun}$/yr, $i =
383: 41$ degrees and $M_{wd} = 0.8 M_{\sun}$. Finally we tried two temperature
384: (WD + belt) fits. The best fit two temperature WD yields $\chi^{2} = 0.74$
385: with the cooler white dwarf portion ( T$_{eff} = 24,000$K) giving 57\% of
386: the flux and the hotter belt (T$_{belt} = 33,000$K) providing 43\%
387: (figure 6).
388:
389: In general, for a distance d = 150 pc, the model fits to UU Aql's {\it{FUSE}}
390: spectrum are worse than for 350 pc. Applying single temperature white
391: dwarf fits, we obtained T$_{eff} = 17,000$K, $R_{wd}/R_{\sun} = 1.06
392: \times 10^{-2}$ and a $\chi^{2} = 1.13$. An accretion disk alone yielded a
393: best fit with $\chi^{2} = 1.23$, an accretion rate of $1.3 \times 10^{-11}
394: M_{\sun}$/yr and inclination $i = 41$ degrees and M$_{wd} = 0.8 M_{\sun}$.
395: A combination white dwarf plus accretion disk yielded a modest improvement
396: with $\chi^{2} = 1.13$, $\dot{M} = 1.6\times10^{-11} M_{\sun}$/yr, $i =
397: 41$ degrees and $M_{wd} = 0.8 M_{\sun}$. A two temperature white dwarf (WD
398: + belt) gives a best-fit with a $\chi^{2} = 1.02$, with a 17,000K white
399: dwarf providing 77\% of the FUV flux and the belt giving 23\% of the flux.
400: In view of the much better agreement of the models with the observations of
401: UU Aql for our assumed distance of 350 pc than for a distance of
402: 150 pc, the closer distance can be ruled out.
403:
404: For CH UMa, the {\it{FUSE}} spectrum is very noisy
405: and underexposed. We took into
406: account our adopted distance of 300 pc in the model fitting, we fixed the
407: WD mass at M$_{wd} = 1.2 M_{\sun}$ (Log $g = 9.0$, with a radius of
408: $\approx 4,000$km), and fixed the disk inclination at the published value
409: of 18 degrees. A single temperature white dwarf fit to CH UMa had
410: $\chi^{2} = 0.227$, and yielded a best fit T$_{eff} = 29,000$K, and a
411: distance of 310pc. This model however did not fit very well in the
412: shorter wavelengths ($<$1020\AA ). A lowest $\chi^{2}$ fit for this same WD
413: mass was obtained for T=40,000K, with $\chi^{2} = 0.208$, but it yielded a
414: distance of 600pc, twice the adopted estimate of the distance. Since the
415: Ritter catalog give a mass of 1.95$M_{\odot}$ (well above the Chandraskhar
416: mass limit for a WD), we decided to try a larger mass with a
417: correspondingly smaller radius which lead to a smaller emitting surface
418: area and therefore a shorter distance. We assumed $M=1.38M_{\odot}$
419: ($log {g} = 9.5$, with a radius of $\approx 2,000$km) and found that the best
420: fit was for $T=40,000$K. This model yielded a distance of 307pc with
421: $\chi^{2} = 0.199$. Since the absorption features around
422: 1120\AA\ - 1150\AA\ are
423: not pronounced in the observed spectrum, we decided to increase the
424: rotational velocity to improve the fit of this model. However, a better
425: result was obtained by simply reducing the abundances of Si and C to 0.01
426: their solar value. This low Si and C model had a $\chi^{2} = 0.184$ and a
427: distance of 314pc. This model is shown in Figure 7. Because of the low
428: S/N of the spectrum the assessment of the error on the temperature
429: estimate is of the order of 5,000K, namely $T_{wd}=40,000\pm 5,000$K.
430:
431: Though the WD fit yielded the lowest value of $\chi^2$, we tried
432: accretion disk fits alone to CH UMa's {\it{FUSE}} data. The best fit gave a
433: $\chi^{2} = 0.213$, an accretion rate of $5 \times 10^{-12} M_{\sun}$/yr
434: for $M_{wd} = 1.2 M_{\sun}$ and $i = 18$ degrees.
435:
436: Various attempts to fit the combined {\it{FUSE}}
437: + {\it{IUE}} spectra of CH UMa met with
438: limited success as summarized in Table 5. The best combination fit was for an
439: accretion disk plus WD with the disk contributing 79\% of the FUV flux. However,
440: these fits were less satisfactory than the fits
441: to the {\it{FUSE}} spectrum alone.
442:
443: Because the {\it{FUSE}} spectrum of CH UMa is very noisy, and because of the
444: broad emission lines and the absence of strong absorption lines, it is
445: difficult to assess which model (disk or WD) is the best solution.
446: However, the absence of strong absorption lines would favor the
447: accretion disk model because of Keplerian broadening.
448: Also because of the poor quality of the spectrum,
449: composite models (WD+accretion disk, two-temperature WD)
450: did not improve the fit. In view of all of the above, we cannot be confident
451: that we have determined the temperature of the white dwarf in CH UMa.
452:
453: Next we analyzed the combined {\it{FUSE}} + {\it{IUE}} spectra of
454: CH UMa.
455: The best white dwarf-only fit yielded T$_{eff} = 31,000$K, log
456: $g = 9$ a $\chi^{2} = 3.02$ and $R_{wd}/R_{\sun} = 6.02 \times 10^{-3}$.
457: For accretion disk models only, the best fit occurred with a $\chi^{2} =
458: 2.02$, corresponding to $\dot{M} = 3 \times 10^{-9} M_{\sun}$/yr. This
459: disk fit is a modest improvement of the fit to CH UMa since the $\chi^{2}$
460: value was lowered to 2.02. The best-fitting white dwarf + accretion disk
461: model resulted in only a modest, statistically
462: insignificant improvement. The $\chi^{2}$ value was lowered to 1.87, the
463: accretion rate was $6.4 \times 10^{-11} M_{\sun}$/yr with the WD T$_{eff}
464: = 22,000$K and the scale factor yielding a white dwarf radius of $5.84
465: \times 10^{-3} R_{\sun}$. In this composite disk plus white dwarf fit, the
466: WD contributes 21\% of the FUV flux while the accretion disk contributes
467: 79\% of the FUV flux. We also tried a two-temperature
468: WD solutions with the best-fitting model consisting of a 26,000K WD
469: providing 77\% of the flux and a hot accretion belt/ring with T$_{belt} =
470: 50,000$K giving 23\% of the UV flux. However, this two-temperature fit was
471: no better than the WD + accretion disk fit.
472:
473: For BV Cen we dereddened the spectrum assuming E(B-V)=0.10,
474: and first tried single temperature white dwarf fits with a white
475: dwarf mass $= 0.83 M_{\sun}$, and
476: used solar chemical abundances. We found the best-fitting white dwarf
477: model to have T$_{eff} = 40,000\pm 1000$K, log $g= 8.3$, $V \sin i = 500$
478: km/s $\pm 100$ km/s. This fit yielded $\chi^{2} = 0.2701$ and
479: a distance d=435pc (see figure 8).
480: We note here that the WD solution
481: fits the following absorption features quite accurately:
482: C\,{\sc ii} (1066\AA ),
483: S\,{\sc iv} (1073\AA ),
484: N\,{\sc ii} (1084\AA ),
485: S\,i{\sc iv} (1122.5\AA , 1128.3\AA ), and
486: S\,i{\sc iii} (1140\AA - 1146\AA ).
487:
488: For an optically thick, steady state accretion disk alone,
489: we chose $M_{wd} = 0.80 M_{\sun}$, $i = 60 $ degrees.
490: The best fit we obtained has a mass accretion rate
491: of $10^{-8.5}M_{\odot}$yr$^{-1}$, too large for dwarf nova quiescence.
492: Moreover, the longer wavelength part of the spectrum
493: is rather flat and unable to fit the absorption features around
494: 1120\AA\ and 1130\AA. This fit, with i=60deg, leads to a distance
495: of 1255pc. In order to fit these absorption features, one needs to assume an
496: inclination of 18 degrees, inconsistent with the known inclination
497: of the system (62 degrees). Such a model leads to a distance of
498: more than 2000pc, again inconsistent with all estimates of the system distance
499: (500pc). Therefore, based on the parameters of the system,
500: the disk solution is completely inconsistent. We tried
501: composite model fits, but they also led to very poor results.
502: We also combined BV Cen's {\it{FUSE}} + {\it{IUE}} spectra but they
503: led to very poor fits, much worse than the fits to the {\it{FUSE}} spectrum
504: alone. Since the WD solution is consistent with the parameters of the
505: system and fits the absorption features of the spectra, it is clear that the
506: favored solution of the {\it{FUSE}} spectrum of
507: BV Cen is $T_{wd}=40,000\pm 2,000$K.
508:
509: \section{Discussion}
510:
511: Our principal objective of determining the surface temperatures of the
512: white dwarfs in these three dwarf novae during quiescence has met with
513: mixed results. From synthetic spectral fits to the {\it{FUSE}} spectra of the
514: three long period dwarf novae, UU Aql, CH UMa and BV Cen, and the {\it{FUSE}}
515: + {\it{IUE}} archival SWP spectra of CH UMa we have presented preliminary
516: evidence that during quiescence, their accreting white dwarfs all have
517: surface temperatures hotter than 20,000K. Unfortunately, all three
518: temperatures have considerable uncertainty due to
519: the low S/N of the {\it{FUSE}} spectra and
520: {\it{IUE}} spectra as well as the difficulty
521: of disentangling the flux contribution of the second component of FUV flux
522: or "accretion disk" during quiescence. Of the three systems in this study,
523: we regard our estimate of the $T_{eff}$ of the WD in UU Aql to be the most
524: reliable since that system appears to be dominated in the FUV by the white
525: dwarf flux.
526:
527: For UU Aql, we used both assumed distances, 150 pc and 350 pc, and tried
528: the composite fits (WD + disk) to UU Aql's {\it{FUSE}} spectrum. However,
529: the quality of the fits for WD-only, disk-only, WD + disk, and WD + "belt"
530: were all roughly comparable and thus it is difficult to distinguish the
531: best-fit case. For both distances, statistically insignificant
532: improvements in the fits result when a white dwarf and accretion disk are
533: combined or a two-temperature WD (WD + belt) is applied to the {\it{FUSE}}
534: data. The results in Table 5 illustrate the difficulty. Qualitatively, the
535: composite fits involving combinations of white dwarf plus accretion disk
536: or accretion belt models look marginally more reasonable than the fits
537: that involve single component (WD or Disk). It appears that for both
538: distances, the white dwarf component is the dominant source of FUV flux
539: and that the $T_{eff}$ of the WD is probably between 17,000K and 27,000K
540: (say 22,000$\pm$5,000K).
541:
542: For BV Cen, the WD model fit to the {\it{FUSE}} spectrum gave the best result,
543: both in fitting actual features of the observed spectrum and in leading
544: to consistent values of the system parameters. This was not the case
545: for the disk model and the composite models.
546: From the best WD model fit we obtained that the
547: WD of BV Cen must have a temperature of about 40,000K.
548:
549: For CH UMa, the broad and dominant emission lines together with
550: the poor S/N (and possible detector noise at very short wavelengths)
551: of the {\it{FUSE}} and {\it{IUE}} spectra precluded the opportunity to obtain
552: conclusive results. However, the results for the {\it{FUSE}} spectrum
553: were of a much higher quality than for the
554: {\it{FUSE}} + {\it{IUE}} combined spectrum.
555: Therefore we adopt the {\it{FUSE}} results for CH UMa with the possibility
556: that the WD temperature could be as high as 40,000K.
557:
558: In Table 6, we list the dwarf novae above the period gap whose
559: white dwarfs have surface temperature determinations. In Column (1) we
560: give the system name, column (2) the orbital period; column (3) the surface
561: temperature and column (4) the temperature reference. As seen in Table 6,
562: there is now a sample of eight long period dwarf novae
563: of which roughly seven have relatively secure white dwarf temperatures
564: obtained during quiescence. In the case of BV Cen, the
565: inclination is expected to be high. Thus, it is plausible to expect that
566: the quiescent accretion disk may be blocking the direct radiation from the
567: accreting white dwarf.
568:
569: The relatively poor {\it{FUSE}} spectral quality of CH UMa
570: underscores the need for re-observation with longer exposure
571: times. However, analysis will remain hindered until more reliable
572: information on white dwarf masses and distances becomes available. Until
573: then, the conclusions in this work must be regarded as preliminary.
574:
575: \section{Acknowledgements}
576:
577: We thank an anonymous referee for helpful comments and corrections.
578: PG wishes to thank the Space Telescope Science
579: Institute for its kind hospitality.
580: This work was supported by NSF grant AST05-07514 and NASA
581: grants NAG5-12067 and NNG04GE78 to Villanova University.
582: This research was based on observations made with the
583: NASA-CNES-CSA Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer.
584: {\it{FUSE}} is operated for NASA by the Johns Hopkins University under
585: NASA contract NAS5-32985.
586:
587: \clearpage
588:
589: \begin{thebibliography}{}
590:
591: \bibitem[Araujo-Betancor et al. (2003)]{ara03}
592: Araujo-Betancor, S., et al. 2003, \apj, 583, 437
593:
594: \bibitem[Bruch \& Engel (1994)]{bru94}
595: Bruch, A., \& Engel, A.1994, \aaps, 68, 41
596:
597: \bibitem[Friend et al. (1990)]{fri90}
598: Friend, M.T., Martin, J.S., Connon-Smith, R., \& Jones, D.H.P.
599: 1990, \mnras, 246, 654
600:
601: \bibitem[Gilliland (1982)]{gil82}
602: Gilliland, R. 1982, \apj, 263, 302
603:
604: \bibitem[Godon et al. (2006)]{god06}
605: Godon, P., Seward, L., Sion, E.M., \& Szkody, P. 2006,
606: \aj, 131, 2634
607:
608: \bibitem[Harrison et al. (2004)]{har04}
609: Harrison, T.E., Johnson, J.J., McArthur, B.E., Benedict, G.F.,
610: Szkody, P., Howell, S.B., Gelino, D.M. 2004, \aj, 127, 460
611:
612: \bibitem[Hartley et al. (2005)]{har05}
613: Hartley, L.E., Long, K.S., Froning, C.S., \& Drew, J.E. 2005,
614: \apj, 623, 425
615:
616: \bibitem[Hubeny (1988)]{hub88}
617: Hubeny, I. 1988, Comput. Phys. Comm., 52, 103
618:
619: \bibitem[Hubeny \& Lanz (1995)]{hub95}
620: Hubeny, I., \& Lanz, T. 1995, \apj, 439, 875
621:
622: \bibitem[laDous (1991)]{lad91}
623: laDous, C. 1991, \aap, 252, 100
624:
625: \bibitem[Ritter \& Kolb (2003)]{rit03}
626: Ritter, H., \& Kolb, U. 2003, \aap, 404, 301
627:
628: \bibitem[Sion (1991)]{sio91}
629: Sion, E.M. 1991, \aj, 102, 295
630:
631: \bibitem[Sion (1999)]{sio99}
632: Sion, E.M. 1999, \pasp, 111, 532
633:
634: \bibitem[Sion et al (2004)]{sio04}
635: Sion, E.M., Cheng, F., Godon, P., Urban, J.A., \& Szkody, P.
636: 2004, \aj, 128, 1834
637:
638: \bibitem[Sion et al. (1995)]{sio95}
639: Sion, E.M., Cheng, F., Long, K.S., Szkody, P., Huang, M., Gilliland, R.,
640: Hubeny, I. 1995, \apj, 439, 957
641:
642: \bibitem[Sion et al. (1998)]{sio98}
643: Sion, E.M., Cheng, F., Szkody, P., Sparks, W.M., G\"ansicke, B.T.,
644: Huang, M., \& Mattei, J. 1998, \apj, 496, 449
645:
646: \bibitem[Sion et al. (2001)]{sio01}
647: Sion, E.M., Szkody, P., G\"ansicke, B.T., Cheng, F., LaDous, C.,
648: Hassall, B. 2001, \apj, 555, 834
649:
650: %\bibitem[
651: %Sion, E.M., \& Urban, J.2002, ApJ, 572, 456\\
652:
653: \bibitem[Szkody (1987)]{szk87}
654: Szkody, P. 1987, \apjs, 63, 685
655:
656: %\bibitem[
657: %Thorstensen, J. 2003, AJ, 126, 3017 \\
658:
659: \bibitem[Townsley \& Bildsten (2002)]{tow02}
660: Townsley, D., \& Bildsten, L. 2002, \apj, 565, 35
661:
662: \bibitem[Townsley \& Bildsten (2003)]{tow03}
663: Townsley, D., \& Bildsten, L. 2003, \apj, 596, L227
664:
665: \bibitem[Urban \& Sion (2006)]{urb06}
666: Urban, J., \& Sion, E.M. 2006, \apj, 642, 1029
667:
668: \bibitem[Verbunt (1987)]{ver87}
669: Verbunt, F. 1987, \aap, 71, 339
670:
671: \bibitem[Wade \& Hubeny (1998)]{wad98}
672: Wade, R.A., \& Hubeny, I. 1998, \apj, 509, 350
673:
674: \bibitem[Warner (1995)]{war95}
675: Warner, B. 1995, Cataclysmic Variable Stars (Cambridge University Press)
676:
677: \end{thebibliography}
678:
679: \clearpage
680:
681:
682: \begin{table}
683: \caption{Dwarf Nova Parameters}
684: \begin{tabular}{llllllcccc}
685: %\multicolumn{10}{c}
686: \hline \\
687: System & $P_{orb}$ &$t_{rec}$&V$_{q}$ &V$_{o}$ & Sec. & i & $M_{wd}$ &$E_{B-V}$& Distance \\
688: Name & (days) & (days) & & & & (deg) &$(M_{\odot})$& & (pc) \\ \hline
689: BV Cen & 0.610108 & 150 & 12.6 & 10.5 & G5-8V &$62 \pm5$&$0.83\pm 0.1$ & 0.10 & 500 \\
690: CH UMa & 0.343 & 204 & 15.3 & 10.7 & K4-M0V&$21 \pm4$& & & 300 \\
691: UU Aql & 0.14049 & 71 & 16.0 & 11.0 & M2-4V & & & & 150-350 \\
692: \hline
693: \end{tabular}
694: \end{table}
695:
696: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccc}
697: \tablecaption{{\it{FUSE}} Observations}
698: \tablewidth{0pc}
699: %\tablenum{2}
700: \tablehead{
701: \colhead{Target} &
702: \colhead{Data ID} &
703: \colhead{Aperture} &
704: \multicolumn{2}{c}{Time of Observation} &
705: \colhead{t$_{exp}$} &
706: \colhead{$\lambda_{centered}$} &
707: \colhead{S/N(0.1\AA)}
708: }
709: \startdata
710: UU Aql & C1100301000 & LWRS 30x30 & 2004-05-16 & 13h:48m:00s & 16,121s & 1035\AA & 5.15 \\
711: BV Cen & D1450301000 & LWRS 30x30 & 2003-04-13 & 20h:26m:00s & 26,545s & 1035\AA & 5.9 \\
712: CH UMa & D1450201000 & LWRS 30x30 & 2003-04-02 & 22h:00m:00s & 17,311s & 1035\AA & 3.6 \\
713: \enddata
714: \end{deluxetable}
715:
716: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}
717: \tablecaption{{\it{IUE}} Observations}
718: %\tablenum{3}
719: \tablehead{
720: \colhead{Target}&
721: \colhead{SWP No. }&
722: \colhead{Aperture}&
723: \colhead{Dispersion}&
724: \colhead{Date}&
725: \colhead{Time 0f Mid-Exposure}&
726: \colhead{t$_{exp}$(s)}
727: }
728: \startdata
729: BV Cen & 26623 & Lg & Low & 08/16/85& 17:17:00& 14,400\\
730: CH UMa & 56270 & Lg & Low & 12/06/95& 12:15:49& 13,800\\
731: \enddata
732: \end{deluxetable}
733:
734: \clearpage
735:
736: \begin{deluxetable}{ll}
737: \tablecaption{Masked Spectral Regions}
738: %\tablenum{4}
739: \tablehead{
740: \colhead{Target}&\colhead{Emission Features }
741: }
742: \startdata
743: UU Aql & for $ \lambda <$ 1050\AA\ if $F_{\lambda}>6 \times 10^{-15}$ergs$~$s$^{-1}$cm$^{-2}$\AA$^{-1}$ \\
744: & for 1050 \AA\ $ < \lambda <$ 1185\AA\ if $F_{\lambda}>1.8 \times 10^{-14}$ergs$~$s$^{-1}$cm$^{-2}$\AA$^{-1}$ \\
745: & 975-985\AA \\
746:
747: CH UMa & for $\lambda < 957$\AA\ if $F_{\lambda} > 1 \times 10^{-14}$ergs$~$s$^{-1}$cm$^{-2}$\AA$^{-1}$ \\
748: & 970-980, 987-994, 1023-1042, 1071-1090, 1107-1136, 1167-1180, 1200-1260, \\
749: & 1285-1315, 1380-420, 1532-1560, 1630-1650, 1846-1940\AA \\
750:
751: BV Cen & for $\lambda < 1185$\AA\ if $F_{\lambda} > 2.5 \times 10^{-14}$ergs$~$s$^{-1}$cm$^{-2}$\AA$^{-1}$ \\
752: & 1190-1220, 1320-1340, 1375-1415, 1530-1570, 1625-1650, 1835-1880\AA \\
753:
754: \enddata
755: \end{deluxetable}
756:
757: \begin{deluxetable}{llclccccc}
758: \tablecaption{UU Aql, BV Cen, and CH UMa Fitting Results}
759: \tablehead{
760: \colhead{System} &
761: \colhead{Spectrum} &
762: \colhead{d} &
763: \colhead{$\chi^{2}$} &
764: \colhead{$T_{wd}$} &
765: \colhead{$T_{belt}$} &
766: \colhead{$\dot{M}$} &
767: \colhead{\% Flux} &
768: \colhead{Fig} \\
769: \colhead{ } &
770: \colhead{ } &
771: \colhead{(pc)} &
772: \colhead{ } &
773: \colhead{($103$K)} &
774: \colhead{($103$K)} &
775: \colhead{($M_{\sun}$/yr)} &
776: \colhead{(Contribution)} &
777: \colhead{ }
778: }
779: \startdata
780: UU Aql & {\it{FUSE}} & 350 & 0.96 & 27 & - & - & 100(WD) & 4 \\
781: & {\it{FUSE}} & 150 & 1.13 & 17 & - & - & 100(WD) & - \\
782: & {\it{FUSE}} & 350 & 1.13 & - & - & $5 \times 10^{-11}$ & 100(Disk) & 5 \\
783: & {\it{FUSE}} & 150 & 1.24 & - & - & $1 \times 10^{-11}$ & 100(Disk) & - \\
784: & {\it{FUSE}} & 350 & 0.714 & 24 & - & $2 \times 10^{-11}$ & 73(WD)/27(Disk) & - \\
785: & {\it{FUSE}} & 150 & 1.13 & 17 & - & $3 \times 10^{-11}$ & 60(WD)/40(Disk) & - \\
786: & {\it{FUSE}} & 350 & 0.738 & 24 & 33 & - & 57(WD)/43(Belt) & 6 \\
787: & {\it{FUSE}} & 150 & 1.021 & 16 & 29 & - & 77(WD)/23(Belt) & - \\
788: CH UMa & {\it{FUSE}} & 314 & 0.184 & 40 & - & - & 100(WD) & 7 \\
789: & {\it{FUSE}} & 313 & 0.213 & - & - & $5 \times 10^{-12}$ & 100(Disk) & - \\
790: & {\it{FUSE}}+{\it{IUE}} & 300 & 3.02 & 31 & - & - & 100(WD) & - \\
791: & {\it{FUSE}}+{\it{IUE}} & 300 & 2.02 & - & - & $3 \times 10^{-9}$ & 100(Disk) & - \\
792: & {\it{FUSE}}+{\it{IUE}} & 300 & 1.87 & 22 & - &$6.4\times 10^{-11}$ & 21(WD)/79(Disk)& - \\
793: & {\it{FUSE}}+{\it{IUE}} & 300 & 2.00 & 26 & 50 & - & 77(WD)/23(Belt)& - \\
794: BV Cen & {\it{FUSE}} & 435 & 0.27 & 40 & - & - & 100(WD) & 8 \\
795: & {\it{FUSE}} & 1255& 0.27 & - & - & $3 \times 10^{-9}$ & 100(Disk) & -
796: \enddata
797: \end{deluxetable}
798:
799: \clearpage
800:
801: \begin{table}
802: \caption{Surface Temperatures of White Dwarfs in Dwarf Novae above the Period Gap}
803: \begin{tabular}{lccl}
804: %\multicolumn{4}{c}
805: \hline
806: \hline
807: System Name & Period & $T_{eff}$ & References \\
808: & (min) & (Kelvin) & \\ \hline
809: BV Cen & 878.6 & 40,000: & This paper \\
810: RU Peg & 539.4 & 49,000 & \citet{sio04} \\
811: Z Cam & 417.4 & 57,000 & \citet{har05} \\
812: RX And & 302.2 & 34,000 & \citet{sio01} \\
813: SS Aur & 263.2 & 31,000 & \citet{sio04} \\
814: U Gem & 254.7 & 31,000 & \citet{sio98} \\
815: WW Ceti & 253.1 & 26,000 & \citet{god06} \\
816: UU Aql & 202.3 & 27,000: & This paper \\
817: \hline
818: \end{tabular}
819: \end{table}
820:
821: \clearpage
822:
823: Figure Captions
824:
825: \figcaption{The flux $F_{\lambda}$ (ergs/cm$^{2}$/s/\AA) versus
826: wavelength (\AA) {\it{FUSE}}
827: spectrum of the U Gem-type dwarf nova UU Aql during quiescence. The
828: identifications of the strongest neutral and ionized line features as well
829: as rotational-vibrational transitions of molecular
830: hydrogen are marked with vertical
831: tick marks. The molecular hydrogen absorption are modestly affecting
832: the continuum, slicing it at almost regular wavelength intervals.
833: We identify the most prominent molecular hydrogen
834: absorption lines by their band
835: (Werner or Lyman), upper vibrational level (1-16), and rotational transition
836: (R,P, or Q) with lower rotational state (J=1,2,3).
837: Air glow line features are indicated with the earth
838: symbol. The C\,{\sc iii} (977\AA ) and O\,{\sc vi} doublet sharp emissions
839: are due to heliocoronal emission often present
840: in some of the {\it{FUSE}} channels when the target (i.e. UU Aql) is faint.}
841:
842: \figcaption{The flux $F_{\lambda}$ (ergs/cm$^{2}$/s/\AA) versus
843: wavelength (\AA) {\it{FUSE}}
844: spectrum of the U Gem-type dwarf nova BV Cen during quiescence. The
845: identifications of the strongest neutral and ionized line features as well
846: as rotational-vibrational transitions of molecular
847: hydrogen are marked with vertical
848: tick marks. Air glow line features are indicated with the earth
849: symbol. The O\,{\sc i} emissions are also due to air glow.
850: The broad C\,{\sc iii} (977\AA )
851: and O\,{\sc vi} (doublet) features might
852: be real broad emissions from the source, as these
853: correspond to the left wing of the Lyman $\gamma$
854: \& $\beta$ (respectively) and not
855: much flux is expected there. The N\,{\sc i} and N\,{\sc ii}
856: sharp emission features are geocoronal.}
857:
858: \figcaption{The flux F$\lambda$ (ergs/cm$^{2}$/s/\AA) versus wavelength
859: (\AA) {\it{FUSE}}
860: spectrum of the U Gem-type dwarf nova CH UMa during quiescence. The
861: identifications of the strongest neutral and ionized line features as well
862: as rotational-vibrational transitions of molecular hydrogen are marked
863: with vertical tick marks. Several terrestrial
864: line features are indicated with the earth
865: symbol. There are some broad emission features associated with the source:
866: we identify here the O\,{\sc vi} doublet, C\,{\sc iii}
867: (at 977\AA\ and 1175\AA ).
868: There could be some N\,{\sc iv} emission in the short
869: wavelengths (between 920\AA\
870: and 925\AA ), but the increase of flux in the very short wavelengths
871: suggests that most the flux at $\lambda <930$\AA\ could be
872: higher orders of the hydrogen Lyman series associated with air glow
873: contamination and possibly some detector noise.}
874:
875: \figcaption{A single temperature WD fit to the {\it{FUSE}} spectrum of UU Aql
876: for a distance of 350 pc. The best-fit yielded T$_{eff} = 27,000$K
877: $\pm3000$K, log $g = 9$. The
878: white dwarf contributes 100\% of the FUV flux.}
879:
880: \figcaption{An accretion disk-only fit to the
881: {\it{FUSE}} spectrum of UU Aql for
882: a distance of 350 pc. The best-fit corresponded to M$_{wd} =
883: 0.8 M_{\sun}$, $i = 41$ degrees, $\dot{M} = 5 \times 10^{-11}
884: M_{\sun}$/yr. The accretion disk contributes 100 \% of the FUV flux.}
885:
886: \figcaption{A WD + belt fit to the {\it{FUSE}} spectrum of UU Aql for
887: a distance of 350 pc. The dotted line is the white dwarf flux
888: component, the dashed line is the belt flux component and the solid
889: line is the combined two-temperature fit.
890: This best fit two temperature WD yields $\chi^{2} = 0.74$
891: with the cooler white dwarf portion ( T$_{eff} = 24,000$K) giving 57\% of
892: the flux and the hotter belt (T$_{belt} = 33,000$K) providing 43\%.}
893:
894: \figcaption{A single temperature WD fit to the {\it{FUSE}} spectrum
895: of CH UMa. The
896: best-fit yielded T$_{eff} = 40,000\pm1,000$K, log $g = 9.5$
897: and a projected rotational velocity of $V_{rot} \sin{i}=200$km/s.
898: The portions of the spectrum that have been masked are shown in blue and
899: include emission lines (either intrinsic to the source or due to air glow) and
900: ISM molecular hydrogen absorption lines (which have been matched using a simple
901: ISM model to identify the exact location of the ISM lines). Therefore
902: the fit is between the model and the red portions of the observed
903: {\it{FUSE}} spectrum. The absence of strong absorption features in the
904: lower panel were modeled assuming low Si and C abundances and led to
905: a lower $\chi^2$ than the same model with solar C and Si abundances but with
906: a high projected rotational velocity ($\approx 1,000$km/s).}
907:
908: \figcaption{A single temperature WD fit to the
909: {\it{FUSE}} spectrum of BV Cen. The
910: best-fit yielded T$_{eff} = 40,000$K$\pm1000$K, a projected rotational
911: velocity of 500km/s, and d=435pc, assuming $M=0.83M_{\odot}$.}
912:
913: %\figcaption{A WD plus accretion disk fit to
914: %the {\it{FUSE}} plus {\it{IUE}} spectrum of UU
915: %Aql for d = 350 pc. The white dwarf T$_{eff} = 24,000$K$\pm 3000$K,
916: %$\dot{M} = 2 \times 10^{-11} M_{\sun}$/yr, for $i = 41$ degrees, log $g =
917: %8.2$, with the WD contributing 73\% of the FUV flux and the accretion disk
918: %providing 27\% of the FUV flux.}
919: %
920: %\figcaption{A WD plus accretion disk fit to
921: the {\it{FUSE}} plus {\it{IUE}} spectrum of UU
922: %Aql for d = 350 pc. The white dwarf T$_{eff} = 24,000$K$\pm 3000$K,
923: %$\dot{M} = 2 \times 10^{-11} M_{\sun}$/yr, for $i = 41$ degrees, log $g =
924: %8.2$, with the WD contributing 73\% of the FUV flux and the accretion disk
925: %providing 27\% of the FUV flux.}
926: %
927:
928: \clearpage
929: \begin{figure}
930: \plotone{f1.eps}
931: \end{figure}
932:
933:
934: \clearpage
935: \begin{figure}
936: \plotone{f2.eps}
937: \end{figure}
938:
939:
940: \clearpage
941: \begin{figure}
942: \plotone{f3.eps}
943: \end{figure}
944:
945:
946: \clearpage
947: \begin{figure}
948: \plotone{f4.eps}
949: \end{figure}
950:
951:
952: \clearpage
953: \begin{figure}
954: \plotone{f5.eps}
955: \end{figure}
956:
957: \clearpage
958: \begin{figure}
959: \plotone{f6.eps}
960: \end{figure}
961:
962:
963:
964: \clearpage
965: \begin{figure}
966: \plotone{f7.eps}
967: \end{figure}
968:
969:
970: \clearpage
971: \begin{figure}
972: \plotone{f8.eps}
973: \end{figure}
974:
975:
976:
977:
978: \end{document}
979: