1: %
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 03 Jan 01
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17:
18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: %%\usepackage{bibtopic}
21:
22:
23:
24: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
25:
26: % \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
27:
28: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
29:
30: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
31:
32: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
33: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
34: %% the \begin{document} command.
35: %%
36: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
37: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
38: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
39: %% for information.
40:
41: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
42: \newcommand{\myemail}{noelia@iac.es}
43:
44: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
45:
46: %\slugcomment{To appear in The Astronomical Journal}
47:
48: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
49: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
50: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
51: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
52: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters. Running heads
53: %% will not print in the manuscript style.
54:
55: \shorttitle{SMC stellar populations}
56: \shortauthors{No\"el, N.E.D. et al.}
57:
58: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
59: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
60:
61: \begin{document}
62:
63: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
64: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
65: %% you desire.
66:
67: \title{OLD MAIN-SEQUENCE TURNOFF PHOTOMETRY IN THE SMALL MAGELLANIC CLOUD. I.
68: CONSTRAINTS ON THE STAR FORMATION HISTORY IN DIFFERENT FIELDS}
69: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
70: %% author and affiliation information.
71: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
72: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
73: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
74: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.
75:
76: \author{Noelia E. D. No\"el}
77: \affil{Instituto de Astrof\'\i sica de Canarias. 38200 La
78: Laguna. Tenerife, Canary Islands. Spain.}
79: \email{noelia@iac.es}
80:
81: \author{Carme Gallart}
82: \affil{Instituto de Astrof\'\i sica de Canarias. 38200 La
83: Laguna. Tenerife, Canary Islands. Spain.}
84: \email{carme@iac.es}
85:
86: \author{Edgardo Costa}
87: \affil{Departamento de Astronom\'\i a, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 36-D, Santiago, Chile.}
88: \email{costa@das.uchile.cl}
89:
90:
91: \and
92:
93: \author{Ren\'e A. M\'endez}
94: \affil{Departamento de Astronom\'\i a, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 36-D, Santiago, Chile.}
95: \email{rmendez@das.uchile.cl}
96:
97:
98: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
99: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
100: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
101: %% affiliation.
102:
103: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
104: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
105: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
106: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
107: %% editorial office after submission.
108:
109:
110: \begin{abstract}
111:
112: We present ground-based {\it B} and {\it R}-band color-magnitude diagrams (CMDs),
113: reaching the oldest main-sequence turnoffs with good photometric accuracy for twelve fields in the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC). Our fields, located between $\sim$1${\degr}$ and $\sim$4${\degr}$ from the center of the galaxy, are situated in different parts of the SMC such as the ``Wing'' area, and towards the West and South. In this paper we perform a first analysis of the stellar content in our SMC fields through
114: comparison with theoretical isochrones and color functions (CFs). We find that the underlying spheroidally distributed
115: population is composed of both intermediate-age and old stars and that its age composition does not show strong galacto-
116: centric gradients. The three fields situated toward the east, in the Wing region, show very active current star formation. However, only in the eastern field closest to the center do we find an enhancement of recent star formation with respect to a
117: constant SFR(t). The fields corresponding to the western side of the SMC present a much less populated young MS, and
118: the CF analysis indicates that the SFR$(t)$ greatly diminished around 2 Gyr ago in these parts. Field smc0057, the closest
119: to the center of the galaxy and located in the southern part, shows recent star formation, while the rest of the southern
120: fields present few bright MS stars. The structure of the red clump in all the CMDs is consistent with the large amount
121: of intermediate-age stars inferred from the CMDs and color functions. None of the SMC fields presented here are
122: dominated by old stellar populations, a fact that is in agreement with the lack of a conspicuous horizontal branch in all
123: these SMC CMDs. This could indicate that a disk population is ruling over a possible old halo in all the observed fields.
124:
125:
126: \end{abstract}
127:
128: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
129: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
130: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
131: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
132:
133: \keywords{local group galaxies: evolution --- galaxies: individual (Small Magellanic Cloud) --- galaxies: photometry --- galaxies: stellar content --- Local Group}
134:
135: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
136: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
137: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
138: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
139: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
140: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
141: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
142: %% each reference.
143:
144: \section{INTRODUCTION} \label{intro}
145:
146:
147: Dwarf galaxies are believed to represent the dominant population, by
148: number, of the present day universe, and a major constituent of groups
149: (C\^ot\'e et al. 1997) and clusters (e.g. Ferguson \& Sandage 1991). Studying their star formation and chemical enrichment histories is key to understanding the evolution of galaxies on cosmological timescales (e.g. Madau et al. 1998). Local Group galaxies are ideal laboratories for detailed studies of
150: dwarf galaxy properties: we can resolve their individual stars and
151: thus learn about their star formation histories (SFHs) by exploring ages, metallicities, and the spatial distribution of the stellar populations they contain.
152:
153: The color-magnitude diagram (CMD) is the best tool to retrieve the SFH
154: of a stellar system. The ideal situation is when it reaches the oldest
155: main-sequence (MS) turnoffs with good photometric accuracy. In this
156: case, the information on the SFH can be obtained directly and with
157: little ambiguity from the distribution of stars on the MS, and its
158: comparison with that predicted by stellar evolution models in this
159: relatively well known phase of stellar evolution. In particular, the
160: range of ages and metallicities present can be determined through
161: comparison with theoretical isochrones. To quantitatively
162: determine the SFH, it is necessary to compare the observed density
163: distribution of stars with that predicted by stellar evolution models
164: (see Gallart, Zoccali \& Aparicio 2005). Shallower CMDs (e.g. those
165: reaching just below the horizontal-branch (HB) or a couple of
166: magnitudes below the tip of the red giant branch (RGB)) still contain
167: stars born through the whole galaxy's lifetime, but the interpretation
168: of the distribution of stars in terms of the SFH is progressively less
169: detailed and uncertain as the CMD is shallower. The reason for this is
170: twofold: on one hand, the stellar evolution models are less accurate
171: for more advanced stellar evolution phases such as the RGB or the HB,
172: because the corresponding physics is more complicated or uncertain. On
173: the other hand, in these stellar evolution phases, stars of very
174: different ages are packed together in the CMD in a small interval of
175: color and/or magnitude, and suffer from important age-metallicity
176: degeneracies (see Gallart 2000 and Gallart et al. 2005 for
177: detailed discussions of all these issues).
178:
179: For all the Milky Way satellites, it is possible to obtain CMDs
180: reaching the oldest MS turnoffs using ground based telescopes, while
181: for the rest of the Local Group, this is possible using the ACS on
182: board the HST. The Magellanic Clouds (MCs) are particularly interesting
183: among the Milky Way satellites since they are actively star forming
184: galaxies which SFH can shed light on the role played by interactions
185: in galaxy evolution. But in spite of their proximity and intrinsic
186: interest, it is remarkable that there are still important gaps in the
187: knowledge of the SFH of the MCs. This may be explained by their huge
188: projected size and the big number of stars to analyze.
189:
190: In this paper we will focus on the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC). The SMC is a dwarf irregular satellite of our Galaxy,
191: with low mean metallicity and a high mass fraction remaining in gaseous form (van den Bergh 1999).
192: These characteristics suggest that the SMC is in a more primitive evolutionary stage than its larger neighbor,
193: the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC).
194: Historically, the study of this galaxy has been in general
195: neglected in favor of the LMC. The uncertainty about its
196: line of sight depth, its more complicated shape (elongated towards the Northeast), and its larger distance from us are factors at
197: play.
198:
199: To our knowledge, only two papers have presented CMDs reaching the oldest
200: MS turnoffs for a small field of view each: Dolphin et al. (2001) and
201: McCumber et al. (2005). Dolphin et al. presented a
202: combination of HST and ground-based {\it V} and {\it I} images of a SMC field
203: situated 2${\degr}$ Northeast of NGC 121 (avoiding the contamination
204: from 47 Tucanae) in order to derive the SFH of this SMC field. From their ground-based images,
205: they inferred a peak of star formation between 5 and 8 Gyr ago with a medium age of 7.5 Gyr at the 1 $\sigma$ level,
206: and that 14$\pm$5\% of the stars were formed more
207: than 11 Gyr ago. The SFH they derived is also consistent at the 2 $\sigma$ level with
208: a continuous star formation from ancient times until $\sim$2 Gyr ago, when the star formation rate
209: dropped to finally stop entirely in the past 0.5 Gyr.
210: More recently,
211: McCumber et al. (2005) analyzed the stellar populations of a SMC field located in the ``Wing''\footnote{We call ``Wing''
212: area to the Eastern part of the SMC. Some authors (in particular, Gardiner \& Hatzidimitriou (1992) and papers in the same series)
213: also distinguish between the inner and outer ``Wing'' and the ``Arm''.}
214: area with observations from the
215: HST WFPC2. They compared the luminosity function from
216: their observed CMD with those obtained from two different model CMDs, one with constant SFR(t)
217: and another with bursts of star formation
218: at $\sim$2 and at $\sim$8 Gyr.
219: They found that the population appears to have formed largely in a
220: quasi-continuous mode, with a main period of star formation between 4-12 Gyr ago and very recent star formation with
221: bright stars as young as 100$\pm$10 Myr.
222:
223:
224: Two main wide field studies of the SMC exist: the pioneer work
225: by Gardiner \& Hatzidimitriou (1992) and a recent study from Harris \& Zaritsky (2004; hereafter HZ04).
226: Gardiner \& Hatzidimitriou (1992) presented the first large area study of the SMC, and mainly concentrated their analysis
227: in the outer regions,
228: beyond 2${\degr}$ from the SMC center.
229: They took six photographic plates with the UK Schmidt Telescope covering a total area of 130${\degr}$$\times$130${\degr}$.
230: Since their photometry is rather shallow (reaching the HB level at R$\sim$20 mag), they mainly gave information
231: about the young populations (age $\leq$2 Gyr). From their CMDs
232: and contour plots of the surface distribution of MS stars with {\it B-R}$<$0.1 and {\it R}$<$20, they noticed the almost complete
233: absence of bright MS stars in the Northwestern part, while a considerable bright
234: MS population was present in the Eastern and Southern area.
235: With the aid of luminosity functions they found that young populations ($<$0.6 Gyr in age) are concentrated towards the center of the SMC
236: and in the ``Wing'' region.
237: Using an index defined as the difference between the
238: median color (in {\it (B-R)}) of the RC and the color of the RGB
239: at the level of the HB, the authors inferred that the bulk of the field population
240: has a median age around 10-12 Gyr.
241: They were the first to notice the different distribution of
242: young and old populations in the SMC. Zaritsky et al. (2000) and Cioni et al. (2000) confirmed that the asymmetric appearance
243: of the SMC, similar to that
244: of the HI (Stanimirovi\'c et al. 1999), is primarily caused by the
245: distribution of young stars (upper MS stars, younger than $\sim$0.2 Gyr),
246: and that the older stars have a spheroidal distribution.
247:
248: HZ04 presented a study of the SMC based on the Magellanic Clouds Photometric Survey (MCPS)
249: {\it UBVI} catalog (Zaritsky et al. 1997), which covers a 4${\degr}$$\times$4.5${\degr}$ area of the SMC to a depth of {\it V}$\leq$21.
250: This work represents the most complete analysis of the spatially resolved SFH of the central part of the SMC.
251: They divided the SMC survey in a grid of 351 cells and obtained the SFH, through a $\chi$$^2$ minimization
252: between the star counts in the observed CMD and those in the model CMDs based on isochrones by Girardi et al. (2002).
253: They inferred that a significant fraction ($\sim$50\%) of all stars in the SMC were formed more than
254: 8.4 Gyr ago. Between 3 and 8.4 Gyr ago they found a quiescent period during which the SMC formed few stars.
255: They also found a recent active time from 3 Gyr ago until now, with bursts at 2.5 Gyr, 400 Myr, and 60 Myr.
256: Although deeper than the one from Gardiner \& Hatzidimitriou (1992), this study is still limited by its shallowness.
257: In fact, the oldest stars that they can observe on the MS are $\sim$2 Gyr old, and this implies a necessarily poor temporal
258: resolution and larger uncertainties in their SFH at ages older than that.
259:
260: In spite of the increasing interest in studying the SMC, reflected by the recent works
261: mentioned before, there are still many questions unanswered which require the information provided by
262: CMDs reaching the oldest MS turnoffs.
263: What is the age distribution of the old and intermediate-age population?, are there gradients in the composition of
264: this underlying population?.
265: Shallower studies
266: inform about the existence of a large amount of young population in certain areas,
267: but does this young population reflect an exceptional increase of the
268: star formation at the present time with respect to the average SFR?.
269: To shed light on these aspects, in this article we present twelve unprecedented deep
270: {\it BR}-based SMC CMDs with positions
271: ranging from $\sim$1{\degr} to $\sim$4{\degr} from the SMC center.
272: Our fields are distributed in different parts of the SMC, avoiding the central area,
273: where crowding may not allow us to reach the oldest MS turnoffs from the ground.
274: Three of our fields are located in the ``Wing'' area, near the field studied by McCumber et al. (2005);
275: two fields are in the Western part and one in the Northwestern area, near the field from Dolphin et al. (2001) located 2{\degr} northeast
276: of NGC121;
277: finally, six fields are placed towards the South at different galactocentric distances.
278: This strategic selection of fields, in spite of their small size, permit us to sample several
279: regions of the SMC with high temporal resolution in order to address the above issues.
280: The depth of our fields, reaching the oldest MS turnoffs with very
281: good photometric accuracy, will allow us to obtain detailed SFHs from all of them, and to investigate, therefore, the variation of the
282: SFH across the SMC field. This will be the subject of a forthcoming paper. Here we
283: will focus the analysis in the inspection of the CMDs with the aid of theoretical isochrones and color functions.
284:
285: This paper is organized as follows. In \S~\ref{obs} we present the observations and data
286: reduction. In \S~\ref{photometry} we discuss the photometry of the SMC fields, obtained using DAOPHOT II/ALLSTAR
287: and ALLFRAME programs. In \S~\ref{stellar} the CMDs are discussed with the help of isochrones and color functions.
288: In \S~\ref{summary} and \S~\ref{conclu} our results are summarized and discussed.
289: In a future paper (No\"el et al., in preparation) we will derive the SFH of the SMC through comparison of the
290: observed CMDs with synthetic CMDs.
291:
292:
293: \section{OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION} \label{obs}
294:
295: The present paper is a result of a more comprehensive program to study the SMC, which also includes the determination of its Absolute
296: Proper Motion by observing SMC fields in which background quasars have been identified. These quasars provide a quasi-inertial reference
297: frame with respect to which (in conjunction with existing radial velocity measurements) the absolute total space velocity vector of the
298: SMC can be precisely determined (see e.g. Pedreros, Costa \& M\'endez 2006). The imaging strategy was therefore
299: designed in a way that would satisfy the needs of the
300: stellar populations program as well as the
301: astrometry program. Given that for the latter it was mandatory to obtain {\it R}-band images, this bandpass together with {\it B}
302: imaging
303: was chosen to construct the CMDs.
304:
305: The observations were made with a 24 $\mu$m/pixel Tektronic 2048x2048 CCD detector attached to the Cassegrain focus of
306: the 100-inch Ir{\'e}n{\'e}e du Pont telescope (C100) at Las Campanas Observatory, in Chile. This combination
307: gives a field size of 8.85$\arcmin$$\times$8.85$\arcmin$ and a scale of 0.259$\arcsec$/pixel.
308: Inverse gain was 3e$^{-}$/ADU with a read noise of 7e$^{-}$.
309: Basic reduction of the CCD frames was done using standard IRAF\footnote{version 2.11.3, NOAO, University of Arizona} tasks.
310: For this purpose,
311: bias exposures, sky flats, and dome flats were taken every night.
312:
313: \begin{figure}
314: \plotone{f1.eps}
315: \caption{Panel (a) shows the
316: spatial distribution of our SMC fields (black squares) overlapped on an HI column-density image of the SMC from
317: Stanimirovi\'c et al. (1999). The big rectangle denotes the area covered by the MCPS (Zaritsky et al. 1997).
318: The position of the fields studied by Dolphin et al.
319: (2001) and McCumber et al. (2005) is also superimposed.
320: The actual figure from Stanimirovi\'c et al. (1999) is delimitated
321: by the labelled box and includes the range in declination from $\sim$-75{\degr} to $\sim$-70{\degr}.
322: The grey-scale intensity range is 0 to 1.03$\times$10$^{22}$ atom/cm$^{2}$
323: with a linear transfer
324: function. The maximum HI column-density is 1.43$\times$10$^{22}$ atom/cm$^{2}$.
325: Panels (b) and (c), are taken from Cioni et al. (2000), and show the distribution of young and RGB stars in the SMC respectively.
326: The position of our fields has also been overlapped.
327: The fields superimposed are the same in the three figures but the name of each field
328: in panels (b) and (c) have been omitted for clarity.
329: \label{SMCHI}}
330: \end{figure}
331:
332: Throughout our four year campaign (2001-2004), {\it B} and {\it R} band images of thirteen fields in the SMC were obtained.
333: The
334: coordinates of these fields and the data obtained for each of them are detailed in Table~\ref{fields}, where the first column denotes the
335: field, the second and third columns the right ascension and the declination respectively, fourth and fifth
336: columns the galactocentric distance
337: (r) and the position angle (p), and the sixth and seventh columns the integration times in {\it B} and {\it R}.
338: Seeing was typically
339: between 0.$\arcsec$7 and 1.$\arcsec$2 in all epochs.
340: Figure~\ref{SMCHI}a shows a HI column-density image of the SMC taken from Stanimirovi\'c et al. (1999) with
341: our SMC fields (black squares) and the fields from Dolphin et al. (2001) and McCumber et al. (2005) (black circles)
342: overlapped. The black rectangle denotes the area covered by the MCPS (Zaristky et al. 1997).
343: The actual figure from Stanimirovi\'c et al. (1999)
344: includes the range in declination from $\sim$-75{\degr} to $\sim$-70{\degr}.
345: Those squares denoted with ``qj'' represent the fields centered in quasars observed for astrometric purposes. We followed the
346: naming convention by Tinney et al. (1997), in which the numbers following ``qj'' refer to the right ascension of the quasar (the
347: declination, includded in the full
348: Tinney naming convention, was ommitted).
349: The fields denoted with ``smc'' (and followed by the right ascension, for consistency with the naming convention)
350: were specifically selected for this project and were chosen to span a wide range of galactocentric distances, from
351: $\sim$1${\degr}$ to $\sim$4${\degr}$.
352: The combination of ``qj'' and ``smc''
353: fields results in a sampling of the SMC that covers both a good range of galactocentric distances and position angles.
354: It is important to note that given the elongation of the SMC, with a position angle of
355: $\sim$45{\degr} (Cioni et al. 2000), a certain galactocentric distance in the Northwest or
356: Southeast directions is different than in the Southwest or Northeast
357: directions in which the stellar densities are larger.
358: Figure~\ref{SMCHI}b show the distribution of young MS stars
359: and Figure~\ref{SMCHI}c the layout of the RGB (intermediate-age and old population) stars in
360: the SMC from Cioni et al. (2000) with our SMC fields superimposed. The name
361: of each field was omitted for clarity.
362:
363: \begin{deluxetable}{rrrrrrrrr}
364: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
365: \tablewidth{0pt}
366: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.05in}
367: \tablecaption{Data obtained in the SMC}
368: \tablehead{
369: \colhead{Field} & \colhead{$\alpha_{2000}$} & \colhead{$\delta_{2000}$} & r(\arcmin)\tablenotemark{a}& p({\degr}) & \colhead{{\it B}-band exposures (sec)} &
370: \colhead{{\it R}-band exposures (sec)} }
371: \startdata
372:
373: smc0057& 00:57 & -73:53 & 65.7 & 164.4 &1$\times$60+1$\times$600+2$\times$800+2$\times$1000+1$\times$1200 & 2$\times$60+2$\times$600+3$\times$800+1$\times$1200\\
374: qj0037 & 00:37 & -72:18 & 78.5& 294 &1$\times$60+5$\times$800& 7$\times$60+16$\times$600\\
375: qj0036 & 00:36 & -72:25 & 79.8 & 288 &2$\times$60+10$\times$600+12$\times$800& 15$\times$60+26$\times$500+22$\times$600\\
376: qj0111 & 01:11 & -72:49 & 80.9 & 89.5 &1$\times$60+3$\times$800& 8$\times$60+4$\times$500+17$\times$600+1$\times$700+1$\times$800\\
377: qj0112 & 01:12 & -72:36 & 87.4 & 81 &1$\times$60+1$\times$600+6$\times$800& 9$\times$60+7$\times$500+15$\times$600\\
378: qj0035 & 00:35 & -72:01 & 95.5 & 300.6 &4$\times$600+1$\times$700& 4$\times$60+1$\times$100+3$\times$500+15$\times$600+3$\times$800\\
379: qj0116 & 01:16 & -72:59 & 102.5 & 95.2 &1$\times$60+13$\times$600+2$\times$800& 7$\times$60+14$\times$500+20$\times$600\\
380: smc0100& 01:00 & -74:57 & 130.4 & 167.5 &1$\times$60+7$\times$800+3$\times$900 &1$\times$60+7$\times$600+3$\times$700\\
381: qj0047 & 00:47 & -75:30 & 161.7 & 187.7 &1$\times$800+3$\times$1000& 6$\times$60+16$\times$600+2$\times$800\\
382: qj0033 & 00:33 & -70:28 & 172.9 & 325 &1$\times$60+5$\times$600+1$\times$700& 6$\times$60+3$\times$500+20$\times$600\\
383: smc0049& 00:49 & -75:44 & 174.8 & 184.6 &1$\times$60+1$\times$600+4$\times$800 & 1$\times$60+5$\times$600\\
384: qj0102 & 01:02 & -75:46 & 179.5 & 169.4 &3$\times$60+6$\times$800& 8$\times$60+3$\times$500+15$\times$600+1$\times$700+2$\times$800\\
385: smc0053& 00:53 & -76:46 & 236.3 & 179.4 &1$\times$60+8$\times$800+2$\times$900& 1$\times$60+8$\times$600+2$\times$700\\
386:
387: \enddata
388: \tablenotetext{a}{Distance from the SMC center, $\alpha_{2000}=$ 00:52.7, $\delta_{2000}=$ -72:49}
389: \label{fields}
390: %\tablecomments{}
391: \end{deluxetable}
392:
393: \section{THE PHOTOMETRY} \label{photometry}
394:
395: \subsection{Photometry of SMC fields}
396:
397:
398: We performed our photometry using the DAOPHOT II/ALLSTAR software
399: package (Stetson 1987, and updates: Stetson 1990, 1992) to find stars and to determine
400: an empirical PSF for each frame and then simultaneously fit it
401: to all detected stars.
402: After testing various PSF models, we adopted a Moffat function with $\beta$=2.5 (Stetson et al. 2003)
403: as the best analytical model. The Moffat function is usually a much better representation of a star image than a
404: Gaussian function, because it has more prominent and extended wings, like real star images. Also, unlike other
405: functions (e.g. the Lorentz function), the Moffat function offers the option of tuning the
406: radial falloff of the wings to match observations.
407: Between 50 and 100 stars were used
408: to construct the PSF of each image. Quadratic spatial variation was included because it reduced the fitting errors.
409:
410: After the DAOPHOT/ALLSTAR analysis
411: of all the original frames was performed, an optimum, complete star list was achieved by cross matching the ALLSTAR
412: results of the individual frames
413: with DAOMASTER (Stetson 1993).
414: ALLFRAME (Stetson 1994) was then used to obtain simultaneous photometry of stars in all CCD images of each SMC field.
415:
416: After ALLFRAME, we ran MONTAGE2 for each field.
417: MONTAGE2 takes the images from which all the stars
418: have been subtracted according to their final positions and brightnesses, and applies the known geometric transformations that relate their
419: coordinate systems and the known differences in their photometric zero-points, to produce a median image of each field.
420: We tested in each of the 13 SMC fields that the number of stars detected on the median of the subtracted images,
421: and considered real stars after
422: running DAOPHOT, ALLSTAR, and ALLFRAME a second time, was less than 1\%, i.e. negligible for our goal.
423:
424: ALLFRAME produces an image-quality index, CHI, which is a dimensionless measure of the agreement between the
425: brightness profile of any given object and that of the model PSF for the frame in which it is measured. Similarly,
426: ALLFRAME gives the SHARP index, which is a first-order estimate of the intrinsic angular radius of a source.
427: Another index provided by ALLFRAME is $\sigma$, which represent the standard error
428: of the star's magnitude and is representative of the internal errors of the photometry.
429: Stars with at least one valid measurement in each band ({\it B} and {\it R}) were selected, and their final magnitudes were obtained
430: using DAOMASTER, which combines the magnitudes measured for each star in each image to provide the ``mean weighted'' magnitude. DAOMASTER
431: also provides $\sigma$, CHI, and SHARP parameters for each stars, which are a combination of the corresponding parameters for each image.
432: We used the
433: following limits for the error and shape parameters
434: given by DAOMASTER: $\sigma$$_{(B-R)}$$^{2}$=$\sigma$$_{B}$$^{2}$+$\sigma$$_{R}$$^{2}$$\leqslant$0.15,
435: -0.6$\leqslant$$\mid$SHARP$\mid$$\leqslant$0.6, and $\mid$CHI$\mid$$\leqslant$2.5.
436: The final number of stars we kept, measured in {\it (B-R)} of each field
437: (and consequently, in each CMD)
438: is given in Table~\ref{exposure}. A total of 215,121 stars down to {\it R}$\thickapprox$24
439: were measured.
440:
441: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccccccccccccc}
442: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
443: \tablewidth{0pt}
444: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.3in}
445: \tablecaption{Final number of stars measured in {\it (B-R)}}
446: \tablehead{
447: \colhead{Field} & \colhead{N\tablenotemark{\dag}}}
448: \startdata
449:
450: smc0057 & 21246 \\
451: qj0037 & 21579 \\
452: qj0036 & 23756 \\
453: qj0111 & 25845 \\
454: qj0112 & 47548 \\
455: qj0035 & 24114 \\
456: qj0116 & 19875 \\
457: smc0100 & 7801 \\
458: qj0047 & 9762 \\
459: qj0033 & 3797 \\
460: smc0049 & 3580 \\
461: qj0102 & 4030 \\
462: smc0053 & 2188 \\
463:
464: \label{exposure}
465: \enddata
466: \tablenotetext{\dag}{Selected stars with $\sigma$$\leqslant$0.15,\\ CHI$\leqslant$2.5 and -0.6$\leqslant$SHARP$\leqslant$0.6.}
467:
468: %\tablecomments{}
469: \end{deluxetable}
470:
471: The so-called
472: aperture corrections, i.e., the corrections that place the relative
473: profile-fitting magnitudes on the system of the ``total'' instrumental magnitudes for a particular frame,
474: were obtained from synthetic aperture photometry by measuring several isolated, bright stars through a series of increasing
475: apertures and the
476: construction of growth curves (Stetson 1990).
477: We used a growth sequence which consists in twelve apertures from {\it $r_{1}$} to {\it $r_{12}$}
478: in such a way that we considered the first radius {\it $r_{1}$} about half of the one we used for the aperture photometry of our objects
479: and {\it $r_{12}$}=30$\arcsec$. The sequence is {\it $r_{k}$=$\sqrt[11]{r_{12}/r_{1}}$$\times$ $r_{k-1}$ }, {\it $k=2,...,12$}.
480: The aperture corrections were derived using the program DAOGROW (Stetson 1990). In each image we selected
481: the brightest and most isolated 30 to 80 stars among those used in the
482: derivation of the
483: PSF for that frame. The
484: aperture photometry results were then provided to DAOGROW which returns the ``total'' instrumental magnitude
485: and its standard error for each of the selected stars. The aperture correction for
486: a particular frame was obtained as the median of the differences
487: between the ``total'' magnitude and the profile-fitting ALLFRAME magnitude for all
488: selected stars on that frame. Errors in the aperture corrections were calculated as the
489: standard error of the mean of these differences, and were typically between $\pm$0.001 and $\pm$0.003.
490:
491:
492:
493:
494:
495:
496:
497: \subsection{Standard Stars Photometry}\label{calibration}
498:
499: Our instrumental photometric system was defined by the use of the Harris {\it BVRI} filter set, which constitutes the default
500: option on the C100 for broad-band photometry on the standard Johnson-Kron-Cousins system. In photometric nights, typically six
501: {\it BVRI} standard star areas from the catalog of Landolt (1992) were observed several times to determine the transformation of our
502: instrumental magnitudes to the standard {\it BR} system. Thirty-one different standard stars with
503: colors: -0.49$<${\it (B-R)}$<$5.00
504: were observed, and a total of 272 observations were made; 178 in 2001 and
505: 94 in 2002.
506: Most of these areas include stars of a wide variety of colors. A few of
507: them were
508: followed up to about 2.0 airmasses to determine atmospheric extinction optimally. During these nights we also obtained
509: short exposure {\it BR} frames of all our fields of interest, which served the purpose of calibrating all frames
510: taken with non-photometric sky. Field qj0035 is not considered in this paper because we do not have yet a secure calibration for it.
511:
512:
513: The Landolt standard images are uncrowded fields, thus no profile-fitting photometry was necessary for them.
514: Instead, DAOGROW
515: was used in an identical way as for the program stars to directly derive the total instrumental magnitudes
516: for the standard stars from their aperture photometry.
517:
518: To put our observations into the standard system, we used the following transformation equations:
519:
520: \begin{eqnarray} \label{transf}
521: \nonumber B=b+\alpha_{b}+\beta_{b}(B-R)+\gamma_{b}X_{b} \\
522: \\
523: \nonumber R=r+\alpha_{r}+\beta_{r}(B-R)+\gamma_{r}X_{r}
524: \end{eqnarray}
525:
526:
527: where $(b,r)$ and $(B,R)$ are the instrumental
528: and standard magnitudes respectively, and (X$_{b}$, X$_{r}$) are the airmasses.
529: No time dependence terms were added since a preliminary fit showed no trends in the residuals of both {\it B} and {\it R} with time.
530:
531:
532: The color terms
533: ($\beta$$_{b}$, $\beta$$_{r}$) and extinction coefficients ($\gamma$$_{b}$, $\gamma$$_{r}$),
534: as well as the zero-points ($\alpha$$_{b}$, $\alpha$$_{r}$) are
535: unknown, presumably constant, transformation coefficients and are to be calculated. Both the color-dependent term and the zero-point
536: in the
537: transformation, are expected to be reasonably constant properties of the telescope/filter/detector
538: combination and, in fact, the night-to-night differences for a given year
539: in their computed values were found to be consistent with the uncertainty of the
540: individual determinations.
541: The above equations were applied to the Landolt standard star magnitudes, and solved for
542: $\alpha$$_{b}$, $\alpha$$_{r}$, $\beta$$_{b}$, $\beta$$_{r}$, $\gamma$$_{b}$ and $\gamma$$_{r}$, for each night, using a custom program.
543:
544: \begin{deluxetable}{ccrrrrrrrrcrl}
545: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
546: \tablewidth{0pt}
547: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.3in}
548: \tablecaption{Transformation equation coefficients}
549: \tablehead{
550: \colhead{Campaign} & \colhead{$\alpha$$_{b}$} & \colhead{$\alpha$$_{r}$} & \colhead{$\beta$$_{b}$} & \colhead{$\beta$$_{r}$}
551: }
552: \startdata
553:
554: 2001 & -0.709$\pm$0.002 & -0.423$\pm$0.001 & +0.040$\pm$0.002 & +0.001$\pm$0.001 \\
555: 2002 & -0.892$\pm$0.002 & -0.549$\pm$0.002 & +0.045$\pm$0.002 & +0.002$\pm$0.002 \\
556:
557: \label{coefficients}
558: \enddata
559:
560: %\tablecomments{}
561: \end{deluxetable}
562:
563: Then, we followed an iterative procedure to refine our photometric transformation. First,
564: a new set of unique ($\alpha$$_{b}$, $\alpha$$_{r}$) and ($\beta$$_{b}$, $\beta$$_{r}$) values for each campaign was obtained by
565: imposing the
566: extinction coefficients ($\gamma$$_{b}$, $\gamma$$_{r}$) corresponding to each night. Then, we applied the resultant zero-points and
567: color terms
568: to each night of each year and new extinction coefficients were derived for each night. In this way,
569: we have a set of ($\alpha$$_{b}$, $\alpha$$_{r}$) and ($\beta$$_{b}$, $\beta$$_{r}$) values for each year
570: and ($\gamma$$_{b}$, $\gamma$$_{r}$) values
571: for each night of each year.
572: In Table~\ref{coefficients} we present the zero-points and the color coefficients. The first column denotes the year, the
573: second and third columns indicate the ($\alpha$$_{b}$, $\alpha$$_{r}$) coefficients,
574: and fourth and fifth columns the ($\beta$$_{b}$, $\beta$$_{r}$) coefficients.
575: The final values for
576: the extinction coefficients are shown in the second and third columns of Table~\ref{atmospheric_extinction}, where the first column
577: shows the night to which the coefficients correspond.
578: Figure~\ref{four} shows the standard distributions for each filter and each year; the slope represents the extinction
579: coefficient.
580: Fitting errors in the zero-points correspond to $\sigma$/$\sqrt{(N-2)}$, where N is the number of measurements we have.
581: They turned out to be between $\pm$0.001 and $\pm$0.002.
582:
583: \begin{figure}
584: \plotone{f2.eps}
585: \caption{The upper panels show the [B-b-$\beta$$_{b}$(B-R)] vs. X$_{b}$ (for standards in {\it B}-band)
586: and the lower panels show the
587: [R-r-$\beta$$_{r}$(B-R)] vs. X$_{r}$ (standards in {\it R}-band) for 2001 and 2002.
588: The slope correspond to the extinction coefficient value. Open triangles correspond to 10/16/2001, open squares to 10/17/2001,
589: diagonal crosses to 10/18/2001 and open circles to 10/19/2001. For 2002, open squares correspond to 10/10 and filled
590: triangles to 10/13.\label{four}}
591: \end{figure}
592:
593: The total zero-point errors of the photometry, including the error in the extinction, in the aperture corrections, and
594: the uncertainties in the calibrations, are $\sim$0.02 mag in both {\it B} and {\it R}. These values are consistent with the
595: systematic errors derived comparing photometry of different epochs.
596: Using those SMC fields for which we have standard star observations from more than one night, we
597: tested the photometric differences resulting from the use of different standard sets
598: corresponding to different nights. We found that these
599: differences are between $\pm$0.001 and $\pm$0.03 in {\it B} and between $\pm$0.001 and $\pm$0.04 in {\it R}
600: (standard errors of the mean).
601:
602: \begin{deluxetable}{ccc}
603: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
604: \tablewidth{0pt}
605: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.3in}
606: \tablecaption{Atmospheric extinction coefficients}
607: \tablehead{
608: \colhead{Night} & \colhead{$\gamma$$_{b}$} & \colhead{$\gamma$$_{r}$} %%@
609: } %%@
610:
611: \startdata
612:
613: 16/10/2001 & -0.218$\pm$0.007 & -0.078$\pm$0.003 \\
614: 17/10/2001 & -0.219$\pm$0.007 & -0.077$\pm$0.007 \\
615: 18/10/2001 & -0.219$\pm$0.006 & -0.070$\pm$0.009 \\
616: 19/10/2001 & -0.211$\pm$0.005 & -0.065$\pm$0.005 \\
617: 10/10/2002 & -0.207$\pm$0.008 & -0.066$\pm$0.009 \\
618: 13/10/2002 & -0.215$\pm$0.008 & -0.076$\pm$0.008 \\
619:
620: \enddata
621: \label{atmospheric_extinction}
622:
623: %\tablecomments{}
624: \end{deluxetable}
625:
626: \section{THE SMC STELLAR CONTENT} \label{stellar}
627:
628: We present unprecedented deep SMC CMDs obtained using a medium aperture telescope (100-inch). The quality of the CMDs
629: is comparable to that of the CMDs obtained for the MCs using the HST (e.g. McCumber et al. 2005).
630: Given the depth of our diagrams, which reach the oldest turnoffs, accurate information about age can be derived from the
631: MS turnoff luminosities. As discussed by Gallart, Zoccali, \& Aparicio (2005), reaching the oldest turnoffs will allow us to break the
632: age-metallicity degeneracy affecting most methods to obtain the SFH.
633:
634: \begin{figure}
635: \plotone{f3.eps}
636: \caption{CMDs corresponding to the fields on the Eastern side of the SMC, in order of
637: increasing distance from the SMC center (r) and with different position angles (p).
638: \label{three_east}}
639: \end{figure}
640: \begin{figure}
641: \plotone{f4.eps}
642: \caption{CMDs corresponding to the Western side of the SMC, in order of
643: increasing distance from the SMC center (r) and for different position angles (p).
644: \label{three_west}}
645: \end{figure}
646: \begin{figure}
647: \plotone{f5.eps}
648: \caption{CMDs corresponding to the Southern side of the SMC, in order of
649: increasing distance from the SMC center (r) with different position angles (p).
650: \label{six_south}}
651: \end{figure}
652:
653: Figures~\ref{three_east} to ~\ref{six_south} show the [{\it(B-R),R}] CMDs for the twelve
654: SMC fields in order of increasing galactocentric distance.
655: The fields range from galactocentric radius $\sim$1$\degr$ to $\sim$4$\degr$, and sample different
656: regions of the SMC, as shown in Figure~\ref{SMCHI}, where the fields are depicted in the context of the HI distribution
657: (Figure~\ref{SMCHI}a), and of the young (Figure~\ref{SMCHI}b) and intermediate-age and old (RGB stars)
658: populations (Figure~\ref{SMCHI}c).
659: All the CMDs reach a couple of magnitudes below the old MS
660: turnoff (even the most populated), with great photometric accuracy.
661:
662: Figure~\ref{three_east} shows the CMD of fields qj0111,
663: qj0112, and qj0116,
664: which have a galactocentric radius ranging from
665: 1.4$\degr$ to 1.7$\degr$. These fields correspond to the Eastern side of the galaxy (facing the LMC) as seen in Figure~\ref{SMCHI}a,
666: from which we can notice that they are located in an area of high HI concentration, inside the Supergiant Shell 304A with HI mass of
667: 5.7$\times$10$^{7}$ M$_{\odot}$ (the total HI mass in the area observed by Stanimirovi\'c et al. is $\sim$4$\times$10$^{8}$
668: M$_{\odot}$).
669: These fields are also in the region of the bridge which connects the so-called ``stellar bar''\footnote{The SMC
670: is not a type of barred Irr galaxy, for which the LMC is the prototype,
671: but sometimes it is useful to call bar to the brightest portion of its chaotic major axis.} with the ``Wing''. From
672: Figure~\ref{SMCHI}b and Figure~\ref{SMCHI}c, it can be noticed that these fields are located
673: in very densely populated isopleths of young, intermediate-age and old population.
674: Indeed, the
675: CMDs of these fields show a conspicuous MS, well populated from the oldest turnoff at R$\sim$22 to R$\sim$16,
676: which implies the presence of a large number of very young stars in all the CMDs.
677: The three Western fields are also shown in
678: Figure~\ref{SMCHI}a and the corresponding CMDs are presented in order
679: of increasing galactocentric distance from 1.3$\degr$ to 2.9$\degr$
680: in Figure~\ref{three_west}. These fields are
681: situated in the opposite side of the LMC, in a region with low concentration of HI. From Figure~\ref{SMCHI}b it
682: is evident that they are located in an area of low young stellar density,
683: but still high density of intermediate and old population similar to that of the Eastern fields.
684: The CMDs of these Western fields show a less significant MS, even at similar distances from the center as the Eastern fields. This
685: fact is
686: in agreement with the low density of the HI column in this part of the galaxy (see Figure~\ref{SMCHI}a).
687: We would like to address if the differences seen in the young population can be extended to the intermediate and old population.
688:
689:
690:
691: Figure~\ref{six_south} shows the CMDs of the six Southern fields, whose galactocentric distances range from
692: 1.1$\degr$ to 4$\degr$. As seen in Figure~\ref{SMCHI}a these fields are located in regions in which the HI column-density is very low.
693: Field smc0057, the closest to the center, presents a conspicuous young MS.
694: In Figure~\ref{SMCHI}b is shown that the stellar density of young stars in this field
695: is higher than in the rest of the Southern fields and similar to the Eastern field qj0111. Field smc0100 still shows many
696: bright young MS stars but further on 2.7$\degr$
697: the CMDs have less populated young MS, and present a similar distribution of stars (with less statistics while going
698: further South). The four furthest fields are located in an area in which the stellar density is similar, as shown in
699: Figures~\ref{SMCHI}b and~\ref{SMCHI}c.
700:
701: Depending on their mass and metallicity, the core He-burning stars produce the horizontal branch (HB) and the
702: RC.
703: The presence of a prominent blue HB
704: points out the existence of an old, metal poor population; the lack of such HB and the presence of a RC
705: may indicate that core He burners are not so old,
706: or more metal rich, or both (see Gallart et al. 2005 for details).
707: A shared feature in all our SMC CMDs is the absence of a well populated, blue extended HB, pointing out that the amount
708: of
709: field stellar population as old and metal poor as that of the Milky Way halo globular clusters and dwarf spheroidal
710: galaxies is small in the SMC.
711: The RC is well populated and
712: extended in luminosity, with a width of up to
713: $\triangle$R$\sim$1 mag, denoting the presence of a large intermediate-age population.
714: The fields with a prominent bright MS, as the Eastern fields and smc0057, for example, show the \emph{vertical extension of the RC}
715: feature corresponding to non-degenerate core He-burners (Gallart 1998).
716: The
717: older stars in the core He-burning phase lie in the lower part of the observed RC, while younger stars are brighter.
718:
719: In the following sections, we discuss the main features of the
720: SMC CMDs using isochrones (sec \S~\ref{isochrones}) and Color Functions (sec \S~\ref{CF}). This will
721: allow us to describe the SMC stellar
722: populations, as a starting point to a study (No\"el et al., in preparation) in which
723: we will address the SMC SFH by comparing in detail the distribution of stars in
724: the observed CMDs with a set of model CMDs.
725:
726:
727:
728: \subsection{Theoretical isochrones} \label {isochrones}
729:
730: The interpretation of CMDs of composite stellar population strongly relies on the stellar evolution models adopted (see
731: Gallart et al. 2005). For the present work, we used the Teramo stellar evolution models (Pietrinferni et al. 2004) as the reference.
732: In Figures~\ref{three_east_iso}, ~\ref{three_west_iso}, and ~\ref{six_south_iso}
733: we have superimposed Teramo isochrones to our CMDs for three different metallicities suitable
734: for the SMC stellar populations: Z=0.001 ([Fe/H]=-1.27), Z=0.002 ([Fe/H]=-0.96), and Z=0.004 ([Fe/H]=-0.66).
735: The final selection of the metallicities was done taking into account the RGB and MS star colors and its best match by Teramo isochrones
736: of given ages and metallicities.
737:
738: \begin{figure}
739: \plotone{f6.eps}
740: \caption{Fields located to the East side of the SMC,
741: with Teramo isochrones (Pietrinferni et al. 2004)
742: superimposed. The CMDs were transformed to absolute magnitudes using
743: (m-M)$_{0}$=18.9, and de-reddened with the reddening labelled, obtained using the criteria explained in the
744: text.\label{three_east_iso}}
745: \end{figure}
746: \begin{figure}
747: \plotone{f7.eps}
748: \caption{As in Figure~\ref{three_east_iso}, but showing the CMDs of fields located to the West side of the SMC.\label{three_west_iso}}
749: \end{figure}
750: \begin{figure}
751: \plotone{f8.eps}
752: \caption{As in Figure~\ref{three_east_iso}, but showing the CMDs of fields located to the South of the SMC.\label{six_south_iso}}
753: \end{figure}
754:
755: The observed CMDs have been transformed to absolute magnitudes
756: using a distance modulus of $(m-M)_0=18.9$ (see van den Bergh 1999) and de-reddened as follows.
757: For the two outermost fields, the reddening values given by the IRAS/COBE extinction maps (Schlegel, Finkbeiner \&
758: Davis 1998) were used. For the innermost regions, Schlegel et al. (1998) estimate a typical reddening
759: of E(B-V)=0.037, from the median dust
760: emission in surrounding annuli, since reddenings {\it through} the SMC cannot be calculated because its temperature
761: structure is not sufficiently well resolved by DIRBE. Their quoted value, therefore, is not accurate enough and we have estimated a mean
762: value of the reddening for each of the fields smc0057, qj0037, qj0036, and qj0111 by requiring a good fit
763: of the CMD by the same isochrones that were overlapped to the other fields,
764: for which the IRAS/COBE reddening values are
765: reliable. This assumes the same age-metallicity relation for all fields, which is in agreement with the results found by Carrera (2006)
766: and Carrera et al. (2006, in preparation) using CaII triplet spectroscopy.
767:
768: In all cases, the relations
769: $A_B=1.316$E(B-V), and $A_R=0.758$ E(B-V) (Schlegel et al. 1998) have been assumed to calculate the
770: extinction in the {\it B} and {\it R} bands.
771:
772: Canonical isochrones of 6, 9, and 13 Gyr with Z=0.001, isochrones with overshooting of 1, 3, and 4 Gyr with Z=0.002,
773: and of 0.1 Gyr with Z=0.004 were overlapped. In the Eastern fields and in field smc0057 a 0.03 Gyr isochrone with
774: overshooting and Z=0.004 was also superimposed.
775:
776: Figure~\ref{three_east_iso} shows the CMDs of the Eastern fields with the superposition of Teramo isochrones.
777: In these CMDs the conspicuous MS is well populated from the oldest turnoff
778: at M$_{R}$=3.5 (13 Gyr isochrone) up to the 0.03 Gyr isochrone. All the CMDs show a large number of young stars well represented by
779: the 0.03 Gyr and 0.1 Gyr isochrones. The areas around the
780: 1 to 6 Gyr isochrones are densely populated, indicating a strong presence of
781: intermediate-age stars. No obvious differences between the MS of these fields
782: can be inferred from the comparison with isochrones alone.
783:
784:
785: Figure~\ref{three_west_iso} shows the CMDs of the Western fields with the isochrones overlapped.
786: In these fields,
787: the intermediate-age population ($\sim$3-4 to 9 Gyr) seems dominant.
788: Fields qj0036 and qj0037 have a small fraction of stars born up to 0.1 Gyr ago,
789: while qj0033, the most remote of the three, seems to have no stars
790: younger than 1 Gyr (though this could be an effect of small number statistics).
791:
792:
793: Figure~\ref{six_south_iso} shows the CMDs of the six Southern fields with the superposition of isochrones.
794: Field smc0057, the closest to the center, presents an important MS
795: where the 0.1 Gyr isochrone is still quite populated.
796: In field smc0100 there is still a substantial population between 1 and 3 Gyr old, but
797: fields qj0047 to smc0053 show few stars
798: younger than 3-4 Gyr.
799: The population of these relatively far-off fields is not purely old but contains an important amount of
800: intermediate-age stars that inhabit the zones of the MS and subgiant branch
801: around the 3, 4, 6, and 9 Gyr isochrones, in addition to the several
802: old stars around the 13 Gyr isochrones.
803:
804:
805:
806: \subsection{Color Functions} \label {CF}
807:
808:
809: Gallart et al. (2005) have discussed the potential of MS Color Functions (CFs) to provide information on the stellar populations present in a galaxy.
810: They concluded that, in fact, the CF may be a better tracer of the SFH than the LF. The reason is that, in CMDs like
811: [{\it (B-R), R}] or [{\it (V-I), I}], the MS of isochrones of different age follow roughly vertical paths up to the MS turnoff
812: where they turn
813: to the red, almost perpendicularly to the MS, to form the subgiant branch or, in the case of more massive stars, the blue loops. This
814: effect is clear from the CMD in panel (a) of Figure~\ref{docfsynt} (we will return to this figure later).
815: The fact that the turnoff of a stellar population gets redder as the populations gets older implies a general dependency on age of
816: the CF of the MS and subgiant branch stars brighter than the oldest MS turnoff. Here we will discuss CFs that will include the whole CMD
817: within a region comprised between: -1$\leqslant$M$_{R}$$\leqslant$3.5 and
818: -0.5$\leqslant$(B-R)$\leqslant$1.5. The star counts have been normalized to the total stars present in the integrated range.
819: Most of the information belongs in any case to the MS and subgiant branch. The fraction of CF that belongs
820: to the RGB and RC serves as a check of the metallicity assumed for the synthetic CMD, and contributes to the overall normalization of the
821: CF.
822:
823: \begin{figure}
824: \plotone{f9.eps}
825: \caption{\small{The panel (a) shows a synthetic CMD showing the position of stars in different ages intervals.
826: The Teramo stellar evolution models have been used in the computation using the tool iac-STAR (http://iac-star.iac.es/iac-star/).
827: Constant SFR(t) from 13 Gyr ago to
828: the present time has been assumed. In the inset on top of panel (a) the metallicity law used is shown:
829: Z=0.004 ([Fe/H]=-0.66) between 0 and 1 Gyr ago,
830: Z=0.002([Fe/H]=-0.96) between 1 and 5 Gyr ago, and
831: Z=0.001 ([Fe/H]=-1.27) between 5 and 13 Gyr ago. In panel (b) different CF distributions,
832: corresponding to synthetic populations with different SFR(t) and
833: integrated in the range -1$<$M$_{R}$$<$3.5 are depicted (see inset).
834: Black CF correspond to the CMD in panel (a). The CF for a population with an enhancement in the SFR(t) 3 Gyr ago is depicted in blue.
835: The green CF represents a population in which the SFR(t) decreased by 50\% between 8 and 3 Gyr ago. The CF in red represents a
836: population
837: with a gap in the SFR(t) between 8 and 3 Gyr ago.
838: Panel (c) shows the CF corresponding to the CMD in panel (a) with limited age ranges, as described in the labels.\label{docfsynt}}}
839: \end{figure}
840:
841: Comparison of the stellar content
842: of a galaxy with isochrones and CFs is complementary in terms of the information on the stellar population they
843: provide.
844: The isochrones give us the range of ages present in a given CMD;
845: the comparison between theoretical and observed CFs is a good tool to assess
846: the relative amounts of stars of different ages present in a stellar population.
847: This is a particular case of a comparison of the number of stars in a set of boxes in the observed and synthetic CMDs
848: respectively (e.g. Gallart et al. 1999).
849: However, the CF is particularly useful for a first qualitative assessment of the SFH because it is a one-dimensional
850: representation of the content of the CMD in which there is a relatively direct correlation between range of ages and color.
851: All the models used here have been computed using the synthetic CMD algorithm iac-STAR (Aparicio \& Gallart 2004).
852:
853: Panel (a) in Figure~\ref{docfsynt} shows a synthetic CMD calculated assuming a constant SFR(t) from 13 Gyr ago to date and
854: metallicities: Z=0.004 in the range 0 Gyr$\leqslant$t$\leqslant$1 Gyr, Z=0.002
855: in the range 1 Gyr$\leqslant$t$\leqslant$5 Gyr, and Z=0.001 in the range 5 Gyr$\leqslant$t$\leqslant$13 Gyr (see inset).
856: Stars corresponding to each age interval are depicted in different colors.
857: A 30\% of binary stars have been assumed; the
858: parallel feature to the red of the MS between 3.5$\leqslant$M$_{R}$$\leqslant$5 corresponds to binary stars.
859: Some of these binaries between 8-13 Gyr old are noticeably brighter than single stars at the same age and mass
860: (red points in the synthetic CMD between 2$\leqslant$M$_{R}$$\leqslant$3).
861:
862:
863: Panel (b) in Figure~\ref{docfsynt} shows the composite CFs of populations with different SFR(t) (shown in the inset).
864: Three main
865: features characterize the CF: a local elevation in the blue part between -0.3$\leqslant$(B-R)$\leqslant$0.2, a central peak
866: between 0.2$\leqslant$(B-R)$\leqslant$0.9, and a second local maximum in the red part.
867: Panel (c) of Figure~\ref{docfsynt} shows which populations contribute to each feature in the CF for the synthetic CMD in panel (a).
868: By comparing these, we find the following:
869: the elevation in -0.3$\lesssim$(B-R)$\lesssim$0.2 in the composite CF
870: mostly corresponds to stars in the age range 0$\leqslant$t$\lesssim$1.1 Gyr; in the central
871: peak (0.3$\lesssim$(B-R)$\lesssim$0.9) there are populations of all ages, predominating
872: the intermediate-age and old stars ($\sim$2-13 Gyr).
873: The second local maximum corresponds to the RC and the red part of the subgiant branch
874: and is composed by stars with age $\gtrsim$1 Gyr as seen in panel (c) in Figure~\ref{docfsynt}.
875: Going back to panel (b), the CF in black corresponds to a galaxy with a constant SFR(t)
876: (i.e., the CF of the CMD in the panel (a)). The blue CF is from a synthetic CMD computed assuming a SFR(t) that
877: increased from 3 Gyr ago to the present.
878: This CF presents a higher blue elevation due to the bigger number of young blue stars; also
879: the central peak is somewhat blueshifted.
880: The green CF represents a stellar population in which the SFR(t)
881: dropped by
882: 50\% between 3 and 8 Gyr ago. This is reflected in the shape of the
883: absolute maximum, where a depression appears as a result of the
884: assumed SFH. This kind of feature would be difficult to detect in a real population.
885: Finally, the red CF corresponds to a SFR(t) with a totally quiescent period between 3 and 8 Gyr ago.
886: The deep hollow shown in the absolute maximum of this CF is due to the gap at intermediate ages in the
887: SFH. The last two CFs show a higher blue elevation as compared to a CF of a CMD with constant SFR(t) due to the higher
888: fraction of young stars over the whole population.
889:
890:
891: Prior to present a discussion based on CFs, we will briefly talk about the crowding effects and, in general, the observational errors
892: that are present in our photometry.
893: A careful study of the extent and nature of these crowding effects is key to study the
894: stellar populations present in the SMC. We will understand and
895: quantify the crowding effects using the artificial-star tests procedure.
896: These artificial-star tests have been performed in a
897: way similar to that described in Gallart et al. (1999) and
898: will be presented in detail in a forthcoming paper (No\"el et al. in preparation). In short, a number of
899: artificial stars of known magnitudes and colors are injected in the original frames,
900: using the ADDSTAR algorithm of DAOPHOT II (Stetson 1993). The photometry is re-done following the same procedure
901: used to obtain the photometry for the original frames. This process is repeated several times in order to test a large number of
902: artificial stars (60,000 in the case of each of our SMC fields). The injected and recovered magnitudes of the artificial stars,
903: together with the information from those that were lost, provide the necessary information about all the observational effects
904: present in the photometry.
905:
906: \begin{figure}
907: \plotone{f10.eps}
908: \caption{Color functions of a synthetic CMD integrated over the magnitude
909: range -1$\leqslant$M$_{R}$$\leqslant$3.5 assuming different levels of crowding in the data.
910: The solid line represents the CF
911: of the original synthetic CMD, the dotted line corresponds to the CF of the synthetic CMD, in which the observational errors of
912: field smc0057 have been simulated, the dashed line is the CF of the synthetic CMD with the
913: simulation of errors from field qj0111, and dot-long dashed line is the CF of the synthetic CMD with
914: errors in field smc0049 simulated.}
915: \label{dispersadas}
916: \end{figure}
917:
918: We will discuss here how the observational errors affect the CF of a few representative fields.
919: Those located closer to the SMC center (e.g. smc0057 and qj0111) are more affected by crowding
920: than the rest of the fields. To quantify these observational errors we have simulated them for
921: different SMC fields in the synthetic CMD of Figure~\ref{docfsynt}.
922: Following Gallart et al. (1999), we will call the latter ``model CMDs''.
923: The model CFs (corresponding to the model CMDs) corresponding to fields
924: smc0057, qj0111, and smc0049 are shown in Figure~\ref{dispersadas}, together with the original CF (the CF obtained from the
925: synthetic CMD).
926: The observational errors may produce significant variations in the appearance of the CF of our more central, crowded field smc0057.
927: Simulating the observational
928: errors of this field in the synthetic CMD, we obtain a model CF (dotted line)
929: which differs substantially from the CF of the original synthetic CMD: the absolute maximum in its CF is smaller than in the CF of the
930: synthetic CMD, and the blue elevation is bigger because faint stars on the low MS
931: are lost much more frequently than the brighter blue stars that constitute the young MS.
932: The dispersion introduced in the CMD when the observational errors are simulated produces an absolute maximum that is slightly wider
933: as shown in the dotted line
934: in Figure~\ref{dispersadas}.
935: This shows how crowding
936: could simulate a non-constant SFH, mimicking a recent enhancement of the star formation, similar to the one
937: shown in blue in panel (b) of Figure~\ref{docfsynt}.
938: Although still present, the effects of crowding are less severe in the case of field qj0111 since the CF of the corresponding model
939: CMD (dashed line) resembles quite closely
940: the CF for the synthetic CMD. In this field, confusion is mainly affecting the {\it yellow} stars so the main maximum is
941: shorter than in the synthetic CF.
942: In the case of smc0049, it can be seen that the CF of the
943: model CMD (dot-long dashed line)
944: is similar to the one of the synthetic CMD (solid line), indicating that crowding is affecting
945: very little the CMDs of this part of the galaxy (at $\sim$2.9$\degr$).
946: In conclusion, only the CF of field smc0057 is substantially affected by observational errors.
947: The effects of crowding on field qj0111 can be considered as an upper limit for
948: fields qj0112 and qj0116. For fields
949: smc0100, qj0047, qj0102, smc0053, qj0037, qj0036, and qj0033 the crowding level is similar to that of smc0049. Therefore, we can safely
950: discuss the stellar content of
951: all of our fields (except smc0057) by comparing their CFs straight with that of synthetic CMDs.
952:
953: \begin{figure}
954: \plotone{f11.eps}
955: \caption{CF for the observed CMDs corresponding to the Eastern SMC fields (solid lines), overlapped with the synthetic CF
956: (dashed lines) from panel (a) in Figure~\ref{docfsynt}, normalized to the number of stars in the
957: region between -0.5$<$(B-R)$<$1.5 and -1$<$M$_{R}$$<$3.5.
958: In the first panel, corresponding to field qj0111, the CFs of synthetic populations with burst of star formation of 30\% and 50\% from 1
959: Gyr ago to now (dotted and long-dashed line respectively) and of 50\% from 2 Gyr ago to now (dot-long dashed line) were also
960: overplotted, showing that there was a recent enhancement of the star formation around 1 Gyr ago in this field.}
961: \label{three_east_synt}
962: \end{figure}
963: \begin{figure}
964: \plotone{f12.eps}
965: \caption{CF for the observed CMDs corresponding to the Western SMC fields (solid lines), overlapped with the synthetic CF
966: (dashed lines) from panel (a) in Figure~\ref{docfsynt}, normalized to the number of stars in this
967: region between -0.5$<$(B-R)$<$1.5 and -1$<$M$_{R}$$<$3.5.}
968: \label{three_west_synt}
969: \end{figure}
970: \begin{figure}
971: \plotone{f13.eps}
972: \caption{CF for the observed CMDs corresponding to the Southern SMC fields (solid lines), overlapped with the synthetic CF
973: (dashed lines) from panel (a) in Figure~\ref{docfsynt}, normalized to the number of stars in this
974: region between -0.5$<$(B-R)$<$1.5 and -1$<$M$_{R}$$<$3.5.
975: In field smc0057, was also superposed
976: the CF of a model CMD (dotted lines) in which observational errors from this field were simulated (same as in Figure~\ref{dispersadas}).}
977: \label{six_south_synt}
978: \end{figure}
979:
980: Let's concentrate now on the observed CFs of each of our fields.
981: In Figures~\ref{three_east_synt} to ~\ref{six_south_synt} the CF corresponding to the synthetic CMD (dashed lines)
982: from panel (a) in Figure~\ref{docfsynt} and
983: the CFs (solid lines) from the observed CMDs were overlapped.
984: Note that the
985: shape of the synthetic CF depends on the selection of metallicities and stellar evolution libraries.
986: However, small changes in the metallicity law, which result in synthetic CMDs with a color distribution compatible with the data have
987: also very similar CFs.
988: Comparison between the observed and synthetic CFs computed
989: assuming constant SFR(t) lets us to qualitatively analyze the SFH of each field.
990:
991: Figure~\ref{three_east_synt} shows the CFs of the Eastern SMC fields.
992: In the first panel, corresponding to field qj0111,
993: synthetic CFs of synthetic populations
994: with bursts of 50\% 1 Gyr ago (long dashed line), of 30\% 1 Gyr ago (dotted line), and of 50\% 2 Gyr ago
995: (dot-long dashed line) were also overplotted.
996: The CF of field qj0111 shows some differences with respect to the CF of a population with constant SFR(t).
997: In particular, the observed CF has higher values than the synthetic one in the blue elevation
998: (-0.3$\lesssim$(B-R)$\lesssim$0.2; age$\lesssim$1.1 Gyr) which indicates
999: a SFH with enhanced star formation at young ages.
1000: This fact is also shown by comparing with the CF of synthetic
1001: populations with bursts. In fact, the blue maximum and the main peak
1002: of the CF with a burst of 30\% 1 Gyr ago and the ones of the observed CF match very well, pointing out that there was
1003: an episode around 1
1004: Gyr ago of enhanced star formation in this field which may have continued to the present time.
1005: Though a comprehensive analysis of the CMDs will be presented in a forthcoming paper,
1006: this superposition allows us to say that the observed CF is compatible with a SFH with
1007: an increase in the star formation of $\sim$30\% in the last 1 Gyr.
1008: Also note that
1009: crowding effects are not very significative in this field, as seen from the artificial star tests.
1010: The CF of field qj0112 is a remarkable case where the CF corresponds almost exactly with that of a population with constant
1011: SFR(t) (at least in average).
1012: The CF of qj0116
1013: presents a somewhat greater values of the CF in
1014: 0$\lesssim$(B-R)$\lesssim$0.3 as compared with the CF of a CMD with constant SFR(t),
1015: which may correspond to stars formed between $\sim$1-2 Gyr ago, possibly
1016: indicating some enhancement in
1017: the SFR(t) at those ages in comparison with more recent ages.
1018: Note that these three fields have a very similar CMD, and that simple comparison with isochrones gives
1019: the same information for all three:
1020: presence of stars of all ages.
1021: The differences in their CFs are a good illustration of the complementary information that the CF can provide.
1022: The presence in the observed CFs of all the features that characterize the synthetic CF is the counterpart,
1023: in this representation of the data, of the fact
1024: that the CMDs are well populated over all age ranges. The additional information brought forward by the CFs
1025: is the relative weight of the different age ranges in the population.
1026:
1027:
1028: In Figure~\ref{three_west_synt}, the CFs of the Western SMC fields are shown. The almost complete
1029: absence of the blue elevation in the
1030: color interval -0.3$\lesssim$(B-R)$\lesssim$0.2, reflects the fact that there are few stars younger
1031: than $\sim$1 Gyr. This is another example of the usefulness of the CFs: while
1032: in fields qj0036 and qj0037 there are stars until around
1033: the 0.1 Gyr isochrone, the CFs indicate that the relative
1034: amount of stars between 0 Gyr and 2 Gyr is substantially less than in the case of
1035: a field with constant SFR(t).
1036: The central maximum is slightly shifted to the red, possibly indicating that the SFR(t) started to decline around 3 Gyr ago.
1037: Note that this shift is unlikely due to an overall shift of the observed CMD with
1038: respect to the synthetic one, since the shift does not affect the red relative
1039: maximum of the CF. In fact, this maximum is slightly shifted to the blue and higher in the CF of the observed
1040: CMD as compared with that of the synthetic one. This is possibly due to field stars, which contribute more in relative numbers
1041: to the poorly populated CMDs. Actually, the observed red maximum is higher with respect to the theoretical one in the less populated
1042: qj0033.
1043: The composition of the population in these three Western CMDs seems to be very similar, even in the outermost field, qj0033.
1044:
1045: Finally, Figure~\ref{six_south_synt} shows the CFs of the Southern SMC fields.
1046: In the case of field smc0057, the relative amount of young stars might be overestimated due to crowding effects
1047: if these were not taken into account. The overplot of the
1048: observed CF (solid line) with the synthetic (dashed line) and the model (i.e. after taking into account crowding effects, dotted line)
1049: ones shown in Figure~\ref{six_south_synt} indicate that part of the enhancement of the blue
1050: elevation in field smc0057 is
1051: produced by observational errors but that there is still
1052: a true recent enhancement (0$\leqslant$t$\leqslant$3 Gyr) in the star formation.
1053: The CF of field smc0100 is still almost compatible with a constant SFR(t) on average, with possibly a truncation of the SFR(t) at recent
1054: ages, as also hinted by the comparison of its CMD with isochrones in Figure~\ref{six_south_iso}.
1055: Moving further away from the SMC center, the elevations corresponding to the first structure
1056: in the CFs are less conspicuous, indicating that young stars are less common and
1057: intermediate-age stars dominate the fields.
1058: The fact that the main peak is redder from field qj0047 on (except, maybe, in the case of field qj0102 which is
1059: situated more towards the East than the other Southern fields),
1060: points out that there is a larger amount of old stars and, like in the Western fields, that possibly the SFR(t) started to decline around
1061: 3 Gyr ago.
1062: As in the case of the Western field qj0033, the second,
1063: red relative maximum in the CFs gets bigger with increasing galactocentric distance. The reasons for this
1064: are twofold. First, the amount of stars in the RC and in the RGB, relative to
1065: the total stellar content is larger at larger
1066: distances from the center (even though not large differences among fields seem to be present beyong r$\thickapprox$2.7$\degr$),
1067: where the age of the stellar population is older on average. Second,
1068: the contamination by foreground stars is larger relative to the total number
1069: of stars from the galaxy. This last factor, may be the main player in the case of field smc0053.
1070:
1071: \section{SUMMARY} \label{summary}
1072:
1073: We obtained {\it B} and {\it R}-band photometry of stars from 12 SMC fields observed during 4 different
1074: campaigns with the C100 telescope at Las Campanas Observatory.
1075: The spatial distribution of the
1076: fields samples different parts of the galaxy, both in areas with large amounts of recent star formation such as the
1077: ``Wing'' area and ``undisturbed'' regions at the West and towards the South part of the galaxy, in which the stellar populations
1078: may be representative of the underlying population of the SMC formed prior to the events of star formation that shaped its current
1079: irregular morphology.
1080: The stellar content present in these SMC fields has been analyzed by means of a set of [{\it B-R, R}] CMDs that reach
1081: the oldest MS turnoffs (M$_{R}$$\sim$3.5) with an excellent photometric accuracy.
1082:
1083: In this first aproach to study the SFH of our SMC fields, we found the following.
1084: The fields in the ``Wing'' area contain very young blue stars and show
1085: a broad MS turnoff/subgiant region and a wide range in luminosity of the RC, pointing out that star formation in these parts has
1086: extended from at least $\sim$13 Gyr ago to the present with no substantial gaps,
1087: as the areas around all the overlapped isochrones are well populated.
1088: Field qj0111 (the closest to the center of the SMC in this ``Wing'' area)
1089: seems to have experienced an enhancement in its recent
1090: star formation, compatible with an enhancement of 30\% in the SFR(t) over the last 1 Gyr.
1091: This is indicated by the height of the blue elevation its CF (color interval in
1092: the range -0.3$\lesssim$(B-R)$\lesssim$0.2) as compared with that of CFs corresponding to synthetic populations with different SFR(t).
1093: The
1094: other two fields analyzed in this direction seem to have had a SFR(t) close to constant on average.
1095:
1096:
1097: Very little star formation has been going on from $\sim$1 Gyr ago until now in the Western fields,
1098: as indicated by the
1099: much lower amount of young blue stars and the lack of the blue elevation in the CFs.
1100: Considering the RC (formed by stars older than $\sim$1 Gyr)
1101: of fields qj0036 and qj0111, both located at the same galactocentric distance, we found that the number of stars is comparable,
1102: indicating that the integrated SFR(t) from old ages and until
1103: $\sim$1 Gyr ago in both fields is similar, and that there was a mechanism in the ``Wing'' area that
1104: triggered the star formation around 1 Gyr ago, in particular, in the location of field qj0111.
1105: Field qj0033, though located further away from the center in the Northwest, presents a
1106: distribution of stellar ages similar to that of
1107: the two other Western fields, as seen from the resemblance of the three CFs and from its CMD, in which
1108: the area below the turnoff of the 4 Gyr isochrone is still quite populated.
1109: In fact, the apparent differences between the CMD of field qj0033 and the other two are due to the much larger number of stars populating
1110: those. If only a subset of stars of those CMDs are represented, to equal number of stars in the CMD of qj0033, the distribution of stars
1111: around the different isochrones is very similar.
1112: In these three fields, the bulk of stars seems to be older than 3-4 Gyr. A similar conclusion was reached by Dolphin et al. (2001)
1113: for a field located
1114: in the Northwestern part and relatively close to field qj0033 (see Figure~\ref{SMCHI}),
1115: where they found a greatly decreased star formation in the past 2 Gyr.
1116:
1117:
1118: Regarding the fields observed toward the South, the young population is less important from r=2.7$\degr$ on.
1119: The blue elevation in the CFs of
1120: the Southern fields is only found in the two fields closer to the center. In the case of smc0057, its shape is consistent with
1121: some enhancement of the recent SFH as compared to a constant SFR(t).
1122: From the CFs it is evident that
1123: field smc0100 has many more stars younger than 2 Gyr (relative to the total population
1124: of the field) than the Western fields qj0036 and qj0037, even when it is almost 1$\degr$
1125: further from the SMC center than the latters. Note that this field is located at the border of a more densely populated
1126: isopleth than qj0036 and qj0037 and in the part in
1127: which the trumpet-like distribution of the young population {\it fans out}.
1128: Beyond
1129: $\sim$2.7$\degr$, there are only few stars younger than 3 Gyr old
1130: and the differences between the fields are small (except for the fact that the density of stars in field smc0049 is larger than in
1131: the other two).
1132: Finally, except for Eastermost field qj0102, the further South
1133: from the SMC center we go, the more is the main peak of the CF shifted to the red. This, together with the above facts,
1134: may indicate that the {\it main} epoch of star formation beyond $\sim$2.2$\degr$ in this direction ended around 3-4 Gyr ago.
1135:
1136: \section{CONCLUSIONS} \label{conclu}
1137:
1138: The SMC shows a clear morphologic dichotomy between its young and old
1139: population. The youngest component has an asymmetric distribution
1140: which {\it fans out} towards the ``Wing'' area in the Northeast,
1141: similarly to the HI distribution (Stanimirovi\'c et al. 1999), while
1142: the RGB and AGB stars have a more symmetric, spheroidal
1143: distribution. Using deep (down to $M_{R}=5.5$) CMDs in 12 small fields
1144: that strategically sample different SMC regions, we are trying to
1145: shed some new light into our knowledge of the SMC evolution, and
1146: answer some of the questions posed in the Introduction.
1147:
1148: We found that the underlying spheroidally distributed
1149: population is mainly composed by intermediate-age and old stars, and its distribution does
1150: not show strong galactocentric gradients. Our fields situated toward
1151: the Northwest of the bar, at galactocentric distances from 1.3$\degr$
1152: to 2.9$\degr$ contain very few stars younger than $\simeq$ 3 Gyr.
1153: The comparison of their CFs with that of a synthetic population with constant SFR(t) indicates there has been an actual drop of the SFR(t)
1154: at around this age until the present. Even
1155: though, some residual star formation seems to have continued up to now.
1156: No strong differences can be noticed between the CMDs
1157: and CFs of the fields at 1.3$\degr$ and 1.4$\degr$ and the one at
1158: 2.9$\degr$. The apparent differences between these CMDs are mainly due
1159: to the different number of stars in them, rather to a fundamentally
1160: different composition of the stellar populations. Something similar
1161: occurs in the case of the Southern fields beyond $\simeq 2.2
1162: \degr$. In addition, we estimated that the SFR(t) at intermediate to old ages in fields located at the same distance from the SMC center
1163: and at either side (e.g. qj0111 and qj0036) is similar.
1164: With the current analysis of the data we cannot provide a detailed SFH
1165: for these fields, and therefore we cannot confirm nor rule out periods
1166: of quiescence as found in other studies that used shallower data. This
1167: will be the subject of a forthcoming paper.
1168:
1169:
1170: The three fields situated towards the East, in the ``Wing''
1171: region, show very active current star formation. In the case of the field closer
1172: to the center, qj0111, we estimated that the current star formation rate (from around 1 Gyr ago to the present)
1173: in this field is $\sim$30\% larger than the SFR(t) averaged over the
1174: galaxy's life. However, the other two northeastern fields, situated
1175: just slightly further away from the center, have a CF which is
1176: compatible with that of a constant SFR(t) over the whole galaxy's
1177: history. Therefore, only the parts of the Wing closer to the center,
1178: seem to be undergoing an exceptionally intense episode of star
1179: formation at the present time.
1180:
1181: At the radius of the innermost field ($\sim$1 kpc), we derived a crossing time
1182: of $\sim$10$^8$ yr, obtained adopting a measured velocity dispersion of 36 km/s (Carrera 2006, using the
1183: stars below the RGB tip corresponding to our SMC fields).
1184: In the case of our outermost field ($\sim$4 kpc) the crossing time is
1185: $\sim$2$\times$10$^8$ yr.
1186: Large scale asymmetries should disappear within a few crossing times, and the population older than $\sim$1 Gyr is
1187: then expected to be well mixed at a radius of $\sim$1 kpc, while the population older than $\sim$2 Gyr is well mixed at $\sim$4 kpc.
1188: Hence, although our fields only cover little isolated parts of the SMC (as compared with the huge area embraced by HZ04),
1189: they are representative of the SMC populations older than $\sim$2 Gyr.
1190:
1191:
1192: The larger amount of young stars present in the Eastern fields may be
1193: related to a recent interaction between the SMC, the LMC, and the
1194: Milky Way as is suggested by numerical models (e.g. Yoshizawa \&
1195: Noguchi 2003). Note that the presence of a considerable young
1196: population in the eastern fields and lack thereof in the western ones
1197: is in good correspondence with the existence or absence of large
1198: amounts of HI at the corresponding locations (Stanimirovi\'c et
1199: al. 1999). It is interesting to notice that this trend is not
1200: maintained in the closest Southern field, smc0057, in which there is a
1201: considerable amount of young population but the amount of HI is small.
1202:
1203: The presence of a substantial amount of intermediate-age population in
1204: our outermost SMC fields, could be a sign that a few gigayears ago HI gas
1205: extended as far as $\sim$4$\degr$ and has since gradually
1206: receded to the more central regions.
1207: Another possible explanation for this is that tidal interactions happened periodically,
1208: and then these stars dynamically mixed, resulting in old stars (those from previous passages) being
1209: symmetrically distributed and the younger ones only in the current tidal feature.
1210: None of the studied fields is
1211: dominated by an old stellar component, as one would expect for an old
1212: stellar halo similar to the one of the Milky Way. This may mean that a
1213: disk population is still dominating over a possible old halo, if it
1214: does exist in the SMC.
1215:
1216:
1217:
1218: \acknowledgments
1219: We want to thank Antonio Aparicio and Santi Cassisi
1220: for many very useful opinions and discussions and
1221: a careful reading of the manuscript. We are very grateful
1222: to the anonymous referee for a critical and useful report that helped to improve the paper.
1223: The authors acknowledge support by the Plan Nacional de Investigaci\'on Cient\'ifica, Desarrollo, e Investigaci\'on Tecnol\'ogica,
1224: (AYA2004-06343). E. C. and R. A. M. acknowledge support by the Fondo Nacional de Investigaci\'on Cient\'{\i}fica y Tecnol\'ogica (No.
1225: 1050718, Fondecyt) and by the Chilean Centro de Astrof\'{\i}sica FONDAP (No. 15010003). This project has made generous use of the 10\%
1226: Chilean time, and continuous support from the CNTAC and Las Campanas staff is greatly appreciated.
1227:
1228:
1229: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1230: \bibitem[ag]{ag04} Aparicio, A., \& Gallart, C. 2004, \aj, 128, 1465
1231: \bibitem[car]{car06} Carrera, R.J. 2006, PhD thesis
1232: \bibitem[ci]{cion00} Cioni, M.-R. L., Habing, H. J., Israel, F. P. 2000, A\&A, 358, 9L
1233: \bibitem[co]{co97} C\^ot\'e, S., Freeman, K. C., Carignan, C. \& Quinn, P. J. 1997, \aj, 114, 1313
1234: \bibitem[d]{d01} Dolphin, A. E., Walker, A. R., Hodge, P. W., Mateo, M., Olszewski, E. W.,
1235: Schommer, R. A., \& Suntzeff, N. B. 2001, \apj, 562, 303
1236: \bibitem[f]{f91} Ferguson, H. C., \& Sandage, A. 1991, \aj, 101, 765
1237: \bibitem[gal]{gal98} Gallart, C. 1998, \apjl, 495, 43L
1238: \bibitem[galet]{galetal99} Gallart, C., Freedman, W. L., Aparicio, A., Bertelli, G. 1999, \aj, 118, 2245
1239: \bibitem[galet00]{gal2000} Gallart, C. 2000, in ASP Conf. Proc. 221, Stars, Gas and Dust in Galaxies: Exploring the Links,
1240: ed. D. Alloin, K. Olsen, \& G. Galaz (San Francisco, ASP), 133
1241: \bibitem[galetal]{galetal05} Gallart, C., Zoccali, M., Aparicio, A. 2005, ARA\&A, 43, 10
1242: \bibitem[ghat]{gh92} Gardiner, L. T., \& Hatzidimitriou, D. 1992, \mnras, 257, 195
1243: \bibitem[giro]{get02} Girardi, L., Bertelli, G., Bressan, A., Chiosi, C., Groenewegen, M. A. T.,
1244: Marigo, P., Salasnich, B., \& Weiss, A. 2002, A\&A, 391, 195
1245: \bibitem[hz]{h04} Harris, J., \& Zaritsky, D. 2004, \aj, 127, 1531 (HZ04)
1246: \bibitem[hz]{hol99} Holtzman, J. A., Gallagher, J. S. III, Cole, A. A., et al. 1999, \aj, 118, 2262
1247: \bibitem[Landolt]{Landolt92} Landolt, A. U. 1992, \aj, 104, 340
1248: \bibitem[Madau]{Madau98} Madau, P., Pozzetti, L., Dickinson, M. 1998, \apj, 498, 106
1249: \bibitem[MC]{MC05} McCumber, M. P., Garnett, D. R., \& Dufour, R. J. 2005, \aj, 130, 1083
1250: \bibitem[Pedreros]{Pedreros06} Pedreros, M. H., Costa, E., \& M\'endez, R. A. 2006, \aj, 131, 1461
1251: \bibitem[Pietrinferni]{Pietrinferni04} Pietrinferni, A., Cassisi, S., Salaris, M., \& Castelli, F. 2004, \apj, 612, 168
1252: \bibitem[schlegel]{red98} Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., \& Davis, M. 1998, \apj, 500, 525
1253: \bibitem[stani]{stani99} Stanimirovi\'c, S., Staveley-Smith, L., Dickey, J. M., Sault, R. J. \& Snowden, S. L. 1999, \mnras, 302, 417
1254: \bibitem[stet]{st87} Stetson, P. B. 1987, \pasp, 99, 191
1255: \bibitem[stets]{st90} Stetson, P. B. 1990, \pasp, 102, 932
1256: \bibitem[stetso]{st92} Stetson, P. B. 1992, in ASP Conf. Ser. 25, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems I,
1257: ed. D. M. Worrall, C. Biemesderfer, \& J. Barnes (San Francisco, ASP), 297
1258: \bibitem[stetsonp]{st93} Stetson, P. B. 1993, User's Manual for DAOPHOT II
1259: \bibitem[stetsonpb]{st94} Stetson, P. B. 1994, \pasp, 106, 250
1260: \bibitem[pbstetson]{ste03} Stetson, P. B., Bruntt, H., \& Grundahl, F. 2003, \pasp, 115, 413
1261: \bibitem[tinney]{tdcz} Tinney, C. G., Da Costa, G. S., \& Zinnecker, H. 1997, \mnras, 285, 111
1262: \bibitem[vdb]{vdb99} van den Bergh, S. 1999, ARA\&A, 9, 273
1263: \bibitem[yn]{yn03} Yoshizawa, A. M., Noguchi, M. 2003, MNRAS, 339, 1135
1264: \bibitem[z]{z00} Zaritsky, D., Harris, J., Grebel, E. K., \& Thompson, I. B. 2000, \apjl, 534, 53L
1265: \bibitem[zht]{zht97} Zaritsky, D., Harris, J., \& Thompson, I. B. 1997, \aj, 114, 1002
1266: \end{thebibliography}
1267:
1268: %% end bibliography
1269:
1270: \end{document}
1271:
1272:
1273:
1274:
1275: