1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \newcommand{\etal}{\mbox{\rm et al.~}}
3: \newcommand{\ms}{\mbox{m s$^{-1}~$}}
4: \newcommand{\ks}{\mbox{km s$^{-1}~$}}
5: \newcommand{\cse}{\mbox{cm s$^{-2}$}}
6: \newcommand{\kse}{\mbox{km s$^{-1}$}}
7: \newcommand{\mse}{\mbox{m s$^{-1}$}}
8: \newcommand{\msune}{M$_{\odot}$}
9: \newcommand{\mstar}{M$_{\star}~$}
10: \newcommand{\msun}{M$_{\odot}~$}
11: \newcommand{\lsun}{L$_{\odot}~$}
12: \newcommand{\rsun}{R$_{\odot}~$}
13: \newcommand{\rstar}{R$_{\star}~$}
14: \newcommand{\rsune}{R$_{\odot}$}
15: \newcommand{\mjup}{M$_{\rm JUP}~$}
16: \newcommand{\mearth}{M$_{\rm EARTH}~$}
17: \newcommand{\msat}{M$_{\rm SAT}~$}
18: \newcommand{\mjupe}{M$_{\rm JUP}$}
19: \newcommand{\rjup}{R$_{\rm JUP}$}
20: \newcommand{\msini}{$M \sin i~$}
21: \newcommand{\vsini}{$v \sin i~$}
22: \newcommand{\mbsini}{$M_b \sin i~$}
23: \newcommand{\mcsini}{$M_c \sin i~$}
24: \newcommand{\chisq}{$\sqrt{\chi_{\nu}^2}~$}
25: \newcommand{\arel}{$a_{\rm rel}~$}
26: \newcommand{\teff}{$T_{\rm eff}~$}
27: \newcommand{\teffe}{$T_{\rm eff}$}
28: \newcommand{\fe}{{\rm [Fe/H]}}
29: \newcommand{\logg}{${\rm \log g}~$}
30: \newcommand{\rhk}{$\log R^\prime_{HK}~$}
31: \newcommand{\shk}{$S_{HK}~$}
32: \newcommand{\prot}{$P_{ROT}~$}
33:
34: \textwidth 6.5in
35:
36: \received{}
37: \accepted{}
38:
39: \slugcomment{to appear in ApJ}
40:
41: \shortauthors{Fischer \etal}
42: \shorttitle{Five Planets}
43: \begin{document}
44:
45: \title{Five Intermediate-Period Planets from the N2K Sample \altaffilmark{1,2}}
46: \author{Debra A. Fischer\altaffilmark{3},
47: Steven S. Vogt\altaffilmark{4},
48: Geoffrey W. Marcy\altaffilmark{5},
49: R. Paul Butler\altaffilmark{6},
50: Bun'ei Sato\altaffilmark{7},
51: Gregory W. Henry\altaffilmark{8},
52: Sarah Robinson\altaffilmark{4},
53: Gregory Laughlin\altaffilmark{4},
54: Shigeru Ida\altaffilmark{7},
55: Eri Toyota\altaffilmark{9}
56: Masashi Omiya\altaffilmark{10}
57: Peter Driscoll\altaffilmark{11},
58: Genya Takeda\altaffilmark{12},
59: Jason T. Wright\altaffilmark{5},
60: John A. Johnson\altaffilmark{5}}
61:
62: \email{fischer@stars.sfsu.edu}
63:
64: \altaffiltext{1}{Based on observations obtained at the W. M. Keck Observatory,
65: which is operated by the University of California and the California Institute of
66: Technology. Keck time has been granted by NOAO and NASA.}
67:
68: \altaffiltext{2}{Based on observations obtained at the Subaru Telescope, which
69: is operated by the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan}
70:
71: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Physics \& Astronomy, San Francisco State University,
72: San Francisco, CA 94132; fischer@stars.sfsu.edu}
73:
74: \altaffiltext{4}{UCO/Lick Observatory, University of California at Santa Cruz,
75: Santa Cruz, CA 95064}
76:
77: \altaffiltext{5}{Department of Astronomy, University of California,
78: Berkeley, CA USA 94720}
79:
80: \altaffiltext{6}{Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institute of
81: Washington DC, 5241 Broad Branch Rd. NW, Washington DC, USA 20015-1305}
82:
83: \altaffiltext{7}{Tokyo Institute of Technology,
84: 2-12-1 Okayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan}
85:
86: \altaffiltext{8}{Center of Excellence in Information Systems, Tennessee State
87: University, 3500 John A. Merritt Blvd., Box 9501, Nashville, TN 37209}
88:
89: \altaffiltext{9}
90: {Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Graduate School of Science,
91: Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodai, Nada, Kobe 657-8501, Japan}
92:
93: \altaffiltext{10}
94: {Department of Physics, Tokai University, 1117 Kitakaname,
95: Hiratsuka, Kanagawa 259-1292, Japan}
96:
97: \altaffiltext{11}{Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins University,
98: Baltimore, MD 21218}
99:
100: \altaffiltext{12}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Northwestern
101: University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208}
102:
103: \begin{abstract}
104: We report the detection of five Jovian mass planets
105: orbiting high metallicity stars. Four of these stars were first
106: observed as part of the N2K program and exhibited low RMS velocity
107: scatter after three consecutive observations. However, follow-up observations
108: over the last three years now reveal the presence of
109: longer period planets with orbital periods ranging from 21 days
110: to a few years. HD~11506 is a G0V star with a planet of \msini = 4.74 \mjup
111: in a 3.85 year orbit. HD~17156 is a G0V star with a 3.12 \mjup planet
112: in a 21.2 day orbit. The eccentricity of this orbit is 0.67,
113: one of the highest known for a planet with a relatively short period.
114: The orbital period for this planet places it in a region of parameter
115: space where relatively few planets have been detected.
116: HD~125612 is a G3V star with a
117: planet of \msini = 3.5 \mjup in a 1.4 year orbit. HD~170469 is a G5IV star with a planet
118: of \msini = 0.67 \mjup in a 3.13 year orbit. HD~231701 is an F8V star
119: with planet of 1.08 \mjup in a 142 day orbit. All of these stars have
120: supersolar metallicity. Three of the five stars were observed photometrically
121: but showed no evidence of brightness variability. A transit search conducted
122: for HD~17156 was negative but covered only 25\% of the search space and so
123: is not conclusive.
124: \end{abstract}
125:
126: \keywords{planetary systems -- stars: individual (HD 11506, HD 17156,
127: HD 125612, HD 170469, HD 231701)}
128:
129:
130: \section{Introduction}
131:
132: Ongoing Doppler surveys of stars closer than 150 pc have
133: detected more than 200 exoplanets (Butler \etal 2006, Wright \etal 2007).
134: This ensemble of exoplanets exhibit a diverse range of statistical characteristics
135: (Marcy \etal 2005). Notably, the mass distribution of exoplanets
136: falls exponentially for masses greater than one Jupiter-mass. In addition, there is a
137: statistical pile-up of planets in orbits of just a few days, a paucity of
138: planets with periods between 10 - 100 days, and a rising number of gas giant
139: planets found at separations greater than 1 AU. Orbital eccentricities
140: span a surprising range from 0 - 0.93, although 92\% of planet eccentricities
141: are less than 0.6 and even for planets with periods longer than five days
142: (i.e., not tidally circularized) the median exoplanet eccentricity is 0.26.
143:
144: It has also been shown that planet formation is tied to the chemical composition
145: of the host star. There is a few percent probability of finding a gas
146: giant planet around a solar metallicity star, while
147: planet occurrence rises dramatically to $\sim 25$\% for stars with three times
148: the heavy metal composition of the Sun (Santos \etal 2005, Fischer \& Valenti 2005).
149: Ida \& Lin (2004) have accounted for this metallicity correlation within
150: the context of core accretion.
151:
152: The statistical characteristics of exoplanets serve as tracers of planet
153: formation and migration histories. The planet-metallicity correlation
154: indicates initial high metallicity in the protoplanetary disk which in
155: turn may be correlated with a higher surface density of solid particles
156: in the midplane of the disk that enhances core accretion. Orbital eccentricities and the
157: proximity of gas giant plants to their host stars are remnant signatures of
158: gravitational interactions that drive orbital migration. The architecture
159: of multi-planet systems, sometimes locked in resonances, adds to our understanding
160: of evolution of the protoplanetary disk.
161:
162: The N2K program (Fischer \etal 2005) is a survey of metal-rich stars,
163: designed to identify short period planets. These planets are geometrically
164: endowed with a higher transit probability; transit events provide a rare opportunity
165: to derive information about the planet density, internal structure and the
166: atmosphere (Burrows \etal 2007, Charbonneau 2006, Sato \etal 2005).
167: Because short-period planets can be flagged with just a few observations,
168: the N2K program only requires three Doppler measurements to screen each star.
169: However, an increased occurrence of planets is correlated with high
170: host star metallicity at all detected separations. Therefore, additional
171: observations were obtained for the highest metallicity stars to check for longer
172: period planets. This extended program has detected six new intermediate
173: period planets: HD~5319 and HD~75898 (Robinson \etal 2007), and four of the
174: five planets presented here: HD~11506, HD~17156, HD~125612, HD~231701.
175:
176:
177: \section{HD 11506}
178:
179: \subsection{Stellar Characteristics}
180:
181: HD 11506 is classified as a G0 star with V=7.51. The Hipparcos catalog (ESA 1997)
182: lists B-V = 0.607 with a parallax of 18.58 milliarcseconds, corresponding to a distance of
183: 53.8 pc. The distance and apparent magnitude set the absolute visual magnitude
184: as $M_V$=3.85 and the stellar bolometric luminosity
185: as 2.29 \lsun, including a bolometric correction of -0.033
186: (VandenBerg \& Clem 2003) based on effective temperature, surface gravity and
187: metallicity of the star. High resolution spectroscopic analysis
188: described in Valenti \& Fischer (2005) yields
189: \teff = 6058 $\pm$ 51K, \logg = 4.32 $\pm$ 0.08,
190: \vsini = 5.0 $\pm$ 0.5 \ks, and \fe = 0.31 $\pm$ 0.03 dex.
191: HD 11506 is about 0.65 magnitudes above the main sequence. We expect the
192: star to be located about 0.3 magnitudes above the main sequence because of
193: high stellar metallicity, so this star appears to be slightly evolved
194: by a few tenths of a magnitude, and is likely just
195: beginning to transition onto the subgiant branch.
196:
197: The stellar radius is calculated to be 1.3 \rsun using
198: $L = 4 \pi R^2 \sigma T^4$.
199: We have also run a fine grid of evolutionary tracks (described in Takeda \etal 2007),
200: tuned to the uniform spectroscopic analysis of Valenti \& Fischer (2005) and
201: based on the Yale Stellar Evolution Code. This analysis provides posterior
202: probability distributions for stellar mass, radius, gravity and ages. Based
203: on these evolutionary tracks, we derive a stellar mass of 1.19 \msune,
204: a radius of 1.38 \rsune, and an age of 5.4 Gyr. As a measure of the
205: formal uncertainties, the lower and upper 95\% credibility intervals from
206: a Bayesian posterior probability distribution are
207: provided in parentheses in Table~1 for these values.
208:
209: The Ca II H \& K lines (Figure 1) show that HD 11506 is chromospherically inactive.
210: We measure \shk, the core emission in the Ca II H \& K lines relative to the
211: continuum, for all of our stars.
212: Based on nineteen Keck observations, we measure an average \shk = 0.156
213: for HD~11506. The ratio of flux from \shk to the bolometric stellar flux is
214: designated as \rhk and gives the best diagnostic of chromospheric activity.
215: The average \rhk$= -4.99$ for this star and we derive an activity-based rotational
216: period (Noyes \etal 1984), \prot$ = 12.6 d$, and an
217: activity-based age of 5.4 Gyr,
218: in excellent agreement with the age from evolutionary tracks.
219: The activity, spectral type and evolutionary stage of the star allow us to estimate
220: an additional source of astrophysical noise, or stellar jitter for the velocities of each
221: of the stars on our Doppler survey (Wright 2005).
222:
223: We monitored the brightness of HD~11506 with the T10 0.8~m automatic
224: photometric telescope (APT) at Fairborn Observatory (Henry 1999,
225: Eaton, Henry \& Fekel 2003). The T10 APT measures
226: the brightness of program stars relative to nearby constant comparison stars
227: with a typical precision of 0.0015--0.0020 mag for a single measurement.
228: For HD~11506, we obtained 102 $b$ and $y$ measurements spanning 451 days
229: between 2004 October and 2006 January. The standard deviation of a single
230: observation from the mean was 0.0023 mag, our upper limit to possible
231: photometric variability in HD~11506. A periodogram analysis found no
232: significant periodicity between 1 and 225 days, so our photometry confirms
233: the star's low chromospheric activity. The stellar parameters are summarized
234: in Table~1.
235:
236: \subsection{Doppler Observations and Keplerian Fit}
237:
238: Doppler observations were made at the Keck telescope using HIRES
239: (Vogt \etal 1994) with
240: an iodine cell to model the instrumental profile and to provide the wavelength scale
241: (Butler \etal 1996). An exposure meter maintains a constant signal-to-noise ratio
242: of about 200 in our spectra, yielding a mean radial velocity precision of 2.75 \ms for
243: HD~11506. We obtained a total of 26 Doppler measurements. The observation
244: dates, radial velocities and measurement uncertainties for the
245: radial velocities are listed in Table 2
246: and plotted in Figure 2.
247:
248: In addition to velocity errors arising from our measurement uncertainties (including
249: photon shot noise), the star itself can have pulsations, cool spots or granular convective
250: flows that contribute non-dynamical velocity noise. These astrophysical sources of noise
251: are termed jitter and we empirically estimate stellar jitter based on the spectral type and
252: chromospheric activity of the star, following Wright (2005).
253: For purposes of fitting a Keplerian model, the stellar jitter is added
254: in quadrature to the formal instrumental errors, however the estimated jitter is never
255: included in the measurement uncertainties for the tabulated radial velocity sets.
256:
257: The periodogram of the radial velocities shows a strong, broad peak in the power
258: spectrum at about 1270 days with an associated false alarm probability (FAP) $< 0.0001$. The FAP
259: associated with the periodogram tests whether scrambled velocities yield power that
260: exceeds the observed, unscrambled velocities. A high FAP suggests that
261: the signal is not significant or could have been caused by a window function
262: in the data. Using a Monte Carlo simulation, one thousand data sets
263: of noise were generated by randomly drawing (with replacement) sets of actual stellar
264: velocities. The fraction of trials with maximum periodogram power
265: that exceeds the observed value from the initial unscrambled
266: data set defines the FAP (Cumming 2004).
267:
268: For each of the radial velocity data sets in this paper, a
269: Levenberg-Marquardt fitting algorithm was used to model the
270: radial velocities with a theoretical Keplerian orbital curve. There are six orbital
271: parameters derived in the fit: orbital period (P), time of periastron passage ($T_P$),
272: eccentricity (e), the orientation of the orbit (or line of apsides) ($\omega$), the
273: semi-velocity amplitude (K) and the residual center of mass radial velocity
274: (after subtracting a median radial velocity).
275:
276: Uncertainties in the orbital parameters are determined with a bootstrap Monte Carlo
277: analysis. First, a best-fit Keplerian model is obtained. Then, for each of 100 trials, the
278: theoretical best fit is subtracted from the observed radial velocities. The residual
279: velocities are then scrambled (with replacement) and added back to the theoretical best fit
280: velocities and a new trial Keplerian fit
281: is then obtained. The standard deviation of each orbital
282: parameter for the 100 Monte Carlo trials was adopted as the parameter uncertainty.
283:
284: The best fit Keplerian model gives an orbital period of 1405 $\pm$ 45 d,
285: semi-velocity amplitude of 80 $\pm$ 3 \mse and orbital eccentricity of 0.3 $\pm$ 0.1.
286: The RMS to this fit is 10.8 \mse. Based on the chromospheric activity of this star,
287: we estimated a jitter of 2 \ms (Wright 2005). When this jitter is added in quadrature
288: with the error bars listed in Table 2, \chisq = 3.2. While the large amplitude
289: Doppler variation is clear, the \chisq fit is worse than usual, suggesting
290: that our velocity errors may be underestimated or that
291: additional low amplitude dynamical velocities are present. A periodogram of
292: the residual velocities to the single Keplerian fit show several peaks with
293: similar power. For example, we can fit a second planet with a period of 170 days with a
294: significant reduction in the residual velocity RMS and an improvement in \chisq,
295: however this is not yet a unique double planet fit; additional data are required to better
296: evaluate the possible second signal.
297:
298: Using the stellar mass of 1.19 \msun derived from
299: evolutionary tracks, we find \msini = 4.74 \mjup and a semi-major axis of 2.48 AU.
300: At the distance of this star, this physical separation corresponds to an
301: angular separation of $\alpha = 0.'' 04$.
302: The Keplerian orbital solution is listed in Table 3 and the best-fit
303: Keplerian model is plotted in Figure 2.
304:
305: \section{HD 17156}
306:
307: \subsection{Stellar Characteristics}
308:
309: HD 17156 is a listed as a G5 star in the SIMBAD database and the
310: Hipparcos catalog. However, this spectral type seems at odds with other data
311: for the star. The visual magnitude is $V = 8.17$,
312: $B-V = 0.59$, and the Hipparcos parallax (ESA 1997) is 12.78 milliarcseconds,
313: corresponding to a distance of 78.24 pc. The bolometric correction -0.039
314: (VandenBerg \& Clem 2003) and absolute visual magnitude, $M_V$=3.70,
315: imply a bolometric stellar luminosity of 2.6 \lsun. Spectroscopic analysis
316: yields \teff = 6079 $\pm$ 56K, \logg = 4.29 $\pm$ 0.06, \vsini = 2.6 $\pm$ 0.5 \ks, and
317: \fe = 0.24 $\pm$ 0.03. The $B - V$ color and the effective temperature
318: are independent measurements that are consistent with each other.
319: Together with the absolute
320: magnitude and position on the H-R diagram, the spectral type for this star is
321: more likely to be G0 and the star is just beginning to evolve off the main sequence.
322:
323: The stellar mass, from evolutionary models described by
324: Takeda \etal (2007), is 1.2 \msune, and the age is 5.7 Gyr.
325: The stellar radius from evolutionary models is 1.47 \rsune, and agrees with
326: the value we derive using the observed luminosity and the Stefan-Boltzmann relation.
327:
328: The absence of Ca II H \& K emission (Figure 1) demonstrates low chromospheric activity.
329: Taking the average of 25 observations, we measure \shk = 0.15 and \rhk = -5.04 and derive
330: a rotational period, \prot = 12.8 d, with an estimated stellar age of $6.4 \pm 2$Gyr,
331: which compares favorably with the age derived above from stellar evolution tracks.
332:
333: We obtained 241 photometric measurements with the T12 APT spanning 179 days
334: between 2006 September and 2007 March. The standard deviation of the
335: observations from their mean was 0.0024 mag, the upper limit to photometric
336: variability in the star. Periodogram analysis revealed no significant
337: periodicity between 1 and 100 days. In particular, a least-squares sine fit
338: of the observations on the 21.22-day radial velocity period resulted in a
339: photometric amplitude of only $0.00039 \pm 0.00023$ mag, providing further
340: evidence that the radial velocity variations in HD~17156 are not due to
341: chromospheric activity. The stellar characteristics, including our assessment
342: of photometric variability, are summarized in Table 1.
343:
344:
345: \subsection{Doppler Observations and Keplerian Fit}
346:
347: We initially obtained eight Doppler observations of HD 17156 using the High Dispersion
348: Spectrometer (Noguchi \etal 2002) at the Subaru Telescope in 2004 and 2005.
349: For the first observing runs, the iodine absorption cell was located behind
350: the entrance slit of the spectrometer (Kambe \etal 2002, Sato \etal 2002, Sato \etal 2005).
351: The box holding the I2 cell included a window with a lens to maintain constant focal
352: length inside the spectrometer.
353: This eliminated the need to adjust the collimator position when
354: moving the I2 cell in and out of the light path (i.e., when taking program
355: and template observations).
356: However, the lens introduced a different wavelength dispersion
357: for program observations relative to the template observation.
358: Modeling of those early data is still ongoing, however,
359: standard stars, known to have constant radial velocities show RMS
360: scatter greater than 15 \mse, with larger run-to-run velocity offsets
361: for Doppler observations obtained with that setup.
362:
363: The Subaru N2K program was awarded ten nights of ``intensive'' time in summer 2006 and in
364: December 2006. Before the intensive time allocation, the iodine cell was moved in front of
365: the slit, eliminating the change in wavelength dispersion between
366: template and program observations.
367: With this new setup, the RMS scatter decreased,
368: ranging from 4 - 12 \ms in a set of four RV standard stars.
369:
370: HD 17156 had exhibited large radial velocity variations in 2004 - 2005 at Subaru.
371: Follow-up observations at Keck confirmed velocity variations, so the star was observed on nine
372: consecutive nights at Subaru from 8 December to 16 December, 2006. Setup StdI2b was
373: used to cover the wavelength region of 3500--6100 \AA \ with a mosaic of
374: two CCDs. The slit width of 0$^{\prime\prime}$.6 was used to
375: give a reciprocal resolution ($\lambda/\Delta\lambda$) of 60000. We obtained a typical
376: signal-to-noise ratio of $S/N\sim150$ pixel$^{-1}$ at 5500 \AA \ with
377: exposure times of about 120 seconds. Because of the larger systematic errors for
378: observations taken before summer 2006 (with the iodine cell behind the slit), only
379: the nine radial velocities from December 2006 are listed in Table 4. To account
380: for the intrinsic RMS velocity scatter in standard stars, 5 \ms was added in
381: quadrature to the nine Subaru observations in Table 4.
382:
383: After HD 17156 was flagged as an N2K candidate at Subaru, it was added
384: to the N2K planet search program at Keck. We obtained 24 radial velocity
385: measurements at the Keck Observatory with an average
386: internal velocity precision of 1.6 \mse.
387: Observation dates, radial velocities and uncertainties for 33 observations are listed in Table 4.
388: The last column designates the source of the observations as ``K'' (Keck Observatory)
389: or ``S'' (Subaru Observatory). The periodogram of the radial velocity data shows
390: a strong narrow peak at 21.1 days with a FAP less than 0.0001 (for 10000 Monte Carlo trials).
391:
392: When combining the Subaru and Keck velocities, we first determined a velocity difference
393: of about 130 \ms between two observations taken at Subaru and Keck on the same night (JD 2454083.9).
394: With that initial guess, we included a velocity offset as a free parameter and found
395: that an offset of 116.0 \ms produced a minimum \chisq.
396: That offset was added to the Subaru velocities listed in Table 4.
397: The best fit Keplerian model for the combined Subaru and Keck data sets
398: yields an orbital period of 21.2 $\pm$ 0.3 d,
399: semi-velocity amplitude, $K = 275 \pm$ 15 \mse,
400: and orbital eccentricity, $e = 0.67 \pm$ 0.08.
401: The RMS to the fit is 3.97 \mse. Adding jitter of 3 \ms (expected for this star)
402: in quadrature with the actual
403: single-measurement errors gives \chisq = 1.04 for this Keplerian fit.
404:
405: Adopting a stellar mass of 1.2 \msune, we derive \msini = 3.12 \mjup and a semi-major axis
406: of 0.15 AU. The Keplerian orbital solution is summarized in Table 3. The phase-folded plot of
407: the Doppler measurements for Keck and Subaru observations are shown in the left plot of Figure 3 and
408: include 3 \ms jitter. Keck observations are represented by diamonds and the Subaru
409: observations are shown as filled circles.
410:
411: Because the high eccentricity is unusual, we examined the Keplerian fit for the
412: Keck data alone, shown in the right plot Figure 3. The Keck data have
413: poor phase coverage near periastron, and yield a Keplerian
414: fit with lower amplitude and lower eccentricity. The Subaru observations map
415: periastron passage and help to model the eccentricity
416: of the orbit.
417:
418:
419:
420: \subsection{Transit Search}
421:
422: The 21.22 day period of the companion to HD~17156 is by far the shortest
423: planetary orbital period in this paper. The orbital semi-major axis of
424: 0.15 AU and the stellar radius of 1.47 \rsun lead to an {\it a priori}
425: transit probability of 7\% (Seagroves et al. 2003). Therefore,
426: we used our 241 brightness measurements to conduct a preliminary transit
427: search. The orbital parameters in Table~3 constrain the predicted times
428: of transit to about $\pm~0.3$ days, which is slightly greater than the
429: 0.25-day duration of a central transit. We performed our transit search,
430: using a technique similar to the one described by Laughlin (2000), over
431: all orbital phases for periods between 20 and 23 days. The search was
432: negative but was able to cover effectively only 25\% of the period-phase
433: search space corresponding to the uncertainties in the orbital parameters.
434: Thus, our photometric data do not preclude the possibility of transits in
435: HD~17156.
436:
437: \section{HD 125612}
438:
439: \subsection{Stellar Characteristics}
440:
441: HD 125612 is a G3V main sequence star with V=8.31, B-V = 0.628, and Hipparcos
442: parallax (ESA 1997) of 18.93 corresponding to a distance of 52.82 pc
443: and absolute visual magnitude, $M_V$=4.69. Spectroscopic analysis yields
444: \teff = 5897 $\pm$ 40K, \logg = 4.45 $\pm$ 0.05,
445: \vsini = 2.1 $\pm$ 0.5 \ks, and \fe = 0.24 $\pm$ 0.03 dex.
446: The bolometric correction is -0.061, giving a stellar luminosity of 1.08 \lsun.
447: The luminosity and \teff
448: imply a stellar radius of 1.0 \rsune. Within uncertainties, this agrees well
449: with the value of 1.05 \rsun determined from stellar evolutionary tracks. We also
450: derive a stellar mass of 1.1 \msun from stellar evolution models and an age of 2.1 Gyr.
451:
452: Figure 1 shows the Ca H line for HD~125612; the lack of emission indicates low
453: chromospheric activity for this star. Taking the mean of 18 observations,
454: we measure \shk = 0.178 and \rhk = -4.85, and derive \prot = 10.5 d, and
455: a stellar age of $3.3 \pm 2$ Gyr (which compares well with the age of 2.1 Gyr from
456: stellar evolution tracks).
457: Stellar parameters are summarized in Table~1.
458:
459:
460: \subsection{Doppler Observations and Keplerian Fit}
461:
462: We obtained 19 Keck velocity measurements for HD 125612 with a typical uncertainty of
463: 2.2 \mse. Observation dates, radial velocities
464: and instrumental uncertainties in the radial velocities are listed in Table 5.
465: A periodogram of the velocities shows a strong broad peak at about 500 days.
466:
467: The best fit Keplerian model is plotted in Figure 4 and yields a period of 510 $\pm$ 14 d,
468: with semi-velocity amplitude 90.7 $\pm$ 8 \mse, orbital eccentricity, 0.38 $\pm$ 0.05,
469: and a linear trend of 0.037 meters per day.
470: Adopting a stellar mass of 1.1 \msune, we derive \msini = 3.5 \mjup and semi-major axis
471: of 1.2 AU (angular separation, $\alpha = 0''.023$). The Keplerian orbital solution is
472: listed in Table 3 and the RV data are plotted with the best-fit Keplerian
473: model (solid line) in Figure 4.
474:
475: The RMS to the Keplerian fit shown in Figure 4 is 10.7 \mse. The
476: velocity jitter for this star is expected to be about 2
477: \mse. Therefore, the residual RMS is several times the typical error bar, consistent with the
478: poor \chisq statistic of 3.56. A periodogram of the
479: residuals to a 510-day planet fit shows
480: power near 3.5 d. However, there are several other peaks of
481: nearly comparable height, showing that other orbital solutions
482: may give similar improvements.
483: Thus, while we could fit the residuals with a second Keplerian, the FAP of the peak does
484: not yet meet our standards of statistical significance,
485: and more data are required for follow up.
486:
487:
488: \section{HD 170469}
489:
490: \subsection{Stellar Characteristics}
491:
492: HD 170469 is a G5 subgiant star with visual magnitude V=8.21, B-V = 0.677, and
493: Hipparcos parallax (ESA 1997) of 15.39 milliarcseconds, corresponding to a distance of 64.97 pc.
494: The absolute visual magnitude of the star is $M_V$=4.14.
495: The bolometric correction is -0.072 providing a
496: bolometric stellar luminosity of 1.6 \lsun and (with \teff) stellar radius of 1.2 \rsun
497: calculated from the luminosity.
498: Evolutionary tracks provide a stellar mass estimate of 1.14 \msun and stellar radius
499: of 1.22 \rsun and age of 6.7 Gyr. Our spectroscopic analysis
500: gives \teff = 5810 $\pm$ 44K, \logg = 4.32 $\pm$ 0.06,
501: \vsini = 1.7 $\pm$ 0.5 \ks, and \fe = 0.30 $\pm$ 0.03 dex.
502:
503: The Ca H \& K lines (Figure 1) indicate low chromospheric activity.
504: Taking the mean of thirteen observations, we measure
505: \shk = 0.145 and \rhk = -5.06 and derive a rotational period,
506: \prot = 13.0 d and an activity-calibrated age (Noyes \etal 1984) of $7 \pm 2$ Gyr.
507:
508: We obtained 215 brightness measurements with the T10 APT spanning 630 days
509: between 2005 March and 2006 November. The standard deviation of the observations
510: was 0.0018 mag, the upper limit to photometric variability in HD~170469. A
511: periodogram analysis found no significant periodicity between 1 and 315 days,
512: confirming the star's low chromospheric activity. The stellar characteristics are
513: summarized in Table 6.
514:
515:
516: \subsection{Doppler Observations and Keplerian Fit}
517:
518: We obtained 35 Keck velocities for HD 170469 with a mean velocity precision of
519: 1.6 \mse. Observation dates, radial velocities
520: and instrumental uncertainties in the radial velocities are listed in Table 7.
521: A periodogram of the velocities yields very strong power at about 1100 days with a
522: FAP less than 0.0001.
523:
524: The best fit Keplerian model gives an orbital period of 1145 $\pm$ 18 d,
525: semi-velocity amplitude of 12.0 $\pm$ 1.9 \ms and orbital eccentricity, 0.11 $\pm$ 0.08.
526: The RMS to the fit is 4.18 \ms with \chisq = 1.59, including
527: the estimated astrophysical jitter of 2.0 \mse.
528: Adopting a stellar mass of 1.14 \msune, we derive \msini = 0.67 \mjup
529: and a semi-major axis of 2 AU ($\alpha = 0.''03$). The
530: Keplerian orbital parameters are listed in Table 8 and the RV data
531: are plotted with the best-fit Keplerian model (solid line) in Figure 5.
532:
533:
534: \section{HD 231701}
535:
536: \subsection{Stellar Characteristics}
537:
538: HD 231701 is an F8V star with $V = 8.97$, $B-V = 0.539$, and Hipparcos parallax
539: (ESA 1997) of 9.22 milliarcseconds, corresponding to a distance of 108.4 pc.
540: The absolute visual magnitude is $M_V$=3.79, so this star is beginning to evolve
541: onto the subgiant branch.
542: Spectroscopic analysis yields \teff = 6208 $\pm$ 44K, \logg = 4.33 $\pm$ 0.06,
543: \vsini = 4.0 $\pm$ 0.5 \ks, and \fe = 0.07 $\pm$ 0.03 dex.
544: The bolometric correction is -0.037 and bolometric
545: luminosity is 2.4 \lsun. The luminosity and effective temperature yield
546: a stellar radius of 1.36 \rsun. Modeling the stellar evolutionary
547: tracks, we derive a stellar mass of 1.14 \msune, radius of 1.35 \rsune, and
548: age of 4.9 Gyr.
549:
550: The Ca H\&K lines (Figure 1) show that the star has low chromospheric activity.
551: We measure \shk = 0.159 and \rhk = -5.0 and derive a rotational period,
552: \prot = 12.2 d and a stellar age of $5.6 \pm 2$ Gyr.
553: Stellar parameters are listed in Table 6.
554:
555:
556: \subsection{Doppler Observations and Keplerian Fit}
557:
558: We obtained 17 Keck observations of HD 231701 with mean internal
559: errors of 3.2 \mse. Observation dates, radial velocities
560: and measurement uncertainties in the radial velocities are listed in Table 9.
561: The periodogram of this data set has a FAP of 0.006 for a period near
562: 140 days.
563:
564: The best fit Keplerian model has an orbital period of 141.6 $\pm$ 2.8 d,
565: with semi-velocity amplitude 39 $\pm$ 3.5 \ms and orbital eccentricity, 0.1 $\pm$ 0.06.
566: The RMS to this fit is 5.9 \mse. The expected astrophysical jitter for this
567: star is 2.2 \mse. Adding this jitter in quadrature with the error bars listed
568: in Table 9 yields \chisq = 1.46 for this Keplerian fit.
569: Adopting the stellar mass of 1.14 \msune, we
570: derive \msini = 1.08 \mjup and semi-major axis of
571: 0.53 AU. The Keplerian orbital solution is listed in Table 8 and the phased RV data
572: is plotted with the best-fit Keplerian model (solid line) in Figure 6.
573:
574:
575: \subsection{Discussion}
576:
577: Here, we present the detection of 5 new exoplanets detected
578: with Doppler observations.
579: For each of the Keplerian models, we also carried out a
580: Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) analysis to better estimate
581: the orbital parameters and their uncertainties following the algorithm
582: described by Ford (2003). Unlike the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm that we
583: generally use to determine a best fit Keplerian orbit, the MCMC analysis
584: provides the full posterior probability density distribution for each
585: parameter. This approach is particularly useful for data sets where
586: the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm can minimize \chisq with a model that
587: fits a sparse data set. The MCMC algorithm explores a wider range of
588: parameter space because it is not driven solely by \chisq minimization.
589: However, MCMC does not explore an exhaustive range of parameter space. For
590: example, solutions with very different orbital periods might be missed.
591: For each of the models presented here, we began with the input parameters
592: found with Levenberg Marquardt fitting and confirmed that the orbital
593: elements were recovered with strongly peaked probability distributions
594: using MCMC.
595:
596: HD 170469 is a star on the regular planet search at Keck that has a planet of
597: \msini = 0.66 \mjup in a $\sim$3 yr orbit with eccentricity 0.23. The host star is
598: metal-rich with [Fe/H] = 0.3.
599: The remaining four exoplanets were initially part of the N2K program
600: at Keck. The N2K program targets metal-rich stars for rapid identification of
601: short-period planets. The first three radial velocity measurements for
602: the stars presented here had RMS scatter
603: less than 5 \mse (except HD 17156, with initial RMS scatter of 34 \ms), so these
604: stars were not candidates for short period planets. However, a follow-up program to obtain
605: Doppler observations on N2K-vetted high metallicity stars with low chromospheric
606: activity and low RMS velocity scatter has detected the presence of these longer period planets.
607:
608: HD 11506 b is a fairly massive planet, with \msini = 4.74 \mjup and a semi-major axis
609: of 2.5 AU. This could well constitute the outer edge of a habitable zone location
610: for putative rocky moons orbiting the planet, depending on atmospheric properties
611: of any moons. The host star has a luminosity
612: that is 2.3 times that of the Sun. The eccentricity of this system is 0.3,
613: so the temperature at the top of the planet
614: atmosphere would change by about 50K between apastron and periastron.
615:
616: HD 17156 b has a mass of \msini = 3.12 \mjup and an orbital period of 21.2 days, placing it
617: in the so-called period valley between 10 and 100 days (Udry \etal 2003),
618: where a relatively small fraction of exoplanets have been detected.
619: We derive a substantial orbital eccentricity of
620: 0.67 for HD~17156~b. At this proximity to the subgiant host star, the planet moves between 0.05 and 0.25 AU,
621: experiencing temperature changes of a few hundred degrees between periastron and apastron.
622: It is possible that these thermal changes could be observed with sensitive IR flux
623: measurements from space, even though the planet is not known to transit its host star.
624:
625: The distribution of orbital eccentricities for known exoplanets is shown in
626: Figure 7. An upper envelope in the distribution of eccentricities rises steeply
627: from periods of a few days to reach the maximum observed eccentricities (for HD 80606
628: and HD 20782) at periods of 100 - 1000 days. Although an orbital eccentricity of 0.67
629: seems remarkable for HD 17156 b, given its orbital period of just 21.2 days,
630: the eccentricity still falls along the upper edge of the observed eccentricity distribution.
631:
632: HD 125612 b has \msini = 3.5 \mjup with a semi-major axis of 1.2 AU. This
633: planet has an eccentricity of 0.38. The planet is carried from 0.47 AU
634: at periastron, where the temperature at the top of the atmosphere is
635: about 300 K, to about 2.1 AU where the temperature falls below the freezing
636: point of water to about 200 K. A single planet model does not appear to
637: adequately describe the velocities of HD 125612 because the RMS to that fit is
638: 10.7 \mse, yet the star is chromospherically quiet and slowly
639: rotating, with \vsini = 2 \kse. This star may well have an additional
640: planet orbiting in a relatively short period.
641:
642:
643: Velocity variations in HD 231701 have been modeled as a planet with
644: \msini = 1.08 \mjup with a semi-major axis of 0.53 AU and orbital eccentricity
645: of about 0.1. The MCMC probability distributions for HD 231701 are consistent
646: with this Keplerian model, but allow for eccentricity
647: solutions that extend to zero. This
648: analysis alerts us that more RV measurements should be taken
649: to better constrain the orbital eccentricity of this system.
650:
651: We have now obtained three or more Doppler observations for 423 stars at
652: Keck Observatory as part of the N2K program. Spectral synthesis modeling
653: has been carried out for all of these stars, and we plot the percentage of stars
654: with detected planets in each 0.1 dex metallicity bin in Figure 8. Superimposed on
655: this plot is the planet detectability curve from Fischer \& Valenti (2005).
656: A planet probability can be assigned based on the stellar metallicity. Integrating
657: planet probabilities we expect $27 \pm 5$ exoplanets with masses greater than
658: 1 \mjup and orbital periods shorter than 4 years. Fourteen, or about half
659: of the expected planets in the sample have now been detected.
660:
661:
662: \acknowledgements
663: We gratefully acknowledge the dedication and support of the
664: Keck Observatory staff, in particular Grant Hill for support with HIRES.
665: We thank Akito Tajitsu and Tae-Soo Pyo for their expertise and support of the Subaru HDS
666: observations. DAF acknowledges support from NASA grant NNG05G164G and from
667: Research Corporation. SSV acknowledges support from NSF AST-0307493. BS is supported
668: by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No. 17740106) from the Japan Society
669: for the Promotion of Science (JSPS). We thank the Michelson Science Center for
670: travel support through the KPDA program.
671: We thank the NASA and UC Telescope assignment committees for generous
672: allocations of telescope time.
673: The authors extend thanks to those of
674: Hawaiian ancestry on whose sacred mountain of Mauna Kea we are
675: privileged to be guests. Without their kind hospitality, the
676: Keck observations presented here would not have been possible.
677: This research has made use of the SIMBAD database, operated at CDS,
678: Strasbourg, France, and of NASA's Astrophysics Data System Bibliographic
679: Services and is made possible by the generous support of
680: Sun Microsystems, NASA, and the NSF.
681:
682:
683: \clearpage
684:
685: \begin{thebibliography}{}
686: \parsep 0pt
687: \itemsep -3pt
688:
689: \bibitem[Butler {et~al.} 2006]{B06}
690: Butler, R. P., Wright, J. T., Marcy, G. W.,
691: Fischer, D. A., Vogt, S. S., Tinney, C. G.,
692: Jones, H. R. A., Carter, B. D., Johnson, J. A.,
693: McCarthy, C., Penny, A. J. 2006
694: ApJ 646, 505
695:
696: \bibitem[Butler { et~al.} 1996]{BuMaWi96}
697: Butler, R. P., Marcy, G. W.,
698: Williams, E., McCarthy, C., Dosanjh, P., Vogt, S. S. 1996,
699: \newblock { PASP, } {108}, 500
700:
701: \bibitem[Burrows \etal]{bhbh07}
702: Burrows, A., Hubeny, I., Budaj, J., Hubbard, W. 2007,
703: \newblock{ ApJ}, in press
704:
705: \bibitem[Charbonneau \etal]{c06}
706: Charbonneau, D., Brown, T. M., Burrows, A., Laughlin, G.
707: 2006, in Protostars and Planets V, ed. B. Reipurth,
708: D. Jewitt, and K. Keil (University of Arizona Press)
709:
710: \bibitem[Cumming 2004]{c04}
711: Cumming, A. 2004,
712: MNRAS, 354, 1165
713:
714: \bibitem[Eaton \etal]{e03}
715: Eaton, J. A., Henry, G. W., Fekel, F. C. 2003, in
716: The Future of Small Telescopes in the New Millennium, Volume II--The
717: Telescopes We Use, ed. T. D. Oswalt (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 189
718:
719: \bibitem[ESA 1997]{esa97}
720: ESA 1997, The Hipparcos and Tycho Catalogs.
721: ESA-SP 1200
722:
723: \bibitem[Fischer \etal 2005]{fis05}
724: Fischer, D. A. \etal 2005,
725: ApJ, 629, 481
726:
727: \bibitem[Fischer \& Valenti (2005)]{FV05}
728: Fischer, D. A., Valenti, J. A. 2005,
729: ApJ 622, 1102
730:
731: \bibitem[Ford, 2003]{f03}
732: Ford, E. 2003, ApJ, 129, 1706
733:
734: \bibitem[Henry]{h99}
735: Henry, G. W. 1999, PASP, 111, 845
736: \bibitem[Laughlin]{l99}
737: Laughlin, G. 2000, ApJ, 545, 1064
738:
739: \bibitem[Ida \& Lin]{il04}
740: Ida, S., Lin, D. N. C. 2004, ApJ 616, 567
741:
742: \bibitem[Kambe etal]{k2002}
743: Kambe, E. \etal 2002, \pasj, 54, 873
744:
745: \bibitem[Marcy \etal 2005]{mbfvwtj05}
746: Marcy, G. W., Butler, R. P., Fischer, D. A., Vogt, S. S.,
747: Wright, J. T., Tinney, C. G., Jones, H. R. A. 2005,
748: PThPS, 158, 24
749:
750: \bibitem[noguchi 02]{noguchi02}
751: Noguchi, K. \etal. 2002, \pasj, 54, 855
752:
753: \bibitem[Noyes et al. 1984]{noyes84}
754: Noyes, R. W., Hartmann, L., Baliunas, S. L.,
755: Duncan, D. K., Vaughan, A. H.
756: 1984, ApJ, 279, 763
757:
758: \bibitem[Robinson \etal 2007]{rlf07}
759: Robinson, S. E., Laughlin, G., Vogt, S. S., Fischer, D., Butler, R. P.,
760: Marcy, G. W., Takeda, G., Driscoll, P. 2007,
761: ApJ in press
762:
763: \bibitem[Santos \etal]{santos05}
764: Santos, N. C., Israelian, G., Mayor, M., Bento, J. P., Almeida, P. C.,
765: Sousa, S. G., Ecuvillon, A. 2005,
766: A \& A, 437, 1127
767:
768: \bibitem[Sato 2002]{sato02}
769: Sato, B., Kambe, E., Takeda, Y., Izumiura, H., Ando, H. 2002, \pasj, 54 873
770:
771: \bibitem[Sato \etal]{s05}
772: Sato, B. \etal 2005, ApJ, 633, 465
773:
774: \bibitem[Seagroves \etal]{s03}
775: Seagroves, S., Harker, J., Laughlin, G., Lacy, J., \& Castellano, T. 2003,
776: PASP, 115, 1355
777:
778: \bibitem[Takeda \etal]{t06}
779: Takeda, G., Ford, E. B., Sills, A., Rasio, F.,
780: Fischer, D. A., Valenti, J. A. 2007, ApJS, 168, 297
781:
782: \bibitem[Udry \etal]{u03}
783: Udry, S., Mayor, M., Clausen, J. V., Freyhammer, L. M., Helt, B. E.,
784: Lovis, C., Naef, D., Olsen, E. H., Pepe, F., Queloz, D., Santos, N. C.
785: 2003, A \& A, 407, 679
786:
787: \bibitem[Valenti \& Fischer (2005)]{vf04}
788: Valenti, J. A., Fischer, D. A. 2005,
789: ApJS, 159, 141
790:
791: \bibitem[Vandenberg \$ Clem]{vc03}
792: VandenBerg, D. \& Clem, J. 2003, AJ, 126, 778
793:
794:
795: \bibitem[Vogt94]{v94}
796: Vogt, S. S. \etal 1994,
797: SPIE, 2198, 362.
798:
799: \bibitem[Wright 05]{wright05}
800: Wright, J. T. 2005,
801: PASP, 117, 657
802:
803: \bibitem[Wright et al. 2007]{w07}
804: Wright, J. T., Marcy, G. W., Fischer, D. A., Butler, R. P.,
805: Vogt, S. S., Tinney, C. G., Jones, H. R. A., Carter, B. D.,
806: Johnson, J. A., McCarthy, C., Apps, K. 2007,
807: ApJ, 657, 533
808:
809: \end{thebibliography}
810:
811:
812: \begin{figure}
813: \plottwo{f1a.eps}{f1b.eps}
814: \epsscale{1.0}
815: \caption{The Ca H line for HD 11506 and 17156 are plotted
816: in the left panel, with the same wavelength segment of the Sun shown for
817: comparison. HD 125612, HD 170469 and HD 231701 are
818: plotted in the right panel. All of these stars have low
819: chromospheric activity based on our measurement of line core emission
820: relative to the continuum. }
821: \label{fig1}
822: \end{figure}
823:
824: \begin{figure}
825: \plotone{f2.eps}
826: \figcaption{Radial velocities for HD 11506. The velocity error
827: bars have been augmented by adding 2 \ms in quadrature to the
828: single measurement precision listed in Table 2. This gives \chisq = 3.2
829: for the Keplerian fit. With a stellar mass of 1.19 \msune, we derive
830: a planet mass of \msini = 4.74 \mjup and semi-major axis, \arel = 2.48 AU. }
831: \label{fig2}
832: \end{figure}
833: \clearpage
834:
835: \begin{figure}
836: \plottwo{f3a.eps}{f3b.eps}
837: \epsscale{1.2}
838: \figcaption{(left) Radial velocities for HD 17156
839: from Keck Observatory (diamonds) and Subaru Observatory (filled
840: circles) have 3 \ms added in quadrature to
841: the uncertainties listed in Table 4
842: to account for expected photospheric jitter.
843: Adopting a stellar mass of 1.2 \msun we derive a planet mass, \msini = 3.12 \mjup
844: and semi-major axis for the orbit, \arel = 0.15 AU.
845: (right) The plot on the right shows the Keck velocities only. Although
846: the phase coverage misses periastron the Keck velocites alone confirm
847: high eccentricity in HD 17156 b.}
848: \label{fig3}
849: \end{figure}
850: \clearpage
851:
852: \begin{figure}
853: \plotone{f4.eps}
854: \figcaption{Radial velocities for HD 125612.
855: The velocity measurements have 2 \ms added to their error bars listed
856: in Table 5 to account for the level of astrophysical noise (jitter)
857: we expect from the star. With the assumed stellar mass of 1.1 \msune,
858: we derive a planet mass, \msini = 3.5 \mjup and semi-major axis of 1.2 AU.
859: This Keplerian model still has a high RMS and \chisq of 3.56, suggesting the possible
860: presence of an additional planet. }
861: \label{fig4}
862: \end{figure}
863: \clearpage
864:
865: \begin{figure}
866: \plotone{f5.eps}
867: \figcaption{Keck radial velocities for HD 170469 include 2.0 \ms
868: added in quadrature with the internal error bars listed in
869: Table 7. With the added jitter, the Keplerian
870: fit has \chisq = 1.59. The assumed stellar mass of 1.14 \msun yields
871: a planet mass of \msini = 0.67 \mjup
872: and semi-major axis of about 2 AU. }
873: \label{fig5}
874: \end{figure}
875: \clearpage
876:
877: \begin{figure}
878: \plotone{f6.eps}
879: \figcaption{Phase-folded radial velocities for HD 231701 include stellar
880: jitter of 2.2 \mse added to the errors listed in Table 9, giving \chisq = 1.46.
881: The stellar mass of 1.14 \msun implies a
882: planet mass of \msini = 1.08 \mjup
883: and orbital radius of 0.53 AU. }
884: \label{fig6}
885: \end{figure}
886: \clearpage
887:
888: \begin{figure}
889: \plotone{f7.eps}
890: \figcaption{Orbital eccentricity distribution for exoplanets.
891: A rising envelope defines the distribution for planets with periods
892: between 2 and 100 days. The distribution peaks for periods between
893: 100 - 1000 days. The arrow points to the dot representing HD~17156 b.
894: With an orbital period of 21 days and eccentricity of
895: 0.67, HD 17156 b still fits within the envelope of this eccentricity
896: distribution.}
897: \label{fig7}
898: \end{figure}
899: \clearpage
900:
901:
902: \begin{figure}
903: \plotone{f8.eps}
904: \figcaption{Stars with at least 4 Doppler observations
905: that were observed at Keck as part of the N2K program were
906: been binned according to metallicity. In each 0.1 dex
907: metallicity bin, the percentage of stars with detected
908: planets is plotted and Poisson error bars are shown.
909: Superimposed on this histogram is the curve of planet
910: occurrence as a function of metallicity from
911: Fischer \& Valenti (2005). Most stars on the N2K program have only
912: 4-5 observations, however the metallicity correlation
913: is still emerging and is supported in this sample. }
914: \label{fig8}
915: \end{figure}
916: \clearpage
917:
918:
919: %table 1
920: \begin{deluxetable}{llll}
921: \tablenum{1}
922: \tablecaption{Stellar Parameters}
923: \tablewidth{0pt}
924: \tablehead{\colhead{Parameter} & \colhead{HD11506} & \colhead{HD17156} & \colhead{HD125612} \\
925: }
926: \startdata
927: V & 7.51 & 8.17 & 8.31 \\
928: $M_V$ & 3.85 & 3.70 & 4.69 \\
929: B-V & 0.607 & 0.590 & 0.628 \\
930: Spectral Type & G0V & G0V & G3V \\
931: Distance (pc) & 53.82 & 78.24 & 52.82 \\
932: $L_{bol}/$\lsun & 2.29 & 2.6 & 1.08 \\
933: ${\rm [Fe/H]}$ & 0.31 (0.03) & 0.24 (0.03) & 0.24 (0.03) \\
934: $T_{eff}$ (K) & 6058 (51) & 6079 (56) & 5897 (40) \\
935: \vsini (\kse) & 5.0 (0.50) & 2.6 (0.50) & 2.1 (0.50) \\
936: \logg & 4.32 (0.08) & 4.29 (0.06) & 4.45 (0.05) \\
937: $M_{STAR}$ (\msun)\tablenotemark{a} & (1.1) 1.19 (1.29) & (1.1) 1.2 (1.3) & (1.04) 1.1 (1.17) \\
938: $R_{STAR}$ (\rsun)\tablenotemark{a} & (1.25) 1.38 (1.53) & (1.3) 1.47 (1.6) & (0.99) 1.05 (1.13) \\
939: Age (Gyr)\tablenotemark{a} & (3.9) 5.4 (7.0) & (3.8) 5.7 (7.0) & (0.16) 2.1 (5.6) \\
940: \shk & 0.156 & 0.15 & 0.178 \\
941: \rhk & -4.99 & -5.04 & -4.85 \\
942: \prot (d) & 12.6 d & 12.8 d & 10.5 d \\
943: $\sigma_{phot}$ (mag) & 0.0023 & 0.0024 & \nodata \\
944: \enddata
945: \tablenotetext{a}{Stellar masses, radii and ages are derived from evolutionary tracks}
946: \end{deluxetable}
947: \clearpage
948:
949: %table 2
950: \include{tbl2}
951: \clearpage
952:
953:
954: %table 3
955: \begin{deluxetable}{llll}
956: \tablenum{3}
957: \tablecaption{Orbital Parameters}
958: \tablewidth{0pt}
959: \tablehead{\colhead{Parameter} & \colhead{HD 11506} & \colhead{HD 17156} & \colhead{HD 125612} \\
960: }
961: \startdata
962: P (d) & 1405 (45) & 21.2 (0.3) & 510 (14) \\
963: ${\rm T}_{\rm p}$ (JD) & 13603 (102) & 13738.529 (0.5) & 13228.3 (12) \\
964: $\omega$ (deg) & 262 (19) & 121 (11) & 21 (9) \\
965: ecc & 0.3 (0.1) & 0.67 (0.08) & 0.38 (0.05) \\
966: K$_1$ (\mse) & 80 (3) & 275 (15) & 90.7 (8) \\
967: $dv/dt$ (\mse per day) & \nodata & \nodata & 0.037 \\
968: $a_{rel}$ (AU) & 2.48 & 0.15 & 1.2 \\
969: $a_1 \sin i$ (AU) & 0.0099 & 0.00039 & 0.0039 \\
970: f$_1$(m) (M$_\odot$) & 6.53e-08 & 1.83e-08 & 3.09e-08 \\
971: $M\sin i$ (M$_{Jup}$) & 4.74 & 3.12 & 3.5 \\
972: ${\rm Nobs}$ & 26 & 33 & 19 \\
973: RMS (\ms) & 10.8 & 3.97 & 10.7 \\
974: Jitter (\ms) & 2 & 3 & 2 \\
975: Reduced \chisq & 3.2 & 1.17 & 3.56 \\
976: FAP (periodogram) & $< 0.0001$ & $< 0.0001$ & $0.0003$ \\
977: \enddata
978: \end{deluxetable}
979: \clearpage
980:
981:
982: %table 4
983: \include{tbl4}
984: \clearpage
985:
986: %table 5
987: \include{tbl5}
988: \clearpage
989:
990:
991: \begin{deluxetable}{lll}
992: \tablenum{6}
993: \tablecaption{Stellar Parameters}
994: \tablewidth{0pt}
995: \tablehead{\colhead{Parameter} & \colhead{HD 170469} & \colhead{HD 231701} \\
996: }
997: \startdata
998: V & 8.21 & 8.97 \\
999: $M_V$ & 4.14 & 3.79 \\
1000: B-V & 0.677 & 0.539 \\
1001: Spectral Type & G5IV & F8V \\
1002: Distance (pc) & 64.97 & 108.4 \\
1003: $L_{bol}/$\lsun & 1.6 & 2.4 \\
1004: ${\rm [Fe/H]}$ & 0.30 (0.03) & 0.07 (0.03) \\
1005: $T_{eff}$ (K) & 5810 (44) & 6208 (44) \\
1006: \vsini (\kse) & 1.7 (0.5) & 4 (0.50) \\
1007: \logg & 4.32 (0.06) & 4.33 (0.06) \\
1008: $M_{STAR}$ (\msun)\tablenotemark{a} & (1.05) 1.14 (1.16) & (1.08) 1.14 (1.22) \\
1009: $R_{STAR}$ (\rsun)\tablenotemark{a} & (1.15) 1.22 (1.3) & (1.16) 1.35 (1.55) \\
1010: Age (Gyr)\tablenotemark{a} & (5.0) 6.7 (7.8) & (3.5) 4.9 (6.2) \\
1011: \shk & 0.145 & 0.159 \\
1012: \rhk & -5.06 & -5.00 \\
1013: \prot (d) & 13.0 d & 12.2 d \\
1014: $\sigma_{phot}$ (mag) & 0.0018 & \nodata \\
1015: \enddata
1016: \tablenotetext{a}{Stellar masses, radii and ages are derived from evolutionary tracks}
1017: \end{deluxetable}
1018: \clearpage
1019:
1020: %table 7
1021: \include{tbl7}
1022: \clearpage
1023:
1024: \begin{deluxetable}{lll}
1025: \tablenum{8}
1026: \tablecaption{Orbital Parameters}
1027: \tablewidth{0pt}
1028: \tablehead{\colhead{Parameter} & \colhead{HD 170469} & \colhead{HD 231701} \\
1029: }
1030: \startdata
1031: P (d) & 1145 (18) & 141.6 (2.8) \\
1032: ${\rm T}_{\rm p}$ (JD) & 11669.0 (21) & 13180.0 (4.2) \\
1033: $\omega$ (deg) & 34 (19) & 46 (24) \\
1034: ecc & 0.11 (0.08) & 0.10 (0.08) \\
1035: K$_1$ (\ms) & 12.0 (1.9) & 64 (8) \\
1036: $dv/dt$ (\mse per day) & \nodata & \nodata \\
1037: $a_{rel}$ (AU) & 2.1 & 0.53 \\
1038: $a_1 \sin i$ (AU) & 0.00126 & 0.0005 \\
1039: f$_1$(m) (M$_\odot$) & 2.03e-10 & 8.6e-10 \\
1040: $M\sin i$ (M$_{Jup}$) & 0.67 & 1.08 \\
1041: ${\rm Nobs}$ & 35 & 17 \\
1042: RMS (\ms) & 4.18 & 5.90 \\
1043: Jitter (\ms) & 2.0 & 2.22 \\
1044: Reduced \chisq & 1.59 & 1.46 \\
1045: FAP (periodogram) & $< 0.0001$ & 0.006 \\
1046: \enddata
1047: \end{deluxetable}
1048: \clearpage
1049:
1050:
1051: %table 9
1052: \include{tbl9}
1053: \clearpage
1054:
1055:
1056: \end{document}
1057: