1: \NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}
2: \documentclass{iaus238}
3:
4: \usepackage{graphicx}
5: %\usepackage[dvips, plainpages=false, colorlinks=true, linkcolor=red, citecolor=red, urlcolor=blue]{hyperref}
6:
7: \title[The Galactic Center]{The Galactic Center}
8:
9: \author[R.~Genzel \& V. Karas]{Reinhard
10: Genzel$^{1,2}$ \and Vladim\'{\i}r Karas$^3$}
11:
12: \affiliation{$^1$~Max-Planck Institut f\"ur Extraterrestrische Physik, Garching, Germany\\[\affilskip]
13: $^2$~Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, USA\\[\affilskip]
14: $^3$~Astronomical Institute, Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic}
15:
16: \pubyear{2006}
17: \volume{238}
18: %\pagerange{001--999}
19: %\date{??? and in revised form ???}
20: \setcounter{page}{173}
21: \jname{Black Holes: from Stars to Galaxies -- across the Range of Masses}
22: \editors{V. Karas \& G. Matt, eds.}
23: \begin{document}
24:
25: \maketitle
26:
27: \begin{abstract}
28: In the past decade high resolution measurements in the infrared
29: employing adaptive optics imaging on $10$m telescopes have allowed
30: determining the three dimensional orbits stars within ten light hours of
31: the compact radio source at the center of the Milky Way. These
32: observations show the presence of a three million solar mass black hole
33: in Sagittarius~A* beyond any reasonable doubt. The Galactic Center thus
34: constitutes the best astrophysical evidence for the existence of black
35: holes which have long been postulated, and is also an ideal `lab' for
36: studying the physics in the vicinity of such an object. Remarkably,
37: young massive stars are present there and probably have formed in the
38: innermost stellar cusp. Variable infrared and X-ray emission from
39: Sagittarius~A* are a new probe of the physical processes and space-time
40: curvature just outside the event horizon.
41: \keywords{Galaxy: center -- black hole physics}
42: \end{abstract}
43:
44: \firstsection
45: \section{Introduction -- Sagittarius A*}
46: The central light years of our Galaxy contain a dense and luminous star
47: cluster, as well as several components of neutral, ionized and extremely
48: hot gas (Genzel, Hollenbach \& Townes \cite{gen94}). The Galactic Center
49: also contains a very compact radio source, Sagittarius~A* (Sgr~A*;
50: Balick \& Brown \cite{bal74}) which is located at the center of the
51: nuclear star cluster and ionized gas environment. Short-wavelength
52: centimeter and millimeter VLBI observations have established that its
53: intrinsic radio size is a mere $10$~light minutes (Bower {\etal}
54: \cite{bow04}; Shen {\etal} \cite{she05}). Sgr~A* is also an X-ray
55: emission source, albeit of only modest luminosity (Baganoff {\etal}
56: \cite{bag01}). Most recently, Aharonian {\etal} (\cite{aha04}) have
57: discovered a source of TeV $\gamma$-ray emission within $10$~arcsec of
58: Sgr~A*. It is not yet clear whether these most energetic $\gamma$-rays
59: come from Sgr~A* itself or whether they are associated with the nearby
60: supernova remnant, Sgr~A East.
61:
62: Sgr~A* thus may be a supermassive black hole analogous to QSOs, albeit
63: of much lower mass and luminosity. Because of its proximity -- the
64: distance to the Galactic Center is about $10^5$ times closer than the
65: nearest quasars -- high resolution observations of the Milky Way nucleus
66: offer the unique opportunity of stringently testing the black hole
67: paradigm and of studying stars and gas in the immediate vicinity of a
68: black hole, at a level of detail that will not be accessible in any
69: other galactic nucleus in the foreseeable future.
70:
71: Since the center of the Milky Way is highly obscured by interstellar
72: dust particles in the plane of the Galactic disk, observations in the
73: visible light are not possible. Investigations require measurements at
74: longer wavelengths -- the infrared and microwave bands, or at shorter
75: wavelengths -- hard X-rays and $\gamma$-rays, where the veil of dust is
76: transparent. The dramatic progress in our knowledge of the Galactic
77: Center over the past two decades is a direct consequence of the
78: development of novel facilities, instruments and techniques across the
79: whole range of the electromagnetic spectrum.
80:
81: \begin{figure}
82: \includegraphics[height=2.7in]{fig1}
83: \hfill
84: \includegraphics[height=2.7in]{fig2}
85: \caption{Left: VLA radio continuum map of the central parsec (Roberts \&
86: Goss \cite{rob93}). The radio emission delineates ionized gaseous
87: streams orbiting the compact radio source Sgr~A*. Spectroscopic
88: measurements in the radio band (Wollman {\etal} \cite{wol77}) provided
89: the first dynamical evidence from large gas velocities that there might
90: be a hidden mass of $3$--$4$ million solar masses located near Sgr~A*.
91: Right: A diffraction limited image of Sgr~A* ($\sim0.05$~arcsec
92: resolution) from the $8$m ESO VLT, taken with the NACO AO-camera and an
93: infrared wavefront sensor at $1.6$/$2.2$/$3.7$~${\mu}m$ (Genzel {\etal}
94: \cite{gen03b}). The central black hole is located in the centre of the
95: box. NACO is a collaboration between ONERA (Paris), Observatoire de
96: Paris, Observatoire Grenoble, MPE (Garching), and MPIA (Heidelberg)
97: (Lenzen {\etal} 1998; Rousset {\etal}
98: \cite{rou98}).}\label{fig1}
99: \end{figure}
100:
101: \section{High angular resolution astronomy}
102: The key to the nature of Sgr~A* obviously lies in very high angular
103: resolution measurements. The Schwarzschild radius of a $3.6$ million
104: solar mass black hole at the Galactic Center subtends a mere
105: $10^{-5}$~arcsec. For the high-resolution imaging from the ground it is
106: necessary to correct for the distortions of an incoming electromagnetic
107: wave by the refractive and dynamic Earth atmosphere. VLBI overcomes this
108: hurdle by phase-referencing to nearby QSOs; sub-milliarcsecond
109: resolution can now be routinely achieved.
110:
111: In the optical/near-infrared wavebands the atmosphere smears out
112: long-exposure images to a diameter at least ten times greater than the
113: diffraction limited resolution of large ground-based telescopes
114: (Fig.~\ref{fig1}). From the early 1990s onward initially speckle imaging
115: (recording short exposure images, which are subsequently processed and
116: co-added to retrieve the diffraction limited resolution) and then later
117: adaptive optics (AO, correcting the wave distortions on-line) became
118: available. With these techniques it is possible to achieve diffraction
119: limited resolution on large ground-based telescopes. The diffraction
120: limited images are much sharper and also much deeper than the seeing
121: limited images. In the case of AO (Beckers \cite{bec93}) the incoming
122: wavefront of a bright star near the source of interest is analyzed, the
123: necessary corrections for undoing the aberrations of the atmosphere are
124: computed (on time scales shorter than the atmospheric coherence time of
125: a few milli-seconds) and these corrections are then applied to a
126: deformable optical element (e.g. a mirror) in the light path.
127:
128: The requirements on the brightness of the AO star and on the maximum
129: allowable separation between star and source are quite stringent,
130: resulting in a very small sky coverage of natural star AO. Fortunately,
131: in the Galactic Center there is a bright infrared star only $6$~arcsec
132: away from Sgr~A*, such that good AO correction can be achieved with an
133: infrared wavefront sensor system. Artificial laser beacons can overcome
134: the sky coverage problem to a considerable extent. For this purpose, a
135: laser beam is projected from the telescope into the upper atmosphere and
136: the backscattered laser light can then be used for AO correction. The
137: Keck telescope team has already begun successfully exploiting the new
138: laser guide star technique for Galactic Center research (Ghez {\etal}
139: \cite{ghe05a}).
140: After AO correction, the images are an order of magnitude sharper and
141: also much deeper than in conventional seeing limited measurements. The
142: combination of AO techniques with advanced imaging and spectroscopic
143: instruments (e.g. integral field imaging spectroscopy) have resulted in
144: a major breakthrough in high resolution studies of the Galactic Center.
145:
146: \section{Nuclear star cluster and the paradox of youth}
147: One of the big surprises is a fairly large number of bright stars in
148: Sgr~A*, a number of which were already apparent on the discovery
149: infrared images of Becklin \& Neugebauer (\cite{bec75}, \cite{bec78}).
150: High-resolution infrared spectroscopy reveals that many of these bright
151: stars are actually somewhat older, late-type supergiants and AGB stars.
152: Starting with the discovery of the AF-star (Allen {\etal} \cite{all90};
153: Forrest {\etal} \cite{for87}), however, an ever increasing number of the
154: bright stars have been identified as being young, massive and early
155: type. The most recent counts from the deep SINFONI integral-field
156: spectroscopy yields about one hundred OB stars, including various
157: luminous blue supergiants and Wolf-Rayet stars, but also normal
158: main-sequence OB stars (Paumard {\etal} \cite{pau06a}). The nuclear star
159: cluster is one of the richest concentrations of young massive stars in
160: the Milky Way.
161:
162: The deep adaptive optics images also trace the surface density
163: distribution of the fainter stars, to about K~$17$--$18$~mag,
164: corresponding to late B or early A stars (masses of $3$--$6$ solar
165: masses), which are a better probe of the density distribution of the
166: overall mass density of the star cluster. While the surface brightness
167: distribution of the star cluster is not centered on Sgr~A*, the surface
168: density distribution is. There is clearly a cusp of stars centered on
169: the compact radio source (Genzel {\etal} \cite{gen03b}; Sch\"odel {\etal}
170: \cite{sch06}). The inferred volume density of the cusp is a power-law
171: ${\propto}R^{-1.4\pm0.1}$, consistent with the expectation for a stellar
172: cusp around a massive black hole (Alexander \cite{ale05}).
173:
174: If there is indeed a central black hole associated with Sgr~A* the
175: presence of so many young stars in its immediate vicinity constitutes a
176: significant puzzle (Allen \& Sanders \cite{all86}; Morris \cite{mor93};
177: Alexander \cite{ale05}). For gravitational collapse to occur in the
178: presence of the tidal shear from the central mass, gas clouds have to be
179: denser than $\sim10^9(R/(10^{\prime\prime}))^{-3}$ hydrogen atoms per
180: cm$^{-3}$. This `Roche' limit exceeds the density of any gas currently
181: observed in the central region. Recent near-diffraction limited AO
182: spectroscopy with both the Keck and VLT shows that almost all of the
183: cusp stars brighter than $\mbox{K}\sim16$~mag appear to be normal, main
184: sequence B stars (Ghez {\etal} \cite{ghe03}; Eisenhauer {\etal}
185: \cite{eis05a}). If these stars formed in situ, the required cloud
186: densities approach the conditions in outer stellar atmospheres.
187:
188: Several scenarios have been proposed to account for this paradox of
189: youth. In spite of this effort the origin of central stars
190: (S-stars) is not well understood: models have difficulties in
191: reconciling different aspects of the Galaxy Centre -- on one side it is
192: a low level of present activity, indicating a very small accretion rate,
193: and on the other side it is the spectral classification that suggests
194: these stars have been formed relatively recently; see Alexander
195: (\cite{ale05}) for a detailed discussion and references. The most
196: prominent ideas to resolve the apparent problem are in situ formation in
197: a dense gas accretion disk that can overcome the tidal limits,
198: re-juvenation of older stars by collisions or stripping, and rapid
199: in-spiral of a compact, massive star cluster that formed outside the
200: central region and various scattering a three body interaction
201: mechanisms, including resonant relaxation (Alexander \cite{ale05}).
202: Several other mechanisms have been proposed that could set stars on
203: highly eccentric orbits and bring them to the neighbourhood of the
204: central black hole (e.g., Hansen \& Milosavljevi\'c
205: \cite{han03}; McMillan \& Portegies Zwart \cite{mcm03}; Alexander \&
206: Livio \cite{ale04}; \v{S}ubr \& Karas \cite{sub05}), but the problem of
207: the S-stars remains open.
208:
209: \begin{figure*}
210: \includegraphics[height=2.8in]{fig3.eps}
211: \hfill
212: \includegraphics[height=2.65in]{fig4.eps}
213: \caption{Positions on the sky as
214: a function of time for the central stars
215: orbiting the compact radio source Sgr~A*. Left: the data from the UCLA
216: group working with the Keck telescope (Ghez {\etal} \cite{ghe05b}). Right:
217: the data from the MPE--Cologne group at the ESO-VLT (Sch\"odel {\etal}
218: \cite{sch03}; Eisenhauer {\etal} \cite{eis05a}; Gillessen {\etal},
219: in preparation).
220: }\label{fig2}
221: \end{figure*}
222:
223: \section{Compelling evidence for a central massive black hole}
224: With diffraction limited imagery starting in 1991 on the $3.5$m ESO New
225: Technology Telescope and continuing since 2002 on the VLT, a group at
226: MPE was able to determine proper motions of stars as close as
227: $\sim0.1$~arcsec from Sgr~A* (Eckart \& Genzel \cite{eck96},
228: \cite{eck97}). In 1995 a group at the University of California, Los
229: Angeles started a similar program with the $10$m diameter Keck telescope
230: (Ghez {\etal} \cite{ghe98}). Both groups independently found that the stellar
231: velocities follow Kepler laws and exceed $10^3$~km/s within the central
232: light month.
233:
234: Only a few years later both groups achieved the next and crucial step:
235: they were able to determine individual stellar orbits for several stars
236: very close to the compact radio source (Fig.~\ref{fig2}; Sch\"odel et
237: al. \cite{sch02}, \cite{sch03}; Ghez {\etal} \cite{ghe03}, \cite{ghe05b};
238: Eisenhauer {\etal} \cite{eis05a}). In addition to the astrometric imaging
239: they obtained near-diffraction limited Doppler spectroscopy of the same
240: stars (Ghez {\etal} \cite{ghe03}; Eisenhauer {\etal} \cite{eis03a},b),
241: yielding precision measurements of the three dimensional structure of
242: several orbits, as well as the distance to the Galactic Center. At the
243: time of writing, the orbits have been determined for about a dozen stars
244: in the central light month. The central mass and stellar orbital
245: parameters derived by the two teams agree mostly very well. The orbits
246: show that the gravitational potential indeed is that of a point mass
247: centered on Sgr~A* within the relative astrometric uncertainties of
248: $\sim10$~milliarcsec. Most of the mass must be concentrated well within
249: the peri-approaches of the innermost stars, $\sim10$--$20$ light hours,
250: or $70$ times the Earth orbit radius and about $1000$ times the event
251: horizon of a $3.6$ million solar mass black hole. There is presently no
252: indication for an extended mass greater than about $5$\% of the point
253: mass.
254:
255: Simulations indicate that current measurement accuracies are sufficient
256: to reveal the first and second order effects of Special and General
257: Relativity in a few years time (Zucker {\etal} \cite{zuc06}).
258: Observations with future $30$m+ diameter telescopes will be able to
259: measure the mass and distance to the Galactic Center to $\sim0.1$\%
260: precision. They should detect radial precession of stellar orbits due to
261: General Relativity and constrain the extended mass to $<10^{-3}$ of the
262: massive black hole (Weinberg, Milosavljevic \& Ghez \cite{wei05}). At
263: that level a positive detection of a halo of stellar remnants (stellar
264: black holes and neutron stars) and perhaps dark matter would appear to
265: be likely. Future interferometric techniques will push capabilities yet
266: further.
267:
268: Long-term VLBA observations have set $2\sigma$ upper limits of about
269: $20$~km/s and $2$~km/s (or $50$~micro-arcsec per year) to the motion of
270: Sgr~A* itself, along and perpendicular to the plane of the Milky Way,
271: respectively (Reid \& Brunthaler \cite{rei04}; see also Backer \& Sramek
272: \cite{bac99}). This precision measurement demonstrates very clearly that
273: the radio source itself must indeed be massive, with simulations
274: indicating a lower limit to the mass of Sgr~A* of $\sim10^5$ solar
275: masses. The intrinsic size of the radio source at millimeter wavelengths
276: is less than $5$ to $20$ times the event horizon diameter (Bower {\etal}
277: \cite{bow04}; Shen {\etal} \cite{she05}). Combining the radio size and
278: proper motion limit of Sgr~A* with the dynamical measurements of the
279: nearby orbiting stars leads to the conclusion that Sgr~A* can only be a
280: massive black hole, beyond any reasonable doubt. An astrophysical dark
281: cluster fulfilling the observational constraints would have a life-time
282: less than a few $10^4$ years and thus can be safely rejected, as can be
283: a possible fermion ball of hypothetical heavy neutrinos. In fact all
284: non-black hole configurations can be excluded by the available
285: measurements (Sch\"odel {\etal} \cite{sch03}; Ghez {\etal} \cite{ghe05b})
286: -- except for a hypothetical boson star and the gravastar
287: hypothesis, but it appears that the two mentioned alternatives have
288: difficulties of their own, and they are less likely and certainly much
289: less understood than black holes (e.g. Maoz \cite{mao98}; Miller {\etal}
290: \cite{mil98}).
291: We thus conclude that, under the assumption of the validity of General
292: Relativity, the Galactic Center provides the best quantitative evidence
293: for the actual existence of (massive) black holes that contemporary
294: astrophysics can offer.
295:
296: \begin{figure*}
297: \begin{center}
298: \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{fig5}
299: \end{center}
300: \caption{Photo-center wobbling (left) and light curve (right) of a hot
301: spot on the innermost stable orbit around Schwarzschild black hole
302: (inclination of $80$~deg), as derived from ray-tracing computations.
303: Dotted curve: `true' path of the hot spot; dashed curves: apparent path
304: and a predicted light curve of the primary image; dash-dotted curves:
305: the same for secondary image; solid curves: path of centroid and
306: integrated light curve. Axes on the left panel are in Schwarzschild
307: radii of a $3$~million solar-mass black hole, roughly equal to the
308: astrometric accuracy of $10$~arcsec; the abscissa axis of the right
309: panel is in cycles. The loop in the centroids track is due to the
310: secondary image, which is strongly sensitive to the space-time
311: curvature. The overall motion can be detected at good significance at
312: the anticipated accuracy of GRAVITY. Details can be obtained by
313: analyzing several flares simultaneously (Gillessen {\etal} \cite{gil06b};
314: Paumard {\etal} \cite{pau05}).}\label{fig3}
315: \end{figure*}
316:
317: \section{Zooming in on the accretion zone and event horizon}
318: Recent millimeter, infrared and X-ray observations have detected
319: irregular, and sometimes intense outbursts of emission from Sgr~A*
320: lasting anywhere between 30 minutes and a number of hours and occurring
321: at least once per day (Baganoff {\etal} \cite{bag01}; Genzel {\etal}
322: \cite{gen03a}; Marrone {\etal} \cite{mar06}). These flares originate from
323: within a few milli-arcseconds of the radio position of Sgr~A*. They
324: probably occur when relativistic electrons in the innermost accretion
325: zone of the black hole are significantly accelerated, so that they are
326: able to produce infrared synchrotron emission and X-ray synchrotron or
327: inverse Compton radiation (Markoff {\etal} \cite{mar01}; Yuan {\etal}
328: \cite{yua03}; Liu {\etal} \cite{liu05}). This interpretation is also
329: supported by the detection of significant polarization of the infrared
330: flares (Eckart {\etal} \cite{eck06b}), by the simultaneous occurrence of
331: X- and IR-flaring activity (Eckart {\etal} \cite{eck06a}; Yusef-Zadeh et
332: al. \cite{yus06}) and by variability in the infrared spectral properties
333: (Ghez {\etal} \cite{ghe05b}; Gillessen {\etal} \cite{gil06a}; Krabbe et
334: al. \cite{kra06}). There are indications for quasi-periodicities in the
335: light curves of some of these flares, perhaps due to orbital motion of
336: hot gas spots near the last circular orbit around the event horizon
337: (Genzel {\etal} \cite{gen03a}; Aschenbach {\etal}
338: \cite{asc04}; B\'elanger {\etal} \cite{bel06}).
339:
340: The infrared flares as well as the steady microwave emission from
341: Sgr~A* may be important probes of the gas dynamics and space-time metric
342: around the black hole (Broderick \& Loeb \cite{bro06}; Meyer {\etal}
343: \cite{mey06a},b; Paumard {\etal} \cite{pau06b}). Future long-baseline
344: interferometry at short millimeter or sub-millimeter wavelengths may be
345: able to map out the strong light-bending effects around the photon orbit
346: of the black hole. It is interesting to realize that the angular size of
347: the ``shadow'' of black hole (Bardeen \cite{bar73}) is not very far from
348: the anticipated resolution of interferometric techniques and it may thus
349: be accessible to observations in near future (Falcke, Melia \& Agol
350: \cite{fal00}).
351:
352: Polarization measurements will help us to set further constraints on the
353: emission processes responsible for the flares. Especially the
354: time-resolved lightcurves of the polarized signal carry specific
355: information about the interplay between the gravitational and magnetic
356: fields near Sgr~A* horizon, because the propagation of the polarization
357: vector is sensitive to the presence and properties of these fields along
358: the light trajectories (Bromley, Melia \& Liu \cite{bro01}; Hor\'ak \&
359: Karas \cite{hor06}; Paumard {\etal} \cite{pau06b}). Polarization is also
360: very sensitive also to intrinsic properties of the source -- its
361: geometry and details of radiation mechanisms responsible for the
362: emission.
363:
364: Synthesis of different techniques will be a promising way for the
365: future: the astrometry of central stars gives very robust results
366: because the stellar motion is almost unaffected by poorly known
367: processes of non-gravitational origin, while the flaring gas occurs much
368: closer to the black hole horizon and hence it directly probes the
369: innermost regions of Sgr~A*. Eventually the two components -- gas and
370: stars of the Galaxy Center -- are interconnected and form the unique
371: environment in which the flaring gas is influenced by intense stellar
372: winds whereas the long-term motion and the `non-standard' evolution of
373: the central stars bears imprints of the gaseous medium though which the
374: stars pass.
375:
376: Eisenhauer {\etal} (\cite{eis05b}) are developing GRAVITY (an instrument for
377: `General Relativity Analysis via VLT Interferometry'), which will provide
378: dual-beam, $10$ micro-arcsecond precision infrared astrometric imaging of faint
379: sources. GRAVITY may be able to map out the motion on the sky of hot spots during
380: flares with a high enough resolution and precision to determine the size
381: of the emission region and possibly detect the imprint of multiple
382: gravitational images (see Fig.~\ref{fig3}). In addition to studies of
383: the flares, it will also be able to image the orbits of stars very close
384: to the black hole, which should then exhibit the orbital radial oscillations
385: and Lense-Thirring precession due to General Relativity. Both the microwave
386: shadows as well as the infrared hot spots are sensitive to the
387: space-time metric in the strong gravity regime. As such, these
388: ambitious future experiments can potentially test the validity of the
389: black hole model near the event horizon and perhaps even the validity of
390: General Relativity in the strong field limit.
391:
392: \begin{acknowledgments}
393: An extended version of this lecture was presented by RG as Invited Discourse
394: during the $26^{\rm{}th}$~General Assembly of the International Astronomical Union
395: in Prague, 22nd August 2006 ({\em{}Highlights of Astronomy}, Volume~14, 2007).
396: VK thanks the Czech Science Foundation for continued support (ref.\ 205/07/0052).
397: \end{acknowledgments}
398:
399: \vspace*{-1em}
400:
401: \begin{thebibliography}{}
402: \bibitem[2004]{aha04}Aharonian~F., Akhperjanian A.~G., Aye K.-M {\etal} 2004, A\&A, 425, L13
403: \bibitem[2005]{ale05}Alexander~T. 2005, Phys. Rep., 419, 65
404: \bibitem[2004]{ale04}Alexander~T., Livio~M. 2004, 606, L21
405: \bibitem[1986]{all86}Allen D.~A., Sanders R. 1986, Nature, 319, 191
406: \bibitem[1990]{all90}Allen D.~A., Hyland A.~R., Hillier D.~J. 1990, MNRAS, 244, 706
407: \bibitem[2004]{asc04}Aschenbach B., Grosso N., Porquet D., Predehl P. 2004, A\&A, 417, 71
408: \bibitem[1999]{bac99}Backer D.~C., Sramek R.~A. 1999, ApJ, 524, 805
409: \bibitem[2001]{bag01}Baganoff F., Bautz M.~W., Brandt W.~N. {\etal} 2001, Nature, 413, 45
410: \bibitem[1974]{bal74}Balick B., Brown~R. 1974, ApJ, 194, 265
411: \bibitem[1973]{bar73}Bardeen J.~M. 1973, in Black Holes, eds. C.~DeWitt \& B.~S. DeWitt (New York: Gordon \& Breach), p.~215
412: \bibitem[1993]{bec93}Beckers J.~M. 1993, ARAA, 31, 13
413: \bibitem[1975]{bec75}Becklin E.~E., Neugebauer G. 1975, ApJ, 200, L71
414: \bibitem[1978]{bec78}Becklin E.~E., Matthews K., Neugebauer G., Willner S.~P. 1978, ApJ, 219, 121
415: \bibitem[2006]{bel06}B\'elanger G., Terrier~R., De Jager O.~C., Goldwurm~A., Melia~F. 2006, J. Phys., 54, 420
416: %\bibitem[]{1300}Blandford, R., Begelman, M.C. 1999, MNRAS 303, L1
417: %\bibitem[]{1400}Bonnet, H. {\etal} 2004, ESO Messenger 117, 17
418: \bibitem[2004]{bow04}Bower G.~C. Falcke~H., Herrnstein R.~M., Zhao Jun-Hui, Goss W.~M., Backer D.~C. 2004, Science, 304, 704
419: \bibitem[2006]{bro06}Broderick A., Loeb A. 2006, MNRAS, 367, 905
420: \bibitem[2001]{bro01}Bromley B.~C., Melia~F., Liu~Siming 2001, ApJ, 555, L83
421: %\bibitem[]{1700}Davies, M.B., King, A. 2005, ApJ 624, L25
422: %\bibitem[]{1800}DePoy, D.L., Sharp, N.A. 1991, AJ 101, 1324
423: %\bibitem[]{1900}De Villier, J.P. Hawley, J.F., Krolik, J.H., Hirose, S. 2005, ApJ 620, 878
424: %\bibitem[]{2000}Eckart, A., Genzel, R., Hofmann, R., Sams, B.J., Tacconi-Garman, L.E. 1993, ApJ 407, L77
425: %\bibitem[]{2100}Eckart, A., Genzel, R., Hofmann, R., Sams, B.J., Tacconi-Garman, L.E. 1995, ApJ 445, L23
426: \bibitem[1996]{eck96}Eckart A., Genzel R. 1996, Nature, 383, 415
427: \bibitem[1997]{eck97}Eckart A., Genzel R. 1997, MNRAS, 284, 576
428: \bibitem[2006a]{eck06a}Eckart A., Baganoff F.~K., Sch\"odel~R. {\etal} 2006a, A\&A, 450, 535
429: \bibitem[2006b]{eck06b}Eckart A., Sch\"odel~R., Meyer~L., Trippe~S., Ott~T., Genzel~R. 2006b, A\&A, 455, 1
430: %\bibitem[]{2600}Einstein, A. 1916, Ann.Phys. 49, 50
431: \bibitem[2003b]{eis03b}Eisenhauer F., Abuter~R., Bickert~K. {\etal} 2003b, Proc. SPIE, 4841, 1548
432: \bibitem[2005a]{eis05a}Eisenhauer F., Genzel~R., Alexander~T. {\etal} 2005a, ApJ, 628, 246
433: \bibitem[2005b]{eis05b}Eisenhauer F., Perrin G., Rabien S., {\etal} 2005b, AN, 326, 561
434: \bibitem[2003a]{eis03a}Eisenhauer F., Sch\"odel~R., Genzel~R. {\etal} 2003a, ApJ, 597, L121
435: \bibitem[2000]{fal00}Falcke H., Melia F., Agol E. 2000, ApJ, 528, L13
436: %\bibitem[]{3200}Ferrarese, L., Merritt, D. 2000, ApJ 539, L9
437: \bibitem[1987]{for87}Forrest W.~J., Shure M.~A., Pipher J.~L., Woodward C.~A. 1987, in The Galactic Center, AIP Conf. 155, ed. D.~C. Backer (New York: AIP), 153
438: \bibitem[1994]{gen94}Genzel R., Hollenbach D., Townes C.~H. 1994, Rep. Prog. Phys., 57, 417
439: \bibitem[2003a]{gen03a}Genzel R., Sch\"odel~R., Ott~T. {\etal} 2003a, Nature, 425, 934
440: \bibitem[2003b]{gen03b}Genzel R., Sch\"odel~R., Ott~T. {\etal} 2003b, ApJ, 594, 812
441: \bibitem[2003]{ghe03}Ghez A.~M., Duch\^ene~G., Matthews~K. {\etal} 2003, ApJ, 586, L127
442: \bibitem[1998]{ghe98}Ghez A.~M., Klein B.~L., Morris M., Becklin E.~E. 1998, ApJ, 509, 678
443: \bibitem[2005a]{ghe05a}Ghez A.~M., Hornstein S.~D., Lu J.~R. {\etal} 2005a, ApJ, 635, 1087
444: \bibitem[2005b]{ghe05b}Ghez A.~M., Salim~S., Hornstein S.~D. {\etal} 2005b, ApJ, 620, 744
445: %\bibitem[]{4200}Giacconi, R., Gursky, H., Paolini, F., Rossi, B.B. 1962, Phys.Rev.Lett. 9, 439
446: %\bibitem[]{4300}Giacconi, R. 2003, Rev.Mod.Phys. 75, 995
447: \bibitem[2006a]{gil06a}Gillessen S., Eisenhauer~F., Quataert~E. {\etal} 2006a, ApJ, 640, L163
448: \bibitem[2006b]{gil06b}Gillessen S., Perrin~G., Brandner~W. {\etal} 2006b, in Advances of Stellar Interferometry, eds. J.~D. Monnier {\etal}, Proc. SPIE, vol.~6268, 626811
449: \bibitem[2003]{han03}Hansen B.~M.~S., Milosavljevi\'c~M. 2003, ApJ, 593, L80
450: \bibitem[2006]{hor06}Hor\'ak~J., Karas~V. 2006, MNRAS, 365, 813
451: %\bibitem[]{4600}Hopman, C., Alexander, T. 2006, ApJ 645, 1152
452: %\bibitem[]{4700}Kerr, R.1963, Ph.Rev.Lett., 11, 237
453: %\bibitem[]{4800}Kormendy, J. 2004, in Coevolution of Black Holes and Galaxies, Carnegie Observatories Centennial Symposia. Cambridge University Press, Ed. L.C. Ho, p. 1
454: \bibitem[2006]{kra06}Krabbe A., Iserlohe~C., Larkin J.~E. {\etal} 2006, ApJ, 642, L145
455: \bibitem[1998]{len98}Lenzen R., Hofmann R., Bizenberger P., Tusche A. 1998, Proc. SPIE, 3354, 606
456: \bibitem[2005]{liu05}Liu S., Melia F., Petrosian V. 2005, ApJ, 636, 798
457: %\bibitem[]{5200}Lynden-Bell, D. 1969, Nature 223, 690
458: \bibitem[1998]{mao98}Maoz~E. 1998, ApJ, 494, L181
459: \bibitem[2001]{mar01}Markoff S., Falcke H., Yuan F., Biermann P.~L. 2001, A\&A, 379, L13
460: \bibitem[2006]{mar06}Marrone D., Moran J.~M., Zhao J.-H., Rao R. 2006, ApJ, 640, 308
461: %\bibitem[]{5500}Matthews, K. {\etal} 2006, in preparation
462: %\bibitem[]{5600}Melia, F., Falcke, H. 2001, Ann.Rev.Astr.Ap. 39, 309
463: %\bibitem[]{5700}McClintock, J., Remillard R. 2004, in Compact Stellar X-ray sources , eds. W.Lewin and M.van der Klis, Cambirdge Univ. Press (astro-ph 0306123)
464: %\bibitem[]{5800}Miyoshi, M. {\etal} 1995, Nature 373, 127
465: \bibitem[2003]{mcm03}McMillan S.~L.~W., Portegies Zwart S.~F. 2003, ApJ, 596, 314
466: \bibitem[2006a]{mey06a}Meyer~L., Eckart~A., Sch\"odel~R., Duschl W.~J., Muzic~K., Dov\v{c}iak~M., Karas~V. 2006a, A\&A, 460, 15
467: \bibitem[2006b]{mey06b}Meyer~L., Sch\"odel~R., Eckart~A., Karas~V., Dov\v{c}iak~M., Duschl W.~J. 2006b, A\&A, 458, L25
468: \bibitem[1998]{mil98}Miller J.~C., Shahbaz~T., Nolan L.~A. 1998, MNRAS, 29
469: \bibitem[1993]{mor93}Morris M. 1993, ApJ, 408, 496
470: %\bibitem[]{6000}Narayan, R., Yi, I., Mahadevan, R. 1996, Nayure 374, 623
471: \bibitem[2006a]{pau06a}Paumard T., Genzel~R., Martins~F. {\etal} 2006a, ApJ, 643, 1011
472: \bibitem[2006b]{pau06b}Paumard T., Mueller~T., Genzel~R., Eisenhauer~F., Gillesen~S. 2006, in preparation
473: \bibitem[2005]{pau05}Paumard T., Perrin~G., Eckart~A. {\etal} 2005, AN, 326, 568
474: %\bibitem[]{6300}Quataert, E. 2004 ApJ 613, 322
475: %\bibitem[]{6400}Rees, M. 1984, Ann.Rev Astr.Ap. 22, 471
476: %\bibitem[]{6500}Reid, M.J. 1993, Ann.Rev. Astr.Ap. 31, 345
477: \bibitem[2004]{rei04}Reid M.~J., Brunthaler~A. 2004, ApJ, 616, 872
478: %\bibitem[]{6700}Revnivtsev, M.G. {\etal} 2004, A\&A 425, L49
479: %\bibitem[]{6800}Rivera, E.J. {\etal} 2005, ApJ 634, 625
480: \bibitem[1993]{rob93}Roberts D.~A., Goss W.~M. 1993, ApJSS, 86, 133
481: \bibitem[1998]{rou98}Rousset G., Lacombe~F., Puget~P. {\etal} 1998, in Adaptive Optical System Technologies, eds. D.~Bonaccini \& R.~K. Tyson, Proc. SPIE, vol. 3255, 508
482: \bibitem[2002]{sch02}Sch\"odel R., Ott~T., Genzel~R. {\etal} 2002, Nature, 419, 694
483: \bibitem[2003]{sch03}Sch\"odel R., Ott~T., Genzel~R. {\etal} 2003, ApJ, 596, 1015
484: \bibitem[2006]{sch06}Sch\"odel R. {\etal} 2006, A\&A, submitted
485: %\bibitem[]{7400}Schmidt, M. 1963, Nature 197, 1040
486: %\bibitem[]{7500}Schwarzschild, K., 1916, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad.Wiss., 424
487: \bibitem[2005]{she05}Shen Z.~Q., Lo K.~Y., Liang M.~C., Ho P.~T.~P., Zhao J.~H. 2005, Nature, 438, 62
488: \bibitem[2005]{sub05}\v{S}ubr~L., Karas~V. 2005, A\&A, 433, 405
489: %\bibitem[]{7700}Townes,C.H.; Lacy,J.H.; Geballe, T. R., Hollenbach,D.J. 1982, Nature 301, 661
490: \bibitem[2005]{wei05}Weinberg N.~N., Milosavljevic M., Ghez A.~M. 2005, ApJ, 622, 878
491: %\bibitem[]{7900}Wheeler, J.A. 1968, Amer.Scient. 56, 1
492: %\bibitem[]{8000}Wizinovich, P. {\etal} 2006, in preparation
493: \bibitem[1977]{wol77}Wollman E.~R., Geballe T.~R., Lacy J.~H., Townes C.~H., Rank D.~M. 1977, ApJ, 218, L103
494: \bibitem[2003]{yua03}Yuan F., Quataert~E., Narayan~R. 2003, ApJ, 598, 301
495: \bibitem[2006]{yus06}Yusef-Zadeh F., Bushouse~H., Dowell C.~D {\etal} 2006, ApJ, 644, 198
496: \bibitem[2006]{zuc06}Zucker S., Alexander~T., Gillessen~S., Eisenhauer~F., Genzel~R. 2006, ApJ, 639, L21
497:
498: \end{thebibliography}
499:
500: \end{document}
501:
502: \discuss{Zden\v{e}k Stuchl\'{\i}k}{Do you observe any signs of interaction
503: between a gaseous disc and stars near the massive central black hole
504: in Sagittarius A*?}
505:
506: \discuss{Reinhard Genzel}{We have no observational evidence for such gaseous
507: disc. It might be there to some level -- Jorge Cuadra might discuss this
508: matter in more detail -- but we have been looking for it and it does not
509: appear to be present.}
510:
511: \discuss{Alexander Zakharov}{Is there a cusp in the center, e.g. within
512: the distance of S2-star orbit?}
513:
514: \discuss{Reinhard Genzel}{We are of course running out of counting
515: statistics, but a core is possible. Physical collisions should be likely
516: in that region.}
517:
518: \discuss{Thaisa Storchi-Bergmann}{Comment: In my presentation on
519: Friday, I will show that, as in the Galactic center, nearby galaxies,
520: when in inactive phase, exhibit nuclear stellar discs, while AGN matched
521: to the inactive galaxies in host galaxy properties exhibit instead
522: nuclear gas plus dust spirals.}
523:
524: \cleardoublepage
525: