1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \documentclass{emulateapj}
3:
4: %++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
5: % TITLE AND ABSTRACT
6: %++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
7:
8: \shorttitle{OBSERVATIONS OF H$_{2}$ EMISSION FROM AB AURIGAE}
9: \shortauthors{BITNER ET AL.}
10:
11: %\newcommand{\szero}{$J = 2-0 $}
12: %\newcommand{\sone}{$J = 3-1 $}
13: %\newcommand{\stwo}{$J = 4-2 $}
14: %\newcommand{\sfour}{$J = 6-4 $}
15:
16: \newcommand{\szero}{S(0)}
17: \newcommand{\sone}{S(1)}
18: \newcommand{\stwo}{S(2)}
19: \newcommand{\sfour}{S(4)}
20:
21:
22: \begin{document}
23:
24: \title{TEXES OBSERVATIONS OF PURE ROTATIONAL H$_{2}$ EMISSION FROM AB AURIGAE}
25:
26: \author{Martin A. Bitner\altaffilmark{1,2}, Matthew J. Richter\altaffilmark{2,3},
27: John H. Lacy\altaffilmark{1,2}, Thomas K. Greathouse\altaffilmark{2,4},
28: Daniel T. Jaffe\altaffilmark{1,2}, Geoffrey A. Blake\altaffilmark{5}}
29:
30:
31: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712;
32: mbitner@astro.as.utexas.edu, lacy@astro.as.utexas.edu, dtj@astro.as.utexas.edu}
33: \altaffiltext{2}{Visiting Astronomer at the Infrared Telescope Facility, which is operated by the University of Hawaii under Cooperative Agreement no. NCC 5-538 with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Science Mission Directorate, Planetary Astronomy Program.}
34: \altaffiltext{3}{Physics Department, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA 95616;
35: richter@physics.davis.edu}
36: \altaffiltext{4}{Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, TX 77058; greathouse@lpi.usra.edu}
37: \altaffiltext{5}{Division of Geological \& Planetary Sciences, California Institute
38: of Technology, MS 150-21, Pasadena, CA 91125; gab@gps.caltech.edu}
39:
40: \begin{abstract}
41: We present observations of pure rotational molecular hydrogen
42: emission from the Herbig Ae star, AB Aurigae.
43: Our observations were made using the Texas Echelon Cross Echelle
44: Spectrograph (TEXES) at the NASA Infrared Telescope Facility and the Gemini
45: North Observatory.
46: We searched for H$_{2}$ emission in the \sone, \stwo, and \sfour ~lines at
47: high spectral resolution and detected all three.
48: By fitting a simple model for the emission in the three
49: transitions, we derive T $= 670 \pm 40$ K and
50: M $=0.52 \pm 0.15$~M$_{\oplus}$ for the emitting gas.
51: Based on the 8.5 km s$^{-1}$ FWHM of the \stwo ~line, assuming the emission
52: comes from the circumstellar disk, and with an inclination estimate of the AB Aur
53: system taken from the literature, we place the location for the emission near 18 AU.
54: Comparison of our derived temperature to a disk structure model suggests
55: that UV and X-ray heating are important in heating the disk atmosphere.
56: \end{abstract}
57:
58: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
59: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
60: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
61: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
62:
63: \keywords{circumstellar matter, infrared:stars, stars:planetary systems,
64: protoplanetary disks, stars:individual(AB Aur), stars:pre-main sequence}
65:
66: %++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
67: % INTRODUCTION
68: %++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
69:
70: \section{INTRODUCTION}
71:
72: Disks around young stars are a natural part of the star
73: formation process and, as the likely site of planet
74: formation, have generated much interest.
75: A considerable
76: amount has been learned about the structure of circumstellar
77: disks through the study of dust emission and detailed modeling
78: of the spectral energy distributions (SED) of these stars.
79: However, if we assume the standard gas-to-dust ratio
80: for the interstellar medium, dust makes up only 1\% of the
81: mass of the disk.
82: Thus there is an interest in developing direct tracers of the gas component.
83: Studies of gas in disks have so far focused mainly on gas
84: at either large radii ($> 50$ AU), using observations at
85: submillimeter wavelengths \citep{semenov05}, or small radii,
86: using observations of near-infrared CO lines \citep{blake04,najita03}.
87: Mid-infrared spectral diagnostics may probe disks at
88: intermediate radii (1-10 AU) \citep{najita06}.
89:
90: Molecular hydrogen diagnostics are promising because they trace the dominant
91: constituent of the disk and so do not rely on conversion factors
92: to determine the mass of the emitting gas.
93: H$_{2}$ has been observed in circumstellar environments at ultraviolet
94: \citep{krull00} and near-infrared \citep{bary03} wavelengths.
95: These observations trace hot circumstellar gas, or gas excited
96: by fluorescent processes, and are therefore difficult to translate into gas
97: masses.
98: The pure rotational mid-infrared H$_{2}$ lines are useful probes
99: because the level populations should be in LTE at the local gas
100: temperature, and so line ratios allow determination of the
101: excitation temperature and mass of the warm gas.
102: The line ratios of the three low-J lines accessible from the ground are
103: sensitive to gas at temperatures of 200-800 K.
104: Other lines in the mid-infrared such as [NeII] at 12.8 $\mu$m
105: \citep{glassgold07}, [SI] at 25.2 $\mu$m and [FeII] at 26 $\mu$m
106: \citep{pascucci06} should be useful probes of
107: gas in disks but their interpretation requires detailed modeling.
108: Molecular hydrogen emission does not trace the cold, optically thick regions
109: of disks, and therefore estimates of the amount of warm gas based on
110: H$_{2}$ emission represent a lower limit to the total disk mass.
111: In order to see H$_{2}$ emission arising from a disk, the warm gas must be
112: either physically separated from optically thick dust or at a
113: different temperature.
114: These conditions can be met in the disk surface layer or in gaps or holes
115: in the disk.
116: In either case, gas can be physically separated (due to dust settling or clearing)
117: as well as thermally decoupled (due to lower densities) from the
118: dust and heated to a higher temperature by X-ray and UV radiation
119: \citep{glassgold04,gorti04,nomura05}.
120:
121: From the ground, three H$_{2}$ mid-infrared rotational lines are accessible:
122: \sone ~($\lambda = 17.035 ~\mu$m), \stwo ~($\lambda = 12.279 ~\mu$m), and
123: \sfour ~($\lambda = 8.025 ~\mu$m).
124: The high spectral resolution achievable with the Texas Echelon Cross
125: Echelle Spectrograph (TEXES; Lacy et al. 2002) is crucial for
126: these observations in order to separate the lines from nearby telluric
127: features and to maximize the line contrast against the dust continuum.
128: Observations at high spectral resolution also have the
129: advantage that, when coupled with information about the disk inclination,
130: they allow an estimate for the location of the emitting gas.
131: For emission lines with small equivalent width,
132: ground-based observations with TEXES can be more sensitive than
133: \textit{Spitzer} IRS observations.
134:
135: AB Aur is one of the brightest and thus one of the most well-studied of
136: the Herbig Ae stars.
137: It is located at a distance of 144 pc based on Hipparcos measurements
138: \citep{vanden98},
139: has a spectral type of A0-A1 \citep{hernandez04} and is surrounded
140: by a disk/envelope structure that extends to at least $r \sim 450$ AU \citep{mannings97}.
141: Observations at 11.7 and 18.7 $\mu$m by \citet{chen03} show that AB Aur
142: varies in the mid-infrared.
143: The mass of the star is 2.4 M$_\odot$ with an age of 2-4 Myr \citep{vanden98}.
144: AB Aur has a SED which is well-fit by the passive irradiated disk with puffed-up inner rim model of \citet{dullemond01}.
145: There have been a wide range of inclination estimates for AB Aur (see
146: Brittain et al. 2003 for an extended discussion of this issue).
147: Recent results by \citet{semenov05} derive an inclination of $17 ^{+6}_{-3}$ deg
148: for the AB Aur system by modeling millimeter observations. We will assume this
149: value for analysis of our data.
150:
151: Several attempts have been made to observe molecular hydrogen emission from
152: the disk of AB Aur.
153: \citet{thi01} claimed the detection of H$_{2}$ \szero ~and \sone ~emission associated with
154: the AB Aur system using the \textit{Infrared Space Observatory (ISO)}, but
155: subsequent observations from the ground with improved spatial resolution
156: were unable to confirm the emission \citep{richter02}.
157: \citet{richter02} and \citet{sheret03} saw some evidence of emission in the \stwo
158: ~line but the data quality was such that a definitive statement could not
159: be made.
160: They saw no evidence of the \sone ~line.
161: In this paper, we present definite detections of the \sone, \stwo, and \sfour ~lines.
162:
163: %++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
164: % OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION
165: %++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
166:
167: \section{OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION}
168:
169: All of the data were acquired using TEXES in its high-resolution mode on
170: the NASA Infrared Telescope Facility (IRTF) between December 2002
171: and October 2004 and on Gemini North in November 2006 under program ID
172: GN-2006B-Q-42.
173: Table~1 lists details of the observations.
174: We nodded the source along the slit to remove background sky emission.
175: We observed flux and telluric standards at each setting.
176: Other calibration files taken include blank sky and an ambient temperature
177: blackbody used to calibrate the wavelength and to flatfield the data.
178:
179: The data were reduced using the standard TEXES pipeline \citep{lacy02} which produces
180: wavelength-calibrated one dimensional spectra.
181: The TEXES pipeline data reduction gives a first order flux calibration.
182: However, because of the different slit illumination of the ambient temperature
183: blackbody and point sources, we observed flux standards to determine a correction factor.
184: We assumed that the slit illumination was the same for the target as for the flux
185: standard.
186: Guiding and seeing variations can introduce uncertainty into our flux calibration.
187:
188:
189: %++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
190: % RESULTS
191: %++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
192:
193: \section{RESULTS}
194: Figure~\ref{3linefit-fig} shows flux-calibrated spectra for all three
195: settings taken at the Gemini North Observatory.
196: Overplotted on each spectrum is a Gaussian with integrated line flux
197: equal to that derived from the best-fit model assuming the emission
198: arises from an isothermal mass of optically thin H$_{2}$ gas.
199: The three lines were fit simultaneously while varying the temperature
200: and mass of the emitting gas in the model.
201: For the simultaneous fitting, we adopted the FWHM and centroid of the \stwo ~line for all three lines.
202: The quoted errors for the temperature and mass are 1-$\sigma$ based on the contour plot of
203: the $\chi^{2}$ values.
204: Our best-fit model based on Gemini data has T~$=670 \pm 40$ K and M~$=0.52 \pm0.15 $~M$_{\oplus}$.
205: A similar analysis of our IRTF data, which consisted of a detection at \stwo ~and
206: upper limits for \sone ~and \sfour, gives T~$=630 \pm 60$ K and M~$=0.7 \pm0.2 $~M$_{\oplus}$.
207: Though within 2-$\sigma$ uncertainties, the lower measured \stwo ~flux observed at Gemini than from the
208: IRTF combined with the fact that our slit is smaller on the sky at Gemini suggests we may be
209: resolving out some of the flux we see at the IRTF.
210: To investigate this possibility, we examined spatial plots of our 2-D echellograms but found
211: no clear evidence for the existence of spatially resolved line emission.
212:
213: Table~2 contains a summary of our results.
214: We fit each line individually with a Gaussian to determine centroid, FWHM, and flux values.
215: The lines are all centered near the systemic velocity of AB Aur and have FWHM $\sim$10 km s$^{-1}$.
216: \citet{roberge01} find A$_{v}$ = 0.25 for AB Aur, so we assume no extinction at our wavelengths.
217: We quote equivalent widths in addition to line fluxes due
218: to uncertainty in the determination of the continuum level.
219: In an attempt to test how sensitive our temperature and mass estimates are to errors
220: in the flux calibration, we fit our data after normalizing to the continuum flux values
221: from ISO SWS observations of AB Aur \citep{meeus01}.
222: The resulting temperature and mass do not differ significantly from the values based on our
223: internal flux calibration.
224: We derive T $=630$ K and M $=0.71$~M$_{\oplus}$ when normalizing to the ISO continuum values of 13.1 Jy
225: at 8 $\mu$m, 21.0 Jy at 12 $\mu$m, and 30.8 Jy at 17 $\mu$m before fitting.
226: The upper limits for \sone ~and \sfour ~from the IRTF quoted in Table~2 are based on
227: a Gaussian fit at the expected position of each line plus a 1-$\sigma$ error.
228: The 1-$\sigma$ line flux errors were computed by summing over the number
229: of pixels corresponding to the FWHM of the lines in regions of the spectrum
230: with similar atmospheric transmission.
231:
232: Figure~\ref{popdia-fig} shows a population diagram based on our observations.
233: The points marked are based on the line fluxes derived from Gemini observations
234: listed in Table~2, and the error bars are 1-$\sigma$.
235: The overplotted solid line is not a fit to the population diagram; rather it
236: is based on the best-fit model temperature and mass.
237: Even though we only have three points, the deviation from a single temperature
238: (a straight line on this plot) is significant and may indicate that the emission
239: is coming from a mix of temperatures, as expected for a disk with a radial temperature
240: gradient.
241: We note that curvature in the population diagram can also occur if the ortho-to-para (OTP)
242: ratio is different from our assumed value of 3.
243: \citet{fuente99} derived a an OTP ratio between 1.5-2 for H$_{2}$ in a photodissociation
244: region with gas temperatures of 300-700 K.
245: However, the sense of the curvature in our population diagram would require an
246: OTP ratio greater than 3 to explain the increased \sone ~flux, which seems unlikely.
247: We discuss the derived temperature of the gas and its location in the next section.
248:
249: %++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
250: % DISCUSSION
251: %++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
252:
253: \section{DISCUSSION}
254:
255: We have detected all three mid-IR H$_{2}$ lines with good signal to noise.
256: The results are consistent with the previous upper limits and the 2-$\sigma$ detection
257: of the \stwo ~line \citep{richter02,sheret03}.
258: Our observations of all three lines allow us to put tighter
259: constraints on the temperature and mass of the emitting gas.
260: The analysis of our data has three components.
261: First, we determine a characteristic temperature of the emitting gas by fitting a simple model
262: to the three lines.
263: Second, we locate the position in the disk where the emission arises by comparing our observed
264: line profiles to line profiles calculated from a Keplerian disk model.
265: Finally, in order to comment on the structure of the disk, we compare our results to the predictions
266: of a well-established disk structure model which assumes well-mixed gas and dust at the same
267: temperature and find that, under such assumptions, we do not reproduce our observations.
268: This argues for the need for additional gas heating mechanisms which may come in the form
269: of X-ray and UV heating. The importance of UV and X-ray heating in the surface layers of
270: disks has been demonstrated observationally by \citet{bary03} and \citet{qi06}.
271:
272: The procedure used to derive a temperature of T~$=670 \pm 40$ K and mass of
273: M~$=0.52 \pm0.15$~M$_{\oplus}$ from a simulaneous fit to the H$_{2}$ \sone, \stwo, and \sfour
274: ~lines assumes the gas is optically thin and in LTE at a single temperature.
275: If the emission arises in the atmosphere of a disk where radial and vertical
276: temperature gradients exist, the derived temperature
277: should be considered a characteristic or average temperature.
278: In fact, Figure~\ref{popdia-fig} shows evidence that the emission arises in
279: gas at a mix of temperatures.
280: It should be noted that radial temperature gradients in a disk also affect the
281: detectability of various lines.
282: Since we are most sensitive to narrow emission lines, the \sone ~line, originating in
283: cooler gas farther out in the disk, is easier to detect than emission in the \sfour ~line.
284: Emission arising very close to the star from the inner rim of the disk would be
285: more difficult for us to detect at our high spectral resolution due to line broadening.
286:
287: Our derived temperature, 670 K, is in agreement with the
288: temperature found by \citet{richter02} who derived T $> 380$ K based on \stwo ~and
289: the upper limit on \sone.
290: \citet{brittain03} made observations toward AB Aur at 4.7 $\mu$m of
291: $^{12}$CO v = 1-0 emission.
292: The low-J lines in the resulting population diagram have a steeper slope,
293: interpreted as emission coming from cooler gas than the high-J lines.
294: Fits to the population diagrams assuming LTE gas give T $= 70$ K for the cool gas
295: and T $= 1540$ K for the hot gas.
296: The authors explain the hot CO emission as coming from the inner rim of the disk,
297: while the cool emission originates in the outer flared part of the disk after it
298: emerges from the inner rim's shadow.
299: \citet{blake04} also observed 4.7 $\mu$m CO emission from AB Aur.
300: Isothermal fits with T $\sim 800$ K are able to reproduce their line fluxes.
301: The line widths for the CO lines are generally broader than what we observed,
302: suggesting that the CO emission comes from smaller radii or outflowing gas
303: \citep{blake04}.
304:
305: Our derived mass, 0.52 ~M$_{\oplus}$, is four orders of magnitude less than the total
306: disk mass of AB Aur \citep{semenov05}.
307: This is partly due to the fact that AB Aur's disk is optically thick
308: at mid-infrared wavelengths \citep{sheret03}.
309: Most of the gas in the disk is hidden by optically thick dust and is also too cool
310: to emit at our wavelengths.
311: The mass we derive should therefore be interpreted as a lower limit to the amount
312: of warm gas on the surface of the disk facing us.
313:
314: By comparing the FWHM of our observed \stwo ~line profile with computed line profiles from a simple
315: Keplerian disk model, we derive an estimate of where the line emission originates.
316: We generate line profiles under the assumption of emission from a Keplerian disk
317: inclined at $17^\circ$ \citep{semenov05} orbiting a 2.4 M$_\odot$ star \citep{vanden98}
318: with equal emissivity at all points within an annulus 2 AU in extent.
319: We convolve the line profiles with our instrumental broadening function plus a thermal
320: broadening function based on our derived temperature, T = 670 K, and compare the
321: resulting FWHM of the line profiles to our observed \stwo ~line.
322: Under these assumptions, the line profiles imply that our emission arises near 18 AU in the disk.
323:
324: We used parameters for the disk based on the fit to AB Aurigae's SED from \citet{dullemond01}
325: as input to the vertical disk
326: structure model of \citet{dullemond02} in order to derive a grid of temperature
327: and density values as a function of disk radius and height above the midplane.
328: The \citet{dullemond01} model does an excellent job fitting the SED, although we note
329: that their derived inclination angle, $65^\circ$, is significantly larger than our assumed
330: value of $17^\circ$.
331: As noted in \citet{dullemond01}, the large discrepancy between their derived
332: inclination and what most observations suggest is probably due to the inclusion
333: in their SED model of a perfectly vertical inner rim which may not be physically accurate.
334: We input this radial and vertical temperature and density profile into an LTE radiative
335: transfer program.
336: We assume the gas is in LTE with the dust and compute the emergent
337: spectrum.
338: The emission lines produced by our model under these conditions are much weaker than
339: our observations.
340: This is not especially surprising given our assumption of well-mixed gas and dust at
341: the same temperature and suggests the need for additional gas heating mechanisms.
342:
343: The vertical structure model of \citet{dullemond02} is mainly concerned with modeling the
344: dust emission from disks.
345: By assuming equal gas and dust temperature, the gas only reaches a temperature of $\sim$ 260 K
346: at the top of the disk at 18 AU, much cooler than our derived temperature of 670 K.
347: To explain the observed emission, an additional mechanism is needed to heat the gas.
348: X-ray and UV heating are likely possibilities which can heat the gas to temperatures
349: significantly hotter than the dust.
350: \citet{glassgold07} computed the gas temperature in X-ray irradiated disks around T Tauri stars.
351: At 20 AU, the temperature can reach over 3000 K at the top of the disk before dropping to 500-2000 K
352: in a transition zone and then to much cooler temperatures deep in the disk.
353: \citet{nomura05} considered UV heating of protoplanetary disks and the resulting
354: molecular hydrogen emission.
355: The temperature in their model at 10 AU reaches over 1000 K and predicts an H$_{2}$ \stwo
356: ~line flux of $2 \times 10^{-15}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$, somewhat lower than our
357: observed flux, but their model was for a less massive star and disk.
358: H$_{2}$ emission could also arise in regions where there is spatial
359: separation of the gas from the dust due to dust settling or coagulation of dust
360: into larger particles.
361: The SED of AB Aur shows no evidence for gaps in the AB Aur disk and we are unable
362: to make definitive statements based on our observations.
363:
364: A UV-heated H$_{2}$ layer in a protostellar disk ought to exhibit at least some similarities
365: to the comparable hot layer at the surface of photodissociation regions (PDRs) with high
366: densities and strong radiation fields.
367: We therefore compare our observations of AB Aur with earlier mid-IR H$_{2}$ spectroscopy of the
368: Orion Bar PDR.
369: The UV field expressed in terms of the mean interstellar radiation field that was adopted
370: by \citet{allers05} ($3 \times 10^{4}$) is somewhat smaller than that expected at 18 AU
371: around an A0 star ($\sim 10^{5}$).
372: \citet{jonkheid07} have computed the strength of the UV field throughout a disk around a
373: Herbig Ae star finding values between $10^{5}$ - $10^{6}$ near the disk surface at 20 AU.
374: Our derived temperature, 670 K, is in the range of temperatures (400-700 K) derived for
375: the Orion bar PDR based on the H$_{2}$ \sone, \stwo, and \sfour
376: ~lines \citep{allers05}.
377: As shown in \citet{allers05}, the line ratios are determined by a complex mix of the temperature
378: gradient, H$_{2}$ abundance and dust properties.
379: As another check of the plausibility that the surface of AB Aur's disk is similar to a PDR, we computed
380: the surface brightnesses of our three lines.
381: Assuming our observed emission arises from an annulus 2 AU in extent centered at 18 AU, we
382: derive surface brightnesses of $\sim 10^{-5}$ ergs cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ sr$^{-1}$, roughly an order of
383: magnitude lower than those seen by \citep{allers05}.
384: However, \citet{allers05} estimated that their line intensities were brightened by a
385: factor of 10 since the Orion Bar PDR is seen nearly edge-on making our surface brightnesses
386: consistent with each other.
387:
388: \acknowledgements
389: We thank the Gemini staff, and John White in particular, for their support
390: in getting TEXES to work on Gemini North.
391: We thank Rob Robinson for useful discussions on the analysis of our data.
392: The development of TEXES was supported by grants from the NSF and the
393: NASA/USRA SOFIA project.
394: Modification of TEXES for use on Gemini was supported by Gemini
395: Observatory.
396: Observations with TEXES were supported by NSF grant AST-0607312.
397: This work is based on observations obtained at the Gemini Observatory,
398: which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in
399: Astronomy, Inc., under a cooperative agreement with the NSF on behalf
400: of the Gemini partnership: the National Science Foundation (United States),
401: the Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council (United Kingdom),
402: the National Research Council (Canada), CONICYT (Chile), the Australian
403: Research Council (Australia), CNPq (Brazil) and CONICET (Argentina).
404:
405: %++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
406: % REFERENCES
407: %++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
408:
409: \begin{thebibliography}{}
410:
411: \bibitem[Allers et al.(2005)]{allers05}
412: Allers, K.N., Jaffe, D.T., Lacy, J.H., Draine, B.T.,\& Richter, M.J.
413: 2005, \apj, 630, 368
414:
415: \bibitem[Bary et al.(2003)]{bary03}
416: Bary, J.S., Weintraub, D.A., \& Kastner, J.H.
417: 2003, \apj, 586, 1136
418:
419: \bibitem[Beckwith et al.(1990)]{beckwith90}
420: Beckwith, S.V.W., Sargent, A.I., Chini, R.S., \& Guesten, R.
421: 1990, \aj, 99, 924
422:
423: \bibitem[Blake \& Boogert(2004)]{blake04}
424: Blake, G.A., \& Boogert, A.C.A.
425: 2004, \apj, 606, L73
426:
427: \bibitem[Brittain et al.(2003)]{brittain03}
428: Brittain, S.D., Rettig, T.W., Simon, T., Kulesa, C., DiSanti, M.A.,
429: \& Dello Russo, N.
430: 2003, \apj, 588, 535
431:
432: \bibitem[Chen \& Jura(2003)]{chen03}
433: Chen, C.H., \& Jura, M.
434: 2003, \apj, 591, 267
435:
436: \bibitem[Dullemond et al.(2001)]{dullemond01}
437: Dullemond, C.P., Dominik, D. \& Natta, A.
438: 2001, \apj, 560, 957
439:
440: \bibitem[Dullemond et al.(2002)]{dullemond02}
441: Dullemond, C.P., van Zadelhoff, G.J. \& Natta, A.
442: 2002, \aap, 389, 464
443:
444: \bibitem[Fuente et al.(1999)]{fuente99}
445: Fuente, A., Mart\'in-Pintado, J., Rodr\'iguez-Fern\'andez, N.J.,
446: Rodr\'iguez-Franco, A., De Vicente, P., \& Kunze, D.
447: 1999, \apj, 518, L45
448:
449: \bibitem[Glassgold et al.(2004)]{glassgold04}
450: Glassgold, A.E., Najita, J. \& Igea, J.
451: 2004, \apj, 615, 972
452:
453: \bibitem[Glassgold et al.(2007)]{glassgold07}
454: Glassgold, A.E., Najita, J. \& Igea, J.
455: 2007, \apj, 656, 515
456:
457: \bibitem[Gorti \& Hollenbach(2004)]{gorti04}
458: Gorti, U. \& Hollenbach, D.
459: 2004, \apj, 613, 424
460:
461: \bibitem[Hern\'andez et al.(2004)]{hernandez04}
462: Hern\'andez, J., Calvet, N., Brice\~no, C. Hartmann, L., \& Berlind, P.
463: 2004, \aj, 127, 1682
464:
465: \bibitem[Johns-Krull et al.(2000)]{krull00}
466: Johns-Krull, C.M., Valenti, J.A., \& Linsky, J.L.
467: 2000, \apj, 539, 815
468:
469: \bibitem[Jonkheid et al.(2007)]{jonkheid07}
470: Jonkheid, B., Dullemond, C.P., Hogerheijde,M.R., \& van Dishoeck, E.F.
471: 2007, \aap, 463, 203
472:
473: \bibitem[Lacy et al.(2002)]{lacy02}
474: Lacy, J.H., Richter, M.J., Greathouse, T.K., Jaffe, D.T., \& Zhu, Q.
475: 2002, \apj, 114, 153
476:
477: \bibitem[Mannings \& Sargent(1997)]{mannings97}
478: Mannings, V., \& Sargent, A.I.
479: 1997, \apj, 490, 792
480:
481: \bibitem[Meeus et al.(2001)]{meeus01}
482: Meeus, G., Waters, L.B.F.M., Bouwman, J., van den Ancker, M.E., Waelkens, C.,
483: Malfait, K.
484: 2001, \aap, 365, 476
485:
486: \bibitem[Najita et al.(2003)]{najita03}
487: Najita, J., Carr, J.S., \& Mathieu, R.D.
488: 2003, \apj, 589, 931
489:
490: \bibitem[Najita et al.(2006)]{najita06}
491: Najita, J.R., Carr, J.S., Glassgold, A.E.,Valenti, J.A. 2006,
492: in \textit{Protostars and Planets V}, ed. B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt,
493: K. Keil. (Tucson: University of Arizona Press), 507
494:
495: \bibitem[Nomura \& Millar(2005)]{nomura05}
496: Nomura, H., \& Millar, T.J.
497: 2005, \aap, 438, 923
498:
499: \bibitem[Pascucci et al.(2006)]{pascucci06}
500: Pascucci, I. et al.
501: 2006, \apj, 651, 1177
502:
503: \bibitem[Qi et al.(2006)]{qi06}
504: Qi, C., Wilner, D.J., Calvet, N., Bourke, T.L., Blake, G.A.,
505: Hogerheijde, M.R., Ho, P.T.P., \& Bergin, E.
506: 2006, \apj, 636, L157
507:
508: \bibitem[Richter et al.(2002)]{richter02}
509: Richter, M. J., Jaffe, D. T., Blake, G. A.,
510: \& Lacy, J. H.
511: 2002, \apj, 572, L161
512:
513: \bibitem[Roberge et al.(2001)]{roberge01}
514: Roberge, A. et al.
515: 2001, \apj, 551, L97
516:
517: \bibitem[Semenov et al.(2005)]{semenov05}
518: Semenov, D., Pavlyuchenkov, Y., Schreyer, K.,
519: Henning, T., Dullemond, C., \& Bacmann, A.
520: 2005, \apj, 621, 853
521:
522: \bibitem[Sheret et al.(2003)]{sheret03}
523: Sheret, I., Ramsey Howat, S.K., \& Dent, W.R.F.
524: 2003, \mnras, 343, L65
525:
526: \bibitem[Thi et al.(2001)]{thi01}
527: Thi, W.F. et al.
528: 2001, \apj, 561, 1074
529:
530: \bibitem[van den Ancker et al.(1998)]{vanden98}
531: van den Ancker, M.E., de Winter, D., \& Tjin A Djie, H.R.E.
532: 1998, \aap, 330, 145
533:
534: \end{thebibliography}
535:
536: %++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
537: % FIGURE CAPTIONS
538: %++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
539:
540: \clearpage
541:
542: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccc}
543: %preamble commands
544: %\tabletypesize{small}
545: %\rotate
546: %\tablewidth{dimen}
547: %\tablenum{text}
548: %\tablecolumns{num}
549: %\tableheadfrac{num}
550: \tablecaption{Observing Parameters\label{tab:obs}}
551: \tablehead{
552: \colhead{Date} &
553: \colhead{Telescope} &
554: \colhead{Line\tablenotemark{a}} &
555: \colhead{Resolving Power\tablenotemark{b}} &
556: \colhead{Slit Width\tablenotemark{c}} &
557: \colhead{Integration Time}\\
558: &
559: &
560: &
561: \colhead{($R\equiv \lambda/ \delta \lambda$)} &
562: \colhead{(arcsec, AU)} &
563: \colhead{(s)}
564: }
565:
566: \startdata
567: %table data
568: Dec 2002 & IRTF & \sone & 60,000 & 2.0, 288 & 2591 \\
569: Dec 2002 & IRTF & \stwo & 85,000 & 1.4, 202 & 4792 \\
570: Dec 2003 & IRTF & \stwo & 81,000 & 1.4, 202 & 2072 \\
571: Oct 2004 & IRTF & \sfour & 88,000 & 1.4, 202 & 8549 \\
572: Nov 2006 & Gemini & \sone & 80,000 & 0.81, 117 & 2007 \\
573: Nov 2006 & Gemini & \stwo & 100,000 & 0.54, 78 & 2072 \\
574: Nov 2006 & Gemini & \sfour & 100,000 & 0.54, 78 & 1295 \\
575:
576: \enddata
577: \tablenotetext{a}{\sone\ is at 587.0324~cm$^{-1}$. \stwo\ is at
578: 814.4246~cm$^{-1}$. \sfour\ is at 1246.098~cm$^{-1}$. }
579: \tablenotetext{b}{The resolving power is deduced from
580: observations of stratospheric emission from Titan or Saturn
581: at similar frequencies or
582: unresolved emission lines in a low pressure gas cell.}
583: \tablenotetext{c}{The slit width in AU is calculated at AB Aur's
584: distance of 144 pc.}
585: \end{deluxetable}
586:
587: \clearpage
588:
589: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccc}
590: %preamble commands
591: %\tabletypesize{small}
592: %\rotate
593: %\tablewidth{5.0in}
594: %\tablenum{text}
595: %\tablecolumns{num}
596: %\tableheadfrac{num}
597: \tablecaption{Summary of Results\label{tab:res}}
598: \tablehead{
599: \colhead{Telescope} &
600: \colhead{$\lambda$} &
601: \colhead{F$_{\nu}$} &
602: \colhead{Line Flux} &
603: \colhead{Equivalent Width} &
604: \colhead{FWHM}\\
605: &
606: \colhead{($\mu$m)}&
607: \colhead{(Jy)} &
608: \colhead{($10^{-14}$ ~ergs ~s$^{-1}$ ~cm$^{-2}$)} &
609: \colhead{(km ~s$^{-1}$)} &
610: \colhead{(km ~s$^{-1}$)}
611: }
612:
613: \startdata
614: %table data
615: & 8 & 12.9 (1.1) & $<1.2$ & ... & ... \\
616: IRTF & 12 & 13.3 (0.4) & 0.93 (0.25) & 0.86 (0.23) & 7.0 \\
617: & 17 & 25.2 (1.8) & $<1.1$ & ... & ... \\
618: & 8 & 12.7 (0.4) & 1.47 (0.34) & 0.93 (0.21) & 10.4 \\
619: Gemini & 12 & 14.7 (0.3) & 0.53 (0.07) & 0.44 (0.06) & 8.5 \\
620: & 17 & 24.6 (0.4) & 1.1 (0.30) & 0.76 (0.21) & 9.0 \\
621:
622: \enddata
623:
624: \end{deluxetable}
625:
626: \clearpage
627:
628: \begin{figure}
629: \plotone{f1.eps}
630: \caption{Regions of the three H$_{2}$ pure rotational lines available from the ground.
631: The data shown were obtained at Gemini North in November 2006 under Gemini
632: program GN-2006B-Q-42.
633: Each spectrum has been flux-calibrated.
634: The lines were individually fit with a Gaussian to determine their centroid,
635: flux, and FWHM.
636: The lines are all centered near the systemic velocity of AB Aur and have FWHM
637: $\sim$10 km s$^{-1}$.
638: Line fluxes are listed in Table~2.
639: The overplotted Gaussians are based on the simultaneous fit and are not the individual fits
640: to each line.
641: The three spectral regions were simultaneously fit with a model assuming the
642: observed emission arises from a mass of H$_{2}$ gas at a single temperature.
643: The best-fit model with T = 670 K and H$_{2}$ mass = 0.52 M$_{\oplus}$ is overplotted.
644: \label{3linefit-fig}
645: }
646: \end{figure}
647:
648: \clearpage
649:
650: \begin{figure}
651: \includegraphics[scale=.80,angle=90]{f2.ps}
652: \caption
653: {Population diagram based on Gemini North observations.
654: The points marked are based on fluxes derived by fitting a Gaussian to each of the lines and
655: shown with 1-$\sigma$ error bars.
656: The overplotted solid line is not a fit to the population diagram; rather it is
657: based on the best-fit model temperature and mass found by simultaneously fitting
658: all three lines.
659: The deviation of the points from the single-temperature line is significant and
660: suggests that the emission may arise from gas at a range of temperatures.
661: \label{popdia-fig}
662: }
663: \end{figure}
664:
665:
666: \end{document}
667: