1: %
2: % GV Tau HCN, C2H2, CO Paper
3: %
4: % Version date: 12 January 2004
5: %
6: %-------------------------------------------------
7:
8: %\documentclass[12pt]{article}
9: %\documentclass{aastex} % manuscript format
10: %\documentclass[preprint]{aastex} % manuscript format
11: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex} % manuscript format
12: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
13: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}
14:
15: %
16: %\received{RECEIVED DATE}
17: %\revised{REVISION DATE}
18: %\accepted{ACCEPTED DATE}
19: %\cpright{TYPE}{YEAR}
20: %\journalid{VOL}{JOURNAL DATE}
21: %\articleid{START PAGE}{END PAGE}
22: %\paperid{MANUSCRIPT ID}
23: %\ccc{CODE}
24: %
25:
26: \newcommand{\etal}{et~al.}
27: \newcommand{\mic}{~$\mu$m}
28: \newcommand{\water}{H$_2$O}
29: \newcommand{\methane}{CH$_4$}
30: \newcommand{\acetylene}{C$_2$H$_2$}
31: \newcommand{\ee}[1]{$\times\ 10^{#1}$}
32: \newcommand{\wvn}{\,cm$^{-1}$}
33: \newcommand{\pcmsq}{$\,$cm$^{-2}$}
34:
35: % use this to say : "submitted to whomever on such-and-such a date"
36: % for now, show the version date
37: %\slugcomment{Version date: \today}
38:
39: %\received{2003 August 22}
40: %\received{2004 February 26}
41: \begin{document}
42: %
43: \title{Warm HCN, \acetylene, and CO in the disk of GV Tau}
44: %
45: \author{E. L. Gibb, K. A. Van Brunt}
46: \affil{Dept. of Physics \& Astronomy, University of Missouri - St. Louis, 8001 Natural Bridge Rd, St. Louis, MO, 63121}
47: %
48: \author{S. D. Brittain}
49: \affil{Dept. of Physics \& Astronomy, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29631}
50: %
51: \author{T. W. Rettig}
52: \affil{Dept. of Physics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556}
53: %
54:
55: \begin{abstract}
56:
57: We present the first high-resolution, ground-based observations of
58: HCN and \acetylene\ toward the T Tauri binary star system GV Tau.
59: We detected strong absorption due to HCN $\nu_3$ and weak
60: \acetylene\ ($\nu_3$ and $\nu_2 + (\nu_4 + \nu_5)^0_+$) absorption
61: toward the primary (GV Tau S) but not the infrared companion. We
62: also report CO column densities and rotational temperatures, and
63: present abundances relative to CO of HCN/CO $\sim$~0.6\% and
64: \acetylene/CO $\sim$~1.2\% and an upper limit for \methane/CO $<$
65: 0.37\% toward GV Tau S. Neither HCN nor \acetylene\ were detected
66: toward the infrared companion and results suggest that abundances
67: may differ between the two sources.
68:
69: \end{abstract}
70:
71: \keywords{infrared: ISM --- ISM: abundances ---
72: ISM: molecules --- stars: protoplanetary disks }
73:
74: \section{Introduction}
75:
76: GV Tau (Haro 6-10, IRAS 04263$+$2426) is an unusual young T Tauri
77: binary system partly embedded in the L1524 molecular cloud. It is one
78: of a small number of young binaries for which the primary (GV Tau S)
79: is optically visible and the infrared companion (IRC, GV Tau N),
80: located 1$\farcs$2 to the north, is strongly extincted. The spectral
81: energy distribution (SED) of the primary is flat or rising in the
82: 1--100~\mic\ range, suggesting that it is a class I object
83: \citep{kore99}. \citet{lein89} found that the IRC was generally
84: brighter than the primary at wavelengths longer than $\sim$4~\mic. It
85: has also been found that the system is variable, particularly in the
86: near infrared, and on timescales as short as a month
87: \citep{lein01,kore99}. \citet{lein01} found that the primary became
88: redder as it became fainter at K. Also, the depth of the 3~\mic\ ice
89: band was found to vary with time, and their results suggested that an
90: increase in optical depth corresponded to a decrease in K brightness.
91: Both of these measurements are consistent with the dominant mechanism
92: of the variability of GV Tau S being due to inhomogeneities in
93: circumstellar material that result in changes in extinction. The
94: behavior for the IRC is more complex and suggests the possibility of
95: variable accretion mechanisms \citep{lein01}.
96:
97: The system shows a parsec-scale Herbig-Haro flow with a well-defined
98: axis, as well as other smaller flows, one of which is associated with
99: the IRC, and one that does not appear to be associated with either
100: object \citep{devi99}. Near-infrared emission images suggest the
101: presence of a flattened circumbinary envelope with a semi-major axis
102: of $\sim$1000--1500~AU seen nearly edge-on as the source of the
103: observed polarization and part of the extinction toward both objects
104: \citep{mena93}. We note that their observations do not exclude the
105: additional presence of circumstellar disks around one or both objects.
106:
107: In this paper we report high-resolution near-infrared detections of
108: CO, HCN, and \acetylene\ toward GV Tau S. For the IRC, CO was
109: detected in absorption, but HCN and \acetylene\ were not. In section 2
110: we discuss the observations and data analysis. In section 3 we
111: present the results of analysis for HCN, \acetylene, and CO, along
112: with upper limits for \methane. Results are discussed in section 4.
113:
114: \section{Observations and data reduction}
115:
116: High-dispersion, infrared observations of GV Tau were taken with the
117: cryogenic echelle spectrometer NIRSPEC at the 10-meter W. M. Keck
118: Observatory on Mauna Kea, Hawaii \citep{mcle98}. NIRSPEC provides a
119: resolving power of $\sim$25,000, which allows for the clean separation
120: of fundamental and excited states of $^{12}$CO, $^{13}$CO, and
121: C$^{18}$O as well as the $\nu_3$ band of HCN and two strong bands of
122: \acetylene ($\nu_3$ and $\nu_2 + (\nu_4+\nu_5)^0_+$).
123: Table~\ref{table1} presents the spectral settings, wavelength
124: coverage, and integration times for the spectral orders analyzed in
125: this paper. The M- and K-band data covering the fundamental and
126: overtone transitions of CO, respectively, were acquired in March and
127: August 2003. KL band spectra were obtained on February 17-18, 2006 to
128: search for gas phase absorptions due to organic species toward GV Tau.
129: The infrared companion of GV Tau was observed simultaneously during
130: the February 17, 2006 and March 2003 observations, enabling us to
131: characterize the spectra toward both objects.
132:
133: Our reduction and analysis procedures are discussed in
134: \citet{disa01,brit03}. We summarize them below. Observations at L
135: and particularly at M band are dominated by a thermal ($\sim$300 K)
136: background with sky emission lines superposed. In order cancel
137: atmospheric and background effects, we nodded the telescope between
138: positions one quarter of the way from the top and bottom of the slit,
139: our "A" and "B" positions, respectively. Each exposure corresponded
140: to one minute of integration time. Telluric lines were cancelled to
141: first order by combining observations as \{A-B-B+A\}/2. A series of
142: flats and darks was taken for each grating setting. After
143: flatfielding and dark subtraction, systematically hot and dead pixels
144: and cosmic ray hits were removed and the data were resampled to align
145: the spectral and spatial dimensions along rows and columns,
146: respectively. Examples of extracted spectra are shown in
147: Figures~\ref{fig1} and \ref{fig2}. The individual lines of each
148: molecule are labeled.
149:
150: The atmospheric transmittance function was modeled using the Spectrum
151: Synthesis Program \citep[SSP]{kund74}, which accesses the updated
152: HITRAN 2000 molecular database \citep{roth03}. For each grating
153: setting, the column burdens of atmospheric species, the spectral
154: resolving power, and the wavelength calibrations were established by
155: fitting the optimized model. To extract our spectral absorption
156: features, we subtracted the model, convolved to the resolution of the
157: instrument, from the spectral extract. This results in a residual
158: that is still convolved to the telluric spectrum. For intrinsically
159: narrow lines, we obtain the true line intensity incident at the top of
160: the terrestrial atmosphere by dividing each spectral line by the
161: transmittance at the Doppler shifted position using the fully resolved
162: model. The optimized model is shown as the dashed line in
163: Figures~\ref{fig1} and \ref{fig2} and has been found to reproduce the
164: telluric spectrum accurately.
165:
166: We note that the relative continuum brightnesses of the primary and
167: companion varied significantly between our 2003 and 2006 observations.
168: In particular, the IRC was fainter than GV Tau S through the
169: 2--5~\mic\ region. Both objects are known to vary in the infrared
170: \citep{lein01} and the variations are thought to be due primarily to
171: variable amounts of intervening gas and dust, essentially clumpy
172: circumbinary material. \citet{lein01} reported that GV Tau S got
173: slightly fainter at M band over the period from 1993-2000 while the
174: IRC was found to get brighter during the same time interval. A
175: similar trend was seen for both objects at L'. In SpeX data acquired
176: in November 2004, the infrared companion was substantially fainter
177: than GV Tau S throughout the 2-5~\mic\ region. This was also true for
178: our 3.3~\mic\ observations in 2006. Nonetheless, we were able to
179: extract spectra from both GV Tau S and its IRC.
180:
181: The extinction toward GV Tau S is relatively small (A$_V$ $\sim$5.6
182: mag) and thus we may also be detecting stellar photospheric absorption
183: lines. To check for possible photospheric lines, we compared our
184: spectral type K3 GV Tau spectra \citep{good86} to a high-resolution K2
185: spectrum of Arcturus \citep{hink95}. The Arcturus spectrum was
186: Doppler shifted to the geocentric velocity of GV Tau as determined by
187: our HCN and CO observations, which were found to be consistent with
188: the heliocentric velocity measured by \citet{whit04}, and convolved to
189: the resolution of our NIRSPEC data. Broad (consistent the rotational
190: broadening reported by \citet{whit04}) absorption lines corresponding
191: to photospheric OH and NH were present toward GV Tau S (indicated by
192: crosses and asterisks in Figure~2). Contaminated lines were
193: eliminated from our analysis. The remaining absorption features were
194: measured by fitting a Gaussian profile to calculate the equivalent
195: width.
196:
197: \section{Molecular Absorptions Toward GV Tau}
198:
199: \subsection{CO gas spectra}
200:
201: \subsubsection{GV Tau S}
202: For GV Tau S, the fundamental ro-vibrational lines of $^{12}$CO,
203: $^{13}$CO, and C$^{18}$O near 4.67~\mic\ and the overtone bands near
204: 2.3~\mic\ were observed in absorption in March and August 2003,
205: respectively (Figure 1). Absorption line studies have the advantage
206: of measuring physical conditions in a pencil-beam column of gas along
207: the line of sight to the emitting source, usually the star and inner
208: accretion disk. This allows us to sample a long path length through
209: the edge-on circumbinary envelope and circumstellar disk. The
210: rotational temperatures and column densities of the different bands
211: and isotopes of CO were derived using a population analysis and are
212: presented in Figure~3 and Table~2. The overall rotational temperature
213: found for CO toward GV Tau S is $\sim$200~K, somewhat warmer than that
214: found for HCN (section 3.2), though within 3-sigma for the overtone
215: lines and lines of C$^{18}$O, and consistent with the T$_{rot}$ found
216: for \acetylene\ (section 3.4). This is also similar to the warm
217: ($\sim$100~K) temperatures we find toward other flared disk systems
218: \citep{rett06} and implies that the gas is located in the inner,
219: potentially planet forming ($\sim$10~AU or so) region of the
220: circumstellar disk rather than in the more distant interstellar or
221: circumbinary material. The column density of $^{12}$CO was found to
222: be (5.9 $\pm$ 1.2) x 10$^{18}$~\pcmsq\ based on an analysis of the
223: overtone lines, which are optically thin. The fundamental lines of CO
224: are optically thick and require a curve of growth analysis.
225:
226: We found $^{12}$CO/$^{13}$CO to be 54 $\pm$ 15, consistent with that
227: measured toward Orion A \citep[67 $\pm$ 3]{lang90} and that found
228: toward the young star HL Tau \citep[76 $\pm$ 9]{brit05}. The
229: $^{12}$CO/C$^{18}$O ratio is 420 $\pm$ 170, somewhat lower than toward
230: Orion \citep[$\sim$660]{lang90}, HL Tau \citep[800 $\pm$ 200]{brit05},
231: and the canonical interstellar value of 560 $\pm$ 25 found by
232: \citet{wils94}. We would expect the isotopic abundance ratios to
233: reflect the isotopic composition of the dense cloud unless influenced
234: by a mechanism such as selective dissociation \citep{lyon05}, which
235: may occur since the isotopomers are not self-shielded as effectively
236: as $^{12}$CO. This effect does not seem to be evident toward GV Tau.
237:
238: \subsubsection{IRC}
239:
240: The infrared companion was observed at M band in March 2003, but was
241: not placed in the slit during the K-band observations. The IRC was
242: resolved and $^{13}$CO was detected, though C$^{18}$O was not. We
243: estimate that the $^{12}$CO column density is
244: $\sim$3x10$^{18}$~\pcmsq, assuming that the $^{12}$CO/$^{13}$CO ratio
245: toward the two objects is the same. This assumption seems reasonable,
246: given that the $^{12}$CO lines toward the IRC are about half as strong
247: as those toward GV Tau S, and in order to bring N($^{12}CO$) for the
248: IRC in agreement with the primary, the $^{12}$CO/$^{13}$CO ratio would
249: have to be a factor of two higher. Future observations of the
250: overtone CO lines toward the IRC are planned to directly measure
251: $^{12}$CO.
252:
253: \subsection{HCN gas}
254:
255: \subsubsection{GV Tau S}
256:
257: Rather strong absorption lines due to the HCN (100-000) band near
258: 3.0~\mic\ were detected toward GV Tau S. Spectral extracts are shown in
259: Figure 2. The geocentric Doppler shifted positions (+49 km/s) of the
260: HCN absorption lines and the specific identifications are indicated by
261: solid ticks. We performed a rotational analysis on absorption
262: features that were at transmittance $>$80\%, were not blended with
263: \acetylene\ transitions (also indicated in Figure 2), and were clear
264: of contamination from stellar absorption features as determined from a
265: comparison to the similar spectral type high-resolution Arcturus
266: spectrum of \citet{hink95}. There were a total of 10 lines that
267: satisfied these criteria, ranging from J=0-7.
268:
269: Einstein A's and line positions were taken from the ab initio line
270: list calculated by \citet{harr02}, which expanded on previous line
271: lists and improved accuracy by using the most accurate potential
272: energy surface and dipole moment surface information available. The
273: population diagram is shown in Figure 4. The Doppler shifted
274: positions and equivalent widths used are given in Table 3.
275:
276: We note that the lines in our analysis are optically thin for most
277: reasonable values of the intrinsic line widths (b). For example, the
278: R6 line is optically thin ($\tau < 1$) for all b $>$ 1.7 km/s. For
279: R1, $\tau > 1$ is achieved only for b $<$ 0.9 km/s. \citet{brit05}
280: found b = 1.3$\pm$0.1 for CO toward HL Tau. \citep{lahu06} find that
281: no good fit can be made to the \acetylene\ and CO profiles for b $<$ 2
282: km/s. \citet{boog02} find that 0.8$<$b$<$1.5 km/s toward L1489 to
283: explain the CO observations. If we make a reasonable assumption that
284: b$>$1 km/s, then our absorptions are optically thin. This is also
285: supported by the linearity of the population diagram. From this, we
286: derive a rotational temperature of 115$^{+11}/_{-10}$~K and a total
287: HCN column density of (3.7$\pm$0.3) x 10$^{16}$~\pcmsq\ toward GV Tau
288: S. Comparing this to the CO column density (section 3.1) provides an
289: HCN/CO $\sim$ 0.63\%
290:
291: \subsubsection{IRC}
292:
293: Interestingly, HCN absorption was not seen toward the infrared
294: companion star. If we assume the same T$_{rot}$ as found for the
295: primary (115~K), the 3-sigma upper limit for the HCN column density
296: toward the infrared companion is 4.8 x 10$^{15}$~\pcmsq, a factor of
297: about 8 lower than the primary. The estimated CO column density
298: toward the IRC is a factor of two less than toward GV Tau S. If we
299: assume that the CO absorption originates in the inner circumstellar
300: disk of each object, then the resulting difference in HCN column
301: densities implies that HCN is at least a factor of four less abundant
302: toward the IRC. This result is important. The fact that the HCN
303: column density is significantly lower toward the IRC is a strong
304: constraint that argues for the HCN being located in the warm inner
305: disk of the primary, rather than in the interstellar medium or the
306: circumbinary material that surrounds both objects.
307:
308: This result may suggest that there are significant compositional
309: differences between the inner disk ($\sim$10~AU or so) material toward
310: the two objects. However, we point out that caution must be used when
311: comparing the primary to the IRC. There is no a priori reason to
312: assume the same gas temperature toward both objects if the gas is
313: associated with a circumstellar disk rather than the circumbinary
314: material. The IRC was not located in the slit during our KL2
315: observation (Table~1). This means that only the J$<$8 transitions of
316: HCN were covered. Due to the fact that only low J lines were sampled
317: toward the IRC, the upper limit is less constrained for higher
318: temperatures. For example, if we assume T=400~K, then the upper limit
319: for N(HCN) becomes $\sim$1.1x10$^{17}$~\pcmsq.
320:
321: \subsection{\methane\ Gas}
322:
323: We attempted to detect \methane\ in our KL, order 25 setting, which
324: covered several transitions. With a geocentric Doppler shift of +49
325: km/s during the observations, the lines should have been shifted out
326: of the telluric features to transmittances ranging from $\sim$60\% for
327: P2 up to $\sim$80\% for R0 and P1 to 86\% for R1. From this, we
328: calculated a 3-sigma upper limit for the \methane\ column density of
329: $<$2.2 x 10$^{16}$~\pcmsq\ using the methodology discussed in
330: \citet{gibb04} and assuming the same rotational temperature as that
331: found for HCN (115~K). When compared with the HCN and CO we find that
332: \methane/HCN $<$ 60\% and \methane/CO $<$ 0.37\%. This is not as well
333: constrained as the gas phase \methane/CO ratio found for HL Tau
334: \citep{gibb04}, but it is still substantially smaller than the overall
335: \methane/CO ratio found for comets \citep{gibb03} and somewhat lower
336: than reported for \methane/CO (ice+gas) for massive YSOs by
337: \citet{boog97,boog98}.
338:
339: \subsection{\acetylene\ Gas}
340:
341: There are two comparably strong bands of acetylene in the 3~\mic\
342: region: the $\nu_3$ band centered at 3294.84~\wvn\ and the $\nu_2$ +
343: $(\nu_4 + \nu_5)^0_+$ band centered at 3281.90~\wvn\ (see
344: \citet{jacq03} and references therein). Ordinarily, the $\nu_3$ band
345: would be 1100 times stronger than the combination mode. However, a
346: Fermi resonance between the two bands causes the combination band to
347: become slightly stronger than the $\nu_3$ band \citep{vand93}.
348:
349: From the analysis of the 3~\mic\ spectra (Figure 2), a number of
350: unblended lines of \acetylene\ are detected at relatively good
351: transmittance ($>$80\%). The positions of individual \acetylene\
352: lines are indicated in Figure 3 (dot-dash ticks). We analyzed 15
353: unblended lines with high transmittance from the $\nu_2$ + $(\nu_4 +
354: \nu_5)^0_+$ band and 4 lines of the $\nu_3$ band to determine the
355: column density (Figure 5, Table 4). We also checked for possible
356: contamination due to stellar photospheric features by comparison with
357: an Arcturus spectrum. The rotational temperature analysis yielded a
358: T$_{rot}$ = 170$^{+19}/_{-16}$~K, which is consistent with those found
359: for HCN and CO within the uncertainty, and a total column density of
360: (7.3$^{+0.1}/_{-0.2}$) x 10$^{16}$~\pcmsq. These values are
361: consistent with the non-detection of the $\nu_3$ P18 line, which is at
362: 97\% transmittance and unblended. The predicted equivalent width of
363: P18, based on the fit in Figure 5, is 0.0011~\wvn, within the 1-sigma
364: noise limit of 0.0014~\wvn.
365:
366: \section{Discussion}
367:
368: We investigated the composition of several organic molecules toward
369: the binary T Tauri system GV Tau. Such species as HCN, \acetylene,
370: and \methane\ are key to understanding the chemical compositions and
371: evolution of the volatile material that becomes incorporated into the
372: planet forming regions of disks around young stars. We detected HCN
373: and \acetylene\ toward the primary and provide upper limits for the
374: IRC. This is only the second reported detection of these species in
375: the gas phase toward a low mass T Tauri star. The first reported
376: detection of these molecules was via Spitzer IRS observations toward
377: IRS 46 in the $\rho$ Ophiuchus cloud \citep{lahu06}. The warm
378: temperatures ($\sim$400~K for HCN and $\sim$800~K for \acetylene)
379: suggested a possible disk origin for the absorptions, but were not
380: definitive as \citet{lahu06} could not distinguish whether the gas was
381: located in the disk or a jet.
382:
383: \subsection{Location of the Gas Toward GV Tau}
384:
385: In February 2006, HCN was detected toward the primary (GV Tau S,
386: Fig.~\ref{fig2}). However for the IRC, which was observed
387: simultaneously, the lack of a detection suggests a significant lower
388: total column density if we assume the same rotational temperature.
389: Similarly, the CO spectra toward GV Tau S and the IRC are
390: significantly different, suggesting a factor of two difference in
391: column density, resulting in a factor of at least four lower abundance
392: toward the IRC. This result is a strong indication that the HCN is
393: located close to GV Tau S, within the circumstellar flared disk, and
394: not associated with the IRC (and therefore not in the circumbinary
395: material). The warm rotational temperatures of $\sim\!$100-200~K
396: determined for HCN, \acetylene, and CO also suggest a location in the
397: inner region of the disk that surrounds GV Tau S rather than in the
398: circumbinary envelope. A jet origin can likely be eliminated as the
399: Doppler shifts of stellar photospheric absorption lines agree with
400: those found for the intervening molecular material to within $\sim$5
401: km/s. We derive a heliocentric radial velocity of 21$\pm$5 km/s for CO
402: and 19.5$\pm$3.4 for HCN. This is similar the heliocentric Doppler
403: shift of 13.4$\pm$3.8 km/s reported by \citet{whit04} using high
404: resolution optical spectra of stellar emission lines. The combination
405: of velocity information, significantly different compositions toward
406: closely spaced objects, and warm rotational temperatures combine to
407: argue that the HCN, \acetylene, and CO are located in the disk of GV
408: Tau S.
409:
410: If we assume that the near-infrared variability toward GV Tau is due
411: primarily to cooler material in the outer disk or circumbinary
412: envelope rather than the warm material where the CO, HCN, and
413: \acetylene\ absorptions originate, as suggested by the 3~$\mu$m ice
414: feature variability, then we can compare our column densities of HCN
415: and \acetylene\ to CO (see Table~2). We must be cautious with such an
416: interpretation, however, since our CO (2 and 5~\mic) observations and
417: our 3~\mic\ observations were taken at different times and the sources
418: are both highly variable in the infrared over short time scales. This
419: could affect the amount of gaseous material in the line of sight. For
420: example, tidal interactions between the two stars, which are only
421: separated by about 170 AU, may affect the gas structure close to the
422: stars. Perhaps the temperature and density structures of the inner
423: disks differ, resulting in dissimilar chemical evolution. It may also
424: be possible that an inner circumstellar disk of the IRC is more
425: inclined than the nearly edge-on GV Tau S and that we are seeing warm
426: CO in the flared disk. The molecules in disk atmospheres are less
427: protected from energetic photons than those in the midplane, leading
428: to higher photodissociation rates. Collisional dissociation in the
429: inner disk may act to remove hydrogen atoms from molecules like
430: \acetylene\ and HCN. Also, the increased production of ions in disk
431: atmospheres and the resulting ion-molecule chemistry will further
432: modify the composition. The extent to which these processes occur is
433: dependent on the local ionizing radiation field, temperature, and
434: density (see papers by \citet{will98,marc02,aika99,aika02} for
435: discussion of chemistry in protoplanetary disks). Hence, the
436: chemistry is dependent on radial and vertical distances in the disk
437: and our measurements are correspondingly dependent on viewing
438: geometry. Additional observations to simultaneously measure CO and
439: HCN toward GV Tau are planned to address this issue and to investigate
440: the possibility of variations in column densities of gaseous species.
441:
442: \subsection{Compositional Comparisons}
443:
444: It is interesting to compare our results for GV Tau S to those found
445: toward other young stars, models of chemistry in protoplanetary disks,
446: and comets in our own solar system. Assuming that CO, HCN, and
447: \acetylene\ originate in the same region, we found a \acetylene/HCN
448: ratio of $\sim$2.0 toward GV Tau S and HCN/CO $\sim$ 0.63\% and
449: \acetylene/CO $\sim$ 1.2\%. \acetylene/HCN was found to be $\sim$0.6
450: toward IRS 46 \citep{lahu06}, another low mass object, assuming that
451: both species originate in the same region. The 13-14~\mic\ Q-branches
452: and band heads of \acetylene\ and HCN were studied by ISO
453: \citep{lahu00} toward massive YSOs. In general, \acetylene/HCN for
454: the warm component was found to be $\sim$40-50\% toward most
455: objects. Interestingly, HCN was found to be more abundant
456: ($\sim$2.5\%) toward IRS 46 compared to CO (this is a lower limit).
457: This can be seen graphically in Figure~\ref{fig6}. In that figure,
458: \acetylene/HCN is indicated by asterisks while the abundances of
459: \acetylene\ and HCN relative to CO (in \%) are indicated by filled
460: squares and diamonds, respectively.
461:
462: \citet{marc02} modeled molecular distributions of abundant species in
463: the inner 10 AU of protostellar disks surrounding T Tauri stars.
464: \citet{gibb04} measured an upper limit for \methane/CO toward HL Tau
465: that was significantly lower than predicted by the model. The same
466: was found for GV Tau S, where \methane/CO $<$ 0.0037 is much smaller
467: than the \methane/CO $\sim$1 predicted by Markwick through most of the
468: inner disk. However, we find that HCN/CO, \acetylene/CO, and
469: \acetylene/HCN ratios toward GV Tau S are in general agreement with
470: the range of abundances found in \citet{marc02} (see
471: Figure~\ref{fig6}). Our rotational temperatures ($\sim$100-200~K) are
472: also consistent with the midplane temperatures in the inner $\sim$5~AU
473: of the protoplanetary disk in the Markwick model. We note, however
474: that we are likely sampling a region above the midplane, possibly in a
475: disk atmosphere, which may be heated by various mechanisms such as
476: viscous accretion, X-rays, or an X-wind (see \citet{glas04} for a
477: discussion of disk heating). This would move the location of the gas
478: outward by an amount depending on the local environment. Nonetheless,
479: the similarity in abundances between \citet{marc02}, GV Tau, and IRS
480: 46 is interesting and should be pursued further.
481:
482: Another interesting comparison is with comets in our own solar system.
483: Comets are generally considered to be the most pristine objects in the
484: solar system and are thought to have formed in the giant-planet region
485: (from $\sim$5-30~AU). Infrared spectroscopy has routinely measured
486: abundances of CO, HCN, and \acetylene\ toward comets for the last
487: decade (see \citet{mumm03} and references therein). HCN and
488: \acetylene\ abundances measured in comets (compared to water) are
489: fairly consistent over the Oort cloud population measured to date and
490: the \acetylene/HCN ratio is found to be typically $\sim$0.9-1.1,
491: reasonably consistent with the \acetylene/HCN ratios of 0.6 and 2.0
492: found for IRS 46 and GV Tau, respectively. The CO abundance in comets
493: has been found to be highly variable, likely as a result of thermal
494: history and processing of comets in the protoplanetary disk. The
495: resulting HCN/CO and \acetylene/CO ratios range from $\sim$0.01-0.16.
496: The HCN/CO and \acetylene/CO ratios found in GV Tau and IRS 46 are
497: consistent with those found for CO rich comets. It is possible that
498: the more volatile CO was preferentially lost in comets for which the
499: HCN/CO or \acetylene/CO ratios are high. If we assume that the comets
500: with the greatest abundance of CO more closely represent the initial
501: volatile abundance of the giant-planet forming region of the solar
502: nebula, the resulting \acetylene/HCN, \acetylene/CO, and HCN/CO ratios
503: agree to within a factor of two with those found for GV Tau S, IRS 46,
504: massive YSOs, and several of the Markwick model results.
505:
506: Also of interest is \methane, another particularly volatile molecule
507: for which the abundance (relative to water) has been observed to be
508: highly variable in comets (by over an order of magnitude). While the
509: magnitude of the abundance variation is similar to that found for CO
510: in comets, the two molecules are not correlated \citep{gibb03}. In
511: comets \methane/CO is found to vary from $\sim$0.05--0.8, much higher
512: than in HL Tau ($<$0.0002 in the gas phase) or GV Tau S ($<$0.0037),
513: and lower than the \methane/CO$\sim$1 found by \citet{marc02}.
514: \methane/HCN is found to vary from $\sim$2--5 among comets yet is
515: $<$0.6 toward GV Tau S. The reasons for these compositional
516: differences are unknown and more work must be done to characterize
517: volatiles toward comets and low mass star forming regions.
518:
519: \section{Conclusion}
520:
521: We have measured column densities and rotational temperatures for CO,
522: HCN, and \acetylene\ and an upper limit for \methane\ toward GV Tau S.
523: We find that the absorptions are consistent with an origin in the
524: inner region of a protoplanetary disk. This conclusion is further
525: strengthened by the lack of absorptions due to organic species toward
526: the infrared companion to GV Tau S, though gas phase CO is present.
527: The upper limit for HCN toward the IRC may suggest compositional
528: differences between the two objects, though a different temperature or
529: viewing geometry cannot be ruled out. We note that GV Tau is variable
530: in the near-infrared, likely due to inhomogeneities in the
531: circumbinary material or outer disk. Future observations at M and L
532: band are planned to test whether the variability affects the column
533: densities and abundances of the gas phase species reported in this
534: paper.
535:
536: We find that the abundances of HCN and \acetylene\ relative to each
537: other and to CO are similar to those found among the comet population,
538: that found toward low mass object IRS 46 by \citet{lahu06}, and
539: consistent with the disk model by \citet{marc02}. \methane, on the
540: other hand, appears to be underabundant in the young stars sampled to
541: date when compared to comets in our own solar system. This exciting
542: result illustrates the feasibility of detecting minor volatile
543: constituents toward low mass young stars from the ground, a study
544: which is vitally important to understanding how our own system
545: evolved.
546:
547: \acknowledgements
548: The data presented herein were obtained at the W.M. Keck
549: Observatory, which is operated as a scientific partnership among the
550: California Institute of Technology, the University of California and
551: the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The Observatory
552: was made possible by the generous financial support of the W.M. Keck
553: Foundation. TWR was supported by NSF Astronomy grant AST02-05581 and
554: AST05-07419. SB was supported in part by a NASA Michelson
555: Fellowship (2005-2006). ELG was supported by NSF Astronomy grant
556: AST-0507419.
557:
558: \begin{thebibliography}{}
559:
560: \bibitem[Aikawa \etal\ (2002)]{aika02} Aikawa, Y., van Zadelhoff,
561: G. J., van Dishoeck, E. F., \& Herbst, E. 2002, \aap, 386, 622
562:
563: \bibitem[Aikawa \etal\ (1999)]{aika99} Aikawa, Y., Umebayashi, T.,
564: Nakano, T., \& Miyama, S. M. 1999, \apj, 419, 705
565:
566: \bibitem[Boogert \etal\ (1997)]{boog97} Boogert, A. C. A., Schutte,
567: W. A., Helmich, F. P., Tielens, A. G. G. M., \& Wooden, D. H. 1997,
568: \aap, 317, 929
569:
570: \bibitem[Boogert \etal\ (1998)]{boog98} Boogert, A. C. A., Helmich,
571: F. P., van Dishoeck, E. F., Schutte, W. A., Tielens, A. G. G. M., \&
572: Whittet, D. C. B. 1998, \aap, 336, 352
573:
574: \bibitem[Boogert \etal\ (2002)]{boog02} Boogert, A. C. A.,
575: Hogerheijde, M. R., \& Blake, G. A. 2002, ApJ, 568, 761
576:
577: \bibitem[Brittain \etal\ (2003)]{brit03} Brittain, S. D., Rettig,
578: T. W., Simon, T., Kulesa, C., DiSanti, M. A., \& Dello Russo, N. 2003,
579: \apj, 588, 535
580:
581: \bibitem[Brittain \etal\ (2005)]{brit05} Brittain, S. D., Rettig,
582: T. W., Simon, T., \& Kulesa, C. 2005, \apj, 626, 283
583:
584: \bibitem[Devine \etal\ (1999)]{devi99} Devine, D., Reipurth, B.,
585: Bally, J., \& Balonek, T. J. 1999, \aj, 117, 2931
586:
587: \bibitem[DiSanti \etal\ (2001)]{disa01} DiSanti, M. A., Mumma, M. J.,
588: Dello Russo, N., \& Magee-Sauer, K. 2001, Icarus, 153, 361
589:
590: \bibitem[Gibb \etal\ (2003)]{gibb03} Gibb, E. L., Mumma, M. J., Dello
591: Russo, N., DiSanti, M. A., \& Magee-Sauer, K. 2003, Icarus, 165, 391
592:
593: \bibitem[Gibb \etal\ (2004)]{gibb04} Gibb, E. L., Brittain, S. D.,
594: Rettig, T. W., Kulesa, C., \& Simon, T. 2004, ApJ, 610, L113
595:
596: \bibitem[Glassgold \etal\ (2004)]{glas04} Glassgold, A. E., Najita,
597: J., \& Igea, J. 2004, ApJ, 615, 972
598:
599: \bibitem[Goodrich (1986)]{good86} Goodrich, R. W. 1986, AJ, 92, 885
600:
601: \bibitem[Harris \etal\ (2002)]{harr02} Harris, G. J., Polyansky,
602: O. L., \& Tennyson, J. 2002, ApJ, 578, 657
603:
604: \bibitem[Hinkle \etal\ (1995)]{hink95} Hinkle, K., Wallace, L., \&
605: Livingston, W. 1995. PASP, 107, 1042
606:
607: \bibitem[Jacquemart \etal\ (2003)]{jacq03} Jacquemart, D., Mandin,
608: J. -Y., Dana, V., Claveau, C., Vander Auwera, J., Herman, M.,
609: Rothman, L. S., R\'{e}galia-Jarlot, L., \& Barbe, A. 2003,
610: J. Quant. Radiat. Transfer, 82, 363
611:
612: \bibitem[Koresko \etal\ (1999)]{kore99} Koresko, C. D., Blake, G. A.,
613: Brown, M. E., Sargent, A. I., \& Koerner, D. W. 1999, \apj, 525, L49
614:
615: \bibitem[Kunde \& Maguire (1974)]{kund74} Kunde, V. G., \& Maguire,
616: W. C. 1974, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radat. Transfer, 14, 803
617:
618: \bibitem[Lahuis \& van Dishoeck (2000)]{lahu00} Lahuis, F., \& van
619: Dishoeck, E. F. 2000, \aap, 355, 699
620:
621: \bibitem[Lahuis \etal\ (2006)]{lahu06} Lahuis, F., van Dishoeck,
622: E. F., Boogert, A. C. A., \& 8 colleagues, 2006, \apj, 636, L145
623:
624: \bibitem[Langer \& Penzias (1990)]{lang90} Langer, W. D., \& Penzias,
625: A. A. 1990, ApJ, 357, 477
626:
627: \bibitem[Leinert \etal\ (2001)]{lein01} Leinert, Ch., Beck, T. L.,
628: Ligori, S., Simon, M., Woitas, J., \& Howell, R. R. 2001, \aap, 369,
629: 215
630:
631: \bibitem[Leiner \& Haas (1989)]{lein89} Leinert, Ch., \& Haas,
632: M. 1989, \apj, 342, L39
633:
634: \bibitem[Lyons \& Young (2005)]{lyon05} Lyons, J. R., \& Young,
635: E. D. 2006, Nature, 435, 317
636:
637: \bibitem[Markwick \etal\ (2002)]{marc02} Markwick, A. J., Ilgner,
638: M., Millar, T. J., \& Henning, Th. 2002, \aap, 385, 632
639:
640: \bibitem[McLean \etal\ (1998)]{mcle98} McLean, I. S., et al. 1998,
641: Proc. Spie, 3354, 566
642:
643: \bibitem[M\'{e}nard \etal\ (1993)]{mena93} M\'{e}nard, F., Monin, J.-L.,
644: Angelucci, F., \& Rouan, D. 1993, \apj, 414, L117
645:
646: \bibitem[Mumma \etal\ (2003)]{mumm03} Mumma, M. J., DiSanti, M. A.,
647: Dello Russo, N., Magee-Sauer, K., Gibb, E., \& Novak, R. 2003, AdSpR,
648: 31, 2563
649:
650: \bibitem[Rettig \etal\ (2006)]{rett06} Rettig, T. W., Brittain, S. D.,
651: Simon, T., Gibb, E. L., Balsara, D. S., Tilley, D. A., \& Kulesa,
652: C. 2006, \apj, 646, 342
653:
654: \bibitem[Rothman \etal\ (2003)]{roth03} Rothman, L. S., et al. 2003,
655: J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 82, 5
656:
657: \bibitem[Vander Auwera \etal\ (1993)]{vand93} Vander Auwera, J.,
658: Hurtmans, D., Carleer, M., \& Herman, M. 1993, J. Molecular
659: Spectrosc., 157, 337
660:
661: \bibitem[White \& Hillenbrand (2004)]{whit04} White, R. J., \&
662: Hillenbrand, L. A. 2004, \apj, 616, 998
663:
664: \bibitem[Willacy \etal\ (1998)]{will98} Willacy, K., Klahr, H. H.,
665: Millar, R. J., \& Henning, Th. 1998, \aap, 338, 995
666:
667: \bibitem[Wilson \& Rood (1994)]{wils94} Wilson, T. L., \& Rood,
668: R. 1994, ARA\&A, 32, 191
669:
670: \end{thebibliography}
671:
672: \clearpage
673:
674: \begin{table}
675: \begin{center}
676: \caption{Observing Log \label{table1}}
677: \begin{tabular}{lccc}
678: \tableline
679: Date & Instrument Setting & Wavelength Coverage & Integration Time \\
680: & & & (s) \\
681: \tableline
682: 03/18/2003 & MW1 & 2118--2153~\wvn\ (order 16) & 240 \\
683: 03/18/2003 & MW2 & 2094--2127~\wvn\ (order 16) & 240 \\
684: 08/05/2003 & K1\tablenotemark{a} & 4202--4267~\wvn\ (order 32) & 1200 \\
685: & & 4333--4397~\wvn\ (order 33) & \\
686: 08/05/2003 & K2\tablenotemark{a} & 4265--4326~\wvn\ (order 33) & 1200 \\
687: 02/17/2006 & KL1 & 3024--3072~\wvn\ (order 23) & 240 \\
688: & & 3286--3337~\wvn\ (order 25) & \\
689: 02/18/2006 & KL2\tablenotemark{a} & 2985--3028~\wvn\ (order 23) & 240 \\
690: & & 3243--3290~\wvn\ (order 25) & \\
691: \tableline
692: \end{tabular}
693: \tablenotetext{a}{Note: The IRC was not in the slit in this observation.}
694: \end{center}
695: \end{table}
696:
697: \clearpage
698:
699: \begin{deluxetable}{lccc}
700: \tablecolumns{4}
701: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
702: \tablecaption{Column Densities and Rotational Temperatures for Molecules}
703: \label{tbl2}
704: \tablewidth{0pt}
705: \tablehead{
706: \colhead{Molecule} & \colhead{Column Density} & \colhead{T$_{rot}$} & \colhead{Abundance Relative to $^{12}$CO} \\
707: & \colhead{(10$^{16}$ \pcmsq)} & \colhead{(K)} & \colhead{(\%)}}
708: \startdata
709: GV Tau S & & & \\
710: \hline
711: $^{12}$CO & 590$\pm$120 & 200$\pm$40 & --- \\
712: $^{13}$CO & 11 & 260$\pm$20 & 1.9 \\
713: C$^{18}$O & 1.4$\pm$0.5 & 140$\pm$50 & 0.24 \\
714: HCN & 3.7$\pm$0.3 & 115$^{+11}/_{-10}$ & 0.63 \\
715: \acetylene & 7.3$^{+0.1}/_{-0.2}$ & 170$^{+19}/_{-16}$ & 1.2 \\
716: \methane & $<$2.2 & --- & $<$0.37 \\
717: \hline\hline
718: Infrared Companion & & & \\
719: \hline
720: $^{12}$CO & $\sim$300\tablenotemark{a} & --- & --- \\
721: $^{13}$CO & 5.5 & 220$\pm$40 & 54\tablenotemark{a} \\
722: HCN & $<$0.48 & --- & $<$0.16 \\
723: \hline
724: \enddata
725: \tablenotetext{a}{Assuming $^{12}$CO/$^{13}$CO ratio is the same as for GV Tau S}
726: \end{deluxetable}
727:
728: \clearpage
729:
730: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccc}
731: \tablecolumns{6}
732: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
733: \tablecaption{HCN Line Positions and Equivalent Widths}
734: \label{tbl2}
735: \tablewidth{0pt}
736: \tablehead{
737: \colhead{Line ID} & \colhead{$\nu_{rest}$} & \colhead{$\nu_{shift}$} &
738: \colhead{v$_{rad}$} & \colhead{\%T} & \colhead{W$\pm$dW} \\
739: & \colhead{(\wvn)} & \colhead{(\wvn)} & \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(\wvn)}}
740: \startdata
741: P7 & 3290.35 & 3289.81 & 49 & 0.91 & 0.0154(0.0016) \\
742: P5 & 3296.49 & 3295.92 & 52 & 0.91 & 0.0184(0.0016) \\
743: P4 & 3299.53 & 3299.01 & 48 & 0.95 & 0.0183(0.0016) \\
744: P3 & 3302.53 & 3302.02 & 48 & 0.97 & 0.0162(0.0015) \\
745: P2 & 3305.54 & 3304.97 & 52 & 0.98 & 0.0136(0.0015) \\
746: R1 & 3317.33 & 3316.77 & 50 & 0.95 & 0.0128(0.0016) \\
747: R2 & 3320.22 & 3319.69 & 48 & 0.98 & 0.0179(0.0015) \\
748: R3 & 3323.09 & 3322.54 & 50 & 0.89 & 0.0212(0.0016) \\
749: R5 & 3328.78 & 3328.25 & 47 & 0.95 & 0.0222(0.0016) \\
750: R6 & 3331.59 & 3331.07 & 47 & 0.98 & 0.0236(0.0015) \\
751: \enddata
752:
753: \end{deluxetable}
754:
755: \clearpage
756:
757: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}
758: \tablecolumns{5}
759: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
760: \tablecaption{\acetylene\ Line Positions and Equivalent
761: Widths} \label{tbl3}
762: \tablewidth{0pt}
763: \tablehead{
764: \colhead{Line ID} & \colhead{$\nu_{rest}$} &
765: \colhead{$\nu_{shift}$} & \colhead{\%T}
766: & \colhead{W$\pm$dW} \\
767: & \colhead{(\wvn)} & \colhead{(\wvn)} & \colhead{(\wvn)}}
768: \startdata
769: $\nu_3$ band & & & &\\
770: R4 & 3306.48 & 3305.94 & 0.96 & 0.0067(0.0020) \\
771: P2 & 3290.13 & 3289.59 & 0.86 & 0.0058(0.0014) \\
772: P3 & 3287.75 & 3287.22 & 0.96 & 0.0044(0.0019) \\
773: P11 & 3268.48 & 3267.94 & 0.97 & 0.0077(0.0014) \\
774: $\nu_2+(\nu_4+\nu_5)^0_+$ band & & & &\\
775: R15 & 3318.35 & 3317.81 & 0.90 & 0.0037(0.0016) \\
776: R12 & 3311.71 & 3311.17 & 0.88 & 0.0041(0.0017) \\
777: R10 & 3307.22 & 3306.68 & 0.95 & 0.0049(0.0018) \\
778: R7 & 3300.42 & 3299.88 & 0.91 & 0.0084(0.0016) \\
779: R5 & 3295.84 & 3295.31 & 0.95 & 0.0124(0.0014) \\
780: R3 & 3291.23 & 3290.69 & 0.86 & 0.0047(0.0016) \\
781: P5 & 3270.05 & 3269.52 & 0.94 & 0.0044(0.0016) \\
782: P6 & 3267.66 & 3267.12 & 0.94 & 0.0105(0.0015) \\
783: P7 & 3265.26 & 3264.72 & 0.78 & 0.0088(0.0018) \\
784: P8 & 3262.84 & 3262.31 & 0.95 & 0.0059(0.0014) \\
785: P9 & 3260.43 & 3259.89 & 0.84 & 0.0077(0.0017) \\
786: P11 & 3255.56 & 3255.03 & 0.84 & 0.0046(0.0017) \\
787: P12 & 3253.12 & 3252.59 & 0.95 & 0.0025(0.0014) \\
788: P13 & 3250.66 & 3250.13 & 0.98 & 0.0053(0.0013) \\
789: P14 & 3248.20 & 3247.67 & 0.95 & 0.0026(0.0015) \\
790: P18 & 3251.09 & 3250.56 & 0.97 & $<$0.0014 \\
791: \enddata
792:
793: \end{deluxetable}
794:
795: \clearpage
796:
797: \begin{figure}
798: \epsscale{0.9}
799: \plottwo{f1a.eps}{f1b.eps}
800: \caption{(a) Sample normalized residual M-band spectrum showing CO
801: absorption toward GV Tau S (bottom) and the IRC (top). The dotted
802: lines indicate positions of the $^{12}$CO lines, the dashed lines
803: indicate $^{13}$CO, and the dot-dashed lines indicate C$^{18}$O. (b)
804: Normalized K band spectrum of GV Tau S with the telluric model
805: overplotted (dot-dash line). Above is the residual with the
806: Arcturus spectrum overplotted, convolved to the resolving power of
807: NIRSPEC, veiled and Doppler shifted to the geocentric velocity of GV
808: Tau. Asterisks indicate the positions of CO (2-0) absorption
809: lines. \label{fig1}}
810: \end{figure}
811:
812: \clearpage
813:
814: \begin{figure}
815: \epsscale{1.0}
816: \plotone{f2.eps}
817: \caption{GV Tau S, KL Order 25 spectrum showing the positions of HCN
818: and \acetylene\ lines. Solid black ticks are the HCN $\nu_3$ band,
819: dashed ticks indicate the \acetylene\ $\nu_3$ band, and dot-dashed
820: ticks indicate the \acetylene\ $\nu_2$ + ($\nu_4$ + $\nu_5$)$^0_+$
821: band. Asterisks and crosses denote Doppler shifted positions of
822: stellar OH and NH, respectively. \label{fig2}}
823: \end{figure}
824:
825: \clearpage
826:
827: \begin{figure}
828: \epsscale{1.0}
829: \plotone{f3.eps}
830: \caption{Population diagram of the $^{12}$CO (2-0),
831: $^{13}$CO (1-0) and C$^{18}$O (1-0) lines. \label{fig3}}
832: \end{figure}
833:
834: \clearpage
835:
836: \begin{figure}
837: \epsscale{1.0}
838: \plotone{f4.eps}
839: \caption{Population diagram for HCN absorption toward GV Tau
840: S. \label{fig4}}
841: \end{figure}
842:
843: \clearpage
844:
845: \begin{figure}
846: \epsscale{1.0}
847: \plotone{f5.eps}
848: \caption{Population diagram for \acetylene\ absorption toward GV Tau
849: S. Asterisks are data points from the $\nu_3$ branch, diamonds are
850: from the $\nu_2$ + ($\nu_4$ + $\nu_5$)$^0_+$ branch. \label{fig5}}
851: \end{figure}
852:
853: \clearpage
854:
855: \begin{figure}
856: \epsscale{1.0}
857: \plotone{f6.eps}
858: \caption{Figure comparing abundances toward GV Tau S, IRS 46, Massive YSOs, Oort Cloud Comets, and the chemical model of \citet{marc02}. Asterisks indicate the \acetylene/HCN ratio. Filled squares and diamonds indicate the abundances relative to CO of \acetylene\ and HCN, respectively. \label{fig6}}
859: \end{figure}
860:
861:
862:
863:
864: \end{document}
865:
866: