1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %
3: % After referee's report, 2007/XII/20
4: %
5: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
6: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
7: % \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
8: \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
9: \shorttitle{Spitzer/IRAC and the Lambda Orionis cluster}
10: \shortauthors{Barrado y Navascu\'es et al.}
11: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
12: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
13: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
14: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
15: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
16: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
17: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
18: \begin{document}
19:
20: %Next line is needed for using bibtex
21: % To use it:
22: % latex fileFigure2
23: % bibtex file
24: % latex file
25: %\bibliographystyle{aa}
26:
27:
28:
29: \title{SPITZER: Accretion in Low Mass Stars and Brown Dwarfs in the
30: Lambda Orionis Cluster\footnote{Based on observations collected Spitzer Space Telescope;
31: at the German-Spanish Astronomical Center of Calar Alto
32: jointly operated by the Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Astronomie Heidelberg
33: and the Instituto de Astrof\'{\i}sica de Andaluc\'{\i}a (CSIC);
34: and at the WHT operated on the island of La Palma by the Isaac Newton Group in the Spanish Observatorio del
35: Roque de los Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias} }
36: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
37: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
38: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
39: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
40: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
41: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
42: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
43: \author{David Barrado y Navascu\'es}
44: \affil{Laboratorio de Astrof\'{\i}sica Espacial y F\'{\i}sica Fundamental,
45: LAEFF-INTA, P.O. Box 50727, E-28080 Madrid, SPAIN}
46: \email{barrado@laeff.esa.es}
47:
48: \author{John R. Stauffer}
49: \affil{Spitzer Science Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125}
50:
51: \author{Mar\'{\i}a Morales-Calder\'on, Amelia Bayo}
52: \affil{Laboratorio de Astrof\'{\i}sica Espacial y F\'{\i}sica Fundamental, LAEFF-INTA, P.O. Box 50727, E-28080 Madrid, SPAIN}
53:
54:
55: \author{Giovanni Fazzio, Tom Megeath, Lori Allen}
56: \affil{Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA 02138}
57:
58: \author{Lee W. Hartmann, Nuria Calvet}
59: \affil{Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan}
60:
61: %\author{Other authors\altaffilmark{3}}
62: %\affil{other affiliations}
63:
64: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
65: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
66: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
67: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
68: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
69: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
70: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
71:
72:
73: \begin{abstract}
74: We present multi-wavelength optical and infrared photometry of 170
75: previously known low mass stars and brown dwarfs of the 5 Myr Collinder 69 cluster
76: (Lambda Orionis). The new photometry supports cluster membership for
77: most of them, with less than 15\% of the previous candidates
78: identified as probable non-members. The near
79: infrared photometry allows us to identify stars with IR excesses, and
80: we find that the Class~II population is very large, around 25\% for
81: stars (in the spectral range M0 - M6.5) and 40\% for brown dwarfs, down to
82: 0.04 M$_\odot$, despite the fact that the H$\alpha$\
83: equivalent width is low for a significant fraction of them. In addition,
84: there are a number of substellar objects, classified as Class~III, that
85: have optically thin disks. The Class~II
86: members are distributed in an inhomogeneous way, lying preferentially
87: in a filament running toward the south-east. The IR excesses for the
88: Collinder 69 members range from pure Class~II (flat or nearly flat
89: spectra longward of 1 $\mu$m), to transition disks with no near-IR
90: excess but excesses beginning within the IRAC wavelength range, to two
91: stars with excess only detected at 24 $\mu$m.
92: Collinder 69 thus appears to be at an age where it provides a natural
93: laboratory for the study of primordial disks and their dissipation.
94:
95: \end{abstract}
96:
97: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
98: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
99: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
100: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
101: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
102: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
103: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
104:
105: \keywords{open clusters and associations: individual
106: (Lambda Orionis Star Forming region)
107: -- stars: low-mass, brown dwarfs -- stars: pre-main-sequence }
108:
109:
110: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
111: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
112: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
113: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
114: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
115: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
116: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
117:
118: %$\,$
119:
120: \newpage
121:
122:
123: \section{Introduction}
124:
125:
126: The star-formation process appears to operate successfully over a wide
127: range of initial conditions. In regions like Taurus, groups of a few
128: stars to a few tens of stars are the norm. The molecular gas in
129: Taurus is arranged in a number of nearly parallel filaments, possibly
130: aligned with the local magnetic field, and with the small stellar
131: groups sited near end-points of the filaments \citep{Hartmann04IAU}.
132: No high mass stars have been formed in the Taurus groups, and the
133: Initial Mass Function (hereafter, IMF) also appears to be relatively
134: deficient in brown dwarfs \citep{Briceno03IAU,Luhman04} --but see also
135: \citep{Guieu06} for an alternate view. The Taurus groups are not
136: gravitationally bound, and will disperse into the field on short
137: timescales. At the other end of the mass spectrum, regions like the
138: Trapezium cluster and its surrounding Orion Nebula cluster (ONC) have
139: produced hundreds of stars. The ONC includes several O stars, with
140: the earliest having spectral type O6 and an estimated mass of order 35
141: M$_\odot$. The very high stellar density in the ONC (10,000
142: stars/pc$^{3}$ at its center \citep{McCaughrean94}) suggests that
143: star-formation in the ONC was gravity dominated rather than magnetic
144: field dominated. It is uncertain whether the ONC is currently
145: gravitationally bound or not, but it is presumably at least regions
146: like the ONC that are the progenitors of long-lived open clusters like
147: the Pleiades. UV photoionization and ablation from O star winds
148: likely acts to truncate the circumstellar disks of low mass stars in
149: the ONC, with potential consequences for giant planet formation.
150:
151: An interesting intermediate scale of star-formation is represented by
152: the Lambda Ori association. The central cluster in the association
153: --normally designated as Collinder 69 or the Lambda Orionis cluster--
154: includes at least one O star, the eponymous $\lambda$ Ori, with
155: spectral type O8III. However, a number of lines of evidence suggests
156: that one of the Coll 69 stars has already passed through its post-main
157: sequence evolution and become a supernova, and hence indicating it was
158: more massive than Lambda Ori (see the complete Initial Mass Function in
159: \citet{Barrado2005a}). A census of the stars in Coll 69 by
160: \citet{Dolan01} --hereafter, DM-- indicates that the cluster is now
161: strongly unbound. DM argue that this is due to rapid removal of
162: molecular gas from the region that occurred about 1 Myr ago when the
163: supernova exploded. They interpreted the color-magnitude diagram of
164: Coll 69 as indicating a significant age spread with a maximum age of
165: order 6 Myr; an alternative interpretation is that the cluster has
166: negligible age spread (with age $\sim$6 Myr) and a significant number
167: of binary stars. While DM identified a large population of low mass
168: stars in Coll 69, only four of 72 for which they obtained spectra are
169: classical T Tauri stars (based on their H$\alpha$\ emission equivalent
170: widths). Much younger stars, including classical T Tauri stars, are
171: present elsewhere in the Lambda Ori SFR, which DM attribute to
172: star-formation triggered by the supernova remnant shock wave impacting
173: pre-existing molecular cores in the region (the Barnard 30 and
174: Barnard 35 dark clouds, in particular).
175:
176: We have obtained Spitzer space telescope IRAC and MIPS imaging of a
177: $\sim$one square degree region centered on the star $\lambda$ Ori in
178: order to (a) search for circumstellar disks of members of the Coll 69
179: cluster and (b) attempt to identify new, very low mass members of the
180: cluster in order to determine better the cluster IMF
181: (in a forthcoming paper).
182: In \S2, we
183: describe the new observations we have obtained; and in \S3 we use
184: those data to reconsider cluster membership. In \S4 we use the new
185: candidate member list and the IR photometry to determine the fraction
186: of cluster members with circumstellar disks in both the stellar and
187: substellar domain, and we sort the stars with disks according to their
188: spectral slope from 1 to 24 $\mu$m.
189:
190:
191:
192:
193: \section{The data}
194: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
195:
196: \subsection{Optical and Near Infrared photometry}
197: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
198:
199: The optical and the near IR data for the bright candidate members come
200: from \citet{Barrado04} --hereafter, Paper~I. The $RI$ --Cousins
201: system-- data were collected with the CFHT in 1999, whereas the $JHKs$
202: come from the 2MASS All Sky Survey \citep{Cutri03}. For cluster
203: members, the completeness limit is located at $I$(complete,cluster)
204: $\sim$ 20.2 mag, whereas 2MASS provides near infrared data down to a
205: limiting magnitude of $J$=16.8, $H$=16.5, and $Ks$=15.7 mag. In some
206: cases, low resolution spectroscopy in the optical, which provides
207: spectral types and H$\alpha$\ equivalent widths, is also available.
208: Twenty-five objects out of the 170 CFHT1999 candidate members are in
209: common with \citet{Dolan99,Dolan01}. Those 25 stars also have
210: H$\alpha$\ and lithium equivalent widths, and radial velocities.
211:
212: \subsubsection{New deep Near Infrared photometry}
213: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
214:
215: For the objects with large error in 2MASS JHKs, or without this type
216: of data due to their intrinsic faintness, we have obtained additional
217: measurements with the WHT (La Palma Observatory, Spain) and INGRID
218: (4.1$\times$4.1 arcmin FOV) in November 2002 and February 2003, and
219: with the Calar Alto 3.5m telescope (Almeria, Spain) and Omega2000 in
220: October 2005 (15.36$\times$15.36 arcmin FOV). In all cases, for each
221: position, we took five individual exposures of 60 seconds each, with
222: small offsets of a few arcseconds, thus totalling 5 minutes. In the case
223: of the campaigns with INGRID, we observed the area around the star
224: $\lambda$ Orionis creating a grid. Essentially, we have observed about
225: 2/3 of the CFHT 1999 optical survey region in J (in the area around the star
226: and west of it), with some coverage in H and K. On the other hand,
227: the Omega2000 observations, taken under a Director's Discretionary Time
228: program, were focused on the faint candidate members. Except for one
229: object (LOri154), we collected observations in the J, H and Ks
230: filters. The conditions of the first observing run with INGRID were
231: photometric, and we calibrated the data using standard stars from
232: \citet{Hunt98} observed throughout the nights of the run. The average
233: seeing was 0.9 arcsec. We had cloud cover during the second run with
234: INGRID, and the data were calibrated using the 2MASS catalog and the
235: stars present in each individual image. The dispersion of this
236: calibration is $\sigma$=0.05 magnitudes in each filter, with a seeing
237: of about 1.0 arcsec. Finally, no standard stars were observed during
238: the DDT observations at Calar Alto. The seeing in this case was 1.2
239: arcsec. The faint Lambda Orionis candidate members were calibrated
240: using also 2MASS data. In this last case, the dispersion is somewhat
241: higher, probably due to the worse seeing and the larger angular pixel
242: scale of the detector, with $\sigma$=0.1 mag. Note that this is
243: dispersion not the error in the calibration. These values correspond
244: to the FWHM of the gaussian distribution of the values
245: zeropoint(i)=mag$_{raw}$(i)-mag$_{2MASS}$(i), for any star $i$, which
246: also includes the photometric errors in the 2MASS photometry and any
247: contribution due to the cluster stars being photometrically variable.
248: Since there is a large number of stars per field (up to 1,000 in the
249: Omega2000 images), the peak of this distribution can be easily
250: identified and the zero points derived. A better estimate of the error
251: in the calibration is based on the distance between mean, median and
252: mode values, which are smaller than half of the FWHM (in the case of
253: the mean and the median, almost identical to the hundredth of
254: magnitude). Therefore, the errors in the calibration can be estimated
255: as 0.025 and 0.05 magnitudes for the INGRID and the Omega2000
256: datasets, respectively.
257:
258: All the data were processed and analyzed with IRAF\footnote{IRAF is
259: distributed by National Optical Astronomy Observatories, which is
260: operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy,
261: Inc., under contract to the National Science Foundation, USA}, using
262: aperture photometry. These measurements, for 166 candidate members, are listed in
263: Table 1 (WHT/INGRID) and Table 3 (CAHA/Omega2000). Note
264: that the errors listed in the table correspond to the values produced
265: by the $phot$ task with the $digi.apphot$ package and does not include the errors
266: in the calibrations.
267:
268:
269:
270:
271:
272:
273: \subsection{Spitzer imaging}
274: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
275:
276:
277: Our Spitzer data were collected during March 15 (MIPS) and October 11
278: (IRAC), 2004, as part of a GTO program. The InfraRed Array
279: Camera (IRAC, \citet{Fazio04}) is a four channel camera which
280: takes images at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and 8.0~$\mu$m with a field of view
281: that covers $\sim$5.2$\times$5.2~arcmin. IRAC imaging was performed
282: in mapping mode with individual exposures of 12 seconds ``frametime"
283: (corresponding to 10.4 second exposure times) and three dithers at
284: each map step. In order to keep the total observation time for a
285: given map under three hours, the Lambda Ori map was broken into two
286: segments, each of size 28.75$\times$61.5 arcmin - one offset west of
287: the star $\lambda$ Ori and the other offset to the east, with the
288: combined image covering an area of 57$\times$61.5 arcmin, leaving the
289: star $\lambda$ Orionis approximately at the center. Each of the
290: IRAC images from the Spitzer Science Center pipeline were corrected
291: for instrumental artifacts using an IDL routine developed by S. Carey
292: and then combined into the mosaics at each of the four bandpasses
293: using the MOPEX package \citep{Makovoz05}. Note that the IRAC images
294: do not cover exactly the same FOV in all bands, providing a slice
295: north of the star with data at 3.6 and 5.8 micron, and another slice
296: south of it with photometry at 4.5 and 8.0 microns. The size of these
297: strips are about 57$\times$6.7 arcmin in both cases. The
298: Multiband Imaging Photometer for Spitzer (MIPS, \citet{Rieke04}) was
299: used to map the cluster with a medium rate scan mode and 12 legs
300: separated by 302 arcsec in the cross scan direction. The total
301: effective integration time per point on the sky at 24~$\mu$m for most
302: points in the map was 40 seconds, and the mosaic covered an area
303: of 60.5$\times$98.75 arcmin centered around the star $\lambda$
304: Orionis. Since there were no visible artifacts in the pipeline
305: mosaics for MIPS 24~$\mu$m we used them as our starting point to
306: extract the photometry. We obtained MIPS 70 $\mu$m and 160 $\mu$m
307: imaging of the $\lambda$ Ori region, but very few point sources were
308: detected and we do not report those data in this paper.
309:
310: The analysis of the data was done with IRAF. First, we detected
311: objects in each image using the ``starfind'' command. Since the images
312: in the [3.6] and [4.5] bands are deeper than those in the [5.8] and
313: [8.0] bands, and since the fluxes of most objects are brighter at
314: those wavelengths, the number of detections are much larger at the
315: IRAC short wavelengths than at the longer ones. Only a relatively few
316: objects have been detected at 24~$\mu$m with MIPS.
317: As a summary, 164 objects were detected at at 3.6 and 4.5 micron,
318: 145 at 5.8 micron, 139 at 8.0 micron
319: and 13 at 24 micron.
320:
321:
322:
323: We have performed aperture photometry to derive fluxes for C69
324: cluster members. For the IRAC
325: mosaics we used an aperture of 4 pixels radius, and the sky was computed
326: using a circular annulus 4 pixels wide, starting at a radius 4 pixels
327: away from the center. It is necessary to apply an aperture correction
328: to our 4-pixel aperture photometry in order to estimate the flux
329: for a 10-pixel aperture, because the latter is the aperture size used
330: to determine the IRAC flux calibration. In some cases, due to the presence
331: of nearby stars, hot pixels, or because of their faintness, a 2 pixel
332: aperture and the appropriate aperture correction were used (see notes to Table 3).
333: For the MIPS
334: photometry at 24~ $\mu$m, we used a 5.31 pixels (13 arcsec) aperture
335: and a sky annulus from 8.16~pixels (20 arcsec) to 13.06~pixels (32
336: arcsec). An aperture correction was also applied. Table 2 provides the
337: zero points, aperture corrections and conversion factors between
338: magnitudes and Jansky, as provided by the Spitzer Science Center website.
339:
340: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
341: %%%% -- Actual values are from Aug 2006, 4 pix and 2 pix aperture photometry.
342: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
343:
344:
345: \subsubsection{Data cross-correlation}
346: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
347:
348: The coverage on the sky of our Spitzer/IRAC data is an approximate
349: square of about 1 sq.deg, centered on the star $\lambda$ Orionis. The
350: optical data taken with the CFHT in 1999 covers an area of
351: 42$\times$28 arcmin, again leaving the star in the center of this
352: rectangle. Therefore, the optical survey is completely included in
353: the Spitzer mapping, and we have been able to look for the counterpart
354: of the cluster candidates presented in Paper~I. The analysis of the
355: area covered by Spitzer but without optical imaging in the CFHT1999
356: survey will be discussed in a forthcoming paper. We have not been able
357: to obtain reliable Spitzer photometry for some candidate members from Paper I,
358: especially at the faint end of the cluster sequence. The faintest detected object,
359: LOri167, depending on the isochrone and the model, would have a mass of $\sim$0.017
360: $M_\odot$, if it is a member (\citet{Barrado2005b}).
361:
362:
363: The results are listed in Table~3, where non-members and members are
364: included, respectively (see next section for the discussion about the
365: membership). In both cases, we include data corresponding to the bands
366: R and I --from CFHT--, J, H and Ks --from 2MASS and CAHA--,
367: [3.6], [4.5], [5.8], and [8.0] --from IRAC-- and [24] --from MIPS.
368: Additional near IR photometry from WHT can be found in Table~1.
369:
370:
371:
372:
373: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
374: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
375: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
376: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
377: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
378: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
379:
380:
381: \section{Color-Color and Color-Magnitude Diagrams and new membership assignment}
382: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
383:
384: Before discussing membership of the Paper I stars based on all of the
385: new optical and IR data, we have made an initial selection based on
386: the IRAC colors. Figure 1 (see further discussion in the next section)
387: displays a Color-Color Diagram with the four IRAC bands. We have found
388: that 31 objects fall in the area defined by \citet{Allen04} and \citet{Megeath2004} as Class~II
389: objects (ie, TTauri stars). Another two candidate members are
390: located in the region corresponding to Class~I/II objects. We consider
391: all these 33 objects as bona-fide members of the C69 cluster.
392: \citet{Harvey06} have discussed the confusion by extragalactic and other
393: sources when analysing Spitzer data (in their case, they used Serpens, a cloud
394: having a large extinction).
395: We believe that this contribution is negligible for our Lambda Ori
396: data, since those Class II objects detected at 24 micron are in the TTauri area
397: defined by \citet{Sicilia05}, as displayed in her figure 5.
398: There can be a higher level of contamination among the objects classiefied as Class~III.
399: All of the objects in Figure 1 had previously been identified as
400: cluster candidate members based on optical CMDs --it is unlikely that a significant
401: number of AGN would have passed both our optical and our IR criteria (and also have
402: been unresolved in our optical CFHT images). Moreover, prior to our Spitzer data,
403: only 25\% candidate members which had optical, near-IR data and
404: optical low-resolution spectroscopy turned out to be non-members
405: (Paper I). After adding the Spitzer photometry,
406: we are quite confident in the membership of the selection.
407:
408:
409: Figure~2 and Figure~3 display several color-magnitude diagrams
410: (CMD) using the data listed in Tables~1 and 3. In the case of the
411: panels of the first figure, we present optical and IR, including
412: Spitzer/IRAC data; whereas in the second set of figures only IR data
413: are plotted. For the sake of simplicity, we have also removed the
414: non-members from Figure~3.
415: %%%%%%
416: %In addition, we have included information regarding the
417: %presence of excesses at 3.6 and 4.5 microns, based on CCD (see next subsection).
418: %%%%%%
419:
420: Based on these diagrams and on the spectroscopic information included
421: in Paper~I, we have reclassified the candidate members as belonging or
422: not to the cluster. In color-magnitude diagrams, C69 members lie in
423: a fairly well-defined locus,
424: with a lower bound that coincides approximately with the 20 Myr
425: isochrone in this particular set
426: of theoretical models (Baraffe et al. 1998).
427: Stars that fall well below (or blueward)
428: of that locus are likely non-members; stars that fall above or redward
429: of that locus are retained because they could have IR excesses or above
430: average reddening. We combine the ``votes" from several CMD's to
431: yield a qualitative membership determination, essentially yes, no or
432: maybe. In total, out of 170 candidates, 19 are probable non-members, four
433: have dubious membership and the rest (147 objects) seem to be bona-fide
434: members of the cluster. Therefore, the ratio of non-members
435: to initial candidate members is 13.5 \%.
436: In any case, only additional spectroscopy (particularly medium and high resolution)
437: can be used to establish the real status. Proper motion might be helpful,
438: but as shown by Bouy et al. (2007), some bona-fide member
439: can appear to have discrepant proper motions
440: when compared with the average values of the association.
441: Table~4 shows
442: the results for each candidate in the different tests used to
443: determine its membership, the membership as in Paper~I, and the final
444: membership based on the new photometry. The second and last columns show
445: the spectroscopic information. Note that the degree of confidence in
446: the new membership classification varies depending on the available
447: information and in any event it is always a matter of probability.
448:
449: As Table~3 shows, the Spitzer/IRAC data does not match completely the
450: limiting magnitudes of either our optical survey with CFHT or the
451: 2MASS $JHKs$ data. In the case of the band [3.6], essentially all the
452: Lambda Orionis candidate members should have been detected (except
453: perhaps the faintest ones, at about $I$=22 mag). Some objects in the
454: faint end have 3.6 micron data, but lack 2MASS NIR, although in most
455: cases we have supplied it with our own deep NIR survey. In the case of
456: the Spitzer data at 4.5 micron, some additional candidate members
457: fainter than $I$=20.9 mag were not found, due to the limiting
458: magnitude of about [4.5]$_{lim}$=16.3 mag. The data at 8.0 micron only
459: reach [8.0]$_{lim}$=14.0 mag, which means that only cluster members
460: with about $I$=18.6 mag --or $Ks$=14.9-- can be detected at that
461: wavelength. This is important when discussing both the membership
462: status based on color-magnitude diagrams and the presence of infrared
463: excesses by examining color-color diagrams. Note, however, that
464: objects with IR excesses have fainter optical/near-IR counterparts
465: than predicted in the table.
466:
467: Figure 4 presents another CMD with the optical magnitudes from the
468: CFHT survey ($R$ and $I$), where we display the 170 candidate members
469: using different symbols to distinguish their actual membership
470: status. Small dots correspond to non-members based on the previous
471: discussion, whereas plus symbols, crosses and circles denote probable
472: members. In the first case --in most cases due to their faintness--
473: they do not have a complete set of IRAC magnitudes, although they can
474: have either a measurement at 3.6 and 4.5, or even at 5.8 microns. In
475: the case of the objects represented by crosses, they have been
476: classified as Class~III objects (Weak-line TTauri stars and substellar
477: analogs if they indeed belong to the cluster) based on an IRAC
478: color-color diagram (see next section and Figure~1). Finally, big
479: circles correspond to Class~II sources. The pollution rate seems to be
480: negligible in the magnitude range $I$=12-16 (1.2--0.17 M$_\odot$
481: approx, equivalent to M0 and M5, respectively),
482: where our initial selection based on the optical and the near
483: infrared (2MASS data) has worked nicely. However, for fainter
484: candidates, the number of spurious members is very large and the
485: pollution rate amounts to about 15\% for objects with 16 $<$
486: $I$\ $<$ 19, and about 45\% for I$\ge$19 (approximately the magnitude
487: beyond the reach of the 2MASS survey).
488:
489: At a distance of 400 pc and for an age of 5 Myr, and according to the
490: models by \citet{Baraffe98}, the substellar borderline is located at
491: about I=17.5 mag. Table~5 lists other values for different ages, as
492: well other bands --$J$, $Ks$ and $L'$-- discussed in this paper.
493: Among our 170 CFHT candidate members, there are 25 objects fainter
494: than that magnitude, and which pass all of our membership criteria
495: which are probable brown dwarfs. Out of these 25 objects, 12 have
496: low-resolution spectroscopy and seem to be bona-fide members and,
497: therefore, brown dwarfs. The other 13 objects are waiting for spectral
498: confirmation of their status. Assuming an age of 3 or 8 Myr would
499: increase or decrease the number of brown dwarf by seven in each
500: case. In the first case (3 Myr), five out of the seven possible BDs
501: have spectroscopic membership, whereas in the second case only three
502: were observed in Paper~I. As a summary, we have found between 18
503: and 32 good brown dwarfs candidates (depending on the final age) in
504: the Lambda Orionis cluster, and between 17 and 9 have their nature
505: confirmed via low-resolution spectroscopy. Note that even this
506: technique does not preclude the possibility that a few among them
507: would actually be non-members.
508:
509: Finally, the planetary mass domain starts at about $Ic$=21.5, using a
510: 5 Myr isochrone (DUSTY models from \citet{Baraffe02}). In that region,
511: there is only one promising planetary mass candidate, LOri167
512: (\citet{Barrado2007AALetters}).
513:
514: % We do not have
515: %spectroscopy for this object yet, but we hope to get a spectrum of it
516: %in Fall 2005 using Keck and NIRSPEC (we did, John, but it is not good enought).
517:
518: \section{Discussion}
519:
520: \subsection{The Color-Color diagrams, the diagnostic of IR excess and the disk ratio}
521: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
522:
523: The Spitzer/IRAC colors are a powerful tool to reveal the dust and,
524: therefore, the population of Class~I and II sources in a stellar
525: association. Figure 1 (after \citet{Allen04} and \citet{Megeath2004}) displays the colors
526: derived from the measurements at 3.6 minus 4.5 microns, versus those
527: obtained at 5.8 minus 8.0 microns. This diagram produces an excellent
528: diagnostic, allowing an easy discrimination between objects with and
529: without disks. Note that due to the limiting magnitudes of the IRAC
530: bands (see the discussion in previous section), objects fainter than
531: about $I$=18.6 mag cannot have a complete set of IRAC colors and
532: therefore cannot be plotted in the diagram. This fact imposes a limit
533: on our ability to discover mid-IR excesses at the faint end of the
534: cluster sequence. For Lambda Orionis cluster members, assuming a
535: distance of 400 pc and an age of 5 Myr (and according to the models by
536: \citet{Baraffe98}), this limit is located at 0.040 M$_\odot$. Figure 1
537: contains a substantial number of objects in the region corresponding
538: to the Class~II sources. In total, there are 31 objects located within
539: the solid rectangle out of 134 Lambda Orionis members with data in the
540: four IRAC bands.
541: Among them, three (LOri045, LOri082 and LOri092) possibly have
542: relatively large photometric errors in their 5.8 $\mu$m flux, because
543: inspection of
544: their SEDs indicates they are likely diskless.
545: Two additional objects, LOri038 and LOri063, have
546: IRAC colors indicating Class~I/II (actually, LOri038 is very close to
547: the Class~II region). The SED (see below) indicates that both are Class~II stars.
548: Therefore, the fraction of cluster members that are Class~II PMS stars
549: based on their IR excesses is $\sim$22--25\%, for the spectral range M0--M6.5.
550: This is different from what was inferred by
551: \citet{Dolan99, Dolan01} and by us (Paper~I), based on the
552: distribution of the H$\alpha$\ emission and near-infrared color-color
553: diagrams. The Spitzer/IRAC data clearly demonstrate that Lambda
554: Orionis cluster does contain a significant number of stars with dusty
555: circumstellar disks. No embedded objects (Class~I) seem to be present,
556: in agreement with the age range for the association (3-8 Myr or even
557: slightly larger). Note that our different IR excess frequency compared
558: to Dolan \& Mathieu may result from their sample being primarily of
559: higher mass stars than ours.
560:
561: Figure~5 is a blow-up of the region in Figure 1 corresponding to the
562: Class~II sources. We have also added big minus and plus symbols, and
563: large squares, to indicate those objects with measured H$\alpha$\
564: equivalent widths (in low- and medium-resolution spectrum). We have
565: used the saturation criterion by
566: \citet{Barrado03} to distinguish between objects with high W(H$\alpha$)
567: --plus symbols-- and normal W(H$\alpha$) --minus symbols. In
568: principal, an object with a W(H$\alpha$) value above the saturation
569: criterion is either accreting or is undergoing a flare episode. There
570: are two low mass stars (LOri050 and LOri063) with an H$\alpha$\
571: line broader than 200 km/s \citep{Muzerolle03}, another independent
572: indication of accretion (based on \citet{Natta04}, they should have
573: very large accretion rates $\sim$10$^{-9}$ $M_\odot$/yr). The
574: theoretical disk models used to interpret IRAC Color-Color Diagram by
575: \citet{Allen04} suggest that the accretion rates increase from the
576: bottom-left to the top-right of the figure. This is in agreement with
577: our results, since most of the accreting objects (assuming that strong
578: H$\alpha$\ is a good indicator of accretion) lie in the area of the
579: figure with the larger excesses (top-right). A couple of objects with very low
580: H$\alpha$\ emission are located near the edge of the Class~II
581: area (bottom-left), a fact that suggest that they may have a
582: relatively thin disk, with small or negligible accretion.
583: Actually these objects are surrounded by thin disks instead of
584: thick primordial disks (see next section).
585: % For completeness,
586: %Figure~6 displays additional color-color diagrams.
587:
588: Regarding the brown dwarfs in the cluster, several probable members
589: (LOri126, LOri129, LOri131, LOri132, LOri139 and LOri140) are located within the
590: precinct of Classical TTauri stars. They are just at the border
591: between stars and substellar objects, with magnitudes in the range
592: $I$=17.52--18.21 and $J$=15.38--16.16 (the boundary is located at
593: $I$=17.55 and $J$=15.36 for 5~Myr, see Table~5). In Paper~I we
594: presented low-resolution spectroscopy of LOri126, LOri139 and LOri140,
595: which suggests they are cluster members (the spectral types are M6.5,
596: M6.0 and M7.0 with a H$\alpha$\ equivalent width of 26.2, 19.7 and
597: 72.8 \AA, respectively). In addition we have confirmed the
598: membership of LOri129 via medium-resolution spectroscopy (spectral
599: type, M6.0 with a H$\alpha$\ equivalent width of 12.1 \AA).
600: %%%%%%%5
601: %There are two cluster brown dwarfs (in the sense that the fulfil the photometric
602: %and
603: %low-resolution spectroscopic membership criteria) with large H$\alpha$\ equivalent
604: %width, namely
605: % LOri156 and LOri161, with W(H$\alpha$)=101.7, and 123 \AA, respectively.
606: %However, the IRAC photometry is not deep enough and we have been
607: %not able to classify them as Class~II or III
608: %based on Figure 1.
609: % The other two stars with large H$\alpha$\ equivalent widths are
610: %
611:
612: In total, there are 15 brown dwarf candidates with a complete set of
613: IRAC colors, six of which fall in the Class~II region,
614: thus making the fraction of brown dwarfs with IR colors
615: indicative of circumstellar disks close to 40\% (down to 0.04 M$_\odot$),
616: similar to the 50\% obtained by \citep{Bouy2007}
617: in Upper Sco brown dwarfs,
618: using mid-IR photometry or the 50\% derived by Guieu et al. (2006) in Taurus brown dwarfs
619: with Spitzer.
620:
621:
622: %Figure 6 illustrates the evolution of the disk fraction with the age
623: %for several stellar associations (assuming that the infrared excess
624: %serves as a proxy of the presence of a circumstellar disk). References
625: %can be found in
626: %\citet{Barrado03}.
627: %We only represent the low mass star fraction. The ratio for the Lambda
628: %Orionis cluster (Collinder 69) is about 25\%, slightly larger than other associations
629: %of similar age such as the Sigma Orionis cluster (just south of the
630: %Orion's Belt) and the Upper Scorpius Complex, although this property
631: %depend on the technique used \citep{Bouy2007}. As stated
632: %before, for the objects below the substellar borderline, the fraction
633: %of Classical TTauri objects seems to be larger. This result can be due
634: %to the fact that in the case of Lambda Orionis this value has been
635: %derived using the Spitzer data (in particular the Spitzer/IRAC CCD),
636: %which are sensitive to smaller and cooler disks than other techniques.
637:
638: %%%%%%%
639: %NOTE: include other Spitzer data from previous works? Megeath et al. (2004)
640: %The figure has already been redone in july 2005, with IRAC data.
641: %The previous paragraph has to be rewritten
642: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
643:
644: \subsection{The Spectral Energy Distribution}
645: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
646:
647:
648:
649: We have plotted the SEDs of our Lambda
650: Orionis candidate members in Figures~6-8. There is clearly a range
651: from approximately flat spectrum, to black-body in the near-IR but
652: starting to show excesses at IRAC wavelengths, to only showing excess
653: at 24 micron. A way to study the presence of a circumstellar disk around
654: an object is to analyze the shape of the SED.
655: After \citet{Lada06} we have used the
656: 3.6--8.0~$\mu$m slope for each source detected in at least three IRAC
657: bands to distinguish between objects with optically thick,
658: primordial disks, objects surrounded by optically thin or anemic disks
659: and objects without disks.
660: The results of this test are presented in
661: Table~4. In Figures~6-8 the SEDs are sorted in agreement with their IRAC
662: slope classification:
663: diskless objects (slope index or $\alpha$$<$$-2.56$) in Figure 6,
664: thick disks ($\alpha$$>$$-1.8$) in Figure 7,
665: and objects surrounded by thin disks
666: ($-1.8$$<$$\alpha$$<$$-2.56$) in Figure 8.
667: In this last figure we also include two low mass stars which present an excess
668: only at 24 micron, due to a transition disk (see below).
669: According to the IRAC slope the fraction of cluster members
670: detected in at least three of the IRAC bands with optically thick
671: disks is 14\%, while the total disk fraction is found to be 31\%
672: (similar to the 25\% derived with the IRAC CCD). This
673: fraction is lower than the 50\% found by \citet{Lada06} in IC348
674: (1-3~Myr) as expected due to the different age of the clusters.
675:
676: Figure 9 illustrates the evolution of the disk fraction with the age
677: for several stellar associations (assuming that the infrared excess
678: serves as a proxy of the presence of a circumstellar disk). The ratios for the
679: different associations come from IRAC data \citep{Hartmann05,Lada06,Sicilia06}
680: in order to avoid different results depending on the technique used \citep{Bouy2007}.
681: The ratio for the Lambda Orionis cluster (Collinder 69) is about 30\% and, as stated
682: before, for the objects below the substellar borderline, the fraction
683: of Classical TTauri objects seems to be larger. According to its older age,
684: the thick disk fraction in Collinder~69 is lower than that of IC348
685: (this fraction is represented by open squares in Figure~9).
686:
687: Among the objects classified as Class~III sources from Figure 1, only
688: two (LOri043 and LOri065) have a measurement at [24] with an unambiguous
689: detection. These two stars do not have excesses at 3.6 or 4.5 micron.
690: Therefore, they can be classified as transition objects, the
691: evolutionary link between the primordial disks and debris disks.
692: A third of the Class~II sources (11 out of 33) have measurements in
693: the [24] band, all of them with clear excess, as expected from
694: their Class~II status. The
695: lack of IR excesses at shorter wavelengths for LOri043 and LOri065
696: probably stems from an inner disk hole or at least less inner dust
697: than for the Class~II sources. Models of similar 24 $\mu$m-only
698: excess sources and a discussion of their disk-evolutionary significance
699: can be found in \citet{Sicilia06,Muzerolle06,DAlessio06}.
700: Figure~10 shows the same diagram as in Figure~1 but the MIPS 24~$\mu$m
701: information is included as dashed squares. The small circles stand
702: for objects having optically thin (dashed) or optically thick (solid)
703: disks based on their IRAC slope. The diagram shows a smooth transition
704: between the three types of objects: diskless, thin, and primordial
705: disks.
706: LOri103 has a thin disk based on its 3.6--5.8~$\mu$m
707: slope. It has been classified as Class~III due to its magnitude at
708: 8.0~$\mu$m but we believe that it is actually a Class~II source and the faint
709: magnitude at this bandpass is probably due to the presence
710: of a nebulosity.
711:
712: There are some objects classified as Class~III sources by the
713: IRAC CCD (they are outside, but close to the Class~II area in the
714: diagram), but have disks based on their IRAC slope. All these objects
715: are brown dwarfs according to the models by \citet{Baraffe98} (5~Myr)
716: which pass all our membership criteria and thus the ratio of substellar
717: objects bearing disks increases to 50~\% (note that we need detections
718: in at least three IRAC bands to calculate the IRAC slope).
719:
720: None of our brown dwarf candidates have been detected at 24 micron.
721: This is probably due to the detection limits for this band.
722:
723: As a summary, of the 170 objects presented in Paper I, 167 are discussed here
724: (the other three are spurious detections or the Spitzer photometry is not reliable).
725: Excluding the sources classified as non-members,
726: there are 22 which cannot be classified due to the incompleteness of the IRAC data,
727: 95 have been classified as diskless, another two have transition disks, 25 thin disks
728: and 20 thick disks. All this information has been listed in Table 4.
729: Note that
730: there are nine
731: objects classified as Class III from color-color diagrams but which have thin
732: disks according to the SED slopes, and another one
733: (LOri156, a very low mass brown dwarf candidate with a very intense H$\alpha$) which has a
734: thick disk based on the slope of the IRAC data.
735:
736:
737: \subsection{The Spatial distribution of the members}
738: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
739:
740: We have plotted the spatial distribution of our good candidate members
741: in Figure~11. Four-point stars represent B stars and $\lambda$ Orionis
742: (O8III). The Class~III members (crosses) are approximately randomly
743: distributed across the survey region. Both the Class~II sources and
744: the B stars give the impression of being concentrated into linear
745: grouping - with most of the B stars being aligned vertically near
746: RA = 83.8, and a large number of the Class~II sources being aligned
747: in the East-Southeast direction (plus some less well-organized
748: alignments running more or less north-south). It is possible the
749: spatial distributions are reflective of the birth processes in C69 -
750: with the youngest objects (the Class~II sources and B stars) tracing
751: the (former?) presence of dense molecular gas, whereas the Class~III
752: sources have had time to mix dynamically and they are no longer near the
753: locations where they were born.
754:
755:
756: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
757: %% NOTE: Relation with conservation of the disks? Is this true? Why?
758: %%%
759:
760: Figure 12 shows three different views of the central portion of the
761: Spitzer mosaic at 3.6
762: microns for the C69 region. Figures 12a and 12b (with 12b being a
763: blow-up of the center of 12a) emphasize the distribution of Class~II
764: sources relative to the cluster center; Figure 12c shows the
765: distribution of our brown dwarf candidates. The star $\lambda$ Orionis
766: is at the center of each of these figures. The object located
767: south of the star $\lambda$ Orionis is BD+09 879 C (or HD36861 C, a F8
768: V star), with an angular distance of about 30 arcsec from the close
769: binary $\lambda$ Orionis AB (the projected distance, if BD+09 879 C is
770: a cluster member, would be 12,000 AU from the AB pair). The apparent
771: relative lack of cluster candidate members within about 75 arcsec from the
772: star $\lambda$ Orionis may be illusory, as this region was ``burned out"
773: in the optical images of the CFHT1999 survey and is also adversely
774: affected in our IRAC images. There are a number of Class~II sources
775: at about 75-90 arcsec from $\lambda$\ Ori, corresponding to a projected
776: separation of order 30,000 AU, so at least at that distance
777: circumstellar disks can survive despite the presence of a nearby
778: O star.
779:
780: Regarding the distribution of brown dwarfs, a significant number of
781: them (30 \%) are within the the inner circle with a diameter of 9
782: arcmin (our original optical survey covered an area of 42$\times$28 arcmin).
783: However, there are substellar members at any distance from the
784: star $\lambda$ Ori (Figure ~12c), and there is no substantial evidence that the
785: cluster brown dwarfs tend to be close to the massive central star.
786:
787:
788:
789:
790:
791: We have estimated the correlation in spatial distribution of
792: different sets of data: Class II vs. Class III candidates,
793: objects with any kind of disk (thin, thick and transition)
794: vs. diskless objects, and stellar vs. substellar objects
795: (following the substellar frontier given in Table 5 for
796: different ages and bands).
797: We have computed the two-sided Kuiper statistic (invariant
798: Kolmogorov-Smirnov test), and its associated probability that
799: any of the previously mentioned pairs of stellar groups were drawn
800: from the same distribution. We have calculated the two
801: dimensional density function of each sample considering a
802: 4.5$\times$3 arcmin grid-binning in a 45$\times$30 arcmin region centered at 05:35:08.31,
803: +09:56:03.6 (the star Lambda Orionis).
804: The test reveals that in the first case, the cumulative
805: distribution function of Class II candidates
806: is significantly different from that of Class III candidates, with a
807: probability for these data sets being drawn from the same
808: distribution of $\sim 1 \%$. This situation changes when
809: comparing the set of objects harbouring any kind
810: of disk with that of diskless objects, finding a probability
811: of $\sim 50 \%$ in this case (and hence no conclusion can be
812: drawn, other than that there is no strong correlation).
813: On the other hand, regarding a correlation with age, the test points out a
814: trend in the relationship between the spatial distribution
815: of stellar and substellar objects depending on the assumed age.
816: The value of the probability
817: of these two populations sharing a common spatial distribution
818: decreases from a $\sim 30 \%$ when assuming an age of 3 Myr, to $\sim 0.001 \%$
819: for an age of 8 Myr. The value assuming an age of 5 Myr is $\sim 1 \%$.
820:
821:
822: The spatial distribution of objects detected at 24 micron can be seen
823: in Figure~13. The nebulosity immediately south of the star $\lambda$ Orionis
824: (close to BD $+$09 879 C) corresponds to the HII region LBN
825: 194.69-12.42 (see the detail in Figure 12b in the band [3.6]). Most of
826: the detected members are located within the inner 9 arcmin circle,
827: with an apparent concentration in a ``filament'' running approximately
828: north-south (i.e. aligned with the B stars as illustrated in Figure 11b).
829: Out of the cluster members discovered by
830: \citeauthor{Dolan01}, 11 are within the MIPS [24] image (see
831: Figure~13) and have fluxes above the detection level. The closest
832: member to $\lambda$ Orionis is D\&M\#33 (LOri034), about 2 arcmin
833: east from the central star.
834:
835:
836: The MIPS image at 24 micron suggest that there are two bubbles
837: centered around the $\lambda$ Orionis multiple star
838: (actually, the center might be the C component or the HII region
839: LBN 194.69-12.42). The first one is
840: about 25 arcmin away, and it is located along the
841: North-East/South-West axis. More conspicuous is the smaller front
842: located at a distance of 10.75 arcmin, again centered on the HII
843: region and not in $\lambda$ Orionis AB. In this case, it is most visible
844: located in the direction West/North-West, opposite to the alignment of Class
845: II objects and low mass members with excess at 24 micron. Similar structures
846: can be found at larger scales in the IRAS images of this region,
847: at 110 and 190 arcmin.
848:
849: The star 37 Ori, a B0III, is located at the center of the cocoon at
850: the bottom of the image.
851: The source IRAS 05320+0927 is very close and it is probably the same.
852:
853:
854: Note that while BD $+$09 879 C would appear to be the source of a
855: strong stellar wind and/or large UV photon flux, it is not obvious that
856: the visible star is the UV emitter because the spectral type for
857: BD $+$09 879 C is given as F8V \citep{Lindroos85}. It would be useful
858: to examine this star more closely in order to try to resolve this
859: mystery.
860:
861:
862: %%%%%%
863: %JOHN: could be the wind of the O8 III star inhomogeneous, leaving the disks
864: %where the wind is not present? The photoinizing front should be homogeneous,
865: %with spheric symmetry (although it is true that what we see depends on the
866: % original distribution of gas and dust). Does this direction correspod to the
867: % rotation axis
868: %fo the star lambda Ori? It is just a wild thought. Could it be related with several
869: %episodes of mass expulsion?
870:
871:
872:
873: \section{Conclusions}
874: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
875: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
876: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
877: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
878: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
879: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
880:
881: We have obtained Spitzer IRAC and MIPS data of an area about one
882: sq.deg around the star $\lambda$ Orionis, the central star of the 5
883: Myr Lambda Orionis open cluster (Collinder 69). These data were
884: combined with our previous optical and near infrared photometry (from
885: 2MASS). In addition, we have obtained deep near infrared imaging. The
886: samples have been used to assess the membership of the 170 candidate
887: members, selected from \citet{Barrado04}.
888:
889: By using the Spitzer/IRAC data and the criteria developed by Allen et
890: al. (2004) and Hartmann et al. (2005), we have found 33 objects which
891: can be classified as Classical TTauri stars and substellar analogs
892: (Class~II objects). This means that the fraction of members with disks
893: is 25\% and 40\%, for the stellar (in the spectral range M0 - M6.5)
894: and substellar population
895: (down to 0.04 M$_\odot$). However,
896: by combining this information with H$\alpha$\ emission (only a
897: fraction of them have spectroscopy), we find that some do not seem
898: to be accreting.
899:
900: Moreover, as expected from models,
901: we see a correlation in the $[3.6]$ - $[4.5]$ vs. $[5.8]$ - $[8.0]$ diagram
902: for objects with redder colors (more IR excess) to have stronger
903: H$\alpha$\ emission.
904: In addition, following \citet{Lada06} and the classification
905: based on the slope of the IRAC data, we found that the ratio of
906: substellar members
907: bearing disks (optically thin or thick) is $\sim$~50\%, whereas is
908: about 31\% for the complete sample (14\% with thick disks).
909: This result suggests that the timescale for primordial disks
910: to dissipate is longer for lower
911: mass stars, as suggested in Barrado y Navascu\'es \& Mart\'{\i}n (2003).
912:
913: We have also found that the distribution of Collinder members is very
914: inhomogeneous, specifically for the Class~II objects. Most of them are
915: located in a filament which goes from the central star $\lambda$
916: Orionis to the south-east, more or less towards the dark cloud Barnard
917: 35. In addition, there are several Class~II stars close to the central
918: stars. If the (previously) highest mass member of C69 has already
919: evolved off the main sequence and become a supernova, either the
920: disks of these Class~II stars survived that episode or they formed
921: subsequent to the supernova.
922:
923: We have also derived the fluxes at 24 micron from Spitzer/MIPS
924: imaging. Only a handful --13-- of the low mass stars were detected (no
925: brown dwarfs). Most of them are Class~II objects. In the case of the
926: two Class~III members with 24 micron excess, it seems that they
927: correspond to transitions disks, already evolving toward the
928: protoplanetary phase.
929:
930:
931:
932: \acknowledgements
933: We thank Calar Alto Observatory for allocation of director's discretionary
934: time to this programme.
935: This research has been funded by Spanish grants MEC/ESP2004-01049, MEC/Consolider-CSD2006-0070,
936: and CAM/PRICIT-S-0505/ESP/0361.
937:
938:
939: %\bibliography{Lori_Paper}
940: \begin{thebibliography}{29}
941: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
942:
943: \bibitem[{{Allen} {et~al.}(2004){Allen}, {Calvet}, {D'Alessio}, {Merin},
944: {Hartmann}, {Megeath}, {Gutermuth}, {Muzerolle}, {Pipher}, {Myers}, \&
945: {Fazio}}]{Allen04}
946: {Allen}, L.~E., {Calvet}, N., {D'Alessio}, P., {et~al.} 2004, \apjs, 154, 363
947:
948: \bibitem[{{Baraffe} {et~al.}(1998){Baraffe}, {Chabrier}, {Allard}, \&
949: {Hauschildt}}]{Baraffe98}
950: {Baraffe}, I., {Chabrier}, G., {Allard}, F., \& {Hauschildt}, P.~H. 1998, \aap,
951: 337, 403
952:
953: \bibitem[{{Baraffe} {et~al.}(2002){Baraffe}, {Chabrier}, {Allard}, \&
954: {Hauschildt}}]{Baraffe02}
955: {Baraffe}, I., {Chabrier}, G., {Allard}, F., \& {Hauschildt}, P.~H. 2002, \aap,
956: 382, 563
957:
958: \bibitem[{{Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s} \& {Mart{\'{\i}}n}(2003)}]{Barrado03}
959: {Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s}, D. \& {Mart{\'{\i}}n}, E.~L. 2003, \aj, 126, 2997
960:
961: \bibitem[{{Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s} {et~al.}(2004){Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s},
962: {Stauffer}, {Bouvier}, {Jayawardhana}, \& {Cuillandre}}]{Barrado04}
963: {Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s}, D., {Stauffer}, J.~R., {Bouvier}, J.,
964: {Jayawardhana}, R., \& {Cuillandre}, J.-C. 2004, \apj, 610, 1064 (Paper I)
965:
966: \bibitem[Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s, Stauffer, \& Bouvier (2005)]{Barrado2005a}
967: Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s, D., Stauffer, J.~R., \& Bouvier, J.\ 2005, ASSL Vol.~327:
968: The Initial Mass Function 50 Years Later, 133
969:
970: \bibitem[Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s, Hu{\'e}lamo, \& Morales Calder{\'o}n (2005)]{Barrado2005b}
971: Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s, D., Hu{\'e}lamo, N., \& Morales Calder{\'o}n, M.\ 2005,
972: Astronomische Nachrichten, 326, 981
973:
974: \bibitem[Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s et al .(2007)]{Barrado2007AALetters}
975: Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s, D., Bayo, A., Morales Calder{\'o}n, M., Hu{\'e}lamo, N., Stauffer, J.R., Bouy, H.\
976: 2007, A\&A Letters, submitted
977:
978: \bibitem[{{Bouy et al.}(2007)}]{Bouy2007}
979: Bouy, H., Hu{\'e}lamo, N.,
980: Mart{\'{\i}}n, E.~L., Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s, D., Sterzik, M., \& Pantin,
981: E.\ 2007, \aap, 463, 641
982:
983: \bibitem[{{Brice{\~n}o} {et~al.}(2003){Brice{\~n}o}, {Luhman}, {Hartmann},
984: {Stauffer}, \& {Kirkpatrick}}]{Briceno03IAU}
985: {Brice{\~n}o}, C., {Luhman}, K.~L., {Hartmann}, L., {Stauffer}, J.~R., \&
986: {Kirkpatrick}, J.~D. 2003, in IAU Symposium, ed. E.~{Mart{\'{\i}}n}, 81--+
987:
988: \bibitem[{{Chabrier} {et~al.}(2000){Chabrier}, {Baraffe}, {Allard}, \&
989: {Hauschildt}}]{Chabrier00}
990: {Chabrier}, G., {Baraffe}, I., {Allard}, F., \& {Hauschildt}, P. 2000, \apj,
991: 542, 464
992:
993: \bibitem[{{Cutri} {et~al.}(2003){Cutri}, {Skrutskie}, {van Dyk}, {Beichman},
994: {Carpenter}, {Chester}, {Cambresy}, {Evans}, {Fowler}, {Gizis}, {Howard},
995: {Huchra}, {Jarrett}, {Kopan}, {Kirkpatrick}, {Light}, {Marsh}, {McCallon},
996: {Schneider}, {Stiening}, {Sykes}, {Weinberg}, {Wheaton}, {Wheelock}, \&
997: {Zacarias}}]{Cutri03}
998: {Cutri}, R.~M., {Skrutskie}, M.~F., {van Dyk}, S., {et~al.} 2003, {2MASS All
999: Sky Catalog of point sources.} (The IRSA 2MASS All-Sky Point Source Catalog,
1000: NASA/IPAC Infrared Science
1001: Archive.~http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/applications/Gator/)
1002:
1003: \bibitem[{{D'Alessio} {et~al.}(2006){D'Alessio}, {Calvet}, {Hartmann},
1004: {Franco-Hern{\'a}ndez}, \& {Serv{\'{\i}}n}}]{DAlessio06}
1005: {D'Alessio}, P., {Calvet}, N., {Hartmann}, L., {Franco-Hern{\'a}ndez}, R., \&
1006: {Serv{\'{\i}}n}, H. 2006, \apj, 638, 314
1007:
1008: \bibitem[{{Dolan} \& {Mathieu}(1999)}]{Dolan99}
1009: {Dolan}, C.~J. \& {Mathieu}, R.~D. 1999, \aj, 118, 2409
1010:
1011: \bibitem[{{Dolan} \& {Mathieu}(2001)}]{Dolan01}
1012: {Dolan}, C.~J. \& {Mathieu}, R.~D. 2001, \aj, 121, 2124
1013:
1014: \bibitem[{{Engelbracht et al.}(2006)}]{Engelbracht06}
1015: {Engelbracht et al.} 2006, in prep.
1016:
1017: \bibitem[Fazio et al.(2004)]{Fazio04}
1018: {Fazio}, G.~G., et al.\ 2004, \apjs, 154, 10
1019:
1020: %
1021: %\bibitem[{{Fazio} {et~al.}(2004){Fazio}, {Hora}, {Allen}, {Ashby}, {Barmby},
1022: % {Deutsch}, {Huang}, {Kleiner}, {Marengo}, {Megeath}, {Melnick}, {Pahre},
1023: % {Patten}, {Polizotti}, {Smith}, {Taylor}, {Wang}, {Willner}, {Hoffmann},
1024: % {Pipher}, {Forrest}, {McMurty}, {McCreight}, {McKelvey}, {McMurray}, {Koch},
1025: % {Moseley}, {Arendt}, {Mentzell}, {Marx}, {Losch}, {Mayman}, {Eichhorn},
1026: % {Krebs}, {Jhabvala}, {Gezari}, {Fixsen}, {Flores}, {Shakoorzadeh}, {Jungo},
1027: % {Hakun}, {Workman}, {Karpati}, {Kichak}, {Whitley}, {Mann}, {Tollestrup},
1028: % {Eisenhardt}, {Stern}, {Gorjian}, {Bhattacharya}, {Carey}, {Nelson},
1029: % {Glaccum}, {Lacy}, {Lowrance}, {Laine}, {Reach}, {Stauffer}, {Surace},
1030: % {Wilson}, {Wright}, {Hoffman}, {Domingo}, \& {Cohen}]{Fazio04}
1031: %{Fazio}, G.~G., {Hora}, J.~L., {Allen}, L.~E., {et~al.} 2004, \apjs, 154, 10
1032:
1033: \bibitem[{{Guieu} {et~al.}(2006){Guieu}, {Dougados}, {Monin}, {Magnier}, \&
1034: {Mart{\'{\i}}n}}]{Guieu06}
1035: {Guieu}, S., {Dougados}, C., {Monin}, J.-L., {Magnier}, E., \& {Mart{\'{\i}}n},
1036: E.~L. 2006, \aap, 446, 485
1037:
1038: \bibitem[{{Hartmann}(2004)}]{Hartmann04IAU}
1039: {Hartmann}, L. 2004, in IAU Symposium, ed. M.~{Burton}, R.~{Jayawardhana}, \&
1040: T.~{Bourke}, 201--+
1041:
1042: \bibitem[{{Hartmann} {et~al.}(2005){Hartmann}, {Megeath}, {Allen}, {Luhman},
1043: {Calvet}, {D'Alessio}, {Franco-Hernandez}, \& {Fazio}}]{Hartmann05}
1044: {Hartmann}, L., {Megeath}, S.~T., {Allen}, L., {et~al.} 2005, \apj, 629, 881
1045:
1046: \bibitem[Harvey et al.(2006)]{Harvey06} Harvey, P.~M., et al.\
1047: 2006, \apj, 644, 307
1048:
1049: \bibitem[{{Hunt} {et~al.}(1998){Hunt}, {Mannucci}, {Testi}, {Migliorini},
1050: {Stanga}, {Baffa}, {Lisi}, \& {Vanzi}}]{Hunt98}
1051: {Hunt}, L.~K., {Mannucci}, F., {Testi}, L., {et~al.} 1998, \aj, 115, 2594
1052:
1053: \bibitem[{{Lada} {et~al.}(2006){Lada}, {Muench}, {Luhman}, {Allen}, {Hartmann},
1054: {Megeath}, {Myers}, {Fazio}, {Wood}, {Muzerolle}, {Rieke}, {Siegler}, \&
1055: {Young}}]{Lada06}
1056: {Lada}, C.~J., {Muench}, A.~A., {Luhman}, K.~L., {et~al.} 2006, \aj, 131, 1574
1057:
1058: \bibitem[{{Lindroos}(1985)}]{Lindroos85}
1059: {Lindroos}, K.~P. 1985, \aaps, 60, 183
1060:
1061: \bibitem[{{Luhman}(2004)}]{Luhman04}
1062: {Luhman}, K.~L. 2004, \apj, 617, 1216
1063:
1064: \bibitem[{{Makovoz} \& {Khan}(2005)}]{Makovoz05}
1065: {Makovoz}, D. \& {Khan}, I. 2005, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific
1066: Conference Series, ed. P.~{Shopbell}, M.~{Britton}, \& R.~{Ebert}, 81--+
1067:
1068: \bibitem[Megeath et al.(2004)]{Megeath2004} Megeath, S.~T., et al.\
1069: 2004, \apjs, 154, 367
1070:
1071: \bibitem[{{McCaughrean} \& {Stauffer}(1994)}]{McCaughrean94}
1072: {McCaughrean}, M.~J. \& {Stauffer}, J.~R. 1994, \aj, 108, 1382
1073:
1074: \bibitem[{{Muzerolle} {et~al.}(2006){Muzerolle}, {Adame}, {D'Alessio},
1075: {Calvet}, {Luhman}, {Muench}, {Lada}, {Rieke}, {Siegler}, {Trilling},
1076: {Young}, {Allen}, {Hartmann}, \& {Megeath}}]{Muzerolle06}
1077: {Muzerolle}, J., {Adame}, L., {D'Alessio}, P., {et~al.} 2006, \apj, 643, 1003
1078:
1079: \bibitem[{{Muzerolle} {et~al.}(2003){Muzerolle}, {Hillenbrand}, {Calvet},
1080: {Brice{\~n}o}, \& {Hartmann}}]{Muzerolle03}
1081: {Muzerolle}, J., {Hillenbrand}, L., {Calvet}, N., {Brice{\~n}o}, C., \&
1082: {Hartmann}, L. 2003, \apj, 592, 266
1083:
1084: \bibitem[{{Natta} {et~al.}(2004){Natta}, {Testi}, {Muzerolle}, {Randich},
1085: {Comer{\'o}n}, \& {Persi}}]{Natta04}
1086: {Natta}, A., {Testi}, L., {Muzerolle}, J., {et~al.} 2004, \aap, 424, 603
1087:
1088: \bibitem[{{Reach} {et~al.}(2005){Reach}, {Megeath}, {Cohen}, {Hora}, {Carey},
1089: {Surace}, {Willner}, {Barmby}, {Wilson}, {Glaccum}, {Lowrance}, {Marengo}, \&
1090: {Fazio}}]{Reach05}
1091: {Reach}, W.~T., {Megeath}, S.~T., {Cohen}, M., {et~al.} 2005, \pasp, 117, 978
1092:
1093: \bibitem[{{Rieke} {et~al.}(2004){Rieke}, {Young}, {Engelbracht}, {Kelly},
1094: {Low}, {Haller}, {Beeman}, {Gordon}, {Stansberry}, {Misselt}, {Cadien},
1095: {Morrison}, {Rivlis}, {Latter}, {Noriega-Crespo}, {Padgett}, {Stapelfeldt},
1096: {Hines}, {Egami}, {Muzerolle}, {Alonso-Herrero}, {Blaylock}, {Dole}, {Hinz},
1097: {Le Floc'h}, {Papovich}, {P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez}, {Smith}, {Su}, {Bennett},
1098: {Frayer}, {Henderson}, {Lu}, {Masci}, {Pesenson}, {Rebull}, {Rho}, {Keene},
1099: {Stolovy}, {Wachter}, {Wheaton}, {Werner}, \& {Richards}}]{Rieke04}
1100: {Rieke}, G.~H., {Young}, E.~T., {Engelbracht}, C.~W., {et~al.} 2004, \apjs,
1101: 154, 25
1102:
1103: \bibitem[Sicilia-Aguilar et al.(2005)]{Sicilia05}
1104: Sicilia-Aguilar, A., Hartmann, L.~W., Hern{\'a}ndez, J., Brice{\~n}o, C.,
1105: \& Calvet, N.\ 2005, \aj, 130, 188
1106:
1107: \bibitem[{{Sicilia-Aguilar} {et~al.}(2006){Sicilia-Aguilar}, {Hartmann},
1108: {Calvet}, {Megeath}, {Muzerolle}, {Allen}, {D'Alessio}, {Mer{\'{\i}}n},
1109: {Stauffer}, {Young}, \& {Lada}}]{Sicilia06}
1110: {Sicilia-Aguilar}, A., {Hartmann}, L., {Calvet}, N., {et~al.} 2006, \apj, 638,
1111: 897
1112:
1113: \end{thebibliography}
1114:
1115: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1116: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1117: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1118: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1119: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1120: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1121:
1122: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1123: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1124: %
1125: % TABLES
1126: %
1127: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1128: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1129: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1130: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1131: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1132: \clearpage
1133: \input{tab1.tex}
1134: \input{tab2.tex}
1135: \input{tab3.tex}
1136: \input{tab4.tex}
1137: \input{tab5.tex}
1138:
1139: \clearpage
1140:
1141: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1142: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1143: %
1144: % Figures
1145: %
1146: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1147: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1148: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1149: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1150: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1151:
1152:
1153:
1154: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1155:
1156: \setcounter{figure}{0}
1157: %-----------------------------------------------------------
1158: \begin{figure*}
1159: \centering
1160: \includegraphics[width=10.8cm]{f01.eps}
1161: \caption{
1162: Spitzer/IRAC CCD. Class~I/II (big empty circles, magenta),
1163: Class~II (big empty circles, red) and Class~III --or not members--
1164: (crosses) have been classified using this diagram
1165: (After \citet{Allen04} and \citet{Hartmann05}).
1166: }
1167: \end{figure*}
1168: %______________________________________________________________
1169: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1170: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1171:
1172:
1173:
1174:
1175:
1176:
1177:
1178: \setcounter{figure}{1}
1179: %-----------------------------------------------------------
1180: \begin{figure*}
1181: \centering
1182: \includegraphics[width=7.8cm]{f02a.eps}
1183: \includegraphics[width=7.8cm]{f02b.eps}
1184: \includegraphics[width=7.8cm]{f02c.eps}
1185: \includegraphics[width=7.8cm]{f02d.eps}
1186: \caption{
1187: Optical/IR Color-Magnitude Diagram. Non-members appear as dots.
1188: Class~II sources
1189: (Classical TTauri stars and substellar analogs)
1190: have been included as big (red) circles, whereas
1191: Class~III (Weak-line TTauri) objects appear as crosses, and other Lambda Orionis
1192: members lacking the complete set of IRAC photometry are displayed with the plus
1193: symbol.
1194: The figure includes 1, 3, 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 Myr isocrones from Baraffe et al. (1998) as
1195: solid lines, as well as 5 Myr isochrones corresponding to dusty and COND models
1196: \citep{Chabrier00, Baraffe02}, as dotted and dashed lines.
1197: }
1198: \end{figure*}
1199: %______________________________________________________________
1200: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1201: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1202:
1203:
1204: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1205:
1206: \setcounter{figure}{2}
1207: %-----------------------------------------------------------
1208: \begin{figure*}
1209: \centering
1210: \includegraphics[width=7.8cm]{f03a.eps}
1211: \includegraphics[width=7.8cm]{f03b.eps}
1212: \includegraphics[width=7.8cm]{f03c.eps}
1213: \includegraphics[width=7.8cm]{f03d.eps}
1214: \caption{
1215: Near-IR and Spitzer Color-Magnitude Diagram.
1216: Class~II sources
1217: (Classical TTauri stars and substellar analogs)
1218: have been included as big (red) circles, whereas Class~III
1219: (Weak-line TTauri) objects appear as crosses, and other Lambda Orionis
1220: members lacking the complete set of IRAC photometry are displayed with the plus
1221: symbol.
1222: The figure includes 1, 5, 10, 20, and 100 Myr isochrones from Baraffe et al. (1998)
1223: as
1224: solid lines, as well as 5 Myr isochrones corresponding to dusty and COND models
1225: (Chabrier et al. 2000; Baraffe et al. 2002), as dotted and dashed lines.
1226: Note that in the last panel we have the the L and M data
1227: for the NextGen models, since Spitzer photometry has not been computed for this
1228: set of models.
1229: }
1230: \end{figure*}
1231: %______________________________________________________________
1232: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1233: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1234:
1235:
1236:
1237:
1238:
1239:
1240:
1241: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
1242:
1243: \setcounter{figure}{3}
1244: %-----------------------------------------------------------
1245: \begin{figure*}
1246: \centering
1247: \includegraphics[width=16.8cm]{f04.eps}
1248: \caption{
1249: Optical Color-Magnitude Diagram with the CFHT magnitudes and our new membership
1250: classification. Symbols as in previous figures.
1251: }
1252: \end{figure*}
1253: %______________________________________________________________
1254: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1255: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1256:
1257:
1258:
1259:
1260:
1261:
1262:
1263:
1264:
1265:
1266:
1267:
1268:
1269:
1270: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1271:
1272: \setcounter{figure}{4}
1273: %-----------------------------------------------------------
1274: \begin{figure*}
1275: \centering
1276: \includegraphics[width=10.8cm]{f05.eps}
1277: \caption{
1278: Spitzer/IRAC CCD for Class~II objects.
1279: We have included information regarding the H$\alpha$\ emission.
1280: }
1281: \end{figure*}
1282: %______________________________________________________________
1283: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1284: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1285:
1286:
1287:
1288: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1289:
1290: \setcounter{figure}{5}
1291: %-----------------------------------------------------------
1292: \begin{figure*}
1293: \centering
1294: \includegraphics[width=4.2cm]{f06a.eps}
1295: \includegraphics[width=4.2cm]{f06b.eps}
1296: \includegraphics[width=4.2cm]{f06c.eps}
1297: \includegraphics[width=4.2cm]{f06d.eps}
1298: \includegraphics[width=4.2cm]{f06e.eps}
1299: \includegraphics[width=4.2cm]{f06f.eps}
1300: \includegraphics[width=4.2cm]{f06g.eps}
1301: \includegraphics[width=4.2cm]{f06h.eps}
1302: \includegraphics[width=4.2cm]{f06i.eps}
1303: \includegraphics[width=4.2cm]{f06j.eps}
1304: \includegraphics[width=4.2cm]{f06k.eps}
1305: \includegraphics[width=4.2cm]{f06l.eps}
1306: \includegraphics[width=4.2cm]{f06m.eps}
1307: \caption{
1308: Spectral Energy Distributions for some stellar members of the Lambda
1309: Orionis cluster sorted according to their IRAC slope:
1310: simple photosphere spectra. Objects lacking IRAC
1311: slope or being in the boundary between two types have been classified after visual inspection.
1312: }
1313: \end{figure*}
1314: %______________________________________________________________
1315: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1316: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1317:
1318: \setcounter{figure}{6}
1319: %-----------------------------------------------------------
1320: \begin{figure*}
1321: \centering
1322: \includegraphics[width=5.4cm]{f07a.eps}
1323: \includegraphics[width=5.4cm]{f07b.eps}
1324: \caption{
1325: Spectral Energy distribution for some stellar members of the Lambda
1326: Orionis cluster sorted according to their IRAC slope:
1327: flat, or sloping IR spectra with the excess starting in the near-IR (thick disks).
1328: }
1329: \end{figure*}
1330: %______________________________________________________________
1331: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1332: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1333:
1334: \setcounter{figure}{7}
1335: %-----------------------------------------------------------
1336: \begin{figure*}
1337: \centering
1338: \includegraphics[width=5.4cm]{f08a.eps}
1339: \includegraphics[width=5.4cm]{f08b.eps}
1340: \includegraphics[width=5.4cm]{f08c.eps}
1341: \caption{
1342: Spectral Energy distribution for some stellar members of the Lambda
1343: Orionis cluster sorted according to their IRAC slope:
1344: spectra with excesses begining in the IRAC or MIPS
1345: range (thin disks and transition objects).
1346: LOri043 and LOri065 were classified as diskless objects
1347: but have been sorted as objects bearing thin disks due to their excess at MIPS [24].
1348: %Near IR data (J, H or K or all of them) are highlighted
1349: %with big open circles when coming from Magellan/Panic.
1350: }
1351: \end{figure*}
1352: %______________________________________________________________
1353: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1354: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1355: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1356:
1357: \setcounter{figure}{8}
1358: %-----------------------------------------------------------
1359: \begin{figure*}
1360: \centering
1361: \includegraphics[width=7.8cm]{f09.eps}
1362: \caption{
1363: The fraction of Class~II stars and massive brown dwarfs in several SFRs and young clusters (filled squares). Open squares stand for thick disk fractions of IC348 and C69.
1364: }
1365: \end{figure*}
1366: %______________________________________________________________
1367: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1368: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1369:
1370: \setcounter{figure}{9}
1371: %-----------------------------------------------------------
1372: \begin{figure*}
1373: \centering
1374: \includegraphics[width=10.8cm]{f10.eps}
1375: \caption{
1376: Spitzer/IRAC CCD. We show with different symbols (see key)
1377: cluster members with different types of disks.
1378: }
1379: \end{figure*}
1380: %______________________________________________________________
1381: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1382: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1383:
1384:
1385:
1386:
1387:
1388:
1389:
1390:
1391: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1392:
1393: \setcounter{figure}{10}
1394: %-----------------------------------------------------------
1395: \begin{figure*}
1396: \centering
1397: \includegraphics[width=7.8cm]{f11a.eps}
1398: \includegraphics[width=7.8cm]{f11b.eps}
1399: \caption{
1400: {\bf a)}
1401: Spatial distribution of our sample.
1402: IRAS contour levels at 100 microns also have have been
1403: included as solid (magenta) lines. The big, thick-line rectangle corresponds to the
1404: CFHT
1405: survey (Paper~I).
1406: Class~II sources (Classical TTauri stars and substellar analogs)
1407: have been included as big (red) circles, whereas Class~III (Weak-line TTauri)
1408: objects appear as crosses, and other Lambda Orionis
1409: members lacking the complete set of IRAC photometry are displayed with the plus
1410: symbol.
1411: {\bf b)}
1412: Spatial distribution of the low mass stars from Dolan \& Mathieu (1999, 2001).
1413: OB stars appear as four-point (blue) stars, with size related to magnitude
1414: (the bigger, the brighter).
1415: The overplotted thick triangles indicates those stars whose H$\alpha$\ equivalent
1416: width is larger than the saturation criterion defined by
1417: Barrado y Navascu\'es \& Mart\'{\i}n (2003), thus suggesting the presence of active
1418: accretion. Based on H$\alpha$ alone, the fraction of accreting stars would be 11\%.}
1419: \end{figure*}
1420: %______________________________________________________________
1421: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1422: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1423:
1424:
1425:
1426:
1427:
1428: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1429:
1430: \setcounter{figure}{11}
1431: %-----------------------------------------------------------
1432: \begin{figure*}
1433: \centering
1434: \includegraphics[width=6.7cm]{f12a.eps}
1435: \includegraphics[width=6.8cm]{f12b.eps}
1436: \includegraphics[width=11.8cm]{f12c.eps}
1437: \caption{
1438: Spitzer/IRAC image at 3.6 micron centered around the star $\lambda$ Orionis.
1439: {\bf a)}
1440: The size is about 9$\times$9 arcmin, equivalent to 192,000 AU.
1441: The double circle indicates the presence of a Class~II object, whereas
1442: squares indicate the location of cluster members from Dolan \& Mathieu (1999;2001).
1443: The intensity of the image is in logarithmic scale.
1444: {\bf b)} Detail around the star $\lambda$ Orionis.
1445: The size is about 3.3$\times$3.3 arcmin, equivalent to 80,000 AU.
1446: {\bf c)}
1447: Distribution of bona-fide brown dwarfs.
1448: The size of the image is 45$\times$30 arcmin.
1449: North is up, East is left.
1450: }
1451: \end{figure*}
1452: %______________________________________________________________
1453: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1454: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1455:
1456:
1457:
1458:
1459:
1460:
1461:
1462: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% AFTER this, the 24 micron analysis
1463:
1464:
1465:
1466: \setcounter{figure}{12}
1467: %-----------------------------------------------------------
1468: \begin{figure*}
1469: \centering
1470: \includegraphics[width=16.8cm]{f13.eps}
1471: \caption{
1472: Spitzer/MIPS image at 24 microns which includes the members of the Lambda Orionis
1473: cluster
1474: visible at this wavelength, including those cluster members
1475: by Dolan \& Mathieu (1999, 2001)
1476: as big circles and CFHT member as small circles detected at this wavelength.
1477: The size is about 60.5$\times$60.5 arcmin.
1478: North is up, East is left.
1479: The figure is centered on the star $\lambda$ Ori AB.}
1480: \end{figure*}
1481: %______________________________________________________________
1482: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1483: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1484:
1485:
1486: %\setcounter{figure}{13}
1487: %%-----------------------------------------------------------
1488: % \begin{figure*}
1489: % \centering
1490: % \includegraphics[width=12.8cm]{f14.eps}
1491: % \caption{
1492: %The whole MIPS image at 24 micron, including those cluster members
1493: %by Dolan \& Mathieu (1999, 2001)
1494: %as big circles and CFHT member as small circles detected at this wavelength.
1495: %The field-of-view is about 60.5$\times$98.75 arcmin.
1496: % North is up, East is left.}
1497: % \end{figure*}
1498: %______________________________________________________________
1499: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1500: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1501:
1502:
1503: %\setcounter{figure}{13}
1504: %-----------------------------------------------------------
1505: % \begin{figure*}
1506: % \centering
1507: % \includegraphics[width=10.8cm]{IRAS025_4deg.ps}
1508: % \includegraphics[width=10.8cm]{IRAS100_4deg.ps}
1509: % \caption{
1510: %Two IRAS images at 25 and 100 micron.
1511: %The field-of-view is about 4$\times$4 deg.
1512: %The star $\lambda$ Orionis, visible at 25 micron but not at 100 micron, is located
1513: %at the center. North is up, East is left.}
1514: % \end{figure*}
1515: %______________________________________________________________
1516: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1517: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1518:
1519: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1520:
1521:
1522: \end{document}
1523:
1524: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1525: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1526: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1527: \begin{figure*}
1528: %\plottwo{f2.eps}{f2_color.eps}
1529: \caption{A panel taken from Figure 2 of \citet{rudnick03}.
1530: See the electronic edition of the Journal for a color version
1531: of this figure.\label{fig2}}
1532: \end{figure*}
1533:
1534:
1535:
1536: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1537:
1538: