1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2005 December 5
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21:
22: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
23:
24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
25:
26: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
27:
28: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
29: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
30: %% use the longabstract style option.
31:
32: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
33:
34: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
35: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
36: %% the \begin{document} command.
37: %%
38: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
39: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
40: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
41: %% for information.
42:
43: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
44: \newcommand{\myemail}{rwang@nrao.edu}
45:
46: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
47:
48: %%\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
49:
50: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
51: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
52: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
53: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
54: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
55: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
56:
57: \shorttitle{Millimeter and Radio Observations of z$\sim$6 Quasars}
58: \shortauthors{Wang et al.}
59:
60: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
61: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
62:
63: \begin{document}
64:
65: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
66: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
67: %% you desire.
68:
69: \title{Millimeter and Radio Observations of z$\sim$6 Quasars}
70:
71:
72: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
73: %% author and affiliation information.
74: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
75: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
76: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
77: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
78:
79: \author{Ran Wang }
80: \affil{Astronomy Department, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China}
81: \affil{National Radio Astronomy Observatory, PO Box 0, Socorro, NM, USA 87801}
82: \email{rwang@nrao.edu}
83: %\and
84: \author{Chris L. Carilli}
85: \affil{National Radio Astronomy Observatory, PO Box 0, Socorro, NM, USA 87801}
86: \email{ccarilli@aoc.nrao.edu}
87: %\and
88: \author{Alexandre Beelen}
89: \affil{Argelander-Institut f$\rm \ddot u$r Astronomie, University of
90: Bonn, Auf dem H$\rm \ddot u$gel 71, 53121 Bonn, Germany}
91: \affil{Institut d'Astrophysique Spatiale, Universit$\rm \acute{e}$
92: de Paris-Sud, F-91405 Orsay, France}
93: \email{abeelen@astro.uni-bonn.de}
94: \author{Frank Bertoldi}
95: \affil{Argelander-Institut f$\rm \ddot u$r Astronomie, University of
96: Bonn, Auf dem H$\rm \ddot u$gel 71, 53121 Bonn, Germany}
97: \email{bertoldi@astro.uni-bonn.de}
98: %\and
99: \author{Xiaohui Fan}
100: \affil{Steward Observatory, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721}
101: \email{fan@as.arizona.edu}
102: %\and
103: \author{Fabian Walter}
104: \affil{Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy, K$\rm \ddot o$nigsstuhl
105: 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany} \email{walter@mpia.de}
106: %\and
107: \author{Karl M. Menten}
108: \affil{Max-Plank-Institute for Radioastronomie, Auf dem H$\rm \ddot
109: u$gel 71, 53121 Bonn, Germany} \email{kmenten@mpifr-bonn.mpg.de}
110: %\and
111:
112: %\and
113: \author{Alain Omont}
114: \affil{Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris, CNRS and Universite Pierre
115: et Marie Curie, Paris, France} \email{omont@iap.fr}
116: %\and
117: \author{Pierre Cox}
118: \affil{Institute de Radioastronomie Millimetrique, St. Martin d'Heres, F-38406, France}
119: \email{cox@iram.fr}
120: %\and
121: \author{Michael A. Strauss}
122: \affil{Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University,
123: Princeton, NJ, USA, 08544} \email{strauss@astro.princeton.edu}
124: %\and
125: \author{Linhua Jiang}
126: \affil{Steward Observatory, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721}
127: \email{jiang@as.arizona.edu}
128:
129: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
130: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
131: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
132: %% affiliation.
133:
134: %\altaffiltext{1}{Visiting Astronomer, Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory.
135: %CTIO is operated by AURA, Inc.\ under contract to the National Science
136: %^Foundation.}
137: %\altaffiltext{2}{Society of Fellows, Harvard University.}
138: %\altaffiltext{3}{present address: Center for Astrophysics,
139: % 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138}
140: %\altaffiltext{4}{Visiting Programmer, Space Telescope Science Institute}
141: %\altaffiltext{5}{Patron, Alonso's Bar and Grill}
142:
143: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
144: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
145: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
146: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
147: %% editorial office after submission.
148:
149: \begin{abstract}
150:
151: We present millimeter and radio observations of 13 SDSS quasars at
152: reshifts z$\sim$6. We observed eleven of them with the Max-Planck
153: Millimeter Bolometer Array (MAMBO-2) at the IRAM 30m-telescope at
154: 250 GHz and all of them with the Very Large Array (VLA) at 1.4 GHz.
155: Four sources are detected by MAMBO-2 and six are detected by the VLA
156: at $\rm \gtrsim 3 \sigma$ level. These sources, together with
157: another 6 published in previous papers, yield a
158: submillimeter/millimeter and radio observed SDSS quasar sample at
159: z$\sim$6. We use this sample to investigate the far-infrared (FIR)
160: and radio properties of optically bright quasars in the early
161: universe. We compare this sample to lower redshift samples of
162: quasars observed in the submillimeter and millimeter wavelengths
163: ((sub)mm), and find that the distribution of the FIR to B band
164: optical luminosity ratio ($\rm L_{FIR}$/$\rm L_{B}$) is similar from
165: z$\sim$2 to 6. We find a weak correlation between the FIR luminosity
166: ($\rm L_{FIR}$) and B band optical luminosity ($\rm L_{B}$) by
167: including the (sub)mm observed samples at all redshifts. Some strong
168: (sub)mm detections in the z$\sim$6 sample have radio-to-FIR ratios
169: within the range defined by star forming galaxies, which suggests
170: possible co-eval star forming activity with the powerful AGN in
171: these sources. We calculate the rest frame radio to optical ratios (
172: $\rm R^{*}_{1.4}=L_{\nu ,1.4GHz}/L_{\nu\ 4400\AA}$) for all of the
173: VLA observed sources in the z$\sim$6 quasar sample. Only one radio
174: detection in this sample, J083643.85+005453.3, has $\rm
175: R^{*}_{1.4}\sim40$ and can be considered radio loud. There are no
176: strong radio sources ($\rm R^{*}_{1.4}\geq100$) among these SDSS
177: quasars at z$\sim$6. These data are consistent with, although do not
178: set strong constraints on, a decreasing radio-loud quasar fraction
179: with increasing redshift.
180:
181: \end{abstract}
182:
183: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
184: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
185: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
186: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
187:
188: \keywords{galaxies: quasars --- infrared: galaxies --- radio
189: continuum: galaxies --- galaxies: starburst --- galaxies:
190: high-redshift}
191:
192: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
193: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
194: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
195: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
196: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
197: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
198: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
199: %% each reference.
200:
201:
202: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
203: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so by tagging
204: %% their objects with \objectname{} or \object{}. Each macro takes the
205: %% object name as its required argument. The optional, square-bracket
206: %% argument should be used in cases where the data center identification
207: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper. The text appearing
208: %% in curly braces is what will appear in print in the published paper.
209: %% If the object name is recognized by the data centers, it will be linked
210: %% in the electronic edition to the object data available at the data centers
211: %%
212: %% Note that for sources with brackets in their names, e.g. [WEG2004] 14h-090,
213: %% the brackets must be escaped with backslashes when used in the first
214: %% square-bracket argument, for instance, \object[\[WEG2004\] 14h-090]{90}).
215: %% Otherwise, LaTeX will issue an error.
216:
217: \section{Introduction}
218: The tight correlation between the mass of supermassive black holes
219: (SMBH) in the centers of galaxies and the bulge mass/velocity
220: dispersion is well documented in the local universe (Magorrian et
221: al. 1998; Marconi \& Hunt 2003; Ferrarese \& Merritt 2000; Gebhardt
222: et al. 2000; Tremaine et al. 2002) and suggests that the evolution
223: of SMBH and spheroidal galaxies is coupled even at high redshift.
224: Due to the negative K-correction, submillimeter and millimeter
225: ((sub)mm) observations become an efficient way to study the host
226: galaxies of high redshift quasars (Blain \& Longair 1993). Such
227: observations probe the rest frame FIR emission from the dust
228: components in the interstellar medium (ISM) of these objects, and
229: thus provide a unique chance to test co-eval black hole and bulge
230: formation by searching for massive starbursts in the host galaxies
231: of high redshift optically bright quasars.
232:
233: The (sub)mm and radio properties of some optically bright quasars at
234: high redshift are discussed in a number of papers. Observations of
235: large samples of optically selected quasars from z$\sim$1.5 to 5
236: (Omont 2001, 2003; Carilli et al. 2001; Isaak et al. 2002; Priddey
237: et al. 2003a; Beelen et al. 2004) result in a (sub)mm detection rate
238: of about 30\% at mJy sensitivity. The derived far-infrared (FIR)
239: luminosities of the (sub)mm detections are typically $\sim10^{13}\rm
240: \,L_{\odot}$ and imply dust masses $\geq10^{8}\rm \, M_{\odot}$.
241: Comparing samples observed with the Max-Planck Millimeter Bolometer
242: (MAMBO) at the 30-meter IRAM telescope at redshift 2 and 4, Omont et
243: al. (2003) found that the FIR luminosities of the optically bright
244: quasars in these samples do not evolve with redshift. Statistical
245: tests for these (sub)mm observed quasars show a weak correlation
246: between the optical and FIR luminosities (Omont et al. 2003; Beelen
247: 2004; Cox et al. 2005), which is argued as an evidence for FIR
248: emission from warm dust heated by star formation. The inferred star
249: formation rate is $\sim10^{3}\rm \, M_{\odot}\ yr^{-1}$ when
250: assuming a normal initial mass function (IMF). This interpretation
251: is supported by the fact that the radio-to-FIR ratios for the
252: FIR-luminous sources are consistent with the range spanned by star
253: forming galaxies (Carilli et al. 2001; Petric et al. 2006).
254:
255: The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS, York et al. 2000) has identified
256: 19 bright quasars at z$\sim$6 (Fan et al. 2000, 2001, 2003, 2004,
257: 2006a). These quasars are unique, in that they are undergoing rapid
258: accretion onto SMBHs with masses $\gtrsim 10^{9}\rm \,M_{\odot}$,
259: within 1 Gyr of the Big Bang, an epoch approaching cosmic
260: reionization (Fan et al. 2006c). These z$\sim$6 quasars have been
261: observed at all wavelengths from the X-ray to the radio (eg.
262: Bechtold et al. 2003; Pentericci et al. 2003; Shemmer et al. 2006;
263: Jiang et al. 2006a; Petric et al. 2003). The X-ray to near-infrared
264: (NIR) observations imply Spectral Energy distributions (SEDs)
265: similar to those of local quasars. The integrated bolometric
266: luminosities exceed $\gtrsim10^{13}\rm \, L_{\odot}$, and the black
267: hole masses are $\gtrsim10^{9}\rm \, M_{\odot}$ (Willott et al.
268: 2003; Iwamuro et al. 2004; Jiang et al. 2006a). Seven z$\sim$6 SDSS
269: quasars (Fan et al. 2000, 2001, 2003) were observed at 350 GHz with
270: the SCUBA camera at the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope or at 250 GHz
271: with MAMBO. Three are detected by SCUBA (Priddey et al. 2003b;
272: Robson et al. 2004) and two are detected by MAMBO (Bertoldi et al.
273: 2003a). Deep VLA observations at 1.4 GHz were made for six sources,
274: resulting in detections of two of them (Petric et al. 2003; Carilli
275: et al. 2004).
276:
277: %SDSS J083643.85+005453.3 is the first $>$1mJy radio source at 1.4GHz
278: %among the z$\sim$6 SDSS quasars. It was detected by Petric et al.
279: %(2003), as well as the FIRST survey (White et al. 1997), leading to
280: %a weighted average flux density at 1.4 GHz of 1.74$\pm$0.04mJy.
281: %Combining with observations at 5GHz gives a steep radio spectral
282: %index of -0.8 for this source (Petric et al. 2003).
283:
284: SDSS J114816.64+525150.3 at $z=6.42$ is the best studied FIR
285: luminous source at z$\sim$6. It was detected with SHARC II, the
286: bolometer camera at the Caltech Submillimeter Observatory at 350
287: $\rm \mu$m, SCUBA at 450 $\rm \mu$m and 850 $\rm \mu$m, MAMBO at 1.2
288: mm, and the VLA at 1.4GHz (Beelen et al. 2006; Robson et al. 2004;
289: Bertoldi et al. 2003a; Carilli et al. 2004). Fits to the SED from
290: the FIR to radio imply a warm dust component with a temperature of
291: 55K (Beelen et al. 2006). The corresponding FIR luminosity is
292: $2.2\times10^{13}\rm \, L_{\odot}$ with an inferred dust mass of
293: $4.5\times10^{8}\rm \, M_{\odot}$. It is also the only z$\sim$6
294: source that has been detected in the CO and [C II] 158 $\rm \mu$m
295: emission lines (Bertoldi et al. 2003b; Walter et al. 2003; Walter et
296: al. 2004; Maiolino et al. 2005). These CO observations reveal a
297: large mass of molecular gas ($\sim2\times10^{10}\rm \, M_{\odot}$)
298: in the host galaxy.
299:
300: The (sub)mm through radio observations of J114816.64+525150.3 argue
301: for a massive starburst in its host galaxy, because (i) the FIR to
302: radio ratio of this source follows that of typical star forming
303: galaxies in the local universe (Yun et al. 2001; Carilli et al.
304: 2004), (ii) the huge amount of molecular gas in its host galaxy can
305: provide the required fuel for massive star formation, and (iii) the
306: star formation rates indicated by both FIR luminosity and [C II]
307: 158$\mu$m line luminosity are $\sim 10^3$ \rm M$_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$
308: (Bertoldi et al. 2003a; Maiolino et al. 2005).
309:
310: Nineteen z$\sim$6 SDSS quasars have been published to date (Fan et
311: al. 2006b). These are an optically selected sample at the highest
312: redshift. We are pursuing a series of (sub)mm through radio studies
313: on this sample in order to (i) find the general dust and gas
314: properties in the host galaxies of these highest redshift quasars,
315: and (ii) search for star formation activity co-eval with the rapid
316: growth of SMBHs in the early universe.
317:
318: In this paper, we present new MAMBO-2 250 GHz observations of
319: eleven, and VLA 1.4GHz observations of thirteen, z$\sim$6 SDSS
320: quasars. Then, together with previously published results, we
321: discuss the general far-infrared and radio properties of the
322: optically selected quasars at z$\sim$6, focusing on luminosity
323: correlations and evolution. We will also discuss the radio loud
324: fraction of quasars. We will present further analysis of the FIR to
325: radio SEDs and discuss possible star forming activity in a second
326: paper (paper II). The sample and observations are described in
327: section 2, and results are presented in section 3. In section 4 and
328: 5, we analyse and discuss the general properties of FIR and radio
329: luminosities for the entire sample and give the conclusion in
330: section 6. We adopt a concordance cosmology with $H_{0}=71\rm\, km\,
331: s^{-1}\, Mpc^{-1}$, $\Omega_{m}=0.27$ and $\Omega_{\lambda}=0.73$
332: throughout this paper.
333:
334: %\object[M1]{Crab nebula}!
335:
336: \section{Sample and Observation}
337:
338:
339: %% In a manner similar to \objectname authors can provide links to dataset
340: %% hosted at participating data centers via the \dataset{} command. The
341: %% second curly bracket argument is printed in the text while the first
342: %% parentheses argument serves as the valid data set identifier. Large
343: %% lists of data set are best provided in a table (see Table 3 for an example).
344: %% Valid data set identifiers should be obtained from the data center that
345:
346: %% is currently hosting the data.
347: %%
348: %% Note that AASTeX interprets everything between the curly braces in the
349: %% macro as regular text, so any special characters, e.g. "#" or "_," must be
350: %% preceded by a backslash. Otherwise, you will get a LaTeX error when you
351: %% compile your manuscript. Special characters do not
352: %% need to be escaped in the optional, square-bracket argument.
353:
354: The sample of z$\sim$6 quasars are selected from about 6600 $\rm
355: deg^2$ of imaging data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (Fan et al.
356: 2006b). Fan et al. (2000, 2001, 2003, 2004, 2006a) selected sources
357: with very red $i-z\, colors$ as z$\geq5.7$ quasar candidates. These
358: candidate sources were followed up with high quality spectroscopy.
359: Nineteen z$\sim$6 quasars have been published by the SDSS survey
360: (Fan et al. 2000, 2001, 2003, 2004, 2006a) with redshifts ranging
361: from 5.74 to 6.42 and rest frame B band optical luminosities\footnote{$\rm
362: L_{B}\equiv \nu L_{\nu,4400\AA}$: $L_{\nu,4400\AA}$ is the luminosity
363: density at rest frame $\rm 4400\AA$. we calculate $L_{\nu,4400\AA}$ and $L_{B}$
364: from the AB magnitude at rest frame $1450\AA$ in the discovering papers
365: (Fan et al. 2000, 2001, 2003, 2004, 2006a), assuming
366: an optical spectral index of -0.5. } from $10^{12.5} \rm\,
367: L_{\odot}$ to $10^{13.3} \rm\, L_{\odot}$. Most of the 13 objects we
368: observed in this work were discovered in the past two years (Fan et
369: al. 2004; 2006a) and have not been observed in the (sub)mm or radio
370: bands before.
371:
372: We compare the (sub)mm properties of the z$\sim$6 objects with
373: luminous (\rm $L_{B}\ge10^{12.5}\rm\, L_{\odot}$) quasars at lower
374: redshifts from the literature. We define a low redshift group, $\rm
375: 1.5\le z \le3.0$, using a sample from Omont et al. (2003) containing
376: radio-quiet quasars with B-band absolute magnitude $\rm -29.5\le
377: M_{B}\le-27.0$ and redshift $\rm 1.8\le z \le2.8$ observed by MAMBO
378: at 250GHz, and a sample from Priddey et al. (2003a) of radio-quiet
379: quasars with $\rm -29.2\le M_{B}\le-27.5$ and $\rm 1.5\le z \le3.0$.
380: Our higher redshift group ($\rm 3.6\le z \le5.0$) is drawn from the
381: the Palomar Sky Survey (PSS) selected sample of Omont et al. (2001)
382: ($\rm M_B\le-27.0$; $\rm 3.9\le z \le4.6$) and the SDSS sample of
383: Carilli et al. (2001) ($\rm -28.8\le M_B\le-26.1$; $\rm 3.6\le z
384: \le5.0$), both observed with MAMBO at 250 GHz. The 3$\rm \sigma$
385: detection limits of the MAMBO observations by Omont et al. (2001)
386: and (2003) are $\sim$1.5 to 4 mJy, and $\sim$1.4 mJy by Carilli et
387: al. (2001). The typical 3$\rm \sigma$ detection limit of SCUBA
388: observations reported by Priddey et al. (2003a) is $\rm \sim10$ mJy
389: at 350 GHz, which corresponds to an upper limit of $\rm \sim$4 mJy
390: at 250 GHz (assuming a warm dust SED with temperature $\rm
391: T_{d}=47K$ and emissivity index $\rm \beta=1.6$).
392:
393: %We also include all the MAMBO and SCUBA
394: %observed z$>5$ quasars from Petric et al. (2003)
395: %and Priddey et al. (2003) in this group.
396:
397:
398: %\section{Observations}
399:
400: %Six sources out of the 19 z$\sim$6 quasar sample are already
401: %observed by previous literatures.
402:
403: A total of 13 z$\sim$6 SDSS quasars were observed in the course of
404: the work presented here, all with the VLA at 1.4GHz and eleven (all
405: but J000552.34-000655.8 and J104845.05+463718.3) with MAMBO-2 at
406: 250GHz (See Table 1 for the source list). J104845.05+463718.3 was a
407: published detection by MAMBO (Bertoldi et al. 2003a) and was
408: observed by the VLA with a signal at 2.2$\rm \sigma$ (Carilli et al.
409: 2004). We re-observed it with the VLA, and combined all the data.
410:
411: MAMBO-2 at the IRAM 30m telescope is a 117-channel bolometer array.
412: The Half Power Beamwidth (HPBW) of each pixel is $\rm 11''$ and the
413: spacing between horns is about $\rm 20''$. The effective sensitivity
414: is about 40 mJy$\rm s^{1/2}$. The new observations were made in the
415: winters of 2004-2005 and 2005-2006 during pooled observations using
416: the on-off mode, wobbling by $\rm 32''-46''$ in azimuth and at a
417: rate of 2 Hz. The target sources are positioned on the most
418: sensitive bolometer and the correlated sky noise is determined from
419: the other bolometers and subtracted from the source bolometer. The
420: median rms is $\sim$0.8 mJy (Table 1).
421: %We spent roughly two hours on each source and the typical r.m.s of
422: %our observations is $\sim$0.8mJy.
423: We reduced the data with the MOPSIC software package (Zylka 1998)
424: and standard scripts for on-off observation data.
425:
426: The VLA observations were made with the A array, of which the
427: maximum baseline is 30 km. The sources were observed at 1.4 GHz with
428: two Intermediate Frequency bands "IFs" and 50MHz bandwidth per IF.
429: The corresponding Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) resolution is
430: about $\rm 1.4''$. We observed each source for two to four hours to
431: a typical rms noise level of $\sim$16 $\rm \mu Jy\,beam^{-1}$ (Table
432: 1). The data were reduced and images were made using the standard
433: VLA wide field data reduction software AIPS.
434:
435: %% In this section, we use the \subsection command to set off
436: %% a subsection. \footnote is used to insert a footnote to the text.
437:
438: %% Observe the use of the LaTeX \label
439: %% command after the \subsection to give a symbolic KEY to the
440: %% subsection for cross-referencing in a \ref command.
441: %% You can use LaTeX's \ref and \label commands to keep track of
442: %% cross-references to sections, equations, tables, and figures.
443: %% That way, if you change the order of any elements, LaTeX will
444: %% automatically renumber them.
445:
446: %% This section also includes several of the displayed math environments
447: %% mentioned in the Author Guide.
448:
449: \section{Results}
450: %\setcounter{footnote}{0}
451:
452: We present our MAMBO-2 results of 11 sources and the VLA results of
453: 13 sources in Table 1. The optical properties are taken from Fan et
454: al. (2006b) and presented in Col. (1): the SDSS name, Col. (2): the
455: redshift, and Col. (3): the AB magnitude at 1450$\rm \AA$. Col. (4)
456: lists the radio 1.4GHz surface brightness at the optical position.
457: Col. (5), (6), and (7) list the nearest radio peak position and peak
458: surface brightness for detected sources. Col. (8) presents the
459: 250GHz flux densities in mJy. We mark detections in bold face. For
460: the source J000552.34-000655.8, there is a strong ($\rm\sim$Jy) radio
461: source in the field which precludes deep VLA radio imaging. The rms on the
462: 1.4GHz map is 130 $\mu$Jy, which is an order of magnitude higher than the
463: others, yielding an extremely high upper limit of $\sim$390 $\mu$Jy.
464: Thus, we exclude this source in all of our analyses in this
465: paper.
466:
467: We show the radio 1.4GHz continuum images of the 12 remaining sources in
468: Figure 1. We searched for $\rm \geq3\sigma$ peaks within a $\rm 0^{''}.6$
469: radius from the optical quasar position in the radio map. This is a
470: combination of the positional uncertainty of $\rm 0^{''}.3$ between the
471: radio and optical reference frames (Deutsch 1999) and the radio
472: observation uncertainty of $\rm \sigma
473: _{pos}\sim\frac{FWHM}{SNR}\sim0^{''}.5$\footnote{We require a signal
474: to noise ratio (SNR) of 3 for detections here.}. Six sources are
475: detected at the $\rm \geq3\sigma$ level. According to the 1.4 GHz radio
476: source counts (Fomalont et al. 2006, in prep.), we expect 0.003
477: detections with $\rm S_{1.4GHz}\geq50\,\mu Jy$ by chance, within the
478: total search area around the 12 quasars.
479:
480: We obtain four detections among the 11 sources with MAMBO. Three of
481: the detections, J084035.09+562419.9 J092721.82+200123.7 and
482: J133550.81+353315.8, are detected at $\rm >4\sigma$. The fourth
483: source, J081827.40+172251.8, is marginally detected at the $\rm
484: \sim3 \sigma$ level.
485: %We also get a signal at the 2$\rm \sigma$ level for
486: %the source J160253.98+422824.9.
487: As a comparison, the cumulative
488: number counts of 250 GHz source is about 400 deg$^{-2}$ with flux
489: density $\rm S_{250GHz}\geq 2.4\,mJy$ (Greve et al. 2004; Voss et al. 2006)
490: which is the typical 3$\rm \sigma$ limit of our observations.
491: Thus we should expect 0.03 detections in our 11 fields by chance,
492: given the $\rm 11''$ beam size of the MAMBO bolometer elements.
493:
494: We summarize the (sub)mm and radio observations of the six
495: previously observed quasars in the z$\sim$6 SDSS sample (Petric et
496: al. 2003; Priddey et al. 2003b; Bertoldi et al. 2003a; Robson et al.
497: 2004; Carilli et al. 2004) in Table 2. Col. (1), (2), and (3) give
498: the name, redshift, and 1450$\rm \AA$ AB magnitude, and Col. (4),
499: (5), (6), and (7) the flux densities at 250 GHz, 350 GHz, 667 GHz
500: and 1.4 GHz.
501:
502: Combining Tables 1 and 2, there are seventeen z$\sim$6 quasars that
503: have been observed with MAMBO. Together with the results from SCUBA
504: at 850 $\mu$m, there are eighteen z$\sim$6 SDSS quasars that have
505: (sub)mm observations at the 1 mJy sensitivity level and 8 of them
506: are detected at $\rm \gtrsim 3\sigma$. The detection rate is $\rm
507: 44\pm16\%$. The detection rate of optically bright quasar samples at
508: redshifts 2 and 4 is $\rm \sim30\%$ in Omont et al. (2001, 2003)
509: with an rms level of $>1.5\,mJy$, and $\rm \sim39\%$ in Carilli et
510: al. (2001) with a lower rms level of $\sim 1.4\,mJy$. Thus our
511: detection rate at z$\sim$6 is slightly higher compared to these
512: observations at lower redshifts, but is consistent within the
513: errors.
514:
515: Seventeen sources in the z$\sim$6 SDSS quasar sample have deep
516: observations with the VLA at 1.4 GHz and 8 are detected at the $\rm
517: \gtrsim 3\sigma$ level. J083643.85+005453.3 is the only $>$1 mJy
518: radio source at 1.4 GHz among them. It was detected by Petric et al.
519: (2003), as well as in the FIRST survey (White et al. 1997), leading
520: to a weighted average flux density of 1.74$\pm$0.04 mJy\footnote{The
521: 1.4 GHz flux density for J083643.85+005453.3 is $\rm 1750\pm40\,\mu Jy$
522: in Petric et al. (2003) and $\rm 1530\pm150\,\mu Jy$ in the FIRST
523: catalog. }. Another source, J163033.90+401209.6, has not been
524: observed with the VLA yet, and the FIRST catalog yields an upper
525: limit of 0.44 mJy at the optical position (Bertoldi et al. 2003). We
526: thus exclude this source in the analysis of radio properties in the
527: next section.
528:
529: \section{Analysis}
530:
531: %The spectra energy distributions (SEDs) from optical to radio with available data from literature
532: %are ploted in Figure. 2. The optical data from SDSS and NIR data from Spitzer (blue and green crosses)
533: %are taken from Jiang et al. (2006). FIR, radio data from MAMBO,
534: %SCUBA, SHARC II and VLA (Petric et al. 2003, Pridden et al. 2003, Robson et al. 2004,
535: %Beelen et al. 2006) are ploted as red squares with arrows denoting
536: %upper limits. We also plot the mean QSO SEDs (dashed and solid lines)
537: %at low redshift from Elvis et al. 1994 and Richards et al. 2006.
538:
539: %Two important facts are seen according to the SED plots. One is that, compared to
540: %the local QSO templates, FIR excesses are seen in several of the
541: %MAMBO detected sources, which is evident for a warm dust component in addition to
542: %the hot dust emission from the torus. The other is when fit the MAMBO data to a grey body model
543: %(T=47K, $\beta$=1.6; hard solid line in Figure 2; Beelen et al. 2006) and extended the
544: %model SED to the radio band with the typical radio-FIR
545: %correlation of a star forming galaxy, i.e. q=2.34 (Yun et al. 2001), the radio
546: %measurements among the MAMBO detected sources are all within the range
547: %defined by star forming galaxies (dotted lines). And the marginally
548: %MAMBO detected source, J0818, has a high radio flux density
549: %which exceeds the star formation galaxy defined range by a factor of 4.
550: %We now analyze the FIR and radio properties of the 19 z$\sim$6
551: %quasars, and compare them to (sub)mm observed quasar samples at
552: %different redshifts, in order to investigate the following topics:
553: %\vspace{-1.5em}
554: %\begin{itemize}
555: %\setlength{\itemsep}{-0.5em}
556: %\setlength{\parsep}{-1.5em}
557: %\item The physical evolution of the FIR luminosities and FIR-optical ratios
558: %of quasars from redshift 1.5 to 6.
559: %\item The correlations between the FIR, B-band and radio luminosities, and the underlying energy-producing mechanism.
560: %\item The radio loud fraction of these z$\sim$6 optically bright quasars.
561: %\end{itemize}
562: %\vspace{-1.5em}
563: \subsection{The FIR emission}
564:
565: To estimate the FIR luminosity of our z$\sim$6 quasars, we model
566: the FIR continuum with an optically thin grey body (Eq. (1)), adopting a dust
567: temperature of $\rm T_{d}=47K$ and emissivity index, $\rm
568: \beta=1.6$, which is derived from the mean SED of high-redshift
569: quasars (Beelen et al. 2006). We normalize the SED to the (sub)mm
570: data and integrate the model SED from rest frame 42.5 $\rm \mu m$ to
571: 122.5 $\rm \mu m$ to get the total FIR flux\footnote{For
572: J114816.64+525150.3, we directly adopt the fitting results from
573: Beelen et al. (2006) with $\rm T_{d}=55K$ and
574: $\rm \beta=1.6$.}:\\
575: \begin{equation}
576: \rm FIR\propto\int \nu ^{3+\beta}\frac{1}{exp(h\nu /kT_{d})-1}d\nu\\
577: \end{equation}
578: %This is consistent with the typical FIR flux
579: %definition based on IRAS photometries (Helou et al. 1985, 1988; see
580: %also Yun et al. 2001).
581: This estimation of FIR emission is sensitive to the assumed dust
582: temperature ($\rm T_{d}$). A higher temperature, eg. $\rm
583: T_{d}=55K$, will increase the estimated FIR flux by a factor of
584: $\sim$1.5. For non-detections ($<\,3\sigma$), we adopt as upper
585: limits the larger value of either (a) the 2$\rm \sigma$ rms or (b)
586: the measured value at the optical position plus 1$\rm \sigma$ rms
587: for all the following calculations and plots. The FIR luminosities
588: ($\rm L_{FIR}$) are given in table 4; most of the (sub)mm detected
589: sources are very luminous in the FIR band, with implied $\rm
590: L_{FIR}\sim10^{13}\, L_{\odot}$ (see Table 4). We estimated the FIR
591: luminosities for all the low redshift comparison samples in the same
592: way.
593:
594: We plot the FIR luminosity ($\rm L_{FIR}$) versus redshift in Figure 2, including
595: the z$\sim$6 SDSS sample and all the comparison samples. In Figure
596: 3, we present the histograms of the $\rm L_{FIR}$ and $\rm
597: L_{FIR}/L_{B}$ distributions separately for different redshift
598: intervals. For the (sub)mm detections at all redshifts, the $\rm
599: L_{FIR}$ values lie between $10^{12.5}\rm\, L_{\odot}$ and
600: $10^{13.8}\rm\, L_{\odot}$. The $\rm 1.5\le z \le 3$ group covers an
601: even narrower range with most of the detected sources distributed at
602: $\rm L_{FIR}\ge10^{13}\, L_{\odot}$ These ranges are partially a
603: result of the detection thresholds, i.e. a detection limit of 1.5mJy
604: at 250GHz corresponds to FIR luminosities $\sim10^{12.5} \rm\,
605: L_{\odot}$ for redshifts from 4 to 6 and $\sim10^{13} \rm\,
606: L_{\odot}$ at z$\sim$2. However, the $\rm\, L_{FIR}/L_{B}$
607: distributions are similar for the (sub)mm detections at all
608: redshifts (See Fig. 3 (b)). A similar conclusion was
609: obtained by Omont et al. (2003) and Beelen et al. (2004), but we are
610: extending it to the quasar sample at z$\sim$6. This fact suggests
611: the optical to FIR spectra energy distributions (SEDs) of the
612: luminous quasars in both optical and FIR bands do not evolve much
613: from z$\sim$2 to 6.
614:
615: $\rm L_{FIR}$ versus $\rm L_{B}$ is plotted in Figure 4, for quasars
616: at all redshifts. We present correlation tests for (i) the z$\sim$6
617: sample only (z$\sim$6), (ii) samples at all redshifts (Total), and
618: (iii) (sub)mm detections in all samples (Detection). We apply the
619: General Kendall's tau test (Isobe et al. 1986), taking $\rm L_{B}$
620: as the independent variable and $\rm L_{FIR}$ as the dependent
621: variable. The results are listed in Table 3 with Col. (1) the sample
622: used, Col. (2) the sample size, and Col. (3) the Kendall's tau
623: value. The probabilities ($\rm P_{null}$) that no correlation exists
624: between $\rm L_{B}$ and $\rm L_{FIR}$ (the null hypothesis) are
625: given in Col. (4). We take $\rm P_{null}=5\%$ as the significance
626: level below which the null hypothesis can be rejected.
627:
628: There is no correlation between $\rm L_{B}$ and $\rm L_{FIR}$ for
629: the z$\sim$6 sample only ($\rm P_{null}\sim44\%$).
630: However, the $\rm P_{null}$ value is 6\% when all the samples
631: are included, which suggests a marginal correlation.
632: These results indicates that the FIR and optical emission of
633: these (sub)mm observed quasars are correlated, but the scatter is
634: large enough that the correlation is not seen over a narrow
635: luminosity range. This correlation is even more significant
636: when we do the test with only the (sub)mm detections at all
637: redshifts ($\rm P_{null}\sim0.02\%$). But one should be
638: careful with this result as there may be a number of
639: observational or selection bialses in the sample of detections.
640: For example, given the similar observational sensitivity level,
641: the FIR luminosity threshold for the (sub)mm detections
642: is decreasing with redshifts at $z>2$ (see Figure 1).
643: %However, the $\rm
644: %P_{null}$ value is 6\% when all the samples are included, which
645: %suggests a marginal correlation. A further test with all the (sub)mm
646: %detections gives a correlation between $\rm L_{FIR}$ and $\rm L_{B}$
647: %with $\rm P_{null}\sim0.02\%$.
648: %These results indicates that the FIR and optical emission of
649: %these (sub)mm observed quasars are correlated, but the scatter is
650: %large enough that the correlation is not seen over a narrow
651: %luminosity range.
652: We apply linear regression to all of the (sub)mm
653: observed samples (Total) and the subsample of detections
654: (Detection), using the Expectation-Maximization (EM) method which
655: can deal with data including upper limits (Isobe et al. 1986). The
656: best
657: fitting results are:\\
658: \begin{equation}
659: \rm Total:\ log\,(\frac{L_{FIR}}{L_{\odot}})=(0.21\pm0.15)log(\frac{L_{B}}{L_{\odot}})+(9.67\pm2.03)\\
660: \end{equation}
661: \begin{equation}
662: \rm Detection:\ log\,(\frac{L_{FIR}}{L_{\odot}})=(0.40\pm0.09)log(\frac{L_{B}}{L_{\odot}})+(7.82\pm1.20)\\
663: \end{equation}
664:
665: The regression results show a non-linear
666: relationship between the FIR emission and the quasars'
667: optical emission with slopes much smaller than unity.
668: We plot the fitting results in Figure 4. As a comparison,
669: We calculate the typical FIR-to-B band luminosity ratios
670: for local optical quasars based on the radio quiet and radio
671: loud quasar templates in Elvis et al. (1994). The FIR
672: luminosities are integrated directly from the template SEDs.
673: The derived FIR-to-B band luminosity ratios ($\rm L_{FIR}/L_{B}$)
674: are 0.29 and 0.38 for the radio quiet and radio loud templates
675: respectively, and are ploted as $\rm L_{FIR}=0.29L_{B}$ (solid line)
676: and $\rm L_{FIR}=0.38L_{B}$ (long dashed line) in Figure 4.
677: According to Figure 4, most of the (sub)mm detections have larger $\rm L_{FIR}/L_{B}$
678: value than that of the local optical quasar templates. For the eight
679: (sub)mm detected quasars at z$\sim$6, six of them have FIR emission
680: stronger than that predicted from the radio quiet template (by factors
681: from $\rm \sim1.5$ to $\rm \gtrsim5$), and only one source J081827.40+172251.8
682: is consistent with the template within errors.
683:
684: \subsection{The Radio emission}
685:
686: The rest frame 1.4GHz luminosities ($\rm L_{Rad}$\footnote{$\rm
687: L_{Rad}\equiv \nu L_{\nu,1.4GHz}$ in rest frame}) for the 17 quasars observed with
688: the VLA in the z$\sim$6 sample are calculated, assuming a power law
689: ($\rm f_{\nu}\sim \nu ^{\alpha}$) radio SED and a radio spectral
690: index of $\rm \alpha = -0.75$ (Condon 1992). Since all the sources
691: are unresolved on the radio maps (Figure 2), we adopt the peak
692: surface brightness in Table 1 as the 1.4GHz flux density for our VLA
693: detections and take the larger value of either the $\rm 2\sigma$ rms
694: on the radio map or the measured value at the optical position plus
695: 1$\rm \sigma$ rms as the upper limits for non-detections. The rest
696: frame radio to B band optical luminosity density ratios $\rm
697: R^{*}_{1.4}=L_{\nu ,1.4GHz}/L_{\nu,4400\AA}$ (Cirasuolo et al. 2003;
698: 2006) are calculated and listed in Table 4. $\rm L_{\nu,4400\AA}$ is
699: the luminosity density at rest frame $\rm 4400\AA$ (See the footnote
700: in Section 2). We adopt $\rm
701: R=L_{\nu,5GHz}/L_{\nu,4400\AA}=10$ (Kellermann et al. 1989) to
702: separate radio loud and radio quiet sources. This corresponds to
703: $\rm R^{*}_{1.4}\sim30$ by assuming the above radio spectral index
704: and converting the rest frame 5 GHz flux density to 1.4 GHz.
705:
706: We plot the rest frame 1.4 GHz radio luminosity ($\rm L_{Rad}$) vs. B
707: band luminosity ($\rm L_{B}$) in Figure 5. The typical 3$\rm \sigma$
708: detection limit of the VLA observation is $\rm \sim50\,\mu$Jy (dotted
709: line), which is roughly 10 times deeper than the FIRST survey (solid
710: line). Thus our VLA observations are sensitive enough to detect any radio loud source
711: with B band luminosity $\rm >10^{12}\,L_{\odot}$ at z$\sim$6 for all of
712: the 17 sources. We plot the $\rm R^{*}_{1.4}$ distribution of the 17
713: z$\sim$6 quasars in Figure 6. None of the 13 sources with new radio
714: data reported in this paper is radio-loud. For the whole sample of 17
715: z$\sim$6 quasars, there is one marginally radio-loud object,
716: J083643.85+005453.3, with $\rm R^{*}_{1.4}\sim40$.
717:
718: The deep VLA observations also enable us to investigate the
719: correlation between radio and FIR emission of the z$\sim$6 quasars.
720: Yun et al. (2001) employ a $q$ parameter
721: to quantify the ratio of the FIR and radio luminosities:\\
722: \begin{equation}
723: \rm q\equiv log(\frac{FIR}{3.75\times10^{12}\,W\,
724: m^{-2}})-log(\frac{f_{1.4GHz}}{W\, m^{-2}\,Hz^{-1}}).\\
725: \end{equation}
726: Yun et al. (2001) studied the infrared-selected galaxies in the IRAS
727: 2Jy sample and found a $q$ value of 2.34 for typical star forming
728: galaxies. We calculate the $\rm q$ values for the 12 z$\sim$6
729: quasars that are detected at either radio or (sub)mm wavelengths.
730:
731: We also plot $\rm L_{FIR}$ vs. the rest frame 1.4GHz radio
732: luminosity density ($\rm L_{\nu,1.4GHz}$) in Figure 6, comparing the
733: z$\sim$6 quasar sample to typical star forming galaxies in the local
734: universe (Yun et al. 2001). The solid line in Figure 6 corresponds
735: to the typical $\rm q$ value of $2.34$ in star forming galaxies, and
736: the dotted lines denote excesses that are 5 times above and below
737: this typical correlation (Yun et al. 2001).
738:
739: There are four sources in the z$\sim$6 quasar sample that are
740: detected in both the radio and (sub)mm regimes. One of them,
741: J081827.40+172251.8, has a small q value that falling
742: beyond the range defined by typical star forming galaxies,
743: indicating the dominance of AGN power in the FIR to radio
744: SED of this source. However, the FIR-to-radio ratios of the other
745: three sources, though slightly above the mean value of $\rm q=2.34$,
746: are consistent with star forming galaxies (Figure 6 and Table 4).
747: %For the whole sample, due to the 1.4GHz
748: %detection limit with the VLA, we cannot tell if there are sources
749: %that have even weaker radio emission falling below the typical star
750: %forming galaxy range.}
751:
752: % add to discussion?
753:
754: \section{Discussion}
755:
756: The heating sources of the FIR emitting dust in quasars
757: are studied and the contributions from host galaxy star formation
758: are discussed in a number of papers (eg. Haas et al. 2003; Omont et al. 2003;
759: Schweitzer et al. 2006). Star formation is believed to be
760: the dominated dust heating resource in the local infrared luminous
761: quasars that are located in ULIRGs (Hao et al. 2005). Schweitzer et
762: al. (2006) studied the connection between FIR emission and PAH/low
763: excitation fine-structure emission lines of the local PG quasars.
764: Their results suggest that star formation is responsible for at
765: least 30\% to the average local quasar FIR emission and that this
766: contribution tends to increase with FIR luminosity. The z$\sim$6
767: SDSS quasars we discussed in this paper belong to the population of
768: the brightest quasars in the optical. About $\rm 1/3$ of them are detected
769: at (sub)mm wavelength. According to Figure 4, most of these
770: detections have FIR luminosities stronger than the predictions from
771: local quasar templates, indicating extra
772: emission from warm dust in these sources compared to the
773: typical optical quasar emission. Moreover, the relationship
774: between the FIR and B band optical emission is non-linear
775: and significantly scattered, only manifesting itself when
776: a larger luminosity range is considered (See Section 4.1).
777: Beelen (2004) studied a number of optically bright quasar samples at
778: $\rm z>1.5$ that had (sub)mm observations, and first report this weak
779: correlation between FIR and B band optical emission,
780: namely $\rm logL_{FIR}=(8.36\pm 0.90)+(0.33\pm 0.07)\times logL_{B}$
781: (See also Cox et al. 2005). The results are consistent when we
782: include our new observations at z$\sim$6. Additionally,
783: most of the (sub)mm detections at z$\sim$6 have FIR-to-radio ratios
784: or upper limits within the range occupied by star forming
785: galaxies (See Table 4 and Figure 6).
786:
787: One possible explanation for all of these facts
788: is that star formation is happening on a massive scale in the host
789: galaxies of these FIR luminous z$\sim$6 quasars and
790: dominating the heating process of the FIR emitting warm dust.
791: The implied star formation rate
792: is $\rm \sim 10^3\,M_{\odot}\,yr^{-1}$.
793: This idea is supported by the detections of CO in the
794: high-redshift quasars that have strong FIR
795: emission ($\rm L_{FIR}\gtrsim10^{13}\,L_{\odot}$).
796: CO line emission was detected in several FIR luminous
797: quasars at z$\gtrsim$4, including the highest redshift
798: quasar J114816.64+525150.2 (eg. Riechers et al. 2006;
799: Bertoldi et al. 2003b; Walter et al. 2003, 2004).
800: The CO detections indicate huge amount of molecular
801: gas in the host galaxies of these FIR luminous
802: quasars which are the requisite fuel for star
803: formation. Moreover, Riechers et al. (2006) found
804: that the FIR-to-CO relation of the high-redshift
805: FIR luminous quasars are consistent with that defined by
806: ULIRGs, starforming galaxies and submillimeter
807: galaxies.
808: %The host galaxy dynamics
809: %revealed by the CO observatios of this source also implies the stellar
810: %bulge have not been well formed give a SMBH mass of
811: %$\sim10^{9}M_{\odot}$ (Walter et al. 2004). These results suggest that we are
812: %seeing a co-eval bulge and SMBH formation phase. However,
813: %this is not consistent with the simulation results of galaxy formations
814: %at the highest redshift (Li et al. 2006), which argues that
815: %the local black hole-bulge mass relationship should be already
816: %established at that redshift.
817:
818: One may argue that the strong FIR emission can be also
819: processed by the AGN power since the dust torus geometry
820: of these sources are still unkown. This possibility
821: cannot be rule out given the limited data we have
822: for these sources, but detailed dust models are required
823: to explain the results we list above. One fact is that the hot
824: dust emission of the SDSS z$\sim$6 quasars probed by recent
825: Spitzer observation are similar to those of the local quasar templates
826: as we mentioned in Section 1 (Jiang et al. 2006a).
827: Four (sub)mm detections are included in this Spitzer
828: observed sample, and no different properties are found in the
829: optical to near infrared SEDs of these sources. This may
830: not support the idea of a quite different geometry of the
831: dust torus.
832:
833: However, we should mention that there are still large
834: uncertainties in the estimations of the FIR luminosities
835: for these (sub)mm detected z$\sim$6 quasars.
836: The FIR luminosities for some of the sources can be
837: overestimated given the poor data at (sub)mm wavelengths.
838: Thus further studies on these (sub)mm detected z$\sim$6 quasars are
839: required, including observations of the submm continuum
840: at higher frequencies and emission lines of CO and other
841: molecules, such as HCN, as well as the C and $\rm C^+$
842: fine structure lines.
843:
844: Another interesting question is how the current radio observations
845: constrain the radio loud fraction (RLF) at z$\sim$6. The RLF of
846: optically selected quasar samples is $\rm \sim10\%$, as quoted in
847: many papers (Kellermann et al. 1989; Ivezi$\rm \acute{c}$ et al.
848: 2002, 2004; Cirasuolo et al. 2003, 2006).
849: %The observed RLF with the
850: %samples in all of these works is $\le20\%$.
851: %Cirasuolo et al. (2003) fitted the distribution of $R^{*}_{1.4}$ of
852: %large samples of optically selected quasars at low redshift with a
853: %pair of Gaussians. The implied RLF is $\sim$3\% (i.e. fraction of
854: %$R^{*}_{1.4}\geq30$). However,
855: Jiang et al. (2006b) studied the FIRST data (Becker et al. 1995) for
856: SDSS quasars with redshifts up to 5, and suggested that the quasar
857: RLF increases with optical luminosity and decreases with redshift,
858: namely $\rm
859: log\,((RLF)/(1-RLF))\,=\,(-0.112\pm0.109)+(-2.196\pm0.269)log(1+z)+(-0.203\pm0.026)(M_{2500}+26)$.
860: This result gives an RLF of $\rm \sim37\%$ at $\rm z=0.5$, $\rm \sim11\%$ at $\rm z=2$, and $\rm
861: \sim2\%$ at $\rm z=6$, given the rest frame 2500$\rm \AA$ absolute
862: AB magnitude $\rm M_{2500}=-27.3$
863: --- the typical value of the z$\sim$6 SDSS quasar
864: sample\footnote{The $\rm M_{2500}$ is estimated from the absolute
865: AB magnitude at rest frame $\rm 1450\AA$ ($\rm M_{1450}$, Fan et al. 2006b). For the
866: current sample of 19 z$\sim$6 SDSS quasars with $\rm M_{1450}$
867: from -26.2 to -27.9, we adopt a typical value of $\rm M_{1450}=-27.0$
868: and an optical spectral power law index of -0.5.}.
869:
870: There is one marginally radio loud source in this z$\sim$6 sample of
871: 17 sources. This result argues against a high RLF, i.e. $>20\%$,
872: for the current SDSS quasar sample at z$\sim$6. Thus it is roughly consistent
873: with the result of Jiang et al. (2006b). However, the
874: sample size is still too small to set a strict constrain,
875: i.e. differentiate an RLF between $\rm \sim2\%$ and $\rm \sim10\%$.
876: Thus to provide a better test of the redshift evolution
877: of the RLF; we would need a sample three times
878: larger to usefully constrain the RLF at z$\sim$6.
879:
880: We should also mention the recent discovery of a radio loud quasar
881: at z$>$6, FIRST J1427385+331241(McGreer et al. 2006), with a FIRST
882: flux density of 1.73mJy. This source is the most radio luminous
883: quasar known at z$\sim$6, with $\rm R^{*}_{1.4}>100$. However, it
884: cannot be included in our radio loud analysis at z$\sim$6, as the
885: selection criteria of this source are quite different from that of
886: the SDSS quasars and its UV/Optical emission is just beyond the SDSS
887: detection limits (McGreer et al. 2006).
888:
889: \section{Conclusion}
890:
891: %% The displaymath environment will produce the same sort of equation as
892: %% the equation environment, except that the equation will not be numbered
893: %% by LaTeX.
894:
895: In this paper, we present new results of millimeter and radio
896: observations of a sample of z$\sim$6 quasars. These quasars are
897: selected from the SDSS survey and observed with MAMBO-2 at 250 GHz
898: and the VLA at 1.4 GHz. We obtained three $\rm >4\sigma$ detections
899: and one $\rm \sim3\sigma$ detection out of 11 observed sources by
900: MAMBO-2 and six radio detections out of 13 observed sources by the
901: VLA.
902:
903: We combine our new millimeter and radio results of the
904: SDSS z$\sim$6 quasars with results from the literature and discuss the
905: FIR and radio properties of the optically selected quasars at
906: z$\sim$6.
907: Our conclusions are as follows.\\
908: \vspace{-2.5em}
909: \begin{itemize}
910: \setlength{\itemsep}{-2.0em}
911: \item Eight out of
912: 18 z$\sim$6 optically selected quasars are detected in the (sub)mm
913: regime. This indicates a (sub)mm detection rate of $44\%$ at
914: z$\sim$6 at mJy sensitivity. Within the errors, this is consistent
915: with the $\sim$30\% (sub)mm detection rate at lower reshift (eg.
916: Carilli et al. 2001; Omont et al. 2001;
917: 2003). The observational data imply FIR luminosities $\rm \sim10^{13}\rm\, L_{\odot}$ in the (sub)mm detected sources.\\
918: \item We compare the distribution of FIR luminosities
919: and FIR to optical ratios between the z$\sim$6 SDSS sample and
920: (sub)mm observed optically bright quasars ($\rm
921: L_{B}\ge10^{12.5}\rm\, L_{\odot}$) at lower reshifts. The
922: distributions of the FIR-optical ratio are similar for different
923: redshift groups, which suggests that the average optical-to-FIR
924: SED of optically bright quasars is independent of redshift.\\
925: \item We extend the quasar FIR-to-optical correlation
926: study to the z$\sim$6 SDSS sample. No correlation is found with the
927: z$\sim$6 sample only. However, a correlation (albeit with large
928: scatter) can be seen when all the samples extending from z=1.5 to
929: 6.42 are included.\\
930: %We conclude that the correlation between FIR and
931: %optical emission shows significantly scatter, but becomes apparent
932: %when considering a large
933: %luminosity range. \\
934: %This fact indicates effects from the starburst activities.
935: %Theoritically, the FIR and optical emission should be correlated even
936: %the FIR emission dust is heated by UV photon from starburst. And the competing
937: %between black hole accretion and star formation activity should be
938: %responsible for the significant scatter.
939: \item We also discussed the FIR-to-radio ratios of
940: the z$\sim$6 quasars, by comparing them to the typical correlation
941: defined by star forming galaxies. Three of the four sources that are
942: detected in both the millimeter and radio bands have FIR-to-radio
943: ratios within the range
944: defined by star forming galaxies.\\
945: \item We found no strong radio sources with $\rm R^{*}_{1.4}\geq30$
946: among the new SDSS sources of bright z$\sim$6 quasars. In the whole
947: z$\sim$6 sample, only one radio detection has a radio to optical
948: ratio $R^{*}_{1.4}\sim40$ and no source has $R^{*}_{1.4} \gtrsim
949: 100$. These data are consistent with, although do not set strong
950: constraints on, the recent conclusion of a decreasing
951: radio loud quasar fraction with increasing redshift (Jiang et al. 2006b).\\
952: \end{itemize}
953: \vspace{-2.5em}
954:
955: %In summary, we present millimeter and radio observations of the
956: %z$\sim$6 SDSS quasars down to the mJy ((sub)mm) and 10 $\mu$Jy
957: %(20\,cm radio continuum) sensitivity levels respectively.
958: These
959: results give a view of the general FIR through radio properties of
960: the z$\sim$6 SDSS quasars. The data are consistent with the idea
961: that massive starbursts may exist in the host galaxies of the strong
962: (sub)mm detections at z$\sim$6 and contribute to the FIR and radio
963: emission.
964: %This point will be addressed in more detail in paper II,
965: %including individual FIR to radio SEDs and correlations between the
966: %FIR emission and AGN activity.
967: These strong (sub)mm sources provide
968: the only candidates to search for CO and $\rm C^{+}$ into the epoch
969: of reionization, and to test the idea of co-eval SMBH and host
970: galaxy formation. We may expect to go an order of magnitude deeper
971: in a few years time with the coming instruments of the Expanded Very
972: Large Array (EVLA) and the Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA).
973:
974: %% If you wish to include an acknowledgments section in your paper,
975: %% separate it off from the body of the text using the \acknowledgments
976: %% command.
977:
978: %% Included in this acknowledgments section are examples of the
979: %% AASTeX hypertext markup commands. Use \url without the optional [HREF]
980: %% argument when you want to print the url directly in the text. Otherwise,
981: %% use either \url or \anchor, with the HREF as the first argument and the
982: %% text to be printed in the second.
983:
984: \acknowledgments We acknowledge support from the Max-Planck Society
985: and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation through the
986: Max-Planck-Forschungspreis 2005. The National Radio Astronomy
987: Observatory is a facility of the National Science Foundation,
988: operated by Associated Universities, Inc. We thank Dr. R. Zylka at
989: IRAM for his help with the MAMBO data reduction. Ran Wang thanks her
990: supervisor, Prof. Xue-Bing Wu and the whole AGN group at Peking
991: University for helpful discussions. X. Fan acknowledge support from
992: NSF grant AST 03-07384, a Sloan Research Fellowship, and a Packard
993: Fellowship for Science and Engineering.
994:
995: %% To help institutions obtain information on the effectiveness of their
996: %% telescopes, the AAS Journals has created a group of keywords for telescope
997: %% facilities. A common set of keywords will make these types of searches
998: %% significantly easier and more accurate. In addition, they will also be
999: %% useful in linking papers together which utilize the same telescopes
1000: %% within the framework of the National Virtual Observatory.
1001: %% See the AASTeX Web site at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX
1002: %% for information on obtaining the facility keywords.
1003:
1004: %% After the acknowledgments section, use the following syntax and the
1005: %% \facility{} macro to list the keywords of facilities used in the research
1006: %% for the paper. Each keyword will be checked against the master list during
1007: %% copy editing. Individual instruments or configurations can be provided
1008: %% in parentheses, after the keyword, but they will not be verified.
1009:
1010: {\it Facilities:} \facility{VLA}, \facility{IRAM (MAMBO)},
1011: \facility{SDSS}.
1012: \newpage
1013:
1014: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1015: \bibitem[]{945} Beelen, A. 2004, PhD thesis, Observatoire de Paris
1016: \bibitem[]{946} Beelen, A., Cox, P., Benford, D. J., Dowell, C. D., Kov$\rm \acute{a}$cs, A., Bertoldi, F., Omont, A., \& Carilli, C. L. 2006, ApJ, 642, 694
1017: \bibitem[]{947} Bechtold, J. et al. 2003, ApJ, 588, 119
1018: \bibitem[]{948} Becker, R. H., White, R. L., \& Helfand, D. J. 1995,
1019: ApJ, 450, 559
1020: \bibitem[]{950} Bertoldi, F., Carilli, C. L., Cox, P., Fan, X., Strauss, M. A., Beelen, A., Omont, A., \& Zylka, R. 2003a, A\& A, 406, L55
1021: \bibitem[]{951} Bertoldi, F. et al. 2003b, A\& A, 409, L47
1022: %\bibitem[]{952} Bertoldi, F., Carilli, C. L., Schinnerer, E. et al. 2006, ApJs, submitted
1023: \bibitem[]{953} Blain, A. W., \& Longair, M. S. 1993, MNRAS, 264, 509
1024: \bibitem[]{954} Blain, A. W., Smail, I., Ivison, R. J. et al. 2002,
1025: Phys. Rept. 369, 111
1026: \bibitem[]{956} Carilli, C. L. et al. 2001, ApJ, 555, 625
1027: \bibitem[]{957} Carilli, C. L. et al. 2004, AJ, 128, 997
1028: \bibitem[]{958} Cirasuolo, M., Celotti, A., \& Magliocchetti, M. 2003, MNRAS, 346, 447
1029: \bibitem[]{959} Cirasuolo, M., Magliocchetti, M., Gentile, G., Celotti, A., Cristiani, S., \& Danese, L. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 695
1030: %\bibitem[]{960} Cool, R. J., Kochanek, C. S., Eisenstein, D. J. et al.
1031: %2006, AJ, 132, 823
1032: \bibitem[]{962} Condon, J. J. 1992, ARA\& A, 30, 575
1033: \bibitem[]{963} Cox, P., Beelen, A., Bertoldi, F. 2005, The dusty and
1034: molecular Universe, ESA SP-577, 115
1035: \bibitem[]{965} Deutsch, E. W. 1999, AJ, 118, 1882
1036: %\bibitem[]{966} Dowell, C. D. et al. 2003, Proc. SPIE, 4855, 73
1037: \bibitem[]{967} Fan, X. et al. 2000, AJ, 120, 1167
1038: \bibitem[]{968} Fan, X. et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 2833
1039: \bibitem[]{969} Fan, X. et al. 2003, AJ, 125, 1649
1040: \bibitem[]{970} Fan, X. et al. 2004, AJ, 128, 515
1041: \bibitem[]{971} Fan, X. et al. 2006a, AJ, 131, 1203
1042: \bibitem[]{972} Fan, X. et al. 2006b, AJ, 132, 117
1043: \bibitem[]{973} Fan, X., Carilli, C. L., \& Keating, B. 2006c, ARA\& A, 44, 415
1044: \bibitem[]{974} Ferrarese, L., \& Merritt, D. 2000, ApJ, 539, L9
1045: \bibitem[]{975} Fomalont, E. B. 2006, preprint
1046: \bibitem[]{976} Gebhardt, K., Bender, R., Bower, G. 2000, ApJ, 539, 13
1047: \bibitem[]{977} Greve, T. R., Ivison, R. J., Bertoldi, F., Stevens, J. A., Dunlop, J. S., Lutz, D., \& Carilli, C. L. 2004, MNRAS, 354,779
1048: \bibitem[]{978} Haas, M. et al. 2003, A\& A, 402, 87
1049: \bibitem[]{979} Hao, C. N., Xia, X. Y., Mao, Shude, Wu, Hong, Deng, Z. G. 2005, ApJ, 625, 78
1050: \bibitem[]{980} Isaak, K. G., Priddey, R. S., McMahon, R. G., Omont, A., Peroux, C., Sharp, R. G., \& Withington, S. 2002, MNRAS, 329, 149
1051: \bibitem[]{981} Isobe, T., Feigelson, E. D., \& Nelson, P. I. 1986, ApJ, 306, 490
1052: \bibitem[]{982} Ivezi$\rm \acute{c}$, Z. et al. 2002, AJ, 124, 2364
1053: \bibitem[]{983} Ivezi$\rm \acute{c}$, Z. et al. 2004, ASPC, 311, 347
1054: \bibitem[]{984} Iwamuro, F,. Kimura, M., Eto, S., Maihara, T., Motohara, K., Yoshii, Y., \& Doi, M. 2004, ApJ, 614, 69
1055: \bibitem[]{985} Jiang, L. et al. 2006a, AJ, 132, 2127
1056: \bibitem[]{986} Jiang, L., Fan, X., Ivezi$\acute{c}$, Z., Richards, G. T., Schneider, D. P., Strauss, M. A. \& Kelly, B. C. 2006b, ApJ, 656, 680
1057: \bibitem[]{987} Kellermann K. I., Sramek, R., Schmidt, M., Shaffer, D. B., \& Green, R. 1989, AJ, 98,1195
1058: \bibitem[]{988} Li, Y. et al. 2006, ApJ, submitted (astro-ph/0608190)
1059: \bibitem[]{989} Magorrian, J. et al. 1998, AJ, 115, 2285
1060: \bibitem[]{990} Maiolino, R. et al. 2005, A\& A, 440, L51
1061: \bibitem[]{991} Marconi, A., \& Hunt, L. K. 2003, ApJ, 589, L21
1062: \bibitem[]{992} McGreer, I. D., Becker, R. H., Helfand, D. J., \& White, R.L. 2006, ApJ, 652, 157
1063: \bibitem[]{993} Omont, A., Cox, P., Bertoldi, F., Cox, P., Carilli, C. L., Priddey, R. S., McMahon, R. C., \& Isaak, K. G. 2001, A\& A, 374, 371
1064: \bibitem[]{994} Omont, A., Beelen, A., Bertoldi, F., McMahon, R. G., Carilli, C. L., \& Isaak, K. G. 2003, A\& A, 398, 657
1065: \bibitem[]{995} Pentericci, L. et al. 2003, A\& A, 410, 75
1066: \bibitem[]{996} Petric, A. O., Carilli, C. L., Bertoldi, F., Fan, X., Cox, P., Strauss, M. A., Omont, A., \& Schneider, D. P. 2003, AJ, 126, 15
1067: \bibitem[]{997} Petric, A. O., Carilli, C. L., Bertoldi, F., Beelen, A., Cox, P., \& Omont, A. 2006, AJ, 132, 1307
1068: \bibitem[]{998} Priddey, R. S., Isaak, K. G., McMahon, R. G., \& Omont, A. 2003a, MNRAS, 339, 1183
1069: \bibitem[]{999} Priddey, R. S., Isaak, K. G., McMahon, R. G., Roboson, E. I., \& Pearson, C. P. 2003b, MNRAS, 344, L74
1070: \bibitem[]{1000} Riechers, D. A. et al. 2006, ApJ, 650, 604
1071: \bibitem[]{1001} Robson, I., Priddey, R. S., Isaak, K. G., \& McMahon, R. G. 2004, MNRAS, 351, L29
1072: \bibitem[]{1002} Schweitzer, M. et al. 2006, ApJ, 649, 79
1073: \bibitem[]{1003} Shemmer, O. et al. 2006, ApJ, 644, 86
1074: \bibitem[]{1004} Tremaine, S. et al. 2002, ApJ, 574, 740
1075: \bibitem[]{1005} Voss, H., Bertoldi, F., Carilli, C., Owen, F. N., Lutz, D., Holdaway, M., Ledlow, M., \& Menten, K. M. 2006, A\& A, 448, 823
1076: \bibitem[]{1006} Walter, F. et al. 2003, Nature, 424, 406
1077: \bibitem[]{1007} Walter, F., Carilli, C. L., Bertoldi, F., Menten, K., Cox, P., Lo, K. Y., Fan, X., \& Strauss, M. A. 2004, ApJ, 615, L17
1078: \bibitem[]{1008} White, R. L., Becker, R. H., Helfand, D. J., \& Gregg, M. D. 1997, ApJ, 475, 479
1079: \bibitem[]{1009} Willott, C. J., McLure, R. J. \& Jarvis, M. J. 2003, ApJ, 587, L15
1080: \bibitem[]{1010} York, D. G. et al. 2000, AJ, 120, 1579
1081: \bibitem[]{1011} Yun, M. S., Reddy, N. A., \& Condon, J. J. 2001, ApJ, 554, 803
1082: \bibitem[]{1012} Zylka, R. 1998, MOPSI Users Manual, (IRAM: Grenoble)
1083: \end{thebibliography}
1084:
1085:
1086:
1087: %\newpage
1088: %% figure 1 radio maps
1089:
1090: \begin{figure}
1091: %%\epsscale{}
1092: \plottwo{f1a.eps}{f1b.eps}\\
1093: \plottwo{f1c.eps}{f1d.eps}\\
1094: \figcaption{VLA images of 12 z$\sim$6 quasars at 1.4GHz at 1.4$''$
1095: resolution (FWHM). The parameter 'con' denotes the value for the
1096: contour increment in each map in units of $\rm \mu Jy/Beam$. The
1097: contour levels are (-3, -2, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10)
1098: $\times$con. The ellipse indicates the beam in each case, and the
1099: cross marks the optical position. \label{fig1}}
1100: \end{figure}
1101:
1102: \begin{figure}
1103: \figurenum{1}
1104: \plottwo{f1e.eps}{f1f.eps}\\
1105: \plottwo{f1g.eps}{f1h.eps}\\
1106: Fig. 1 -- Continued
1107: \end{figure}
1108:
1109: \begin{figure}
1110: \figurenum{1}
1111: \plottwo{f1i.eps}{f1j.eps}\\
1112: \plottwo{f1k.eps}{f1l.eps}\\
1113: Fig. 1 -- Continued
1114: \end{figure}
1115:
1116: %figure 2
1117:
1118: \begin{figure}
1119: \figurenum{2}
1120: \epsscale{0.6} \plotone{f2.eps}\\
1121: \figcaption{The logarithm of the FIR luminosity ($\rm log
1122: L_{FIR}$) versus redshift for different samples. The filled
1123: symbols represent detections with 1$\rm \sigma$ errors. The open
1124: symbols with arrows denote upper limits: we adopt the larger value
1125: of either the 2$\rm \sigma$ rms or the measured value at the optical
1126: position plus 1$\rm \sigma$ rms as upper limits for non-detected
1127: sources. The dashed and dotted lines represent the typical
1128: $\rm 3\sigma$ detection limits of MAMBO at 250 GHz and SCUBA at 350
1129: GHz, respectively, namely $\rm S_{250GHz}=2.4\,mJy$ (this work) and
1130: $\rm S_{350GHz}=10\,mJy$ (Priddey et al. 2003a). \label{fig2}}
1131: \end{figure}
1132:
1133: %figure 3
1134:
1135: \begin{figure}
1136: \figurenum{3}
1137: \epsscale{0.6}
1138: \plotone{f3a.eps}\\
1139: \plotone{f3b.eps}\\
1140: \figcaption{(a) The distribution of the logarithm of the FIR
1141: luminosity for quasars at different redshifts. The z$\sim$6 quasars
1142: are plotted as black lines. The $\rm 1.5\leq z\leq 3$ group (red
1143: lines) is combined with the samples from Omont et al. (2003) and
1144: Priddey et al. (2003a), while the $\rm 3.6\leq z \leq 5$ group (blue
1145: lines) is from Omont et al. (2001) and Carilli et al. (2001). For
1146: all the samples, the shaded areas represent detections and dotted
1147: lines denote upper limits: the upper limits are calculated as in
1148: Figure 2. (b) The distribution of the logarithm of the FIR-optical
1149: ratio ($\rm log L_{FIR}/L_{B}$) for quasars at different redshifts.
1150: \label{fig3}}
1151: \end{figure}
1152:
1153: \begin{figure}
1154: \figurenum{4}
1155: \epsscale{0.8} \plotone{f4.eps} \figcaption{The logarithm of the FIR
1156: luminosity is plotted against the logarithm of the B band luminosity
1157: for all the (sub)mm observed quasars. The symbols are the same as in
1158: Figure 2. The dashed line is the linear regression result for the
1159: (sub)mm observed samples at all redshifts including upper limits,
1160: while the dotted line is the result using the detected objects only.
1161: The solid and long dashed lines represent the FIR-to-B band luminosity
1162: ratios of local radio quiet and radio loud quasar templates
1163: in Elvis et al. (1994), respectively.
1164: \label{fig4} }
1165: \end{figure}
1166:
1167: %\begin{figure}
1168: %\epsscale{0.8} \plotone{LfirLr.eps} \caption{Logarithm rest frame
1169: %1.4GHz radio luminosity ($log L_{R}$) versus logarithm FIR
1170: %luminosity ($log L_{FIR}$). The filled symbols represent detections
1171: %while the open symbols with left and down arrows denotes 3$\sigma$
1172: %upper limits in X and Y axes. The dashes line is plotted as the
1173: %typical radio-FIR correlation in star forming galaxies with the
1174: %correlation parameter q=2.34 (Yun et al. 2001). The dotted lines
1175: %represents the excesses that are five times above and below the
1176: %typical q value. \label{fig6}}
1177: %\end{figure}
1178:
1179:
1180: \begin{figure}
1181: \figurenum{5}
1182: \epsscale{0.8} \plotone{f5.eps} \figcaption{The logarithm of the
1183: rest frame 1.4GHz radio luminosity ($\rm log L_{Rad}$) is plotted
1184: against the logarithm of the B band luminosity ($\rm log L_{B}$) for
1185: the z$\sim$6 quasars observed with the VLA at 1.4GHz. The filled
1186: squares represent detections with 1$\rm \sigma$ errors, and the open
1187: squares with arrows denote upper limits: the upper limits are
1188: calculated as in Figure 2. The dashed lines represent rest frame
1189: radio-to-optical ratios ($\rm R^{*}_{1.4}$) of 100, 30 (separation
1190: of radio loud and quiet), and 1. The
1191: dotted line denotes the typical 3$\rm \sigma$ detection limits of
1192: our VLA observations, while the solid line shows the 3$\rm \sigma$
1193: detection limit of the FIRST survey. \label{fig5}}
1194: \end{figure}
1195:
1196: \begin{figure}
1197: \figurenum{6}
1198: \epsscale{0.8} \plotone{f6.eps} \figcaption{The logarithm of the
1199: rest frame 1.4 GHz radio luminosity density ($\rm log L_{\nu
1200: ,1.4GHz}$) versus the logarithm of the FIR luminosity ($\rm log
1201: L_{FIR}$). The filled squares represent the detections in both radio
1202: and (sub)mm bands, and the open squares with arrows represent the
1203: upper limits of the non-detections in either radio or (sub)mm. The
1204: upper limits are calculated as in Figure 2. The crosses represent
1205: the IRAS 2Jy sample of galaxies in Yun et al. (2001) and the dashed
1206: line indicates the typical radio-to-FIR correlation in star forming
1207: galaxies, with correlation parameter $\rm q=2.34$ (Yun et al. 2001).
1208: The dotted lines represent excesses five times above and below the
1209: typical $\rm q$ value.\label{fig6}}
1210: \end{figure}
1211:
1212: %table 1 & 2
1213: \vspace{-5em}
1214: \begin{center}
1215: \begin{table}
1216: {\scriptsize \caption{1.4GHz and 250GHz results of 13
1217: z$\sim$6 quasars. \label{tbl-1}}
1218: \begin{tabular}{lccccccr}
1219: \hline \noalign{\smallskip}
1220: SDSS name & z &$\rm m_{1450\AA}$& \multicolumn{4}{c}{radio detection at 1.4 GHz}&$\rm S_{250GHz}$\\
1221: \cline{4-7}
1222: & & &$\rm S_{1.4opt}$\tablenotemark{b}&$\rm RA_{peak}$\tablenotemark{c}&$\rm Dec_{peak}$\tablenotemark{c}&$\rm S_{peak}$\tablenotemark{c}& \\
1223: & & &$\mu$Jy\,Beam$^{-1}$&h m s&\ $^{\circ}$\ $^{'}$\ $^{''}$&$\rm \mu$Jy\,Beam$^{-1}$&mJy\\
1224: (1)&(2)&(3)&(4)&(5)&(6)&(7)&(8)\\
1225: \noalign{\smallskip} \hline \noalign{\smallskip}
1226: J000239.39+255034.8&5.80&19.02 &81$\pm$14&00:02:39.36&25:50:34.9&{\bf 89}\tablenotemark{d}&0.20$\pm$0.88\\
1227: J000552.34$-$000655.8&5.85&20.03 &40$\pm$130& & & &\\
1228: J081827.40+172251.8&6.00&19.34 &119$\pm$12&08:18:27.39&17:22:51.8&{\bf 123}&{\bf 1.45$\pm$0.49}\\
1229: J084035.09+562419.9&5.85& 20.04&12$\pm$9& & & &{\bf 3.20$\pm$0.64}\\
1230: J092721.82+200123.7&5.79&19.87 &33$\pm$14&09:27:21.82&20:01:23.1&{\bf 45}&{\bf 4.98$\pm$0.75}\\
1231: J104845.05+463718.3&6.20&19.25 &6$\pm$11& & & &{\bf 3.00$\pm$0.40}\tablenotemark{a}\\
1232: J113717.73+354956.9&6.01&19.63 &9$\pm$17& & & &0.10$\pm$1.13\\
1233: J125051.93+313021.9&6.13&19.64 &37$\pm$21& & & &0.07$\pm$0.90\\
1234: J133550.81+353315.8&5.95& 19.89&35$\pm$10&13:35:50.81&35:33:15.9&{\bf 35}&{\bf 2.34$\pm$0.50}\\
1235: J141111.29+121737.4&5.93&19.97 &44$\pm$16&14:11:11.29&12:17:38.0&{\bf 61}&1.00$\pm$0.62\\
1236: J143611.74+500706.9&5.83&20.16&6$\pm$16& & & &-0.21$\pm$1.14\\
1237: J160253.98+422824.9&6.07&19.86 &53$\pm$15&16:02:53.95 &42:28:24.9 &{\bf 60}&1.82$\pm$0.86\\
1238: J162331.81+311200.5&6.22&20.13 &24$\pm$31& & & &0.17$\pm$0.80\\
1239: \noalign{\smallskip} \hline
1240: \end{tabular}
1241: }\tablenotetext{a}{Result taken from Bertoldi et al. (2003a).}
1242: \tablenotetext{b}{Surface brightness at the optical quasar position
1243: plus the $\rm 1\sigma$ rms on the radio map.}
1244: \tablenotetext{c}{Position and surface brightness of the detected
1245: radio peak.}\tablenotetext{d}{The detections are marked as
1246: boldface.}
1247: \end{table}
1248: \end{center}
1249:
1250: %% If you use the table environment, please indicate horizontal rules using
1251: %% \tableline, not \hline.
1252: %% Do not put multiple tabular environments within a single table.
1253: %% The optional \label should appear inside the \caption command.
1254:
1255: \begin{table}
1256: \begin{center}
1257: {\scriptsize
1258: \caption{Published results from the literature.
1259: \label{tbl-2}}
1260: \begin{tabular}{rcccccl}
1261: \hline \noalign{\smallskip}
1262: SDSS name&z&$\rm m_{1450\AA}$&$\rm S_{250GHz}$&$\rm S_{350GHz}$&$\rm S_{667GHz}$&$\rm S_{1.4GHz}$\\
1263: & & & mJy & mJy & mJy & uJy\\
1264: (1)&(2)&(3)&(4)&(5)&(6)&(7)\\
1265: \noalign{\smallskip} \hline \noalign{\smallskip}
1266: J083643.85+005453.3&5.82&18.81&-0.4$\pm$1.0\tablenotemark{a}&1.7$\pm$1.5\tablenotemark{b}&-24$\pm$10\tablenotemark{b}&{\bf 1740$\pm$40}\tablenotemark{f,g}\\
1267: J103027.10+052455.0&6.28&19.66&-1.1$\pm$1.1\tablenotemark{a}&1.3$\pm$1.0\tablenotemark{b}&-21$\pm$10\tablenotemark{b}&-3$\pm$20\tablenotemark{a}\\
1268: J104433.04$-$012502.2&5.74&19.21&-&{\bf 6.1$\pm$1.2}\tablenotemark{b}&-&-15$\pm$24\tablenotemark{a}\\
1269: J114816.64+525150.3&6.42&19.03&{\bf 5$\pm$0.6}\tablenotemark{c}&{\bf 7.8$\pm$0.7}\tablenotemark{d}&{\bf 24.7$\pm$7.4}\tablenotemark{d}&{\bf 55$\pm$12}\tablenotemark{e}\\
1270: J130608.26+035626.3&5.99&19.55&-1.0$\pm$1.0\tablenotemark{a}&{\bf 3.7$\pm$1.0}\tablenotemark{b}&-7$\pm$14\tablenotemark{b}&14$\pm$21\tablenotemark{a}\\
1271: J163033.90+401209.6&6.05&20.64&0.8$\pm$0.6\tablenotemark{c}&2.7$\pm$1.9\tablenotemark{d}&15.4$\pm$9.6\tablenotemark{d}&$<440$\tablenotemark{c}\\
1272: \noalign{\smallskip} \hline
1273: \end{tabular}
1274: }\tablenotetext{a}{Petric et al. (2003).} \tablenotetext{b}{Priddey
1275: et al. (2003b).} \tablenotetext{c}{Bertoldi et al. (2003a).}
1276: \tablenotetext{d}{Robson et al. (2004).} \tablenotetext{e}{Carilli
1277: et al. (2004).}\tablenotetext{f}{weighted average of the results in
1278: Petric et al. (2003) and the FIRST survey.}\tablenotetext{g}{The
1279: detections are marked as boldface.}
1280: \end{center}
1281: \end{table}
1282:
1283: %%table 3
1284:
1285: \begin{table}
1286: \begin{center}
1287: {\scriptsize \caption{Correlation tests \label{tbl-5}}
1288: \begin{tabular}{rccc}
1289: \hline \noalign{\smallskip}
1290: Group & Number & Kendall's tau &$\rm P_{null}$ \\
1291: (1) & (2) & (3) &(4) \\
1292: \noalign{\smallskip} \hline \noalign{\smallskip}
1293: z$\sim$6& 18 & 0.2222 & 0.4402 \\
1294: Total & 208& 0.1246 & 0.0575\\
1295: Detection & 64 & 0.6310 & 0.0002\\
1296: %$L_{B}$ &$L_{R}$ & z$\sim$6& 16 & 0.0778& log D& 0.0189\\
1297: %$L_{B}$ &$L_{R}$ & Total & 75 & 0.0353& log D& 0.0910\\
1298: %$L_{B}$ &$L_{R}$ & FIR & 23 & 0.7137&- & -\\
1299: %$L_{FIR}$ &$L_{R}$ & z$\sim$6& 16 & 0.4835&- & -\\
1300: %$L_{FIR}$ &$L_{R}$ & Total & 56 & 0.7399&- &- \\
1301: %$L_{FIR}$ &$L_{R}$ & FIR & 23 & 0.7691&- &- \\
1302: \noalign{\smallskip} \hline
1303: \end{tabular}
1304: }
1305: \end{center}
1306: \end{table}
1307:
1308: %%table 4&5
1309: %\begin{table}
1310: %\begin{center}
1311: %{\scriptsize
1312: %\caption{Distribution tests between the z$\sim$6 quasars and samples at lower redshift.
1313: %\label{tbl-4}}
1314: %\begin{tabular}{rccccccl}
1315: %\hline \noalign{\smallskip}
1316: %Com. Sample & Number & \multicolumn{3}{c}{$P_{null, L_{FIR}}$} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{$P_{null, L_{FIR}/L_{B}}$}\\
1317: % & & Gehan & Logrank & Peto\&Prentice & Gehan & Logrank & Peto\&Prentice\\
1318: % (1) & (2) & (3) &(4) &(5) &(6)&(7) &(8)\\
1319: %\noalign{\smallskip} \hline
1320: %\noalign{\smallskip}
1321: %Carilli et at. 2001 & 36\tablenotemark{a} &0.6360 &0.5010 &0.0730 &0.7420 &0.8290 &0.1120\\
1322: %Omont et al. 2001 & 65 &0.2784 &0.4909 &0.3887 &0.7044 &0.4604 &0.0074\\
1323: %Omont et al. 2003 & 35 &0.0650 &0.1390 &0.1030 &0.9870 &0.7250 &0.8630\\
1324: %\noalign{\smallskip} \hline
1325: %\end{tabular}
1326: %}\tablenotetext{a}{excluded sources with z$\ge$ 4.75}
1327: %\end{center}
1328: %\end{table}
1329:
1330: \begin{table}
1331: \begin{center}
1332: {\scriptsize \caption{Derived parameters of the z$\sim$6 quasars
1333: \label{tbl-3}}
1334: \begin{tabular}{rccccc}
1335: \hline \noalign{\smallskip}
1336: SDSS name & log$L_{B}$ & log$\rm L_{FIR}$ & log$\rm L_{Rad}$ & $\rm R^{*}_{1.4}$ & $\rm q$ \\
1337: & ($\rm L_{\odot}$)&($\rm L_{\odot}$)&($\rm L_{\odot}$)& & \\
1338: (1)&(2)&(3)&(4)&(5)&(6)\\
1339: \noalign{\smallskip} \hline \noalign{\smallskip}
1340: J000239.39+255034.8& 13.20& $<$12.62&7.89&2.40& $<$1.31\\
1341: J081827.40+172251.8& 13.09& 12.53&8.06&4.55& 1.04 \\
1342: J083643.85+005453.3& 13.28& $<$12.66&9.18&38.68& $<$0.05\\
1343: J084035.09+562419.9& 12.79& 12.88&$<$7.27&$<$1.46&$>$2.18\\
1344: J092721.82+200123.7& 12.86& 13.08& 7.59& 2.65&2.06\\
1345: J103027.10+052455.0& 12.99& $<$12.71&$<$7.62&$<$2.05&--\\
1346: J104433.04-012502.2& 13.11& 12.83&$<$7.62&$<$1.55&$>$1.79\\
1347: J104845.05+463718.3& 13.15& 12.84&$<$7.42&$<$0.90&$>$1.99\\
1348: J113717.73+354956.9& 12.98& $<$12.72&$<$7.50&$<$1.65&--\\
1349: J114816.64+525150.2& 13.26& 13.18&7.77&1.60&1.98\\
1350: J125051.93+313021.9& 12.98& $<$12.62&$<$7.75&$<$2.87&--\\
1351: J130608.26+035626.3& 13.00& 12.61&$<$7.60&$<$1.91&$>$1.59\\
1352: J133550.81+353315.8& 12.86& 12.74&7.51&2.14&1.80\\
1353: J141111.29+121737.4& 12.83& $<$12.58&7.75&4.01&$<$1.41\\
1354: J143611.74+500706.9& 12.74& $<$12.73&$<$7.45&$<$2.48&--\\
1355: J160253.98+422824.9& 12.89& $<$12.76&7.76&3.62&$<$1.58\\
1356: J162331.81+311200.5& 12.80& $<$12.56&$<$7.80&$<$4.86&--\\
1357: J163033.90+401209.6& 12.58& $<$12.51& -- & -- &--\\
1358: \noalign{\smallskip} \hline
1359: \end{tabular}\\
1360: }
1361: \end{center}
1362: Note. --- Col. (1), the name of the source, Col. (2), the B band
1363: luminosity (see the footnote in Section 2 for the calculation), Col.
1364: (3), the rest frame FIR luminosity, Col. (4), the rest frame 1.4 GHz
1365: radio luminosity, Col. (5), the radio-optical ratio $\rm
1366: R^{*}_{1.4}$, and Col. (6) the FIR-to-radio correlation parameter
1367: $\rm q$.
1368: \end{table}
1369:
1370: \end{document}
1371:
1372: %%
1373: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
1374:
1375:
1376:
1377: