1: % mn2esample.tex
2: %
3: % v2.1 released 22nd May 2002 (G. Hutton)
4: %
5: % The mnsample.tex file has been amended to highlight
6: % the proper use of LaTeX2e code with the class file
7: % and using natbib cross-referencing. These changes
8: % do not reflect the original paper by A. V. Raveendran.
9: %
10: % Previous versions of this sample document were
11: % compatible with the LaTeX 2.09 style file mn.sty
12: % v1.2 released 5th September 1994 (M. Reed)
13: % v1.1 released 18th July 1994
14: % v1.0 released 28th January 1994
15:
16: \documentclass[useAMS,usenatbib]{mn2e}
17:
18: % If your system does not have the AMS fonts version 2.0 installed, then
19: % remove the useAMS option.
20: %
21: % useAMS allows you to obtain upright Greek characters.
22: % e.g. \umu, \upi etc. See the section on "Upright Greek characters" in
23: % this guide for further information.
24: %
25: % If you are using AMS 2.0 fonts, bold math letters/symbols are available
26: % at a larger range of sizes for NFSS release 1 and 2 (using \boldmath or
27: % preferably \bmath).
28: %
29: % The usenatbib command allows the use of Patrick Daly's natbib.sty for
30: % cross-referencing.
31: %
32: % If you wish to typeset the paper in Times font (if you do not have the
33: % PostScript Type 1 Computer Modern fonts you will need to do this to get
34: % smoother fonts in a PDF file) then uncomment the next line
35: % \usepackage{Times}
36:
37: %%%%% AUTHORS - PLACE YOUR OWN MACROS HERE %%%%%
38:
39: \usepackage[dvips,draft]{graphicx}
40:
41: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
42:
43: \title[Eclipsing Light Curve for Accretion Flows around Rotating Black Hole]
44: {Eclipsing Light Curve for Accretion Flow around Rotating Black Hole
45: and Atmospheric Effects of Companion Star}
46: \author[Takahashi \& Watarai]{R. Takahashi$^{1}$\thanks{E-mail:
47: rohta@provence.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp}
48: and
49: K. Watarai$^{2}$
50: \\
51: %\footnotemark[1]\thanks{This file has been amended to
52: %highlight the proper use of \LaTeXe\ code with the class file.
53: %These changes are for illustrative purposes and do not reflect the
54: %original paper by A. V. Raveendran.}\\
55: $^{1}$
56: Department of Earth Science and Astronomy,
57: Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan\\
58: $^{2}$Astronomical Institute, Osaka Kyoiku University, Kashiwara, Osaka 582-8582
59: }
60: \begin{document}
61:
62: \date{Accepted 200X December XX. Received 200X December XX; in original form 200X August 5}
63:
64: \pagerange{\pageref{firstpage}--\pageref{lastpage}} \pubyear{200X}
65:
66: \maketitle
67:
68: \label{firstpage}
69:
70: \begin{abstract}
71: We calculate eclipsing light curves for accretion flows around a rotating black hole taking into account the atmospheric effects of the companion star. In the cases of no atmospheric effects, the light curves contain the information of the black hole spin because most of X-ray photons around 1 keV usually comes from the blue-shifted part of the accretion flow near the black-hole shadow and the size and the position of the black-hole shadow depend on the spin. In these cases, when most of the emission comes from the vicinity of the event horizon, the light curves becomes asymmetric at ingress and egress. We next investigate the atmospheric absorption and scattering effects of the companion stars. By using the solar-type atmospheric model, we have taken into account the atmospheric effects of the companion star, such as the photoionization by HI and HeI. We found that the eclipsing light curves observed at 1 keV possibly contain the information of the black-hole spin. However, in our atmospheric model, the effects of the atmosphere are much larger than the effects of the black-hole spin. Therefore, even in the case that the light-curves contain the information of the black hole spin, it may be difficult to extract the information of the black hole spin if we do not have the realistic atmospheric profiles, such as, the temperature, the number densities for several elements. Even in such cases, the light curve asymmetries due to the rotation of the accretion disc exist. Only when we have the reliable atmospheric model, in principle, the information of the strong-gravity regions, such as, the black hole spin, can be obtained from the eclipsing light curves.
72: \end{abstract}
73:
74: \begin{keywords}
75: accretion: accretion discs---black hole physics---X-rays: stars.
76: \end{keywords}
77:
78: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
79: \section{Introduction}
80: %
81: Elucidating the nature of the physics of extremely strong gravity around
82: black holes is one of the greatest challenges in astrophysics in this century.
83: %
84: In order to obtain physical information of the strong gravity region in the vicinity of
85: black holes, direct imaging of a black hole is an extremely promising method.
86: %
87: The emission from the vicinity of the event horizon contains information
88: about the physical parameters of a black hole.
89: %
90: Since the apparent shapes of the black hole shadows and the appearances of the
91: circular orbit around the black hole
92: are deformed by the effects of the black hole's rotation and charge
93: (e.g. Cunningham \& Bardeen 1972, 1973, Bardeen 1973, Takahashi 2004, 2005,
94: Zakharov et al. 2005),
95: the size and the position of the most luminous parts generally existing
96: in the vicinity of the shadow depend on the physical parameters of black holes.
97: %
98:
99:
100: %
101: In general,
102: methods for probing strong-field gravity near supermassive black holes
103: or stellar-mass black holes are quite limited.
104: %
105: Although the past VLBI observations give the images of the galactic centers
106: with the spatial resolution within 100 Schwarzschild radii
107: (e.g., for Sgr A*, Shen et al. 2005, for M87, Junor, Biretta \& Livio 1999),
108: the direct mapping of the shadows of both supermassive and stellar-mass
109: black holes has not been performed so far.
110: %
111: Several future interferometers have plans to image the shadows
112: around massive black holes: e.g. VSOP-2 for radio (Hirabayashi et al. 2005),
113: MAXIM for soft X-ray (see MAXIM web page: http://maxim.gsfc.nasa.gov/).
114: %
115: While these planned interferometers will image the massive black hole,
116: direct imaging of the stellar-mass black holes are difficult because
117: the apparent size of the black hole shadow is extremely small.
118: %
119: For example, in the case of the black hole with 10 solar mass
120: at the distance of 10 pc,
121: the apparent size of the black hole shadow ($\sim$ 5 Schwarzschild radii)
122: is about 0.1 micro-arcsecond.
123: %
124: So, even with the future planned radio or X-ray interferometer,
125: the direct mapping of the shadow of the stellar-mass black hole
126: is practically impossible.
127: %
128: However, if the stellar-mass black hole in the binary system is occulted
129: by its companion star, the eclipsing light curves give
130: the direct information for the spatial distribution of the brightness
131: patterns of the accretion flows around the black hole.
132: %
133: This is the primary motivation of the present study.
134: %
135: In terms of the studies about the strong-gravity region around the
136: stellar-mass black hole,
137: some observations in the field of X-ray spectroscopy
138: proposed the values of the spin parameters of stellar-mass black holes
139: (e.g. Zhang et al. 1997, Miller et al. 2002).
140: %
141: In addition, recently the works in this field
142: have achieved the significant advances for understanding the accretion
143: flows in the strong-gravity regions around the black holes
144: (e.g. Davis et al. 2006, Done \& Gierlinski 2003, 2006, Gierlinski \& Done 2004).
145:
146: %
147: In the present study, we study the method to investigate the physical
148: information included in the strong-gravity region around
149: the black hole by light-curve analysis for an accretion disc around
150: a black hole occulted by its companion star.
151: %
152: The basic idea for the eclipsing light curve analysis
153: was first proposed by Fukue (1987).
154: %
155: Watarai, Takahashi \& Fukue (2005) investigated the eclipsing light curves
156: for the supercritical accretion flows which may be suggested
157: as the accretion flow model for some X-ray black-hole binaries.
158: %
159: In principle,
160: light curves obtained at the time of eclipsing have information about
161: the black hole if the region around the black hole is optically thin.
162: %
163: However, the real observational data of the eclipsing light curves
164: may contain the additional effects which are not sometimes simple.
165: %
166: One of such effects is the atmospheric effects of the companion star.
167: %
168: Recently, Pietsch et al. (2006) give the observational data of the
169: eclipsing light curves for the X-ray binary M33 X-7
170: detected by {\it Chandra}.
171: %
172: In soft X-ray, the atmospheric effects in the companion star may vanish the
173: relativistic effects in the eclipsing light curves.
174: %
175: In other words, the eclipsing light curves also contain the information of
176: the atmosphere of the companion star.
177: %
178: Thus, the eclipsing light curve analysis will be used for
179: the investigation of the atmosphere of the companion star.
180: %
181: In the present study,
182: we also investigate the companion star's atmospheric effects in the
183: eclipsing light curves of the black-hole binaries,
184: and compare these effects with the effects of the black hole's rotation.
185: %
186:
187: %
188: In \S 2, we give the calculation method of the eclipsing light curves.
189: %
190: The adopted accretion disk model, the assumed spectral model and
191: the calculation method of the eclipsing light curves without the atmospheric
192: effects of the companion star are given in \S 2.1.
193: %
194: The assumed atmospheric model of the companion star and
195: the calculation method of the eclipsing light curves with the atmospheric
196: effects of the companion star are given in \S 2.2.
197: %
198: In \S 3, we calculate eclipsing light curves
199: without the atmospheric effects of the companion star.
200: %
201: After we calculate the eclipsing light curves around rotating black holes
202: in \S 3.1,
203: the analysis by using the normalized light curves and
204: the statistical quantities of the skewness and the kurtosis are
205: performed in \S 3.2 and \S 3.3, respectively.
206: %
207: In \S 4, we calculate eclipsing light curves
208: with the atmospheric effects of the companion star.
209: %
210: After we show the sample images of the black hole shadows
211: with the atmospheric effects in \S 4.1
212: and the normalized light curves in \S 4.2,
213: the eclipsing light curves are analysed with respect to
214: the observed photon energy in \S 4.3,
215: the black hole spin in \S 4.4,
216: and
217: the inclination angle between the rotation axis of the disc and the direction
218: of the observer in \S 4.5.
219: %
220: Related topics are discussed in \S 5.
221: %
222: We give concluding remarks in the last section, \S 6.
223:
224: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
225: \section{Calculation Method for Eclipsing Light Curves}
226: %
227: \subsection{Eclipsing Light Curves without Atmospheric Effects}
228:
229: %\clearpage
230: %%% fig1 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
231: \begin{figure}
232: \includegraphics[width=80mm]{f1.eps}
233: \caption{
234: Bolometric flux distribution (erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$)
235: for black-hole spins of $a/M=0$ ({\it left panels}) and $1$
236: ({\it right panels}), and inclination angles of $i=60^\circ$
237: ({\it top panels}) and $80^\circ$ ({\it bottom panels}).
238: The relativistic standard discs are adopted.
239: The inner edge of the accretion disc is assumed to be the marginally
240: stable circular orbit.
241: For non-rotating black holes, indirect images can be seen in the region
242: within the inner stable circular orbit.
243: The flux distributions are asymmetric due to the disc rotation and the
244: frame-dragging effects.
245: The shapes of the shadows casted by the black holes are asymmetric due to
246: frame-dragging effects around the rotating black holes.
247: }
248: \label{fig:BHimage}
249: \end{figure}
250: %\newpage
251: %
252:
253:
254: %\clearpage
255: %%% fig1 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
256: \begin{figure}
257: \includegraphics[width=80mm]{f2.eps}
258: \caption{
259: Schematic diagrams for the eclipsing black-hole binaries when the ingress ({\it top panel}) and
260: the egress ({\it bottom panel}).
261: }
262: \label{fig:ingress_egress}
263: \end{figure}
264: %\newpage
265:
266: In order to calculate a light curve during an eclipse,
267: some assumptions were required.
268: %
269: In the present study, we assume the relativistic standard disc
270: (Novikov \& Thorne 1973, Page \& Thorne 1974) at equatorial plane.
271: %
272: Based on this model,
273: the radial profile of the effective temperature of the accretion flow
274: can be calculated.
275: %
276: Then, at each radius, we assume the black body spectrum with the effective
277: temperature calculated from the relativistic standard accretion disc model.
278: %
279:
280: %
281: The calculation method for the observed spectrum of the emission
282: in the Kerr metric is established (e.g. Cunningham \& Bardeen 1973).
283: %
284: At each light ray,
285: the observed
286: specific intensity, $I_{\nu_{\rm obs}}$ [erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ str$^{-1}$ Hz$^{-1}$],
287: of the accretion disc observed at the photon frequency $\nu_{\rm obs}$ is calculated as
288: %
289: %%%%%
290: $I_{\nu_{\rm obs}}=g^3 I_{\nu_{\rm rest}}$,
291: %%%%%
292: %
293: where $\nu_{\rm rest}$ is the photon frequency measured in the local rest
294: frame of the accretion flow, $T_{\rm eff}$ is the temperature
295: of the relativistic standard accretion disc at the radius where the light ray intersects,
296: $I_{\nu_{\rm rest}}$ is the specific intensity measured at the local rest frame
297: of the accretion disc, and $g$ is the frequency ratio defined
298: $g=\nu_{\rm obs}/\nu_{\rm rest}$.
299: %
300: The frequency ratio $g$ is calculated same as Cunningham \& Bardeen (1973).
301: %
302: In this study, we assume $I_{\nu_{\rm rest}}$ is the black body spectrum with
303: the effective temperature at the radius where the light ray intersects, i.e.
304: $I_{\nu_{\rm rest}}=B_{\nu_{\rm rest}}(T)$, where $T$ is the temperature of the
305: accretion disc.
306: %
307: By using the relation $d\nu_{\rm obs}=gd\nu_{\rm rest}$ and the assumption of the
308: isotropic radiation at the local rest frame of the accretion disc,
309: the observed flux $F_{\rm obs}$ [erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$]
310: is calculated as $F_{\rm obs}=(1/d^2) \int g I_{\nu_{\rm obs}}d\nu_{\rm obs}
311: =(1/d^2)\int g^4 I_{\nu_{\rm rest}} d\nu_{\rm rest}$ where $d$ is the distance
312: to the accretion disc.
313: %
314: By integrating the observed flux in $x$-$y$ plane, we can calculate the observed
315: bolometric luminosity $L_{\rm bol}$ [erg s$^{-1}$].
316: %
317: On the other hand, the observed flux at the observed photon frequency
318: $\nu_{\rm obs}$,
319: $F^{\rm obs}_{\nu_{\rm obs}}$ [erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ Hz$^{-1}$],
320: is calculated by using the delta-function as
321: $F_{\nu_{\rm obs}}=(1/d^2)\int g^4 I_{\nu_{\rm rest}}
322: \delta (\nu_{\rm obs}-g\nu_{\rm rest}) d\nu_{\rm rest}$.
323: %
324: By integrating the flux in $x$-$y$ plane, the luminosity at the observed frequency
325: $\nu_{\rm obs}$, $L_{\nu_{\rm obs}}$ [erg s$^{-1}$ Hz$^{-1}$] is calculated.
326: %
327: The luminosity are calculated by the ray-tracing method,
328: which is commonly used in the past studies (e.g. Fukue \& Yokoyama 1988,
329: Takahashi 2004).
330: %
331: When we transform the luminosity from the local rest frame to
332: the Boyer-Lindquist frame by calculations of tetrads,
333: the relativistic effects are included, that is,
334: the special relativistic effects such as beaming effects and Doppler
335: boosting, and the general relativistic effects such as
336: gravitational redshift, gravitational lensing and frame-dragging effects.
337: %
338: The frequency ratio $g$ includes these special and general relativistic effects.
339: %
340:
341: %
342: For all calculations in the present study,
343: we assume a black hole mass of $10M_\odot$ and mass accretion rate of
344: $1\dot{M}_{\rm Edd}$, and the disc thickness is neglected.
345: %
346: Here $\dot{M}_{\rm Edd}$ is the Eddington mass accretion rate defined
347: as $\dot{M}_{\rm Edd} \equiv L_{\rm Edd}/c^2 =1.4\times
348: 10^{17} (M/M_\odot)$
349: [g/s] where $L_{\rm Edd}$ is the Eddington luminosity
350: (e.g. Kato, Fukue \& Mineshige 1998).
351: %
352: Also, we implicitly assume that the binary system has a relatively high
353: inclination angle, $i>60^\circ$.
354: %
355: In figure \ref{fig:BHimage}, we show
356: examples of the spatial distribution of the observed flux of the accretion flows
357: in the vicinity of the black holes.
358: %
359: For all panels of figure \ref{fig:BHimage},
360: the mass center of the black hole is at the center of the image.
361: %
362: The width and the height of the images in figure \ref{fig:BHimage} are
363: both 20 $M$ where $M$ is the gravitational radius and 1 $M$ corresponds
364: to 0.5 Schwarzschild radius.
365: %
366: We define $x$-axis and $y$-axis as the horizontal line and the vertical line
367: crossing at the center of the each image of figure \ref{fig:BHimage}.
368: %
369: In figure \ref{fig:BHimage},
370: the position of the mass center of the black hole is at $(x,~y)=(0,~0)$, and
371: the displayed region is $-10$ [$M$]$<x<10$ [$M$] and $-10$ [$M$]$<y<10$ [$M$].
372: %
373: Based on the calculations of the observed luminosity described above,
374: we calculate the eclipsing light curves.
375: %
376:
377: %
378: In figure \ref{fig:ingress_egress},
379: we show the schematic diagrams for the eclipsing black-hole binaries
380: when the ingress ({\it top panel}) and
381: the egress ({\it bottom panel}).
382: %
383: We also plot $x$-axis and $y$-axis in panels of figure \ref{fig:ingress_egress}.
384: %
385: When the ingress and the egress phases described in figure \ref{fig:ingress_egress},
386: the companion star is crossing the line of sight between the observer and
387: the black hole binary along the direction of $x$-axis.
388: %
389: Since the size of the companion star is generally much larger than the emission region
390: around the black hole,
391: we assume the carve of the stellar surface as the straight line in our calculations.
392: %
393: Although in our calculations the brightness profiles of
394: the accretion disc are calculated within $r<200$ [$M$],
395: the light curves are calculated in the range of $-60$ [$M$]$<x<60$ [$M$].
396: %
397: That is, in terms of the range in $y$-axis direction, we use the brightness profile
398: of the disc in the range of $-200$ [$M$]$<y<200$ [$M$], but
399: the brightness profiles of the accretion disc are given within $r<200$ [$M$].
400: %
401:
402: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
403: \subsection{Atmospheric Model of Companion Star and
404: Eclipsing Light Curves with Atmospheric Effects}
405: %
406: In the present study, we use the atmospheric model calculated for
407: the solar atmosphere
408: (Daw et al. 1995, Fontenla et al. 1993, Gabriel 1976).
409: %
410: In the top panel of figure \ref{fig:tau}, we plot
411: HI number density $N_{\rm HI}$ [cm$^{-3}$] ({\it solid line})
412: and temperature $T$ [K] ({\it dashed line}) of the adopted atmosphere
413: model.
414: %
415: Here, $H$ [km] denote the height above the photosphere.
416: Temperature of the atmosphere suddenly increase and the number density
417: decrease in the transition zone between
418: the lower chromosphere ($\sim 10^{3-4}$ [K]) and
419: the upper corona ($\sim 10^6$ [K]).
420: %
421: The two separate temperatures of HI correspond to
422: two stable regions of the cooling function of HI
423: (e.g. chapter 6 in Spitzer 1978).
424: %
425:
426: \begin{table}
427: \centering
428: %\begin{minipage}{140mm}
429: \caption{Cross sections [cm$^2$] for photoionization absorption
430: due to HI, HeI, HeII and Compton scattering in X-ray of 0.1 keV, 1 keV and
431: 10 keV.}
432: \begin{tabular}{@{}cccc@{}}
433: \hline
434: & 0.1 keV & 1 keV & 10 keV \\
435: \hline
436: $\sigma_{\rm HI}$ & $1.9\times 10^{-20}$
437: & $1.1\times 10^{-23}$ & $4.5\times 10^{-27}$ \\
438: $\sigma_{\rm HeI}$ & $3.9\times 10^{-19}$
439: & $3.4\times 10^{-22}$ & $1.4\times 10^{-25}$ \\
440: $\sigma_{\rm HeII}$ & $3.0\times 10^{-19}$
441: & $2.7\times 10^{-22}$ & $1.3\times 10^{-25}$ \\
442: $\sigma_{\rm Comp}$ & $1.4\times 10^{-25}$
443: & $1.3\times 10^{-25}$ & $6.4\times 10^{-25}$ \\
444: \hline
445: \end{tabular}
446: %\end{minipage}
447: \label{table:cs}
448: \end{table}
449:
450: %
451: In figure \ref{fig:BHRT},
452: we show the schematic diagrams for the observer, the eclipsing black-hole binaries,
453: the companion star with its atmosphere and the light ray penetrating
454: the atmosphere.
455: %
456: Here, the light ray penetrates the atmosphere with the length of $2\ell_{\rm max}$.
457: %
458: $H_{\rm max}$ is the length from the center of the companion star to
459: the maximum height of the atmosphere,
460: and $H$ is the length between the center of the companion star
461: and the point where the light ray penetrate the atmosphere.
462: %
463: The optical depth, $\tau(\nu)$, in the atmosphere can be calculated as
464: \begin{equation}
465: \tau(\nu)
466: =\int d\ell~(\sigma_{\rm abs}N_{\rm abs}+\sigma_{\rm sca}N_{\rm sca}),
467: \end{equation}
468: where $\sigma_{\rm abs}$ and $\sigma_{\rm sca}$
469: are cross sections of the absorption and scattering, respectively,
470: and $N_{\rm abs}$ and $N_{\rm sca}$ are the number densities
471: of the absorber and the scattering medium, respectively.
472: %
473: The integrations are performed along the atmosphere of the companion star
474: in the line of sight.
475: %
476:
477: %
478: In soft X-ray band, the photoionization absorption by hydrogen and helium
479: contribute to opacity.
480: %
481: The photoionization absorption cross sections of HI, HeI and HeII
482: in soft X-ray are summarized in table \ref{table:cs}.
483: %
484: We also calculate the Compton scattering cross section
485: in the same table.
486: %
487: Since for 0.1 keV and 1 keV
488: the scattering cross section is significantly lower than
489: the absorption cross sections, we can neglect the effects of
490: the Compton scatterings.
491: %
492: On the other hand, for 10 keV the scattering effects are dominated.
493: In this case, we only take into account the out-going photons
494: as the scattering effects for simplicity.
495: %
496: We see that the photoionization absorption cross sections of HI, HeI
497: and HeII are comparable in soft X-ray.
498: %
499: Calculations by Fontenla et al (1993) shows that
500: the number density of HeII, $N_{\rm HeII}$, is significantly
501: lower, e.g. by order 4, than that of HI, $N_{\rm HI}$, in the solar
502: atmosphere, i.e. $N_{\rm HeII}\ll N_{\rm HI}$, and
503: the number density of HeI is lower by about
504: order 1 than that of HI through the atmosphere, i.e.
505: $N_{\rm HeI}\sim N_{\rm HI}$.
506: %
507: Therefore, in the present study,
508: we neglect the scattering effects in the atmosphere for 0.1 keV and
509: the absorption by HeII for 0.1 keV, 1 keV and 10 keV.
510: %
511: Then, we calculate the optical depth in the atmosphere as
512: \begin{equation}
513: \tau(\nu)=2\int_0^{\ell_{\rm max}} d\ell~
514: (\sigma_{\rm HI}N_{\rm HI}+\sigma_{\rm HeI}N_{\rm HeI}
515: +\sigma_{\rm Comp}N_e),
516: \end{equation}
517: where $\ell_{\rm max}=(H_{\rm max}^2-H^2)^{1/2}$, $H_{\rm max}$ is set to
518: $10^5$ [km], the number density of electrons $N_{e}$ is calculated only
519: in the photosphere based on numerical table given by
520: Fontenla et al. (1993).
521: %
522: However,
523: according to Fontenla et al. (1993)
524: the number density of electrons in the atmosphere
525: is lower than that of HI by factor 3-4 in the almost region
526: of photosphere, then the scattering effects are negligible in
527: the photosphere.
528: %
529: Near the transition zone,
530: the number density of the electron is lower than that of HI
531: within factor 1, and for cases of 10 keV
532: the scattering effects contribute to the optical depth.
533: By using the optical depth calculated above,
534: we solve the radiative transfer equation along the atmosphere in the
535: line of sight.
536: %
537: The brightness decreases along the light rays in the atmosphere
538: by the exponential of the optical depth.
539: %
540:
541: %
542: By using the optical depth $\tau$ calculated above,
543: the observed luminosity with the atmospheric effects is calculated
544: by multiplying the factor $e^{-\tau(\nu_{\rm obs})}$ to
545: the observed luminosity without the effects of the atmospheric effects.
546: %
547: The observed luminosity without the atmospheric effects corresponds
548: to the case of $\tau=0$.
549: %
550: Since the distance between the accretion disc and the atmosphere of the
551: companion star is very large, here
552: we evaluate the optical depth $\tau$ at
553: the observed photon frequency $\nu_{\rm obs}$.
554: %
555: In the bottom panel of figure \ref{fig:tau}, we show
556: the corresponding transparency ratio, $e^{-\tau}$,
557: of the modeled atmosphere for X-ray:
558: 0.1 keV ({\it long dashed line}), 1 keV ({\it solid line}),
559: 10 keV ({\it short dashed line}).
560: In the cases of 1 keV and 10 keV,
561: while the lines in the corona are optically thin,
562: the photoionization absorption is effective in the photosphere.
563: %
564: By using the optical depths calculated as figure \ref{fig:tau},
565: we calculate the eclipsing light curves with the atmospheric effects
566: of the companion star in later section.
567: %
568:
569: %%% fig5 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
570: \begin{figure}
571: \includegraphics[width=80mm]{f3.eps}
572: \caption{
573: HI number density $N_{\rm HI}$ [cm$^{-3}$] ({\it solid line})
574: and temperature $T$ [K] ({\it dashed line}) of the adopted atmosphere
575: model ({\it top panel}).
576: The atmosphere model has been constructed for the solar atmosphere
577: (Daw et al. 1995).
578: The number density of HeI, $N_{\rm HeI}$, is assumed to be
579: $N_{\rm HeI}=0.1N_{\rm HI}$.
580: The corresponding transparency ratio, $e^{-\tau}$,
581: of the modeled atmosphere
582: ({\it bottom panel}) for X-ray:
583: 0.1 keV ({\it long dashed line}), 1 keV ({\it solid line}),
584: 10 keV ({\it short dashed line}).
585: Here, $\tau$ is the optical depth of the photoionization absorption
586: by HI and HeII.
587: }
588: \label{fig:tau}
589: \end{figure}
590: %\newpage
591:
592: %\clearpage
593: %%% fig1 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
594: \begin{figure}
595: \includegraphics[width=80mm]{f4.eps}
596: \caption{
597: %
598: Schematic diagrams for the observer, the eclipsing black-hole binaries,
599: the companion star with its atmosphere and the light ray penetrating
600: the atmosphere.
601: %
602: Here, the light ray penetrate the atmosphere with the distance $2\ell_{\rm max}$.
603: %
604: $H_{\rm max}$ is the distance from the center of the companion star to
605: the maximum height of the atmosphere,
606: and $H$ is the distance between the center of the companion star
607: and the point where the light ray penetrate the atmosphere.
608: %
609: }
610: \label{fig:BHRT}
611: \end{figure}
612: %\newpage
613:
614: In the present study, we do not include contributions from the heavy elements
615: which are important in some cases because the photoelectric cross sections are
616: generally proportional to $Z^4$ where $Z$ is the proton number.
617: However, we do not intend to give the quantitatively precise information of the
618: eclipsing light curves in this section, but to roughly investigate the possibility
619: whether the atmospheric absorption effects can be negligible or not.
620: Moreover, even if we calculate more precise light curves including
621: the effects of the heavy elements, there is no observational targets having the
622: solar-type atmosphere for which the precise light curves can be used to fitting
623: the observational data (See also discussion for the case of M33 X-7).
624:
625:
626: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
627: \section{Eclipsing Light Curves without Atmospheric Effects of
628: Companion Star}
629:
630: \subsection{Calculated Light Curves}%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
631: %%% fig2 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
632: \begin{figure}
633: \includegraphics[width=80mm]{f5.eps}
634: \caption{
635: Eclipsed light curves before ({\it left panel}) and after
636: ({\it right panel}) a total eclipse by a companion stars.
637: For each panel,
638: the lower abscissa shows the time of eclipse and the upper abscissa
639: shows the position of eclipse with respect to the position of
640: black hole ($x=0$).
641: The inclination angles are $60^\circ$ ({\it solid lines}) and
642: $80^\circ$ ({\it dashed lines}).
643: The black hole spins are $0$, $0.5$, $0.9$ and $1$ from bottom to top
644: for $i=60^\circ$ and $80^\circ$, respectively.
645: The lines showing zero time (time$=0$ s) indicate the boundary of a complete eclipse.
646: We assumed an orbital velocity of $200$ km s$^{-1}$, a black hole mass of
647: $10 M_\odot$ and mass accretion rate of $1 \dot{M}_{\rm Edd}$.
648: }
649: \label{fig:LC}
650: \end{figure}
651: %\newpage
652:
653: %
654: %The basic configurations of the binary system and the occultation events
655: %considered in the present study is the same as figure 1
656: %in Watarai, Takahashi \& Fukue (2005).
657: %
658: By using the observed bolometric luminosity $L_{\rm bol}$,
659: in figure \ref{fig:LC} we show the light curves
660: at the ingress ({\it left panel}) and egress ({\it right panel})
661: of an eclipse.
662: %
663: The observed bolometric luminosity is the function of the position
664: of the surface $x_s$ of the companion star, i.e. $L_{\rm bol}=L_{\rm bol}(x_s)$.
665: %
666: The observed bolometric luminosity is calculated by integrating the observed flux
667: in $x$-$y$ plane.
668: %
669: For the ingress phase with the stellar surface at $x$, the bolometric luminosity
670: $L_{\rm bol}(x)$ is given as
671: %
672: \begin{equation}
673: L_{\rm bol}(x)
674: =\frac{1}{d^2}\int_{x}^{200[M]}dx^\prime\int_{-200[M]}^{200[M]}dy^\prime
675: \int d\nu_{\rm rest}~g^4~I_{\nu_{\rm rest}},
676: \end{equation}
677: %
678: where $g$ and $I_{\nu_{\rm rest}}$ are the functions of the light ray, $x^\prime$ and $y^\prime$,
679: and we set the observer's distance to be $d=100$ [$M$].
680: %
681: As denoted in the previous section, we assume $I_{\nu_{\rm rest}}=B_{\nu_{\rm rest}}$.
682: %
683: In the same way, for egress phase with the stellar surface at $x$,
684: %
685: \begin{equation}
686: L_{\rm bol}(x)
687: =\frac{1}{d^2}\int_{-200[M]}^x dx^\prime\int_{-200[M]}^{200[M]}dy^\prime
688: \int d\nu_{\rm rest}~g^4~I_{\nu_{\rm rest}}.
689: \end{equation}
690: %
691: We calculate the observed bolometric luminosity
692: for the position of the stellar surface $x$ in the range of $-60$[$M$] $<x<60$[$M$].
693: %
694:
695: The observed bolometric luminosity can be also the function of time.
696: %
697: Here, we define the origin of the time when the stellar surface is
698: at $60$ [$M$] for the ingress and at $-60$ [$M$] for the egress.
699: %
700: The region between $\pm 60$ [$M$] are enough to cover the effectively
701: emitting region of the accretion disc observed at 1 keV, so we use these
702: values in this study when we calculate the normalized light curves.
703: %
704: In figure \ref{fig:LC}, the upper and lower abscissas are
705: the position of the stellar surface $x$ and the time $t$.
706: %
707: The larger values of the bolometric luminosity is achieved for
708: the larger spin parameter of a black hole.
709: %
710: A rotating black hole transfers angular momentum to the accreting gas
711: via the frame-dragging effect which is also calculated when the
712: frame transformation by using tetrads.
713: %
714: This effects increases the observed luminosity.
715: %
716:
717: %
718: Also, the marginally stable circular orbit $r_{ms}$
719: decreases as the black hole spin increases, e.g. $r_{\rm ms}=6M$
720: for $a/M=0$ and $r_{\rm ms}=M$ for $a/M=1$
721: (Bardeen, Press \& Teukolsky 1972).
722: %
723: Then, the black hole rotation increase the observed luminosity and
724: the emission region in the vicinity of the black hole.
725: %
726: The angular velocity $\omega$
727: of the zero angular momentum observer (ZAMO) with
728: respect to distant observer is calculated as
729: $\omega=-g_{t\phi}/g_{\phi\phi}=g^{t\phi}/g^{tt}=2Mar/A$.
730: %
731: Here, $A\equiv (r^2+a^2)^2-a^2\Delta\sin^2\theta$ where $\Delta\equiv
732: r^2-2Mr+a^2$. In this study, we assume $\theta=90^\circ$ for the photon
733: emitting region.
734: Since this angular velocity $\omega$ is roughly proportional to
735: $\omega\propto 2Ma/r^3$,
736: the effects of the black hole rotation drastically decrease for large $r$.
737:
738: \subsection{Normalized Light-Curve Analysis}%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
739:
740: %%% fig3 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
741: \begin{figure}
742: \includegraphics[width=80mm]{f6.eps}
743: \caption{
744: Normalized eclipsed light curves before ({\it left panels}) and after
745: ({\it right panels}) a total eclipse by a companion stars.
746: For each panel,
747: the lower abscissa shows the time of eclipse and the upper abscissa
748: shows the position of eclipse with respect to the position of
749: black hole ($x=0$).
750: %
751: The ordinate shows the normalized bolometric luminosities defined as
752: $L_{\rm bol}(x)/L_{\rm bol}(x=60 M)$ for the ingress and
753: $L_{\rm bol}(x)/L_{\rm bol}(x=-60 M)$ for the egress.
754: %
755: Here, $L_{\rm bol}(x)$ is the observed bolometric luminosity when
756: the stellar surface is at $x$.
757: %
758: That is, for the ingress phase, we normalize the observed bolometric luminosity $L_{\rm bol}(x)$
759: by the observed bolometric luminosity when the stellar surface is at $L_{\rm bol}(x=60M)$,
760: and for the egress phase, the observed bolometric luminosity is normalized
761: by the observed bolometric luminosity when the stellar surface is at $L_{\rm bol}(x=60M)$.
762: %
763: In the same way,
764: the observed luminosity $L_\nu(x)$ [erg s$^{-1}$ Hz$^{-1}$] can be also
765: normalized by the observed luminosity when the stellar surfaces are at $x=\pm 60M$.
766: %
767: The inclination angles are
768: are 60$^\circ$ ({\it top panels}) and 80$^\circ$ ({\it bottom panels}),
769: and the black-hole spins are
770: $a/M=0$ ({\it solid lines}), $0.5$ ({\it long dashed lines}),
771: $0.9$ ({\it short dashed lines}) and $1$ ({\it dotted lines}).
772: The lines showing zero time (time$=0$ s) indicate the boundary of a complete eclipse.
773: We assumed an orbital velocity of $200$ km s$^{-1}$, a black hole mass of
774: $10 M_\odot$ and mass accretion rate of $1 \dot{M}_{\rm Edd}$.
775: }
776: \label{fig:LCspin}
777: \end{figure}
778: %\newpage
779:
780: %%% fig4 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
781: \begin{figure}
782: \includegraphics[width=80mm]{f7.eps}
783: \caption{
784: Same as figure \ref{fig:LCspin}.
785: The inclination angles are
786: are $60^\circ$ ({\it solid lines}), $70^\circ$ ({\it long dashed lines}),
787: and $80^\circ$ ({\it short dashed lines}) and
788: $85^\circ$ ({\it dotted lines}).
789: The black-hole spins are
790: $a/M=0$ ({\it top panels}) and $1$ ({\it bottom panels}).
791: }
792: \label{fig:LCincli}
793: \end{figure}
794: %\newpage
795:
796: Although in figure \ref{fig:LC}
797: we clearly see the effects of the black hole rotation as the
798: increase of the bolometric luminosity,
799: it is known that the mass accretion rate also increase the bolometric
800: luminosity for some inclination angles (Watarai, Takahashi \& Fukue 2005).
801: So, in addition to the maximum bolometric luminosity,
802: we analyze the shapes of the light curves which contain the
803: information of a black hole spin.
804: %
805: In order to do this, we define the normalized bolometric luminosity as
806: $L_{\rm bol}(x)/L_{\rm bol}(x=\pm 60 M)$.
807: %
808: That is, for the ingress phase,
809: %
810: \begin{eqnarray}
811: \frac{L_{\rm bol}(x)}{L_{\rm bol}(-60)}
812: &=&\int_x^{200} dx^\prime\int_{-200}^{200}dy^\prime
813: \int d\nu_{\rm rest}~g^4~I_{\nu_{\rm rest}}
814: \nonumber\\
815: &&\bigg/
816: \int_{-60}^{200} dx^\prime\int_{-200}^{200}dy^\prime
817: \int d\nu_{\rm rest}~g^4~I_{\nu_{\rm rest}},
818: \end{eqnarray}
819: %
820: where the unit for the length is $M$, and for the egress phase,
821: %
822: \begin{eqnarray}
823: \frac{L_{\rm bol}(x)}{L_{\rm bol}(+60)}
824: &=&\int_{-200}^x dx^\prime\int_{-200}^{200}dy^\prime
825: \int d\nu_{\rm rest}~g^4~I_{\nu_{\rm rest}}
826: \nonumber\\
827: &&\bigg/
828: \int_{-200}^{60} dx^\prime\int_{-200}^{200}dy^\prime
829: \int d\nu_{\rm rest}~g^4~I_{\nu_{\rm rest}}.
830: \end{eqnarray}
831: %
832:
833:
834: Since we calculate the eclipsing light curves in the region of
835: $-60M<r<60M$ in the present study,
836: $L_{\rm bol}(x=\mp 60M)$ represent the maximum bolometric luminosity
837: at the ingress and the egress, respectively.
838: Figure $\ref{fig:LCspin}$ shows the calculated normalized light curves
839: at the ingress ({\it left panel}) and egress ({\it right panel})
840: of an eclipse.
841: From this figures, we see that the black hole rotation clearly deforms
842: the shapes of the normalized light curves.
843: For larger spin parameters, the light curves changes in the closer
844: region of the black hole center ($x=0$[$M$]).
845: This is because the effective emission region of photon from
846: the accretion disc become more compact for larger spin parameter
847: as shown in figure \ref{fig:BHimage}.
848: Then, the drastically changed timescale of the normalized luminosity
849: become shorter for the larger spin parameter.
850: We also investigate the effects of the inclination angle $i$.
851: At first glance of the upper panels and the lower panels of
852: figure \ref{fig:LCspin}, there is little dependence on the inclination
853: angle.
854: In order to see the effects of the inclination angles on the shapes of the
855: light curves, in figure \ref{fig:LCincli}
856: we plot the normalized light curves for the black hole spin of $a/M=0$
857: ({\it upper panels}) and $1$ ({\it lower panels}).
858: Although the absolute value of the bolometric luminosity depends on the
859: inclination angle largely as we can see in figure \ref{fig:LC},
860: from figure \ref{fig:LCincli} the effects of the inclination angle on the
861: normalized light curves is very small.
862: Then, the shape and the variation timescale of
863: the normalized light curve are the possible candidates
864: of the good indicator of the black hole spin.
865:
866: \subsection{Skewness and Kurtosis}%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
867:
868: In addition to the normalized light curves given in the previous section,
869: we present the other indicator of the effects of the black hole spin.
870: We introduce the statistical quantities of skewness, $S$, and kurtosis,
871: $K$, as indicators of the light-curve asymmetry.
872: These are the same as the analysis in Watarai, Takahashi \& Fukue (2005).
873: The skewness and kurtosis represent the deviation of the observational
874: data from the Gaussian (normal) distribution.
875: Skewness, $S$, is a measure of the degree of asymmetry of a distribution.
876: On the other hand, kurtosis, $K$, is the degree of peaky feature of
877: a distribution.
878:
879: We have done the skewness and kurtosis analysis for the inverted
880: bolometric light curves as calculated in figure \ref{fig:LC}.
881: From the data of the inverted normalized light curve, we first obtain
882: $f_i$ as $f_i=L_{\rm bol, max}-L_{\rm bol}(t_i)$ where $t_i$ is the time
883: of each mesh.
884: The statistical quantities are defined as
885: \begin{eqnarray}
886: P_i&=&f_i/\sum_{i=0}^n f_i,\\
887: \bar{t}&=&\sum_{i=0}^n t_i P_i,\\
888: \sigma^2&=&\sum_{i=0}^n (t_i-\bar{t})^2 P_i,\\
889: S&=&\frac{1}{\sigma^3}\sum_{i=0}^n (t_i-\bar{t})^3 P_i,\label{eq:S}\\
890: K&=&\frac{1}{\sigma^4}\sum_{i=0}^n (t_i-\bar{t})^4 P_i,\label{eq:K}\\
891: \end{eqnarray}
892: where $n$ is the number of data points,
893: $P_i$ is the normalized distribution calculated from the bolometric
894: light curves as shown in figure \ref{fig:LC},
895: $\bar{t}$ is an weighted average time
896: and $\sigma$ is the standard deviation.
897: If the left tail is more pronounced than the right tail,
898: the skewness becomes negative ($S<0$).
899: If the reverse is true, the skewness becomes positive ($S>0$).
900: The skewness for a normal distribution is zero $S=0$,
901: and any symmetric data should have a skewness near zero.
902: The kurtosis for a standard normal distribution is three.
903: Positive kurtosis indicates a peaked distribution and negative
904: kurtosis indicates a flat distribution.
905:
906: In figure \ref{fig:SK}, we show the dependence of
907: the calculated skewness, $S$ ({\it left panel})
908: and kurtosis, $K$ ({\it right panel}) on the black hole spin, $a/M$,
909: for eight inclination angles ($60^\circ$, $65^\circ$, $70^\circ$,
910: $75^\circ$, $80^\circ$, $82^\circ$, $85^\circ$ and $88^\circ$).
911: Since the marginally stable orbit become larger for non-rotating
912: black hole than the rotating cases, then the emission region
913: become wider than the rotating one.
914: Then, for larger spin parameters, the skewness becomes smaller value.
915: This is clearly seen in the left panel of figure \ref{fig:SK}.
916: On the other hand, for larger spin parameters, the emission region and
917: the variation timescale of the light curves become smaller.
918: Then the light curves are expected to be more peaky than cases of
919: the non-rotating black hole.
920: Then, the kurtosis become larger value for the larger spin parameters of
921: black holes.
922: This feature can be seen in the right panel of figure \ref{fig:SK}.
923: While the kurtosis cannot be good indicator of the mass accretion rate
924: for non-rotating black holes as shown in
925: Watarai, Takahashi \& Fukue (2005),
926: both of the skewness and the kurtosis can be the possible indicator of
927: the black hole spin.
928:
929: %%% fig5 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
930: \begin{figure*}
931: \includegraphics[width=170mm]{f8.eps}
932: \caption{
933: Skewness and kurtosis for different black-hole spins and inclination
934: angles, $i=60^\circ$, $65^\circ$, $70^\circ$, $75^\circ$, $80^\circ$,
935: $82^\circ$, $85^\circ$ and $88^\circ$.
936: }
937: \label{fig:SK}
938: \end{figure*}
939: %\newpage
940:
941: \section{Eclipsing Light Curves with Atmospheric Effects of Companion Star}
942:
943: While in the last section we do not take into account the atmospheric
944: effects of the companion star,
945: in this section, we calculate the eclipsing light curves with the atmospheric effects.
946: One of the key questions in terms of the atmospheric effects
947: are whether the information of the black hole spin
948: in the eclipsing light curves
949: is completely smeared out by the atmospheric effects.
950: One of the main goals in this section is to answer this question.
951: We also investigate how the eclipsing light curves depend on
952: the observed photon energy in X-ray and the inclination angle.
953:
954: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
955: \subsection{Black Hole Shadows with the Atmospheric Effects}
956: %%% fig5 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
957: \begin{figure*}
958: \includegraphics[width=170mm]{f9.eps}
959: \caption{
960: Images of black hole shadows with $a/M=0.5$ when ingress
961: at the observed frequency of 1 keV for cases with no absorption
962: effects ({\it top panels}) and atmospheric absorptions
963: ({\it bottom panels}).
964: The size of each image is same as figure \ref{fig:BHimage}, i.e.
965: $-20<x/M<20$ and $-20<y/M<20$.
966: For no absorption case for top panels,
967: the edges of the companion star are located at
968: -20, -10, 0 and 10 in units of $M$ ({\it left to right}).
969: For the absorption case for bottom panels, we define these edges
970: as positions with $\tau(\nu)=7$.
971: }
972: \label{fig:BHabs}
973: \end{figure*}
974: %\newpage
975:
976: %
977: We first calculate the images of the black hole shadows with absorption
978: effects in the atmosphere of the companion star.
979: %
980: In figure \ref{fig:BHabs}, we show
981: images of black hole shadows when ingress
982: at the observed frequency of 1 keV for cases with no absorption
983: effects ({\it top panels}) and atmospheric photoionization absorptions
984: ({\it bottom panels}).
985: %
986: We assume the mass of the companion star to be 1 $M_\odot$.
987: The size of each image is same as figure \ref{fig:BHimage}, i.e.
988: -20 [$M$]$<x<$20 [$M$] and -20 [$M$]$<y<$20 [$M$].
989: %
990: For no absorption case for top panels,
991: the edges of the companion star are located at
992: -20, -10, 0 and 10 in units of $M$ ({\it left to right}).
993: %
994: For the cases with the atmospheric effects ({\it bottom panels}),
995: we define these edges
996: as positions with $\tau(\nu)=7$.
997: %
998: We can see that the brightness around the black hole shadow are
999: decreased by the photoionization absorption in the atmosphere.
1000: %
1001: In addition to the decrease of the absolute values of the brightness,
1002: the clear edges of the companion star which can be seen for no absorption
1003: cases are smeared out by the absorption effects.
1004: %
1005: This is because the effective region with absorption effects is
1006: comparable to the size of X-ray emitting regions.
1007: %
1008:
1009: \subsection{Normalized Light Curves with the Atmospheric Effects}
1010: %
1011: We next calculate the eclipsing light curves with effects of the
1012: photoionization absorption.
1013: %
1014: In figure \ref{fig:norLCabs_1keV}, we show
1015: normalized light curves
1016: with ({\it thick lines})
1017: and
1018: without ({\it thin lines})
1019: the atmospheric effects of the companion star.
1020: %
1021: The observed energy is set to be 1 keV in figure \ref{fig:norLCabs_1keV}.
1022: %
1023: The black hole spins are $a/M=0$ ({\it solid lines}) and 1 ({\it dotted lines}),
1024: and the observed inclination angles with respect to the rotation axis
1025: of the accretion disc are $i=60^\circ$ ({\it top panels}) and
1026: $80^\circ$ ({\it bottom panels}).
1027: %
1028: While the normalization light curves with no absorption effects
1029: largely change in a short time when the most luminous parts of the
1030: accretion disc are occulted or unocculted by the sharp edge of
1031: the companion star,
1032: the normalization light curves with absorption effects
1033: gradually decrease or increase compared to the cases with no absorption
1034: effects.
1035: %
1036: This is because the atmosphere of the companion star absorb some fraction
1037: of X-ray photons gradually before the most luminous part of the accretion
1038: disc is completely occulted or unocculted.
1039: %
1040: In other words, the width of the absorption region which causes the
1041: gradual changes of the X-ray brightness of the accretion disc
1042: is comparable to size of the luminous parts of the accretion disc as
1043: denoted above.
1044: %
1045:
1046: %
1047: The differences between
1048: the normalized light curves with absorption effects for $a/M=0$ and 1
1049: become smaller than the cases of no absorption effects.
1050: %
1051: When egress, i.e. $t>0$, the normalized light curves with $a/M=0$
1052: rise more rapidly than the cases of $a/M=1$.
1053: %
1054: That is to say, the timescale of the increase of normalized $L_\nu$
1055: for $a/M=0$ is longer than that for $a/M$.
1056: %
1057: This is because the most luminous parts of the accretion disc for
1058: $a/M=1$ is more compact than those for $a/M$.
1059: %
1060: This results in the shorter crossing time of the companion star along
1061: the luminous parts of the disc for $a/M=1$ than the cases for $a/M=0$.
1062: %
1063: This feature can be seen in the case of no absorption by
1064: the companion star.
1065: %
1066:
1067: %
1068: Since the size of the most luminous parts of the accretion disc
1069: depends on the black hole spin,
1070: the crossing timescale of the companion star along the most luminous parts
1071: of the accretion disc can be one of the key physical quantities
1072: which distinguish the cases of rapidly rotating black holes and
1073: the cases of no rotating black hole.
1074: %
1075: But these effects are generally
1076: smeared out by the atmospheric effects of the companion star
1077: at some fraction.
1078: %
1079: In our calculations assuming the solar atmosphere,
1080: the atmospheric absorption can not completely smeared out the difference
1081: between the cases of rapidly rotating black holes and
1082: the cases of no rotating black hole.
1083: %
1084: Then, the observed eclipsing light curves at 1 keV with the
1085: atmospheric effects of the companion star possibly contain
1086: the information of the black hole spin.
1087: %
1088: However, since the effects of the atmosphere is larger than the effects of the
1089: spin, only when we have the reliable atmospheric model,
1090: we can determine the black hole spin from the eclipsing light curves
1091: observed by the wavelength where the atmospheric absorption is effective.
1092: %
1093:
1094: %%% fig5 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1095: \begin{figure}
1096: \includegraphics[width=80mm]{f10.eps}
1097: \caption{
1098: Normalized light curves
1099: with ({\it thick lines})
1100: and
1101: without ({\it thin lines})
1102: the atmospheric effects of the companion star
1103: at observed energy of 1 keV for
1104: black hole spins $a/M=0$ ({\it solid lines}) and 1 ({\it dotted lines}),
1105: and the observed inclination angles with respect to the rotation axis
1106: of the accretion disc $i=60^\circ$ ({\it top panels}) and
1107: $80^\circ$ ({\it bottom panels}).
1108: }
1109: \label{fig:norLCabs_1keV}
1110: \end{figure}
1111: %\newpage
1112:
1113: \subsection{Observed Photon Energy}
1114:
1115: Here, we investigate the observed energy dependence of the atmospheric
1116: absorption effects in the images of the black hole shadows
1117: and the normalized light curves.
1118: %fig 9
1119: In figure \ref{fig:BHkeV_a10},
1120: images of the black hole shadows in the accretion discs
1121: are shown for observed photon energy of
1122: 0.1 keV ({\it left panel}),
1123: 1 keV ({\it middle panel}) and
1124: 10 keV ({\it right panel}).
1125: Here, we do not include the atmospheric absorption effects.
1126: In these panels, the inclination angle of the observer is $i=80^\circ$ and
1127: the black hole spin is $a/M=1$.
1128: The absolute values of the luminosities are largest for the case
1129: of 1 keV.
1130: On the other hand,
1131: the larger the observed photon energy becomes,
1132: the more compact
1133: the regions of the luminous parts in the accretion discs become.
1134: Especially,
1135: in the case of 10 keV,
1136: the size of the luminous parts in the accretion disc is smallest and
1137: the luminous parts exist in the blue shifted parts of the
1138: accretion disc which are located in just outside the black hole shadow.
1139: As Takahashi (2004) calculated,
1140: the size and the positions of the black hole shadows in the accretion
1141: discs clearly depend on the black hole spins.
1142: Thus, the eclipsing light curves for higher photon energy can
1143: contain the information of the black hole shadows in case that
1144: the atmospheric smearing effects are negligible.
1145:
1146:
1147: %%% fig5 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1148: \begin{figure*}
1149: \includegraphics[width=170mm]{f11.eps}
1150: \caption{
1151: Images of the black hole shadows in the accretion discs for
1152: observed energy of
1153: 0.1 keV ({\it left panel}),
1154: 1 keV ({\it middle panel}) and
1155: 10 keV ({\it right panel}).
1156: In these panels, the inclination angle of the observer is $i=80^\circ$ and
1157: the black hole spin is $a/M=1$.
1158: }
1159: \label{fig:BHkeV_a10}
1160: \end{figure*}
1161: %\newpage
1162: %%% fig5 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1163: \begin{figure}
1164: \includegraphics[width=80mm]{f12.eps}
1165: \caption{
1166: The normalized light curves with effects of the atmospheric absorption
1167: for observed energy of
1168: 0.1 keV ({\it dashed lines}),
1169: 1 keV ({\it solid lines}) and
1170: 10 keV ({\it dotted lines}).
1171: The black hole spin is $a/M=0$ and
1172: the inclination angles of the observers are
1173: $i=60^\circ$ ({\it top panel}) and
1174: $80^\circ$ ({\it bottom panel}).
1175: }
1176: \label{fig:norLCabs_keV_a00}
1177: \end{figure}
1178: %\newpage
1179:
1180: %%% fig5 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1181: \begin{figure}
1182: \includegraphics[width=80mm]{f13.eps}
1183: \caption{
1184: The same as figure \ref{fig:norLCabs_keV_a00} but for $a/M=1$.
1185: }
1186: \label{fig:norLCabs_keV_a10}
1187: \end{figure}
1188: %\newpage
1189:
1190: The normalized light curves with effects of the atmospheric absorption
1191: are shown in figure \ref{fig:norLCabs_keV_a00} when $a/M=0$
1192: and in figure \ref{fig:norLCabs_keV_a10} when $a/M=1$
1193: for observed energy of
1194: 0.1 keV ({\it dashed lines}),
1195: 1 keV ({\it solid lines}) and
1196: 10 keV ({\it dotted lines}).
1197: The black hole spin is $a/M=0$ and
1198: the inclination angles of the observers are
1199: $i=60^\circ$ ({\it top panels}) and
1200: $80^\circ$ ({\it bottom panels}).
1201: The differences between cases of 0.1 keV, 1 keV and 10 keV are
1202: clearly shown in these figures.
1203: The higher the observed photon energy become,
1204: the shorter the timescales of the changes of the normalization light curves
1205: become.
1206: This is because the larger the observed photon energy becomes,
1207: the more compact
1208: the regions of the luminous parts in the accretion discs become and then
1209: the crossing time of the companion star is shortest in the case of 10 keV
1210: and longest in the case of 0.1 keV.
1211: These features can be seen in both cases of
1212: $a/M=0$ in figure \ref{fig:norLCabs_keV_a00}
1213: and $1$ in figure \ref{fig:norLCabs_keV_a10}.
1214:
1215:
1216: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1217: \subsection{Black Hole Spin}
1218:
1219: %%% fig5 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1220: \begin{figure}
1221: \includegraphics[width=80mm]{f14.eps}
1222: \caption{
1223: The same as figure \ref{fig:norLCabs_1keV} but for
1224: the observed photon energy of 0.1 keV.
1225: }
1226: \label{fig:norLCabs_01keV}
1227: \end{figure}
1228: %\newpage
1229:
1230: %%% fig5 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1231: \begin{figure}
1232: \includegraphics[width=80mm]{f15.eps}
1233: \caption{
1234: The same as figure \ref{fig:norLCabs_1keV} but for
1235: the observed photon energy of 10 keV.
1236: }
1237: \label{fig:norLCabs_10keV}
1238: \end{figure}
1239: %\newpage
1240:
1241:
1242:
1243: %fig 12
1244: %fig 13
1245: In order to see the effects of the black hole spin in the normalized
1246: light curves when the observed photon energies are 0.1 keV and 10 keV,
1247: we plot the normalized light curves
1248: same as figure \ref{fig:norLCabs_1keV} but for
1249: the observed photon energy of 0.1 keV in figure \ref{fig:norLCabs_01keV}
1250: and 10 keV in figure \ref{fig:norLCabs_10keV}.
1251: In the case of 0.1 keV in figure \ref{fig:norLCabs_01keV},
1252: the difference of the normalized light curves
1253: between the cases of $a/M=0$ and the cases of $a/M=1$
1254: are very small for both cases of $i=60^\circ$ and $80^\circ$.
1255: Thus, it seems very difficult to see the information of the black hole spin
1256: in the observed light curves.
1257: On the other hand, in the case of 10 keV,
1258: we can clearly see the difference of the normalized light curves
1259: between the cases of $a/M=0$ and the cases of $a/M=1$
1260: for both cases of $i=60^\circ$ and $80^\circ$.
1261: The timescale of the change of the normalized light curve for the
1262: case of $a/M=1$ is longer than the timescale for the case of $a/M=0$
1263: for both cases of ingress and egress.
1264: The normalized light curves are gradually decrease and increase
1265: because of the atmospheric effects and
1266: the most luminous
1267: parts of the accretion discs exist in just outside of the black hole
1268: shadows as denoted above.
1269: Moreover, the size of the black hole shadows become smaller
1270: for larger spin and the position of the black hole shadow are shifted to
1271: the opposite side of the most luminous parts of the accretion discs
1272: (Takahashi 2004).
1273: The timescale when the most luminous parts can be seen by
1274: the observer become longer when $a/M=1$ than the case of $a/M=0$ because
1275: the most luminous parts exist in more inner regions when $a/M=1$ than the
1276: case of $a/M=0$.
1277:
1278: \subsection{Inclination Angle between the Rotation Axis and the Direction of
1279: the Observer}
1280: %fig 14
1281: We also investigate the dependence of the normalized light curves
1282: on the observed inclination angles, $i$,
1283: with respect to the rotation axis of the accretion disc.
1284: While so far we plot the normalized light curves for both cases of
1285: $i=60^\circ$ and $80^\circ$,
1286: in order to see the dependence on the inclination angle $i$,
1287: we plot the normalized light curves with same black hole spins
1288: in the same panel.
1289: The normalized light curves for cases of $a/M=0$ ({\it top panel})
1290: and $1$ ({\it bottom panel}) are shown in figure
1291: \ref{fig:norLCabs_keV_incli}.
1292: For each panel, the lines are plotted for the combinations of
1293: the inclination angle $i=60^\circ$, $70^\circ$ and $80^\circ$
1294: and the observed photon energy to be 0.1 keV, 1 keV and 10 keV.
1295: While the observed images of the black hole shadows in the accretion
1296: discs are clearly different for the different inclination angles $i$,
1297: the dependences on the inclination angles are very small in the
1298: normalized light curves.
1299:
1300: %%% fig5 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1301: \begin{figure}
1302: \includegraphics[width=80mm]{f16.eps}
1303: \caption{
1304: The normalized light curves for cases of $a/M=0$ ({\it top panel})
1305: and $1$ ({\it bottom panel}).
1306: For each panel, the lines are plotted for the combinations of
1307: the inclination angle $i=60^\circ$, $70^\circ$ and $80^\circ$
1308: and the observed photon energy to be 0.1 keV, 1 keV and 10 keV.
1309: }
1310: \label{fig:norLCabs_keV_incli}
1311: \end{figure}
1312: %\newpage
1313:
1314: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1315: %\section{Discussion}
1316: %\subsection{Observational Feasibility}%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1317: %\subsection{Comparison to other determination methods of a black hole spin}
1318: %\subsection{Accretion disc Models}%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1319:
1320: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1321: \section{Discussion}
1322:
1323: \subsection{Eclipsing Light Curves and Observational Feasibility}
1324: Recently, Pietsch et al. (2006) give the clear observational data of the
1325: eclipsing light curves for the X-ray binary M33 X-7
1326: detected by {\it Chandra}.
1327: While the absorption effects in the companion atmosphere seem to vanish the
1328: relativistic effects in the eclipsing light curves
1329: in their observational data,
1330: our calculations show that the information of the black hole spin in the
1331: eclipsing light curves can not be completely smeared out for the observed
1332: photon energy of 1 keV and 10 keV if we assume the solar-type
1333: atmospheric model.
1334: However, as denoted above, even if we have the reliable observational data
1335: with high signal-to-noise ratio,
1336: only when we have the reliable atmospheric model of the companion star,
1337: the physical information of the strong-gravity regime,
1338: such as, a black hole spin, can be obtained.
1339:
1340: In addition, in the present study we use the solar atmospheric model
1341: as a basic sample of the atmospheric structure.
1342: In the case of the eclipsing X-ray binary M33 X-7,
1343: the companion star is an O6III star.
1344: Although some recent observational data suggest the existence of corona
1345: in the atmosphere of Herbig Ae/Be stars (Stelzer et al. 2006),
1346: it remains one of the unsolved issues whether
1347: the high temperature stars such as O-type stars
1348: have corona in their atmosphere.
1349: If there is the corona in the atmosphere of O-type stars,
1350: the stellar atmosphere will have two-temperature structure such as the
1351: solar atmosphere.
1352: In such cases, our calculations roughly calculate the light curves for
1353: the case of M33 X-7.
1354:
1355: Basically, the count rates of the X-ray photons
1356: from X-ray binaries in external galaxies
1357: with the possible exception of the Magellanic Clouds are generally
1358: much too low to provide the precise eclipse mapping of the inner
1359: portions of the accretion discs even in Chandra observations.
1360: In addition, the time resolutions for the data of the eclipsing light curves
1361: for M33 X-7 are insufficient to precisely map the small strong-gravity regime
1362: in the center of the accretion flows.
1363: Even in the case that the calculations in the present study
1364: are not used to the present low count rate observations in X-ray,
1365: future X-ray data with higher count rates obtained by the future
1366: X-ray telescope such as Constellation-X Observatory in NASA
1367: (see, http://constellation.gsfc.nasa.gov/) or
1368: XEUS (X-Ray Evolving Universe Spectrometer) in ESA
1369: (see, http://www.esa.int/science/xeus)
1370: will provide the information of the extremely strong-gravity regions
1371: of the accretion discs.
1372:
1373: \subsection{Accretion Disc Model}
1374: %
1375: While our calculation assumes the standard accretion disc,
1376: for the accretion discs with larger mass accretion rate,
1377: Watarai, Takahashi \& Fukue (2005) pointed out the light curves are
1378: deformed by the self-occultation effects, and shows that
1379: for larger mass accretion rate the skewness becomes small value and
1380: the kurtosis is nearly constant.
1381: %
1382: On the other hand, our analysis shows the larger the black hole spin becomes,
1383: the smaller the skewness becomes and the larger the kurtosis becomes
1384: for any observed inclination angles.
1385: %
1386: The dependence of the kurtosis on the black hole spins contrast with
1387: the dependence of the mass accretion rate.
1388: %
1389: We expect that the effects due to the black hole rotation can not be seen
1390: for discs with large mass accretion rate because of the self-occultation
1391: effect.
1392: %
1393: The same analysis for the accretion discs with high mass accretion rate
1394: around rotating black hole is a topic for future study.
1395: %
1396: Moreover,
1397: from the eclipsing light curves, it may be possible to examine
1398: the disk structure such as stress at the marginally stable orbit,
1399: the angular dependence of the emitted radiation, and the dynamical
1400: structure relating the magnetic processes such as magnetorotational instabilities
1401: in the supersonic region which are the fundamental unsolved issues about
1402: the accretion flow models.
1403: %
1404: These issues are also topics for future studies.
1405: %
1406:
1407: \subsection{X-ray Heating Effects}
1408: So far, we implicitly neglect the effects of the heating of the atmosphere
1409: due to the absorbed X-ray photons in the atmosphere of the companion star.
1410: According to the calculations of the structure of the heated atmosphere
1411: (e.g. Basko \& Sunyaev 1973), the temperature of the atmosphere
1412: increase by about factor 2 due to the absorbed X-ray photons.
1413: The number density is also changed by similar factor.
1414: Although these changes causes the quantitative changes of the optical
1415: depth in X-ray of the atmosphere of the companion star,
1416: we do not expect the qualitative changes of the dependence of the
1417: eclipsing light curves on the physical parameters.
1418: Since the absorption effects basically do not change the timescale of the
1419: change of the eclipsing light curves,
1420: the effects of the X-ray heating will not drastically alter the dependence
1421: of the crossing timescale of the luminous parts of the accretion disc.
1422: In addition to the changes of the optical depths,
1423: a X-ray heating effects causes
1424: a radiatively driven stellar wind originated from
1425: the X-ray heated atmosphere (e.g. Blondin 1994, Wojdowski et al. 2001).
1426: The atmospheric profile of the companion star is not the same
1427: between ingress and egress due to this effect.
1428: Since this effects also change the optical depth of the atmosphere in
1429: X-ray, we expect the effect will not change
1430: the timescale of the change of the eclipsing light curves drastically.
1431:
1432:
1433: \subsection{Cases for Neutron Stars and Seyfert Galaxies}
1434: Asymmetric brightness distribution exists not only in black hole X-ray
1435: binaries, but also in neutron star X-ray binaries (NSXBs).
1436: This is because the relativistic effects still works in NSXBs.
1437: Even in the case that the emission from the neutron star is dominant,
1438: the asymmetric component still remains in its light curves
1439: as long as the emission from the neutron star surface is isotropic.
1440: The observational data for the eclipsing neutron star binaries are actually
1441: obtained (e.g. Homan et al. 2003).
1442: In the case of optically thin along the light paths,
1443: we can estimate the emitting radius from the duration time
1444: of ingress or egress,
1445: and measure the spin of the neutron star from the skewness analysis
1446: of the asymmetric eclipsing light curves.
1447: According to our results,
1448: the result does not depend on the inclination angle.
1449: Weaver \& Yaqoob (1998) shows the "deep minimum" in the X-ray light curves
1450: of Seyfert 1 galaxy MGC-6-30-15.
1451: Some obscuring body in the line of sight seem to
1452: cause the occultation phenomena in the light curves.
1453: Only when such events occur many times and the typical features of the
1454: light curves are obtained, and the photons from the vicinity of the black hole
1455: are directly detected,
1456: it may be possible to obtain the physical
1457: information in the vicinity of the black hole,
1458: such as the size of emission region and black hole spin.
1459:
1460: \section{Concluding Remarks}
1461: In this paper, we propose an eclipsing light-curve diagnosis
1462: for accretion flows around rotating black holes.
1463: %
1464: When emission from an inner part of the accretion disc around black hole
1465: is occulted by a companion star,
1466: the light curves at ingress and egress show the asymmetric features
1467: due to the relativistic effects such as Doppler boosting originally
1468: pointed out by Fukue (1987).
1469: %
1470: Our calculations include the asymmetric feature due to the black hole
1471: rotation.
1472: %
1473: After we give the calculation method of the eclipsing light curves
1474: with and without the atmospheric effects of the companion star in
1475: \S 2.1 and \S 2.2, respectively,
1476: the numerical calculation of the eclipsing light curves are
1477: performed and the analysis for the curves are given.
1478: %
1479: When no atmospheric effects of the companion star,
1480: the effects of the black hole rotations on the light curves are
1481: clearly seen in
1482: the light curves (\S 3.1),
1483: the normalized light curves (\S 3.2)
1484: and the statistical quantities of skewness and kurtosis (\S 3.3).
1485: %
1486: We show that
1487: the eclipsing light curves without the atmospheric effects clearly
1488: reflect the effects of the black hole's rotation.
1489: %
1490: We also investigate the eclipsing light curves with the atmospheric
1491: effects of the companion star.
1492: Based on the adopted atmospheric model, after evaluating the absorption and
1493: scattering effects in X-ray, we calculate the images of
1494: the black hole shadows in \S 4.1,
1495: the normalized light curves \S 4.2.
1496: The analysis of the eclipsing light curves with the atmospheric effects
1497: are given in terms of
1498: the observed photon energy (\S 4.3), the black hole spin (\S 4.4) and
1499: the inclination angle (\S 4.5).
1500: %
1501: The higher the observed photon energy become,
1502: the shorter the timescales of the changes of the normalization
1503: light curves become.
1504: %
1505: This is because
1506: the crossing time of the companion star is shortest in the case of 10 keV
1507: and longest in the case of 0.1 keV.
1508: %
1509: Since the size of the most luminous parts of the accretion disc
1510: depends on the black hole spin,
1511: the crossing timescale of the companion star along the most luminous parts
1512: of the accretion disc can be one of the key physical quantities
1513: which distinguish the cases of rapidly rotating black holes and
1514: the cases of no rotating black hole.
1515: %
1516: In our calculations assuming the solar atmosphere,
1517: while the effects of black hole spins are negligible
1518: when the observed photon energy of 0.1 keV
1519: for both cases
1520: with no atmospheric effects and with atmospheric effects,
1521: for the observed photon energies of 1 keV and 10 keV
1522: the atmospheric absorption can not completely smeared out the difference
1523: between the cases of rapidly rotating black holes and
1524: the cases of no rotating black hole.
1525: %
1526: However, these effects are
1527: smeared out by the atmospheric effects of the companion star
1528: at some fraction, and
1529: in our atmospheric model, the effects of the atmosphere are
1530: much larger than the effects of the black-hole spin.
1531: %
1532: Therefore, even in the case that the light-curves contain the information
1533: of the black hole spin, it may be difficult to extract the information of the
1534: black hole spin if we do not have the realistic atmospheric profiles, such as,
1535: the temperature, the number densities for several elements.
1536: %
1537: Even in such cases, based on our calculations,
1538: the light curve asymmetries due to the rotation of the accretion disc exist.
1539: %
1540: Only when we have the reliable atmospheric model, in principle,
1541: the black hole spin can be determined
1542: from the eclipsing light curves observed around 1 keV.
1543: %
1544:
1545: %\[
1546: % [\nu_1]-[\nu_2]=-2.5\log [f(\nu_1)/f(\nu_2)],
1547: %\]
1548: %\hbox{100\,$\umu$m}
1549:
1550: %\begin{figure}
1551: % \vspace{302pt}
1552: % \caption{
1553: % }
1554: %\end{figure}
1555:
1556: %\begin{figure*}
1557: % \vspace*{174pt}
1558: % \caption{
1559: % }
1560: %\end{figure*}
1561:
1562: \section*{Acknowledgments}
1563:
1564: One of the author (RT) express his thanks to T. Suzuki, M. Shibata,
1565: I. Hachisu and Y. Sekiguchi for valuable comments and discussion.
1566: The author (RT) is grateful to Y. Eriguchi and S. Mineshige
1567: for their continuous encouragements.
1568: This research was partially supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture,
1569: Sports, Science and Technology, Grant-in-Aid for
1570: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
1571: (JSPS) Fellows (17010519 RT; 16004706 KW).
1572:
1573:
1574:
1575: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
1576: \bibitem[]{}
1577: Bailyn, C. D., Orosz, J. A., McClintock, J. E., \& Remillard, R. A.,
1578: 1995, Nature, 378, 157
1579: \bibitem[]{}
1580: Bardeen, J.M., 1973, in Black Holes, ed. C. DeWitt and
1581: B. DeWitt (Gordon and Breach, New York)
1582: \bibitem[]{}
1583: Bardeen, J.M., Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., 1972, ApJ, 178, 347
1584: \bibitem[]{}
1585: Blondin, J. M., 1994, ApJ, 435, 756
1586: \bibitem[]{}
1587: Cunningham, C. T., Bardeen, J. M., 1972, ApJ, 173, 137
1588: \bibitem[]{}
1589: Cunningham, C. T., Bardeen, J. M., 1973, ApJ, 183, 237
1590: \bibitem[]{}
1591: Davis, S. W., Done, C., Blaes, O. M., 2006, ApJ, 647, 525
1592: \bibitem[]{}
1593: Daw, A., DeLuca, E. E., Gould, L., 1995, ApJ, 453, 929
1594: \bibitem[]{}
1595: Done, C., Gierlinski, M., 2003, MNRAS, 342, 1041
1596: \bibitem[]{}
1597: Done, C., Gierlinski, M., 2006, MNRAS, 367, 659
1598: \bibitem[]{}
1599: Fontenla, J. M., Avrett, E. H., Loeser, R., 1993, ApJ, 406, 319
1600: \bibitem[]{}
1601: Fukue, J., 1987, Nature, 327, 600
1602: \bibitem[]{}
1603: Fukue, J., 2003, PASJ, 55, 155
1604: \bibitem[]{}
1605: Fukue, J., \& Yokoyama, T., 1988, PASJ, 40, 15
1606: \bibitem[]{}
1607: Gabriel, A., 1976, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London, 281, 399
1608: \bibitem[]{}
1609: Gierlinski, M., Done, C., 2004, MNRAS, 347, 885
1610: \bibitem[]{}
1611: Hirabayashi, H., et al., 2005, in Proc. 7th Symp. European VLBI Network on
1612: New Developments in VLBI Science and Technology, ed. R. Bachiller,
1613: F. Colomer, J.-F. Desmars, \& P. de Vicente (Obs. Astron. Nac. Spain), 285
1614: (astro-ph/0501020)
1615: \bibitem[]{}
1616: Homan, J., Wijnands, R., van den Berg, M., 2003, A\&A, 412, 799
1617: \bibitem[]{}
1618: Junor, W., Biretta, J. A., Livio, M., 1999, Nature, 401, 891
1619: \bibitem[]{}
1620: Kato, S., Fukue, J., Mineshige, S., 1998, Black-Hole Accretion discs,
1621: Kyoto University Press
1622: \bibitem[]{}
1623: Miller, J. M., et al., 2002, ApJ, 570, L69
1624: \bibitem[]{}
1625: Novikov, I. D., \& Thorne, K. S., 1973, in Black Holes, ed. C. DeWitt and
1626: B. DeWitt (Gordon and Breach, New York)
1627: \bibitem[]{}
1628: Page, D. N., \& Thorne, K. S., ApJ, 191, 499
1629: \bibitem[]{}
1630: Pietsch, W., Haberl, F., Sasaki, M., Gaetz, T. J., Plucinsky, P. P.,
1631: Ghavamian, P., Long, K. S., Pannuti, T. G., 2006, ApJ, 646, 420
1632: \bibitem[]{}
1633: Shen, Z.-Q., Lo, K. Y., Liang, M.-C., Ho, P. T. P., Zhao, J.-H., 2005, Nature, 438, 62
1634: \bibitem[]{}
1635: Stelzer, B., Micela, G., Hamaguchi, K., Schmitt, J. H. M. M., 2006, A\& A, 457, 223
1636: \bibitem[]{}
1637: Spitzer, L. Jr., 1978, Physical Processes in the Interstellar Medium, John Wiley \& Sons, Inc.
1638: \bibitem[]{}
1639: Takahashi, R., 2004, ApJ, 611, 996
1640: \bibitem[]{}
1641: Takahashi, R., 2005, PASJ, 57, 273
1642: \bibitem[]{}
1643: Watarai, K., Takahashi, R., Fukue, J., 2005, PASJ, 57, 827
1644: \bibitem[]{}
1645: Watarai, K., Ohsuga, K., Takahashi, R., \& Fukue, J., 2005, PASJ, 57, 513
1646: \bibitem[]{}
1647: Weaver, K. A. \& Yaqoob, T., 1998, ApJ, 502, L139
1648: \bibitem[]{}
1649: Wojdowski, P. S., Liedahl, D. A., Sako, M., 2001, ApJ, 547, 973
1650: \bibitem[]{}
1651: Zakharov, A. F., de Paolis, F., Ingrosso, G., Nucita, A. A., 2005, A\&A,
1652: 442, 795
1653: \bibitem[]{}
1654: Zhang, S. N., Cui, W., Chen, W., 1997, ApJ, 482, L155
1655: \end{thebibliography}
1656:
1657:
1658:
1659:
1660:
1661:
1662: %\appendix
1663:
1664: %\section[]{Metric Components}
1665:
1666:
1667: \bsp
1668:
1669: \label{lastpage}
1670:
1671: \end{document}
1672: