1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: %\pagestyle{myheadings}
4:
5: \shorttitle{Properties of Dwarf Galaxies, Local Sample}
6: \shortauthors{O. Vaduvescu, M. L. McCall, M. G. Richer}
7: \slugcomment{Accepted in AJ (for August 2007 issue)}
8:
9: \begin{document}
10:
11: \title{Chemical Properties of Star Forming Dwarf Galaxies}
12:
13: \author{Ovidiu Vaduvescu\altaffilmark{1}}
14: \affil{
15: Instituto de Astronom\'{i}a, Universidad Cat\'{o}lica del Norte \\
16: Avenida Angamos 0610, Antofagasta, Chile \\
17: Former address: ACRU \& SAAO, University of KwaZulu-Natal, \\
18: School of Mathematical Sciences, Durban 4041, South Africa }
19:
20: \author{Marshall L. McCall\altaffilmark{2}}
21: \affil{
22: York University, Department of Physics and Astronomy \\
23: 4700 Keele Street, M3J~1P3, Toronto, ON, Canada}
24:
25: \author{Michael G. Richer\altaffilmark{3}}
26: \affil{
27: Observatorio Astr\'{o}nomico Nacional, Instituto de Astronomia \\
28: Universidad Nacional Aut\'{o}noma de M\'{e}xico \\
29: PO Box 439027, San Diego, CA 92143-9027, USA}
30:
31: \altaffiltext{1}{email: ovidiuv@yahoo.com}
32: \altaffiltext{2}{email: mccall@yorku.ca}
33: \altaffiltext{3}{email: richer@astrosen.unam.mx}
34:
35: \begin{abstract}
36:
37: Recent studies of the near-infrared (NIR) properties of dwarf irregular galaxies (dIs)
38: and blue compact dwarfs (BCDs) have provided improved estimates for the NIR luminosity
39: of old stellar populations in these galaxies. These can be used to derive gas fractions,
40: and thereby to evaluate how BCDs have evolved with respect to dIs. Oxygen abundances
41: have been derived for four BCDs in the Virgo Cluster from a run at Gemini-North in 2003.
42: Combining these new abundances with published values, we study the correlations among
43: the metallicity, $K_s$ luminosity, gas mass, baryonic mass, and gas fraction. Within
44: errors, the two types of dwarfs appear to share a common relation between the oxygen
45: abundance and the luminosity in $K_s$. The correlation between metallicity and the gas
46: fraction is the same for BCDs as for dIs, indicating that BCD evolution has been similar
47: to dIs. Since dIs appear to have evolved as isolated systems, the BCD bursts are
48: unlikely to be a consequence of gas infall or merging.
49:
50: \end{abstract}
51:
52: \keywords{galaxies: dwarf irregulars, blue compact dwarfs; galaxies: evolution;
53: near-infrared; luminosity; mass; metallicity; gas fractions. }
54:
55:
56: \section{Introduction}
57:
58: \subsection{A Universe of Dwafs}
59:
60: Dwarf galaxies are by far the most numerous galaxies in the Universe. About 80--90 per
61: cent of the members of the Local Group are classified as dwarfs \citep{mat98,gre00}, while
62: about 85 per cent of the known galaxies in the Local Volume ($D\la10$ Mpc) are also dwarfs
63: \citep{kar04}. The space density of dwarfs in the Universe has been suggested to be
64: about 40 times that of bright galaxies \citep{sta92}.
65:
66: {\it Dwarf galaxies} are defined arbitrarily as galaxies having an absolute magnitude
67: fainter than $M_B \sim -16$ mag \citep{tam94} or $M_V \sim -18$ mag \citep{gre00,gre01}.
68: Based on their optical appearance, dwarf galaxies can be classified into five groups:
69: dwarf irregulars (dIs), blue compact dwarfs (BCDs), dwarf ellipticals (dEs), dwarf
70: spheroidals (dSphs), and dwarf spirals (dS's). The distinction between dEs and dSphs
71: is not clear (e.g., \citealp{bin94}), while dS's can be regarded as the very small end
72: of spirals \citep{mat97,gre01}. Excluding dS's, dIs and BCDs are the only systems
73: harboring active or recent star formation activity. According to hierarchical clustering
74: models of galaxy formation, larger galactic structures build up and grow through the
75: accretion of dwarf galaxies \citep{whi91,kau93}.
76: Nevertheless, some recent evidence (e.g., \citealp{ven04,hel06}) suggests that the halo
77: of the Milky Way could not have been constructed from dSphs as we presently know them.
78: In this picture, dIs and BCDs may be similar to the building blocks for more massive
79: galaxies. As such, they are important probes for studying matter in its near-primordial
80: state, thus being relevant to understanding galaxy formation and evolution.
81:
82: Despite the advances in the last decades, the relation between dIs and BCDs remains
83: unclear. Some authors suggest that BCDs and dIs are the same type of galaxy, with BCDs
84: being dIs undergoing bursts of star formation (e.g. \citealp{thu85}). Others argue that
85: dIs are a fundamentally distinct type from BCDs, with no simple evolutionary links between
86: them (e.g., \citealp{jam94}). \citet{ric95} argued on chemical grounds that BCDs may be
87: more akin to dSphs than dIs. \citet{pap96a} review previous arguments concerning the
88: evolutionary relationships between BCDs, dIs and dEs without reaching firm conclusions.
89:
90: \subsection{Determining Chemical Abundances for Dwarfs}
91: \label{abund_dwarfs}
92:
93: The {\it metallicity}, $Z$, is defined as the fraction of elements other than hydrogen and
94: helium by mass (e.g., \citealp{pag97}). Metallicity is a key parameter intimately linked to
95: the formation and evolution of galaxies. It gives an indication of age in the sense that it
96: reveals how far the conversion of gas into stars has proceeded. In practice, the metallicity
97: in star-forming galaxies is quantified via the {\it oxygen abundance}, defined as the
98: fraction of oxygen by number, $12+$log($n$(O)/$n$(H)).
99: After hydrogen and helium, the most abundant element in the Universe is oxygen. It is
100: convenient to measure the oxygen abundance because it exhibits emission lines in HII region
101: spectra which are very bright and easy to measure.
102:
103: Physical and chemical properties of nebulae can be derived by measuring ratios of
104: intensities of collisionally-excited emission lines (e.g., \citealp{ost89}). Recombination
105: lines of metals are normally too faint to detect in extragalactic nebulae, though in some
106: of the very brightest objects recombination lines have been detected (e.g., \citealp{pei06}).
107: The radiation emitted by a nebula depends upon the abundances of the chemical elements
108: and the physical state of the gas, especially its average temperature and density.
109:
110: A natural reference for elemental abundances is the Sun, which has an oxygen abundance,
111: $12+\log(\rm{O/H})_{\odot}=8.69$ (e.g., \citealp{all01}).
112: We define Z$_{\odot}$ = (O/H)$_{\odot}$.
113: It is customary to define ``metal poor'' as a system with an abundance lower
114: than this value, and ``metal-rich'' as a system with an abundance exceeding this value.
115: dIs and BCDs are the most metal-poor galaxies, having metallicities as low as
116: $\sim1/50$ Z$_{\odot}$. In high-redshift clouds of gas, which may be building blocks
117: of today's galaxies, the metallicity can reach values as low as 0.001 Z$_{\odot}$
118: \citep{kun00}. Stars in our Galaxy reach metallicities as low as 0.00001 Z$_{\odot}$
119: \citep{spa00}.
120:
121: There are two commonly-used methods to determine oxygen abundances in HII regions.
122: The {\it direct method} ($T_e$) is founded upon a direct measurement of temperature.
123: It is applicable whenever the temperature diagnostic [O~III]$\lambda4363$ is detectable and
124: in which the doubly ionized O$^{+2}$ ion represents the dominant form of oxygen \citep{ost89}.
125: The most accurate oxygen abundances are derived using the direct method, but for most
126: galaxies [O~III]$\lambda4363$ is faint and difficult to detect.
127: When [O~III]$\lambda4363$ is not detected,
128: the {\it bright-line method} ($R_{23}$), originally proposed by \citet{pag79},
129: is commonly used.
130: The oxygen abundance is parametrized as a function of the ratio
131: $R_{23} = (I\rm{[OII]}\lambda3727 + I\rm{[OIII]}\lambda\lambda4959,5007)/I(H\beta)$.
132: Unfortunately, the $R_{23}$ indicator is not a monotonic function of oxygen abundance;
133: for a given value of $R_{23}$, two values of the oxygen abundance are possible.
134: However, \citet{mcg91} suggested that $\log([\rm{NII}]\lambda6583/[\rm{OII}]\lambda3727)$
135: can be used as a discriminator between the lower and upper branches.
136: To estimate oxygen abundances, we adopt the calibration of $R_{23}$ developed by
137: \citet{mcg94}, which employs $O_{32}=I(\rm{[OIII]}\lambda4959,5007)/I(\rm{[OII]}\lambda3727)$
138: to discriminate between the two branches.
139:
140: \subsection{Dwarfs and the Closed Box Model}
141:
142: One of the simplest frameworks for galaxy evolution is the {\it closed box model}
143: \citep{sea72,pag97}.
144: According to this model, a galaxy consists initially of gas with no stars and no metals.
145: The stellar initial mass function (IMF) is assumed to be constant in time. Stars that
146: end their life as supernovae are assumed to enrich the interstellar gas with metals
147: immediately, thereby eliminating time as a variable. Throughout the entire time, the
148: galaxy evolves as a closed system, with no mass inflow or outflow. For such a system,
149: the metallicity at any given time is solely determined by the fraction of baryons which
150: remains in gaseous form, which is referred to as the {\it gas fraction}.
151:
152: Many researchers, starting with \citet{leq79}, have examined how the metallicity of
153: a galaxy depends upon its mass or luminosity, finding that more massive galaxies are
154: more abundant in metals.
155: \citet{ski89} confirmed a strong correlation between absolute magnitude and metallicity
156: for local dIs, in the sense that the least luminous dIs are the most metal-poor systems.
157: \citet{ric95} derived a more robust $L_B-Z$ relationship, based on a sample of 25 nearby
158: irregular galaxies having well-determined and self-consistent distances along with abundances
159: calculated from measured [O~III] temperatures.
160: An enlarged sample was considered by \citet{mil96}, with the same conclusions. The same
161: correlation was found by \citet{van97} in another sample of 15 gas-rich, low surface
162: brightness dwarfs.
163:
164: Information about the chemical evolution of dwarf galaxies is buried within the $L-Z$
165: relation, but it is extremely difficult to extract. This is because the relation is
166: affected by both flows (which may influence the metallicity, but not the luminosity) and
167: the detailed history of star formation (which affects noth metallicity and luminosity).
168: Luminosity is a proxy for stellar mass, but how representative of stellar mass it is
169: depends upon the bandpass.
170:
171: In a series of four papers, \citet{mel02}, \citet{mel04}, \citet{leej04} and \citet{sal05}
172: studied the $L-Z$ relationship of giant ``starburst emission-line galaxies'' (ELGs), using
173: data in the visible and NIR. The authors derived a linear relationship with a steeper slope
174: than previously found for dwarfs, finding that the slope decreases as the wavelength of the
175: luminosity bandpass increases.
176: Using spectra of 6387 emission-line star-forming galaxies, \citet{lam04}
177: confirmed a linear $L-Z$ relation in the local Universe ($z<0.15$) over a large range of
178: abundances ($\sim2$ dex) and luminosities ($\sim9$ mag). \citet{tre04} utilized SDSS
179: imaging and spectroscopy of about 53,000 star-forming galaxies at $z\sim0.1$, finding
180: linear $L-Z$ relationships, although contours appear to level off at high luminosities
181: ($M_g<-20$).
182:
183: A more useful relation for studying chemical evolution is the correlation between
184: metallicity and the gas fraction. \citet{lee03a} and \citet{lee03b} used data in the
185: visible to show that the oxygen abundance in dIs is tightly correlated with the gas
186: fraction. The result was used to argue that dIs have evolved in isolation, without
187: inflow or outflow of gas.
188: The observations pointed to a subsolar yield (e.g., \citealp{gar02}), but the
189: significance of this is difficult to assess because values for yields are critically
190: dependent upon methods used to determine abundances.
191: However, yields are relative, being critically dependent on methods used to determine
192: abundances.
193: A somewhat different conclusion was reached by \citet{van06b}, who measured abundances
194: in 21 apparently isolated dIs selected based on their morphological classification and
195: distances determined mostly from systemic velocities. While several galaxies in their
196: sample follow the closed box model, they argue that either outflow of enriched gas or
197: inflow of pristine gas has occurred in most galaxies.
198:
199: \subsection{NIR Imaging of Dwarfs}
200:
201: The utility of light as a gauge of galaxy mass depends upon the wavelength of observation.
202: In star--forming galaxies such as dIs and most BCDs, the young population shines brightly
203: in the visible, overwhelming the light from the old stellar component, which traces the bulk
204: of the mass. Therefore, observations in the visible do not necessarily reflect the
205: stellar mass of a galaxy. This problem can be reduced in the near--infrared (NIR), where
206: the intermediate--age and old populations become more visible. Furthermore, light in the NIR
207: is much less attenuated by extinction (absorption of light due to internal and Galactic dust)
208: than light in the visible.
209:
210: \citet{vad05a} (hereafter referred to as Paper I) and \citet{vad06} (hereafter referred to
211: as Paper II) studied the structural properties of dIs and BCDs in the NIR. The dI sample
212: (Paper I) included 28 dwarfs from the Local Volume closer than ~5 Mpc having accurate
213: distances from the literature (i.e., derived using Cepheids and the tip of the red giant
214: branch). The BCD sample (Paper II) included 16 dwarfs in the Virgo Cluster, all
215: approximated to have the same distance modulus ($DM=30.62$). The surface brightness profiles
216: of dIs were fitted using a sech law, which models the light at all radii, while BCDs were
217: fitted using a sech function to model the diffuse old component plus a Gaussian to model
218: the young starburst (at small radii). Absolute sech magnitudes were derived using the known
219: distances and correcting for the extinction. These data are used here to gauge the stellar
220: masses of the systems and thereby make possible a detailed study of chemical evolution.
221:
222: \subsection{The Present Paper}
223:
224: In the present paper, we analyse the chemical properties of our dI and BCD samples.
225: We use the NIR data gathered in Papers I and II, in conjunction with metallicities taken
226: from the literature and derived from our own spectra, to derive fundamental relations
227: relevant to the formation and evolution of dwarfs and to compare dIs and BCDs chemically.
228:
229: In Section~\ref{observations}, we present spectral observations of four Virgo BCDs
230: which we observed at Gemini North, and in Section~\ref{reduction} their reduction.
231: Sections~\ref{chemical} and \ref{mass-met} address chemical properties of dIs and BCDs,
232: considering correlations among luminosity, metallicity, mass (in various forms), and
233: the gas fraction. In Section~\ref{evolution}, we approach the implications for evolution,
234: comparing dIs and BCDs in the context of the closed box model. Section~\ref{conclusions}
235: presents our conclusions.
236:
237:
238: \section{Gemini Observations}
239: \label{observations}
240: Using Gemini-North with GMOS, we detected [O~III]$\lambda4363$ in two of the four
241: BCDs which we observed.
242: Long-slit spectra of four BCDs in the Virgo Cluster (VCC~24, VCC~459, VCC~641, and
243: VCC~2033) were acquired in queue mode on two nights between Feb 28 and Mar 2, 2003.
244: The data were taken with the Gemini Multi-Object
245: Spectrograph (GMOS) mounted at the f/15.82 focus of the Gemini-North 8.1~m telescope located
246: atop Mauna Kea, Hawaii. The slit width was 0.5\arcsec~and the slit length was 5.5\arcmin.
247: The GMOS camera includes three CCDs with $2048\times4608$ pixels each, creating a mosaic of
248: $6144\times4608$ pixels. Pixel sizes are 13.5 $\rm{\mu m}$, so the scale is 0.0824\arcsec/pixel
249: along the dispersion axis and 0.0727\arcsec/pixel along the slit axis. We used the B600\_G5303
250: grating which gave a spectral resolution of 0.45 \AA/pixel. Data were acquired both in the blue
251: (central wavelength of the grating 4680 \AA, range 3298-6062 \AA) and in the red (central
252: wavelength 5600 \AA, range 4218-6982 \AA). Data were binned $4\times4$. Air masses were
253: between 1.0 and 1.2, so the slit was not oriented along the parallactic angle.
254:
255: Dome flat fields were acquired every night for all instrumental settings, interspersed
256: between blue and red galaxy spectra, and also between blue and red standard star spectra.
257: Biases were taken at the end of the run. One spectroscopic standard star, Feige 66, was
258: observed once every night. We include the log of our observations in Table~\ref{tbl-1}.
259:
260:
261: \section{Data Analyses}
262: \label{reduction}
263:
264: \subsection{Reductions}
265:
266: Images were reduced using the GEMINI v.1.6 GMOS package under IRAF using the sequence
267: given in \citet{vad05b}. Bias and flat field frames (the latter taken for each instrument
268: setting) were applied first, then individual spectra were combined for each grating setting.
269: The arc lamp spectra were corrected for bias and flat field and used to calibrate the combined
270: red and blue spectra. The two-dimensional spectra were collapsed to one dimension. The same
271: sequence was applied to the standard star spectra. Spectra were calibrated using the standard
272: star observations, correcting for atmospheric extinction. The blue and red calibrated spectra
273: were joined into final spectra, using the common lines H$\beta$~$\lambda$4861,
274: [O~III]$\lambda$4959 and [O~III]$\lambda$5007 to equalize flux scales. The scale factors
275: ranged between 1.3 and 2.4.
276:
277: Figures~\ref{sp_VCC459comb} to \ref{sp_VCC24641comb} present the reduced combined
278: spectra of VCC~459, VCC~2033, VCC~24, and VCC~641. The first two are presented using
279: different scalings to show the bright and faint lines. The last two show fewer lines,
280: so they are displayed using a single scaling. In a few cases, a ``fracture'' due to
281: imperfect combination of the red and blue spectra is visible in the overlapping region
282: at 6200 \AA. Because the scaling of the red and blue spectra was based entirely upon
283: emission line fluxes, measurements of the emission lines should be unaffected.
284:
285: \subsection{Line Measurements}
286:
287: We detected [O~III]$\lambda4363$ in the core of two Virgo BCDs, namely VCC~459 and VCC~2033, for
288: which it was possible to determine the oxygen abundances using the direct method. In VCC~24 and
289: VCC~641 we did not detect [O~III]$\lambda4363$, but did measure stronger lines. For them, we
290: were able to use the bright-line method to derive abundances.
291:
292: Emission lines were measured using INTENS, a FORTRAN program developed by \citet{mcc85}.
293: This is a non-interactive non-linear least-squares fitting program
294: which can efficiently fit and measure emission and/or absorption lines in one-dimensional
295: spectra (flux versus wavelength) or two-dimensional spectra (flux versus wavelength as a
296: function of spatial position). All spectra analyzed in this paper were one-dimensional.
297:
298: A few of the hydrogen lines exhibited obvious underlying Balmer absorption, especially
299: at H$\beta$. Using INTENS, a simultaneous fit of emission and absorption profiles allowed for
300: a direct determination of the flux in the emission and the equivalent width of the underlying
301: Balmer absorption. Measured emission fluxes are given in Table~\ref{VCC_lines}.
302: In Figure~\ref{INTENS_FITS}, we illustrate two fits.
303:
304: \subsection{Abundances}
305:
306: We used SNAP (Spreadsheet Nebular Analysis Package; \citealp{kra97}) to derive
307: abundances from ratios of line fluxes. SNAP is an add-in for Microsoft Excel$^{\rm{TM}}$.
308: From appropriately chosen spectral diagnostics, SNAP will compute reddening, apply
309: equivalent width and reddening corrections, compute electron temperatures and densities,
310: and compute ionic abundances.
311:
312: Using SNAP, the extinction was calculated using $F(H\alpha)/F(H\beta)$ ratio, assuming
313: the reddening model of \citet{fit99} and that the dust is located in the Galactic foreground.
314: The redshift of each galaxy was taken from NED. If the [O~III]$\lambda4363$ line was detected,
315: then the temperature was calculated using $I($[O~III]$\lambda5007)/I($[O~III]$\lambda4363)$.
316: Otherwise, the temperature was assumed to be $T_e=10,000$ K. The electron density was computed
317: using the $I([\rm{S~II}]\lambda6716)/I([\rm{S~II}]\lambda6731)$ ratio.
318: If the [S~II] lines were poorly measured, a density of 100 electrons/cm$^3$ was assumed.
319:
320: Once the data were corrected for reddening, the ionic abundances of O$^+$ and O$^{++}$
321: relative to H$^+$ were calculated for those objects for which [O~III]$\lambda4363$ was
322: detected. These were then summed to get $12+$log($n$(O)/$n$(H)).
323:
324: We include in Table~\ref{VCC_lines} the reddening-corrected line fluxes with respect
325: to H$\beta$ for VCC~24, VCC~459, and VCC~2033. For VCC~641, H$\beta$ was severely affected
326: by underlying absorption, so we report its line fluxes with respect to H$\alpha$ instead.
327:
328: Table~\ref{table_BCDs_props} lists the measured chemical properties of the four BCDs observed.
329: For VCC~2033, [O~III]$\lambda4363$ was marginally detected, and thus, the oxygen abundance error
330: is large (0.3 dex). Using the bright line $R_{23}$ method \citep{mcg91,mcg94}, we
331: derive $12+\log(\rm{O/H})=8.31$, which is 0.3 dex higher than
332: the [O~III]$\lambda4363$ value ($12+\log(\rm{O/H})=7.99 \pm 0.30$).
333: The $R_{23}$ value seems to agree better with the measurement of \citet{vil03}, who give lower
334: and upper limits of 8.11 and 8.40, respectively. Due to the large error in our
335: [O~III]$\lambda4363$ measurement, we adopt for VCC~2033 an oxygen abundance which is the average
336: value of the [O~III]$\lambda4363$ and the $R_{23}$ measurements, i.e., $12+\log(\rm{O/H})=8.15 \pm 0.15$.
337: For VCC~641, H$\beta$ was not detected, so in this case we used the emissivity calculations to
338: determine the ratio H$\alpha/$H$\beta$, then we employed the bright line method.
339: \citet{van06a} compare the reliabilty of empirical and semi-empirical methods to derive
340: abundances, suggesting that the typical error in an abundance derived from $R_{23}$ is around
341: 0.2 dex. We include this error for all our $R_{23}$ results in Tables~\ref{table_BCDs_props},
342: \ref{dIs_met}, and \ref{BCDs_met}.
343:
344:
345: \section{Chemical Properties of Dwarf Galaxies}
346: \label{chemical}
347:
348: \subsection{Our Luminosity-Metallicity Relation for dIs}
349:
350: In Table~\ref{dIs_met}, we include the oxygen abundances for 17 dwarfs classified as dIs from
351: our Local Volume sample, out of 27 observed in the NIR (Paper I), together with their sources.
352: In the second part of the table we include four dwarfs from Virgo observed by us in the NIR
353: (Paper II), classified as dIs based on their luminosity profiles.
354: In the last part of the Table we append another 8 dIs with known metallicities from the literature
355: for which $K_s$ luminosities are determined from 2MASS data using the best distances available
356: in the literature (Fingerhut 2005, personal communication). Note that 2MASS stars were used
357: to derive zero-points for our observed fields (Papers I and II), so the photometric scales are
358: consistent. Nevertheless, one must be wary of 2MASS magnitudes for galaxies, owing to the
359: short exposure times and the correspondingly bright detection-thresholds.
360:
361: In Figure~\ref{LZ_fig_dIs}, we plot the $L_K-Z$ relationship for the 29 dIs in Table~\ref{dIs_met}.
362: For the galaxies observed by us, we use sech absolute magnitudes, while for the ones observed by
363: 2MASS, we use total absolute magnitudes.
364: $T_e$-based abundances are plotted as solid symbols, and $R_{23}$-based abundances as open symbols.
365: We include errors in metallicities; typical errors for absolute magnitudes are about 0.1 mag.
366: There is an excellent correlation. Four outliers appear in the plot: NGC~5264 and NGC~3741,
367: whose metallicities are derived using the bright line method, Holmberg II, whose $K_s$ magnitude
368: comes from 2MASS, and VCC~1725.
369:
370: Following \citet{lee03a}, a best-fit line for the correlation between two parameters with
371: comparable errors can be obtained with the geometric mean functional relationship \citep{dra98},
372: which assumes similar dispersions in both observables. An equal weighting of points is assigned
373: for both variables in a given fit. The geometric mean functional relationship relies upon the
374: minimization of the sum of areas bounded by the shortest horizontal and vertical lines from
375: each data point to the best-fit line.
376:
377: Excluding the four labeled points, we obtain the following L$_K$-Z relationship for 25 dIs
378: from Table~\ref{dIs_met}:
379: %
380: \begin{equation}
381: 12 + \log(\rm{O/H}) = (-0.141 \pm 0.015) M_K + (5.581 \pm 0.244)
382: \label{LZ_eq_dIs}
383: \end{equation}
384:
385: \noindent
386: We plot the fit as a dashed line in Figure~\ref{LZ_fig_dIs}. Most of the points are
387: consistent with the fit, given the errors in metallicities. A nearly identical
388: relationship is obtained in $J$:
389: %
390: \begin{equation}
391: 12 + \log(\rm{O/H}) = (-0.140 \pm 0.014) M_J + (5.692 \pm 0.214)
392: \end{equation}
393: \noindent
394: The rms dispersion in abundances in the $L-Z$ relations in $K_s$ and $J$ is 0.11 and 0.10,
395: respectively. Similar relations are obtained using the isophotal and total absolute magnitudes
396: instead of the sech magnitudes.
397:
398: \subsection{Our Luminosity-Metallicity Relation for BCDs}
399:
400: In Table~\ref{BCDs_met}, we include 15 dwarfs classified as BCDs based on the literature and
401: luminosity profiles. In the first part of the table, we include 12 BCDs from Virgo (Paper II),
402: and, in the last part, the three dwarfs from the Local Volume classified as BCDs based on
403: their luminosity profiles (Paper II) and \citet{van00}.
404:
405: In Figure~\ref{LZ_fig_BCDs}, we plot the $L_K-Z$ relationship for 15 BCDs from Table~\ref{BCDs_met}.
406: To sample the underlying stellar population, we employed sech magnitudes.
407: $T_e$-based abundances are plotted as solid points, and $R_{23}$-based abundances as open triangles.
408: We include errors in metallicities; typical errors for absolute magnitudes are about $0.1$ mag.
409: One outlier appears in the plot, VCC~641, having a very uncertain oxygen abundance.
410: Excluding this point, we obtain the following $L_K-Z$ relation for 14 BCDs from geometric mean
411: fitting:
412: %
413: \begin{equation}
414: 12 + \log(\rm{O/H}) = (-0.224 \pm 0.030) M_K + (4.212 \pm 0.537)
415: \label{LZ_eq_BCDs}
416: \end{equation}
417: \noindent
418: We plot the fit as a dashed line in Figure~\ref{LZ_fig_BCDs}. A similar $L_J-Z$relationship is
419: obtained in $J$:
420: %
421: \begin{equation}
422: 12 + \log(\rm{O/H}) = (-0.216 \pm 0.028) M_J + (4.530 \pm 0.473)
423: \end{equation}
424: \noindent
425: The rms dispersion in abundance in the $L-Z$ relations in $K$ and $J$ is 0.12 and 0.11,
426: respectively. Similar relations are obtained using the isophotal and total magnitudes
427: instead of the sech magnitudes.
428:
429: In Figure~\ref{LZ_fig_dIs_BCDs}, we combine the dIs and BCDs in our samples. For visibility
430: reasons, we do not include the five outlier points. The solid line represents the $L_K-Z$
431: relation for the dIs. Recall the sech magnitude for BCDs excludes the luminosity of the starburst
432: and so represents the underlying stellar component.
433: Figure~\ref{LZ_fig_dIs_BCDs} illustrates that, though the $L_K-Z$ relations for dIs and BCDs
434: are formally different, the two samples largely overlap.
435: Given the relatively poor luminosity distribution of our BCD sample ($M_K$ mostly between
436: -18 and -20), more data are required to definitively decide whether the two $L_K-Z$ relations
437: are really different.
438:
439: \subsection{Comparison with the Literature}
440:
441: In Table~\ref{LZ_comp}, we summarize different $L-Z$ relationships presented in the literature.
442: The $L-Z$ relation we derive here for local dIs is similar to those found by others in the $B$-band
443: \citep{ski89,ric95,lee03a,van06b} and in the NIR \citep{sav05}. The coefficients derived by us in
444: the NIR are very close to the ones derived by \citet{ric95} and \citet{van06b} in the visible
445: employing mostly $T_e$-based abundances. Using NIR luminosities has not reduced the scatter
446: about this relation for dIs, perhaps due to the difficulty of obtaining sufficiently deep NIR
447: photometry. Recently, \citet{oli06} used data from Paper I and 2MASS to find a $L_K-Z$ relation
448: very similar to ours but with larger dispersion. Their sample includes 29 dwarfs, of which six
449: appear to be BCDs. \citet{lee06a} find less scatter in the $L-Z$ relation using mid-IR luminosities
450: at 4.5 microns from the {\it Spitzer Space Telescope}. Assuming that most of the galaxies of
451: \citet{sal05} are BCDs and that their total magnitudes approximate the old component, then their
452: results are in agreement with ours, provided BCDs and dIs follow different $L-Z$ relations.
453:
454: The studies quoted in Table~\ref{LZ_comp} may be divided into local and more distant
455: samples of dwarf galaxies. The slopes of the $L-Z$ relations for the local samples
456: (\citealp{ski89,ric95,lee03a,shi05,oli06,lee06a}, and this work) are all very similar.
457: There may be a difference between the slopes in the blue and
458: infrared, but it is slight. The more distant samples of dwarfs (\citealp{lam04,tre04,sal05}),
459: however, all produce $L-Z$ relations with steeper slopes, reminiscent of our relation for
460: BCDs. If these samples of more distant dwarfs are composed primarily of BCDs with some
461: smaller fractions of dIs, the steeper slopes make sense. However, based upon our data,
462: it is possible that the steeper slope arises from an imperfection in the calibration of
463: $R_{23}$ at high metallicity.
464:
465: \section{Mass-Metallicity Relations}
466: \label{mass-met}
467:
468: Gas-rich star forming dwarf galaxies are systems that are well mixed chemically, elemental
469: abundances being observed to vary very little across their faces \citep{kob96,kob97,pag97},
470: having no signifiant spacial inhomogeneities in [O~III]$\lambda4363$ oxygen abundances measured
471: from HII regions located at different galactocentric radii \citep{lee04,lee05,lee06b}. Chemical
472: evolution can be explored via correlations between oxygen abundance and the stellar mass, gas
473: mass, total mass, and the gas fraction.
474:
475: Using data in $B$ for a sample of dIs observed in the field, \citet{lee03a} showed that the oxygen
476: abundance correlates with the stellar mass of the systems. However, in another sample of dIs in the
477: Virgo Cluster, the relation was more scattered. \citet{lee03b} found also that the relation with
478: the gas mass was scattered for the field sample, and that some Virgo dIs were depleted in gas.
479: The relation between metallicity and the gas fraction suggested that the evolution of some dIs in
480: Virgo was affected by flows, such as stripping of gas due to the cluster neighborhood.
481: The authors showed that this relationship could be used unequivocally to recognize gas
482: deficiency in dwarfs. Below we address the relations between metallicity and mass, employing
483: NIR photometry.
484:
485: \subsection{Gas Masses}
486:
487: The total mass of gas can be gauged from the HI 21-cm flux, $F_{21}$, measured by radio
488: observations (\citealp{huc00}; \citealp{huc01,huc03}).
489: Data for dIs are summarized by \citet{kar04}. We include in Table~\ref{dIs_met} the
490: logarithm of the total HI flux from the latter source. For Virgo BCDs, HI fluxes are given
491: in Table~\ref{BCDs_met}. They are derived from \citet{gav05}, who synthesize a set of data
492: for 355 late-type galaxies in the Virgo cluster with HI masses for many dwarfs derived from
493: previous work by Hoffman and collaborators (\citealp{huc00}; \citealp{huc01,huc03}).
494:
495: The HI mass, $M_{HI}$, in solar masses is given by the following equation \citep{rob75,rob94}:
496: %
497: \begin{equation}
498: M_{HI} = 2.356 \times 10^5 F_{21} D^2
499: \label{HI_mass}
500: \end{equation}
501: %
502: \noindent
503: where $F_{21}$ is the 21-cm flux integral in Jy km s$^{-1}$ and $D$ is the distance in Mpc.
504: To account for helium and other metals, the total gas mass in solar masses is given by
505: %
506: \begin{equation}
507: M_{gas} = M_{HI}/X
508: \end{equation}
509: %
510: \noindent
511: where $X$ is the fraction of the gas in the form of hydrogen, here assumed to be 0.733
512: \citep{lee03a}.
513: In Table~\ref{dIs_met} we include the logarithm of the total gas mass for the dIs in our
514: sample, calculated from $F_{21}$ and the distance modulus included in the first column.
515: In Table~\ref{BCDs_met} we include the logarithm of the total gas mass for the BCDs in our
516: sample.
517:
518: Figure~\ref{met_gasmass} plots the metallicity versus the logarithm of the total gas mass
519: (expressed in solar units). dIs are plotted with circles, and BCDs with triangles. Dwarfs
520: having $T_e$ abundances are plotted with solid sybols and those having $R_{23}$ abundances
521: with open symbols. The correlation for the dIs is very poor, with NGC~5264 again being an
522: outlier in the sample. Rejecting this point, a geometric linear fit to the rest of the dI
523: sample (28 objects) gives the following relation:
524: %
525: \begin{equation}
526: 12+\log(\rm{O/H}) = (5.13 \pm 0.45) + (0.34 \pm 0.06) \log(M_{gas})
527: \end{equation}
528: %
529: \noindent
530: This relation is very close to the fit found by \citet{lee03a}, who used data for 21 dIs.
531: The two samples overlap, with the sample of \citet{lee03a} extending from $M_B=-18$ to $-11$
532: mag (corresponding to $M_K$ from $-21$ to $-14$), and our sample extending from $M_K=-20$
533: to $-13$. We plot in Figure~\ref{met_gasmass} our fit with a solid line and the fit of
534: \citet{lee03a} with a dotted line. Some Virgo BCDs lie leftward of the dI envelope, i.e.,
535: less gas for a given oxygen abundance, a result found also in \citet{lee03b} for their Virgo
536: dI sample, suggesting that they are depleted in gas relative to dIs of comparable metallicity.
537: Either they are less massive systems overall, or gas has been removed, perhaps by dynamical
538: interactions in the cluster environment.
539:
540: \subsection{Stellar Masses}
541:
542: In Paper I, it was shown that the shape of the unresolved (diffuse) stellar component
543: of nearby dIs in the NIR is approximated well by a hyperbolic secant (sech) function.
544: In Paper II, it was demonstrated that the same function fits the shape of the diffuse
545: component underlying star formation bursts in BCDs. It is believed that the luminosity
546: associated with the sech model provides a good estimate of the contribution to the light
547: by stellar populations older than about 3 Gyr (Paper I). As such, it should be the best
548: gauge of total stellar mass.
549:
550: Expressed in solar masses, stellar masses can be calculated from
551: %
552: \begin{equation}
553: \log M_* = \log {\frac {M_*}{L_K}(old)} - 0.4 (M_K(old)-M_{K\sun})
554: \label{star_mass}
555: \end{equation}
556: %
557: \noindent
558: where $M_*/L_K(old)$ is the mass-to-light ratio of the old stellar component in $K_s$,
559: in solar units, $M_K(old)$ is the absolute magnitude of the old component in $K_s$, and
560: $M_{K\sun}$ is the absolute magnitude of the Sun in $K_s$. Here, we prefer the sech
561: magnitudes derived in Papers I and II as representative of the luminosity of the old
562: population, $M_K(old)$.
563: However, we augment the dI sample with galaxies detected by 2MASS for which catalogued
564: total magnitudes are used as estimates of $M_K(old)$. These galaxies are distinguished
565: symbolically in plots. For the absolute magnitude of the Sun, we adopt $M_{K\sun}=+3.3$
566: \citep{bes98}.
567:
568: For low metallicity galaxies (0.004 Z$_{\odot}$ to 0.0004 Z$_{\odot}$), Portinari
569: (2005, private communication) derived $M_*/L_K \sim 0.8\, M_{\sun}/L_{K\sun}$ using
570: population synthesis models. \citet{dro04} obtained an identical result from composite
571: stellar population models for ages between about 4 and 8 Gyr (see their Figure 1). From
572: extensive modeling of the Milky Way, \citet{bis03} derived $M_*/L_K = 0.6$.
573: Based on galaxy evolution models to investigate the relation between
574: mass to light ratios and colours of spiral galaxies, \citet{bel03} predict
575: $M/L_K\sim1\, M_{\sun}/L_{K\sun}$ for $B-R\sim2$ mag
576: (which can be regarded as an average colour of dwarfs).
577: Here, we adopt $M_*/L_K = 0.8\, M_{\sun}/L_{K\sun}$.
578:
579: \subsection{Baryonic Masses}
580:
581: Assuming baryonic matter consists of gas and stars only, the baryonic mass of a galaxy
582: can be expressed simply by the sum of the two components, $M_{bary} = M_{gas} + M_*$.
583: Figure~\ref{met_totalmass} plots the metallicity versus the logarithm of the baryonic
584: mass expressed in solar masses. dIs are plotted with circles, and BCDs with triangles.
585: Dwarfs having $T_e$ abundances are plotted with solid symbols, while those having $R_{23}$
586: abundances with open symbols. In the dI sample, NGC~5264 is once more an outlier. Rejecting
587: this point, a geometric linear fit to the rest of the sample (28 dIs) gives the following
588: relation:
589: %
590: \begin{equation}
591: 12+\log(\rm{O/H}) = (4.91 \pm 0.46) + (0.35 \pm 0.05) \log(M_{bary})
592: \end{equation}
593: %
594: \noindent
595: This relation is very close to the fit found by \citet{lee03a} which was derived from
596: $B$ photometry for 21 dIs in the field. We plot our fit with a solid line and the fit
597: of \citet{lee03a} with a dotted line.
598: The close agreement suggests that the two-component decomposition scheme of
599: \citep{lee03a} was effective for deriving stellar masses. Most BCDs in
600: Figure~\ref{met_totalmass} appear to lie at lower baryonic masses compared to dIs at
601: a given oxygen abundance, possibly as a consequence of how BCDs are selected. It is
602: possible that larger galaxies with comparable bursts are simply not classified as
603: BCDs!
604:
605: \subsection{Metallicity and Gas Fraction}
606:
607: The closed box model of chemical evolution predicts a linear correlation between
608: $n$(O)$/n$(H) and the logarithm of the inverse gas fraction $1/\mu$, where
609: %
610: \begin{equation}
611: \mu = \frac{M_{gas}} {M_{gas}+M_{*}}
612: \end{equation}
613: %
614: The slope of the relation conveys the yield of oxygen. Judging stellar masses from
615: BV photometry, \citet{lee03a} concluded that field dIs obey the closed box model, implying
616: that their evolution has been isolated. Here, we study the correlation obtained for
617: both dIs and BCDs using NIR sech luminosities to assess stellar masses. In principle,
618: our masses should be more reliable, as they are less sensitive to recent star formation.
619:
620: Figure~\ref{miumiuz} plots $\log(\rm{O/H})$ versus $\log(\log(1/\mu))$, for which the
621: closed box model predicts a linear correlation with a slope of unity and an intercept
622: equal to the yield. Gas fraction $\mu$ increases to the left, according to the labels
623: plotted along the top horizontal axis.
624: We represent dIs with photometry from the present work with circles, and dIs with
625: 2MASS photometry with crosses. We plot the fit of \citet{lee03a} with a dotted line.
626: Most dIs from our sample lie close to the fit of Lee.
627: We overlay in Figure~\ref{miumiuz} triangles representing our BCD sample.
628: Most BCDs appear close to the fit of Lee, too, with about three outliers.
629: Note that gas has not been detected in VCC 802, so its abscissa is a lower limit.
630: One posibility is that VCC~802 has been stripped due to the hot intracluster medium since
631: it is projected near the M86/M84 clump, which is a region of enhanced density \citep{boe94}.
632: If dIs follow the closed box model, as the data suggests, then the proximity of BCDs to
633: the dI locus suggests that bursts in present-day BCDs do not have sufficient strength
634: to blow out neutral gas from the host galaxies. The fact that several dIs and at least
635: one BCD do show HI deficiencies in dense environments (\citealp{lee03a}; this paper)
636: indicates that external processes are more likely to remove gas from dwarfs.
637: In summary, we concur with Lee that the evolution of field dIs has not been affected
638: much by flows. We also conclude that BCDs have evolved similarly to dIs.
639:
640:
641: \section{Implications for Evolution}
642: \label{evolution}
643:
644: A few evolutionary scenarios that involve dIs and BCDs have been proposed over the years,
645: most without firm conclusions (e.g., \citealp{pap96b}). Some links have emerged using stellar
646: masses derived from data in the visible, although with large scatter. We summarize below our
647: main results.
648:
649: For both dIs and BCDs, metallicity correlates with stellar mass, gas mass,
650: and baryonic mass, in the sense that more massive systems are more enriched in metals.
651: Our most important discovery is that the relationship between the metallicity and the gas
652: fraction for BCDs follows that for dIs. It means that BCDs and dIs have evolved similarly.
653: Using NIR photometry, we confirm the conclusion of \citet{lee03a} that the evolution of
654: field dIs has not been noticeably influenced by gas flows. By implication, the same
655: conclusion must be reached for BCDs. Thus, star formation bursts in BCDs are unlikely
656: to be caused by the transfer of material from elsewhere.
657:
658:
659: \section{Conclusions}
660: \label{conclusions}
661:
662: Oxygen abundances have been derived for four blue compact dwarf galaxies in the
663: Virgo Cluster observed in a queue run at Gemini-North in 2003.
664: Drawing upon the NIR properties studied in Papers I and II and oxygen abundances
665: from our work and the literature, we studied the correlations between the metallicity
666: and the stellar mass, gas mass, baryonic, mass, and the gas fraction for both dIs
667: and BCDs.
668: Metallicity correlates with all four parameters, in the sense that more massive
669: systems contain more metals. The oxygen abundance correlates well with the luminosity
670: in $K_s$, for both dIs and BCDs.
671: Using NIR sech magnitudes to measure luminosity, the $L_K-Z$ relations for dIs and
672: BCDs are statistically indistinguishable.
673: dIs and BCDs appear to share a common relationship between metallicity and the gas
674: fraction, namely one which is consistent with the closed-box evolution. Thus, BCDs appear to
675: be dIs with enhanced star formation activity. The origin of the enhancement remains
676: unknown, but it is unlikely to be caused by flows.
677:
678:
679: \acknowledgments
680:
681: We thank the Gemini-North time allocation committees for granting us the opportunity to observe.
682: MLM thanks the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada for its continuing
683: support. MGR acknowledges financial support from CONACyT grant 43121 and UNAM DGAPA grants
684: IN108406-2, IN108506-2, and IN112103.
685: OV thanks Dr. Henry Lee for providing up-to-date references regarding metallicities.
686: Special acknowledgement is due to Dr. Jose Manuel Vilchez who served as the external
687: examiner for the PhD thesis of OV, providing interesting discussions.
688: Thanks are due to Robin Fingerhut for providing updated distances of dwarfs in the Local Volume.
689: For our data reductions, we used the GEMINI package written at the Gemini Observatories and IRAF,
690: which is maintained by the National Optical Astronomy Observatories, operated by the
691: Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement
692: with the National Science Foundation.
693: This research has made use of the GOLDMine Database in Milano and the NASA/IPAC
694: Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the JPL, CALTECH, under contract with NASA.
695: Special acknowledgement is due to an anonymous referee who provided discussions which allowed
696: us to improve the manuscript.
697:
698:
699: \begin{thebibliography}{}
700:
701: \bibitem[Allende Prieto, Lambert, \& Asplund(2001)]{all01}
702: Allende Prieto, C., Lambert, D. L., \& Asplund, M., 2001, \apj, 556, L63
703:
704: \bibitem[Bessell, Castelli, \& Plez(1998)]{bes98}
705: Bessell, M. S., Castelli, F., \& Plez, B., 1998, \aap, 333, 231
706:
707: \bibitem[Bingelli(1994)]{bin94}
708: Binggeli, B., 1994, A Note on the Definition and Nomenclature of Dwarf Galaxies, in {\it Dwarf Galaxies}, ESO Conference and Workshop Proc No. 49, Eds. G. Meylan and P. Prugniel, Paris, p. 13
709:
710: \bibitem[Bissantz, Englmaier, \& Gerhard(2003)]{bis03}
711: Bissantz, N., Englmaier, P., \& Gerhard, O., 2003, \mnras, 340, 949
712:
713: \bibitem[Boehringer et al.(1994)]{boe94}
714: Boehringer, M., Briel, U. G., Schwarz, R. A., Voges, W., Hartner, G., Trumper, J., 1994, \nat, 368, 828
715:
716: \bibitem[de Jong and Bell(2003)]{bel03}
717: de Jong, R. S. and Bell, E. F., 2003, Stellar M/L Ratios and Spiral Galaxy Dynamics, in {\it The Mass of Galaxies at Low and High Redshift}, Proceedings of the ESO and Universitats-Sternwarte Munchen Workshop, Venice, Italy, 24-26 Oct 2001, ESO Astrophysics Symposia, Eds. Bender, R. and Renzini, A., Springer-Verlag, 2003, p. 213
718:
719: \bibitem[de Oliveira et al.(2006)]{oli06}
720: de Oliveira, M., Temporin, S., Cypriano, E. S., Plana, H., Amram, P, Sodre, L. Jr., Balkowski, C., 2006, \aj, 132, 570
721:
722: \bibitem[Draper and Smith(1998)]{dra98}
723: Draper, N. R. and Smith, H., 1998, {\it Applied Regression Analysis}, New York: Wiley, p. 89
724:
725: \bibitem[Drory et al.(2004)]{dro04}
726: Drory, N., Bender, R., Feulner, G., Hopp, U., Maraston, C., Snigula, J., Hill, G. J., 2004, \apj, 608, 742
727:
728: \bibitem[Fitzpatrick(1999)]{fit99}
729: Fitzpatrick, E. L., 1999, \pasp, 111, 63
730:
731: \bibitem[Gallagher and Hunter(1989)]{gal89}
732: Gallagher, G. and Hunter, D. A., 1989, \aj, 98, 806
733:
734: \bibitem[Garnett(2002)]{gar02}
735: Garnett, D. R., 2002, \apj, 581, 1019
736:
737: \bibitem[Gavazzi et al.(2005)]{gav05}
738: Gavazzi, G., Boselli, A., van Driel, W., O`Neil, K., 2005, \aap, 429, 439
739:
740: \bibitem[Grebel(2000)]{gre00}
741: Grebel, E. K., 2000, The Local Group, in {\it Microlensing 2000: A New Era of Microlensing Astrophysics}, ASP Conf. Ser., Eds. J. W. Menzies and P. D. Sackett, cape Town, also in astro-ph/0008249
742:
743: \bibitem[Grebel(2001)]{gre01}
744: Grebel, E. K., 2001, \apjs, 277, 231
745:
746: \bibitem[Guseva, Izotov, \& Thuan(2000)]{gus00}
747: Guseva, N. G., Izotov, Y. I., \& Thuan, T. X., 2000, \apj, 531, 776
748:
749: \bibitem[Helmi et al.(2006)]{hel06}
750: Helmi, A. et al., 2006, \apj, 651L, 121
751:
752: \bibitem[Hidalgo-Gamez and Olofsson(1998)]{hid98}
753: Hidalgo-Gamez, A. M. and Olofsson, K., 1998, \aap, 334, 45
754:
755: \bibitem[Hidalgo-Gamez, Sanchez-Salcedo, \& Olofsson(2003)]{hid03}
756: Hidalgo-Gamez, A. M., Sanchez-Salcedo, F. J., \& Olofsson, K., 2003, \aap, 399, 63
757:
758: \bibitem[Hodge and Miller(1995)]{hod95}
759: Hodge, P. and Miller, B. W., 1995, \apj, 451, 176
760:
761: \bibitem[Huchtmeier and Richter(1989)]{hr89}
762: Huchtmeier, W. K. and Richter, O.-G., 1989, {\it A General Catalog of HI Observations of Galaxies. The Reference Catalog}, Berlin: Springer-Verlag
763:
764: \bibitem[Huchtmeier et al.(2000)]{huc00}
765: Huchtmeier, W. K., Karachentsev, I. D., Karachentseva, V. E., Ehle, M., 2000, \aap, 141, 469
766:
767: \bibitem[Huchtmeier, Karachentsev, \& Karachentseva(2001)]{huc01}
768: Huchtmeier, W. K., Karachentsev, I. D., \& Karachentseva, V. E., 2001, \aap, 377, 801
769:
770: \bibitem[Huchtmeier, Karachentsev, \& Karachentseva(2003)]{huc03}
771: Huchtmeier, W. K., Karachentsev, I. D., \& Karachentseva, V. E., 2003, \aap, 401, 483
772:
773: \bibitem[Hunter and Hoffman(1999)]{hun99}
774: Hunter, D. A. and Hoffman, L., 1999, \aj, 117, 2789
775:
776: \bibitem[Izotov and Thuan(1999)]{izo99}
777: Izotov, Y. I. and Thuan, T. X., 1999, \apj, 511, 639
778:
779: \bibitem[James(1994)]{jam94}
780: James, P. A., 1994, \mnras, 269, 176
781:
782: \bibitem[Karachentsev et al.(2004)]{kar04}
783: Karachentsev, I. D., Karachentseva, V. E., Huchtmeier, W. K., Makarov, D. I., 2004, \aj, 127, 2031
784:
785: \bibitem[Kauffmann, White, \& Guiderdoni(1993)]{kau93}
786: Kauffmann, G., White, S. D. M., \& Guiderdoni, B., 1993, \mnras, 264, 201
787:
788: \bibitem[Kennicutt and Skillman(2001)]{ken01}
789: Kennicutt, R. C. and Skillman, E. D., 2001, \aj, 121, 1461
790:
791: \bibitem[Kobulnicky and Skillman(1996)]{kob96}
792: Kobulnicky, H. A. and Skillman, E. D., 1996, \apj, 471, 211
793:
794: \bibitem[Kobulnicky and Skillman(1997)]{kob97}
795: Kobulnicky, H. A. and Skillman, E. D., 1997, \apj, 489, 636
796:
797: \bibitem[Krawchuk et al.(1997)]{kra97}
798: Krawchuk, C. A. P., McCall, M. L., Komljenovic, M., Kingsburgh, R., Richer, M., Stevenson, C, 1997, SNAP: Spreadsheet nebular analysis package, {\it Planetary Nebulae, IAU Symposium 180}, Eds. H. J. Habing and G. L. M. Lamers, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 116
799:
800: \bibitem[Kunth and Ostlin(2000)]{kun00}
801: Kunth, D. and Ostlin, G., 2000, {\it The Most Metal-Poor Galaxies}, The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 10, Issue 1/2, p. 1-79
802:
803: \bibitem[Lamareille et al.(2004)]{lam04}
804: Lamareille, F., Mouhcine, M., Contini, T., Lewis, I., Maddox, S., 2004, \mnras, 350, 396
805:
806: \bibitem[Lee, Salzer, \& Melbourne(2004)]{leej04}
807: Lee, J., Salzer, J. J., \& Melbourne, J., 2004, \apj, 616, 752
808:
809: \bibitem[Lee et al.(2003a)]{lee03a}
810: Lee, H., McCall, M. L., Kingsburgh, R. L., Ross, R., Stevenson, C., 2003, \aj, 125, 146
811:
812: \bibitem[Lee, McCall, \& Richer(2003)]{lee03b}
813: Lee, H., McCall, M. L., \& Richer, M. G., 2003, \aj, 125, 2975
814:
815: \bibitem[Lee, Grebel, \& Hodge(2003)]{lee03c}
816: Lee, H., Grebel, E. K., \& Hodge, P. W., 2003, \apj, 401, 141
817:
818: \bibitem[Lee and Skillman(2004)]{lee04}
819: Lee, H. and Skillman E. D., 2004, \apj, 614, 698
820:
821: \bibitem[Lee, Skillman, \& Venn(2005)]{lee05}
822: Lee, H., Skillman E. D., \& Venn, K. A., 2005, \apj, 620, 223
823:
824: \bibitem[Lee et al.(2006)]{lee06a}
825: Lee, H., Skillman, E. D., Cannon, J. M., Jackson, D. C., Gehrz, R. D., Polomski, E. F., Woodward, C. E., 2006, \apj, 647, 970
826:
827: \bibitem[Lee, Skillman, \& Venn(2006)]{lee06b}
828: Lee, H., Skillman E. D., \& Venn, K. A., 2006, \apj, 642, 813
829:
830: \bibitem[Lequeux et al.(1979)]{leq79}
831: Lequeux, J., Peimbert, M., Rayo, J. F., Serrano, A., Torres-Peimbert, S., 2003, \aap, 80, 155
832:
833: \bibitem[Martin(1997)]{m97}
834: Martin, C. L., 1997, \apj, 491, 561
835:
836: \bibitem[Mateo(1998)]{mat98}
837: Mateo, M., 1998, \araa, 36, 453
838:
839: \bibitem[Matthews and Gallagher(1997)]{mat97}
840: Matthews, L. D. and Gallagher, J. S., 1997, \aj, 114, 5
841:
842: \bibitem[McCall, Rybski, \& Shields(1985)]{mcc85}
843: McCall, M. L., Rybski, P. M., \& Shields, G. A., 1985, \apjs, 57, p. 1-62
844:
845: \bibitem[McGaugh(1991)]{mcg91}
846: McGaugh, S. S., 1991, \apj, 426, 135
847:
848: \bibitem[McGaugh(1994)]{mcg94}
849: McGaugh, S. S., 1994, \apj, 380, 140
850:
851: \bibitem[Melbourne and Salzer(2002)]{mel02}
852: Melbourne, J. and Salzer, H. J., 2002, \aj, 123, 2302
853:
854: \bibitem[Melbourne et al.(2004)]{mel04}
855: Melbourne, J., Phillips, A. S., John J., Gronwall, C., Sarajedini, V. L., 2004, \aj, 127, 686
856:
857: \bibitem[Miller and Hodge(1996)]{mil96}
858: Miller, B. W. and Hodge, P., 1996, \apj, 458, 467
859:
860: \bibitem[Moles, Aparicio, \& Masegosa(1990)]{mol90}
861: Moles, M., Aparicio, A., \& Masegosa, J., 1990, \aap, 228, 310
862:
863: \bibitem[Osterbrock(1989)]{ost89}
864: Osterbrock, D. E., 1989, {\it Astrophysics of Gaseous Nebulae and Active Galactic Nuclei}, Sausalito: University Science Books
865:
866: \bibitem[Papaderos et al.(1996a)]{pap96a}
867: Papaderos, P., Loose, H.-H., Thuan, T. X., Fricke, K. J., 1996a, \aaps, 120, 207
868:
869: \bibitem[Papaderos et al.(1996b)]{pap96b}
870: Papaderos, P., Loose, H.-H., Fricke, K. J., Thuan, T. X., 1996b, \aap, 314, 59
871:
872: \bibitem[Pagel et al.(1979)]{pag79}
873: Pagel, B. E. J., Edmunds, M. G., Blackwell, D. E., Chun, M. S., Smith, G., 1979, \mnras, 189, 95
874:
875: \bibitem[Pagel(1997)]{pag97}
876: Pagel, B. E. J., 1997, {\it Nucleosynthesis and the Chemical Evolution of Galaxies}, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press
877:
878: \bibitem[Pena and Ayala(1993)]{pen93}
879: Pena, M. and Ayala, S., 1993, \rmxaa, 27, 171
880:
881: \bibitem[Peimbert et al.(2006)]{pei06}
882: Peimbert, M., Peimbert, A., Esteban, C., Garcia-Rojas, J., Bresolin, F., Carigi, L., Ruiz, M. T., Lopez-Sanchez, A. R., 2006, {\it The Calibration of the O/H Abundance Indicators for Extragalactic HII regions based on OII Recombination Lines}, in First Light Science with the Gran Telescopio Canarias, to appear in \rmxaa (SC), astro-ph/0608440
883:
884: \bibitem[Pilyugin(2000)]{pil00}
885: Pilyugin, L. S., 2000, \aap, 362, 325
886:
887: \bibitem[Pilyugin(2001a)]{pil01a}
888: Pilyugin, L. S., 2001, \aap, 369, 594
889:
890: \bibitem[Pilyugin(2001)]{pil01b}
891: Pilyugin, L. S., 2001, \aap, 374, 412
892:
893: \bibitem[Pilyugin, Vilchez, \& Contini(2004)]{pil04}
894: Pilyugin, L. S., Vilchez, J. M., \& Contini, T., 2004, \aap, 425, 849
895:
896: \bibitem[Richer and McCall(1995)]{ric95}
897: Richer, M. G. and McCall, M. L., 1995, \apj, 445, 642
898:
899: \bibitem[Roberts(1975)]{rob75}
900: Roberts, M. S., 1975, {\it Radio Observations of Neutral Hydrogen in Galaxies}, in Galaxies and the Universe, Eds. A. Sandage, M. Sandage and J. Kristian (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), p. 309
901:
902: \bibitem[Roberts and Haynes(1994)]{rob94}
903: Roberts, M. S. and Haynes, M. P., 1994, \araa, 32, 115
904:
905: \bibitem[Salzer et al.(2005)]{sal05}
906: Salzer J. J., Lee, J. C., Melbourne, J., Hinz, J. L., Alonso-Herrero, A., Jangren, A., 2005, \apj, 624, 661
907:
908: \bibitem[Saviane et al.(2005)]{sav05}
909: Saviane, I., Held, E. V., Ivanov, V., Alloin, D., Bresolin, F., Rich, R. M., Rizzi, L., Momany, Y., 2005, {\it The near-IR luminosity-metallicity relation of dwarf irregular galaxies}, in {\it Near-Field Cosmology with Dwarf Elliptical Galaxies, IAU Colloquium 198} Les Diablerets, Switzerland, 14-18 March 2005, Eds. H. Jerjen and B. Binggeli
910:
911: \bibitem[Searle and Sargent(1972)]{sea72}
912: Searle, L. and Sargent, W. L. W., 1972, \apj, 173, 25
913:
914: \bibitem[Shi et al.(2005)]{shi05}
915: Shi, F., Kong, X., Li, C., Cheng, F. Z., 2005, \aap, 437, 849
916:
917: \bibitem[Skillman, Kennicutt, \& Hodge(1989)]{ski89}
918: Skillman, E. D., Kennicutt, R. C., \& Hodge, P. W., 1989, \apj, 347, 875
919:
920: \bibitem[Skillman et al.(1994)]{ski94}
921: Skillman, E. D., Televich, R. J., Kennicutt, R. C., Garnett, D. R., Terlevich, E., 1994, \apj, 431, 172
922:
923: \bibitem[Sparke and Gallagher(2000)]{spa00}
924: Sparke, L. and Gallagher, J. S., 2000, {\it Galaxies in the Universe: An Introduction}, Cambridge Univ. Press
925:
926: \bibitem[Stasinska, Comte, \& Vigroux(1986)]{sta86}
927: Stasinska, G., Comte, G., \& Vigroux, L., 1986, \aap, 154, 352
928:
929: \bibitem[Stavely-Smith, Davies, \& Kinman(1992)]{sta92}
930: Stavely-Smith, L., Davies, R. D., \& Kinman, T. D., 1992, \mnras, 258, 334
931:
932: \bibitem[Tammann(1994)]{tam94}
933: Tammann, G. A., 1994, Dwarf Galaxies in the Past, in {\it Dwarf Galaxies, ESO Conference and Workshop Proc No. 49}, Eds. G. Meylan and P. Prugniel, Paris, p. 3
934:
935: \bibitem[Thuan(1985)]{thu85}
936: Thuan, T. X., 1985, \apj, 299, 881
937:
938: \bibitem[Tremonti et al.(2004)]{tre04}
939: Tremonti, C. A. et al. 2004, \aj, 613, 898
940:
941: \bibitem[Tully et al.(1981)]{tul81}
942: Tully, R. B., Boesgaard, A. M., Dyck, H. M., Schempp, W. V., 1981, \apj, 246, 38
943:
944: \bibitem[van der Bergh(2000)]{van00}
945: van den Bergh, S., 2000, in {\it The Galaxies of the Local Group}, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
946:
947: \bibitem[van Zee, Haynes, \& Salzer(1997)]{van97}
948: van Zee, L., Haynes, M. P., \& Salzer, J. J., 1997, \aj, 114-6, 2497
949:
950: \bibitem[van Zee, Skillmann, \& Haynes(2006)]{van06a}
951: van Zee, L., Skillman, E., \& Haynes, M. P., 2006, \apj, 637, 269
952:
953: \bibitem[van Zee and Haynes(2006)]{van06b}
954: van Zee, L., and Haynes, M. P., 2006, \apj, 636, 214
955:
956: \bibitem[Vilchez and Iglesias-Paramo(2003)]{vil03}
957: Vilchez, J. M. and Iglesias-Paramo, J., 2003, \apjs, 145, 225
958:
959: \bibitem[Vaduvescu(2005)]{vad05b}
960: Vaduvescu, O., 2005, {\it Infrared Properties of Star Forming Dwarf Galaxies}, PhD Thesis, York University
961:
962: \bibitem[Vaduvescu et al.(2005a)]{vad05a}
963: Vaduvescu, O., McCall, M. L., Richer, M. G., Fingerhut, R. L., 2005 (Paper I), \aj, 130, 1593
964:
965: \bibitem[Vaduvescu, Richer, \& McCall(2006)]{vad06}
966: Vaduvescu, O., Richer, M. G., \& McCall, M. L., 2006 (Paper II) \aj, 131, 1318
967:
968: \bibitem[Venn et al.(2004)]{ven04}
969: Venn, K. A., Irwin, M., Shetrone, M. D., Tout, C. A., Hill, V., \& Tolstoy, E., 2004, \aj, 128, 117
970:
971: \bibitem[Webster and Smith(1983)]{web83}
972: Webster, B. L. and Smith, M. G., 1983, \mnras, 204, 743
973:
974: \bibitem[White and Frenk(1991)]{whi91}
975: White, S. D. M. and Frenk, C. S., 1991, \apj, 379, 52
976:
977: \end{thebibliography}
978:
979:
980: %
981: % =========== TABLES ==============
982: %
983:
984: \clearpage
985: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrcrc}
986: \tablewidth{0pt}
987: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
988: \tablecaption{Gemini-North observing log \label{tbl-1}}
989: \tablehead{
990: \colhead{Galaxy} &
991: \colhead{$\alpha$} &
992: \colhead{$\delta$} &
993: \colhead{$PA$} &
994: \colhead{Date} &
995: \colhead{$\lambda_c$} &
996: \colhead{Exposure} \\
997: \colhead{} &
998: \colhead{(h m s)} &
999: \colhead{($\deg$ $\arcmin$ $\arcsec$)} &
1000: \colhead{(deg)} &
1001: \colhead{(UT)} &
1002: \colhead{(\AA)} &
1003: \colhead{(no.exp $\times$ s)} \\
1004: \colhead{(1)} &
1005: \colhead{(2)} &
1006: \colhead{(3)} &
1007: \colhead{(4)} &
1008: \colhead{(5)} &
1009: \colhead{(6)} &
1010: \colhead{(7)}
1011: }
1012: \startdata
1013: VCC 24 & 12:10:35.7 & +11:45:38 & 147 & Mar 1, 2003 & 4680 & $3\times600$ \\
1014: ... & ... & ... & 147 & Mar 1, 2003 & 5600 & $3\times200$ \\
1015:
1016: VCC 459 & 12:21:12.1 & +17:38:21 & 111 & Mar 1, 2003 & 4680 & $3\times600$ \\
1017: ... & ... & ... & 111 & Mar 1, 2003 & 5600 & $3\times200$ \\
1018:
1019: VCC 641 & 12:23:28.6 & +05:48:59 & 15 & Mar 1, 2003 & 4680 & $3\times600$ \\
1020: ... & ... & ... & 15 & Mar 1, 2003 & 5600 & $3\times200$ \\
1021:
1022: VCC 2033 & 12:46:04.5 & +08:28:33 & 14 & Mar 2, 2003 & 4680 & $3\times600$ \\
1023: ... & ... & ... & 14 & Mar 2, 2003 & 5600 & $3\times200$ \\
1024: \enddata
1025: \tablecomments{
1026: (1) Designation of galaxy in Virgo Cluster Catalog (VCC)
1027: (2) Right Ascension (J2000) for the centre of the slit
1028: (3) Declination (J2000) for the centre of the slit
1029: (4) Slit position angle (E of N)
1030: (5) Observing date
1031: (6) Central wavelength
1032: (7) Exposure time
1033: }
1034: \end{deluxetable}
1035:
1036:
1037: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrrrrr}
1038: \tablewidth{0pt}
1039: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1040: \tablecaption{Observed and corrected line ratios \label{VCC_lines}}
1041: \tablehead{
1042: &
1043: \multicolumn{2}{c}{VCC 24 \tablenotemark{a}} &
1044: \multicolumn{2}{c}{VCC 459 \tablenotemark{a}} &
1045: \multicolumn{2}{c}{VCC 641 \tablenotemark{b}} &
1046: \multicolumn{2}{c}{VCC 2033 \tablenotemark{a}} \\
1047: \\
1048: \cline{1-9}
1049: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Identification (\AA)} &
1050: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$F$} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$I$} &
1051: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$F$} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$I$} &
1052: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$F$} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$I$} &
1053: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$F$} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$I$}
1054: }
1055: \startdata
1056: $\rm{[O~II]}$ 3727 & 334.8$\pm$16.1 & 344.8$\pm$16.8 & 212.4$\pm$1.4 & 230.2$\pm$4.6 & 280.7$\pm$48.2 & 297.3$\pm$52.6 & 436.3$\pm$4.4 & 447.0$\pm$4.6 \\
1057: $\rm{[H~12]}$ & \nodata & \nodata & 1.8$\pm$1.2 & 2.0$\pm$1.4 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1058: $\rm{[H~11]}$ 3771 & \nodata & \nodata & 2.3$\pm$0.3 & 2.5$\pm$0.3 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1059: $\rm{[H~10]}$ 3798 & \nodata & \nodata & 3.5$\pm$0.3 & 3.8$\pm$0.4 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1060: $\rm{[He~I]}$ 3820 & \nodata & \nodata & 0.6$\pm$0.3 & 0.6$\pm$0.3 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1061: $\rm{[H~9]}$ 3835 & \nodata & \nodata & 4.3$\pm$0.3 & 4.7$\pm$0.4 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1062: $\rm{[Ne~III]}$ 3869 & \nodata & \nodata & 28.3$\pm$0.6 & 30.3$\pm$1.0 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1063: $\rm{He~I + H~8}$ 3889 & \nodata & \nodata & 15.7$\pm$0.5 & 16.9$\pm$0.7 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1064: $\rm{[Ne~III]}$ 3967 & \nodata & \nodata & 20.2$\pm$0.4 & 21.5$\pm$0.6 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1065: $\rm{[S~II]}$ 4069 & \nodata & \nodata & 2.0$\pm$0.3 & 2.1$\pm$0.3 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1066: $\rm{H\delta}$ 4101 & \nodata & \nodata & 22.3$\pm$0.3 & 23.6$\pm$0.6 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1067: $\rm{H\gamma}$ 4340 & \nodata & \nodata & 45.3$\pm$0.4 & 47.1$\pm$0.9 & \nodata & \nodata & 47.0$\pm$2.0 & 47.5$\pm$2.1 \\
1068: $\rm{[O~III]}$ 4363 & \nodata & \nodata & 2.8$\pm$0.3 & 3.0$\pm$0.4 & \nodata & \nodata & 2.1$\pm$0.9 & 2.1$\pm$0.9 \\
1069: $\rm{[He~I]}$ 4472 & \nodata & \nodata & 3.5$\pm$0.1 & 3.6$\pm$1.5 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1070: $\rm{H\beta}$ 4861 & 100.0$\pm$2.1 & 100.0$\pm$4.3 & 100.0$\pm$0.5 & 100.0$\pm$1.0 & \nodata & \nodata & 100.0$\pm$2.8 & 100.0$\pm$3.0 \\
1071: $\rm{He~I}$ 4922 & \nodata & \nodata & 1.0$\pm$0.4 & 1.0$\pm$0.5 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1072: $\rm{[O~III]}$ 4959 & 92.2$\pm$3.8 & 92.0$\pm$4.0 & 132.3$\pm$1.7 & 131.3$\pm$2.3 & 54.9$\pm$6.6 & 56.5$\pm$7.3 & 57.8$\pm$1.9 & 57.6$\pm$2.0 \\
1073: $\rm{[O~III]}$ 5007 & 271.3$\pm$8.0 & 270.2$\pm$8.3 & 396.5$\pm$2.0 & 392.1$\pm$3.7 & 82.3$\pm$11.5 & 84.5$\pm$12.6 & 172.8$\pm$3.8 & 172.2$\pm$3.9 \\
1074: $\rm{[He~I]}$ 5876 & \nodata & \nodata & 12.4$\pm$0.1 & 11.6$\pm$0.1 & 13.8 & 13.9$\pm$4.6$\pm$0.5 & 9.0$\pm$0.6 & 9.0$\pm$0.7 \\
1075: $\rm{[O~I]}$ 6300 & \nodata & \nodata & 4.5$\pm$0.1 & 4.2$\pm$0.1 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1076: $\rm{[S~III]}$ 6312 & \nodata & \nodata & 1.6$\pm$0.1 & 1.4$\pm$0.1 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1077: $\rm{[O~I]}$ 6363 & \nodata & \nodata & 1.2$\pm$0.1 & 1.1$\pm$0.1 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1078: $\rm{[N~II]}$ 6548 & 16.8$\pm$2.4 & 16.3$\pm$2.5 & 7.5$\pm$0.9 & 6.9$\pm$0.8 & \nodata & \nodata & 7.6$\pm$1.2 & 7.4$\pm$1.3 \\
1079: $\rm{H\alpha}$ 6563 & 373.9$\pm$4.0 & 286.3$\pm$4.4 & 314.6$\pm$1.2 & 286.3$\pm$0.6 & 100.0$\pm$8.3 & 100.0$\pm$9.1 & 261.4$\pm$5.1 & 254.1$\pm$5.3 \\
1080: $\rm{[N~II]}$ 6583 & 44.6$\pm$2.8 & 43.1$\pm$3.0 & 22.2$\pm$0.9 & 20.2$\pm$0.8 & 18.3$\pm$3.3 & 18.3$\pm$3.6 & 24.6$\pm$1.4 & 23.9$\pm$1.5 \\
1081: $\rm{[He~I]}$ 6678 & 4.6$\pm$1.0 & 4.4$\pm$1.0 & 3.6$\pm$0.1 & 3.3$\pm$0.1 & \nodata & \nodata & 2.6$\pm$0.2 & 2.5$\pm$0.2 \\
1082: $\rm{[S~II]}$ 6716 & 65.6$\pm$2.5 & 63.2$\pm$2.6 & 26.6$\pm$0.1 & 24.1$\pm$0.1 & 34.7$\pm$3.6 & 34.6$\pm$3.9 & 28.5$\pm$0.6 & 27.6$\pm$0.7 \\
1083: $\rm{[S~II]}$ 6730 & 50.0$\pm$2.8 & 48.2$\pm$3.0 & 19.4$\pm$0.1 & 17.6$\pm$0.1 & 21.3$\pm$2.8 & 21.3$\pm$3.1 & 19.7$\pm$0.5 & 19.1$\pm$0.5
1084: \enddata
1085: \tablecomments{
1086: $^a$ Flux ratios are reported with respect to H$\beta$~(H$\beta$=100)
1087: $^b$ Flux ratios are reported with respect to H$\alpha$~(H$\alpha$=100).
1088: Wavelengths are listed in \AA. $F$ is the observed flux ratio. $I$ is the flux ratio corrected for reddening.
1089: }
1090: \end{deluxetable}
1091:
1092: \clearpage
1093: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccc}
1094: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1095: \tablewidth{0pt}
1096: \tablecaption{Derived properties for HII regions in Virgo BCDs \label{table_BCDs_props}}
1097: \tablehead{
1098: \colhead{Property} &
1099: \colhead{VCC 24} &
1100: \colhead{VCC 459} &
1101: \colhead{VCC 641} &
1102: \colhead{VCC 2033}
1103: }
1104: \startdata
1105: $I(H\beta$) & (3.65$\pm$0.08) & (2.38$\pm$0.07) & \nodata & (3.62$\pm$0.05) \\
1106: (ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$) & $\times 10^{-15}$ & $\times 10^{-14}$ & \nodata & $\times 10^{-15}$ \\
1107: $\tau_1$ & 0.032 & 0.087 & 0.028 & 0.026 \\
1108: $W(H\beta$) (\AA) & 4.73$\pm$0.10 & 92.80$\pm$1.19 & \nodata & 11.10$\pm$0.17 \\
1109: $n_e$ (cm$^{-3}$) & \nodata & 52 & \nodata & \nodata \\
1110: log $R_{23}$ & 0.849 & 0.877 & 1.097 & 0.830 \\
1111: log $O_{32}$ & 0.021 & 2.273 & -0.324 & -0.289 \\
1112: $T_e$(O$^{+2}$) (K) & \nodata & 10500 & \nodata & 12500 \\
1113: O$^+$/H$^+$ & \nodata & (6.9$\pm$1.4)$\times 10^{-5}$ & \nodata & (6.9$\pm$0.7)$\times 10^{-5}$ \\
1114: O$^{+2}$/H$^+$ & \nodata & (1.2$\pm$0.3)$\times 10^{-4}$ & \nodata & (2.9$\pm$1.3)$\times 10^{-5}$ \\
1115: $12+\log(\rm{O/H})$ $[T_e]$ & \nodata & 8.27$\pm$0.09 & \nodata & 7.99$\pm$0.30 \\
1116: $12+\log(\rm{O/H})$ $[R_{23}]$ & 8.58$\pm$0.20 & 8.09$\pm$0.20 & 8.86$\pm$0.20 & 8.31$\pm$0.20 \\
1117: \enddata
1118: \tablecomments{
1119: I(H$\beta$) represents the H$\beta$ intensity, in ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$, corrected for underlying Balmer absorption and reddening;
1120: $\tau_1$ is the optical depth of dust at 1 $\mu m$, assuming a Fitzpatrick (1999) reddening model and dust in the foreground located in the Milky Way, calculated using H$\alpha$/H$\beta$;
1121: W(H$\beta$) is the emission equivalent width, in \AA, corrected for underlying Balmer absorption;
1122: $n_e$ is the electron density;
1123: $\log(R_{23})$ and $\log(O_{32})$ are the diagnostics for the bright-line method (\citealp{pag79}, \citealp{mcg94});
1124: $T_e(\rm{O}^{+2})$ is the computed electron temperature in degrees Kelvin;
1125: $12+\log(\rm{O/H})$ $[T_e]$ is the derived oxygen abundance in dex measured via $T_e$;
1126: $12+\log(\rm{O/H})$ $[R_{23}]$ is the derived oxygen abundance in dex measured via $R_{23}$.
1127: }
1128: \end{deluxetable}
1129:
1130: \clearpage
1131: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrrcrrr}
1132: \tablewidth{0pt}
1133: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1134: \tablecaption{Properties of the dI sample \label{dIs_met}}
1135: \tablehead{
1136: \colhead{Galaxy} &
1137: \colhead{DM} &
1138: \colhead{$M_K$} &
1139: \colhead{$\log F_{21}$} &
1140: \colhead{$\log M_{gas}$} &
1141: \colhead{$\log M_*$} &
1142: \colhead{$\mu$} &
1143: \colhead{12+log(O/H)} &
1144: \colhead{Method} &
1145: \colhead{Reference} \\
1146: \colhead{(1)} &
1147: \colhead{(2)} &
1148: \colhead{(3)} &
1149: \colhead{(4)} &
1150: \colhead{(5)} &
1151: \colhead{(6)} &
1152: \colhead{(7)} &
1153: \colhead{(8)} &
1154: \colhead{(9)} &
1155: \colhead{(10)}
1156: }
1157: \startdata
1158: Cassiopeia 1 & 27.59 & -18.23 & 1.70 & 8.24 & 8.51 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata &\nodata \\
1159: MB 1 & 27.59 & -17.56 & 0.91 & 7.45 & 8.25 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata &\nodata \\
1160: UGCA 92 & 26.20 & -15.68 & 2.02 & 8.01 & 7.49 & 0.765 & 7.70 $\pm$ 0.20 & $R_{23}$ & HM95 \\
1161: Orion dwarf & 28.66 & -17.96 & 1.89 & 8.86 & 8.41 & 0.740 & 7.88 $\pm$ 0.20 & $R_{23}$ & LFM05 \\
1162: DDO 47 & 28.39 & -15.04 & 1.88 & 8.74 & 7.24 & 0.970 & 7.85 $\pm$ 0.04 & $T_e$ & SKH89 \\
1163: UGC 4115 & 28.53 & -16.60 & 1.32 & 8.24 & 7.86 & 0.704 & 7.81 $\pm$ 0.20 & $R_{23}$ & LFM05 \\
1164: DDO 53 & 27.58 & -13.59 & 1.14 & 7.68 & 6.66 & 0.913 & 7.62 $\pm$ 0.05 & $T_e$ & SKH89 \\
1165: UGC 4483 & 27.37 & -14.67 & 1.13 & 7.58 & 7.09 & 0.757 & 7.51 $\pm$ 0.03 & $T_e$ & STK94 \\
1166: UGC 4998 & 29.95 & -18.53 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1167: UGC 5423 & 28.11 & -16.17 & 0.58 & 7.33 & 7.69 & 0.304 & 7.98 $\pm$ 0.10 & $T_e$ & MH96 \\
1168: UGC 5692 & 27.83 & -17.62 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1169: UGC 5848 & 29.70 & -18.11 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1170: UGC 5979 & 30.55 & -18.49 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1171: UGC 6456 & 28.03 & -15.50 & 1.15 & 7.87 & 7.42 & 0.736 & 7.64 $\pm$ 0.10 & $T_e$ & TBD81 \\
1172: Markarian 178 & 27.78 & -16.04 & 0.48 & 7.10 & 7.64 & 0.224 & 7.82 $\pm$ 0.06 & $T_e$ & GIT00 \\
1173: NGC 3741 & 27.24 & -15.02 & 1.72 & 8.12 & 7.23 & 0.886 & 8.10 $\pm$ 0.20 & $R_{23}$ & GH89 \\
1174: NGC 4163 & 27.30 & -16.34 & 0.98 & 7.41 & 7.76 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1175: NGC 4190 & 27.20 & -16.47 & 1.37 & 7.76 & 7.81 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1176: Markarian 209 & 28.37 & -15.67 & 1.00 & 7.85 & 7.49 & 0.698 & 7.77 $\pm$ 0.01 & $T_e$ & IT99 \\
1177: NGC 4789A & 27.80 & -15.63 & 2.16 & 8.79 & 7.47 & 0.953 & 7.67 $\pm$ 0.05 & $T_e$ & KS01 \\
1178: GR 8 & 26.52 & -13.60 & 0.89 & 7.00 & 6.66 & 0.687 & 7.63 $\pm$ 0.10 & $T_e$ & MAM90 \\
1179: DDO 167 & 27.93 & -14.56 & 0.66 & 7.34 & 7.05 & 0.662 & 7.66 $\pm$ 0.03 & $T_e$ & SKH89 \\
1180: UGC 8508 & 26.87 & -15.43 & 1.15 & 7.40 & 7.39 & 0.506 & 7.89 $\pm$ 0.20 & $R_{23}$ & LFM05 \\
1181: NGC 5264 & 28.11 & -18.64 & 1.09 & 7.84 & 8.68 & 0.127 & 8.64 $\pm$ 0.20 & $R_{23}$ & LGH03 \\
1182: Holmberg IV & 29.22 & -18.19 & 1.30 & 8.49 & 8.50 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
1183: DDO 187 & 26.78 & -14.33 & 1.08 & 7.30 & 6.95 & 0.688 & 7.69 $\pm$ 0.09 & $T_e$ & LMK03 \\
1184: \\
1185: VCC 428 & 30.62 & -15.78 &$-$0.20 & 7.55 & 7.53 & 0.512 & 7.64 $\pm$ 0.09 & $T_e$ & VP03 \\
1186: VCC 1374 & 30.62 & -18.17 & 0.40 & 8.15 & 8.49 & 0.315 & 8.35 $\pm$ 0.14 & $T_e$ & VP03 \\
1187: VCC 1699 & 30.62 & -18.90 & 0.79 & 8.54 & 8.78 & 0.366 & 8.32 $\pm$ 0.06 & $T_e$ & VP03 \\
1188: VCC 1725 & 30.62 & -18.81 & 0.28 & 8.03 & 8.75 & 0.162 & 7.74 $\pm$ 0.14 & $T_e$ & VP03 \\
1189: \\
1190: NGC 55 & 25.94 & -19.69 & 3.43 & 9.31 & 9.10 & 0.621 & 8.34 $\pm$ 0.10 & $T_e$ & WS83 \\
1191: NGC 1560 & 27.07 & -18.25 & 2.65 & 8.98 & 8.52 & 0.743 & $>$ 7.97 & $T_e$ & LMK03 \\
1192: Holmberg II & 27.50 & -18.72 & 2.56 & 9.07 & 8.71 & 0.694 & 7.71 $\pm$ 0.13 & $T_e$ & LMK03 \\
1193: NGC 3109 & 25.72 & -16.46 & 3.22 & 9.01 & 7.81 & 0.942 & 7.74 $\pm$ 0.33 & $T_e$ & LMK03 \\
1194: IC 2574 & 27.86 & -17.15 & 2.65 & 9.30 & 8.08 & 0.943 & 8.09 $\pm$ 0.07 & $T_e$ & MH96 \\
1195: NGC 4214 & 28.25 & -20.34 & 2.51 & 9.32 & 9.36 & 0.476 & 8.24 $\pm$ 0.12 & $T_e$ & KS96 \\
1196: NGC 5408 & 27.76 & -16.39 & 1.81 & 8.42 & 7.78 & 0.814 & 8.01 $\pm$ 0.02 & $T_e$ & SCV86 \\
1197: NGC 6822 & 23.46 & -16.83 & 3.38 & 8.27 & 7.95 & 0.674 & 8.11 $\pm$ 0.11 & $T_e$ & L05
1198: \enddata
1199: \tablecomments{
1200: (1) Galaxy name, ordered by right ascension. The first two groups list our field and Virgo observed samples, and the third group lists the the 2MASS sample
1201: (2) Distance modulus
1202: (3) Absolute magnitude in $K_s$ (sech for our sample, total for 2MASS)
1203: (4) Logarithm of the total HI flux in Jy km s$^{-1}$ \citep{kar04}
1204: (5) Logarithm of the total gas mass in solar masses
1205: (6) Logarithm of the stellar mass in solar masses
1206: (7) Gas fraction
1207: (8) Oxygen abundance and uncertainty
1208: (9) Method of determining abundances: $T_e$-direct determination via [O III]$\lambda$4363 \citep{ost89}; $R_{23}$-determination via the bright line method \citep{mcg94}
1209: (10) Reference for abundance: KS97: \citet{kob97}; HM95: \citet{hod95}; LFM05: Lee, Fingerhut and McCall, 2005 (in progress);
1210: SKH89: \citet{ski89}; STK94: \citet{ski94}; MH96: \citet{mil96}; TBD81: \citet{tul81};
1211: GIT00: \citet{gus00}; M97: \citet{m97}; GH89: \citet{gal89}; IT89: \citet{izo99};
1212: KS01: \citet{ken01}; MAM90: \citet{mol90}; LGH03: \citet{lee03c}; LMK03: \citet{lee03a};
1213: WS83: \citet{web83}; KS96: \citet{kob96}; SKV86: \citet{sta86}; L05: Lee, H., Skillman, E. D., \& Venn, K. A., 2005, private communication;
1214: VP03: \citet{vil03}
1215: }
1216: \end{deluxetable}
1217:
1218: %
1219: % BCDs ..............................
1220: %
1221:
1222: \clearpage
1223: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrrrcrrr}
1224: \tablewidth{0pt}
1225: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1226: \tablecaption{Properties of the BCD sample \label{BCDs_met}}
1227: \tablehead{
1228: \colhead{Galaxy} &
1229: \colhead{DM} &
1230: \colhead{$M_K$} &
1231: \colhead{$\log F_{21}$} &
1232: \colhead{$\log M_{gas}$} &
1233: \colhead{$\log M_*$} &
1234: \colhead{$\mu$} &
1235: \colhead{12+log(O/H)} &
1236: \colhead{Method} &
1237: \colhead{Reference} \\
1238: \colhead{(1)} &
1239: \colhead{(2)} &
1240: \colhead{(3)} &
1241: \colhead{(4)} &
1242: \colhead{(5)} &
1243: \colhead{(6)} &
1244: \colhead{(7)} &
1245: \colhead{(8)} &
1246: \colhead{(9)} &
1247: \colhead{(10)}
1248: }
1249: \startdata
1250: VCC 24 & 30.62 & -17.54 & 0.58 & 8.33 & 8.24 & 0.553 & 8.27 $\pm$ 0.20 & $R_{23}$ & V05 \\
1251: VCC 144 & 30.62 & -17.73 & 0.36 & 8.11 & 8.31 & 0.387 & 8.35 $\pm$ 0.07 & $T_e$ & VP03 \\
1252: VCC 213 & 30.62 & -19.42 & 0.17 & 7.92 & 8.99 & 0.079 & 8.70 $\pm$ 0.20 & $R_{23}$ & VP03 \\
1253: VCC 324 & 30.62 & -18.70 & 0.36 & 8.11 & 8.70 & 0.205 & 8.50 $\pm$ 0.10 & $R_{23}$ & VP03 \\
1254: VCC 334 & 30.62 & -17.38 & 0.12 & 7.87 & 8.17 & 0.335 & 8.15 $\pm$ 0.05 & $R_{23}$ & VP03 \\
1255: VCC 459 & 30.62 & -18.17 & 0.39 & 8.14 & 8.49 & 0.310 & 8.27 $\pm$ 0.09 & $T_e$ & V05 \\
1256: VCC 641 & 30.62 & -17.25 & 0.05 & 7.81 & 8.12 & 0.325 & 8.86 $\pm$ 0.20 & $R_{23}$ & V05 \\
1257: VCC 802 & 30.62 & -16.40 & $<-$1.13 & 6.62 & 7.78 & 0.065 & 7.84 $\pm$ 0.15 & $T_e$ & VP03 \\
1258: VCC 848 & 30.62 & -17.91 & 0.75 & 8.51 & 8.39 & 0.568 & 8.03 $\pm$ 0.16 & $T_e$ & VP03 \\
1259: VCC 1313 & 30.62 & -15.07 & 0.01 & 7.76 & 7.25 & 0.765 & 7.77 $\pm$ 0.06 & $T_e$ & VP03 \\
1260: VCC 1437 & 30.62 & -18.37 & 0.40 & 8.15 & 8.57 & 0.277 & 8.30 $\pm$ 0.20 & $R_{23}$ & VP03 \\
1261: VCC 2033 & 30.62 & -17.91 &$-$0.38 & 7.37 & 8.39 & 0.088 & 8.15 $\pm$ 0.15 & $T_e+R_{23}$ & V05 \\
1262: \\
1263: NGC 1569 & 26.37 & -18.19 & 1.87 & 8.05 & 8.49 & 0.268 & 8.19 $\pm$ 0.04 & $T_e$ & KS97 \\
1264: NGC 3738 & 28.27 & -18.59 & 1.34 & 8.28 & 8.64 & 0.305 & 8.23 $\pm$ 0.01 & $T_e$ & M97 \\
1265: IC 10 & 24.35 & -18.90 & 2.98 & 8.36 & 8.78 & 0.276 & 8.19 $\pm$ 0.14 & $T_e$ & LMK03 \\
1266: \enddata
1267: \tablecomments{
1268: (1) Galaxy name, ordered by number. The first group represents our Virgo observed sample, and the second our BCD field sample
1269: (2) Distance modulus
1270: (3) Sech absolute magnitude in $K_s$
1271: (4) Logarithm of the total HI flux in Jy km s$^{-1}$ based on \citet{gav05}
1272: (5) Logarithm of the total gas mass in solar masses
1273: (6) Logarithm of the stellar mass in solar masses
1274: (7) Gas fraction
1275: (8) Oxygen abundance and uncertainty
1276: (9) Method of determining abundances: $T_e$-direct determination via [O III]$\lambda$4363 \citep{ost89}; $R_{23}$-determination via the bright line method \citep{mcg94}
1277: (10) Reference for abundances: V05: this work; VP03: \citet{vil03}; KS97: \citet{kob97}; M97: \citet{m97}
1278: }
1279: \end{deluxetable}
1280:
1281:
1282: \clearpage
1283: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrr}
1284: \tablewidth{0pt}
1285: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1286: \tablecaption{Luminosity-metallicity relations for star-forming galaxies \label{LZ_comp}}
1287: \tablehead{
1288: \colhead{Author} &
1289: \colhead{Band} &
1290: \colhead{Sample} &
1291: \colhead{$L-Z$ Slope} &
1292: \colhead{$L-Z$ Intercept} &
1293: \colhead{rms} \\
1294: \colhead{(1)} &
1295: \colhead{(2)} &
1296: \colhead{(3)} &
1297: \colhead{(4)} &
1298: \colhead{(5)} &
1299: \colhead{(6)}
1300: }
1301: \startdata
1302: SKH89 & $B$ & 19 dIs & -0.153 & 5.500 & 0.16 \\
1303: RM95 & $B$ & 12 dIs & -0.147 $\pm$ 0.029 & 5.670 $\pm$ 0.480 & 0.09 \\
1304: LMK03 & $B$ & 22 dIs & -0.153 $\pm$ 0.025 & 5.590 $\pm$ 0.540 & 0.17 \\
1305: ZH06 & $B$ & 21 dIs & -0.149 $\pm$ 0.011 & 5.650 $\pm$ 0.170 & 0.15 \\
1306:
1307: LMC04 & $B$ & $\times$100 MP SFGs from 2dFGRS & -0.200 $\pm$ 0.020 & 4.290 $\pm$ 0.420 & $>$0.3 \\
1308: LMC04 & $B$ & 6387 SFGs from 2dFGRS & -0.223 $\pm$ 0.004 & 4.070 $\pm$ 0.090 & 0.32 \\
1309:
1310: THK04 & $B$ & $\sim$53000 SFGs from SDSS & -0.185 $\pm$ 0.001 & 5.238 $\pm$ 0.018 & $>$0.3 \\
1311:
1312: SKL05 & $B$ & 24 dwarf BCGs $M_B>-18$ & -0.139 $\pm$ 0.011 & 5.800 $\pm$ 0.170 & $>$0.2 \\
1313: SKL05 & $B$ & 48 BCGs $M_B<-18$ & -0.079 $\pm$ 0.018 & 6.930 $\pm$ 0.370 & $>$0.2 \\
1314:
1315: SLM05 & $B$ & 765 SFGs from KISS & -0.222 $\pm$ 0.003 & 4.180 $\pm$ 0.060 & 0.25 \\
1316: SLM05 & $J$ & 420 SFGs from KISS & -0.200 $\pm$ 0.004 & 4.130 $\pm$ 0.090 & 0.22 \\
1317: SLM05 & $K$ & 370 SFGs from KISS & -0.195 $\pm$ 0.004 & 4.030 $\pm$ 0.010 & 0.23 \\
1318:
1319: O06 & $K$ & 29 dwarfs from Paper I and 2MASS & -0.140 $\pm$ 0.020 & 5.550 $\pm$ 0.260 & 0.15 \\
1320:
1321: V05 & $J$ & 25 dIs & -0.140 $\pm$ 0.014 & 5.692 $\pm$ 0.214 & 0.11 \\
1322: V05 & $K$ & 25 dIs & -0.141 $\pm$ 0.015 & 5.581 $\pm$ 0.244 & 0.10 \\
1323:
1324: V05 & $J$ & 14 BCDs & -0.216 $\pm$ 0.027 & 4.530 $\pm$ 0.473 & 0.12 \\
1325: V05 & $K$ & 14 BCDs & -0.224 $\pm$ 0.030 & 4.212 $\pm$ 0.537 & 0.11 \\
1326: \enddata
1327: \tablecomments{
1328: (1) Reference: SKH89: \citet{ski89}; RM95: \citet{ric95}; LMK03: \citet{lee03a}; ZH06: \citet{van06b};
1329: LMC04: \citet{lam04}; THK04: \citet{tre04}; SKL05: \citet{shi05}; SLM05: \citet{sal05};
1330: O06: \citet{oli06}; V05: Vaduvescu 2005 (this work);
1331: (2) Observing Band (for the absolute magnitude);
1332: (3) Sample: SFGs: Star-Forming Galaxies; BCGs: Blue Compact Galaxies; MP: metal-poor ($12+\log(\rm{O/H})\la8.3$);
1333: (4) $L-Z$ relation slope;
1334: (5) $L-Z$ relation intercept;
1335: (6) root mean square error in log(O/H).
1336: }
1337: \end{deluxetable}
1338:
1339:
1340: %
1341: % ============= FIGURES ================
1342: %
1343:
1344: \clearpage
1345: \begin{figure}
1346: \epsscale{1.0}
1347: \plotone{f1.eps}
1348: \caption{
1349: \label{sp_VCC459comb}
1350: Reduced combined spectrum of VCC 459.
1351: For a better view of the lines, the spectra are shown at two vertical scalings.
1352: A ``fracture'' due to imperfect combination of the continua is visible at 6200 \AA.
1353: This did not affect measurements of the emission lines.
1354: }
1355: \end{figure}
1356:
1357: \clearpage
1358: \begin{figure}
1359: \epsscale{1.0}
1360: \plotone{f2.eps}
1361: \caption{
1362: \label{sp_VCC2033comb}
1363: Reduced combined spectrum of VCC 2033.
1364: For a better view of the lines, the spectra are shown at two vertical scalings.
1365: A ``fracture'' due to imperfect combination of the continua is visible at 6200 \AA.
1366: This did not affect measurements of the emission lines.
1367: }
1368: \end{figure}
1369:
1370: \clearpage
1371: \begin{figure}
1372: \epsscale{1.0}
1373: \plotone{f3.eps}
1374: \caption{
1375: \label{sp_VCC24641comb}
1376: Reduced combined spectra of VCC 24 and VCC 641.
1377: A ``fracture'' due to imperfect combination of the continua of VCC 641 is visible at 6200 \AA.
1378: This did not affect measurements of the emission lines.
1379: }
1380: \end{figure}
1381:
1382: \clearpage
1383: \begin{figure}
1384: \epsscale{1.0}
1385: \plottwo{f4a.eps}{f4b.eps}
1386: \caption{
1387: \label{INTENS_FITS}
1388: Flux versus wavelength for two INTENS fits. Left: H$\beta$ in VCC~24;
1389: Right: H$\gamma$ and [OIII]$\lambda4363$ in VCC~2033. Pluses mark observations, and solid curves are fits.
1390: }
1391: \end{figure}
1392:
1393: \clearpage
1394: \begin{figure}
1395: \epsscale{1.0}
1396: \plotone{f5.eps}
1397: \caption{
1398: \label{LZ_fig_dIs}
1399: The oxygen abundance versus absolute sech magnitude in $K_s$ for dIs.
1400: $T_e$-based abundances are plotted as solid symbols, and $R_{23}$-based abundances as open symbols.
1401: Errors in metallicities are shown as vertical bars. Typical errors for absolute magnitudes are $\sim0.1$
1402: mag. Four outliers are labeled in the plot. The geometric mean fit to other dIs is plotted as a dashed line.
1403: }
1404: \end{figure}
1405:
1406: \clearpage
1407: \begin{figure}
1408: \epsscale{1.0}
1409: \plotone{f6.eps}
1410: \caption{
1411: \label{LZ_fig_BCDs}
1412: The oxygen abundance versus absolute sech magnitude in $K_s$ for BCDs.
1413: $T_e$-based abundances are plotted as solid symbols, and $R_{23}$-based abundances as open symbols.
1414: We include errors in metallicities.
1415: Typical errors for absolute magnitudes are $\sim0.1$ mag. One outlier is labeled. The geometric
1416: mean fit to the other BCDs is plotted as a dashed line.
1417: }
1418: \end{figure}
1419:
1420: \clearpage
1421: \begin{figure}
1422: \epsscale{1.0}
1423: \plotone{f7.eps}
1424: \caption{
1425: \label{LZ_fig_dIs_BCDs}
1426: The oxygen abundance versus absolute sech magnitudes in $K_s$ for dIs and BCDs.
1427: dIs are plotted as circles, while BCDs as triangles.
1428: $T_e$-based abundances are plotted as solid symbols, and $R_{23}$-based abundances as open symbols.
1429: The five outliers from Figures~\ref{LZ_fig_dIs}-\ref{LZ_fig_BCDs} are not shown. The solid line
1430: represents the $L-Z$ relation for the dIs.
1431: }
1432: \end{figure}
1433:
1434: \clearpage
1435: \begin{figure}
1436: \epsscale{1.0}
1437: \plotone{f8.eps}
1438: \caption{
1439: \label{met_gasmass}
1440: Correlation between oxygen abundance and the gas mass.
1441: dIs are plotted with circles, and BCDs with triangles.
1442: $T_e$-based abundances are plotted as solid symbols, and $R_{23}$-based abundances as open symbols.
1443: dIs with a greater gas mass are more abundant in metals.
1444: Ignoring NGC~5264, the geometric linear fit to the dI data is marked by a solid line. For
1445: comparison, the fit found by \citet{lee03a} is shown with a dotted line.
1446: BCDs often have less gas than dIs at a given metallicity.
1447: }
1448: \end{figure}
1449:
1450: \clearpage
1451: \begin{figure}
1452: \epsscale{1.0}
1453: \plotone{f9.eps}
1454: \caption{
1455: \label{met_totalmass}
1456: Correlation between oxygen abundance and baryonic mass. dIs are plotted with circles,
1457: and BCDs with triangles.
1458: $T_e$-based abundances are plotted as solid symbols, and $R_{23}$-based abundances as open symbols.
1459: Stellar masses were derived from sech magnitudes in $K_s$. More massive dIs are more abundant in
1460: metals. Ignoring NGC~5264, the geometric linear fit to the dI data is drawn as a solid line.
1461: For comparison, the \citet{lee03a} fit is plotted with a dashed line.
1462: }
1463: \end{figure}
1464:
1465: \clearpage
1466: \begin{figure}
1467: \epsscale{1.0}
1468: \plotone{f10.eps}
1469: \caption{
1470: \label{miumiuz}
1471: Correlation between oxygen abundance and the gas fraction, $\mu$. dIs whose stellar
1472: masses were derived from sech magnitudes in $K_s$ (Paper I) are plotted with circles,
1473: and while those derived from 2MASS photometry are plotted with crosses.
1474: BCDs, all of whose stellar masses were derived from sech
1475: magnitudes in $K_s$, are represented with triangles. $T_e$-based abundances are plotted
1476: as solid symbols and crosses, and $R_{23}$-based abundances as open symbols.
1477: The linear fit derived by \citet{lee03a} for his field dI sample is
1478: plotted with a dotted line. The gas fraction increases towards the left.
1479: Although there is a lot of scatter, most dIs and BCDs appear to follow the closed box model.
1480: }
1481: \end{figure}
1482:
1483:
1484: \end{document}
1485:
1486: