1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %%% PASJ LaTeX template for draft(body)<2001/02/08>
3: %%%
4: %%% IMPORTANT NOTICE FOR AUTHORS
5: %%% 1. ``\draft'' creates single column and double spaces format.
6: %%% 2. If you comment out ``\draft'', the output will be double column
7: %%% and single space.
8: %%% 3. For cross-references, the use of \label/\ref/\cite and the
9: %%% thebibliography environment is strongly recommended
10: %%% 4. Do NOT use \def/\renewcommand.
11: %%% 5. Do NOT redifine commands provided by PASJ00.cls.
12: %%%
13: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
14: %\documentclass[proof]{pasj00}
15: \documentclass{pasj00}
16: %\draft
17:
18: \begin{document}
19: \SetRunningHead{Author(s) in page-head}{Running Head}
20: \Received{2007/0X/XX}%{yyyy/mm/dd}
21: \Accepted{200X/XX/XX}%{yyyy/mm/dd}
22:
23: \title{The first determination of the actinide Th abundance for a red
24: giant of the Ursa Minor dwarf galaxy\thanks{Based on data collected at
25: Subaru Telescope, which is operated by the National Astronomical
26: Observatory of Japan. }}
27:
28: \author{%
29: Wako \textsc{Aoki},\altaffilmark{1,2}
30: Satoshi \textsc{Honda},\altaffilmark{1}
31: Kozo \textsc{Sadakane},\altaffilmark{3} \\
32: and
33: Nobuo \textsc{Arimoto},\altaffilmark{1,2}
34: }
35:
36: \altaffiltext{1}{National Astronomical Observatory, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588}
37: \email{aoki.wako@nao.ac.jp, honda@optik.mtk.nao.ac.jp, arimoto@optik.mtk.nao.ac.jp}
38:
39: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Astronomy, Graduate University of Advanced
40: Studies, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588}
41:
42: \altaffiltext{3}{Astronomical Institute, Osaka Kyoiku University, Asahigaoka, Kashiwara, Osaka 582-8582}
43: \email{sadakane@cc.osaka-kyoiku.ac.jp}
44:
45: \KeyWords{nuclear reactions, nucleosynthesis, abundances --- stars: abundances --- stars: individual (Ursa Minor COS~82) --- galaxies: dwarf}
46:
47: %Do NOT move this preamble from here!
48:
49: \maketitle
50:
51: \begin{abstract}
52:
53: The Thorium abundance for the red giant COS~82 in the Ursa Minor dwarf
54: spheroidal galaxy is determined based on a high resolution
55: spectrum. This is the first detection of actinides in an extra
56: Galactic object. A detailed abundance pattern is determined for 12
57: other neutron-capture elements from the atomic number 39 to 68. These
58: elements are significantly over-abundant with respect to other metals
59: like Fe ($>$ 1~dex) and their abundance pattern agrees well with
60: those of the r-process-enhanced, very metal-poor stars known in the
61: Galactic halo, while the metallicity of this object ([Fe/H]$\sim
62: -1.5$) is much higher than these field stars ([Fe/H] $\sim -3.0$).
63: The results indicate that the mechanism and the astrophysical site
64: that are responsible for neutron-capture elements in COS~82 is similar
65: to that for field r-process-enhanced stars, while the condition of low
66: mass star formation is quite different. An estimate of the age of this
67: object based on the Th abundance ratio is discussed.
68:
69: \end{abstract}
70:
71:
72: \section{Introduction}\label{sec:intro}
73:
74: The rapid process (r-process) is known to be responsible for about
75: half of the abundances of elements heavier than Fe in solar-system
76: material. Since the reaction occurs through very neutron-rich,
77: unstable nuclei, the understanding of the process is still a
78: challenging issue in nuclear physics. The astrophysical sites of this
79: process are still unclear, though numerical simulations have been made
80: for many possibilities (e.g. Wanajo \& Ishimaru 2006).
81:
82: An important progress in this field in the past decade is the
83: discoveries of very metal-poor stars having large over-abundances of
84: r-process elements. Such objects are expected to record the yields of
85: nucleosynthetic events in the early Galaxy including the r-process.
86: Several objects having very large excesses of r-process elements
87: (e.g. Eu) with respect to other metals ([Eu/Fe]$>1$) are known in the
88: Galactic halo \citep{sneden03, hill02, christlieb04, barklem05}, and
89: are called as 'r-II' stars \citep{beers05}. A remarkable result for
90: these stars is that the abundance patterns of neutron-capture elements
91: are very similar. Objects having such large excesses of r-process
92: elements are only found at the metallicity around [Fe/H]$=-3.0$, and
93: no object having [Eu/Fe]$\gtrsim+1.0$ is known in the range of
94: [Fe/H]$>-2.5$ in the Galactic halo, though the reason for such
95: a metallicity distribution is still unknown.
96:
97: However, the situation is quite different in some dwarf spheroidal
98: galaxies (dSph), in which high abundance ratios of r-process elements
99: are found even in stars with relatively high metallicity. The chemical
100: abundance studies for individual stars in the local group dSph made
101: large progresses in the past several years, thanks to high resolution
102: spectrographs mounted at 8--10~m telescopes (e.g. Shetrone et
103: al. 2001, 2003; Venn et al. 2004). One surprising result derived by
104: these abundance studies is the existence of stars showing extremely
105: large enhancements of heavy neutron-capture elements with relatively
106: high metallicity. The most remarkable star is the red giant COS~82 in
107: the Ursa Minor dSph. High resolution spectroscopy of this object was
108: first obtained by Shetrone et al. (2001; in their
109: paper, this star is referred to as '199'), who reported that this star
110: is moderately metal-poor ([Fe/H]$\sim -1.5$) but shows large
111: enhancement of heavy neutron-capture elements ([Eu/Fe]=1.49). Our
112: previous observing obtained a red spectrum of this
113: star with higher quality, and has successfully detected some other
114: heavy elements (e.g. Dy, Er), confirming that the abundance pattern of
115: elements heavier than Ba almost completely agrees with the r-process
116: abundance pattern estimated from solar-system material (Sadakane et
117: al. 2004). This result is surprising, because no moderately
118: metal-poor star ([Fe/H]$\gtrsim-2$) in our Galaxy is known to date to
119: have such large excesses of r-process elements. Tsujimoto \& Shigeyama
120: (2002) applied their supernova-driven star formation model and
121: proposed that this phenomenon can be explained by assuming a large
122: velocity dispersion of the gas from which low mass stars like COS~82
123: formed.
124:
125: In this Letter, we report the detection of the Th absorption line at
126: 5989~{\AA} for this object by the re-analysis of our high resolution
127: spectrum obtained by \citet{sadakane04}. The actinide Th has an
128: isotope whose half life is 14.05 Gyr, and is produced only by the
129: r-process. The production of actinides is very sensitive to the
130: environment of the sites (e.g. entropy, timescale of the explosion)
131: according to model calculations for the r-process. Therefore, the Th
132: abundance can be a very strong constraint on the study of the origin
133: of the neutron-capture elements in this object. While Th abundance has
134: been determined for more than ten field metal-poor stars and globular
135: cluster stars, our measurement for COS~82 is the first determination
136: of an actinide abundance for an extra Galacitic object. We also
137: discuss the possibility to apply the Th abundance ratio to estimate
138: the age of this object.
139:
140: \section{Observation, Analysis and Results}
141:
142: A high resolution spectrum of COS~82 was obtained by
143: \citet{sadakane04} with the Subaru Telescope High Dispersion
144: Spectrograph (HDS, Noguchi et al. 2002). The spectrum covers
145: 4400--7100~{\AA} with a resolving power of 40,000. The
146: signal-to-noise ratio per 1.8~km$^{-1}$ pixel is 60 at 5900~{\AA}.
147: Standard data reduction procedures are carried out with the IRAF
148: echelle package\footnote{IRAF is distributed by the National Optical
149: Astronomy Observatories, which is operated by the Association of
150: Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc. under cooperative
151: agreement with the National Science Foundation.} as described by
152: \citet{aoki05}. Equivalent widths for isolated absorption lines are
153: measured by fitting gaussian profiles.
154:
155: A standard abundance analysis was made for the measured equivalent
156: widths using the model atmospheres of \citet{kurucz93}. The analysis
157: was made primarily based on the line list of \citet{sadakane04}. We
158: added some weak Fe {\small I} lines, which enable one to determine the
159: micro-turbulence more accurately. The effective temperature ($T_{\rm
160: eff}$) of 4300~K, determined by \citet{sadakane04}, was adopted in the
161: analysis. The micro-turbulence ($v_{\rm turb}$) and gravity ($g$) are
162: determined so that the derived Fe abundance is not dependent on the
163: strengths of Fe {\small I} lines nor on the ionization stage,
164: respectively. The results ($\log g=0.6$~dex and $v_{\rm
165: turb}=1.7$~km~s$^{-1}$) agree with those of \citet{sadakane04} within
166: the estimated errors. The metallicity is assumed to be the
167: Fe abundance ([Fe/H]). The Fe abundance derived by the present
168: analysis is [Fe/H]$=-1.42$, adopting the solar abundance of
169: $\log\epsilon$(Fe) = 7.45 \citep{asplund05}. The results of the abundance
170: analysis are given in table \ref{tab:res}.
171:
172: The Th abundance is determined from the Th {\small II} 5989~{\AA}
173: line. The oscillator strengths of Th lines, including the 5989~{\AA}
174: line, are obtained by \citet{nilsson02}. This line was investigated by
175: \citet{yushchenko05} for the field metal-poor star HD~221170. The line
176: was measured for the same object, using a higher quality spectrum, by
177: \citet{ivans06}, who reported that the abundance determined from this
178: line agrees with those from other Th {\small II} lines. We performed
179: an analysis for HD~221170 using the spectrum obtained with the Subaru
180: Telescope and the model atmosphere \citep{kurucz93} with the
181: parameters adopted by \citet{ivans06}, and confirmed that the
182: derived Th abundance agrees very well with their result. We note that
183: the partition function of the Th {\small II} was calculated using the
184: energy levels listed by \citet{bw92}.
185:
186: Though telluric absorption lines, probably due to water vapor, exist
187: in this wavelength range, we found that the Th {\small II} 5989~{\AA}
188: line of COS~82 is not distinctively affected by them.
189: Figure~\ref{fig:sp} shows the observed spectrum along with the
190: synthetic ones for three Th abundances. The data for spectral lines
191: other than the Th {\small II} line were adopted from the list of
192: \citet{kurucz95}. The wavelength of the observed spectrum is
193: determined from 137 Fe {\small I} lines in the spectrum. We identified
194: the absorption feature at 5989.3~{\AA} as a Nd {\small II} line.
195: Although a Nd {\small II} line at 5989.378~{\AA} with the lower
196: excitation potential of 6005.270 cm$^{-1}$ is listed by
197: \citet{kurucz95}, J. E. Lawler (private communication) suggests that
198: the line should be the transition from 19758.540 to 3066.755
199: cm$^{-1}$ at $\lambda_{\rm air} =$ 5989.312~{\AA}. Since the transition
200: probability of this line is unknown, we assume it to be $\log
201: gf=-2.05$. This $gf$-value and the Nd abundance determined from other
202: spectral regions well reproduce the strength of the line for COS~82 as
203: well as for HD~221170.
204:
205: The Th abundance is determined by $\chi^{2}$-fitting of synthetic
206: spectra to the observed one from 5988.9 to 5989.2~{\AA}, which is not
207: severely affected by the 5989.3~{\AA} feature. The derived abundance
208: is $\log \epsilon$(Th)$=-0.25$. The 2$\sigma$ level of the fitting
209: error is 0.07~dex. The continuum level is estimated for the spectrum
210: around the absorption features. The uncertainty of the continuum
211: placement ($\sim 0.5$\%) results in an possible error of 0.03~dex in
212: the Th abundance. We estimate the line broadening for relatively clean
213: lines in the spectrum, and found that the line widths are primarily
214: determined by the instrumental broadening, and no significant
215: broadening by macro-turbulence nor rotation is detected. The possible
216: errors in the Th abundance due to the adopted broadening parameter
217: ($\pm 0.5$~km~s$^{-1}$) is 0.03~dex.
218:
219: The abundances of other elements are determined using the line list of
220: \citet{sadakane04} with some modifications. The transition
221: probabilities of Nd {\small II}, Sm {\small II} and Gd {\small II} are
222: updated, adding several new lines to the list, using the data of
223: \citet{hartog03}, \citet{lawler06} and \citet{hartog06}, respectively.
224: The effects of hyperfine splitting for Ba, La, Eu, and Pr are included
225: using the line data obtained by \citet{mcwilliam98},
226: \citet{lawler01a}, \citet{lawler01b}, and \citet{ginibre89},
227: respectively. We also measure the O abundance from the [O {\small I}]
228: 6300.3~{\AA} line. The results are listed in table~\ref{tab:res}. An
229: upper limit of the Os abundance is derived from the Os {\small I}
230: 5584~{\AA} line. Estimates of upper limits for other neutron-capture
231: elements are also attempted, but no meaningful result is derived from
232: our spectrum. The abundances of Fe and most neutron-capture
233: elements derived by the present analysis agrees with the results of
234: \citet{sadakane04} within the errors (see below). Exceptions are Eu
235: and Gd abundances, for which the differences between the two
236: measurements are about 0.25~dex. This would be due to the difference
237: of the spectral features and line data adopted in the analysis. The
238: abundances of Fe and some neutron-capture elements determined by
239: \citet{shetrone01} agree well with our results, while their Ce and Sm
240: abundances are more than 0.3~dex higher than ours. We suspect that
241: their results are uncertain because of the low S/N ratio in the blue
242: region of their spectrum where Ce and Sm lines used in their analysis
243: exist.
244:
245: The abundance uncertainties for elements for which more than 10 lines
246: are measured are estimated by $\sigma N^{-1/2}$, where $\sigma$ is the
247: standard deviation of the abundances from individual lines and $N$ is
248: the number of lines used. A typical uncertainty of the equivalent
249: width measurement from our spectrum is 6~m{\AA}. We performed
250: abundance analyses for Fe {\small I} lines with equivalent widths from
251: 30 to 200~m{\AA}, changing the equivalent widths by 6~m{\AA}. The
252: effects of the change of equivalent widths on the derived abundances
253: are 0.15--0.20~dex, which agree with the $\sigma$ (0.18~dex) for Fe
254: {\small I} ($\sigma_{\rm Fe I}$). For elements whose abundances are
255: determined from less than 10 lines, the random error is estimated by
256: $\sigma_{\rm Fe I}N^{-1/2}$. Errors due to the uncertainty of
257: atmospheric parameters are estimated by calculating abundances
258: changing atmospheric parameters by $\Delta(T_{\rm eff})$=150~K,
259: $\Delta(\log g)$=0.3~dex, $\Delta$([Fe/H])=0.2~dex, and $\Delta(v_{\rm
260: turb})=0.3$~km~s$^{-1}$. These errors are added, in quadrature, to the
261: random errors estimated above, and are given in table~\ref{tab:res}
262: ($\sigma_{\rm total}$). We found, however, that the abundances of the
263: neutron-capture elements determined from the ionized species
264: systematically scales by changes of the adopted atmospheric
265: parameters. For the discussion based on the abundance pattern, we
266: calculate the average of the abundance changes for heavy
267: neutron-capture elements (La--Er) by changing the atmospheric
268: parameters, and adopt the deviation from this systematic abundance
269: change for individual elements as the errors due to the uncertainties
270: of atmospheric parameters. This results in quite small errors ($\leq
271: 0.05$~dex). These errors and the random errors are added in
272: quadrature, and are also given in table~\ref{tab:res} as $\sigma_{\rm
273: n-cap}$.
274:
275: %### Figure 1
276: \begin{figure}
277: \begin{center}
278: \FigureFile(80mm,150mm){fig1.ps}
279: \end{center}
280: \caption{
281: Comparisons of synthetic spectra for the region including the Th II
282: 5989~{\AA} line with the observed spectrum. The Th abundances assumed
283: in the calculations are $\log\epsilon$(Th)$= -0.15, -0.25, -0.35$
284: (solid lines), and $-\infty$ (dotted line). }\label{fig:sp}
285: \end{figure}
286:
287: %The dashed line shows a
288: %calculation for the Nd {\small II} line listed by \citet{kurucz95},
289: %while others are calculated shifting its wavelength by $-0.06$~{\AA}
290: (see text).
291:
292: %\clearpage
293:
294: %### Figure 1
295: \begin{figure}
296: \begin{center}
297: \FigureFile(80mm,150mm){fig2.ps}
298: \end{center}
299: \caption{
300: Upper panel: Scaled abundances of neutron-capture elements for COS~82
301: (filled circles), CS~22892--052 (open circles), CS~31082--001
302: (crosses), and the solar-system r-process component (solid line). The
303: abundances are normalized to the average of the abundances of the 10 elements
304: from Ba to Er in the logarithmic scale. Lower panel: Abundance
305: differences in the logarithmic scale between COS~82 and CS~22892--052
306: (open circles) and that between COS~82 and the solar-system r-process
307: component (filled circles). Solid lines indicate the averages of the
308: abundance differences for Ba--Er.}\label{fig:pattern}
309: \end{figure}
310:
311: \begin{longtable}{lrrrrrr}
312: \caption{Elemental Abundances Results}\label{tab:res}
313: \hline
314: \hline
315: species & $\log\epsilon_{\rm sun}$ & $\log\epsilon$& [X/Fe] & $N$ & $\sigma_{\rm totol}$ & $\sigma_{\rm n-cap}$ \\
316: \endhead
317: \hline
318: Fe I & 7.45 & 6.03 & ... & 137 & 0.27 & ... \\
319: Fe II & 7.45 & 6.02 & ... & 13 & 0.18 & ... \\
320: O I & 8.70 & 7.45 & 0.17 & 1 & 0.2 & ... \\
321: Y II & 2.21 & 1.22 & 0.42 & 6 & 0.23 & 0.14 \\
322: Zr II & 2.59 & 1.82 & 0.65 & 1 & 0.24 & 0.19 \\
323: Ba II & 2.17 & 1.36 & 0.60 & 3 & 0.30 & 0.21 \\
324: La II & 1.13 & 0.52 & 0.81 & 8 & 0.16 & 0.06 \\
325: Ce II & 1.63 & 0.76 & 0.55 & 4 & 0.20 & 0.14 \\
326: Pr II & 0.80 & 0.20 & 0.82 & 7 & 0.19 & 0.11 \\
327: Nd II & 1.45 & 1.00 & 0.97 & 41 & 0.17 & 0.05 \\
328: Sm II & 0.98 & 0.90 & 1.34 & 2 & 0.21 & 0.13 \\
329: Eu II & 0.52 & 0.34 & 1.24 & 3 & 0.17 & 0.11 \\
330: Gd II & 1.09 & 1.10 & 1.43 & 3 & 0.16 & 0.12 \\
331: Dy II & 1.17 & 1.13 & 1.38 & 3 & 0.17 & 0.10 \\
332: Er II & 0.97 & 0.73 & 1.18 & 3 & 0.17 & 0.11 \\
333: Th II & 0.09 &-0.25 & 1.08 & 1 & 0.15 & 0.08 \\
334: \noalign{\smallskip}
335: \hline
336: \end{longtable}
337:
338: \section{Discussion and concluding remarks}
339:
340: The upper panel of figure~\ref{fig:pattern} shows the abundance patterns
341: of neutron-capture elements for COS~82, the solar-system r-process
342: component \citep{simmerer04}, and the two r-process-enhanced field
343: stars CS~22892--052 \citep{sneden03} and CS~31082--001
344: \citep{hill02}. The abundances are normalized to the average of Ba--Er
345: ones. As reported by \citet{sadakane04}, the overall abundance pattern
346: of heavy neutron-capture elements (Ba--Er) in COS~82 agrees well with
347: the r-process abundance pattern. In the lower panel, the abundance
348: differences between COS~82 and the solar-system r-process component, as
349: well as that between COS~82 and CS~22892--052, are shown. The Th
350: abundance of COS~82 is lower than the normalized value of the
351: solar-system r-process component, while that agrees very well with the
352: value of CS~22892--052. This point is discussed below in more
353: detail. The abundance of the light neutron-capture element Y in COS~82
354: is also lower than the normalized value in the solar-system r-process
355: component as found in field r-process-enhanced stars.
356:
357: %. A similar trend is known in the r-process-enhanced field
358: %stars including CS~22892--052, and it is interpreted that there is
359: %another component that contribute to the light neutron-capture
360: %elements in the solar-system r-process component than the component
361: %represented by r-process-enhanced stars.
362:
363: %The normalized Y and Zr abundances of COS~82 are slightly higher than
364: %those of CS~22892-052, possibly indicating that another process also
365: %contributed to these elements to COS~82.
366:
367: Although such small deviation exists, an important result derived from
368: the comparison is that the abundance pattern of neutron-capture
369: elements, including Th, in COS~82 agrees with the pure r-process
370: abundance pattern. According to model calculations for the r-process,
371: the actinide abundances with respect to other neutron-capture elements
372: are very sensitive to the model parameters (e.g. electron fraction,
373: entropy; Wanajo et al. 2002). The agreement of the Th abundance ratio
374: to other neutron-capture elements in COS~82 with that of CS~22892--052
375: indicates that the mechanism and astrophysical sites that are
376: responsible for the heavy elements in COS~82 is common with those for
377: the r-process-enhanced field stars. Recent abundance studies for
378: r-process-enhanced stars suggest that the r-process occurs under a
379: quite limited condition (e.g. supernova explosions whose progenitors
380: have mass in a very narrow range). Our result shows that this is also
381: applied to stars even in dSph.
382:
383: The metallicity of COS~82 is more than one order of magnitude higher
384: than those in the field r-II stars ([Fe/H]$\sim -3$). The chemical
385: composition of field stars with such metallicity is believed to be
386: affected by a number of nucleosynthesis events. However, the
387: metallicity, as well as the amount of neutron-capture elements, should
388: be related to how the yields from a nucleosynthesis event are captured
389: by the clouds from which next generation, low mass stars formed, and
390: the neutron-capture elements of COS~82 might be provided by a single
391: event. For instance, \citet{tsujimoto02} proposed that the large
392: excesses of neutron-capture elements in a few objects in dSph,
393: including COS~82, are the result of a larger velocity dispersion of
394: the gas from which low mass stars like COS~82 formed in dSph than in
395: the Galactic halo. That is, the yields of one supernova are recorded
396: in the next generations of stars with smaller mixing with
397: metal-deficient (or metal-free) gas in dSph.
398:
399: Finally, we discuss an estimate of the age of COS~82 from the abundance
400: ratio between Th and other stable elements, which could be an
401: independent calibration for the age measurements for this galaxy. If
402: the age of this star is shown to be quite long ($>10$~Gyr), the star
403: formation of this dSph should be completed with a short time scale.
404: Th has a half life of 14.05 Gyr, and the age of the object (more
405: strictly, the duration from the r-process event) is estimated from the
406: Th abundance ratio to other stable elements, if its initial abundance
407: ratio is given. Here the average of abundances of the nine elements
408: from La to Er is used as the reference \footnote{Ba is excluded from
409: the reference elements, because its abundance error is relatively
410: large due to the strengths of the lines used in the analysis. The
411: conclusion in this paragraph is, however, unchanged if this element is
412: included in the calculation.} (E$_{\rm stable}$). The Th/E$_{\rm
413: stable}$ ratio of COS~82 agrees very well with that of CS~22892--052,
414: while that is 0.3~dex lower than the value in the r-process component in
415: solar-system material (figure~\ref{fig:pattern}).
416:
417: Unfortunately, the abundance ratio of Th/E$_{\rm stable}$ produced by
418: the r-process is not constant. Indeed, the actinides including Th are
419: significantly enhanced, with respect to other neutron-capture
420: elements, in the r-II star CS~31082--001, compared to that of the
421: solar-system r-process component \citep{hill02}. However, studies of
422: Th abundances for a number of r-process enhanced field stars show that
423: the abundance ratios distribute in a rather narrow range ($-0.6\leq
424: $Th/E$_{\rm stable} \leq -0.1$), and CS~22892--052 is one of the
425: objects that have the lowest ratio. Assuming that the initial
426: abundance ratio of Th/E$_{\rm stable}$ for COS~82 is within this
427: range, and that the field halo stars including CS~22892--052 are quite
428: old (their ages are around 12--13 Gyr), COS~82 is also an old object.
429: (If a higher value of the initial Th/E$_{\rm stable}$ ratio is
430: assumed, the derived age becomes longer).
431:
432: The error ($\sigma_{\rm n-cap}$) in the determination of the Th
433: abundance ratio is 0.08~dex, while the scatter of the abundances of
434: the above nine stable elements around those of the solar-system
435: r-process component, as well as of CS~22892--052, is 0.11~dex. We
436: estimate the error of the Th/E$_{\rm stable}$ to be 0.13~dex, which
437: results in the uncertainty of the age estimate to be 6 Gyr. Hence,
438: though the object is suggested to be as old as field halo stars, the
439: age estimate using Th chronometer gives only a weak constraint. A
440: measurement of U/Th ratio, which is a more sensitive chronometer, for
441: this object will enable one to estimate the age with a much smaller
442: error ($\lesssim$ 2 Gyr). \\
443:
444:
445: We are grateful to Dr. J. E. Lawler for providing useful Nd {\small
446: II} line data.
447:
448: %\input{refe}
449: \begin{thebibliography}{}
450:
451:
452: \bibitem[Aoki et al. (2005)]{aoki05} Aoki, W., et al.\ 2005,
453: \apj, 632, 611
454:
455: \bibitem[Asplund et al.(2005)]{asplund05} Asplund, M., Grevesse,
456: N., \& Sauval, A.~J.\ 2005, ASP Conf.~Ser.~336: Cosmic Abundances as
457: Records of Stellar Evolution and Nucleosynthesis, 336, 25
458:
459: \bibitem[Barklem et al.(2005)]{barklem05} Barklem, P.~S., et al.\
460: 2005, \aap, 439, 129
461:
462: %\bibitem[Beers, Preston, and Shectman (1992)]{beers92} Beers T. C.,
463: %Preston G. W., \& Shectman S. A. 1992, \aj, 103, 1987
464:
465: \bibitem[Beers \& Christlieb(2005)]{beers05} Beers, T.~C., \&
466: Christlieb, N.\ 2005, \araa, 43, 531
467:
468: \bibitem[Blaise \& Wyart (1992)]{bw92} Blaise, J., \& Wyart, J.-F. 1992,
469: Energy Levels and Atomic Spectra of Actinides, International Tables of
470: Selected Constants 20, Paris
471:
472: \bibitem[Christlieb et al.(2004)]{christlieb04} Christlieb, N., et
473: al.\ 2004, \aap, 428, 1027
474:
475: \bibitem[Den Hartog et al.(2003)]{hartog03} Den Hartog, E.~A.,
476: Lawler, J.~E., Sneden, C., \& Cowan, J.~J.\ 2003, \apjs, 148, 543
477:
478: \bibitem[Den Hartog et al.(2006)]{hartog06} Den Hartog, E.~A.,
479: Lawler, J.~E., Sneden, C., \& Cowan, J.~J.\ 2006, \apjs, 167, 292
480:
481: \bibitem[Ginibre (1989)]{ginibre89} Ginibre, A. 1989, Physica Scripta 39, 694
482:
483: \bibitem[Hill et al.(2002)]{hill02} Hill, V., et al.\ 2002,
484: \aap, 387, 560
485:
486: \bibitem[Honda et al.(2004)]{honda04} Honda, S., Aoki, W.,
487: Kajino, T., Ando, H., Beers, T.~C., Izumiura, H., Sadakane, K., \&
488: Takada-Hidai, M.\ 2004, \apj, 607, 474
489:
490: \bibitem[Ivans et al.(2006)]{ivans06} Ivans, I.~I., Simmerer,
491: J., Sneden, C., Lawler, J.~E., Cowan, J.~J., Gallino, R., \& Bisterzo, S.\
492: 2006, \apj, 645, 613
493:
494: \bibitem[Kurucz (1993)]{kurucz93} Kurucz, R.\ 1993, ATLAS9
495: Stellar Atmosphere Programs and 2 km/s grid.~Kurucz CD-ROM No.~13.~
496: Cambridge, Mass.: Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, 1993., 13,
497:
498: \bibitem[Kurucz \& Bell(1995)]{kurucz95} Kurucz, R., \& Bell,
499: B.\ 1995, Atomic Line Data (R.L.~Kurucz and B.~Bell) Kurucz CD-ROM
500: No.~23.~Cambridge, Mass.: Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, 1995., 23,
501:
502: \bibitem[Lawler, Bonvallet, Sneden (2001)]{lawler01a} Lawler, J.~E.,
503: Bonvallet, G., \& Sneden, C.\ 2001, \apj, 556, 452
504:
505: \bibitem[Lawler et al.(2001)]{lawler01b} Lawler, J.~E.,
506: Wickliffe, M.~E., den Hartog, E.~A., \& Sneden, C.\ 2001, \apj, 563, 1075
507:
508: \bibitem[Lawler et al.(2006)]{lawler06} Lawler, J.~E., Den
509: Hartog, E.~A., Sneden, C., \& Cowan, J.~J.\ 2006, \apjs, 162, 227
510:
511: \bibitem[McWilliam(1998)]{mcwilliam98} McWilliam, A.\ 1998, \aj,
512: 115, 1640
513:
514: %\bibitem[McWilliam et al.(1995)]{mcwilliam95} McWilliam, A.,
515: %Preston, G.~W., Sneden, C., \& Searle, L.\ 1995, \aj, 109, 2757
516:
517: \bibitem[Nilsson et al. (2002)]{nilsson02} Nilsson, H., Zhang,
518: Z.~G., Lundberg, H., Johansson, S., \& Nordstr{\"o}m, B.\ 2002, \aap, 382,
519: 368
520:
521: \bibitem[Noguchi et al. (2002)]{noguchi02} Noguchi, K., et al.\
522: 2002, \pasj, 54, 855
523:
524: \bibitem[Sadakane et al.(2004)]{sadakane04} Sadakane, K., Arimoto,
525: N., Ikuta, C., Aoki, W., Jablonka, P., \& Tajitsu, A.\ 2004, \pasj, 56,
526: 1041
527:
528: \bibitem[Shetrone et al. (2001)]{shetrone01} Shetrone, M. D., Cote, P.,
529: Sargent, W. L. W. 2001, ApJ, 548, 592
530:
531: \bibitem[Shetrone et al. (2003)]{shetrone03} Shetrone, M., Venn,
532: K.~A., Tolstoy, E., Primas, F., Hill, V., \& Kaufer, A.\ 2003, \aj, 125,
533: 684
534:
535: \bibitem[Simmerer et al.(2004)]{simmerer04} Simmerer, J., Sneden,
536: C., Cowan, J.~J., Collier, J., Woolf, V.~M., \& Lawler, J.~E.\ 2004, \apj,
537: 617, 1091
538:
539: \bibitem[Sneden et al.(2003)]{sneden03} Sneden, C., et al.\
540: 2003, \apj, 591, 936
541:
542: \bibitem[Tsujimoto \& Shigeyama (2002)]{tsujimoto02} Tsujimoto \&
543: Shigeyama 2002, \apj, 571, L93
544:
545: \bibitem[Venn et al.(2004)]{venn04} Venn, K.~A., Irwin, M.,
546: Shetrone, M.~D., Tout, C.~A., Hill, V., \& Tolstoy, E.\ 2004, \aj, 128,
547: 1177
548:
549: \bibitem[Wanajo et al.(2002)]{wanajo02} Wanajo, S., Itoh, N.,
550: Ishimaru, Y., Nozawa, S., \& Beers, T.~C.\ 2002, \apj, 577, 853
551:
552: \bibitem[Wanajo \& Ishimaru(2006)]{wanajo06} Wanajo, S., \&
553: Ishimaru, Y.\ 2006, Nuclear Physics A, 777, 676
554:
555: \bibitem[Yushchenko et al.(2005)]{yushchenko05} Yushchenko, A., et
556: al.\ 2005, \aap, 430, 255
557:
558: \end{thebibliography}
559:
560: %\clearpage
561: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
562:
563:
564: %\input{table}
565:
566:
567: %Na I & 6.17 & 3.82 & -0.93 & 2 & 0.41 & \\
568: %Mg I & 7.53 & 6.31 & 0.20 & 1 & 0.31 & \\
569: %Si I & 7.51 & 6.13 & 0.04 & 1 & 0.18 & \\
570: %Ca I & 6.31 & 4.80 & -0.09 & 22 & 0.25 & \\
571: %Sc II & 3.05 & 1.19 & -0.45 & 6 & 0.15 & \\
572: %Ti I & 4.90 & 3.15 & -0.33 & 18 & 0.38 & \\
573: %Ti II & 4.90 & 3.10 & -0.39 & 7 & 0.15 & \\
574: %V I & 4.02 & 2.21 & -0.40 & 9 & 0.32 & \\
575: %Cr I & 5.64 & 4.01 & -0.21 & 7 & 0.38 & \\
576: %Mn I & 5.39 & 3.63 & -0.34 & 9 & 0.29 & \\
577: %Co I & 4.92 & 2.98 & -0.52 & 2 & 0.29 & \\
578: %Ni I & 6.23 & 4.40 & -0.41 & 15 & 0.23 & \\
579: %Zn I & 4.60 & 2.87 & -0.31 & 1 & 0.22 & \\
580:
581: \end{document}
582:
583: