1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %
3: % HD 37366 HD 54662
4: %
5: %
6: % Revision history:
7: % Fall 2003: RV work done by Jay Dunn chris Farrington
8: % Winter 2005 RV analysis redone by Boyajian
9: % Spring 2006: First draft in progress by Boyajian/Gies
10: % June 15, 2006: Revisions by Gies
11: % November, 2006: Added results from Oct KPNO CF run
12: % February, 2007: Revisions made from Referee report and Bolton.
13: %
14: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
15: %
16: %\documentclass{aastex}
17: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}
18:
19: %Single column, submission format:
20: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
21:
22: %2 columns for drafts:
23: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
24:
25: \usepackage{epsfig}
26: \usepackage{natbib} % To format bibliographies.
27:
28: %\setlength{\bibsep}{0pt} % Necessary for bib entries to have
29: % correct line spacing.
30:
31: \citestyle{aa}
32: %\voffset 0.7truein
33: %
34: \newcommand{\myemail}{tabetha@chara.gsu.edu}
35: %
36: \shorttitle{HD~37366, HD~54662}
37: \shortauthors{Boyajian et al.}
38: %
39: %
40: %
41: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
42:
43: \begin{document}
44:
45: %%\received{}
46: %%\accepted{}
47:
48: \title{The Long Period, Massive Binaries HD 37366 and HD 54662: \\
49: Potential Targets for Long Baseline Optical
50: Interferometry\altaffilmark{1}}
51:
52: \altaffiltext{1}{Based on observations obtained
53: at the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope (CFHT) which
54: is operated by the National Research Council of Canada,
55: the Institut National des Sciences de l'Univers of the
56: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique of France,
57: and the University of Hawaii.}
58:
59:
60: \author{T. S. Boyajian\altaffilmark{2}, D. R. Gies\altaffilmark{2}, \\
61: J. P. Dunn, C. D. Farrington,
62: E. D. Grundstrom\altaffilmark{2}, W. Huang\altaffilmark{3}, \\
63: M. V. McSwain\altaffilmark{2,4,5}, S. J. Williams\altaffilmark{2}, D. W. Wingert\altaffilmark{2}}
64: \affil{Center for High Angular Resolution Astronomy and \\
65: Department of Physics and Astronomy,\\
66: Georgia State University, P. O. Box 4106, Atlanta, GA 30302-4106; \\
67: tabetha@chara.gsu.edu, gies@chara.gsu.edu,
68: dunn@chara.gsu.edu, farrington@chara.gsu.edu,
69: erika@chara.gsu.edu, wenjin@astro.caltech.edu,
70: mcswain@astro.yale.edu, swilliams@chara.gsu.edu, wingert@chara.gsu.edu}
71:
72: \altaffiltext{2}{Visiting Astronomer, Kitt Peak National Observatory,
73: National Optical Astronomy Observatory, operated by the Association
74: of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under contract with
75: the National Science Foundation.}
76: \altaffiltext{3}{Current Address: Department of Astronomy,
77: California Institute of Technology, MS 105-24, Pasadena, CA 91125}
78: \altaffiltext{4}{Current Address: Astronomy Department,
79: Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8101}
80: \altaffiltext{5}{NSF Astronomy and Astrophysics Postdoctoral Fellow}
81:
82: \author{A. W. Fullerton}
83: \affil{Space Telescope Science Institute,
84: 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218; \\
85: fullerton@stsci.edu}
86:
87: \author{C. T. Bolton}
88: \affil{David Dunlap Observatory, University of Toronto\\
89: P.O.\ Box 360, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4C 4Y6, Canada;\\
90: bolton@astro.utoronto.ca}
91:
92:
93:
94: %%\slugcomment{}
95: %%\paperid{}
96: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
97: %DEFINITIONS FOLLOW
98: %water
99: \def\hzo {H$_2$O}
100: %km/s
101: \def\kms {\ifmmode{{\rm km~s}^{-1}}\else{km~s$^{-1}$}\fi}
102: %Mdot
103: \def\Mdot {\ifmmode {\dot M} \else $\dot M$\fi}
104: %solar masses per year
105: \def\Mspy {\ifmmode {M_{\odot} {\rm yr}^{-1}} \else $M_{\odot}$~yr$^{-1}$\fi}
106: %solar mass
107: \def\Msun {$M_{\odot}$}
108: %micron
109: \def\mum {\ifmmode{\mu{\rm m}}\else{$\mu{\rm m}$}\fi}
110: %R_star
111: \def\Rstar {$R_{\star}$}
112: %
113: %definitions end
114: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
115:
116: \begin{abstract}
117:
118: We present the results from an optical spectroscopic analysis of
119: the massive stars HD~37366 and HD~54662. We find that
120: HD~37366 is a double-lined spectroscopic binary with a period of
121: $31.8187\pm0.0004$ days, and HD~54662 is also
122: a double lined binary with a much
123: longer period of $557.8\pm0.3$ days.
124: The primary of HD~37366 is classified as O9.5~V, and it
125: contributes approximately two-thirds of the optical flux.
126: The less luminous secondary is a broad-lined,
127: early B-type main-sequence star.
128: Tomographic reconstruction of the individual
129: spectra of HD~37366 reveals
130: absorption lines present in each component,
131: enabling us to constrain the nature of the secondary
132: and physical characteristics of both stars. Tomographic
133: reconstruction was not possible for HD~54662; however,
134: we do present mean spectra from our observations that
135: show that the secondary component is approximately half
136: as bright as the primary. The observed spectral energy
137: distributions (SEDs) were fit with model SEDs and galactic
138: reddening curves to determine the angular sizes of the stars.
139: By assuming radii appropriate for their classifications,
140: we determine distance ranges of 1.4 -- 1.9 and 1.2 -- 1.5 kpc
141: for HD~37366 and HD~54662, respectively.
142: \end{abstract}
143: \keywords{binaries: spectroscopic ---
144: stars: early-type ---
145: stars: individual (HD~37366, HD~54662)}
146:
147: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
148:
149: \setcounter{footnote}{5}
150:
151: \section{Introduction} % Section 1
152:
153: There remains considerable uncertainty about
154: the masses of the most massive stars because of the
155: relatively small number of known binary systems for
156: which accurate masses can be determined \citep{gie03}.
157: Spectroscopic measurements alone yield mass functions
158: dependent on the unknown orbital inclination,
159: and the determination of inclination requires either the
160: good fortune of finding eclipsing binaries or the angular
161: resolution of the orbit on the sky. The angular semimajor axis
162: of a binary (in units of milliarcsec = mas) is given by
163: \begin{equation}
164: a({\rm mas}) = 0.28 \frac{(P/(10~{\rm d}))^{2/3} (M_{\rm total}/(30 M_\odot ))^{1/3}}{ (d/(1 {\rm kpc}))}
165: \end{equation}
166: where $P$ is the orbital period, $M_{\rm total}$ is the
167: combined mass of the stars, and $d$ is the distance.
168: The denominators of each unit give typical values for these
169: parameters among OB binaries, and the leading coefficient of
170: 0.28~mas indicates that most massive systems are probably
171: too closely separated for direct resolution with optical long baseline
172: interferometers, where the limits are currently above 1~mas.
173: The key objective here is to find double-lined
174: spectroscopic binaries with long orbital periods. Such binaries
175: are difficult to detect because their orbital semiamplitudes
176: are small, the component lines are often blended, and a
177: long term observational program is required to obtain adequate
178: phase coverage. The best candidates for direct resolution are
179: 15~Mon ($P\approx 25$~y; \citealt{gie97}),
180: HD~15558 ($P=442$~d; \citealt{gar81, deb06}), and
181: HD~193322 ($P=311$~d; \citealt{mck98}).
182:
183: Here we report on new orbits for two such long period
184: massive binaries, HD~37366 and HD~54662.
185: The star HD~37366 (BD$+30^\circ 968$; HIP 26611;
186: O9.5~V, \citealt{wal73}) is a member of the Aur~OB1 association
187: at a distance of approximately 1.3~kpc \citep{hum78}.
188: This association has many bright early-type giants
189: and supergiants, but HD~37366 has the earliest spectral
190: type among the member stars that still reside on the main sequence.
191: The {\it Hipparcos} mission \citep{per97} detected a visual
192: companion to HD~37366 with $\Delta H_{p}=3.5$, a
193: separation of $0\farcs58$, and a period of
194: approximately 1300 years \citep{mas98}. The brighter
195: component of these two stars ($H_{p}=7.7$)
196: is a radial velocity variable \citep{pet61,you42},
197: and it is known to show asymmetry in its spectral
198: lines \citep*{gri92}. Observations with the
199: {\it International Ultraviolet Explorer (IUE)} confirm
200: that the spectrum displays double lines \citep{sti01}.
201:
202: The second target HD~54662 (BD$-10^\circ 1892$; HIP 34536;
203: LS 197; O6.5~V, \citealt{wal72}) is also the brightest
204: and earliest member of its resident association,
205: CMa~OB1, at a distance of 1.3 kpc \citep{hum78}.
206: Radial velocity measurements for HD~54662 extend
207: back many decades \citep*{pla24,con77a,gar80},
208: and these display only modest variability.
209: However, \citet{ful90} noted the presence of
210: blue extensions to the spectral lines that
211: probably indicate the presence of a companion
212: in a long period orbit. The scatter in the
213: {\it IUE} velocities also indicates that the
214: star is a binary \citep{sti01}.
215:
216: Here we present an analysis of the radial velocities
217: and spectra of both stars from spectroscopic observations
218: that we have obtained over the past few years (\S2).
219: We discuss each system's orbital velocity solution (\S3)
220: and the spectral and physical properties of each component
221: star in these binaries (\S4,5). We conclude with a
222: consideration of the prospects for the angular resolution of the
223: orbits using optical long baseline interferometry (\S6).
224:
225:
226: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
227:
228: \section{Observations} % Section 2
229:
230: We observed HD~37366 and HD~54662 with the
231: Kitt Peak National Observatory (KPNO)
232: 0.9~m Coud\'{e} Feed telescope during
233: two separate observing runs in 2000
234: October and 2000 December.
235: The spectra were made using the
236: long collimator, grating B (in second order with order sorting
237: filter OG 550), camera 5, and the F3KB CCD, a Ford Aerospace
238: $3072 \times 1024$ device with $15 \mu$m square pixels.
239: The setup yielded a resolving
240: power of $R=\lambda/\delta\lambda$=9500, with a spectral
241: coverage of 6440$-$7105 \AA. Exposure times were
242: usually 10 minutes or less, and we generally obtained
243: two spectra (taken a few hours apart) each
244: night. For HD~37366, we made
245: two more red spectral observations in 2004 October
246: using a similar arrangement but with a different
247: detector, the T2KB CCD ($2048 \times 2048$ $24 \mu$m square pixels).
248: In 2006 October, both HD~37366 and HD~54662
249: were observed in the red region
250: again using this same instrumental set-up.
251: We also observed the rapidly rotating A-type star,
252: $\zeta$~Aql, which we used for removal of
253: atmospheric water vapor and O$_2$ bands.
254: Each set of observations was accompanied by
255: numerous bias, flat field,
256: and Th-Ar comparison lamp calibration frames.
257:
258: We also obtained a small set of blue spectra of these targets.
259: For HD~37366, the first group of four
260: spectra were made in 2005 October with
261: the KPNO 2.1~m telescope and GoldCam spectrometer.
262: We used the $\#47$ grating in second order,
263: recording the spectral region from 4050$-$4950\AA ~with a
264: resolving power of $R=\lambda/\delta\lambda\approx 3000$.
265: Then in 2005 November and 2006 October we obtained
266: higher resolution observations in the blue with
267: the KPNO Coud\'{e} Feed 0.9~m telescope.
268: HD~37366 was observed on both occasions,
269: whereas HD~54662 was only included during the 2006 observing run.
270: We used grating A in second order
271: with order sorting filter 4-96, camera 5, and the T2KB CCD.
272: This setup gave us a resolving power of
273: $R=\lambda/\delta\lambda\approx 12100$ and a wavelength
274: coverage of 4240$-$4585\AA.
275:
276: The spectra were extracted and calibrated
277: using standard routines in IRAF\footnote{IRAF is distributed by the
278: National Optical Astronomy Observatory, which is operated by
279: the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc.,
280: under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.}.
281: All the spectra were rectified to a unit continuum by fitting
282: line-free regions. The removal of atmospheric lines
283: from the red spectra was done by
284: creating a library of $\zeta$~Aql spectra from each run, removing
285: the broad stellar features from these, and then dividing each target
286: spectrum by the modified atmospheric spectrum that most closely
287: matched the target spectrum in a selected region dominated by
288: atmospheric absorptions. The spectra from each run were then
289: transformed to a common heliocentric wavelength grid.
290:
291: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
292:
293: \section{Radial Velocities and Orbital Elements} %Section 3
294:
295: \subsection{HD~37366}
296:
297: We measured radial velocities of the
298: high resolution red spectra
299: collected in 2000 and 2006 using
300: a template-fitting scheme \citep{gie02}
301: for the \ion{He}{1}~$\lambda 6678$ line.
302: We decided not to measure the other strong lines
303: in this region because the binary components
304: are badly blended in the H$\alpha$ profile and the
305: \ion{He}{1}~$\lambda 7065$ line was marred by
306: residual features left behind by the telluric
307: cleaning procedure.
308: This radial velocity measurement scheme assigns template spectra that
309: are approximate matches for the primary
310: (hotter and more massive star) and secondary
311: spectra, and then makes a non-linear least-squares fit
312: of the shifts for each component that best match
313: the observed line profile. We need to make assumptions
314: at the outset about the temperature, gravity, projected
315: rotational velocity, and flux contribution of each star,
316: but these can be checked after completion of the
317: velocity analysis by studying the properties of
318: tomographically reconstructed spectra of the components (\S4).
319:
320: The matching template spectra for the primary and secondary
321: components were constructed from the grid of O-type star model
322: spectra from \citet{lan03} that are based upon the line blanketed,
323: non-LTE, plane-parallel, hydrostatic atmosphere code {\it TLUSTY}
324: and the radiative transfer code {\it SYNSPEC} \citep*{hub88,hub95,hub98}.
325: We selected the spectrum taken on HJD~2,451,901.92,
326: which shows well separated, individual components of
327: each star, as a reference to determine
328: the approximate spectral parameters for both stars.
329:
330: The template fitting procedure also requires
331: preliminary estimates of the primary and secondary
332: stars' radial velocities. We estimated these for each spectrum
333: with well separated lines using the IRAF {\it
334: splot} routine and deblend option
335: to fit two Gaussians to each composite profile.
336: We also measured relative radial velocity shifts
337: of the strong interstellar lines in all the spectra
338: referenced to the first spectrum in the stack. We then
339: used these relative shifts in the interstellar lines
340: (which should remain motionless) to make additional
341: small corrections for the wavelength calibrations
342: (all these corrections were $<2$ \kms).
343:
344: The final radial velocities from this template
345: fitting procedure (the majority of the observations)
346: are listed in Table~1 along with the
347: heliocentric Julian date of mid-observation,
348: the corresponding orbital phase,
349: and the residual from the orbital fit
350: (observed minus calculated) for both the primary and
351: the secondary. The typical errors in these velocities
352: are also listed in Table~1. We measure only one line for this data set,
353: so we list the characteristic
354: errors (not individual errors), which are based upon
355: the scatter in closely spaced pairs
356: of observations. These errors are 1.3 and 2.2
357: km~s$^{-1}$ for the primary and secondary, respectively.
358:
359: \placetable{tab1} % Table 1 - Radial velocities for HD 37366
360:
361: This template fitting routine was also used in
362: determining radial velocities for the high resolution
363: blue spectra (collected in 2005 November
364: and 2006 October), using
365: the four lines \ion{O}{2}~$\lambda 4349$,
366: \ion{He}{1}~$\lambda\lambda 4387, 4471$,
367: and \ion{Mg}{2}~$\lambda 4481$. We followed
368: the same procedure in obtaining the spectral templates
369: and the preliminary radial velocity
370: estimates as described above. Since no
371: strong interstellar features are apparent in this region,
372: no additional radial velocity correction was applied.
373: The line-to-line $1\sigma$ errors in
374: these $V_{R}$ measurements are $< 1$
375: \kms~for the primary, and
376: $4-9$ \kms~for the secondary (Table~1). These final $V_{R}$
377: measurements are also presented in Table~1.
378:
379: The four observations made in the blue during
380: 2005 October had a much lower resolution, thus making it
381: difficult to apply this method of template fitting.
382: To avoid possible errors from unseen line blending
383: in the two components, we chose to measure only radial
384: velocities of the \ion{He}{2}~$\lambda\lambda 4541, 4686$
385: lines present since these
386: lines are found only in the spectrum of the
387: much hotter, primary star (\S4).
388: We used a parabolic fitting routine
389: to determine the mean velocities of these lines (Table~1). The
390: line-to-line $1\sigma$ errors associated with these
391: measurements are $< 6$ \kms (Table~1).
392:
393: The two red observations made in 2004 showed no
394: indication of double-lined profiles. In this case,
395: we measured velocities only for the primary
396: star by parabolic fitting of the line cores of \ion{He}{1}
397: $\lambda\lambda 6678, 7065$, in order to minimize the
398: influence of the secondary on the line profile.
399: The line-to-line $1\sigma$ error associated
400: with these fits are $< 2$ \kms~(exclusive of blending
401: errors). These velocities are also presented in Table~1.
402:
403: The final two spectra of HD~37366 were collected and
404: downloaded from the archive of the
405: International Ultraviolet Explorer ({\it IUE})
406: satellite\footnote{http://archive.stsci.edu/iue/}.
407: We measured radial velocities for these two high dispersion,
408: short wavelength, prime camera spectra using a
409: cross-correlation method \citep{pen99} with
410: the spectrum of HD~34078
411: as the reference template. The spectrum was
412: double-lined in the first spectrum, SWP~30165.
413: The errors are approximately 5~\kms~
414: for the primary and 10~\kms~for the
415: secondary. These final
416: velocities are also presented in Table~1.
417:
418: The radial velocities from all
419: the data sets (six total)
420: span 20 years with 45 radial velocity
421: measurements for the primary and
422: 38 radial velocity measurements for the secondary (Table~1).
423: We first constructed a power spectrum using all
424: the primary star's radial velocity
425: measurements, being more reliable and plentiful,
426: to identify possible orbital periods for
427: the binary. We
428: used the discrete Fourier
429: transform and CLEAN deconvolution algorithm \citep*{rob87},
430: which shows that the strongest signal occurs near
431: $P = 31.7$ days. We then used this estimate as
432: a starting value for the period in
433: fits of the orbital elements.
434:
435: We determined the orbital elements
436: of the binary using the non-linear, least-squares,
437: orbital fitting
438: program from \citet{mor74}. We began with a
439: fit of the primary's velocities that is
440: given in column~2 of Table~2 done with equal
441: weighting except for the low resolution blue
442: spectra, which have a weight set to zero. This solution
443: has a period of $31.8187 \pm 0.0004$ days.
444: The independent orbital solution for
445: the secondary has a period of
446: $31.822 \pm 0.002$ days, given in
447: column~3 of Table~2. Since the independent solutions
448: agree well with each other, we derive a joint
449: solution by fixing the weighted means of the shared
450: orbital parameters ($P$, $T$, $e$, $\omega$) found in the
451: independent solutions for the binary
452: in order to make fits of the systemic
453: velocity, $\gamma_{1,2}$,
454: and the semiamplitude, $K_{1,2}$, for
455: each component (column~4 of Table~2).
456: In the case of massive binaries, the systemic
457: velocities of the components may not
458: agree exactly because of differences in their expanding
459: atmospheres and/or in our case, differences in the shapes of
460: the template spectra for the \ion{He}{1}~$\lambda6678$,
461: \ion{He}{2}~$\lambda6683$ blend. The radial velocity curves for the
462: joint solution are plotted together
463: with the observations in Figure~1. We also made
464: similar fits weighting each each point by the normalized,
465: inverse square of its associated error, these results
466: matched within errors of those from the equal weighting fits
467: given in Table~2.
468:
469: \placetable{tab2} % Table 2 - Orbital elements for HD 37366
470:
471: \placefigure{fig1} % Figure 1 - Radial velocity curve for HD 37366
472:
473: \subsection{HD~54662} % Section 3.2
474:
475: We obtained relative radial velocities for the
476: primary (hotter, more massive) star in HD~54662 by
477: cross-correlation with a single spectrum
478: of the star that had good S/N properties.
479: These relative velocities were
480: transformed to an absolute velocity
481: scale by adding the mean
482: velocity measured through parabolic
483: fits to the cores of the absorption
484: lines in this reference spectrum.
485: All the strong lines were included
486: in the cross-correlation measurements,
487: namely, H$\alpha$, \ion{He}{1}~
488: $\lambda6678$ $+$ \ion{He}{2}~
489: $\lambda6683$, and \ion{He}{1}~
490: $\lambda7065$. We excluded
491: \ion{He}{2}~$\lambda\lambda 6527, 6890$
492: because their measurements deviated
493: from the set listed above, as well
494: as compared to each other. We suspect that the residual
495: telluric lines in the spectra, that are very
496: prominent in these regions, are the cause of this
497: disagreement. The velocities for the primary star
498: are presented in Table~3, along with the
499: average velocity and $\sigma$ (line-to-line)
500: from the \ion{C}{4}~$\lambda\lambda5801,5812$
501: and \ion{He}{1}~$\lambda5876$
502: lines presented by \citet{ful90}.
503: We were unable to measure velocities for the
504: secondary star in individual spectra due to severe
505: line blending with profiles of the
506: primary star (see \S5).
507:
508: Published velocities for HD~54662
509: (\S1) do not show significant
510: variations. Table~3 shows that
511: our measurements change only slightly
512: over our observation period.
513: However, \citet{ful90}
514: found convincing evidence that
515: this system is a double-lined binary with
516: either a long period or high eccentricity,
517: since he observed a blue-shifted secondary component
518: (suspected ~O7 spectral type) in the profiles of
519: \ion{C}{4}~$\lambda\lambda 5801, 5812$
520: and \ion{He}{1}~$\lambda 5876$.
521:
522: Here we present a preliminary orbital
523: solution for the primary component that was determined
524: using our measurements combined with published
525: measurements \citep{pla24,gar80,ful90,sti01} for a total
526: of 67 radial velocities spanning 85 years.
527: \citet{sti01} proposed a possible
528: period of $\approx 92$~d, however, their orbit
529: was determined excluding selected data points.
530: We re-investigated the possible period by
531: power spectrum analysis of all the available data.
532: We examined all the peaks in the CLEANed
533: spectrum using the non-linear, least-squares,
534: orbital fitting routine, and among the
535: periods limited by the timescales sampled in
536: our two long runs, we find
537: that the best solution occurs at a period
538: of $\approx$558 days.
539: This confirms the suggestion from
540: \citet{ful90} that HD~54662 is in fact a
541: long period binary.
542: Table~4 lists the preliminary orbital
543: elements for HD~54662 assuming equal
544: weighting for all velocities,
545: and this solution is plotted in Figure~2. We
546: show below (\S5) that these results are
547: affected by line blending, and the derived semiamplitude,
548: for example, is a lower limit to the actual value.
549: It is also possible that the results collected in the
550: literature have systematic differences related to
551: the specific lines and measurement techniques used.
552: These systematic offsets are likely much smaller than the
553: system semi-amplitude, and since this system has such a
554: long orbital period, we include all available
555: measurements for this preliminary orbital solution.
556:
557:
558:
559: \placetable{tab4} % Table 4 - Orbital elements for HD54662
560:
561: \placefigure{fig2} % Figure 2 - Radial velocity curve for HD54662
562:
563:
564: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
565:
566: \section{Tomographic Spectral Reconstruction and Stellar Parameters for HD~37366} % Section 4
567:
568: We used a Doppler tomography algorithm
569: \citep{bag94} to separate the primary and
570: secondary spectra of HD~37366. We applied
571: tomographic reconstruction to the red spectra
572: collected in 2000 (30 total) and to the high
573: dispersion blue spectra collected in 2005
574: and 2006 (five total). Figure~3 shows the
575: reconstructed red spectra for the
576: primary ({\it top}) and the
577: secondary ({\it bottom}). The region affected by
578: the atmospheric band from $\approx 6850-7000$
579: \AA~ was set to unity. The secondary
580: spectrum shows the weak lines of
581: \ion{O}{2} $\lambda\lambda 6641, 6721$, and
582: \ion{C}{2} $\lambda\lambda 6578, 6582$. These
583: lines are absent in the primary
584: spectrum that shows instead features
585: such as \ion{He}{2} $\lambda 6683$ that
586: are found in O-type spectra. To determine
587: a monochromatic flux ratio, $F_{2}/F_{1}$, we used the
588: equivalent width of \ion{He}{1} $\lambda 6678$,
589: since it does not change significantly
590: with spectral type for late O- to
591: early B- stars \citep{con74}.
592: These equivalent widths
593: in the primary and secondary
594: reconstructed spectra are equal
595: for a flux ratio of $F_{2}/F_{1} = 0.35 \pm 0.05$.
596:
597: \placefigure{fig3} % Figure 3 - TR mean spec of HD37366 in red
598:
599: We fit these reconstructed spectra with
600: the TLUSTY/SYNSPEC model synthetic spectra (see \S3) to
601: estimate the projected rotational velocity
602: $V \sin i$, effective temperature
603: $T_{\rm eff}$, and gravity $\log g$.
604: These values are listed for both
605: components of HD~37366 in Table~5 (where
606: subscript 1 identifies the primary and 2
607: the secondary). For stars like these, the
608: disappearance of the \ion{C}{2} and \ion{O}{2}
609: lines and the emergence of the \ion{He}{2}
610: and \ion{Si}{4} lines with increasing
611: temperature provide a useful temperature
612: estimate, while the width of the H$\alpha$ wings
613: is sensitive to the adopted gravity.
614: $V \sin i$ was measured using
615: a rotational broadening function applied to
616: the model spectra to fit the two
617: \ion{He}{1} absorption lines. The red
618: spectra were first used in the determination of
619: these parameters, and the results were
620: later checked with the reconstructed blue
621: spectra, which include H$\gamma$ as well other
622: lines from heavier elements.
623: The small $V \sin i$ estimate we derive for the primary
624: agrees with the {\it IUE} measurements from
625: \citet{how97} and \citet{sti01} and is much smaller
626: than the value for the broader-lined secondary.
627: The primary's temperature is somewhat larger than
628: the $T_{\rm eff}=29.0 \pm 1.8$~kK
629: estimate by \citet{gri92} but the gravities
630: agree exactly. Our results for $T_{\rm eff}$
631: and $\log g$ using the TLUSTY code
632: are expected to be more reliable than the
633: previous models used in \citet{gri92}, which
634: used the PAM code \citep{and85} that only includes
635: nine elements and many fewer metal
636: lines than does TLUSTY.
637:
638: The reconstructions from the five
639: high-resolution blue spectra
640: are presented in Figure~4 along with
641: identifications of absorption lines.
642: The secondary spectrum ({\it bottom}) has lower S/N,
643: but even with only five spectra the tomography
644: algorithm was able extract its spectrum.
645: It is again apparent that the lines of the secondary
646: are much broader than those of the
647: primary. Notice also the absence
648: of the \ion{He}{2}~
649: $\lambda 4541$ line in the secondary's spectrum,
650: reinforcing our conclusion that the secondary
651: is the cooler of the two stars. Based upon
652: the secondary's cooler temperature and high surface
653: gravity, we estimate that it is a B0$-$1~V star.
654: Note that the magnitude difference we derive is
655: larger than expected for main
656: sequence stars separated by only a
657: subtype or so \citep*{mar05}, so it is possible
658: that the primary is a somewhat evolved,
659: more luminous star and/or the companion is a
660: very young star close to the ZAMS.
661: It is interesting to note that
662: the high $M_1 \sin^3 i$ and
663: $M_2 \sin^3 i$ values from the orbital solution
664: suggest that the inclination
665: is large, $i = 60-90\degr$. However, {\it Hipparcos}
666: photometry plotted with the period from our
667: spectroscopic orbital solution shows no
668: evidence of eclipses.
669:
670: \placefigure{fig4} % Figure 4 - TR mean spec of HD37366 in the blue
671:
672: \placetable{tab5} % Table 5 - Stellar parameters of HD 37366
673:
674:
675: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
676:
677: \section{Stellar Parameters for HD~54662 from Composite Profile Fits} % Section 5
678:
679: Radial velocities measured for HD~54662 were
680: used to create mean spectra for our observations
681: made in 2000 (Fig.~5) and for those
682: made by \citet{ful90} in 1986.
683: Figure~6 shows an expanded view
684: of the regions surrounding the \ion{He}{1}
685: profiles for two epochs of observation. We see that
686: the secondary component appeared blue-shifted
687: during the 1986 run ({\it left panel}) and
688: red-shifted in recent spectra ({\it right panel}).
689:
690: \placefigure{fig5} % Figure 5 - Mean spectrum of HD 54662
691:
692: \placefigure{fig6} % Figure 6 - Composite profiles of HD 54662 for both He lines, modshift1.pro written 9-21-06
693:
694: We made preliminary two component fits of the
695: blended \ion{He}{1} lines ($\lambda 5876$ for the
696: spectra obtained by \citealt{ful90} and
697: $\lambda 7065$ for this work) using
698: TLUSTY/SYNSPEC models. We used the temperature and
699: gravity calibrations of
700: \citet{mar05} to select parameters for the composite
701: model profiles to
702: fit our observations. Our model spectra for the primary star
703: are based upon an assumed type of O6.5~V \citep{wal72}.
704: We constructed model spectra for the secondary
705: for spectral subtypes of O7~V -- O9.5~V.
706: Next, we compared our
707: observed mean line profiles to
708: these models applying the appropriate
709: flux ratio (from $\Delta M_{V}$
710: in \citealt{mar05}) for each
711: spectral component in the shifted, combined line profiles.
712: In each trial for a given secondary spectral type, the
713: only variables were the component radial velocities
714: and the secondary's projected rotational velocity
715: $V_2 \sin i$ (we assumed
716: $V_1 \sin i = 70$~\kms;~\citealt{con77}).
717: Our best match for the
718: secondary was made with an O9~V
719: subtype and $V_2 \sin i = 110 \pm 10$ \kms,
720: which yields a flux ratio of $F_{2}/F_{1} =
721: 0.51$. Our fits of \ion{He}{1} $\lambda7065$
722: required us to make small and equal adjustments to the model
723: line depths. The resulting fits are shown in
724: Figure~6. We caution that an uncertainty in
725: $V_2 \sin i$ has a large effect upon the best
726: fit line shifts and flux ratio results.
727:
728: The wavelength shifts made to fit these
729: composite line profiles
730: provide us with average velocities for the
731: primary and secondary components for each observing run.
732: Assuming that the true anomaly $\nu$ and the longitude
733: of periastron $\omega$ are known from the preliminary
734: orbital fit (Table~4), we may estimate
735: the systematic velocity $\gamma$ and
736: semiamplitude $K$ by making a least-squares, linear fit
737: of these three velocities using
738: \begin{equation}
739: V_{r}= \gamma_{1,2} \pm K_{1,2} [\cos(\nu+\omega)+e \cos\omega].
740: \end{equation}
741: This solution gives semiamplitudes of $K_{1} = 29\pm4$~\kms~and
742: $K_{2} = 75\pm7$~\kms~and systemic velocities of
743: $\gamma_{1} = 45\pm3$~\kms~and $\gamma_{2} = 40\pm6$~\kms.
744: This estimate of the
745: secondary radial velocity curve also allows us to
746: compute the component minimum masses of the system,
747: $M_1\sin ^{3}i\approx 41.5 \pm 7.6$~$M_\odot$ and
748: $M_2\sin ^{3}i\approx 16.0 \pm 3.4$~$M_\odot$.
749: The radial velocity curves
750: for these solutions for the primary
751: ({\it dashed line}) and secondary
752: ({\it dot-dashed line}) are also
753: plotted in Figure~2, along with the
754: time-averaged radial velocities from the
755: two-component fits. This analysis of the line blending
756: problem clearly illustrates how the presence of the
757: blended secondary spectrum skews the velocity
758: measurements for the primary (Table~3) towards
759: the system's center of mass, resulting in a
760: semiamplitude (Table~4) that is approximately a factor
761: of two smaller than the actual value.
762:
763:
764: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
765:
766: \section{Discussion} % Section 6
767:
768: One of the motivations for this study
769: was to find long period binaries that
770: may be resolved by optical
771: long baseline interferometry. The CHARA Array,
772: for example, can resolve binaries with
773: angular separations as small as 1 mas
774: \citep{ten05}. To determine the
775: angular separation of the binaries
776: components, we re-estimated their distances by
777: fitting their observed
778: spectral energy distribution (SED) with
779: a model SED to find the angular stellar
780: diameters that we then compared with stellar
781: radii estimates for their spectral classifications.
782: For each binary, the
783: model temperatures, gravities, and flux ratios were
784: applied to create a combined model flux distribution over
785: a range of $1200-30000$ \AA. The galactic
786: extinction curve from \citet{fit99} was then
787: applied to the model SED to fit the observed
788: photometry for each target. The
789: observed SED includes ultraviolet fluxes
790: ({\it IUE}; TD-1, \citealt{tho78})
791: and $UBV$ \citep*{nek80},
792: $uvby$ \citep{hau98},
793: and {\it 2MASS} $JHK$ infrared magnitudes \citep{skr06,cut03},
794: all of which were transformed into calibrated flux
795: measurements \citep*{col96,gra98,coh03}.
796: The best fit parameters for reddening
797: $E(B-V)$, ratio of total-to-selective
798: extinction $R$, and the limb darkened angular
799: diameter for the primary $\theta_{LD}$ (from
800: the flux normalization) are listed in Table~6.
801: Figures 7 and 8 show the SED plots of these best
802: fits for HD~37366 and HD~54662, respectively.
803:
804: \placetable{tab6} % Table 6 - SED parameters
805: \placefigure{fig7} % Figure 7 - SED plot for HD37366
806: \placefigure{fig8} % Figure 8 - SED plot for HD54662
807:
808:
809: We then compared the expected theoretical
810: radii for the primary stars,
811: based upon their spectral classifications
812: as main sequence stars \citep{mar05}, with the angular
813: sizes to obtain distances of 1.38 and 1.23~kpc
814: for HD~37366 and HD~54662, respectively (Table~6).
815: These estimates are consistent with the accepted
816: distances to their home associations \citep{hum78}.
817: The distance ranges given in Table~6 reflect
818: the change in stellar radius between ZAMS
819: luminosity class V and giant
820: luminosity class III. The mid-point increase in
821: size is $\triangle R \approx 3 R_\odot$ for our stars,
822: and we adopted this difference to estimate the
823: associated range in distance. Errors will also
824: result from the spread in radius for each
825: spectral sub-type bin, but this is
826: quite small ($\pm 0.4 R_\odot$) compared to
827: the luminosity range. The error in
828: $\theta_{LD}$ from the SED fit contributes
829: only $\approx 1\%$ in the distance error budget.
830:
831: The binary semimajor axis $a$
832: was found using Kepler's Third Law,
833: the derived orbital period, and the stellar
834: mass calibrations from \citet{mar05}
835: (for O stars) and \citet{har88} (for B stars).
836: The results for the maximum angular separation
837: $\rho_{\rm max}$ for the projected
838: elliptical orbit are also presented in Table~6
839: where we give the range in $\rho_{\rm max}$
840: associated with the range in distance.
841: These separations are too small for
842: speckle resolution ($\rho > 0\farcs035$ for
843: $\triangle m <3.0$), but they are close to
844: or above the limits of
845: long baseline interferometry. The HD~54662
846: binary system in particular may prove to be
847: important target for mass determination
848: by interferometry.
849:
850:
851: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
852:
853: \acknowledgments
854:
855: We thank Daryl Willmarth, Paul Rybski, Eric Phillips,
856: Travis Fischer, and the KPNO staff for their assistance
857: in making these observations possible.
858: This material is based on work supported by the
859: National Science Foundation under Grants
860: AST-0506573 and AST-0606861.
861: Bolton's research is partially supported by
862: a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research
863: Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant.
864: Fullerton held an NSERC Post-graduate Scholarship
865: during the course of this work.
866: Some of the data presented in this paper were
867: obtained from the Multimission Archive at the
868: Space Telescope Science Institute (MAST).
869: STScI is operated by the Association of
870: Universities for Research in Astronomy,
871: Inc., under NASA contract NAS5-26555.
872: Support for MAST for non-HST data is provided
873: by the NASA Office of Space Science via grant
874: NAG5-7584 and by other grants and contracts.
875: This publication makes use of data products
876: from the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is
877: a joint project of the University of Massachusetts
878: and the Infrared Processing and Analysis
879: Center/California Institute of Technology,
880: funded by the National Aeronautics and Space
881: Administration and the National Science Foundation.
882:
883:
884: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
885:
886: % The bibliography starts here.
887:
888: \bibliographystyle{apj} % Please learn to use the
889: % formatting of Latex's Bibtex. It
890: % will make your life easier.
891: % apj.bst should be in this directory as well as apj-jour.bib and reference paper.bib
892: \bibliography{apj-jour,paper} % "paper.bib" contains all my
893: % references. "apj-jour.bib"
894: % contains abbreviations of
895: % journals.
896:
897:
898: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
899: % Tables
900:
901: \newpage
902: % Table 1
903: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccccc}
904: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
905: \tablewidth{0pt}
906: \tablenum{1}
907: \tablecaption{HD~37366 Radial Velocity Measurements\label{tab1}}
908: \tablehead{
909: \colhead{HJD} &
910: \colhead{Telescope/} &
911: \colhead{Orbital} &
912: \colhead{$V_1$} &
913: \colhead{$\sigma_{1}$} &
914: \colhead{$(O-C)_1$} &
915: \colhead{$V_2$} &
916: \colhead{$\sigma_{2}$} &
917: \colhead{$(O-C)_2$} \\
918: \colhead{($-$2,400,000)} &
919: \colhead{Band} &
920: \colhead{Phase} &
921: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} &
922: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} &
923: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} &
924: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} &
925: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} &
926: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} }
927: \startdata
928: 46821.612 & IUE/UV & 0.303 &
929: \phn\phs $ 76.9$ & 5.0 &\phn\phs $ 0.7$ & \phn $ -57.3$ & 10.0 & \phn\phs $ 4.3$\\
930: 46866.116 & IUE/UV & 0.702 &
931: \phn\phs $ 13.2$ & 5.0 &\phn $ -0.5$ & \phn \nodata & \nodata & \phs \nodata\\
932: 51817.934 & CF/Red & 0.327 &
933: \phn\phs $ 75.9$ & 1.3 &\phn $ -1.3$ & \phn $ -64.5$ & \phn 2.2 &\phn $ -1.5$ \\
934: 51818.938 & CF/Red & 0.358 &
935: \phn\phs $ 76.2$ & 1.3 &\phn $ -1.0$ & \phn $ -67.1$ &\phn2.2 &\phn $ -4.1$ \\
936: 51819.929 & CF/Red & 0.389 &
937: \phn\phs $ 75.5$ & 1.3 &\phn $ -0.6$ & \phn $ -53.2$ &\phn2.2 &\phn\phs $ 8.3$ \\
938: 51820.922 & CF/Red & 0.420 &
939: \phn\phs $ 74.7$ & 1.3 &\phn\phs $ 0.8$ & \phn $ -63.8$ &\phn2.2 &\phn $ -5.2$ \\
940: 51821.918 & CF/Red & 0.452 &
941: \phn\phs $ 71.2$ & 1.3 &\phn\phs $ 0.4$ & \phn $ -51.9$ &\phn2.2 &\phn\phs $ 2.5$ \\
942: 51822.918 & CF/Red & 0.483 &
943: \phn\phs $ 64.1$ & 1.3 &\phn $ -2.7$ & \phn $ -49.4$ &\phn2.2 &\phn $ -0.3$ \\
944: 51823.853 & CF/Red & 0.513 &
945: \phn\phs $ 62.2$ & 1.3 &\phn $ -0.1$ & \phn $ -38.1$ &\phn2.2 &\phn\phs $ 4.9$ \\
946: 51823.980 & CF/Red & 0.517 &
947: \phn\phs $ 60.1$ & 1.3 &\phn $ -1.5$ & \phn $ -41.7$ &\phn2.2 &\phn\phs $ 0.4$ \\
948: 51824.881 & CF/Red & 0.545 &
949: \phn\phs $ 55.8$ & 1.3 &\phn $ -0.7$ & \phn $ -38.8$ &\phn2.2 &\phn $ -3.6$ \\
950: 51824.997 & CF/Red & 0.549 &
951: \phn\phs $ 57.1$ & 1.3 &\phn\phs $ 1.3$ & \phn $ -36.9$ &\phn2.2 &\phn $ -2.6$ \\
952: 51830.904 & CF/Red & 0.734 &
953: \phn\phn\phs $ 0.2$ & 1.3 &\phn $ -1.1$ & \phn\phs$ 45.9$ &\phn2.2 &\phn\phs $ 7.4$ \\
954: 51889.881 & CF/Red & 0.588 &
955: \phn\phs $ 47.9$ & 1.3 &\phn\phs $ 0.5$ & \phn $ -26.0$ &\phn2.2 &\phn $ -3.0$ \\
956: 51890.819 & CF/Red & 0.617 &
957: \phn\phs $ 42.0$ & 1.3 &\phn\phs $ 2.0$ & \phn $ -20.9$ &\phn2.2 &\phn $ -7.6$ \\
958: 51892.787 & CF/Red & 0.679 &
959: \phn\phs $ 20.9$ & 1.3 &\phn $ -0.8$ & \phn\phs$ 17.9$ &\phn2.2 &\phn\phs $ 6.7$ \\
960: 51893.855 & CF/Red & 0.713 &
961: \phn\phn\phs $ 9.6$ & 1.3 &\phn $ -0.2$ & \phn\phs$ 26.5$ &\phn2.2 &\phn $ -0.7$ \\
962: 51894.780 & CF/Red & 0.742 &
963: \phn\phn $ -1.6$ & 1.3 &\phn\phs $ 0.3$ & \phn\phs$ 53.6$ &\phn2.2 &\phs $ 10.9$ \\
964: 51894.856 & CF/Red & 0.744 &
965: \phn\phn $ -3.3$ & 1.3 &\phn $ -0.5$ & \phn\phs$ 47.2$ &\phn2.2 &\phn\phs $ 3.2$ \\
966: 51895.874 & CF/Red & 0.776 &
967: \phn $ -19.6$ & 1.3 &\phn $ -2.4$ & \phn\phs$ 58.7$ &\phn2.2 &\phn $ -4.5$ \\
968: 51896.802 & CF/Red & 0.805 &
969: \phn $ -32.7$ & 1.3 &\phn $ -1.0$ & \phn\phs$ 78.4$ &\phn2.2 &\phn $ -4.2$ \\
970: 51896.914 & CF/Red & 0.809 &
971: \phn $ -34.6$ & 1.3 &\phn $ -1.0$ & \phn\phs$ 78.8$ &\phn2.2 &\phn $ -6.1$ \\
972: 51897.802 & CF/Red & 0.837 &
973: \phn $ -46.9$ & 1.3 &\phn\phs $ 1.7$ & \phs $ 100.7$ &\phn2.2 &\phn $ -4.4$ \\
974: 51897.910 & CF/Red & 0.840 &
975: \phn $ -51.4$ & 1.3 &\phn $ -0.8$ & \phn\phs$ 96.0$ &\phn2.2 & $ -11.6$ \\
976: 51898.811 & CF/Red & 0.868 &
977: \phn $ -66.2$ & 1.3 &\phn\phs $ 0.3$ & \phs $ 128.1$ &\phn2.2 &\phn $ -0.8$ \\
978: 51898.922 & CF/Red & 0.872 &
979: \phn $ -68.7$ & 1.3 &\phn $ -0.2$ & \phs $ 133.2$ &\phn2.2 &\phn\phs $ 1.6$ \\
980: 51899.809 & CF/Red & 0.900 &
981: \phn $ -83.5$ & 1.3 &\phn $ -0.1$ & \phs $ 153.0$ &\phn2.2 &\phn\phs $ 1.7$ \\
982: 51899.915 & CF/Red & 0.903 &
983: \phn $ -84.4$ & 1.3 &\phn\phs $ 0.5$ & \phs $ 154.2$ &\phn2.2 &\phn\phs $ 0.7$ \\
984: 51900.802 & CF/Red & 0.931 &
985: \phn $ -95.5$ & 1.3 &\phn\phs $ 0.6$ & \phs $ 171.8$ &\phn2.2 &\phn\phs $ 3.5$ \\
986: 51900.908 & CF/Red & 0.934 &
987: \phn $ -96.3$ & 1.3 &\phn\phs $ 0.7$ & \phs $ 172.6$ &\phn2.2 &\phn\phs $ 3.1$ \\
988: 51901.788 & CF/Red & 0.962 &
989: \phn $ -99.8$ & 1.3 &\phn\phs $ 0.3$ & \phs $ 173.7$ &\phn2.2 &\phn\phs $ 0.2$ \\
990: 51901.917 & CF/Red & 0.966 &
991: $-100.5$ & 1.3 &\phn $ -0.7$ & \phs $ 177.2$ &\phn2.2 &\phn\phs $ 4.1$ \\
992: 53291.928 & CF/Red & 0.651 &
993: \phn\phs $ 30.8$ & 2.6 & \phn\phs $ 0.2$ & \phn \nodata & \phn\nodata & \phs \nodata \\
994: 53292.984 & CF/Red & 0.684 &
995: \phn\phs $ 20.6$ & 0.4 & \phn\phs $ 0.6$ & \phn \nodata & \phn\nodata & \phs \nodata \\
996: 53658.997\tablenotemark{a} & 2.1m/Blue & 0.187 &
997: \phn\phs $ 52.6$ & 6.7 & \phn $ -0.8$ & \phn \nodata & \phn\nodata & \phs \nodata \\
998: 53659.000\tablenotemark{a} & 2.1m/Blue & 0.187 &
999: \phn\phs $ 51.5$ & 1.4 & \phn $ -2.0$ & \phn \nodata & \phn\nodata & \phs \nodata \\
1000: 53663.010\tablenotemark{a} & 2.1m/Blue & 0.313 &
1001: \phn\phs $ 71.6$ & 0.4 & \phn $ -5.0$ & \phn \nodata & \phn\nodata & \phs \nodata \\
1002: 53663.989\tablenotemark{a} & 2.1m/Blue & 0.344 &
1003: \phn\phs $ 89.0$ & 4.2 & \phs $ 11.7$ & \phn \nodata & \phn\nodata & \phs \nodata \\
1004: 53684.903 & CF/Blue & 0.001 &
1005: \phn $ -85.7$ & 1.3 &\phn\phs $ 0.8$ & \phs $ 155.4$ & \phn4.2 &\phn\phs $ 0.1$ \\
1006: 53686.902 & CF/Blue & 0.064 &
1007: \phn $ -30.1$ & 0.7 &\phn\phs $ 0.9$ & \phn\phs $ 76.3$ & \phn9.8 &\phn $ -4.9$ \\
1008: 53688.846 & CF/Blue & 0.125 &
1009: \phn\phs $ 21.9$ & 0.9 &\phn\phs $ 0.9$ & \phn\phs $ 13.1$ & \phn5.2 &\phn\phs $ 1.3$ \\
1010: 54020.972 & CF/Red & 0.564 &
1011: \phn\phs $ 51.2$ & 1.8 & \phn $ -1.1$ & \phn $ -25.8$ & \phn2.2 & \phn\phs $ 4.1$ \\
1012: 54024.926 & CF/Red & 0.688 &
1013: \phn\phs $ 17.4$ & 2.8 & \phn $ -1.0$ & \phn\phs $ 13.9$ & \phn3.4 &\phn $ -1.1$ \\
1014: 54030.021 & CF/Blue & 0.848 &
1015: \phn $ -56.0$ & 2.0 & \phn $ -0.8$ & \phs $ 103.2$ & \phn2.4 & \phn $ -9.3$\\
1016: 54031.999 & CF/Blue & 0.911 &
1017: \phn $ -90.1$ & 2.9 & \phn $ -1.7$ & \phs $ 144.4$ & \phn3.5 & $ -12.0$ \\
1018: \enddata
1019: %\caption{Radial velocities and observations for HD37366. All measurements were made
1020: %at the KPNO Coud\'{e} Feed telescope during October and December of 2000, unless
1021: %otherwise indicated.}
1022: \tablenotetext{a}{zero weight}
1023: %\tablenotetext{a}{{\it IUE}, 1987}
1024: %\tablenotetext{b}{KPNO Coud\'{e} Feed, 2004}
1025: %\tablenotetext{c}{KPNO 2.1m, 2005}
1026: %\tablenotetext{d}{KPNO Coud\'{e} Feed, 2005}
1027: %\tablenotetext{e}{KPNO Coud\'{e} Feed, 2006}
1028: \end{deluxetable}
1029: \newpage
1030:
1031:
1032: %Table 2
1033: \begin{deluxetable}{lccc}
1034: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1035: \tablewidth{0pc}
1036: \tablenum{2}
1037: \tablecaption{Orbital Elements for HD 37366\label{tab2}}
1038: \tablehead{
1039: \colhead{Element} &
1040: \colhead{Primary} &
1041: \colhead{Secondary} &
1042: \colhead{Joint Solution} }
1043: \startdata
1044: $P$~(days) \dotfill & $31.8187 \pm 0.0004$\phn & $31.822 \pm 0.002$\phn & $31.8188$\tablenotemark{a} \\
1045: $T_1$ (HJD--2,400,000) \dotfill & $53653.013\pm0.04$\phn\phn\phn\phn\phn & \nodata & $53653.02$\tablenotemark{a} \\
1046: $T_2$ (HJD--2,400,000) \dotfill & \nodata & $53653.15 \pm0.19$\phn\phn\phn\phn & $53653.02$\tablenotemark{a} \\
1047: $e_1$ \dotfill & $0.329\pm0.003$ & \nodata & $0.330$\tablenotemark{a} \\
1048: $e_2$ \dotfill & \nodata & \phn$0.35 \pm0.012$ & $0.330$\tablenotemark{a} \\
1049: $\omega_1$ (deg) \dotfill & $211.4 \pm0.6$\phn\phn & \nodata & $211.6$\tablenotemark{a} \\
1050: $\omega_2$ (deg) \dotfill & \nodata & $212 \pm2$\phn & $211.6$\tablenotemark{a}\\
1051: $K_1$ (km s$^{-1}$) \dotfill & $88.6 \pm0.3$\phn & \nodata & $88.7 \pm0.2$\phn \\
1052: $K_2$ (km s$^{-1}$) \dotfill & \nodata & $118.4 \pm1.6$\phn\phn & $117.4\pm1.2$\phn\phn \\
1053: $\gamma_1$ (km s$^{-1}$) \dotfill & $13.3 \pm0.2$\phn & \nodata & $13.3\pm0.2$\phn \\
1054: $\gamma_2$ (km s$^{-1}$) \dotfill & \nodata & $20.6 \pm1.3$\phn & $21.6\pm0.9$\phn \\
1055: $M_1\sin ^{3}i$ ($M_\odot$)\dotfill & $13.8 \pm 0.3$\phn & \nodata & $13.9 \pm0.3$\phn \\
1056: $M_2\sin ^{3}i$ ($M_\odot$)\dotfill & \nodata & $10.5 \pm0.1$ & $10.42 \pm0.08$\phn \\
1057: $a_1 \sin i$ ($R_\odot$) \dotfill & $52.6 \pm0.2$\phn & \nodata & $ 52.62\pm0.13$\phn \\
1058: $a_2 \sin i$ ($R_\odot$) \dotfill & \nodata & $69.7 \pm1.0$\phn & $69.7 \pm0.7$\phn \\
1059: $\sigma_1$ (km s$^{-1}$) \dotfill & \phn$1.1$ & \nodata & \phn $1.0$ \\
1060: $\sigma_2$ (km s$^{-1}$) \dotfill & \nodata & \phn$5.3$ & \phn$5.4$ \\
1061: \enddata
1062: \tablenotetext{a}{Fixed.}
1063: \end{deluxetable}
1064:
1065: \newpage
1066:
1067: % Table 3
1068: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccc}
1069: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1070: \tablewidth{0pt}
1071: \tablenum{3}
1072: \tablecaption{HD~54662 Primary Radial Velocity Measurements\label{tab3}}
1073: \tablehead{
1074: \colhead{HJD} &
1075: \colhead{Telescope/} &
1076: \colhead{Orbital} &
1077: \colhead{$V_{r}$} &
1078: \colhead{$\sigma$(line$-$line)} &
1079: \colhead{$O-C$} \\
1080: \colhead{($-$2,400,000)}&
1081: \colhead{Band} &
1082: \colhead{Phase} &
1083: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} &
1084: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} &
1085: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} }
1086: \startdata
1087: 46426.830 & CFHT/Yellow & 0.191 &
1088: \phn\phs $ 62.2$ & 2.0 & \phn $ -0.3$ \\
1089: 46426.904 & CFHT/Yellow & 0.191 &
1090: \phn\phs $ 61.3$ & 1.6 & \phn $ -1.1$ \\
1091: 46426.980 & CFHT/Yellow & 0.191 &
1092: \phn\phs $ 61.8$ & 1.6 & \phn $ -0.6$ \\
1093: 46427.802 & CFHT/Yellow & 0.192 &
1094: \phn\phs $ 61.3$ & 1.7 & \phn $ -1.2$ \\
1095: 46427.869 & CFHT/Yellow & 0.192 &
1096: \phn\phs $ 61.6$ & 2.2 & \phn $ -0.9$ \\
1097: 46427.925 & CFHT/Yellow & 0.193 &
1098: \phn\phs $ 61.1$ & 2.0 & \phn $ -1.4$ \\
1099: 46427.973 & CFHT/Yellow & 0.193 &
1100: \phn\phs $ 61.5$ & 1.6 & \phn $ -1.0$ \\
1101: 46428.036 & CFHT/Yellow & 0.193 &
1102: \phn\phs $ 61.6$ & 1.4 & \phn $ -0.9$ \\
1103: 46428.132 & CFHT/Yellow & 0.193 &
1104: \phn\phs $ 62.0$ & 2.1 & \phn $ -0.5$ \\
1105: 46428.805 & CFHT/Yellow & 0.194 &
1106: \phn\phs $ 62.2$ & 2.0 & \phn $ -0.3$ \\
1107: 46429.021 & CFHT/Yellow & 0.194 &
1108: \phn\phs $ 61.4$ & 1.9 & \phn $ -1.2$ \\
1109: 46429.814 & CFHT/Yellow & 0.196 &
1110: \phn\phs $ 61.8$ & 1.7 & \phn $ -0.8$ \\
1111: 46429.883 & CFHT/Yellow & 0.196 &
1112: \phn\phs $ 61.5$ & 2.1 & \phn $ -1.1$ \\
1113: 46432.853 & CFHT/Yellow & 0.201 &
1114: \phn\phs $ 61.4$ & 2.1 & \phn $ -1.3$ \\
1115: 46432.897 & CFHT/Yellow & 0.201 &
1116: \phn\phs $ 60.9$ & 1.4 & \phn $ -1.8$ \\
1117: 46432.999 & CFHT/Yellow & 0.202 &
1118: \phn\phs $ 62.2$ & 2.0 & \phn $ -0.5$ \\
1119: 46433.093 & CFHT/Yellow & 0.202 &
1120: \phn\phs $ 61.2$ & 1.5 & \phn $ -1.6$ \\
1121: 51817.967 & CF/Red & 0.855 &
1122: \phn\phs $ 33.2$ & 0.6 & \phn\phs $ 0.0$ \\
1123: 51818.962 & CF/Red & 0.857 &
1124: \phn\phs $ 33.5$ & 2.5 & \phn\phs $ 0.4$ \\
1125: 51819.962 & CF/Red & 0.859 &
1126: \phn\phs $ 33.7$ & 1.1 &\phn\phs $ 0.7$ \\
1127: 51820.990 & CF/Red & 0.860 &
1128: \phn\phs $ 33.0$ & 2.1 & \phn\phs $ 0.1$ \\
1129: 51821.968 & CF/Red & 0.862 &
1130: \phn\phs $ 33.0$ & 0.9 & \phn\phs $ 0.2$ \\
1131: 51822.941 & CF/Red & 0.864 &
1132: \phn\phs $ 34.6$ & 3.7 & \phn\phs $ 1.9$ \\
1133: 51823.957 & CF/Red & 0.866 &
1134: \phn\phs $ 34.5$ & 3.4 & \phn\phs $ 1.8$ \\
1135: 51824.903 & CF/Red & 0.867 &
1136: \phn\phs $ 35.2$ & 1.2 & \phn\phs $ 2.6$ \\
1137: 51889.990 & CF/Red & 0.984 &
1138: \phn\phs $ 37.5$ & 2.6 & \phn\phs $ 0.7$ \\
1139: 51890.923 & CF/Red & 0.986 &
1140: \phn\phs $ 37.1$ & 1.2 & \phn\phs $ 0.0$ \\
1141: 51892.899 & CF/Red & 0.989 &
1142: \phn\phs $ 35.0$ & 2.0 & \phn $ -2.6$ \\
1143: 51893.926 & CF/Red & 0.991 &
1144: \phn\phs $ 37.5$ & 1.9 & \phn $ -0.3$ \\
1145: 51894.882 & CF/Red & 0.993 &
1146: \phn\phs $ 37.5$ & 1.5 & \phn $ -0.6$ \\
1147: 51894.956 & CF/Red & 0.993 &
1148: \phn\phs $ 39.0$ & 2.3 & \phn\phs $ 0.9$ \\
1149: 51895.934 & CF/Red & 0.995 &
1150: \phn\phs $ 37.6$ & 1.3 & \phn $ -0.8$ \\
1151: 51896.033 & CF/Red & 0.995 &
1152: \phn\phs $ 39.0$ & 1.6 & \phn\phs $ 0.6$ \\
1153: 51896.881 & CF/Red & 0.996 &
1154: \phn\phs $ 39.4$ & 0.6 & \phn\phs $ 0.8$ \\
1155: 51896.952 & CF/Red & 0.997 &
1156: \phn\phs $ 37.0$ & 1.6 &\phn $ -1.7$ \\
1157: 51897.879 & CF/Red & 0.998 &
1158: \phn\phs $ 37.9$ & 1.7 & \phn $ -1.0$ \\
1159: 51897.943 & CF/Red & 0.998 &
1160: \phn\phs $ 37.1$ & 1.6 & \phn $ -1.8$ \\
1161: 51898.891 & CF/Red & 0.000 &
1162: \phn\phs $ 39.1$ & 2.5 & \phn $ -0.1$ \\
1163: 51898.953 & CF/Red & 0.000 &
1164: \phn\phs $ 38.3$ & 2.0 & \phn $ -0.9$ \\
1165: 51899.885 & CF/Red & 0.002 &
1166: \phn\phs $ 37.4$ & 0.8 & \phn $ -2.1$ \\
1167: 51899.947 & CF/Red & 0.002 &
1168: \phn\phs $ 38.3$ & 0.5 & \phn $ -1.2$ \\
1169: 51900.878 & CF/Red & 0.004 &
1170: \phn\phs $ 39.0$ & 2.9 & \phn $ -0.8$ \\
1171: 51900.940 & CF/Red & 0.004 &
1172: \phn\phs $ 38.7$ & 3.1 & \phn $ -1.1$ \\
1173: 51901.885 & CF/Red & 0.005 &
1174: \phn\phs $ 39.5$ & 2.9 & \phn $ -0.6$ \\
1175: 51901.949 & CF/Red & 0.006 &
1176: \phn\phs $ 39.1$ & 2.8 & \phn $ -1.0$ \\
1177: 54020.025 & CF/Red & 0.802 &
1178: \phn\phs $ 33.9$ & 7.5 & \phn $ -2.5$ \\
1179: 54024.964 & CF/Red & 0.811 &
1180: \phn\phs $ 31.8$ & 5.6 & \phn $ -4.0$ \\
1181: 54027.025 & CF/Blue & 0.815 &
1182: \phn\phs $ 35.8$ & 5.0 & \phn\phs $ 0.2$ \\
1183: 54028.964 & CF/Blue & 0.819 &
1184: \phn\phs $ 34.4$ & 6.4 & \phn $ -0.9$ \\
1185: 54030.961 & CF/Blue & 0.822 &
1186: \phn\phs $ 37.4$ & 4.4 & \phn\phs $ 2.3$ \\
1187: 54032.012 & CF/Blue & 0.824 &
1188: \phn\phs $ 35.2$ & 4.3 & \phn\phs $ 0.2$ \\
1189: \enddata
1190: %\tablenotetext{a}{\citet{ful90}}
1191: %\tablenotetext{b}{KPNO Coud\'{e} Feed, 2006}
1192: \end{deluxetable}
1193:
1194: \newpage
1195:
1196:
1197:
1198: %Table 4: edited 11-9-06 for solutions with cf 2006 Vr's
1199: \begin{deluxetable}{lc}
1200: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1201: \tablewidth{0pc}
1202: \tablenum{4}
1203: \tablecaption{Preliminary Orbital Elements for HD 54662\label{tab4}}
1204: \tablehead{
1205: \colhead{Element} &
1206: \colhead{Value}}
1207: \startdata
1208: $P$~(days) \dotfill & $557.8 \pm 0.3 \phn\phn $ \\
1209: $T$ (HJD--2,400,000) \dotfill & $22333 \pm 5\phn\phn\phn\phn$ \\
1210: $e$ \dotfill & $0.28 \pm 0.04 $ \\
1211: $\omega$ (deg) \dotfill & $238 \pm 5 \phn\phn $ \\
1212: $K$\tablenotemark{a} (km s$^{-1}$) \dotfill & $15.9 \pm 0.5 \phn$ \\
1213: $\gamma$ (km s$^{-1}$) \dotfill & $49.9 \pm 0.6 \phn$ \\
1214: $f(m)$\tablenotemark{a} ($M_\odot$) \dotfill & $0.20 \pm 0.02$ \\
1215: $a_1\sin i$\tablenotemark{a} ($R_\odot$) \dotfill & $168 \pm 6 \phn\phn$ \\
1216: rms (km s$^{-1}$) \dotfill & $\phn 3.3$ \\
1217: \enddata
1218: \smallskip
1219: \tablenotetext{a}{\ Lower limit due to line blending.}
1220: \end{deluxetable}
1221: \newpage
1222:
1223: %Table 5
1224: \begin{deluxetable}{lc}
1225: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1226: \tablewidth{0pc}
1227: \tablenum{5}
1228: \tablecaption{Stellar Parameters for HD~37366\label{tab5}}
1229: \tablehead{
1230: \colhead{Parameter} &
1231: \colhead{Value} }
1232: \startdata
1233: $V_1\sin i$ (\kms) & $30 \pm 10$ \\
1234: $V_2\sin i$ (\kms) & $100 \pm 10$ \\
1235: $T_{\rm eff,1}$ (kK) & $33 \pm 1$ \\
1236: $T_{\rm eff,2}$ (kK) & $30 \pm 1$ \\
1237: $\log g_{1}$ (cgs) & $4.0 \pm 0.1$ \\
1238: $\log g_{2}$ (cgs) & $4.5 \pm 0.2$ \\
1239: $F_{2}/F_{1}$ & $0.35 \pm 0.05$ \\
1240: $\Delta M_{V}$ & $1.1 \pm 0.1$ \\
1241: \enddata
1242: \end{deluxetable}
1243:
1244:
1245: %Table 6
1246: \begin{deluxetable}{lcc}
1247: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1248: \tablewidth{0pc}
1249: \tablenum{6}
1250: \tablecaption{SED Parameters\label{tab6}}
1251: \tablehead{
1252: \colhead{Parameter} &
1253: \colhead{HD~37366} &
1254: \colhead{HD~54662}}
1255: \startdata
1256: Primary Type \dotfill & \phn O9.5~V\tablenotemark{a} & O6.5~V\tablenotemark{a} \\
1257: Secondary Type \dotfill & B0$-$1~V & O9~V\phn \\
1258: $E(B-V)$(mag) \dotfill & $0.39 \pm 0.01$ & $0.32 \pm 0.01$ \\
1259: $R_V$(mag) \dotfill & $3.59 \pm 0.01$ & $2.82 \pm 0.01$ \\
1260: $\theta_{LD}$($\mu$as)\tablenotemark{b} \dotfill & $48.4 \pm 3.0\phn$ & $72.7\pm3.4\phn$ \\
1261: $d$ (kpc) \dotfill & $1.38-1.92$ & $1.23-1.53$ \\
1262: $\rho_{\rm max}$ (mas) \dotfill & $0.4-0.5$ & $3.7-4.7$ \\
1263: \enddata
1264: \tablenotetext{a}{\citet{wal72,wal73}}
1265: \tablenotetext{b}{Primary}
1266: \end{deluxetable}
1267:
1268: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1269:
1270:
1271: % Figure captions
1272:
1273: \clearpage
1274:
1275: \input{epsf}
1276: % Figure 1
1277: \begin{figure}
1278: \begin{center}
1279: {\includegraphics[angle=90,height=12cm]{f1.eps}}
1280: \end{center}
1281: \caption{Calculated radial velocity curves
1282: ({\it solid lines}) for HD~37366.
1283: The primary and secondary star's measured
1284: radial velocities are indicated by {\it circles}
1285: (2000), {\it inverted triangles} (2004 October),
1286: {\it stars} (2005 October), {\it triangles}
1287: (2005 November), {\it diamonds}
1288: (2006 October), and {\it squares} ({\it IUE}
1289: 1987). The filled symbols correspond to the
1290: primary and the open symbols to the secondary.
1291: The uncertainties in individual measurements
1292: are generally smaller than the size of the symbols.}
1293: \label{fig1}
1294: \end{figure}
1295:
1296:
1297: \clearpage
1298:
1299: \input{epsf}
1300: % Figure 2
1301: \begin{figure}
1302: \begin{center}
1303: {\includegraphics[angle=90,height=12cm]{f2.eps}}
1304: \end{center}
1305: \caption{Tentative radial velocity curve ({\it solid
1306: line}) for HD~54662 for a period of 558~d.
1307: The measured radial velocities are indicated by
1308: {\it solid circles} (2000), {\it solid diamonds}
1309: (2006), {\it squares} (\citealt{sti01}),
1310: {\it open circles} (\citealt{ful90}),
1311: {\it stars} (\citealt{gar80}), {\it inverted triangles}
1312: (\citealt{con77a}), and {\it triangles} (\citealt{pla24}).
1313: Expanded {\it horizontal bars} are plotted to show the radial
1314: velocities derived from fitting the composite line profile
1315: from the average spectra for three observational epochs (\S5).
1316: The {\it dashed} and {\it dot-dashed} lines
1317: are the radial velocity curves
1318: fit to these time-averaged points for
1319: the primary and secondary star, respectively.
1320: The uncertainties in individual measurements
1321: are generally smaller than the size of the symbols. }
1322: \label{fig2}
1323: \end{figure}
1324:
1325:
1326:
1327: \clearpage
1328:
1329: \input{epsf}
1330: % Figure 3
1331: \begin{figure}
1332: \begin{center}
1333: {\includegraphics[angle=90,height=12cm]{f3.eps}}
1334: \end{center}
1335: \caption{Tomographic reconstruction of the spectra of
1336: HD~37366 based upon the 30 red
1337: spectra obtained in 2000. This plot shows the primary ({\it
1338: top}) and the secondary spectrum ({\it bottom}), as well as
1339: absorption line identifications
1340: ({\it vertical marks}). The atmospheric lines in the region of
1341: 6850$-$7000\AA ~ are replaced with the continuum.}
1342: \label{fig3}
1343: \end{figure}
1344:
1345: \clearpage
1346:
1347: \input{epsf}
1348: % Figure 4
1349: \begin{figure}
1350: \begin{center}
1351: {\includegraphics[angle=90,height=12cm]{f4.eps}}
1352: \end{center}
1353: \caption{Tomographic reconstruction of the spectra of
1354: HD~37366 based upon five
1355: blue spectra from runs in 2005 and 2006.
1356: This plot shows the primary ({\it top}) and the secondary spectrum
1357: ({\it bottom}) as well as a number of absorption
1358: line identifications ({\it vertical marks}).}
1359: \label{fig4}
1360: \end{figure}
1361:
1362: \clearpage
1363:
1364: \input{epsf}
1365: % Figure 5
1366: \begin{figure}
1367: \begin{center}
1368: {\includegraphics[angle=90,height=12cm]{f5.eps}}
1369: \end{center}
1370: \caption{Mean spectrum of HD~54662 from our observations.
1371: Line identifications are marked by vertical lines.}
1372: \label{fig5}
1373: \end{figure}
1374:
1375: \clearpage
1376:
1377: \input{epsf}
1378: % Figure 6
1379: \begin{figure}
1380: \begin{center}
1381: {\includegraphics[angle=90,height=12cm]{f6.eps}}
1382: \end{center}
1383: \caption{The mean line profiles of HD~54662 for \ion{He}{1} $\lambda 5876$
1384: ({\it left}; \citealt{ful90}) and \ion{He}{1} $\lambda 7065$ ({\it right};
1385: this work). The observations are plotted as {\it thick lines}, the
1386: combined model fit as {\it thin lines}, and the individual component
1387: profiles are represented as {\it dotted/dashed lines} for the
1388: primary and secondary, respectively.}
1389: \label{fig6}
1390: \end{figure}
1391:
1392: \input{epsf}
1393: % Figure 7
1394: \begin{figure}
1395: \begin{center}
1396: {\includegraphics[angle=90,height=12cm]{f7.eps}}
1397: \end{center}
1398: \caption{Best fit SED for HD~37366. The {\it solid line} indicates
1399: the combined model flux for the binary, and the {\it diamonds}
1400: represent the photometric observations (described in the text).}
1401: \label{fig7}
1402: \end{figure}
1403:
1404: \input{epsf}
1405: % Figure 8
1406: \begin{figure}
1407: \begin{center}
1408: {\includegraphics[angle=90,height=12cm]{f8.eps}}
1409: \end{center}
1410: \caption{Best fit SED for HD~54662. The {\it solid line} indicates
1411: the combined model flux for the binary, and the {\it diamonds}
1412: represent the photometric observations (described in the text).}
1413: \label{fig8}
1414: \end{figure}
1415:
1416: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1417:
1418: \end{document}
1419: