1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2004 January 9
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: % MY OWN natbib refs
21:
22: %\usepackage{natbib}
23: \bibliographystyle{apj}
24:
25: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
26:
27: %% \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
28:
29: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
30:
31: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
32:
33: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
34: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
35: %% use the longabstract style option.
36:
37: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
38:
39: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
40: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
41: %% the \begin{document} command.
42: %%
43: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
44: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
45: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
46: %% for information.
47:
48: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
49: \newcommand{\myemail}{brenda.frye@dcu.ie}
50:
51: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
52:
53: %\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
54:
55: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
56: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
57: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
58: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
59: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
60: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
61:
62: \shorttitle{The Sextet Arcs towards A1689}
63: \shortauthors{Frye et al.}
64:
65: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
66: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
67:
68: \begin{document}
69:
70: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
71: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
72: %% you desire.
73:
74: \title{The Sextet Arcs: a Strongly Lensed Lyman Break Galaxy in the ACS Spectroscopic Galaxy Survey towards Abell 1689}
75:
76: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
77: %% author and affiliation information.
78: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
79: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
80: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
81: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
82:
83: \author{Brenda L. Frye\altaffilmark{1}$^,$\altaffilmark{2}, Dan Coe\altaffilmark{3},
84: David V. Bowen\altaffilmark{4},
85: Narciso Ben{\' \i}tez\altaffilmark{3}, Tom Broadhurst\altaffilmark{5}, Puragra Guhathakurta\altaffilmark{6},
86: Garth Illingworth\altaffilmark{6}, Felipe Menanteau\altaffilmark{7},
87: Keren Sharon\altaffilmark{5}, Robert Lupton\altaffilmark{4}, Georges Meylan\altaffilmark{8},
88: Kerry Zekser\altaffilmark{9},Gerhardt Meurer\altaffilmark{9}, and Mairead Hurley\altaffilmark{1}}
89:
90: %\affil{Department of Physical Sciences, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland}
91:
92: %\author{C. D. Biemesderfer\altaffilmark{4,5}}
93: %\affil{National Optical Astronomy Observatories, Tucson, AZ 85719}
94: %\email{aastex-help@aas.org}
95:
96: %\and
97:
98: %\author{R. J. Hanisch\altaffilmark{5}}
99: %\affil{Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD 21218}
100:
101: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
102: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
103: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
104: %% affiliation.
105:
106: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physical Sciences, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland; brenda.frye@dcu.ie}
107: \altaffiltext{2}{Council on Science \& Technology Fellow, Princeton University}
108: \altaffiltext{3}{Instituto de Astrofisica de Andaluc{\'i}a (CSIC), C/Camino Bajo de Hu{\'e}tor, 24, Granada, 18008, Spain}
109: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Peyton Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540}
110: \altaffiltext{5}{School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69988, Israel}
111: \altaffiltext{6}{UCO/Lick Observatory, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064}
112: \altaffiltext{7}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers the State University of NJ, Piscataway, NJ 08854}
113: \altaffiltext{8}{Laboratoire d'Astrophysique, Ecole Polytechnique F\'ed\'erale de Lausanne (EPFL) Observatoire, CH-1290, Sauverny, Suisse}
114: \altaffiltext{9}{Physics and Astronomy Department, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD}
115: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
116: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
117: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
118: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
119: %% editorial office after submission.
120:
121: \begin{abstract}
122:
123: We present results of the HST Advanced Camera for Surveys
124: spectroscopic ground-based redshift survey in the field of A1689. We
125: measure 98 redshifts, increasing the number of spectroscopically
126: confirmed objects by sixfold. We present two spectra from this
127: catalog of the Sextet Arcs, images which arise from a strongly-lensed
128: Lyman Break Galaxy (LBG) at a redshift of $z$=3.038. Gravitational
129: lensing by the cluster magnifies its flux by a
130: factor of $\sim$16 and produces six separate images with a total
131: $r$-band magnitude of $r_{625}=21.7$. The two spectra, each of which
132: represents emission from different regions of the LBG, show H~I and
133: interstellar metal absorption lines at the systemic redshift.
134: Significant variations are seen in Ly-$\alpha$ profile across a
135: single galaxy, ranging from strong absorption to a combination of
136: emission plus absorption. A spectrum of a third image close to the
137: brightest arc shows Ly-$\alpha$ emission at the same redshift
138: as the LBG, arising from either another spatially distinct region of
139: the galaxy, or from a companion galaxy close to the LBG. Taken
140: as a group, the Ly-$\alpha$ equivalent width in these three
141: spectra decreases with increasing equivalent width of the
142: strongest interstellar absorption lines. We discuss how these
143: variations can be used to understand the physical conditions in the
144: LBG. Intrinsically, this LBG is faint, $\sim$0.1$L^*$, and forming
145: stars at a modest rate, $\sim$4 $M_{\odot}~{\rm yr}^{-1}$. We also
146: detect absorption line systems toward the Sextet Arcs at $z$=2.873 and
147: $z$=2.534. The latter system is seen across two of our spectra.
148:
149: \end{abstract}
150:
151: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
152: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
153: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
154: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
155:
156: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
157: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so in the
158: %% subject header. Objects should be in the appropriate "individual"
159: %% headers (e.g. quasars: individual, stars: individual, etc.) with the
160: %% additional provision that the total number of headers, including each
161: %% individual object, not exceed six. The \objectname{} macro, and its
162: %% alias \object{}, is used to mark each object. The macro takes the object
163: %% name as its primary argument. This name will appear in the paper
164: %% and serve as the link's anchor in the electronic edition if the name
165: %% is recognized by the data centers. The macro also takes an optional
166: %% argument in parentheses in cases where the data center identification
167: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper.
168:
169: \keywords{galaxies: clusters: general --- galaxies: clusters: individual (A1689)---galaxies: high-redshift---gravitational lensing---techniques: spectroscopic---methods: data analysis}
170:
171: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
172: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
173: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
174: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
175: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
176: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
177: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
178: %% each reference.
179:
180: \section{Introduction}
181:
182: From a certain observational standpoint, our understanding of
183: Lyman-break galaxies (LBGs) is akin to that of the Milky Way nearly
184: half a century ago. The discovery of the connection between stellar
185: abundances and kinematics to the history of galaxy evolution made for
186: a significant step forward in the growing understanding of galaxies
187: \citep{Freeman:02,Eggen:62}.
188:
189: For LBGs, the large leap forward came with the discovery of nearly
190: one-thousand galaxies at $z\sim$3 initially targeted via color
191: selection for the Lyman-series break inherent in their spectra
192: \citep{Steidel:03}. The general properties of this galaxy population
193: have been investigated in detail \citep{Adelberger:03, Adelberger:98,
194: Steidel:98}. To examine the intrinsic properties of LBGs as a group,
195: \citet{Shapley:03} produced a composite spectrum from over 800
196: individual LBG spectra. They found that the combined absorption plus
197: emission rest equivalent width (REW) of Ly-$\alpha$ depended on four
198: primary spectral characteristics: for increasing Ly-$\alpha$ REW the
199: total REW of the low ionization interstellar lines decreased, the rest
200: frame UV spectrum became bluer, the velocity offset between
201: Ly-$\alpha$ and the mean redshift of the interstellar lines decreased,
202: and the star formation rate went down. They explained these effects
203: as a combination of incomplete coverage of the UV continuum light by
204: gas and dust, and a range of velocities over which gas is absorbed.
205:
206: The coaddition of many hundred LBG spectra by \citet{Shapley:03} was
207: necessary because individual LBGs are faint, and the spectral
208: properties of individual LBGs are hard to record at high spectral
209: resolution and signal-to-noise. A notable exception is the
210: strongly-lensed LBG MS1512$-$cB58 (hereafter cB58) at $z$=2.73
211: \citep{Yee:96}. Magnification by the cluster MS1512$+$36 increases
212: the flux of the LBG to $r_{625}=20.4$, making it possible to observe
213: this galaxy at a resolution high enough to obtain accurate abundances
214: from interstellar absorption lines. \citet{Pettini:02, Pettini:00}
215: found the gas outflowing from cB58 to be highly enriched in
216: $\alpha$-elements (from Type~II supernovae), with abundances of O, Mg,
217: Si, P and S all $\sim0.4$ times the solar value. At the same time,
218: the N and Fe-peak elements of Mn, Fe and Ni were underabundant by a
219: factor of three. Such a pattern implied that the outflowing gas had
220: been enriched for only $\sim 300$~Myr.
221:
222: The class of strongly-lensed LBGs (hereafter SLLBGs), of which cB58 is
223: a member, is characterized by its enhanced flux. Ordered by
224: increasing $r_{625}$-band flux, the recently discovered `8 o'clock
225: arc' is the brightest with a total magnitude of $r_{625}$=19.22
226: \citep{Allam:06}. It is followed by LBG J2135.2-0102 the `Cosmic Eye'
227: \citep{Smail:06}, cB58, A2218-384 \citep{Ebbels:96}, the Sextet Arcs
228: (this paper), 1E0657-56-A \citep{Mehlert:01}, and Q0000-D6
229: \citep{Giallongo:02}. %The least known of the bright SLLBGs is
230: %A2218$-$384 at $z$=2.515
231: %\citep{Ebbels:96}. It is only 0.8 magnitudes fainter than cB58, and has
232: %been magnified into a giant arc with a similar spatial extent of $\sim$3 arcsec.
233: Note there is also one bright strongly-lensed galaxy known at lower
234: redshift, $z$=1.9, but the Ly-series break is not redshifted into the
235: optical bands and so it is not included here
236: \citep{Lemoine-Busserolle:03}. They are brighter than the majority of
237: field LBGs, making medium spectral resolution observations feasible.
238: Additionally, the five brightest SLLBGs, $r_{625}<22.5$ (including the
239: one presented in this paper), are also extended on the sky, enabling
240: spatially-resolved spectroscopy of high redshift galaxies. This has
241: already been achieved for two fainter, higher redshift objects: the
242: quadruply-lensed giant arc in A2390 at $z$=4.040
243: \citep{Frye:97,Bunker:98}, and a galaxy at $z\sim5$
244: \citep{Swinbank:07}.
245:
246:
247: While detailed studies of this class are in progress, there are
248: already clues that the intrinsic properties of luminosity and
249: extinction for at least some of the SLLBGs are different from the
250: general LBG population. The brightest SLLBG, the 8 o-clock arc, has
251: an estimated unlensed magnitude that is brighter than the general LBG
252: population by four magnitudes in $r_{625}$. In another recently
253: discovered SLLBG, the so-called Cosmic Eye arc, LBG J2135.2-0101, the
254: extinction is high enough to place it on the borderline of the reddening
255: selection criterion for the \citet{Steidel:03} sample.
256:
257: We present here spectra of a new SLLBG at $z$=3.038 whose lensed
258: images we designate as the ``Sextet Arcs." The Sextet Arcs consist of
259: six separate images towards the massive lensing cluster A1689
260: ($z$=0.187) with a total magnitude integrated over all images of
261: $r_{625}=21.7$. This bright LBG was first identified by
262: \citet{Broadhurst:05} as a part of the strong lensing study of A1689
263: and is relatively rare in being a multiply-imaged galaxy with a
264: reported spectroscopic redshift. Only three of the $\sim$30 multiply
265: imaged galaxies have confirming spectra, and thus this system of arcs
266: has featured prominently in several recent strong lensing analyses
267: used to derive dark matter mass distributions in this well studied
268: cluster \citep{Leonard:07,Limousin:06, Zekser:06, Halkola:06,
269: Broadhurst:05}.
270:
271: Most of these data were taken for the HST {\it Advanced Camera for
272: Surveys} (ACS) spectroscopic ground-based redshift survey. Some data
273: were acquired prior to the start of this GTO program on A1689. We
274: present a redshift catalog of nearly 100 objects in the field of
275: A1689, with nearly three-fourths of them being new arclets with
276: $z>$0.23. Until this paper, only the redshifts of 10 objects in the
277: background of A1689 have appeared in the literature \citep{Broadhurst:05, Frye:02}.
278:
279: This paper is organized as follows: We summarize the imaging and
280: spectroscopic observations in \S2, and outline the custom-built
281: reductions and analysis in \S3. We show the spectra for the Sextet
282: Arcs in \S4, and the spectra for the spatially-resolved intervening
283: absorption system in \S5. In \S6 we discuss the
284: variations of spectral characteristics seen along the Sextet Arcs and
285: the $z$=2.534 absorption system and how these results can be used to
286: further constrain the lens model. We also measure the intrinsic
287: properties of star formation rate and intrinsic luminosity. Finally
288: in \S7 we give the summary and conclusion. The results of our
289: spectroscopic catalog, and comparison with the literature, is given in
290: the Appendix. Throughout this paper we assume a cosmology with
291: $H_0=70$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$, $\Omega_{m,0} = 0.3$, $\Omega_{\Lambda,0} = 0.7$.
292:
293: \section{Observations}
294:
295: \subsection{Imaging}
296:
297: Abell 1689 was observed in June, 2002 as part of HST ACS GTO time.
298: Deep exposures were taken in the $g_{475}$, $r_{625}$, $i_{775}$, and
299: $z_{850}$ passbands, reaching limiting magnitudes of 27.5, 27.2, 27.2
300: and 26.7 respectively. Details of the ACS observations can be found
301: in \citet{Broadhurst:05}. To calculate robust photometric redshifts,
302: we obtained $UBVRIZJHK$ ground-based images. The $U$-band image was
303: acquired from the DuPont Telescope at Las Campanas and was taken in
304: conditions of $0\farcs93$ seeing, as measured from the PSF off the
305: images. The $B$-band image was acquired from the Nordic Optical
306: Telescope (NOT) at La Palma, from which we measure $1\farcs13$ seeing.
307: Broadband $V$, $R$, $I$ images, and a narrow-band $Z$ band image taken
308: with the NB9148 filter were obtained in March 1999 with LRIS on Keck 2
309: taken under conditions of $0\farcs81$, $0\farcs74$, $0\farcs68$, and
310: $0\farcs91$ seeing, and limiting magnitudes of 27.17, 26.96, 26.41,
311: and 24.81 respectively for the four filters. Finally, the $J$, $H$,
312: and $Ks$ images were obtained with Son of Isaac (SOFI) on the ESO New
313: Technology Telescope (NTT) taken under conditions of $0\farcs87$,
314: $0\farcs99$, and $0\farcs82$ seeing to limiting magnitudes of 25.12,
315: 24.22, and 24.06. A complementary $Ks$-band Infrared Spectrometer and
316: Array Camera (ISAAC) VLT image taken under conditions of $0\farcs95$
317: seeing was also analyzed.
318:
319: \subsection{Imaging Results}
320: The ACS $gri$ true color image of the central portion of Abell 1689 is
321: shown in Figure~\ref{fig2}. This image was made using the Sloan
322: Digital Sky Survey pipeline photo \citep{Lupton:01}. The asinh
323: stretch was applied, as described in \citet{Lupton:04}; it is fast,
324: and qualitatively similar to the ACS image presented by
325: \citet{Broadhurst:05}. Cluster members appear as extended yellow
326: objects in the center and left of center, and the objects from our
327: sample in common with our larger Keck LRIS field are marked.
328: Additionally, two images of the six Sextet Arcs at $z=3.038$ are
329: circled.
330:
331: %magnification estimate from Keren: 36/4.5 = 8 (average diameter). ratio of areas gives: 4^2 = 16x
332: %cB58 physical size of
333: The Sextet Arcs were identified by \citet{Broadhurst:05} to be one
334: object lensed into six separate arcs. The arcs are labeled \#1.1
335: through \#1.6 and each of them are shown in our HST ACS $r_{625}$-band
336: data, (Figure~\ref{fig7}). The image in the upper left panel of this
337: 6-panel image is a fold arc comprising two unseparated images but
338: taken to be one image, named \#1.1. Image \#1.1 has an estimated
339: magnified image area of $\sim$16$\times$, as measured from the
340: delensed images in \citet{Broadhurst:05}. Images \#1.1 and \#1.2
341: subtend a length of $\sim$6 arcseconds, similar in apparent size to
342: the other known strongly-lensed LBGs. The five images comprising
343: source \#2, which we designate as the `Quintet Arcs,' are also shown.
344: %We obtained a spectrum of image \#2.1 which is also presented in this paper.
345: Table~\ref{table3} gives the positions of all images of the Sextet Arcs and Quintet Arcs in
346: ACS $g_{475}$, $r_{625}$, and $i_{775}$-band magnitudes.
347:
348: We recount the argument in \citet{Broadhurst:05} to show that the six
349: separate images comprising the Sextet Arcs all belong to one source
350: galaxy. First, each image of the Sextet Arcs, except for the central
351: demagnified one, has the same elongated morphology. Each image of the
352: Sextet Arcs is also always accompanied by a neighboring image which
353: has a distinctive core-plus-halo morphology. These neighboring
354: images, with an average angular separation of $\sim$2 arcsec depending
355: on the differing magnifications for each image, are the Quintet Arcs
356: (Source \#2). The image pairs, comprising one image each of the
357: Sextet Arcs (Source \#1) and Quintet Arcs (Source \#2), appear with
358: strikingly-similar morphologies at multiple locations despite being
359: stretched, rotated, and parity-flipped, thus allowing for their
360: confident identification by-eye as multiply-lensed
361: (Figure~\ref{fig7}). From this initial identification a mass model
362: was constructed and used to predict and verify the positions of other
363: counterarcs, including the central demagnified image. Photometric
364: redshifts were then calculated and found to match the data. Finally,
365: spectra were taken of two of the images which yielded the same
366: redshift, $z=3.038$.
367:
368:
369: \subsection{Spectroscopy}
370: A summary of the ground-based spectroscopic observations is given in
371: Table~\ref{table2}. Observations were carried out at the Keck
372: Observatory, the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and Las Campanas
373: Magellan-Clay Observatory. Targets were color-selected in Keck LRIS
374: bands $V_{AB}-I_{AB}$ to be behind the cluster, and the limiting
375: $I_{AB}$ magnitude selected to suit the allocated observing time and
376: instrument. In total, spectra were obtained for 255 objects. Of
377: those, 98 objects with secure spectroscopic redshifts are presented
378: here (see Tables~\ref{table1} and \ref{table3}).
379:
380: \subsubsection{Keck Observations}
381:
382: Nearly three-fourths of the data were obtained from Keck LRIS over a
383: course of five observing runs, from April 1996 to March 2003. Seven
384: multislit masks were used with either the 300 lines/mm grating (blazed
385: at a central wavelength of 5000 \AA), or the 400 lines/mm grating
386: (blazed at 8500 \AA). The observed resolution varied slightly over
387: the observing runs, with the lower dispersion grating providing a
388: resolution of 12 \AA \ FWHM and the higher one, 9 \AA \ FWHM,
389: determined from the 6300 \AA \ skyline. Typical exposure times for
390: both setups were 6 $\times$ 1200 sec with 1\farcs0 dithers between
391: exposures to correct for fringing and uneven illumination along the
392: slits. The slit widths were chosen to be from 0.8\arcsec $-$1\arcsec,
393: and the conditions ranged from $\sim 0.65$\arcsec $-$ 0\farcs85
394: seeing. The spectrum of the brightest image of the Sextet Arcs, \#1.1,
395: was obtained in June, 1997 with the 300 line/mm grating in 2.8 hours
396: of integration (see Figure~\ref{fig7}).
397:
398:
399: \subsubsection{VLT Observations}
400: Spectroscopic data were obtained at VLT on FORS2 in June and July 2001
401: in service mode. One multislit mask was used with the 300 lines/mm
402: grism, providing 12 \AA \ resolution at 6300 \AA. Exposure times were
403: 33 $\times$ 1200 sec with 1\farcs0 dithers between exposures. The
404: slitwidths were 1\arcsec. Objects fainter than $I_{AB} =23$ were
405: targeted, and the results are given in Table~\ref{table2}. One high
406: redshift galaxy was discovered, an emission line object at $z$=4.705
407: and $I_{AB}$=25.3 (see Table~\ref{table3}). Also additional data on
408: the bright triply-lensed system at $z$=4.868 was obtained and will
409: appear in an upcoming paper (see Frye et al. 2002 for the Keck LRIS
410: spectrum of this object).
411:
412: \subsubsection{Magellan Observations}
413: One-fourth of the survey was carried out at Magellan Observatory in
414: 2003 May on the low-dispersion survey spectrograph (LDSS2). Five
415: multislit masks were used with the 300 lines/mm medium-blue grism
416: blazed at 5500 \AA. The grism provided 16 \AA \ resolution at 6700
417: \AA. Exposure times varied from 2 $\times$ 3600 sec to 14 $\times$
418: 3600 sec, with 1\arcsec \ dithers after every two exposures. Spectra
419: for arclets \#1.4 and \#2.1 were obtained in a total of 8 h and 11 h
420: respectively.
421:
422: % up to 14 exposures of 1 hr each. How much for our key objects, and for objects in general??
423: % 11 exp for 22196 (source_1p1b.dat)
424: % 8 exp for 20703 (source 1p4.dat)
425: % between 2 and 11 exposures.
426:
427: \section{Data Reduction}
428: \subsection{Spectra}
429: We have custom-built a spectroscopic reduction package for this
430: project. The aim is to maximize the signal to noise of background
431: limited data without resampling the pixels, so that groups of pixels
432: carrying faint continuum signal have every chance of being detected as
433: a coherent pattern in the final reduced image. It can operate on full
434: 2d fits frames directly, outputting reduced 2d frames. It is unique
435: in that it can follow the object signal over the full dispersion range
436: even if the object signal drops off, by following the curvature of the
437: similarly-distorted spectrum box edges. Also it can correct for mask
438: defects such as the complex spatial slit profile, and can accommodate
439: subpixel shifts between the flatfield and the data frames by modeling
440: the slit profile with a dispersed flatfield. The details of the
441: reduction pipeline can be found in \citet{Frye:02}.
442:
443: The spectral data for image \#1.1 of the Sextet arc was fluxed by
444: taking the spectrum of an early-type cluster member at $z$=0.187,
445: observed simultaneously through the multislit mask, and comparing it
446: to the standard empirical E/SO spectrum of \citet{Kennicutt:92}. The
447: spectral data for images \#1.4 and \#2.1 from Magellan were taken at
448: low $\sim$20 \AA \ resolution. The data were flux calibrated with the
449: standard star LTT3218. A sensitivity function was created using the
450: IRAF task sensfunc, which was then scaled to the spectrum and divided
451: into the data.
452:
453: \subsection{Photometry}
454: Objects within the ACS FOV were detected in a
455: $g\arcmin$+$r\arcmin$+$i\arcmin$+$z\arcmin$ ``galaxy-subtracted''
456: image using SExtractor \citep{Bertin:96}. The galaxy subtraction
457: involved carefully modeling the A1689 cluster galaxies, and
458: subtracting their light from each image. This helps both to detect
459: extra galaxy images (especially near the center of the cluster) and to
460: improve the photometry of the faint, low-surface brightness background
461: galaxies. This meticulous process has not been extended to our
462: ground-based images. Bayesian photometric redshifts were obtained
463: based on this galaxy-subtracted These redshift estimates provided a
464: means of confirming the thirty sets of multiply-imaged objects
465: identified in the field \citep{Broadhurst:05}. These images are very
466: faint, $23.4<i<28$, making spectroscopy unfeasible for all $>$100
467: images.
468:
469: To include galaxies within a larger FOV, objects were also detected in
470: the deepest Keck image (the $I$-band). Aperture-matched PSF-corrected
471: photometry was then obtained across the 14-filter ACS and ground-based
472: image set using techniques since made available in the ColorPro
473: software package \citep{Coe:06}. A separate Bayesian photometric
474: redshift catalog was obtained based on these magnitudes. A good
475: general agreement is found between measured redshifts for objects
476: detected in both catalogs. For objects within the ACS FOV, we report
477: photometric redshifts as measured in the above-mentioned ACS catalog,
478: while for objects outside the ACS FOV, we quote results from this
479: Keck-based catalog. More details will be published along with the
480: full photometric catalogs in an upcoming paper \citep{Coe:07}.
481:
482: \section{Source \#1: The Sextet Arcs}
483: \subsection{Image \#1.1}
484: %\subsection{Redshift Determination}
485: The spectrum of image \#1.1 was optimally-extracted and is shown in
486: Figure~\ref{fig_dvb}. Several strong low ionization absorption lines
487: are detected. They are Si II $\lambda$1260, O~I~$\lambda 1302$ +
488: Si~II~$\lambda1304$ (where we take the mean wavelength of these
489: blended lines to be 1303~\AA), C~II $\lambda$1334, SiIV
490: $\lambda\lambda$1393, 1402, Si II $\lambda$1527, Fe II $\lambda$1608,
491: and Al II $\lambda$1671. The rest equivalent widths of these lines
492: are listed in Table~\ref{table3}, including their 1-$\sigma$ errors.
493: A fit to the line centroids of the four strongest interstellar
494: absorption lines, Si II $\lambda$1260, O~I $+$ Si~II $\lambda_{mean}=
495: 1303$, C~II $\lambda$1334, and Si II $\lambda$1527, yields an
496: absorption line redshift of $z$=3.041.
497:
498: The Ly-$\alpha$ absorption line profile shows considerable structure,
499: some of which appears to be caused by the superposition of a weak
500: emission line at 4907~\AA. Although this feature may simply be an
501: artifact of complex multicomponent Ly-$\alpha$ absorption lines close
502: to the redshift of Source \#1, we find a similar, unambiguously
503: identified Ly-$\alpha$ emission line in the spectrum of image \#1.4
504: at an identical redshift (see \S5.2). For this reason, we believe the
505: weak feature near the deepest part of the Ly-$\alpha$ absorption line
506: profile in the spectrum of image \#1.1 is indeed a Ly-$\alpha$
507: emission line. As there are no stellar photospheric features, we
508: cannot measure the systemic redshift of the SLLBG directly. We
509: obtain the velocity offset correction by following the prescription
510: in \citet[their equation (5)]{Adelberger:03}. Based on a mean
511: velocity difference of -75 km s$^{-1 }$ between Ly-$\alpha$ emission
512: and the low ionization interstellar lines, we calculate a velocity
513: offset of $240$ km s$^{-1}$ smaller than the nebular redshift, or
514: $z_{sys}$=$3.038\pm0.003$.
515: %Even though these computations are based on measurements that are less than one resolution element,
516: %we find the results do improve the match to the line centroids and so take this to be our systemic redshift.
517:
518: The Ly-$\alpha$ absorption is wide, and has a shape reminiscent of a
519: Damped Ly-$\alpha$ (DLA) line. However, the flux of the line never
520: reaches zero, as would be expected for a DLA observed at the
521: resolution of our data. As discussed above, this is probably because
522: the absorption is filled in with Ly-$\alpha$ emission. Apart from
523: this contamination, the underlying absorption must arise from some
524: combination of high and low H~I column density clouds overlapping in
525: velocity. At the resolution of our data, however, we cannot untangle
526: the velocity structure of the absorption. On the other hand, we can
527: at least set an upper limit to the H~I column density, $N${H~I},
528: assuming that the absorption comes from a single high-$N$(H~I) cloud.
529: We can set the absorption redshift to be the same as that of the SiII
530: $\lambda$1260 line, which is the only metal line not blended with
531: metal lines from lower redshift absorption line systems. The redshift
532: of this line is $z$=3.038 (the same as the Ly-$\alpha$ emission) must
533: therefore reflect the redshift of the bulk of the H~I gas. The upper
534: limit to $N$(H~I) can then be determined by fitting the red wing of
535: the Ly-$\alpha$ absorption between $\approx$1200-1250 \AA. This
536: procedure is not straightforward, since not only do we not know the
537: full velocity extent of the contaminating Ly-$\alpha$ emission, and
538: the wing may well be contaminated by SiIV $\lambda \lambda$ 1393, 1402
539: at $z$=2.534 (see \S6. Using the available continuum, however, it
540: seems likely that the H I column density is log $N$(H~I) $\le 21.5$.
541: We also find that at $z$=3.038, the Ly-$\beta$ line expected from the
542: Ly-$\alpha$ absorption does not line-up well with the feature
543: identified as Ly-$\beta$ at 4122 \AA. It thus seems likely that the
544: Ly-$\beta$ absorption line is also filled in with Ly-$\beta$ emission,
545: and cannot be used to better constrain $N$(H~I).
546:
547: The low ionization absorption lines are all strong, and reminiscent of
548: the SLLBG MS1512-cB58 \citep{Pettini:02}. A comparison of rest
549: equivalent widths of all the lines that are in common with those seen
550: towards cB58 shows that the absorption in the spectrum of image \#1.1
551: is weaker. Only C~II $\lambda$ 1334 is of equal strength, but this is
552: due to a chance blend with two other intervening absorption lines,
553: SiIV $\lambda\lambda$1394, 1402 at $z$=2.873, and SiII $\lambda$1527
554: at $z$=2.534. As is true for cB58, the metal lines in our data are
555: also likely saturated. For example, the ratio of the rest equivalent
556: width of SiII $\lambda$1260 to SiII $\lambda$1527 should be $\sim$6
557: for optically thin lines \citep{Morton:03}. We measure the ratio of
558: rest equivalent widths to be $W_0(1260)/W_0(1527)=1.9 \pm 0.73$, as
559: compared to 0.95 for the composite LBG spectrum \citep{Shapley:03}.
560: %We note this doublet ratio was reported to be small also for the strongly-lensed
561: %LBG A2218$-$384, but a value was not reported for it \citep{Ebbels:96}.
562: As for SiIV $\lambda\lambda$1393, 1402, while
563: we do detect both lines, they are blended with AlII $\lambda$ 1608 at $z$=2.534 and so
564: are of no use other than redshift confirmation.
565: Note at our resolution we do not detect any weak absorption
566: features which fall on the linear part of the curve of growth.
567: % propagation of errors for division: deltaz=z*sqrt((deltax/x)^2 + (deltay/y)^2)
568:
569: The spectrum of image \#1.1 appears to show little evidence for gas
570: motions. The velocity difference between the line centroid of
571: Ly-$\alpha$ emission and the mean of the interstellar absorption lines
572: is $\Delta v =-75 \pm150$ km~s$^{-1}$. Gas with such a velocity
573: offset that is consistent with a static medium or even a blueshift is
574: observed in only $\sim$5\% of cases in the general LBG population
575: \citep{Shapley:03}. The theoretical prediction from Monte Carlo
576: simulations of $z\sim3$ galaxies is for Ly-$\alpha$ to be redshifted
577: from the stellar redshift by twice the velocity shift of the
578: interstellar lines from Ly-$\alpha$ \citep{Verhamme:06}. For our data
579: Ly-$\alpha$ is blueshifted from the interstellar lines by $\Delta v =
580: 150$ km~s$^{-1}$, and Ly-$\alpha$ is also blueshifted from the stellar
581: redshift, by $\Delta v_{sys}= 200$ km~s$^{-1}$. At the same time,
582: %we also find evidence
583: %of gas motions in the linewidths and measure a
584: %deconvolved FWHM for the `peak' in the Ly-$\alpha$ absorption trough of $>$1500 km s$^{-1}$.
585: %Further, the low ionization absorption line profile
586: the absorption line profile of Si~IV $\lambda$1394 shows broad blueshifted absorption indicative of gas outflow.
587: We require higher resolution data
588: to address the somewhat unusual kinematics of this galaxy.
589:
590: To measure the extinction in this spectrum, we fit our multiwavelength
591: photometry to the starburst SED templates of \citet{Calzetti:94}. Six
592: starburst galaxy templates are provided with various levels of
593: extinction. To these we add interpolations of adjacent templates
594: until a best fit is found. We measure $E(B-V)=0.47$, and consider
595: this value to be an upper limit owing to an unknown level of light
596: contamination from a nearby cluster elliptical at $z=0.183$.
597:
598: In addition to the absorption at $z$=3.038, there are also two other
599: intervening absorption systems, both of which are marked in
600: Figure~\ref{fig_dvb}. The first is at $z$=2.873. It shows strong
601: Ly-$\alpha$ absorption, O I $\lambda$1302 $+$ Si II $\lambda$1304,
602: C~II $\lambda$1334, SiIV $\lambda$1393 (blended with C~II
603: $\lambda$1334 at $z$=3.038 and Si~II $\lambda$1527 at $z$=2.534), and
604: Si II $\lambda$1527. The second absorption system is at $z$=2.534.
605: It shows O I $\lambda$1302 $+$ Si II $\lambda$1304, $\lambda_{mean}=
606: 1303$, SiIV $\lambda\lambda$1393, 1402, Si II $\lambda$1527, Fe II
607: $\lambda$1608, and Al II $\lambda$1671. Interestingly, we observed
608: the absorption system at $z$=2.534 also in another spectrum taken only
609: 2 arcsec away on the sky, which will be discussed in \S5.
610:
611: \subsection{Image \#1.4}
612: Image \#1.1 discussed above and image \#1.4 are both images of the
613: same source. In Figure~\ref{fig_1d} we show the spectrum of image
614: \#1.4. It shows strong Ly-$\alpha$ emission and Ly-series decrement
615: (Figure~\ref{fig_1d}). We see indications of gas motions in the
616: linewidth of the Ly-$\alpha$ line as indicated by a large deconvolved
617: FWHM = 1700 km s$^{-1}$. Further, the P-Cygni type profile of
618: Ly-$\alpha$ is indicative of large scale gas outflow, and is in
619: contrast to the Ly-$\alpha$ absorption seen in image \#1.1
620: (Figure~\ref{fig_1d}). The implications of the variations in
621: Ly-$\alpha$ seen across a {\it single} galaxy will be discussed in
622: \S7.
623:
624:
625: We calculate the extinction in image \#1.4 to be $E(B-V)=0.10$. It
626: was calculated in the same way as that for image \#1.1, discussed
627: above. Given the small size of this image compared to the slitwidth
628: of the multislit mask, we are confident that we are capturing all of
629: the stellar component of this LBG in the spectrum of image \#1.4.
630: This is in contrast to image \#1.1, for which the spectrum records
631: only 1 arcsec of the giant ($>$5.5 arcsec long) arc. For this reason
632: we adopt our measured value of the extinction of $E(B-V)$=0.10 as the
633: best value for the Sextet Arcs. The value is similar to the values
634: measured by \citet{Shapley:03} in their composite LBG spectra.
635:
636: %our spectrum of image \#2.1 may be yet a third spatial sampling of Source \#1,
637: %as is discussed in \S6 below.
638:
639: \section{Source \#2: The Quintet Arcs}
640: The Quintet Arcs (our designation for the five images of Source \#2
641: identified by Broadhurst et al. 2005), are shown in Figure~\ref{fig7}.
642: They are spatially-resolved and characterized by a two component
643: compact bright core plus extended halo. This morphology is
644: recognizable from image to image along the critical curve of the
645: cluster despite being stretched, rotated, and parity-flipped. The
646: Quintet Arcs subtend an average lensed separation from the Sextet Arcs
647: of 2 arcsec, with the variation in angular separation between the
648: images accounted for by the differing magnifications along this second
649: strongly-lensed object in this paper.
650:
651: \subsection{Image \#2.1}
652:
653: The spectrum for image \#2.1 is shown in Figure~\ref{fig_1d}. Unlike
654: the spectra for either image \#1.1 or \#1.4, Ly-$\alpha$ is seen in
655: emission only, with no corresponding Ly-$\alpha$ absorption. The low
656: ionization lines of SiII $\lambda$ 1260 and C~II $\lambda$1334 (Si~II
657: $\lambda$1527 at $z$=2.534 and SiIV $\lambda\lambda$1393, 1402 at
658: $z$=2.87). We see indications of gas motions in the linewidths of
659: this spectrum, reporting a deconvolved FWHM for Ly-$\alpha$ of 1350 km
660: s$^{-1}$. The total profile of emission plus absorption for
661: Ly-$\alpha$ is symmetric, in contrast both to the absorption seen in
662: the spectrum of image \#1.1 and the P-Cygni type profile seen towards
663: image \#1.4. We measure $E(B-V)=0.17$, similar to image \#1.4.
664:
665: There is an intervening absorption system towards this object at
666: $z$=2.534 (Figure~\ref{fig_1d}). Several low ionization lines are
667: detected, including Si II $\lambda$1260, O I $\lambda$1302 $+$ Si II
668: $\lambda$1304, C~II $\lambda$1334, Si II $\lambda$1527, C IV
669: $\lambda\lambda$1448, 1550, and Fe II $\lambda$1609. Ly-$\alpha$
670: absorption clearly reaches the zero-level of the continuum, and is
671: possibly damped.
672:
673: \subsection{Source Correspondence and Redshift Determination for Image \#2.1}
674:
675: The slit used to obtain a spectrum of image \#2.1 unexpectedly
676: produced a spectrum with precisely the same redshift as Sextet Arc
677: image \#1.1, including a strong emission feature at the expected
678: position of Ly-$\alpha$ at $z$=3.038. However, we think it unlikely
679: that this is the true redshift of \#2.1. We searched for the same
680: Ly-$\alpha$ emission feature in our other spectra of Source \#2, but
681: only our 3 h LDSS2 Magellan spectrum of image \#2.2 covered the
682: correct wavelength range. The observed equivalent width of
683: Ly-$\alpha$ in the spectrum of image \#2.1 is measured to be
684: $W_{obs}=20$ \AA. A comparison measurement made of a typical noise
685: feature near the expected position of Ly-$\alpha$ in the spectrum of
686: image \#2.2 gives $W_{obs}=40$ \AA. It is thus unlikely that we would
687: be able to detect the same Ly-$\alpha$ seen in the spectrum of image
688: \#1.1 in the available spectrum of image \#2.2.
689:
690: The idea that there may be significant contamination from image \#1.1
691: at the position of image \#2.1 was first put forth by
692: \citet{Broadhurst:05}, given that both images are found near the
693: critical curve and stretched significantly on the sky.
694: Figure~\ref{fig10} shows the observational setup used to record the
695: spectra of images \#1.1 and \#2.1 using a one arcsec slit centered on
696: image \#2.1, and a one arcsec slit centered on the brightest part of
697: image \#1.1. This separation is only two arcsec on the sky, which may
698: not be enough to clear it of stray light from \#1.1. In fact, the
699: Ly-$\alpha$ emission peak in the spectrum of image \#2.1 is found to
700: be separated in velocity by only $+40$ km s$^{-1}$ from the
701: Ly-$\alpha$ emission from image \#1.1.
702:
703:
704: As discussed in \S6.2, there is a strong intervening absorption system
705: at $z$=2.534. While it is not possible to measure a column density at
706: this resolution, the absorption is so broad, 4000 km s$^{-1}$, that it
707: is probably a damped Ly-$\alpha$ system. With this observation and
708: the significant stretching of image \#1.1, we propose that the
709: Ly-$\alpha$ in the spectrum of image \#2.1 is scattered light from
710: Sextet Arc \#1.1, and that the redshift of image \#2.1 is detected by
711: {\it absorption} at $z$=2.534 toward the Sextet Arc \#1.1. Note the
712: photometric redshift for image \#2.1 is $z=2.62 \pm 0.48$,
713: encompassing both redshifts $z$=2.534 and $z$=3.038 within the errors
714: (see Table~\ref{table3}). If image \#2.1 does represent another
715: spatial region of Source \#1 at $z$=3.038, then these significant
716: variations in the Ly-$\alpha$ profile may have rather interesting
717: implications for the kinematics, as is discussed in \S6.
718:
719:
720:
721: \section{Discussion}
722:
723: \subsection{Ly-$\alpha$ Trends for the Sextet Arcs }
724: The Ly-$\alpha$ profiles in the spectra of images \#1.1, \#1.4 and
725: \#2.1 range from strong absorption to a combination of emission plus
726: absorption, to pure emission (Figure~\ref{fig_1d}). The spectra for
727: images \#1.1 and \#1.4 appear to be representing two different spatial
728: regions of the same spatially-resolved LBG at $z$=3.038, and the
729: spectrum for image \#2.1 possibly does as well, depending on the
730: identification of its source of starlight. The spectrum for image
731: \#1.1 was taken of a one arcsec portion of what is a giant arc with a
732: total length of more than 5.5 arcsec and an estimated area
733: magnification factor of $\gtrsim16$ (Figure~\ref{fig10}). In turn,
734: image \#1.4, with a smaller estimated magnification of $\sim8$, has a
735: total spatial extent that is smaller than the slitwidth used to record
736: the spectrum, so that our data contains all the light from Source \#1.
737: Image \#2.1 has an estimated magnification of $\sim16$. Its spectrum
738: shows a second and different one-arcsec portion of the giant arc
739: \#1.1, or a companion galaxy in a pair or group of galaxies at the
740: systemic redshift of the Sextet Arcs.
741:
742: We can compare the equivalent widths of Ly-$\alpha$ for the three
743: images with the four LBG subsamples established by \citet{Shapley:03}.
744: By sorting their sample of 811 galaxies by rest equivalent width of
745: Ly-$\alpha$, W$_{Ly\alpha}$, they found a significant dependence of
746: W$_{Ly\alpha}$ on rest equivalent with of the strongest low ionization
747: interstellar absorption lines W$_{LIS}$.
748: %on reddening as traced by E(B-V), and on the velocity difference between the
749: %Ly-$\alpha$ and the low ionization interstellar absorption lines (when Ly-$\alpha$ is seen in emission).
750: %At our coarse resolution for two of the sightlines, up to 10$\times$
751: %lower than \citet{Shapley:03}, the uncertainties in velocity shift are
752: %too high to make meaningful comparisons with W$_{Ly\alpha}$. Reddening, although
753: %less dependent on resolution, is made complicated by the presence of
754: %two high column density intervening absorption systems. These make for
755: %large uncertainties in the choice of attenuation curve to fit to the data, and so is
756: %also not accurate enough make for a meaningful constraint. Fortunately measurements
757: %of equivalent widths are feasible, as is discussed below.
758: For each image \#1.1, \#1.4, and \#2.1, we measure rest equivalent
759: width of Ly-$\alpha$, W$_{Ly\alpha}$, with the uncertainty determined
760: by continuum placement in the Lyman-$\alpha$ forest and the position
761: of the wavelength boundaries. For image \#1.1, there are at least
762: four features that carve into the Ly-$\alpha$ absorption line profile
763: at $z$=3.038. In the blue damping wing a second Ly-$\alpha$ line
764: appears at $z$=2.783. At the systemic redshift there is a partial
765: emission-filling of the Ly-$\alpha$ line, and just redward of this
766: emission feature there are the two absorption features Si~IV
767: $\lambda$$\lambda$ 1393, 1402 at $z$=2.53. We selected wavelength
768: boundaries by eye from 1182.0 - 1241.6 \AA. For image \#1.4,
769: Ly-$\alpha$ is seen both in emission and absorption. The equivalent
770: width is computed across both components, from 1193.0 - 1223.6 \AA.
771: For the metal lines, the total rest equivalent width of Si II
772: $\lambda$1260, O I$\lambda$1302+Si II$\lambda$1304, and C II
773: $\lambda$1334 was taken, with the errors based on the noise and
774: continuum placement. Although the errors are large, particularly for
775: the lowest resolution data of images \#1.4 and \#2.1, W$_{LIS}$
776: decreases in strength as W$_{Ly\alpha}$ increases from $-26$ \AA \ in
777: absorption to 5.4 \AA \ in emission (Figure~\ref{fig11}).
778:
779: These measurements suggest significant variations of Ly-$\alpha$
780: strength are possible within a {\it single} galaxy. Note even if our
781: spectrum for image \#2.1 is not a spatial extended region of the
782: Sextet Arc \#1.1, there is still a large variation in both the
783: strength and profile of Ly-$\alpha$ for images \#1.1 and \#1.4. The
784: equivalent widths from the literature are included for other SLLBGs,
785: where available. For cB58, W$_{Ly\alpha}$ was not reported by
786: \citet{Pettini:02}. It is visibly damped at their resolution of 58 km
787: s$^{-1}$, so in principle one could infer a value of W$_{Ly\alpha}$.
788: It is interesting that their value for W$_{LIS}$ is higher than the
789: Sextet Arcs and four LBG subsamples by a factor of two.
790:
791: At least two of the three images are representing different parts of
792: an individual galaxy, thus fixing the LBG age. Thus if the dependancy
793: of Ly-$\alpha$ strength with the strength of the metal lines is real,
794: then we infer that this trend does not appear to be a function of LBG
795: age. To address whether the correlation may depend on metallicity,
796: \citet{Shapley:03} measured a small line ratio of Si II $\lambda$1260
797: and $\lambda$1527, and so do we for image \#1.1, implying that Si II
798: is saturated, and therefore that differences in equivalent width do
799: not depend on metallicity, but rather on the combination of covering
800: factor and a range of velocities over which the gas is absorbed.
801:
802:
803: \subsection{The Absorption System at $z$=2.53}
804:
805: The absorption system at $z$=2.534 is seen toward two of our spectra
806: over a baseline of two arcsec on the sky. Strong Ly-$\alpha$
807: absorption is seen toward both images \#1.1 and \#2.1. While the data
808: are of insufficient resolution to measure column densities, there is
809: evidence in spectrum \#2.1 of absorption that clearly reaches the
810: zero-level of the continuum. It is interesting that our spectrum
811: \#1.1 is at an estimated unlensed physical separation of 2$h^{-1}$ kpc
812: from the center of our slit for spectrum \#2.1, and yields Ly-$\alpha$
813: that is strong but probably unsaturated (Figure~\ref{fig10}). It is
814: tempting to conclude that we are seeing the HI column density decrease
815: with radius over a size scale a factor of ten larger than the
816: half-light radius of image \#2.1. However, two counterarcs of image
817: \#2.1 are predicted between images \#1.1 and \#1.2. Thus it is
818: possible that our spectrum for image \#1.1 suffers from contaminated
819: light from these faint additional images.
820:
821: The high ionization metal lines in this absorption system at $z$=2.534
822: are similar in strength to those in the Sextet Arc \#1.1 at $z$=3.038.
823: It is interesting that interstellar C~IV and Si~IV should be so
824: prominent in an {\it absorption} system at our low resolution. We
825: consider briefly the possibility that this absorption system is not an
826: intervening object, but rather the spectrum of an outflow absorption
827: from the Sextet Arcs LBG. The velocity difference between the
828: $z=3.038$ and $z=2.5$ systems is 38,000 km~s$^{-1}$. Such a large
829: velocity difference for an associated outflow is not unusual for QSOs,
830: but the the Sextet Arc \#1.1 is an image of an LBG and does not show
831: any signs of AGN-like activity.
832:
833:
834:
835: \subsection{The Lens Model}
836:
837: Our lens model is taken from the surface mass density map in
838: \citet{Broadhurst:05}. Briefly, the model was constructed based on 30
839: multiply-lensed galaxies, by minimizing the angular distance between
840: the predicted images and the observed images in the image plane. The
841: model consists of the sum of a smoothly-varying low-frequency
842: component representing the dark matter, and a high-frequency component
843: representing the nonnegligable cluster galaxy contribution. The
844: resulting mass map reproduces the positions and of the $106$ images
845: with a precision of typically 1-3\arcsec \ from the best fit model,
846: and accurately predicts the morphology, size, orientation, and parity
847: of the lensed images. The critical curve in the region of Sextet Arcs
848: images \#1.1 and \#1.2, and Quintet Arcs image \#2.1, is shown in
849: Figure~\ref{fig10}. The local cusp is produced by the massive nearby
850: cluster elliptical at $z$=0.187. The region of high magnification
851: with positive parity (yellow-red), and high magnification with
852: negative parity (blue-white), are shown. The thin black line at the
853: interface between these two regions marks locus of points for which
854: the magnification factor diverges.
855: %how relative positions of sources 1 and 2 indicate source is likely at smaller redshift.
856: This model has predictive power to estimate redshifts.
857: A comparison of the observed separations between the Source \#1 and \#2 image pairs
858: \#1.3 and \#2.4, \#1.4 and \#2.2, and \#1.5 and \#2.3
859: with model-predicted locations for different source redshifts
860: suggests that source \#1 has a higher redshift. Thus the model favors the scenario in which
861: Source \#1 and \#2 have redshifts $z$=3.038 and $z$=2.534 respectively.
862:
863:
864: If Sources \#1 and \#2 appear only as image pairs, there should be the
865: same number of total images of each source, but instead there are
866: seven images of the Sextet Arcs (but identified in
867: \citet{Broadhurst:05} as six separate ones), and five images of the
868: Quintet Arcs. Two images of the Sextet Arcs appear as two merging
869: images, which is referred to as image \#1.1. Their locations are
870: predicted by the model, at the intersection of the critical curve with
871: the giant arc (Figure~\ref{fig10}). In a similar manner, two additional
872: unseparated images of Source \#2 are predicted at the position of the
873: second region of intersection of the critical curve with the giant arc
874: (between images \#1.1 and \#1.2). These images are created from a
875: small portion of image \#2.1 which does not contain the bright
876: emission peak seen in the center of the 1 arcsec slit in
877: Figure~\ref{fig10}. This arc is possibly matched with a faint
878: stretched arc that is barely visible in the ACS image, between images
879: \#1.1 and \#1.2. It is possible that these additional faint images
880: may have been detected by their {\it absorption}, even though our
881: spectrum for image \#1.1 falls $\sim1$ arcsec short of covering the
882: most likely position of these new predicted images. Our spectrum of
883: image \#1.1 shows a strong intervening absorption system at $z$=2.534
884: which is also seen in our spectrum of image \#2.1. However, this
885: absorption system is weaker in Ly-$\alpha$ than in its counterpart
886: absorption at the same redshift in our image \#2.1
887: (Figure~\ref{fig10}). From this we conclude that this absorption
888: system may be the predicted unseparated counterarcs from a small
889: portion of image \#2.1. Alternatively, if this intervening absorption
890: system forms a spatially-contiguous extension with origin at the
891: center of image \#2.1, we be may detecting the relatively unusual case
892: of a drop-off of H~I column density with radius at high-$z$.
893: Spectroscopy along the long axis of this giant arc will enable source
894: identifications of these absorption systems, thus yielding additional
895: constraints on the effort to derive a precision massmap for A1689.
896:
897:
898:
899: \subsection{Intrinsic Properties of the Sextet Arcs}
900:
901: The Sextet Arcs have an estimated reddening of $E(B-V) \sim 0.47,
902: 0.10, 0.17$, for images \#1.1, \#1.4, and \#2.1, respectively. As
903: discussed above, the extinction in image \#1.1 suffers from
904: contamination by a nearby cluster elliptical. We can use these values
905: for the extinction plus the rest-frame ultraviolet flux to compute a
906: star formation rate. Specifically, the ultraviolet flux of each best
907: SED fit is measured within a synthetic tophat filter of rest-frame
908: width 300 \AA, from 1250-1550 \AA. Given the galaxy's redshift, we
909: convert $F_{\nu}(1400\textrm{\AA})$ for image \#1.1 to a luminosity
910: $L_{\nu}(1400\textrm{\AA})$, which in turn can be converted to a star
911: formation rate:
912:
913: \begin{equation}
914: 7.14\times10^{27}\frac{\textrm{ergs}}{\textrm{s}\cdot\textrm{Hz}}\label{eq:SFR}\rightarrow1\,\frac{M_{\odot}}{\textrm{yr}}\end{equation}
915:
916: This conversion rate is computed for a Salpeter (1955) IMF truncated between $0.1\ <\ M/M_{\odot}\ <\ 100$. Allowing the Salpeter IMF to extend from
917: $0.1~<~M/M_{\odot}~<125$ results in a conversion rate of
918: $8\times10^{27}$ ergs/s/Hz per $M_{\odot}$/year. This is prefered by
919: some authors. Meanwhile a Scale (1986) IMF yields $3.5\times10^{27}$
920: ergs/s/Hz per $M_{\odot}$/year. If the currently fashionable Kroupa
921: (2001) IMF proves to be more accurate, then our SFR estimates should
922: be multiplied by $2/3$; the Kroupa conversion rate is
923: $1.07\times10^{28}$ ergs/s/Hz per $M_{\odot}$/year. The conversion we
924: adopt in Eq. \ref{eq:SFR} is employed by \citet{Hopkins:04}. Objects
925: \#1.1, \#1.4, and \#2.1 have star formation rates of $\sim$40, 25, and
926: 50 $M_{\odot}~{\rm yr}^{-1}$, respectively. We correct these stellar
927: values by the extinction imposed by interstellar gas and dust as:
928: $E(B-V)_{\star} = 0.44 E(B-V)_{\rm gas}$. This attenuation in
929: magnitudes is: $A(\lambda) = E(B-V)_{\star} k(\lambda)$, where
930: $k(1400\textrm{\AA}) = 10.775$. \citep{Calzetti:00}. Upon
931: also correcting for the magnification, we measure star formation
932: rates (SFRs) of $\sim$4, $\sim$4, and $\sim$5 $M_{\odot}~{\rm
933: yr}^{-1}$ for images \#1.1, \#1.4, and \#2.1, respectively. This SFR
934: is roughly one-tenth lower than that found for the general LBG
935: population of 25-52 $M_{\odot}~{\rm yr}^{-1}$ \citep{Shapley:03}.
936: However, it is similar to the SLLBG recently found at $z$=4.88, for
937: which a SFR of $12 \pm 2$ $M_{\odot}~{\rm yr}^{-1}$ has been measured
938: \citep{Swinbank:07}.
939:
940: The Sextet Arcs are also rather faint, with unlensed apparent
941: magnitudes of $K$=$25.2 \pm 0.2$, $<27.4$, and $25.3 \pm 0.2$ for
942: \#1.1, \#1.4, and \#2.1 respectively. The brightness for image \#1.1
943: is three magnitudes fainter in $K$ than $K^*$. This makes the Sextet
944: Arcs quite faint, and not consistent with $L_V^*$ for the $z\sim3$
945: LBGs \citep{Shapley:01}. Clearly more data taken at higher resolution
946: and along the long axis of \#1.1 in particular will be well rewarded
947: by providing spatially-resolved physical and kinematic information for
948: this rather unusual LBG.
949:
950: %corresponding to a physical separation of 2$h^{-1}$ kpc for a redshift of $z$=2.534 and an
951: % estimated tangential stretch factor of 4.
952:
953: %The half-light radius
954: %is 1.5 arcsec, corresponding to a delensed size of 0.4 arcsec, a typical size
955: %scale for the LBG population.
956:
957: %We report a deconvolved FWHM for Ly-$\alpha$ of 1350 km s$^{-1}$, 1700 km s$^{-1}$, and
958: %1500 km s$^{-1}$, for \#2.1, \#1.4, and
959: %the `peak' in the absorption trough of \#1.1 respectively.
960: %1.1 1600 inst. 560 km/s fwhm (decon) = 1500 km/s
961: %2.1 1600 inst. 860 km/s fwhm decon = 1350 km/s
962: %1.4 1890 inst. 860 km/s fwhm decon = 1680 km/s
963: %ly-b 1.1 1560 inst. 560 km/s decon = 1450 km/s
964:
965: % From the strong, unblended line of SiII $\lambda$1260 we calculate a mean
966: % FWHM = 710 $_{-10}^{+170}$ km s$^{-1}$ for sightline \#1.1.
967: %The upper limit is its observed FWHM,
968: % and the lower bound is based on the value for an object filling the 1 arcsec slit for our instrumental resolution for this observing run of 12.5 \AA.
969: % There are no significant
970: %absorption lines in sightline \#1.4, and for \#2.1, we measure a larger
971: %deconvolved FWHM =860 $_{-10}^{+350}$ km s$^{-1}$
972: %for an average instrumental resolution of 850 km s$^{-1}$.
973: %The results are $E(B-V) \sim 0.47, 0.10, 0.17$, for images \#1.1, \#1.4, and \#2.1, respectively.
974:
975:
976:
977: \section{Summary and Future Work}
978:
979: We have undertaken a spectroscopic redshift survey and present spectra
980: of the strongly-lensed LBG, the Sextet Arcs, at $z$=3.038. The Sextet Arcs are
981: remarkable for their large apparent total magnitude of
982: $r_{625}=21.71$. Our results are as follows:
983:
984: %, it is only 1.4 magnitudes fainter than cB58. .
985:
986:
987: \begin{enumerate}
988:
989: \item{Spectra of the Sextet Arcs at $z_{sys}$=3.038 are presented for
990: two different images, \#1.1 and \#1.4. The spectrum centered on image
991: \#2.1 is also presented, which is either a companion galaxy at the
992: same systemic redshift of the Sextet Arcs or, as we think more likely,
993: a different spatial region of image \#1.1. This yields up to three
994: spatial regions across a single LBG: two different parts of image
995: \#1.1, and the whole of image \#1.4.}
996:
997: \item{Unusually, Ly-$\alpha$ does not show evidence for gas motions.
998: The velocity difference between Ly-$\alpha$ and the low ionization
999: interstellar absorption lines is $\Delta v = -75 \pm 150$ km s$^{-1}$.
1000: However, the line profile of Si~IV $\lambda$1394 shows broad,
1001: blueshifted absorption indicative of gas outflow.}
1002:
1003: \item{Across the spectra for the three images, \#1.1, \#1.4, and
1004: \#2.1, the Ly-$\alpha$ profile changes dramatically, and W$_{IS}$
1005: decreases in strength with increasing W$_{\alpha}$, similar to the
1006: four LBG subsamples of \citet{Shapley:03}. We emphasize that for the
1007: Sextet Arcs this correlation all takes place within a {\it single}
1008: galaxy.}
1009:
1010: \item{Intrinsically, the Sextet Arcs have a rather modest SFR and
1011: luminosity. We infer SFR of $\sim4$, $\sim4$, and $\sim5$
1012: $M_{\odot}~{\rm yr}^{-1}$ for images \#1.1, \#1.4, and \#2.1,
1013: respectively. This SFR is very different to that found for the
1014: general LBG population, roughly one-tenth as high. The Sextet Arcs
1015: are also rather faint intrinsically, $K=25.2 \pm 0.13$ for image
1016: \#1.1, which corresponds roughly to $\sim0.1K^*$.}
1017:
1018: \item{The same intervening absorption system at $z$=2.534 is seen
1019: towards our spectra of image \#1.1, where it is possibly damped, and
1020: image \#2.1, which is weaker. The angular separation is two arcsec on
1021: the sky, or an unlensed physical size of $\sim2h^{-1}$kpc for an
1022: estimated tangential stretch factor of four. We interpret this either
1023: as evidence of another counterimage of image \#2.1, or, if it is a
1024: spatially-contiguous extension of image \#2.1, of a dropoff of H I
1025: column density with radius from an origin centered on image \#2.1. }
1026:
1027: \item{We present a spectroscopic catalog in the field of A1689
1028: comprising 98 secure redshifts, 82 of which are arclets, $z>$0.23 (see
1029: Tables~\ref{table1} \& \ref{table3}). This survey increases the
1030: number of known arclets by six-fold. We augment our catalog with
1031: the spectroscopic redshifts of all known cluster members and measure a new cluster redshift for A1689
1032: of $z$=0.187.}
1033:
1034:
1035: \end{enumerate}
1036:
1037:
1038:
1039: LBGs with $r_{625}$-band magnitudes brighter than 23 are still fairly
1040: rare, but no longer mere oddities. The newest member, the Sextet Arcs
1041: at $z$=3.038 presented in this paper, is unique for showing a
1042: spatially-resolved strong intervening absorption system as well.
1043: While SLLBGs are anomalously bright, strongly-magnified, and
1044: spatially-resolved due to gravitational lensing, how their intrinsic
1045: characteristics compare with the general LBG population is still a
1046: work in progress. As more SLLBGs are discovered and studied, we will
1047: be afforded valuable information on how intrinsic properties such as
1048: the luminosity, extinction and SFR compare with the general LBG
1049: population, and more generally, with the evolutionary state of
1050: galaxies at $z \sim3$.
1051:
1052: % Also note the intrinsic luminosity of this LBG is rather low, $K \approx25.2$
1053: %(unlensed). This corresponds to $\approx.1K^*$ for Lyman-break galaxies at $z\sim3$
1054: %\citep{Shapley:01}.
1055:
1056:
1057: \acknowledgments We would like to thank Holland Ford, Alice Shapley, Bruce Draine,
1058: and Todd Tripp for useful discussions, and Ray Murphy for his
1059: technical assistance. The ACS was developed under NASA contract NAS
1060: 5-32865. BLF acknowledges support from Science Foundation Ireland
1061: Research Frontiers Programme Grant PHY008. DVB is funded through NASA
1062: Long Term Space Astrophysics Grant NNG05GE26G. The authors wish to
1063: recognize and acknowledge the very significant cultural roleAand
1064: reverence that the summit of Mauna Kea has always had within the
1065: indigenous Hawaiian community. We are most fortunate to have the
1066: opportunity to conduct observations from this mountain.
1067:
1068: %More information on the AASTeX macros package is available \\ at
1069: %\url{http://www.aas.org/publications/aastex}.;
1070: %For technical support, please write to
1071: %\email{aastex-help@aas.org}.
1072:
1073: %% To help institutions obtain information on the effectiveness of their
1074: %% telescopes, the AAS Journals has created a group of keywords for telescope
1075: %% facilities. A common set of keywords will make these types of searches
1076: %% significantly easier and more accurate. In addition, they will also be
1077: %% useful in linking papers together which utilize the same telescopes
1078: %% within the framework of the National Virtual Observatory.
1079: %% See the AASTeX Web site at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX
1080: %% for information on obtaining the facility keywords.
1081:
1082: %% After the acknowledgments section, use the following syntax and the
1083: %% \facility{} macro to list the keywords of facilities used in the research
1084: %% for the paper. Each keyword will be checked against the master list during
1085: %% copy editing. Individual instruments can be provided in parentheses,
1086: %% after the keyword, but they will not be verified.
1087:
1088: Facilities: \facility{HST(ACS)}, \facility{Keck:I(LRIS)}, \facility{VLT}, \facility{Magellan:Baade ()}.
1089:
1090:
1091: \appendix
1092: \section{Spectroscopic Catalog}
1093:
1094: \subsection{General Description}
1095:
1096: A total of 98 objects with secure redshifts in the A1689 field are presented in Tables~\ref{table2}
1097: and \ref{table3}. The columns are: right ascension and declination, spectroscopic redshift, $I_{AB}$
1098: magnitude, Bayesian photometric redshift, date of observation and telescope reference. Only
1099: objects with secure redshifts appear in the tables, and that we take to mean
1100: two or more spectroscopic features be detected
1101: at the 2$\sigma$ level in the continuum. In the case of a single emission line, we require
1102: that it be detected blueward of rest-frame H$\alpha$ and have a photometric redshift consistent
1103: with its identification.
1104: All other objects with only one
1105: spectroscopic feature are considered insecure and not included in this catalog.
1106: The magnitude distribution of all of our objects with spectroscopic redshifts shows our catalog to
1107: be complete down to roughly $I_{AB}\sim22.5$.
1108:
1109: %\subsection{The Master Catalog}
1110:
1111: Our catalog is augmented by objects drawn from the literature.
1112: This larger catalog of spectroscopic redshifts is shown
1113: in
1114: Figure~\ref{fig4}. The objects are
1115: divided into two categories: those from this survey (positive slope
1116: fill pattern) and all other published sources (negative slope fill
1117: pattern) that are nonredundant \citep{Broadhurst:05,
1118: Mieske:05, Frye:02, Duc:02, Balogh:02, Teague:90}. Additionally, objects in common
1119: between the catalogs were removed. In the inset is shown the
1120: redshift histogram for the cluster members from all
1121: published sources, including this catalog. Our catalog makes a significant
1122: contribution to the number of arclets. Of the 98 objects,
1123: 82 are in the background, and 72 of those are new
1124: spectroscopic redshifts. Note our 10 duplicate arclets are included in
1125: Tables~\ref{table1} and \ref{table3} as they are the result of new data and are useful for the
1126: purposes of confirmation. For A1689, there are 186 cluster members in total in the
1127: `master' catalog, with ten new contributions out of the 11 cluster members in our sample.
1128: From these 186 cluster members we calculate a new mean cluster
1129: redshift of $z$=0.1872. Finally, five objects in our catalog are stars and are
1130: included in this paper for completeness.
1131:
1132: The arcs at $z$=3.038 were first published in \citet{Broadhurst:05}, and their
1133: references are revised from Table~1 as follows:
1134: the spectroscopic redshifts for images \#1.1 and \#1.4 were first referenced in \citet{Broadhurst:05}, and not in
1135: \citet{Frye:02} and Fort et~al.~(1997), as given in their Table 1.
1136: As for other catalogs, one object from the \citet{Teague:90}
1137: survey was removed as its position lies between two objects,
1138: (RA, DEC) = (13:11:30.516, -01:20:45.82). Also the positions of
1139: four objects from \citet{Mieske:05} are revised from what appears in their paper as follows:
1140: Candidate 2 (RA, DEC) = (13:11:33.11, -01:19:22.5),
1141: Candidate 3 (RA, DEC) = (13:11:29.90, -01:20:05.5),
1142: Candidate 4 (RA, DEC) = (13:11:31.09, -01:21:42.1), and
1143: Candidate 5 (RA, DEC) = (13:11:25.73, -01:21:14.8). All
1144: coordinates are J2000.
1145:
1146:
1147: % 5 objects are stars
1148: % 11 objects with z</= 0.23 from this paper - 1 dup
1149: %82 objects with z>0.23 (this paper) - 4 dups, -4 from frye et a. 2002, -2 from Broadhurst, et al. 2005 = 72 nonredundant objects
1150: % 7 objects with z>0.23 from out4 Duc, et al. 2002
1151: % 3 objects with z>-.23 from out6 Broadhurst et al. 2005
1152:
1153: %\subsection{Arclets}
1154: \subsection{Multiply-imaged Systems}
1155:
1156: All spectroscopically-confirmed $z>0.23$ objects in the field of
1157: Abell 1689 are shown in Figure~\ref{fig5}. The symbols
1158: denote different source references, as indicated. This survey
1159: increases the number of known
1160: background objects significantly, from 12 to 72.
1161: Six objects are clearly separated from the
1162: bulk of faint background galaxies to be at high-z ($z>2.5$) and small in radius.
1163: Note there are five high-z objects and six high-z points.
1164: The two points at $z$=3.038 represent two images of the Sextet Arcs, which is the focus of this paper.
1165: Four images of multiply-imaged systems are in our spectroscopic sample, Sources \#1.1 and \#1.4 (of the Sextet Arcs),
1166: Source \#2.1 (one of the Quintet Arcs) and Source \#7.1.
1167: These images were introduced in
1168: \citet{Broadhurst:05}, in which 30 multiply-imaged systems were identified.
1169:
1170: The highest spectroscopically-confirmed
1171: redshifts in the A1689 field come from emission line objects at $z=4.868$ (\#7.1) and at $z=5.12$
1172: \citep{Frye:02}. Object \#7.1 is triply-imaged, and FORS2 VLT data show it to have significant structure in the Lyman-series forest.
1173: The data include the region below the Lyman-limit, and will be
1174: presented in an upcoming paper. The galaxy at $z=4.71$ is new, and was
1175: also discovered with FORS2 at the VLT.
1176:
1177: %There is one LBG in our 6 $\times$ 7.8 arcmin Keck field of view, yielding
1178: %a number density of n$_{LBG} >$ 0.04 objects/arcmin$^2$. As our catalog is more complete
1179: %in the smaller ACS field of 200 $\times$ 202 arcsec,
1180: %here we identify four objects with z$>$2.5, or n = 0.36 objects/arcmin$^2$, and two LBGs, to give
1181: %n$_{LBG}$ = 0.18 objects/arcmin$^2$. Our z$>$2.5 objects appear to be underabundant compared to our reference sample
1182: %of the full dataset of \citet{Steidel:03}, They
1183: %measure 940 redshifts in 0.38 deg$^2$, or n$_{LBG}=0.69$ LBGs per arcmin$^2$. The difference
1184: %is owing possibly to our catalog completeness of $I_{AB}\sim22.5$.
1185: %By contrast, at z$>$3.8, we count 0.09 objects/arcmin$^2$ and 0.2 objects/arcmin$^2$ in the Keck and ACS fields respectively, which compares rather favorably
1186: %with the number expected based on the high-z dataset of \citet{Steidel:99} of 48 redshifts
1187: %in 0.23 deg$^2$, or n$_{hiz}$=0.058 objects/arcmin$^2.
1188:
1189: \subsection{Photometric Redshifts}
1190:
1191: The photometric redshifts given in Tables~\ref{table1} and~\ref{table3} are derived using a Bayesian approach.
1192: The Bayesian photometric redshift (BPZ) method is described in detail in other papers
1193: \citep{Benitez:04,Benitez:00},
1194: and is found to meet the requirements of a field that is faint, crowded, and magnified.
1195: The comparison of spectroscopic and photometric redshifts is shown in Figure~\ref{fig6}.
1196: There are two clear outliers at $z_{spec} \sim 0.7$, one object with similarly large deviance
1197: but with 95\% error bars that encompass the true redshift of $z_{spec} = 4.71$, and one
1198: object at $z=0$.
1199: When these three objects are removed,
1200: we find the best fit BPZ redshifts agree with the spectroscopic redshifts
1201: to within $0.11 (1 + z_{spec})$.
1202:
1203: %DC
1204: This scatter is somewhat larger than that achieved in previous BPZ studies, with the most
1205: recent example being the Ultra Deep Field (UDF) \citep{Coe:06}.
1206: %which seems disappointing given the extensive
1207: %$g\arcmin r\arcmin i\arcmin z\arcmin U B V R I Z J H Ks$
1208: %filter set used to obtain these redshifts.
1209: The main uncertainty in the photometric redshift calculations is traced back to
1210: the difficulty of determining reliable magnitudes for faint objects in rich cluster fields in comparison
1211: to other field studies such as the UDF or Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey (GOODS) \citep{Mobasher:04}.
1212: Our sample here is characterized by lensed objects with very low surface brightness.
1213: The images are background-limited and in many cases, extended into giant arcs,
1214: leading to larger photometric errors than comparable unlensed galaxies to similar
1215: depth, such as GOODS.
1216: Another source of uncertainty is the crowded field.
1217: Light from many of our sample galaxies is contaminated by light from cluster members.
1218: We have done our best to subtract this cluster light to improve the photometry (\S3.2),
1219: but the galaxy-modeling is not perfect.
1220: Apart from the unavoidable 'root-n' noise, the subtraction introduces both random error
1221: and an error that is filter-dependent and most prominent for the fainter objects.
1222: % I already discuss how the ground-based images *are* utilized for the photometry in the photometry section.
1223:
1224: Additional improvements in the photometric redshifts should result from
1225: use of the \citet{Coe:06} BPZ template set, which includes younger (bluer) starbursts.
1226: And the reported agreement between photometric and spectroscopic redshifts should tighten further
1227: once galaxies with poor SED fits (i.e., $\chi^2_{mod} < 1$) are removed from the comparison.
1228: These issues will all be addressed with the release of the full A1689 photometric redshift catalog
1229: (Coe et al., in prep.).
1230:
1231:
1232: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.
1233: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.
1234: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of
1235: %% curly braces. If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error
1236: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".
1237: %%
1238: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite
1239: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a
1240: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds
1241: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).
1242: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the
1243: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain
1244: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in
1245: %% place of the \cite commands.
1246:
1247: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.
1248: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.
1249: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.
1250:
1251: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly
1252: %% different from previous examples. The natbib system solves a host
1253: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly
1254: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.
1255: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.
1256:
1257: \bibliography{bfrye,apj-jour.bib}
1258:
1259:
1260: %% If you are not including electonic art with your submission, you may
1261: %% mark up your captions using the \figcaption command. See the
1262: %% User Guide for details.
1263: %%
1264: %% No more than seven \figcaption commands are allowed per page,
1265: %% so if you have more than seven captions, insert a \clearpage
1266: %% after every seventh one.
1267:
1268: %% Tables should be submitted one per page, so put a \clearpage before
1269: %% each one.
1270:
1271: %% Two options are available to the author for producing tables: the
1272: %% deluxetable environment provided by the AASTeX package or the LaTeX
1273: %% table environment. Use of deluxetable is preferred.
1274: %%
1275:
1276: %% Three table samples follow, two marked up in the deluxetable environment,
1277: %% one marked up as a LaTeX table.
1278:
1279: %% In this first example, note that the \tabletypesize{}
1280: %% command has been used to reduce the font size of the table.
1281: %% We also use the \rotate command to rotate the table to
1282: %% landscape orientation since it is very wide even at the
1283: %% reduced font size.
1284: %%
1285: %% Note also that the \label command needs to be placed
1286: %% inside the \tablecaption.
1287:
1288: %% This table also includes a table comment indicating that the full
1289: %% version will be available in machine-readable format in the electronic
1290: %% edition.
1291: %%
1292:
1293: \clearpage
1294:
1295: \begin{deluxetable}{cccc}
1296: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1297: \tablecaption{Log of A1689 Spectroscopic Observations}
1298: %\tablewidth{6.45in}
1299: \tablewidth{0pt}
1300: %\rotate
1301: %\tablehead{ Site & Date & Exp (h) & Grating (lines/mm) & Seeing (\arcsec) & $I_{AB}$ }
1302: \tablehead{ Site & Date & Exp (h) & Grating (lines/mm) }
1303: \startdata
1304: Keck LRIS & Apr 1996 (1) & 2 & 300 at 5000 \AA \\ %& 0.7 & 20.5 -- 25 \\
1305: $^{\prime\prime}$ & Apr 1996 (2) & 2 &$^{\prime\prime}$ \\ %& 0.7 & 20.5 -- 25 \\
1306: $^{\prime\prime}$ & Jun 1998 & 2.8 & $^{\prime\prime}$ \\ %& 0.6-0.8 & 19 -- 25 \\
1307: $^{\prime\prime}$ & Mar 1999 & 2.2 & 400 at 8500 \AA \\ %& -- & 21 -- 25 \\
1308: $^{\prime\prime}$ & Apr 1999 & 2 & $^{\prime\prime}$ \\ %0.8 & 20.5 -- 25 \\
1309: $^{\prime\prime}$ & Mar 2003 (1) & 1.9 & $^{\prime\prime}$ \\ %-- & 23 -- 24.5 \\
1310: $^{\prime\prime}$ & Mar 2003 (2) & 1.9 & $^{\prime\prime}$ \\ %-- & 20.5 -- 25 \\
1311: VLT FORS2 & Jun/Jul 2001 & 11 & 300 at 8600 \AA \\ %-- & $>$23 \\
1312: Magellan LDSS-2 & May 2003 &$2-14$& 300 at 5500 \AA \\ %-- & 23 -- 24.5 \\
1313: \enddata
1314: \label{table2}
1315: \end{deluxetable}
1316:
1317:
1318: \clearpage
1319:
1320: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccl}
1321: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1322: \tablecaption{Spectroscopic Features for the Spatially-resolved
1323: Sextet Arc at $z$=3.038}
1324: \tablewidth{0pt}
1325: \tablehead{
1326: \colhead{Source \#} & \colhead{Identification} & \colhead{$\lambda_{obs}
1327: $} & \colhead{W$_0$} \\
1328: & & \colhead{(\AA)} & \colhead{(\AA)} & \colhead{Comments}
1329: }
1330: \startdata
1331: \#1.1 & HI & 1215.67 & $-26_{+1.7}^{5.4}$ & \\
1332:
1333: & Si II & 1260.42 & $-1.9\pm0.42$ & \\
1334: & SiII+OI & 1303.27\tablenotemark{a} & $-2.2\pm0.61$& \\
1335: & C II & 1334.53 & $-3.0\pm0.36$ & Blend: SiIV $\lambda$1394 ($z$=2.87) + SiII $\lambda$1527 ($z$=2.53) \\
1336: & SiIV & 1393.76 & $-2.1\pm0.42$ & \\
1337: & SiIV & 1402.77 & $-1.2\pm0.34$& Blend with FeII $\lambda$1608 ($z$=2.53)\\
1338: & SiII & 1526.71 & $-4.1\pm1.28$ & \\
1339: & CIV & 1549.48\tablenotemark{b} & $-0.88\pm0.30$& \\
1340: & FeII & 1608.45 & $-1.1\pm0.57$& \\
1341: & AlII & 1670.79 & $-1.2\pm0.62$& \\
1342:
1343: \#1.4 & HI &1215.67 & -4.0 $_{-1.5}^{+11.5}$& \\
1344: &SiII, SiII+OI, CII &1260.42,1303.27,1334.53 & -6.7$_{+2.1}^{-1.1}$ & \\
1345: %& Si II & 1260.42 & -1.8$_{+0.96}^{-0.27}$ &\\
1346: %& SiII+OI & 1303.27 & 1.3 $_{-0.44}^{+0.97}$ &\\
1347: %& C II & 1334.53 & -4.8$_{+1.8}^{-0.33}$ &\\
1348: &SiII & 1526.71 & -2.0$_{+0.22}^{-1.0}$ & \\
1349:
1350: \#2.1 & HI & 1215.67 &4.0$^{+1.5}_{-5.0}$ & \\
1351: &SiII, SiII+OI, CII &1260.42,1303.27,1334.53 & $-5.1\pm2.1$ & \\
1352: %& Si II & 1260.42 &$>-$2.4 &\\
1353: %& SiII+OI & 1303.27 &$>- $1.5 &\\
1354: %& C II & 1334.53 & $>-$2.9 &\\
1355: %& Si II & 1526.71 & $>-$1.79 &\\
1356:
1357: \enddata
1358: %\tablenotetext{a}{This value is based on the assignment of the peak
1359: %in the Ly-$\alpha$ absorption trough as Ly-$\alpha$ emission rather
1360: %than a coincidental peak in a complex emission-filling profile }
1361: \tablenotetext{a}{This is the mean vacuum wavelength of O I $\lambda$
1362: 1302 and Si II $\lambda$ 1304, and
1363: all quantities measured refer to the total of these two lines which
1364: are blended at our spectral resolution. }
1365:
1366: \tablenotetext{b}{This is the mean vacuum wavelength of the C IV $\lambda$1548, 1550 doublet,
1367: which is blended in this spectrum.}
1368:
1369: \label{table4}
1370: \end{deluxetable}
1371:
1372:
1373: \clearpage
1374:
1375:
1376: %\begin{deluxetable}{ccccccl}
1377: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1378: %\tablecaption{Confirmation of Multiply-lensed Objects in the A1689 Field}
1379: %\tablewidth{0pt}
1380: %\rotate
1381: %\tablehead{
1382: %\colhead{Image} & \colhead{RA} & \colhead{Dec} & \colhead{$i$} & \colhead{z$_{pub}$} & \colhead{z$_{BPZ}$} &\colhead{z$_{spec}$, (this paper)}
1383: %}
1384: %\startdata
1385: %Sextet$-$1.1&13:11:26.257& -01:19:56.68 &24.0 & 3.038\tablenotemark{a}&3.03$\pm$0.53 &Secure (see Fig.\ref{fig9}) \\
1386: %"$-$1.4 &13:11:32.871& -01:20:29.33 &23.6 & 3.038\tablenotemark{a}&2.94$\pm$0.52 &Secure (see Fig.\ref{fig9})\\
1387: %7.1 &13:11:25.417& -01:20:51.63 &23.3 & 4.868\tablenotemark{b}&4.92$\pm$0.78 &Secure \\
1388: % 12.1 &13:11:30.333& -01:19:51.04 &25.4 &1.82\tablenotemark{a} &1.87$\pm$0.38 & None \\
1389: % 12.5 &13:11:33.490& -01:20:51.56 &25.5 & 1.82\tablenotemark{a} &1.87$\pm$0.38 &None; poss. [OII]$\lambda$3727 at z=1.8 \\ %look on 2d image to see if OII looks real
1390: %10.1 &13:11:33.950& -01:20:51.63 &23.7& 1.37\tablenotemark{a} &1.75$^{+0.74}_{-0.36}$&None; poss. AlIII $\lambda\lambda$1855, 1863 at z=2.6 \\
1391: %10.2 &13:11:28.034& -01:20:12.50 &23.3& $-$ &1.54$\pm$0.33 &None \\
1392: %2.1 &13:11:26.524& -01:19:55.45 &23.4& 2.537\tablenotemark{c} &2.62$^{+0.47}_{-0.48}$&Secure (see Fig.\ref{fig9}) \\
1393: %2.2 &13:11:32.942& -01:20:25.51 &24.2& $-$ &2.57$\pm$0.47 &None \\
1394: %2.4 &13:11:29.783& -01:21:06.01 &24.5& $-$ &2.36$\pm$0.44 &None; poss. AlIII $\lambda\lambda$1855, 1863 at z=1.83 \\
1395: %\enddata
1396: %\tablenotetext{a}{\citet{Broadhurst:05}}
1397: %\tablenotetext{b}{\citet{Frye:02}}
1398: %\tablenotetext{c}{Frye, et al. (2007), this paper}
1399: %\label{table4}
1400: %\end{deluxetable}
1401:
1402:
1403: %\begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}
1404: %\tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1405: %\tablecaption{Strongly-lensed Lyman Break Galaxies}
1406: %\tablewidth{0pt}
1407: %\tablehead{Name & $z_{spec}$ & $g_{475}$& $r_{625}$ &$i_{775}$ & (\arcsec)\tablenotemark{a} & $\mu$\tablenotemark{b}}
1408: %\startdata
1409: %8 o'clock Arc &2.73 & 19.95\tablenotemark{c} & 19.22\tablenotemark{c} & 18.96\tablenotemark{c} & 9.6 & 12.3$^{+15}_{-3.6}$ \\
1410: %LBG J2135.2-0102 & 3.074 & $-$ &20.27\tablenotemark{d} & $-$ & 3 & 28 $\pm$ 3 \\
1411: %MS1512-cB58&2.73 & 20.64$\pm$0.05\tablenotemark{e} & 20.41$\pm$ 0.05\tablenotemark{e} & 20.35 $\pm$ 0.05\tablenotemark{e} & 3 & $\sim$30\\
1412: %8 o'clock-A2 &2.73 & 20.99 & 20.40 & 20.11 \\
1413: %A2218-384 &2.515& 22.1\tablenotemark{f} & 21.6\tablenotemark{f} & 20.6 \tablenotemark{f} & 3 & \\
1414: %The Sextet Arcs &3.038& 22.47\tablenotemark{g} & 21.71\tablenotemark{g} & 21.59\tablenotemark{g} & 6 &$\sim$16 \\
1415: %1E0657-56-A &3.2 & 23.11$\pm$0.01\tablenotemark{h} & 22.66$\pm$0.01\tablenotemark{h} & 22.45$\pm$0.01\tablenotemark{h} &6.4 & \\
1416: %Q0000-D6 & 2.961 & $-$ & 22.88 \tablenotemark{i} & $-$& & \
1417: %A2390 Quad & & & & & \\
1418: %Swinbank arc & && & & \\
1419: %\enddata
1420: %\tablenotetext{a}{Arc length}
1421: %\tablenotetext{b}{Area magnification factor}
1422: %\tablenotetext{c}{Arc total magnitude, \citet{Allam:06}}
1423: %\tablenotetext{d}{Arc total magnitude, \citet{Smail:06}}
1424: %\tablenotetext{e}{\citet{Teplitz:04}}
1425: %\tablenotetext{f}{\citet{Ebbels:96}}
1426: %\tablenotetext{g}{Arc total magnitude, this paper}
1427: %\tablenotetext{h}{Convolved to seeing in $R$-band, \citet{Mehlert:01}}
1428: %\tablenotetext{i}{\citet{Giallongo:02}}
1429: %\label{table5}
1430: %\end{deluxetable}
1431:
1432:
1433:
1434: %% If you use the table environment, please indicate horizontal rules using
1435: %% \tableline, not \hline.
1436: %% Do not put multiple tabular environments within a single table.
1437: %% The optional \label should appear inside the \caption command.
1438:
1439:
1440: %% Tables may also be prepared as separate files. See the accompanying
1441: %% sample file table.tex for an example of an external table file.
1442: %% To include an external file in your main document, use the \input
1443: %% command. Uncomment the line below to include table.tex in this
1444: %% sample file. (Note that you will need to comment out the \documentclass,
1445: %% \begin{document}, and \end{document} commands from table.tex if you want
1446: %% to include it in this document.)
1447:
1448: %% \input{table}
1449:
1450: %% The following command ends your manuscript. LaTeX will ignore any text
1451: %% that appears after it.
1452:
1453: \begin{deluxetable}{ccllcll}
1454: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1455: \tablecaption{Spectroscopic Identification of $z<$2.5 Objects towards A1689}
1456: \tablewidth{0pt}
1457: \tablehead{
1458: \colhead{RA} & \colhead{DEC} & \colhead{$z$} & \colhead{{\it $I_{AB}$}} & \colhead{$z_{BPZ}$} & \colhead{Date} & \colhead{Telescope}
1459: }
1460: \startdata
1461: 13:11:19.289&-01:19:43.42& 0.228& 22.83$\pm$ 0.46 &--- & 96 Apr & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/apr96/mask2/arc1p52.dat
1462: 13:11:20.231&-01:20:01.10& 0.81 & 22.51$\pm$ 0.03 & 0.69$^{+0.22}_{-0.22}$ & 03 May & Magellan \\ %/scr0/magellan/may27/mask4/spec882.dat
1463: 13:11:20.346&-01:21:15.94& 0.626& 21.90$\pm$ 0.45 &--- & 96 Apr & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/apr96/mask3/arc2p92.dat
1464: 13:11:21.056&-01:17:31.19& 0.733& 21.41$\pm$ 0.01 & 0.65$^{+0.22}_{-0.22}$ & 03 May & Magellan \\ %/scr0/magellan/may28/mask1/spec1098.dat
1465: 13:11:21.503&-01:17:47.40& 0.733& 22.80$\pm$ 0.03 & 0.82$^{+0.24}_{-0.24}$ & 03 May & Magellan \\ %/scr0/magellan/may28/mask5/spec1056.dat
1466: 13:11:21.853&-01:17:26.80& 0.733& 23.14$\pm$ 0.04 & 4.41$^{+0.71}_{-0.71}$ & 03 May & Magellan \\ %/scr0/magellan/may28/mask5/spec1078.dat
1467: 13:11:22.523&-01:20:39.43& 0.960& 23.03$\pm$ 0.02 & 0.94$^{+0.26}_{-0.26}$ & 99 Mar & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/mar99/a1689/spec_G84.dat
1468: 13:11:22.781&-01:19:01.65& 0.709& 24.06$\pm$ 0.06 & 0.50$^{+0.20}_{-0.20}$ & 96 Apr & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/apr96/mask2/arc2p09.dat
1469: 13:11:22.843&-01:17:06.32& 0.66 & 22.33$\pm$ 0.02 & 0.70$^{+0.22}_{-0.22}$ & 03 May & Magellan \\ %/scr0/magellan/may27/mask4/93_1082.dat
1470: %13:11:24.066&-01:18:47.17& 4.705& 25.26$\pm$ 0.13 & 0.73$^{+4.65}_{-0.23}$ & 01 Jul & VLT FORS2 \\%/scr0/vlt/67redux/analysis/z4p7_1521/z4p7all_clean.dat
1471: 13:11:24.104&-01:18:52.65& 0.672& 21.96$\pm$ 0.01 & 0.67$^{+0.22}_{-0.22}$ & 03 May & Magellan \\ %/scr0/magellan/may27/mask3/spec869.dat
1472: 13:11:24.155&-01:19:56.54& 1.155& 21.34$\pm$ 0.01 & 0.96$^{+0.26}_{-0.26}$ & 98 Jun & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/jun98/a1689/arc21.dat
1473: 13:11:24.240&-01:19:52.68& 0.857& 21.91$\pm$ 0.02 & 1.12$^{+0.28}_{-0.28}$ & 98 Jun & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/jun98/a1689/spec_A9ellb.dat
1474: %13:11:24.246&-01:19:57.04& 1.155& 21.34$\pm$ 0.01 & 0.96$^{+0.26}_{-0.26}$ & 98 Jun & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/jun98/a1689/arc21.dat
1475: 13:11:24.367&-01:19:36.87& 0.895& 23.75$\pm$ 0.06 & 0.81$^{+0.24}_{-0.24}$ & 98 Jun & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/jun98/a1689/arc1p93.dat
1476: 13:11:24.609&-01:19:20.83& 0.757& 24.16$\pm$ 0.09 & 0.69$^{+0.22}_{-0.22}$ & 03 Mar & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/mar03/mask1/spectra/spec_1826.dat
1477: 13:11:24.652&-01:20:03.38& 0.481& 21.33$\pm$ 0.01 & 0.48$^{+0.19}_{-0.19}$ & 96 Apr & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/apr96/mask2/arc7.dat
1478: 13:11:24.802&-01:20:23.08& 0.0 & 21.84$\pm$ 0.01 & 5.27$^{+0.82}_{-0.82}$ & 96 Apr & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/apr96/mask3/arc1p04a.dat
1479: 13:11:24.960&-01:19:36.61& 0.722& 24.23$\pm$ 0.11 & 0.27$^{+0.17}_{-0.17}$ & 03 Mar & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/mar03/mask2/spectra/spec_1768.dat
1480: %13:11:25.447&-01:20:51.74& 4.868& 23.22$\pm$ 0.03 & 4.89$^{+0.77}_{-0.77}$ & 01 Jul & VLT FORS2 \\ %/scr0/vlt/67redux/fluxing/flam_z4p87all.dat
1481: 13:11:25.617&-01:18:01.21& 1.005& 22.61$\pm$ 0.03 & 0.76$^{+0.23}_{-0.23}$ & 03 May & Magellan \\ %/scr0/magellan/may28/mask5/spec904.dat
1482: %13:11:26.237&-01:19:56.45& 0.183& 18.10$\pm$ 0.01 & 0.23$^{+0.16}_{-0.16}$ & 96 Apr & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/apr96/mask2/arc36b.dat
1483: 13:11:26.237&-01:19:56.45& 0.183& 18.10$\pm$ 0.01 & 0.34$^{+0.18}_{-0.18}$ & 98 Jun & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/jun98/a1689/arc31b.dat
1484: %13:11:26.257&-01:19:56.68& 3.042& 22.60$\pm$ 0.04 & 0.31$^{+0.17}_{-0.17}$ & 98 Jun & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/jun97/a1689/arc31a.dat
1485: 13:11:26.714&-01:19:37.49& 0.959& 21.0 $\pm$ 0.42 & 0.75$^{+0.23}_{-0.23}$ & 99 Mar & Keck LRIS \\%/scr0/keck/mar99/a1689/spec_ARC32.dat
1486: 13:11:26.919&-01:20:00.65& 0.0 & 22.35$\pm$ 0.03 & 0.05$^{+0.14}_{-0.05}$ & 03 May & Magellan \\ %/scr0/magellan/may27/mask4/spec673.dat
1487: 13:11:27.122&-01:18:48.43& 0.184& 19.84$\pm$ 0.01 & 0.16$^{+0.15}_{-0.15}$ & 03 May & Magellan \\ %/scr0/magellan/may28/mask1/spec785.dat
1488: 13:11:27.173&-01:18:49.98& 0.480& 21.5 $\pm$ 0.44 & 0.49$^{+0.20}_{-0.20}$ & 03 May & Magellan \\ %/scr0/magellan/may28/mask1/spec778.dat
1489: 13:11:27.191&-01:18:26.55& 1.112& 22.09$\pm$ 0.02 & 0.94$^{+0.26}_{-0.26}$ & 98 Jun & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/jun98/a1689/arc26.dat
1490: 13:11:27.851&-01:20:07.65& 0.175& 17.48$\pm$ 0.01 & 0.18$^{+0.16}_{-0.16}$ & 03 May & Magellan \\ %/scr0/magellan/may28/mask1/spec634.dat
1491: 13:11:28.221&-01:20:50.93& 0.703& 22.00$\pm$ 0.02 & 0.26$^{+0.17}_{-0.17}$ & 03 Mar & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/mar03/mask2/spectra/spec_1368.dat
1492: 13:11:28.325&-01:18:27.50& 0.710& 20.59$\pm$ 0.01 & 0.74$^{+0.23}_{-0.23}$ & 03 May & Magellan \\ %/scr0/magellan/may27/mask3/spec778.dat
1493: 13:11:28.547&-01:23:02.85& 0.756& 23.76$\pm$ 0.10 & 0.49$^{+0.20}_{-0.20}$ & 99 Mar & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/mar99/a1689/spec_G48s.dat
1494: 13:11:28.685&-01:17:37.54& 0.231& 22.38$\pm$ 0.02 & 0.14$^{+0.15}_{-0.14}$ & 01 Jun & VLT FORS2 \\ %/scr0/vlt/67redux/12jun/spectra/spec_1871.dat
1495: 13:11:28.886&-01:20:01.94& 0.180& 21.05$\pm$ 0.01 & 0.20$^{+0.16}_{-0.16}$ & 96 Apr & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/apr96/mask2/arc51b.dat
1496: 13:11:29.100&-01:19:46.93& 0.188& 19.31$\pm$ 0.01 & 0.20$^{+0.16}_{-0.16}$ & 03 Mar & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/mar03/mask1/spectra/spec_1519.dat
1497: %13:11:29.938&-01:19:14.87& 3.770 & 24.03$\pm$ 0.06 & 4.19$^{+0.68}_{-0.68}$ & 98 Jun & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/jun98/a1689/arc24.dat
1498: 13:11:30.231&-01:22:46.10& 0.0 & 22.68$\pm$ 0.03 & 4.51$^{+0.72}_{-0.72}$ & 99 Mar & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/mar99/a1689/spec_G50b.dat
1499: 13:11:30.508&-01:19:34.67& 0.174& 20.66$\pm$ 0.02 & 0.23$^{+0.16}_{-0.16}$ & 03 Mar & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/mar03/mask1/spectra/spec_1487.dat
1500: 13:11:30.677&-01:18:55.50& 0.676& 23.85$\pm$ 0.05 & 3.87$^{+0.64}_{-0.64}$ & 03 Mar & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/mar03/mask2/spectra/spec_1657.dat
1501: 13:11:30.751&-01:21:38.78& 0.691& 20.32$\pm$ 0.01 & 0.61$^{+0.21}_{-0.21}$ & 99 Mar & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/mar99/a1689/spec_A10.dat
1502: 13:11:31.472&-01:21:05.94& 0.189& 20.62$\pm$ 0.01 & 0.19$^{+0.16}_{-0.16}$ & 96 Apr & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/apr96/mask3/arc11.dat
1503: 13:11:31.622&-01:23:21.20& 0.705& 21.23$\pm$ 0.01 & 0.68$^{+0.22}_{-0.22}$ & 03 May & Magellan \\ %/scr0/magellan/may27/mask4/spec203.dat
1504: 13:11:31.824&-01:17:49.29& 0.617& 21.12$\pm$ 0.01 & 0.67$^{+0.22}_{-0.22}$ & 01 Jul & VLT FORS2 \\ %/scr0/vlt/67redux/12jun/spectra/spec_1812.dat
1505: 13:11:32.025&-01:21:55.40& 0.959& 21.10$\pm$ 0.01 & 0.88$^{+0.25}_{-0.25}$ & 98 Jun & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/jun98/a1689/arc11.dat
1506: 13:11:32.424&-01:24:18.19& 1.204& 24.17$\pm$ 0.08 & 1.37$^{+0.53}_{-0.36}$ & 99 Apr & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/apr99/a1689/spec_57.dat
1507: 13:11:33.230&-01:19:16.95& 0.200& 20.37$\pm$ 0.01 & 0.19$^{+0.16}_{-0.16}$ & 98 Jun & Keck LRIS \\ %~/Documents/keck/jun98/a1689/arc4b.dat
1508: 13:11:33.028&-01:19:14.64& 0.790& 22.98$\pm$ 0.07 & 0.82$^{+0.58}_{-1.06}$ & 96 Apr & Keck LRIS \\ %~/Documents/keck/apr96/mask2/arc1p08.dat
1509: %13:11:32.871&-01:20:29.33& 3.042& 23.86$\pm$ 0.06 & 3.01$^{+0.53}_{-0.53}$ & 03 May & Magellan \\ %/scr0/magellan/coaddition/spec_20703_1p4a.dat
1510: 13:11:33.555&-01:19:01.50& 0.244& 22.11$\pm$ 0.02 & 0.16$^{+0.15}_{-0.15}$ & 96 Apr &Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/apr96/mask2/arc24.dat
1511: 13:11:33.632&-01:22:02.00& 0.387& 22.92$\pm$ 0.04 & 0.39$^{+0.18}_{-0.18}$ & 03 May &Magellan \\ %/scr0/magellan/may28/mask1/spec270.dat
1512: 13:11:33.950&-01:19:15.75& 1.362& 22.48$\pm$ 0.03 & 1.49$^{+0.33}_{-0.33}$ & 98 Jun &Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/jun98/a1689/arc5.dat
1513: 13:11:34.211&-01:19:23.98& 1.051& 22.44$\pm$ 0.04 & 0.69$^{+0.22}_{-0.24}$ & 98 Jun &Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/jun98/a1689/arc6a.dat
1514: 13:11:34.318&-01:19:04.93& 0.676& 22.60$\pm$ 0.02 & 0.27$^{+0.17}_{-0.17}$ & 03 May &Magellan \\ %/scr0/magellan/coaddition/spec_42028.dat
1515: 13:11:34.900&-01:18:35.62& 0.918& 22.31$\pm$ 0.02 & 1.10$^{+0.28}_{-0.28}$ & 96 Apr &Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/apr96/mask2/arc1.dat
1516: %13:11:35.042&-01:19:51.61& 5.120& 25.58$\pm$ 0.30 & 0.54$^{+0.20}_{-0.39}$ & 99 Mar &Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/mar99/a1689/spec_A6_5p1.dat
1517: 13:11:35.057&-01:21:26.00& 0.584& 21.22$\pm$ 0.01 & 0.57$^{+0.21}_{-0.21}$ & 98 Jun &Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/jun98/a1689/arc28.dat
1518: 13:11:35.227&-01:20:30.16& 0.587& 20.64$\pm$ 0.01 & 0.60$^{+0.21}_{-0.21}$ & 98 Jun &Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/jun98/a1689/arc8.dat
1519: 13:11:35.264&-01:19:01.50& 0.918& 22.27$\pm$ 0.03 & 0.75$^{+0.23}_{-0.23}$ & 96 Apr & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/apr96/mask2/arc20.dat
1520: 13:11:35.619&-01:21:52.59& 0.722& 23.56$\pm$ 0.04 & 0.65$^{+0.22}_{-0.22}$ & 03 Mar &Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/mar03/mask1/spectra/spec_764.dat
1521: 13:11:36.052&-01:19:24.71& 0.916& 22.85$\pm$ 0.03 & 0.93$^{+0.25}_{-0.25}$ & 99 Apr &Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/apr99/a1689/spec_1404.dat
1522: 13:11:36.370&-01:19:06.25& 0.937& 23.66$\pm$ 0.05 & 1.17$^{+0.29}_{-0.28}$ & 96 Apr &Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/apr96/mask3/arc22b.dat
1523: 13:11:36.536&-01:19:25.03& 0.790& 20.50$\pm$ 0.01 & 0.77$^{+0.23}_{-0.23}$ & 96 Apr &Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/apr96/mask2/arc4a.dat
1524: 13:11:36.638&-01:22:32.72& 0.790& 24.17$\pm$ 0.10 & 0.84$^{+0.24}_{-0.24}$ & 98 Jun &Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/jun98/a1689/arc1p55.dat
1525: 13:11:37.089&-01:19:26.10& 0.924& 21.60$\pm$ 0.01 & 0.70$^{+0.22}_{-0.22}$ & 96 Apr &Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/apr96/mask2/113_727.dat
1526: 13:11:37.183&-01:21:40.60& 0.813& 21.78$\pm$ 0.01 & 0.73$^{+0.23}_{-0.23}$ & 96 Apr & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/apr96/mask3/arc2p01.dat
1527: 13:11:37.284&-01:21:06.02& 0.829& 23.91$\pm$ 0.04 & 0.68$^{+0.22}_{-0.22}$ & 03 Mar &Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/mar03/mask1/spectra/spec_843.dat
1528: 13:11:37.577&-01:21:24.34& 0.831& 22.02$\pm$ 0.01 & 0.75$^{+0.23}_{-0.23}$ & 98 Jun & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/jun98/a1689/arc29.dat
1529: 13:11:37.590&-01:23:00.70& 1.362& 24.11$\pm$ 0.07 & 1.45$^{+0.37}_{-0.32}$ & 03 Mar &Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/mar03/mask2/spectra/spec_449.dat
1530: 13:11:37.694&-01:19:49.79& 0.625& 20.95$\pm$ 0.01 & 0.10$^{+0.14}_{-0.10}$ & 03 May &Magellan* \\ %/scr0/magellan/coaddition/spec_40349.dat
1531: 13:11:38.051&-01:19:58.25& 0.189& 22.18$\pm$ 0.01 & 0.07$^{+0.21}_{-0.07}$ & 96 Apr &Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/apr96/mask3/arc1p10.dat
1532: 13:11:38.239&-01:21:42.05& 0.214& 21.98$\pm$ 0.02 & 0.72$^{+0.23}_{-0.23}$ & 03 May &Magellan \\ %/scr0/magellan/may27/mask3/spec122.dat
1533: 13:11:38.348&-01:22:22.76& 0.741& 24.00$\pm$ 0.10 & 0.47$^{+0.19}_{-0.19}$ & 98 Jun & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/jun98/a1689/arc1p57.dat
1534: 13:11:38.653&-01:21:38.87& 0.496& 22.06$\pm$ 0.02 & 0.44$^{+0.19}_{-0.19}$ & 03 May & Magellan \\ %/scr0/magellan/may28/mask5/spec143.dat
1535: 13:11:38.690&-01:22:17.78& 0.743& 21.77$\pm$ 0.02 & 0.65$^{+0.22}_{-0.22}$ & 03 May & Magellan \\ %/scr0/magellan/may28/mask1/spec83.dat
1536: 13:11:38.791&-01:20:52.17& 0.829& 21.03$\pm$ 0.01 & 0.72$^{+0.23}_{-0.23}$ & 96 Apr & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/apr96/mask3/arc1p90.dat
1537: 13:11:38.846&-01:23:41.89& 0.600& 20.21$\pm$ 0.01 & 0.61$^{+0.21}_{-0.21}$ & 03 Mar & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/mar03/mask2/spectra/spec_242.dat
1538: 13:11:39.101&-01:23:45.53& 1.127& 23.59$\pm$ 0.06 & 1.33$^{+0.31}_{-0.96}$ & 03 Mar &Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/mar03/mask2/spectra/spec_219.dat
1539: 13:11:39.472&-01:22:51.09& 1.161& 24.21$\pm$ 0.08 & 0.47$^{+1.05}_{-0.24}$ & 03 Mar &Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/mar03/mask2/spectra/spec_386.dat
1540: 13:11:39.524&-01:20:46.21& 0.924& 22.35$\pm$ 0.02 & 0.83$^{+0.24}_{-0.24}$ & 96 Apr &Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/apr96/mask3/arc2p57a.dat
1541: 13:11:39.544&-01:20:13.37& 0.953& 24.22$\pm$ 0.06 & 0.79$^{+0.23}_{-0.24}$ & 96 Apr &Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/apr96/mask2/arc4p39.dat
1542: 13:11:39.748&-01:22:55.89& 1.161& 23.88$\pm$ 0.06 & 1.33$^{+0.31}_{-0.45}$ & 03 Mar &Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/mar03/mask1/spectra/spec_345.dat
1543: 13:11:39.804&-01:21:31.52& 0.662& 24.19$\pm$ 0.06 & 0.44$^{+0.19}_{-0.19}$ & 03 Mar & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/mar03/mask2/spectra/spec_643.dat
1544: 13:11:39.833&-01:22:36.47& 0.407& 24.26$\pm$ 0.06 & 0.36$^{+0.18}_{-0.18}$ & 98 Jun & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/jun98/a1689/arc8p56a.dat
1545: 13:11:39.891&-01:20:31.08& 1.436& 23.36$\pm$ 0.03 & 1.94$^{+0.39}_{-0.50}$ & 03 Mar &Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/mar03/mask2/spectra/spec_847.dat
1546: 13:11:40.204&-01:18:52.38& 0.0 & 21.50$\pm$ 0.01 & 0.91$^{+0.25}_{-0.25}$ & 96 Apr & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/apr96/mask2/arc2p60.dat
1547: 13:11:40.284&-01:23:02.45& 0.839& 23.91$\pm$ 0.07 & 0.64$^{+0.22}_{-0.21}$ & 03 Mar &Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/mar03/mask1/spectra/spec_296.dat
1548: 13:11:40.614&-01:19:38.24& 0.94 & 22.09$\pm$ 0.02 & 0.96$^{+0.26}_{-0.26}$ & 03 May & Magellan \\ %/scr0/magellan/may27/mask4/spec257.dat
1549: 13:11:41.322&-01:21:44.92& 0.813& 22.71$\pm$ 0.06 & 0.62$^{+0.21}_{-0.21}$ & 96 Apr &Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/apr96/mask2/arc2p59.dat
1550: 13:11:41.341&-01:22:39.09& 0.596& 23.91$\pm$ 0.12 & 0.58$^{+0.21}_{-0.40}$ & 03 Mar & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/mar03/mask2/spectra/spec_336.dat
1551: 13:11:41.620&-01:20:54.24& 0.690& 20.35$\pm$ 0.01 & 0.69$^{+0.22}_{-0.22}$ & 03 May & Magellan \\ %/scr0/magellan/may28/mask1/spec126.dat
1552: 13:11:41.986&-01:19:34.47& 0.342& 22.91$\pm$ 0.03 & 0.08$^{+0.26}_{-0.08}$ & 96 Apr & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/apr96/mask2/arc1p73b.dat
1553: 13:11:42.154&-01:19:34.06& 1.01 & 19.35$\pm$ 0.01 & 0.44$^{+0.19}_{-0.19}$ & 96 Apr & Keck LRIS \\ %/scr0/keck/apr96/mask2/arc1p73a.dat
1554: 13:11:42.301&-01:20:07.79& 0.544& 21.66$\pm$ 0.01 & 0.71$^{+0.23}_{-0.22}$ & 03 May & Magellan \\ %/scr0/magellan/may28/mask1/spec162.dat
1555: 13:11:42.838&-01:20:25.94& 0.848& 22.63$\pm$ 0.46 & --- & 96 Apr & Keck LRIS \cr %/scr0/keck/apr96/mask3/arc1p66.dat
1556: 13:11:43.607&-01:20:36.93& 0.848& 23.26$\pm$ 0.46 & --- & 96 Apr &Keck LRIS \cr %/scr0/keck/apr96/mask3/arc1p59.dat
1557: 13:11:43.825&-01:19:38.76& 0.940& 22.85$\pm$ 0.44 & --- & 96 Apr &Keck LRIS \cr %/scr0/keck/apr96/mask2/arc2p52.dat
1558: 13:11:44.466&-01:20:30.58& 1.161& 22.72$\pm$ 0.46 & --- & 96 Apr &Keck LRIS \cr %/scr0/keck/apr96/mask3/arc1p49.dat
1559: 13:11:46.056&-01:20:51.94& 0.0 & --- & --- & 96 Apr & Keck LRIS \cr %/scr0/keck/apr96/mask2/arc1p40a.dat
1560: \enddata
1561: \label{table1}
1562: \end{deluxetable}
1563:
1564: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccccc}
1565: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1566: \tablecaption{$z>$2.5 Objects in the A1689 Field}
1567: \tablewidth{0pt}
1568: %\rotate
1569: \tablehead{RA (J2000) & Dec (J2000) &Name\tablenotemark{a} & $z_{spec}$
1570: & $z_{BPZ}$ & $g_{475}$ & $r_{625}$& $i_{775}$ }
1571: \startdata
1572: 13:11:26.450& -01:19:56.75 & Sextet$-$1.1 &$3.038\pm 0.003$\tablenotemark{b}&3.03
1573: $\pm$ 0.53&23.34 $\pm$ 0.01&22.55 $\pm$ 0.01&22.40 $\pm$ 0.01 \\
1574: 13:11:26.281& -01:20:00.26 & $^{\prime\prime}-$1.2 &$-$
1575: &3.04 $\pm$ 0.53&24.33 $\pm$ 0.01&23.60 $\pm$ 0.01&23.51 $\pm$0.01 \\
1576: 13:11:29.777& -01:21:07.48 & $^{\prime\prime}-$1.3 &$-$
1577: &3.27 $\pm$ 0.56&25.23 $\pm$ 0.02&24.53 $\pm$ 0.02&24.48 $\pm$0.02 \\
1578: 13:11:33.063& -01:20:27.40 & $^{\prime\prime}-$1.4 &$3.038\pm 0.003$\tablenotemark{c}&2.94
1579: $\pm$ 0.52&24.67 $\pm$ 0.13&24.03 $\pm$ 0.01&24.02 $\pm$ 0.01 \\
1580: 13:11:31.935& -01:20:06.00 & $^{\prime\prime}-$1.5 &$-$
1581: &3.35 $\pm$ 0.57&25.46 $\pm$ 0.03&24.63 $\pm$ 0.02&24.56 $\pm$ 0.02 \\
1582: 13:11:29.853& -01:20:38.41 & $^{\prime\prime}-$1.6 & $-$
1583: &1.06$^{+1.97}_{-0.27}$&25.02 $\pm$ 0.05&24.18 $\pm$ 0.05&23.94 $\pm$ 0.06
1584: \\
1585: 13:11:26.523& -01:19:55.45 & Quintet$-$2.1 &2.534\tablenotemark{d}&2.62
1586: $\pm$ 0.48&23.56 $\pm$ 0.01&23.27 $\pm$0.01 &23.07 $\pm$0.01 \\
1587: 13:11:32.783 &-01:20:27.60 & $^{\prime\prime}-$2.2 & $-$ &2.54 & 24.03 $\pm$0.01
1588: & 23.85 $\pm$ 0.01 & 23.76 $\pm$0.01 \\
1589: 13:11:31.776 &-01:20:09.24 &$^{\prime\prime}-$2.3 & $-$ &2.54 & 24.29 $\pm$0.02
1590: & 24.06 $\pm$ 0.02 & 24.10 $\pm$0.02 \\
1591: 13:11:29.616 &-01:21:07.92 &$^{\prime\prime}-$2.4 & $-$ &2.54 & 24.42 $\pm$0.02
1592: & 24.23 $\pm$ 0.02 & 24.14 $\pm$ 0.02 \\
1593: 13:11:29.689 &-01:20:41.28 &$^{\prime\prime}-$ 2.5 & $-$ &2.54 & 24.26 $\pm$0.03
1594: & 23.45 $\pm$ 0.03 & 23.04 $\pm$ 0.03 \\
1595: 13:11:29.938& -01:19:14.65 & & 3.770\tablenotemark{b}&4.58 $\pm$ 0.73& $>27.2$
1596: &24.98 $\pm$ 0.12&24.13 $\pm$ 0.90 \\
1597: 13:11:24.066& -01:18:47.17 & & 4.705\tablenotemark{c}&0.73$^{+4.65}_{-0.23}$&
1598: $-$ &$-$ &$-$ \\
1599: 13:11:25.449& -01:20:51.84 & \#7.1 &4.868\tablenotemark{b}&4.92
1600: $\pm$ 0.78&26.70 $\pm$ 0.67&25.12 $\pm$ 0.12&23.48 $\pm$ 0.03 \\
1601: 13:11:34.991& -01:19:51.07 & & 5.120\tablenotemark{b}&4.94 $\pm$ 0.78&$>27.2$
1602: &26.59 $\pm$ 0.70&25.58 $\pm$ 0.18 \\
1603: \enddata
1604:
1605: \tablenotetext{a}{Published name from \citet{Broadhurst:05}, where available}
1606: \tablenotetext{b}{\citet{Broadhurst:05}}
1607: \tablenotetext{c}{\citet{Frye:02}}
1608: \tablenotetext{d}{This paper}
1609: \label{table3}
1610: \end{deluxetable}
1611:
1612:
1613: \clearpage
1614:
1615: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
1616: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
1617: %% To embed the sample graphics in
1618: %% the file, uncomment the \plotone, \plottwo, and
1619: %% \includegraphics commands
1620: %%
1621: %% If you need a layout that cannot be achieved with \plotone or
1622: %% \plottwo, you can invoke the graphicx package directly with the
1623: %% \includegraphics command or use \plotfiddle. For more information,
1624: %% please see the tutorial on "Using Electronic Art with AASTeX" in the
1625: %% documentation section at the AASTeX Web site,
1626: %% http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX.
1627: %%
1628: %% The examples below also include sample markup for submission of
1629: %% supplemental electronic materials. As always, be sure to check
1630: %% the instructions to authors for the journal you are submitting to
1631: %% for specific submissions guidelines as they vary from
1632: %% journal to journal.
1633:
1634:
1635: %% This example uses \plotone to include an EPS file scaled to
1636: %% 80% of its natural size with \epsscale. Its caption
1637: %% has been written to indicate that additional figure parts will be
1638: %% available in the electronic journal.
1639:
1640:
1641: \clearpage
1642:
1643: %% Here we use \plottwo to present two versions of the same figure,
1644: %% one in black and white for print the other in RGB color
1645: %% for online presentation. Note that the caption indicates
1646: %% that a color version of the figure will be available online.
1647: %%
1648:
1649: %\begin{figure}
1650: %\includegraphics[viewport= 30 30 35 400, scale=1.4]{catalog_circled.pdf}
1651: %\caption{Deep Keck LRIS image of the central portion of Abell 1689. All new spectroscopic redshifts from this sample
1652: %are labelled in this image mosaic in $I$. The multiply-imaged Sextet Arc redshift is
1653: %highlighted in red, and its intervening LBG absorption system of z=2.536 is also marked.
1654: % north up east to the left.
1655: %\label{fig1}}
1656: %\end{figure}
1657:
1658:
1659: \begin{figure}
1660: %\includegraphics[viewport=-60 0 300 1900, scale=0.22]{f1.eps}
1661: \plotone{f1.pdf}
1662: \caption{Deep HST ACS $gri$ true color image of the central portion of Abell 1689.
1663: It was made
1664: using the Sloan Digital Sky Survey pipeline photo \citep{Lupton:01}.
1665: All new spectroscopic redshifts in this field are indicated, with two of the six
1666: separate images of the Sextet Arcs labeled (\#1.1 and \#1.4 at $z$=3.038).
1667: The Sextet Arcs are a strongly-lensed LBG with a total magnitude integrated over all the arcs
1668: of $r_{625} = 21.7$, bright enough to do high spectral resolution followup work.
1669: %north left, east down.
1670: \label{fig2}}
1671: \end{figure}
1672:
1673: %\begin{figure}
1674: %\includegraphics[viewport=30 5 25 300,scale=1.2]{hist_Imag.pdf}
1675: %\caption{Histogram of I$_{AB}$ magnitudes of the objects presented in this paper.
1676: %We estimate it is complete to I$_{AB}\sim22.5$.
1677: %\label{fig3}}
1678: %\end{figure}
1679:
1680: \begin{figure}
1681: \includegraphics[viewport= 30 5 250 350,scale=1.2]{f2.pdf}
1682: %\includegraphics[width=.8\textwidth,angle=90]{f2.pdf}
1683: \caption{Histogram of all published spectroscopic redshifts for Abell 1689. The positive
1684: and negative slope
1685: fill patterns indicate numbers of objects from the catalog in this paper, and those from all other
1686: published spectroscopic redshift catalogs respectively.
1687: The criss-cross fill pattern shows the intersection between the catalogs.
1688: The inset histogram shows the redshift distribution of the cluster members.
1689: A new mean cluster redshift of $z$=0.187 is obtained, as indicated. Note the preponderance
1690: of background objects contributed by this paper. This survey contributes
1691: 72 new objects in the background, thus increasing the
1692: number of arclets by sixfold. \label{fig4}}
1693: \end{figure}
1694:
1695: \begin{figure}
1696: \includegraphics[viewport= -40 70 150 600, scale=0.85]{f3.pdf}
1697: %\epsscale{.7}
1698: %\plotone{f3.pdf}
1699: %\epsscale{1}
1700: \caption{Spectroscopic redshift as a function of radius for all objects
1701: with published redshifts $z>$0.23 in the field of A1689.
1702: The cluster redshift of $z$=0.187 is indicated by the dotted line,
1703: and the different symbols give the contributing references. Six galaxies have been
1704: discovered with $z>2.5$. Note the
1705: two points at $z$=3.038 are two images of the same galaxy, the Sextet Arcs, and so
1706: are counted as one object.
1707: \label{fig5}}
1708: \end{figure}
1709:
1710: \begin{figure}
1711: \includegraphics[viewport=10 5 5 400,scale=1.]{f4.pdf}
1712: %\plotone{f4.pdf}
1713: \caption{Bayesian photometric redshifts, $z_{BPZ}$, are compared with spectroscopic redshifts from our sample. When the four outliers are removed,
1714: we find the best fit BPZ redshifts agree with the spectroscopic redshifts
1715: to within $z_{BPZ} = 0.11 (1 + z_{spec})$. The photometry was meticulously computed based on galaxy-subtracted images to
1716: correct for significant contamination from cluster members.
1717: \label{fig6}}
1718: \end{figure}
1719:
1720: \begin{figure}
1721: \includegraphics[viewport=10 13 500 500, scale=0.6]{f5.pdf}
1722: %\includegraphics[width=.6\textwidth,angle=90]{f5.pdf}
1723: \caption{All six separate images of the Sextet Arcs at $z$=3.038 (Source \#1) are shown,
1724: including labels and spectroscopic redshifts, if known.
1725: Images \#1.1 and \#1.2 comprise a giant arc that is spatially-extended on the sky,
1726: $>5.5$ arcsec. Source \#2 is also multiply-imaged, and all five of this set of images, the Quintet
1727: Arcs, are also marked. Note the similar morphologies of the image pairs of
1728: sources \#1 and \#2 from panel to panel
1729: despite being stretched, rotated, and tangentially and radially parity-flipped.
1730: \label{fig7}}
1731: \end{figure}
1732:
1733: \clearpage
1734:
1735: \begin{figure}
1736: \includegraphics[viewport=115 100 600 500,scale=0.69]{f6.pdf}
1737: %\includegraphics[width=.45\textwidth,angle=90]{f6.pdf}
1738: \caption{Spectrum of the Sextet Arc \#1.1 of at $z$=3.038 is plotted vs. Observed Wavelength.
1739: There are many prominent interstellar absorption features, and two intervening absorption systems,
1740: at $z$=2.873 and $z$=2.534. The latter absorption system is spatially-extended on the sky,
1741: and shows stronger Ly-$\alpha$ absorption in our spectrum of image \#2.1 taken two arcsec away on the sky,
1742: or 2$h^{-1}$kpc at $z$=2.534. The positions of the prominent skylines in the spectrum are indicated.
1743: \label{fig_dvb}}
1744: \end{figure}
1745:
1746: \begin{figure}
1747: \includegraphics[viewport=25 80 200 650,scale=0.85]{f7.pdf}
1748: %\epsscale{.7}
1749: %\plotone{f7.pdf}
1750: %\epsscale{1}
1751: \caption{Spectra taken of two different images of the sextuply-lensed galaxy at $z$=3.038, the Sextet Arcs. The high signal-to-noise spectrum for image \#1.1 is rich in features, and corresponds
1752: to a one arcsec spatial region of this giant arc $>5.5$ arcsec in extent.
1753: The spectrum for \#1.4, by contrast,
1754: includes all of the light from this smaller arclet with lower magnification.
1755: A third spectrum is also shown, centered on image \#2.1, and taken at a
1756: two arcsec separation from our spectrum for image \#1.1.
1757: The Ly-$\alpha$ profile between all three spectra
1758: shows considerable variations, from
1759: strong absorption,
1760: to a combination of absorption plus emission and strong emission.
1761: \label{fig_1d}}
1762: \end{figure}
1763:
1764: \begin{figure}
1765: \includegraphics[viewport=15 -20 300 350,scale=0.87]{f8.pdf}
1766: %\includegraphics[width=.5\textwidth,angle=90]{f8.pdf}
1767: \caption{Ly-$\alpha$ profiles for the strong intervening absorption system at $z$=2.534.
1768: The observational setup is overlayed, showing our two 1\arcsec \ slits at two different spatial
1769: positions of this intervening LBG. In the spectrum centered on image \#2.1, Ly-$\alpha$
1770: at $z$=2.534
1771: is strongly absorbed and reaches the bottom of the continuum.
1772: By contrast, in our spectrum of image \#1.1 of the Sextet Arcs, there is also
1773: significant absorption by Ly-$\alpha$, but it is not obviously saturated.
1774: %This second detection of the absorption system either represents
1775: %another counterimage of image \#2.1, or if it is a spatially-contiguous extension of image \#2.1,
1776: %indicates a dropoff of H I column density with radius.
1777: The critical curve is overlayed, showing the region of high magnification with
1778: positive parity (yellow-red) and high magnification with negative parity (blue-white).
1779: The intersections of the critical curve with this giant arc mark the predicted positions of
1780: a fold arc of the Sextet Arcs, which is seen, and a fold arc of the Quintet Arcs,
1781: which is predicted to be fainter and if present, may be detected only by {\it absorption}
1782: towards the Sextet Arcs. We conclude that if the spatially-resolved absorption system
1783: seen at $z$=2.535 is a spatially-contiguous extension of image \#2.1, we are detecting a drop
1784: off of H I column density with radius, and if not, we may be detecting additional counterimages
1785: of Source \#2. \label{fig10}
1786: }
1787: \end{figure}
1788:
1789:
1790: \begin{figure}
1791: \includegraphics[viewport=60 70 200 450,scale=1.1]{f9.pdf}
1792: %\plotone{f9.pdf}
1793: \caption{The total rest equivalent width of the strong low ionization interstellar absorption
1794: lines (W$_{LIS}$) is plotted against the rest equivalent width for Ly-$\alpha$. The three triangular-shaped points correspond to each of our three spectra: image \#1.1, image \#1.4,
1795: and image \#2.1. There is a trend emerging of decreasing W$_{LIS}$ with increasing W$_{Ly\alpha}$.
1796: The diamond-shaped points correspond to the four LBG subsamples
1797: of \citet{Shapley:03}. Also included are
1798: cB58 \citep{Pettini:02}, and Q0000-D6 \citep{Giallongo:02}.
1799: This trend is similar to that found for the four LBG subsamples but
1800: in our case are seen across a {\it single} galaxy.
1801: \label{fig11}}
1802:
1803: \end{figure}
1804:
1805:
1806: \end{document}
1807:
1808: %%
1809: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
1810:
1811: