1: \documentclass[letter]{aa}
2: %\documentclass[referee]{aa}
3: \usepackage{txfonts}
4: \usepackage{natbib}
5: \usepackage{graphicx}
6: \begin{document}
7: \title{XMM-Newton observations of the first unidentified TeV gamma-ray source
8: TeV J2032+4130\thanks{Based on observations obtained with XMM-Newton, an ESA science mission with instruments and contributions directly funded by ESA Member States and NASA.}}
9: \author{D. Horns\inst{1} \and
10: A.I.D. Hoffmann\inst{1} \and
11: A. Santangelo\inst{1} \and
12: F.A. Aharonian\inst{2} \and
13: G.P. Rowell\inst{3}
14: \institute{Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics T\"ubingen (IAAT)
15: Sand~1, D-72076 T\"ubingen, Germany
16: \and
17: Max-Planck Institut f\"ur Kernphysik (MPIK)
18: P.O. Box 10\,39\,80, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany
19: \and
20: School of Chemistry and Physics, University of Adelaide, Australia
21: }
22: }
23: \date{Received / Accepted }
24: \abstract
25: % CONTEXT
26: {
27: The first unidentified very high energy gamma ray source (TeV J2032+4130) in the
28: Cygnus region has been the subject of intensive search for a counterpart source at other
29: wavelengths. In particular, observations in radio and X-rays are important to trace a population
30: of non-thermal electrons. }
31: % AIMS
32: {
33: A deep ($\approx 50$~ksec) exposure of TeV~J2032+4130 with \textit{XMM-Newton} has been obtained.
34: The large collection area and the field of view of the X-ray telescopes on-board of \textit{XMM-Newton}
35: allow to search for faint extended X-ray emission possibly linked to TeV~J2032+4130.
36: }
37: % Methods
38: {
39: The contribution of point sources to the observed X-ray emission from TeV~J2032+4130
40: is subtracted from the data.
41: The point-source subtracted X-ray data are analyzed using blank sky exposures and regions
42: adjacent to the position of TeV~J2032+4130
43: in the field of view covered by the XMM-Newton telescopes to search for diffuse X-ray emission.
44: }
45: % Results
46: {
47: An extended X-ray emission region with a full width half maximum (FWHM) size of $\approx 12$~arc min
48: is found. The centroid of the emission is co-located with the position of TeV~J2032+4130. The angular
49: extension of the X-ray emission region is slightly smaller than the angular size of TeV~J2032+4130
50: (FWHM=$14\pm 3$~arc min). The energy spectrum of the emission coinciding with the position and extension
51: of TeV~J2032+4130 can be modeled
52: by a power-law model with a photon index $\Gamma=1.5\pm0.2_\mathrm{stat}\pm0.3_\mathrm{sys}$ and
53: an energy flux integrated between 2 and 10~keV of
54: $f_{2-10~\mathrm{keV}} \approx 7\cdot 10^{-13}$~ergs/(cm$^2$ s)
55: which is lower than the very high energy gamma-ray flux observed from TeV~J2032+4130.
56: {The energy flux detected from the extended emission region is about a factor of two
57: smaller than the summed contribution of the point sources present.}
58: The energy spectrum can also be fit with a thermal emission model from an ionized plasma with a temperature
59: $k_BT\approx 10$~keV.
60: }
61: % Conclusions
62: {
63: We conclude that the faint extended X-ray emission discovered in this observation is the X-ray
64: counterpart of TeV~J2032+4130. {Formally, it can not be excluded that
65: the extended emission is due to an unrelated population of faint, hot ($k_BT\approx 10$~keV)
66: unresolved point-sources which by chance coincides with the position and extension of TeV~J2032+4130.}
67: We discuss our findings in the frame of both hadronic and
68: leptonic gamma-ray production scenarios.
69: }
70: \keywords{}
71: \authorrunning{Horns et al.}
72: \titlerunning{XMM-Newton observation of TeV J2032+4130}
73: \maketitle
74: %
75: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
76: \section{Introduction}
77: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
78: %
79: Ground based air Cherenkov telescopes have detected in the last 6 years a number of unidentified
80: sources of very high energy (VHE, $E>100$~GeV) gamma-rays located in the Galactic plane.
81: %
82: The first representative of these sources {(TeV~J2032+4130)} was discovered serendipitously with the HEGRA telescope system
83: in the Cygnus region \citep{discovery,hegra1}.
84:
85: In a subsequent deep exposure for a total of $\approx 280$~hours of observation time the source
86: {detection} was confirmed and
87: {its properties were} studied in detail \citep{chicago,hegra2}. \\
88: A remarkable feature of TeV~J2032+4130 is the fact that the angular extension of the source is
89: $(6.2 \pm 1.2_\mathrm{stat}\pm0.9_\mathrm{sys})$ arc~min
90: in radius which corresponds to a FWHM=14 arc~min.
91: Gamma-ray emission from TeV~J2032+4130 has been confirmed
92: independently by the Whipple collaboration \citep{whipple,konopelko}.
93: %
94: A gamma-ray excess from the Cygnus region albeit more extended
95: was recently reported by the Milagro collaboration \citep{jordan}.
96: The properties of TeV~J2032+4130 are common to most of the other unidentified VHE gamma-ray sources
97: that have been discovered with the H.E.S.S. telescopes so far \citep{hess1,hess2}:
98: TeV~J2032+4130 can be considered as the proto-type of the unidentified
99: VHE gamma-ray sources known today. \\
100: %
101: %
102: %%
103: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
104: So far, a number of point-like or moderately extended candidates for counterparts
105: of TeV~J2032+4130 have been identified at radio \citep{paredes, butt3} and X-rays
106: \citep{butt1,butt2,reshmee1,reshmee2}.\\
107: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
108: {The origin and nature of TeV~J2032+4130 remains unclear}.
109: It has been suggested that the nearby ($d=1.7$~kpc) massive stellar OB association Cyg
110: OB2 (see e.g. \citet{knoedel})
111: could be an accelerator of charged cosmic rays and consequently a site of
112: gamma-ray production \citep{hegra1,butt2,hegrawind}.
113: {This scenario has been strengthened by the recently discovered spatially extended VHE gamma-ray emission
114: from the direction of the open stellar cluster Westerlund 2 \citep{reimer_hess}.}\\
115: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
116: Other possible explanations for the nature of TeV~J2032+4130
117: have been brought forward including gamma-ray production in possible jet lobes of Cyg X-3 \citep{hegra1},
118: an unknown pulsar wind nebula \citep{bednarek}, or even extra-galactic source candidates as suggested {by}
119: \citet{reshmee1} {and} \citet{butt3}.\\
120: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
121: Independent of the nature of the source,
122: two different gamma-ray production mechanisms are {generally} considered.
123: %
124: In the \textit{hadronic scenario}, gamma-rays are
125: produced mainly via inelastic scattering of accelerated nuclei
126: with the ambient medium (see e.g. \citet{hegra2,reimer,domingo}).
127: %
128: Alternatively, in the \textit{leptonic} scenario gamma-rays are produced
129: via inverse Compton scattering of ambient photons from a population of energetic electrons \citep{hegra2,reimer}.
130: %
131: Recently, {it has been suggested, that} excitation of giant dipole resonances of relativistic heavy nuclei
132: in radiation dominated environments
133: {could be responsible for} gamma-ray production in Cyg OB2 \citep{anchordoq}.\\
134: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
135: While the gamma-ray observations so far have been inconclusive with respect to the
136: origin of the observed signal, X-ray observations can provide additional information to identify
137: the origin of the emission and to discern between the two proposed scenarios. \\
138: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
139: In this \textit{Letter}, we report the detection of spatially extended X-ray emission coinciding with the position
140: of TeV~J2032+4130.
141: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
142: \section{Observations and Data analyses}
143: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
144: %
145: The data were taken during two separate pointings of \textit{XMM-Newton}.
146: %
147: Table~\ref{table1} summarizes the available data and configurations
148: of the instruments used.
149: %
150: The data were screened for soft proton flares following the method suggested in \citet{read}.
151: The detectors performed almost nominally: CCD~\#6 of the MOS~1 camera had been switched off
152: and CCD~\#5 of MOS2 shows an increased instrumental background below 1~keV which is two times
153: larger than the background seen in the adjacent CCDs~\#4 and \#6.
154: %
155: However, above 1~keV the background rate in CCD~\#5 appeared consistent with the other detectors.
156: The data suffer from contamination of single scattering events from the bright X-ray source Cyg~X-3.
157: %
158: The contamination is most prominent in the energy band above $5$~keV.
159: For this reason, the analyses {that} have been performed
160: {are} constrained on the energy range from
161: 1--5~keV where the instrumental background and stray light contamination from Cyg~X-3 are minimal.
162: {A closer inspection of the contamination using ray-tracing simulations has shown that the
163: contribution of scattered light from Cyg~X-3 to the X-ray emission seen from TeV~J2032+4130 is negligible}.
164: %
165: At the same time, the vignetting of the telescopes is smallest in this energy range \citep{kirsch,pradas}.\\
166: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
167: Data reduction and analyses were performed using the Standard XMM-Newton Science Analysis Software \textit{SAS} v7.0.
168: %%%%%%%%%%%
169: \begin{figure*}[t]
170: % \includegraphics[width=0.95\linewidth]{ds9.png}
171: \mbox{
172: \includegraphics[height=6.5cm]{fig1a.eps}
173: \includegraphics[height=6.5cm]{fig1b.eps}
174: \includegraphics[height=6.5cm]{fig1c.eps}
175: }
176: \caption{\label{mosaic}
177: {Background subtracted and exposure corrected images obtained from the combined
178: exposures of the MOS1 and MOS2 cameras (in units of counts/(sec arcmin$^2$). While the left image shows the
179: emission including all point sources, the middle image shows the
180: image after subtracting off all point sources and smoothed with
181: a Gaussion of 45 arc~sec width}. Finally, the right image is obtained by
182: smoothing the source subtracted image with a Gaussian of 1.5 arc min width and changing the scaling to highlight the extended
183: X-ray emission present.
184: %
185: The green contours indicate (in linear spacing) the
186: significance contour of the HEGRA observations (starting at 3~$\sigma$).
187: %
188: }
189: \end{figure*}
190: %
191: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
192: \subsection{Search for diffuse X-ray emission}
193: %
194: In an initial step of the data analyses, a catalogue of sources detected in the 1-5~keV energy range
195: is assembled using the \texttt{edetect\_chain} task simultaneously for the MOS1, MOS2, and EPIC pn
196: cameras for each of the two exposures. {The minimum detection likelihood is set to a low value of 2.
197: This way, 13.5~\% of the detected sources are due to statistical fluctuations while at the same time,
198: more and fainter sources are detected than with the default value of 10.}
199: A detailed study of the point sources detected in this XMM-Newton observation will be presented elsewhere.
200: Here, the source catalogue has been used to {generate model images of the point sources separately
201: for each camera and pointing taking into account the position dependent point spread function of
202: the XMM-Newton mirrors.
203: %
204: These model images are then subtracted off
205: the individual frames of the three cameras and for the two pointings.
206: Within the 6.2$'$ region covered by the extension of the
207: TeV source, a total energy flux of
208: $f_{1-5~\mathrm{keV}}\approx 10^{-12}$~ergs/(cm$^2$~s) associated with point sources
209: is observed.
210: %% mention unresolved sources!
211: %% limiting flux
212: }
213: In order to
214: {subtract the particle and extragalactic photon background
215: blank sky event files for the corresponding observation modes and filter settings have been obtained from
216: the XMM guest observers' facility\footnote{\texttt{ftp://xmm.esac.esa.int}}. The blank field data have been
217: processed to match the observational data and the resulting images are subtracted off the pointings towards TeV~J2032+4130.} %
218: %
219: The images for the MOS1 and MOS2 cameras obtained from the two exposures are combined to form a background subtracted mosaic.
220: {The images of the EPIC pn camera have been omitted because of artefacts resulting from over-subtracting
221: the contribution of point sources. For each of the four remaining images, exposure maps have been generated
222: using the SAS task {eexpmap}.
223: %
224: The exposure maps are combined in a mosaic which is then trimmed
225: to a minimum exposure of 5~ksec corresponding to roughly 5~\% of the peak value. The background
226: subtracted mosaic is then divided by the exposure map to obtain an exposure corrected, background subtracted,
227: and source free image.}
228: %
229: {Fig.~\ref{mosaic} shows three images of the combined exposures of the MOS1 and MOS2 cameras before
230: the subtraction of the model images of the point sources (a), after the subtraction
231: {and smoothing with Gaussian of fixed width of 45 arc~sec} (b), and finally,
232: the image after convolving it with a Gaussian of fixed width of 1.5 arc~min (c). Note the presence of
233: scattered light along ring segments in the southern part of Fig.~1a.}
234: {While Fig.~1b shows indications for the presence of a rim-like feature resembling
235: the morphology observed in radio by \citet{paredes}, it should be noted
236: that the subtraction of point-sources has an impact on the observed morphology on angular
237: scales small compared to the extension of the detected extended emission.}
238: %
239: For a comparison with the extension and morphology of the gamma-ray
240: source TeV~J2032+4130, contours are overlaid to {Fig.~\ref{mosaic}c}.
241: %
242: The X-ray image shows an extended emission region which is co-located with
243: TeV~J2032+4130 and of similar extension.
244: %
245: {The exposure corrected image of the diffuse emission is fit by a Gaussian
246: with a width of $(5.1\pm0.3)$~arc~min which corresponds to
247: a FWHM$=(11.7\pm 0.6)$~arc~min\footnote{all errors given throughout the paper are to the
248: confidence of one standard deviation}.}
249: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
250: \subsection{Energy spectrum of the diffuse X-ray emission}
251: %
252: {In order to determine the energy spectrum of the diffuse X-ray emission, the contribution of
253: the point sources has to be removed by excising regions around the sources. We use an excising region adapted
254: to the point spread function and brightness of the source. The size of the region is chosen such that the
255: relative contribution of the source to the local background is less than 20~\% at the boundary of the
256: excised region. The wings of the point spread function lead to a contamination of the detected diffuse emission
257: which amounts to 27~\% of the excess signal seen. This effect of contamination would be however compensated by
258: the opposite effect caused by the diffuse emission present in the excised region ($\approx 25$~\% )
259: and therefore excluded from the reconstructed energy spectrum. We estimate the systematic uncertainty
260: of this contamination to be 10~\% of the total flux.}
261: The energy spectra of a source region with a radius of $6.2'$ centered on the position of TeV~J2032+4130
262: from the MOS2 and EPIC~pn cameras of the second pointing (ObsID 0305560201) are extracted.
263: The second pointing is centered 5$'$ north
264: of the centroid of TeV~J2032+4130 and therefore, we can choose a background region which is
265: mirrored through the center of the field of view and
266: has a similar acceptance as the source extraction region.
267: %
268: Using the background region in the same field of view, the
269: background estimate includes all relevant background components including X-ray emission from the Galactic ridge and
270: the particle and instrumental background specific to this observation.
271: %
272: The small azimuthal modulation of the acceptance of the MOS cameras can be neglected
273: along this direction.
274: The MOS1 camera is not used because the disabled CCD\#6 unfortunately does not allow to cover the entire source.\\
275: The response files are generated for these particular observations using
276: the standard tools \texttt{arfgen} and \texttt{rmfgen}. Finally, the
277: geometrical areas of the source and background regions are calculated taking gaps between the CCDs, bad pixels,
278: and point source exclusion regions into account.
279: The resulting background subtracted X-ray spectrum is fit with a power-law as well as
280: an optically thin hot plasma model (\texttt{apec}) including photoelectric absorption (\texttt{phabs}).
281: The spectral fitting of the two spectra was done using the
282: \texttt{xspec} v11.3.2p spectral fitting package \citep{arnaud}.
283: The fit describes the data well (see Table~\ref{table2} for
284: a summary of the fit parameters; only statistical $1~\sigma$ errors are quoted).\\
285: %%%%%%%%%
286: {In order to estimate the influence of faint,
287: unresolved point sources present in the stellar cluster,
288: we have reduced X-ray imaging data taken with the Chandra satellite (Obs.\# 4501 for 48.6 ksec
289: on TeV J2032+4130 and Obs.\# 4511 for 98.7 ksec in the south-west of TeV J2032+4130, centered on the
290: core of Cyg OB2). Based upon a comparison of the Chandra and XMM-Newton source catalogues
291: and the study of the X-ray source population present in the
292: Cyg OB2 cluster \citep{colombo}, we estimate that point sources below the XMM-Newton
293: detection limit can contribute up to $\approx 30$~\% of the observed diffuse emission. It is however not
294: straight-forward to correct the observed excess for the unresolved point sources detected with Chandra as
295: the flux of the sources is generally found to vary with time.
296: We estimate the systematic uncertainty on the flux conservatively
297: to be 50~\% combining the influence of the unresolved
298: point sources ($\approx 30$~\%), uncertainties on the background subtraction ($\approx 10$~\%), as well as
299: the tails of the point spread functions of excised point sources ($\approx 10$~\%).
300: The total, unabsorbed
301: energy flux derived from the model fit (see Table~\ref{table2})
302: is found to be $f_{2-10}=(7.3\pm3.5_\mathrm{sys}\pm1.1_\mathrm{stat})\times 10^{-13}$~ergs/(cm$^2$~s).
303: }
304: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
305: \begin{table}
306: \caption{\label{table1} Summary of observation times and configurations on the
307: target ``TeV~J2032+4130''. All instruments were
308: operated in full frame mode with a medium filter. The exposure quoted in parenthesis
309: is for the EPIC pn camera.}
310: \begin{tabular}{lcccc}
311: \hline
312: ObsID & Date & R.A. & Dec. & Exposure \\
313: & & J2000 & J2000 & [ksec] \\
314: \hline
315: \hline
316: 0305560101 & 2005-10-21 & 20:31:57 & 41:29:58 & 27.3(23.6) \\
317: 0305560201 & 2005-10-25 & 20:31:57 & 41:34:55 & 25.8(20.5) \\
318: \hline
319: \end{tabular}
320: \end{table}
321: %%%%%%%%%%5
322: \begin{table}
323: \caption{\label{table2} Summary of the fit results of the X-ray energy spectrum
324: with a power-law model (\texttt{powerlaw}) or thermal emission (\texttt{apec}
325: with fixed solar abundances of the plasma)
326: including photo-electric absorption (\texttt{phabs}). }
327: \begin{center}
328: \begin{tabular}{lrr}
329: \hline
330: Parameter & Value (powerlaw) & Value (apec)\\
331: \hline \hline
332: $N_H$ $[10^{21}$~cm$^{-2} ]$ & $3.5 \pm 1.6$ & $3.2\pm 1.1$ \\
333: $\Gamma$, $k_B T$ $[$keV$]$ & $1.5 \pm 0.2$ & $10.5\pm 3.2$\\
334: $f_{2-10~\mathrm{keV}}$ $[10^{-13}$~ergs/(cm$^2$ s)$]$ & $7.3\pm 1.1$ & $7.4\pm1.1$ \\
335: $\chi_\mathrm{red}^2$ (d.o.f.) & 1.02 (862) & 1.01 (861)\\
336: \hline
337: \end{tabular}
338: \end{center}
339: \end{table}
340: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
341: %%
342: \begin{figure}[t!]
343: \includegraphics[width=0.98\linewidth]{fig2.eps}
344: \caption{The spectral energy distribution of TeV~J2032+4130:
345: the bow-tie indicates the energy spectrum as measured with
346: XMM-Newton including systematic and statistical uncertainties. The lines indicate the result of a model calculation
347: for a hadronic gamma-ray and neutrino production scenario for a {continuously active accelerator of protons
348: up to a maximum energy of 5~PeV at an} age {of} $t_\mathrm{age}=2\,500$~yrs and magnetic field
349: $B=1~$mG.
350: The radio flux point of a possible non-thermal
351: extended radio-source at $\lambda=20$~cm \citep{paredes}
352: is assumed to be an upper limit to the actual radio emission associated with
353: TeV~J2032+4130.
354: The upper limits between 0.5--5~keV (CX, Chandra) and 20--40~keV (ISGRI, INTEGRAL) are taken from \citet{butt2}. The energy spectrum of the
355: EGRET source 3EG~J2030+4118 \citep{hartman}
356: is considered to be an upper limit.
357: The Milagro (MI) upper limit
358: is the integrated emission in a 3x3 $(^\circ)^2$ region \citep{jordan}
359: while the lower limit (MI) is scaled to the solid angle
360: covered by TeV~J2032+4130 assuming a uniform surface brightness.
361: The upper limit from the HEGRA-AIROBICC (HA) wide angle Cherenkov
362: detector is taken from \citet{hegra1}. \label{sed1}}
363: \end{figure}
364: % %%%%%%%
365: \begin{figure}[t!]
366: \includegraphics[width=0.98\linewidth]{fig3.eps}
367: \caption{In the leptonic scenario, the data are described well by a
368: young source of an age of 1500~yrs,
369: a magnetic field of $B=3~\mu$G and an energy density of the seed photon field of $w_\mathrm{IR}=3$~eV/cm$^3$
370: with a grey body temperature of $T=10~$K. As
371: an alternative, an older source at an age of 35~kyrs is shown ($B=3~\mu$G, $w_\mathrm{IR}=1$~eV/cm$^3$). For a description of the
372: multi-wavelength data see the caption of Fig.~\ref{sed1}. \label{sed2}}
373: \end{figure}
374: %%%%%%%%%%5
375: \section{Conclusions}
376: The XMM-Newton observations presented here indicate the presence of an extended (FWHM=11.7 arc~min) X-ray source co-located
377: with the first unidentified VHE gamma-ray source TeV~J2032+4130 discovered with the HEGRA air Cherenkov telescope system.
378: The size of the X-ray source is similar to the one of TeV~J2032+4130. The energy spectrum can be fit by a power-law model or
379: by a thermal emission model with a plasma temperature of $k_BT\approx 10$~keV.
380: The unabsorbed energy flux of the X-ray source in the energy range from 2--10 ~keV is a factor of 2--3 smaller
381: than the one observed from TeV~J2032+4130 at energies from 1--10~TeV. \\
382: We note that the observed extended X-ray emission could in principle be a so far unknown population of faint X-ray sources
383: that are by chance distributed at an angular size which is similar to the one of TeV~J2032+4130. The energy spectrum of these
384: sources would have to be different from the bulk of the stellar X-ray sources detected from Cyg OB2 \citep{colombo}
385: which on average show a thermal spectrum with $k_BT\approx 1\ldots 3$~keV.
386: Taking these considerations into account, we conclude that the observed extended
387: X-ray emission is the X-ray counterpart of TeV~J2032+4130. \\
388: Initial modeling of the X-ray and gamma-ray energy spectra {using a hadronic gamma-ray production scenario} indicates that
389: the observed spectra can be naturally explained by a young (a few kyrs)
390: ``Pevatron'' accelerator. {The observation of synchrotron X-ray emission
391: up to $\approx 5$~keV constrains
392: the product of the square of maximum energy of accelerated protons
393: ($E_\mathrm{max}^2$) and magnetic field ($B$) to
394: exceed $E_\mathrm{max}^2\cdot B\ga 5~\mathrm{PeV}^2~\mathrm{mG}$}.
395: In this picture, the
396: gamma-ray energy spectra would continue without cut-off well beyond 10~TeV. The hard X-ray emission from a
397: similar source size region as the gamma-ray emission is a natural prediction within this
398: model where the X-rays are produced by synchrotron emission of secondary electrons. Notably, in the frame of this model,
399: the extended gamma-ray emission found
400: by the Milagro collaboration would be explained by gamma-rays produced by accelerated particles of energies $\ga 100$~TeV which have already escaped
401: the accelerator.\\
402: A leptonic scenario provides a valid explanation of the observations as well (see Fig.~\ref{sed2}).
403: In this scenario, a young accelerator with a low magnetic field of a few $\mu$G accelerating electrons {following
404: a power-law distribution with $dN/dE \propto E^{-2}$} reaching up to
405: energies of a few 100 TeV can provide a good fit to the X-ray and gamma-ray data. In contrary to the hadronic scenario,
406: the gamma-ray energy spectrum above 10~TeV is expected to be rather soft due to un-avoidable Klein-Nishina suppression
407: of inverse Compton scattering. Furthermore, the seed photon density has to be higher
408: than the average value in the interstellar medium (which is not unlikely given the possible proximity to
409: the Cyg OB2 stellar association and the large stellar extinction towards that region indicating high density of dust).
410: In the leptonic scenario, the X-ray spectrum can be expected to vary at different
411: parts of the source due to cooling effects. More X-ray observations will be required to detect spectral variability.\\
412: Finally, neutrino observations will prove decisive to discern {between} the two emission scenarios
413: {(since neutrinos are only expected in the hadronic scenario)}. Even though the neutrino flux calculated here
414: is very likely not detectable with the coming generation of neutrino telescopes like IceCube \citep{icecube}, it may be that
415: the gamma-ray flux detected with Milagro from the same region is tracing the high energy particles which have already left the accelerator
416: and fill a much larger volume. In this case, the region \textit{around} TeV~J2032+4130 would be a powerful high energy neutrino source and
417: would be detectable with future neutrino telescopes \citep{beacom}.\\
418: It should be noted that the observations of TeV~J2032+4130 carried out with XMM-Newton are so far the deepest observations
419: available for any of the unidentified {VHE} gamma-ray sources. It will be interesting to
420: perform similar observations to search for faint, extended X-ray counterparts of other unidentified VHE gamma-ray sources.
421: %%%
422: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
423: \begin{acknowledgements}
424: We acknowledge the support of the Deutsches Zentrum f\"ur Luft- und Raumfahrt under grant number 50OR0302 and the support of the
425: Eberhard Karls Universit\"at T\"ubingen. We wish to thank Olaf Reimer and Facundo Albacete for providing the source lists found in the Chandra
426: observations and Josep Paredes for making their results available prior to publication.
427: This research has made use of NASA's Astrophysics Data System. We thank the anonymous referee for
428: valuable comments.
429: \end{acknowledgements}
430: \begin{thebibliography}{}
431: %%%%%%%
432: \bibitem[Abdo et al.(2006)]{jordan} Abdo, A.A. et al.\
433: 2007, \apj, 658, L33
434: %
435: \bibitem[Achterberg et al.(2006)]{icecube} Achterberg, A. et al.
436: (Icecube Collaboration),\ 2006, Astroparticle Physics, 26, 155
437: %%%%%%%
438: %%%%%%
439: \bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2002)]{hegra1} Aharonian, F., et
440: al.\ (HEGRA coll.) 2002, \aap, 393, L37
441: %%%%%%%
442: \bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2005a)]{hegra2} Aharonian, F., et
443: al.\ (HEGRA coll.) 2005a, \aap, 431, 197
444: %%%%%%%%%
445: \bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2005b)]{hess1} Aharonian, F., et
446: al.\ (HESS coll.) 2005b, Science, 307, 1938
447: %%%%%%%%%
448: \bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2006a)]{hess2} Aharonian, F., et
449: al.\ (H.E.S.S. coll.) 2006a, \apj, 636, 777
450: %%%%%%%
451: \bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2006b)]{hegrawind} Aharonian, F., et
452: al.\ (HEGRA coll.) 2006b, \aap, 454, 775
453: %
454: \bibitem[Aharonian et al.(2007)]{reimer_hess} Aharonian, F., et al.\ (H.E.S.S. coll.)
455: 2007, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, arXiv:astro-ph/0703427
456: %%%%%%
457: \bibitem[Colombo et al.(2006)]{colombo} Albacete
458: Colombo, J.~F., Flaccomio, E., Micela, G., Damiani, F., \& Sciortino, S.\
459: 2007, \aap, 464, 211
460: %%%%%%%
461: \bibitem[Anchordoqui et al.(2006)]{anchordoq} Anchordoqui, L.~A.,
462: Beacom, J.~F., Goldberg, H., Palomares-Ruiz, S., \& Weiler, T.~J.\ 2007,
463: \prd 75, 063001
464: %%%%%%
465: \bibitem[Arnaud(1996)]{arnaud} Arnaud, K.~A.\ 1996, ASP
466: Conf.~Ser.~101: Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, 101, 17
467: %%%
468: \bibitem[Beacom \& Kistler(2007)]{beacom}
469: Beacom, J.F. \& Kistler, M.D. 2007, submitted to \prd
470: ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, arXiv: astro-ph/0701751
471: %%%%%%%
472: \bibitem[Bednarek(2003)]{bednarek} Bednarek, W.\ 2003, \mnras,
473: 345, 847
474: %%%%%%
475: %%%%%%%
476: \bibitem[Butt et al.(2003)]{butt1} Butt, Y.~M., et al.\ 2003,
477: \apj, 597, 494
478: %%%%%%%
479: \bibitem[Butt et al.(2006a)]{butt2} Butt, Y.~M., Drake, J.,
480: Benaglia, P., Combi, J.~A., Dame, T., Miniati, F., \& Romero, G.~E.\ 2006a,
481: \apj, 643, 238
482: %%%
483: \bibitem[Butt et al.(2006b)]{butt3} Butt, Y.~M., Combi, J.A.,
484: Drake, J., Finley, J.P., Konopelko, A., Lister, M., \& Rodriguez, J.
485: \ 2006b, submitted to \apjl, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, arXiv: astro-ph/0611731
486: %%%%%%%
487: \bibitem[Domingo-Santamar{\'{\i}}a \& Torres(2006)]{domingo}
488: Domingo-Santamar{\'{\i}}a, E., \& Torres, D.~F.\ 2006, \aap, 448, 613
489: %%%%%%%
490: \bibitem[Hartman et al.(1999)]{hartman} Hartman, R.~C., et al.\
491: 1999, \apjs, 123, 79
492: %%%%%%
493: \bibitem[Horns et al.(2006)]{horns} Horns, D., Aharonian, F.,
494: Santangelo, A., Hoffmann, A.~I.~D., \& Masterson, C.\ 2006, \aap, 451, L51
495: %%%%%%%%%
496: \bibitem[Horns \& Rowell(2004)]{chicago} Horns, D., \& Rowell,
497: G.\ 2004, New Astronomy Review, 48, 489
498: %%%%%%%
499: \bibitem[Kelner et al.(2006)]{kelner} Kelner, S.~R.,
500: Aharonian, F.~A., \& Bugayov, V.~V.\ 2006, \prd, 74, 034018
501: %%%%%%%
502: \bibitem[Kirsch(2006)]{kirsch} Kirsch, M. in internal report XMM-SOC-CAL-TN-0018, 2006
503: %%%%%%%
504: \bibitem[Konopelko et al.(2006)]{konopelko}
505: Konopelko, A. et al. \ 2006 , accepted for publ. in \apj,
506: ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, arXiv:astro-ph/0611730
507: %%%%%%%
508: \bibitem[Kn{\"o}dlseder(2000)]{knoedel} Kn{\"o}dlseder, J.\
509: 2000, \aap, 360, 539
510: %%%%%%%
511: \bibitem[Lang et al.(2004)]{whipple} Lang, M.~J., et al.\ 2004,
512: \aap, 423, 415
513: %%%%%%%%
514: \bibitem[Mukherjee et al.(2003)]{reshmee1} Mukherjee, R.,
515: Halpern, J.~P., Gotthelf, E.~V., Eracleous, M., \& Mirabal, N.\ 2003, \apj,
516: 589, 487
517: %%%%%%%
518: \bibitem[Mukherjee et al.(2006)]{reshmee2} Mukherjee, R.,
519: Gotthelf, E.~V., \& Halpern, J.~P.\ 2006, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints,
520: arXiv:astro-ph/0610299
521: %%%%%%%%%%%
522: \bibitem[Paredes et al.(2006)]{paredes}
523: Paredes, J.M., Marti, J, Ishwara Chandra C.H., \& Bosch-Ramon, V. \
524: 2007, \apj, 654, 135
525: %%%%%%
526: \bibitem[Pradas \& Kerp(2005)]{pradas} Pradas, J., \& Kerp,
527: J.\ 2005, \aap, 443, 721
528: %%%%%%%%%%%
529: \bibitem[Read \& Ponman(2003)]{read} Read, A.~M., \& Ponman,
530: T.~J.\ 2003, \aap, 409, 395
531: %%%%%%%%%%%
532: \bibitem[Reimer et al.(2006)]{reimer} Reimer, A., Pohl, M., \&
533: Reimer, O.\ 2006, \apj, 644, 1118
534: %%%%%%%%%%%
535: %%%%%%%%%%%
536: \bibitem[Rowell \& Horns(2002)]{discovery} Rowell, G. \& Horns, D.
537: In Proceedings of \textit{The Gamma-Ray Universe}, ed. A. Goldwurm, Les Arcs, France 2002, 385
538: %%%%%%%%%%%
539: \bibitem[Waldron et al.(1998)]{waldron} Waldron, W.~L.,
540: Corcoran, M.~F., Drake, S.~A., \& Smale, A.~P.\ 1998, \apjs, 118, 217
541: %%%%%%%%%%%
542: \end{thebibliography}
543: \end{document}
544:
545: