1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \newcommand\simgt{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel > \over \sim \;$}}
3: \newcommand\simlt{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel < \over \sim \;$}}
4:
5: \newcommand{\kmpers}{\mathrm{km\ s^{-1}}}
6: \newcommand{\di}{\item[--]}
7: \newcommand{\Fig}[1]{Figure \ref{#1}}
8: \newcommand{\Eq}[1]{Eq. [\ref{#1}]}
9: \newcommand{\vct}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath{$#1$}}}
10: \newcommand{\mach}{\mathcal{M}}
11: \newcommand{\step}{\mathcal{H}}
12: \newcommand{\D}{\mathcal{D}}
13: \newcommand{\I}{\mathcal{I}}
14: \newcommand{\ext}{\mathrm{ext}}
15: \newcommand{\rmin}{r_\mathrm{min}}
16: \newcommand{\rmax}{r_\mathrm{max}}
17: \newcommand{\cs}{c_\mathrm{s}}
18: \newcommand{\tR}{\tilde{R}}
19: \newcommand{\tx}{\tilde{x}}
20: \newcommand{\tz}{\tilde{z}}
21: \newcommand{\sMsml}{(\mach^2-1)^{1/2}}
22: \newcommand{\sMsRsml}{(\mach^2\tR^2-1)^{1/2}}
23: \newcommand{\IB}{\textit{IB}}
24: \newcommand{\IM}{\textit{IM}}
25: \newcommand{\OM}{\textit{OM}}
26:
27: \shorttitle{DYNAMICAL FRICTION OF CIRCULAR-ORBIT PERTURBER}
28: \shortauthors{KIM \& KIM}
29:
30:
31: \begin{document}
32: \title{Dynamical Friction of a Circular-Orbit Perturber in a Gaseous Medium}
33: \author{Hyosun Kim and Woong-Tae Kim }
34: \affil{Department of Physics and Astronomy, FPRD, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea}\email{hkim@astro.snu.ac.kr, wkim@astro.snu.ac.kr}
35:
36: \begin{abstract}
37: We investigate the gravitational wake due to, and dynamical friction on, a
38: perturber moving on a circular orbit in a uniform gaseous medium
39: using a semi-analytic method. This work is a straightforward extension
40: of \citet{ost99} who studied the case of a straight-line trajectory.
41: The circular orbit causes the bending of the wake in the background
42: medium along the orbit, forming a long trailing tail.
43: The wake distribution is thus asymmetric, giving rise to the drag
44: forces in both opposite (azimuthal) and lateral (radial) directions
45: to the motion of the perturber, although the latter does not contribute to
46: orbital decay much.
47: For subsonic motion, the density wake with a weak tail is simply a curved
48: version of that in Ostriker and does not exhibit the front-back symmetry.
49: The resulting drag force in the opposite direction is
50: remarkably similar to the finite-time, linear-trajectory counterpart.
51: On the other hand, a supersonic perturber is able to overtake its
52: own wake, possibly multiple times, and develops a very pronounced tail.
53: The supersonic tail surrounds the perturber in a trailing spiral fashion,
54: enhancing the perturbed density
55: at the back as well as far front of the perturber.
56: We provide the fitting formulae for the drag forces as functions of the
57: Mach number, whose azimuthal part is surprisingly in good agreement
58: with the Ostriker's formula,
59: provided $V_p t=2R_p$, where $V_p$ and $R_p$ are the velocity
60: and orbital radius of the perturber, respectively.
61: \end{abstract}
62: \keywords{hydrodynamics --- galaxies : kinematics and dynamics --- ISM: general --- shock waves}
63:
64:
65:
66: \section{INTRODUCTION}
67:
68: Dynamical friction refers to momentum loss suffered by a massive object
69: moving through a background medium due to its gravitational interaction with
70: its own induced wake. The gravitational drag force removes angular
71: momentum from an object in orbital motion, causing it to gradually
72: spiral in toward the center of the orbit.
73: In a pioneering study, \citet{chandra} derived the classical
74: formula of dynamical friction in a uniform collisionless background,
75: the result of which has been applied to a number of astronomical systems.
76: Examples include orbital decay of satellite galaxies orbiting their host
77: galaxies
78: (e.g., \citealt{tremaine,lin83,weinberg, hashimoto, fujii}; see also
79: \citealt{bin87}),
80: dynamical fates of globular clusters near the Galactic center
81: (e.g., \citealt{kimss03, mcm03, kimss}),
82: galaxy formation within the framework of hierarchical clustering scenario
83: (e.g., \citealt{zen03,bul05} and references therein),
84: formation of Kuiper-belt binaries \citep{gol02}, and
85: planet migrations \citep{planet} via interactions with planetesimals, etc.
86:
87: Although less well recognized, dynamical friction also operates in gaseous
88: backgrounds. Using a time-dependent linear perturbation theory,
89: \citet[hereafter O99]{ost99} derived the analytic expressions for
90: the density wake and drag force
91: for a perturber in a uniform gaseous medium. O99 showed that
92: resonant interactions between a perturber and pressure waves
93: make the gaseous drag more efficient than the collisionless drag
94: when the Mach number $\mach\sim1$.
95: She also found that even a subsonic perturber experiences a nonvanishing
96: gaseous drag if interaction time between the perturber and the background
97: is finite. This is an improvement on the previous notion that
98: the gaseous drag is absent for subsonic perturbers
99: because of the front-back symmetry in the steady-state density wake
100: \citep{dokuchaev, ruderman, rep80}.
101:
102: The results of O99 were confirmed numerically by \citet{sanchez99}
103: and have been applied to various situations including
104: massive black hole mergers in galactic nuclei
105: (e.g., \citealt{escala,liu,escala05,dotti}),
106: orbital decay of compact objects (e.g., \citealt{narayan,kar01})
107: and associated viscous heating (e.g., \citealt{chang,cha03})
108: in accretion disks, and heating of an intracluster medium by
109: supersonically moving galaxies in clusters
110: (e.g., \citealt{elz04,fal05,kim}). Without involving shocks,
111: density wakes in a collisionless medium are distributed more smoothly
112: and achieve larger amplitudes than those in a gaseous medium \citep{mul83},
113: which led \citet{fur02} to suggest that X-ray emissions from galaxy wakes
114: can in principle be used to discern the collisional character
115: of dark matter in galaxy clusters.
116:
117: While the results of \citet{chandra} and O99 are simple and
118: provide good physical insights, they apply strictly to a mass traveling on
119: a straight-line trajectory through an infinite homogeneous background.
120: Real astronomical systems obviously have nonuniform density distributions
121: and perturbers tend to follow curvilinear orbits.
122: For instance, motions of galaxies in galaxy clusters, binary black holes
123: near the central parts of galaxies, and compact stars in accretion disks
124: are better approximated by near-circular than straight-line orbits,
125: and their background media usually in hydrostatic equilibrium are
126: stratified in the radial direction.
127: Even for objects experiencing orbital decay, a near-circular orbit is a
128: good approximation if the associated friction time is longer than the
129: orbital time.
130: Consideration of a circular-orbit perturber is of particular interest
131: since it will allow the perturber, if supersonic, to overtake the backside
132: of its wake that was created about an orbital period earlier.
133: In this case, a steady-state wake that eventually forms has
134: morphology and drag force that might be
135: significantly different from
136: the linear-trajectory counterparts.
137: Numerical simulations carried out by \citet{sanchez} and \citet{escala}
138: indeed show that the density wake by a near-circular orbit perturber
139: contains a trailing spiral tail, which is absent in the linear-trajectory
140: cases.
141: They also showed that the resulting drag force is smaller than the
142: estimate based on the formula given in O99,
143: which is probably due to the near-circular orbit,
144: although the effect of nonuniform backgrounds in their models
145: cannot be ignored completely.
146:
147: The drag formula based on perturbers moving straight in either a
148: collisionless medium or a gaseous medium depends on the Coulomb logarithm
149: $\ln(\Lambda) \equiv \ln(\rmax/\rmin)$, where
150: $\rmin$ and $\rmax$ are the cutoff radii introduced
151: to avoid a divergence of the force integrals.\footnote{For a perturber
152: moving with velocity $V_p$ through a gaseous medium, $\rmax=V_p t$,
153: where $t$ denotes time elapsed since the perturber was introduced (O99).}
154: While many previous studies conventionally adopted $\rmin$ and $\rmax$ as
155: the characteristic sizes of the perturber and the background medium,
156: respectively, the choice of $\rmax$ remains somewhat
157: ambiguous for objects moving on near-circular orbits
158: (e.g., \citealt{bin87}).
159: For {\it collisionless} backgrounds, \citet{hashimoto} and \citet{fujii}
160: performed N-body experiments for orbital evolution of satellite galaxies
161: in a spherical halo, and found that
162: the Coulomb logarithm with $\rmax$ varying proportionally
163: to the orbital radius rather than fixed to the system size
164: gives better fits to their numerical results (see also \citealt{tremaine}).
165: We shall show in the present work that
166: a similar modification of the Coulomb logarithm is necessary in order
167: to apply the results of O99 to perturbers on near-circular orbits
168: in {\it gaseous} backgrounds, as well.
169:
170: In this paper, we consider a perturber moving on a circular orbit in a
171: uniform gaseous medium. Using a linear semi-analytic approach, we
172: explore the structure of the density wake,
173: evaluate the drag force on the perturber,
174: and compare them with those in the straight-line trajectory cases.
175: In \S2, we revisit the linear perturbation
176: analysis of O99 for the perturbed density response and apply it to
177: the case of a circular-orbit perturber. We solve the resulting
178: equations numerically. In \S3, we present the numerical results
179: for the wakes and drag forces with varying Mach number.
180: We provide simple fitting expressions to the numerical results,
181: and show that Ostriker's formula still gives a good estimate for
182: the drag force on a circular-orbit perturber only if
183: the outer cutoff radius in the Coulomb logarithm is taken equal to the
184: orbital diameter of the perturber.
185: In \S4, we summarize the present work and briefly discuss our finding.
186:
187: \section{FORMULATION}
188:
189: \subsection{Formal Solution for Density Wake}
190:
191: We consider the response of gas to
192: a point-mass perturber moving on a circular orbit and calculate the
193: resulting gravitational drag force on the perturber.
194: We treat the gas as an inviscid, adiabatic fluid, and
195: do not consider the effects of magnetic fields as well
196: as gaseous self-gravity.
197: The governing equations for ideal hydrodynamics are
198: \begin{equation}\label{eq:con}
199: \frac{\partial\rho}{\partial t}+\vct{\nabla}\cdot(\rho\vct{v})=0,
200: \end{equation}
201: and
202: \begin{equation}\label{eq:mom}
203: \frac{\partial\vct{v}}{\partial t}+\vct{v}\cdot\vct{\nabla}\vct{v}
204: = -\frac{1}{\rho}\vct{\nabla}P-\vct{\nabla}\Phi_\ext,
205: \end{equation}
206: where $\Phi_\ext$ is the gravitational potential of the perturber.
207: Other symbols have their usual meanings.
208:
209: Following O99,
210: we consider an initially uniform gaseous medium with density $\rho_0$.
211: Assuming that the wake induced by the perturber remains at small amplitudes,
212: we linearize equations (\ref{eq:con}) and (\ref{eq:mom}) using
213: $\rho=\rho_0[1+\alpha(\vct{x},t)]$ and
214: $\vct{v}=\cs\,\vct{\beta}(\vct{x},t)$,
215: where $c_s$ is the adiabatic speed of sound in the unperturbed medium
216: and $\alpha$ and $\vct{\beta}$ denote the
217: dimensionless density and velocity perturbations, respectively.
218: Eliminating $\vct{\beta}$ from the linearized equations, one
219: obtains a three-dimensional wave equation
220: \begin{equation}\label{eq:wave}
221: \vct{\nabla}^2\alpha-\frac{1}{\cs^2}\frac{\partial^2\alpha}{\partial t^2}
222: = -\frac{4\pi G}{\cs^2}\rho_\ext(\vct{x},t),
223: \end{equation}
224: where $\rho_\ext = \vct{\nabla}^2\Phi_\ext /(4 \pi G)$ represents
225: the mass density of the perturber.
226: The formal solution to equation (\ref{eq:wave}) based on the
227: the retarded Green function technique is given by
228: \begin{equation}\label{eq:formal}
229: \alpha(\vct{x},t) = \frac{G}{\cs^2} \int\!\!\!\int d^3x' dt'
230: \ \rho_\ext(\vct{x'},t')
231: \frac{\delta\,[t'-(t-\vert\vct{x}-\vct{x'}\vert/\cs)]}
232: {\vert\vct{x}-\vct{x'}\vert}
233: \end{equation}
234: (O99; see also \citealt{jackson}).
235: In the case of a perturber on a straight-line trajectory,
236: O99 solved equation (\ref{eq:formal}) directly to obtain an
237: expression for the perturbed density. The same result was found
238: by \citet{fur02} who independently used a Fourier transform method
239: in both space and time variables.
240:
241: \subsection{Density Wake for Circular-Orbit Perturbers}
242:
243: We now concentrate on the case where a point-mass perturber
244: with mass $M_p$ moves on a circular orbit with a fixed orbital radius
245: $R_p$ and a constant velocity $V_p$ in an otherwise uniform gaseous medium;
246: the angular speed of the perturber is $\Omega = V_p/R_p$.
247: It is convenient
248: to work in cylindrical coordinates ($R$, $\varphi$, $z$) whose origin lies
249: at the center of the orbit. The $\hat{z}$-axis points perpendicular to the
250: orbital plane. Assuming that the perturber
251: is introduced at $(R_p, 0, 0)$ when $t=0$, one can write
252: $\rho_\ext(\vct{x},t)=M_p\;
253: \delta (R-R_p)\, \delta [R_p(\varphi- \Omega t)]\,
254: \delta (z)\, \step (t)$,
255: where $\step (t)$ is a Heaviside step function.
256: Equation (\ref{eq:formal}) is then reduced to
257: \begin{equation} \label{eq:delta}
258: \alpha(\vct{x},t)=\frac{G M_p}{\cs^2 R_p} \int dw\
259: \frac{\delta\left(w+s+\mach\ d\,(w;\tR,\tz)\right)}{d\,(w;\tR,\tz)}\
260: \step\left(\frac{w+\varphi}{\Omega}\right),
261: \end{equation}
262: where $w \equiv \varphi^\prime-\varphi$ and
263: $s \equiv \varphi-\Omega t$ are angular distances in
264: the $z=0$ plane\footnote{Note that $w$ and $s$ in O99 are
265: defined as {\it linear} distances along the line of motion,
266: while they measure {\it angular} distances in the present work.},
267: \begin{equation}\label{eq:dist}
268: d\,(w;\tR,\tz)\equiv \frac{\vert\vct{x}-\vct{x'}\vert}{R_p}
269: =\left(1 + \tR^2+\tz^2-2\tR\cos w\right)^{1/2},
270: \end{equation}
271: and $\mach\equiv V_p/\cs$ is the Mach number of the perturber.
272: In equation (\ref{eq:dist}), $\tR\equiv R/R_p$ and $\tz\equiv z/R_p$.
273:
274: \Fig{sketch} schematically illustrates the situation at the orbital plane
275: and the meanings of variables used in equation (\ref{eq:delta}).
276: At time $t$, the perturber is located at $\vct{x_p}=(R_p, \Omega t, 0)$.
277: During its journey along the thick curve, the perturber continuously
278: launches sound waves that propagate into the background gaseous medium.
279: The position $\vct{x}=(R,\varphi,z)$ denotes a region of interest
280: in the surrounding gas where the density response will be evaluated.
281: Since the sound waves have finite traveling time, only the signals
282: emitted by the perturber at the location(s) $\vct{x'}=(R_p, \varphi', 0)$
283: at the retarded time $t'=t-\vert\vct{x}-\vct{x'}\vert/\cs$
284: are able to affect the point $\vct{x}$ at time $t$.
285: Note that $s$ and $w$ represent the projected angular distances
286: in the orbital plane between $\vct{x_p}$ and $\vct{x}$ and
287: between $\vct{x'}$ and $\vct{x}$, respectively. The symbol $d$
288: in equation (\ref{eq:dist}) refers to the three-dimensional linear distance
289: between $\vct{x'}$ and $\vct{x}$ normalized by $R_p$.
290:
291:
292: Using the identity $\delta\,[f(w)]=\sum_i\delta(w-w_i)/\vert f'(w_i)\vert$,
293: where $w_i$ are the roots of an arbitrary function $f(w)$, equation
294: (\ref{eq:delta}) is further simplified to
295: \begin{equation}\label{eq:alpha}
296: \alpha( \vct{x},t)
297: = \frac{G M_p}{\cs^2 R_p}\ \D (\vct{x},t),
298: \end{equation}
299: with the dimensionless perturbed density
300: \begin{equation} \label{eq:D}
301: \D(\vct{x},t) = \sum_{w_i}
302: \frac{\mach} {\vert w_i+s-\mach^2\tR\ \sin w_i \vert}
303: \step\left(\frac{w_i+\varphi} {\Omega}\right).
304: \end{equation}
305: Here, the summation is over all possible roots $w_i$ that satisfy
306: the condition
307: \begin{equation} \label{eq:w}
308: \mach\ d\,(w_i;\tR,\tz) = - ( w_i+s ),
309: \end{equation}
310: for fixed values of $\tR$, $\tz$, and $s$.
311: The function $\step [(w_i+\varphi)/\Omega]$ in equation (\ref{eq:D})
312: defines the region of influence (or casual region) outside of which sonic
313: perturbations sent off by the perturber at $t=0$ have insufficient time
314: to reach. For $\tR, \tz, \Omega t\gg 1$, equation (\ref{eq:w}) yields
315: $w_i + \varphi = \Omega t - \mach (\tR^2+\tz^2)^{1/2}$, so that
316: the region of influence corresponds roughly to a sphere with radius $c_st$
317: centered at the orbital center.
318: Appendix \ref{sec:limit} presents limiting solutions of
319: equation (\ref{eq:D}) near the perturber.
320:
321: Since $d$ is a periodic function of $w$ with period 2$\pi$,
322: equation (\ref{eq:w}) has at least one real root and may possess multiple
323: roots for $w_i$ depending on the values of $\mach$, $\tR$, $\tz$, and $s$.
324: In Appendix \ref{sec:wi}, we describe how the number of solutions of
325: equation (\ref{eq:w}) vary with the Mach number of a perturber.
326: It turns out that there is only a single root for $w_i$
327: everywhere for a subsonic, circular-orbit perturber, which is the same as
328: in the straight-line trajectory case (O99).
329: When a circular-orbit perturber moves at a supersonic speed, however,
330: equation (\ref{eq:w}) has an odd number of roots that contribute to
331: the wake in a steady state, which is distinct from the straight-line
332: trajectory case where
333: only one or two points along the orbit influence the wake.
334:
335: \subsection{Gravitational Drag Force}
336:
337: Once the gravitational wake $\alpha( \vct{x},t)$ is found,
338: it is straightforward to evaluate the drag force
339: exerted on the perturber:
340: \begin{equation}
341: \vct{F}_\mathrm{DF} = G M_p \rho_0 \int d^3\vct{x}\
342: \frac{\alpha(\vct{x},t)\ (\vct{x}-\vct{x_p})}
343: {\vert \vct{x}-\vct{x_p} \vert^3}\mbox{.}
344: \end{equation}
345: In the straight-line trajectory case studied by O99,
346: $\alpha(\vct{x},t)$ always remains cylindrically symmetric with respect to
347: the line of motion, resulting in the drag force
348: in the anti-parallel direction.
349: When the perturber is on a circular orbit, $\alpha(\vct{x},t)$
350: loses the cylindrical symmetry and instead becomes symmetric relative
351: to the orbital plane, making the vertical component of
352: $\vct{F}_\mathrm{DF}$ vanish.
353:
354: We decompose the nonvanishing parts into
355: the radial and azimuthal components:
356: \begin{equation}\label{eq:fdf}
357: \vct{F}_\mathrm{DF} = -\mathcal{F} \;
358: (\I_{\rm R} \hat{\vct{R}} + \I_{\rm \varphi} \hat{\vct{\varphi}}),
359: \;\;\;\;
360: \mathcal{F} \equiv \frac{4\pi\rho_0 (GM_p)^2}{V_p^2}
361: \end{equation}
362: where
363: \begin{mathletters} \label{eq:I}
364: \begin{equation}
365: \I_{R} = -\frac{\mach^2}{4\pi} \int d^3\tilde{\vct{x}}\
366: \frac{\D({\vct{x}},t)\ (\tR\cos s -1)}
367: {(1+\tz^2+\tR^2-2\tR\cos s)^{3/2}}\mbox{,}
368: \end{equation}
369: and
370: \begin{equation}
371: \I_{\varphi} = -\frac{\mach^2}{4\pi} \int d^3\tilde{\vct{x}}\
372: \frac{\D({\vct{x}},t)\ \tR\sin s}
373: {(1+\tz^2+\tR^2-2\tR\cos s)^{3/2}}.
374: \end{equation}
375: \end{mathletters}
376: Note that
377: $\I_{R}$ measures the drag force along the lateral direction of the
378: instantaneous perturber motion,
379: while $\I_{\varphi}$ is for the backward direction.
380: The dimensional term $\mathcal{F}$ in equation (\ref{eq:fdf}) allows to
381: directly compare $\I_{R}$ and $\I_{\varphi}$ with the
382: linear-trajectory counterparts (see eq.~[12] of O99).
383: As we shall show in \S\ref{sec:sum},
384: it is the azimuthal drag $\I_{\varphi}$ that
385: is responsible for the orbital decay of a perturber.
386:
387:
388:
389: \subsection{Numerical Method}
390:
391: We solve equations (\ref{eq:D}) and (\ref{eq:w})
392: numerically
393: to find the perturbed density distribution $\D(\vct{x},t)$ for given
394: $\mach$ and $t$.
395: We first construct a three-dimensional Cartesian mesh centered at the
396: center of the orbit, and solve equation (\ref{eq:w}) for
397: $w_i$ at each grid point using a hybrid Newton-bisection method.
398: By checking the conditions for multiple roots discussed
399: in Appendix \ref{sec:wi},
400: we ensure that we do not miss any solution for $w_i$.
401: The corresponding drag forces $\I_R$ and $\I_\varphi$ are calculated
402: by direct integration of equations (\ref{eq:I}).
403:
404: Since the density wake often exhibits sharp discontinuities especially
405: for supersonic perturbers and is distributed over a large spatial range,
406: it is important to check that the drag forces we calculate do not
407: depend on the size of the computational box and its resolution.
408: For fixed $\mach$, we repeated the calculations with varying box size
409: and resolution and found that depending on the Mach number, the box size
410: of $\sim (20-100)R_p$ and resolution of $\sim (80-640)$ grids per
411: $1R_p$ are sufficient to guarantee good convergence of the drag forces.
412: Although the density perturbations are non-zero outside the box,
413: they have very low amplitudes and are located far from the perturber,
414: providing a negligible contribution to the drag.
415: Very high resolution calculations are required for Mach numbers
416: near the critical values $\mach_n$, in which cases the wake tails become
417: thin and dense (see Appendix \ref{sec:wi}).
418:
419:
420: \section{RESULTS}\label{sec:res}
421:
422: \subsection{Density Wake} \label{sec:density}
423:
424: \subsubsection{Supersonic Cases}\label{sec:superwake}
425:
426: We begin by illustrating temporal evolution of density perturbations
427: induced by a supersonic perturber.
428: \Fig{evolution} shows snapshots of the density wake and the corresponding
429: number of roots of equation (\ref{eq:w}) at the orbital
430: plane for $\mach=2.0$.
431: Time is expressed in units of $R_p$/$c_s$. The black circle represents
432: the orbit of a perturber which, introduced at
433: $ (R, \varphi, z) =(R_p, 0, 0)$ initially,
434: moves in the counterclockwise direction.
435: At early time ($t\simlt 1.5$), the density wake consists of a Mach cone
436: and a sonic sphere that are curved along the orbit.
437: Except the bending, the overall wake structure, not to mention the number
438: of solutions for $w_i$ which is either one or two inside the casual
439: region, is the same as in the straight-line trajectory case of O99.
440: As the wake bends further, the Mach cone and the sonic sphere become
441: folded at the innermost interface, creating high-density regions near
442: the center ($t=1.8$). The wake expands with time
443: at a sonic speed and the Mach cone becomes elongated further.
444:
445: Unlike in the case of a straight-line trajectory
446: where the Mach cone and the sonic sphere never interact with each other,
447: the perturber (and the head of the Mach cone) on a circular orbit is
448: able to enter its own wake,
449: providing additional perturbations for some regions inside the sonic sphere.
450: Alternatively, this can be viewed as the sonic sphere whose center lies
451: at the initial position of the perturber expands radially outward,
452: swallowing a part of the elongated Mach cone. Consequently, the overlapping
453: of the Mach cone and the sonic sphere creates a high-density trailing tail
454: that has received perturbations three times from the perturber
455: ($t\simgt 1.9$).
456: \Fig{evolution} shows that immediate outside the sonic sphere,
457: there still exists a region of the undisturbed Mach cone
458: with two $w_i$'s. As time proceeds, however, this region
459: moves away from the perturber and thus gives an increasingly small
460: contribution to the drag force. In a steady state which is
461: attained at $t\rightarrow\infty$, the entire domain is affected
462: either once or three times by the perturber.
463:
464: \Fig{steadyM20} displays the steady-state distributions of the density wake
465: for $\mach=2.0$ on the $x/R_p=1$, $y=0$, and $z=0$ planes,
466: which clearly shows that the trailing tail loosely wraps around
467: the perturber.
468: The tail becomes narrower with increasing $|z|$.
469: A close inspection of the tail at the $z=0$ plane shows that density
470: becomes smaller away from the perturber along the tail and is largest
471: at the edges across the tail. This is similar to the density
472: distribution inside the Mach cone in the linear trajectory
473: case where diverging flows (and reduced gravitational potential) after
474: the shock cause density to decrease away from the shock front
475: (and the perturber).
476: This suggests that the edges of the tail are shock fronts.
477: The outer edge of the tail shown in \Fig{steadyM20} that connects smoothly
478: all the way to the perturber corresponds indeed to the surface of the
479: curved Mach cone (see also Fig.~\ref{sketch}).
480: On the other hand, the inner edge of the tail traces the interface between
481: the Mach cone and the sonic sphere that is newly swept up by the expanding
482: sonic sphere (see Fig.~\ref{evolution}).
483: Appendix \ref{sec:angle} proves that the half-opening angle of the
484: head of the curved Mach cone in the $z=0$ plane is equal to
485: $\sin^{-1} (1/\mach)$, entirely consistent with the case of a linear
486: trajectory.
487:
488: The wake tail becomes thicker as $\mach$ increases from unity.
489: \Fig{overlap} shows the steady-state density wakes
490: as well as the number of $w_i$'s that contribute to $\D$
491: for $\mach=4.0$ and $\mach=5.0$ at the $z=0$ plane. In both panels,
492: the perturber moving in the counterclockwise direction is located
493: at $x/R_p=1, y=0.$
494: When $\mach=4.0$, the tail is fat enough to cover most of the space
495: except near the center and a narrow lane between the tail edges.
496: At $\mach_1 \approx 4.603$, the inner edge of the tail
497: eventually touches the neighboring outer edge,
498: enabling three $w_i$ for the entire region under the conditions
499: expressed by equation (\ref{eq:ncond}).
500: When the Mach number is slightly larger than $\mach_1$,
501: the tail overlaps itself. This in turn creates a new tail with
502: five $w_i$'s, as \Fig{overlap}\textit{b} displays.
503: As $\mach$ increases further,
504: the new tail again becomes thicker, starts to overlap
505: at $\mach_2 \approx 7.790$, and produces a narrow lane with
506: seven $w_i$'s when $\mach>\mach_2$. The same pattern repeats with
507: increasing $\mach$, and equation (\ref{eq:M}) determines
508: the critical Mach numbers.
509:
510: \subsubsection{Subsonic Cases}\label{sec:subwake}
511:
512: Unlike in the supersonic cases where a perturber can overtake its own wake
513: and create a tail with complicated structure, sonic perturbations generated
514: by a subsonic perturber produce a gravitational wake that is spatially smooth
515: and does not involve a shock. Since perturbations propagate
516: faster than a perturber with $\mach<1$,
517: the whole casual region is affected by a perturber
518: just once, corresponding to a single $w_i$ at any position.
519: \Fig{steadyM05} shows the slices
520: of the perturbed density for $\mach=0.5$ in the
521: $x/R_p=1$, $y=0$, and $z=0$ planes when a steady state is reached.
522: Again, the perturber is located at $x/R_p=1$, $y=z=0$.
523: The density structure in the $z=0$ plane is simply a curved version
524: of what a linear-trajectory perturber would produce.
525: In particular, as Appendix \ref{sec:limit} shows,
526: the iso-density surfaces near the perturber have the shapes of
527: oblate spheroids with ellipticity $e=\mach$, with the short axis parallel to
528: the direction of the motion of the perturber, a characteristic feature
529: of a subsonic wake created by a linear-trajectory perturber (O99).
530:
531: Notice, however, that the bending of wakes in circular-orbit cases
532: makes the perturbed density distributions intrinsically asymmetric.
533: This results in nonvanishing drag forces even in a steady state,
534: and the dominant contribution to the drag comes from high-density
535: regions near the perturber.
536: This is markedly different from the purely steady-state linear-trajectory
537: cases where a subsonic perturber experiences no drag due to
538: the front-back symmetry of a wake about the perturber
539: (e.g., \citealt{rep80}).
540: Even if the finite interaction time between the straight-line perturber and
541: the background gas is considered, regions with symmetric perturbed
542: density close to the perturber exert zero net force (O99).
543: Nevertheless, the resulting drag force in the backward direction of motion
544: on a circular-orbit perturber is almost the same as that in the
545: linear-trajectory cases, as we will show in the next subsection.
546: Compared with supersonic cases, the tail in a subsonic wake is short,
547: loosely wound, and very weak, suggesting that its contribution to
548: the drag force is negligible.
549:
550:
551: \subsection{Gravitational Drag Force}
552:
553: As sonic perturbations launched from a perturber at $t=0$ propagate
554: radially outward, the volume of space exerting the gravitational
555: drag on the perturber grows with time.
556: \Fig{time} plots the drag force as functions of time for a few chosen
557: Mach numbers. The solid and dotted lines are for $\I_\varphi$ and
558: $\I_R$, respectively. Since $\D(\vct{x},t)$ is singular at
559: $\vct{x}=\vct{x}_p$, only the region with $r > r_{\rm min} = R_p/10$
560: is taken into account in force computation,
561: where $r$ is the three-dimensional distance measured from the perturber;
562: the dependence on $\rmin$ will be checked below.
563: The drag force on a subsonic perturber increases almost linearly with
564: time before turning abruptly to a constant value, whereas a supersonic
565: wake with a high-density tail gives rise to slow fluctuations
566: in the drag at early time. At any event, both components of the drag
567: force converge to respective steady-state values,
568: typically within the sound crossing time
569: over the distance equal to the orbital diameter or
570: within about an orbital period when $\mach$ is of order unity.
571: The primary reason for this is of course because the perturbed density
572: decreases quite rapidly with $r$ and also because
573: gravity is an inverse-square force.
574: This is unlike the case of a straight-line trajectory where
575: the drag increases secularly as $\ln(V_p t)$ for $\mach>1$.
576: The fast convergence of the drag force guarantees that
577: one can use the steady-state values of $\I_\varphi$ and $\I_R$
578: for all practical purposes.
579:
580:
581: Next, we check the dependence of the drag force on $\rmin (\ll R_p)$.
582: \Fig{rmin} shows the results for
583: $\mach=0.5$, 2.0, and 4.0. The sizes of errorbars associated with
584: finite grid resolution are smaller than the radius of a solid circle
585: at each data point.
586: First of all, the drag force, $\I_R$, in the radial direction converges
587: to a constant value as $\rmin$ decreases for both subsonic and
588: supersonic cases.
589: On the other hand, the drag force, $\I_\varphi$, in the opposite direction
590: of the orbital motion, varies as $\ln (1/\rmin) $ with decreasing $\rmin$ for
591: supersonic perturbers, while independent of $\rmin$ for subsonic
592: perturbers.
593: This dependence of $\I_\varphi$ on small $\rmin$ for
594: circular-orbit perturbers is exactly the same as in the linear
595: trajectory cases, which makes sense because the curvature of
596: a circular orbit is almost negligible in a tiny volume
597: near the perturber.
598:
599: We plot in \Fig{forces} the steady-state drag forces for a
600: circular-orbit perturber as functions of the Mach number.
601: For all the points, $\rmin=R_p/10$ is taken and numerical
602: convergence is checked.
603: Filled circles give $\I_\varphi/\mach^2$, while open circles are for
604: $\I_R/\mach^2$, which can be compared with Figure 3 of O99.
605: For practical use, we fit the data using
606: \begin{equation}\label{eq:IR}
607: \I_R = \left\{\begin{array}{l l@{\ }r@{\;}c@{\,}l}
608: \mach^2\ 10^{\ 3.51\mach-4.22}, &\textrm{for}&&\mach&<1.1,\\
609: 0.5\ \ln\big[9.33\mach^2(\mach^2-0.95)\big],
610: &\textrm{for}&1.1\leq&\mach&<4.4,\\
611: 0.3\ \mach^2, &\textrm{for}&4.4\leq&\mach,
612: \end{array}\right.
613: \end{equation}
614: and
615: \begin{equation}\label{eq:Iphi}
616: \I_\varphi = \left\{\begin{array}{l l@{\ }r@{\;}c@{\,}l}
617: 0.7706\ln\left(\frac{1+\mach}{1.0004-0.9185\mach}\right)
618: -1.4703\mach,
619: &\textrm{for}&&\mach&<1.0,\\
620: \ln\left[330 (R_p/\rmin) (\mach-0.71)^{5.72}\mach^{-9.58} \right],
621: &\textrm{for}&1.0\leq&\mach&<4.4, \\
622: \ln\left[(R_p/\rmin)/(0.11\mach+1.65)\right],
623: &\textrm{for}&4.4\leq&\mach,
624: \end{array}\right.
625: \end{equation}
626: which are drawn as solid lines in \Fig{forces}.
627: The fits are within 4\% of our semi-analytic results for $\mach<4.4$
628: and within 16\% for $\mach>4.4$.
629: Both components of the drag force peak at $\mach\sim 1.2-1.4$,
630: analogous to the linear-trajectory cases, and $\I_\varphi$ dominates
631: over $\I_R$ for transonic perturbers.
632: Although $\I_R$ is larger than $\I_\varphi$
633: for $\mach \simgt 2.2$, its effect on orbital decay of a perturber
634: is insignificant (see \S\ref{sec:sum}).
635: The local bumps in the drag forces at $\mach \approx 4.6$ and 7.8 are due to
636: the self-overlapping of a wake tail explained in \S\ref{sec:superwake}.
637:
638:
639: \Fig{forces} also plots as dotted curves the results of O99 for drag force
640: on linear-trajectory perturbers.
641: Despite the difference in the shape of the orbits,
642: the agreement between $\I_\varphi$ and
643: Ostriker's formula is excellent for the subsonic case.
644: This presumably reflects the fact that other than bending, the wake
645: structure created by a subsonic circular-orbit perturber is not
646: significantly different from the linear-trajectory counterpart
647: (see \S\ref{sec:subwake}).
648: Note also that Ostriker's formula for the supersonic case,
649: for which $V_pt=2R_p$ is adopted to fit our numerical results,
650: is overall in good agreement with $\I_\varphi$ for a range of
651: $\mach$.
652: It is remarkable that the subsonic and supersonic drag formulae
653: (with $V_p t$ chosen adequately in supersonic cases)
654: obtained from perturbers moving straight still give a reasonably good
655: estimate for the drag even on circular-orbit perturbers.
656:
657:
658:
659: \section{SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION}\label{sec:sum}
660:
661: We have taken a semi-analytic approach to study the gravitational wake
662: and the associated drag force on a perturber moving on a circular orbit
663: in an infinite, uniform gaseous medium. This work extends
664: \citet{ost99} who studied the cases with straight-line
665: trajectory perturbers. The circular orbit generally causes the wake to
666: bend along the orbit and creates a trailing tail.
667: For a subsonic perturber, the density wake has a weak tail and is
668: distributed quite smoothly (see Fig.~\ref{steadyM05}).
669: On the other hand, a supersonic perturber can catch up with its own wake,
670: possibly multiple times depending on the Mach number,
671: forming a very pronounced trailing tail across which density
672: changes abruptly (see Fig.~\ref{steadyM20}).
673: Although the region influenced by the perturber keeps expanding
674: with time into the surrounding medium, the drag
675: force promptly saturates to a steady state value within less than
676: the crossing time of sound waves over the distance equal to
677: the orbital diameter.
678:
679: Because of asymmetry in the density wake, it is desirable to decompose
680: the drag force into two components: $\I_R$ and $\I_\varphi$ in the radial and
681: azimuthal directions, respectively (eq.~[\ref{eq:fdf}]).
682: \Fig{forces} plots our main results for
683: $\I_R$ and $\I_\varphi$ as functions of the Mach number $\mach$;
684: equations (\ref{eq:IR}) and
685: (\ref{eq:Iphi}) give the algebraic fits to the numerical results.
686: The azimuthal drag force varying rather steeply with $\mach$ peaks
687: at $\mach\sim1.2-1.4$, while the radial force is highly
688: suppressed at $\mach<1$ and exceeds the azimuthal drag at
689: $\mach\simgt 2.2$.
690: It is remarkable that the drag on linear-trajectory perturbers given in
691: O99 is almost identical to
692: $\I_\varphi$ for subsonic cases, and gives a good approximation
693: for supersonic cases, too, provided $V_pt = 2R_p$.
694:
695: A striking feature in gravitational wakes formed by circular-orbit
696: perturbers is a long tail in a trailing spiral shape. Such a tail
697: structure is indeed commonly seen in recent hydrodynamic simulations
698: for black hole mergers in a gaseous medium
699: (e.g., \citealt{escala,escala05,dotti}; see also \citealt{sanchez}).
700: Albeit much weaker, it is also apparent in N-body simulations
701: for satellite orbital decay
702: in a collisionless background (e.g., \citealt{weinberg,her89}).
703: For supersonic perturbers, the tail is a curved Mach cone and
704: bounded by the shock fronts that propagate radially outward.
705: As explained in Appendices \ref{sec:wi} and \ref{sec:angle}, the
706: outer edge of the tail is described by $\Omega t - \varphi = w_+ + y_+$,
707: where $w_+$ and $y_+$ are defined through equation (\ref{eq:wy}).
708: By taking a time derivative of this equation for fixed $\varphi$,
709: one can show that the propagation speed $\dot R_{\rm sh}$
710: of the spiral tail in the radial direction is given by
711: $\dot R_{\rm sh}/c_s = \mach \tR(\mach^2\tR^2-1)^{-1/2}$
712: for $\tR\equiv R/R_p\geq1$.
713: Clearly, $\dot R_{\rm sh}=c_s$ for $R/R_p \gg 1$,
714: and $\dot R_{\rm sh} = c_s\mach/(\mach^2-1)^{1/2}$ near $R/R_p =1 $ as
715: equation (\ref{eq:half}) implies.
716: This prediction is roughly consistent with
717: \citet{escala} who empirically found that the tail in a model
718: with $\mach=\sqrt{2}$ has an average propagation speed of
719: $\dot R_{\rm sh} \approx 1.1 c_s$.
720:
721:
722: Many previous studies on dynamical friction
723: adopted the drag formula based on perturbers moving straight and
724: estimated the Coulomb logarithm by taking $\rmax=R_{\rm sys}$,
725: where $R_{\rm sys}$ is the system size (see references in \S1).
726: Unlike a straight-line trajectory,
727: a circular orbit naturally introduces a characteristic
728: length scale, $R_p$. The results of our semi-analytic analyses suggest
729: that, at least in a gaseous medium,
730: the drag force obtained for linear-trajectory perturbers
731: can be a reasonable approximation to that for circular-orbit
732: perturbers with the same Mach number
733: if $\rmax \equiv V_p t$ is taken equal to $2R_p$.
734: Since $R_{\rm sys}>2R_p$ in most relevant situations, using
735: $\rmax =R_{\rm sys}$ usually overestimates the drag force for
736: objects in near-circular motion.
737: From hydrodynamic simulations for orbital decay of
738: perturbers in a stratified gaseous sphere,
739: \citet{sanchez} suggested $\ln(\Lambda)=
740: \ln(\rmax/\rmin) \rightarrow 2.34 \ln
741: (0.79 R_p/\rmin)$ with an identification $\rmin = 2.25 R_{\rm soft}$,
742: where $R_{\rm soft}$ is the softening radius of the point-mass potential
743: \citep{sanchez99}. This happens to be similar to our suggestion
744: $\ln(\Lambda) \rightarrow \ln(2R_p/\rmin)$ for the parameter
745: range $R_p/\rmin \sim 2-6$ that they considered.
746:
747: Our suggestion for the Coulomb logarithm on near-circular orbit perturbers
748: in a gaseous medium is also consistent with the common prescription
749: for orbital decay of small satellites in collisionless backgrounds
750: (e.g., \citealt{tremaine, lin83, hashimoto, fujii}).
751: In particular, \citet{hashimoto} found that
752: Chandrasekhar's formula with $\ln(\Lambda) \rightarrow
753: \ln[R_p/(1.4 R_{\rm soft})]$ gives excellent fits to the results of
754: their N-body simulations.
755: The discrepancy between our suggestion and their prescription may be
756: attributable in part to the effects of
757: collisionless nature, nonuniform background density,
758: and self-gravity of particles in their models.
759:
760: Density inhomogeneity in the background can also make significant
761: changes to the classical drag force. For collisionless backgrounds,
762: \citet{just} found that nonuniform density induces
763: an additional drag force in the lateral direction of
764: the perturber motion, taking up to 10\% of the drag in the
765: backward direction.
766: They proposed the inverse of a local density gradient as
767: an appropriate choice for $\rmax$ in the Coulomb logarithm
768: (see also \citealt{spi03}), which was confirmed by \citet{are07} who
769: ran a number of numerical simulations for systems with a
770: large central density concentration.
771: Hydrodynamic models in \citet{sanchez} studied the combined effects of
772: nonuniform backgrounds and curvilinear orbits
773: on dynamical friction in a gaseous medium,
774: although it is challenging to isolate each effect separately.
775:
776: Finally, as a heuristic example, we consider the dynamical friction
777: of a galaxy on a near-circular orbit subject to the drag force given by
778: equations (\ref{eq:IR}) and (\ref{eq:Iphi}) due to an intracluster
779: medium. The cluster is dominated by dark matter
780: whose mass distribution follows the NFW profile with the characteristic mass
781: $M_0=6.6\times 10^{14} M_\sun$ and the scale radius $r_\mathrm{s}=460$ kpc
782: \citep{NFW}. The intracluster medium has
783: a constant electron density $n_e=0.05\ \mathrm{cm}^{-3}$
784: and temperature 1 keV; the corresponding adiabatic speed of sound is
785: $\cs = 500\ \kmpers$.
786: Initially, a galaxy with size $\rmin=10$ kpc and
787: mass $M_p=5\times 10^{11} M_\sun$ including
788: a dark halo (e.g., \citealt{zen03,halkola}) is orbiting at $R_0=100$ kpc
789: with an equilibrium velocity $V_p=10^3\ \kmpers$ about the
790: cluster center.
791: The equations of motion in the orbital plane are
792: \begin{mathletters} \label{eq:gal}
793: \begin{equation}
794: \ddot{R} - R\dot{\varphi}^2 = -(\mathcal{F}/M_p) \I_R -
795: \frac{d\Phi_{\rm NFW}}{dR}
796: \mbox{,}\\
797: \end{equation}
798: \begin{equation}
799: R\ddot{\varphi} + 2\dot{R}\dot{\varphi} =
800: -(\mathcal{F}/M_p) \I_\varphi,
801: \end{equation}
802: \end{mathletters}
803: where $\Phi_{\rm NFW}$ is the NFW potential and dots represent
804: derivatives with respect to time.
805: \Fig{orbitNFW} plots the
806: resulting temporal variations of the orbital radius of the galaxy.
807: The solid line corresponds to the case with full $\I_R$ and $\I_\varphi$
808: given by equations (\ref{eq:IR}) and (\ref{eq:Iphi}),
809: while the dashed line is for a controlled case
810: where $\I_R$ is artificially taken to be zero.
811: Except for slight mismatches in phase,
812: both agree fairly well with each other, demonstrating that
813: the radial drag force does not have a serious impact on the orbital decay.
814: As equation (\ref{eq:gal}) implies, it is the azimuthal
815: drag $\I_\varphi$ that takes away most of the orbital angular momentum from
816: the galaxy; the radial drag changes the orbital eccentricity more
817: than the semi-major axis (\citealt{bur76}; see also \citealt{just}).
818:
819: \Fig{orbitNFW} also plots as dot-dashed line the decay of the orbital radius
820: blindly using Ostriker's formula with $\ln (V_pt/\rmin) = 4.6$,
821: corresponding to $V_pt=1$ Mpc.
822: While the galaxy motion remains supersonic ($t<1.5$ Gyr),
823: this value of the Coulomb logarithm overestimates the realistic drag force,
824: on average, by a factor of 1.7 and thus brings the galaxy
825: to $R=0.1R_0$ in 2 Gyrs,
826: which is about 2.3 times faster than the estimate based on the realistic
827: drag force. On the other hand, the result of using $V_p t = 2R(t)$ in
828: the formula of O99, shown as dotted line in \Fig{orbitNFW}, is in excellent
829: agreement with those using equations (\ref{eq:IR}) and (\ref{eq:Iphi}).
830: This demonstrates again that Ostriker's formula with $V_p t = 2R$
831: gives quite a good approximation to the drag force even in the case of
832: a circular-orbit perturber.
833:
834: \acknowledgments
835:
836: We are grateful to E.\ Ostriker for suggesting this project
837: and making stimulating comments. We also acknowledge a thoughtful report
838: from the referee, A.\ Escala, and helpful comments from J.\
839: S{\'a}nchez-Salcedo.
840: This work was supported by Korea Science and Engineering
841: Foundation (KOSEF) grant R01-2004-000-10490-0 at SNU.
842: H.\ Kim has been partially supported by the BK21 project of the
843: Korean Government.
844: The numerical computations presented in this work were performed on the
845: Linux cluster at KASI (Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute)
846: built with funding from KASI and ARCSEC.
847:
848:
849: \appendix
850: \section{
851: Solutions for $\D(\vct{x},t)$ Near the Perturber}
852: \label{sec:limit}
853:
854: In this Appendix, we explore the approximate solutions to equation
855: (\ref{eq:D}) near the perturber ($|\tR-1|, |s|, |\tz| \ll 1$).
856: For subsonic motion ($\mach<1$), $|w_i| \ll 1$ and
857: $d\approx ( \delta^2 + w^2 + \tz^2)^{1/2}$ with $\delta\equiv \tR-1$.
858: In this case, equation (\ref{eq:w}) has a single root,
859: \begin{equation}\label{eq:www}
860: w_1 = \frac{s + \mach [ s^2 + (1-\mach^2)(\delta^2 + \tz^2)]^{1/2}}
861: {\mach^2-1}.
862: \end{equation}
863: Inserting $w_1$ into equation (\ref{eq:D})
864: and retaining the
865: first-order terms in $|\tR-1|, |s|$, and $|\tz|$, one obtains
866: $\D(\vct{x})
867: = [s^2 + (1-\mach^2)(\delta^2 + \tz^2)]^{-1/2}$ at a steady state,
868: whose functional form is identical to equation (9) of O99
869: for $\mach<1$. Obviously,
870: the equi-density surfaces of this distribution are
871: oblate spheroids with the short axis parallel to the direction
872: of the motion of the perturber.
873:
874: For supersonic motion ($\mach>1$), we seek for asymptotic solutions
875: of $\D$ just behind the perturber along its orbit (i.e.,
876: $0<-s\ll 1$, $\tR=1, \tz=0$).
877: We further restrict the discussion to not-so-highly
878: supersonic cases\footnote{More
879: precisely, $1<\mach < \mach_1$, where $\mach_1$ is a critical Mach
880: number discussed in Appendix \ref{sec:wi}.},
881: for which equation (\ref{eq:w}) has three roots:
882: \begin{mathletters}\label{eq:wthree}
883: \begin{eqnarray}
884: w_1 &\approx& -\frac{s}{1 + \mach}, \\
885: w_2 &\approx& -\frac{s}{1 - \mach}, \\
886: w_3 &\approx& w_0 -s \left(1 - \frac{\mach^2 \sin w_0}{w_0}\right)^{-1},
887: \end{eqnarray}
888: \end{mathletters}
889: as long as $0<-s \ll (\mach-1)^{3/2}$.
890: Here, $w_0$ is a non-zero solution of
891: \begin{equation}
892: \mach(2-2\cos w_0)^{1/2} + w_0=0
893: \end{equation}
894: for given $\mach$ ($\neq1$).
895: Note that $w_1$ and $w_2$ are analogous to two solutions of O99 that
896: contribute the wake in the rear Mach cone for a linear-trajectory
897: perturber, while $w_3$ is a new solution introduced by a circular orbit.
898: For $\mach \rightarrow 1^{+0}$, $w_0 \rightarrow -[24(\mach-1)]^{1/2}$.
899:
900: Substituting equations (\ref{eq:wthree}) into equation (\ref{eq:D})
901: and taking the steady-state limit ($\step \rightarrow 1$),
902: we obtain
903: \begin{equation}\label{eq:Dss}
904: \D(s) = \frac{2}{\vert s \vert} +
905: \frac{\mach}{\mach^2\sin w_0 - w_0},
906: \end{equation}
907: for $-s \ll (\mach-1)^{3/2}$.
908: The first term in the right-hand side of equation (\ref{eq:Dss}) again
909: represents the perturbed density in the linear trajectory case.
910: The second term, albeit small compared with the first term for small $|s|$,
911: arises as the perturber on a circular orbit can overtake its wake.
912: The effects of circular orbits are significant in regions
913: away from the perturber, which is pursued numerically in \S\ref{sec:res}.
914:
915:
916:
917: \section{Number of Roots for $w_i$ of Equation (\ref{eq:w})} \label{sec:wi}
918:
919: To obtain the perturbed density $\D(\vct{x},t)$ at given time and location,
920: it is crucial to find $w_i$ that satisfies equation (\ref{eq:w}).
921: Let us define $f(w)\equiv \mach d(w; \tR, \tz)$ for a fixed set of
922: $\mach, \tR, \tz$, and $s$. Then, finding solutions of equation
923: (\ref{eq:w}) is equivalent to finding the intersections of two
924: curves $y = -w -s$ and $y=f(w)$ on the $w$ -- $y$ plane. Since
925: $\vert df/dw \vert \leq \mach$ for all $\tR$ and $\tz$, it is
926: trivial to show that
927: there is only one solution for all space and time if $\mach < 1$.
928: This implies that any location inside the casual
929: region for sound waves is influenced just once by a perturber moving
930: at a subsonic speed. The same is true for a
931: subsonic perturber moving on a straight-line trajectory studied
932: by O99.
933:
934: A necessary condition for having more than one root is
935: $\vert df/dw \vert > 1$ for any $w$, which after some algebra results in
936: \begin{equation}\label{eq:ncond}
937: \mach > 1, \quad
938: \tR > \mach^{-1},\quad\mbox{and} \quad
939: |\tz| < \mach^{-1}\ \sMsml\ \sMsRsml\mbox{.}
940: \end{equation}
941: When the conditions (\ref{eq:ncond}) are fulfilled, there are two
942: tangent points of the curve $y=f(w)$ to lines with
943: a slope of $-1$ in the range $-\pi < w < 0$.
944: Let ($w_+$, $y_+$) and ($w_-$, $y_-$) denote the tangent points,
945: such that
946: $-\pi < w_- < w_+<0$ and $0<y_+ < y_-<\mach$.
947: The tangent condition $df/dw\vert_{w_\pm} =-1$ yields
948: \begin{mathletters}\label{eq:wy}
949: \begin{eqnarray}
950: w_\pm &=& - \cos^{-1}
951: \left(\frac{1\pm\sMsml\sMsRsml}{\mach^2\tR}\right)\mbox{,} \\
952: y_\pm &=& \vert \sMsRsml \mp \sMsml \vert,
953: \end{eqnarray}
954: \end{mathletters}
955: at the $z=0$ plane.
956: Note that the $2\pi$ periodicity of $y=f(w)$ ensures that
957: ($w_\pm + 2\pi n$, $y_\pm$) for arbitrary integer $n$ are also tangent
958: points to a line with slope of $-1$.
959:
960: For given $\mach>1$,
961: the number of solutions of equation (\ref{eq:w}) depends on
962: the slopes of lines connecting the points $(w_- - 2\pi n, y_-)$ and
963: $(w_+, y_+)$. When the line passing through $(w_- - 2\pi, y_-)$ and
964: $(w_+, y_+)$ has a slope larger than $-1$, which occurs for
965: $1 < \mach < \mach_1$ (see below for the definition of $\mach_n$ with
966: integer $n\geq 1$), the spatial regions that satisfy equations
967: (\ref{eq:ncond}) as well as
968: $ w_+ + y_+ < -s < w_- + y_-$ have three roots for
969: $w_i$, while the other regions have only a single root.
970: When $\mach_1 < \mach < \mach_2$, the slope of the line connecting
971: $(w_- - 4\pi, y_-)$ and $(w_+, y_+)$ is greater than $-1$, so that the
972: regions bounded by the condition $ w_+ + y_+ < -s < w_- + y_- - 2\pi$
973: possess five roots; the other regions
974: have three roots. Note that the volume that does not satisfy conditions
975: (\ref{eq:ncond}) still has a single root.
976: As the Mach number increases further, new regions emerge to have
977: a larger (odd) number of roots for $w_i$.
978: Generalizing the discussion given above,
979: the critical Mach number $\mach_n$ below which a steady-state wake
980: possesses up to $2n+1$ roots can be determined by the requirement
981: $(y_+ - y_-)/(w_+ - w_- + 2\pi n) =-1$. Using
982: equations (\ref{eq:wy}), this is simplified to
983: \begin{equation} \label{eq:M}
984: 2 (\mach_n^2 -1)^{1/2}-\cos^{-1}\,(2\mach_n^{-2}-1) = 2 \pi n,
985: \end{equation}
986: where we take $\tR=1$ without any loss of generality since the existence
987: of multiple roots requires $\tR > \mach^{-1}$ (eq. [\ref {eq:ncond}]).
988: The first few solutions of equation (\ref{eq:M}) are $\mach_1=4.6033$,
989: $\mach_2=7.7897$, $\mach_3=10.9499$, etc.
990:
991: The presence of multiple roots implies that the density wake in those
992: regions are constructed by a superposition of sonic signals that were
993: emitted by the perturber at as many different locations (and
994: corresponding retarded times)
995: as the number of roots.
996: The $\mach$-dependency of the number of roots for a circular-orbit
997: supersonic
998: perturber is in sharp contrast to the case of a straight-line trajectory
999: where only one (within a sonic sphere) or two (within
1000: a rear Mach cone) roots are allowed regardless of the Mach number (O99).
1001: When a perturber is moving
1002: at a supersonic speed along a circular orbit, it is able to catch up with
1003: its own wake (possibly multiple times), adding new sonic disturbances
1004: to the regions that were already disturbed by the perturber.
1005: Regions of multiple roots
1006: usually take a form of a long trailing spiral, as exemplified in Figures
1007: \ref{evolution}, \ref{steadyM20}, and \ref{overlap}.
1008:
1009:
1010: \section{HALF-OPENING ANGLE} \label{sec:angle}
1011:
1012: Although a Mach cone is generally curved for a circular-orbit
1013: perturber, its half-opening angle in the vicinity of the perturber
1014: is the same as in the linear trajectory counterpart.
1015: As explained in \S\ref{sec:superwake}, the interior of a curved Mach cone
1016: and an attached trailing tail is the region where equation (\ref{eq:w})
1017: has multiple roots in a steady state. It is bounded by
1018: $-s=w_\pm + y_\pm$ curves in the $z=0$ plane.
1019: More specifically, the $-s=w_+ + y_+$ curve describes the inner and outer
1020: edges of the
1021: Mach cone head near the perturber as well as the outer edge of the tail,
1022: represented by light solid curve and dashed curve at the
1023: boundaries of the shade region displayed in \Fig{sketch}.
1024: On the other hand, the $-s=w_- + y_-$ curve corresponds to the inner
1025: edge of the tail (dot-dashed curve in Fig.~\ref{sketch}) that
1026: meets the Mach cone head at $\tR = \mach^{-1}$.
1027: By Taylor expanding $w_+$ and $y_+$ about $\tR=1, s=0$
1028: in the $z=0$ plane and adding the resulting expressions together,
1029: one can show the head of the Mach cone is described by
1030: \begin{equation}\label{eq:half}
1031: s = - (\mach^2 -1)^{1/2} \vert \delta \vert,
1032: \end{equation}
1033: up to the first order in $\vert \delta \vert\equiv \vert \tR-1\vert$.
1034: The negative sign in equation (\ref{eq:half})
1035: results since $s$ is measured in the counterclockwise direction
1036: from the perturber
1037: (Fig.~\ref{sketch}). Let $\theta$ be the half-opening angle of the Mach
1038: cone near the perturber. Then, $\tan \theta = -|\delta|/s
1039: = (\mach^2-1)^{-1/2}$, or $\theta = \sin^{-1}(1/\mach)$, the same result
1040: as in the linear trajectory case.
1041:
1042:
1043:
1044: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1045: \bibitem[Arena \& Bertin(2007)]{are07} Arena, S.\ E., \& Bertin, G.\
1046: 2007, \aap, 463, 921
1047: \bibitem[Binney \& Tremaine(1987)]{bin87}
1048: Binney, J., \& Tremaine, S.\ 1987, Galactic Dynamics
1049: (Princeton: Princeton Univ.\ Press)
1050: \bibitem[Bullock \& Johnston(2005)]{bul05}
1051: Bullock, J.\ S., Johnston, K.\ V.\ 2005, \apj, 635, 931
1052: \bibitem[Burns(1976)]{bur76} Burns, J.\ A.\ 1976, American Journal of Phys.,
1053: 44, 944
1054: \bibitem[Chandrasekhar(1943)]{chandra} Chandrasekhar, S.\ 1943, \apj, 97, 255
1055: \bibitem[Chang(2001)]{chang} Chang, H.-Y.\ 2001, \apjl, 551, L159
1056: \bibitem[Chang \& Choi(2003)]{cha03} Chang, H.-Y., Choi, C.-S.\
1057: 2003, \aap, 410, 519
1058: \bibitem[Del Popolo et al.(2003)]{planet} Del Popolo, A., Ye{\c s}ilyurt, S., \& Ercan, E.~N.\ 2003, \mnras, 339, 556
1059: \bibitem[Dokuchaev(1964)]{dokuchaev} Dokuchaev, V.~P.\ 1964, Soviet Astron., 8, 23
1060: \bibitem[Dotti et al.(2006)]{dotti} Dotti, M., Colpi, M., \& Haardt, F.\ 2006, \mnras, 367, 103
1061: \bibitem[El-Zant et al.(2004)]{elz04} El-Zant, A.~A., Kim, W.-T., \& Kamionkowski, M.\ 2004, \mnras, 354, 169
1062: \bibitem[Escala et al.(2004)]{escala} Escala, A., Larson, R.~B., Coppi, P.~S., \& Mardones, D.\ 2004, \apj, 607, 765
1063: \bibitem[Escala et al.(2005)]{escala05} Escala, A., Larson, R.~B., Coppi, P.~S., \& Mardones, D.\ 2005, \apj, 630, 152
1064: \bibitem[Faltenbacher et al.(2005)]{fal05}
1065: Faltenbacher, A., Kravtsov, A.\ V., Nagai, D., \& Gottloeber, S.\
1066: 2005, \mnras, 358, 139
1067: \bibitem[Fujii et al.(2006)]{fujii} Fujii, M., Funato, Y., \& Makino, J.\ 2006, \pasj, 58, 743
1068: \bibitem[Furlanetto \& Loeb(2002)]{fur02} Furlanetto, S.~R., \& Loeb, A.\ 2002, \apj, 565, 854
1069: \bibitem[Goldreich et al.(2002)]{gol02} Goldreich, P., Lithwick, Y., \& Sari, R.\ 2002, \nat, 420, 643
1070: \bibitem[Halkola et al.(2007)]{halkola}
1071: Halkola, A., Seitz, S., \& Pannella, M.\ 2007, \apj, 656, 739
1072: \bibitem[Hashimoto et al.(2003)]{hashimoto} Hashimoto, Y., Funato, Y., \& Makino, J.\ 2003, \apj, 582, 196
1073: \bibitem[Hernquist \& Weinberg(1989)]{her89}
1074: Hernquist, L., \& Weinberg, M.\ D.\ 1989, \mnras, 238, 407
1075: \bibitem[Jackson(1975)]{jackson} Jackson, J.~D.\ 1975, Classical Electrodynamics (New York: Wiley)
1076: \bibitem[Just \& Pe{\~n}arrubia(2005)]{just} Just, A., \& Pe{\~n}arrubia, J.\ 2005, \aap, 431, 861
1077: \bibitem[Karas \& \v{S}ubr(2001)]{kar01}
1078: Karas, V., \v{S}ubr, L.\ 2001, \aap, 376, 686
1079: \bibitem[Kim \& Morris(2003)]{kimss03} Kim, S.~S., \& Morris, M.\ 2003, \apj, 597, 312
1080: \bibitem[Kim et al.(2004)]{kimss} Kim, S.~S., Figer, D.~F., \& Morris, M.\ 2004, \apjl, 607, L123
1081: \bibitem[Kim et al.(2005)]{kim} Kim, W.-T., El-Zant, A.~A., \& Kamionkowski, M.\ 2005, \apj, 632, 157
1082: \bibitem[Lin \& Tremaine(1983)]{lin83}
1083: Lin, D.\ N.\ C., Tremaine, S.\ 1983, \apj, 264, 364
1084: \bibitem[Liu(2004)]{liu} Liu, F.~K.\ 2004, \mnras, 347, 1357
1085: \bibitem[McMillan \& Portegies Zwart(2003)]{mcm03}
1086: McMillan, S.\ L.\ W., Portegies Zwart, S.\ F.\ 2003, \apj, 596, 314
1087: \bibitem[Mulder(1983)]{mul83} Mulder, W.\ A.\ 1983, \aap, 117, 9
1088: \bibitem[Narayan(2000)]{narayan} Narayan, R.\ 2000, \apj, 536, 663
1089: \bibitem[Navarro et al.(1996)]{NFW} Navarro, J.~F., Frenk, C.~S., \& White, S.~D.~M.\ 1996, \apj, 462, 563
1090: \bibitem[Ostriker(1999)]{ost99} Ostriker, E.~C.\ 1999, \apj, 513, 252 (O99)
1091: \bibitem[Rephaeli \& Salpeter(1980)]{rep80} Rephaeli, Y., \& Salpeter, E.~E.\ 1980, \apj, 240, 20
1092: \bibitem[Ruderman \& Spiegel(1971)]{ruderman} Ruderman, M.~A., \& Spiegel, E.~A.\ 1971, \apj, 165, 1
1093: \bibitem[S{\'a}nchez-Salcedo \& Brandenburg(1999)]{sanchez99} S{\'a}nchez-Salcedo, F.~J., \& Brandenburg, A.\ 1999, \apjl, 522, L35
1094: \bibitem[S{\'a}nchez-Salcedo \& Brandenburg(2001)]{sanchez} S{\'a}nchez-Salcedo, F.~J., \& Brandenburg, A.\ 2001, \mnras, 322, 67
1095: \bibitem[Spinnato et al.(2003)]{spi03}
1096: Spinnato, P.\ F., Fellhauer, M., Portegies Z., \& Simon F.\
1097: \mnras, 344, 22
1098: \bibitem[Tremaine(1976)]{tremaine} Tremaine, S.~D.\ 1976, \apj, 203, 72
1099: \bibitem[Weinberg(1989)]{weinberg} Weinberg, M.~D.\ 1989, \mnras, 239, 549
1100: \bibitem[Zentner \& Bullock(2003)]{zen03}
1101: Zentner, A., \& Bullock, J.~S.\ 2003, \apj, 598, 49
1102: \end{thebibliography}
1103:
1104: %fig 1
1105: \clearpage
1106: \begin{figure}
1107: \epsscale{0.8}
1108: \plotone{f1.eps}
1109: \caption{\label{sketch}
1110: Schematic diagram illustrating the situation on the $z=0$ plane at
1111: time $t$. A perturber initially introduced at $(R_p, 0, 0)$ moves
1112: along a circle with radius $R_p$ at uniform angular speed
1113: $\Omega$ in the counterclockwise direction, and is currently at
1114: the position $\vct{x}_p\equiv (R_p, \Omega t, 0)$.
1115: At this time, an observer sitting at $\vct{x}=(R, \varphi, z)$ receives
1116: a sonic signal that was emitted by the perturber when it was at
1117: $\vct{x'}=(R_p, \Omega t', 0)$, where
1118: $t'=t-\vert\vct{x}-\vct{x'}\vert/\cs$ is the retarded time.
1119: The angular variables are $w\equiv \varphi'-\varphi$ and
1120: $s\equiv \varphi-\Omega t$ along the orbital plane.
1121: The shaded area represents a curved Mach cone and a wake tail
1122: formed by a supersonic perturber with $\mach>1$.
1123: The inner edge (dashed curve) of the Mach cone
1124: meets the inner edge (dot-dashed curve) of the tail
1125: at a point on a circle with radius $R_p/\mach$.
1126: The outer edge (light solid curve) of the Mach cone defines
1127: the outer edge of the tail.}
1128: \end{figure}
1129:
1130: %fig 2
1131: \clearpage
1132: \begin{figure}
1133: \epsscale{1.0}
1134: \plotone{f2.eps}
1135: \caption{\label{evolution}
1136: Temporal evolution at the $z=0$ plane of (a) the
1137: dimensionless density wake $\D(\vct{x},t)$
1138: in logarithmic color scale and (b)
1139: the number of roots for $w_i$ in equation (\ref{eq:w})
1140: for the case of $\mach=2.0$.
1141: The time is in unit of $R_p/\cs$. See text for details.}
1142: \end{figure}
1143:
1144: %fig 3
1145: \clearpage
1146: \begin{figure*}
1147: \plotone{f3.eps}
1148: \caption{\label{steadyM20}
1149: Density distributions of the steady-state wake for $\mach=2.0$
1150: on the $x/R_p=1$ (\textit{bottom right}),
1151: $y=0$ (\textit{top left}), and $z=0$ (\textit{bottom left}) planes.
1152: The perturber is located at $(x,\,y)=(R_p,\,0)$,
1153: and the black circle in the bottom left frame denotes the orbit of
1154: the perturber. Color bar labels $\log \D$.}
1155: \end{figure*}
1156:
1157: %fig 4
1158: \clearpage
1159: \begin{figure*}
1160: \epsscale{1.}
1161: \plotone{f4.eps}
1162: \caption{\label{overlap}
1163: Distributions of the perturbed density $\D$ in logarithmic color scale
1164: (\textit{top}) and the corresponding number of roots for
1165: $w_i$ in equation (\ref{eq:w}) (\textit{bottom})
1166: at the $z=0$ plane of the steady-state wake for
1167: (a) $\mach=4.0$ and (b) $\mach=5.0$.
1168: The perturber is located at $(x,\,y)=(R_p,\,0)$.}
1169: \end{figure*}
1170:
1171: %fig 5
1172: \clearpage
1173: \begin{figure}
1174: \plotone{f5.eps}
1175: \caption{\label{steadyM05}
1176: Same as Fig.~\ref{steadyM20} except for $\mach=0.5$.}
1177: \end{figure}
1178:
1179: %fig 6
1180: \clearpage
1181: \begin{figure}
1182: \plotone{f6.eps}
1183: \caption{\label{time}
1184: Time evolution of the drag force for $\mach=0.5$, 1.2, 2.0, 4.0, and 5.0.
1185: Solid curves draw the azimuthal drag $\I_\varphi$, while
1186: dashed curves are for the radial drag $\I_R$.
1187: For all cases, $\rmin=R_p/10$ is taken. Note that
1188: both $\I_\varphi$ and $\I_R$ converge typically within the
1189: sound crossing time across $2R_p$,
1190: indicating that a steady state is reached quite rapidly.}
1191: \end{figure}
1192:
1193: %fig 7
1194: \clearpage
1195: \begin{figure}
1196: \epsscale{1.}
1197: \plotone{f7.eps}
1198: \caption{\label{rmin}
1199: Dependence on $\rmin$ of the steady-state drag force
1200: for $\mach=0.5$, 2.0, and 4.0.
1201: \textit{Left}: For $R_p/\rmin > 10$, the radial drag force
1202: $\I_R$ converges to a respective constant value marked by dotted line.
1203: \textit{Right}: The azimuthal drag force $\I_\varphi$
1204: varies as $\ln\,(R_p/\rmin)$
1205: for small $\rmin$ when $\mach>1$, while independent of $\rmin$
1206: for $\mach<1$. Dotted lines indicate a slope of unity.}
1207: \end{figure}
1208:
1209: %fig 8
1210: \clearpage
1211: \begin{figure}
1212: \epsscale{1.}
1213: \plotone{f8.eps}
1214: \caption{\label{forces}
1215: Gravitational drag force on a circular-orbit perturber in a gaseous
1216: medium as a function of the Mach number $\mach$.
1217: The open and filled circles give the results of our semi-analytic
1218: calculation for the drag in the radial and azimuthal directions,
1219: respectively.
1220: For all the points, $\rmin/R_p=0.1$ is taken.
1221: Solid lines draw the fits, equations (\ref{eq:IR}) and (\ref{eq:Iphi}),
1222: to the semi-analytic results. Dotted line corresponding to
1223: the force formula with $V_p t=2R_p$ in O99 for the case of
1224: linear-trajectory perturbers is in quite a good agreement with the
1225: azimuthal drag for circular-orbit perturbers.}
1226: \end{figure}
1227:
1228: %fig 9
1229: \clearpage
1230: \begin{figure}
1231: \epsscale{1.}
1232: \plotone{f9.eps}
1233: \caption{\label{orbitNFW}
1234: Orbital decay of a model galaxy caused by dynamical friction due to an
1235: intracluster gas. Solid line corresponds to the case when
1236: both $\I_R$ (eq.\ [\ref{eq:IR}]) and
1237: $\I_\varphi$ (eq.\ [\ref{eq:Iphi}]) are considered, while dashed line shows
1238: the result with only $\I_\varphi$ (i.e., with $\I_R=0$).
1239: For comparison, the results of Ostriker's formula with fixed $V_p t=1$ Mpc
1240: and varying $V_p t = 2R(t)$ are plotted as dot-dashed and dotted lines,
1241: respectively.}
1242: \end{figure}
1243:
1244: \end{document}
1245: