1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: \documentclass[12pt,epsfig]{article}
3: \usepackage{epsfig}
4: %\usepackage{axodraw}
5: \setlength{\textwidth}{16cm}
6: \setlength{\textheight}{21.5cm}
7: \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-0.2cm}
8: \setlength{\evensidemargin}{1cm}
9: \setlength{\headheight}{0cm}
10: \setlength{\headsep}{1.5cm}
11: \setlength{\topmargin}{0.5cm}
12: \setlength{\footskip}{1.5cm}
13: %\usepackage{feynmp}
14: \begin{document} %%
15: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
16:
17: \def\a{\alpha}
18: \def\b{\beta}
19: \def\c{\varepsilon}
20: \def\d{\delta}
21: \def\e{\epsilon}
22: \def\f{\phi}
23: \def\g{\gamma}
24: \def\h{\theta}
25: \def\k{\kappa}
26: \def\l{\lambda}
27: \def\m{\mu}
28: \def\n{\nu}
29: \def\p{\psi}
30: \def\q{\partial}
31: \def\r{\rho}
32: \def\s{\sigma}
33: \def\t{\tau}
34: \def\u{\upsilon}
35: \def\v{\varphi}
36: \def\w{\omega}
37: \def\x{\xi}
38: \def\y{\eta}
39: \def\z{\zeta}
40: \def\D{\Delta}
41: \def\G{\Gamma}
42: \def\H{\Theta}
43: \def\L{\Lambda}
44: \def\F{\Phi}
45: \def\P{\Psi}
46: \def\S{\Sigma}
47:
48: \def\o{\over}
49: \def\beq{\begin{eqnarray}}
50: \def\eeq{\end{eqnarray}}
51: \newcommand{\gsim}{ \mathop{}_{\textstyle \sim}^{\textstyle >} }
52: \newcommand{\lsim}{ \mathop{}_{\textstyle \sim}^{\textstyle <} }
53: \newcommand{\vev}[1]{ \left\langle {#1} \right\rangle }
54: \newcommand{\bra}[1]{ \langle {#1} | }
55: \newcommand{\ket}[1]{ | {#1} \rangle }
56: \newcommand{\EV}{ {\rm eV} }
57: \newcommand{\KEV}{ {\rm keV} }
58: \newcommand{\MEV}{ {\rm MeV} }
59: \newcommand{\GEV}{ {\rm GeV} }
60: \newcommand{\TEV}{ {\rm TeV} }
61: \def\diag{\mathop{\rm diag}\nolimits}
62: \def\Spin{\mathop{\rm Spin}}
63: \def\SO{\mathop{\rm SO}}
64: \def\O{\mathop{\rm O}}
65: \def\SU{\mathop{\rm SU}}
66: \def\U{\mathop{\rm U}}
67: \def\Sp{\mathop{\rm Sp}}
68: \def\SL{\mathop{\rm SL}}
69: \def\tr{\mathop{\rm tr}}
70:
71: \def\IJMP{Int.~J.~Mod.~Phys. }
72: \def\MPL{Mod.~Phys.~Lett. }
73: \def\NP{Nucl.~Phys. }
74: \def\PL{Phys.~Lett. }
75: \def\PR{Phys.~Rev. }
76: \def\PRL{Phys.~Rev.~Lett. }
77: \def\PTP{Prog.~Theor.~Phys. }
78: \def\ZP{Z.~Phys. }
79:
80: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
81:
82: \baselineskip 0.7cm
83:
84: \begin{titlepage}
85:
86: \begin{flushright}
87: UT-07-15
88: \end{flushright}
89:
90: \vskip 1.35cm
91: \begin{center}
92: {\large \bf
93: Determining the Mass for a Light Gravitino
94: }
95: \vskip 1.2cm
96: K. Hamaguchi, S. Shirai and T. T. Yanagida
97: \vskip 0.4cm
98:
99: {\it Department of Physics, University of Tokyo,\\
100: Tokyo 113-0033, Japan}
101:
102:
103:
104: \vskip 1.5cm
105:
106: \abstract{Gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking scenarios with an ultra-light gravitino of mass $m_{3/2}=1$--10~eV
107: are very interesting, since there is no cosmological gravitino problem. We propose a new experimental
108: determination of the gravitino mass for such an ultra-light gravitino,
109: by measuring a branching ratio of two decay modes of sleptons.}
110: \end{center}
111: \end{titlepage}
112:
113: \setcounter{page}{2}
114:
115:
116: \section{Introduction}
117:
118: Gauge mediation of supersymmetry (SUSY) breaking in a hidden to the SUSY standard model (SSM) sector~\cite{Giudice:1998bp}
119: is very attractive, since it provides us with a natural solution to
120: the problems of flavor-changing neutral current and CP-violation in the SSM.
121: The gauge mediation predicts a light gravitino ($\tilde{G}_{3/2}$) of mass $m_{3/2}=1~{\rm eV}-10$ GeV,
122: which is most likely the lightest SUSY particle (LSP).
123: In particular, an ultra-light gravitino of mass in a range of $1-10$ eV is very interesting,
124: since there is no cosmological gravitino problem~\cite{Pagels:1981ke+Viel:2005qj}.
125: For such an ultra-light gravitino, the determination of
126: its mass will be of crucial importance at the LHC and ILC,
127: since the small gravitino mass would predict a relatively low SUSY-breaking scale
128: $\sqrt{F} = \sqrt{\sqrt{3}m_{3/2}M_P} \simeq 60-200$ TeV,
129: where $M_P\simeq 2.4\times 10^{18}$ GeV is the reduced Planck scale.
130: If it is the case,
131: it might not be impossible to access the physics for the SUSY
132: breaking in future experiments.
133:
134: Nevertheless, it is very difficult to determine the gravitino mass for the light gravitino.
135: The gravitino mass may be determined by measuring the lifetime of the next lightest SUSY particle (NLSP),
136: since the NLSP lifetime is proportional to $F^2\propto m_{3/2}^2$~\cite{NLSPlifetime,Kawagoe:2003jv}.\footnote{If the gravitino mass is large enough, a measurement of the gravitino mass by kinematical reconstruction may also be possible,
137: which serves as a test of supergravity~\cite{SUGRAtest}. However, this is also impossible for the ultra-light gravitino.} For the ultra-light gravitino,
138: however, the NLSP lifetime is very short and it will be very challenging to measure its decay length:
139: For a slepton NLSP, the decay length is given by $c \tau \simeq 0.55~\mu\mathrm{m}
140: (m_{3/2}/1~\mathrm{eV})^2 (m_{\rm NLSP}/200~\mathrm{GeV})^{-5}$,
141: whereas the experimental resolution of the impact parameter is
142: at least $\mathcal{O}(10)~\mu\mathrm{m}$ or larger \cite{LHC-TDR,TESLA-TDR}.
143:
144: In this letter we propose a possible independent experimental determination of
145: the mass for such a light gravitino ${\tilde G}_{3/2}$.
146: We consider the case where
147: the NLSP is the lighter stau ($\tilde{\tau}$), and the
148: right-handed smuon ($\tilde{\mu}$) and selectron
149: ($\tilde{e}$) are slightly heavier than the stau ($\tilde{\tau}$) but lighter than the lightest
150: neutralino $\chi^0_1$, $m_{\tilde{\tau}} < m_{\tilde{\mu}/\tilde{e}} < m_{\chi^0_1}$, which is a typical mass spectrum
151: in the gauge mediated SUSY breaking scenario (GMSB) as shown in the next section. The smuon/selectron
152: then decays into two channels;
153: one is ${\tilde \ell}\rightarrow {\tilde \tau} +\tau +\ell$ and the other is ${\tilde \ell}
154: \rightarrow \ell + {\tilde G}_{3/2}$, where $\tilde\ell$ ($\ell$) denotes
155: $\tilde{\mu}$ or $\tilde{e}$ ($\mu$ or $e$).
156: The former process is fixed by the SSM interactions and SUSY-particle masses and the latter
157: is fixed by the gravitino mass and the smuon/selectron mass.
158: Therefore, we can determine the gravitino mass
159: by measuring the ratio of these decay processes, provided that
160: the masses of relevant SUSY particles are known.
161:
162: \section{Gauge-mediation model}
163:
164: We consider a simple gauge-mediation model, where
165: a SUSY breaking field $S$ couples to $N$ pairs of
166: messenger chiral superfields, $\psi$ and $\bar{\psi}$,
167: which transform as
168: ${\bf 5}$ and ${\bf 5}^*$ under the $SU(5)_{\rm GUT}$:
169: $W = k\psi\bar{\psi}S$. The $S$ field develops a vacuum expectation value $k\langle S \rangle = M + \theta^2 F$, where $M$ is the messenger mass.
170: We assume an ultra-light gravitino of mass $1-10$ eV, and therefore it is natural to assume a direct gauge-mediation, that is
171: $F/k=\sqrt{3}m_{3/2}M_P$. We choose $k=1$ in the following discussion, for simplicity.
172:
173: With the above conditions the low-energy spectrum of the SUSY particles including
174: the gravitino mass are determined by 5 parameters, $F$, $M$, $N$,
175: $\tan\beta$, and ${\rm sgn}(\mu) = \pm 1$. We consider $N\le 4$ to maintain the perturbative
176: unification of the standard model (SM) gauge couplings.
177:
178: Let us now discuss the spectrum of the SSM SUSY particles. In the GMSB models gaugino masses are generated
179: from loop diagrams of the messengers~\cite{Giudice:1998bp}. At the one-loop level, gaugino masses are given by
180: \begin{equation}
181: M_{a} = \frac{N\alpha_a}{4\pi}\Lambda g(x)~ ~(a=1,2,3),\label{eq:gaugino_mass}
182: \end{equation}
183: where $\Lambda = F/M$, $x=F/M^2$, $\alpha_1=5 \alpha _{\rm EM}/(3 \cos^2\theta_{W})$ and
184: \begin{equation}
185: g(x) = \frac{1}{x^2}[(1+x)\log(1+x)+(1-x)\log(1-x)].
186: \end{equation}
187: Scalar masses, at the two loop level, are written as
188: \begin{equation}
189: m^2_{\phi_i}=2N\Lambda ^2 \sum_a \left(\frac{\alpha_a}{4\pi}\right)^2 C_a (i) f(x), \label{eq:scalar_mass}
190: \end{equation}
191: where $C_a(i)$ are Casimir invariants for the particle $\phi_i$
192: ($C_1(i) = 3Y_i^2/5$)
193: and
194: \begin{equation}
195: f(x) = \frac{1+x}{x^2}\left[ \log(1+x) - 2 {\rm Li}_2(x/[1+x]) + \frac{1}{2} {\rm Li}_2(2x / [1+x]) \right] + (x \rightarrow -x).
196: \end{equation}
197: For $x<1$, both $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ are ${\cal O}(1)$. Detailed behaviors of these functions are given in~\cite{Giudice:1998bp}.
198: $F < M^2$ should be satisfied, since otherwise messenger scalars are tachyonic and the SM gauge symmetry is spontaneously broken. We consider the case of $F < 0.8 M^2$ in the present analysis. The masses in Eq.(\ref{eq:gaugino_mass}) and Eq.(\ref{eq:scalar_mass}) are given at the messenger scale. To calculate the decay rate
199: of the scalar leptons, we need to evaluate the on-shell masses and mixings for the SUSY particles. We
200: should evolve the renormalization group equations down to the electroweak scale and calculate the neutralino mixing and scalar's left-right mixing.
201: To evaluate those values, we have used the program
202: {\verb SOFTSUSY } 2.0.11~\cite{Allanach:2001kg}. In our computation, we have chosen ${\rm sgn}(\mu) = +1$.
203:
204: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% slepton and neutralino mass %%%%%%%%%%%%%
205: \begin{figure}[t]
206: \hspace{-3mm}
207: \begin{tabular}{cc}
208: \begin{minipage}{0.5\hsize}
209: \begin{center}
210: \rotatebox{-90}{\epsfig{file=mass_mu.eps,bb=251 55 554 487, clip,width=5.5cm}}
211: \caption[]{$m_{\tilde{\ell}}$'s dependence on $\Lambda$ for $\tan \beta=10$. The lines with a short range are for $m_{3/2} = 1~ {\rm eV}$, and the others for $m_{3/2} = 10~ {\rm eV}$.
212: }
213: \label{fig:slepton}
214: \end{center}
215: \end{minipage}
216: \hspace{5mm}
217: \begin{minipage}{0.5\hsize}
218: \begin{center}
219: \rotatebox{-90}{\epsfig{file=ratio.eps,clip,width=5.5cm}}
220: \caption{$m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}/m_{\tilde{\ell}}$ dependence on $\Lambda$ for $\tan \beta=10$. These ratios are almost independent on $\tan\beta$}
221: \label{fig:mass_ratio}
222: \end{center}
223: \end{minipage}
224: \end{tabular}
225: \end{figure}
226: For our purpose, $m_{\tilde{\tau}}$, $m_{\tilde{\ell}}$ and $m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}$ are the most important parameters.
227: In Fig.\ref{fig:slepton}, $m_{\tilde{\ell}}$ are shown as a function of $\Lambda$. We see that $m_{\tilde{\ell}}$ depend linearly on $\Lambda$. We have
228: checked that $m_{\tilde{\ell}}$ are
229: almost independent of $\tan\beta$.
230: Fig.\ref{fig:mass_ratio} shows the ratios
231: $m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}/m_{\tilde{\ell}}$. Those are also almost independent of $\tan\beta$, and change mainly through ${\cal O}(1)$ functions,
232: $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ in Eq.(\ref{eq:gaugino_mass}) and Eq.(\ref{eq:scalar_mass}).
233: For $N=1$, the mass spectrum cannot satisfy our assumption~($m_{\tilde{\tau}}<m_{\tilde{\ell}}<m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1} $).
234: Therefore we consider the case $N\ge 2$ in the present analysis.
235: Lastly, Fig.\ref{fig:mass_diff} shows the contour plots of $\Delta m=m_{\tilde{\ell}}-m_{\tilde{\tau}}$.
236: We see that $\Delta m$ is a simply increasing function of $\tan\beta$. For $\Delta m < m_{\tau}$, the decay $\tilde{\ell}\rightarrow \ell+ \tau +\tilde{\tau}$ is
237: kinematically forbidden, and effectively all the $\tilde{\ell}$ decay via $\tilde{\ell}\rightarrow \ell+ \tilde{G}_{3/2}$ for the ultra-light gravitino.
238: Thus, we concentrate on the case of $\Delta m>m_{\tau}$,
239: which corresponds to $\tan\beta \gsim 5$.
240:
241: We should also note here on the constraints from the lower bound of the Higgs mass. In large parameter regions of our interest,
242: the so-called decoupling limit is satisfied. Namely, CP-odd Higgs $A^0$ is heavy: $m_{A^0}\gsim200$ GeV.
243: Thus, the lighter CP-even neutral Higgs $h^0$ is an almost SM-like Higgs particle.
244: We find that some parameter regions are excluded by the experimental lower bound $m_{h^0}\gsim 114$ GeV.
245: For example, all parameter regions are excluded in the case of $N=2$ and $m_{3/2}=1$eV as shown in Fig.\ref{fig:gamma_ratio}-(a).
246: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% differece betewwn smu's mass and stau's mass
247: \begin{figure}[t]
248: \hspace{-3mm}
249: \begin{tabular}{cc}
250: \begin{minipage}{0.5\hsize}
251: \begin{center}
252: \rotatebox{-90}{\epsfig{file=dm_N2_1eV.eps,clip,width=5.5cm}}
253: (a)
254: \end{center}
255: \end{minipage}
256: \hspace{5mm}
257: \begin{minipage}{0.5\hsize}
258: \begin{center}
259: \rotatebox{-90}{\epsfig{file=dm_N4_1eV.eps,clip,width=5.5cm}}
260: (b)
261: \end{center}
262: \end{minipage}\\
263: \\
264: \begin{minipage}{0.5\hsize}
265: \begin{center}
266: \rotatebox{-90}{\epsfig{file=dm_N2_10eV,clip,width=5.5cm}}
267: (c)
268: \end{center}
269: \end{minipage}
270: \hspace{5mm}
271: \begin{minipage}{0.5\hsize}
272: \begin{center}
273: \rotatebox{-90}{\epsfig{file=dm_N4_10eV,clip,width=5.5cm}}
274: (d)
275: \end{center}
276: \end{minipage}
277: \end{tabular}
278:
279: \caption{The contour plots of the mass difference between $m_{\tilde{\tau}}$ and $m_{\tilde{\ell}}$,
280: $\Delta m\!=\!m_{\tilde{\ell}}-m_{\tilde{\tau}}$,
281: on the ($\tan\beta$, $\Lambda$) plane. The contour parameters are $0.5$, $1$, $2$, $5$, $10$, $20$ GeV from left to right.
282: (a) is for $N=2$ and $m_{3/2}=1$ eV, (b) $N=4$ and $m_{3/2}=1$ eV, (c) $N=2$ and $m_{3/2}=10$ eV, (d) $N=4$ and $m_{3/2}=10$ eV.
283: }
284: \label{fig:mass_diff}
285: \end{figure}
286: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
287:
288: \begin{figure}[t]
289: \hspace{-3mm}
290: \begin{tabular}{cc}
291: \begin{minipage}{0.5\hsize}
292: \begin{center}
293: {\epsfig{file=fey3.eps, clip,width=5.5cm}}
294: \caption{A diagram for $\tilde{\ell} \rightarrow \ell + \tilde{\tau} + \tau$}
295: \label{fig:smudecay1}
296: \end{center}
297: \end{minipage}
298: \hspace{5mm}
299: \begin{minipage}{0.5\hsize}
300: \begin{center}
301: {\epsfig{file=feyG.eps,clip,width=5.5cm}}
302: \caption{A diagram for $\tilde{\ell} \rightarrow \ell + \tilde{G}_{3/2} $}
303: \label{fig:smudecay2}
304: \end{center}
305: \end{minipage}
306: \end{tabular}
307: \end{figure}
308:
309:
310:
311: \section{$\tilde{\mu}/\tilde{e}$ decay}
312:
313: In our model ${\tilde \mu}/{\tilde e}$ can decay in two channels, as shown in Fig.\ref{fig:smudecay1} and Fig.\ref{fig:smudecay2}. In the following, we neglect
314: the masses of the electron and the muon.
315: The decay rate
316: $\Gamma(\tilde{\ell} \rightarrow \ell + \tilde{\tau} + \tau)$ is calculated from a Feynman diagram in Fig.\ref{fig:smudecay1}, where
317: $\tilde{\ell} = \tilde{\mu}$ or $\tilde{e}$ and $\ell = \mu$ or $e$.
318: Detailed calculations are given in \cite{Ambrosanio:1997bq}. For the parameter regions of our interest,
319: the decay rate is approximately written as
320: \begin{eqnarray}
321: \Gamma(\tilde{\ell} \rightarrow \ell + \tilde{\tau} + \tau)&\approx&
322: \frac{2}{15\pi}\left(\frac{\alpha_{\rm EM}}{\cos^2\theta_{W}} \right)^2 m_{\tilde{\ell}}
323: \frac{(1+r_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}^2)}{(r_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}^2-1)^2}\left(\frac{\Delta m}{m_{\tilde{\ell}}} \right)^5 \label{eq:3body1}\\
324: &=&4.4~\mathrm{eV} \left(\frac{m_{\tilde{\ell}}}{100~ {\rm GeV}} \right)^{-4} \label{eq:3body2}
325: \left(\frac{\Delta m}{10~ {\rm GeV}} \right)^5 \frac{1+r_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}^2}{(r_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}^2-1)^2},
326: \label{eq:Gamma3body}
327: \end{eqnarray}
328: where $r_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}=m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1}/m_{\tilde{\ell}}$. Here we have assumed $\Delta m =m_{\tilde{\ell}}-m_{\tilde{\tau}}\gg m_{\tau}$.
329: When $\Delta m$ becomes comparable to $m_\tau$,
330: $\Gamma(\tilde{\ell} \rightarrow \ell + \tilde{\tau} + \tau)$
331: becomes even smaller than Eq.(\ref{eq:3body2}).
332: On the other hand,
333: $\Gamma(\tilde{\ell} \rightarrow \ell + \tilde{G}_{3/2} )$ is calculated from a diagram in Fig.\ref{fig:smudecay2}.
334: For a light gravitino,
335: the decay rate is given by
336: \begin{eqnarray}
337: \Gamma(\tilde{\ell} \rightarrow \ell + \tilde{G}_{3/2} )&=&\frac{1}{48\pi}\frac{m_{\tilde{\ell}}^5}{m_{3/2}^2M_P^2} \label{eq:G_decay}\\
338: &=&0.011~\mathrm{eV}~\left(\frac{m_{\tilde{\ell}}}{100 ~{\rm GeV}} \right)^5 \left(\frac{m_{3/2}}{1 ~{\rm eV}} \right)^{-2}.
339: \end{eqnarray}
340:
341: We see that the decay rate $\Gamma(\tilde{\ell} \rightarrow \ell + \tilde{G}_{3/2} )$ becomes larger for smaller $m_{3/2}$.
342: On the other hand, the decay rate
343: $\Gamma(\tilde{\ell} \rightarrow \ell + \tilde{\tau} + \tau)$ is suppressed for smaller $\Delta m$.
344: Therefore, in a certain parameter region, these two decay rates become comparable to each other.
345: We have found parameter regions of $(N,\tan\beta,\Lambda)$ in which the ratios,
346: $\Gamma(\tilde{\ell} \rightarrow \ell + \tilde{G}_{3/2} )/\Gamma(\tilde{\ell} \rightarrow \ell + \tilde{\tau} + \tau)$,
347: are of ${\cal O}(1)$ (from $10^{-2}$ to $10^2$) as shown in Fig.\ref{fig:gamma_ratio}. From Eq.(\ref{eq:G_decay}), the gravitino mass is written as
348: \begin{equation}
349: m_{3/2}^2 = \frac{m_{\tilde{\ell}}^5}{48 \pi M_P^2}
350: \left(\frac{\Gamma(\tilde{\ell} \rightarrow \ell + \tilde{\tau} + \tau)}{\Gamma(\tilde{\ell} \rightarrow \ell + \tilde{G}_{3/2} )} \right)
351: \frac{1}{\Gamma(\tilde{\ell} \rightarrow \ell + \tilde{\tau} + \tau)}.\label{eq:G_mass}
352: \end{equation}
353: If masses for relevant SUSY particles are known, we can calculate the decay rate $\Gamma(\tilde{\ell} \rightarrow \ell + \tilde{\tau} + \tau)$ \cite{Ambrosanio:1997bq}.\footnote{For our parameter regions,
354: $0.6 \lsim \Gamma(\tilde{\ell} \rightarrow \ell + \tilde{\tau} + \tau)/
355: \Gamma_{\rm no~mixing}(\tilde{\ell} \rightarrow \ell + \tilde{\tau} + \tau)\lsim 1 $,
356: where $\Gamma_{\rm no~mixing}$ is calculated without the mixing parameters.
357: Thus, we can determine $m_{3/2}$ with an accuracy of factor 20\%
358: without knowing the mixing parameters.}
359: Therefore, we can determine the gravitino mass $m_{3/2}$ from Eq.(\ref{eq:G_mass}) by combining the measured branching ratio,
360: $\Gamma(\tilde{\ell} \rightarrow \ell + \tilde{G}_{3/2} )/\Gamma(\tilde{\ell} \rightarrow \ell + \tilde{\tau} + \tau)$,
361: and the theoretical estimate of $\Gamma(\tilde{\ell} \rightarrow \ell + \tilde{\tau} + \tau)$.
362: %If the ratio $\Gamma(\tilde{\ell} \rightarrow \ell + \tilde{G}_{3/2} )/\Gamma(\tilde{\ell} \rightarrow \ell + \tilde{\tau} + \tau)$ is measured and
363: %$\Gamma(\tilde{\ell} \rightarrow \ell + \tilde{\tau} + \tau)$ is calculated from SUSY particles' parameters other than the gravitino mass,
364: % we can determine the gravitino mass $m_{3/2}$ from Eq.(\ref{eq:G_mass}).
365:
366:
367: \begin{figure}[t!]
368: \hspace{-3mm}
369: \begin{tabular}{cc}
370: \begin{minipage}{0.5\hsize}
371: \begin{center}
372: \rotatebox{-90}{\epsfig{file=dm_m_N2_1eV.eps,clip,width=5.5cm}}
373: (a)
374: \end{center}
375: \end{minipage}
376: \hspace{5mm}
377: \begin{minipage}{0.5\hsize}
378: \begin{center}
379: \rotatebox{-90}{\epsfig{file=dm_m_N4_1eV.eps,bb=251 55 554 487,clip,width=5.5cm}}
380: (b)
381: \end{center}
382: \end{minipage}\\
383: \\
384: \begin{minipage}{0.5\hsize}
385: \begin{center}
386: \rotatebox{-90}{\epsfig{file=dm_m_N2_10eV,clip,width=5.5cm}}
387: (c)
388: \end{center}
389: \end{minipage}
390: \hspace{5mm}
391: \begin{minipage}{0.5\hsize}
392: \begin{center}
393: \rotatebox{-90}{\epsfig{file=dm_m_N4_10eV,bb=251 55 554 487,clip,width=5.5cm}}
394: (d)
395: \end{center}
396: \end{minipage}
397: \end{tabular}
398: \caption{The contour plots of the ratio of the decay rates,
399: $\Gamma(\tilde{\ell}\to\tilde{G}_{3/2}\ell)/\Gamma(\tilde{\ell}\to\tilde{\tau}\tau\ell) $,
400: on the ($m_{\tilde{\ell}}$, $\Delta m$) plane. The contour parameters are $10^3$, $10^2$, $10$, $1$, $10^{-1}$, $10^{-2}$, $10^{-3}$. (a) is for $N=2$ and $m_{3/2}=1$ eV, (b) $N=4$ and $m_{3/2}=1$ eV, (c) $N=2$ and $m_{3/2}=10$ eV, (d) $N=4$ and $m_{3/2}=10$ eV.
401: Below the thick solid line, the assumption $m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_1} > m_{\tilde{\ell}}$ is not satisfied. With the constraint of $m_{h^0}>114$GeV, all the region of (a) is
402: excluded, and (b), (c) and (d) are partially excluded.}
403: \label{fig:gamma_ratio}
404: \end{figure}
405:
406:
407:
408:
409:
410: \section{Summary}
411: Once SUSY particles are discovered at the LHC/ILC
412: and their masses are measured, one of the most important tasks in the next step would be
413: the determination of SUSY breaking scale, or the gravitino mass.
414: In this letter we have proposed a new experimental method to determine the gravitino mass, which works well for an ultra-light gravitino of mass $m_{3/2}=1$--10~eV.
415: We have found that the branching ratio of $\Gamma(\tilde{\ell}\to\tilde{G}_{3/2}+\ell)/\Gamma(\tilde{\ell}\to\tilde{\tau}+\tau+\ell) $
416: becomes $10^{-2}-10^2$ in a broad parameter
417: region for the gauge-mediated SUSY breaking scenario with the gravitino mass
418: $m_{3/2}=1$--10~eV.
419: We can estimate the gravitino mass with the measurement of this branching ratio,
420: provided that the masses of the other relevant particles are known.
421: The largest error of the gravitino mass may come from the
422: error of $\Delta m$ in our method. To determine the gravitino mass
423: with an accuracy of factor 2,
424: we need to know $\Delta m$ with an accuracy of factor 30\% (cf. Eq.(\ref{eq:Gamma3body})).
425: This may be accessible by precise measurements of the slepton masses and/or by studying the decay products of the process $\tilde{\ell}\to\tilde{\tau}+\tau+\ell$.
426:
427: Remarkably, we have also found that, the dominant decay modes
428: of the smuon and the selectron are $\tilde{\ell}\to \ell + \tilde{G}_{3/2}$
429: in a large parameter region. These processes
430: produce an energetic muon or electron together with missing energy,
431: which may become clear signals for an ultra-light gravitino scenario.
432: A study of possible backgrounds in determining the ultra-light gravitino mass
433: at the LHC/ILC will be given elsewhere \cite{preparation}.
434:
435:
436:
437:
438: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
439:
440:
441: %\cite{Giudice:1998bp}
442: \bibitem{Giudice:1998bp}
443: See for a review,
444: G.~F.~Giudice and R.~Rattazzi,
445: %``Theories with gauge-mediated supersymmetry breaking,''
446: Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 322} (1999) 419
447: [arXiv:hep-ph/9801271].
448: %%CITATION = PRPLC,322,419;%%
449:
450: \bibitem{Pagels:1981ke+Viel:2005qj}
451: %\cite{Pagels:1981ke}
452: %\bibitem{Pagels:1981ke}
453: H.~Pagels and J.~R.~Primack,
454: %``Supersymmetry, Cosmology And New Tev Physics,''
455: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 48} (1982) 223;
456: %%CITATION = PRLTA,48,223;%%
457: \\
458: %\cite{Viel:2005qj}
459: %\bibitem{Viel:2005qj}
460: M.~Viel, J.~Lesgourgues, M.~G.~Haehnelt, S.~Matarrese and A.~Riotto,
461: %``Constraining warm dark matter candidates including sterile neutrinos and
462: %light gravitinos with WMAP and the Lyman-alpha forest,''
463: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71} (2005) 063534
464: [arXiv:astro-ph/0501562].
465: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D71,063534;%%
466:
467:
468: \bibitem{NLSPlifetime}
469: %\cite{Ambrosanio:1999iu}
470: %\bibitem{Ambrosanio:1999iu}
471: S.~Ambrosanio and G.~A.~Blair,
472: %``Measuring gauge-mediated supersymmetry breaking parameters at a 500-GeV e+
473: %e- linear collider,''
474: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 12} (2000) 287
475: [arXiv:hep-ph/9905403].
476: %%CITATION = EPHJA,C12,287;%%
477: %\cite{Mercadante:2000hw}
478: %\bibitem{Mercadante:2000hw}
479: P.~G.~Mercadante, J.~K.~Mizukoshi and H.~Yamamoto,
480: %``Analysis of long-lived slepton NLSP in GMSB model at linear collider,''
481: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64} (2001) 015005
482: [arXiv:hep-ph/0010067].
483: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D64,015005;%%
484: %\cite{Ambrosanio:2000ik}
485: %\bibitem{Ambrosanio:2000ik}
486: S.~Ambrosanio, B.~Mele, S.~Petrarca, G.~Polesello and A.~Rimoldi,
487: %``Measuring the SUSY breaking scale at the LHC in the slepton NLSP scenario
488: %of GMSB models,''
489: JHEP {\bf 0101} (2001) 014
490: [arXiv:hep-ph/0010081];
491: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0101,014;%%
492:
493: %\cite{Kawagoe:2003jv}
494: \bibitem{Kawagoe:2003jv}
495: K.~Kawagoe, T.~Kobayashi, M.~M.~Nojiri and A.~Ochi,
496: %``Study of the gauge mediation signal with non-pointing photons at the CERN
497: %LHC,''
498: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69} (2004) 035003
499: [arXiv:hep-ph/0309031].
500: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D69,035003;%%
501:
502: \bibitem{SUGRAtest}
503: %\cite{Buchmuller:2004rq}
504: %\bibitem{Buchmuller:2004rq}
505: W.~Buchmuller, K.~Hamaguchi, M.~Ratz and T.~Yanagida,
506: %``Supergravity at colliders,''
507: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 588} (2004) 90
508: [arXiv:hep-ph/0402179];
509: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B588,90;%%
510: %\cite{Hamaguchi:2004df}
511: %\bibitem{Hamaguchi:2004df}
512: K.~Hamaguchi, Y.~Kuno, T.~Nakaya and M.~M.~Nojiri,
513: %``A study of late decaying charged particles at future colliders,''
514: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 70} (2004) 115007
515: [arXiv:hep-ph/0409248];
516: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D70,115007;%%
517: %\cite{Feng:2004yi}
518: %\bibitem{Feng:2004yi}
519: J.~L.~Feng and B.~T.~Smith,
520: %``Slepton trapping at the Large Hadron and International Linear Colliders,''
521: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71} (2005) 015004
522: [Erratum-ibid.\ D {\bf 71} (2005) 0109904]
523: [arXiv:hep-ph/0409278];
524: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D71,015004;%%
525: %\cite{Martyn:2006as}
526: %\bibitem{Martyn:2006as}
527: H.~U.~Martyn,
528: %``Detecting metastable staus and gravitinos at the ILC,''
529: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 48} (2006) 15
530: [arXiv:hep-ph/0605257];
531: %%CITATION = EPHJA,C48,15;%%
532: %\cite{Hamaguchi:2006vu}
533: %\bibitem{Hamaguchi:2006vu}
534: K.~Hamaguchi, M.~M.~Nojiri and A.~de Roeck,
535: %``Prospects to study a long-lived charged next lightest supersymmetric
536: %particle at the LHC,''
537: JHEP {\bf 0703} (2007) 046
538: [arXiv:hep-ph/0612060].
539: %%CITATION = JHEPA,0703,046;%%
540:
541: \bibitem{LHC-TDR}
542: ATLAS Collaboration, Report No. CERN-LHCC-99-14/ATLAS-TDR-14, 1999;
543: \\
544: CMS Collaboration, Report No. CERN-LHCC-2006-11/CMS-TDR-008-1, 2006.
545:
546: \bibitem{TESLA-TDR}
547: T.~Behnke (ed.), S.~Bertolucci (ed.), R.~D.~Heuer (ed.), R.~Settles (ed.),
548: TESLA Technical design report, Pt. 4: A Detector for TESLA,
549: DESY-01-011, 2001.
550:
551: %\cite{Allanach:2001kg}
552: \bibitem{Allanach:2001kg}
553: B.~C.~Allanach,
554: %``SOFTSUSY: A C++ program for calculating supersymmetric spectra,''
555: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\ {\bf 143} (2002) 305
556: [arXiv:hep-ph/0104145].
557: %%CITATION = CPHCB,143,305;%%
558:
559: %\cite{Ambrosanio:1997bq}
560: \bibitem{Ambrosanio:1997bq}
561: S.~Ambrosanio, G.~D.~Kribs and S.~P.~Martin,
562: %``Three-body decays of selectrons and smuons in low-energy supersymmetry
563: %breaking models,''
564: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 516} (1998) 55
565: [arXiv:hep-ph/9710217].
566: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B516,55;%%
567: \bibitem{preparation}
568: K. Hamaguchi, S. Shirai and T. T. Yanagida, in preparation.
569: \end{thebibliography}
570: \end{document}
571:
572:
573:
574:
575:
576: