1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %% Beginning of file 'ms.tex' %%
3: %% %%
4: %% This is the revised version of the FeSt IRAM paper %%
5: %% modified in response to referee's report as %%
6: %% of March 18, 2007. Re-submitted to ApJ March 23, 2007 %%
7: %% Revised slighlty on April 25 to accomodate 2nd referee's %%
8: %% report. %%
9: %% %%
10: %% %%
11: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
12:
13:
14:
15: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
16: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
17:
18: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
19: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
20: %% any data that comes before this command.
21:
22: %% The command below calls the preprint style
23: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
24: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
25: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
26: %%
27:
28:
29: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
30: \usepackage{natbib}
31: \usepackage{amsmath} % need for subequations
32: %\bibliographystyle{apj}
33:
34: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
35:
36: %%\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
37:
38: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
39:
40: %%\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
41:
42: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
43: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
44: %% use the longabstract style option.
45:
46: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
47:
48: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
49: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
50: %% the \begin{document} command.
51: %%
52: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
53: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
54: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
55: %% for information.
56: %%\usepackage{natbib}
57: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
58: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
59: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}
60: \newcommand{\fest}{\mbox{FeSt~1-457}}
61: \newcommand{\coI}{\mbox{C$^{18}$O ($J = 1 \to 0$)}}
62: \newcommand{\coII}{\mbox{C$^{18}$O ($J = 2 \to 1$)}}
63: \newcommand{\co}{C$^{18}$O}
64: \newcommand{\hcoI}{\mbox{HCO$^+$ ($J = 1 \to 0$)}}
65: \newcommand{\hco}{HCO$^+$}
66: \newcommand{\csII}{\mbox{CS ($J = 2 \to 1$)}}
67: \newcommand{\csV}{\mbox{CS ($J = 5 \to 4$)}}
68: \newcommand{\nhI}{\mbox{N$_2$H$^+$ ($J = 1 \to 0$)}}
69: \newcommand{\nh}{N$_2$H$^+$}
70: \newcommand{\ud}{\mathrm{d}}
71:
72: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
73:
74: \slugcomment{To appear in ApJ 20 August 2007}
75:
76: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
77: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
78: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
79: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
80: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
81: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
82:
83: \shorttitle{Dynamical State of FeSt 1-457}
84: \shortauthors{Aguti et al.}
85:
86: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
87: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
88:
89: \begin{document}
90:
91: \title{The Dynamical State of the Starless Dense Core FeSt 1-457:
92: A Pulsating Globule?}
93:
94:
95: \author{E.~D. Aguti\altaffilmark{1,2}, C.~J. Lada\altaffilmark{2},
96: E.~A. Bergin\altaffilmark{3}, J.~F Alves\altaffilmark{4}, and
97: M. Birkinshaw\altaffilmark{1}}
98:
99:
100: \altaffiltext{1}{Astrophysics Group, University of Bristol, Tyndall
101: Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1TL, UK. \mbox{esther.aguti@bristol.ac.uk}}
102: \altaffiltext{2}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street,
103: Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. \mbox{clada@cfa.harvard.edu}}
104: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan, 825
105: Dennison Building, 501 East University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109,
106: USA. \mbox{ebergin@umich.edu}}
107: \altaffiltext{4}{Calar Alto Observatory, Centro Astron\'{o}mico Hispano
108: Alem\'{a}n, c/Jes\'{u}s Durb\'{a}n Rem\'{o}n 2-2, 04004
109: Almeria, Spain. \mbox{jalves@caha.es}}
110:
111: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
112: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
113: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
114: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
115: %% editorial office after submission.
116:
117: \begin{abstract}
118:
119: High resolution molecular line observations of \csII, \hcoI, \coI, \coII\ and
120: \nhI\ were obtained toward the starless globule \fest\ in order to investigate
121: its kinematics and chemistry. The HCO$^+$ and CS spectra show clear self-reversed
122: and asymmetric profiles across the face of the globule. The sense of the
123: observed asymmetry is indicative of the global presence of expansion motions in
124: the outer layers of the globule. These motions appear to be
125: subsonic and significantly below the escape velocity of the globule. Comparison
126: of our observations with near-infrared extinction data indicate that the globule
127: is gravitationally bound. Taken together these considerations lead us to
128: suggest that the observed expansion has its origin in an oscillatory motion of
129: the outer layers of the globule which itself is likely in a quasi-stable state
130: near hydrostatic equilibrium. Analysis of the observed linewidths of \co\ and
131: \nhI\ confirm that thermal pressure is the dominant component of the cloud's
132: internal support. A simple calculation suggests that the dominant mode of
133: pulsation would be an l = 2 mode with a period of $\sim$ $3 \times 10^5$ yrs.
134: Deformation of the globule due to the large amplitude l = 2 oscillation may be
135: responsible for the double-peaked structure of the core detected in high
136: resolution extinction maps.
137:
138: Detailed comparison of the molecular-line observations and extinction data
139: provides evidence for significant depletion of \co\ and perhaps \hco\ while
140: \nhI\ may be undepleted to a cloud depth of $\sim$ 40 magnitudes of
141: visual extinction.
142:
143: \end{abstract}
144:
145: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
146: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
147: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
148: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
149:
150: \keywords{ISM:clouds, ISM: globules, ISM: molecules, ISM:
151: individual(\object[FEST 1-457]{FeSt 1-457})}
152:
153:
154:
155: \section{Introduction}
156:
157: A key component to understanding star formation lies in determining the
158: dynamical nature of globules and cores of molecular clouds from which stars
159: form. This is typically done using molecular lines, and observations of
160: asymmetry or self-reversal in the line profiles of optically thick species
161: portray the motion of the outer layers of material within a cloud. Many of the
162: spectra measured from starless cores and globules have blue asymmetirc profiles,
163: such that the blue side of the profile is stronger than the red side, suggestive
164: of red-shifted self-absorption and infall motion. For example, in their survey
165: of starless cores, \citet{lee01} found that approximately one third of the cores
166: they observed displayed bona fide infall motions in the outer layers and
167: therefore were consistent with expectations of collapse. In this survey and in
168: a number of others, however, there were a number of cores that displayed
169: evidence for blue-shifted self-absorption in their spectra, e.g., CB246, L1521F
170: and L429-1. This is an indication of expansion but with no protostar in the
171: core, what mechanism drives the expanding motions? There are also cores and
172: globules which show both redshifted and blueshifted self-absorption
173: simultaneously in a single map of one molecular transition, for example, L1512,
174: L1689B, L1544 \citep{lee01}, and B68 \citep{lada03}. Other cores and globules
175: have spectra that shift from redshifted to blueshifted self-absorption depending
176: on which molecular transition is observed. For example, self -absorption in the
177: source L1157 is redshifted in the HCO$^+$($J = 3 \to 2$) line profile but
178: blueshifted in the HCO$^+$($J = 4 \to 3$) line profile \citep{greg97}. Clearly
179: complex motions are occurring in the various layers of the cores but it is not
180: clear what causes them.
181:
182: \citet{redm04} concluded that the pattern of redshifted and
183: blueshifted self-absorption observed across the source in L1689 is caused by
184: rotational motion in the globule. In B68, where the spatial pattern
185: switches from blueshifted to redshifted profiles both east and west of
186: the center of the globule, the observed line profiles cannot be
187: explained by rotation. \citet{lada03} proposed that B68 could be in a
188: quasi-stable state near hydrostatic equilibrium, and the systematic
189: velocity field observed is likely to be caused by oscillatory motions
190: within the outer layers of the globule. For stable and quasi-stable
191: clouds, such motions are predicted by theory, e.g., \citet{mats03}
192: showed that small amounts of rotation can cause an initially
193: gravitationally unstable cloud to stabilize and oscillate;
194: \citet{clar97} in considering the thermal and dynamical balance in low
195: mass dense cores find that a quasi-equilibrium state can be
196: established, which is not static but is pulsationally
197: stable, and in their hydrodynamic study of starless cores,
198: \citet{keto05} found that cores could oscillate with periods of about
199: one million years (or the sound crossing time) if perturbed by a
200: modest external force. Such oscillatory behavior is a signature of
201: dynamical equilibrium, and therefore, the presence of such complex
202: patterns in their spectral line maps could indicate pulsationally
203: stable initial states for the star-forming cores and globules.
204:
205: In this study, we have obtained high angular resolution spectra of the
206: source listed in the catalogue of \citet{feit84} as \fest. It is a
207: small, round, dark globule situated in the Pipe Nebula with no
208: associated IRAS, MSX or Spitzer Space Telescope point sources, and is
209: therefore almost certainly starless. Its distance has not been
210: directly determined but it is associated with the Pipe Nebula, for which
211: some distance estimates have been made. The most reliable estimate to
212: date is 130~pc determined by using infrared extinction measurements
213: for Hipparcos stars, \citep{lomb06}. In their Bonnor-Ebert sphere
214: fitting analysis, however, \citet{kand05} report a distance of 70~pc,
215: which compares to the value of 90~pc derived in a similar fashion for
216: B68, also, incidently, part of the Pipe Nebula complex. In this
217: paper, we adopt the \citet{lomb06} distance of 130 pc. The angular
218: diameter of \fest, as apparent in optical images, is $\sim$
219: 4.5$\arcmin$, which is $\sim$ 35,000 AU (0.17 pc) at 130 pc. Section
220: \ref{sec:obs} describes our observations of \fest, and
221: \S\ref{sec:results}, is a description of the results. We detected
222: expanding motions in \hco and CS line profiles across the surface of
223: \fest\ but since no protostar has been detected, the source of this
224: expansion is a mystery. In \S\ref{sec:disc}, we show that the core is
225: bound and self-gravitating and we propose that pulsation or
226: oscillatory motion within the cloud layers may account for the
227: observed expanding motions. Finally, we present evidence for
228: molecular depletion in the central regions of the core.
229:
230:
231:
232: \section{Observations}\label{sec:obs}
233:
234: The observations reported here were made in July 2003 using the 30-m
235: IRAM millimeter-wave telescope at Pico Veleta in Spain. The dual
236: mixer, dual-channel receiver was tuned to observe the molecules listed
237: with their respective frequencies, beamwidths and velocity resolutions
238: in Table~\ref{tb:linpars}. The frequency-switching mode was used to
239: obtain the observations, and system temperatures were 150 - 200~K.
240: The chopper wheel method was used for calibration. The spectrometer
241: is an autocorrelator configured to give the velocity resolutions
242: listed in Table~\ref{tb:linpars}. Beam efficiencies were $\sim$ 0.75
243: for the lower frequency 80 - 115~GHz range, and $\sim$ 0.6 for the
244: higher frequency 197 - 266~GHz range. Observations were made in a
245: grid with a reference position at \mbox{$\alpha_{2000}$ =
246: 17$^h$35$^m$47$\fs$5}, \mbox{$\delta_{2000}$ =
247: -25$\degr$33$\arcmin$2$\farcs$0}. \hco, \coI\ and \coII\ were
248: uniformly sampled such that a region centered on the reference
249: position was observed every 24$\arcsec$ out to a maximum distance of
250: 96 $\arcsec$ in Right Ascension and 120$\arcsec$ in Declination, a
251: total of 9 $\times$ 11 or 99 spectra for each species. This grid spacing is
252: approximately one beamwidth, slightly over for \hco\ and under for
253: \co. The \nh\ and CS emission was much weaker and less extended so
254: the grid size was reduced to 5 $\times$ 5 around the reference point
255: with an additional two measurements directly north, east, south and
256: west of the center, resulting in a total of 33 spectra for these
257: species. The spacing between measurements was also 24$\arcsec$,
258: approximately one beamwidth for each of the molecules. Data reduction
259: was done using the standard IRAM package CLASS and IDL (Interactive
260: Data Language by Research Systems, Inc.).
261:
262:
263:
264:
265: \section{Results}\label{sec:results}
266:
267:
268: \subsection{Self-Reversed HCO$^+$ and CS Lines} \label{sec:hco}
269:
270: Figure \ref{spec} shows the \csII, \hcoI\ and \coI\ spectra at the reference
271: position. The CS and HCO$^+$ profiles display a split asymmetric, double-peaked
272: shape while the C$^{18}$O line is single-peaked, though slightly asymmetric. The
273: C$^{18}$O line appears to bisect the CS and HCO$^+$ profiles in velocity
274: indicating that the two latter lines are likely optically thick and
275: self-reversed. The blue-shifted sense of the self-absorption in the self-reversals is
276: indicative of expansion motions in the outer cloud layers. Individual spectra of
277: the HCO$^+$ and \coI\ emission from across \fest\ are simultaneously displayed in
278: Figure \ref{c18ohcomap} for comparison. Examination of the figure shows similar
279: double-peaked, self-reversed HCO$^+$ emission profiles at several positions
280: around the center of the globule. In all cases the sense of the asymmetry is the
281: same suggesting expansion of the outer cloud layers. In most other positions
282: the HCO$^+$ lines display blue-shifted self-absorption relative to C$^{18}$O,
283: also consistent with expansion motions.
284:
285: As can be seen in Figure \ref{c18ocsmap} CS spectra are also clearly self-reversed
286: with blue-shifted self-absorption similar to the HCO$^+$ lines in positions where
287: the HCO$^+$ was also self-reversed, but the signals have lower intensity. Similar
288: to HCO$^+$, the other CS spectra appear to exhibit asymmetric profiles relative to
289: C$^{18}$O with a sense indicative of expansion motions. The critical density ($3
290: \times 10^5$ cm$^{-3}$) at which CS emission occurs is the same as that for
291: HCO$^+$ emission (Ungerechts et al. 1997) so it is reasonable to assume that the
292: two emission lines probe the same layer of material in the cloud.
293:
294: A rough estimate of the expansion speed of material was determined by comparing
295: the velocity of the stronger \hco\ peak to the peak velocity of a \co\ spectrum
296: at the same position. The peak velocities were obtained by fitting Gaussian line
297: profiles to the spectral lines. This resulted in velocity differences
298: \mbox{$\delta V$ = $v_{pk}$(\co) - $v_{pk}$(\hco)} which are all negative
299: confirming that the blueshifted profiles are characteristic of expansion, and
300: indicating that material is expanding in the cloud over the whole layer under
301: observation with a mean expansion velocity of -0.09 $\pm$ 0.04~km~s$^{-1}$. The
302: same process was applied to the CS spectra and the velocity differences
303: \mbox{($\delta V$ = $v_{pk}$(\co) - $v_{pk}$(CS))} were also found to be negative
304: everywhere with a mean difference (expansion velocity) of -0.12 $\pm$ 0.02
305: km~s$^{-1}$. This is similar to the range of $\delta V$ for \hco. This
306: expanding motion is therefore also evident in the CS line emission profiles.
307:
308: Another estimate of the expansion speed of material within the cloud
309: was obtained using the model of \citet{myer96}. This model can only
310: be applied to positions (10 positions) where there is a clear double
311: peak. In this model, the expansion velocity, $v_{exp}$ is given by,
312: \begin{equation}
313: v_{exp} = \frac{\sigma^2}{v_R - v_B}\
314: \ln \frac{1 + e (T_{BD}/T_D)}{1 + e (T_{RD}/T_D)} ,
315: \end{equation}
316: where $T_D$ is the brightness temperature of the dip, $T_{BD}$ is the
317: height of the blue peak above the dip with its corresponding velocity,
318: $v_B$, $T_{RD}$ is the height of the red peak above the dip with its
319: corresponding velocity, $v_R$, $\sigma$ is the velocity dispersion of
320: an optically thin line (\co\ here). For the \hco\ lines, the mean
321: expansion speed was calculated to be -0.07 $\pm$ 0.02 and
322: and for the CS lines, -0.07 $\pm$ 0.02 km s$^{-1}$; both
323: these estimates are somewhat lower than
324: those derived from the peak velocity difference method in the previous
325: paragraph. Nonetheless, though somewhat uncertain, the overall expansion
326: speeds we estimate are formally less than the one dimensional sound speed of
327: $a \sim$ 0.19 km s$^{-1}$ in a 10 K gas.
328:
329:
330: \subsection{Velocity Field}\label{sec:vel}
331:
332: Figure~\ref{c18opkv} shows maps of the variation of the velocity of
333: the peak in the \co\ spectra. The peak velocities were determined
334: from Gaussian fits to the line profiles. We note that a few of the
335: \coI\ and \coII\ lines are flat-topped, broadened or slightly asymmetric,
336: indicating that the lines are slightly optically thick. The two maps,
337: however, do reveal a systematic velocity gradient increasing from
338: upper left to lower right of the map.
339:
340: To estimate the magnitude and direction of this gradient, the method
341: of \citet{good93} was used as adapted by \citet{lada03}. The velocity
342: gradient is assumed to be linear when projected against the plane of
343: the sky so the observed velocity $v_{lsr}$ can be related to the
344: velocity gradient $\ud v/ \ud s$ using
345: \begin{equation}
346: v_{lsr} = v_0 + \frac{\ud v}{\ud s}\Delta\alpha~\mathrm{cos} \theta +
347: \frac{\ud v}{\ud s} \Delta\delta~\mathrm{sin} \theta
348: \end{equation}
349: $\Delta\alpha$ and $\Delta\delta$ are Right Ascension and Declination
350: offsets in arcseconds. $v_0$ is the systemic velocity of the cloud
351: and $\theta$ is the angle between north and the
352: direction of the velocity gradient of magnitude
353: $\ud v/ \ud s$. A least-squares fit of a two-dimensional plane to the
354: observed $v_{lsr}$ (line center velocity) measurements of \coI, \coII\
355: and \nhI\ (the \nhI\ spectra contained hyperfine components, and so
356: the isolated component at the same $v_{lsr}$ as the \coI\ line was
357: used in this analysis) provided estimates given in Table
358: \ref{tb:velgradfit}. The errors for the N$_2$H$^+ $ are larger
359: because there were only nine spectra measured that were useful for
360: this purpose. The \nh\ emission was less extended than the \co\
361: emission, therefore, more densely sampled observations are needed
362: to confirm the estimates using the N$_2$H$^+ $ data.
363:
364: If the velocity gradient derived previously is removed, the average
365: velocity difference between the neighboring spectra is then
366: essentially zero ($\sim 0.0025$ km s$^{-1}$).
367:
368:
369:
370: \subsection{Line Width Distribution}\label{sec:linwid}
371:
372: Line widths (FWHP) were determined from Gaussian fits to the observed \coI\ and
373: \coII\ line profiles. The \nhI\ spectra have several hyperfine components so
374: the line widths were determined from a Gaussian fit to the isolated ($F_1 =
375: 0-1$) component. The resulting \coI\ and \coII\ line widths were found to be
376: in a range from $\sim$~0.19 to $\sim$~0.35~km~s$^{-1}$. The \nh\ line widths
377: were narrower, and were in the range $\sim$ 0.15 to $\sim$~0.25 km s$^{-1}$.
378: Figure~\ref{c18olnw} shows the variation in line width of the \coI\ line
379: profiles. Because some of these lines are optically thick (see comment in
380: \S~\ref{sec:vel}), the line widths determined from a single Gaussian fit are
381: slightly larger than they would be if the lines were optically thin.
382: Nevertheless, the line widths seem to increase slightly at positions away from
383: the highly extincted region around offset (24$\arcsec$,~0$\arcsec$), marked with
384: a white cross in Figure~\ref{c18olnw}. This is similar to B68 where the
385: linewidths also appeared to increase away from its center. The reason for this
386: is not clear.
387:
388: No independent measure of the kinetic temperature of
389: \fest\ has as yet been made; a value of 10~K has therefore been
390: adopted in this paper because data has shown that this applies to most
391: globules and dense cores (e.g., \citet{bens89}). The thermal line
392: width, $\surd[(8\mathrm{ln}2) kT_K/(\mu m_H)]$ for \coI\
393: lines was therefore calculated to be 0.123~km~s$^{-1}$, and for \nh
394: lines, 0.125~km~s$^{-1}$. The nonthermal contribution to the line
395: width was then estimated using the relation,
396: \begin{equation}
397: (\Delta v_{obs})^2 = (\Delta v_{th})^2 + (\Delta v_{nth})^2 ,
398: \end{equation}
399: where $\Delta v_{obs}$ is the observed line width, $\Delta v_{th}$ is
400: the thermal line width and $\Delta v_{nth}$ is the nonthermal line
401: width. The resulting average nonthermal line width for the \coI\
402: lines was $\sim$~0.25~km~s$^{-1}$, and for the \nh\ lines,
403: $\sim$~0.15~km~s$^{-1}$.
404: To the extent that these lines are optically
405: thin, this suggests that in producing the observed line profiles,
406: nonthermal broadening mechanisms, e.g., turbulence, may play
407: a role. There may be more turbulent motion in the outer layers probed
408: by the \co\ molecular lines than in the inner more dense layers probed
409: by the \nh\ line. However, the corresponding one dimensional non-thermal
410: velocity dispersions ($\sigma_{nth}$) are 0.11 and 0.06 km~s$^{-1}$
411: for the \co\ and \nh\ emitting gas, respectively. These values are
412: both subsonic, that is, less than the one dimensional
413: sound speed (0.19 km~s$^{-1}$) in a 10 K gas.
414:
415:
416: \subsection{Spatial Distributions of Molecular Emission and Dust Extinction}
417: %\subsection{Integrated Intensity and Extinction Maps}
418:
419: In Figure 6 we show contour maps of C$^{18}$O (1--0), N$_2$H$^+$ (1--0), and
420: HCO$^+$ (1--0) integrated emission overlaid on a grey-scale map of the
421: distribution of visual extinction. The extinction map was constructed
422: from the data of Alves et al. (2002) and convolved
423: with a 24 arc sec Gaussian smoothing kernel to match the resolution
424: of the molecular-line data. The patterns seen in this figure are comparable to those seen in
425: numerous other low-mass pre-stellar cores such as B68 or L1544 (Bergin et al.
426: 2002; Tafalla et al. 2002). In particular, both C$^{18}$O and HCO$^+$ show
427: emission distributions that are broader than the distribution in extinction with peaks well
428: separated from the extinction maximum. In contrast N$_2$H$^+$ shows the highest
429: degree of agreement with the dust extinction. This pattern is attributed to the
430: freeze-out of molecules on the surfaces of cold dust grains in gas where the
431: density exceeds 10$^5$ cm$^{-3}$ (e.g. Bergin \& Langer 1997; Aikawa et al.
432: 2005). In this scenario the freeze-out of CO and its isotopologues leads to the
433: formation of N$_2$H$^+$ in the dense gas dominated by freeze-out and traced by
434: the dust. HCO$^{+}$ has structure similar to CO which is not surprising since
435: HCO$^+$ likely forms from gas phase reactions involving CO. For a
436: summary of this process in starless cores see Bergin \& Tafalla (2007).
437:
438:
439:
440: \section{Discussion}\label{sec:disc}
441:
442:
443: \subsection{Is FeSt 1-457 Gravitationally Bound?}\label{sec:grav}
444:
445:
446: One explanation for the expansion of material from \fest\ could be that the
447: globule is simply unbound. This might be expected if the core is a transitory
448: feature in a global turbulent sea \citep{ball06}. In this section, we assess
449: this possibility by determining whether or not the core is bound. A mass for
450: \fest\ of $\sim 3.1\ [\frac{d(pc)}{130}]^2$ $M_{\sun}$ was derived by spatially
451: integrating the extinction data over the area of the globule, after correcting
452: for a significant foreground/background extinction component (A$_V$ $\sim$ 6
453: magnitudes) and an assumed distance of $d$~pc. The magnitude of the background
454: extinction was derived from examination of the azmuthially averaged extinction
455: profile of the globule constructed from the Alves et al. (2002) deep extinction
456: data and is the same as that derived by Alves et al. (2007) for this core
457: from a wavelet decomposition of their 2MASS extinction map of the Pipe cloud.
458: The escape velocity ($\surd [2GM/R]$) from \fest\ is estimated to be $\sim 0.6$\
459: $[\frac{d(pc)}{130}]^{0.5}$ km s$^{-1}$. The average three-dimensional velocity
460: dispersion ($\sqrt{3a^2 + 3\sigma^2_{nth}}$) of the bulk gas in the globule
461: is $\sim$ 0.3-0.4~km~s$^{-1}$, and significantly
462: less than the escape velocity. Thus the globule is likely to be gravitationally
463: bound for the assumed distance of 130 pc or for any other plausible distance to
464: the cloud. Moreover, the expansion speeds detected in the self-absorbed
465: molecular line data ($\sim$ 0.1 km s$^{-1}$, see \S~\ref{sec:hco}) are also
466: significantly less than the calculated escape speed. The expansion of the outer
467: layers of the globlule appears not to be caused simply by evaporation of its gas
468: as in an unbound, transient cloud.
469:
470: A Jeans mass of $3.8~$M$_{\sun}$ was derived using $M_J =
471: 18~$M$_{\sun}~T_K~^{1.5}~\bar{n}^{-0.5}$ where $T$ is the globule's kinetic
472: temperature assumed to be $\sim$ 10~K. However, if we assume the lines are only
473: thermally broadened, with no turbulence, then the kinetic temperature is 17~K and
474: this doubles the Jeans mass estimate (\S~\ref{sec:linwid}). The average density
475: $\bar{n} $=$ 2.2\times 10^4$ cm$^{-3}$ was determined using the extinction data
476: and a radius, $R = 2.6 \times 10^{17}$ cm. The radius was determined to be the
477: point at which the radially averaged extinction profile reaches the background and
478: marks the outer edge of the globule. Since the mass of \fest\ is comparable to
479: its Jeans mass, we conclude that it is likely marginally stable against
480: gravitational collapse. If thermal pressure is not the only source of internal
481: support then the globule could be even more stable against collapse. More
482: detailed analysis of the globule's structure would be required to better evaluate
483: its overall stability.
484:
485:
486: \subsection{Possible Rotation?}
487:
488: There may be some contribution to stability of the globule from rotation.
489: Assuming solid body rotation, $\beta$, the ratio of rotational kinetic energy to
490: gravitational energy, is given by \citep{good93},
491:
492: \begin{equation}
493: \beta = \frac{(1/2)I \omega^2}{q G M^2 /R} = \frac{1}{2} \frac{p}{q} \frac{\omega^2 R^3}{G M}
494: \end{equation}
495:
496: \noindent
497: $R$ is the globule's radius, $M$ its mass and $p$ is defined such that
498: the moment of inertia, $I = p\hspace{0.1em}MR^2$, and $q$ is defined
499: such that the gravitational potential energy is
500: $q\hspace{0.2em}GM^2/R$. $\beta$ was estimated to be 0.01 for
501: \fest\ using $M = 3.1~$M$_{\sun}, R = 2.6 \times 10^{17}$ cm,
502: $\omega = (\ud v/\ud s)/\sin i = $ [1.5~km~s$^{-1}$~pc$^{-1}$]/$\sin
503: i$ (for \coI, see Table~\ref{tb:velgradfit}),
504: where $i$ is the inclination of the globule to the line of sight, and assuming
505: $p/q = 0.22$ as for a sphere with a density profile $r^{-2}$ and
506: $\sin i =1$. The contribution of rotation to the overall stability of
507: \fest\ is therefore not significant. Note that $\beta$ of 0.01 is also
508: consistent with the results of \citet{good93} that most clouds have
509: $\beta \leq 0.05$.
510:
511:
512:
513: \subsection{Thermal vs. Turbulent Support}\label{sec:therm}
514:
515: Thermal motions may be a significant source of pressure support for \fest. This
516: can be quantified by evaluating the ratio of thermal to nonthermal (turbulent)
517: pressure given by,
518:
519: \begin{equation}
520: R_p = \frac{a^2}{\sigma_{nth}^2} ,
521: \end{equation}
522: \noindent
523:
524: where $a$ is the one dimensional isothermal sound speed and $\sigma_{nth}$ is
525: the one dimensional nonthermal or turbulent velocity dispersion and
526: $\sigma_{nth} = [\Delta v_{nth} / \surd[8\ln2]]$. Assuming a gas temperature
527: of 10 K, the average value of $R_p$ for all the
528: C$^{18}$O observations is 3.75 $\pm$ 1.95, which may be an underestimate for
529: those lines that may be somewhat thick. The average value of $R_p$ for the \nh\
530: data is 6.09 $\pm$ 2.07. These values indicate that the thermal pressure
531: significantly exceeds the turbulent pressure in the globule, and absent strong
532: static magnetic fields, is the dominant source of internal support against
533: gravity.
534:
535: In comparing the turbulent velocity dispersion to the isothermal sound
536: speed of 0.19~km~s$^{-1}$ in a 10~K molecular gas, the nonthermal
537: motions appear to be subsonic over the surface of \fest. If the
538: \nh\ observations probe a deeper layer of the globule than the
539: \co\ lines, these motions are even more subsonic in the inner layers of
540: the globule. These considerations further indicate that thermal motions
541: provide a significant source of internal pressure.
542:
543: The apparent velocity gradient in the \co\ data was calculated and removed in
544: \S~\ref{sec:vel}. The resulting average velocity difference between neighboring
545: spectra was essentially zero (\mbox{$\sim 0.0025$ km s$^{-1}$}) so there appears
546: to be no residual scatter in peak velocities of the spectra on scale sizes
547: comparable to the beam width that could be caused by turbulent motions. This
548: also is consistent with significant thermal support for the globule.
549:
550:
551:
552: \subsection{Pulsating Globule?}
553:
554: In the absence of an embedded source in \fest\ that could cause outflow of
555: material, it is difficult to explain the observations reported here. In the
556: previous section we showed that the globule is gravitationally bound with thermal
557: pressure as the dominant source of internal support. But what causes the observed
558: expansion motions? The facts that 1- the globule is bound, 2- thermally
559: supported and 3- does not exceed the Jean's mass, suggest that this core is stable
560: and not far from a state of hydrostatic equilibrium. Moreover, the expected
561: (one-dimensional) virial velocity dispersion, $ \sigma_{virial} = \surd[{1\over
562: 5}GM/R]$, is 0.18 km s$^{-1}$ and is comparable to the sound speed in a 10 K gas
563: as would be expected for a thermally dominated, stable core. Indeed, we derive
564: the velocity dispersion for the H$_2$ gas in the core to be $\sigma = \sqrt{a^2 +
565: \sigma_{nth}^2} \approx $ 0.21 km s$^{-1}$ close to the predicted value. However,
566: given that its outer layers are globally expanding, the globule cannot be
567: presently in a strict equilibrium state. One viable explanation that can
568: simultaneously account for all these facts, is that \fest\ is in dynamical
569: oscillation around an equilibrium state. The outflowing motion is then part of
570: a mode of oscillation such that its layers pulse in and out with a period of
571: possibly a few hundred thousand years. We further explore this
572: interesting possibility below.
573:
574: In their study of molecular lines observed in the globule B68, \citet{lada03}
575: concluded that that globule could be experiencing low order mode, nonradial
576: oscillations of its outer layers. They suggest that the globule may have
577: interacted with the shock of a supernova remnant, which instigated a
578: perturbation that set at least its outer layers in oscillatory motion. Figure~7
579: of their paper displays the real parts of the spherical harmonic functions for a
580: range of low order modes for an oscillating sphere. The $l = 2, m = 2$ mode
581: corresponds closely to the pattern observed in B68. A study by \citet{keto06}
582: demonstrated that linear perturbations on a pressure-bounded thermally supported
583: sphere could indeed produce the spatial variation in profile shape observed in
584: B68. \fest\ could also be oscillating in this mode but the geometry is such
585: that we are looking `edge-on' to the pulsating cloud. This means the mode of
586: pulsation appears similar to the `breathing' or $l = 0$ mode, i.e., outflow
587: motion over the whole surface of the cloud \citep{keto06}.
588:
589: Calculations were carried out to find the modes of pulsation for an
590: isothermal, spherical globule of gas with similar parameters (e.g.,
591: radius = $2.6 \times 10^{17}$ cm, density = $2.2\times 10^4$
592: cm$^{-3}$ , internal sound speed = 0.18~km~s$^{-1}$) as
593: for \fest. Small wave-like perturbations were introduced, and a
594: differential wave equation was determined using the perturbed and
595: unperturbed forms of its equations of state. The modes of oscillation
596: postulated are likely to be acoustic, with relatively large amplitudes
597: and energies, so that the linear approximation that we use for the mode
598: frequencies is a simplification of the full dynamical problem. In this
599: linear approximation, we ignore the gravitational modes, and
600: find that the acoustic modes follow the dispersion relation
601:
602: \begin{equation}\label{eq:disp1}
603: \mathfrak{D}(\omega) =
604: \frac{h_l^{(1) \prime}(x_{\omega})}{ h_l^{(1)} (x_{\omega})} -
605: \frac{c_{out}}{c_{in}} \ \frac{\rho_{0(out)}}{\rho_{0(in)}} \
606: \frac{j_l^{\prime} \left( x_{\omega} \left[c_{out}/c_{in}
607: \right] \right) }{j_l \left( x_{\omega} \left[ c_{out}/c_{in} \right] \right)} = 0
608: \end{equation}
609:
610: \noindent
611: $x_{\omega} = \omega R_0 / c_{out}$ where $\omega$ is the frequency of
612: the oscillations; $R_0$ is the unperturbed radius; $c_{in}, c_{out}$
613: are isothermal sound speeds inside and outside the globule
614: respectively; $\rho_{0(in)}, \rho_{0(out)}$ are the unperturbed
615: densities inside and outside the globule respectively; and,
616: $h_l^{(1)}$ and $j_l$ are spherical Hankel and Bessel functions
617: of the first kind or order $l$, with the prime denoting differentiation with
618: respect to the argument.
619:
620: The frequency $\omega$ is complex and roots of the dispersion relation where
621: $\omega$ has a negative imaginary part, correspond to decaying modes of
622: oscillation. The required mode for pulsation is the least-damped mode or the
623: mode which decays at the slowest rate; this is the mode with the smallest
624: negative imaginary part of $\omega$. This mode was calculated to be $l = 2$
625: with a frequency of $\sim 9 \times 10^{-14}$ Hz corresponding to an oscillation
626: period of $\sim 3 \times 10^5$~years, comparable to the sound crossing time. It
627: is plausible that this oscillation was excited by some transient dynamical
628: event, such as a shock, that deposits an energy greater than about $3 \times
629: 10^{43}$~ergs, (our best estimate of the kinetic energy in coherent motions)
630: into the outer regions of \fest, where \hco\ molecules exhibit a coherent
631: pattern of expansion motions. Calculations by \citet{keto06} show that such
632: large amplitude motions (i.e., motions comparable to the sound speed) can cause
633: significant geometrical distortions of a core. An important point to note is
634: that in the high resolution extinction map of \fest\ obtained by \citet{alve02},
635: a slight splitting of the core's central regions is visible. This splitting
636: could be another manifestation of an $l = 2$ mode of oscillation.
637:
638: \fest\ is situated in the direction of the Pipe Nebula, which lies at the edge
639: of the Scorpio Centaurus OB Association. \citet{onis99} suggested that stellar
640: wind from the B0 type star $\tau$~Sco caused compression of the molecular gas,
641: triggering star formation in the B59 cloud, situated $\sim$~5$\degr$ west and
642: $\sim$~3$\degr$ north of \fest. In Figure~5 of their paper, \citet{onis99} show
643: an observation of \fest, designating it `Core 12'. In discussing the effect of
644: the OB stars on the Pipe Nebula, \citet{onis99} estimated that $\sim 1 \times
645: 10^{46}$ ergs has been deposited in the cloud over a period of $1 \times 10^7$
646: years. If \fest\ is indeed near this OB association and was also able to
647: intercept only 0.3\% of the estimated energy deposition, then the effects of the
648: postulated shock waves may be more widespread than previously speculated. Not
649: only did they trigger star formation in B59, but they may have also set gaseous
650: globules such as \fest\ and B68 (which is also part of the Pipe complex) into
651: oscillation. More observations and comparison with theoretical models of cloud
652: pulsation are needed to confirm this hypothesis.
653:
654:
655: \subsection{Molecular Depletion}
656:
657: In Figure 7 we provide a direct comparison of the dependence of C$^{18}$O (1--0)
658: and N$_2$H$^+$ (1--0) emission with visual extinction at the same angular
659: resolution. For both species the figures display trends that are similar to
660: those seen in B68 by Bergin et al. (2002). In these plots, a linear
661: correlation between integrated intensity and A$_V$ corresponds to a constant
662: abundance throughout the cloud.
663:
664:
665: %To examine this behavior in greater detail we have fit two ranges
666: %with linear regressions:
667: %
668: %\begin{equation}
669: %\int T_{mb}dv ({\rm C^{18}O}) = -0.375 \pm 0.037 + (0.126 \pm 0.004){\rm A_V}\;
670: %\ {\rm K\,km\,s^{-1}} (0^{m} < {\rm A_V} < 12^m)
671: %\end{equation}
672: %
673: %\noindent
674: %and
675: %
676: %\begin{equation}
677: %\int T_{mb}dv ({\rm C^{18}O}) = 1.063 \pm 0.021+ (0.003 \pm 0.001){\rm A_V}\;
678: %\ {\rm K\,km\,s^{-1}} ({\rm A_V} > 12^m).
679: %\end{equation}
680: %\noindent
681:
682: The C$^{18}$O (1--0) emission shows
683: a linear dependence with A$_V$ until $\sim 10-12$ mag whereupon the trend
684: flattens.
685: Given the drop in the
686: the C$^{18}$O integrated emission/A$_V$ relation near A$_V \sim 12$ mag we
687: have fit the following function:
688: $\int T_{mb}dv ({\rm C^{18}O}) = a + b(A_V - 12)$ to the data.
689: We find an intercept of $a = 1.09\pm 0.01$ K km s$^{-1}$ and a slope of
690: \begin{equation}
b=
\begin{cases} 0.117\pm0.002 &
691: \text{if $A_V \le 12^m$,}
\\
0.002\pm0.001 &\text{if $A_V > 12^m$.}
\end{cases}
\end{equation}
692:
693:
694:
695:
696:
697:
698: \noindent
699: Thus for A$_V <$ 12$^m$, where we see a significant linear correlation between
700: gas emission and dust extinction, we estimate a C$^{18}$O abundance of $\sim
701: 10^{-7}$ (relative to H$_2$). This is comparable to that measured previously by
702: Frerking, Langer, \& Wilson (1982) of $1.7 \times 10^{-7}$ in Taurus and to that
703: obtained from a similar comparison of extinction and CO measurements toward L 977
704: (Alves et al. 1999). For A$_V > 12^m$ the correlation is essentially flat,
705: indicative of saturation or, as in B68, a drop in abundance towards denser
706: regions. We can use the intercept to estimate average abundance in this gas and
707: find that the abundance is $\sim (2 - 4) \times 10^{-8}$ between 20 and 40
708: magnitudes. Thus, we estimate that CO is depleted by a factor of $\sim$5. In \S
709: 3.2 we noted that the C$^{18}$O emission lines show indications of being slightly
710: optically thick. Thus these abundance estimates
711: are upper limits to the {\em average} depletion in
712: the cloud.
713:
714: The situation for N$_2$H$^+$ (1--0) in Figure 7 is more complicated. There is a
715: rough correspondence between integrated emission and A$_V$ and it is well fit by a
716: line with a slope of 0.106$\pm$0.001 K km s$^{-1}$ mag$^{-1}$ and an intercept of
717: -0.711$\pm$0.031 K km s$^{-1}$. This is consistent with an abundance of
718: 10$^{-10}$ relative to hydrogen. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that
719: the trend becomes flat at $A_V > 20$~mag. Fits to the intensities of the
720: hyperfine lines of \nhI\ suggest that the total opacities are of order 12 at the
721: emission peaks, so that all the hyperfine components are saturated. This is not
722: the case at low A$_V$, where the lines appear to be optically thin. Thus we
723: believe that the line integrated intensity-$A_V$ correlation may be turning over
724: at high A$_V$ as a result of saturation and rather than depletion. However, we
725: also note that the spatial map of N$_2$H$^+$ in Figure 6 displays peaks northeast
726: and southwest of the dust extinction peak and this could also be an indication of
727: depletion of this species similar to what has been observed in B68 (Bergin et al.
728: 2002). However, due to the high opacity of the line, it is not possible to
729: separate the effects of spatial variations in excitation from those of column
730: density without detailed chemical modeling.
731:
732:
733:
734:
735:
736:
737: \section{Summary}
738:
739: High resolution radio observations were made of the globule \fest.
740: Molecular lines observed were \csII, \hcoI, \coI, \coII\
741: and \nhI. The \hco\ and CS spectra showed clear self-reversed,
742: asymmetric profiles across the face of the globule. The sense of the
743: asymmetry is indicative of the presence of global expansion motions
744: across the globule. These motions appear to be
745: subsonic and significantly below the
746: escape speed of the cloud. A search for IRAS, MSX sources and Spitzer
747: sources showed the globule to be starless, and therefore the origins
748: of these expansion motions is unclear.
749:
750: In this paper, we propose the explanation that the globule is in a
751: quasi-stable state near hydrodynamic equilibrium such that its outer
752: layers are pulsating. It is possible that a passing shock wave from a
753: nearby OB star association has excited the globule setting its outer
754: layers into motion. Such oscillatory motion is visible in
755: the layers on the Sun (where the fundamental radial period is $\sim$ 1
756: hour and other oscillation periods are $\sim$ 5 minutes) but in \fest,
757: the periods are thought to be of the order of hundreds of thousands of
758: years. This is similar to what \citet{lada03} observed in B68.
759: Calculations to determine the dominant mode of pulsation resulted in
760: an $l = 2$ mode with a frequency of $\sim 9 \times 10^{-14}$ Hz, and
761: an oscillation period of $\sim 3 \times 10^5$ years. A high resolution
762: extinction map of \fest\ exhibits a double peak structure at
763: the highest levels of opacity, corresponding to visual extinctions
764: of $\sim$50 mag \citep{alve02}. It is possible that the proposed
765: $l = 2$ mode of oscillation could explain the observed splitting of the
766: core in this column density map.
767:
768: Finally, we find evidence for significant depletion of CO and perhaps
769: \hco\ in this globule. However, \nhI\ may be undepleted to
770: depths of about 40 magnitudes of visual extinction in the core of
771: the cloud.
772:
773:
774: %% If you wish to include an acknowledgments section in your paper,
775: %% separate it off from the body of the text using the \acknowledgments
776: %% command.
777:
778: %% Included in this acknowledgments section are examples of the
779: %% AASTeX hypertext markup commands. Use \url without the optional [HREF]
780: %% argument when you want to print the url directly in the text. Otherwise,
781: %% use either \url or \anchor, with the HREF as the first argument and the
782: %% text to be printed in the second.
783:
784: \acknowledgments
785:
786: We are grateful to Dr. Tracy Huard and the staff at the IRAM 30 m telescope for
787: their assistance with the observations. We thank Dr. Carlos Roman-Zuniga for
788: assistance in constructing the appropriate extinction map and with calculating the
789: cloud mass. We thank the referee for insightful suggestions that strengthened the
790: presentation. EDA is particularly indebted to Dr. Mike Masheder for his able
791: guidance, useful suggestions and continued support throughout all aspects of this
792: project. EDA was supported by a PPARC Postgraduate Studentship. CJL acknowledges
793: support from NASA Origins grant NAG-13041.
794:
795:
796:
797: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
798: %% BIBLIOGRAPHY %%
799: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
800:
801: \begin{thebibliography}{}
802:
803: \bibitem[Aikawa et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...620..330A} Aikawa, Y., Herbst, E.,
804: Roberts, H., \& Caselli, P.\ 2005, \apj, 620, 330
\\
805:
806: \bibitem[Alves et al.(1999)]{alves99} Alves, J. Lada, C.J., \& Lada, E.A.
807: 1999, \apj, 515, 265 \\
808:
809: \bibitem[Alves et al.(2002)]{alve02} Alves, J., Lada, C.,
810: Lada, E., Lombardi, M., \& Bergin, E.~A.\ 2002, in Proceedings of the
811: ESO Workshop Held in Garching, Germany, April, 24-27, 2001, ESO
812: Astrophysics Symposia, ed. J.~F. Alves and M.~J. McCaughrean (Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag), 37 \\
813:
814: \bibitem[Alves et al(2007)]{all07} Alves, J., Lombardi, M. \& Lada, C.J. 2007,
815: \aap, 462, L17 \\
816:
817: \bibitem[Ballesteros-Paredes et al.(2006)]{ball06} Ballesteros-Paredes,
818: J., Klessen, R.~S., Mac Low, M.~-M., \& V\'{a}zquez-Semadeni, E. 2006,
819: in Proceedings of \textit{``Protostars and Planets V''}, Hilton
820: Waikoloa Village, Hawai'i, October 25-28, 2005, ed. B. Reipurth,
821: D. Jewitt, and K. Keil (Tucson: University of Arizona Press),
822: arXiv:astro-ph/0603357 \\
823:
824: \bibitem[Benson \& Myers(1989)]{bens89} Benson, P. ~J., \& Myers,
825: P. ~C. \apjs, 71, 89 \\
826:
827: \bibitem[Bergin \& Tafalla(2007)]{1997ApJ...486..316B} Bergin, E.~A., \&
828: Tafalla, M.\ 2007, \araa, in press \\
829:
830: \bibitem[Bergin et al.(2002)]{2002ApJ...570L.101B} Bergin, E.~A., Alves,
J.,
831: Huard, T., \& Lada, C.~J.\ 2002, \apjl, 570, L101
\\
832:
833:
834: \bibitem[Bergin \& Langer(1997)]{berg97} Bergin, E. ~A., \& Langer,
835: W. ~D. \apj, 486, 316 \\
836:
837: \bibitem[Clarke \& Pringle(1997)]{clar97} Clarke, C. ~J., \& Pringle, J. ~E.
838: 1997, \mnras, 288, 674 \\
839:
840: \bibitem[Evans(2002)]{evan02} Evans, N. ~J., ~II. 2001, in
841: Proceedings of \textit{``Chemistry as a Diagnostic of Star
842: Formation''}, University of Waterloo, Canada, August 21-23, 2002,
843: ed. Charles L. Curry \& Michel Fich (Ottawa: NRC Press) 27,
844: arXiv:astro-ph/0211526 \\
845:
846: \bibitem[Feitzinger \& St\"{u}we(1984)]{feit84} Feitzinger, J. V., \&
847: St\"{u}we, J. A. 1984, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser., 58, 385 \\
848:
849: \bibitem[Frerking et al.(1982)]{1982ApJ...262..590F} Frerking, M.~A.,
850: Langer, W.~D., \& Wilson, R.~W.\ 1982, \apj, 262, 590 \\
851:
852:
853: \bibitem[Goodman et al.(1993)]{good93} Goodman, A. ~A., Benson,
854: P. ~J., Fuller, G. ~A., \& Myers, P. ~C. 1993, \apj, 406, 528 \\
855:
856: \bibitem[Gregersen et al.(1997)]{greg97} Gregersen, E. ~M., Evans, N. ~J., ~II.,
857: Zhou, S., \& Choi, M. 1997, \apj, 484, 256 \\
858:
859: \bibitem[Gregersen \& Evans(2000)]{greg00} Gregersen, E. ~M.\& Evans, N. ~J.,
860: ~II. 2000, \apj, 538, 260 \\
861:
862: \bibitem[Kandori et al.(2005)]{kand05} Kandori, R., Nakajuma, N.,
863: Motohide, T., Tatematsu, K., Aikawa, Y., et al. 2005, \apj, 130, 2166 \\
864:
865: \bibitem[Keto et al.(2004)]{keto04} Keto, Rybicki, G.~B., Bergin,
866: E.~A., \& Plume, R. 2004, \apj, 613, 335 \\
867:
868: \bibitem[Keto \& Field(2005)]{keto05} Keto, E., \& Field, G. 2005,
869: \apj, 635, 1151 \\
870:
871: \bibitem[Keto et al.(2006)]{keto06} Keto, E., Broderick,
872: A.~E., Lada, C.~J., \& Narayan, R.\ 2006, \apj, 652, 1366 \\
873:
874: \bibitem[Lada et al.(2003)]{lada03} Lada, C. ~J., Bergin, E. ~A., Alves, J. ~F.,
875: \& Huard, T. ~L. 2003, \apj, 586, 286 \\
876:
877: \bibitem[Lee et al.(1999)]{lee99} Lee, C. ~W., Myers, P. ~C., \& Tafalla, M.
878: 1999, \apj, 526, 788 \\
879:
880: \bibitem[Lee et al.(2001)]{lee01} Lee, C. ~W., Myers, P. ~C., \& Tafalla, M.
881: 2001, \apjs, 136, 703\\
882:
883: \bibitem[Lombardi et al.(2006)]{lomb06} Lombardi, M., Alves,
884: J., \& Lada, C.~J.\ 2006, \aap, 454, 781 \\
885:
886: \bibitem[Mardones et al.(1997)]{mard97} Mardones, D., Myers, P. ~C., Wilner, D.
887: ~J., Bachiller, R., \& Garay, G. 1997, \apj, 489, 719 \\
888:
889: \bibitem[Matsumoto \& Hanawa(2003)]{mats03} Matsumoto, T., \& Hanawa, T.
890: 2003, \apj, 595, 913 \\
891:
892: \bibitem[Myers et al.(1996)]{myer96} Myers, P. ~C., Mardones, D., Tafalla, M.,
893: Williams, J. ~P., \& Wilner, D. ~J. 1996, \apj, 465, L133 \\
894:
895: \bibitem[Onishi et al.(1999)]{onis99} Onishi, T., Kawamura, A., Abe, R.,
896: Yamaguchi, N., Saito, H., Moriguchi, Y., Mizuno, A., Ogawa, H., \& Fukui, Y.
897: 1999, \pasj, 51, 871 \\
898:
899: \bibitem[Redman et al.(2004)]{redm04} Redman, M., ~P., Keto, E.,
900: Rawlings, J. ~M. ~C., \& Williams, D. ~A. 2004, \mnras, 352, 1365 \\
901:
902: \bibitem[Tafalla et al.(2002)]{tafa02} Tafalla, M., Myers, P. ~C.,
903: Caselli, P., Walmsley, C. M., \& Comito, C. 2002, \apj, 569, 815 \\
904:
905: \bibitem[Ungerechts et al.(1997)]{1997Uetal} Ungerechts, H.,
906: Bergin, E.~A., Goldsmith, P.~F., Irvine, W.~M., Schloerb, F.~P., \& Snell,
907: R.~L.\ 1997, \apj, 482, 245
908:
909:
910:
911:
912: \end{thebibliography}
913:
914: \clearpage
915:
916:
917:
918: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
919: %% FIGURES %%
920: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
921:
922: \begin{figure}
923: \begin{center}
924: \includegraphics[height=4in]{f1.eps}
925: \caption{Emission-line spectra of \csII, \hcoI\ and \coI\
926: near the center of \fest\ measured using the 30m
927: IRAM telescope. Split asymmetric, double-peaked profile
928: shapes characterize the CS and HCO$^+$ lines but not the
929: C$^{18}$O line which is single-peaked indicating that the former
930: emission lines are likely very optically thick and self-reversed. The sense
931: of the asymmetry suggests expansion motions of the outer cloud layers.}
932: \label{spec}
933: \end{center}
934: \end{figure}
935:
936: \clearpage
937:
938:
939:
940:
941: \begin{figure}
942: \begin{center}
943: \includegraphics[height=4in]{f2.eps}
944: \caption{Map of emission-line spectra from across \fest.
945: Solid lines are HCO$^+$ emission spectra and dotted
946: lines are those of C$^{18}$O. The map is centered at
947: $\alpha_{2000}$ = 17$^h$35$^m$47.5$^s$, $\delta_{2000}$ =
948: -25$\degr$33$\arcmin$2.0$\arcsec$. Double-peaked, self-reversed
949: and asymmetric profiles
950: are evident in
951: the HCO$^+$ lines across the globule. In all positions the sense of
952: the profile asymmetry is indicative of expansion motions.}
953: \label{c18ohcomap}
954: \end{center}
955: \end{figure}
956:
957: \clearpage
958:
959:
960: \begin{figure}
961: \begin{center}
962: \includegraphics[height=4in]{f3.eps}
963: \caption{Map of \csII\ and \coI\ emission-line spectra from \fest.
964: Solid lines are CS emission spectra and dotted
965: lines are those of C$^{18}$O. The map is centered at $\alpha_{2000}$ =
966: 17$^h$35$^m$47.5$^s$, $\delta_{2000}$ =
967: -25$\degr$33$\arcmin$2.0$\arcsec$. Asymmetric, self-absorbed CS profiles
968: indicative of expansion are evident across the map}
969: \label{c18ocsmap}
970: \end{center}
971: \end{figure}
972:
973: \clearpage
974:
975:
976: \begin{figure}
977: \begin{center}
978: \includegraphics[height=3in]{f4.eps}
979: \caption{\textit{Left.} Peak velocity distribution for \co~($J =
980: 1 \to 0$) emission spectra.
981: \textit{Right.} Peak velocity distribution for \co~($J = 2
982: \to 1$) emission spectra.}
983: \label{c18opkv}
984: \end{center}
985: \end{figure}
986:
987: \clearpage
988:
989:
990: \begin{figure}
991: \begin{center}
992: \includegraphics[height=3.5in]{f5.eps}
993: \caption{Line width distribution of \coI\
994: spectra. The white cross denotes the position of the dust extinction
995: peak.}
996: \label{c18olnw}
997: \end{center}
998: \end{figure}
999:
1000: \clearpage
1001:
1002:
1003: \begin{figure}
1004: \begin{center}
1005: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=\textwidth]{f6.eps}
1006: \caption{
1007: Comparison of the spatial distributions of molecular emission shown as
1008: contours with a map of
1009: visual extinction constructed with the same angular resolution and shown as
1010: grey scale. Contour levels are given in
1011: $\int T_A^*\;dv$ with units of K km s$^{-1}$ (C$^{18}$O: 0.2 to 2.0 by 0.2;
1012: N$_2$H$^+$: 0.1 to 0.8 by 0.1; HCO$^{+}$: 0.2 to 1.2 by 0.2).
1013: The extinction scale is shown in the bar on the right of the figure and
1014: the extinction ranges from approximately 6 - 43 magnitudes. For clarity
1015: the grey-scale contrast
1016: has been adjusted to emphasize the dust distribution in the center of the core.
1017: }
1018: \label{festcompare}
1019: \end{center}
1020: \end{figure}
1021:
1022:
1023: \clearpage
1024:
1025:
1026: \begin{figure}
1027: \begin{center}
1028: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{f7.eps}
1029: \caption{
1030: ({\em Left}) C$^{18}$O J=1-0 integrated intensity as a function of
1031: visual extinction for
1032: the entire FeSt 1-457 dark cloud. ({\em Right}) N$_2$H$^+$ J=1-0 integrated
1033: emission as a function
1034: of visual extinction. In all plots the data are presented as open
1035: squares with error bars while solid traces are the result of linear fits to
1036: the data. The extinction and molecular line observations in both
1037: plots were obtained at the same angular resolution.
1038: }
1039: \label{avplots}
1040: \end{center}
1041: \end{figure}
1042:
1043:
1044:
1045: %%%%%%%%%%%%
1046: %% TABLES %%
1047: %%%%%%%%%%%%
1048:
1049: \clearpage
1050:
1051: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}
1052: \tablewidth{0pt}
1053: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{3mm}
1054: \tablecaption{Line parameters. \label{tb:linpars}}
1055: \tablehead{
1056: \colhead{Line} &
1057: \colhead{$\nu$\tablenotemark{a}} &
1058: \colhead{HPBW\tablenotemark{b}} &
1059: \colhead{$\Delta v$\tablenotemark{c}} \\
1060: \colhead{} & \colhead{(GHz)} & \colhead{($\arcsec$)} & \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} }
1061: \startdata
1062: \csII & 97.980968 & 25 & 0.030 \\
1063: %\csV & 244.935606 & 10 & 0.012 \\
1064: \hcoI & 89.188512 & 28 & 0.033 \\
1065: \coI & 109.78218 & 22 & 0.027 \\
1066: \coII & 219.560319 & 11 & 0.013 \\
1067: \nhI & 93.173178 & 26 & 0.031 \\
1068: \enddata
1069: \tablenotetext{a}{{Line rest frequency}}
1070: \tablenotetext{b}{{Half power beam width}}
1071: \tablenotetext{c}{{Velocity resolution}}
1072: \end{deluxetable}
1073:
1074: %% If you use the table environment, please indicate horizontal rules using
1075: %% \tableline, not \hline.
1076: %% Do not put multiple tabular environments within a single table.
1077: %% The optional \label should appear inside the \caption command.
1078:
1079: \clearpage
1080:
1081:
1082:
1083:
1084: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}
1085: \tablewidth{0pt} \setlength{\tabcolsep}{3mm}
1086: \tablecaption{Results of velocity gradient fit.\tablenotemark{a} \label{tb:velgradfit}}
1087: \tablehead{ \colhead{Line} & \colhead{$v_0$\tablenotemark{b}} &
1088: \colhead{$\ud v / \ud s$\tablenotemark{c}} & \colhead{$\ud v / \ud
1089: s $ at 160 pc} & \colhead{$\theta$\tablenotemark{d}} \\
1090:
1091: \colhead{} & \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(m s$^{-1}$ arcsec$^{-1}$)} &
1092: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$ pc$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{($\degr$)} }
1093:
1094: \startdata
1095: \coI & $5.81 \pm 0.001$ & $0.73 \pm 0.012$ & 1.5 & $231.5 \pm 1.0$ \\
1096:
1097: \coII & $5.79 \pm 0.001$ & $0.70 \pm 0.022$ &
1098: 1.4 & $238.9 \pm 1.9$ \\
1099:
1100: \nhI & $5.79 \pm 0.003$ & $1.13 \pm 0.13$ &
1101: 2.3 & $249.8 \pm 7.5$ \\
1102: \enddata
1103:
1104: \tablenotetext{a}{{Errors quoted are $1 \sigma$ uncertainty}}
1105: \tablenotetext{b}{{Systemic velocity}}
1106: \tablenotetext{c}{{Magnitude of velocity gradient}}
1107: \tablenotetext{d}{{Direction of velocity gradient measured East of North}}
1108: \end{deluxetable}
1109:
1110: \clearpage
1111:
1112:
1113:
1114: %% The following command ends your manuscript. LaTeX will ignore any text
1115: %% that appears after it.
1116:
1117: \end{document}
1118:
1119: %% %% End of file `ms.tex'.
1120: