1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2005 December 5
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
9: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
10: %% any data that comes before this command.
11:
12: %% The command below calls the preprint style
13: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
14: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
15: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
16: %%
17: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
18: %\documentclass[twocolumn]{emulateapj}
19:
20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21:
22: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
23: \usepackage{lscape}
24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
25:
26: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
27:
28: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
29: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
30: %% use the longabstract style option.
31:
32: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
33:
34: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
35: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
36: %% the \begin{document} command.
37: %%
38: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
39: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
40: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
41: %% for information.
42:
43: %\newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
44: %\newcommand{\myemail}{ntejos@das.uchile.cl}
45: \newcommand{\lya}{Ly$\alpha$}
46: \newcommand{\kms}{km~s$^{-1}$}
47: \newcommand{\dnzcg}{$dN/dz|_{\rm GRB}^{\rm CIV}$}
48: \newcommand{\dnzcq}{$dN/dz|_{\rm QSO}^{\rm CIV}$}
49: \newcommand{\mdnzcq}{dN/dz|_{\rm QSO}^{\rm CIV}}
50: \newcommand{\mdnzcg}{dN/dz|_{\rm GRB}^{\rm CIV}}
51: \newcommand{\dnzmgg}{$dN/dz|_{\rm GRB}^{\rm MgII}$}
52: \newcommand{\mdnzmgg}{dN/dz|_{\rm GRB}^{\rm MgII}}
53: \newcommand{\dnzmgq}{$dN/dz|_{\rm QSO}^{\rm MgII}$}
54: \newcommand{\mdnzmgq}{dN/dz|_{\rm QSO}^{\rm MgII}}
55:
56: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
57:
58: %\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
59:
60: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
61: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
62: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
63: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
64: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
65: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
66:
67: \shorttitle{\ion{C}{4} in GRB sightlines}
68: \shortauthors{Tejos, N. et al.}
69:
70: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
71: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
72:
73: \begin{document}
74:
75: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
76: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
77: %% you desire.
78:
79: \title{On the Incidence of \ion{C}{4} Absorbers Along the Sightlines to
80: Gamma-Ray Bursts}
81:
82: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
83: %% author and affiliation information.
84: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
85: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
86: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
87: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
88:
89: %JXP -- I think the following will be the full author list.}
90:
91: \author{Nicolas Tejos\altaffilmark{1},
92: Sebastian Lopez\altaffilmark{1},
93: Jason X. Prochaska\altaffilmark{2},
94: Hsiao-Wen Chen\altaffilmark{3},
95: Miroslava Dessauges-Zavadsky\altaffilmark{4}
96: }
97: %\email{ntejos@das.uchile.cl}
98:
99: \altaffiltext{1}{Departamento de Astronom\'{\i}a; Universidad de Chile; Casilla 36-D, Santiago, Chile; ntejos@das.uchile.cl}
100: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics,
101: UCO/Lick Observatory;
102: University of California, 1156 High Street,
103: Santa Cruz, CA 95064; xavier@ucolick.org}
104: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Astronomy; University of Chicago;
105: 5640 S. Ellis Ave., Chicago, IL 60637; hchen@oddjob.uchicago.edu}
106: \altaffiltext{4}{Observatoire de Gen\`eve, 51 Ch. des Maillettes,
107: 1290 Sauverny, Switzerland}
108:
109:
110: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
111: %% are identified by the \altaffilmrk after each name. Specify alternate
112: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
113: %% affiliation.
114:
115:
116:
117: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
118: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
119: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
120: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
121: %% editorial office after submission.
122:
123: %JXP -- Do a spell check on the full document
124:
125: \begin{abstract}
126: We report on the statistics of strong
127: ($W_r > 0.15$ \ \AA) \ion{C}{4} absorbers at $z=1.5-3.5$
128: toward high-redshift
129: gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). In contrast with a recent survey
130: for strong \ion{Mg}{2} absorption systems at $z < 2$,
131: we find that the number of \ion{C}{4}
132: absorbers per unit redshift $dN/dz$ does not show a significant deviation
133: from previous surveys using quasi-stellar objects (QSOs) as background sources. We find that the number density of \ion{C}{4} toward GRBs is
134: $dN/dz|_{\rm GRB} (z \sim 1.5)= 2.2_{-1.4}^{+2.8}$,
135: $dN/dz|_{\rm GRB} (z \sim 2.5)= 2.3_{-1.1}^{+1.8}$ and
136: $dN/dz|_{\rm GRB} (z \sim 3.5)= 1.1_{-0.9}^{+2.6}$.
137: These numbers are consistent with previous \ion{C}{4} surveys
138: using QSO spectra.
139: Binning the entire dataset, we set a 95$\%$ c.l.\ upper limit
140: to the excess of \ion{C}{4} absorbers along GRB sightlines at
141: twice the incidence observed along QSO sightlines.
142: Furthermore, the distribution of equivalent widths of the GRB
143: and QSO samples are consistent with being drawn from the
144: same parent population.
145: Although the results for \ion{Mg}{2} and \ion{C}{4} absorbers
146: along GRB sightlines appear to contradict one another, we note
147: that the surveys are nearly disjoint: the \ion{C}{4} survey
148: corresponds to higher redshift and more highly ionized gas than the
149: \ion{Mg}{2} survey. Nevertheless, analysis on
150: larger statistical samples may constrain properties of the galaxies
151: hosting these metals (e.g.\ mass, dust content)
152: and/or the coherence-length of the gas giving rise to the
153: metal-line absorption.
154: \end{abstract}
155:
156: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
157: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
158: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
159: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
160:
161: \keywords{gamma-ray bursts: absorption systems}
162:
163: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
164: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
165: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
166: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
167: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
168: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
169: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
170: %% each reference.
171:
172:
173: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
174: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so by tagging
175: %% their objects with \objectname{} or \object{}. Each macro takes the
176: %% object name as its required argument. The optional, square-bracket
177: %% argument should be used in cases where the data center identification
178: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper. The text appearing
179: %% in curly braces is what will appear in print in the published paper.
180: %% If the object name is recognized by the data centers, it will be linked
181: %% in the electronic edition to the object data available at the data centers
182: %%
183: %% Note that for sources with brackets in their names, e.g. [WEG2004] 14h-090,
184: %% the brackets must be escaped with backslashes when used in the first
185: %% square-bracket argument, for instance, \object[\[WEG2004\] 14h-090]{90}).
186: %% Otherwise, LaTeX will issue an error.
187:
188: \section{Introduction}
189: After extensive studies on absorption line systems in spectra
190: of quasi-stellar objects (QSOs) it has been widely accepted that the
191: majority of systems discovered are intervening and that they trace the
192: cosmological expansion of the universe. Various surveys have been
193: conducted that focus on the cosmological evolution of metal absorption
194: systems for distinct atomic transitions. A standard observational
195: measure is the number of absorbers per unit redshift, $dN/dz$, which
196: includes the cosmological evolution in the physical pathlength and
197: evolution intrinsic to the absorbers themselves
198: \citep[e.g.,][]{lanzetta1987,sargent1988,steidel1990}.
199:
200: Since the production of heavy elements takes place in the stars which
201: mainly group into galaxies, it is natural to relate metal absorbers to
202: galaxies \citep[although this has proven difficult to test, especially
203: at high redshift; e.g.,][]{churchill2004, tripp05}. Therefore, studying
204: the evolution of metal absorbers may impact our understanding of both
205: galaxy evolution and the physics of the intergalactic medium (IGM).
206:
207: Recently, \citet{prochter2006} have found a significant overabundance
208: (a factor of $\sim 4$) of strong (rest-frame equivalent width of
209: \ion{Mg}{2}~2796, $W_{r}(2796) \ge 1.0$ \r A) \ion{Mg}{2}
210: absorbers in lines-of-sight toward gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) when
211: compared to the statistics drawn from lines-of-sight toward QSOs. This
212: result is striking because a key hypothesis of this experiment is that
213: intervening absorbers are independent of the background source.
214: Several physical effects have been proposed to explain the
215: overabundance:
216: (1) dust within the \ion{Mg}{2} absorbers may obscure
217: faint QSOs,
218: (2) the \ion{Mg}{2} gas may be intrinsic to the GRBs,
219: (3) the GRBs may be gravitationally lensed by these absorbers, and
220: (4) the absorbers are small enough that different `beam sizes' between GRBs
221: and QSOs may affect the statistics
222: \citep{prochter2006,frank2006,hao06}. \citet{prochter2006} and
223: \citet{porciani07} have argued that none of these explanations is
224: likely to explain the full effect but it may be possible for several
225: to contribute together to resolve the discrepancy.
226:
227: In this paper, we revisit high-resolution GRBs spectra and look for
228: \ion{C}{4} absorbers to obtain the first statistics of such absorbers
229: in this type of lines-of-sight. Because the C$^{+3}$ ion has a much
230: higher ionization potential than Mg$^+$, the \ion{C}{4} doublet is
231: likely to trace more diffuse and hotter gas. Therefore, \ion{C}{4}
232: systems may represent a different "population" of larger "cross
233: section" absorbers and the study of their statistics may help address
234: the problem opened by the \citet{prochter2006} result.
235:
236: The paper is organized as follows. In $\S$~\ref{data} we present the
237: spectra used in this study. The statistical
238: sample and the redshift number density calculation are
239: described in $\S$~\ref{CIV}. The results are summarized in
240: $\S$~\ref{results} and discussed in $\S$~\ref{discuss}.
241:
242:
243:
244: \section{Data}\label{data}
245: We have drawn our spectral sample from echelle observations summarized
246: in Table \ref{table1}. We have restricted our analysis to the
247: sightlines with at least coverage redward of the \lya\ forest
248: (i.e. $z_{GRB}^{Ly\alpha} < z^{CIV} \le z_{GRB}^{CIV}$) and to spectra
249: with moderate to high signal-to-noise ratio ($>5$\,pix$^{-1}$). The
250: sample is comprised of echelle spectra of the following GRB
251: afterglows: GRB021004, GRB050730, GRB050820, GRB050922C and GRB060607.
252: The data was obtained with the MIKE/Las Campanas \citep{mike},
253: UVES/VLT \citep{uves} and HIRES/Keck \citep{vogt94} echelle
254: spectrographs allowing high spectral resolution of $R \sim 40000$. The
255: UVES data were retrieved from the ESO archive and processed with the
256: standard UVES pipeline. For each GRB the individual spectra
257: acquired with a given instrument were reduced, coadded and normalized
258: with standard techniques. We refer the reader to the following papers
259: for a full discussion of the observations
260: \citep{fiore05,chen05,prochaska07,fiore07,ledoux06}.
261:
262:
263: \section{\ion{C}{4} Absorption Systems toward GRBs}\label{CIV}
264:
265: \subsection{Equivalent Widths}
266: Equivalent widths were calculated using both direct pixel integration,
267: $W^{pixel}$, and a Gaussian fit, $W^{gauss}$, applied directly to the
268: high-resolution data (since previous surveys used spectra of lower
269: resolution, we first confirmed that smoothing and re-binning our data
270: does not alter the equivalent widths). We obtained $W^{pixel}$ over
271: the smallest velocity window that contain the whole system. The rest
272: frame equivalent width $W_r$ was calculated by taking
273: $W_r=W_{obs}/(1+z)$. We arbitrarily defined the redshift of the
274: absorption system such that it appears centered in velocity space.
275:
276: To obtain $W^{gauss}$, we fitted a single or multiple Gaussian profile
277: to the absorption lines, and summed each component of an individual
278: system. In the case of multiples components, the error associated is,
279: $\sigma_{system}^2=\sum_i \sigma_{i}^2$, where $\sigma_{i}$ is the
280: individual error of component $i$. Figure~\ref{Ws} shows that
281: equivalent widths from both methods are, in general,
282: self-consistent. The outlier is due to the blended feature in
283: the main component of the system at $z=2.89048$ (see
284: Figure~\ref{figint}). Hereafter, we will use only $W^{gauss}$ because
285: of its robustness (continuum and blended systems are fitted,
286: independently of velocity window).
287:
288: \subsection{Definition of the Samples}\label{sample}
289: \subsubsection{Full Sample}
290: We first define a Full Sample of \ion{C}{4} absorption systems that
291: satisfy the following criteria: (1) $z_{GRB}^{Ly\alpha}<z_{abs}^{CIV}
292: \le z_{GRB}^{CIV}$; i.e., the Full Sample includes lines associated
293: with the GRB host galaxy (we will later restrict the analysis to
294: intervening \ion{C}{4} systems). (2) The equivalent width of the
295: \ion{C}{4} doublet must be detected at the 5$\sigma$ level or
296: higher. No conditions were imposed to the equivalent width ratio for
297: both components although all members of the Statistical Sample
298: (see below) exhibit an equivalent width ratio $W(1548)/W(1550)$
299: between 1 (saturated regime) and 2 (unsaturated regime). (3)
300: A complex system is considered a single system if the velocity
301: components group within $500$ \kms. This last condition is useful to
302: compare with previous surveys that were made at lower spectral
303: resolution \citep[for instance,][used a velocity window of $150$ \kms\
304: to group components of a single system but then defined a statistical
305: sample counting as a single system all components within $1000$ \kms;
306: Our Statistical Sample, defined below, does not have systems separated
307: by less than $1000$ \kms, therefore these two samples are
308: comparable]{steidel1990}.
309:
310: Although performed redward of the \lya\ forest, the \ion{C}{4} survey
311: has one significant contaminant: the \ion{O}{1}~1302/\ion{Si}{2}~1304
312: pair of transitions has nearly identical separation as the \ion{C}{4}
313: doublet. It is trivial, however, to identify these contaminants by
314: searching for other \ion{Si}{2} transitions and the \ion{C}{2}~1334
315: transition.
316:
317: We found 29 candidate \ion{C}{4} absorption systems in our
318: Full Sample. This number includes absorption systems with $z \sim
319: z_{GRB}$. Table \ref{table2} shows the information on redshift limits
320: of each line-of-sight, $z_{abs}^{CIV}$ and $W_r$.
321:
322: \subsubsection{Statistical Sample}
323: To compare the statistics of \ion{C}{4} absorption along GRB
324: sightlines with that one for QSO sightlines, one must define a sample
325: with identical equivalent width limits. Previous surveys have defined
326: this limit to $W_{min} = 0.15$ \AA\ in the rest frame
327: \citep{steidel1990,misawa2002}. We adopt the same value, i.e., $W_r >
328: 0.15$ \AA \ in \textit{both} members of the \ion{C}{4} doublet.
329:
330: In addition, to avoid contributions from galaxies clustered with the
331: hosts of GRB and wind features that might be associated with the GRB
332: progenitor \citep{chen07} and to compare with previous surveys,
333: we define a Statistical Sample with the same $z_{start}$ as in
334: the Full Sample but $z_{end}$ at $5000 \ km \ s^{-1}$ from $z_{GRB}$
335: \citep[as in][for $z_{QSO}$]{steidel1990}.
336:
337: All the spectra included in our Statistical Sample permit detections
338: of lines with $W_r > 0.15$ \AA\ with at least $5\sigma$ significance
339: from $z_{GRB}^{Ly\alpha}$ to $5000 \ km \ s^{-1}$ within
340: $z^{CIV}_{GRB}$. The Statistical Sample is composed of 7 absorption
341: systems (see systems labeled with a dagger in Table \ref{table2} and
342: see Figure \ref{figint} for velocity plots). We excluded 2
343: systems due to their dubious character (systems labeled with an 'X' in
344: Table \ref{table2}): $z_{abs}=3.254$, although not saturated, it shows
345: an equivalent width ratio $< 1$; $z_{abs}=2.3589$ falls very
346: close to $W_{min}$ \AA\ but $W^{gauss}_r(1550) < 0.15$ \AA.
347:
348: \subsection{Redshift Number Density}\label{dNdz}
349: The redshift number density, $dN/dz$, is the number of absorbers per
350: unit redshift. By definition, $dN/dz = N_{abs}/ \Delta z$ where
351: $N_{abs}$ is the number of absorption systems in the redshift path
352: $\Delta z$. Defining the number of lines-of-sight between $z$ and $z$
353: $+ dz$ as $g(z)$ (a function that defines the redshift path density),
354: the redshift path can be written as $\Delta z = \sum g(z) \delta z$
355: where $\delta z$ is the grid resolution. Figure \ref{gz_b5} shows
356: $g(z)$ for our sample. Figure \ref{fig_comp2} shows our result on
357: $dN/dz$ toward GRBs ($dN/dz|_{\rm GRB}$). The choice of redshift bins
358: is arbitrary; we used 3 bins of 1 redshift unit between $z=1$ and
359: $z=4$.
360:
361: To estimate the error in $dN/dz$ we assume a Poissonian distribution
362: in the number of absorbers $N_{abs}$ in a given redshift bin $\Delta
363: z^{bin}$ and then assign the upper and lower limit corresponding to
364: $1\sigma$ confidence level of a Gaussian distribution, ($1\sigma =
365: 0.8413$) $1\sigma_{N_{abs}}^+$ and $1\sigma_{N_{abs}}^-$ respectively
366: obtained from \citet{gehrels86}. Therefore, $\sigma_{dN/dz}^{+,-} =
367: 1\sigma_{N_{abs}}^{+,-}/\Delta z^{bin}$. This is done for each
368: redshift bin.
369:
370: \section{Result} \label{results}
371: For the Statistical Sample we find $dN/dz|_{\rm GRB}(z \sim
372: 1.5)= 2.2_{-1.4}^{+2.8}$, $dN/dz|_{\rm GRB}(z \sim 2.5)=
373: 2.3_{-1.1}^{+1.8}$ and $dN/dz|_{\rm GRB}(z \sim 3.5)=
374: 1.1_{-0.9}^{+2.6}$. Table \ref{table3} shows the specific results for
375: each redshift bin.
376:
377: How do these numbers compare with $dN/dz|_{\rm QSO}$? One of the
378: largest published surveys of \ion{C}{4} along QSO sightlines was
379: carried out by \citet{steidel1990}. In that survey, 66 QSO spectra
380: with low spectral resolution ($\sim 1-2$ \AA) were used (55 of them
381: were obtained from \citet{sargent1988}). We used their result as
382: comparison. \citet{steidel1990} measured the incidence of \ion{C}{4}
383: systems with $W_{min} = 0.15$ \r A and parameterized their results as
384: $dN/dz|_{\rm QSO} = N_0 (1+z)^{-1.26}$. However, in what follows, we
385: compute $dN/dz|_{\rm QSO}$ directly from the tables in
386: \citet{steidel1990} and \citet{sargent1988}. We also compare with
387: another published survey by \citet{misawa2002} (18 QSO spectra with
388: resolution of $\sim 2$ \AA) although this survey has much lower
389: redshift coverage and does not provide a better sensitivity ($W_{min}
390: = 0.15$ \r A).
391:
392: We find that $dN/dz|_{\rm GRB}$ decreases with redshift in the range
393: between $z=1$ and $z=4$ as in QSO surveys. In Figure \ref{fig_comp2}
394: we compare $dN/dz|_{\rm GRB}$ with $dN/dz|_{\rm QSO}$ using our
395: binning. It can be seen that, within errors, our result on \ion{C}{4}
396: matches the \citet{steidel1990} and the \citet{misawa2002} ones
397: (according to Misawa \textit{et al.}, the fact that these two previous
398: results do not match each other would be due to an statistical
399: accident). On the other hand, if we use only one redshift bin between
400: $z=1$ and $z=4$ we find that the incidence of \ion{C}{4} absorbers
401: along GRB sightlines is less than twice that one along QSOs (Steidel
402: 1990 sample) at the 95$\%$ confidence level, i.e.,\ a large
403: overabundance is improbable (even taking into account the 2 dubious
404: systems excluded from the Statistical Sample). Therefore, there is no
405: significant difference between the GRB and QSO statistics in our
406: sample.
407:
408: \section{Discussion}\label{discuss}
409:
410: The principal result of our analysis is that the incidence of
411: \ion{C}{4} absorbers ($W_r \ge 0.15$\r A) along GRB sightlines is
412: consistent with that observed along QSO sightlines. Note that
413: the same conclusion is reached by \citet{sudilovsky2007} using similar
414: data (although these authors use a smaller total redshift path and a
415: lower equivalent width cutoff than ours).
416:
417: Quantitatively, we set a 95$\%$ upper limit of $\mdnzcg < 2 \mdnzcq$
418: over the redshift interval $z \sim 2$ to 4. At the surface, this
419: result lies in stark contrast to the incidence of strong \ion{Mg}{2}
420: absorbers at $z<2$ where \citet{prochter2006} find a {\it lower limit}
421: $\mdnzmgg > 2 \mdnzmgq$ at the 99.9$\%$ significance level.
422:
423: Are these two results contradictory? Let us first stress that the two
424: absorption-line samples may be nearly disjoint. Firstly, one important
425: difference is that the \ion{Mg}{2} absorbers were surveyed at $z<2$
426: while most of the pathlength surveyed here for \ion{C}{4} absorption
427: has $z>2$. While there is no indication that the \dnzmgg\ enhancement
428: is declining with increasing redshift, there are possible reasons to
429: expect such an effect (e.g.\ gravitational lensing efficiency is
430: maximal at $z_{lens} \approx z_{GRB}/2$). In that case the \ion{Mg}{2}
431: enhancement would vanish at the redshifts probed here with \ion{C}{4}.
432:
433: But even if this were not the case, let us consider a second argument
434: in favor of the present results. The key issue is that \ion{C}{4} may
435: track a distinct phase of gas from \ion{Mg}{2} in the intergalactic
436: medium owing to its substantially higher ionization potential. This is
437: reflected in the statistics of QSO surveys. At $z=2$, $\mdnzmgq \approx
438: 0.4$ \citep{prochter2006a} and $\mdnzcq \approx 2.5$
439: \citep{steidel1990}, i.e., \ion{C}{4} systems are a factor of 6 more
440: abundant than \ion{Mg}{2} for the $W_r$ thresholds relevant to our
441: study. In other words, there is plenty of \ion{C}{4} (weak) systems
442: that do not show strong \ion{Mg}{2} absorption.
443:
444: On the other hand, we expect that nearly every strong \ion{Mg}{2}
445: absorber will also exhibit \ion{C}{4} absorption. Furthermore, many
446: of these will have an equivalent width in excess of 0.15\AA\
447: \citep[e.g.][]{churchill1999}. Therefore, if the enhancement in
448: \dnzmgg\ continues beyond $z=2$, we do expect a certain bias to larger
449: \dnzcg. However, since there is not a one-to-one correspondence
450: between $W_r \ge 1$\AA\ \ion{Mg}{2} absorbers and $W_r \ge 0.15$\AA\
451: \ion{C}{4} absorbers, such possible bias is diluted in the much more
452: numerous statistics of \ion{C}{4} (indeed, none of the \ion{C}{4}
453: absorbers in our sample that have coverage of the \ion{Mg}{2} doublet
454: shows significant absorption; e.g., $z_{CIV} = 1.568, 1.989$ from
455: GRB~050922C). Even if we assume that $\mdnzmgg = 4~ \mdnzmgq$ and that
456: each system also has $W_{CIV} > 0.15$\AA\, the effect on \dnzcg\ is
457: less than $50\%$ (at most (\dnzcg)/(\dnzcq) = 9/6 given that
458: (\dnzmgg)/(\dnzmgq) = 4/1 and (\dnzcq)/(\dnzmgq) = 6/1).
459:
460: While the change to \dnzcg\ for $W_{1548} > 0.15$\AA\ may be modest,
461: as argued above, it is possible that an enhancement in \dnzmgg\ will
462: imply an \ion{C}{4} equivalent width {\it distribution} that is very
463: different from that toward QSOs, e.g., a much higher incidence of
464: $W_r(1548) > 1$\AA. Figure~\ref{fig_Wdist} presents a histogram of the
465: equivalent widths for our analysis and that of \citet{steidel1990} with
466: arbitrary binning. We performed a K-S test on the un-binned
467: distributions of rest frame equivalent widths that rules out the null
468: hypothesis (of similar distributions) at only the 1\% c.l. Therefore,
469: there is no indication of possible differences between equivalent
470: width distributions of \ion{C}{4} absorbers toward GRBs and QSOs.
471:
472:
473: In summary, there is no fundamental conflict between observing an
474: enhanced incidence of strong \ion{Mg}{2} absorbers along GRB
475: sightlines without a corresponding enhancement of \ion{C}{4}
476: absorbers. Before concluding, let us speculate on the implications of
477: these results under the assumption that future data confirm the
478: currently measured incidences. If our results on \dnzcg\ and the
479: current enhancement in \dnzmgg\ are confirmed in larger surveys, one
480: may use these contrasting results to infer characteristics of the
481: \ion{C}{4} absorbers. For example, if the \dnzmgg\ enhancement is to
482: be explained by the geometric differences between the GRB and
483: QSO beams (comparable with the characteristic size of \ion{Mg}{2}
484: `clouds') \citep{frank2006}, then one would conclude \ion{C}{4}
485: absorbers are significantly larger than \ion{Mg}{2} clouds and the QSO
486: beam size. Indeed, such differences have been inferred from
487: comparisons of metal-line absorption along gravitationally lensed
488: QSOs \citep[e.g.,][]{lopez99}.
489:
490: Similarly, the results could constrain the dust redenning or
491: mass of the galaxies hosting \ion{C}{4} absorbers. Correlations
492: between these quantities and \ion{Mg}{2} equivalent width have been
493: found by recent studies using \ion{Mg}{2} statistics derived from
494: Sloan Digital Sky Survey QSOs. For instance, \citet{menard2007} have
495: parameterized the (significant) amount of QSO redenning due to
496: \ion{Mg}{2} absorbers, and \citet{bouche2006} have found an
497: anti-correlation between \ion{Mg}{2} equivalent width and mass of the
498: dark-matter halo hosting the absorbing galaxy. The different behavior
499: of \ion{C}{4} and \ion{Mg}{2}, as revealed by the statistics toward
500: GRBs, then can put constraints on these absorber properties by
501: studying \ion{Mg}{2} samples selected by \ion{C}{4}.
502:
503:
504:
505: %% To help institutions obtain information on the effectiveness of their
506: %% telescopes, the AAS Journals has created a group of keywords for telescope
507: %% facilities. A common set of keywords will make these types of searches
508: %% significantly easier and more accurate. In addition, they will also be
509: %% useful in linking papers together which utilize the same telescopes
510: %% within the framework of the National Virtual Observatory.
511: %% See the AASTeX Web site at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX
512: %% for information on obtaining the facility keywords.
513:
514: %% After the acknowledgments section, use the following syntax and the
515: %% \facility{} macro to list the keywords of facilities used in the research
516: %% for the paper. Each keyword will be checked against the master list during
517: %% copy editing. Individual instruments or configurations can be provided
518: %% in parentheses, after the keyword, but they will not be verified.
519:
520: %{\it Facilities:} \facility{Nickel}, \facility{HST (STIS)}, \facility{CXO (ASIS)}.
521:
522: %% Appendix material should be preceded with a single \appendix command.
523: %% There should be a \section command for each appendix. Mark appendix
524: %% subsections with the same markup you use in the main body of the paper.
525:
526: %% Each Appendix (indicated with \section) will be lettered A, B, C, etc.
527: %% The equation counter will reset when it encounters the \appendix
528: %% command and will number appendix equations (A1), (A2), etc.
529:
530:
531: \begin{thebibliography}{}
532: \bibitem[{Bernstein} {\it et al.}\ (2003)]{mike} Bernstein, R.,
533: Shectman, S. A., Gunnels, S. M., Mochnacki, S. \& Athey, A. E.,
534: 2003, in { Instrument Design and Performance for Optical/Infrared
535: Ground-based Telescopes. Edited by Iye, Masanori, Moorwood, Alan
536: F. M. Proceedings of the SPIE, Volume 4841, pp. 1694-1704 (2003).},
537: 1694.
538: %\bibitem[Boksenberg {\it et al.} (2003, submitted)]{boksenberg2003} Boksenberg A., Sargent, W. L. W. \& Rauch, M. 2003, astro-ph/0307557
539: \bibitem[Bouche {\it et al.} (2006)]{bouche2006} Bouche, N., Murphy, M. T., Peroux, C., Csabai, I. \& Wild, V., 2006,
540: MNRAS, 371, 495
541: \bibitem[Chen {\it et al.} (2005)]{chen05} Chen, H.-W., Prochaska, J. X., Bloom, J. S. \& Thompson, I. B. 2005, \apj, 634L, 25C
542: \bibitem[Chen {\it et al.} (2007)]{chen07} Chen, H.-W., Prochaska, J. X., Ramirez-Ruiz, E., Bloom, J. S., Dessauges-Zavadsky, M. \& Foley, R. J. 2007,
543: ApJ, 663, 420C
544: \bibitem[Churchill {\it et al.}\ (1999)]{churchill1999} Churchill, C., Mellon, R.R.,
545: Charlton, J.C., Januzzi, B.T., Kirhako, S., Steidel, C. \& Schneider, D.P.
546: 1999, \apj, 519, L43.
547: \bibitem[Churchill {\it et al.}\ (2004)]{churchill2004} Churchill, C. W., Steidel, C., \& Kacprzak, G. 2004, in ASP Conf. Ser. 331, Extra-Planar Gas, ed. R. Braun (San Francisco: ASP), 387, astro-ph/0411269
548: \bibitem[{Dekker} {\it et al.}\ (2000)]{uves} Dekker, H., D'Odorico, S., Kaufer, A., Delabre, B. \& Kotzlowski, H. 2000, in { Proc. SPIE Vol. 4008, p. 534-545, Optical and IR Telescope Instrumentation and Detectors, Masanori Iye, Alan F.
549: Moorwood, Eds.}, ed.\ M. {Iye} and A.~F. {Moorwood}, 534.
550: \bibitem[Fiore {\it et al.} (2005)]{fiore05} Fiore, F., D'Elia, V., Lazzati, D., Perna, R., Sbordone, L., Stratta, G., Meurs, E. J. A., Ward, P., Antonelli, L. A., Chincarini, G., Covino, S., Di Paola, A., Fontana, A., Ghisellini, G., Israel, G., Frontera, F., Marconi, G., Stella, L., Vietri, M. \& Zerbi, 2005, \apj, 624, 853F
551: \bibitem[Frank {\it et al.} (2006)]{frank2006} Frank, S., Bentz, Misty C., Stanek, K. Z., Dietrich, M., Mathur, S., Peterson, B. M. \& Atlee, D. W., 2006, astro-ph/0605676v2
552: \bibitem[Gehrels (1986)]{gehrels86} Geherels, N. 1986, \apj, 303, 336
553: \bibitem[Hao \it{et al.}\ (2007)]{hao06}Hao, H., Stanek, K. Z., Dobrzycki, A., Matheson, T., Bentz, M. C., Kuraszkiewicz, J., Garnavich, P. M., Howk, J. C., Calkins, M. L., Worthey, G., Modjaz, M., Serven, J., 2007, \apj, 659L, 99H
554: \bibitem[Lanzetta {\it et al.} (1987)] {lanzetta1987} Lanzetta, K., Turnshek, D. \& Wolf, A. 1987, \apj, 322, 739
555: \bibitem[Ledoux {\it et al.} (2006)] {ledoux06} Ledoux, C., Vreeswijk, P., Smette, A., Jaunsen, A. \& Kaufer, A. 2006, GRB Coordinates Network, Circular Service, 5237, 1
556: \bibitem[Lopez {\it et al.} (1999)] {lopez99} Lopez, S., Reimers, D., Rauch, M., Sargent, W. L. W. \& Smette, A. 1999, \apj, 513, 598
557: \bibitem[M\'enard {\it et al.} (2007)]{menard2007} M\'enard, B., Nestor, D., Turnshek, D., Quider, A., Richards, G., Chelouche, D. \& Rao, S. 2007, astro-ph/0706.0898
558: \bibitem[Misawa {\it et al.} (2002)]{misawa2002} Misawa, T., Tytler, D., Iye, M., Storrie-Lombardi, L. J., Suzuki, N. \& Wolfe, A. M., 2002, \apj, 123, 1847
559: \bibitem[{Piranomonte} {\it et al.}\ (2007)]{fiore07} Piranomonte, S., D'Elia, V., Ward, P., Fiore, F. \& Meurs, E. J. A., 2007, astro-ph/0701563
560: \bibitem[Porciani {\it et al.} (2007)]{porciani07} Porciani, C., Viel, M. \& Lilly, S. J. 2007, \apj, 659, 218P
561: \bibitem[Prochaska {\it et al.} (2007)]{prochaska07} Prochaska, J. X., Chen, H.-W., Bloom, J. S., Dessauges-Zavadsky, M., O'Meara, J. M., Foley, R. J., Bernstein, R., Burles, S., Dupree, A. K., Falco, E. \& Thompson, I. B., 2007, \apjs, 168, 231P
562: \bibitem[Prochter {\it et al.} (2006a)]{prochter2006a} Prochter, G. E., Prochaska, J. X. \& Burles, S. M. 2006a, ApJ,
563: 639, 766
564: \bibitem[Prochter {\it et al.} (2006b)]{prochter2006} Prochter, G. E., Prochaska, J. X., Chen, H.-W., Bloom, J. S., Dessauges-Zavadsky, M., Foley, R. J., Lopez, S., Pettini, M., Dupree, A. K. \& Guhathakurta, P., 2006b, \apj, 648, L93
565: \bibitem[Sargent {\it et al.} (1988)]{sargent1988} Sargent, W. L. W., Boksenberg, A. \& Steidel, C. C. 1988, ApJS, 68, 539
566: \bibitem[Steidel (1990)]{steidel1990} Steidel, C. 1990, \apjs, 72, 1
567: \bibitem[Sudilovsky {\it et al.} (2007)]{sudilovsky2007} Sudilovsky, V., Savaglio, S. Vreeswijk, P., Ledoux, C. Smette, A. \& Greiner, J., 2007, astro-ph/0705.0706
568: \bibitem[Tripp \& Bowen (2005)]{tripp05} Tripp, T. M., \& Bowen, D. V. 2005, in IAU Colloq. 199, Probing Galaxies through Quasar Absorption Lines, ed. P. R. Williams, C.-G. Shu, \& B. M\'enard (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press), 5, astro-ph/0510312
569: \bibitem[{Vogt} {\it et al.}\ (1994)]{vogt94}
570: Vogt, S. S., Allen, S. L., Bigelow, B. C., Bresee, L., Brown, B., Cantrall, T., Conrad, A., Couture, M., Delaney, C., Epps, H. W., Hilyard, D., Hilyard, D. F., Horn, E., Jern, N., Kanto, D., Keane, M. J., Kibrick, R. I., Lewis, J. W., Osborne, J., Pardeilhan, G. H., Pfister, T., Ricketts, T., Robinson, L. B., Stover, R. J., Tucker, D., Ward, J. \& Wei, M. Z., 1994, in { Proc. SPIE Instrumentation in Astronomy
571: VIII, David L. Crawford, Eric R. Craine, Eds., Volume 2198, p. 362}, 362.
572:
573: \end{thebibliography}
574:
575: \clearpage
576:
577: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
578: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
579: %% To embed the sample graphics in
580: %% the file, uncomment the \plotone, \plottwo, and
581: %% \includegraphics commands
582: %%
583: %% If you need a layout that cannot be achieved with \plotone or
584: %% \plottwo, you can invoke the graphicx package directly with the
585: %% \includegraphics command or use \plotfiddle. For more information,
586: %% please see the tutorial on "Using Electronic Art with AASTeX" in the
587: %% documentation section at the AASTeX Web site,
588: %% http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX.
589: %%
590: %% The examples below also include sample markup for submission of
591: %% supplemental electronic materials. As always, be sure to check
592: %% the instructions to authors for the journal you are submitting to
593: %% for specific submissions guidelines as they vary from
594: %% journal to journal.
595:
596: %% This example uses \plotone to include an EPS file scaled to
597: %% 80% of its natural size with \epsscale. Its caption
598: %% has been written to indicate that additional figure parts will be
599: %% available in the electronic journal.
600:
601:
602:
603: \clearpage
604: \input{tab1}
605: \clearpage
606: \input{tab2}
607: \clearpage
608: \input{tab3}
609: \clearpage
610:
611:
612: \begin{figure}
613: \plotone{f1.eps}
614: \caption{Rest frame equivalent width of \ion{C}{4} in the Full Sample measured with Gaussian fit and with pixel integration. The dashed line is the identity function.}\label{Ws}
615: \end{figure}
616: \clearpage
617: \begin{figure}
618: \plotone{f2.eps}
619: \caption{Velocity profiles of \ion{C}{4} absorption systems toward GRBs in the Statistical Sample.}\label{figint}
620: \end{figure}
621: \clearpage
622: \begin{figure}
623: \plotone{f3.ps}
624: \caption{Number of GRB lines-of-sight available for a \ion{C}{4} survey
625: with $W_r > 0.15$\r A\ using $\beta c=5000$ \kms\
626: to discount the contamination of the source.}\label{gz_b5}
627: \end{figure}
628:
629: \clearpage
630: \begin{figure}[h]
631: \begin{center}
632: \plotone{f4.eps}
633: \caption{Distribution of the number of \ion{C}{4} absorption systems
634: per unit redshift in our GRB Statistical Sample. As a comparison
635: (dashed line) we show results from QSO survey by \citet{steidel1990}
636: and \citet{misawa2002} using the same binning as that for the
637: GRB-\ion{C}{4} analysis. The bins have been slightly offset in
638: redshift for clarity.}
639: \label{fig_comp2}
640: \end{center}
641: \end{figure}
642:
643: \clearpage
644: \begin{figure}[h]
645: \begin{center}
646: \plotone{f5.eps}
647: \caption{Distribution of the rest frame equivalent widths $W_r(1548)$
648: for our Statistical Sample compared with the \citet{steidel1990} one (dashed line). The bins have been slightly offset in $W_r(1548)$ for clarity.}
649: \label{fig_Wdist}
650: \end{center}
651:
652: \end{figure}
653: \clearpage
654:
655:
656: %\begin{figure}
657: %\begin{center}
658: %\epsscale{1.0}
659: %\plotone{intervening2.ps}
660: %\caption{Velocity profiles of \ion{C}{4} absorption system of the Statistical Sample.}\label{figint2}
661: %\end{center}
662: %\end{figure}
663:
664: %\clearpage
665: %\begin{figure}
666: %\epsscale{0.9}
667: %\plotone{systems/GRB021004z2.298.ps}
668: %\caption{Velocity profiles of \ion{C}{4} absorption system at $z=2.29800$ in the GRB021004 spectrum. We also plot the \ion{Si}{4} $\lambda\lambda 1393,1402$ doublet and \ion{H}{1} velocity profiles at the same redshift.}\label{figa}
669: %\end{figure}
670: %
671: %\clearpage
672: %\begin{figure}
673: %\epsscale{0.9}
674: %\plotone{systems/GRB021004z2.328.ps}
675: %\caption{Velocity profiles of \ion{C}{4} absorption system at $z=2.32800$ in the GRB021004 spectrum. We also plot the \ion{Si}{4} $\lambda\lambda 1393,1402$ doublet and \ion{H}{1} velocity profiles at the same redshift.}\label{figb}
676: %\end{figure}
677: %
678: %\clearpage
679: %\begin{figure}
680: %\epsscale{0.9}
681: %\plotone{systems/GRB050730z3.513.ps}
682: %\caption{Velocity profiles of \ion{C}{4} absorption system at $z=3.51315$ in the GRB050730 spectrum. We also plot the \ion{Si}{4} $\lambda\lambda 1393,1402$ doublet and \ion{H}{1} velocity profiles at the same redshift.}\label{figc}
683: %\end{figure}
684: %
685: %\clearpage
686: %\begin{figure}
687: %\epsscale{0.9}
688: %\plotone{systems/GRB050730z3.968.ps}
689: %\caption{Velocity profiles of \ion{C}{4} absorption system at $z=3.96803$ in the GRB050730 spectrum. We also plot the \ion{Si}{4} $\lambda\lambda 1393,1402$ doublet and \ion{H}{1} velocity profiles at the same redshift.}\label{figd}
690: %\end{figure}
691: %
692: %\clearpage
693: %\begin{figure}
694: %\epsscale{0.9}
695: %\plotone{systems/GRB050820z2.146.ps}
696: %\caption{Velocity profiles of \ion{C}{4} absorption system at $z=2.14629$ in the GRB050820 spectrum. We also plot the \ion{Si}{4} $\lambda\lambda 1393,1402$ doublet and \ion{H}{1} velocity profiles at the same redshift.}\label{fige}
697: %\end{figure}
698: %
699: %\clearpage
700: %\begin{figure}
701: %\epsscale{0.9}
702: %\plotone{systems/GRB050820z2.614.ps}
703: %\caption{Velocity profiles of \ion{C}{4} absorption system at $z=2.61444$ in the GRB050820 spectrum. We also plot the \ion{Si}{4} $\lambda\lambda 1393,1402$ doublet and \ion{H}{1} velocity profiles at the same redshift.}\label{figf}
704: %\end{figure}
705: %
706: %\clearpage
707: %\begin{figure}
708: %\epsscale{0.9}
709: %\plotone{systems/GRB050922Cz1.568.ps}
710: %\caption{Velocity profiles of \ion{C}{4} absorption system at$z=1.56843$ in the GRB050922C spectrum. We also plot the \ion{Si}{4} $\lambda\lambda 1393,1402$ doublet and \ion{H}{1} velocity profiles at the same redshift.}\label{figg}
711: %\end{figure}
712: %
713: %\clearpage
714: %\begin{figure}
715: %\epsscale{0.9}
716: %\plotone{systems/GRB050922Cz1.989.ps}
717: %\caption{Velocity profiles of \ion{C}{4} absorption system at$z=1.98911$ in the GRB050922C spectrum. We also plot the \ion{Si}{4} $\lambda\lambda 1393,1402$ doublet and \ion{H}{1} velocity profiles at the same redshift.}\label{figh}
718: %\end{figure}
719: %
720: %\clearpage
721: %\begin{figure}
722: %\epsscale{0.9}
723: %\plotone{systems/GRB050922Cz2.009.ps}
724: %\caption{Velocity profiles of \ion{C}{4} absorption system at $z=2.00869$ in the GRB050922C spectrum. We also plot the \ion{Si}{4} $\lambda\lambda 1393,1402$ doublet and \ion{H}{1} velocity profiles at the same redshift.}\label{figi}
725: %\end{figure}
726: %
727: %
728: %\clearpage
729: %\begin{figure}
730: %\epsscale{0.9}
731: %\plotone{systems/GRB050922Cz2.200.ps}
732: %\caption{Velocity profiles of \ion{C}{4} absorption system at $z=2.19973$ in the GRB050922C spectrum. We also plot the \ion{Si}{4} $\lambda\lambda 1393,1402$ doublet and \ion{H}{1} velocity profiles at the same redshift.}\label{figj}
733: %\end{figure}
734: %
735: %\clearpage
736: %\begin{figure}
737: %\epsscale{0.9}
738: %\plotone{systems/GRB060607z2.891.ps}
739: %\caption{Velocity profiles of \ion{C}{4} absorption system at$z=2.89048$ in the GRB060607 spectrum. We also plot the \ion{Si}{4} $\lambda\lambda 1393,1402$ doublet and \ion{H}{1} velocity profiles at the same redshift.}\label{figk}
740: %\end{figure}
741: %
742: %\clearpage
743: %\begin{figure}
744: %\epsscale{0.9}
745: %\plotone{systems/GRB060607z2.936.ps}
746: %\caption{Velocity profiles of \ion{C}{4} absorption system at$z=2.93633$ in the GRB060607 spectrum. We also plot the \ion{Si}{4} $\lambda\lambda 1393,1402$ doublet and \ion{H}{1} velocity profiles at the same redshift.}\label{figl}
747: %\end{figure}
748: %
749: %\clearpage
750: %\begin{figure}
751: %\epsscale{0.9}
752: %\plotone{systems/GRB060607z3.050.ps}
753: %\caption{Velocity profiles of \ion{C}{4} absorption system at$z=3.04979$ in the GRB060607 spectrum. We also plot the \ion{Si}{4} $\lambda\lambda 1393,1402$ doublet and \ion{H}{1} velocity profiles at the same redshift.}\label{figm}
754: %\end{figure}
755: %
756: %\clearpage
757: %\begin{figure}
758: %\epsscale{0.9}
759: %\plotone{systems/GRB060607z3.075.ps}
760: %\caption{Velocity profiles of \ion{C}{4} absorption system at $z=3.07488$ in the GRB060607 spectrum. We also plot the \ion{Si}{4} $\lambda\lambda 1393,1402$ doublet and \ion{H}{1} velocity profiles at the same redshift.}\label{fign}
761: %\end{figure}
762:
763:
764: %% Here we use \plottwo to present two versions of the same figure,
765: %% one in black and white for print the other in RGB color
766: %% for online presentation. Note that the caption indicates
767: %% that a color version of the figure will be available online.
768: %%
769:
770: %% This figure uses \includegraphics to scale and rotate the still frame
771: %% for an mpeg animation.
772:
773: %\includegraphics[angle=90,scale=.50]{f3.eps}
774:
775:
776: %% If you are not including electonic art with your submission, you may
777: %% mark up your captions using the \figcaption command. See the
778: %% User Guide for details.
779: %%
780: %% No more than seven \figcaption commands are allowed per page,
781: %% so if you have more than seven captions, insert a \clearpage
782: %% after every seventh one.
783:
784: %% Tables should be submitted one per page, so put a \clearpage before
785: %% each one.
786:
787: %% Two options are available to the author for producing tables: the
788: %% deluxetable environment provided by the AASTeX package or the LaTeX
789: %% table environment. Use of deluxetable is preferred.
790: %%
791:
792: %% Three table samples follow, two marked up in the deluxetable environment,
793: %% one marked up as a LaTeX table.
794:
795: %% In this first example, note that the \tabletypesize{}
796: %% command has been used to reduce the font size of the table.
797: %% We also use the \rotate command to rotate the table to
798: %% landscape orientation since it is very wide even at the
799: %% reduced font size.
800: %%
801: %% Note also that the \label command needs to be placed
802: %% inside the \tablecaption.
803:
804: %% This table also includes a table comment indicating that the full
805: %% version will be available in machine-readable format in the electronic
806: %% edition.
807:
808: %% If you use the table environment, please indicate horizontal rules using
809: %% \tableline, not \hline.
810: %% Do not put multiple tabular environments within a single table.
811: %% The optional \label should appear inside the \caption command.
812:
813:
814: %% If the table is more than one page long, the width of the table can vary
815: %% from page to page when the default \tablewidth is used, as below. The
816: %% individual table widths for each page will be written to the log file; a
817: %% maximum tablewidth for the table can be computed from these values.
818: %% The \tablewidth argument can then be reset and the file reprocessed, so
819: %% that the table is of uniform width throughout. Try getting the widths
820: %% from the log file and changing the \tablewidth parameter to see how
821: %% adjusting this value affects table formatting.
822:
823: %% The \dataset{} macro has also been applied to a few of the objects to
824: %% show how many observations can be tagged in a table.
825:
826:
827:
828: %% Tables may also be prepared as separate files. See the accompanying
829: %% sample file table.tex for an example of an external table file.
830: %% To include an external file in your main document, use the \input
831: %% command. Uncomment the line below to include table.tex in this
832: %% sample file. (Note that you will need to comment out the \documentclass,
833: %% \begin{document}, and \end{document} commands from table.tex if you want
834: %% to include it in this document.)
835:
836: %% \input{table}
837:
838: %% The following command ends your manuscript. LaTeX will ignore any text
839: %% that appears after it.
840:
841: \end{document}
842:
843: %%
844: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
845: