1: %
2: % $Id: ms.tex,v 1.1 2007/05/04 17:07:50 milagro Exp $
3: %
4: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
5: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
6: %\documentclass{emulateapj}
7: %\usepackage{subfigure}
8: \usepackage{color}
9: \usepackage{graphicx}
10: \usepackage{natbib}
11: \usepackage{epsfig}
12: \def\comma{,~}
13: %\DeclareGraphicsExtensions{.jpg,.eps}
14: %\DeclareGraphicsRule{.jpg}{.eps}{.jpg.bb}{'jpeg2ps -h -r 600 #1}
15:
16: \begin{document}
17:
18: \title{TeV Gamma-Ray Sources from a Survey of the Galactic Plane with Milagro}
19:
20: \author{
21: A.~A.~Abdo,\altaffilmark{1}
22: B.~Allen,\altaffilmark{2}
23: D.~Berley,\altaffilmark{3}
24: S.~Casanova,\altaffilmark{4}
25: C.~Chen,\altaffilmark{2}
26: D.~G.~Coyne,\altaffilmark{5}
27: B.~L.~Dingus,\altaffilmark{4}
28: R.~W.~Ellsworth,\altaffilmark{6}
29: L.~Fleysher,\altaffilmark{7}
30: R.~Fleysher,\altaffilmark{7}
31: M.~M.~Gonzalez,\altaffilmark{8}
32: J.~A.~Goodman,\altaffilmark{3}
33: E.~Hays,\altaffilmark{3}
34: C.~M.~Hoffman,\altaffilmark{4}
35: B.~Hopper,\altaffilmark{3}
36: P.~H.~H\"untemeyer,\altaffilmark{4}
37: B.~E.~Kolterman,\altaffilmark{7}
38: C.~P.~Lansdell,\altaffilmark{3}
39: J.~T.~Linnemann,\altaffilmark{1}
40: J.~E.~McEnery,\altaffilmark{9}
41: A.~I.~Mincer,\altaffilmark{7}
42: P.~Nemethy,\altaffilmark{7}
43: D.~Noyes,\altaffilmark{3}
44: J.~M.~Ryan,\altaffilmark{10}
45: P.~M.~Saz~Parkinson,\altaffilmark{5}
46: A.~Shoup,\altaffilmark{11}
47: G.~Sinnis,\altaffilmark{4}
48: A.~J.~Smith,\altaffilmark{3}
49: G.~W.~Sullivan,\altaffilmark{3}
50: V.~Vasileiou,\altaffilmark{3}
51: G.~P.~Walker,\altaffilmark{4}
52: D.~A.~Williams,\altaffilmark{5}
53: X.~W.~Xu\altaffilmark{4}
54: and
55: G.~B.~Yodh\altaffilmark{2}}
56:
57: \altaffiltext{1}{ Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI}
58: \altaffiltext{2}{ University of California, Irvine, CA}
59: \altaffiltext{3}{ University of Maryland, College Park, MD}
60: \altaffiltext{4}{ Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM}
61: \altaffiltext{5}{ University of California, Santa Cruz, CA}
62: \altaffiltext{6}{ George Mason University, Fairfax, VA}
63: \altaffiltext{7}{ New York University, New York, NY}
64: \altaffiltext{8}{ Instituto de Astronomia, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, D.F., MEXICO}
65: \altaffiltext{9}{ NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD}
66: \altaffiltext{10}{ University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH}
67: \altaffiltext{11}{ Ohio State University, Lima, OH}
68:
69: \begin{abstract}
70: A survey of Galactic gamma-ray sources at a median energy of $\sim$20 TeV has been performed
71: using the Milagro Gamma Ray Observatory.
72: Eight candidate sources of TeV emission are detected with pre-trials significance
73: $>4.5\sigma$ in the region of Galactic longitude
74: $l\in[30^\circ,220^\circ]$ and latitude $b\in[-10^\circ,10^\circ]$.
75: Four of these sources, including the Crab nebula and the recently published MGRO J2019+37,
76: are observed with significances $>4\sigma$ after accounting for the trials involved in searching the
77: 3800 square degree region.
78: All four of these sources are also coincident with EGRET sources. Two of the lower significance sources are
79: coincident with EGRET sources and one of these sources is Geminga. The other two candidates are
80: in the Cygnus region of the Galaxy.
81: Several of the sources appear to be spatially extended. The fluxes of the sources at 20 TeV
82: range from $\sim25\%$ of the Crab flux to nearly as bright as the Crab.
83: \end{abstract}
84:
85: \keywords{gamma rays: observations}
86:
87: \section{Introduction}
88:
89: A survey of the entire Northern Hemisphere sky for sources of TeV gamma rays
90: has been performed using the Milagro Gamma Ray Observatory \citep{atkins_allsky}.
91: This paper reports on observations of sources in the region of Galactic longitude
92: $l\in[30^\circ,220^\circ]$ and latitude $b\in[-10^\circ,10^\circ]$. This survey is
93: at a higher energy of $\sim20$ TeV and in a different region than the survey performed by
94: the HESS atmospheric Cherenkov telescope (ACT) above 200 GeV. The HESS survey covered
95: $l\in[-30^\circ,30^\circ]$ and $b\in[-2^\circ,2^\circ]$ and resulted in the detection
96: of 14 new sources \citep{2006ApJ...636..777A}. At even lower energies,
97: EGRET on the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory detected 80 sources
98: above 100 MeV \citep{3EG} and 28 sources above 1 GeV \citep{GEV} within 10 deg of the
99: Galactic plane. Fourteen of these GeV sources are in the region surveyed by Milagro.
100: Most of the EGRET sources and several of the TeV sources are unidentified
101: without counterparts at lower energies. However, the improved localizations of HESS have
102: led to identification of supernova remnants
103: (SNR)\citep{2004Natur.432...75A}, pulsar wind nebulae (PWN) \citep{2005A&A...442L..25A},
104: and molecular clouds \citep{2006Natur.439..695A}
105: as emitters of TeV gamma rays.
106:
107: In the Milagro data, four sources (including the Crab) are detected with post-trials significance
108: greater than 4$\sigma$, and four additional lower significance candidates are identified.
109: Six of these eight TeV excesses are coincident with the locations of EGRET sources. Many of
110: these sources have stringent upper limits at TeV energies, such as those from the
111: Whipple observatory \citep{2005ApJ...624..638F}. However, these upper limits weaken for
112: extended sources by the ratio of the radius of the
113: source to the angular resolution. The angular resolution
114: of Milagro is approximately an order of magnitude larger
115: than ACTs, but is less than half that of EGRET, resulting in little reduction in
116: sensitivity for sources up to $\sim2^\circ$ diameter.
117: The TeV flux, spatial morphology, and potential counterparts
118: of these new sources are discussed below.
119:
120: \section{Analysis}
121:
122: The analysis was performed on 2358 days of data collected by Milagro during the
123: operational period from July 19, 2000 through Jan 1, 2007. Data from the last 3 years
124: of operation were collected after the completion of the outrigger array, which
125: substantially increased the sensitivity of Milagro, particularly at high energies.
126: The Milagro data were analyzed using the method described in \citet{2007ApJ...658L..33A}, in which
127: the events are weighted based on the gamma/hadron separation parameter ($A_{4}$).
128: The signal and background maps are smoothed with the point spread function (PSF),
129: which varies based on the number of hits in the events. The statistical significance
130: of the excess or deficit is computed using eqn. 17 in \citet{LiMa}.
131:
132: The Milagro detector is located at latitude $36^\circ$ N, where the Galactic center and
133: the central Galactic bulge are outside the field of view. In this survey of the Northern Galactic
134: plane, only events with zenith angle less than $45^\circ$ are included, which
135: covers declinations north of $\delta=-7^\circ$. In Galactic coordinates, this
136: region is longitude $l\in[30^\circ,220^\circ]$ and latitude $b\in[-10^\circ,10^\circ]$,
137: which subtends 9.2\% of the
138: entire sky and covers more than half of the Galactic plane. The energy threshold and
139: sensitivity of Milagro vary with zenith angle. Table 1 shows the median energy and
140: relative sensitivity of the instrument as a function of declination for an
141: assumed differential photon power law spectrum of spectral index $\alpha=-2.3$.
142:
143: The background at a given location in celestial coordinates is found use the method
144: described in \citet{atkins_crab} with the modification that the events are weighted.
145: The signal map is searched for excesses over the background map with a statistical
146: significance $>4.5\sigma$.
147: When a source candidate is found, the region in the vicinity of the candidate is
148: removed to prevent double counting, and the search is repeated.
149: With this automated procedure, two nearby sources may be identified as a
150: single source candidate or a single extended source may be broken up into
151: multiple candidates.
152:
153: The event excess in the vicinity of each source candidate is fit to a two-dimensional
154: Gaussian to determine the location, spatial extent and flux. The average angular
155: resolution\footnote{To be consistent with HESS and EGRET, the angular resolution
156: is described by the radius that contains 68\% of the signal events from a
157: point source. In previous publications, the sigma of the Gaussian function was
158: referenced, which is $\sim0.7^\circ$.}
159: of these weighted events is $1.1^\circ$ and has been measured with
160: observations of the Crab. Astrophysical sources are better described by a top hat
161: function than a Gaussian; however, a Gaussian
162: approximates a top hat of less than a few degrees diameter that is convolved with
163: the Milagro PSF. Therefore, the Gaussian sigma is used to constrain the diameter
164: of the top hat function that best fits the angular extent of the source.
165:
166: The excess above the assumed isotropic background is calculated from the
167: volume of the fit two-dimensional Gaussian. This calculation results in a
168: larger uncertainty than implied by the significance of the detection, but
169: properly accounts for the flux of extended sources.
170: The excess is converted to a flux with a Monte Carlo simulation of
171: extensive air showers using CORSIKA \citep{corsika}
172: and of the Milagro detector using GEANT4 \citep{geant}. The source fluxes are
173: computed assuming a differential photon spectrum of a power law with spectral index
174: $\alpha=-2.3$ with no cutoff. This is the average spectrum for Galactic sources
175: observed by HESS \citep{2006ApJ...636..777A}. The flux is quoted at
176: 20 TeV, which is approximately the median energy of the gamma rays
177: from the sources detected by Milagro, as seen in table 1.
178: The median energy of Milagro varies with source spectra and declination, however
179: the uncertainty in the flux at 20 TeV is relatively insensitive to the
180: assumed spectrum and varies by only $<20\%$ when $\alpha$ varies from
181: $-2.0$ to $-2.6$.
182:
183: \section{Results}
184:
185: Figure \ref{fig:galactic_plane} shows a PSF-smoothed map of the Galactic plane, with the color scale
186: indicating the statistical significance of the Milagro excess or deficit at each point.
187: Table \ref{tab:galactic_sources} gives the locations,
188: fluxes, statistical significances, angular extents, and counterparts for the
189: eight source candidates identified with a pre-trials significance in the PSF-smoothed map
190: of $>4.5\sigma$.
191: Because several of the candidates are extended beyond the PSF of Milagro, the maximum pre-trials
192: significance for a search with a larger bin of size
193: $3^\circ \times 3^\circ$ is also given in Table \ref{tab:galactic_sources}.
194: However, the post-trials significances are not based on this {\em a posteriori} observation, but are calculated from the
195: PSF-smoothed pre-trials significances. A Monte Carlo
196: simulation is used to account for the trials involved in
197: searching this 3800 square degree region. This simulation predicts that 4\% of such searches would
198: result in at least one source with
199: $> 4.5 \sigma$ pre-trials significance anywhere in the region due to background fluctuation.
200: The list of eight candidates includes the Crab and MRGO 2019+37, which was previously reported
201: \citep{2007ApJ...658L..33A}.
202: Excluding these previously known gamma-ray sources, six new candidates are identified.
203: The two most significant of these, MGRO J1908+06 and MGRO J2031+41,
204: exceed $4.5\sigma$ after accounting for trials. Therefore, the four most significant sources in Table 1
205: are considered definitive TeV gamma-ray source detections.
206: The remaining four source candidates, labeled as C1-C4, have post-trials significances less
207: than $4.5\sigma$ and are regarded as lower confidence detections.
208:
209: The non-isotropic Galactic diffuse gamma-ray background will contribute to the observed flux of a source.
210: Diffuse emission is particularly bright in the Cygnus region, where five of the eight candidate sources
211: are located. The GALPROP model \citep{galprop} predicts that the TeV gamma-ray diffuse
212: emission flux is 3 to 7 times lower than the observed flux in the large Cygnus
213: region defined as $l\in[65^\circ,85^\circ]$ and $b\in[-2^\circ,2^\circ]$\citep{2007ApJ...658L..33A}.
214: For individual sources near high concentrations of matter, the diffuse
215: emission will be a larger fraction of the quoted flux. However, due to uncertainties in the model
216: predictions, the diffuse emission was not subtracted from the source fluxes.
217:
218: The {\bf Crab Nebula}, a standard reference source for TeV astronomy, is detected at 15.0$\sigma$.
219: The flux derived from the Milagro data is consistent, within errors,
220: with the flux results obtained from atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes \citep{2004ApJ...614..897A}.
221: The fit location is $0.11^\circ$ from the pulsar location, which is consistent with the statistical
222: error.
223:
224: {\bf MGRO J2019+37} is one of five Milagro sources in the Cygnus region of the Galactic plane.
225: It is the most significant source detection by Milagro after the Crab and was discussed in depth in
226: \citet{2007ApJ...658L..33A}. More data have been analyzed since the publication of that paper,
227: so the flux and significance in Table \ref{tab:galactic_sources} have been updated.
228:
229: {\bf MGRO J1908+06} is observed with a pre-trials significance of 8.3$\sigma$, with a flux that is
230: $\sim$80\% of the Crab flux. This location is the closest of the eight candidates to the inner Galaxy, where the
231: diffuse emission is expected to increase. This source is coincident with GEV J1907+0557 and with the
232: bright radio, shell-type, SNR G40.5-0.5\citep{Green}. GEV J1097+0557 was observed for
233: 87 hours by the HEGRA TeV Observatory, resulting in
234: an upper limit for a point source of 2.6\% of the Crab flux at 700 GeV \citep{2005A&A...439..635A}.
235: The Milagro data are consistent both with a point source and with an extended source with diameter
236: up to $<2.6^\circ$. The Milagro data are consistent both with a point source and with an extended
237: source of diameter up 2.6$^\circ$. The Milagro flux and HEGRA upper limit taken together imply a
238: harder spectrum than other Galactic sources detected in this energy range by HESS. However, if
239: the source is extended, the HEGRA upper limit would be increased, allowing for a spectrum typical
240: of other TeV sources.
241: The Tibet Air Shower Observatory has a similar energy threshold and angular resolution as Milagro,
242: and reports a location within $0.9^\circ$ of {\bf MGRO J1908+06} as one of eight locations in their survey
243: of the Northern Hemisphere sky that is above 4.5$\sigma$\citep{tibet}.
244:
245: {\bf MGRO J2031+41} is observed with a pre-trials significance of 6.6$\sigma$ and
246: is located in the area with the largest concentration of molecular and atomic gas in the
247: Cygnus region. Its location is consistent with EGRET sources GEV J2035+4214 and 3EG J2033+4118
248: and with TEV J2032+413 \citep{2005A&A...431..197A}. The flux of TeV J2032+413 is measured up to $\sim$10 TeV,
249: and is only about one third of the Milagro flux when extrapolated to 20 TeV. The low energy counterpart
250: for TEV J2032+413 is unclear, but several possibilities have recently been postulated
251: \citep{CygTeVCounter1,2007PhRvD..75f3001A}.
252: The spatial extent of the Milagro detection, at $3.0^\circ \pm 0.9^\circ$, is much larger than the
253: few arcminute extent of TEV J2032+413. There must be
254: another source or sources contributing to the Milagro excess.
255:
256: There are two source candidates in the Cygnus region -- {\bf C1} and {\bf C2}
257: -- that are less significant and have no obvious EGRET, PWN, or SNR counterparts.
258: {\bf C1} is located farthest from the Galactic plane at b = $-3.9^\circ$.
259: {\bf C2} may be an extension of {\bf MGRO J2019+37} but is $2.2^\circ$ away.
260: {\bf C2} is not well fit by a two dimensional Gaussian.
261: For this source, the bin in the PSF-smoothed map with the highest excess is used to determine
262: the best location, and the flux is obtained from the excess in a $2.0^\circ \times 2.0^\circ$ angular bin.
263:
264: {\bf C3} is positionally consistent with Geminga, which is the brightest EGRET source in the
265: Northern Hemisphere sky.
266: Geminga is a pulsar that is only 160 pc away and is $\sim$300,000 years old \citep{1996ApJ...461L..91C}.
267: The 5.1$\sigma$ source detected by Milagro is consistent with the
268: pulsar location and is extended with a diameter of $2.8^\circ \pm 0.8^\circ$.
269: The significance increases to $5.9\sigma$ in a $3^\circ\times3^\circ$ bin.
270: The significance of the Milagro excess at the location of the pulsar is 4.9$\sigma$ in the PSF-smoothed map.
271: Only pulsed emission was detected by EGRET, but a PWN has been observed in X-rays \citep{2003Sci...301.1345C} that
272: delineates the bow shock created by the pulsar's motion.
273: The diameter of the excess implies an $\sim8$ pc source extent, which is consistent with the
274: observations by HESS of more distant PWN \citep{2005A&A...442L..25A}. Upper limits on the TeV flux
275: from Geminga of $\sim100$ mCrab \citep{1999A&A...346..913A, 1993A&A...274L..17A, vish} assumed the emission
276: was from a point source and were set at a much lower energy than this observation.
277: If the spectral index is $\sim-2.3$ or harder, or if the source is extended,
278: the Milagro detection is consistent with the previously reported limits.
279:
280: {\bf C4} is the least significant source in table \ref{tab:galactic_sources} at 5.0$\sigma$.
281: However, as seen in Figure 1, the source appears very elongated and the significance increases to
282: $6.3\sigma$ with the larger $3^\circ \times 3^\circ$
283: bin. The source location is consistent with 3EG J2227+6122, GEV J2227+6106, and the SNR G106.6+2.9
284: with the accompanying Boomerang PWN. This PWN is predicted by \citet{2005JPhG...31.1465B}
285: to be the third brightest TeV PWN in the Northern sky, surpassed only by the Crab and PWN G75.2+0.1, which
286: both have high significance Milagro counterparts.
287:
288: \section{Discussion}
289:
290: A survey of $190^\circ$ of the Galactic plane at $\sim20$ TeV has been performed with Milagro
291: with a sensitivity from 3 to 6 $\times 10^{-15}$ (TeV$^{-1}$cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1})$.
292: Eight sources are identified with $>4.5\sigma$ pre-trials significance above the
293: isotropic cosmic ray background. All four of the high confidence sources and two of the lower significance
294: candidates are associated with EGRET GeV sources, of which there are only 14 in the search region.
295: Four of these six sources appear extended, and the significance of the other two lower significance sources increases
296: substantially with a larger bin of size $3^\circ\times3^\circ$.
297: The significance for a true point source would be expected to decrease slowly for larger bin sizes
298: due to the addition of gamma rays beyond the edge of the optimal bin. On the other hand, the
299: significance of a statistical fluctuation of background would be expected to decrease inversely
300: proportional to the bin radius.
301: The remaining two lower confidence source candidates are within the Cygnus region,
302: where the diffuse emission is high and there is a large concentration of EGRET sources.
303: The differential photon spectrum that connects
304: the fluxes observed by EGRET at 1 GeV with those observed at 20 TeV
305: by Milagro is described by a power law with spectral index $\alpha\sim-2.3$, except for
306: Geminga which is steeper.
307: This spectrum implies a break from the harder spectra observed for most of these
308: sources by EGRET above 100 MeV.
309: Four of these sources are associated with PWNe, of which only 11
310: are known in this region \citep{PWN_Roberts}, and one is associated with a SNR. Other
311: members of these classes of sources have also been detected by HESS.
312: The angular extents of the Milagro sources are large, as
313: would be expected if the sources are nearby, like Geminga. The enhanced sensitivity of GLAST
314: should allow these objects to be resolved at energies above a few GeV. In addition, a Milagro
315: energy spectrum analysis is being developed that will measure spectra of these sources up to 50 TeV.
316: The morphology at different energies provides important clues about the energy of the particles
317: producing the radiation and the energy loss mechanisms of these particles.
318: Combining spatial resolution over a broad range of energies is key to understanding the
319: Galactic sources that emit the highest energy gamma rays.
320:
321: \begin{acknowledgments}
322:
323: We thank Scott Delay, Michael Schneider, and Owen Marshall for their dedicated efforts
324: on the Milagro experiment. We also gratefully acknowledge the financial support of
325: the National Science Foundation (under grants
326: PHY-0245234, %UCI; previous is PHY-0070933
327: -0302000, %UMD
328: -0400424, %Milagro Operations; previous is PHY-0075326
329: -0504201, %NYU current; previous are PHY-9901496 & PHY-0206656
330: -0601080, %UCSC; previous are PHY-0070927 & PHY-0245143
331: and
332: ATM-0002744), %UNH
333: the Department of Energy (Office of High Energy Physics), Los
334: Alamos National Laboratory, the University of California,
335: and the Institute for Geophysics and Planetary
336: Physics at Los Alamos National Laboratory.
337:
338: \end{acknowledgments}
339:
340: \begin{thebibliography}{3}
341:
342: % Milagro Cygnus Paper
343: \bibitem[Abdo, A. et al. (2007)]{2007ApJ...658L..33A} Abdo, A.~A., et al.\ 2007, \apjl, 658, L33
344:
345: % GEANT reference
346: \bibitem[Agostinelli, S. et al. (2003)]{geant} Agostinelli, S., et al. 2003, NIM A 506 2003, 250
347:
348: % HESS molecular cloud
349: \bibitem[Aharonian et al. (2006a)]{2006Natur.439..695A} Aharonian, F., et al.\ 2006, \nat, 439, 695
350:
351: % HESS GP source spectra
352: \bibitem[Aharonian et al. (2006b)]{2006ApJ...636..777A} Aharonian, F., et al.\ 2006, \apj, 636, 777
353:
354: % HESS crab paper
355: %\bibitem[Aharonian et al. (2006c)]{2006A&A...457..899A} Aharonian, F., et al.\ 2006, \aap, 457, 899
356:
357: % HESS PWN
358: \bibitem[Aharonian et al. (2005a)]{2005A&A...442L..25A} Aharonian, F.~A., et al.\ 2005, \aap, 442, L25
359: %\bibitem[Aharonian et al. 2005]{anotherHESSpwn} Aharonian, F., et al.\ 2005, \aap, 435, L17
360:
361: % HEGRA upper limit for l=40 source
362: \bibitem[Aharonian et al. (2005b)]{2005A&A...439..635A} Aharonian, F., et al.\ 2005, \aap, 439, 635
363:
364: % HESS Science paper on GP sources
365: %\bibitem[Aharonian et al. (2005c)]{2005Sci...307.1938A} Aharonian, F., et al.\ 2005, Science, 307, 1938
366:
367: % Final HEGRA ref for TeV2032+41
368: \bibitem[Aharonian et al. (2005d)]{2005A&A...431..197A} Aharonian, F., et al.\ 2005, \aap, 431, 197
369:
370: % HESS SNR papers
371: \bibitem[Aharonian et al. (2004a)]{2004Natur.432...75A} Aharonian, F.~A., et al.\ 2004, \nat, 432, 75
372: %\bibitem[Aharonian et al. 2005]{anotherHESSsnr} Aharonian, F., et al.\ 2005, \aap, 437, L7
373: %\bibitem[Aharonian et al. 2005]{another2HESSsnr} Aharonian, F., et al.\ 2005, \aap, 432, L25
374:
375: % HEGRA Crab paper
376: \bibitem[Aharonian et al. (2004b)]{2004ApJ...614..897A} Aharonian, F., et al.\ 2004, \apj, 614, 897
377:
378: %\bibitem[Aharonian et al. 2001]{2001A&A...375.1008A} Aharonian, F.~A., et al.\ 2001, \aap, 375, 1008
379:
380: % HEGRA Geminga limit
381: \bibitem[Aharonian et al. (1999)]{1999A&A...346..913A} Aharonian, F., et al.\ 1999, \aap, 346, 913
382:
383: % Whipple Geminga limit
384: \bibitem[Akerlof et al. (1993)]{1993A&A...274L..17A} Akerlof, C.~W., et al.\ 1993, \aap, 274, L17
385:
386: % Tibet Survey
387: \bibitem[Amenomori et al. (2005)]{tibet} Amenomori, M., et al.\ 2005, \apj, 633, 1005
388:
389: % Paper on cyg OB2 region as source of gammas and neutrinos
390: \bibitem[Anchordoqui et al. (2007)]{2007PhRvD..75f3001A} Anchordoqui, L.~A., et al\ 2007, \prd, 75, 063001
391:
392: \bibitem[Atkins et al.(2004)]{atkins_allsky} Atkins, R., et al.\ 2004, \apj, 608, 680
393:
394: \bibitem[Atkins et al.(2003)]{atkins_crab} Atkins, R., et al.\ 2003, \apj, 595, 803
395:
396: %\bibitem[Bowden et al. 1993]{1993JPhG...19L..29B} Bowden, C.~C.~G., et al.\ 1993, Journal of Physics G Nuclear Physics, 19, L29
397:
398: %PWN paper by Bednarek
399: \bibitem[Bednarek \& Bartosik(2005)]{2005JPhG...31.1465B} Bednarek, W., \&
400: Bartosik, M.\ 2005, Journal of Physics G Nuclear Physics, 31, 1465
401:
402: % Paper on neutrinos from the Cyg region
403: \bibitem[Butt et al. (2006)]{CygTeVCounter1} Butt, Y.~M., et al. 2006, arXiv:astro-ph/0611731
404:
405: % Distance estimate to Geminga
406: \bibitem[Caraveo et al. (1996)]{1996ApJ...461L..91C} Caraveo, P.~A.,et al. \ 1996, \apjl, 461, L91
407:
408: % Geminga as an x-ray source
409: \bibitem[Caraveo et al. (2003)]{2003Sci...301.1345C} Caraveo, P.~A., et al. 2003, Science, 301, 1345
410:
411: % SNR as a source of TeV gamma-rays
412: \bibitem[Esposito et al. (1996)]{esposito} Esposito, J.~A., et al. 1996, \apj, 461, 820
413:
414: % S. Fegan on EGRET UnId observations by Whipple
415: \bibitem[Fegan et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...624..638F} Fegan, S.~J., et al. 2005, \apj, 624, 638
416:
417: \bibitem[Green (2006)]{Green} Green D. A., 2006, `A Catalogue of Galactic Supernova Remnants (2006 April version)', Astrophysics Group, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge, United Kingdom
418:
419: % EGRET 3EG
420: \bibitem[Hartman et al. (1999)]{3EG} Hartman, R.~C., et al.\ 1999, \apjs, 123, 79
421:
422: % Corsika
423: \bibitem[Heck et al. (1998)]{corsika} Heck, D. et al., Report FZKA 6019, 1998
424:
425: % EGRET GEV Catalog
426: \bibitem[Lamb and Macomb (1997)]{GEV} Lamb, R.~C., \& Macomb, D.~J.\ 1997, \apj, 488, 872
427:
428: %Li and Ma
429: \bibitem[Li and Ma (1983)]{LiMa} Li, T.-P., and Ma, Y.-Q.\ 1983, \apj, 272, 317
430:
431: %\bibitem[Roberts et al. (2001)]{roberts} Roberts, M.S.E., Romani, R.W., \& Kawai, N.\ 2001, \apjs, 133, 451
432:
433: \bibitem[Roberts (2004)]{PWN_Roberts}Roberts, M.S.E., 2004, $http://www.physics.mcgill.ca/~pulsar/pwncat.html$
434:
435: \bibitem[Strong et al. (2004)]{galprop} Strong, A.W., Moskalenko, I.V., \& Reimer, O.\ 2004, \apj, 613, 962
436:
437: \bibitem[Vishwanath et al. (1993)]{vish} Vishwanath, P.~R., et al.\ 1993, \aap, 267, L5
438:
439: \end{thebibliography}
440:
441: \newpage
442:
443: \begin{figure*}[width=4.5in,p]
444:
445: %\plotone{galplane_3panel_blue.eps}
446: \plotone{f1p.eps}
447: %\includegraphics[height=6in]{f1.jpg}
448: \caption{Significance map of the Galactic plane. The color code shows the pre-trials
449: significance in this PSF-smoothed map. The maximum positive value of the color code saturates at 7$\sigma$
450: although three of the gamma-ray sources are detected with much higher statistical significance. The Crab
451: image is inset with the same x and y scale in the bottom left as an indication of the PSF.
452: Boxes (crosses) indicate the locations of the EGRET 3EG (GEV) sources. }
453: \label{fig:galactic_plane}
454: \end{figure*}
455:
456: \begin{deluxetable}{cccc}
457: \tablewidth{2.5in}
458: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize} % can be \small \tiny \scriptsize and \footnotesize
459: \tablecaption{Sensitivity and Energy Response for a $\frac{dN}{dE}\propto E^{-2.3}$ spectrum\label{tab:energy_and_sensitivity}}
460: \tablehead{
461: \colhead{\bf Dec.} &
462: \colhead{\bf Flux\tablenotemark{a} } &
463: \multicolumn{2}{c}{\bf Energy Range (TeV)\tablenotemark{b}} \\
464: $\bf(deg)$ & \bf Sens. & {\bf Median}& {\bf 10\%-90\%}
465: }
466: \startdata
467: 0 & 6.5 & 40 & 9-150 \\ % -2.3 spectrum
468: 10 & 4.4 & 27 & 6-110 \\
469: 20 & 3.6 & 22 & 5-82 \\
470: 30 & 3.2 & 19 & 4-77 \\
471: 40 & 3.1 & 19 & 4-77 \\
472: 50 & 3.2 & 23 & 5-82 \\
473: 60 & 3.5 & 26 & 6-100 \\
474: 70 & 4.5 & 38 & 8-140 \\
475: \enddata
476: \tablenotetext{a}{ Flux sensitivity for a point source in units of $10^{-15}$TeV$^{-1}$s$^{-1}$cm$^{-2}$ quoted at 20 TeV for a $5\sigma$ detection.}
477: \tablenotetext{b}{ Energy below which the indicated percentage of weighted events are included in the analysis.}
478: \end{deluxetable}
479:
480:
481: % Source list table
482: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccccc}
483: \tabletypesize{\tiny} % can be \small \tiny \scriptsize and \footnotesize
484: \tablewidth{0pt}
485: \tablecaption{Galactic Sources and Source Candidates\label{tab:galactic_sources}}
486: \tablehead{
487: \colhead{\bf Object} &
488: \colhead{\bf Location} &
489: \colhead{\bf Error\tablenotemark{a}} &
490: \multicolumn{3}{c}{\bf Significance($\sigma$)\tablenotemark{b}} &
491: \colhead{\bf Flux\tablenotemark{c} at 20 TeV} &
492: \colhead{\bf Extent}&
493: \colhead{\bf Counterparts} \\
494: & $\bf (l,b)$ & {\bf Radius} & \bf pre- & \bf post-& $\bf 3^\circ\times3^\circ$ & $\bf \times10^{-15}$ &\bf Diameter& \bf (References)\\
495: & & {\bf (deg)} & \bf trials & \bf trials & & $\bf TeV^{-1}cm^{-2}s^{-1}$ & \bf (deg) \\
496: }
497: \startdata
498: \bf Crab & $ 184.5, -5.7$ & 0.11 & \bf 15.0 &\bf 14.3&11.5& $10.9\pm1.2$ & - & Crab \\
499: \bf MGRO J2019+37 & $ 75.0,0.2$ & 0.19 & \bf 10.4 &\bf 9.3 & 8.5& $8.7\pm1.4$ & $1.1^\circ\pm0.5^\circ$ \tablenotemark{d} & GEV J2020+3658, \\
500: & & & & & & & & PWN G75.2+0.1, (1)\\
501: \bf MGRO J1908+06 & $ 40.4, -1.0$ & 0.24 & \bf 8.3 &\bf 7.0 & 6.3& $8.8\pm2.4$ &$<2.6^\circ(90\%CL)$ & GEV J1907+0557,\\
502: & & & & & & & & SNR G40.5-0.5\\
503: \bf MGRO J2031+41 & $ 80.3, 1.1$ & 0.47 & \bf 6.6 &\bf 4.9 & 6.4& $9.8\pm2.9$ & $3.0^\circ\pm0.9^\circ$ & GEV J2035+4214,\\
504: & & & & & & & & TEV J2032+413 (2,3)\\
505: %\bf C1 & $ 70.7, 1.0$ & \tablenotemark{e}& 4.6 & 2.0 & 3.9& $2.9\pm1.0$ & \tablenotemark{e} & - \\
506: \bf C1 & $ 77.5, -3.9$ & 0.24 & 5.8 & 3.8 & 3.4& $3.1\pm0.6$ & $<2.0^\circ(90\%CL)$ & - \\
507: \bf C2 & $ 76.1, -1.7$ & \tablenotemark{e}& 5.1 & 2.8 & 4.5& $3.4\pm0.8$ & \tablenotemark{e} & - \\
508: \bf C3 & $ 195.7, 4.1$ & 0.40 & 5.1 & 2.8 & 5.9& $6.9\pm1.6$ & $2.8^\circ\pm0.8^\circ$ & Geminga\\
509: \bf C4 & $ 105.8, 2.0$ & 0.52 & 5.0 & 2.6 & 6.3& $4.0\pm1.3$ & $3.4^\circ\pm1.7^\circ$ & GEV J2227+6106\\
510: & & & & & & & & SNR G106.6+2.9\\
511: \enddata
512: \tablenotetext{a}{The table lists statistical errors only. The systematic pointing error is $<0.3^\circ$.}
513: \tablenotetext{b}{The post trials significances account for the trials incurred in searching the 3800 square degree region.}
514: \tablenotetext{c}{The table lists statistical errors only. The systematic flux error is 30\%.}
515: \tablenotetext{d}{For this high significance detection, the extent was computed using only large events. See \citet{2007ApJ...658L..33A} for details.}
516: \tablenotetext{e}{Gaussian fit of excess failed for this candidate.}
517: \tablerefs{(1) Abdo et al. 2007, (2) Butt et al. 2003, (3) Anchordiqui et al. 2007.}
518: \end{deluxetable}
519:
520: \end{document}
521:
522: % $Log: ms.tex,v $
523: % Revision 1.1 2007/05/04 17:07:50 milagro
524: % This is the submitted version.
525: %
526: % Revision 1.38 2007/05/04 00:46:27 milagro
527: % *** empty log message ***
528: %
529: % Revision 1.37 2007/05/03 13:53:18 milagro
530: %
531: % Fix Spelling of Hays. -AJS
532: %
533: % Revision 1.36 2007/05/02 23:04:47 milagro
534: % fixed typos
535: %
536: % Revision 1.35 2007/05/02 22:49:49 milagro
537: % Put in Gus's comments. Corrected significances due to Li Ma alpha.
538: % Changed the number of sources to eight.
539: %
540: % Revision 1.34 2007/04/30 22:29:39 milagro
541: %
542: % Removed extraneous commented cruft. -AJS
543: %
544: % Revision 1.33 2007/04/29 21:48:48 milagro
545: %
546: % Added Petra's changes. -AJS
547: %
548: % Revision 1.32 2007/04/29 13:15:33 milagro
549: %
550: % Add changes suggested by Cy, David, Gus, Gary and Jordan. -AJS
551: %
552: % Revision 1.31 2007/04/27 20:38:02 milagro
553: %
554: % One last typo -AJS
555: %
556: % Revision 1.30 2007/04/27 20:30:06 milagro
557: %
558: % Eliminated "Milagro has.." -AJS
559: %
560: % Revision 1.29 2007/04/27 20:25:28 milagro
561: %
562: % Many minor changes. -AJS
563: %
564: % Revision 1.28 2007/04/27 18:48:35 milagro
565: %
566: % Change criteria from 4 sigma to 5 sigma after trials. -AJS
567: %
568: % Revision 1.27 2007/04/27 18:32:44 milagro
569: % Changed post trials significance. Still need to make Table 1 and 2 fluxes
570: % agree, get rid of unused references, change the 4 sigma to 5 sigma everywhere.
571: % Could make table narrower is put flux units in footnote.
572: %
573: % Revision 1.26 2007/04/26 23:03:24 milagro
574: % slight changes in fluxes of c1-3. plus a few more of Pablo's comments.
575: %
576: % Revision 1.25 2007/04/26 22:16:52 milagro
577: % Fixed Pablo and Gary's comments, plus misc from the phone call this morning.
578: %
579: % Revision 1.24 2007/04/26 19:08:57 milagro
580: %
581: % A number was missing from the table. It is in now. -AJS
582: %
583: % Revision 1.23 2007/04/26 18:48:42 milagro
584: %
585: % Still more changes to the table. -AJS
586: %
587: % Revision 1.22 2007/04/26 18:45:37 milagro
588: % *** empty log message ***
589: %
590: % Revision 1.21 2007/04/26 18:39:29 milagro
591: %
592: % Fixed up the table. -AJS
593: %
594: % Revision 1.20 2007/04/26 15:56:24 milagro
595: %
596: % remove label from table note. -AJS
597: % Fixed bug in table. -AJS
598: %
599: % Revision 1.19 2007/04/25 22:01:29 milagro
600: %
601: % Fix ref to Corsika and GEANT
602: %
603: % Revision 1.18 2007/04/25 21:34:20 milagro
604: %
605: % Changed upper limits on source extent and made discussion in text match.
606: %
607: % Revision 1.17 2007/04/25 20:45:27 milagro
608: %
609: % Add new figure. -AJS
610: %
611: % Revision 1.16 2007/04/25 19:17:27 milagro
612: %
613: % Several minor fixes. -AJS
614: %
615: % Revision 1.15 2007/04/25 18:07:39 milagro
616: %
617: % Fixed up table. Moved a column and reordered. -AJS
618: %
619: % Revision 1.14 2007/04/25 17:42:17 milagro
620: % Should we not use Curtis's $\in$?
621: %
622: % Revision 1.13 2007/04/25 17:10:34 milagro
623: %
624: % now it will latex
625: %
626: % Revision 1.12 2007/04/25 17:04:57 milagro
627: % reordered sources, added tophat explanation, changed conclusion.
628: % Need to check Fegan ref about extended sources.
629: % Need to check HESS ref about number of sources.
630: % Also make sure PWN and SNR are defined and catalogs referenced.
631: %
632: % Revision 1.11 2007/04/25 14:11:01 milagro
633: %
634: % Fixed up some references. -AJS
635: %
636: % Revision 1.10 2007/04/25 13:49:50 milagro
637: %
638: % Added Bednarek prediction to Boomerang section and added language to
639: % the discussion. -AJS
640: %
641:
642: