1: \documentclass{emulateapj}
2: %\usepackage{apjfonts}
3:
4: % Personal macros
5:
6:
7: % Title for running header
8: \shorttitle{Off-center HII Regions}
9: \shortauthors{Arthur}
10:
11: \begin{document}
12: \title{Off-center HII regions in power-law density distributions}
13:
14: % For the conference proceedings, the author affiliations should be
15: % subscripted, using \altaffil and/or \altaffilmark + \altaffiltext
16: % Note that \altaffilmark goes after a comma and that `and' is spelt
17: % out.
18: \author{S. Jane Arthur}
19:
20:
21: % Note that \altaffil, \altaffilmark go inside the scope of the
22: % \author{...} command but \altaffiltext is outside it.
23: \affil{Centro de Radioastronom\'\i{}a y Astrof\'\i{}sica,
24: Universidad Nacional Aut\'onoma de M\'exico, Campus Morelia, Apartado Postal 3--72, 58090, Morelia,
25: Michoac\'an, M\'exico }
26: \altaffiltext{1}{Email: j.arthur@astrosmo.unam.mx}
27:
28: \begin{abstract}
29: The expansion of ionization fronts in uniform and spherically
30: symmetric power-law density distributions is a well-studied
31: topic. However, in many situations, such as a star formed at the
32: edge of a molecular cloud core, an offset power-law density
33: distribution would be more appropriate. In this paper a few of the
34: main issues of the formation and expansion of HII regions in such
35: media are outlined and results are presented for the particular
36: cases where the underlying power laws are $r^{-2}$ and $r^{-3}$. A
37: simple criterion is developed for determining whether the initial
38: photoionized region will be unbounded, which depends on the
39: power-law exponent and the ratio of the equivalent Str\"omgren
40: radius produced by the star in a uniform medium to the stellar
41: offset distance. In the expansion stage, the ionized volumes will
42: eventually become unbounded unless pressure balance with the
43: external medium is reached before the ionization front velocity
44: becomes supersonic with respect to the ionized gas.
45: \end{abstract}
46:
47: \keywords{H~II regions --- hydrodynamics --- ISM: kinematics and dynamics}
48:
49: \section{Introduction}
50: \label{sec:intro}
51:
52: The theoretical study of the formation and evolution of \ion{H}{2}
53: regions in non uniform media is motivated by the observational result
54: that the molecular clouds where massive star form generally possess
55: density gradients \citep[e.g.,][]{2007prpl.conf....3L}. The assumed
56: density law is taken to be a power law $n \propto r^{-\alpha}$ with
57: exponents ranging from 1 to 3 \citep{1985ApJ...297..436A} obtained
58: from molecular line studies. Submillimeter continuum dust emission
59: observations of the molecular material around embedded ultracompact
60: \ion{H}{2} regions gives an exponent in the range 1.25 to 2.25
61: \citep{2003A&A...409..589H}. The most commonly found value for the
62: power-law exponent is $\alpha = 2$, which correponds to an isothermal,
63: self-gravitating sphere. However, steeper density laws, $\alpha < 4$
64: have been inferred from radio continuum spectra of a sample of
65: ultracompact \ion{H}{2} regions \citep{2000ApJ...544..277F}.
66:
67: Numerical studies of \ion{H}{2} region expansion near the edge of a
68: molecular cloud (the so-called ``champagne flows''), were carried out
69: by Tenorio-Tagle and collaborators \citep{{1979A&A....71...59T},
70: {1979ApJ...233...85B}, {1981A&A....98...85B}}. In this model, an
71: \ion{H}{2} region formed near the edge of the cloud ``breaks out''
72: into the low density, intercloud medium during the expansion stage and
73: the ionized gas can achieve supersonic velocities of around
74: 30~km~s$^{-1}$ in the accelerating flow. This problem was studied in
75: more detail by \citet{2005ApJ...627..813H}, and applied to the Orion Nebula
76: \ion{H}{2} region. They found that a long-lived quasi-stationary phase
77: exists in which the ionized flow is approximately steady in the frame
78: of reference of the ionization front. during this phase, the flow
79: structure is determined entirely by the distance of the ionizing star
80: from the front and the curvature of the front. The curvature
81: determines whether the flows are more ``champagne like'' or ``globule
82: like''. The curvature of the ionization front depends on the lateral
83: density distribution in the neutral gas.
84:
85:
86: \citet{{1989RMxAA..18...65F},{1990ApJ...349..126F}} developed
87: analytical solutions for the formation and expansion of \ion{H}{2}
88: regions in spherically symmetric, power-law density distributions,
89: where the ionizing star is assumed to be at the center of the density
90: distribution. The main result of their paper is that for spherical
91: clouds with power-law density distributions $r^{-\alpha}$, there is a
92: critical value of the exponent, $\alpha_{\rm crit} = 3/2$ above which
93: the cloud becomes completely ionized during the expansion phase of the
94: \ion{H}{2} region. For power-law exponents higher than this critical
95: value, two regimes were identified: a slow regime, in which the
96: expansion of the dense cloud core is mildly supersonic and has almost
97: constant velocity, corresponding to $3/2 < \alpha \le 3$, and the fast
98: regime, where the core expansion drives a strongly accelerating shock,
99: which corresponds to $\alpha > 3$. This problem was revisited by
100: \citet{2002ApJ...580..969S}, who developed a self-similar solution for
101: the internal motions in the ionized gas in the $\alpha > 3/2$ cases.
102:
103:
104: \citet{{1989RMxAA..18...65F},{1990ApJ...349..126F}} also considered
105: self-gravitating isothermal disk density distributions where the
106: density fall-off is steeper than $r^{-3/2}$. In this case, the
107: \ion{H}{2} region becomes unbounded in a conical section of the disk,
108: where the opening angle of the cone depends on the ratio of the
109: Str\"omgren radius in the midplane density to the density distribution
110: scale height. During the expansion stage of such \ion{H}{2} regions,
111: the flattening of the internal ionized gas density distribution can
112: lead to the trapping of an initially unbounded ionization front.
113:
114: More recently, photoionized regions in a variety of axisymmetric
115: density distributions were modeled numerically by
116: \citet{2006ApJS..165..283A}, who also included the central star's
117: stellar wind. In that work, it was found that the hot bubble created
118: by the shocked stellar wind results in a champagne flow being set up
119: outside the swept-up stellar wind shell, leading to mixed kinematics
120: from an observational point of view. \citet{2006ApJS..165..283A} also
121: considered the possibility of stellar motion up the density gradient,
122: which introduces the added complication of bowshock kinematics to the
123: problem.
124:
125: \citet{2006arXiv.0605501.M} performed low-resolution three-dimensional
126: numerical simulations of \ion{H}{2} region dynamical evolution in a
127: collapsing molecular cloud. Here, the density distribution had a
128: core-envelope structure, where the envelope had a power-law ($r^{-2}$)
129: density distribution. Both turbulent and non-turbulent cases were
130: modeled. In the non-turbulent case, even for ionizing sources
131: off-center from the core, the \ion{H}{2} region expansion was nearly
132: spherical for the parameters adopted and the timescale of the
133: simulation.
134:
135: The photoionized regions produced by moving stars were studied
136: numerically by \citet{2005arXiv.0508467.F}. In that paper, the
137: \ion{H}{2} regions produced by a star off-center in a spherically
138: symmetric density distribution were modeled, where a range of stellar
139: velocities (between 0 and 12~km~s$^{-1}$) were considered. It was
140: found that the \ion{H}{2} region produced by a star off-center in an
141: underlying $r^{-2}$ density distribution did not become unbounded,
142: while that in a $r^{-3}$ density distribution did, for the case of a
143: stationary star. This appears to contradict the main result of
144: \citet{1990ApJ...349..126F}. This result is the motivation for the
145: present work, where we aim to provide simple tools for analyzing the
146: formation and expansion of \ion{H}{2} regions off-center in
147: spherically symmetric density distributions.
148:
149: The structure of this paper is as follows: in \S~\ref{sec:prob} we
150: outline the problem and discuss the initial formation stage of an
151: \ion{H}{2} region off-center in a spherically symmetric density
152: distribution and find a criterion for the \ion{H}{2} region to remain
153: bounded. In \S~\ref{sec:expand} we investigate the expansion stage and
154: derive a simple differential equation that describes the expansion of
155: the ionization front along the symmetry axis. We assess the validity
156: of our assumptions about the internal structure of the ionized gas by
157: comparing our analytical model with the results of numerical
158: simulations in \S~\ref{sec:numerical}. Finally, in
159: \S~\ref{sec:summary} we summarize our results.
160:
161:
162: \section{Description of the problem}
163: \label{sec:prob}
164:
165: \begin{figure}[!t]
166: %\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{geom}
167: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{f1}
168: \caption{Geometrical configuration. The center of the (spherically
169: symmetric) power-law density
170: distribution is denoted by the open circle, the star is represented
171: by the filled circle, a distance $r_c$ from the density center. For
172: a parcel of gas at X, distance $r$ from the density center, the
173: star-centered coordinates are $(R,\theta)$, where $R$ is the
174: distance from the star and $\theta$ is measured clockwise from the
175: extension of the line joining the star to the density
176: center. Rotational symmetry is assumed around the axis joining the
177: star to the center of the density distribution. The
178: position of the ionization front in this coordinate system is
179: $R_i$. An approximate shape for the ionization front is also shown.}
180: \label{fig:geom}
181: \end{figure}
182:
183: The underlying, spherically symmetric density distribution is
184: described by
185: \begin{equation}
186: n(r) = n_c\left(\frac{r}{r_c}\right)^{-\alpha}
187: \label{eq:denorig}
188: \end{equation}
189: where $n_c$ is the number density at the position of the star,
190: $r_c$. We now change our reference system and rewrite the density
191: distribution in axisymmetric coordinates centered on the star
192: position, with the distance from the star, $R$, found from
193: \begin{equation}
194: R^2 - 2r_cR\cos(\pi-\theta) + r_c^2 - r^2 = 0 \ ,
195: \end{equation}
196: where $\theta$ is measured from the symmetry axis and the center of
197: the density distribution is in the direction $\theta = \pi$, see
198: Figure~\ref{fig:geom}. The density distribution of
199: Equation~\ref{eq:denorig}, in terms of this new reference system,
200: $(R,\theta)$, becomes
201: \begin{equation}
202: n(R,\theta) = n_c \left( \frac{R^2 + r_c^2 + 2r_cR\cos
203: \theta}{r_c^2} \right)^{-\alpha/2} \ .
204: \label{eq:denrtheta}
205: \end{equation}
206: Along the symmetry axis, $\theta = 0$, this can be written
207: \begin{equation}
208: n(y) = n_c \left( 1 + y \right)^{-\alpha} \ ,
209: \label{eq:denyplus}
210: \end{equation}
211: where we have defined $y = R/r_c$.
212:
213: For $y < 1$, expansion to linear terms in a Taylor series shows that
214: \begin{equation}
215: n(y) \approx n_c (1 - \alpha y) \ ,
216: \label{eq:densmally}
217: \end{equation}
218: which is no longer a power law. For $y > 1$ we find $n(y) \approx n_c
219: y^{-\alpha}$, that is, the offset density distribution resembles the
220: original power-law density distribution. Consequently, if the initial
221: Str\"omgren radius, $R_s$, is smaller than the stellar offset
222: distance, then we expect the initial \ion{H}{2} region to remain
223: confined, even for power laws steeper than $\alpha > 3/2$.
224:
225: \subsection{Condition for the initial Str\"omgren region}
226: \label{sec:condition}
227: We can develop a quantitative criterion for deciding whether the
228: initial photoionized region will remain bounded in an offset power-law
229: density distribution by balancing recombinations and ionizations,
230: assuming pure hydrogen, along the symmetry axis $\theta = 0$:
231: \begin{equation}
232: \alpha_B r_c^3 \int^y_0 n_c^2 \left( 1 + y^\prime \right)^{-2\alpha}
233: y^{\prime 2} \ dy^\prime = \frac{Q_H}{4\pi} \ ,
234: \label{eq:ionbalance}
235: \end{equation}
236: where $\alpha_B$ is the case B recombination coefficient. This
237: equation can be written
238: \begin{equation}
239: \int^y_0 \left( 1 + y^\prime \right)^{-2\alpha} y^{\prime 2} \ dy^\prime
240: = \frac{1}{3}y^3_{\rm sc} \ ,
241: \label{eq:iontidy}
242: \end{equation}
243: where $y_{\rm sc}$ is the non-dimensionalized Str\"omgren radius
244: for a uniform medium of number density $n_c$, i.e.,
245: \begin{equation}
246: y_{\rm sc} = \frac{R_s}{r_c} = \left( \frac{3 Q_H}{4\pi \alpha_B
247: n_c^2 r_c} \right)^{1/3} \ .
248: \label{eq:nondimstrom}
249: \end{equation}
250: In the ``uphill'' direction, $\theta = \pi$, the equivalent
251: non-dimensionalized ionization balance equation is
252: \begin{equation}
253: \int^y_0 \left(1 - y^\prime\right)^{-2\alpha} y^{\prime 2} \ dy^\prime =
254: \frac{1}{3} y_{\rm sc}^3 \ .
255: \label{eq:uphill}
256: \end{equation}
257: Equations~\ref{eq:nondimstrom} and \ref{eq:uphill} define integral
258: equations for the extent of the ionized
259: region, $y$, along $\theta = 0$ and $\theta = \pi$, respectively, as
260: functions of $y_{\rm sc}$ and $\alpha$.
261: \begin{figure}[!t]
262: %\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{newt.ps}
263: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{f2}
264: \caption{Ratio of ionization front radius along $\theta = 0$ to
265: uniform density Str\"omgren radius, $y/y_{\rm sc}$, as a function of
266: uniform density Str\"omgren radius, $y_{\rm sc}$, for power-law density
267: distributions with exponent $\alpha = 2$ (\textit{solid line}) and $\alpha =
268: 3$ (\textit{dashed line}). The asymptotes are $y_{\rm sc} = 1$ for $\alpha =
269: 2$ and $y_{\rm sc} = 0.464$ for $\alpha = 3$. }
270: \label{fig:newt}
271: \end{figure}
272:
273: Integrating Equation~\ref{eq:iontidy} for $\alpha > 3/2$ we obtain
274: \begin{eqnarray}
275: \frac{1}{3} y_{\rm sc}^3 = &
276: \frac{-2}{(1-2\alpha)(2 -
277: 2\alpha)(3-2\alpha)}(1 - [1+y]^{3-2\alpha}) \nonumber \\
278: & - \frac{2}{(1-2\alpha)(2-2\alpha)}(y[1+y]^{2-2\alpha}) \nonumber \\
279: & + \frac{1}{(1-2\alpha)}(y^2[1+y]^{1-2\alpha}) \ .
280: \label{eq:intresult}
281: \end{eqnarray}
282: In general, this yields a positive, real root for $y$ (the
283: non-dimensionalized ionization front radius) as long as
284: \begin{equation}
285: \frac{1}{3}y_{\rm sc}^3 < \frac{2}{(2\alpha-1)(2\alpha-2)(2\alpha-3)}
286: \ .
287: \label{eq:root}
288: \end{equation}
289: For example, when $\alpha = 2$, the requirement is $y_{\rm sc} < 1$, while for
290: $\alpha = 3$, the condition is $y^3_{\rm sc} < 0.1$, i.e., $y_{\rm sc}
291: < 0.464$, in order that there be a real,
292: positive root for $y$. In Figure~\ref{fig:newt} we plot the ratio
293: $y/y_{\rm sc}$ against $y_{\rm sc}$ for $y_{\rm sc}$ values between
294: 0.01 and 1.0 for the two examples above, $\alpha = 2$ and $\alpha = 3$.
295: We see that for $y_{\rm sc}$ less than the critical value, the value
296: of the root $y$ is not too different from $y_{\rm sc}$, but close to
297: the critical value $y/y_{\rm sc} \rightarrow \infty$.
298:
299: \section{Expansion stage}
300: \label{sec:expand}
301: In order to study the expansion of the ionized gas after the initial
302: formation of the photoionized region we follow the same analysis as
303: \citet{1968dms..book.....S} and \citet{1992phas.book.....S}. As the
304: \ion{H}{2} region expands, a neutral shock is sent out ahead of the
305: ionization front into the ambient medium.
306:
307: Across the isothermal shock, the relevant equations are mass conservation
308: \begin{equation}
309: \rho_{1s} v_{1s} = \rho_{2s} v_{2s} \ ,
310: \label{eq:cont}
311: \end{equation}
312: and momentum conservation
313: \begin{equation}
314: p_{1s} + \rho_{1s} v_{1s}^2 = p_{2s} + \rho_{2s} v_{2s}^2
315: \label{eq:mom}
316: \end{equation}
317: where the subscript $1s$ refers to preshock
318: conditions and $2s$ refers to postshock conditions and all velocities
319: are in the frame of the shock. We also have the equation
320: for the density jump across a
321: weak-D ionization front
322: \begin{equation}
323: \frac{\rho_{2i}}{\rho_{1i}} = \frac{1}{2c_2^2} \left\{%
324: \left(c_1^2 + v_{1i}^2 \right)^2 + \left[ \left( c_1^2 + v_{1i}^2
325: \right)^2 - 4c_2^2 v_{1i}^2 \right]^{1/2} \right\}
326: \label{eq:ifront}
327: \end{equation}
328: where the subscript $1i$ refers to conditions conditions in front of
329: the ionization front and $2i$ refers to conditions in the photoionized
330: gas just behind the ionization front. Here, $c_1$ is the sound speed
331: in the neutral gas and $c_2$ is the sound speed in the ionized gas,
332: and $v_{1i}$ refers to the velocity of the gas ahead of the ionization
333: front in the frame of the ionization front.
334:
335: Furthermore, we assume that the region between the shock front and the
336: ionization front is thin, i.e. $u_{1i} = u_{2s}$, where $u_{1i}$ and
337: $u_{2s}$ are the velocities of the gas ahead of the ionization front
338: and behind the shock front in the frame of the star, and that the
339: density of the ionized gas inside the photoionized region is spatially
340: uniform but decreases with time, i.e. $\rho_{2i} \equiv
341: \rho_{2i}(t)$. This is valid if the sound-crossing time of the ionized
342: region is short compared to the expansion timescale.
343:
344:
345: As a first approximation to the non-spherical shape of the ionization
346: front in a non-uniform density distribution, we assume that the radius
347: of the ionization front can be described by
348: \begin{equation}
349: R_i = a_0 + a_1 \cos \theta \equiv a_0 + a_1 \mu
350: \label{eq:radius}
351: \end{equation}
352: to first order in $\mu = \cos\theta$, where
353: \begin{equation}
354: a_0 = \frac{R_- + R_+}{2}
355: \label{eq:a0}
356: \end{equation}
357: and
358: \begin{equation}
359: a_1 = \frac{R_- - R_+}{2}
360: \label{eq:a1}
361: \end{equation}
362: with $R_-$ corresponding to the shell radius when $\mu = -1$ and $R_+$
363: to the case $\mu = 1$ \citep[see, e.g.,][]{1977A&A....59..161D}.
364:
365: The volume contained within the ionization front $R_i$ is
366: \begin{equation}
367: V_i = \frac{2\pi}{3} \int_{-1}^{1} R(\mu)^3 \ d\mu \ ,
368: \label{eq:volume}
369: \end{equation}
370: which in this approximation becomes
371: \begin{equation}
372: V_i = a_0^3 \left(1 + \frac{a_1^2}{a_0^2} \right) \ .
373: \label{eq:volume2}
374: \end{equation}
375:
376: Assuming uniform expansion, then the mass contained within a
377: volume, $V$, interior to an internal shell of
378: radius $R$ must be conserved during the expansion. That is,
379: \begin{equation}
380: \rho_{2i} V = \mbox{constant} \ ,
381: \label{eq:shellmass}
382: \end{equation}
383: and the total volume of ionized gas satisifies the ionization balance
384: equation, where the ionizing photon output of the star is assumed to
385: be constant, that is
386: \begin{equation}
387: \rho_{2i}^2 V_i = \mbox{constant} \ .
388: \label{eq:ibalance}
389: \end{equation}
390: Taking the time derivatives of Equations~\ref{eq:shellmass} and
391: \ref{eq:ibalance} we find that
392: \begin{equation}
393: \left. \frac{dV}{dt} \right|_{R_i} = \frac{1}{2} \frac{dV_i}{dt} \ .
394: \label{eq:volrelate}
395: \end{equation}
396: where we have evaluated the derivative for a shell located just inside
397: the ionization front radius.
398: Writing
399: \begin{equation}
400: \frac{dV}{dt} = \frac{dV}{dR}\frac{dR}{dt} \mbox{\hspace*{2em} and
401: \hspace*{2em}} \frac{dV_i}{dt} = \frac{dV_i}{dR_i}\frac{dR_i}{dt}
402: \label{eq:dvdt}
403: \end{equation}
404: then we find that the gas velocity behind the ionization front is half
405: the ionization front velocity, $u_{2i} = 0.5 U_i$, where $u_{2i} =
406: \left. \frac{dR}{dt} \right|_{R_i}$ and $U_i = \frac{dR_i}{dt}$.
407: This assumes that the expansion is uniform and that there are no lateral gas
408: motions within the photoionized region.
409:
410: With the additional assumption that $v_{1i}/{c_1} \ll 1$, then
411: equations~\ref{eq:cont}, \ref{eq:mom}, \ref{eq:ifront}, together with
412: $u_{2i} = 0.5 U_i$, can be combined to give
413: \begin{equation}
414: \frac{\rho_{2i}}{\rho_{1s}} = \frac{4U_i^2}{4c_2^2 + U_i^2} \ ,
415: \label{eq:denrat}
416: \end{equation}
417: where we have used the thin shell approximation $U_i \approx U_s$.
418: These assumptions are the same as those of \citet{1968dms..book.....S}.
419:
420: The density ratio can be found from ionization balance
421: \begin{equation}
422: \rho_{2i}^2 V_i = \rho_c^2 R_0^3 \ ,
423: \label{eq:ibalance1}
424: \end{equation}
425: where $R_0$ is the initial Str\"omgren radius formed in a medium of
426: uniform mass density $\rho_c$. We also have the offset power-law
427: initial density distribution, written here for $\mu \pm 1$:
428: \begin{equation}
429: \rho_{1s} = \rho_c \left(1 \pm \frac{R}{r_c} \right)^{-\alpha} \ ,
430: \label{eq:offset}
431: \end{equation}
432: where $r_c$ is the offset distance of the star from the center of the
433: density distribution and $\rho_c$ is the density at this
434: point. Thus
435: \begin{equation}
436: \frac{\rho_{2i}}{\rho_{1s}} = \left( \frac{R_0^3}{V_i}\right)^{1/2}
437: \left(1 \pm \frac{R}{r_c} \right)^{\alpha} \
438: \label{eq:denrat2}
439: \end{equation}
440: in the directions $\mu = \pm 1$ along the symmetry axis.
441:
442: Equation~\ref{eq:denrat} can be written in the form
443: \begin{equation}
444: M^2 \left(4 - \frac{\rho_{2i}}{\rho_{1s}} \right) = 4
445: \frac{\rho_{2i}}{\rho_{1s}} \ ,
446: \label{eq:emsq}
447: \end{equation}
448: where $M = U_i/c_2$. This constitutes a differential equation for the
449: radius of the ionization front, $R_i$, as a function of time and can
450: be solved numerically with standard techniques
451: \citep[e.g.,][]{1992nrfa.book.....P}, by considering directions $\mu =
452: 1$ and $\mu = -1$ together and using equations~\ref{eq:radius},
453: \ref{eq:a0}, \ref{eq:a1}, \ref{eq:volume} and \ref{eq:denrat2}, with
454: initial conditions $M = 2/\sqrt{3}$ when $t = 0$, $R_i = R_0$ and
455: $\rho_{2i} = \rho_{1s}$. Here, it is assumed that $R_0$ is much less
456: than the critical value found from solving Equation~\ref{eq:root}
457: above, and so the initial ionized region radius ($R_i$ at $t = 0$) is
458: taken to be that for a uniform medium.
459: \begin{figure}[!t]
460: %\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{rung_2a_raddown.ps}\\
461: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{f3a}\\
462: %\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{rung_2a_radup.ps}
463: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{f3b}
464: \caption{Radius of the ionization front (in units of the stellar
465: offset radius, $r_c$) against time (in units of the sound crossing
466: time, $\tau = r_c/c_2$). \textit{Top}: $\mu = 1$ direction.
467: \textit{Bottom}: $\mu = -1$ direction. Density power laws are
468: $\alpha = 0$ (\textit{solid line}), $\alpha = 3/2$ (\textit{dashed
469: line}), $\alpha = 2$ (\textit{dot-dashed line}), and $\alpha = 3$
470: (\textit{dotted line}).}
471: \label{fig:radupdown}
472: \end{figure}
473: \begin{figure}[!t]
474: %\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{rung_2a_veldown.ps}\\
475: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{f4a}\\
476: %\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{rung_2a_velup.ps}
477: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{f4b}
478: \caption{Velocity of the ionization front (in units of the ionized gas
479: sound speed) against time (in units of the sound crossing time).
480: \textit{Top}: $\mu = 1$ direction. \textit{Bottom}: $\mu = -1$
481: direction. Linetypes same as in Fig.~\ref{fig:radupdown}.}
482: \label{fig:velupdown}
483: \end{figure}
484:
485: In Figures~\ref{fig:radupdown} and \ref{fig:velupdown} we can see the
486: result of solving Equation~\ref{eq:emsq} numerically for the cases
487: $\alpha = 0$, 2 and 3. In these figures, all distances are scaled to
488: $r_c$ and times are scaled with the sound crossing time of this
489: distance in the ionized gas, $\tau = r_c/c_2$. The results presented
490: are particular to the case $y_{\rm sc} = R_0/r_c = 0.01324$, which
491: corresponds to an ionizing source with $Q_H = 10^{48}$
492: photons~s$^{-1}$ and a density $n_c = 10^7/e$~cm$^{-3}$, where we have
493: also assumed that the case B recombination coefficient takes the value
494: $\alpha_B = 2.6 \times 10^{-13}$~cm$^3$~s$^{-1}$. These values of the
495: parameters are motivated by \citet{2005arXiv.0508467.F}.
496:
497: In the ``upward'' direction ($\mu = -1$, density increasing), as
498: expected the radius grows more slowly in the $\alpha = 2$ and $3$
499: cases than for the uniform medium, classical case $\alpha = 0$, as
500: shown in Figures~\ref{fig:radupdown} and \ref{fig:velupdown}. In the
501: ``downward'' direction, $\mu = 1$, Figures~\ref{fig:radupdown} and
502: \ref{fig:velupdown} clearly show that in the $\alpha = 3$ case, the
503: velocity starts to increase after about 5 sound crossing times and by
504: 100 sound crossing times the velocity of the ionization front has
505: become supersonic with respect to the ionized gas. This means that the
506: ionization front has overtaken the shock wave and will ionize out to
507: infinity. In the $\alpha = 2$ case, although the velocity does start
508: to increase again after about 13 sound crossing times, the increase is
509: only very gradual, and within the timescale studied the ionization front
510: does not become supersonic with respect to the ionized gas.
511:
512:
513: \begin{figure}[!t]
514: %\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{rung_2a_presdown.ps}\\
515: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{f5a}\\
516: %\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{rung_2a_presup.ps}
517: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{f5b}
518: \caption{Internal to external pressure ratio against time (in units of
519: the sound crossing time). \textit{Top}: $\mu = 1$
520: direction. \textit{Bottom}: $\mu = -1$ direction. Linetypes same as
521: in Fig.~\ref{fig:radupdown}. The horizontal line marks equal
522: pressures.}
523: \label{fig:presupdown}
524: \end{figure}
525:
526: In Figure~\ref{fig:presupdown} we show the ratio of the pressure in
527: the ionized gas to that in the ambient medium, assuming that the
528: latter is isothermal with a temperature of 100~K. From these figures
529: we see that in the $\mu = -1$ direction the pressures equalize in
530: about 1 sound crossing time for both $\alpha = 2$ and $\alpha = 3$. In
531: the $\mu = 1$ direction, the $\alpha = 3$ case shows that the
532: pressures do not equalize before the ionization front begins to
533: accelerate. In the $\alpha = 2$ case, the pressures do equalize at
534: around 7 sound crossing times for the adopted parameters (i.e.,
535: initial Str\"omgren radius, $R_0$). We remark that once the pressures
536: become similar, the analysis of this section does not really hold,
537: since the external pressure should be taken into account. However, we
538: also comment that the fact that the pressures do become equal before
539: the shock begins to accelerate in the $\alpha = 2$ case means that, in
540: practice, the \ion{H}{2} region will remain confined for this choice
541: of initial Str\"omgren radius.
542:
543: \begin{figure}[!t]
544: %\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{rung_3_veldown.ps}\\
545: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{f6a}\\
546: %\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{rung_3_presdown.ps}
547: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{f6b}
548: \caption{\textit{Top}: Velocity of the ionization front (in units of
549: the ionized gas sound speed) against time (in units of the sound
550: crossing time) for different values of the initial Str\"omgren
551: radius. From lowest line to uppermost line: $R_0/r_c = 0.01$, 0.02,
552: 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5. \textit{Bottom}: Ratio of internal to external
553: pressures for the same initial Str\"omgren radius values. The
554: horizontal line denotes equal pressures.}
555: \label{fig:multidown}
556: \end{figure}
557: In Figure~\ref{fig:multidown} we show how the breakout time of the
558: ionization front in the $\mu = 1$ direction varies
559: with initial Str\"omgren radius, for values of $R_0/r_c$ between 0.01
560: and 1.0 for the case $\alpha = 2$. As $R_0/r_c \rightarrow 1$ the
561: position of the velocity minimum moves to earlier times and higher
562: velocities. Also in this figure, we show how the internal to external
563: pressure ratio varies with initial Str\"omgren radius. Only for $R_0/r_c
564: \lesssim 0.02$ is there a regime for which pressure balance could
565: possibly halt the expansion and subsequent breakout of the \ion{H}{2}
566: region.
567:
568: \section{Numerical Simulation}
569: \label{sec:numerical}
570: \begin{figure}[!t]
571: %\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{stan411_0060.save_ev.ps}\\
572: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{f7a}\\
573: %\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{stan311_0050.save_ev.ps}
574: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{f7b}
575: \caption{Logarithm of ionized gas density. \textit{Top}: $\alpha =
576: 2$ numerical solution after 60,000~yrs. \textit{Bottom}: $\alpha = 3$
577: numerical solution after 50,000~yrs. The black triangle marks the
578: position of the star and the position $(0,0)$ denotes the center of
579: the density distribution in each case. The heavy black curve
580: represents the shape of the ionization front obtained from the
581: approximation of Equation~\ref{eq:radius}. }
582: \label{fig:numden23}
583: \end{figure}
584:
585: In order to test our assumption that the density within the ionized
586: gas is approximately constant during the expansion stage, we perform
587: numerical simulations of the expansion of an off-center \ion{H}{2}
588: region in a power-law density distribution. The density law for this
589: simulation is taken from \citet{2005arXiv.0508467.F}, namely
590: \begin{equation}
591: n(r) = \left\{
592: \begin{array}{ll}
593: n_0 \exp\left[-\frac{\alpha}{2}\left(r/r_c\right)^2\right] & \mbox{for
594: $r \leq r_c$} , \\
595: n_0 e^{-\alpha/2} \left( r/r_c \right)^{-\alpha} & \mbox{for $r \geq
596: r_c$} ,
597: \end{array}
598: \right.
599: \label{eq:numsimden}
600: \end{equation}
601: where $n_0$ is the central density and $r_c$ is the stellar offset
602: distance from the center of the density distribution. At $r_c$ the
603: density has the value $n_c \equiv n(r_c) = n_0/e^{\alpha/2}$.
604:
605: This density distribution is flatter for radii $r < r_c$ than the
606: simple power-law density distribution discussed in \S\S~\ref{sec:prob} and
607: \ref{sec:expand} above. It is obtained by assuming that the
608: acceleration due to gravity of the hydrostatic equilbrium solution in
609: the halo, $r > r_c$, matches that of the core (defined as $r < r_c$)
610: at $r = r_c$, with the added requirement that the acceleration due to
611: gravity must be zero at the center of symmetry. This particular
612: density law assumes that the acceleration due to gravity is linear
613: with radius for $r < r_c$. We adopt this density distribution rather
614: than a simple power law because the density does not go to infinity at
615: the center of symmetry and the ``core-halo'' structure is more
616: representative of real molecular clouds.
617:
618: Although we do not expect the ionization front expansion of our
619: numerical simulations to agree with the analytic expansion found in
620: \S~\ref{sec:expand} in the region between the stellar position and the
621: center of the density distribution (i.e., $r < r_c$), because the
622: density laws are very different here, we do expect to be able to make
623: a direct comparison in the halo region, $r > r_c$, where the density
624: laws are the same. Since we are primarily interested in whether the
625: \ion{H}{2} region remains bounded in the $\mu = 1$ direction during
626: the expansion stage, then it is sufficient that the density
627: distributions are the same in this direction for radii $r > r_c$.
628:
629:
630: The radiation-hydrodynamics code employed in these simulations has
631: been described previously in \citet{2006ApJS..165..283A}. The model
632: parameters specific to this work are a central density $n_0 = 3.5
633: \times 10^5$~cm$^{-3}$, and distance from density center to the star
634: of $r_c = 0.15$~pc. We assume isothermal, hydrostatic equilibrium in
635: the initially neutral 100~K gas, and include an external gravity
636: field (see \citealp{2005arXiv.0508467.F} for details). The
637: gravitational acceleration does not have any noticeable dynamical
638: effect on the expansion of the \ion{H}{2} region. The ionizing star
639: produces $10^{48}$~photons~s$^{-1}$. The grid size for these
640: calculations is $250 \times 600$ cells, representing a spatial size of
641: $0.25 \times 0.6$~pc. For these parameters, $y_{\rm sc} = R_0/r_c =
642: 0.08235$ for the $\alpha = 2$ case and $y_{\rm sc} = R_0/r_c =
643: 0.11492$ for the $\alpha = 3$ case.
644: \begin{figure}[!t]
645: %\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{stan411_0060.save_evcut.ps}
646: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{f8}
647: \caption{Cuts along the $\mu = \pm 1$ axis of the $\alpha = 2$
648: numerical simulation shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:numden23}.
649: \textit{Top}: density. \textit{Middle}: velocity.
650: \textit{Bottom}: pressure. The thick solid line represents the $\mu
651: = 1$ direction and the thin solid line represents the $\mu = -1$
652: direction. Units are as indicated on the axes.}
653: \label{fig:numcut2}
654: \end{figure}
655: \begin{figure}[!t]
656: %\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{stan311_0050.save_evcut.ps}
657: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{f9}
658: \caption{Cuts along the $\mu = \pm 1$ axis of the $\alpha = 3$
659: numerical simulation shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:numden23}.
660: \textit{Top}: density. \textit{Middle}: velocity.
661: \textit{Bottom}: pressure. The thick solid line represents the $\mu
662: = 1$ direction and the thin solid line represents the $\mu = -1$
663: direction. Units are as indicated on the axes.}
664: \label{fig:numcut3}
665: \end{figure}
666:
667: In Figures~\ref{fig:numden23}, \ref{fig:numcut2} and \ref{fig:numcut3}
668: we show the results of calculations of off-center \ion{H}{2} regions
669: in $\alpha = 2$ and $\alpha = 3$ power-law density
670: distributions. Figure~\ref{fig:numden23} shows the ionized gas
671: density, i.e. the shape of the \ion{H}{2} regions, for both power laws
672: after 60,000 and 50,000~yrs respectively. The density within the
673: ionized regions is approximately constant. We note that for both
674: models, the ionized volumes are approximately spherical, although the
675: star is off-center. This was also noted by \citet{2006arXiv.0605501.M}
676: in their three-dimensional numerical simulations. Overplotted on
677: Figure~\ref{fig:numden23} is the shape the ionization front would have
678: according to the approximation of Equation~\ref{eq:radius}. We can see
679: that the approximation slightly underestimates the volume of the
680: ionized gas with respect to the numerical simulations.
681:
682: In Figures~\ref{fig:numcut2} and \ref{fig:numcut3} we show cuts along
683: the symmetry axis, i.e. the $\mu = \pm 1$ directions, for both
684: cases. From these figures we see that the assumption of constant
685: density is reasonable for the $\mu = 1$ (``downhill'') direction but
686: not so good in the $\mu = -1$ direction, since the density increases
687: with distance from the star. The pressure follows the same pattern as
688: the density, as is to be expected in for an isothermal, $T = 10^4$~K
689: \ion{H}{2} region. Outside the ionized region, in both directions, the
690: pressure is high because the neutral shock sent out ahead of the
691: ionization front pressurizes the gas. The velocities in the ionized
692: gas are subsonic in the $\mu = -1$ direction and become supersonic in
693: the $\mu = 1$ direction.
694:
695: The ripples in the $\mu = -1$ subsonic gas are due to the ionization
696: front not being well resolved in this case, since the high densities
697: lead to a very thin transition zone. The spike in the pressure is due
698: to the heating and cooling being out of equilibrium at the unresolved
699: ionization front. These numerical problems are not dynamically
700: important for these simulations, since we are interested in the
701: expansion in the $\mu = 1$ direction, where the gas is supersonic and
702: hence not affected by fluctuations in the thermal pressure. This
703: problem was noted by \citet{2005ApJ...627..813H}. Their solution to
704: the problem was to reduce the effective ionization cross section,
705: $\sigma_0$, by a factor of 60. In this paper, we reduce $\sigma_0$ by
706: a factor of 10. Reducing the ionization cross section makes the
707: ionization front broader and so allows it to be resolved by the
708: numerical scheme. Since the width of the ionization front is of the
709: order of a few photon mean free paths, where $l_p \propto (n
710: \sigma_0)^{-1}$, then the ionization front is narrower in high density gas
711: than in low density gas, and hence more of a problem to resolve
712: numerically in the former. In the $\mu = 1$
713: direction, the much lower densities mean that the ionization front is
714: easily resolved by the numerical scheme.
715: \begin{figure}[!t]
716: %\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{stan411_stat_up.ps}\\
717: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{f10a}\\
718: %\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{stan311_stat_up.ps}
719: \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{f10b}
720: \caption{Radius (in units of stellar offset radius) against time (in
721: units of sound crossing time) in the $\mu = 1$ direction, showing ionization
722: front radius (\textit{thick solid line}), shock front radius
723: (\textit{thin solid line}), analytical solution for the same
724: parameters (\textit{dot-dashed line}) and uniform density analytical
725: solution (\textit{dashed line}).
726: \textit{Top}: $\alpha = 2$ numerical simulation and corresponding
727: analytical solution. \textit{Bottom}: $\alpha = 3$ numerical
728: simulation and corresponding analytical solution.}
729: \label{fig:numanal23}
730: \end{figure}
731:
732: In Figure~\ref{fig:numanal23} a comparison of the numerical simulation
733: and the analytic solution for the same parameters in the $\mu = 1$
734: direction is plotted. Here, the distance scale is in units of the
735: Str\"omgren radius in a medium of uniform density $n_c e^{-\alpha/2}$,
736: and time is given in units of the sound crossing time of the
737: Str\"omgren sphere. Since the density distribution in the $\mu = -1$
738: direction of the numerical simulation is different to the analytical
739: model discussed in Section~\ref{sec:expand}, we do not show a
740: comparison graph for this case, as it is meaningless. Instead, we
741: focus on the $\mu = 1$ direction, for which the numerical simulation
742: and analytical model density distributions are the same. We plot both
743: the shock wave and the ionization front trajectories, together with
744: the analytical result. For times less than about half a sound crossing
745: time, there is not a good agreement between analytical and numerical
746: results. This can be partly attributed to resolution effects, since
747: the initial Str\"omgren radius in this high density medium is very
748: small, and the details of the hydrodynamics are not particularly well
749: resolved at this scale. For times greater than half a sound crossing
750: time, the agreement between numerical and analytical solutions is very
751: close for the remainder of the calculation.
752: The analytical solution falls between the shock front and ionization
753: front paths for the whole of this time.
754:
755: We do not follow the numerical simulation beyond around 4 sound
756: crossing times because part of the ionized gas volume leaves the
757: computational grid at this point.
758:
759: \section{Summary}
760: \label{sec:summary}
761: In this paper we have developed an analytical treatment for the
762: formation and expansion of an \ion{H}{2} region off center in a steep
763: power-law density distribution. We find that during the initial
764: formation stage, the \ion{H}{2} region will remain bounded as long as
765: the ratio of the Str\"omgren radius in the equivalent uniform medium
766: at the stellar position to the stellar offset position is less than a
767: value that depends only on the power-law exponent (see
768: Eq.~\ref{eq:root}). In the expansion phase, the ionization front will
769: break out (turn supersonic with respect to the ionized gas) unless
770: pressure balance between the internal photoionized gas and the
771: external medium is achieved before this point. For Str\"omgren radius
772: to stellar offset radius ratios of more than 0.02, pressure balance is
773: not possible for an isothermal 100~K medium in hydrostatic equilibrium
774: and so the \ion{H}{2} region will become unbounded, eventually, in
775: these cases.
776:
777: We performed numerical simulations to test the assumption of constant
778: density within the ionized gas during the expansion phase adopted in
779: \S~\ref{sec:expand}. We found that this assumption is valid in the
780: ``downhill'' ($\theta = 0$) direction from the star, but is not so
781: good in the opposite (``uphill'', $\theta = \pi$) direction. In the
782: $\theta = 0$ direction, the numerical solution and analytical solution
783: follow the same expansion law once the elapsed time is greater than
784: about half a sound crossing time. We also assessed the validity of the
785: simple analytical approximation to the ionization front
786: shape. Although the volume of ionized gas is slightly underestimated
787: in the analytical approximation, the effect is not significant, as
788: evinced by the agreement between the numerical and analytic expansion
789: laws. This gives us confidence that our simple description of the
790: \ion{H}{2} region expansion can provide insight into this complicated
791: problem.
792:
793: \acknowledgments We thank Will Henney for a critical reading of the
794: manuscript and Pepe Franco and Stan Kurtz for valuable comments. SJA
795: would like to acknowledge support from DGAPA-UNAM through PAPIIT grant
796: IN112006. This work has made use of NASA's Astrophysics Abstract Data
797: Service and the astro-ph archive.
798:
799: \begin{thebibliography}{}
800: \bibitem[Arquilla \& Goldsmith(1985)]{1985ApJ...297..436A} Arquilla,
801: R., \& Goldsmith, P.~F.\ 1985, \apj, 297, 436
802: \bibitem[Arthur \& Hoare(2006)]{2006ApJS..165..283A} Arthur, S.~J., \&
803: Hoare, M.~G.\ 2006, \apjs, 165, 283
804: \bibitem[Bedijn \& Tenorio-Tagle(1981)]{1981A&A....98...85B} Bedijn, P.~J.,
805: \& Tenorio-Tagle, G.\ 1981, \aap, 98, 85
806: \bibitem[Bodenheimer et al.(1979)]{1979ApJ...233...85B} Bodenheimer, P.,
807: Tenorio-Tagle, G., \& Yorke, H.~W.\ 1979, \apj, 233, 85
808: \bibitem[Dyson(1977)]{1977A&A....59..161D} Dyson, J.~E.\ 1977, \aap, 59,
809: 161
810: \bibitem[Franco et al.(1989)]{1989RMxAA..18...65F} Franco, J.,
811: Tenorio-Tagle, G., \& Bodenheimer, P.\ 1989, Revista Mexicana de
812: Astronom\'{\i}a y Astrof\'{\i}sica, vol.~18, 18, 65
813: \bibitem[Franco et al.(1990)]{1990ApJ...349..126F} Franco, J.,
814: Tenorio-Tagle, G., \& Bodenheimer, P.\ 1990, \apj, 349, 126
815: \bibitem[Franco et al.(2000)]{2000ApJ...544..277F} Franco, J.,
816: Garc{\'{\i}}a-Barreto, J.~A., \& de la Fuente, E.\ 2000, \apj, 544,
817: 277
818: \bibitem[Franco et al.(2007)]{2005arXiv.0508467.F} Franco, J.,
819: Garc\'{\i}a-Segura, G., \& Kurtz, S. E.\ 2007, \apj, in press (astro-ph/0508467)
820: \bibitem[Hatchell \& van der Tak(2003)]{2003A&A...409..589H} Hatchell, J.,
821: \& van der Tak, F.~F.~S.\ 2003, \aap, 409, 589
822: \bibitem[Henney et al.(2005)]{2005ApJ...627..813H} Henney, W.~J., Arthur,
823: S.~J., \& Garc{\'{\i}}a-D{\'{\i}}az, M.~T.\ 2005, \apj, 627, 813
824: \bibitem[Lada et al.(2007)]{2007prpl.conf....3L} Lada, C.~J., Alves, J.~F.,
825: \& Lombardi, M.\ 2007, Protostars and Planets V, eds. B. Reipurth,
826: D. Jewitt, \& K. Keil, (Tucson: University of Arizona Press), 3
827: \bibitem[Mac Low et al.(2006)]{2006arXiv.0605501.M} Mac Low, M.-M.,
828: Toraskar, J., Oischi, J. S. \& Abel, T.\ 2006, \apj, submitted
829: (astro-ph/06055001)
830: \bibitem[Press et al.(1992)]{1992nrfa.book.....P} Press, W.~H., Teukolsky,
831: S.~A., Vetterling, W.~T., \& Flannery, B.~P.\ 1992, Numerical Recipes
832: in Fortran: The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd ed., Cambridge: University
833: Press
834: \bibitem[Shu(1992)]{1992phas.book.....S} Shu, F.~H.\ 1992, Physics of
835: Astrophysics, Vol.~II, University Science
836: Books
837: \bibitem[Shu et al.(2002)]{2002ApJ...580..969S} Shu, F.~H., Lizano, S.,
838: Galli, D., Cant{\'o}, J., \& Laughlin, G.\ 2002, \apj, 580, 969
839: \bibitem[Spitzer(1968)]{1968dms..book.....S} Spitzer, L.\ 1968,
840: Diffuse Matter in Space, New York: Interscience Publication
841: \bibitem[Tenorio-Tagle(1979)]{1979A&A....71...59T} Tenorio-Tagle, G.\ 1979,
842: \aap, 71, 59
843: \end{thebibliography}
844: \end{document}
845: