1: %% ApJ emulation including times fonts
2: \documentclass[apj]{emulateapj}
3: \usepackage{apjfonts}
4:
5: %% Referee style aastex
6: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
7:
8: \begin{document}
9:
10: %% ------------------------------------------------------------------
11: %% TITLE
12: %% ------------------------------------------------------------------
13:
14: \title{A Connection Between Bulge Properties and the Bimodality of
15: Galaxies}
16:
17: \shorttitle{Bulge properties and the bimodality of galaxies}
18: \shortauthors{Drory \& Fisher}
19:
20: %% ------------------------------------------------------------------
21: %% AUTHORS
22: %% ------------------------------------------------------------------
23:
24: \author{Niv~Drory\altaffilmark{1}}
25: \author{David~B.~Fisher}
26:
27: \affil{Department of Astronomy, The University of Texas at Austin,\\
28: 1 University Station C1400, Austin, Texas 78712}
29: \email{drory@astro.as.utexas.edu}
30:
31: \altaffiltext{1}{Current address: Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur
32: Extraterrestrische Physik, Giessenbachstra\ss e, Garching, Germany}
33:
34: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
35: \slugcomment{Submitted to ApJ}
36:
37: %% ------------------------------------------------------------------
38: %% ABSTRACT
39: %% ------------------------------------------------------------------
40:
41: \begin{abstract}
42: The global colors and structural properties of galaxies have
43: recently been shown to follow bimodal distributions. Galaxies
44: separate into a ``red sequence'', populated prototypically by
45: early-type galaxies, and a ``blue cloud'', whose typical objects are
46: late-type disk galaxies. Intermediate-type (Sa-Sbc) galaxies
47: populate both regions. It has been suggested that this bimodality
48: reflects the two-component nature of disk-bulge galaxies. However,
49: it has now been established that there are two types of bulges:
50: ``classical bulges'' that are dynamically hot systems resembling
51: (little) ellipticals, and ``pseudobulges'', dynamically cold,
52: flattened, disk-like structures that could not have formed via
53: violent relaxation. Alas, given the different formation mechanisms
54: of these bulges, the question is whether at types Sa-Sbc, where both
55: bulge types are found, the red-blue dichotomy separates galaxies at
56: some value of disk-to-bulge ratio, $B/T$, or, whether it separates
57: galaxies of different bulge type, irrespective of their $B/T$.
58:
59: In this paper, we identify classical bulges and pseudobulges
60: morphologically with HST images in a sample of nearby
61: galaxies. Detailed surface photometry reveals that: (1) The red --
62: blue dichotomy is a function of bulge type: at the same $B/T$,
63: pseudobulges are in globally blue galaxies and classical bulges are
64: in globally red galaxies. (2) Bulge type also predicts where the
65: galaxy lies in other (bimodal) global structural parameters: global
66: S\'ersic index and central surface brightness. (3) Hence, the red --
67: blue dichotomy is not due to decreasing bulge prominence alone, and
68: the bulge type of a galaxy carries significance for the galaxy's
69: evolutionary history.
70:
71: We interpret this result as showing that the type of bulge a galaxy
72: has is a signpost of the evolutionary history of the whole
73: galaxy. Classical bulges are thought to indicate that a galaxy has
74: undergone violent relaxation, e.g.\ during a major merger (of
75: smaller fragments) in its past. This is more likely to have happened
76: earlier when merging was frequent, in higher-density environments,
77: and when there was still enough gas to subsequently form the disk.
78: Therefore, these galaxies are likely to be red today. Pseudobulges
79: are disk components and therefore indicate a disk-only galaxy. Such
80: a galaxy has not suffered a major merger since the formation of its
81: disk. This is more likely at later epochs, when the merger rate is
82: lower and in low-density environments. Therefore, these are likely
83: to be younger, blue galaxies. In addition, there is evidence that
84: pseudobulge galaxies harbor supermassive black holes that follow the
85: $M_{BH}$--$\sigma$ relation. We discuss the effect of black hole
86: feedback in the host galaxy. If feedback during black hole growth in
87: classical bulges is what quenches star formation in their host
88: galaxies, why does this not happen in galaxies with pseudobulges?
89: \end{abstract}
90:
91:
92: %% KEYWORDS
93: %%
94: \keywords{galaxies: bulges --- galaxies: formation --- galaxies:
95: evolution --- galaxies: structure --- galaxies: fundamental
96: parameters}
97:
98:
99:
100: %% ------------------------------------------------------------------
101: %% INTRODUCTION
102: %% ------------------------------------------------------------------
103:
104: \section{Introduction}\label{sec:introduction}
105:
106: The study of the statistical properties of galaxies has advanced
107: rapidly due to the release of large amounts of homogeneously sampled
108: data from wide area surveys such as the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
109: (SDSS; \citealp{SDSS}). The most notable result of recent years has
110: been the bimodal distribution of many galaxy properties. Galaxies are
111: bimodally distributed in the color--magnitude plane separating into a
112: red sequence and a blue cloud
113: \citep{Stratevaetal01,Baloghetal04,Baldryetal04} and also
114: \citep{Liskeetal03,Driveretal06}. Other structural parameters, such as
115: luminosity, size, surface density, and concentration, separate
116: similarly into two sequences
117: \citep{Blantonetal03,Shenetal03,Kauffmannetal03b,Driveretal06}.
118: Stellar populations and stellar masses and mass surface density follow
119: as well \citep{Kauffmannetal03a,Kauffmannetal03b}.
120:
121: It is worth pointing out that some aspects of this bimodality in
122: galaxy properties have been known in other forms for a while. An
123: example is the existence of a tight color--magnitude relation for
124: early-type galaxies and the non-existence of such a relation for
125: late-type galaxies \citep{dVdV73}.
126:
127: The fact that the bimodality is manifested in many parameters in a
128: similar way is perhaps not surprising. Structural and stellar
129: population related parameters of galaxies are known to be well
130: correlated, giving rise to galaxy classification schemes such as the
131: Hubble Sequence (\citealp{Hubble26,Sandage61}; see \citealp{RH94} for
132: a review of parameter correlations along the Hubble Sequence).
133:
134: On the one extreme of the Hubble Sequence we find elliptical (E)
135: galaxies, which are thought to be the prototypical red-sequence
136: objects, and on the other extreme pure disk galaxies (Sd-Sm), which
137: populate the blue cloud. Intermediate-type (Sa-Sbc) galaxies form a
138: sequence in bulge-to-total ratio, $B/T$, and therefore bridge the red
139: and blue loci in the color--magnitude plane. It is therefore reasonable
140: to attribute the bimodality seen in colors of galaxies to this
141: bulge-disk two-component nature of galaxies, a point recently affirmed
142: by \citet{Driveretal06}.
143:
144: Yet, identifying the physical structures that are responsible for the
145: bimodal distribution is not entirely straight-forward. Firstly, colors
146: of disks and their associated bulges are correlated, such that redder
147: disks harbor redder bulges
148: \citep{PB96,deJong96a,MacArthur04}. Secondly, it has now been
149: established that there are at least two types of bulges, where
150: ``bulge'' is defined as the excess light over the inward extrapolation
151: of the surface brightness profile of the outer disk. The common
152: procedure in the literature to identify bulges is by surface
153: brightness profile decomposition and this practice identifies all
154: types of bulges in a common fashion. Thus we still refer to all the
155: structures that are found in this way as ``bulges''. A more physically
156: motivated definition is given below, however the term ``bulge''
157: defined in such purely observational terms is still operationally
158: useful and hence we will adopt this photometric definition in this
159: paper. We will, however, prefix this observationally-motivated term
160: ``bulge'' by physically-motivated qualifiers.
161:
162: Many bulges are dynamically hot systems resembling elliptical galaxies
163: that happen to have a disk around them \citep[e.g.][]{Renzini99}.
164: These bulges are called ``classical bulges''. Their formation is
165: assumed to be similar to that of elliptical galaxies, which are
166: thought to be the products of violent relaxation during major
167: mergers. This happens in environmentally driven evolution
168: (hierarchical clustering), which was the dominant process driving
169: galaxy formation in the early universe.
170:
171: On the other hand, ``pseudobulges'' are bulges that have structure and
172: kinematics resembling that of disks. They are believed to have formed
173: via dramatically different formation channels than those responsible
174: for the formation of classical bulges (see \citealp{KK04} for a
175: comprehensive review). Pseudobulges are dynamically cold
176: \citep{Kormendy93}. They have flattening similar to that of the outer
177: disk \citep{Kent85,Kormendy93,FP03,KF05,KCBKA06}. Also, they may have
178: embedded secondary bars, rings, and/or spiral structure
179: \citep{carollo1997}. All these are disk phenomena which do not occur
180: in hot stellar systems. Therefore, these bulges could not have been
181: formed by mergers involving violent relaxation. Instead, they are
182: thought to form through slow rearrangement of disk material. Disk
183: galaxies form their structural analogs to these nuclear features as a
184: result of having high angular momentum compared to random motions. We
185: expect a similar phenomenon is occurring in pseudobulges.
186: \citet{Kormendy93} shows that some bulges do have stellar dynamics
187: which resemble inclined disks better than they do oblate rotators.
188:
189: What can drive disk galaxies to reshape themselves to form a
190: pseudobulge? Non-axisymmetries in the gravitational potential (bars,
191: ovals, spiral structure) redistribute energy and angular momentum in
192: disks. A large body of literature reviewed by \citet{KK04} makes a
193: strong case that bars rearrange disk gas into inner rings, outer
194: rings, and dump gas into the center. All indications are that internal
195: evolution builds up the central gas density, resulting in star
196: formation and bulge-like stellar densities, thus forming
197: pseudobulges. Internal evolution is mostly ``secular'' -- its
198: timescales are much longer than the collapse time. \cite{Fisher06}
199: shows that pseudobulges are experiencing enhanced star formation over
200: classical bulges. This further favors the idea that pseudobulges form
201: through a slower process (secular evolution), and hence are still
202: being built today. For recent reviews on this subject see \citet{KK04}
203: and \citet{Atha05}.
204:
205: Hence, if pseudobulges are truly disk phenomena (in some way like bars
206: or rings), it is natural to expect that the dichotomy of galaxy
207: properties is not merely a product of changing bulge-to-total ratio,
208: but distinguishes {\em disks} (including their pseudobulges) from {\em
209: classical bulges}. This imposes us to ask two questions. Do galaxies
210: with pseudobulges behave like bulgeless pure disk galaxies? Secondly,
211: is the location of a galaxy with respect to the (color) bimodality
212: determined by the relative prominence of its bulge and disk components
213: alone?
214:
215: The existence of a dichotomy among bulges themselves offers an
216: opportunity to test this. The question becomes whether at intermediate
217: Hubble types of Sa-Sbc, where both bulge types are found, the color
218: bimodality separates galaxies at some bulge-to-total ratio, or, whether
219: it separates galaxies of different bulge type, irrespective of
220: bulge-to-total ratio (or neither).
221:
222: In this paper, we answer these questions by comparing the location of
223: galaxies with pseudobulges to that of galaxies with classical bulges
224: with respect to the bimodality of the color and structural
225: distributions of galaxies in general, i.e.\ we look for a relationship
226: between the type of bulge a galaxy has and the global properties of
227: the galaxy harboring the bulge.
228:
229: This paper is organized as follows. Sect.~\ref{sec:galaxy-sample}
230: discusses the galaxy sample used in this work and lays out the
231: analysis methods and bulge classification scheme we use. In
232: Sect.~\ref{sec:bulge-type} we present and discuss the dependence of
233: galaxy properties on bulge type. Finally, we summarize and discuss our
234: results in Sect.~\ref{sec:summary}.
235:
236:
237:
238: %% ------------------------------------------------------------------
239: %% THE GALAXY SAMPLE
240: %% ------------------------------------------------------------------
241:
242: \section{The galaxy sample}\label{sec:galaxy-sample}
243:
244: The aim of this work is to compare the location of galaxies with
245: pseudobulges to that of galaxies with classical bulges with respect to
246: the bimodal distribution of global galaxy colors and structural
247: properties. We will compare the loci of galaxies with pseudobulges to
248: that of galaxies with classical bulges in the color--magnitude plane
249: ($u\!-\!r$ vs.\ $M_r$) and structure-color plane (central surface
250: brightness, $\mu_0$, and global S\'ersic index, $n$, vs.\ $u\!-\!r$).
251:
252: We select a sample of 39 galaxies spanning Hubble types S0 to Sc by
253: cross referencing the Third Reference Catalog of Bright Galaxies (RC3;
254: \citealp{RC3}), the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release Four (SDSS -
255: DR4) database \citep{SDSS-DR4}, and the Hubble Space Telescope (HST)
256: archive. We require that the galaxies have inclination $i \leq
257: 60\degr$ to reduce the effect of dust. We will use the RC3 Hubble
258: classification, colors and total magnitudes from SDSS images, and
259: surface brightness profile fits to combined HST and SDSS surface
260: photometry. We identify pseudobulges and classical bulges using the
261: high-resolution HST images. We maintain a roughly even sampling of
262: Hubble types from S0 to Sc.
263:
264: \subsection{Identification of pseudobulges}\label{sec:ident-pseudo}
265:
266: \begin{figure*}[t]
267: \centering
268: \includegraphics[width=0.85\textwidth]{fig1.eps}
269: \caption{An example of pseudobulge (NGC~4536; right panels) and
270: classical bulge (NGC~3898; left panels) identification. The top
271: panels show an SDSS color image of each galaxy. The middle panels
272: show HST WFPC2 images of the bulges of their respective
273: galaxy. The white box on the SDSS image shows the extent of the
274: HST images, and 10\arcsec\ is marked as a white line in the HST
275: images for scale. Bulge-disk decompositions of composite HST plus
276: SDSS surface brightness profiles are shown in the bottom
277: panels.}\label{fig:bulges}
278: \end{figure*}
279:
280: In this study, we classify galaxies as having a pseudobulge using
281: bulge morphology; if the ``bulge'' is or contains a nuclear bar,
282: nuclear spiral, and/or nuclear ring the ``bulge'' is actually a
283: pseudobulge. Conversely if the bulge is featureless and more round
284: than the outer disk, the bulge is called a classical
285: bulge. Fig.~\ref{fig:bulges} illustrates typical examples of what we
286: identify as classical bulges (left panels) and a pseudobulges (right
287: panels). Notice first, that the classical bulge (NGC~3898) has a
288: smooth and regular stellar light profile as seen in the WFPC2 F547M
289: image in the middle panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:bulges}. There is no reason
290: evident in the image to think that this galaxy harbors a
291: pseudobulge. On the other hand, NGC~4536 is a typical example of a
292: galaxy with nuclear spiral structure and patchiness (i.e. a
293: pseudobulge). A decomposition of the stellar surface brightness
294: profile shows that the pseudobulge dominates the light profile to a
295: radius of $\sim 9$ arcseconds. The WFPC2 F606W image in the middle
296: panel implies that the entire pseudobulge appears to exhibit spiral
297: structure. Notice that spiral structure exists in the small region
298: inside the box on the wider field SDSS image. Also notice that the
299: classical bulge has a $\mu(r) \propto r^{1/3.4}$ profile, while the
300: pseudobulge is nearly exponential.
301:
302: We identify pseudobulges using HST archival images in the optical
303: wavelength regime ($B$ through $I$) . This makes bulge classification
304: subject to the effects of dust. However, the structures used to
305: identify pseudobulges are usually experiencing enhanced star formation
306: rates, and are easier to detect in the optical region of the spectrum
307: where the mass-to-light ratios are more affected by young stellar
308: populations, rather than in the near infrared where the effects of
309: dust are lesser. Classical bulges may have dust in their center, as do
310: many elliptical galaxies \citep{Laueretal05}. The presence of dust
311: alone is not enough to classify a galaxy as containing a pseudobulge.
312:
313: Another caveat when using morphology is that the structures we wish to
314: identify as well as the color of a galaxy can be distorted or altered
315: during early stages of a merger. For example NGC~3169 and NGC~3166
316: form a close pair (separation is $\sim50$~kpc). \cite{sandage94} note
317: that NGC~3169 shows a warped disk and peculiar morphology. Both of
318: these galaxies have nuclear structure that is similar to structure
319: found in pseudobulges. However, given the presence of the companion,
320: we cannot say whether the central structure represents a
321: secularly-evolved pseudobulge or is due to short-term merger-induced
322: gas inflow and star formation (see \citealp{KJB04}).
323:
324: We use the NASA Extragalactic Database (NED) to search for any
325: evidence of close companions of similar magnitude, tidal distortions,
326: or peculiar morphology. We remove those galaxies which seem to be
327: interacting with other galaxies from our sample. Three galaxies in our
328: sample have companions at $\sim 100$~kpc, which do not appear to
329: affect the morphology of these galaxies' disks.
330:
331: Of the 39 galaxies in our sample, 10 galaxies are classified as having
332: a classical bulge (3 S0, 3 Sa, and 4 Sab) and 29 galaxies are
333: classified as having a pseudobulge (3 S0, 4 Sa, 1 Sab, 5 Sb, 6 Sbc,
334: and 10 Sc). We do not distinguish between barred and unbarred galaxies
335: in this work. The sample ends up favoring pseudobulges over classical
336: bulges, most likely due to the constraint of even sampling along
337: Hubble types as pseudobulges are more common in late type galaxies.
338:
339: Table~1 lists the galaxies in our bulge sample along with
340: their bulge classification, Hubble types, magnitudes, colors, and
341: other derived quantities (described below).
342:
343: \subsection{Photometry}\label{sec:photometry}
344:
345: We calculate total magnitudes and colors from direct integration of 2D
346: surface brightness profiles in the SDSS $u$ and $r$ band images. We
347: use the code of \cite{BDM98} on images available
348: publicly from the SDSS archive \citep{SDSS-DR4}.
349:
350: First, interfering foreground objects are identified in each image and
351: masked manually. Then, isophotes are sampled by 256 points equally
352: spaced in an angle $\theta$ relating to polar angle by $\tan \theta =
353: a/b\,\tan \phi$, where $\phi$ is the polar angle and $b / a$ is the
354: axial ratio. An ellipse is then fitted to each isophote by least
355: squares. The software determines six parameters for each ellipse:
356: relative surface brightness, center position, major and
357: minor axis lengths, and position angle along the major axis.
358:
359: To calculate the structural quantities central surface brightness,
360: $\mu_0$, and global S\'ersic index, $n$, we fit a S\'ersic function,
361: \begin{equation}\label{eq:sersic-fit}
362: \mu(r)=\mu_0+(r/r_0)^{1/n},
363: \end{equation}
364: to the mean isophote axis of SDSS surface brightness profiles. It is
365: well known that surface brightness profiles of intermediate type
366: galaxies are not well described by single component models. At least
367: two component functions (bulge plus outer disk) are required; also,
368: many galaxies contain bars, rings and ovals that further complicate
369: the surface brightness profile. For the nearby galaxies in our bulge
370: sample a single-component S\'ersic fit is clearly not an excellent fit
371: to the galaxies' light profiles. However, we wish to compare these
372: fits to the published manifestations of the galaxy
373: bimodality. Therefore, we must calculate quantities similar to those
374: in large surveys. Typical root-mean-square deviations of our S\'ersic
375: fits to the galaxy profiles are 0.1-0.2 mag arcsec$^{-2}$.
376:
377: Bulge-to-total ($B/T$) ratios are calculated by fitting S\'ersic
378: functions combined with an exponential for the outer disk to the 1D
379: surface brightness profile of each galaxy:
380: \begin{equation}\label{eq:bt-fit}
381: \mu(r)=\mu_{0,b}+\left(\frac{r}{r_{0,b}}\right)^{1/n_b} \,\ + \,\
382: \mu_{0,d} + \frac{r}{h} \ ,
383: \end{equation}
384: where the $\mu_{0,b}$ and $r_{0,b}$ reflect central surface brightness
385: and scale length of the bulge, while $\mu_{0,d}$ and $h$ are the
386: analogous quantities for the outer disk. $n_b$ is the S\'ersic index
387: of the bulge.
388:
389: Equation \ref{eq:bt-fit} is fit to surface brightness profiles
390: generated from HST archival images combined with SDSS $r$ band
391: photometry as discussed above. For calculating $B/T$, we allow the
392: bulge and the disk component to have individual ellipticities, which
393: we take to be the average ellipticity within each component. This
394: definitely adds a little uncertainty to the resulting $B/T$, as both
395: bulges and disks are known to have varying ellipticity profiles
396: \citep{FP03}. However, for our purposes this method is
397: sufficient. Finally, the $B/T$ that we quote is the ratio of the
398: radially integrated S\'ersic function and the radially integrated sum
399: of the S\'ersic and the exponential. We have checked that there is no
400: trend of $B/T$ with inclination for pseudobulges, classical bulges, or
401: the combined sample.
402:
403: We refer the reader to Table~1, where these quantities
404: are listed for all our bulge galaxies.
405:
406:
407: %% ------------------------------------------------------------------
408: %% DEPENDENCE OF GALAXY PROPERTIES ON BULGE TYPE
409: %% ------------------------------------------------------------------
410:
411: \section{Dependence of bimodal galaxy properties on bulge
412: type}\label{sec:bulge-type}
413:
414: \begin{figure*}[t]
415: \centering
416: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{fig2.eps}
417: \caption{The location of three different galaxy populations is shown
418: in global color vs.\ total magnitude space, from left to right:
419: early-type (E-S0), intermediate-type (Sa-Sbc), and late-type
420: (Sc-Irr). Galaxies identified as having pseudobulges are
421: represented by filled triangles, galaxies with classical bulges
422: are shown as filled circles. Galaxies without bulge identification
423: are shown as open symbols for comparison. The dashed line
424: separates the red sequence from the blue cloud following
425: \citet{Baldryetal04}.}\label{fig:cm}
426: \end{figure*}
427:
428: Does the shift from the blue cloud to the red sequence coincide with a
429: shift in predominance of the disk to the bulge?
430:
431: Using extensive 2D photometry, \citet{Driveretal06} find that the
432: bimodality of galaxies in color--magnitude space becomes more
433: pronounced when the color is constrained to the central region of the
434: galaxy. They also show that the concentration of the galaxy,
435: parameterized by global S\'ersic index, participates in the bimodality
436: in galaxy properties as well. This motivates them to suggest that the
437: fundamental division of galaxies is merely that of bulges (old, red,
438: high concentration) and disks (star forming, blue, diffuse). With this
439: two-component nature of galaxies, the position of an object on the
440: blue--red divide is thought of as a function of the bulge-to-total
441: ratio, $B/T$, alone.
442:
443: The existence of intermediate-type Sa-Sbc galaxies on both the red and
444: blue sequence challenges the suggestion that the bimodality of
445: galaxies divides along the disk-bulge dichotomy. Intermediate type
446: galaxies have roughly constant (and large) bulge-to-total ratios on
447: average \citep{SdV86}. Bulge-to-total ratios begin to fall much more
448: rapidly only at Hubble types Sbc-Sc and later. Moreover, disk color
449: and bulge color are correlated: redder bulges reside in redder disks
450: \citep{PB96,deJong96a,MacArthur04}. Galaxies are not made by randomly
451: mixing disk and bulge components.
452:
453: At issue, therefore, is whether the galaxy bimodality is just a
454: product of changing emphasis of each subcomponent (i.e.\ simply
455: $B/T$), or possibly a signature of differing evolutionary histories of
456: the whole galaxy.
457:
458: The existence of a dichotomy among bulges themselves offers the
459: opportunity to test this. The question becomes whether at intermediate
460: Hubble types of Sa-Sbc, where both bulge types are found, the color
461: bimodality separates galaxies at some bulge-to-total ratio, or,
462: whether it separates galaxies of different bulge type, irrespective of
463: bulge-to-total ratio.
464:
465: \subsection{The color -- magnitude plane and Hubble types}
466:
467: We examine galaxies of Hubble types spanning S0-Sc in the global color
468: ($u\!-\!r$) versus total magnitude ($M_r$) plane, and we mark them
469: according to their bulge type. Fig.~\ref{fig:cm} shows the location of
470: galaxies with classical bulges (round symbols) and galaxies with
471: pseudobulges (triangles; identified by bulge morphology as discussed
472: in Sect.~\ref{sec:ident-pseudo}) in our sample in the $u\!-\!r$ vs.\
473: $M_r$ plane. Note that we plot the total galaxy color and total
474: magnitude, not the bulge color and magnitude. We merely label the
475: galaxies by their bulge type.
476:
477: As a reference sample, we also plot 542 galaxies selected from the
478: intersection of the SDSS-DR4 spectroscopic catalog and the RC3, having
479: inclination $i < 35\degr$, and that are at a distance $z <
480: 0.02$. These galaxies divide into Hubble types as follows: 50 E, 112
481: S0, 48 Sa, 36 Sab, 67 Sb, 57 Sbc, 52 Sc, 40 Scd, 47 Sd, 17 Sm and 16
482: Irr. We use SDSS redshifts for distances and SDSS ``model'' magnitudes
483: for colors and total magnitudes for these objects.
484:
485: We note here that the magnitudes of the galaxies that we classify as
486: having classical bulges or pseudobulges are computed by our own
487: ellipse fitting discussed in Sect.~\ref{sec:photometry}. This may give
488: different results compared to the SDSS model magnitudes which we use
489: only for the reference sample objects in the color--magnitude
490: plane. However, for galaxies with low total S\'ersic index (as the
491: intermediate types mainly are) there is very little difference in the
492: type of magnitude \citep{Grahametal05}. Also note that we do not
493: correct the colors and magnitudes for the effects of extinction by
494: dust. This may cause some disk galaxies to appear redder than their
495: stellar populations are. We moderate this effect by restricting
496: ourselves to low-inclination galaxies. However, some disk galaxies at
497: the locus of the red sequence may have been moved there by the effect
498: of dust. For illustrative reasons, we also plot the line dividing
499: blue from red galaxies following \citet{Baldryetal04}.
500:
501: {\bf Late types} (Right panel in Fig.~\ref{fig:cm}). As has been shown,
502: late type galaxies (type Sc and later) are almost entirely on the blue
503: sequence \citep[e.g.][]{Stratevaetal01}. Note the caveat on dust
504: extinction in disk galaxies discussed above; the reddest galaxies in
505: this bin are most likely affected by dust extinction. We emphasize
506: that the panel with Sc-Irr galaxies does not contain a single
507: classical bulge. As the Hubble sequence progresses toward later types,
508: galaxies tend to have small bulges or no bulge at all. This is
509: indicative of a less violent past, as it is very likely that these
510: galaxies have not experienced a merger event that would have formed a
511: (classical) bulge since the time of formation of their disks. The fact
512: that these galaxies seem to contain pseudobulges if they have a bulge
513: at all, provides a strong reinforcement of this statement.
514:
515: {\bf Intermediate types} (Middle panel in Fig.~\ref{fig:cm}). The
516: intermediate type Sa-Sbc galaxies give us a sample on which to test
517: our hypothesis. Nearly all (87\%) galaxies with pseudobulges are bluer
518: than the red--blue divide, while all the galaxies with classical
519: bulges are redder than the divide. To show that this is not simply
520: the consequence of the pseudobulge galaxies having lower
521: bulge-to-total ratios than the classical bulge galaxies, recall first
522: that the number of pseudobulges in our sample is not a step function
523: at some late Hubble type (5 Sa, 2 Sab, 4 Sb, 6 Sbc) and that as noted
524: above, at these intermediate types the Hubble sequence is not a strong
525: sequence of bulge-to-total ratios (see \citealp{SdV86} and the review
526: by \citealp{RH94}).
527:
528: \begin{figure}[t]
529: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{fig3.eps}
530: \caption{The distribution of bulge-to-total ratios, $B/T$, of
531: intermediate type (Sa-Sbc) galaxies with pseudobulges (blue
532: triangles) and classical bulges (red filled circles) with respect
533: to their global $u\!-\!r$ color. The dashed line marks $B/T =
534: 0.45$. }\label{fig:bt}
535: \end{figure}
536:
537: In fact, in the range of $B/T$ values spanned by galaxies with
538: pseudobulges we find plenty of classical bulge galaxies as well. This
539: is illustrated in Fig.~\ref{fig:bt}, where we plot global $u\!-\!r$
540: against $B/T$ for 24 of our bulge galaxies. We calculate $B/T$ for all
541: 10 classical bulge galaxies and all the 16 intermediate-type
542: pseudobulge galaxies. Two of the latter (NGC~1068 and NGC~5691) are
543: not well-fit by a two-component model (Equation~\ref{eq:bt-fit}) and
544: hence we cannot obtain reliable $B/T$ numbers for these and they are
545: not included in the plot (see also Table~1). Therefore the plot
546: contains 14 pseudobulge galaxies.
547:
548: In our sample, galaxies on the red sequence with classical bulges have
549: $B/T$ ratios as low as 10\%. Galaxies with pseudobulges have $B/T$
550: ratios as high as 40\%. The majority of galaxies with classical bulges
551: in our (small) sample have $B/T$ values in the same range as the
552: galaxies with pseudobulges. Even at the lowest $B/T \sim 0.1$ values
553: in our intermediate type Sa-Sbc galaxies, the assignment of a galaxy
554: to the red sequence or the blue cloud is predicted by its bulge type.
555:
556: It is true that classical bulge galaxies extend to greater $B/T$
557: values than do pseudobulge galaxies. This is easily understood given
558: the different formation channels that are thought to lead to classical
559: bulges and to pseudobulges. Classical bulges are an extension of
560: elliptical galaxies (formed via mergers) that happen to have a disk
561: around them. This sort of evolution naturally extends all the way to
562: $B/T = 1$ (i.e.\ a pure elliptical galaxy; see also
563: \citealp{KB96}). Pseudobulges form secularly by rearranging disk
564: material. Therefore it seems unlikely that a disk would be able to
565: make a pseudobulge equal in size to itself ($B/T \simeq 0.5$) through
566: secular evolution.
567:
568: Also note that in Fig.~\ref{fig:cm}, there is no significant
569: difference in the range of absolute magnitudes spanned by the
570: pseudobulge galaxies and that of the classical-bulge
571: galaxies. Pseudobulge galaxies are not systematically fainter in
572: $M_r$.
573:
574: Concluding this discussion, we find that the red--blue bimodality
575: cannot be a function of decreasing bulge prominence alone. Our results
576: show that it is a function of bulge type. Pseudobulges are in blue
577: galaxies and classical bulges are in red galaxies. Furthermore,
578: galaxies with pseudobulges behave just like pure disk galaxies if we
579: compare their distribution in global color to the distribution of pure
580: disk (late-type) galaxies in Fig.~\ref{fig:cm}. The type of bulge a
581: galaxy has is a signpost for an evolutionary history of the total
582: galaxy.
583:
584: {\bf Early types} (Left panel in Fig.~\ref{fig:cm}). The early-type
585: bin (E - S0) is almost entirely populated by red sequence
586: galaxies. There are three galaxies that we identify as harboring
587: pseudobulges in this panel. All three peudobulges are in S0 galaxies
588: and these are on the red sequence. This illustrates a caveat when
589: dealing with pseudobulges. They do not have to be young. A disk galaxy
590: could have undergone secular evolution long ago and formed a
591: pseudobulge. This is well illustrated by the aforementioned
592: correlation between disk color and bulge color. As a side note, this
593: implies that identifying pseudobulges using color only is bound to
594: misclassify some pseudobulges and underestimate their number. Also,
595: S0 galaxies exist at a wide range of bulge-to-total ratios, a point
596: noticed by \citet{vdB76}. The processes that are thought to make S0
597: galaxies (e.g.\ gas stripping by ram pressure, harassment;
598: \citealp{MKLDO96}) operate independently of the processes that make
599: bulges. It is reasonable to believe that the evolution which makes a
600: galaxy an S0 happens independently of the secular evolution that makes
601: a pseudobulge (see the discussion in \citealp{KK04}). Therefore the
602: position of S0 galaxies in color--magnitude space may be due to
603: separate phenomenona, rather than posing a counter example to our
604: hypothesis.
605:
606: \subsection{Global galaxy structure}
607:
608: \begin{figure*}[t]
609: \centering
610: \includegraphics[width=14cm]{fig4.eps}
611: \caption{Dependence of global structure on bulge type. The left
612: panel shows the S\'ersic index from a fit of a single S\'ersic law
613: (Eq.~\ref{eq:sersic-fit}) to the surface brightness profile of the
614: whole galaxy, plotted against global color. The right panel shows
615: the corresponding central surface brightness versus color. Blue
616: triangles represent pseudobulges, red circles represent classical
617: bulges; S0 galaxies are plotted as open symbols. In both panels
618: the horizontal line denotes $u!\-\!r=2.2$. The vertical line in
619: the left panel denotes $\mu_0=16$, and the horizontal line in the
620: right panel denotes $n=2.5$.}\label{fig:struct}
621: \end{figure*}
622:
623: \cite{Blantonetal03} show that the relation of structure to galaxy
624: color is markedly different for red and blue galaxies. This can be
625: illustrated by plotting the S\'ersic index and a characteristic
626: surface brightness against color. In Fig.~\ref{fig:struct}, we
627: illustrate the dependence of galaxy structure on bulge type. We mark
628: the dividing line of red and blue galaxies with a horizontal line at
629: $u\ -\ g=2.2$ \citep{Stratevaetal01}. Open symbols represent S0
630: galaxies, which likely arise due to distinct phenomena not related to
631: bulge formation as discussed above, and thus do not follow the normal
632: behavior for pseudobulge galaxies. In general, blue galaxies are more
633: diffuse and have lower S\'ersic index than galaxies with classical
634: bulges. In both structural parameters there is a sharp transition from
635: galaxies with pseudobulges to galaxies with classical bulges. Again,
636: as in Fig.~\ref{fig:cm}, we plot total color and S\'ersic parameters
637: from a global single-component fit. We mark galaxies by the type of
638: their bulge.
639:
640: The surface brightness at zero radius is recovered from the single
641: component S\'ersic fits (Eq.~\ref{eq:sersic-fit}). Note that we report
642: the fit value, which should be taken as a characteristic value of the
643: galaxy as a whole. It is also worth noting that central surface
644: brightness is more sensitive to the dichotomy in bulge types than
645: surface brightness at the effective radius. Galaxies with classical
646: bulges form a tight sequence in color that begins at $\mu_{0,r} \sim
647: 16$ (vertical line in the left panel) and extends to higher central
648: surface densities, well populated by giant elliptical galaxies. There
649: is a sharp transition at $\mu_{0,r} \sim 16$. Below this surface
650: density, the diagram becomes completely populated by galaxies with
651: pseudobulges.
652:
653: The S\'ersic index is normally interpreted as a parametrization of the
654: shape of a surface brightness profile of a galaxy. A typical disk
655: galaxy has $n = 1$ and an intermediately sized elliptical galaxy has
656: $n \sim 4$. In the right panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:struct}, galaxies with
657: pseudobulges have lower global S\'ersic index than galaxies with
658: classical bulges. And galaxies with classical bulges do not have
659: global S\'ersic index smaller than $n \sim 2.5$ (vertical line in the
660: right panel).
661:
662: Galaxies with pseudobulges populate a broader range of color, yet the
663: majority of pseudobulge galaxies are restricted to a more narrow range
664: in central surface brightness than classical bulges. The smaller
665: variation in $\mu_0$ and exponential surface brightness profiles are
666: well known properties of disk galaxies \citep{freemanlaw}. We restate
667: that our galaxies with pseudobulges and galaxies with classical bulges
668: both populate the intermediate Hubble types Sa-Sbc. Thus, at the same
669: Hubble type, galaxies with pseudobulges are more like pure disk
670: galaxies than galaxies with classical bulges.
671:
672: What is compelling is not only that global S\'ersic index and central
673: surface density are lower. In fact, the distribution of central
674: surface brightness alone is not dichotomous. It is the combination of
675: these quantities that reveals the structural dichotomies. The
676: distribution in both the color -- S\'ersic and the color -- $\mu_0$
677: plane is completely different for galaxies with pseudobulges and
678: classical bulges. Further, the transition in this behavior is
679: coincident with the transition from red galaxies to blue.
680:
681: The behavior of color and structure is definitely more regular among
682: classical bulges. This makes sense in context of the formation picture
683: of these two types of bulges. Pseudobulges are structures that are
684: continuously evolving. Therefore when we look at a sample of
685: pseudobulge galaxies we are seeing them in many different stages of
686: evolution. As the pseudobulge grows galaxy properties such as color,
687: $\mu_0$ and $n$ will certainly change. However, classical bulges are
688: thought to form in one or multiple discrete and short-lived events
689: separated by periods of passive evolution. If the young stellar
690: populations made in these events age into old, red populations on a
691: timescale that is shorter than the time between star formation events,
692: then classical bulges will spend most of their time looking
693: homogeneously red. We find that the galaxies harboring these classical
694: bulges are globally red. This implies that since the formation of the
695: classical bulge, there has been relatively little evolution in the
696: galaxy that contains it as a whole. Thus, properties of galaxies with
697: classical bulges show little scatter compared to pseudobulge
698: galaxies. Studies considering bulges as a heterogeneous class will
699: likely shed light on such differences.
700:
701: \begin{deluxetable*}{llclclllll}
702: \tablewidth{0pt}
703: \tablecaption{Global colors and structural data for the bulge sample}
704: \tablehead{\colhead{Identifier} & \colhead{Type} & \colhead{Inclination} &
705: \colhead{$m-M$} & \colhead{Bulge\tablenotemark{(a)}} &
706: \colhead{$u\!-\!r$} & \colhead{$M_r$} &
707: \colhead{$\mu_0$\tablenotemark{(b)}} & \colhead{$n$\tablenotemark{(b)}} &
708: \colhead{$B/T$\tablenotemark{(c)}} \\
709: \colhead{} & \colhead{RC3} & \colhead{degrees} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{} &
710: \colhead{mag} & \colhead{mag} & \colhead{mag/arcsec$^2$} &
711: \colhead{global S\'ersic} & \colhead{}}
712: \startdata
713: NGC~2639 & Sa & 44 & 33.24 & c & 2.47 & -21.96 & 12.97 & 3.56 & 0.72 \\
714: NGC~2775 & Sab & 40 & 30.95 & c & 2.41 & -21.29 & 15.57 & 2.72 & 0.52 \\
715: NGC~2880\tablenotemark{(d)}
716: & S0 & 68 & 31.83 & c & 2.52 & -20.53 & 13.59 & 3.42 & 0.65 \\
717: NGC~2962\tablenotemark{(d)}
718: & S0 & 67 & 32.12 & c & 2.63 & -20.53 & 11.57 & 5.13 & 0.44 \\
719: NGC~3031 & Sab & 59 & 27.63 & c & 2.49 & -20.86 & 10.41 & 5.70 & 0.40 \\
720: NGC~3898 & Sab & 57 & 31.49 & c & 2.53 & -21.13 & 13.94 & 3.51 & 0.38 \\
721: NGC~4379 & S0 & 43 & 31.59 & c & 2.46 & -20.18 & 15.30 & 2.38 & 0.49 \\
722: NGC~4698 & Sab & 51 & 31.59 & c & 2.37 & -21.13 & 11.84 & 5.15 & 0.18 \\
723: NGC~4772 & Sa & 64 & 30.64 & c & 2.37 & -19.87 & 14.84 & 3.33 & 0.25 \\
724: NGC~5448 & Sa & 64 & 32.34 & c & 2.57 & -20.68 & 15.89 & 2.62 & 0.10 \\ \hline
725:
726: NGC~1068 & Sb & 21 & 30.46 & p & 1.74 & -20.77 & 14.38 & 1.69 & ---\tablenotemark{(e)} \\
727: NGC~1084 & Sc & 46 & 30.56 & p & 1.55 & -20.10 & 18.34 & 0.91 & \ldots \\
728: NGC~2681 & S0 & 0 & 30.20 & p & 2.32 & -19.84 & 11.51 & 4.09 & \ldots \\
729: NGC~2782 & Sa & 49 & 32.70 & p & 1.56 & -21.25 & 18.77 & 1.23 & 0.14 \\
730: NGC~2859 & S0 & 33 & 31.78 & p & 2.51 & -20.83 & 10.34 & 4.93 & \ldots \\
731: NGC~2950 & S0 & 62 & 31.49 & p & 2.56 & -20.82 & 9.79 & 4.67 & \ldots \\
732: NGC~2976 & Sc & 61 & 27.63 & p & 1.66 & -17.88 & 19.59 & 0.85 & \ldots \\
733: NGC~3259 & Sbc & 61 & 31.97 & p & 1.47 & -19.37 & 18.18 & 1.50 & 0.11 \\
734: NGC~3338 & Sc & 54 & 32.06 & p & 1.78 & -21.36 & 18.83 & 1.66 & \dots \\
735: NGC~3351 & Sb & 42 & 29.24 & p & 2.38 & -19.94 & 17.97 & 1.81 & 0.09 \\
736: NGC~3359 & Sc & 53 & 30.98 & p & 1.21 & -20.13 & 18.19 & 2.23 & \ldots \\
737: NGC~3368 & Sab & 55 & 29.24 & p & 2.27 & -20.12 & 13.78 & 3.42 & 0.21 \\
738: NGC~3627 & Sb & 57 & 29.17 & p & 1.94 & -20.52 & 14.66 & 3.20 & 0.24 \\
739: NGC~3642 & Sbc & 32 & 32.09 & p & 1.92 & -20.64 & 16.82 & 2.34 & 0.13 \\
740: NGC~3810 & Sc & 48 & 29.80 & p & 1.52 & -19.45 & 18.65 & 1.09 & \ldots \\
741: NGC~4030 & Sbc & 40 & 31.70 & p & 1.85 & -21.63 & 17.14 & 1.58 & 0.40 \\
742: NGC~4051 & Sbc & 36 & 30.74 & p & 1.69 & -20.42 & 18.53 & 1.99 & 0.07 \\
743: NGC~4123 & Sc & 48 & 30.91 & p & 2.00 & -19.50 & 20.39 & 0.85 & \ldots \\
744: NGC~4152 & Sc & 40 & 32.31 & p & 1.49 & -20.25 & 18.79 & 0.97 & \ldots \\
745: NGC~4254 & Sc & 32 & 31.59 & p & 1.51 & -22.03 & 18.47 & 0.98 & \ldots \\
746: NGC~4380 & Sb & 59 & 31.59 & p & 2.15 & -20.42 & 19.73 & 1.06 & 0.06 \\
747: NGC~4384 & Sa & 42 & 32.60 & p & 1.13 & -19.73 & 19.63 & 0.77 & 0.07 \\
748: NGC~4500 & Sa & 50 & 33.18 & p & 1.54 & -20.76 & 16.88 & 1.74 & 0.29 \\
749: NGC~4536 & Sbc & 59 & 32.02 & p & 2.15 & -21.90 & 19.85 & 0.97 & 0.06 \\
750: NGC~4647 & Sc & 38 & 31.59 & p & 1.70 & -20.83 & 17.12 & 3.15 & \ldots \\
751: NGC~4900 & Sc & 19 & 30.41 & p & 1.30 & -19.08 & 19.18 & 0.81 & \ldots \\
752: NGC~5055 & Sbc & 56 & 29.21 & p & 1.90 & -20.80 & 16.71 & 2.28 & 0.26 \\
753: NGC~5691 & Sa & 42 & 31.97 & p & 1.45 & -19.91 & 17.38 & 2.00 & ---\tablenotemark{(e)} \\
754: NGC~5806 & Sb & 60 & 32.05 & p & 2.14 & -21.04 & 17.62 & 1.99 & 0.17 \\
755: \enddata
756: \tablenotetext{(a)}{p -- pseudobulge; c -- classical bulge.}
757: \tablenotetext{(b)}{global S\'ersic index and central surface
758: brightness determined by a fit of Eq.~1 to the profiles of all
759: classical bulge galaxies and the intermediate-type pseudobulge
760: galaxies.}
761: \tablenotetext{(c)}{$B/T$ determined by a fit of Eq.~2 to the profile.}
762: \tablenotetext{(d)}{Erwin (2004) finds nuclear bar or inner disk, we do not.}
763: \tablenotetext{(e)}{These galaxies are not well-fit by a two-component model.}
764: \end{deluxetable*}
765: \nocite{Erwin04}
766:
767: %% ------------------------------------------------------------------
768: %% SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION
769: %% ------------------------------------------------------------------
770:
771: \section{Summary and Discussion}\label{sec:summary}
772:
773: We examine galaxies of Hubble types spanning S0-Sc in the global color
774: versus magnitude plane, marking them according to their bulge type. We
775: classify them as having pseudobulges or classical bulges by analyzing
776: the morphology of the bulge using HST imaging.
777:
778: We show that the type of bulge a galaxy has is a good predictor of
779: where that galaxy will fall in the red-blue and structural galaxy
780: dichotomies. Galaxies with pseudobulges lie in the blue cloud. They
781: have the same global color as galaxies with no bulge at all (pure disk
782: galaxies). On the other hand, galaxies having a classical bulge (and
783: elliptical galaxies) lie on the red sequence. We have further shown
784: that this is not an effect of lower bulge-to-total ratios in
785: pseudobulge galaxies. Additionally, we show that galaxies with
786: pseudobulges have lower global S\'ersic index and lower central
787: surface density than galaxies with classical bulges.
788:
789: Our results imply that the processes involved in the formation of
790: galactic bulges are coupled to the processes that form the entire
791: galaxy. Galactic disks and classical bulges remain the two fundamental
792: structural components of galaxies, yet their relative prominence is
793: not what determines the location of an (intermediate-type) galaxy with
794: respect to the color and structural bimodalities. It is the presence
795: of a classical bulge and the influence this bulge has and its
796: formation had on the galaxy that places the galaxy on the red sequence
797: today. Another way of putting this is to say that increasing the
798: bulge-to-total ratio of an intermediate-type galaxy with a pseudobulge
799: will not automatically move the galaxy to the red sequence, and
800: likewise, a galaxy with a classical bulge is on the red sequence no
801: matter how small that bulge is.
802:
803: Thus, the location of a galaxy with respect to the bimodality
804: does -- at least in part -- reflect differing evolutionary paths of
805: the whole galactic system. It is not merely a reflection of different
806: emphasis of the disk and bulge subcomponents.
807:
808: We wish to reiterate that interpreting the red-blue bimodality as due
809: to the fundamental distinction between disks and classical bulges is
810: not necessarily incorrect. However what is incorrect is to say that
811: the bimodality is merely the linear combination of these two
812: components that determines the location of a galaxy with respect to
813: the bimodality. Also, if one defines the components by photometric
814: decomposition only as has been common practice in the literature, then
815: one is likely to obtain ambiguous results.
816:
817: As reviewed in \citet{KK04} and outlined in
818: Sect.~\ref{sec:introduction}, a pseudobulge forms through dynamical
819: processes inside the disk. We also know that the existence of a thin
820: disk signals that the galaxy has not undergone a major merger since
821: the formation of the disk \citep{TO92}. The exact mass ratio in a
822: merger event that is needed to destroy a disk is still under debate
823: \citep{VW99,HC06}, however, it is believed to be of the order of 0.2.
824: All merger events above this mass ratio are believed to result in
825: dynamically hot stellar systems. This leads to the well-known problem
826: of forming late-type disks in cosmological simulations; the disks in
827: these simulations suffer too many mergers and thicken or are destroyed
828: \citep{steinmetz2002}. The problem of forming these galaxies in
829: cosmological simulations gets much worse when we realize that galaxies
830: with pseudobulges should be included with pure disk galaxies in this
831: sense: they have not suffered a major merger event since the formation
832: of the disk.
833:
834: The processes that are believed to make pseudobulges require not only
835: a disk to be present, but that disk must be dynamically very cold in
836: order to be unstable to non-axisymmetric instabilities such as bars
837: that are needed to rearrange gas and stars to form a pseudobulge (see
838: \citealp{KK04} for a detailed review). Thus, pseudobulges, like thin
839: disks, are signatures of a quiet merger history. Pseudobulge formation
840: timescales have been estimated as $\sim 1$~Gyr \citep{KK04,Fisher06}
841: based on current star formation rates. Now consider the time necessary
842: to form a bar and build up a sufficiently high nuclear gas density to
843: form stars. It is quite plausible that these galaxies have remained
844: cold (and thus free of significant mergers) since the formation of
845: their disks.
846:
847: How can we explain our result that classical-bulge galaxies lie
848: exclusively on the red sequence? Classical bulge galaxies are thought
849: to have undergone violent relaxation, most likely during a major
850: merger in their past, presumably one involving lower-mass galaxies to
851: form a typical bulge of today's intermediate type Sa-Sbc
852: galaxies. Intermediate mass mergers happen predominantly in the
853: earlier universe, when the halos harboring these objects
854: assemble. Today, the surviving halos of this mass scale are
855: incorporated into bigger structures. For example, the large and small
856: Magellanic Clouds are sub-halos of the Milky Way system. At early
857: times, intermediate-mass mergers frequently occur, and there is still
858: enough gas left to be accreted, so that a disk forms around the newly
859: formed bulge. The result is a disk galaxy that contains a classical
860: bulge.
861:
862: As the merger rate was much higher at early times in the universe, it
863: is less likely that a pure disk galaxy would have survived this epoch
864: \citep{steinmetz2002}. Therefore old, red galaxies of Hubble type Sc
865: and later do not commonly exist today. Also, the only way to grow a
866: pseudobulge is to have a relatively long period of disk evolution (of
867: the order of a few Gyr) undisturbed by mergers. This is much more
868: likely to happen in low-density environments at later epochs, possibly
869: $z < 1$. Therefore, it is natural that pseudobulges live in blue,
870: relatively younger galactic systems that are more typical of
871: low-density environments today.
872:
873: Parenthetically, in high-density environments a few objects may evolve
874: toward the red sequence within $\sim 1$~Gyr \citep{Blanton06} by gas
875: stripping and quenching of their star formation irrespective of their
876: merger history and resulting bulge type, most likely to become S0s.
877:
878: The environmental dependence of galaxy colors is well established by
879: studies that link galaxy properties to the environment in which they
880: are found. We first recall the morphology-density relation
881: \citep{dressler1980}, namely that early-type (and thus red) galaxies
882: are more clustered than late-type (and thus blue)
883: galaxies. \cite{li2006} restate this in the modern context, showing
884: that not only color, but also surface density, concentration, and
885: 4000\AA\ break strength all correlate with environmental density in
886: the same way (see also \citealp{blanton2005environ}). Since we find
887: all our (non-S0) pseudobulges in blue-cloud galaxies which are
888: preferentially found in low-density environment, we take this as a
889: reinforcement of the conclusion that pseudobulges indicate galaxies
890: with quiescent merger histories.
891:
892: Evidence for a quiet merger history of blue galaxies is also given by
893: \cite{Blanton06}. He finds that the number density of blue-sequence
894: galaxies does not change significantly from $z\sim1$ to $z\sim0.1$.
895: It seems likely that blue sequence is experiencing a quiescent form of
896: evolution over the recent epochs ($z\lesssim 1$), and therefore the
897: blue (disk) galaxies have had time to form pseudobulges. We are
898: compelled to point out an important caveat for interpreting any high
899: redshift results on galaxy evolution. Blue galaxies at high redshifts
900: are not likely to be replicas of today's blue sequence galaxies. It is
901: unfortunate that pseudobulge detection requires such high resolution
902: techniques, otherwise we could test our hypothesis at higher
903: redshifts. The evolution in blue galaxies beyond $z\sim 1$
904: \citep{gerke2006} is possibly due to separate phenomenon from what
905: shapes todays blue galaxies (e.g.\ the movement of galaxies from the
906: blue sequence to the red). However, the result that the blue sequence
907: appears to be less violent over the past few billion years appears
908: established.
909:
910: This leads to a picture where a classical bulge is indicative of a
911: halo formation and assembly history of the galaxy that occurred
912: earlier, leading to older stars in the bulge and in the disk, was more
913: violent, and ultimately the system is red today. On the contrary, a
914: pseudobulge, even at the same Hubble type, is indicative of a quiet
915: assembly history that is much more likely at later times and therefore
916: also leads to bluer and younger systems (See \citealp{GKK01} for the
917: dependence of halo merger histories on environment). Thus, the
918: presence of a classical bulge or the presence of a pseudobulge (or no
919: bulge at all) are indicators of different evolutionary histories of
920: the whole galaxy.
921:
922: Along another line of thought it has suggested that feedback from
923: accreting black holes might be responsible for quenching the star
924: formation history of elliptical galaxies and classical bulges and
925: thereby contribute to the formation of the red sequence
926: (\citealp[e.g.][]{SdMH05,SSB05,deLuciaetal06,Boweretal06}). We know
927: that some pseudobulges contain supermassive black holes since they
928: contain AGN (for example NGC~1068, NGC~3368, and
929: NGC~4051). Furthermore, there is compelling evidence that these lie on
930: the $M_{BH}$--$\sigma$ relation \citep{KG01}. If this turned out to be
931: true, we need to explain why pseudobulges and their supermassive black
932: holes obey the same $M_{BH}$--$\sigma$ relation as classical bulges
933: and ellipticals do despite their disk-like properties, and at the same
934: time why feedback was not able to quench their star formation in spite
935: of doing just the same in classical bulges of the same size. We do not
936: know of convincing answers to these two questions. The latter might
937: imply that AGN feedback is not important in shaping the star formation
938: history of low-mass systems, or, it might be related to different
939: formation timescales of the mergers that form classical bulges and the
940: secular evolution processes that are thought to lead to pseudobulge
941: formation. In fact, \citet{Fillipenko03} find an AGN that obeys the in
942: $M_{BH}$--$\sigma$ relation in NGC~4395, a low-mass galaxy that does
943: not contain any bulge, classical or pseudo \citealp[see
944: also][]{GH06,GBH06}.
945: % This implies that the $M_{BH}$--$\sigma$ might be unrelated to
946: % classical bulge formation.
947:
948: We take our result as clear observational evidence that initial
949: environmental conditions are responsible for many global properties of
950: a galaxy. The merging history of a galaxy is ultimately the driver
951: behind the observed bimodality in the structural, stellar population,
952: and kinematic properties of a galaxy. Bulge types are a signpost of
953: merger history and because of this they predict the position of the
954: whole galaxy with respect to the bimodality in color and structural
955: properties.
956:
957:
958:
959: %% ------------------------------------------------------------------
960: %% ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
961: %% ------------------------------------------------------------------
962:
963: \acknowledgments
964:
965: DBF wishes to thank A.~Filippenko and the University of California at
966: Berkeley for providing support. ND and DBF thank the Max-Planck
967: Society for support during this project. We also thank J.~Kormendy for
968: stimulating and valuable discussions, and the anonymous referee for
969: useful comments.
970:
971: This research was supported by the National Science Foundation under
972: grant AST 06-07490.
973:
974: Some of the data presented in this paper were obtained from the
975: Multi-mission Archive at the Space Telescope Science Institute
976: (MAST). STScI is operated by the Association of Universities for
977: Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS5-26555. Support
978: for MAST for non-HST data is provided by the NASA Office of Space
979: Science via grant NAG5-7584 and by other grants and contracts.
980:
981: This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database
982: (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California
983: Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics
984: and Space Administration.
985:
986: Funding for the SDSS and SDSS-II has been provided by the Alfred P.\
987: Sloan Foundation, the Participating Institutions, the National Science
988: Foundation, the U.S.\ Department of Energy, the National Aeronautics
989: and Space Administration, the Japanese Monbukagakusho, the Max Planck
990: Society, and the Higher Education Funding Council for England. The
991: SDSS Web Site is {\tt http://www.sdss.org/}.
992:
993: The SDSS is managed by the Astrophysical Research Consortium for the
994: Participating Institutions. The Participating Institutions are the
995: American Museum of Natural History, Astrophysical Institute Potsdam,
996: University of Basel, Cambridge University, Case Western Reserve
997: University, University of Chicago, Drexel University, Fermilab, the
998: Institute for Advanced Study, the Japan Participation Group, Johns
999: Hopkins University, the Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics, the
1000: Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, the Korean
1001: Scientist Group, the Chinese Academy of Sciences (LAMOST), Los Alamos
1002: National Laboratory, the Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy (MPIA),
1003: the Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics (MPA), New Mexico State
1004: University, Ohio State University, University of Pittsburgh,
1005: University of Portsmouth, Princeton University, the United States
1006: Naval Observatory, and the University of Washington.
1007:
1008:
1009:
1010: %% ------------------------------------------------------------------
1011: %% REFERENCES
1012: %% ------------------------------------------------------------------
1013:
1014: %\bibliography{literature,bimodal} \bibliographystyle{apj}
1015:
1016: \begin{thebibliography}{}
1017:
1018: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Adelman-McCarthy} et~al.}{{Adelman-McCarthy}
1019: et~al.}{2006}]{SDSS-DR4}
1020: {Adelman-McCarthy}, J.~K., et~al. 2006, \apjs, 162, 38
1021:
1022: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Athanassoula}}{{Athanassoula}}{2005}]{Atha05}
1023: {Athanassoula}, E. 2005, \mnras, 358, 1477
1024:
1025: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Baldry} et~al.}{{Baldry}
1026: et~al.}{2004}]{Baldryetal04}
1027: {Baldry}, I.~K., {Glazebrook}, K., {Brinkmann}, J., {Ivezi{\'c}}, {\v Z}.,
1028: {Lupton}, R.~H., {Nichol}, R.~C., \& {Szalay}, A.~S. 2004, \apj, 600, 681
1029:
1030: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Balogh} et~al.}{{Balogh}
1031: et~al.}{2004}]{Baloghetal04}
1032: {Balogh}, M.~L., {Baldry}, I.~K., {Nichol}, R., {Miller}, C., {Bower}, R., \&
1033: {Glazebrook}, K. 2004, \apjl, 615, L101
1034:
1035: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Bender}, {Doebereiner}, \&
1036: {Moellenhoff}}{{Bender} et~al.}{1988}]{BDM98}
1037: {Bender}, R., {Doebereiner}, S., \& {Moellenhoff}, C. 1988, \aaps, 74, 385
1038:
1039: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Blanton}}{{Blanton}}{2006}]{Blanton06}
1040: {Blanton}, M.~R. 2006, \apj, 648, 268
1041:
1042: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Blanton} et~al.}{{Blanton}
1043: et~al.}{2005}]{blanton2005environ}
1044: {Blanton}, M.~R., {Eisenstein}, D., {Hogg}, D.~W., {Schlegel}, D.~J., \&
1045: {Brinkmann}, J. 2005, \apj, 629, 143
1046:
1047: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Blanton} et~al.}{{Blanton}
1048: et~al.}{2003}]{Blantonetal03}
1049: {Blanton}, M.~R., et~al. 2003, \apj, 594, 186
1050:
1051: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Bower} et~al.}{{Bower}
1052: et~al.}{2006}]{Boweretal06}
1053: {Bower}, R.~G., {Benson}, A.~J., {Malbon}, R., {Helly}, J.~C., {Frenk}, C.~S.,
1054: {Baugh}, C.~M., {Cole}, S., \& {Lacey}, C.~G. 2006, \mnras, 370, 645
1055:
1056: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Carollo} et~al.}{{Carollo}
1057: et~al.}{1997}]{carollo1997}
1058: {Carollo}, C.~M., {Stiavelli}, M., {de Zeeuw}, P.~T., \& {Mack}, J. 1997, \aj,
1059: 114, 2366
1060:
1061: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{de Jong}}{{de Jong}}{1996}]{deJong96a}
1062: {de Jong}, R.~S. 1996, \aap, 313, 377
1063:
1064: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{De Lucia} et~al.}{{De Lucia}
1065: et~al.}{2006}]{deLuciaetal06}
1066: {De Lucia}, G., {Springel}, V., {White}, S.~D.~M., {Croton}, D., \&
1067: {Kauffmann}, G. 2006, \mnras, 366, 499
1068:
1069: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{de Vaucouleurs} \& {de Vaucouleurs}}{{de
1070: Vaucouleurs} \& {de Vaucouleurs}}{1973}]{dVdV73}
1071: {de Vaucouleurs}, G., \& {de Vaucouleurs}, A. 1973, \mnras, 161, 465
1072:
1073: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{de Vaucouleurs} et~al.}{{de Vaucouleurs}
1074: et~al.}{1991}]{RC3}
1075: {de Vaucouleurs}, G., {de Vaucouleurs}, A., {Corwin}, H.~G., Jr., {Buta},
1076: R.~J., {Paturel}, G., \& {Fouque}, P. 1991, {Third Reference Catalogue of
1077: Bright Galaxies} (Volume 1-3, XII, 2069 pp.~7 figs..~ Springer-Verlag Berlin
1078: Heidelberg New York)
1079:
1080: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Dressler}}{{Dressler}}{1980}]{dressler1980}
1081: {Dressler}, A. 1980, \apj, 236, 351
1082:
1083: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Driver} et~al.}{{Driver}
1084: et~al.}{2006}]{Driveretal06}
1085: {Driver}, S.~P., et~al. 2006, \mnras, 368, 414
1086:
1087: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Erwin}}{{Erwin}}{2004}]{Erwin04}
1088: {Erwin}, P. 2004, \aap, 415, 941
1089:
1090: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Fathi} \& {Peletier}}{{Fathi} \&
1091: {Peletier}}{2003}]{FP03}
1092: {Fathi}, K., \& {Peletier}, R.~F. 2003, \aap, 407, 61
1093:
1094: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Filippenko} \& {Ho}}{{Filippenko} \&
1095: {Ho}}{2003}]{Fillipenko03}
1096: {Filippenko}, A.~V., \& {Ho}, L.~C. 2003, \apjl, 588, L13
1097:
1098: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Fisher}}{{Fisher}}{2006}]{Fisher06}
1099: {Fisher}, D.~B. 2006, \apjl, 642, L17
1100:
1101: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Freeman}}{{Freeman}}{1970}]{freemanlaw}
1102: {Freeman}, K.~C. 1970, \apj, 160, 811
1103:
1104: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Gerke} et~al.}{{Gerke}
1105: et~al.}{2006}]{gerke2006}
1106: {Gerke}, B.~F., et~al. 2006, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints
1107:
1108: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Gottl{\"o}ber}, {Klypin}, \&
1109: {Kravtsov}}{{Gottl{\"o}ber} et~al.}{2001}]{GKK01}
1110: {Gottl{\"o}ber}, S., {Klypin}, A., \& {Kravtsov}, A.~V. 2001, \apj, 546, 223
1111:
1112: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Graham} et~al.}{{Graham}
1113: et~al.}{2005}]{Grahametal05}
1114: {Graham}, A.~W., {Driver}, S.~P., {Petrosian}, V., {Conselice}, C.~J.,
1115: {Bershady}, M.~A., {Crawford}, S.~M., \& {Goto}, T. 2005, \aj, 130, 1535
1116:
1117: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Greene}, {Barth}, \& {Ho}}{{Greene}
1118: et~al.}{2006}]{GBH06}
1119: {Greene}, J.~E., {Barth}, A.~J., \& {Ho}, L.~C. 2006, New Astronomy Review,
1120: 50, 739
1121:
1122: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Greene} \& {Ho}}{{Greene} \&
1123: {Ho}}{2006}]{GH06}
1124: {Greene}, J.~E., \& {Ho}, L.~C. 2006, \apjl, 641, L21
1125:
1126: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Hayashi} \& {Chiba}}{{Hayashi} \&
1127: {Chiba}}{2006}]{HC06}
1128: {Hayashi}, H., \& {Chiba}, M. 2006, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints
1129:
1130: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Hubble}}{{Hubble}}{1926}]{Hubble26}
1131: {Hubble}, E.~P. 1926, \apj, 64, 321
1132:
1133: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Kannappan}, {Jansen}, \&
1134: {Barton}}{{Kannappan} et~al.}{2004}]{KJB04}
1135: {Kannappan}, S.~J., {Jansen}, R.~A., \& {Barton}, E.~J. 2004, \aj, 127, 1371
1136:
1137: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Kauffmann} et~al.}{{Kauffmann}
1138: et~al.}{2003a}]{Kauffmannetal03a}
1139: {Kauffmann}, G., et~al. 2003a, \mnras, 341, 33
1140:
1141: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Kauffmann} et~al.}{{Kauffmann}
1142: et~al.}{2003b}]{Kauffmannetal03b}
1143: {Kauffmann}, G., et~al. 2003b, \mnras, 341, 54
1144:
1145: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Kent}}{{Kent}}{1985}]{Kent85}
1146: {Kent}, S.~M. 1985, \apjs, 59, 115
1147:
1148: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Kormendy}}{{Kormendy}}{1993}]{Kormendy93}
1149: {Kormendy}, J. 1993, in IAU Symp. 153: Galactic Bulges, 209
1150:
1151: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Kormendy} \& {Bender}}{{Kormendy} \&
1152: {Bender}}{1996}]{KB96}
1153: {Kormendy}, J., \& {Bender}, R. 1996, \apjl, 464, L119
1154:
1155: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Kormendy} et~al.}{{Kormendy}
1156: et~al.}{2006}]{KCBKA06}
1157: {Kormendy}, J., {Cornell}, M.~E., {Block}, D.~L., {Knapen}, J.~H., \&
1158: {Allard}, E.~L. 2006, \apj, 642, 765
1159:
1160: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Kormendy} \& {Fisher}}{{Kormendy} \&
1161: {Fisher}}{2005}]{KF05}
1162: {Kormendy}, J., \& {Fisher}, D.~B. 2005, in Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y
1163: Astrofisica Conference Series, ed. S.~{Torres-Peimbert} \& G.~{MacAlpine},
1164: 101
1165:
1166: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Kormendy} \& {Gebhardt}}{{Kormendy} \&
1167: {Gebhardt}}{2001}]{KG01}
1168: {Kormendy}, J., \& {Gebhardt}, K. 2001, in American Institute of Physics
1169: Conference Series, Vol. 586, 20th Texas Symposium on relativistic
1170: astrophysics, ed. J.~C. {Wheeler} \& H.~{Martel}, 363
1171:
1172: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Kormendy} \& {Kennicutt}}{{Kormendy} \&
1173: {Kennicutt}}{2004}]{KK04}
1174: {Kormendy}, J., \& {Kennicutt}, R.~C., Jr. 2004, \araa, 42, 603
1175:
1176: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Lauer} et~al.}{{Lauer}
1177: et~al.}{2005}]{Laueretal05}
1178: {Lauer}, T.~R., et~al. 2005, \aj, 129, 2138
1179:
1180: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Li} et~al.}{{Li} et~al.}{2006}]{li2006}
1181: {Li}, C., {Kauffmann}, G., {Jing}, Y.~P., {White}, S.~D.~M., {B{\"o}rner}, G.,
1182: \& {Cheng}, F.~Z. 2006, \mnras, 368, 21
1183:
1184: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Liske} et~al.}{{Liske}
1185: et~al.}{2003}]{Liskeetal03}
1186: {Liske}, J., {Lemon}, D.~J., {Driver}, S.~P., {Cross}, N.~J.~G., \& {Couch},
1187: W.~J. 2003, \mnras, 344, 307
1188:
1189: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{MacArthur} et~al.}{{MacArthur}
1190: et~al.}{2004}]{MacArthur04}
1191: {MacArthur}, L.~A., {Courteau}, S., {Bell}, E., \& {Holtzman}, J.~A. 2004,
1192: \apjs, 152, 175
1193:
1194: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Moore} et~al.}{{Moore}
1195: et~al.}{1996}]{MKLDO96}
1196: {Moore}, B., {Katz}, N., {Lake}, G., {Dressler}, A., \& {Oemler}, A., Jr.
1197: 1996, \nat, 379, 613
1198:
1199: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Peletier} \& {Balcells}}{{Peletier} \&
1200: {Balcells}}{1996}]{PB96}
1201: {Peletier}, R.~F., \& {Balcells}, M. 1996, \aj, 111, 2238
1202:
1203: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Renzini}}{{Renzini}}{1999}]{Renzini99}
1204: {Renzini}, A. 1999, in The Formation of Galactic Bulges, ed. C.~M. {Carollo},
1205: H.~C. {Ferguson}, \& R.~F.~G. {Wyse}, 9
1206:
1207: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Roberts} \& {Haynes}}{{Roberts} \&
1208: {Haynes}}{1994}]{RH94}
1209: {Roberts}, M.~S., \& {Haynes}, M.~P. 1994, \araa, 32, 115
1210:
1211: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Sandage}}{{Sandage}}{1961}]{Sandage61}
1212: {Sandage}, A. 1961, {The Hubble Atlas of Galaxies.} (Carnegie Institution of
1213: Washington)
1214:
1215: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Sandage} \& {Bedke}}{{Sandage} \&
1216: {Bedke}}{1994}]{sandage94}
1217: {Sandage}, A., \& {Bedke}, J. 1994, {The Carnegie atlas of galaxies}
1218: (Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington with The Flintridge
1219: Foundation, |c1994)
1220:
1221: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Scannapieco}, {Silk}, \&
1222: {Bouwens}}{{Scannapieco} et~al.}{2005}]{SSB05}
1223: {Scannapieco}, E., {Silk}, J., \& {Bouwens}, R. 2005, \apjl, 635, L13
1224:
1225: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Shen} et~al.}{{Shen}
1226: et~al.}{2003}]{Shenetal03}
1227: {Shen}, S., {Mo}, H.~J., {White}, S.~D.~M., {Blanton}, M.~R., {Kauffmann}, G.,
1228: {Voges}, W., {Brinkmann}, J., \& {Csabai}, I. 2003, \mnras, 343, 978
1229:
1230: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Simien} \& {de Vaucouleurs}}{{Simien} \& {de
1231: Vaucouleurs}}{1986}]{SdV86}
1232: {Simien}, F., \& {de Vaucouleurs}, G. 1986, \apj, 302, 564
1233:
1234: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Springel}, {Di Matteo}, \&
1235: {Hernquist}}{{Springel} et~al.}{2005}]{SdMH05}
1236: {Springel}, V., {Di Matteo}, T., \& {Hernquist}, L. 2005, \mnras, 361, 776
1237:
1238: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Steinmetz} \& {Navarro}}{{Steinmetz} \&
1239: {Navarro}}{2002}]{steinmetz2002}
1240: {Steinmetz}, M., \& {Navarro}, J.~F. 2002, New Astronomy, 7, 155
1241:
1242: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Strateva} et~al.}{{Strateva}
1243: et~al.}{2001}]{Stratevaetal01}
1244: {Strateva}, I., et~al. 2001, \aj, 122, 1861
1245:
1246: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Toth} \& {Ostriker}}{{Toth} \&
1247: {Ostriker}}{1992}]{TO92}
1248: {Toth}, G., \& {Ostriker}, J.~P. 1992, \apj, 389, 5
1249:
1250: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{van den Bergh}}{{van den
1251: Bergh}}{1976}]{vdB76}
1252: {van den Bergh}, S. 1976, \apj, 206, 883
1253:
1254: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Velazquez} \& {White}}{{Velazquez} \&
1255: {White}}{1999}]{VW99}
1256: {Velazquez}, H., \& {White}, S.~D.~M. 1999, \mnras, 304, 254
1257:
1258: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{York} et~al.}{{York} et~al.}{2000}]{SDSS}
1259: {York}, D.~G., et~al. 2000, \aj, 120, 1579
1260:
1261: \end{thebibliography}
1262:
1263:
1264: \end{document}
1265:
1266:
1267: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1268: % EMACS Stuff
1269: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1270:
1271: % Local Variables:
1272: % reftex-cite-format:natbib
1273: % ispell-local-dictionary: "english"
1274: % LocalWords: rms RMS fwhm FWHM Kron arcmin arcsec arcmin SED SEDs
1275: % LocalWords: Sa Sab Sb Sbc Sc Scd Sd Sdm Im Irr RA DEC HST WFPC ACS
1276: % LocalWords: ersic 2MASS 2dF SDSS NASA NED arcminute arcsecond STScI
1277: % LocalWords: Myr Gyr kpc Mpc IPAC MPA MPIA ApJ AJ AA MNRAS
1278: