1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2005 December 5
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18: % \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
20: % \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
21:
22: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
23:
24: % \documentclass[apj]{emulateapj}
25: \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
26:
27: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
28: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
29: %% use the longabstract style option.
30:
31: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
32:
33: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
34: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
35: %% the \begin{document} command.
36: %%
37: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
38: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
39: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
40: %% for information.
41:
42: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
43: \newcommand{\myemail}{deguchi@nro.nao.ac.jp}
44: % \newcommand{\myemail2}{junichi@asiaa.sinica.edu.tw}
45:
46: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
47:
48: \slugcomment{Version 3.3 2007/05/03}
49:
50: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
51: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
52: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
53: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
54: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
55: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
56:
57: \shorttitle{GLIMPSE Identification of SiO Maser and OH/IR Objects}
58: \shortauthors{Deguchi et al.}
59:
60: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
61: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
62:
63: \begin{document}
64:
65: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
66: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
67: %% you desire.
68:
69: %\title{SiO Masers in a Scutum Massive Star Cluster of Red Supergiants}
70: \title{Identification of Very Red Counterparts of SiO Maser and OH/IR Objects in the GLIMPSE Survey}
71:
72: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
73: %% author and affiliation information.
74: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
75: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
76: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
77: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
78: \author{Shuji \textsc{Deguchi}%
79: }
80: \affil{Nobeyama Radio Observatory, National Astronomical Observatory \\
81: Minamimaki, Minamisaku, Nagano 384-1305, Japan}
82: \author{Jun-ichi \textsc{Nakashima} }
83: \affil{Academia Sinica, Institute of Astronomy
84: and Astrophysics, PO Box 23-141, Taipei, 106, Taiwan}%\email{ccccc@xxx.xxx.xx.xx}
85: \author{ Sun {\sc Kwok}}
86: \affil{Department of Physics, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China\\ and \\
87: Department of Physics \& Astronomy, University of Calgary,
88: Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4}
89:
90: \author{Nicolas \textsc{Koning}}
91: \affil{Department of Physics \& Astronomy, University of Calgary,
92: Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4}%\email{bbbbb@xxx.xxx.xx.xx}
93: %%% end:list of authors
94: %
95: \author{ }
96: \affil{(ApJ part 1, August 10, 2007, v665 no.1 issue in press)}
97: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
98: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
99: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
100: %% affiliation.
101:
102: %\altaffiltext{1}{Visiting Astronomer, Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory.
103: %CTIO is operated by AURA, Inc.\ under contract to the National Science
104: %Foundation.}
105: %\altaffiltext{2}{Society of Fellows, Harvard University.}
106: %\altaffiltext{3}{present address: Center for Astrophysics,
107: % 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138}
108: %\altaffiltext{4}{Visiting Programmer, Space Telescope Science Institute}
109: %\altaffiltext{5}{Patron, Alonso's Bar and Grill}
110:
111: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
112: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
113: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
114: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
115: %% editorial office after submission.
116:
117: \begin{abstract}
118: Using the 3.6/4.5/5.8/8.0 $\mu$m images with 1.2\arcsec\ pixel resolution
119: from the Spitzer/GLIMPSE survey,
120: we investigated 23 masing and 18 very red objects
121: that were not identified in the 2MASS survey.
122: Counterparts for all selected objects were found in the GLIMPSE images.
123: Color indices in these IR bands suggest the presence of a high-extinction layer
124: of more than a few tenths of a solar mass in front of the central star.
125: Furthermore, radio observations in the SiO and H$_2$O maser lines found
126: characteristic maser-line spectra of the embedded objects, e.g., the SiO $J=1$--0 line intensity
127: in the $v=2$ state stronger than that of the $v=1$ state, or very widespread H$_2$O maser emission spectra.
128: This indicates that these objects are actually enshrouded by very thick circumstellar matter,
129: some of which cannot be ascribed to the AGB wind of the central star.
130: Individually interesting objects are discussed, including two newly found water fountains
131: and an SiO source with nebulosity.
132: \end{abstract}
133:
134: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
135: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
136: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
137: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
138:
139: \keywords{infrared: stars --- stars: AGB and post-AGB --- stars: mass loss --- radio lines: stars}
140:
141: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
142: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
143: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
144: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
145: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
146: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
147: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
148: %% each reference.
149:
150:
151: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
152: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so by tagging
153: %% their objects with \objectname{} or \object{}. Each macro takes the
154: %% object name as its required argument. The optional, square-bracket
155: %% argument should be used in cases where the data center identification
156: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper. The text appearing
157: %% in curly braces is what will appear in print in the published paper.
158: %% If the object name is recognized by the data centers, it will be linked
159: %% in the electronic edition to the object data available at the data centers
160: %%
161: %% Note that for sources with brackets in their names, e.g. [WEG2004] 14h-090,
162: %% the brackets must be escaped with backslashes when used in the first
163: %% square-bracket argument, for instance, \object[\[WEG2004\] 14h-090]{90}).
164: %% Otherwise, LaTeX will issue an error.
165:
166:
167: \section{Introduction}
168:
169: The discovery of stellar maser sources \citep{wil68} and their association
170: with very red infrared objects has led to a new class of objects called OH/IR stars.
171: From the OH profiles, we came to the realization that the maser emissions
172: are a manifestation of the mass loss process \citep{kwo76},
173: and OH/IR stars are likely to be stars in the asymptotic giant branch (AGB) phase
174: of evolution \citep{hab96,sev02}. The mass loss process also
175: creates a thick circumstellar dust envelope which often obscures the central star.
176: Although OH/IR stars are often bright mid-infrared objects \citep{jim06},
177: many of them have no optical or near infrared counterparts.
178: In the absence of a spectral classification based on photospheric spectroscopy,
179: the nature of these stars is classified based on the circumstellar spectra
180: in the mid-infrared \citep{kwo97}.
181:
182: It should be noted that the mid-infrared colors alone are not enough to determine the nature of maser sources.
183: For example, the IRAS colors of mass-losing evolved stars overlap
184: with colors of young stellar objects embedded in molecular clouds \citep{van88},
185: and there is no well-defined boundaries in the color-color diagram between young
186: and evolved stars \citep{wei90}. The maser characteristics by themselves are not enough
187: to distinguish the two classes of objects \citep{cas99}.
188: The situation for SiO maser sources is also complex.
189: For example, there are three SiO maser sources in molecular clouds \citep{has85,mor92}
190: that are likely to be young stellar objects. There are also peculiar cases, such as the SiO maser source IRAS 19312+1950 is
191: an evolved star in a dark cloud \citep{nak04,deg04c}, and
192: V838 Mon is an M supergiant with SiO emission which emerged after nova eruption \citep{deg05b,tyl06}.
193:
194:
195:
196: In some cases, the imaging and identification of the central star in NIR bands can greatly facilitate
197: the determination of the nature of these objects \citep{lew04,deg05a}.
198: Young, low-mass stars are usually born in a star cluster, but evolved stars,
199: especially AGB/post-AGB stars with the ages of Giga years, are observed
200: as a single object \citep[see $\S$ 3 of ][]{deg04c}.
201: However, for the case of supergiants, they are frequently a member
202: of stellar associations \citep{hum70}, suggesting they are
203: on their way towards leaving the originating star clusters. Deep infrared imaging
204: can help find the surrounding low-mass stars.
205:
206: The recently performed Galactic Legacy Infrared Mid-Plane Survey Extraordinaire (GLIMPSE)
207: of the {\it Spitzer Space Telescope (SST)} has provided unprecedented deep near-infrared
208: images of the Galactic plane. Because of the high angular resolution 1.2\arcsec\ per pixel)
209: of the GLIMPSE observations, we have the opportunity to obtain an accurate identification
210: of the infrared/maser sources. In this paper, we report the identification of 41 infrared sources from the GLIMPSE data, as well as SiO or H$_2$O maser observations of these sources with the Nobeyama 45-m telescope.
211:
212:
213:
214: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% section 2 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
215: \section{Observations}
216: \subsection{Source selection}
217: We selected 41 sources from the {\it Midcourse Space Experiment (MSX)} Galactic plane survey that are found to have no (or dubious) near-infrared counterparts in the 2MASS sky survey \citep{skr00}.
218: Half of these (22 objects) are OH/IR objects listed by \citet{sev01}, \citet{tel91}, \citet{ede88}, etc.
219: %The positions of these objects were obtained from the MSX catalog \citep{ega99};
220: The positional accuracy of the MSX positions is about a few arcseconds \citep{ega99}, comparable
221: to the positional accuracies of OH masers measured with the Very Large Array (VLA) [see figure 9 of \cite{deg02} for comparison].
222: Most of these objects have reasonably red mid-IR colors with
223: $C_{CE} \ [\equiv log(F_E/F_C)]$ between 0 and 0.5, where $F_C$ and $F_E$
224: are the MSX band C (12 $\mu$m) and band E (21 $\mu$m) flux densities, respectively.
225: %SiO maser sources were identified on the NIR images more easily than these OH/IR sources \citep{deg01,deg02}. Therefore,we did not involve many SiO detected objects except 18245$-$1248, for which identification of the counterpart is somewhat dubious \citep{deg01}.
226:
227:
228: In addition to the MSX sources, we have included a number of medium-bright and red IRAS sources without 2MASS counterparts for which no maser line search was made.
229: These are IRAS 18030$-$1858,
230: 18151$-$1713, 18241$-$1010, 18298$-$0904, 18424$-$0509, 18444$-$0359, 19011+0638,
231: 19025+0702, 19087+1006, 19112+1220,
232: 19114+0920, 19180+1230, 19254+1724, 19266+1815, 19275+1720, G014.2758$-$00.1602,
233: G027.8433$-$00.1060. The MSX colors of these objects are not much different from those of the above OH/IR sources
234: without NIR counterparts.
235: The entire sample we chose for identification in the Spitzer/GLIMPSE survey is listed in table 1,
236: giving the source name, MSX(6C) name, right ascension and declination (J2000) of the MSX source, flux density in the MSX C (12$\mu$m) band,
237: the MSX colors [$C_{AC}=log(F_C/F_A)$, and $C_{CE}=log(F_E/F_C)$], status of detections in SiO, H$_2$O, and OH masers,
238: and a conventional OH object name.
239:
240: \subsection{Spitzer/GLIMPSE Identification}
241: The GLIMPSE survey was made with SST between March and November, 2004 using the Infrared Array Camera (IRAC) \citep{ind04}.
242: The survey covered the area of $|l|=10$--65$^{\circ}$ over latitudes $|b|<1^{\circ}$
243: toward the inner Galactic disk excluding the Galactic center. Simultaneous $5.2' \times 5.2'$ images at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8 and 8 $\mu$m were obtained at a spatial resolution of $\sim 1.2'' \times 1.2''$ per pixel.
244: %The GLIMPSE Survey was performed in 8 "segments" of length ~15 degrees. The exposure time per IRAC frame was 1.2 seconds and each direction in the GLIMPSE survey area was visited at least twice, providing a total exposure time of 2.4 seconds.
245: % IRAC magnitude-flux density conversion p31 of irac60.pdf
246: % fn= fn0 10^(-[Mn]*0.4) --> -0.4*Mn= log(fn/fn0)
247: % C(3.6/5.8)=log(f5.8/f3.6)=log(f5.8/f5.8z)-log(f3.6/f3.6z)+log(f5.8z/f3.6z)
248: % = 0.4(M3.6 -M5.8) + log(5.8z/f3.6z)
249: % M3.6-M5.8= 2.5*C(3.6/5.8) + 2.5* log(f3.6z/f5.8z)= 2.5*C(3.6/5.8) + 0.963984762793
250: % Oth mag 277.5 179.5 116.5 63.13 Jy for [3.6], [4.5], [5.8], [8.0]=0
251:
252:
253: The color-composite images (from the 3.6, 4.5 and 5.8 $\mu$m band images)
254: toward the 41 selected objects are shown in Figure 1. The counterparts for all sources in our sample
255: were found; they are all very red and near the center of the images.
256: Because all of these objects are bright in 8 $\mu$m, the identifications
257: in other bands were made quite easily. The color images were created
258: with special software developed at the Space Astronomy Laboratory of the University of Calgary.
259: The flux densities were derived from the GLIMPSE archives;
260: the aperture size used for photometry was typically a few to 12 arcseconds, depending on the image size
261: of the star. The estimated error of the photometry is dependent on the background noise levels,
262: and are typically $< 2\%$ for the objects brighter than 1, 3, 7, 16 mJy at the 3.6, 4.5 and 5.8 $\mu$m bands respectively.
263: The flux densities are given in columns 4--7 in table 2.
264: The color indices, $[3.6]-[5.8]$
265: and $[3.6]-[12]$, are also listed in the
266: 8th and 9th columns in table 2. Here, [3.6], [5.8], and [12] are the magnitudes
267: in the GLIMPSE 3.6 and and 5.8 $\mu$m, and MSX 12 $\mu$m bands, respectively,
268: and the flux densities at 0th magnitude are 280.9, 115.6, and 26.4 Jy in these bands, respectively.
269: The interstellar extinction toward each object
270: is given in the 10th column of table 2 and
271: it is estimated by the formula
272: based on the full-sky 100 $\mu$m composite map
273: of COBE/DIRBE and IRAS maps \citep{sch98}.\footnote{
274: available at {\it http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/forms/calculator.html}.
275: } %%%%%%%% this is end of foot note: do not remove %%%%%%%%%
276:
277: After getting accurate GLIMPSE positions (the 2nd and 3rd columns in table 2),
278: we again checked the 2MASS images and
279: found the red counterparts corresponding to the positions of 4 sources; 18286$-$0959 ($J$18312292$-$0957194),
280: 18298$-$0904 ($J$18323700$-$0902301), 19275+1902 ($J$19294645+1709013), and 19266+1815 ($J$19285303 +1821228).
281: These counterparts are very faint in the K-band ($K=12.6$--14.7),
282: making previous identifications uncertain. Their positions
283: coincide with those of the GLIMPSE objects within 0.5\arcsec.
284: \citet{jim06} listed NIR counterparts for 5 objects in the present sample:
285: 18182$-$1504, 18460$-$0254, 18488$-$0107, 19087+1006, and 19254+1631.
286: Because of the faintness of the objects ($K>13$), their identifications were again doubtful.
287: We have checked the GLIMPSE positions of these objects and found that 18182$-$1504, 18460$-$0254,
288: and 19254+1631 were correctly identified, but 18488$-$0107 and 19087+1006 were misidentified;
289: the GLIMPSE objects are located 5\arcsec NE and 6\arcsec S of the 2MASS stars ($K=$13.05 and 14.10) given by \citet{jim06}.
290:
291: In addition to the above selected objects without 2MASS counterparts, we checked the GLIMPSE images of
292: about 200 SiO maser sources within the area of $l=10$ -- 60$^{\circ}$, and $|b|<1^{\circ}$ where
293: the near-infrared identifications are already available \citep{deg98,deg01,deg02}. The GLIMPSE images
294: mostly exhibit a single bright object at the center of the field, except for IRAS 19027+0517,
295: which shows accompanying nebulosity (Fig.~6). Because this object has a NIR counterpart
296: in 2MASS images and seems to be intrinsically different from the objects in our sample,
297: we gave a discussion of this object separately in Appendix A.
298:
299: We wish to make a special reference to IRAS 18450$-$0148 (W43A), which is known as a water maser fountain
300: with collimated outflows \citep{ima02}. The detection of SiO maser emission in this object
301: \citep{nak03b} suggests that this is an evolved star.
302: The near-infrared counterpart of this interesting object is identified here for the first time.
303:
304: \subsection{SiO and H$_2$O maser observations at Nobeyama}
305: Because a majority of objects in our sample have not been searched for
306: SiO or H$_2$O maser emissions before, we observed the objects in
307: SiO $J=1$--0 $v=1$ and 2 and H$_2$O $6_{16}$--$5_{23}$ maser lines with the 45-m telescope
308: at Nobeyama during April 10--23, 2006. A cooled HEMT receiver (H40)
309: and an accousto-optical spectrometer array were used for the 43 GHz observations.
310: The receiver system temperature was about 200 K and the effective velocity resolution is 0.3 km s$^{-1}$.
311: The half-power beam width (HPBW) at 43 GHz was $\sim$40$''$ and the conversion factor
312: of the antenna temperature to the flux density was $\sim$2.9 Jy K$^{-1}$.
313: In addition to the SiO maser observations, we made a 22.235 GHz
314: H$_2$O maser observation on April 20 and 23, when weather was unfavorable for 43 GHz observations.
315: We used a cooled HEMT receiver (H22) and the same accousto-optical
316: spectrometer array (with an effective velocity resolution of 0.6 km s$^{-1}$).
317: The conversion factor of the antenna temperature to the flux density was
318: $\sim$2.8 Jy K$^{-1}$ at 22 GHz. Because the H40 and H22 receivers have a 2 GHz band width,
319: we configured the AOS-H spectrometer array to have the spectra of the SiO $J=1$--0 $v=0$ (43.423 GHz),
320: and $v=3$ (42.519 GHz), $^{29}$SiO $J=1$--0, v=0 (42.880 GHz),
321: and H53$\alpha$ (42.952 GHz) lines simultaneously in the H40 receiver,
322: and NH$_3$ \ $J_{K}=1_1$--$1_1$, $2_2$--$2_2$, and $3_3$--$3_3$ lines
323: (23.694, 23.722, 23.870 GHz, respectively) simultaneously in the H22 receiver.
324: The rms noise temperatures for these additional lines are similar to the noise levels of the SiO and H$_2$O lines
325: and therefore are not repeated in tables 3 and 4.
326: No detections in these additional lines were obtained except for 18182$-$1504.
327: Further details of observations using the NRO 45-m telescope are
328: described elsewhere \citep[e.g., ][]{nak03a}.
329:
330: Among the 31 objects observed, 8 were detected in SiO and their spectra are shown in Fig. 2.
331: In all cases, the $v=2$ maser line is stronger than the $v=1$ maser line.
332: Water masers in the $6_{16}$--$5_{23}$ transition were detected in two sources
333: (18286$-$0959 and 18460$-$0151) and their spectra are shown in Fig. 3.
334: It is notable that both of the detected objects exhibit a wide velocity range
335: in the H$_2$O maser emission spectra,
336: which resemble the H$_2$O spectra of ``water fountains'' \citep{mor03}.
337: % The obsevational results are summarided in tables 3 and 4.
338:
339: Because some of our sample objects might be associated with young stellar objects
340: in molecular clouds, we also made simultaneous observations of the HCO$^+ \; J=1$--0 line
341: at 89.189 GHz and the SiO $J=2$--1 $v=1$ line.
342: %especially for two water maser sources with wide spread emission.
343: The non-detection of the HCO$^+$ line effectively excludes the possibility
344: of these water maser sources being associated with young stellar objects.
345:
346:
347: \section{Discussion}
348:
349:
350: \subsection{Two-color diagram}
351: The selected objects have extremely thick circumstellar envelopes.
352: In addition, they suffer from a large interstellar reddening
353: in the Galactic plane even at NIR to MIR wavelengths. Therefore, it is hard to separate the
354: circumstellar from the interstellar reddening for these objects because of the uncertainty of the
355: interstellar extinction correction.\footnote{
356: As noted in Section 2.2, we used a formula given by \citet{sch98}, which gives almost the maximum
357: value of interstellar extinction due to thick dust clouds toward each source.
358: }
359: We discuss here quantities of
360: the sampled objects by introducing the color indices, $[3.6]-[5.6]$ and $[3.6]-[12]$,
361: which vary relatively mildly with the large extinction.
362: We apply a wavelength-dependent extinction derived from the GLIMPSE survey
363: which was obtained from the color excess of stars at $l=42^{\circ}$ and 284$^{\circ}$
364: \citep{ind05}.
365: We compare physical quantities of the sample objects
366: with those of the proto-typical OH/IR star with SiO masers,
367: OH 127.8+0.0, which is believed to be at the final stage of evolution on the AGB.
368: Physical parameters of this star are relatively well known \citep{suh02}, with
369: the optical depth of the envelope being about 10--15 at 9.8 $\mu$m.
370: This bright OH/IR star ($F_C=184$ Jy) has $[3.6]-[5.8]=3.46$ and $[3.6]-[12]=5.0$.
371: Because of the position ($l\sim 128^{\circ}$), the interstellar extinction
372: at the NIR wavelengths is small for this object ($A_K=0.64$).
373: If this object were behind a dust cloud
374: with a heavier extinction of $A_K >7.6$, it would be undetectable on the 2MASS image ($K>13.7$).
375: The spherically symmetric model for OH 127.8+0.0 \citep{kem02} gave a mass loss rate
376: of $7 \times 10^{-5}$ M$_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$. The same model
377: gives a total mass of the envelope of 0.2 M$_{\odot}$
378: (if integrated to the outer radius of the dust shell, $1.3\times 10^{17}$ cm,
379: as used by \citet{kem02}).
380:
381: Figure 4 shows a two-color diagram, $[3.6]-[12]$
382: versus $[3.6]-[5.8]$, for the sampled objects, where
383: OH 128.7+0.0 occupies the position indicated by the square
384: in this diagram. The interstellar reddening moves the position of the star
385: to the upper right with an inclination of about unity because the extinctions
386: at 5.8 and 12 $\mu$m are comparable \citep[Table 1 of ][]{mat90}.
387: % by the amount approximately $\Delta ([3.6]-[5.8])=0.149$ per $A_K=1$.
388: Selected objects in this diagram distribute from the lower-left to the upper right with a
389: steeper slope ($\sim 1.71 \pm 0.19$) than the slope of the interstellar reddening line ($\lesssim 1$).
390: They appear in a very wide range of color indices, over 3 in $[3.6]-[5.8]$
391: (corresponding to $A_K=20$), which is too large to be considered an effect
392: of interstellar reddening. These facts suggest that the extremely red colors of these objects
393: cannot be explained solely by the interstellar reddening applied to the OH 127.8+0.0 type star,
394: but they are more or less intrinsic to these objects.
395:
396: The steepness of the distribution seems to be understandable by the model that the 12 $\mu$m flux is
397: a re-emission of absorbed NIR light by dust grains near the central star.
398: If MIR re-emission does not occur (as interstellar reddening), the star should move
399: on the line indicated by the dotted arrow.
400: SiO detections (filled circles) also appear in a wide range of color indices
401: in figure 4, but % they appear more in the lower-right part of the central concentration. %%%%%%%%%%%%
402: the SiO sources distribute with a steeper inclination ($\sim 1.98 \pm 0.35$) %in this diagram
403: than the no-SiO subsample ($\sim 1.62 \pm 0.21$), %%%%% added
404: indicating that the re-emission effect
405: at 12 $\mu$m is stronger in the SiO maser sources than the non-SiO emitting objects.
406: The SiO maser is an indicator of active mass loss near the central star
407: ($\sim 10^{14}$ cm), suggesting the presence of thick dust re-emitting the
408: stellar radiation more at MIR wavelengths than the objects without SiO masers.
409:
410: The above findings strongly suggest that these objects have
411: an excessively large optical depth of circumstellar dust,
412: which is much larger than that of the circumstellar dust of OH 127.8+0.0.
413: The order of magnitudes of the excess material can be estimated from $[3.6]-[12]$.
414: We use the relation between $[3.6]-[12]$ and the mass loss rate calculated by
415: \citet{kem02}. Applying the interstellar reddening corrections to $[3.6]-[12]$,
416: we computed the mass loss rate of the envelope from figure 6 of \citet{kem02},
417: and obtained the excess factor ($f_c$) of the circumstellar matter
418: (relative to that of the OH 127.8+0.0 envelope),
419: which is listed in the last column of table 2.
420: They exceed the optical depth of the OH 127.8+0.0 envelope by a factor of a few up to 80.
421: Uncertainty of the interstellar extinction correction of about 30 \% makes a
422: shift of $[3.6]-[12]$ up to 0.7 at most, making the uncertainty of the excess factor
423: to be within a factor of 2 even for the worst case.
424:
425:
426: The total envelope mass for each sampled object must exceed by a similar factor, i.e.
427: these objects might have envelope masses of 0.4--20 $M_{\odot}$ if simply integrated until
428: the outer radius of $\sim 10^{17}$ cm. The total mass of the envelope is proportional
429: to the outer-boundary radius for the assumed density distribution
430: of a constant-mass-loss model ($\rho \propto r^{-2}$),
431: whereas the optical depth is rather sensitive to the inner-bounday radius of the dust envelope.
432: Because the color index, $[3.6]-[12]$, which was used here for evaluation of the excess factor,
433: does not give useful restrictions on the outer boundary radius in the Kemper et al's modeling
434: (it is rather restricted by IRAS 60 or 100 $\mu$m flux density),
435: the total mass of the thick matter estimated here has large ambiguity.
436: Because, without precise modeling, it is uncertain as to how far from the central star
437: the extra material in the envelope is located, we only use the
438: excess factor $f_c$ in this paper, which characterizes the envelope of these objects.
439:
440: %The outer bounday radius of these objects are often determined from the IRAS 60/100 $\mu$m flux densities
441: %of these objects, which
442:
443: The total envelope mass for each sampled object can be reduced, in some degree,
444: by introducing a non-spherical distribution of the dust envelope, e.g.
445: a torus or disk structure. However, even a wide opening angle of $120^{\circ}$ for cavity cones
446: %which could be created by bipolar flows,
447: can reduce the mass by 50\% compared
448: with that of the spherical distribution with the same radial density profile.
449: As discussed in the later sections,
450: high-velocity components of water maser emission may suggest the presence of the accretion disk
451: which creates collimated jets. In such a case, the scattered light
452: through the pole of the torus should be observable, although
453: it is hard to detect the scattered light for these objects
454: because of the large interstellar extinction in the $K$ band.
455:
456: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% subsection 3.2
457: \subsection{Characteristic of SiO maser emission} It is striking that only the SiO $J=1$--0 $v=2$ line was
458: detected in 6 out of 8 SiO detected sources. Even in the remaining two sources the intensity of the
459: $J=1$--0 $v=2$ line was considerably stronger than that of the $J=1$--0 $v=1$ line.
460: The trend, i.e. the increase of the $v=2$/1 line intensity ratio with the infrared color
461: [$C_{12}=log(F_{25}/F_{12})$, where $F_{12}$ and $F_{25}$ are IRAS 12 and 25 $\mu$m flux density],
462: was clearly first demonstrated by \citet{nak03b}. For the present sample of SiO detected sources,
463: the MSX color, $C_{CE}=log(F_{21}/F_{12})$, is between 0.10 and 0.34, which fits well
464: with the above trend. All of the SiO detected sources were previously observed by the OH 1612 MHz line
465: and were all detected except for 18241$-$1010.
466:
467: Figure 4 indicates that, for the sampled objects,
468: SiO maser detection rates do not seem to correlate with the colors,
469: $[3.5]-[5.8]$, or $[3.6]-[12]$.
470: The flat detection rate seems to suggest that these stars are
471: still in a mass-losing stage, at the final transient stage of the AGB
472: to planetary-nebula phase. They are not at a later stage of the post-AGB phase
473: when SiO masers should disappear.
474:
475: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% subsection 3.3
476: \subsection{New H$_2$O sources with wide spread emission}
477:
478: Two H$_2$O maser sources, 18286$-$0959 and 18460$-$0151 (Fig.~3)
479: have a very wide velocity range ($\gtrsim$200 km s$^{-1}$) in their maser emission spectra.
480: Although the rich H$_2$O maser emission spectrum in IRAS 18286$-$0959 (Fig.~3 left)
481: resembles the water maser spectra associated with compact H~{\sc ii} regions
482: \citep[for example, ][]{kur05}, the nondetections of HCO$^+$, H53$\alpha$, and NH$_3$ lines
483: toward these sources (the present work: table 3) suggest that
484: they are not associated with dense molecular clouds (or compact H~{\sc ii} regions),
485: and the rich H$_2$O emission could be the result of a very irregular velocity field in the envelope.
486: The fact that these sources are point-like with no associated nebulosity in their GLIMPSE images
487: suggests that they are stellar objects.
488:
489: Similar wide spread water maser spectra were found in the class of ``water fountain'' sources.
490: There are four known water fountain sources [16342$-$3814, OH 12.8+0.9 (18139$-$1816), W43A (18450$-$0148),
491: 19134+2131 \citep{lik88,bob05,ima04,ima05} with a few more probable cases \citep{gom94,dea06}.
492: All of these objects exhibit the H$_2$O maser components in a velocity range that exceed
493: the OH velocity range. The H$_2$O maser components are spatially more extended than
494: the OH maser components \citep{ima04,bob05}. Among these ``water fountain sources'', 16342$-$3814
495: had the highest velocity separation of $\sim 258$ km s$^{-1}$.
496: Our object 18460$-$0151 definitely belongs to the class of water fountain sources from the similarity
497: of the emission characteristic, and it has a record-high separation of 292 km s$^{-1}$
498: between emission components.
499:
500: Both new objects, 18286$-$0959 and 18460$-$0151, are relatively bright IRAS sources (25 and 20 Jy at 12 $\mu$m respectively);
501: the former has a 2MASS counterpart, $J18312292-0957194$, with $K$ magnitude of 12.67 and $H-K=0.89$.
502: They have a rising mid-IR spectrum toward longer wavelengths, indicating the presence of a thick dust envelope.
503: From the radial velocities, we estimate kinematic distances of 18286$-$0959 and 18460$-$0151 as
504: 3.1 and 6.8 kpc, respectively, and luminosities as $8.7 \times 10^3$ and $4.2 \times 10^4 \ L_{\odot}$ for these distances.
505:
506: If these objects have a thick dust torus
507: (as in the unified model of the Type I and II active galactic nuclei),
508: optically observable objects \citep[as IRAS 16342$-$3814; ][]{sah99}
509: must be seen from the polar-axis direction of the dust torus
510: and unseen from equatorial directions.
511: If these high-velocity features are a part of the polar jet,
512: which is created by the accretion disk, the higher velocity objects should have
513: bluer colors.
514: This hypothesis seems applicable for 18286$-$0959 (because of the identified NIR counterpart
515: with $K=12.67$), but not for 18460$-$0151 (with no NIR counterpart).
516: Regarding 18460$-$0151, which has the highest velocity separation among the water fountains,
517: the large distance ($\sim 6.8$ kpc) and the strong interstellar extinction hide this object
518: behind molecular clouds. Applying the large interstellar extinction correction of $A_K=8.2$,
519: we infer the extinction corrected $K$ magnitude to be fainter than 5.8.
520: It is slightly fainter than the extinction-corrected 3.6 $\mu$m magnitude ($[3.6]\sim 5.5$),
521: suggesting that the scattered light is not seen from this object.
522:
523: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% subsection 3.4 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
524: \subsection{Envelopes of extremely red OH/IR stars}
525: The central stars of extremely red OH/IR objects
526: with low expansion velocity ($V_{exp}<15$ km s$^{-1}$)
527: have been considered to be relatively low-initial-mass post-AGB stars
528: compared with those of normal-color sources \citep{sev02}.
529: In fact, the red (``RI'') group sources of \citet{sev02} involved two objects in the present sample:
530: IRAS 18135$-$1456 and 18596+0315, which have the expansion velocities, 14.8 and 13.6 km s$^{-1}$, respectively.
531: Regarding expansion velocites derived from OH peaks, two water fountains, 18450$-$0148 (W43A) and 18460$-$0151,
532: are low expansion-velocity (lower-mass) sources ($V_{exp}=6$ and 11 km s$^{-1}$).
533:
534: Figure 5 shows a plot of the excess factor of the envelope versus expansion velocity
535: for OH 1612 MHz doubly-peaked objects in the present sample. Note that
536: the excess factor was derived from $[3.6]-[12]$ (relative to OH 127.8+0.0; see section 3.1).
537: It indicates that the excess factor does not correlate strongly with the expansion velocity
538: of the envelope, and hence the initial mass of the central star.
539:
540: Figure 5 also indicates that objects with small expansion velocity ($V_{exp}<15$ km s$^{-1}$) seem
541: to have lower SiO detection rates than the larger expansion-velocity objects ($V_{exp}>15$ km s$^{-1}$).
542: This indicates that the lower-mass stars with small expansion velocities are at the phase
543: unfavorable for making strong SiO masers, e.g. dissociating SiO molecules by hot central star radiation,
544: and/or terminating mass loss from the central star.
545: This is consistent with the \citet{sev02}'s finding that
546: the red objects with small expansion velocites are stars in the early post-AGB phases
547: with nearly zero mass loss; the extreme high-velocity flow develops at this phase and SiO masers
548: gradually disappear. We infer that the red stars with large expansion velocites are
549: AGB stars still in an active mass-losing stage because of the presence of SiO masers.
550: However both groups of stars, which are investigated in this paper,
551: are dressed by excessively large amounts of circumstellar matter irrespective
552: of the mass of the central star.
553:
554: The radii of the OH emitting regions were found to be 3 -- 16 $\times 10^{16}$ cm
555: for some of the selected objects (OH 21.5+0.5, 30.1$-$0.7, and 32.0$-$0.5)
556: with the OH phase-lag/angular-size measurements \citep{her85}.
557: Because the H$_2$O masing region of water fountains is extended more than
558: the OH emission region \citep[for W43A]{ima02}, the thick material
559: must be extended out of the OH masing region.
560: There is evidence that H$_2$O maser outflow strikes the dense material
561: which is located outside of the OH masing region.
562: Therefore, it is likely that the excess material found in section 3.1
563: is extended to considerably outer parts of the envelope, i.e. outside of the OH masing region.
564: The H$_2$ number density of the OH masing region is known to be $\sim 10^3$--$10^4$ cm$^{-3}$ \citep[for example, ][]{net87},
565: and the density of the H$_2$O masing region must be, by several orders of magnitude, higher ($\sim 10^9$ cm$^{-3}$).
566: %to collisionally excite the H$_2$O masing transition.
567: Thus, we cannot deny the possibility that the thick layer is extended
568: at the radius of more than $3\times 10^{16}$ cm, though
569: such a layer could be clumpy and dense, depending on the model.
570: %, which was used for mass estimation in section 3.1.
571: Envelope masses of some OH/IR stars [e.g., IRAS 18450$-$0148 (W43A)],
572: exceed 4 $M_{\odot}$ even for the outer radius of $3\times 10^{16}$ cm.
573: Though the envelope mass can vary by a factor of a few,
574: depending on the uncertainty of interstellar extinction and
575: nonspherical distribution of the thick layer as noted before,
576: it is difficult to lower the envelope mass less than 1 $M_{\odot}$
577: for several of the thickest objects of the sample.
578: % to be from 0.4 up to 20 $M_{\odot}$ (if spherical symmetry is assumed), %%%%%%%%%%%%%
579:
580: A number of numerical modelings of thick circumstellar envelopes
581: in the outgoing AGB phase have been made \citep[for example, ][]{van97,lor97}.
582: \citet{dav92} and \citet{suh97} examined superwind models to explain far IR spectra
583: of OH/IR objects accompanying deep silicate absorptions. One of their models, which has
584: a dense shell between radii $2 \times 10^{16}$ and $4 \times 10^{16}$ cm
585: in addition to a normal continuous flow \citep{suh97},
586: successfully fits the computed to the observed spectral energy distribution of IRAS 18257$-$1000 (OH 21.5+0.5),
587: which has a relatively mild excess factor (1.4) in our list (table 2).
588: The large IRAS 60 $\mu$m flux densities of most of the other objects (though some of them
589: might be contaminated from nearby clouds)
590: entail for the much denser outer shell in these models, which inevitably results in a large total envelope mass
591: of more than a few $M_{\odot}$ \citep{dav92}; the superwind models artificially restrict the outer radius
592: of the thick material to keep the enclosed mass smaller.
593: Although the total mass of the outer envelope could in principle be observationally constrained
594: by CO $J=1$--0 intensities or IRAS 60/100 $\mu$m flux densities, it is hard
595: to estimate for these objects because of contamination by radiation from surrounding clouds.
596: %large IRAS 100 $\mu$m flux densities for most of the selected objects require enormous amount of dust masss.
597: %though the large IRAS 60 $$ the contamination of far IR radiation from surrounding molecular clouds,
598: %the large IRAS 60 micron intensities of these objects may not come from the object
599:
600: Though all of these modelings of very red OH/IR objects assume a superwind
601: with a mass loss rate of $\sim 10^{-4}\ M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$ in a duration of about a few hundred years,
602: the origin of the thick material is not necessarily restricted to the superwinds which occur
603: at the end of the AGB phase. Because no correlation appears between the excess factor and the expansion velocity,
604: the thick material does not seem to be related with the central star masses.
605: The excess material at the outer envelope of these objects can be a source of a shock front
606: of the extremely high-velocity outflow created at the early post-AGB phase of stars,
607: that is observed as water fountains. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
608: %This is probably because a simple model with a varying mass loss rate is not enough for
609: %explaining the extremely red color of these objects.
610: This may be due to gas ejection by binary-star interactions \citep{nor06}.
611: \citet{men02} found that the massive dust torus of the Red Rectangle
612: has $M \sim 1.2\ M_{\odot}$, which was formed in the ejection of a common envelope after Roche lobe overflow.
613: Similarly, stellar merging \citep[for example, ][]{bal05,tyl06} may create such massive circumstellar material.
614: Alternatively these stars may simply be in a dense dust cloud, as found in IRAS 19312+1950 \citep{deg04a}.
615: We cannot deny such a possibility for some of these sources (but not all of them)
616: because they are seen toward thick dust clouds.
617: We infer here that massive circumstellar matter of the thickest OH/IR stars in the present sample
618: can be formed by one of the aforementioned mechanisms.
619:
620: \section{Conclusion}
621: SiO maser and OH/IR objects with no 2MASS counterparts were identified
622: in the GLIMPSE 3.6/4.5/5.8/8.0 $\mu$m images with a spatial resolution of 1.2\arcsec.
623: Searches for SiO and H$_2$O masers lead to 10 new detections, each of which show
624: characteristic maser spectra of the stronger SiO $J=1$--0 $v=2$ to $v=1$ line or
625: wide spread H$_2$O maser emission. It turned out that the dust envelopes of these objects
626: are exceptionally thick, though they suffer from a large interstellar extinction.
627: This suggests that a considerable mass of materials toward the objects
628: must exist in the envelope.
629: The SiO detection rate was uncorrelated with the mass of the envelope, but
630: the lower detection rate was obtained for the lower-expansion velocity subsample of
631: the OH/IR stars. The latter suggests that the higher-expansion velocity objects
632: are AGB stars and lower-expansion velocity objects are more evloved stars such as post-AGB stars.
633: The derived envelope mass is not correlated with this sequence of stellar evolution.
634: From these observations, we believe that the thick material in some of these objects
635: cannot be ascribed to the AGB-phase wind of the central star.
636:
637: \acknowledgements
638: %Authors thank ... for reading the manuscripts and helpful comments.
639: We thank Ed Churchwell and the GLIMPSE team for their help in the retrieval and processing of the survey data.
640: We also thank the anonymous referee for useful comments for clarifing the content.
641: This research made use of the SIMBAD and VizieR databases operated at CDS,
642: Strasbourg, France, and as well as use of data products from
643: Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint
644: project of the University of Massachusetts and Infrared Processing
645: and Analysis Center/California Institute of Technology,
646: funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and
647: National Science foundation, and from the Midcourse Space
648: Experiment at NASA/ IPAC Infrared Science Archive, which is operated by the
649: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology,
650: under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space
651: Administration.
652: This work is supported in part by a grant to SK from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
653:
654: \appendix
655: \section{IRAS 19027+0517}
656: The Glimpse images of the SiO maser source, IRAS 19027+0517,
657: exhibit conspicuous nebulosity around the central star at 5.8 and 8.0 $\mu$m (Fig.~6).
658: The nebula is lopsided to the central star and extended to the north.
659: The surface brightness of the nebula seems to increase toward the central star, which suggests
660: a physical association of this nebula to the central star.
661: Among 200 SiO sources investigated, only this object has an extended nebulosity.
662: The 2MASS images show a medium bright central star ($K=8.2$), but do not exhibit any extended features.
663: The nebulous feature is considered to be due to the PAH emission with
664: sharp spectral features at 6.2 and 7.8 $\mu$m \citep{ver01}. It is quite unusual that the O-rich
665: central star in the AGB phase (with SiO masers) accompanies such extended PAH nebulosity.
666: Therefore, we particularly investigated this object more with various molecular lines
667: with the NRO 45m telescope. In addition to the previous
668: detections of the SiO $J=1$--0 $v=1$ and 2 lines \citep{deg04b}, we found
669: emissions of the SiO $J=1$--0 $v=0$ and 3, and $J=2$--1 $v=1$ lines; the
670: spectra are shown in figure 7. Furthermore, we made 45$''$-grid 5-point mapping observations
671: by CO, HCN and HCO$^+$ $J=1$--0 lines, but no emission associated with the central star
672: was detected, except for the fore/background clouds with large velocity separations
673: (see figure 8). The observational results are summarized in table 5.
674: Therefore, we conclude that most of the molecules are dissociated in the nebula toward IRAS 19027+0517,
675: an O-rich AGB star, by UV radiation from a closeby UV source creating the lopsided nebulosity.
676:
677: \begin{thebibliography}{}
678: \bibitem[Allen et al.(1977)]{all77} Allen, D. A., Hyland, A. R., Longmore, A. J., Caswell, J. L., Goss, W. M., \& Haynes, R. F.
679: 1977, \apj, 217, 108
680: \bibitem[Boboltz et al.~(2005)]{bob05} Boboltz, D. A. \& Marvel, K. B. 2005, ApJ, 627, L45
681: \bibitem[Bally \& Zinnecker~(2005)]{bal05} Bally, J. \& Zinnecker, H. 2005, AJ, 129, 2281
682: \bibitem[Caswell~(1999)]{cas99} Caswell, J. L. 1999, MNRAS, 308, 683
683: \bibitem[Chengalur et al.(1993)]{che93} Chengalur, J. N., Lewis, B. M., Eder, J., \& Terzian, Y. 1993, ApJS, 89, 189
684: \bibitem[David \& Papoular~(1992)]{dav92} David, P. \& Papoular, R. 1992, \aap, 265, 195
685: \bibitem[Deacon et al.~(2001)]{dea06} Deacon, R. M., Chapman, J. M., Green, A. J., \& Sevenster, M. N. 2006, submitted to ApJ
686: \bibitem[Deguchi et al.~(2001)]{deg01} Deguchi, S., Fujii, T., Matsumoto, S. Nakashima, J., \& Wood, P. 2001, \pasj, 53, 293
687: \bibitem[Deguchi et al.~(2002)]{deg02} Deguchi, S., Fujii, T., Nakashima, J., \& Wood, P. R., 2002, \pasj, 54, 719
688: \bibitem[Deguchi et al.~(2004a)]{deg04a} Deguchi, S., et al.
689: % Imai, H., Fujii, T., Glass, I. S., Ita, Y., Izumiura, H., Kameya, O., Miyazaki, A. Nakada, Y., Nakashima, J.
690: 2004a, \pasj, 56, 261
691: \bibitem[Deguchi et al.~(2004b)]{deg04b} Deguchi, S. et al.
692: % Imai, H., Fujii, T., Glass, I. S., Ita, Y., Izumiura, H., Kameya, O., Miyazaki, A. Nakada, Y., Nakashima, J.
693: 2004b, \pasj, 56, 765
694: \bibitem[Deguchi et al.~(1998)]{deg98} Deguchi S., Matsumoto S., \& Wood P. R. 1998, \pasj, 50, 597
695: %\bibitem[Deguchi et al.~(2001b)]{deg01b}
696: %Deguchi, S. Nakashima, J., \& Balasubramanyam, R. 2001b, PASJ, 53, 305
697: \bibitem[Deguchi et al.(2004c)]{deg04c} Deguchi, S., Nakashima, J., Takano, S. 2004, \pasj, 56, 1083
698: \bibitem[Deguchi et al.(2005a)]{deg05a} Deguchi, S., Nakashima, J., Miyata, T., \& Ita, Y. 2005, \pasj, 57, 933 % Observations of Stellar Maser Sources with no IRAS Counterpart
699: \bibitem[Deguchi et al.~(2005b)]{deg05b} Deguchi, S., Matsunaga, N., Fukushi, H. 2005, \pasj, 57, L25
700: \bibitem[Eder et al.(1988)]{ede88} Eder, J., Lewis, B. M. \& Terzian, Y. 1988, ApJS, 66, 183
701: \bibitem[Engels et al.~(1986)]{eng86} Engels, D., Schmid-Burgk, J., \& Walmsley, C. M. 1986, \aap, 167, 129
702: \bibitem[Engels \& Lewis~(1996)]{eng96} Engels, D. \& Lweis, B. M. 1996, \aaps, 116, 117
703: \bibitem[Egan et al.~(1999)]{ega99} Egan M. P., et al.
704: % Price S. D., Moshir M., Cohen M., Tedesco E. F., Murdock T. L., Zweil A., Burdick S., Bonito N., Gugliotti G.M., Duszlak J.
705: 1999, Air Force Research Laboratory Technical Report No. AFRL-VS-TR-1999-1522
706: (available at IPAC, $\langle$http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/applications/MSX$\rangle$)
707: \bibitem[Gomez et al.(1990)]{gom90} Gomez, Y., Moran, J. M. \& Rodriguez, L. F. 1990, RMxAA, 20, 55
708: \bibitem[Gomez et al.(1994)]{gom94} Gomez, Y., Rodriguez, L. F., Contreras, M. E., \& Moran, J. M., 1994, RMxAA, 28, 97
709: \bibitem[Habing(1996)]{hab96} Habing, H. J. 1996, A\&AR, 7, 97
710: \bibitem[Hasegawa(1985)]{has85} Hasegawa, T. et al. 1985, in Masers, Molecules and Mass Outflows in Star Forming Regions,
711: ed. A. D. Haschick (Aystack Observatory, Westford), p.275
712: % \bibitem[Hayashi(1961)]{hay61} Hayashi, C. 1961, PASJ, 13, 450
713: \bibitem[Herman et al.~(1985)]{her85} Herman, J., Baud, B., Habing, H. J., \& Winnberg, A 1985, \aap 143, 122H
714: \bibitem[Humphreys~(1970)]{hum70} Humphreys, R. M. 1970, AJ, 75, 602
715: \bibitem[Imai et al.(2002)]{ima02} Imai, H. Obara, K., Diamond, P. J., Omodaka, T., \& Sasao, T. 2002, \textit{Nature}, 417, 829
716: % \bibitem[Imai et al.(2002)]{ima02} Imai, H., Obara, K., Diamond, P. J., Omodaka, T., Sasao, T. 2002, Natur.417, 829 \\
717: \bibitem[Imai et al.(2004)]{ima04} Imai, H., Morris, M., Sahai, R., Hachisuka, K., \& Azzollini F. J. R. 2004, A\&A, 420, 265
718: \bibitem[Imai et al.(2005)]{ima05} Imai, H. Nakashima, J., Diamond, P.J., Miyazaki, A. \& Deguchi, S. 2005, ApJ, 622, L125
719: \bibitem[Indebetouw et al.(2004)]{ind04} Indebetouw, R., Benjamin, R. A., \& Churchwell, E. 2004, ASPC, 317, 109
720: "Milky Way Surveys: The Structure and Evolution of Our Galaxy" ed. by D. Clemens, R. Shah, \& T. Brainerd
721: \bibitem[Indebetouw et al.(2005)]{ind05} Indebetouw, R. et al. 2005, ApJ, 619, 931 % The Wavelength Dependence of Interstellar Extinction from 1.25 to 8.0 Using GLIMPSE Data
722: \bibitem[Izumiura et al.(1999)]{izu99} Izumiura, H. et al. \apjs, 125, 257
723: \bibitem[Jim\'enez-Esteban et al.~(2005)]{jim05} Jim\'enez-Esteban, F. M., Agudo-M\'erida, L., Engels, D., Garc\'ia-Lario, P. 2005, A\&A, 431, 779 % An infrared study of galactic OH/IR stars. I. An optical/near-IR atlas of the Arecibo sample
724: \bibitem[Jim\'enez-Esteban et al.(2006)]{jim06} Jim\'enez-Esteban F. M., Garc\'ia-Lario, P., Engels, D., \& Perea Calder\'on, J. V. 2006, \textit{A\&A}, 446, 773
725: \bibitem[Kemper et al.~(2002)]{kem02} Kemper, F., De Koter, A., Waters L. B. F. M., Bouwman, J., Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2002, A\&A, 384, 585
726: \bibitem[Kurtz \& Hofner~(2002)]{kur05} Kurtz, S. \& Hofner, P. 2005, AJ, 130, 711 % papepr for H2O masers in HII regions
727: \bibitem[Kwok~(1976)]{kwo76} Kwok, S. 1976, JRASC, 70, 49
728: \bibitem[Kwok~(2000)]{kwo00} Kwok, S. in The origin and evolution of Planetary nebulae (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press)
729: \bibitem[Kwok, Volk, \& Bidelman(1997)]{kwo97} Kwok, S., Volk, K., and Bidelman, W.P. 1997, ApJS, 112, 557
730: \bibitem[Lewis et al.(1987)]{lew87} Lewis, B. M., Eder, J., \& Terzian, Y. 1987, AJ, 94, 1025
731: \bibitem[Lewis et al.(2004)]{lew04} Lewis, B. M., Kopon, D. A., \& Terzian, Y. 2004, AJ, 127, 501
732: \bibitem[Likkel \& Morris (1988)]{lik88} Likkel, L., \& Morris, M., 1988, ApJ, 329, 914
733: \bibitem[Likkel et al.(1992)]{lik92} Likkel, L., Morris, M., \& Maddalena, R. J. 1992, \aap, 256, 581
734: \bibitem[Lorenz-Martins \& de Araujo~(1997)]{lor97} Lorenz-Martins, S. \& de Araujo, F. X. 1997, \mnras, 291, 296
735: \bibitem[Mathis~(1990)]{mat90} Mathis, J. S. 1990, ARA\&A 28, 37
736: \bibitem[Men'shchikov et al.~(2002)]{men02} Men'shchikov, A. B., Schertl, D., Tuthill, P. G., Weigelt, G., Yungelson, L. R. 2002, A\&A, 393, 867
737: \bibitem[Morris et al.(2003)]{mor03} Morris, M. R., Sahai, R. \& Claussen, M. 2003, RMxAC 15, 20
738: \bibitem[Morita et al.~(1992)]{mor92} Morita, K. 1990, PASJ, 44, 373
739: \bibitem[Nakashima \& Deguchi~(2003a)]{nak03a} Nakashima, J., \& Deguchi, S. 2003, PASJ, 56, 203
740: \bibitem[Nakashima \& Deguchi~(2003b)]{nak03b} Nakashima, J., \& Deguchi, S. 2003, PASJ, 56, 229
741: \bibitem[Nakashima et al.~(2004)]{nak04} Nakashima, J., Deguchi, S., \& Kuno, N. 2004, PASJ, 56, 193
742: \bibitem[Netzer \& Knapp~(1987)]{net87} Netzer, N. \& Knapp, G. R. 1987, ApJ, 323, 734
743: \bibitem[Nordhaus \& Blackman~(2006)]{nor06} Nordhaus, J. \& Blackman, E. G. 2006, \mnras, 370, 2004
744: \bibitem[Nyman et al.~(1986)]{nym86} Nyman, L.-\AA. Johansson, L. E. B., \& Booth, R. S. 1986, \aap, 160, 352
745: \bibitem[Nyman et al.~(1998)]{nym98} Nyman, L.-\AA., Hall, P. J., \& Olofsson, H. 1998, \aaps, 127, 185
746: \bibitem[Sahai et al.(1999)]{sah99} Sahai, R. Te Lintel-Hekkert, P., Morris, M., Zijlstra, A., \& Likkel, L. 1999, ApJ, 514, L15S
747: \bibitem[Sevenster et al.(2001)]{sev01} Sevenster, M. N., van Langevelde, H. J., Moody, R. A., Chapman, J. M., Habing, H. J., \& Killeen, N. E. B. 2001, \aap, 366, 481
748: \bibitem[Sevenster et al.(2002)]{sev02} Sevenster, M. N. 2002, AJ, 123, 2788
749: \bibitem[Schlegel et al.(1998)]{sch98} Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525 % Dust extinction
750: \bibitem[Skrutskie et al.~(2000)]{skr00}
751: Skrutskie, M. F., Stiening, R., Cutri, R., Beichman, C., Capps, R.,
752: Carpenter, J., Chester, J., Elias, J. et al.\ 2000 (The 2MASS Team)
753: http://www.ipac.caltech.edu/2mass/overview/ 2massteam.html
754: \bibitem[Suh \& Jones (1997)]{suh97} Suh, K-W, \& Jones, T. J. 1997, ApJ, 479, 918
755: \bibitem[Suh \& Kim (2002)]{suh02} Suh, K.-W. \& Kim, H.-Y. 2002, A\&A, 391, 665
756: \bibitem[te Lintel-Hekkert et al.~(1991)]{tel91} te Lintel Hekkert, P., Caswell, J. L., Habing, H. J., Haynes, R. F., \& Norris, R. P. 1991, A\&AS, 90, 327
757: \bibitem[Tylenda \& Soker~(2006)]{tyl06} Tylenda, R. \& Soker, N. 2006, A\&A, 451, 223
758: \bibitem[van der Veen \& Habing~(1988)]{van88}van der Veen, W. E. C. J. \& Habing, H. J. 1988, A\&A, 194, 125
759: \bibitem[van Hoof et al.~(1997)]{van97} van Hoof, P. A. M., Oudmaijer, R. D., \& Waters, L. B. F. M 1997, MNRAS, 289, 371
760: \bibitem[Verstraete et al.~(2001)]{ver01} Verstraete, L., Pech, C., Moutou, C., Sellgren, K., Wright, C. M., Giard, M.,
761: L\'eger, A., Timmermann, R., \& Drapatz, S. 2001, A\&A, 372, 981 % This is for PSH spectrum
762: \bibitem[Weintraub~(1990)]{wei90} Weintraub, D. A. 1990, ApJS, 74, 575
763: \bibitem[Wilson \& Barrett(1968)]{wil68} Wilson, W. J. \& Barrett, A. H. 1968, Science, 161, 778
764: \end{thebibliography}
765: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
766: \clearpage
767: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% tables %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
768: % \input{tables}
769: \begin{deluxetable}{llllccccl}
770: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
771: %\rotate
772: \tablecolumns{9}
773: \tablewidth{0pc}
774: \tablecaption{Objects investigated.}
775: \tablehead{
776: Source & MSX6C name & R.A. & Dec & $F_{\rm C}$ & Cac & Cce & SiO H$_2$O OH & OH name \\
777: & & (h m s) & ($\circ$ $'$ $''$) & & & & (detection$^a$) & }
778: %\colhead{} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Non-shell Stars} & \colhead{} &
779: %\multicolumn{3}{c}{Shell Stars} \\
780: %\cline{2-4} \cline{6-8} \\
781: %\colhead{Mag} & \colhead{F336W} & \colhead{F555W} & \colhead{F814W} &
782: %\colhead{} & \colhead{F336W} & \colhead{F555W} & \colhead{F814W}}
783: \startdata
784: 18034$-$1858 & G011.0064$+$00.9220 & 18 06 25.3 & $-$18 57 44 & 8.8 & 0.194 & 0.186 & n~ n~ --~ & \\
785: 18100$-$1915 & G011.5218$-$00.5826 & 18 13 03.1 & $-$19 14 19 & 13.1 & 0.167 & 0.173 & y~ n~ y$^3$ & OH11.52$-$0.58 \\
786: 18135$-$1456 & G015.7005$+$00.7707 & 18 16 25.7 & $-$14 55 15 & 26.1 & 0.752 & 0.498 &y$^1$ y$^2$ y$^3$ & OH15.7+0.8 \\
787: 18161$-$1713 & G013.9883$-$00.8613 & 18 19 01.7 & $-$17 12 07 & 25.3 & 0.283 & 0.083 & n~ n~ n$^{10}$ & \\
788: 18182$-$1504 & G016.1169$-$00.2903 & 18 21 07.0 & $-$15 03 22 & 48.5 & 0.190 & 0.268 & y~ y$^4$ y$^3$ & OH16.1$-$0.3 \\
789: 18198$-$1249 & G018.2955$+$00.4291 & 18 22 43.1 & $-$12 47 42 & 10.1 & 0.242 & 0.340 & y~ n$^4$ y$^3$ & OH18.30+0.43\\
790: 18212$-$1227 & G018.7683$+$00.3016 & 18 24 05.3 & $-$12 26 12 & 3.6 & 0.863 & 0.601 & n~ n~ y$^3$ & OH18.8+0.3 \\
791: 18241$-$1010 & G021.1164$+$00.7775 & 18 26 50.6 & $-$10 08 19 & 12.4 & 0.176 & 0.099 & y~ --~ n$^{10}$ & \\
792: 18245$-$1248 & G018.8384$-$00.5622 & 18 27 21.2 & $-$12 46 42 & 1.1 & 0.252 & 0.076 &y$^5$ -- -- & \\
793: 18257$-$1000 & G021.4566$+$00.4911 & 18 28 31.0 & $-$09 58 15 & 9.6 & 0.172 & 0.305 & y~ y$^{14}$ y$^3$ & OH021.457+00.491\\
794: 18286$-$0959 & G021.7964$-$00.1273 & 18 31 22.9 & $-$09 57 20 & 45.0 & 0.181 & $-$0.129 & n~ y~ y$^3$ & OH021.797$-$00.127\\
795: 18298$-$0904 & G022.7482$+$00.0248 & 18 32 37.0 & $-$09 02 30 & 18.3 & 0.173 & $-$0.176 & n~ n~ -- & \\
796: 18325$-$0721 & G024.5814$+$00.2245 & 18 35 19.1 & $-$07 19 23 & 4.7 & 0.178 & 0.145 & n~ n~ y$^3$ & OH24.6+0.2\\
797: 18327$-$0645 & G025.1301$+$00.4841 & 18 35 24.3 & $-$06 42 59 & 10.1 & 0.349 & $-$0.099 & n~ n~ --~ & \\
798: 18407$-$0358 & G028.5203$-$00.0141 & 18 43 25.8 & $-$03 55 55 & 3.8 & 0.225 & 0.197 & y~ n~ y$^3$ & OH28.5$-$0.0\\
799: 18424$-$0509 & G027.6621$-$00.9179 & 18 45 04.9 & $-$05 06 28 & 14.5 & 0.111 & $-$0.146 & n~ n~ --~ & \\
800: 18444$-$0359 & G028.9304$-$00.8287 & 18 47 05.2 & $-$03 56 21 & 7.8 & 0.166 & $-$0.135 & n~ n~ --~ & \\
801: 18450$-$0148 & G030.9441$+$00.0350 & 18 47 41.2 & $-$01 45 11 & 23.9 & 0.978 & 0.519 &y$^1$ y$^8$ y$^3$ & OH31.8+0.0, W43A \\
802: 18460$-$0151 & G031.0126$-$00.2195 & 18 48 43.0 & $-$01 48 30 & 14.7 & 0.205 & 0.176 & n~ y~ y$^3$ & OH30.1$-$0.2 \\
803: 18460$-$0254 & G030.0908$-$00.6866 & 18 48 42.0 & $-$02 50 29 & 127.9 & 0.184 & 0.261 &y$^7$ y$^{14}$ y$^3$ & OH30.1$-$0.7 \\
804: 18488$-$0107 & G031.9844$-$00.4849 & 18 51 26.2 & $-$01 03 52 & 31.1 & 0.177 & 0.196 &y$^1$ y$^{14}$ y$^3$ & OH32.0$-$0.5 \\
805: 18509$-$0018 & G032.9524$-$00.5687 & 18 53 30.0 & $-$00 14 28 & 24.9 & 0.211 & 0.122 &y$^1$ --~ y$^3$ & OH32.95$-$0.57\\
806: 18517$+$0037 & G033.8728$-$00.3350 & 18 54 20.8 & $+$00 41 05 & 25.9 & 0.244 & 0.187 &y$^1$ y$^9$ y$^3$ & OH033.873$-$00.335\\
807: 18596$+$0315 & G037.1185$-$00.8473 & 19 02 06.3 & $+$03 20 16 & 2.9 & 0.784 & 0.501 & n~ n~ y$^3$ & OH37.1$-$0.8 \\
808: 19006$+$0624 & G040.0220$+$00.3818 & 19 03 03.4 & $+$06 28 54 & 2.2 & 0.276 & 0.060 &y$^1$ y$^{14}$ y$^{10}$ & OH40.02+0.38\\
809: 19011$+$0638 & G040.2793$+$00.3766 & 19 03 33.1 & $+$06 42 29 & 11.4 & 0.297 & 0.206 & n~ n~ --~ & \\
810: 19025$+$0702 & G040.8005$+$00.2455 & 19 04 59.0 & $+$07 06 40 & 6.9 & 0.354 & 0.068 & n~ --~ --~ & \\
811: 19087$+$1006 & G044.2404$+$00.3090 & 19 11 10.0 & $+$10 11 37 & 3.0 & 0.594 & 0.259 & n~ n~ n$^{12}$ & \\
812: 19112$+$1220 & G046.4992$+$00.8092 & 19 13 37.4 & $+$12 25 39 & 5.2 & 0.383 & 0.058 & n~ n~ n$^{10}$ & \\
813: 19114$+$0920 & G043.8675$-$00.6247 & 19 13 49.4 & $+$09 25 51 & 10.5 & 0.157 & $-$0.172 & n~ n~ n$^{10}$ & \\
814: 19180$+$1230 & G047.4257$-$00.5624 & 19 20 22.0 & $+$12 36 24 & 6.1 & 0.231 & $-$0.123 & n~ --~ --~ & \\
815: 19254$+$1631 & G051.8042$-$00.2247 & 19 27 42.1 & $+$16 37 25 & 22.1 & 0.226 & 0.276 &y$^1$ --~ y$^{13}$ & OH51.8$-$0.2\\
816: 19254$+$1724 & G052.5814$+$00.2014 & 19 27 41.1 & $+$17 30 36 & 3.4 & 0.675 & 0.273 & n~ --~ n$^{10}$ & \\
817: 19266$+$1815 & G053.4614$+$00.3547 & 19 28 53.1 & $+$18 21 23 & 8.8 & 0.168 & $-$0.168 & n~ --~ --~ & \\
818: 19275$+$1702 & G052.5042$-$00.4085 & 19 29 46.5 & $+$17 09 01 & 9.3 & 0.185 & $-$0.136 & n~ n~ --~ & \\
819: 19440$+$2251 & G059.4784$-$00.8969 & 19 46 09.2 & $+$22 59 24 & 17.4 & 0.153 & 0.258 &y$^1$ n$^8$ y$^{11}$ & OH59.48$-$0.90\\
820: G014.2758 & G014.2758$-$00.1602 & 18 17 01.0 & $-$16 37 00 & 6.1 & 0.183 & 0.122 & n~ n~ --~ & \\
821: G017.3913 & G017.3913$-$00.2891 & 18 23 35.0 & $-$13 55 49 & 5.7 & 0.080 & 0.240 & y~ n$^6$ y$^3$ & OH17.4$-$0.3\\
822: G022.0425 & G022.0425$-$00.6084 & 18 33 34.6 & $-$09 57 36 & 1.2 & 0.628 & 0.632 & n~ y$^2$ y$^3$ & OH22.1$-$0.6\\
823: G024.6610 & G024.6610$+$00.0868 & 18 35 57.5 & $-$07 18 58 & 3.1 & 0.218 & 0.324 & y~ n$^6$ y$^3$ & OH24.7+0.1\\
824: G027.8433 & G027.8433$-$00.1060 & 18 42 30.9 & $-$04 34 35 & 7.1 & 0.081 & $-$0.207 & n~ n~ --~ & \\
825: \enddata
826: \tablenotetext{a}{"y" or "n" indicates the detection or nondetection in this paper, othewise noted.
827: References:
828: $^1$: \citet{nak03b}, $^2$: \citet{eng86}, $^3$: \citet{sev01},
829: $^4$: \citet{gom90}, $^5$: \citet{izu99}, $^6$: \citet{nym86},
830: $^7$: \citet{nym98}, $^8$: \citet{lik92}, $^9$: \citet{eng96},
831: $^{10}$: \citet{tel91},$^{11}$: \citet{ede88}, $^{12}$: \citet{lew87},
832: $^{13}$: \citet{che93}, $^{14}$: \citet{dea06}.}
833: %\end{tabular}
834: %\end{center}
835: %\end{table}
836: %\end{longtable}
837: \end{deluxetable}
838:
839: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Table 2 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
840: % \newpage
841: %\begin{table}
842: %\begin{center}
843:
844:
845: \begin{deluxetable}{lccrrrrrrrc}
846: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
847: \tablecolumns{11}
848: \tablewidth{0pc}
849: \tablecaption{Objects identified with Spitzer-Glimpse Survey.}
850: \tablehead{
851: Source & $l$ & $b$ & $F_{3.6}$ & $F_{4.5}$ & $F_{5.8}$ & $F_{8.0}$ & [3.6] & [3.6] & $A_K$ & $f_{c}$ \\
852: (IRAS or MSX) & ($\circ$) & ($\circ$) & (mJy) & (mJy) & (mJy) & (mJy) & $-[5.8]$ & $-[12]$ & & }
853: \startdata
854: 18034$-$1858 & +11.0061 & $+$0.9222 & 29.9 & 308.8 & 1617.0 & --- &5.30 & 8.74 & 1.50 & 7.6\\ %G011.0064$+$00.9220
855: 18100$-$1915 & +11.5216 & $-$0.5824 & 72.7 & 712.7 & 3641.0 & --- &5.21 & 8.21 & 3.05 & 4.9\\ %G011.5218$-$00.5826
856: 18135$-$1456 & +15.7011 & $+$0.7706 & 26.2 & 166.6 & 1033.0 & --- &4.95 & 10.06 & 1.74 & 15.9\\ %G015.7005$+$00.7707
857: 18161$-$1713 & +13.9884 & $-$0.8611 & 264.8 & 1988.0 & 11510.0 & --- &5.06 & 7.52 & 3.33 & 3.2\\ %G013.9883$-$00.8613
858: 18182$-$1504 & +16.1173 & $-$0.2907 & 512.4 & --- & 14120.0 & --- &4.57 & 7.51 & 5.64 & 2.6\\ %G016.1169$-$00.2903
859: 18198$-$1249 & +18.2956 & $+$0.4291 & 56.2 & 847.5 & 1818.0 & --- &4.74 & 8.20 & 2.49 & 5.1\\ %G018.2955$+$00.4291
860: 18212$-$1227 & +18.7688 & $+$0.3017 & 1.9 & 9.9 & 77.7 & 562.0 &4.99 & 10.76 & 3.20 & 20.9\\ %G018.7683$+$00.3016
861: 18241$-$1010 & +21.1166 & $+$0.7775 & 676.4 & 2918.0 & 9559.0 & --- &3.84 & 5.73 & 1.65 & 1.3\\ %G021.1164$+$00.7775
862: 18245$-$1248 & +18.8387 & $-$0.5622 & 81.2 & 447.1 & 1468.0 & 1750.0 &4.11 & 5.40 & 4.91 & 0.8\\ %G018.8384$-$00.5622
863: 18257$-$1000 & +21.4565 & $+$0.4911 & 434.1 & --- & --- & --- & & 5.93 & 2.63 & 1.4\\ %G021.4566$+$00.4911
864: 18286$-$0959 & +21.7972 & $-$0.1272 & 541.6 & --- & --- & --- & & 7.37 & 7.71 & 2.0\\ %G021.7964$-$00.1273
865: 18298$-$0904 & +22.7483 & $+$0.0252 & 231.0 & --- & 3409.0 & --- &3.89 & 7.31 & 7.15 & 2.1\\ %G022.7482$+$00.0248
866: 18325$-$0721 & +24.5814 & $+$0.2243 & 198.1 & 600.7 & 2845.0 & --- &3.86 & 6.01 & 11.48 & 0.3\\ %G024.5814$+$00.2245
867: 18327$-$0645 & +25.1301 & $+$0.4842 & 42.9 & 270.2 & 1074.0 & --- &4.46 & 8.50 & 4.09 & 5.3\\ %G025.1301$+$00.4841
868: 18407$-$0358 & +28.5203 & $-$0.0143 & 75.3 & --- & 2288.0 & --- &4.67 & 6.82 & 10.74 & 1.1\\ %G028.5203$-$00.0141
869: 18424$-$0509 & +27.6622 & $-$0.9174 & 98.3 & 463.1 & 1573.0 & --- &3.98 & 7.99 & 1.31 & 5.0\\ %G027.6621$-$00.9179
870: 18444$-$0359 & +28.9303 & $-$0.8288 & 232.9 & --- & 3738.0 & --- &3.98 & 6.38 & 1.77 & 1.9\\ %G028.9304$-$00.8287
871: 18450$-$0148 & +30.9439 & $+$0.0351 & 1.0 & 12.5 & 0217.2 & 2564.0 &6.81 & 13.51 & 14.79 & 37.8\\ %G030.9441$+$00.0350
872: 18460$-$0151 & +31.0124 & $-$0.2194 & 23.9 & 374.8 & 2598.0 & --- &6.06 & 9.54 & 8.23 & 6.7\\ %G031.0126$-$00.2195
873: 18460$-$0254 & +30.0910 & $-$0.6865 & 558.9 & 5860.0 & --- & --- & & 8.47 & 3.35 & 5.5\\ %G030.0908$-$00.6866
874: 18488$-$0107 & +31.9845 & $-$0.4853 & 778.6 & 6270.0 & 18690.0 & --- &4.42 & 6.57 & 2.70 & 2.0\\ %G031.9844$-$00.4849
875: 18509$-$0018 & +32.9528 & $-$0.5689 & 273.0 & 1198.0 & 3568.0 & 3952.0 &3.76 & 7.47 & 1.59 & 3.6\\ %G032.9524$-$00.5687
876: 18517$+$0037 & +33.8727 & $-$0.3353 & 107.9 & --- & 4579.0 & --- &5.03 & 8.52 & 3.62 & 5.6\\ %G033.8728$-$00.3350
877: 18596$+$0315 & +37.1184 & $-$0.8474 & 9.9 & 49.7 & 217.3 & 806.0 &4.32 & 8.73 & 1.54 & 7.5\\ %G037.1185$-$00.8473
878: 19006$+$0624 & +40.0224 & $+$0.3813 & 85.7 & 484.3 & 1566.0 & --- &4.12 & 6.09 & 2.76 & 1.5\\ %G040.0220$+$00.3818
879: 19011$+$0638 & +40.2794 & $+$0.3761 & 84.9 & 939.7 & 5077.0 & --- &5.41 & 7.89 & 2.71 & 4.2\\ %G040.2793$+$00.3766
880: 19025$+$0702 & +40.8006 & $+$0.2452 & 22.1 & 187.6 & 1009.0 & 4079.0 &5.11 & 8.80 & 2.54 & 7.2\\ %G040.8005$+$00.2455
881: 19087$+$1006 & +44.2406 & $+$0.3086 & 00.9 & 14.7 & 146.5 & 971.8 &6.49 & 11.37 & 3.80 & 28.3\\ %G044.2404$+$00.3090
882: 19112$+$1220 & +46.4995 & $+$0.8093 & 01.6 & 23.5 & 193.8 & 1029.0 &6.17 & 11.35 & 1.88 & 32.9\\ %G046.4992$+$00.8092
883: 19114$+$0920 & +43.8677 & $-$0.6248 & 192.3 & 865.6 & 2582.0 & 1809.0 &3.78 & 6.91 & 2.76 & 2.4\\ %G043.8675$-$00.6247
884: 19180$+$1230 & +47.4258 & $-$0.5625 & 93.5 & 513.5 & 1714.0 & --- &4.12 & 7.10 & 2.92 & 2.6\\ %G047.4257$-$00.5624
885: 19254$+$1631 & +51.8039 & $-$0.2249 & 155.1 & 1076.0 & 4806.0 & --- &4.69 & 7.95 & 2.80 & 4.3\\ %G051.8042$-$00.2247
886: 19254$+$1724 & +52.5815 & $+$0.2014 & 0.2 & 02.4 & 44.4 & 503.2 &6.83 & 13.14 & 2.40 & 88.4\\ %G052.5814$+$00.2014
887: 19266$+$1815 & +53.4611 & $+$0.3551 & 42.8 & 253.3 & 910.0 & 606.5 &4.28 & 8.35 & 2.03 & 5.8\\ %G053.4614$+$00.3547
888: 19275$+$1702 & +52.5040 & $-$0.4085 & 359.6 & 1483.0 & 4437.0 & --- &3.69 & 6.10 & 2.85 & 1.5\\ %G052.5042$-$00.4085
889: 19440$+$2251 & +59.4784 & $-$0.8966 & 179.4 & 1460.0 & --- & --- & & 7.53 & 0.94 & 4.0\\ %G059.4784$-$00.8969
890: G014.2758 & +14.2760 & $-$0.1600 & 367.1 & --- & --- & --- & & 5.62 & 8.35 & 0.4\\ %G014.2758$-$00.1602
891: G017.3913 & +17.3915 & $-$0.2892 & 83.4 & 583.4 & 3113.0 & --- &4.89 & 7.15 & 5.82 & 2.1\\ %G017.3913$-$00.2891
892: G022.0425 & +22.0428 & $-$0.6085 & 6.6 & 22.0 & 83.5 & 365.7 &3.72 & 8.22 & 3.91 & 4.6\\ %G022.0425$-$00.6084
893: G024.6610 & +24.6608 & $+$0.0867 & 6.1 & 130.0 & 990.5 & --- &6.49 & 9.33 & 11.05 & 4.7\\ %G024.6610$+$00.0868
894: G027.8433 & +27.8430 & $-$0.1061 & 236.1 & 811.8 & 2035.0 & 2720.0 &3.30 & 6.26 & 6.30 & 1.2\\ %G027.8433$-$00.1060
895: \enddata
896: %\tablenotetext{\dagger}{Estimated by the formula
897: %based on the full-sky 100 $\mu$m composite map of COBE/DIRBE and IRAS maps \citep{sch98};
898: %available at {\it http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/forms/calculator.html}.
899: %}
900: \end{deluxetable}
901:
902: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Table 3 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
903: % \clearpage
904: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{0.7}
905: \begin{table*}
906: %\begin{center}
907: \caption{Detections by the SiO or H$_2$O maser line.}\label{tab:table3}
908: \begin{tabular}{llrrrr}
909: \tableline\tableline
910: Source & Transition & $V_{lsr}$ & $Ta^{*}$ & line flux & rms \\
911: & & (km s$^{-1}$) & (K) & (K km s$^{-1}$) & (K) \\
912: \tableline
913: 18100$-$1915 & SiO $J=1$--0 $v=1$ & --- & --- & --- & 0.121 \\
914: & SiO $J=1$--0 $v=2$ & 16.5 & 1.202 & 2.087 & 0.114 \\
915: & H$_2$O $6_{16}$--$5_{23}$ & --- & --- & --- & 0.109 \\
916: 18182$-$1504 & SiO $J=1$--0 $v=0$ & 18.3 & 0.650 & 2.536 & 0.153 \\
917: & SiO $J=1$--0 $v=1$ & 22.9 & 16.661 & 45.758 & 0.166 \\
918: & SiO $J=1$--0 $v=2$ & 22.5 & 41.500 & 130.23 & 0.168 \\
919: & SiO $J=1$--0 $v=3$ & 22.5 & 10.434 & 28.839 & 0.173 \\
920: & $^{29}$SiO $J=1$--0 $v=1$ & 23.6 & 1.093 & 2.623 & 0.151 \\
921: 18198$-$1249 & SiO $J=1$--0 $v=1$ & --- & --- & --- & 0.104 \\
922: & SiO $J=1$--0 $v=2$ & 48.2 & 0.579 & 0.429 & 0.107 \\
923: 18241$-$1010 & SiO $J=1$--0 $v=1$ & --- & --- & --- & 0.084 \\
924: & SiO $J=1$--0 $v=2$ & 116.3 & 0.620 & 2.795 & 0.085 \\
925: 18257$-$1000 & SiO $J=1$--0 $v=1$ & --- & --- & --- & 0.097 \\
926: & SiO $J=1$--0 $v=2$ & 114.9 & 0.781 & 1.427 & 0.097 \\ % ? same as below
927: 18286$-$0959 & SiO $J=1$--0 $v=1$ & --- & --- & --- & 0.123 \\
928: & SiO $J=1$--0 $v=2$ & --- & --- & --- & 0.118 \\
929: & H$_2$O $6_{16}$--$5_{23}$ & $-14.7$ & 3.863 & 166.3 & 0.043 \\
930: & SiO $J=2$--1 $v=1$ & --- & --- & --- & 0.065 \\
931: & HCO$^+$ $J=1$--0 & --- & --- & --- & 0.068 \\
932: 18407$-$0358 & SiO $J=1$--0 $v=1$ & 106.5 & 0.572 & 1.457 & 0.108 \\
933: & SiO $J=1$--0 $v=2$ & 107.3 & 0.921 & 2.126 & 0.097 \\
934: & H$_2$O $6_{16}$--$5_{23}$ & --- & --- & --- & 0.087 \\
935: 18460$-$0151 & SiO $J=1$--0 $v=1$ & --- & --- & --- & 0.100 \\
936: & SiO $J=1$--0 $v=2$ & --- & --- & --- & 0.084 \\
937: & H$_2$O $6_{16}$--$5_{23}$ & 117.0 & 4.881 & 24.38 & 0.050 \\ %A18184M
938: & SiO $J=2$--1 $v=1$ & --- & --- & --- & 0.069 \\
939: & HCO$^+$ $J=1$--0 & --- & --- & --- & 0.084 \\
940: G017.3913 & SiO $J=1$--0 $v=1$ & --- & --- & --- & 0.119 \\
941: & SiO $J=1$--0 $v=2$ & 28.7 & 1.398 & 4.106 & 0.117 \\
942: G024.6610 & SiO $J=1$--0 $v=1$ & --- & --- & --- & 0.103 \\
943: & SiO $J=1$--0 $v=2$ & 57.7 & 1.247 & 3.662 & 0.101 \\
944: \tableline
945: \end{tabular}
946: %\end{center}
947: \end{table*}
948: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Table 4 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
949: \newpage
950: \begin{table*}
951: %\begin{center}
952: \caption{Negative results for the SiO and H$_2$O maser line search.}\label{tab:table4}
953: % \caption{Negative results for the SiO and H$_2$O maser.}\label{tab:table4}
954: \begin{tabular}{lccc}
955: \tableline\tableline
956: Source & rms & rms & rms\tablenotemark{a} \\
957: & (SiO $v=1$) & (SiO $v=2$) & (H$_2$O) \\
958: & (K) & (K) & (K) \\
959: \tableline
960: 18034$-$1858 & 0.115 & 0.114 & 0.096 \\
961: 18161$-$1713 & 0.119 & 0.115 & 0.107 \\
962: 18212$-$1227 & 0.096 & 0.095 & 0.086 \\
963: 18298$-$0904 & 0.097 & 0.105 & 0.075 \\
964: 18325$-$0721 & 0.075 & 0.073 & 0.087 \\
965: 18327$-$0645 & 0.099 & 0.097 & 0.088 \\
966: 18424$-$0509 & 0.357 & 0.396 & 0.088 \\ % ? 20m20s integration standing wave ?
967: 18444$-$0359 & 0.126 & 0.121 & 0.113 \\
968: 18596$+$0315 & 0.117 & 0.115 & 0.086 \\ % $\flat$
969: 19011$+$0638 & 0.113 & 0.102 & 0.084 \\
970: 19025$+$0702 & 0.111 & 0.113 & --- \\
971: 19087$+$1006 & 0.077 & 0.075 & 0.080 \\
972: 19112$+$1220 & 0.088 & 0.084 & 0.082 \\
973: 19114$+$0920 & 0.086 & 0.086 & 0.151 \\
974: 19180$+$1230 & 0.071 & 0.073 & --- \\
975: 19254$+$1724 & 0.094 & 0.082 & --- \\ %A19274M
976: 19266$+$1815 & 0.077 & 0.071 & --- \\ %A19285M
977: 19275$+$1702 & 0.094 & 0.090 & 0.093 \\
978: G014.2758 & 0.109 & 0.109 & 0.099 \\
979: G022.0425 & 0.075 & 0.078 & --- \\
980: G027.8433 & 0.103 & 0.099 & 0.062 \\
981: \tableline
982: \end{tabular}
983: \tablenotetext{a}{Dash indicates not observed.}
984: %\end{center}
985: %\tablenotetext{a}{Dash indicates not observed}
986: \end{table*}
987:
988: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Table 5 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
989: \clearpage
990: \begin{table*}
991: %\begin{center}
992: \caption{Observation summary for IRAS 19027+0517.}\label{tab:table5}
993: \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
994: \tableline\tableline
995: Transition & rest freq. & $V_{lsr}$ & $T_a^*$ & line flux & rms \\
996: & (GHz) & (km s$^{-1}$) & (K) & (km s$^{-1}$ K) & (K) \\
997: \tableline
998: H$_2$O $6_{16}$--$5_{23}$& 22.23508 & --- & --- & --- & 0.073 \\
999: NH$_3$ $1_1$--$1_1$ & 23.694 & --- & --- & --- & 0.063 \\
1000: NH$_3$ $2_2$--$2_2$ & 23.722 & --- & --- & --- & 0.044 \\
1001: NH$_3$ $3_3$--$3_3$ & 23.870 & --- & --- & --- & 0.052 \\
1002: SiO $J=1$--0 $v=0$ & 43.42386 & 34.2 & 0.173 & 0.417 & 0.053 \\
1003: SiO $J=1$--0 $v=1$ & 43.12208 & 31.7 & 1.288 & 3.348 & 0.058 \\
1004: SiO $J=1$--0 $v=2$ & 42.82059 & 31.7 & 1.202 & 3.826 & 0.067 \\
1005: SiO $J=1$--0 $v=3$ & 42.51938 & 31.6 & 0.298 & 0.557 & 0.053 \\
1006: $^{29}$SiO $J=1$--0 $v=1$& 42.87992 & --- & --- & --- & 0.054 \\
1007: H53$\alpha$ & 42.95197 & --- & --- & --- & 0.062 \\
1008: SiO $J=2$--1 $v=1$ & 86.24342 & 32.3 & 0.204 & 0.584 & 0.034 \\
1009: SiO $J=2$--1 $v=0$ & 86.84700 & --- & --- & --- & 0.037 \\
1010: HCN $J=1$--0 & 88.63185 & ---\tablenotemark{a} & --- & --- & 0.053 \\
1011: HCO$^+$ $J=1$--0 & 89.18852 & --- & --- & --- & 0.061 \\
1012: CO $J=1$--0 &115.27120 & ---\tablenotemark{a} & --- & --- & 0.200 \\
1013: %\hline
1014: \tableline
1015: \end{tabular}
1016: \tablenotetext{a}{Contaminations at $V_{lsr}=12$, 46, and 63 km s$^{-1}$.}
1017: %\end{center}
1018: \end{table*}
1019: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% end of Tables %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1020:
1021:
1022: \clearpage
1023: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Fig. 1a %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1024: \begin{figure*}
1025: \epsscale{1.5}
1026: \plotone{f1a.eps}
1027: \caption{a. Composite-color images ($285''\times 285''$) of the GLIMPSE field of the sources in Table 1.
1028: IRAC 3.6, 4.5 and 5.8 $\mu$m bands are represented by blue, green, and red colors respectively.
1029: Objects are at the center of the images, and the directions of increasing Galactic longitude and latitude
1030: are left and up, respectively.
1031: \label{fig:GLIMPASEa}}
1032: \end{figure*}
1033: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% figure 1b %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1034: \clearpage
1035: \setcounter{figure}{0}
1036: \begin{figure*}
1037: \epsscale{1.5}
1038: % \plotone{f1b.eps}\\[10mm]
1039: \begin{center}
1040: \plotone{f1b.eps}\\[5mm]
1041: % Fig. 1b. --- Continued.
1042: % \clearpage
1043: \vspace{1cm}
1044: \epsscale{0.36}
1045: \plotone{f1c.eps}\\[5mm]
1046: % Fig. 1b. and 1c. --- Continued.
1047: \caption{b. and c. --- Continued.\label{fig:GLIMPASEbc}}
1048: \end{center}
1049: \end{figure*}
1050: % \clearpage
1051: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% figure 2 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1052: \begin{figure*}
1053: \epsscale{1.6}
1054: \plotone{f2.eps}
1055: \caption{SiO $J=1$--0 $v=1$ and 2 spectra of the detected sources.
1056: For IRAS 18182$-$1504 the SiO $J=1$--0 $v=0$ 1, 2, and 3,
1057: and $^{29}$SiO $J=1$--0 $v=0$ spectra are shown. Source name and observed date
1058: (in yymmdd.d format) are indicated on the left of each panel.
1059: were indicated
1060: }\label{fig:SiO}
1061: \end{figure*}
1062: % \newpage
1063:
1064: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% figure 3 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1065: \begin{figure*}
1066: \epsscale{1.4}
1067: \plotone{f3.eps}
1068: \caption{H$_2$O $6_{16}$--$5_{23}$ spectra for the detected sources.
1069: Source name and observed date (in yymmdd.d format) are indicated on the left of each panel.
1070: }\label{fig:H2O}
1071: \end{figure*}
1072: % \newpage
1073:
1074: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% figure 4 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1075: \begin{figure*}
1076: \epsscale{0.7}
1077: \plotone{f4.eps}
1078: \caption{Two-color diagram, $[3.6]-[12]$ versus $[3.6]-[5.8]$.
1079: The filled and unfilled circles indicate SiO detection and nondetection,
1080: and the square indicates the position of OH 127.8+0.0. The dotted arrow indicates
1081: direction of interstellar reddening; the length corresponds to $A_K=15$.
1082: }\label{fig:two-color}
1083: \end{figure*}
1084: %\newpage
1085: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% figure 5 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1086: \begin{figure*}
1087: \epsscale{0.7}
1088: \plotone{f5.eps}
1089: \caption{Excess factor versus expansion velocity of the OH 1612 MHz double-peak objects.
1090: Filled and unfilled circles indicate SiO detection and nondetection. The broken line
1091: indicates a separation for the low-mass stars.
1092: }\label{fig: mass_loss_Vepxp}
1093: \end{figure*}
1094:
1095: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% figure 6 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1096: \begin{figure*}
1097: \epsscale{0.5}
1098: \plotone{f6.eps}
1099: \caption{Glimpse color-composite image ($285''\times 285''$) of IRAS 19027+0517 made from 4.5 (blue), 5.8(green), and 8.0 (red) $\mu$m IRAS image.
1100: The directions of increasing Galactic longitude and latitude are left and up, respectively.
1101: }\label{fig:19207+0517image}
1102: \end{figure*}
1103: % \newpage
1104: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% figure 7 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1105: \begin{figure*}
1106: \epsscale{1.2}
1107: \plotone{f7.eps}
1108: \caption{SiO, H$_2$O and NH$_3$ spectra (a)
1109: CO $J=1$--0 spectra (b) toward IRAS 19027+0517. The number between the parenthesis
1110: on the left indicates R.A. and Dec. offsets in arcsec from the star position.
1111: The top is the spectrum of the bottom (center) subtracted
1112: by the average of surrounding 4 positions (middle).
1113: }\label{fig:19207+0517SiOH2O}
1114: \end{figure*}
1115: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% figure 8 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1116: \begin{figure*}
1117: \epsscale{0.6}
1118: \plotone{f8.eps}
1119: \caption{CO $J=1$--0 spectra toward IRAS 19027+0517. The number between the parenthesis
1120: on the left indicates R.A. and Dec. offsets in arcsec from the star position.
1121: The top is the spectrum of the bottom (center) subtracted
1122: by the average of surrounding 4 positions (middle).
1123: }\label{fig:19207+0517CO}
1124: \end{figure*}
1125:
1126: \end{document}
1127:
1128: %%
1129: