1: % cup2egui.tex (LaTeX 2e version)
2: % v1.01 --- released 9th July 1997
3: % v1.0 --- released 9th May 1997
4: % based on cupguide.tex v1.2 (for LaTeX2.09, 27.4.95)
5:
6: \NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}[1996/06/01]
7:
8: \documentclass[cup6a]{cupbook}
9: \usepackage[dvips]{graphicx}
10:
11: %\title[ \LaTeXe\ Style Guide for Authors]
12: % {CUP Standard Designs}
13: %\author{Cambridge \TeX-to-type}
14: %\date{9th July 1997}
15:
16: \begin{document}
17:
18: \pagenumbering{roman}
19: \maketitle
20: \tableofcontents
21: \cleardoublepage
22: \pagenumbering{arabic}
23:
24: \chapter{Supermassive Black Holes}
25:
26: Supermassive black holes have generally been recognized as the most destructive
27: force in nature. But in recent years, they have undergone a dramatic shift in
28: paradigm. These objects may have been critical to the formation of structure in
29: the early universe, spawning bursts of star formation and nucleating proto-galactic
30: condensations. Possibly half of all the radiation produced after the Big Bang
31: may be attributed to them, whose number is now known to exceed 300 million.
32: The most accessible among them is situated at the Center of Our Galaxy. In
33: the following pages, we will examine the evidence that has brought us to this
34: point, and we will understand why many expect to actually image the event horizon
35: of the Galaxy's central black hole within this decade.
36:
37: The supermassive black hole story begins in 1963, at the Mount Palomar observatory,
38: where Schmidt (1963) was pondering over the nature of a star-like object with truly
39: anomalous characteristics. Meanwhile, at the university of Texas, Kerr (1963) was
40: making a breakthrough discovery of a solution to Einstein's field equations of
41: general relativity. Kerr's work would eventually produce a description of space
42: and time surrounding a spinning black hole, now thought to power the compact
43: condensations of matter responsible for producing the mystery on Schmidt's desk
44: that year.
45:
46: The development and use of radio telescopes in the 1940s had led to the gradual
47: realization that several regions of the sky are very bright emitters of
48: centimeter-wavelength radiation. In the early 1960's, the British astronomer
49: Cyril Hazard's idea of using lunar occultation to determine with which, if any,
50: of the known visible astronomical objects the emitter of centimeter-wavelength
51: radiation was associated, lead to the successful identification of 3C~273 as a
52: star-like object in Virgo. Its redshifted lines, however, indicated that this was
53: not a star at all, but rather an object lying at great cosmological distances.
54: A recent image of this historic source was made with the {\sl Chandra} X-ray
55: telescope, and is shown in figure~1.
56:
57: \begin{figure}[h]
58: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=4in]{f1bw.eps}}
59: \vskip0.15in
60: \caption{The quasar 3C~273 (the bright object in the upper-left-hand corner)
61: was one of the first objects to be recognized as a ``quasi-stellar-radio-source''
62: (quasar), due to its incredible optical and radio brightness. Insightful analysis
63: led to the realization that 3C~273 is actually an incredibly powerful, distant
64: object. This {\sl Chandra} image has a size $\approx 22\times 22$ square
65: arcseconds, which at the distance to 3C~273, corresponds to about $2,000\times 2,000$
66: square light-years. (Photograph courtesy of H. L. Marshall et al., NASA, and MIT)}
67: \end{figure}
68:
69: 3C~273's total optical output varies significantly in only 10 months or so, implying
70: that its size cannot exceed a few light-years---basically the distance between the
71: Sun and its nearest stellar neighbor. So it was clear right from the beginning that
72: the quasar phenomenon must be associated with highly compact objects. Even more
73: impressively, their X-ray output has now been seen to vary in a matter of only hours,
74: corresponding to a source size smaller than Neptune's orbit. Each quasar typically
75: releases far more energy than an entire galaxy, yet the central engine that drives
76: this powerful activity occupies a region smaller than our solar system.
77:
78: The idea that such small volumes could be producing the power of a hundred billion
79: Suns led to their early identification as radiative manifestations of supermassive
80: black holes (see, e.g., Salpeter 1964, Zel'dovich and Novikov 1967, and
81: Lynden-Bell 1969). But are they ``naked''---deep, dark pits of matter floating
82: aimlessly across the primeval cosmic soup---or are they attached to more
83: recognizable structures in the early universe?
84:
85: In recent years, the task of source identification has been made easier using the Hubble
86: Space Telescope (see figure~2). The most widely accepted view now is that quasars
87: are found in galaxies with active, supermassive black holes at their centers.
88: Because of their enormous distance from Earth, the ``host" galaxies appear very
89: small and faint, and are very hard to see against the much brighter quasar light
90: at their center.
91:
92: \vskip 0.1in
93: \begin{figure}[h]
94: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=4in]{f2bw.eps}}
95: \vskip -0.0in
96: \caption{This Hubble Space Telescope (HST) image reveals the faint host galaxy within
97: which dwells the bright quasar known as QSO 1229+204. The quasar is seen to lie in the
98: core of an ordinary-looking galaxy with two spiral arms of stars connected by a bar-like
99: feature. (Photograph courtesy of John Hutchings, Dominion Astrophysical Observatory,
100: and NASA)}
101: \end{figure}
102:
103: Quasars actually reside in the nuclei of many different types of galaxy, from
104: the normal to those highly disturbed by collisions or mergers. A supermassive
105: black hole at the nucleus of one of these distant galaxies ``turns on" when it
106: begins to accrete stars and gas from its nearby environment; the rate at which
107: matter is converted into energy can be as high as 10 solar masses per year. So
108: the character and power of a quasar depend in part on how much matter is available
109: for consumption. Disturbances induced by gravitational interactions with
110: neighboring galaxies can trigger the infall of material toward the center of the
111: quasar host galaxy (see figure~3). However, many quasars reside in apparently
112: undisturbed galaxies, and this may be an indication that mechanisms other than
113: a disruptive collision may also be able to effectively fuel the supermassive
114: black hole residing at the core.
115:
116: \begin{figure}[h]
117: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=4in]{f3bw.eps}}
118: \vskip 0.15in
119: \caption{The collision between two galaxies begins with the unraveling of
120: the spiral disks. This HST image shows the interacting pair of galaxies NGC~2207 (the
121: larger, more massive object on the left) and IC~2163 (the smaller one on the right),
122: located some 114 million light-years from Earth. By this time, IC~2163's stars have
123: begun to surf outward to the right on a tidal tail created by NGC~2207's strong
124: gravity. (Image courtesy of Debra M. Elmegreen at Vassar College, Bruce G. Elmegreen
125: at the IBM Research Division, NASA, M. Kaufman at Ohio State U., E. Brinks at U. de
126: Guanajuato, C. Struck at Iowa State U., M. Klaric at Bell South, M. Thomasson at
127: Onsala Space Observatory, and the Hubble Heritage Team based at the Space Telescope
128: Space Institute and AURA)}
129: \end{figure}
130:
131: Some supermassive black holes may not be visible as quasars at all, but rather just
132: sputter enough to become the fainter galactic nuclei in our galactic neighborhood.
133: Our Milky Way galaxy and our neighbor, the Andromeda galaxy, harbor supermassive
134: black holes with very little nearby plasma to absorb. The question concerning how
135: the undisturbed galaxies spawn a quasar is still not fully answered. Perhaps the
136: Next Generation Space Telescope, now under development and expected to fly soon
137: after 2010, will be able to probe even deeper than the Hubble Space Telescope has
138: done, and expose the additional clues we need to resolve this puzzle.
139:
140: \section{The Quasar/Supermassive Black Hole Census}
141: By now, some 15,000 distant quasars have been found, though the actual number of
142: supermassive black holes discovered thus far is much greater. Because of their
143: intrinsic brightness, the most distant quasars are seen at a time when the universe
144: was a mere fraction of its present age, roughly one billion years after the Big Bang.
145: The current distance record is held by an object found with the Sloan Digital Sky
146: Survey (SDSS), with a redshift of $\sim 6.3$, corresponding to a time roughly 700
147: million years after the Big Bang.
148:
149: The SDSS has shown that the number of quasars rose dramatically from a billion years
150: after the Big Bang to a peak around 2.5 billion years later, falling off sharply at
151: later times toward the present. Quasars turn on when fresh matter is brought into
152: their vicinity, and then fade into a barely perceptible glimmer not long thereafter.
153:
154: However, not all the supermassive black holes in our midst have necessarily
155: grown through the quasar phase. Quasars typically have masses $\sim 10^9\;
156: M_\odot$. Yet the black hole at the center of our galaxy is barely $3.4\times
157: 10^6\;M_\odot$. In other words, not all the supermassive black holes in our
158: vicinity are dormant quasars.
159:
160: A recent discovery suggests how some of these ``smaller'' black holes may
161: have gotten their start. {\sl Chandra} has identified what appears to be a
162: mid-sized black hole 600 light-years from the center of M82 (Matsumoto et al.
163: 2001). With a mass of $\sim 500\;M_\odot$, this object could conceivably
164: sink to the center of M82, and then grow to become a supermassive black hole
165: in its own right, without having passed through the rapid accretion phase of
166: a quasar.
167:
168: So the class of known quasars may be a good tracer of supermassive black holes,
169: but it clearly does not encompass all of them. Taking advantage of two patches
170: of sky relatively devoid of nearby objects, {\sl Chandra} produced two of the
171: deepest images ever made of the distant cosmos at X-ray energies, one in the
172: southern hemisphere and the other in the north---the latter, called the
173: {\sl Chandra} Deep Field North, is shown in figure~4. Based on the number of
174: suspected supermassive black holes in these images, one infers an overall
175: population of $\sim 300$ million throughout the cosmos.
176:
177: \begin{figure}[h]
178: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=4in]{f4bw.eps}}
179: \vskip -0.0in
180: \caption{The {\sl Chandra} Deep Field North X-ray image. The vast majority of
181: the 500 or so sources in this view (spanning a region approximately 28
182: arcminutes wide) are supermassive black holes. Extrapolating this number to
183: the whole sky, one infers $\sim 300$ million such objects spread across the
184: universe. (Image courtesy of D. M. Alexander, F. E. Bauer, W. N. Brandt,
185: et al., NASA and PSU)}
186: \vskip 0.0in
187: \end{figure}
188:
189: And yet, these X-ray detections speak only of those particular supermassive
190: black holes whose orientation facilitates the transmission of their high-energy
191: radiation toward Earth. Their actual number must be higher than this; indeed,
192: there is now growing evidence that many---perhaps the majority---of the
193: supermassive black holes in the universe are obscured from view. The faint
194: X-ray background pervading the intergalactic medium has been a puzzle for many years.
195: Unlike the cosmic microwave background radiation left over from the Big Bang, the
196: photons in the X-ray haze are too energetic to have been produced at early times.
197: Instead, this radiation field suggests a more recent provenance associated with
198: a population of sources whose overall radiative output may actually dominate over
199: everything else in the cosmos. Stars and ordinary galaxies simply do not radiate
200: profusely at such high energy, and therefore cannot fit the suggested profile.
201:
202: A simple census shows that in order to produce such an X-ray glow with quasars alone,
203: for every known source there ought to be ten more obscured ones. This would also mean
204: that the growth of most supermassive black holes by accretion is hidden from the view
205: of optical, UV, and near infrared telescopes. Fabian et al. (2000) have reported the
206: discovery of an object they call a Type-2 quasar. Invisible to optical light telescopes,
207: the nucleus of this otherwise normal looking galaxy betrayed its supermassive guest with
208: a glimmer of X-rays. The implication is that many more quasars, and their supermassive
209: black-hole power sources, may be hidden in otherwise innocuous-looking galaxies.
210:
211: And so, the all-pervasive X-ray haze, in combination with the discovery of gas-obscured
212: quasars, now point to supermassive black holes as the agents behind perhaps {\it half}
213: of all the universe's radiation produced after the Big Bang. Ordinary stars no longer
214: monopolize the power as they had for decades prior to the advent of space-based astronomy.
215:
216: \section{Black Holes in the Nuclei of Normal Galaxies}
217: Much closer to Earth, within hundreds of thousands of light-years as opposed to the
218: 11 billion-light-year distance to the farthest quasars, supermassive black holes
219: accrete at a lower rate than their quasar brethren and are therefore much fainter.
220: An archetype of this group, Centaurus A, graces the southern constellation of Centaurus
221: at a distance of 11 million light-years (see figure~5). At the center of the dark bands of dust,
222: HST recently uncovered a disk of glowing, high-speed gas, swirling about a concentration of matter
223: with the mass of $\sim 2\times 10^6\;M_\odot$. This enormous mass within the central cavity
224: cannot be due to normal stars, since these objects would shine brightly, producing an intense
225: optical spike toward the middle, unlike the rather tempered look of the infrared image shown here.
226:
227: \begin{figure}[h]
228: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=4in]{f5bw.eps}}
229: \vskip -0.0in
230: \caption{This image of Centaurus A is a composite of three photographs taken by the
231: European Southern Observatory. The dramatic dark band is thought to be the remnant
232: of a smaller spiral galaxy that collided, and ultimately merged, with a large
233: elliptical galaxy. Imaging this galaxy at radio wavelengths, we would see two
234: jets of plasma spewing forth from the central region in a direction perpendicular
235: to the dark dust lanes (see figure~6 for the corresponding configuration in
236: Cygnus A). These relativistic expulsions of plasma share much in common with the
237: X-ray glowing stream shown in figure~1. (Photograph courtesy of Richard M. West and the
238: European Southern Observatory)}
239: \end{figure}
240:
241: Centaurus A is apparently funneling highly energetic particles into beams perpendicular
242: to the dark strands of dust. It may therefore have much in common with the X-ray
243: jet-producing black hole in 3C 273 (see figure~1), and another well-known active
244: galactic nucleus, Gygnus A, shown in figure~6. The luminous extensions in this figure
245: project out from the nucleus of Cygnus A, an incredible distance three times the size of
246: the Milky Way. Yet located 600 million light-years from Earth, they cast an aspect
247: only one-tenth the diameter of the full moon. Radio and X-ray observations show that
248: objects such as this accelerate plasma to relativistic speeds on scales of 10 to 100
249: Schwarzschild radii (see figure~7), and that these jets are not rare.
250:
251: \begin{figure}[h]
252: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{f6bw.eps}}
253: \vskip -0.0in
254: \caption{A VLA image of the powerful central engine and its relativistic ejection of plasma
255: in the nucleus of Cygnus A. Taken at $6$ cm, this view reveals the highly ordered structure
256: spanning over 500,000 light-years, fed by ultra-thin jets of energetic particles beamed from
257: the compact radio core between them. The giant lobes are themselves formed when these jets
258: plow into the tenuous gas that exists between galaxies. Despite its great distance from us
259: (over 600 million light-years), it is still by far the closest powerful radio galaxy and one
260: of the brightest radio sources in the sky. The fact that the jets must have been sustained
261: in their tight configuration for over half a million (possibly as long as ten million)
262: years means that a highly stable central object---probably a rapidly spinning supermassive
263: black hole acting like an immovable gyroscope---must be the cause of all this activity.
264: (Photograph courtesy of Chris Carilli and Rick Perley,
265: NRAO, and AUI)}
266: \end{figure}
267:
268: An important conclusion to draw from the morphology of jets like those in Cygnus A is that
269: the process responsible for their formation must be stable for at least as long as it takes
270: the streaming particles to journey from the center of the galaxy to the extremities of the
271: giant radio lobes. Evidently, these pencil-thin jets of relativistic plasma have retained
272: their current configuration for over one million years. The most conservative view regarding
273: the nature of these objects is that a spinning black hole is ultimately responsible for this
274: activity. The axis of its spin functions as a gyroscope, whose direction determines the
275: orientation of the jets. Although the definitive mechanism for how the ejection takes place
276: is yet to be determined, almost certainly the twisting motion of magnetized plasma near the
277: black hole's event horizon is causing the expulsion. The Kerr spacetime, which describes the
278: dragging of inertial frames about the black hole's spin axis, provides a natural setting for
279: establishing the preferred direction for this ejective process.
280:
281: \begin{figure}[h]
282: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{f7bw.eps}}
283: \vskip -0.05in
284: \caption{Streaming out from the center of M87 is a black-hole-powered jet of
285: plasma traveling at near lightspeed. Its source is a powerful central object
286: with a mass of $\sim 3\times 10^9\;M_\odot$. This sequence of photographs shows
287: progressively magnified views: {\sl top left:} a VLA image showing the full extent
288: of the jets and the blobs at the termination points; {\sl top right:} a visible
289: light image of the giant elliptical galaxy M87, taken with NASA's Hubble Space
290: Telescope; {\sl bottom:} a Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA) radio image of the
291: region surrounding the black hole. This view shows how the extragalactic jet
292: is formed into a narrow beam within a few tenths of a light-year of the nucleus
293: (the red region is only a tenth of a light-year across), corresponding to only
294: 100 Schwarzschild radii for a black hole of this mass. (Photographs courtesy of
295: the National Radio Astronomy Observatory and the National Science Foundation
296: [top left and bottom], and John Biretta at the Space Telescope Science Institute,
297: and NASA [top right])}
298: \end{figure}
299:
300: \section{Weighing Supermassive Black Holes}
301: Black hole masses are measured with a variety of techniques, though all have to
302: do with the dynamics of matter within their gravitational influence. Knowledge
303: of the radiating plasma's distance from the central object, and the force required
304: to sustain its motion at that distance, is sufficient for us to extract the
305: central mass.
306:
307: One of the more compelling applications of this technique has been made to the
308: spiral galaxy NGC~4258. Using global radio interferometry, Miyoshi et al. (1995)
309: observed a disk of dense molecular material orbiting within the galaxy's nucleus
310: at speeds of up to 650 miles per second. This disk produces sufficient radiation
311: to excite condensations of water molecules, leading to strong maser emission at
312: radio wavelengths. The disk within which these water molecules are trapped is
313: small compared to the galaxy itself, but it happens to be oriented fortuitously
314: so that beams of microwaves are directed along our line-of-sight.
315:
316: The maser clouds appear to trace a very thin disk, with a motion that follows
317: Kepler's laws to within one part in 100, reaching a velocity (inferred from
318: the Doppler shift of the lines) of about 650 miles per second at a distance of 0.5
319: light-years from the center. The implied central mass is $\sim (35-40)\times
320: 10^6\;M_\odot$, concentrated within 0.5 light years of the center in NGC~4258.
321: This points to a matter density of at least $10^8\;M_\odot$ per cubic light-year.
322: If this mass were simply a highly concentrated star cluster, the stars would be
323: separated by an average distance only somewhat greater than the diameter of the
324: solar system, and with such proximity, they would not be able to survive the
325: inevitable catastrophic collisions and mergers with each other. Because of the
326: precision with which we can measure this concentration of dark mass, we regard
327: the object in the nucleus of NGC~4258 as one of the two most compelling
328: supermassive black holes now known, the other being the object sitting at the
329: center of our own galaxy, about which we will have more to say shortly.
330:
331: The fortuitous arrangement of factors that permits the use of this particular
332: technique does not occur often, however, so other methods must be used.
333: Often, clouds of gas orbiting the nucleus are irradiated by the central engine,
334: and they in turn produce a spectrum with emission lines indicative of the plasma's
335: ionized state. The method used to determine the distance of these ionized clouds
336: from the black hole is known as reverberation. By monitoring the light emitted by
337: the supermassive black hole and, independently, the radiation from its halo of
338: irradiated clouds of gas, one can determine when a variation in the radiative
339: output has occurred. When the quasar varies its brightness, so does the
340: surrounding matter---but only after a certain time delay. The lag is clearly
341: due to the time it took the irradiating light from the center to reach the clouds,
342: and using the speed of light, this delay provides a measure of the distance between
343: the nucleus and the orbiting plasma. Again, this procedure provides the speed of
344: matter and its distance from the center, which together yield a determination of
345: the gravitating mass.
346:
347: Having said this, the best mass determination one can make is still based on kinematic
348: studies of stars orbiting the central object. The center of our Galaxy is close enough
349: for this method to work spectacularly. Known as Sagittarius A*, the black hole
350: at the center of the Milky Way may not be the most massive, nor the most energetic,
351: but it is by far the closest, only 28,000 light-years away. Figure~10 shows an infrared
352: image of Galactic center produced recently with the 8.2-meter VLT YEPUN telescope at the
353: European Southern Observatory in Paranal, Chile. The image we see here is sharp because
354: of the use of adaptive optics, in which a mirror in the telescope moves constantly to
355: correct for the effects of turbulence in the Earth's atmosphere. Sagittarius A* is so
356: close to us compared to other supermassive black holes, that on an image such as this,
357: we can identify individual stars orbiting a mere seven to 10 light-days from the source
358: of gravity. In the nucleus of Andromeda, the nearest major galaxy to the Milky Way, the
359: best we could do right now is about two light-years.
360:
361: \begin{figure}[h]
362: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=4in]{f8bw.eps}}
363: \vskip 0.2in
364: \caption{This ($1.6-3.5$ micron) image, taken by the European Southern Observatory's
365: 8.2-meter telescope atop Paranal, Chile, provides one of the sharpest views of the
366: stars surrounding the supermassive black hole at the Galactic center. The location
367: of the black hole itself is indicated by the two central arrows. This view represents
368: a scale of approximately $2\times 2$ square light-years. (Photograph courtesy of R.
369: Genzel et al. at the Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Extraterrestrische Physik, and the
370: European Southern Observatory)}
371: \end{figure}
372:
373: In the Galactic center, stars orbit Sagittarius A* at speeds of up to five million
374: kilometers per hour. This motion is rapid, in fact, that we can easily detect their
375: proper motion on photographic plates taken only several years apart. Some of them
376: complete an orbit about the center in only 15 years (Sch\"odel, Ott, Genzel, et al.
377: 2002). In the middle of the photograph in figure~8, it appears that one of the
378: fainter stars---designated as S2---lies right on top of the position where the
379: black hole is inferred to be. S2 is an otherwise ``normal" star, though some
380: 15 times more massive and seven times larger than the Sun. This star, S2, has
381: now been tracked for over ten years and the loci defining its path trace a perfect
382: ellipse with one focus at the position of the supermassive black hole. This
383: photograph, taken near the middle of 2002, just happens to have caught S2 at the
384: point of closest approach (known as the perenigricon), making it look like it was
385: sitting right on top of the nucleus.
386:
387: At perenigricon, S2 was a mere 17 light-hours away from the black hole---roughly
388: three times the distance between the Sun and Pluto, while traveling with a speed
389: in excess of 5,000 kilometers per second, by far the most extreme measurements
390: ever made for such an orbit and velocity. We infer from these data that the mass
391: of Sagittarius A* is $\sim 3.4\times 10^6\;M_\odot$, compressed into a region no
392: bigger than $\sim 17$ light-hours. For this reason, Sagittarius A*, and the
393: central object in NGC~4258, are considered to be the most precisely ``weighed''
394: supermassive black holes yet discovered.
395:
396: \section{The Formation of Supermassive Black Holes}
397: An increasingly important question being asked in the context of supermassive black holes
398: is which came first, the central black hole, or the surrounding galaxy? Quasars seem
399: to have peaked 10 billion years ago, early in the universe's existence. The light from
400: galaxies, on the other hand, originated much later---after the cosmos had aged another
401: 2 to 4 billion years. Unfortunately, both measurements are subject to uncertainty, and
402: no one can be sure we are measuring {\it all} of the light from quasars and galaxies, so
403: this argument is not quite compelling. But we do see quasars as far out as we can look,
404: and the most distant among them tend to be the most energetic objects in the
405: universe, so at least {\it some} supermassive black holes must have existed near
406: the very beginning. At the same time, images such as figure~3 provide evidence of mergers
407: of smaller structures into bigger aggregates, but without a quasar. Perhaps not every
408: collision feeds a black hole or, what is more likely, at least some galaxies must have
409: formed first. Several scenarios for the formation of supermassive black holes are currently
410: being examined. In every case, growth occurs when matter condenses following either the
411: collapse of massive gas clouds, or the catabolism of smaller black holes in collisions and mergers.
412:
413: All of the structure in the universe traces its beginnings to a brief era
414: shortly after the Big Bang. Very few ``fossils'' remain from this period; one
415: of the most important is the cosmic microwave background radiation.
416: The rapid expansion that ensued lowered the matter density and temperature,
417: and about one month after the Big Bang, the rate at which photons were created
418: and annihilated could no longer keep up with the thinning plasma. The radiation
419: and matter began to fall out of equilibrium with each other, forever imprinting
420: the conditions of that era onto the radiation that reaches us to this day from all
421: directions in space.
422:
423: We now know that the temperature anisotropies are smaller than one part in
424: a thousand, a limit below which density perturbations associated with
425: ordinary matter would not have had sufficient time to evolve freely
426: into the nonlinear structures we see today. Only a gravitationally
427: dominant dark-matter component could then account for the strong
428: condensation of mass into galaxies and supermassive black holes.
429: The thinking behind this is that whereas the cosmic microwave
430: background radiation interacted with ordinary matter, it would
431: retain no imprint at all of the dark matter constituents in the
432: universe. The nonluminous material could therefore be condensed
433: unevenly (sometimes said to be `clumped') all the way back to the
434: Big Bang and we simply wouldn't know it.
435:
436: The first billion years of evolution following the Big Bang must have been
437: quite dramatic in terms of which constituents in the universe would eventually
438: gain primacy and lasting influence on the structure we see today. The issue of how
439: the fluctuations in density, mirrored by the uneven cosmic microwave background radiation,
440: eventually condensed into supermassive black holes and galaxies is currently
441: a topic of ongoing work. This question deals with the fundamental contents of
442: the universe, and possibly what produced the Big Bang and what came before it.
443: The evidence now seems to be pointing to a coeval history for these two dominant
444: classes of objects---supermassive black holes and galaxies---though as we have
445: already noted, at least some of the former must have existed quite early.
446:
447: One possibility proposed by Balberg and Shapiro (2002) is that the first
448: supermassive objects formed from the condensation of dark matter alone; only
449: later would these seed black holes have imposed their influence on the latter.
450: But this dark matter has to be somewhat peculiar, in the sense that its
451: constituents must be able to exchange heat with each other. As long as this
452: happens, a fraction of its elements evaporate away from the condensation,
453: carrying with them the bulk of the energy, and the rest collapse and create
454: an event horizon. The net result is that the inner core of such a clump forms
455: a black hole, leaving the outer region and the extended halo in equilibrium
456: about the central object. Over time, ordinary matter gathers around it,
457: eventually forming stars, and planets.
458:
459: Ordinary matter could not have achieved this early condensation because
460: it simply wasn't sufficiently clumped initially. Perhaps this material
461: formed the first stars, followed by more stars, eventually assembling a
462: cluster of colliding objects. Over time, the inner core of such an assembly
463: would have collapsed due to the evaporation of some of its members and the
464: ensuing loss of energy into the extended halo, just as the dark matter did
465: (see, e.g., Haehnelt and Rees 1993). A seed black hole might have formed
466: in the cluster's core. Estimates show that once formed, such an object
467: could have doubled its mass every 40 million years, so over the age of the
468: universe, even a modestly appointed black hole could have grown into a
469: billion-solar-mass object. The problem is that this could not have happened
470: in only 700 million years, when the first supermassive black holes appeared.
471:
472: Yet another method leading to black hole growth results from ongoing
473: collisions between galaxies, which eventually lead to the merger of the
474: black holes themselves. An example of such a process occurring right now
475: is shown in figure~9.
476:
477: \begin{figure}[h]
478: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=4in]{f9bw.eps}}
479: \vskip -0.0in
480: \caption{NGC~6240 is a butterfly-shaped galaxy, believed to be the
481: product of a collision between two smaller galaxies some 30 million
482: years ago. This {\sl Chandra} X-ray image (34,000 light-years across)
483: shows the heat generated by the merger activity, which created the extensive
484: multimillion degree Celsius gas. We see here for the first time direct
485: evidence that the nucleus of such a structure contains not one, but
486: two active supermassive black holes, drifting toward each other across
487: their 3,000-light-year separation; they're expected to merge into a bigger
488: object several hundred million years hence. (Image courtesy of Susan Komossa,
489: Gunter Hasinger, and Joan Centrella, and the Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur
490: Extraterrestrische Physik and NASA)}
491: \end{figure}
492:
493: Almost every large, normal galaxy harbors a supermassive black hole at its
494: center. Some evidence for this has been provided by a recently completed survey
495: of 100 nearby galaxies using the VLA, followed by closer scrutiny
496: with the Very Long Baseline Interferometry array. At least 30 percent of
497: this sample showed tiny, compact central radio sources bearing the
498: unique signature of the quasar phenomenon. Of the hundreds of millions
499: of supermassive black holes seen to pervade the cosmos, none of them
500: appear to be isolated. And even more compelling is the work of Kormendy
501: and Richstone (1995), who set about the task of systematically measuring as
502: many black hole masses as is currently feasible. Direct measurements of
503: supermassive black holes have been made in over 38 galaxies, based on the
504: large rotation and random velocities of stars and gas near their centers.
505: These objects are all relatively nearby because these direct methods don't
506: work unless we can see the individual stars in motion about the central
507: source of gravity. Curiously, none of the supermassive black holes have
508: been found in galaxies that lack a central bulge (figure~10). Galaxies
509: with a central bulge may have undergone one or more mergers in their past.
510: Thus, a collision like that seen in figures 3 and 11 may have been
511: required to create a central supermassive object.
512:
513: \begin{figure}[h]
514: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=4in]{f10bw.eps}}
515: \vskip -0.0in
516: \caption{This image of the spiral galaxy NGC~2613 was captured on February 26, 2002, by the Very
517: Large Telescope in Paranal, Chile. A search for a supermassive black hole in its core produced
518: a null result (Bower et al. 1993). By now the preponderance of evidence suggests that highly
519: flattened disk galaxies lacking a significant central hub, or spheroidal component, also lack
520: a supermassive object in the nucleus. On the other hand, every galaxy that does possess
521: a central bulge also harbors a supermassive black hole. (Image courtesy of S. D'Odorico et al.,
522: who obtained it during the test phase of the VIMOS instrument at the European Southern Observatory's
523: 8-meter MELIPAL telescope, and courtesy also of the European Southern
524: Observatory)}
525: \end{figure}
526:
527: Another recently inferred correspondence between supermassive black holes and their
528: host galaxies seems to have clinched the case for a coeval growth (Ferrarese and Merritt
529: 2000; Gebhardt et al. 2000). The data displayed in figure~11 show the relationship
530: between the mass of the black hole and the velocity dispersion of stars within the
531: spheroidal (or bulge) component of stars in the host galaxy. Based on the very tight
532: correlation evident in this graph, it appears that the mass of the central black hole
533: can be predicted with remarkable accuracy simply by knowing the velocity of stars
534: orbiting so far from it that its gravitational influence could not possibly be affecting
535: their motion at the present time. Pinpointing the trajectory of a single object in the
536: nuclei of the host galaxies is difficult and impracticable. Instead, these measurements
537: are based on the accumulated light from a limited region of the galaxy's central hub,
538: from which one may extract the collective Doppler shift, and thereby an average speed
539: of the stars as a group. What these studies reveal is that the ratio of the black hole's
540: mass to this average speed is constant across the whole sample of galaxies surveyed.
541:
542: \begin{figure}[h]
543: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{f11bw.eps}}
544: \vskip -0.1in
545: \caption{Plotted against the velocity dispersion of stars orbiting within the
546: spheroidal component of the host galaxy, the mass of a supermassive black hole
547: is tightly correlated with the former, hinting at a coeval history.
548: The stars are simply too far away from the nucleus to be directly affected by
549: the black hole's gravity at the present time (Ferrarese and Merritt 2000).}
550: \vskip 0.0in
551: \end{figure}
552:
553: This result is one of the most surprising correlations yet discovered in the
554: study of how the universe acquired its structure. Supermassive black holes,
555: it seems, ``know" about the motion of stars that are too distant to directly feel
556: their gravity. This tight connection suggests an entangled history between a
557: central black hole and the stellar activity in its halo. Although they may not
558: be causally bonded today, they must have had an overlapping genesis in the past.
559:
560: Additional information on the possible coeval history of supermassive black holes
561: and their host galaxies is provided by images such as figure~4. If we adopt a
562: canonical efficiency of $10\;\%$ for the conversion of rest mass energy into
563: radiation, we obtain the mass inflow rate versus redshift relation shown in
564: figure~12. This rate was as high as $10$ solar masses per year at a redshift
565: of $3$ or so, and has declined monotonically to its much lower value of around
566: $0.01$ solar masses per year in the current epoch. An even more interesting
567: evolutionary trait is that obtained by integrating the data in figure~12 over
568: the black hole spatial distribution, which produces the redshift dependence
569: of the so-called accretion rate density (figure~13). This quantity effectively
570: gives us the rate at which black hole mass is increasing with time. The apparent
571: $(1+z)^3$ dependence of this quantity (exhibited in figure~13) is identical to the
572: universe's star formation history, as deduced from the comoving UV intensity as
573: a function of redshift.
574:
575: \begin{figure}[h]
576: \centerline{\rotatebox{90}{\includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f12bw.eps}}}
577: \vskip -0.0in
578: \caption{The black hole accretion rate, in units of solar masses per year, versus
579: redshift, assuming a canonical efficiency rate of $10\,\%$ conversion of rest mass
580: energy into radiation. To generate a $10^9\;M_\odot$ black hole over an accretion
581: period of order $0.5$ Gyr, a rate of order $2\;M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$ is required.
582: (From Barger et al. 2001)}
583: \vskip 0.0in
584: \end{figure}
585:
586: \begin{figure}[h]
587: \centerline{\rotatebox{90}{\includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f13bw.eps}}}
588: \vskip -0.0in
589: \caption{The time history of the accretion rate density (effectively, the
590: rate at which black hole matter is increasing, in units of solar masses per year per megaparsec
591: cubed), integrated from the data exhibited in figure~12. The upper (solid) and lower (open)
592: bounds in this figure correspond to the accretion rate density calculated from the bolometric
593: and X-ray luminosities, respectively. The curves illustrate a $(1+z)^3$ dependence, normalized
594: to the $1<z<1.5$ redshift bin. (From Barger et al. 2001)}
595: \vskip 0.0in
596: \end{figure}
597:
598: Integrating this curve over time, we infer that about $0.006$ of the all
599: the mass contained within the bulge of any given galaxy should be in the
600: form of a central supermassive black hole. This is close to the value of
601: $\sim 0.002$ found in the local neighborhood of our Galaxy. With these
602: facts in hand, and satisfied that most supermassive black holes and their
603: host galaxies grew interdependently, one may hypothesize that once created,
604: a primordial condensation of matter continues to grow with a direct
605: feedback on its surroundings. This may happen either because the
606: quasar heats up its environment and controls the rate at which
607: additional matter can fall in from its cosmic neighborhood,
608: or because mergers between galaxies affect the growth of colliding
609: black holes in the same way that they determine the energy (and
610: therefore the average speed) of the surrounding stellar distribution.
611: In support of the idea that massive black holes may have formed
612: prior to the epoch of galaxy definition, Silk and Rees (1998)
613: suggest further that protogalactic star formation would have been
614: influenced significantly by the quasar's extensive energy outflows.
615: The ensuing feedback on the galaxy's spheroidal component could
616: be the reason we now see such a tight correlation between the
617: mass of the central object and the stellar velocities much farther
618: out.
619:
620: Another possible reason why black hole masses are correlated with
621: the velocity dispersion of the host galaxy bulges may be the importance
622: of galaxy mergers to the hierarchical construction of elaborate elliptical,
623: or disk-plus-bulge profiles. Most large galaxies have experienced at
624: least one major merger during their lifetime. Larger galaxies have
625: grown with a succession of collisions and mergers, a process contributing
626: significantly to the variety of shapes encompassed by the Hubble sequence.
627: Meanwhile, the turbulence generated in the core of the collision drives
628: most of the gas into the middle, where it forms new stars and feeds
629: a central black hole, or a pair of black holes. The tight correlation
630: between the black-hole mass and the halo velocity dispersion may be
631: a direct consequence of this cosmic cascade.
632:
633: \section{Imaging a Supermassive Black Hole}
634: Of course, the most exciting development in black hole research would be
635: the actual imaging of its event horizon (Melia 2003b). This may be feasible
636: in the next several years, with the development of a global mm-VLBA. The spectrum
637: of Sagittarius A* at the galactic center displays the well-known profile of a
638: self-absorbed emitter longward of $3-7$ mm, and a transparent medium at higher
639: frequencies (see figure~14). The fact that Sagittarius A* becomes transparent
640: across the mm/sub-mm bump in its spectrum means that a depression in intensity
641: (literally, a `black hole') should arise shortward of $\sim 1$ mm, due to the
642: effects of strong light bending near the event horizon. The `shadow' cast by the
643: black hole in this fashion should have an apparent diameter of about 5 Schwarzschild
644: radii (Falcke, Melia, and Agol 2000), nearly independent of the black hole
645: spin or its orientation. The distance to Sagittarius A* being roughly $8$ kpc, this diameter
646: corresponds to an angular size of $\sim 30\,\mu$as, which approaches the resolution of
647: current radio interferometers.
648:
649: \begin{figure}[h]
650: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=4in]{f14bw.eps}}
651: \vskip -0.1in
652: \caption{Spectra showing total flux density and polarization from Sagittarius A*.
653: The high-frequency data points are from Aitken et al. (2000) and the curves
654: are from the magnetohydrodynamic model discussed in Bromley, Melia, and Liu (2001). The
655: limit at 84 GHz is from Bower et al. (1999). At even lower frequencies, the best
656: fit polarization is consistent with $0$. In this figure, `negative' polarization
657: corresponds to the polarization vector being aligned with the spin axis of the black
658: hole, whereas positive is for a perpendicular configuration. The polarization
659: crosses $0$ when this vector flips by $90^\circ$ (Bromley, Melia, and Liu 2001).}
660: \end{figure}
661:
662: The fortunate aspect of this transition from optically-thick to optically-thin
663: emission across the mm/sub-mm bump is that it happens to occur at roughly the
664: same frequency where scatter broadening in the interstellar medium decreases
665: below the intrinsic source size. Taking this effect into account, and the finite
666: telescope resolution, one infers (Falcke, Melia, and Agol 2000) that the shadow of
667: Sagittarius A* should be observable below $\sim 1$ mm.
668:
669: Most recently, ray-tracing simulations have taken into account the magnetized
670: Keplerian flow and the effects of light-bending and area amplification
671: to produce the most detailed theoretical predictions of the images that mm-astronomy
672: will produce in the near future. The polarimetric images shown in figure~15
673: demonstrate that future mm/sub-mm interferometry can directly reveal material
674: flowing near the horizon in Sagittarius A*.
675:
676: \begin{figure}[h]
677: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{f15bw.eps}}
678: \vskip -0.0in
679: \caption{Polarization maps at three wavelengths near the
680: peak of the mm to sub-mm emission from Sagittarius A*. The top row shows
681: emission at 1.5~mm, the middle row is at 1~mm, and the
682: bottom row corresponds to 0.67~mm. The images in each row
683: show the raw ray-tracing output (first column on the left), and
684: an image blurred to account for finite VLBI resolution and
685: interstellar scattering (second column). The two rightmost
686: columns give the vertical and horizontal components of the polarized emission.
687: The pixel brightness in all images scales linearly with flux (Bromley, Melia, and Liu 2001).}
688: \vskip 0.0in
689: \end{figure}
690:
691: The blurring in these images is modeled by convolution with two Gaussians: the first
692: is an approximate model of the scattering effects with an ellipsoidal filter
693: whose major- and minor-axis FWHM values are 24.2~$\mu$as~$\times$ $(\lambda/1.3\;\hbox{\rm
694: mm})^2$ and 12.8~$\mu$as~$\times (\lambda/1.3\;\hbox{\rm mm})^2$, respectively,
695: for emission at wavelength $\lambda$. In the simulations
696: shown in Figure~15, the spin axis of the disk was chosen to lie along
697: the minor axis of the scattering ellipsoid, and a global interferometer
698: was assumed with a $8,000$ km baseline. The second is a spherically symmetric
699: filter with a FWHM of 33.5~$\mu$as~$\times (\lambda/1.3\;\hbox{\rm mm})$ to
700: account for the resolution effects of an ideal interferometer. These images
701: demonstrate clearly the viability of conducting polarimetric imaging of the
702: black hole at the Galactic center with upcoming VLBI techniques.
703:
704: \section{Conclusion}
705: \noindent
706: We have come a long way since 1963, when Roy Kerr discovered the spacetime
707: that is now synonymous with black hole research. The past decade, in particular,
708: has seen a dramatic shift in our view of the role played by supermassive black
709: holes in the formation of structure in the universe. We now appear to be on the
710: verge of finally ``seeing" some of these objects, providing more direct
711: evidence for their existence, and a more satisfying confirmation of their
712: properties predicted by general relativity. Within the framework of the Kerr
713: metric, Sagittarius A* at the Galactic center, and possibly even the central
714: black hole in the relatively nearby M81 galaxy, are expected to produce distinct
715: shadows with a precise shape and size of the region where light bending
716: and capture are important. This coming decade may finally give us a view into
717: one of the most important and intriguing predictions of general relativity.
718:
719: \begin{thereferences}
720:
721: \bibitem{Aitken}
722: Aitken, D. K., et al. (2000). Detection of Polarized Millimeter and Submillimeter Emission
723: from Sagittarius A*, \textit{The Astrophysical Journal Letters} \textbf{534}, L173--L176.
724:
725: \bibitem{Baganoff}
726: Baganoff, F. et al. (2001). Rapid X-ray flaring from the direction of the supermassive
727: black hole at the Galactic Centre, \textit{Nature} \textbf{413}, 45--48.
728:
729: \bibitem{Balberg}
730: Balberg, S., and S. L. Shapiro (2002). Gravothermal Collapse of Self-Interacting
731: Dark Matter Halos and the Origin of Massive Black Holes, \textit{Physical Review Letters}
732: \textbf{88}, 101301.1--101301.4.
733:
734: \bibitem{barger}
735: Barger, A. J. et al. (2001). Supermassive Black Hole Accretion History Inferred from a
736: Large Sample of Chandra Hard X-ray Sources, \textit{Astronomical Journal} \textbf{122}, 2177--2194.
737:
738: \bibitem{bower}
739: Bower, G. A., D. O. Richstone, G. D. Bothun, and T. M. Heckman (1993).
740: A Search for Dead Quasars Among Nearby Luminous Galaxies. I. The Stellar Kinematics in the
741: Nuclei NGC~2613, NGC~4699, NGC~5746, and NGC~7331, \textit{Astrophysical Journal} \textbf{402}, 76--94.
742:
743: \bibitem{bower99}
744: Bower, G. C., et al. (1999). The Linear Polarization of Sagittarius A*. I. VLA
745: Spectropolarimetry at 4.8 and 8.4 GHZ, \textit{The Astrophysical Journal} \textbf{521}, 582--586.
746:
747: \bibitem{bromley}
748: Bromley, B., F. Melia, and S. Liu (2001). Polarimetric Imaging of the Massive Black Hole at the
749: Galactic Center, \textit{Astrophysical Journal Letters} \textbf{555}, L83--L86.
750:
751: \bibitem{coker}
752: Coker, R., and F. Melia (1997). Hydrodynamical Accretion onto Sagittarius A* from Distributed
753: Point Sources, \textit{The Astrophysical Journal Letters} \textbf{488}, L149--L152.
754:
755: \bibitem{connors}
756: Connors, P. A., and R. F. Stark (1977). Observable gravitational effects on polarised radiation
757: coming from near a black hole, \textit{Nature} \textbf{269}, 128--129.
758:
759: \bibitem{fabian}
760: Fabian, A. C., et al. (2000). Testing the Connection Between the
761: X-ray and Submillimeter Source Populations Using Chandra,
762: \textit{Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society} \textbf{315}, L8--L12.
763:
764: \bibitem{ferrarese}
765: Ferrarese, L., and D. Merritt (2000). A Fundamental Relation Between
766: Supermassive Black Holes and Their Host Galaxies, \textit{The Astrophysical
767: Journal Letters} \textbf{539}, L9--L12.
768:
769: \bibitem{gebhardt}
770: Gebhardt, K., J. Kormendy, L. C. Ho, R. Bender, G. Bower, A. Dressler, et al. (2000).
771: A Relationship Between Nuclear Black Hole Mass and Galaxy Velocity Dispersion,
772: \textit{The Astrophysical Journal Letters} \textbf{539}, L13--L16.
773:
774: \bibitem{gebhardt1}
775: Gebhardt, K., R. M. Rich, and L. C. Ho (2002). A 20,000 Solar Mass Black Hole in the
776: Stellar Cluster G1, \textit{The Astrophysical Journal Letters} \textbf{578}, L41--L45.
777:
778: \bibitem{falcke}
779: Falcke, H., F. Melia, and E. Agol (2000). Viewing the Shadow of the Black Hole at the
780: Galactic Center, \textit{The Astrophysical Journal Letters} \textbf{528}, L13--L16.
781:
782: \bibitem{green}
783: Green, P. J., T. L. Aldcroft, S. Mathur, B. J. Wilkes, and M. Elvis (2001)
784: A Chandra Survey of Broad Absorption Line Quasars, \textit{The Astrophysical Journal}
785: \textbf{558}, 109--118.
786:
787: \bibitem{haehnelt}
788: Haehnelt, M. G., and M. J. Rees (1993). The Formation of Nuclei in
789: Newly Formed Galaxies and the Evolution of the Quasar Population, \textit{Monthly Notices
790: of the Royal Astronomical Society} \textbf{263}, 168--178.
791:
792: \bibitem{kerr}
793: Kerr, R. P. (1963). Gravitational Field of a Spinning Mass as an Example of
794: Algebraically Special Metrics, \textit{Physical Review Letters} \textbf{11}, 237--238.
795:
796: \bibitem{kormendy}
797: Kormendy, J., and D. Richstone (1995). Inward Bound---The Search for
798: Supermassive Black Holes in Galactic Nuclei, \textit{Annual Reviews of
799: Astronomy and Astrophysics} \textbf{33}, 581--624.
800:
801: \bibitem{laor}
802: Laor, A., and H. Netzer (1990). Massive thin accretion discs. II - Polarization,
803: \textit{Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society} \textbf{242}, 560--569.
804:
805: \bibitem{liu}
806: Liu, S., V. Petrosian, and F. Melia (2004). Electron Acceleration around the
807: Supermassive Black Hole at the Galactic Center, \textit{The Astrophysical Journal
808: Letters} \textbf{611} L101--L104.
809:
810: \bibitem{lynden}
811: Lynden-Bell, D. (1969). Galactic Nuclei as Collapsed Old Quasars,
812: \textit{Nature} \textbf{223}, 690.
813:
814: \bibitem{malizia}
815: Malizia, A., L. Bassani, et al. (2001). Hard X-Ray Detection of the High-Redshift
816: Quasar 4C 71.07, \textit{The Astrophysical Journal} \textbf{531}, 642--646.
817:
818: \bibitem{martini}
819: Martini, P., and R. W. Pogge (1999). Hubble Space Telescope Observations of the
820: CFA Seyfert 2 Galaxies: The Fueling of Active Galactic Nuclei, \textit{Astronomical
821: Journal} textbf{118}, 2646--2657.
822:
823: \bibitem{matsumoto}
824: Matsumoto, H., et al. (2001). Discovery of a Luminous, Variable, Off-Center Source in
825: the Nucleus of M82 with the Chandra High-Resolution Camera, \textit{Astrophysical Journal
826: Letters} \textbf{547}, L25--L28.
827:
828: \bibitem{meliaa}
829: Melia, F. (2003a). \textit{The Edge of Infinity. Supermassive Black Holes in the
830: Universe}. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
831:
832: \bibitem{meliab}
833: Melia, F. (2003b). \textit{The Black Hole at the Center of Our Galaxy}. Princeton:
834: Princeton University Press.
835:
836: \bibitem{melia1}
837: Melia, F., S. Liu, and R. Coker (2000). Polarized Millimeter and Submillimeter
838: Emission from Sagittarius A* at the Galactic Center, \textit{The Astrophysical
839: Journal Letters} \textbf{545}, L117--L120.
840:
841: \bibitem{melia2}
842: Melia, F., S. Liu, and R. Coker (2001). A Magnetic Dynamo Origin for the
843: Submillimeter Excess in Sagittarius A*, \textit{The Astrophysical Journal} \textbf{553},
844: 146--157.
845:
846: \bibitem{merrifield}
847: Merrifield, M. R., D. A. Forbes, and A. I. Terlevich (2000). The Black Hole
848: Mass-galaxy Age Relation, \textit{Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society}
849: \textbf{313}, L29--L32.
850:
851: \bibitem{miyoshi}
852: Miyoshi, M., et al. (1995). Evidence for a Black Hole from High Rotation
853: Velocities in a Sub-Parsec Region of NGC~4258, \textit{Nature} \textbf{373}, p. 127.
854:
855: \bibitem{salpeter}
856: Salpeter, E. E. (1964). Accretion of Interstellar Matter by Massive Objects,
857: \textit{Astrophysical Journal} \textbf{140}, 796--800.
858:
859: \bibitem{schmidt}
860: Schmidt, M. (1963). 3C~273: A Star-like Object with Large Red-shift,
861: \textit{Nature} \textbf{197}, 1040.
862:
863: \bibitem{schodel}
864: Sch\"odel, R., T. Ott, R. Genzel, et al. (2002). A Star in a 15.2-year
865: Orbit Around the Supermassive Black Hole at the Centre of the Milky Way,
866: \textit{Nature} \textbf{419}, 694--696.
867:
868: \bibitem{silk}
869: Silk, J., and M. J. Rees (1998). Quasars and Galaxy Formation,
870: \textit{Astronomy and Astrophysics} \textbf{331}, L1--L4.
871:
872: \bibitem{marel}
873: van der Marel, R. P. (1999). Structure of the Globular Cluster M15 and
874: Constraints on a Massive Central Black Hole, in \textit{Black Holes
875: in Binaries and Galactic Nuclei,} L. Kaper, E.P.J. van den Heuvel,
876: and P. A. Woudt (eds.), 246.
877:
878: \bibitem{yuan}
879: Yuan, F., E. Quataert, and R. Narayan (2003). Nonthermal Electrons in
880: Radiatively Inefficient Accretion Flow Models of Sagittarius A*,
881: \textit{The Astrophysical Journal} \textbf{598}, 301--312.
882:
883: \bibitem{zeldovich}
884: Zel'dovich, Ya. B., and I. D. Novikov (1967). The Hypothesis
885: of Cores Retarded During Expansion and the Hot Cosmological Model,
886: \textit{Soviet Astronomy} \textbf{10}, 602.
887:
888: \end{thereferences}
889:
890: \end{document}
891: