1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \slugcomment{submitted to Ap.J.}
3: \shortauthors{Dhawan et al.}
4: \shorttitle{Kinematics of Black Hole in GRS~1915+105}
5:
6: \begin{document}
7:
8: \title{Kinematics of Black Hole X-ray Binary GRS~1915+105}
9:
10: \author{V. Dhawan}
11: \affil{National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Socorro, NM 87801 USA.}
12: \email{vdhawan@nrao.edu}
13:
14: \author{I.~F. Mirabel \altaffilmark{1} }
15: \affil{European Southern Observatory, Casilla 19001, Santiago 19,
16: Chile}
17: \email{fmirabel@eso.org}
18: \altaffiltext{1}{\footnotesize On leave from Service d'Astrophysique,
19: CEA-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.}
20:
21: \author{M. Rib{\'o}}
22: \affil{Departament d'Astronomia i Meteorologia, Universitat de
23: Barcelona, \\ Marti i Franques 1, 08028 Barcelona, Spain }
24: \email{mribo@am.ub.es}
25:
26: \author{I. Rodrigues}
27: \affil{Universidade do Vale do Paraiba, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil}
28: \email{irapuan@if.ufrgs.br}
29:
30: \begin{abstract}
31:
32: The space velocity of a stellar black hole encodes the history of its
33: formation and evolution. Here we measure the 3-dimensional motion of
34: the microquasar GRS~1915+105, using a decade of astrometry with the
35: NRAO Very Long Baseline Array, together with the published radial
36: velocity. The velocity in the Galactic Plane deviates from circular
37: rotation by 53--80$\pm$8~km~s$^{-1}$, where the range covers any
38: specific distance from 6--12~kpc. Perpendicular to the plane, the
39: velocity is only 10$\pm$4~km~s$^{-1}$. The peculiar velocity is
40: minimized at a distance 9--10~kpc, and is then nearly in the radial
41: direction towards the Galactic Center. We discuss mechanisms for the
42: origin of the peculiar velocity, and conclude that it is most likely a
43: consequence of Galactic velocity diffusion on this old binary, rather
44: than the result of a supernova kick during the formation of the
45: 14~M$_{\odot}$ black hole. Finally, a brief comparison is made with 4
46: other BH binaries whose kinematics are well determined.
47:
48: \end{abstract}
49:
50: \keywords{astrometry --- stars: kinematics --- stars:
51: individual (GRS~1915+105) --- techniques: high angular resolution ---
52: techniques: interferometric}
53:
54: \section{Introduction}
55:
56: GRS~1915+105 is a famous microquasar with superluminal ejecta
57: \citep{MR94}, and spectacular X-ray variability from an unstable
58: accretion disk \citep{GMR96, Bel00}. For nearly a decade, its nature was
59: highly obscured at a distance $D$ of $\sim$10~kpc. Finally, IR
60: spectroscopy with the VLT \citep{GCM01} was used to measure the
61: heliocentric radial velocity of $-$3$\pm$10 km s$^{-1}$ for the center
62: of mass of the binary, a mass of 14$\pm$4~M$_{\odot}$ for the compact
63: object, with a donor mass of $\sim$1.2$\pm$0.2~M$_{\odot}$ in an orbit
64: of 33.5~days period. VLBA imaging \citep{Dha00a}, in addition to the
65: ejecta during outbursts, revealed an AU-sized radio jet closely
66: coupled to the accretion disk activity. Under the conditions imaged
67: here, the so-called low-hard state, the flux of the AU-size jet
68: follows the variation in X-rays with a time-lag of a few minutes,
69: \citep{Metal98, Dha00a}. The jet is hence located within 1~AU
70: (0.1~mas) of the black hole.
71:
72: \section{Observations and Results}
73:
74: \subsection{Observations}
75:
76: Our observations spanned $\sim$10 years, sampled at random times
77: dictated by the flare activity of the source. Usually the goal was to
78: image the AU-size jet and larger scale superluminal ejecta in
79: coordination with X-ray instruments. The moving ejecta can confuse the
80: position determination. Indeed there were some occasions just after a
81: major flare when the central nucleus was very weak or absent, and the
82: moving ejecta dominated the flux density of the source. We have hence
83: selected for this astrometric study only those images which were
84: dominated by the central source of flux density 10 to 50~mJy,
85: corresponding to the AU-size flat-spectrum nuclear jet. Examples of
86: images are published in \citet{Dha00a, Fuc03, RDM04, MJ07}.
87:
88: Standard VLBA phase-referencing was used, \citep{BC95} with a total
89: cycle time of 3~minutes, of which 1~minute was on the primary
90: calibrator J1924+1540, at a separation of 5.3$^{\circ}$ from the
91: target. This technique provides the position of the black hole
92: relative to the reference source, whose position has been
93: pre-determined in the ICRF frame. Most of the observations were at a
94: frequency of 8.4 GHz (3.6cm wavelength). During some observations,
95: depending on the radio spectra, (if available from monitoring with
96: other instruments) we observed at 3.6 and 2~cm. These were alternated
97: every 20min, at 256Mbit~s$^{-1}$ recording. Standard post-processing
98: corrections were applied for ionospheric refraction using a GPS-based
99: global model. A-priori amplitude calibration was done from measured
100: system temperatures and antenna gains, followed by self-calibration
101: on the reference source, application of the refined calibration to
102: all sources including the target, and imaging.
103:
104: We fitted a single elliptical Gaussian to each image to extract the
105: position. The formal errors of the fit are far exceeded by
106: tropospheric variations, resulting in position errors $\sim$1~mas
107: {\it rms} at each epoch. The earliest observations have larger error
108: due to the poor choice of reference sources, J1922+1530 (4.8
109: $^{\circ}$ away, but quite resolved) and J1925+2106, 10.5$^{\circ}$
110: away from the target. We estimated the errors, including systematic
111: errors peculiar to the weather on that day, from the scatter in image
112: position over intervals of $\sim$20~min. In later observations, a
113: second calibrator, J1922+0840 (2.9 $^{\circ}$ away), was observed as
114: a quality check and processed in identical fashion to the target.
115: Positions at the two wavelengths on a given observation date agreed,
116: and were averaged together for that date. On one occasion
117: observations were possible on successive days, positions from which
118: were averaged together.
119:
120: \subsection{Results}
121:
122: The measurements \footnotemark{}
123: %% &&
124: \footnotetext{\footnotesize Strictly, the measured VLBA positions are
125: Geocentric. In the table, plot \& fit, we report measured quantities,
126: rather than correcting them for parallax with an uncertain distance.
127: In the fit for proper motion, the error is reduced by the random
128: observation date, and the long timespan. The parallax is 0.1~mas at
129: $D$=10~kpc. The changes in proper motion if we correct for parallax are
130: $\sim$0.01~mas~yr$^{-1}$, far below our measurement errors. Thus
131: Geocentric positions can safely be taken as Heliocentric.}
132: %% %%
133: are summarized in Table-{\ref{tab1} and Figure-{\ref{fig1}, showing
134: the coordinates of the black hole versus time. We fit the following
135: position and proper motion at MJD 51545 (01 January 2000):
136:
137: RA~(J2000) 19$^{\rm h}$15$^{\rm m}$11$^{\rm s}$.54902 $\pm$0.7~mas
138: ~~~~Dec(J2000) +10$^{\circ}$56'44''.7478 ~$\pm$0.9~mas
139:
140: $\mu_{\rm RA}$ Cos(Dec) = $-$2.86 $\pm$0.07~mas~yr$^{-1}$
141: ~~~~$\mu_{\rm Dec}$ = $-$6.20 $\pm$0.09~mas~yr$^{-1}$
142:
143: The corresponding Heliocentric motions in Galactic coordinates are:
144:
145: $\mu_{\it l}$ = $-$6.82 $\pm$0.10~mas~yr$^{-1}$
146: ~~~~$\mu_{\it b}$ = $-$0.35 $\pm$0.07~mas~yr$^{-1}$
147:
148: Using our measured proper motion and the known V$_{\rm radial}$ of
149: $-$3$\pm$10~km~s$^{-1}$, we transform these measured Heliocentric
150: quantities with the standard method of \citet{JS87} updated for J2000,
151: and the Solar peculiar motion measured by Hipparcos, [U$_{\odot}$,
152: V$_{\odot}$, V$_{\odot}$ = 10.0, 5.25, 7.17 km~s$^{-1}$] from
153: \citet{DB98}. We use the convention U + toward {\it l} = 0$^{\circ}$;
154: V + toward {\it l} = 90$^{\circ}$; W + toward the North Galactic Pole.
155:
156: We compare these measured velocities with those expected from circular
157: rotation at 220~km~s$^{-1}$ at the location of the black hole. For
158: the distance, 11 to 12~kpc have been proposed, \citep{Fen03, Dha00b},
159: but since considerably smaller values are suggested by others, e.g.
160: \citet{Kai04}, we let the distance be a free parameter in
161: Figure~\ref{fig2} and Table~\ref{tab2}. We then evaluate the velocity
162: discrepancy in local and Galactocentric frames, and note that:
163:
164: \begin{itemize}
165:
166: \item The measured W component is small, so the black hole velocity
167: lies primarily in the Galactic Plane.
168:
169: \item At any distance there is a significant component of
170: measured velocity directed inward to the Galactic Center, whereas none
171: is expected for purely circular motion.
172:
173: \item The extremum (negative) proper motion from Galactic rotation
174: along this line of sight occurs at $D$=~9~kpc, and is
175: $-$5.85~mas~yr$^{-1}$, while $-$6.82~mas~yr$^{-1}$ is measured.
176:
177: \item Figure \ref{fig3} shows that the total peculiar velocity of the
178: black hole (in either LSR or GC frame) is minimized at $D$=~9--10~kpc,
179: and is then 53~km~s$^{-1}$ in the radial direction towards the
180: Galactic Center.
181:
182: \item The measured heliocentric velocity matches that expected from
183: circular rotation at $\sim$12~kpc, as already noted by \citet{GCM01}.
184: However, at this distance, the total peculiar velocity is
185: 83~km~s$^{-1}$.
186:
187: \item At $D$=~6.5~kpc, both the Galactocentric components mismatch
188: circular rotation by over 45~km~s$^{-1}$ each.
189:
190: \end{itemize}
191:
192: Hence, the distance favoured by velocity matching is 9--10~kpc, but
193: this is not a very strong argument. A distance determined by
194: trigonometric parallax, while possible with the VLBA, remains very
195: challenging for this object.
196:
197: \subsection{The Galactocentric Orbit}
198:
199: We next compute the Galactocentric orbit of the black hole assuming a
200: smooth Galactic potential composed of disk, spheroid and halo,
201: following \citet{JSH95}. Figure~\ref{fig4} shows the orbit assuming a
202: distance of 12~kpc. The path for the past 1~Gyr is the blue (dashed)
203: line, with the last 250~Myr in red (solid line). The orbit deviates
204: from circularity with an eccentricity of 0.285, and reaches a maximum
205: height above the Galactic Plane of only 230~pc, typical of the thin
206: disk population. However, GRS~1915+105 does not match the velocity of
207: thin disk objects at any distance. Detailed computation of the orbit
208: including the effects of spiral arms is beyond the scope of this
209: paper.
210:
211: \section{Discussion}
212:
213: We discuss mechanisms by which the black hole could have acquired its
214: anomalous velocity. To summarize, though the velocity is significant,
215: its component out of the Galactic plane is low, so an impulsive origin
216: cannot be proved. The age and uncertain distance of the system
217: disallow a strong conclusion about the origin of the velocity.
218: However, our data helps to rank the probability of three mechanisms.
219:
220: \subsection{Stellar Diffusion}
221:
222: An individual star in the disk can acquire significant changes in
223: angular momentum from non-axisymmetric forces such as spiral arms,
224: leading to an increase of its non-circular motion with age
225: \citep{Wei77, SB02}. If we assume the binary is as old as the donor,
226: a red giant of 1.2~M$_{\odot}$ aged $\sim$4~Gyr, then it has endured
227: about 16 Galactic orbits. Velocity imparted by spiral arm passages
228: conforms naturally to the measured low velocity perpendicular to the
229: Galactic plane, and has had sufficient time to operate, given the age
230: of the system. In comparison, the non-circular velocity of
231: progressively older disk stars in the solar neighborhood is
232: 30--50km~s$^{-1}$, as discussed for example in \citet[][Table
233: 6]{Mig00}, and \citet[][population components S$_{3}$ and
234: A$_{3}$]{Alc05}. At a distance $D\sim$9--10~kpc, the above mechanism
235: suffices to account for the peculiar velocity, and must have operated
236: to some extent. It may have difficulty in producing a velocity
237: perturbation of 70--80~km~s$^{-1}$, as would be the case if the source
238: were at 6 or at 12~kpc.
239:
240: \subsection{Natal Kicks}
241:
242: We note that even at 9~kpc, the black hole possesses the momentum of a
243: pulsar of 1.4~M$_{\odot}$ with velocity of 530~km~s$^{-1}$. Hence in
244: the following we discuss the possible origin of the peculiar velocity
245: in a natal supernova event, assuming one occurred. We examine this
246: assumption in a later section.
247:
248: \subsubsection{Blaauw Kick}
249:
250: Mass unbound suddenly and symmetrically by the supernova explosion
251: forces the binary to recoil with a momentum opposite to that of the
252: unbound mass at the time of ejection. This spherical mass loss results
253: in a kick that lies in the plane of the binary orbit. We estimate,
254: using equation~(1) of \citet{Nel99}, that mass unbound from the binary
255: in a SN explosion imparted at most 23--44~km~s$^{-1}$, for allowable
256: mass ratios as measured by \citet{GCM01}. Assuming the binary plane
257: was randomly oriented, the kick has $\sim$25\% probability of lying in
258: the galactic plane within $\pm$15$^{\circ}$, which is the ratio of
259: measured peculiar velocities perpendicular and parallel to the plane.
260:
261:
262: \subsubsection{Asymmetric Kick:}
263:
264: If the binary lies at $D$=~12~kpc or 6~kpc, an {\em additional} kick
265: of $\sim$30~km~s$^{-1}$ is required. It is generally accepted that
266: neutron stars form in asymmetric SN, and receive substantial birth
267: kicks, which are seen in the velocities of young single pulsars,
268: $\sim$400km~s$^{-1}$ \citep{Hob05}. Neutron stars in long period
269: binaries may receive smaller kicks of $\sim$50~km~s$^{-1}$
270: \citep{Pfa02}, which is a case more closely related to the present
271: binary with orbital period 33~days. This kick due to any asymmetries
272: in the explosion has no preferred direction relative to the binary
273: orbit plane, unless it is assumed that the progenitor's spin is
274: parallel to the orbital axis. Assuming random orientation, an
275: asymmetric supernova has roughly the same 25\% chance (as above), of
276: producing a kick that lies in the Galactic plane.
277:
278: \subsection{Comparison with the kinematics of other black hole binaries}
279:
280: The question of whether or not black holes receive a natal kick
281: similar to neutron stars is an open one. On the theoretical side, the
282: formation of black holes of over 10~M$_{\odot}$ challenges stellar
283: evolution models. \citet{Fry01} proposed that black holes of that mass
284: should form by direct collapse without SN explosion, or after a SN
285: with energy insufficient to unbind the stellar envelope. \citet{BB02}
286: also conclude that standard models would work only if wind mass loss
287: for very massive stars was half as much as commonly assumed, and black
288: holes of $\ge$10~M$_{\odot}$ would form by direct collapse. Hence no
289: kick velocity is expected in the formation of the most massive BH.
290: There is some observational evidence that energetic SN may not occur
291: in the formation of stellar black holes of relatively high mass.
292: Cyg~X-1 is a 10~M$_{\odot}$ BH with a peculiar velocity of
293: $<$10~km~s$^{-1}$, and may be an example of such a `dark birth'
294: \citep{MR03a}.
295:
296: Less massive black holes can form through partial fallback onto the
297: collapsing object, after a SN explosion. We briefly evaluate the
298: evidence for runaway black holes which have well measured,
299: 3-dimensional velocities. The most likely mechanism for their high
300: velocity is an asymmetric kick from a SN. Independent confirmation
301: comes from rather difficult measurement of the supernova's
302: nucleosynthesis products in the companion star. Such evidence exists
303: for neutron stars as well, e.g., \citet{GH05}.
304:
305: The runaway binary ~GRO~1655$-$40 contains a dynamically confirmed BH
306: of 6.3~M$_{\odot}$ \citep{Gre01}, and has an anomalous velocity
307: v=~120~km~s$^{-1}$ \citep{Metal02}. \citet{Isr99} found super-solar
308: abundances of several $\alpha$-elements in the atmosphere of the
309: companion star, and concluded that SN ejecta had enriched the
310: companion. \citet{Foe07}, using different techniques, found little
311: evidence for enrichment except in O. More recently, \citet{GH07},
312: using VLT/UVES spectra, support the abundances derived by
313: \citet{Isr99}.
314:
315: ~XTE~1118+48 is another confirmed 7--8~M$_{\odot}$ BH binary
316: \citep{Gel06}, orbiting in the Galactic halo with
317: v=~145~km~s$^{-1}$. \citet{Metal01} proposed that it was born in a
318: globular cluster $\sim$7~Gyr ago. However, more recently \citet{Gon06}
319: claim to have found fossil evidence of a supernova in the metal
320: enrichment of the small mass donor, and propose instead that the
321: progenitor was born in the Galactic disk and the binary shot out to
322: the halo by the SN explosion.
323:
324: LS~5039 has a runaway velocity of 126~km~s$^{-1}$, \citep{Rib02}, and
325: has clearly been kicked, but its mass estimate is closer to the
326: neutron star range than the objects discussed above. It may contain a
327: black hole of 3.7M$_{\odot}$ \citep{Cas05}, if the binary is
328: synchronized at periastron. Without the assumption of
329: pseudo-synchronization, the mass might be as low as 1.4M$_{\odot}$.
330: Regarding the direct detection of SN byproducts, \citet{McS04} find N
331: enrichment, but they caution that it could result from internal mixing
332: due to rapid rotation, a scenario also favoured by \citet{Cas05}.
333:
334: Finally, GRS~1915+105 does not fit easily in either the high or low
335: speed category. The velocity is significantly higher than
336: Cyg~X-1. However, we cannot conclude that GRS~1915+105 is a runaway,
337: because its low velocity out of the plane, and the operation of
338: velocity diffusion in the plane, imply that any natal kick (symmetric
339: and/or asymmetric) was probably smaller than $\sim$30~km$^{-1}$. We
340: hope our data will permit an analysis such as done by \citet{Wil05}
341: for GRO~J1655$-$40, who used all available information to reconstruct
342: the evolution back to the time of core collapse and compact object
343: formation. The observations, even for the small sample so far, imply a
344: variety of formation scenarios for black holes.
345:
346: \section{Conclusions}
347:
348: \begin{enumerate}
349:
350: \item The most massive known stellar black hole moves at
351: (53--80)$\pm$8~km~s$^{-1}$ with respect to its regional standard of
352: rest, for any specific distance in the range 6--12~kpc.
353:
354: \item At the distance of 9--10~kpc, the peculiar velocity is a
355: minimum. If GRS~1915 is 3--5~Gyr old, it could have acquired this
356: velocity by dynamic diffusion, i.e., non-circular motion imparted by
357: perturbations such as spiral arms over time. In this case the black
358: hole in GRS~1915+105 would have formed without a natal kick, like the
359: 10~M$_{\odot}$ black hole in Cyg~X-1.
360:
361: \item If the distance is smaller (6~kpc) or larger (12~kpc), then some
362: additional $\sim$30~km~s$^{-1}$ is required from another mechanism
363: such as a natal supernova explosion, and the kick is constrained to
364: lie within $\pm$15$^{\circ}$ of the Galactic plane.
365:
366: \end{enumerate}
367:
368: \acknowledgements
369:
370: The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the
371: National Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by
372: Associated Universities, Inc. \\
373: %% {\it Facilities:} \facility{VLBA}. %%
374: V.D. acknowledges support from the Science Visitor's Programme of the
375: European Southern Observatory, Chile. ~~M.R. ackowledges financial
376: support from the Spanish Ministerio de Educaci\'on y Ciencia through a
377: \emph {Juan de la Cierva} fellowship linked to the project
378: AYA2004-07171-C02-01, partially supported by FEDER funds. ~~We thank
379: Luis F. Rodriguez for helpful comments. ~~This research has made use
380: of NASA's Astrophysics Data System and the {\bf astro-ph} preprint
381: service.
382:
383:
384: \begin{thebibliography}{}
385:
386: % stellar components of galactic disk
387: \bibitem[Alcob{\'e} \& Cubarsi(2005)]{Alc05} Alcob{\'e}, S., \&
388: Cubarsi, R.\ 2005, \aap, 442, 929
389:
390: % vlba phase referencing
391: \bibitem[Beasley \& Conway(1995)]{BC95} Beasley, A.~J., \& Conway,
392: J.~E.\ 1995, ASP Conf.~Ser.~ 82: Very Long Baseline Interferometry and
393: the VLBA, 82, 328
394:
395: % formation of GRS1915
396: \bibitem[Belczynski \& Bulik(2002)]{BB02} Belczynski, K., \& Bulik,
397: T.\ 2002, \apjl, 574, L147
398:
399: % X-ray variability, classification
400: \bibitem[Belloni et al.(2000)]{Bel00} Belloni, T.,
401: Klein-Wolt, M., M{\'e}ndez, M., van der Klis, M., \& van Paradijs, J.\
402: 2000, \aap, 355, 271
403:
404: % mass of compact object in LS 503 - suggest 3.7 M_o
405: % also suggest metal enrichment is from mixing, not SN pollution.
406: \bibitem[Casares et al.(2005)]{Cas05} Casares, J., Rib{\'o}, M.,
407: Ribas, I., Paredes, J.~M., Mart{\'{\i}}, J., \& Herrero, A.\ 2005,
408: \mnras, 364, 899
409:
410: % solar UVW from hipparcos data.
411: \bibitem[Dehnen \& Binney(1998)]{DB98} Dehnen, W., \& Binney, J.~J.\
412: 1998, \mnras, 298, 387
413:
414: % au-scale jet
415: \bibitem[Dhawan et al.(2000a)]{Dha00a} Dhawan, V., Mirabel, I.~F., \&
416: Rodr{\'{\i}}guez, L.~F.\ 2000, \apj, 543, 373
417:
418: % HI distance to grs1915
419: \bibitem[Dhawan et al.(2000b)]{Dha00b} Dhawan, V., Goss, W.~M., \&
420: Rodr{\'{\i}}guez, L.~F.\ 2000, \apj, 540, 863
421:
422: % inclination angles, doppler boosting limits for GRS 1915
423: \bibitem[Fender(2003)]{Fen03} Fender, R.~P.\ 2003, \mnras, 340, 1353
424:
425: % SN elements in GRO 1655-40 %% NOT ENRICHED, they say.
426: \bibitem[Foellmi et al.(2007)]{Foe07} Foellmi, C., Dall, T.~H., \&
427: Depagne, E.\ 2007, \aap Letters(in press). arXiv:astro-ph/0702059
428:
429: % BH mass spectrum
430: \bibitem[Fryer \& Kalogera(2001)]{Fry01} Fryer, C.~L., \& Kalogera,
431: V.\ 2001, \apj, 554, 548
432:
433: % images of AU-scale jet
434: \bibitem[Fuchs et al.(2003)]{Fuc03} Fuchs, Y., et al.\ 2003, \aap,
435: 409, L35
436:
437: % kinematics of Cen X-3 (NS)
438: \bibitem[Gonz{\'a}lez Hern{\'a}ndez et al.(2005)]{GH05} Gonz{\'a}lez
439: Hern{\'a}ndez, J.~I., Rebolo, R., Pe{\~n}arrubia, J., Casares, J., \&
440: Israelian, G.\ 2005, \aap, 435, 1185
441:
442: %% mass of XTE 1118+49, updated
443: \bibitem[Gelino et al.(2006)]{Gel06} Gelino, D.~M., Balman,
444: {\c S}., K{\i}z{\i}lo{\u g}lu, {\"U}., Y{\i}lmaz, A., Kalemci, E., \&
445: Tomsick, J.~A.\ 2006, \apj, 642, 438
446:
447: % SN elements in XTE 1118+48
448: \bibitem[Gonz{\'a}lez Hern{\'a}ndez et al.(2006)]{Gon06} Gonz{\'a}lez
449: Hern{\'a}ndez, J.~I., Rebolo, R., Israelian, G., Harlaftis, E.~T.,
450: Filippenko, A.~V., \& Chornock, R.\ 2006, \apjl, 644, L49
451:
452: % Confirmation SN enrichment of GRO1655 / Israelian 1999.
453: \bibitem[Gonz{\'a}lez Hern{\'a}ndez et al.(2007)]{GH07} Gonz{\'a}lez
454: Hern{\'a}ndez, J.~I., et al. 2007, \aap, submitted.
455:
456: % mass of GRO 1655-40 - update
457: \bibitem[Greene et al.(2001)]{Gre01} Greene, J., Bailyn,
458: C.~D., \& Orosz, J.~A.\ 2001, \apj, 554, 1290
459:
460: % x-ray variability of GRS 1915
461: \bibitem[Greiner et al.(1996)]{GMR96} Greiner, J., Morgan, E.~H., \&
462: Remillard, R.~A.\ 1996, \apjl, 473, L107
463:
464: % orbital elements of GRS 1915 from IR spectroscopy
465: \bibitem[Greiner et al.(2001)]{GCM01} Greiner, J., Cuby, J.~G., \&
466: McCaughrean, M.~J.\ 2001, \nat, 414, 522
467:
468: % velocities of pulsars
469: \bibitem[Hobbs et al.(2005)]{Hob05} Hobbs, G., Lorimer, D.~R., Lyne,
470: A.~G., \& Kramer, M.\ 2005, \mnras, 360, 974
471:
472: % SN elements in GRO 1655-40 %% ENRICHED, they say.
473: \bibitem[Israelian et al.(1999)]{Isr99} Israelian, G., Rebolo, R.,
474: Basri, G., Casares, J., \& Mart{\'{\i}}n, E.~L.\ 1999, \nat, 401, 142
475:
476: % transformation of velocities
477: \bibitem[Johnson \& Soderblom(1987)]{JS87} Johnson, D.~R.~H., \&
478: Soderblom, D.~R.\ 1987, \aj, 93, 864
479:
480: % galactic potential model
481: \bibitem[Johnston et al.(1995)]{JSH95} Johnston, K.~V.,
482: Spergel, D.~N., \& Hernquist, L.\ 1995, \apj, 451, 598
483:
484: % 6.5kpc distance proposed for GRS 1915
485: \bibitem[Kaiser et al.(2004)]{Kai04} Kaiser, C.~R., Gunn, K.~F.,
486: Brocksopp, C., \& Sokoloski, J.~L.\ 2004, \apj, 612, 332
487:
488: % SN elements in LS 5039 % but could be dredging and not enrichment,
489: %% according to Casares et al.
490: \bibitem[McSwain et al.(2004)]{McS04} McSwain, M.~V., Gies, D.~R.,
491: Huang, W., Wiita, P.~J., Wingert, D.~W., \& Kaper, L.\ 2004, \apj,
492: 600, 927
493:
494: % velocity dispersion of old stars
495: \bibitem[Mignard(2000)]{Mig00} Mignard, F.\ 2000, \aap, 354, 522
496:
497: % grs1915 recent images
498: \bibitem[Miller-Jones et al.(2007)]{MJ07} Miller-Jones, J.~C.~A.,
499: Rupen, M.~P., Fender, R.~P., Rushton, A., Pooley, G.~G., \& Spencer,
500: R.~E.\ 2007, \mnras, 375, 1087
501:
502: \bibitem[Mirabel \& Rodriguez(1994)]{MR94} Mirabel, I.~F., \&
503: Rodriguez, L.~F.\ 1994, \nat, 371, 46
504:
505: % disk/jet co-evolution paper
506: \bibitem[Mirabel et al.(1998)]{Metal98} Mirabel, I.~F., Dhawan, V.,
507: Chaty, S., Rodriguez, L.~F., Marti, J., Robinson, C.~R., Swank, J., \&
508: Geballe, T.\ 1998, \aap, 330, L9
509:
510: % XTE 1118 - halo BH.
511: \bibitem[Mirabel et al.(2001)]{Metal01} Mirabel, I.~F., Dhawan, V.,
512: Mignani, R.~P., Rodrigues, I., \& Guglielmetti, F.\ 2001, \nat, 413,
513: 139
514:
515: % GRO 1655-40 proper motion
516: \bibitem[Mirabel et al.(2002)]{Metal02} Mirabel, I.~F., Mignani, R.,
517: Rodrigues, I., Combi, J.~A., Rodr{\'{\i}}guez, L.~F., \& Guglielmetti,
518: F.\ 2002, \aap, 395, 595
519:
520: % Cyg X-1 formation w/o SN?
521: \bibitem[Mirabel \& Rodrigues(2003a)]{MR03a} Mirabel, I.~F., \&
522: Rodrigues, I.\ 2003, Science, 300, 1119
523:
524: % mass loss in SN
525: \bibitem[Nelemans et al.(1999)]{Nel99} Nelemans, G., Tauris, T.~M., \&
526: van den Heuvel, E.~P.~J.\ 1999, \aap, 352, L87
527:
528: % velocity imparted to NS in long-period binaries.
529: \bibitem[Pfahl et al.(2002)]{Pfa02} Pfahl, E., Rappaport, S.,
530: Podsiadlowski, P., \& Spruit, H.\ 2002, \apj, 574, 364
531:
532: % LS5039 runaway
533: \bibitem[Rib{\'o} et al.(2002)]{Rib02} Rib{\'o}, M., Paredes, J.~M.,
534: Romero, G.~E., Benaglia, P., Mart{\'{\i}}, J., Fors, O., \&
535: Garc{\'{\i}}a-S{\'a}nchez, J.\ 2002, \aap, 384, 954
536:
537: % recent images of grs1915
538: \bibitem[Rib{\'o} et al.(2004)]{RDM04} Rib{\'o}, M., Dhawan, V., \&
539: Mirabel, I.~F.\ 2004, European VLBI Network on New Developments in
540: VLBI Science and Technology, 111
541:
542: % radial mixing in galactic disks
543: \bibitem[Sellwood \& Binney(2002)]{SB02} Sellwood, J.~A., \& Binney,
544: J.~J.\ 2002, \mnras, 336, 785
545:
546: % velocity dispersion of old stars
547: \bibitem[Weilen(1977)]{Wei77} Weilen, R., 1977, \aap, 60, 263
548:
549: % detailed evolution model for GRO 1655-40
550: \bibitem[Willems et al.(2005)]{Wil05} Willems, B., Henninger, M.,
551: Levin, T., Ivanova, N., Kalogera, V., McGhee, K., Timmes, F.~X., \&
552: Fryer, C.~L.\ 2005, \apj, 625, 324
553:
554: \end{thebibliography}
555:
556:
557: \clearpage
558:
559: \input{tab1.tex}
560:
561: \clearpage
562:
563: \input{tab2.tex}
564:
565: \clearpage
566: \pagestyle{empty}
567:
568: \begin{figure*}[!hbt]
569: \epsscale{0.8}
570: \plotone{f1.eps}
571: \caption{Astrometric Position of the Black Hole over a timespan of
572: almost 10 years.}
573: \label{fig1}
574: \end{figure*}
575:
576: \clearpage
577:
578: \begin{figure*}[!hbt]
579: \epsscale{0.8}
580: \plotone{f2.eps}
581: \caption{Measured velocity components (solid lines) vs. distance,
582: compared with expected values for an object in circular rotation about
583: the Galactic Center (dashed lines).}
584: \label{fig2}
585: \end{figure*}
586:
587: \clearpage
588:
589: \begin{figure*}[!hbt]
590: \epsscale{0.9}
591: \plotone{f3.eps}
592: \caption{Total peculiar velocity of GRS~1915+105 plotted at
593: various assumed distances.}
594: \label{fig3}
595: \end{figure*}
596:
597: \clearpage
598:
599: \begin{figure*}[!hbt]
600: \epsscale{0.8}
601: \plotone{f4.eps}
602: \caption{Galactocentric Orbit of GRS~1915+105 for the past 1~Gyr,
603: (dashed blue line), with the most recent 250~Myr shown as the solid
604: red line.}
605: \label{fig4}
606: \end{figure*}
607:
608: \end{document}
609:
610:
611:
612:
613:
614:
615:
616:
617:
618:
619:
620:
621:
622: