1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2005 December 5
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21:
22: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
23:
24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
25:
26: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
27:
28: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
29: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
30: %% use the longabstract style option.
31:
32: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
33:
34: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
35: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
36: %% the \begin{document} command.
37: %%
38: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
39: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
40: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
41: %% for information.
42:
43: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
44: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
45:
46: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
47:
48: \slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
49:
50:
51: \shorttitle{Absolute properties of the binary system BB Pegasi}
52: \shortauthors{B. Kalomeni et al.}
53:
54: \received{2007 January 20}
55: \begin{document}
56:
57:
58: \title{Absolute properties of the binary system BB Pegasi}
59:
60: \author{B. Kalomeni\altaffilmark{1}, K. Yakut\altaffilmark{2,3}, V. Keskin\altaffilmark{2}, \"O. L.De\u{g}irmenci\altaffilmark{2}, B. Ula\c{s}\altaffilmark{4,5}, and O. K\"ose\altaffilmark{2}}
61:
62: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics, \.Izmir Institute of Technology, Turkey }
63: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Astronomy and Space Sciences, University of Ege, Turkey}
64: \altaffiltext{3}{Institute of Astronomy, K.U.Leuven, Belgium}
65: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Physics, Onsekiz Mart University of \c{C}anakkale, Turkey}
66: \altaffiltext{5}{Department of Astrophysics, Astronomy and Mechanics, University of Athens, Greece}
67:
68: \begin{abstract}
69: We present a ground based photometry of the low-temperature contact
70: binary BB~Peg. We collected all times of mid-eclipses available in
71: literature and combined them with those obtained in this study.
72: Analyses of the data indicate a period increase of $3.0(1)\times
73: 10^{-8}$\,days/yr. This period increase of BB Peg can be interpreted
74: in terms of the mass transfer $2.4\times10^{-8}$ M$_{\odot}$
75: yr$^{-1}$ from the less massive to the more massive component. The
76: physical parameters have been determined as $M_\mathrm{c}$ = 1.42
77: M$_\odot$, $M_\mathrm{h}$ = 0.53 M$_\odot$, $R_\mathrm{c}$ = 1.29
78: R$_\odot$, $R_\mathrm{h}$ = 0.83 R$_\odot$, $L_\mathrm{c}$ = 1.86
79: L$_\odot$, and $L_\mathrm{h}$ = 0.94 L$_\odot$\ through simultaneous
80: solution of light and of the radial velocity curves.
81: The orbital parameters of the
82: third body, that orbits the contact system in an eccentric orbit,
83: were obtained from the period variation analysis. The system is
84: compared to the similar binaries in the Hertzsprung-Russell and
85: Mass-Radius diagram.
86: \end{abstract}
87:
88: \keywords{Binaries:close
89: --- binaries: eclipsing --- stars: late-type --- stars: individual(BB Peg)}
90:
91: \section{Introduction}
92:
93: BB~Peg (HIP~110493, V = 11$^\mathrm{m}.6$ , F8V ) is a
94: low-temperature contact binary (LTCB) system which was
95: discovered as a variable star in 1931 by Hoffmeister.
96: Whitney (1959) refined the orbital period. Since then BB~Peg has
97: been the subject of several investigations. The system was observed
98: photoelectrically in 1978 by Cerruti-Sola \& Scaltriti (1980), Zhai
99: \& Zhang (1979), and Awadalla (1988). The times of minima of the system
100: have been published by numerous authors.
101: \par
102: Cerruti Sola, Milano \& Scaltriti (1981) analyzed the BV light curves of Cerruti-Sola \&
103: Scaltriti (1980) using the Wilson-Deviney (Wilson \& Devinney, 1971; Wilson, 1979; hereafter
104: WD) code. Giuricin, Mardirossian \& Mezzetti (1981) solved the same light curves using the Wood
105: (1972) model and obtained somewhat different results. Leung, Zhai \& Zhang (1985) used WD to
106: analyze the BV light curves obtained by Zhai \& Zhang (1979). Awadala (1988) observed UBV light
107: curves but did not perform a light curve analysis. The mass ratio was determined photometrically
108: for these light curve solutions. The first radial velocity study of the system
109: done by Hrivnak (1990) gives the mass ratio as 0.34(2). More recent radial velocity data
110: obtained by Lu \& Rucinski (1999) result in a mass ratio of 0.360(6). The photometric mass ratio (0.360$\mp$0.003) derived by Leung, Zhai \& Zhang (1985) agrees very well with the spectroscopic value, a result of the total/annular nature of the eclipses (see Terrell \& Wilson, 2005). Zola et al. (2003) published the physical parameters of the components. The orbital period variation was studied by Cerruti-Sola \& Scaltriti (1980) and Qian (2001).
111:
112:
113: \section{Observations}
114:
115: The photometric observations of the system were obtained with the
116: 0.4-m (T40), 0.35-m (T35) and 0.30-m telescopes (T30) at the Ege
117: University Observatory (EUO) and T\"UB\.ITAK National Observatory
118: (TUG) on 8 nights during the observing season between
119: August--December 2004 with T35 and 2 nights in 2006 with T40.
120: However, the system was observed at T30 and T40 for only three night
121: in order to obtain the minima times. The light curve of the system was
122: obtained from CCD photometry observations.
123: Light curves of BB Peg in Bessel V and R filters are shown in
124: Fig.~\ref{fig2}d and the data are given in Table\ref{tab1}. The comparison and check stars were
125: BD$+15^\circ4634$ and GSC 01682--01530, respectively.
126:
127: %\newpage
128: \begin{table}
129: \caption{VR measurements of BB Peg (Fig.~\ref{fig2}d). The phases were calculated using the Eq. (1). 1 and 2 denote V, and R filters (F), respectively.} \label{tab1}
130: \begin{tabular}{llll}
131: \hline
132: \hline
133: HJD & Phase & $\Delta$m & F \\
134: \hline
135: 53301.3054 & 0.5115 & 1.2930 & 1 \\
136: 53301.3067 & 0.5151 & 1.2840 & 1 \\
137: 53301.3080 & 0.5187 & 1.2610 & 1 \\
138: 53301.3093 & 0.5224 & 1.2500 & 1 \\
139: 53301.3106 & 0.5260 & 1.2300 & 1 \\
140: 53301.3119 & 0.5296 & 1.2050 & 1 \\
141: 53301.3133 & 0.5333 & 1.1840 & 1 \\
142: 53301.3146 & 0.5369 & 1.1690 & 1 \\
143: 53301.3159 & 0.5405 & 1.1560 & 1 \\
144: \end{tabular}
145: \tablecomments{Table~\ref{tab1} is published in its entirety in the electronic edition of
146: the Astronomical Journal. A portion is shown here for guidance regarding
147: its form and content.}
148: \end{table}
149:
150: \par
151: We obtained two minima times throughout these observations. They are
152: listed in Table~\ref{tab2} together with those published in existing
153: literature. Using these minima times we derived the linear
154: ephemeris:
155: \begin{equation}
156: HJD\,MinI = 24\,50657.4599(4)+0.3615015(1)\times E \label{bbpeq1}
157: \end{equation}
158: and used them in the reduction processes of the observed data.
159:
160: \begin{table*}
161: \begin{center}
162: \scriptsize \caption{The primary (I) and the secondary (II) minima
163: times in HJD*(HJD - 2\,400\,000).}\label{tab2}
164: \begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
165: \hline
166: HJD$*$ & Min. & Ref.& HJD$*$ & Min. & Ref. & HJD$*$ & Min. & Ref.\\
167: \hline
168: 26559.241 & II & 1 & 41181.397 & I & 5 & 50657.4575 & I & 16 \\
169: 26582.014 & II & 2 & 41335.227 & II & 6 & 50671.3770 & II & 16 \\
170: 26965.204 & II & 2 & 42405.259 & II & 7 & 50702.4698 & II & 17 \\
171: 27393.223 & II & 2 & 42607.523 & I & 8 & 50739.7052 & II & 18 \\
172: 30226.826 & I & 3 & 42748.310 & II & 8 & 50769.525 & I & 18 \\
173: 30235.865 & I & 3 & 43729.4491 & II & 9 & 51078.4304 & II & 19 \\
174: 30258.638 & I & 3 & 43730.3512 & I & 9 & 51471.3810 & II & 20 \\
175: 30264.797 & I & 3 & 43754.3896 & II & 9 & 52131.8425 & II & 21 \\
176: 30281.776 & I & 3 & 43754.3896 & I & 9 & 52201.2508 & II & 22 \\
177: 30285.753 & I & 3 & 43757.4667 & I & 9 & 52201.4305 & I & 22 \\
178: 30530.861 & I & 3 & 43764.3334 & I & 9 & 52203.2386 & I & 22 \\
179: 30552.903 & I & 3 & 43806.08453 & II & 10 & 52203.4188 & II & 22 \\
180: 30584.721 & I & 3 & 43806.98838 & I & 10 & 52207.3962 & II & 22 \\
181: 30994.128 & II & 2 & 43813.13365 & I & 10 & 52513.4118 & I & 23 \\
182: 31731.756 & I & 4 & 43814.03710 & II & 10 & 52838.402 & I & 24 \\
183: 31783.455 & I & 4 & 43842.05373 & I & 10 & 52852.4956 & I & 25 \\
184: 32433.631 & II & 4 & 43866.99893 & I & 10 & 53243.4607 & II & 26 \\
185: 32433.801 & I & 4 & 44812.503 & II & 11 & 53284.3112 & II & 22 \\
186: 32436.687 & I & 4 & 45208.3511 & II & 12 & 53285.3957 & II & 22 \\
187: 32436.866 & II & 4 & 45208.5319 & I & 12 & 53353.3577 & II & 26 \\
188: 32451.697 & II & 4 & 46024.2600 & II & 12 & 53984.3589 & I & 26 \\
189: 32455.683 & II & 4 & 46026.2483 & I & 12 & 53984.3591 & I & 26 \\
190: 32473.567 & I & 4 & 49243.4462 & II & 13 & 53984.5409 & II & 26 \\
191: 32477.538 & I & 4 & 49244.3490 & I & 13 & 53984.5411 & II & 26 \\
192: 32477.744 & II & 4 & 49273.2689 & I & 13 & 53986.5271 & I & 26 \\
193: 32479.710 & I & 4 & 49275.2600 & II & 13 & 53986.5276 & I & 26 \\
194: 34711.615 & I & 4 & 50001.3351 & I & 14 & 53992.4949 & II & 26 \\
195: 35468.604 & I & 4 & 50026.2785 & I & 14 & 53992.4957 & II & 26 \\
196: 36056.764 & I & 4 & 50359.4028 & II & 15 & & & \\
197: \hline
198: \end{tabular}
199: \end{center}
200: {References for Table~\ref{tab2}. (1) Zessewitsch (1939), (2)
201: Tsessevich (1954), (3) Whitney (1943), (4) Whitney (1959), (5)
202: Diethelm (1973), (6) Locher (1973), (7) Diethelm (1976), (8)
203: Diethelm (1977), (9) Cerruti-Sola \& Scaltriti (1980), (10) Zhai \&
204: Zhang (1979), (11) Derman et al. (1982), (12) Awadalla (1988), (13)
205: M\"uyessero\u{g}lu et al. (1996), (14) Agerer \& H\"ubscher (1996),
206: (15) Agerer \& H\"ubscher (1998a), (16) Ogloza (1997), (17) Agerer
207: \& H\"ubscher (1998b), (18) Samolyk (1999), (19) Agerer et al.
208: (1999), (20) Agerer et al. (2001), (21) Nelson (2002), (22) Drozdz
209: \& Ogloza (2005a), (23) Demircan et al. (2003), (24) Bak\i\c{s} et
210: al. (2003), (25) H\"ubscher (2005), (26) Present study.}
211: \end{table*}
212:
213: \section{Eclipse timings and period study}
214:
215: The period variation study of the system was presented for the first
216: time by Cerruti-Sola \& Scaltriti (1980), resulting in the ephemeris Min I (HJD) $=2443764.3334(6)+0.3615021(2)E+2.3\times
217: 10^{-11}E^2$. Qian (2001) presented it as Min I
218: (HJD)$=2430285.7618(6)+0.36150027(1)E+2.35(1)\times 10^{-11}E^2$.
219: \par
220:
221: Recently, the existence of a third body was reported via spectroscopic
222: study by D'Angelo et al.(2006). We used the linear ephemeris given by
223: Qian (2001) to construct the binary's O-C diagram. It shows
224: almost a sine-like variation superposed on an upward parabola. A
225: sine-like variation in the O-C curve, where both the primary and the
226: secondary minima follows the same trend, suggests the light time
227: effect via the presence of a tertiary component. Times of minima of
228: BB Peg yielded the following equation
229:
230: \begin{equation}
231: %\begin{array}{l}
232: MinI = T_o +P_oE + \frac{1}{2} \frac{dP}{dE}E^2 + \frac {a_{12} \sin
233: i'}{c} \left[ \frac {1-{e'}^2}{1+{e'} \cos v'} \sin \left( v' +
234: \omega' \right) +{e'} \sin \omega' \right]
235: \label{bbpeq2}
236: %\end{array}
237: \end{equation}
238: where $T_{\rm o}$ is the starting epoch for the primary minimum, $E$ is the integer
239: eclipse cycle number, $P_{\rm o}$ is the orbital period of the
240: eclipsing binary $a_{12}$, $i'$ , $e'$, and $\omega'$
241: are the semi-major axis, inclination, eccentricity, and the
242: longitude of the periastron of eclipsing pair about the third body,
243: and $v'$ denotes the true anomaly of the position of the center of
244: mass. Time of periastron passage $T'$ and orbital period $P'$ are
245: the unknown parameters in Eq.(\ref{bbpeq2}).
246: %\newpage
247: \begin{table}
248: \caption{Orbital elements of the tertiary component in BB Peg. The
249: standard errors 1$\sigma$, in the last digit are given in
250: parentheses.} \label{tab3}
251: \begin{tabular}{lll}
252: \hline
253: Parameter &Unit & Value \\
254: \hline $T_o$ & [HJD] & 2430285.7655(36) \\
255: $P_o$ & [day] & 0.3615006 (1) \\
256: $P'$ & [year] & 27.9(2.0) \\
257: $T'$ & [HJD] & 2438540 (793) \\
258: $e'$ & & 0.56 (0.30) \\
259: $\omega'$ & [$^\circ$] & 69 (18) \\
260: $a_{12} \sin i'$ & [AU] & 0.96 (15) \\
261: $f(m)$ & [M$_{\odot}$] & 0.0010(5) \\
262: $m_{3;i'=10^\circ}$ & [M$_{\odot}$] & 1.23 \\
263: $m_{3;i'=90^\circ}$ & [M$_{\odot}$] & 0.16 \\
264: $Q$ & [c/d] & $1.5(2)\times 10^{-11}$ \\
265: \hline
266: \end{tabular}
267: \end{table}
268: \par
269: Light elements in Eq.(\ref{bbpeq2}) were determined using the
270: differential correction method. We used Eq.(2) along with the values
271: given in Table~\ref{tab2} and a weighted least squares solution to
272: derive the parameters shown in Table~\ref{tab3}. We assigned weight
273: 10 to photoelectric (pe), 1 to photographic (pg) and 0 (pg) to a few
274: cases that shows high deviation from the expected normal position
275: (the open circles in Fig~\ref{fig1}b). The parameters given in
276: Table~\ref{tab3} were used for the $\triangle T_\mathrm{I}$ variation
277: study of the system which is plotted in Fig~\ref{fig1}a. The O-C
278: values in this figure were obtained with the linear elements
279: $T_\mathrm{o}$ and $P_\mathrm{o}$ given in Table~\ref{tab3}. The
280: line in Fig.~\ref{fig1}a shows the secular increase of the binary's
281: orbital period while the dashed line is for both the secular
282: increase and the light-time effect of the tertiary component. We
283: also present the contribution of the light-time effect, $\triangle
284: T_{\mathrm{II}}$, to total period variations of the system in
285: Fig~\ref{fig1}b. In the last section of this study we will discuss
286: the tertiary component in BB~Peg.
287:
288: \begin{figure*}
289: %\centering
290: \includegraphics{f1} \caption{ (a) The $\triangle
291: T_{I}$ diagram of the times of mid-eclipses for BB Peg. The
292: continuous line is for the parabolic variation and the dashed line
293: is for a parabolic variation superimposed on the variation due to
294: the tertiary component, (b) the $\triangle T_{II}$ residuals after
295: subtraction of parabolic change, shown in panel (a).}\label{fig1}
296: \end{figure*}
297:
298: \section{Light curve analysis}
299: Previous light curves have been analyzed by
300: either old methods or with the assumption that photometric mass
301: ratio was known. All previously published light curves, as well as those of the
302: current study, have been analyzed simultaneously with the Lu and Rucinski (1999) radial
303: velocities using the latest version of the WD code (Wilson \& Devinney 1971; Wilson
304: 1994). Mode 3 of the WD code has used throughout the
305: analysis. As seen in the Fig~\ref{fig2}, the light curves show asymmetries in the maxima.
306: Generally it is accepted that the stellar activity may cause to these asymmetries
307: in the light curves, we will discuss these asymmetries in section 5.
308: Hence, the stellar spot parameters, were taken into consideration in our analysis.
309: The adopted values are: $T_\mathrm{1} = 6250$\,K
310: according to the $B-V$ color index, gravity darkening
311: coefficients, and albedos were chosen as $g_\mathrm{1}$ =
312: $g_\mathrm{2}$ = 0.32 (Lucy 1967) and $A_\mathrm{1}$ =
313: $A_\mathrm{2}$ = 0.5 (Rucinski 1969) and the logarithmic limb-darkening
314: coefficients ($x_\mathrm{1}$, $x_\mathrm{2}$) were obtained from
315: van Hamme (1993). Semi major axis of the relative orbit $a$, binary center-of-mass radial
316: velocity $V_\gamma$, inclination $i$, temperature of the secondary
317: component $T_\mathrm{2}$, luminosities of the primary
318: component $L_\mathrm{1}$(U, B, V, R), the potential of the common
319: surface $\Omega$, and spot parameters (latitude, longitude, size and temperature factor) were adjustable parameters. The results are given in
320: Table~\ref{tab4}. Weights for the different sets of data were determined
321: by the scatter of the observations. In all analyses, the B, V and R filters were given 2 times
322: higher weight than the U filter to take their much better dispersion into account.
323: The computed light curves (solid lines) obtained
324: along with the parameters given in Table~\ref{tab4} were compared
325: with all observed light curves shown in Fig.~\ref{fig2}a, b, c, and
326: d. The synthetic light curves were created with the LC program.
327: \par
328: The obtained parameters for the light curves are given in
329: Table~\ref{tab4} . The results of the different light curve solution
330: models (M) have been denoted by different numbers. It has been
331: assigned M1 in Table~\ref{tab4} to two colors (B and V), light curves
332: solution obtained from Cerruti-Sola \& Scaltriti (1980), M2 to two
333: colors (B and V) light curves model of Zhai \& Zhang (1979) (the mean
334: values are taken from Leung et al. 1985), M3 to three colors (U, B,
335: and V) light curves that were obtained by Awadalla (1988) and, M4 to
336: two color (R and V) light curves obtained in this study.
337: All the results appear to be compatible with each other.
338: Consistency of observations, using the
339: results given in Table~\ref{tab4}, with applied models are shown in
340: Fig.~\ref{fig2}a, b, c, and d.
341:
342: \begin{table*}
343: \begin{center}
344: \caption{The photometric elements of BB Peg with their formal
345: 1$\sigma$ errors. See text for details.}\footnotesize \label{tab4}
346: \begin{tabular}{llllll}
347: \hline
348: Parameter & M~1 & M~2 &M~3 &M~4 \\
349: \hline
350: Geometric parameters:&&&\\
351: $i$ ${({^\circ})}$ & 85.3(6) & 87.9(1.4) &84.6(9) &85.0(5) \\
352: $V_{\gamma}$ & -27.8(1.7) & - &-28.0(2.0) &-28.1(2.2) \\
353: $a$ & 2.665(30) & - &2.671(30) &2.664(32) \\
354: $\Omega _{1,2}$ & 6.066(14) & 6.045(6) &6.005(20) &6.056(13) \\
355: $q$ & 2.752(27) & - &2.690(34) &2.702(7) \\
356: Filling factor (\%) & 35 & 38 &33 &34 \\
357: Fractional radii of h. c. &&&\\
358: ${r}_{1~pole}$ &0.2898(12) & 0.2888(4) &0.2922(15) &0.2889(19) \\
359: ${r}_{1~side}$ &0.3042(14) & 0.3028(5) &0.3068(19) &0.3030(24) \\
360: ${r}_{1~back}$ &0.3490(27) & 0.3450(10) &0.3522(34) &0.3457(45) \\
361: Fractional radii of c. c. &&&\\
362: ${r}_{2~pole}$ &0.4541(11) & 0.4499(4) &0.4529(14) &0.4507(16) \\
363: ${r}_{2~side}$ &0.4894(15) & 0.4839(5) &0.4881(19) &0.4849(22) \\
364: ${r}_{2~back}$ &0.5209(20) & 0.5145(7) &0.5200(25) &0.5157(30) \\
365: Radiative parameters:&&&\\
366: $T_1$$^*$ (K) & 6250 & 6250 &6250 &6250 \\
367: $T_2$ (K) & 5905(45) & 5945(40) &5760(45) &5955(30) \\
368: Albedo$^*$ ($A_1=A_2$) & 0.5 & 0.5 &0.5 &0.5 \\
369: Gravity brightening$^*$ ($g_1=g_2$) &0.32 &0.32 &0.32 &0.32 \\
370: Luminosity ratio:$\frac{L_1}{L_1 +L_2}$(\%) &&&\\
371: $U$ & - & - &45 &- \\
372: $B$ & 37 & 36 &41 &- \\
373: $V$ & 36 & 34 &38 &34 \\
374: $R$ & - & - &- &32 \\
375: Spot parameters: &&&\\
376: Colatitude & 1.24(7) & 1.52(3) &1.20(15) &1.05(16) \\
377: Longitude & 4.18(27) & 4.36(6) &4.26(40) &4.78(29) \\
378: Spot radius & 0.18(2) & 0.34(2) &0.24(3) &0.25(2) \\
379: Spot temperature & 0.92(2) & 0.89(1) &0.93(2) &0.92(2) \\
380: \hline $^*$~Fixed
381: \end{tabular}
382: \end{center}
383: \end{table*}
384:
385: \begin{figure*}
386: {\includegraphics[height=13cm]{f2}} \caption{ The observed and
387: computed light curves of BB~Peg. For the sake of comparison the
388: light curves in U, B, and R bands are shifted by a value of $+0.6$,
389: $+0.3$, and $-0.3$ in intensity. Radial velocities (e) from Lu \& Rucinski (1999)
390: and the computed curve through our simultaneous solution. See text for the details.}\label{fig2}
391: \end{figure*}
392:
393: Keeping in mind the possibility of a tertiary component orbiting
394: a third-body orbiting the binary system we assume the
395: 3$^{\mathrm{rd}}$ body's ($l_3$) parameter as a free parameter
396: through the light curve solution. However, we couldn't find meaningful values for the $l_3$
397: parameter throughout the solutions. Likewise, D'Angelo et al. (2006) showed that the light contribution
398: of the third body is tiny ($l_3/l_{1+2}=0.009$).
399:
400:
401: \section{Results and Discussion}
402: All available light curves in literature, have been solved using the recent
403: WD code and the results are presented in Table~\ref{tab4}. The
404: solutions yielded very close results to each other. During the process effective
405: temperature and absolute magnitude of the Sun were taken as 5780~K
406: and 4.75 mag, respectively. In Fig.~\ref{fig3} the components
407: parameters are shown on the H-R and M-R diagrams. We show them along
408: with the LTCB systems (Yakut \& Eggleton 2005) whose physical
409: parameters are well-known. The results obtained from analyzing BB~Peg
410: (Table~\ref{tab5}) seem to be in good agreement with the
411: well-known LTCBs. Location of the less massive component in the
412: system indicates the system is overluminous and oversized, like the
413: other W-subtype secondary stars. Companion stars appear to be below
414: the ZAMS and the massive component is situated near the TAMS. If
415: interstellar absorption is not taken into account then through
416: the parameters given and using the values given in Table~\ref{tab5} the
417: distance of the system can be found as 361(25) pc. This is consistent with the HIPPARCOS value (ESA 1997).
418: The system's distance is derived from the Rucinski \& Duerbeck
419: (1997) in period-color-luminosity relation 389 pc,
420: which is close to the one obtained in this study.
421: \begin{table*}
422: \caption{Absolute parameters of BB Peg. The standard errors
423: 1$\sigma$ in the last digit are given in parentheses.}\label{tab5}
424: \begin{tabular}{lll}
425: \hline
426: Parameter (Unit) & Hot component & Cool component \\
427: \hline
428: Mass ($\mathrm{M_{\odot}}$) & $0.53\,(2)$ & $1.42\,(4)$ \\
429: Radius ($\mathrm{R_{\odot}}$) & $0.83\,(2)$ & $1.29\,(2)$ \\
430: Effective temperature (K) & $6250$ & $5950\,(30)$ \\
431: Luminosity ($\mathrm{L_{\odot}}$) & $0.94\,(6)$ & $1.86\,(8)$ \\
432: Surface gravity (cgs) & $4.33$ & $4.37$ \\
433: Absolute bolometric magnitude (mag) & 4.82$^{-0.08}_{+0.09}$& $4.08^{-0.13}_{+0.08}$ \\
434: Absolute visual magnitude (mag) & 4.98 & 4.26 \\
435: Distance (pc) &\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,$361^{-25}_{+20}$ & \\
436: \hline
437: \end{tabular}
438: \end{table*}
439:
440: \begin{figure*}
441: \includegraphics{f3}
442: \caption{The H-R and M-R diagrams showing BB Peg. The filled circles
443: show the primary component of W-type LTCBs, and the open circles are
444: for the secondaries. The ZAMS line is taken from Pols et al.
445: (1995).}\label{fig3}
446: \end{figure*}
447:
448:
449: Many contact binaries show an asymmetry in which one maximum is
450: higher than the other (the O'Connell effect), these asymmetries are
451: usually attributed to spots, which we interpret here in a very
452: general sense: they might be due to large cool star spots, to hot
453: regions such as faculae, to gas streams and their impact on the
454: companion star, or to some inhomogeneities not yet understood (Yakut
455: \& Eggleton). While the asymmetry is apparent in the shape of the
456: light curve of some systems (e.g. YZ Phe, Samec \& Terrell 1995),
457: ), in others this asymmetry may not so prominent. (e.g, XY Leo,
458: Yakut et al. 2003). The asymmetry in the light curve of BB~Peg
459: is modeled with a cold spot on the secondary component (the cooler with higher mass and
460: radius) of the system. In the model of the light curve denoted by M2
461: the spot activity appears to be prominent with respect to the other
462: models. The results of the model are summarized in Table~\ref{tab4}. Besides, the
463: asymmetry in the light curve is well represented with the model (see
464: Fig.~\ref{fig2}).
465:
466:
467: Fig.~\ref{fig1} shows a parabolic variation. Therefore, we have
468: applied a parabolic fit, and assume that the mass transfer take
469: place between the components. The parabolic $(\triangle T_I)$ curve
470: shown in Fig.~\ref{fig1} indicates the existence of mass transfer in
471: the contact system, BB Peg. Upward parabolic variation suggesting a
472: mass transfer from the less massive component (the hotter component
473: in the case of BB Peg) to the more massive one. Eq.~(\ref{bbpeq2})
474: yields a period increase at a rate of $\frac{dP}{dt}=3.0(1)\times
475: 10^{-8}$\,days yr$^{-1}$. If the period increase is indeed caused by
476: conservative mass transfer, then one can estimate the mass transfer
477: between the components. Using the derived masses, we derive the
478: rate of mass transfer $2.4(4)\times10^{-8}$ M$_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$ from
479: the less massive to the more massive component as in the
480: conservative mass transfer approximation. However, conservative mass transfer is just an optimistic
481: assumption. The non-conservative case is very important in close
482: binary evolution (see for details, Yakut \& Eggleton and
483: references therein). Analysis of the data, obtained over approximately 25 years, using the
484: WD program indicate a period increase of $2.9(1)\times
485: 10^{-8}$\,days/yr, which is close to the one obtained with O-C
486: analysis.
487: \par
488: Fig.~\ref{fig1}b shows the variation of $\triangle T_{II}$ when the
489: observations extracted from the parabolic variation. The $\triangle
490: T_{II}$ variations show a sine-like variation, which implies the
491: existence of a tertiary component orbiting BB~Peg on an eccentric
492: orbit. Spectroscopic study of the system shows the existence of an M
493: -type dwarf star about the binary (D'Angelo et al. 2006). Using this
494: information with sine-line variation of the residuals of (O-C) we
495: solved the system under the assumption of existence of a third body and obtained
496: the values given in Table~\ref{tab3}. The results of the (O-C)
497: analysis show that the third component has a highly eccentric orbit
498: ($e=0.56$) with about a 30-year period. Indeed, (O-C) residuals may
499: indicate that the source of this variation could be due to magnetic activity.
500: The orbit of third body, obtained in this study
501: compared to the data of Pribula \& Rucinski (2006) appeared to be much more
502: eccentric.
503: \par
504: On the other hand, using the values given in Table~\ref{tab3} and
505: Table~\ref{tab5} one may predict the mass of the tertiary
506: component. By assigning 0.96 AU to $a_{12}$sin$i$ and 29.7 yr to period
507: one can give the mass function as $0.0010 \, M_{\odot}$. For orbital
508: inclinations (i$_3$) of 90, 80, 50, 30, 10 the masses of the third
509: body ($m_3$) are estimated to be 0.161, 0.164, 0.214, 0.341, 1.229
510: M$_{\odot}$, respectively. D'Angelo et al. (2006) found a
511: temperature of 3900~K for the tertiary component and a luminosity ratio
512: ($\beta = \frac{l_3}{l_1+l_2}$) of 0.009. Following this
513: information with the deduced luminosities given in this study one
514: may give the radius of third body as 0.33 R$_{\odot}$. $M \simeq
515: 0.978 R$ relationship is deduced using the ten well-known M-type
516: dwarf stars given in the study of Mercedes \& Ribas (2005), then
517: the tertiary body's mass of 0.32 M$_{\odot}$ is found. Taking into
518: consideration that value of mass, the orbital inclination of the
519: third body can be found as 35$^{\circ}$. Useful observations of BB
520: Peg throughout the next decade will help to determine the
521: accurate orbital parameters of the third body from the O--C diagram.
522:
523: \acknowledgements We are grateful to C. Aerts, who has helped to
524: improve the final version of the paper with her comments and
525: suggestions. We thank Robert Smith for his suggestions, which improved the language of the manuscript.
526: We are very grateful to an anonymous referee for his/her comments and helpful constructive suggestions which
527: helped us to improve the paper. This study was supported by Ege University Research
528: Fund and T\"UB\.ITAK National Observatory. KY acknowledge support by the Research Council of the University of
529: Leuven under a DB fellowship.
530:
531:
532: \begin{thebibliography}{}
533: \bibitem[]{533} Agerer, F., Dahm, M., H\"ubscher, J.: 1999, IBVS~4712, 1
534:
535: \bibitem[]{535} Agerer, F., Dahm, M., H\"ubscher, J.: 2001, IBVS~5017, 1
536:
537: \bibitem[]{537} Agerer, F., H\"ubscher, J.: 1996, IBVS~4382, 1
538:
539: \bibitem[]{539} Agerer, F., H\"uebscher, J.: 1998a, IBVS~4562, 1
540:
541: \bibitem[]{541} Agerer, F., H\"ubscher, J.: 1998b, IBVS~4606, 1
542:
543: \bibitem[]{543} Awadalla, N.~S.: 1988, Ap\&SS~140, 137
544:
545: \bibitem[]{545} Bak{\i}\c{s}, V., Bak{\i}\c{s}, H., Erdem, A., \c{C}i\c{c}ek, C., Demircan, O., Budding, E.:
546: 2003, IBVS~5464, 1
547:
548: \bibitem[]{548} Cerruti-Sola, M., Milano, L., Scaltriti, F.: 1981, A\&A~101, 273
549:
550: \bibitem[]{550} Cerruti-Sola, M., Scaltriti, F.: 1980, A\&AS~40, 85
551:
552: \bibitem[]{552} D'Angelo, C., van Kerkwijk, M.~H., Rucinski, S.~M.: 2006, AJ~132, 650
553:
554: \bibitem[]{554} Demircan, O., Erdem, A., \"Ozdemir, S., \c{C}i\c{c}ek, C., Bulut, \.I., Soydugan, F., Soydugan, E., Bak{\i}\c{s}, V., Kaba\c{s}, A., Bulut, A., T\"uys\"uz, M., Zejda, M., Budding, E.: 2003, IBVS~5364, 1
555:
556: \bibitem[]{556} Derman, E., Y{\i}lmaz, N., Engin, S., Aslan, Z., Ayd{\i}n, C., T\"ufekcio\u{g}lu,
557: Z.: 1982, IBVS~2159, 1
558:
559: \bibitem[]{559} Diethelm, R.: 1973, Rocznik Astron. Obser. Krakowskiego
560: 44, 102
561:
562: \bibitem[]{562} Diethelm, R.: 1976, Rocznik Astron. Obser. Krakowskiego 47,
563: 96
564:
565: \bibitem[]{565} Diethelm, R.: 1977, Rocznik Astron. Obser. Krakowskiego 48, 100
566:
567: \bibitem[]{567} Drozdz, M., Ogloza, W.: 2005a, IBVS~5623, 1
568:
569: \bibitem[]{569}ESA: 1997, The Hipparcos and Tycho Catalogues (ESA SP-1200).
570: ESA, Noordwijk
571:
572: \bibitem[]{572} Giuricin, G., Mardirossian, F., Mezzetti, M.: 1981, AN~302, 285
573:
574: \bibitem[]{574} Hoffmeister, C.: 1931, AN~242, 129
575:
576: \bibitem[]{576} Hrivnak, B.~J.: 1990, BAAS~22, 1291
577:
578: \bibitem[]{578} H\"ubscher, J.: 2005, IBVS~5643, 1
579:
580: \bibitem[]{580} Leung, K.-C., Zhai, D., Zhang, Y.: 1985, AJ~90, 515
581:
582: \bibitem[]{582} Locher, K.: 1973, SAC~44, 102
583:
584: \bibitem[]{584} Lu, W., Rucinski, S.~M.: 1999, AJ~118, 515
585:
586: \bibitem[]{586} Lucy, L. B. 1967, ZA~65, 89.
587:
588: \bibitem[]{588}Mercedes, M-L, Ribas, I.: 2005, ApJ~631, 1120
589:
590: \bibitem[]{590} M\"uyessero\u{g}lu, Z., G\"urol, B., Selam, S.~O.: 1996,
591: IBVS~4380, 1
592:
593: \bibitem[]{593} Nelson, R.~H.: 2002, IBVS~5224, 1
594:
595: \bibitem[]{595} Ogloza, W.: 1997, IBVS~4534, 1
596:
597: \bibitem[]{597} Pols, O.~R., Tout, C. A., Eggleton, P.~P. Han, Z.: 1995, MNRAS~274, 964
598:
599: \bibitem[]{599} Pribulla, T., Rucinski, S.~M.: 2006, AJ~131, 2986
600:
601: \bibitem[]{601} Qian, S.: 2001, MNRAS~328, 635
602:
603: \bibitem[]{603} Rucinski, S.~M.: 1969, AcA~19, 245
604:
605: \bibitem[]{605} Rucinski, S.~M., Duerbeck, H.W.: 1997, PASP~109, 134
606:
607: \bibitem[]{607} Samec, R.~G., Terrell, D.: 1995, PASP~107, 427
608:
609: \bibitem[]{609} Samolyk, G.: 1999, AAVSO, 5
610:
611: \bibitem[]{611} Terrell, D., Wilson, R.~E.: 2005, Ap\&SS~296, 221
612:
613: \bibitem[]{613} Tsessevich, V.~P.: 1954, Odessa Izv. 4, 2, 271
614:
615: \bibitem[]{615}van Hamme, W.: 1993, AJ~106, 2096
616:
617: \bibitem[]{617}Whitney, B.~S.: 1943, AJ~50, 131
618:
619: \bibitem[]{619} Whitney, B.~S.:1959, AJ~64, 258
620:
621: \bibitem[]{621} Wilson, R.~E., Devinney, E. J.: 1971, ApJ~166, 605.
622:
623: \bibitem[]{623} Wilson, R.~E.: 1994, PASP~106, 921.
624:
625: \bibitem[]{625} Yakut, K., \.Ibano\u{g}lu, C., Kalomeni, B., De\u{g}irmenci, \"O.~L.: 2003, A\&A~401, 1095
626:
627: \bibitem[]{627} Yakut, K., Eggleton, P.~P.: 2005, ApJ~629, 1055
628:
629: \bibitem[]{629} Zessewitsch, W.: 1939, Quoted in Priceton Contribution
630: No. 19
631:
632: \bibitem[]{632} Zhai, D. S., Zhang, Y.~X.: 1979, Xexue Tongbao 21, 895
633:
634: \bibitem[]{634} Zola, S., Kreiner, J.~M., Zakrzewski, B., Kjurkchieva, D.~P., Marchev, D. V., Baran, A., Rucinski, S.~M., Ogloza, W., Siwak, M., Koziel, D., Drozdz, M., Pokrzywka, B.: 2005,
635: AcA~55, 389
636:
637: \end{thebibliography}
638:
639:
640: \end{document}
641: