1: \documentclass[aps,twocolumn,groupedaddress,nofootinbib]{revtex4}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}
3: \usepackage{amsmath}
4: \usepackage{epsfig}
5:
6:
7:
8: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
9: {\newcommand{\lsim}{\mbox{\raisebox{-.6ex}{~$\stackrel{<}{\sim}$~}}}
10: {\newcommand{\gsim}{\mbox{\raisebox{-.6ex}{~$\stackrel{>}{\sim}$~}}}
11: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
12:
13: \begin{document}
14:
15: \title{Leptogenesis, Dark Matter and Higgs Phenomenology at TeV}
16:
17: \author{Pei-Hong Gu$^{1}_{}$}
18:
19:
20: \author{Utpal Sarkar$^{2}_{}$}
21:
22:
23:
24:
25:
26: \affiliation{$^{1}_{}$The Abdus Salam International Centre for
27: Theoretical Physics, Strada Costiera 11, 34014 Trieste, Italy\\
28: $^{2}_{}$Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad 380009, India}
29:
30:
31:
32:
33: \begin{abstract}
34: We propose an interesting model of neutrino masses to realize
35: leptogenesis and dark matter at the TeV scale. A real scalar is
36: introduced to naturally realize the Majorana masses of the
37: right-handed neutrinos. We also include a new Higgs doublet that
38: contributes to the dark matter of the universe. The neutrino masses
39: come from the vacuum expectation value of the triplet Higgs scalar.
40: The right-handed neutrinos are not constrained by the neutrino
41: masses and hence they could generate leptogenesis at the TeV scale
42: without subscribing to resonant leptogenesis. In our model, all new
43: particles could be observable at the forthcoming Large Hardon
44: Collider or the proposed future International Linear Collider.
45:
46: \end{abstract}
47:
48:
49: \maketitle
50:
51: \textit{Introduction}: Currently many neutrino oscillation
52: experiments \cite{pdg2006} have confirmed that neutrinos have tiny
53: but nonzero masses. This phenomenon is elegantly explained by the
54: seesaw mechanism \cite{minkowski1977}, in which neutrinos naturally
55: acquire small Majorana \cite{minkowski1977} or Dirac \cite{mp2002}
56: masses. At the same time, the observed matter-antimatter asymmetry
57: \cite{pdg2006} in the universe can be generated via leptogenesis
58: \cite{mp2002,fy1986,luty1992,fps1995,pilaftsis1997,ms1998,ars1998,di2002,guo2004,bpy2005}
59: in these models. In this scheme, the right-handed neutrinos or other
60: virtual particles need have very large masses to realize a
61: successful leptogenesis if we don't resort to the resonant effect
62: \cite{fps1995,pilaftsis1997} by highly fine tuning.
63:
64:
65:
66: Another big challenge to the standard model is the dark matter
67: \cite{pdg2006}. What is the nature of dark matter? Recently, it has
68: been pointed out \cite{ma06,bhr2006,ma2006,co2006} that a new Higgs
69: doublet can be a candidate for the dark matter if it doesn't decay
70: into the standard model particles. Although the possibility of Higgs
71: doublet to be a dark matter candidate was proposed many years back
72: \cite{ma77}, following the recent proposal \cite{ma06} a thorough
73: analysis have been carried out \cite{bhr2006,hnot2006} demonstrating
74: its consistency with all the recent results. In this interesting
75: scenario, the dark matter is expected to produce observable signals
76: at the Large Hardon Collider (LHC) \cite{bhr2006} and in the GLAST
77: satellite experiment \cite{hnot2006}. Combining this idea, the
78: type-I seesaw and the concept \cite{kuzmin1997} of generation of the
79: cosmological matter-antimatter asymmetry along with the cold dark
80: matter, the author of \cite{ma2006} successfully unified the
81: leptogenesis and dark matter. However, this scenario need the
82: right-handed neutrinos to be very heavy, around the order of
83: $10^{7}_{}\, \textrm{GeV}$.
84:
85:
86:
87:
88:
89:
90: In this paper, we propose a new scheme to explain neutrino masses,
91: baryon asymmetry and dark matter at TeV scale by introducing a Higgs
92: triplet which is responsible for the origin of neutrino masses, a
93: new Higgs doublet that can be a candidate for the
94: dark matter, and a real scalar which can generate the
95: Majorana masses of the right-handed neutrinos naturally.
96: A discrete symmetry ensures that the new Higgs doublet cannot
97: couple to ordinary particles. This same discrete symmetry
98: will also prevent any connection between the right-handed neutrinos
99: and left-handed neutrino masses. This allows the right-handed
100: neutrinos to decay at low scale generating the lepton
101: asymmetry, which will be finally converted to the baryon asymmetry
102: through the sphaleron processes \cite{krs1985}. This will then explain the
103: observed matter-antimatter asymmetry in the universe, even if the
104: Majorana masses of the right-handed neutrinos
105: are not highly quasi-degenerate. In our model, all
106: new particles could be close to the TeV scale and hence should be
107: observable at the forthcoming LHC or the proposed future
108: International Linear Collider (ILC).
109:
110:
111:
112:
113:
114: \textit{The model}: We extend the standard model with some new
115: fields. The field content is shown in Table \ref{charge}, in which
116: \begin{eqnarray}
117: \psi_{L}^{} &=& \left \lgroup \begin{array}{c}
118: \nu_{L}^{}\\
119: l_{L}^{}\end{array} \right \rgroup\,,\quad \phi = \left \lgroup
120: \begin{array}{c}
121: \phi^{0}_{}\\
122: \phi^{-}_{}\end{array} \right \rgroup
123: \end{eqnarray}
124: are the left-handed lepton doublet and Higgs doublet of the standard
125: model, respectively, while
126: \begin{eqnarray}
127: \eta = \left \lgroup
128: \begin{array}{c}
129: \eta^{0}_{}\\
130: \eta^{-}_{}\end{array} \right \rgroup
131: \end{eqnarray}
132: is the new Higgs doublet that will be the dark matter candidate,
133: $\nu_{R}^{}$ is the right-handed neutrino, $\chi$ is the real scalar
134: and
135: \begin{eqnarray}
136: \Delta_{L}^{} &=& \left \lgroup
137: \begin{array}{cc}
138: \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\delta^{+}_{} &\delta^{++}_{}\\
139: \delta^{0}_{} &-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\delta^{+}_{}\end{array} \right
140: \rgroup
141: \end{eqnarray}
142: is the Higgs triplet. We further introduce a discrete $Z_{4}^{}$
143: symmetry, under which the different fields transform as
144: \begin{eqnarray}
145: &&\psi_{L}^{}\,\,\rightarrow \,\psi_{L}^{}\,,\quad \phi
146: \,\,\rightarrow
147: \,\,\,\,\,\phi\,,\quad\eta\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\rightarrow -i\eta\,,\nonumber\\
148: &&\nu_{R}^{}\,\,\rightarrow i\nu_{R}^{}\,,\quad\chi\,\,\rightarrow
149: -\chi\,,\quad\Delta_{L}^{}\,\,\rightarrow\,\,\,\,\,\,\Delta_{L}^{}\,.
150: \end{eqnarray}
151: Here the other standard model fields, which are all even under the
152: $Z_{4}^{}$, and the family indices have been omitted for simplicity.
153:
154:
155: \begin{table}
156: \begin{center}
157: \begin{tabular}{c|cccccc}
158: \hline\hline
159: \\[-2.5mm]
160: \quad Fields \quad \quad & \quad ~\,$\psi_{L}^{}$ \quad &
161: \quad ~\,$\phi$ \quad & \quad ~\,$\eta$\quad & \quad
162: ~\,$\nu_{R}^{}$\quad & \quad ~\,$\chi$\quad & \quad
163: ~\,$\Delta_{L}^{}$\quad\quad
164: \\[2.5mm]
165: \hline
166: \\[-2.5mm]
167: $SU(2)_{L}^{}$ & \quad ~\,\textbf{2} \quad &
168: \quad~\,\textbf{2}\quad & \quad~\,\textbf{2}\quad
169: &\quad~\,\textbf{1}\quad &\quad~\,\textbf{1}\quad
170: &\quad~\,\textbf{3}\quad\quad
171: \\[2.0mm]
172: $U(1)_{Y}^{}$ & \quad $ -\frac{1}{2} $ \quad & \quad$
173: -\frac{1}{2} $\quad & \quad$ -\frac{1}{2} $\quad&\quad~\, $ 0
174: $\quad& \quad~\,$ 0 $\quad& \quad~\,$ 1 $\quad\quad
175: \\[-2.5mm]
176: \\ \hline \hline
177: \end{tabular}
178: \caption{The field content in the model. Here $\psi_{L}^{}$, $\phi$ are the
179: standard model left-handed lepton doublets and Higgs doublet, $\eta$
180: is the new Higgs doublet, $\nu_{R}^{}$ is the right-handed
181: neutrinos, $\chi$ is the real scalar and $\Delta_{L}^{}$ is the
182: Higgs triplet. Here the other standard model fields and the family
183: indices have been omitted for simplicity.} \label{charge}
184: \end{center}
185: \end{table}
186:
187:
188: We write down the relevant Lagrangian for the Yukawa interactions,
189: \begin{eqnarray}
190: \label{lagrangian1} -\mathcal{L}&\supset&
191: \sum_{ij}^{}\left(y_{ij}^{}\overline{\psi_{Li}^{}}\eta
192: \nu_{Rj}^{}+\frac{1}{2}g_{ij}^{}\chi\overline{\nu_{Ri}^{c}}\nu_{Rj}^{}\right.\nonumber\\
193: &+&\left.\frac{1}{2}f_{ij}^{}\overline{\psi_{Li}^{c}}i\tau_{2}^{}\Delta_{L}^{}\psi_{Lj}^{}+\textrm{h.c.}\right)\,,
194: \end{eqnarray}
195: where $y_{ij}^{}$, $g_{ij}^{}$, $f_{ij}^{}$ are all dimensionless.
196: We also display the general scalar potential of $\phi$, $\eta$,
197: $\chi$ and $\Delta_{L}^{}$,
198: \begin{eqnarray}
199: \label{potential}
200: &&V(\chi,\phi,\eta,\Delta_{L}^{})\nonumber\\
201: &=&\frac{1}{2}\mu_{1}^{2}\chi^{2}_{}+\frac{1}{4}\lambda_{1}^{}\chi^{4}_{}+\mu_{2}^{2}\left(\phi^{\dagger}_{}\phi\right)+\lambda_{2}^{}(\phi^{\dagger}_{}\phi)^{2}_{}\nonumber\\
202: &+&\mu_{3}^{2}\left(\eta^{\dagger}_{}\eta\right)+\lambda_{3}^{}(\eta^{\dagger}_{}\eta)^{2}_{}+M^{2}_{\Delta}\textrm{Tr}\left(\Delta_{L}^{\dagger}\Delta_{L}^{}\right)\nonumber\\
203: &+&\lambda_{4}^{}\textrm{Tr}\left[\left(\Delta_{L}^{\dagger}\Delta_{L}^{}\right)^{2}_{}\right]+\lambda_{5}^{}\left[\textrm{Tr}\left(\Delta_{L}^{\dagger}\Delta_{L}^{}\right)\right]^{2}_{}\nonumber\\
204: &+&\alpha_{1}^{}\chi^{2}_{}\left(\phi^{\dagger}_{}\phi\right)+\alpha_{2}^{}\chi^{2}_{}\left(\eta^{\dagger}_{}\eta\right)+\alpha_{3}^{}\chi^{2}_{}\textrm{Tr}\left(\Delta_{L}^{\dagger}\Delta_{L}^{}\right)\nonumber\\
205: &+&2\beta_{1}^{}\left(\phi^{\dagger}_{}\phi\right)\left(\eta^{\dagger}_{}\eta\right)+2\beta_{2}^{}\left(\phi^{\dagger}_{}\eta\right)\left(\eta^{\dagger}_{}\phi\right)\nonumber\\
206: &+&2\beta_{3}^{}\left(\phi^{\dagger}_{}\phi\right)\textrm{Tr}\left(\Delta_{L}^{\dagger}\Delta_{L}^{}\right)+2\beta_{4}^{}\phi^{\dagger}_{}\Delta_{L}^{\dagger}\Delta_{L}^{}\phi\nonumber\\
207: &+&2\beta_{5}^{}\left(\eta^{\dagger}_{}\eta\right)\textrm{Tr}\left(\Delta_{L}^{\dagger}\Delta_{L}^{}\right)+2\beta_{6}^{}\eta^{\dagger}_{}\Delta_{L}^{\dagger}\Delta_{L}^{}\eta\nonumber\\
208: &+&\left(\mu\phi^{T}_{}i\tau_{2}^{}\Delta_{L}^{}\phi+\kappa\chi\eta^{T}_{}i\tau_{2}^{}\Delta_{L}^{}\eta+\textrm{h.c.}\right)\,,
209: \end{eqnarray}
210: where $\mu_{1,2,3}^{}$ and $\mu$ have the mass dimension-1, while
211: $\lambda_{1,...,5}^{}$, $\alpha_{1,2,3}^{}$, $\beta_{1,...,6}^{}$
212: and $\kappa$ are all dimensionless, $M_{\Delta}^{2}$ is the positive
213: mass-square of the Higgs triplet. Without loss of generality, $\mu$
214: and $\kappa$ will be conveniently set as real after proper phase
215: rotations.
216:
217:
218: \textit{The vacuum expectation values}: For $\lambda_{1}^{}>0$ and
219: $\mu_{1}^{2}<0$, we can guarantee that before the electroweak phase
220: transition, the real scalar $\chi$ acquires a nonzero vacuum
221: expectation value (VEV),
222: \begin{eqnarray}
223: \langle\chi\rangle\equiv u=
224: \sqrt{-\frac{\mu_{1}^{2}}{\lambda_{1}^{}}}\,.
225: \end{eqnarray}
226: We can then write the field $\chi$ in terms of the real physical
227: field $\sigma$ as
228: \begin{eqnarray}
229: \chi\equiv \sigma + u\,,
230: \end{eqnarray}
231: so that the explicit form of the Yukawa couplings become
232: \begin{eqnarray}
233: \label{lagrangian2} -\mathcal{L}&\supset&
234: y_{ij}^{}\overline{\psi_{Li}^{}}\eta
235: \nu_{Rj}^{}+\frac{1}{2}M_{ij}^{}\overline{\nu^{c}_{Ri}}\nu_{Rj}^{}+\frac{1}{2}f_{ij}^{}\overline{\psi_{Li}^{c}}i\tau_{2}^{}\Delta_{L}^{}\psi_{Lj}^{}\nonumber\\
236: &+&\mu\phi^{T}_{}i\tau_{2}^{}\Delta_{L}^{}\phi+\tilde{\mu}\eta^{T}_{}i\tau_{2}^{}\Delta_{L}^{}\eta+\frac{1}{2}g_{ij}^{}\sigma\overline{\nu_{Ri}^{c}}\nu_{Rj}^{}\nonumber\\
237: &+&\kappa\sigma\eta^{T}_{}i\tau_{2}^{}\Delta_{L}^{}\eta+\textrm{h.c.}+M^{2}_{\Delta}\textrm{Tr}\left(\Delta_{L}^{\dagger}\Delta_{L}^{}\right)\,,
238: \end{eqnarray}
239: where we defined,
240: \begin{eqnarray}
241: M_{ij}^{}\equiv g_{ij}^{}u \quad \textrm{and} \quad\tilde{\mu}\equiv
242: \kappa u .
243: \end{eqnarray}
244: For convenience, we diagonalize
245: $g_{ij}^{}\rightarrow g_{i}^{}$ as well as $M_{ij}^{}\rightarrow
246: M_{i}^{}$ by redefining $\nu_{Ri}^{}$ and then simplify the
247: Lagrangian (\ref{lagrangian2}) as
248: \begin{eqnarray}
249: \label{lagrangian3} -\mathcal{L}&\supset&
250: y_{ij}^{}\overline{\psi_{Li}^{}}\eta
251: N_{j}^{}+\frac{1}{2}f_{ij}^{}\overline{\psi_{Li}^{c}}i\tau_{2}^{}\Delta_{L}^{}\psi_{Lj}^{}+\mu\phi^{T}_{}i\tau_{2}^{}\Delta_{L}^{}\phi\nonumber\\
252: &+&\tilde{\mu}\eta^{T}_{}i\tau_{2}^{}\Delta_{L}^{}\eta+\kappa\sigma\eta^{T}_{}i\tau_{2}^{}\Delta_{L}^{}\eta+\textrm{h.c.}\nonumber\\
253: &+&\frac{1}{2}g_{i}^{}\sigma\overline{N_{i}^{}}N_{i}^{}+\frac{1}{2}M_{i}^{}\overline{N_{i}^{}}N_{i}^{}+M^{2}_{\Delta}\textrm{Tr}\left(\Delta_{L}^{\dagger}\Delta_{L}^{}\right)
254: \end{eqnarray}
255: with
256: \begin{eqnarray}
257: N_{i}^{}\equiv\nu_{Ri}^{}+\nu_{Ri}^{c}
258: \end{eqnarray}
259: being the heavy Majorana neutrinos.
260:
261:
262: After the electroweak symmetry breaking, we denote the different
263: VEVs as $\langle
264: \phi\rangle \equiv \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}v$, $\langle \eta\rangle \equiv
265: \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}v'$, $\langle \Delta_{L}^{}\rangle \equiv
266: \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}v_{L}^{}$ and $\langle \chi\rangle \equiv u'$ and
267: then analyze the potential as a function of these VEVs,
268: \begin{eqnarray}
269: \label{potential2}
270: &&V(u',v,v',v_{L}^{})\nonumber\\
271: &=&\frac{1}{2}\mu_{1}^{2}u'^{2}_{}+\frac{1}{4}\lambda_{1}^{}u'^{4}_{}+\frac{1}{2}\mu_{2}^{2}v^{2}_{}+\frac{1}{4}\lambda_{2}^{}v^{4}_{}\nonumber\\
272: &+&\frac{1}{2}\mu_{3}^{2}v'^{2}_{}+\frac{1}{4}\lambda_{3}^{}v'^{2}_{}+\frac{1}{2}M^{2}_{\Delta}v_{L}^{2}+\frac{1}{4}(\lambda_{4}^{}+\lambda_{5}^{})v_{L}^{4}\nonumber\\
273: &+&\frac{1}{2}\alpha_{1}^{}u'^{2}_{}v^{2}_{}+\frac{1}{2}\alpha_{2}^{}u'^{2}_{}v'^{2}_{}+\frac{1}{2}\alpha_{3}^{}u'^{2}_{}v_{L}^{2}\nonumber\\
274: &+&\frac{1}{2}\left(\beta_{1}^{}+\beta_{2}^{}\right)v^{2}_{}v'^{2}_{}+\frac{1}{2}\left(\beta_{3}^{}+\beta_{4}^{}\right)v^{2}_{}v^{2}_{L}\nonumber\\
275: &+&\frac{1}{2}\left(\beta_{5}^{}+\beta_{6}^{}\right)v'^{2}_{}v^{2}_{L}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\mu
276: v^{2}_{}v^{}_{L}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\tilde{\mu}'v'^{2}_{}v_{L}^{}
277: \end{eqnarray}
278: with $\tilde{\mu}'\equiv\kappa u'$. Using the extremum conditions,
279: $0=\partial V /\partial u' =
280: \partial V/\partial v =\partial V/ \partial v' =\partial V /\partial
281: v_{L}^{}$, we obtain,
282: \begin{eqnarray}
283: \label{potential3}
284: 0&=&\lambda_{1}^{}u'^{3}_{}+\mu_{1}^{2}u'+\alpha_{1}^{}
285: v^{2}_{}u'+\alpha_{2}^{} v'^{2}_{}u'+\alpha_{3}^{}
286: v_{L}^{2}u'\nonumber\\
287: &+&\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\kappa v'^{2}_{}v_{L}^{}\,,\\
288: 0&=&\mu_{2}^{2}+\alpha_{1}^{}
289: u'^{2}_{}+\left(\beta_{1}^{}+\beta_{2}^{}\right)
290: v'^{2}_{}+\left(\beta_{3}^{}+\beta_{4}^{}\right)v_{L}^{2}\nonumber\\
291: &+&2\sqrt{2}\mu
292: v_{L}^{}+\lambda_{2}^{}v^{2}_{}\,,\\
293: 0&=&\mu_{3}^{2}+\alpha_{2}^{}
294: u'^{2}_{}+\left(\beta_{1}^{}+\beta_{2}^{}\right)
295: v^{2}_{}+\left(\beta_{5}^{}+\beta_{6}^{}\right)v_{L}^{2}\nonumber\\
296: &+&2\sqrt{2}\tilde{\mu}'v_{L}^{}+\lambda_{3}^{}v'^{2}_{}\,,\\
297: 0&=& \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\mu v^{2}_{}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\tilde{\mu}'
298: v'^{2}_{}+\left[
299: M_{\Delta}^{2}+\alpha_{3}u'^{2}_{}+\left(\beta_{3}^{}+\beta_{4}^{}\right)v^{2}_{}\right.\nonumber\\
300: &+&\left.\left(\beta_{5}^{}+\beta_{6}^{}\right)v'^{2}_{}\right]v^{}_{L}+\left(\lambda_{4}^{}+\lambda_{5}^{}\right)v_{L}^{3}\,.
301: \end{eqnarray}
302: For
303: \begin{eqnarray}
304: &&\left\{
305: \begin{array}{l}
306: \lambda_{3}^{}>0\,,\vspace*{2mm} \\
307: \mu_{3}^{2}+\alpha_{2}^{}
308: u'^{2}_{}+\left(\beta_{1}^{}+\beta_{2}^{}\right)
309: v^{2}_{}+\left(\beta_{5}^{}+\beta_{6}^{}\right)v_{L}^{2}\\
310: +2\sqrt{2}\tilde{\mu}'v_{L}^{}>0\,,
311: \end{array} \right.
312: \end{eqnarray}
313: the new Higgs doublet $\eta$ gets a zero VEV, i.e., $v'=0$. We
314: assume $\mu<M_{\Delta}^{}$ and $v^{2}_{}\ll
315: M_{\Delta}^{2},\,u'^{2}_{}$, and then deduce
316: \begin{eqnarray}
317: \label{vev2} v_{L}^{}&\simeq& \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{\mu
318: v^{2}_{}}{M_{\Delta}^{2}+\alpha_{3}u'^{2}_{}+\left(\beta_{3}^{}+\beta_{4}^{}\right)v^{2}_{}}\nonumber\\
319: &\simeq& \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{\mu
320: v^{2}_{}}{M_{\Delta}^{2}+\alpha_{3}u'^{2}_{}}\nonumber\\
321: &\simeq&\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{\mu v^{2}_{}}{M_{\Delta}^{2}}\quad
322: \textrm{for} \quad M_{\Delta}^{2}\gg \alpha_{3}u'^{2}_{}\,.
323: \end{eqnarray}
324: Subsequently, $u'$ and $v$ can be solved,
325: \begin{eqnarray}
326: u'&=&\sqrt{-\frac{\mu_{1}^{2}+\alpha_{1}^{} v^{2}_{}+\alpha_{3}^{}
327: v_{L}^{2}}{\lambda_{1}^{}}}\nonumber\\
328: &\simeq&\sqrt{-\frac{\mu_{1}^{2}+\alpha_{1}^{}
329: v^{2}_{}}{\lambda_{1}^{}}}\,,\\
330: v&=&\sqrt{-\frac{\mu_{2}^{2}+\alpha_{1}^{}
331: u^{'2}_{}+\left(\beta_{3}^{}+\beta_{4}^{}\right)v_{L}^{2}+2\sqrt{2}\mu
332: v_{L}^{}}{\lambda_{2}^{}}}\nonumber\\
333: &\simeq&\sqrt{-\frac{\mu_{2}^{2}+\alpha_{1}^{}
334: u^{'2}_{}}{\lambda_{2}^{}}}\,,
335: \end{eqnarray}
336: for
337: \begin{eqnarray}
338: &&\left\{
339: \begin{array}{l}
340: \lambda_{1}^{}>0\,,\\
341: \mu_{1}^{2}+\alpha_{1}^{} v^{2}_{}+\alpha_{3}^{} v_{L}^{2}<0\,,
342: \end{array} \right.\\
343: \nonumber\\
344: &&\left\{
345: \begin{array}{l}
346: \lambda_{2}^{}>0\,,\\
347: \mu_{2}^{2}+\alpha_{1}^{}
348: u^{'2}_{}+\left(\beta_{3}^{}+\beta_{4}^{}\right)v_{L}^{2}+2\sqrt{2}\mu
349: v_{L}^{}<0\,,
350: \end{array} \right.
351: \end{eqnarray}
352:
353:
354:
355: We then obtain the masses of resulting physical scalar bosons after
356: the electroweak symmetry breaking,
357: \begin{eqnarray}
358: M^{2}_{\delta^{++}_{}}&\simeq&M^{2}_{\Delta}+\alpha_{3}^{}u'^{2}_{}+\left(\beta_{3}^{}+\beta_{4}^{}\right)v^{2}_{}\,,\\
359: M^{2}_{\delta^{+}_{}}&\simeq&M^{2}_{\Delta}+\alpha_{3}^{}u'^{2}_{}+\left(\beta_{3}^{}+\frac{1}{2}\beta_{4}^{}\right)v^{2}_{}\,,\\
360: M^{2}_{\delta^{0}_{}}&\simeq&M^{2}_{\Delta}+\alpha_{3}^{}u'^{2}_{}+\beta_{3}^{}v\,,\\
361: m^{2}_{\eta_{}^{\pm}}&\simeq&\mu_{3}^{2}+\alpha_{2}^{}u'^{2}_{}+\beta_{1}^{}v^{2}_{}\,,\\
362: m^{2}_{\eta_{R}^{0}}&\simeq&\overline{m}_{\eta^{}_{}}^{2}+\delta{m}_{\eta^{}_{}}^{2}\,,\\
363: m^{2}_{\eta_{I}^{0}}&\simeq&\overline{m}_{\eta^{}_{}}^{2}-\delta{m}_{\eta^{}_{}}^{2}\,,\\
364: \label{massh1}
365: m^{2}_{h_{1}^{}}&\simeq& \overline{m}^{2}_{h}-\delta m^{2}_{h}\,,\\
366: \label{massh2} m^{2}_{h_{2}^{}}&\simeq& \overline{m}^{2}_{h}+\delta
367: m^{2}_{h}\,,
368: \end{eqnarray}
369: with
370: \begin{eqnarray}
371: \label{masseta1} \overline{m}_{\eta^{}_{}}^{2}&\equiv&
372: \mu_{3}^{2}+\alpha_{2}^{}u'^{2}_{}+\left(\beta_{1}^{}+\beta_{2}^{}\right)v^{2}_{}\,,\\
373: \label{masseta2} \delta{m}_{\eta^{}_{}}^{2}&\equiv&
374: \frac{\tilde{\mu}'\mu}{M_{\Delta}^{2}+\alpha_{3}^{}u'^{2}_{}}v^{2}_{}\simeq \frac{\tilde{\mu}'\mu}{M_{\Delta}^{2}}v^{2}_{}\,,\\
375: \overline{m}^{2}_{h}&\equiv&\lambda_{1}^{}u'^{2}_{}+\lambda_{2}^{}v^{2}_{}\,,\\
376: \delta
377: m^{2}_{h}&\equiv&\left[\left(\lambda_{1}^{}u'^{2}_{}-\lambda_{2}^{}v^{2}_{}\right)^{2}_{}
378: +4\alpha_{1}^{2}u'^{2}_{}v^{2}_{}\right]^{\frac{1}{2}}_{}\,.
379: \end{eqnarray}
380: Here $\eta^{+}_{}$ and $\eta_{R,I}^{0}$ are defined by
381: \begin{eqnarray}
382: \eta^{+}_{}&\equiv&\left(\eta^{-}_{}\right)^{\ast}_{}\,,\\
383: \eta^{0}_{}&\equiv&\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\eta^{0}_{R}+i\eta^{0}_{I}\right)\,.
384: \end{eqnarray}
385: In addition, the mass eigenstates $h_{1,2}^{}$ are the linear
386: combinations of $h$ and $\sigma'$, i.e.,
387: \begin{eqnarray}
388: h_{1}^{}&\equiv& \sigma'\sin\vartheta+h\cos\vartheta\,,\\
389: h_{2}^{}&\equiv& \sigma'\cos\vartheta-h\sin\vartheta\,,
390: \end{eqnarray}
391: where $h$, $\sigma'$ are defined by
392: \begin{eqnarray}
393: \phi&\equiv&\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left\lgroup
394: \begin{array}{c}
395: v +h\\
396: 0\end{array} \right\rgroup\,,\quad \chi \equiv u'+\sigma'\,,
397: \end{eqnarray}
398: and the mixing angle is given by
399: \begin{eqnarray}
400: \label{angle} \tan 2\vartheta
401: \simeq\frac{2\alpha_{1}^{}u'v}{\lambda_{2}^{}v^{2}_{}-\lambda_{1}^{}u'^{2}_{}}\,.
402: \end{eqnarray}
403:
404:
405:
406: \textit{Neutrino masses}: The first diagram of Fig.
407: \ref{massgeneration} shows the type-II seesaw approach to the
408: generation of the neutrino masses. It is reasonable to take the
409: scalar cubic coupling $\mu$ less than the triplet mass
410: $M_{\Delta}^{}$ in (\ref{vev2}). In consequence, the triplet VEV in
411: (\ref{vev2}) is seesaw-suppressed by the ratio of the electroweak
412: scale $v$ over the heavy mass $M_{\Delta}^{}$. Substantially, the
413: neutrinos naturally obtain the small Majorana masses,
414: \begin{eqnarray}
415: \label{mass2} (m_{\nu}^{II})_{ij}^{}\equiv
416: \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}f_{ij}^{}v_{L}^{}\simeq -f_{ij}^{}\frac{\mu
417: v^{2}_{}}{ 2M^{2}_{\Delta}}\,.
418: \end{eqnarray}
419:
420:
421: \begin{figure}
422: \vspace{3cm} \epsfig{file=massgeneration, bbllx=4cm, bblly=6.0cm,
423: bburx=14cm, bbury=16cm, width=6cm, height=6cm, angle=0, clip=0}
424: \vspace{-6cm} \caption{\label{massgeneration} The neutrino
425: mass-generation. (a) is the type-II seesaw. (b) is the radiative
426: contribution.}
427: \end{figure}
428:
429:
430:
431: For the zero VEV of new Higgs doublet $\eta$, we can not realize the
432: neutrino masses via the type-I seesaw. However, similar to
433: \cite{ma2006}, it is possible to generate the radiative neutrino
434: masses at one-loop order due to the trilinear scalar interactions in
435: (\ref{lagrangian3}). As shown in the second diagram of Fig.
436: \ref{massgeneration}, the one-loop process will induce a
437: contribution to the neutrino masses,
438: \begin{eqnarray}
439: \label{mass1}
440: (\widetilde{m}_{\nu}^{I})_{ij}^{}&=&\frac{1}{16\pi^{2}_{}}\sum_{k}^{}y_{ik}^{}y_{jk}^{}M'^{}_{k}\left[\frac{m_{\eta_{R}^{0}}^{2}}{m_{\eta_{R}^{0}}^{2}-M'^{2}_{k}}\ln\left(\frac{m_{\eta_{R}^{0}}^{2}}{M'^{2}_{k}}\right)\right.\nonumber\\
441: &-&\left.\frac{m_{\eta_{I}^{0}}^{2}}{m_{\eta_{I}^{0}}^{2}-M'^{2}_{k}}\ln\left(\frac{m_{\eta_{I}^{0}}^{2}}{M'^{2}_{k}}\right)\right]\,.
442: \end{eqnarray}
443: Here $M'^{}_{k}\equiv \frac{u'}{u}M^{}_{k}$. For $|\mu_{1}^{2}|\gg
444: |\alpha_{1}|v^{2}_{}$, we have $u'\simeq u$ and then
445: $M'^{}_{k}\simeq M^{}_{k}$, so the above formula can be simplified
446: as
447: \begin{eqnarray}
448: \label{mass11}
449: (\widetilde{m}_{\nu}^{I})_{ij}^{}&\simeq&\frac{1}{16\pi^{2}_{}}\sum_{k}^{}y_{ik}^{}y_{jk}^{}\frac{1}{M_{k}^{}}\nonumber\\
450: &\times&\left[m_{\eta_{R}^{0}}^{2}\ln\left(\frac{M_{k}^{2}}{m_{\eta_{R}^{0}}^{2}}\right)\right.-\left.m_{\eta_{I}^{0}}^{2}\ln\left(\frac{M_{k}^{2}}{m_{\eta_{I}^{0}}^{2}}\right)\right]\,.
451: \end{eqnarray}
452: by taking $m_{\eta^{0}_{R,I}}^{2} \ll M_{k}^{2}$. Moreover, from
453: (\ref{masseta1}) and (\ref{masseta2}), if $|\tilde{\mu}'\mu|\ll
454: M_{\Delta}^{2}$, we have $\delta m_{\eta^{}_{}}^{2} \ll
455: \overline{m}_{\eta^{}_{}}^{2}$ and then obtain
456: \begin{eqnarray}
457: \label{mass12}
458: (\widetilde{m}_{\nu}^{I})_{ij}^{}&\simeq&-\frac{1}{8\pi^{2}_{}}\sum_{k}^{}y_{ik}^{}y_{jk}^{}\frac{\delta
459: m_{\eta^{}_{}}^{2}}{M_{k}^{}}\left[1-\ln\left(\frac{M_{k}^{2}}{\overline{m}_{\eta^{}_{}}^{2}}\right)\right]\nonumber\\
460: &=&-\xi\sum_{k}^{}y_{ik}^{}y_{jk}^{}\frac{v^{2}_{}}{2M_{k}^{}}
461: \end{eqnarray}
462: for
463: \begin{eqnarray}
464: \label{xi} \xi&=&\mathcal{O}\left(\frac{1}{4\pi^{2}_{}}\frac{\delta
465: m_{\eta^{}_{}}^{2}}{v^{2}_{}}\left[1-\ln\left(\frac{M_{k}^{2}}{\overline{m}_{\eta^{}_{}}^{2}}\right)\right]\right)
466: \nonumber\\
467: &=&\mathcal{O}\left(\frac{1}{4\pi^{2}_{}}\frac{\tilde{\mu}'\mu}{M^{2}_{\Delta}}\left[1-\ln\left(\frac{M_{k}^{2}}{\overline{m}_{\eta^{}_{}}^{2}}\right)\right]\right)\,.
468: \end{eqnarray}
469: Note that the above loop-contribution will be absent once the values
470: of $\kappa$ and then $\tilde{\mu}'$ are taken to be zero.
471:
472:
473:
474:
475: \textit{Baryon asymmetry}: We now demonstrate how the observed
476: baryon asymmetry is generated in this model.
477: In the Lagrangian (\ref{lagrangian3}),
478: the lepton number of the left-handed lepton doublets and the Higgs
479: triplet are $1$ and $-2$, respectively, while those of the heavy
480: Majorana neutrinos, the Higgs doublets and the real scalar are all
481: zero. There are two sources of lepton number violation, one is the
482: trilinear interaction between the Higgs triplet and the Higgs
483: doublets, the other is the Yukawa couplings of the heavy Majorana
484: neutrinos to the left-handed lepton doublet and the new Higgs
485: doublet. Therefore, both the Higgs triplet and the heavy Majorana
486: neutrinos could decay to produce the lepton asymmetry if their
487: decays are CP-violation and out-of-equilibrium\footnote{Note that there
488: is an equivalent choice of lepton number:
489: $L=1$ for $\eta$ and $L=0$ for $\nu_R$, which makes only the $\mu \phi^T
490: i \tau_2 \Delta_L \phi$ term to be lepton number violating. So,
491: the CP asymmetry in the decays of $N_i$ and $\Delta_L$ can only
492: create an asymmetry in the numbers of $\psi_L$ and an equal and opposite
493: amount of asymmetry in the numbers of $\eta$. Thus there is no
494: net lepton number asymmetry
495: at this stage. However, since only the left-handed fields take part
496: in the sphaleron transitions, only the $\psi_L$ asymmetry
497: gets converted to a $B-L$ asymmetry before the electroweak phase
498: transition. After the electroweak phase transition, we are thus
499: left with a baryon asymmetry equivalent to the $B-L$ asymmetry
500: generated from the $\psi_L$ asymmetry and an equivalent amount
501: of $\eta$ asymmetry or lepton number asymmetry, which does not affect
502: the baryon asymmetry of the universe. In the rest of the article
503: we shall not discuss this possibility, since the final amount of
504: baryon asymmetry comes out to be the same.}.
505:
506:
507: We can obtain the CP asymmetry in the decay of $N_{i}^{}$ through
508: the interference between the tree-level process and three one-loop
509: diagrams of Fig. \ref{decay2}, in which the first two one-loop
510: diagrams are the ordinary self-energy and vertex correction
511: involving another heavy Majorana neutrinos, while the third one-loop
512: diagram is mediated by the Higgs triplet \cite{odo1994}.
513: So it is convenient to
514: divide the total CP asymmetry into two independent parts,
515: \begin{eqnarray}
516: \label{CP2}
517: \varepsilon_{i}^{}&\equiv&\frac{\sum_{j}^{}\left[\Gamma\left(N_{i}^{}\rightarrow
518: \psi_{Lj}^{}\eta^{\ast}_{}\right)-\Gamma\left(N_{i}^{}\rightarrow
519: \psi_{Lj}^{c}\eta\right)\right]}{\Gamma_{i}}\nonumber\\
520: &=&\varepsilon_{i}^{N}+\varepsilon_{i}^{\Delta}\,,
521: \end{eqnarray}
522: where
523: \begin{eqnarray}
524: \label{decaywidth2}
525: \Gamma_{i}^{}&\equiv&\sum_{j}^{}\left[\Gamma\left(N_{i}^{}\rightarrow
526: \psi_{Lj}^{}\eta^{\ast}_{}\right)+\Gamma\left(N_{i}^{}\rightarrow
527: \psi_{Lj}^{c}\eta\right)\right]\nonumber\\
528: &=&\frac{1}{8\pi}\left(y^{\dagger}_{}y\right)_{ii}^{}M_{i}^{}
529: \end{eqnarray}
530: is the total decay width of $N_{i}^{}$, while
531: \begin{eqnarray}
532: \label{CP3}
533: \varepsilon_{i}^{N}&=&\frac{1}{8\pi}\frac{1}{\left(y^{\dagger}_{}
534: y\right)_{ii}}\sum_{k\neq i}^{}\textrm{Im}\left[\left(y^{\dagger}_{}
535: y\right)^{2}_{ik}\right]\nonumber\\
536: &\times&\sqrt{\frac{a_{k}^{}}{a_{i}^{}}}\left[1-\left(1+\frac{a_{k}^{}}{a_{i}^{}}\right)\ln\left(1+\frac{a_{i}^{}}{a_{k}^{}}\right)\right.\nonumber\\
537: &+&\left.\frac{a_{i}^{}}{a_{i}^{}-a_{k}^{}} \right]\,,\\
538: \label{CP4} \varepsilon_{i}^{\Delta}&=&\frac{3}{2
539: \pi}\frac{1}{\left(y^{\dagger}_{}y\right)_{ii}}\sum_{jm}^{}
540: \textrm{Im}\left( f^{\dagger}_{jm}
541: y^{\dagger}_{ij}y^{\dagger}_{im}\right)\frac{\tilde{\mu}}{M_{i}^{}}\nonumber\\
542: &\times&\left[1-\frac{a_{\Delta}^{}}{a_{i}^{}}\ln\left(1+\frac{a_{i}^{}}{a_{\Delta}^{}}\right)\right]
543: \end{eqnarray}
544: are the contributions of the first two one-loop diagrams and the
545: third one, respectively. Here the definitions
546: \begin{eqnarray}
547: a_{i}^{}\equiv \frac{M_{i}^{2}}{M_{1}^{2}}\,,\quad
548: a_{\Delta}^{}\equiv \frac{M_{\Delta}^{2}}{M_{1}^{2}}
549: \end{eqnarray}
550: have been adopted.
551:
552:
553: Furthermore, as shown in Fig. \ref{decay1}, in the decay of
554: $\Delta_{L}^{}$, the tree-level diagram interferes with the one-loop
555: correction to generate the CP asymmetry,
556: \begin{eqnarray}
557: \label{cpv1} \varepsilon_{\Delta}^{}&\equiv&
558: 2\frac{\sum_{ij}^{}\left[\Gamma\left(\Delta_{L}^{\ast}\rightarrow
559: \psi_{Li}^{}\psi_{Lj}^{}\right)-\Gamma\left(\Delta_{L}^{}\rightarrow
560: \psi_{Li}^{c}\psi_{Lj}^{c}\right)\right]}{\Gamma_{\Delta}^{}}\nonumber\\
561: &=&\frac{2}{\pi}\frac{\sum_{ijk}^{}\left(y^{}_{ki}y^{}_{kj}f_{ij}^{}\right)\tilde{\mu}M_{k}^{}
562: \ln\left(1+M_{\Delta}^{2}/M_{k}^{2}\right)}{\textrm{Tr}\left(f^{\dagger}_{}f\right)M_{\Delta}^{2}+4\tilde{\mu}^{2}_{}+4\mu^{2}_{}}
563: \end{eqnarray}
564: with
565: \begin{eqnarray}
566: \label{decaywidth1} \Gamma_{\Delta}^{}
567: &\equiv&\sum_{ij}^{}\Gamma\left(\Delta_{L}^{}\rightarrow
568: \psi_{Li}^{c}\psi_{Lj}^{c}\right)\nonumber\\
569: &+&\Gamma\left(\Delta_{L}^{}\rightarrow
570: \eta\eta\right)+\Gamma\left(\Delta_{L}^{}\rightarrow
571: \phi\phi\right)\nonumber\\
572: &\equiv&\sum_{ij}^{}\Gamma\left(\Delta_{L}^{\ast}\rightarrow
573: \psi_{Li}^{}\psi_{Lj}^{}\right)\nonumber\\
574: &+&\Gamma\left(\Delta_{L}^{\ast}\rightarrow
575: \eta_{}^{\ast}\eta_{}^{\ast}\right)+\Gamma\left(\Delta_{L}^{\ast}\rightarrow
576: \phi_{}^{\ast}\phi_{}^{\ast}\right)\nonumber\\
577: &=&\frac{1}{8\pi}\left[\frac{1}{4}\textrm{Tr}\left(f^{\dagger}_{}f\right)+\frac{\tilde{\mu}^{2}_{}+\mu^{2}_{}}{M_{\Delta}^{2}}\right]M_{\Delta}^{}
578: \end{eqnarray}
579: being the total decay width of $\Delta_{L}^{}$ or
580: $\Delta_{L}^{\ast}$.
581:
582:
583:
584:
585:
586: Note that we have not considered the cases where $\sigma$ directly
587: decay to produce the leptons and anti-leptons through the imaginary
588: $N_{i}^{}$ or $\Delta_{L}^{}$ if $m_{\sigma}^{}>2M_{i}^{}$,
589: $M_{\Delta}^{}+2m_{\eta}^{}$ with $m_{\sigma}^{}$ and $m_{\eta}^{}$
590: being the masses of $\sigma$ and $\eta$, respectively. For
591: simplicity, here we will not discuss these cases.
592:
593:
594:
595: \begin{figure}
596: \vspace{6.1cm} \epsfig{file=decay1, bbllx=4cm, bblly=6.0cm,
597: bburx=14cm, bbury=16cm, width=6cm, height=6cm, angle=0, clip=0}
598: \vspace{-3cm} \caption{\label{decay1} The heavy Majorana neutrinos
599: decay at one-loop order. }
600: \end{figure}
601:
602: \begin{figure}
603: \vspace{6.1cm} \epsfig{file=decay2, bbllx=4cm, bblly=6.0cm,
604: bburx=14cm, bbury=16cm, width=6cm, height=6cm, angle=0, clip=0}
605: \vspace{-7cm} \caption{\label{decay2} The Higgs triplets decay to
606: the leptons at one-loop order.}
607: \end{figure}
608:
609:
610: It is straightforward to see that $\varepsilon_{\Delta}^{}$ and
611: $\varepsilon^{\Delta}_{i}$ will both be zero for $\kappa =0$ and
612: then $\tilde{\mu}=0$. In the following, to illustrate how to realize
613: non-resonant TeV leptogenesis, we first focus on the simple case
614: where $\varepsilon^{N}_{i}$ is the unique source of the CP
615: asymmetry. Note that $\tilde{\mu}'=0$ for $\kappa =0$, accordingly,
616: the one-loop diagram of Fig. \ref{massgeneration} is absent and
617: $N_{i}^{}$ have no possibility for the neutrino masses, we thus
618: obtain
619: \begin{eqnarray}
620: \label{CP5}
621: \varepsilon_{1}^{N}&\simeq&-\frac{3}{16\pi}\sum_{k=2,3}^{}\frac{\textrm{Im}\left[\left(y^{\dagger}_{}
622: y\right)^{2}_{1k}\right]}{\left(y^{\dagger}_{}
623: y\right)_{11}}\frac{M_{1}^{}}{M_{k}^{}}\nonumber\\
624: &\lesssim &-\frac{3}{16\pi}\left(\frac{M_{1}^{}}{M_{2}^{}}+\frac{M_{1}^{}}{M_{3}^{}}\right)\sin\delta\\
625: \end{eqnarray}
626: with $\delta$ being the CP phase. Here we have assumed $N_{1}^{}$ to be
627: the lightest heavy Majorana neutrinos, i.e., $M_{1}^{2}\ll
628: M_{2,3}^{2},\,M_{\Delta}^{2}$. The final baryon asymmetry can be
629: given by approximate relation \cite{kt1980}
630: \begin{eqnarray}
631: \label{asymmetry} Y_{B}^{}\equiv\frac{n_{B}^{}}{s}\simeq
632: -\frac{28}{79}\times\left\{
633: \begin{array}{ll} \frac{\varepsilon_{1}^{}}{g_{\ast}^{}}\,,
634: &(\textrm{for}~K \ll
635: 1)\,,\\
636: \frac{0.3\,\varepsilon_{1}^{}}{g_{\ast}^{}K\left(\ln
637: K\right)^{0.6}_{}}\,, &(\textrm{for}~K \gg 1)\,,
638: \end{array} \right.
639: \end{eqnarray}
640: where the factor $28/79$ is the value of $B/(B-L)$ and the parameter
641: $K$ is a measure of the departure from equilibrium and is defined by
642: \begin{eqnarray}
643: \label{parameter}
644: K&\equiv&\left.\frac{\Gamma_{1}^{}}{H(T)}\right|_{T=M_{1}^{}}=\left(y^{\dagger}_{}y\right)_{11}^{}\left(\frac{45}{2^{6}_{}\pi^{5}_{}g_{\ast}^{}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}_{}\frac{M_{\textrm{Pl}}^{}}{M_{1}^{}}\,.
645: \end{eqnarray}
646: Here
647: $H(T)=(4\pi^{3}_{}g_{\ast}^{}/45)^{\frac{1}{2}}T^{2}_{}/M_{\textrm{Pl}}^{}$
648: is the Hubble constant with the Planck mass $M_{\textrm{Pl}}^{}\sim
649: 10^{19}_{}\,\textrm{GeV}$ and the relativistic degrees of freedom
650: $g_{\ast}^{}\sim 100$. For example, inspecting $M_{\Delta}^{}= 10\,
651: \textrm{TeV}$, $|\mu|=1\,\textrm{GeV}$ and $f\sim 10^{-6}_{}$ to
652: (\ref{mass1}), we obtain
653: $m_{\nu}^{}\sim\mathcal{O}(0.1\,\textrm{eV})$ which is consistent
654: with the neutrino oscillation experiments. Furthermore, let
655: $M_{1}=0.1\,M_{2,3}^{}=1\,\textrm{TeV}$, $y \sim 10^{-6}_{}$ and
656: $\sin\delta=10^{-3}_{}$, we drive the sample predictions: $K\simeq
657: 48$ and $\varepsilon_{1}^{} \simeq - 1.2\times 10^{-5}_{}$. In
658: consequence,we arrive at $n_{B}^{}/s\simeq 10^{-10}$ as desired.
659:
660:
661: For $\kappa \neq 0$ and then $\tilde{\mu}', \tilde{\mu}\neq 0$,
662: $\Delta_{L}^{}$ and $N_{i}^{}$ will both contribute to the neutrino
663: masses and the lepton asymmetry. In the limit of $M_{\Delta}^{}\ll
664: M_{i}^{}$, the final lepton asymmetry is expected to mostly produce
665: by the decay of $\Delta_{L}^{}$. However, because the electroweak
666: gauge scattering should be out of thermal equilibrium, it is
667: difficult for a successful leptogenesis to lower the mass of
668: $\Delta_{L}^{}$ at TeV scale. Let us consider another possibility
669: that $N_{i}^{}$ are much lighter than $\Delta_{L}^{}$. In this case,
670: leptogenesis will be dominated by the decay of $N_{i}^{}$. For $
671: M_{1}^{2}\ll M_{2,3}^{2}\,,\,M_{\Delta}^{2}$ and
672: $|\tilde{\mu}'\mu|\ll M_{\Delta}^{2}$, $\varepsilon_{1}^{N}$ and
673: $\varepsilon_{1}^{\Delta}$ can be simplified as \cite{di2002}
674: \begin{eqnarray}
675: \label{CP5}
676: \varepsilon_{1}^{N}&\simeq&-\frac{3}{16\pi}\sum_{k=2,3}^{}\frac{\textrm{Im}\left[\left(y^{\dagger}_{}
677: y\right)^{2}_{1k}\right]}{\left(y^{\dagger}_{}
678: y\right)_{11}}\frac{M_{1}^{}}{M_{k}^{}}\nonumber\\
679: &\simeq& -\frac{3}{8 \pi}\frac{M_{1}^{}}{v^{2}_{}}\sum_{jk}^{}\frac{
680: \textrm{Im}\left[ (\widetilde{m}_{\nu}^{I\ast})_{jk}^{}
681: y^{\dagger}_{1j}y^{\dagger}_{1k}\right]}{\left(y^{\dagger}_{}y\right)_{11}}\frac{1}{\xi}\nonumber\\
682: &\simeq &-\frac{3}{8
683: \pi}\frac{M_{1}^{}\widetilde{m}_{\textrm{max}}^{I}}{v^{2}_{}}\frac{1}{\xi}\sin\delta'\,,\\
684: \label{CP6} \varepsilon_{1}^{\Delta}&\simeq&-\frac{3}{8
685: \pi}\frac{M_{1}^{}}{v^{2}_{}}\frac{\tilde{\mu}}{\mu}\sum_{jk}^{}\frac{
686: \textrm{Im}\left[ (m_{\nu}^{II\ast})_{jk}^{}
687: y^{\dagger}_{1j}y^{\dagger}_{1k}\right]}{\left(y^{\dagger}_{}y\right)_{11}}\nonumber\\
688: &\simeq &-\frac{3}{8
689: \pi}\frac{M_{1}^{}m_{\textrm{max}}^{II}}{v^{2}_{}}\left|\frac{\tilde{\mu}}{\mu}\right|\sin\delta''\,,
690: \end{eqnarray}
691: where $\delta'$ and $\delta''$ are CP phases,
692: $m_{\textrm{max}}^{II}$ and $\widetilde{m}_{\textrm{max}}^{I}$ are
693: the maximal eigenstates of the neutrino mass matrixes (\ref{mass2})
694: and (\ref{mass12}), respectively. Inputting $y\sim 10^{-7}_{}$,
695: $M_{1}=1\,\textrm{TeV}$ and $M_{2,3}^{}=10\,\textrm{TeV}$, we obtain
696: $\widetilde{m}_{\textrm{max}}^{I}=\mathcal{O}(10^{-3}_{}\,\textrm{eV})$.
697: Similarly, $m_{\textrm{max}}^{II}=\mathcal{O}(0.1\,\textrm{eV})$ for
698: $M_{\Delta}^{}=10\,\textrm{TeV}$, $|\mu|=1\,\textrm{GeV}$ and $f\sim
699: 10^{-6}_{}$. Under this setup, we deduce $\xi\simeq 10^{-3}$ by
700: substituting $\overline{m}_{\eta}^{}=70\,\textrm{GeV}$,
701: $|\tilde{\mu}'|=10^{3}_{}\,\textrm{TeV}$ into (\ref{xi}) and then
702: have $\varepsilon_{1}^{N}\simeq -2\times 10^{-12}$ with the maximum
703: CP phase. We also acquire $\varepsilon_{1}^{\Delta}\simeq -3\times
704: 10^{-8}$ for $|\tilde{\mu}|\simeq |\tilde{\mu}'|$ and
705: $\sin\delta''=0.15$. We thus drive the sample predictions: $K\simeq
706: 0.5$ and $\varepsilon_{1}^{} \simeq \varepsilon_{1}^{\Delta}\simeq
707: -3\times 10^{-8}$. In consequence, we arrive at $n_{B}^{}/s\simeq
708: 10^{-10}$ consistent with the cosmological observations.
709:
710:
711:
712: \textit{Dark matter and Higgs phenomenology}: Since the new Higgs
713: doublet can not decay into the standard model particles, the neutral
714: $\eta^{0}_{R}$ and $\eta^{0}_{I}$ can provide the attractive
715: candidates for dark matter \cite{ma06,bhr2006,ma2006}. In particular, to
716: realize dark matter, $\eta^{0}_{R}$ and $\eta^{0}_{I}$ should have
717: the mass spectrum \cite{bhr2006}:
718: \begin{eqnarray}
719: \label{condition1}
720: \Delta m &\simeq &(8-\,\,\,9)\,\textrm{GeV}~~\textrm{for}~~ m_{L}=(60-73)\,\textrm{GeV}\,,\\
721: \label{condition2} \Delta m &\simeq& (9-
722: 12)\,\textrm{GeV}~~\textrm{for}~~ m_{L}=(73- 75)\,\textrm{GeV}\,.
723: \end{eqnarray}
724: Here $\Delta m \equiv m_{NL}^{}-m_{L}^{}$ with $m_{L}^{}$ and
725: $m_{NL}^{}$ being the lightest and the next lightest masses between
726: $\eta^{0}_{R}$ and $\eta^{0}_{I}$. Note
727: \begin{eqnarray}
728: \overline{m}_{\eta}^{}&\equiv&
729: \frac{1}{2}\left(m_{L}^{}+m_{NL}^{}\right)\,, \\
730: |\delta
731: m_{\eta}^{2}|&\equiv&
732: \frac{1}{2}\left(m_{NL}^{2}-m_{L}^{2}\right)\,,
733: \end{eqnarray}
734: we thus deduce,
735: \begin{eqnarray}
736: m_{L}^{}&=&\overline{m}_{\eta}^{}\left(1-\frac{1}{2}\frac{|\delta m_{\eta}^{2}|}{\overline{m}_{\eta}^{2}}\right)\,,\\
737: \Delta m &=&\frac{|\delta m_{\eta}^{2}|}{\overline{m}_{\eta}^{}}\,.
738: \end{eqnarray}
739:
740: In the previous discussions of TeV leptogenesis with $\kappa \neq
741: 0$, we take $M_{\Delta}^{}=10\,\textrm{TeV}$,
742: $|\mu|=1\,\textrm{GeV}$, $|\tilde{\mu}|=10^{3}_{}\,\textrm{TeV}$ and
743: $\overline{m}_{\eta}^{}=70\,\textrm{GeV}$. It is straightforward to
744: see $|\delta m_{\eta}^{}| \simeq 25\, \textrm{GeV}$ from
745: (\ref{masseta2}). Therefore, we obtain $m_{L}\simeq 66\,
746: \textrm{GeV}$ and $\Delta m \simeq 9\,\textrm{GeV}$, which is
747: consistent with the mass spectrum (\ref{condition1}).
748:
749:
750: $\eta^{0}_{R}$ and $\eta^{0}_{I}$ are expected to be produced in
751: pairs by the standard model gauge bosons $W^{\pm}_{}$, $Z$ or
752: $\gamma$ and hence can be verified at the LHC. Once produced,
753: $\eta^{\pm}_{}$ will decay into $\eta_{R,I}^{0}$ and a virtual
754: $W^{\pm}_{}$, which becomes a quark-antiquark or lepton-antilepton
755: pair. For example, if $\eta^{0}_{R}$ is lighter than $\eta^{0}_{I}$,
756: the decay chain
757: \begin{eqnarray}
758: \eta^{+}_{}\rightarrow \eta^{0}_{I}l^{+}_{}\nu \,, \quad
759: \textrm{then} \quad \eta^{0}_{I}\rightarrow
760: \eta^{0}_{R}l^{+}_{}l^{-}_{}
761: \end{eqnarray}
762: has $3$ charged leptons and large missing energy, and can be
763: compared to the direct decay
764: \begin{eqnarray}
765: \eta^{+}_{}\rightarrow \eta^{0}_{R}l^{+}_{}\nu
766: \end{eqnarray}
767: to extract the masses of the respective particles.
768:
769:
770:
771:
772: As for the phenomenology of the Higgs triplet at the LHC as well as
773: the ILC, it has been discussed in \cite{mrs2000}. The same-sign
774: dileptons will be the most dominating modes of the $\delta^{++}_{}$.
775: Complementary measurements of $|f_{ij}^{}|$ at the ILC by the
776: process $e^{+}_{}e^{+}_{}(\mu^{+}_{}\mu^{-}_{})\rightarrow
777: l_{i}^{-}l_{j}^{-}$ would allow us to study the structure of the
778: neutrino mass matrix in detail.
779:
780: For $\langle \chi\rangle=\mathcal{O}(\textrm{TeV})$, which is
781: natural to give the TeV Majorana masses of the right-handed
782: neutrinos and then realize the TeV leptogenesis, the mixing angle
783: $\vartheta$ and the splitting between $h_{1,2}^{}$ may be large.
784: Furthermore, the couplings of $h_{1,2}^{}$ to $W$ and $Z$ bosons,
785: quarks and charged leptons have essentially the same structure as
786: the corresponding Higgs couplings in the standard model, however,
787: their size is reduced by $\cos\vartheta$ and $\sin\vartheta$,
788: respectively. In the extreme case $\vartheta =\frac{\pi}{2}$, the
789: couplings of the lighter physical boson $h_{1}^{}$ to quarks and
790: leptons would even vanish. In other words, this mixing could lead to
791: significant impact on the Higgs searches at the LHC
792: \cite{bgm2006,bgc2006}.
793:
794:
795: \textit{Summary}: We propose a new model to realize leptogenesis and
796: dark matter at the TeV scale. A real scalar is introduced to
797: naturally realize the Majorana masses of the right-handed neutrinos.
798: Furthermore, we also consider a new Higgs doublet to provide the
799: attractive candidates for dark matter. Since the right-handed
800: neutrinos have no responsibility to generate the neutrino masses,
801: which is mostly dominated by the Higgs triplet through the type-II
802: seesaw, they can have large CP asymmetry at a low scale, such as
803: TeV, to produce the observed matter-antimatter asymmetry in the
804: universe, even if their Majorana masses are not highly
805: quasi-degenerate. It should be noticed that all new particles are
806: close to the TeV scale and hence should be observable at the LHC or
807: the ILC.
808:
809:
810:
811:
812: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
813:
814: \bibitem{pdg2006}
815: Particle Data Group, W.M. Yao \textit{et al.}, Journal of Physics G
816: \textbf{33}, 1 (2006).
817:
818:
819: \bibitem{minkowski1977}
820: P. Minkowski, Phys. Lett. B \textbf{67}, 421 (1977); T. Yanagida, in
821: {\it Proc. of the Workshop on Unified Theory and the Baryon Number
822: of the Universe}, ed. O. Sawada and A. Sugamoto (KEK, Tsukuba,
823: 1979), p. 95; M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky, in {\it
824: Supergravity}, ed. F. van Nieuwenhuizen and D. Freedman (North
825: Holland, Amsterdam, 1979), p. 315; S.L. Glashow, in {\it Quarks and
826: Leptons}, ed. M. L$\rm\acute{e}$vy {\it et al.} (Plenum, New York,
827: 1980), p. 707; R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovi$\rm\acute{c}$, Phys.
828: Rev. Lett. \textbf{44}, 912 (1980); J. Schechter and J.W.F. Valle,
829: Phys. Rev. D \textbf{22}, 2227 (1980).
830:
831: \bibitem{mp2002}
832: H. Murayama and A. Pierce, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{89}, 271601
833: (2002); B. Thomas and M. Toharia, Phys. Rev. D \textbf{73}, 063512
834: (2006); B. Thomas and M. Toharia, Phys. Rev. D \textbf{75}, 013013
835: (2007); D.G. Cerdeno, A. Dedes, and T.E.J. Underwood, JHEP
836: \textbf{0609}, 067 (2006); P.H. Gu and H.J. He, JCAP \textbf{0612},
837: 010 (2006).
838:
839:
840: \bibitem{fy1986}
841: M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B \textbf{174}, 45 (1986);
842: P. Langacker, R.D. Peccei, and T. Yanagida, Mod. Phys. Lett. A
843: \textbf{1}, 541 (1986).
844:
845: \bibitem{luty1992}
846: M.A. Luty, Phys. Rev. D \textbf{45}, 455
847: (1992); R.N. Mohapatra and X. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D \textbf{46}, 5331
848: (1992).
849:
850: \bibitem{fps1995}
851: M. Flanz, E.A. Paschos, and U. Sarkar, Phys. Lett. B
852: \textbf{345}, 248 (1995); M. Flanz, E.A. Paschos, U. Sarkar, and J.
853: Weiss, Phys. Lett. B \textbf{389}, 693 (1996).
854:
855: \bibitem{pilaftsis1997}
856: A. Pilaftsis, Phys. Rev. D \textbf{56}, 5431 (1997); A. Pilaftsis
857: and T.E.J. Underwood, Nucl. Phys. B. \textbf{692}, 303 (2004).
858:
859: \bibitem{ms1998}
860: E. Ma and U. Sarkar, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{80}, 5716 (1998).
861:
862:
863:
864: \bibitem{ars1998}
865: E.Kh. Akhmedov, V.A. Rubakov, and A.Yu. Smirnov, Phys. Rev. Lett.
866: \textbf{81}, 1359 (1998); K. Dick, M. Lindner, M. Ratz, and D.
867: Wright, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{84}, 4039 (2000).
868:
869:
870: \bibitem{di2002}
871: S. Davidson and A. Ibarra, Phys. Lett. B \textbf{535}, 25 (2002); W.
872: Buchm$\rm\ddot{u}$ller, P. Di Bari, and M. Pl$\rm\ddot{u}$macher,
873: Nucl. Phys. B \textbf{665}, 445 (2003); Hambye and G.
874: Senjanovi$\rm\acute{c}$, Phys. Lett. B \textbf{582}, 73 (2004); S.
875: Antusch, S.F. King, Phys. Lett. B \textbf{597}, 199 (2004); P. Gu
876: and X.J. Bi, Phys. Rev. D \textbf{70}, 063511 (2004).
877:
878: \bibitem{guo2004}
879: W.L. Guo, Phys. Rev. D \textbf{70}, 053009 (2004); G. D'Ambrosio
880: \textit{et al.}, Phys. Lett. B \textbf{604}, 199 (2004); S. Antusch,
881: S.F. King, JHEP \textbf{0601}, 117 (2006); N. Sahu, U. Sarkar, Phys.
882: Rev. D \textbf{74}, 093002 (2006).
883:
884: \bibitem{bpy2005}
885: W. Buchmuller, R.D. Peccei, and T. Yanagida, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part.
886: Sci. \textbf{55}, 311 (2005).
887:
888:
889:
890:
891: \bibitem{ma06} E. Ma, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 73}, 077301 (2006).
892:
893: \bibitem{bhr2006}
894: R. Barbieri, L.J. Hall, and V.S. Rychkov, Phys. Rev. D \textbf{74},
895: 015007 (2006).
896:
897:
898:
899:
900: \bibitem{ma2006}
901: E. Ma, Mod. Phys. Lett. A \textbf{21}, 1777 (2006).
902:
903:
904: \bibitem{co2006}
905: X. Calmet and J.F. Oliver, Europhys. Lett. \textbf{77}, 51002
906: (2007).
907:
908: \bibitem{ma77} E. Ma, S. Pakvasa, and S.F. Tuan, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 16}, 1568
909: (1977); N.G. Deshpande and E. Ma, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 18}, 2574
910: (1978).
911:
912: \bibitem{hnot2006}
913: L.L. Honorez, E. Nezri, J.F. Oliver, and M.H.G. Tytgat, JCAP
914: \textbf{0702}, 028 (2007); M. Gustafsson, E. Lundstrom, L.
915: Bergstrom, and J. Edsjo, arXiv:astro-ph/0703512.
916:
917: \bibitem{kuzmin1997}
918: V.A. Kuzmin, arXiv:hep-ph/9701269.
919:
920:
921: \bibitem{krs1985}
922: V.A. Kuzmin, V.A. Rubakov, and M.E. Shaposhnikov, Phys. Lett. B
923: \textbf{155}, 36 (1985); R.N. Mohapatra and X. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D
924: \textbf{45}, 2699 (1992).
925:
926: \bibitem{odo1994} P.J. O'Donnell and U. Sarkar, Phys. Rev. D
927: {\bf 49}, 2118 (1994).
928:
929:
930:
931: \bibitem{kt1980}
932: E.W. Kolb and M.S. Turner, \textit{The Early Universe},
933: Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1990; H.B. Nielsen and Y. Takanishi,
934: Phys. Lett. B \textbf{507}, 241 (2001).
935:
936:
937:
938: \bibitem{mrs2000}
939: E. Ma, M. Raidal, and U. Sarkar, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{85}, 3769
940: (2000); Nucl. Phys. B \textbf{615}, 313 (2001).
941:
942:
943: \bibitem{bgm2006}
944: W. Buchm$\rm\ddot{u}$ller, C. Greub, and P. Minkowski, Phys. Lett. B
945: \textbf{267}, 395 (1991).
946:
947:
948: \bibitem{bgc2006}
949: O. Bahat-Treidel, Y. Grossman, and Y.R. Comments,
950: arXiv:hep-ph/0611162; J.R. Espinosa and M. Quir$\rm\acute{o}$s,
951: arXiv:hep-ph/0701145.
952:
953:
954:
955:
956: \end{thebibliography}
957:
958:
959: \end{document}
960: