1: %\newcommand{\hii}{H\,{\sc ii}\rm}
2: %\newcommand{\oiii}{[O\,{\sc iii}]}
3: %\newcommand{\oii}{[O\,{\sc ii}]}
4:
5:
6: \documentclass{emulateapj}
7:
8: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
9: %\usepackage{natbib}
10:
11: %% The command below calls the preprint style
12: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
13: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
14: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
15: %%
16: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
17:
18: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
19:
20: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
21:
22: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
23: %
24: % \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
25:
26: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
27: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
28: %% use the longabstract style option.
29:
30: % \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
31:
32: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
33: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
34: %% the \begin{document} command.
35: %%
36: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
37: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
38: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
39: %% for information.
40: \newcommand{\hii}{H\,{\sc ii}\rm}
41: \newcommand{\oiii}{[O\,{\sc iii}]}
42: \newcommand{\oii}{[O\,{\sc ii}]}
43:
44: %\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
45:
46: \shorttitle{A New Low Surface Brightness Galaxy}
47: \shortauthors{Liang et al.}
48:
49:
50: \begin{document}
51: %
52: \title{SDSS J121811.0+465501.2:~ a new Low Surface Brightness Galaxy with low metallicity}
53:
54: \author {Y. C. Liang\altaffilmark{1}, J. Y. Hu\altaffilmark{1}, F. S. Liu\altaffilmark{1}, Z. T. Liu\altaffilmark{2}}
55:
56:
57: \altaffiltext{1}{National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
58: 20A Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100012, China;
59: emails: ycliang@bao.ac.cn, hjy@bao.ac.cn, lfs@bao.ac.cn}
60: \altaffiltext{2}{School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Beijing
61: Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China; email: liuzht@bjtu.edu.cn}
62:
63: % \date{Received; accepted}
64:
65:
66: \begin{abstract}
67: We serendipitously find a new nearby Low Surface Brightness (LSB)
68: galaxy from SDSS database. We estimate oxygen abundance
69: of its H~{\sc ii} region SDSS J121811.0+465501.2 from electron temperature,
70: as well as for another H~{\sc ii} region, SDSS J135440.5+535309.6,
71: located in irregular LSB galaxy UGC\,8837.
72: These two extragalactic H~{\sc ii} regions were classified
73: as stars in the SDSS-DR4 database, and were found occasionally by us
74: in the automatic recognition and classification on stellar spectra.
75: Their optical spectra show obvious emission lines, i.e.,
76: strong [O~{\sc iii}]$\lambda$$\lambda$4959, 5007,
77: Balmer emission lines,
78: but very weak [N~{\sc ii}]$\lambda$$\lambda$6548,6583
79: and [S~{\sc ii}]$\lambda$$\lambda$6317,6731,
80: which could indicate that they are metal-poor star-forming regions.
81: The derived oxygen abundances of the two objects are
82: 12+log(O/H)$\sim$ 7.88$\pm$0.30 and 7.70$\pm$0.30,
83: respectively.
84: The host of the H~{\sc ii} region SDSS J121811.0+465501.2
85: is identified as a new nearly edge-on LSB disc galaxy (almost without bulge)
86: with the $B$-band central surface brightness $\mu_0(B)$ as 23.68 mag arcsec$^{-2}$
87: and inclination angle as $\sim$75 degree by using
88: the GIM2D software to analyze its $g-$ and $r-$band images independently.
89: It is a nearby dwarf galaxy with redshift $z\sim$0.00157, disk scale-length
90: $\sim$0.40\,kpc and $B$-band absolute magnitude $M_B\sim -$13.51 mag.
91: The very low oxygen abundances of these two objects
92: confirm the low metallicities of LSB galaxies.
93: \end{abstract}
94: \keywords{galaxies: abundances ---
95: galaxies: dwarf ---
96: galaxies: evolution ---
97: galaxies: ISM ---
98: galaxies: irregular
99: galaxies: spiral ---
100: }
101: % \maketitle
102: %
103: %________________________________________________________________
104:
105: %
106: \section{Introduction}
107: %
108:
109: The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS, York et al. 2000)
110: has provided a large set of unique data
111: to study the properties of astrophysics objects, such as
112: galaxies, stars, quasars.
113: Many projects have been done or are ongoing on the basis of
114: this large dataset. For example, about galaxies, besides
115: the large number of typical studies, such as
116: calculating the galaxy luminosity function (Blanton et al. 2001),
117: studying the statistic properties of bright galaxies (Shimasaku et al. 2001),
118: the color separation of galaxy types (Strateva et al. 2001),
119: the mass-metallicity relations and star-formation history
120: of star-forming galaxies (Kauffmann et al. 2003a,b;
121: Brinchmann et al. 2004; Tremonti et al. 2004),
122: the metallicity calibrations of star-forming galaxies (Liang et al. 2006; Yin
123: et al. 2007),
124: the color-magnitude relations of galaxies (Chang et al. 2006a,b) etc.,
125: especially, the SDSS database is also very efficient
126: to search for special interesting objects
127: by taking advantage of the high-quality optical spectra
128: and deep multi-bands photometric images
129: (Wang et al. 2006; Kewley et al. 2007; Zhang et al. 2007).
130:
131: We found two extragalactic H~{\sc ii} regions from
132: the SDSS data release 4 (DR4) database,
133: which were classified as stars in the database. Indeed,
134: one of them, SDSS J121811.0+465501.2, is located in
135: a galaxy which is identified as a new Low Surface Brightness (LSB)
136: galaxy by this study (Sect.\ref{sec5}),
137: and another one,
138: SDSS J135440.5+535309.6, is located in the irregular LSB galaxy UGC\,8837.
139: The reasons they were classified as stars
140: may be that their hosts are very faint with very low luminosities
141: and low surface brightness, and they have very low redshifts.
142: However, their SDSS optical spectra show obvious emission lines, i.e.,
143: strong [O~{\sc iii}]$\lambda$$\lambda$4959, 5007,
144: Balmer emission-lines at low and high levels,
145: but very weak [N~{\sc ii}]$\lambda$$\lambda$6548,6583
146: and [S~{\sc ii}]$\lambda$$\lambda$6317,6731,
147: which show that they could be metal-poor star-forming regions.
148: These two objects must be very interesting to check the metallicities of
149: LSB galaxies by taking advantage of the high quality spectral observations.
150:
151: LSB galaxies are galaxies that emit much less light
152: per area than normal galaxies. Because of their contrast with the night sky they
153: are hard to find, and hence their contribution to the general galaxy population
154: has long been underestimated.
155: They are usually defined as objects with a blue central surface brightness
156: $\mu_0(B)$ significantly fainter than the Freeman value of 21.65 mag arcsec$^{-2}$
157: (Freeman 1970). This threshold value of $\mu_0(B)$
158: varies
159: in the literature from $\geq$23.0 mag arcsec$^{-2}$ (Impey \& Bothun 1997) to
160: $\geq$22.0 mag arcsec$^{-2}$ (Impey, Burkholder \& Sprayberry 2001).
161: McGaugh (1996) tried to quantify this as well.
162: They described as an LSB any
163: disc galaxy with $\mu_0(B)$ $>$ 22.75 mag arcsec$^{-2}$.
164: Further quantitative distinctions were also suggested
165: to avoid the pollution of
166: excessive nomenclature, for example,
167: the intermediate surface brightness (ISB) with
168: $22<$$\mu_0(B)$ $<$ 22.75 between LSB and high surface brightness (HSB),
169: the very low surface brightness (VLSB)
170: with $24.5<$$\mu_0(B)$ $<$ 27 and so on.
171: The detection of LSB galaxies is difficult owing to their intrinsically
172: low global luminosities and their characteristic low surface brightness.
173: A direct probe of the evolutionary state of LSB galaxies is the metal abundance
174: in the interstellar medium (ISM).
175: A low abundance generally indicates only limited enrichment
176: of the ISM and therefore (in a closed system) a small amount of evolution.
177:
178: The high-quality optical spectra from the SDSS permit us to
179: estimate the oxygen and nitrogen abundances from electron temperatures
180: for these two objects.
181: Although the host galaxy of SDSS J121811.0+465501.2 has been caught
182: by the Palomar 48-inch Schmidt survey, and was given
183: as name ``MAPS-NGP O\_171\_0165792" in
184: the Space Telescope Science Institute (ST ScI) Digitized Schmidt
185: Survey (DSS, the reference as 1994DSS...1...0000 in NED),
186: there are no any further study for this object.
187: Besides the metallicity property,
188: by taking advantage of the the $g$- and $r$-band photometric images from SDSS,
189: we can also study its surface brightness
190: profiles and obtain its $B$-band central surface brightness etc.
191: Then, we identify this galaxy as a low surface brightness edge-on disc galaxy
192: with $\mu_0(B)$ $\sim$23.68 mag arcsec$^{-2}$, about 2\,dex lower than
193: the Freeman limit value (see Sect.\ref{sec5}).
194: For the irregular LSB galaxy UGC\,8837, although some studies have been done,
195: such as optical velocity field and rotation curve
196: (Kuzio de Naray et al. 2006; de Blok \& Bosma 2002),
197: H$\alpha$ narrow-band observation (James et al. 2004), and
198: H\,I observation (Swaters et al. 2002) etc.,
199: there are no high-quality optical spectroscopic observation and metallicity estimate
200: for that H~{\sc ii} region coordinated as SDSS J135440.5+535309.6 in this galaxy.
201: We can estimate the oxygen abundance of this H~{\sc ii} region by using its
202: SDSS optical spectrum.
203:
204: This paper is organized as follows.
205: In Sect.2, we show the optical spectra of the two H~{\sc ii} regions
206: and the images of their hosts from SDSS,
207: and give their coordinates and redshifts.
208: In Sect.3, we present the flux measurements of the emission lines,
209: and the resulted diagnostic diagrams.
210: In Sect.4, we calculate their oxygen and nitrogen abundances
211: using the electron temperature method.
212: In Sect.5, we use the GIM2D software to analyze
213: the $g$- and $r$-band images of the host galaxy of SDSS J121811.0+465501.2,
214: and study its morphology and surface brightness.
215: The discussions are given in Sect.\ 6.
216: We conclude this paper in Sect.\ 7.
217: Throughout the paper (hereafter), we omit the ``SDSS" before
218: the IAU designations ``J121811.0+465501.2"
219: and ``J135440.5+535309.6" when referring the objects. Since
220: J121811.0+465501.2 is the only H~{\sc ii} region was taken
221: spectral observation by the
222: SDSS in its host, and just locates in the center region of the host,
223: we also call its host galaxy, the new LSB galaxy, as J121811.0+465501.2
224: in the rest parts of the paper.
225: A cosmological model
226: with $H_0$=70 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$, $\Omega_M$=0.3
227: and $\Omega_\lambda$=0.7 has been adopted.
228:
229: \section{The optical spectra and images}
230:
231: These two extragalactic H~{\sc ii} regions were classified
232: as stars in the SDSS-DR4 database, and were found by us
233: in automatic recognition and classification on stellar spectra
234: on the basis of wavelet transformation (Liu 2006).
235: About 243 special stellar spectra with emission lines (H$\alpha$, H$\beta$, H$\gamma$)
236: were selected from the SDSS-DR4 database in that study.
237: These two objects are among this list,
238: and others could be stars with emission-lines mostly or
239: unknown objects etc.
240: The careful studies on other unknown objects are ongoing.
241: The possible reason to classify them as stars
242: could be that they are
243: quite bright like point sources with the hosts too faint
244: in luminosities and surface brightness,
245: and they are quite nearby with small redshifts.
246:
247: Figures~\ref{fig1}a,b present their SDSS optical spectra at
248: rest-frame,
249: which show their properties of metal-poor star-forming regions:
250: (1) almost no continuum and stellar absorption characteristics;
251: (2) very strong [O~{\sc iii}]4959,5007 and Balmer lines (low and high levels);
252: (3) very weak [N~{\sc ii}]6548, 6583 and [S~{\sc ii}]6717,6731;
253: (4) [O~{\sc iii}]/H$\beta$ ratios are very high, while
254: [N~{\sc ii}]/H$\alpha$ and [S~{\sc ii}]/H$\alpha$ ratios are very low.
255: If [O~{\sc ii}]3727 was not shifted out the observational band, it will
256: provide more information.
257:
258: Figures~\ref{fig2}a,b present the images
259: taken from the SDSS Finding Chart Tool.
260: Their RA, DEC (in 2000 epoch) and the image size have been marked on the
261: left-top corners of the figures.
262: The big crosses mark the places where were done
263: spectroscopic observations (used in this study) in the galaxies.
264: For the galaxy J121811.0+465501.2, the
265: spectrum was observed almost on the center part as shown in the upper panel of
266: Fig.~\ref{fig2}.
267: This is the first time to obtain its high-quality optical spectrum of this galaxy
268: since it was named as
269: ``MAPS-NGO 0\_171\_0165792" in the DSS survey.
270: The detailed photometric study for this galaxy will be given in Sect.~\ref{sec5}.
271: The large galaxy presented in the lower panel of Fig.~\ref{fig2}
272: is the irregular LBG galaxy UGC\,8837, one of its bright H~{\sc ii} regions
273: coordinated as J135440.5+535309.6 has also been done spectroscopic observation by the SDSS,
274: which could be
275: the first high-quality optical spectral observation for this H~{\sc ii} region.
276: There is another H~{\sc ii} region coordinated as J135445.63+535403.6 (MJD-PID-FID:
277: 52797-1323-207) in UGC\,8837 has been done spectroscopic observation by the SDSS, but
278: the S/N ratio of the spectrum is low, which limits us to obtain interesting results
279: from it.
280:
281: The coordinates and redshifts of the two objects are given in Table~1.
282:
283:
284: \section{Flux measurements and diagnostic diagrams}
285:
286: We use SPLOT in IRAF\footnote{IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomical
287: Observatories, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research
288: in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National Science
289: Foundation.} package to measure the fluxes of the emission-lines.
290: The measurements without correction for redding are given in Table~\ref{tab2}.
291:
292: The dust extinction is estimated from H$\alpha $/H$\beta $:
293: assuming case B
294: recombination, with a density of 100\thinspace cm$^{-3}$, a temperature
295: of 10$^{4}$\thinspace K, and the predicted intrinsic
296: H$\alpha $/H$\beta $ ratio of 2.86 (Osterbrock 1989).
297: The derived $A_V$ (=$cR_V/1.47$, Seanton 1979)
298: of the two objects are given in Table~\ref{tab2}.
299: As well as some line ratios after correcting the
300: fluxes by dust extinction.
301:
302: Figures~\ref{figdia}a,b present the
303: diagnostic diagrams for the two objects
304: (the large solid circle for J121811.0+465501.2,
305: and the square for J135440.5+535309.6) with
306: the ratios of the extinction-corrected fluxes
307: [N~{\sc ii}]/H$\alpha$ versus [O~{\sc iii}]/H$\beta$
308: and [S~{\sc ii}]/H$\alpha$ versus [O~{\sc iii}]/H$\beta$.
309: The small points in the figures are the star-forming galaxies from
310: the SDSS (DR2; Tremonti et al. 2004; Liang et al. 2006).
311: The lines in the figures
312: diagnose the H~{\sc ii} regions and AGNs
313: with the solid from MPA/JHU\footnote{http://www.mpa-garching.mpg.de/SDSS/} group
314: (Kauffmann et al. 2003b), and
315: the dashed from Kewley et al. (2001).
316: These diagrams show
317: the properties of these
318: two objects as H~{\sc ii} regions with low metallicities.
319:
320: \section{The ``direct" oxygen and nitrogen abundances derived from electron temperature}
321:
322: Accurate abundance
323: measurements for the ionized gas in galaxies require the
324: determination of the electron temperature ($T_e$), which is
325: usually obtained from the ratio of auroral to nebular line
326: intensities, such as
327: [O~{\sc iii}]$\lambda\lambda4959,5007$/[O~{\sc iii}]$\lambda$4363.
328: This is generally known as the ``direct $T_e$-method" because $T_e$ is
329: directly inferred from observed line ratios, and sensitive to metallicity.
330:
331: We adopt the two-zone model for the temperature structure
332: within the galactic gas, i.e.
333: $T$([O~{\sc iii}]) (in K, as $t_3$ in 10$^{4}$K)
334: is taken to represent the temperature for high-ionization species such as
335: $O^{++}$, and $T$([O~{\sc ii}]) (in K, as $t_2$ in 10$^{4}$K)
336: is used for low-ionization species such as $O^{+}$ (as well as $N^{+}$).
337: Then the total oxygen abundances are derived from the equation:
338: \begin{equation}
339: \frac{O}{H} = \frac{O^{++}}{H^+} + \frac{O^{+}}{H^+}.
340: \end{equation}
341:
342: From the SDSS spectra of the objects,
343: we can obtain their ratios of the auroral ($\lambda$4363)
344: to nebular ($\lambda$$\lambda$4959,5007) [O~{\sc iii}]
345: lines to estimate their $T$([O~{\sc iii}]) (as $t_3$) temperature
346: in high-ionization regions,
347: then
348: we use the set of equations published by Izotov et al. (2006)
349: to determinate the ``direct" oxygen abundances in H~{\sc ii} regions for a five-level
350: atom.
351: They used the atomic data from the references listed
352: in Stasi\'{n}ska (2005). According to those authors, the electron
353: temperature $t_3$ and ionic abundances
354: $O^{++}/H^+$ are estimated as follows:
355: %
356: \begin{equation}
357: t_3 = \frac{1.432}{{\rm log}((\lambda4959 + \lambda5007)/\lambda4363) -
358: {\rm log}C_T},
359: \end{equation}
360: where
361: \begin{equation}
362: C_T = (8.44 - 1.09t_3 + 0.5t_3^2 - 0.08t_3^3)\frac{1 + 0.0004x_3}{1+0.044x_3},
363: \label{eqCt}
364: \end{equation}
365: with $x_3 = 10^{-4}n_et_3^{-1/2}$, and $n_e$ the electron density in cm$^{-3}$.
366: Notice that $x_3$ has a very small impact since
367: it is generally less than 0.1 with $n_e$ $<$ 10$^3$ cm$^{-3}$.
368: And
369: %
370: \begin{eqnarray}
371: 12& + &{\rm log}(O^{++}/H^+) =
372: {\rm log}(I_{{[O}{III]\lambda4959+\lambda5007}}/I_{H\beta}) + \nonumber \\
373: & & 6.200 + \frac{1.251}{t_3} - 0.55{\rm log}t_3 - 0.014t_3.
374: \end{eqnarray}
375: %
376:
377: The electron densities $n_e$ in the ionized gas of the galaxies are
378: calculated from the line ratios [S~{\sc ii}]$\lambda6717$/[S~{\sc
379: ii}]$\lambda6731$ by using the
380: five-level statistical equilibrium
381: model in the task {\sc TEMDEN}/{\sc STSDAS}
382: package at $T_e$=10,000K.
383: For the object J121811.0+465501.2, we assume the $n_e$ as 10$^2$ cm$^{-3}$,
384: the typical case of H~{\sc ii} regions,
385: since its [S~{\sc ii}] line ratio is outside the physical limit of $\sim$1.431.
386:
387: Since [O~{\sc ii}]$\lambda3727$ was shifted out of the observational band,
388: the ionic abundance $O^+$/$H^+$ cannot be obtained
389: from direct measurements.
390: However, it is reasonable to suppose that oxygen abundance is the same
391: throughout the H~{\sc ii} region, the fraction of that oxygen ionized
392: singly or doubly depends on
393: the physical conditions in the gas.
394: The ratio of $O^+$ to $O^{++}$ (and in principle,
395: neutral O) within the $H^+$ zone varies with the hardness of the ionizing
396: spectrum, the gas density, and the O/H abundance itself.
397: Since there is
398: no observed [O~{\sc ii}]$\lambda3727$ to tell us what be measured,
399: some guestimate is
400: warranted. Therefore, here we assume
401: $\frac{O^{+}}{H^+}=\frac{O^{++}}{H^+}$,
402: and then to obtain the total O/H abundance by doubling the
403: $O^{++}$/$H^+$ abundance.
404: It is not particularly reasonable, but
405: at the accuracy required for this work, this assumption is
406: tolerable.
407: Then the accuracy on the total O/H will be entirely dominated by the $O^+$/$H^+$
408: assumption. Since this is a factor of two, a more reasonable uncertainty to
409: quote on the total log(O/H) would be about 0.30 dex.
410: Indeed, these H~{\sc ii} regions are likely to be high ionization
411: (typical of low O/H regions), with
412: low $O^+$/$H^+$ such that the assumed doubling is likely an over-estimate.
413: But this assumption won't change the magnitude order of the oxygen abundance.
414:
415: The $N^+/H^+$ abundances of the objects are estimated by
416: using the equation below from
417: [N~{\sc ii}]$\lambda$$\lambda$6548,6583 over H$\beta$ ratios
418: and the $t_2$ temperature (Izotov et al. 2006):
419: %
420: \begin{eqnarray}
421: &12& + {\rm log}(N^{+}/H^+) =
422: {\rm log}(I_{{[N}{II]\lambda6548+\lambda6583}}/I_{H\beta}) + 6.234 \nonumber \\
423: & & + \frac{0.950}{t_2} - 0.42{\rm log}t_2 - 0.027t_2+{\rm log}(1+0.116x_2),
424: \end{eqnarray}
425: %
426: with $x_2 = 10^{-4}n_et_2^{-1/2}$, and $n_e$ as above.
427: $t_2$ is the electron temperature in low-ionization, which can be estimated
428: from $t_3$ by following an
429: equation derived by fitting H {\sc ii} region models taken from
430: Garnett (1992):
431: \begin{equation}
432: t_2 = 0.7t_3 + 0.3,
433: \end{equation}
434: which is valid over the range 2000K$<$ $T_e$([O~{\sc iii}])$<$ 18,000K,
435: and has been used widely.
436:
437: Finally, the oxygen abundances
438: are obtained as 12+log(O/H) = 7.88$\pm$0.30 and 7.70$\pm$0.30
439: for the objects J121811.0+465501.2
440: and J135440.5+535309.6, respectively,
441: which are almost 1/6 of the solar oxygen abundances
442: when adopting 12+log(O/H)$_{\odot}$$\sim$ 8.66 (Asplund et al. 2005).
443: Their log($N/H$) abundances are 5.93$\pm$0.05 and 6.38$\pm$0.03,
444: respectively, by assuming $N/H$=$N^+/H^+$.
445: Then the derived log(N/O) abundances are
446: -1.65$\pm$0.30 and -1.01$\pm$0.30, respectively. The abundances and
447: some related line ratios, $n_e$, $t_3$, $t_2$
448: are also given in Table~\ref{tab2}. The error-bars
449: come from the uncertainties of the measurements, without considering
450: the uncertainties of calibrations and conversions.
451:
452:
453: \section{Image analysis of J121811.0+465501.2: a new LSB galaxy}
454: \label{sec5}
455:
456:
457: We use the publicly available GIM2D package (Simard et al. 2002)
458: to find best-fit PSF-convolved, two-dimensional (2-D) modelling of
459: the target galaxy J121811.0+465501.2. The 2-D fitting deals with real
460: galaxy images directly, and develops a projected model to
461: approach real light distribution of galaxies, which can provide
462: extra bulge/disc separation. Performing light fitting in 2-D
463: allows proper weighting of data points reflecting uncertainties
464: due to photon statistics, flat fielding uncertainties, sky level
465: uncertainties and model imperfection (de Jong et al. 2004).
466:
467: In this analysis, we use the SDSS $g-$ and $r-$band images
468: since the images in $u-$ and $z-$band are relatively shallow
469: whereas $i-$band image may suffer from the `red halo' effect
470: (Michard 2002; Wu et al. 2005). Since the main source of
471: errors in determining surface brightness profiles for this class
472: of galaxies is the uncertainty in sky estimation, we have
473: performed our own sky subtraction on the images carefully. A detailed
474: description of our method has been provided by Liu et al. (2007).
475:
476: We found the light of galaxy J121811.0+465501.2 can be modeled
477: well by a single exponential disc profile of the form:
478:
479: \begin{equation}
480: \Sigma (r) = \Sigma_0 exp(-{{r}\over{h}}),
481: \end{equation}
482: %
483: where $\Sigma_0$ is the face-on central surface brightness
484: in linear units ($M_{\odot}$ pc$^{-2}$), and $h$ is the
485: scale length along the semi-major axis.
486: This equation can be converted to logarithmic units as:
487: %
488: \begin{equation}
489: \mu (r) = \mu_0 + 1.086({{r}\over{h}}),
490: \end{equation}
491: %
492: where $\mu_0$ is the face-on central surface brightness of
493: the disc in logarithmic units
494: (mag arcsec$^{-2}$) (de Blok et al. 1995).
495:
496: The analysis results are given in Figs.~\ref{fig4}a-f, including
497: the trimmed postage images, the best-fit model images, and the
498: residual images, all in both of the $g$ and $r$ bands. The
499: reduced $\chi^2$ for the model fittings
500: are 1.071 and 1.075 in $g-$ and $r-$bands,
501: respectively. The resulted parameters have been given in
502: Table~\ref{tab3}, including the central surface brightness
503: $\mu_0$, the scale-length $h$ of the disc,
504: the inclination angle etc., all in the two bands.
505: By using the conversion of Smith et al. (2002), we can
506: estimate its $\mu_0(B)$ = 23.68 and $\mu_0(V)$ = 22.96 mag
507: arcsec$^{-2}$. These results show the galaxy J121811.0+465501.2 is
508: a nearly edge-on LSB galaxy, with an exponential disc
509: component and almost without bulge.
510:
511: In the analysis, this disk model is assumed
512: to be infinitely thin. The total flux in this model is given by:
513: \begin{equation}
514: F_{tot} = 2 {\pi} h^2 \Sigma_0.
515: \end{equation}
516: %
517: Then its total apparent magnitude can be determined from this equation and converting
518: to a logarithmic scale. The obtained apparent magnitudes
519: in the $g$ and $r$ bands are given in Table~\ref{tab3}, as well as
520: the $B$- and $V$-band magnitudes calculated by using the conversion
521: of Smith et al. (2002).
522: To estimate the absolute magnitude, we calculate the
523: dust extinction inside the galaxies in $g$ and $r$ bands
524: from $A_V$ (see Table~\ref{tab2}), and
525: also consider the Galactic foreground
526: extinction following the reddening maps of Schlegel et al. (1998).
527: The redshift has been corrected for the motion of the Sun and Local
528: Group using the methods of Courteau \& van den Bergh (1999)
529: and Blanton et al. (2005), and given as $z_{corr}$ in
530: Table~\ref{tab3}.
531: One point should be noticed that we neglect the correction for
532: the peculiar velocity of the galaxy, which could be estimated by maximizing the likelihood
533: density as Blanton et al. (2005).
534: They commented that the typical corrections of this
535: are 200-300 km s$^{-1}$ with dispersion of 150 km s$^{-1}$.
536: We then consider 300 km s$^{-1}$ as the velocity uncertainty for estimating luminosity distances
537: and magnitudes.
538: Therefore, the
539: absolute $B-$magnitude, $M_B$, can be calculated as $-$13.51 mag
540: from the apparent $B-$magnitude after correction for the
541: extinction and considering the luminosity distance.
542: As the redshift of this galaxy is low, no $k-$correction is applied here.
543:
544: This galaxy is similar in size scale and distance to the object
545: $F564-V3$ studied by de Blok et al. (1995).
546: They found $F564-V3$ has a scale length of only 0.3\,kpc,
547: total magnitude $M_T=-$11.77 and luminosity distance $D_L$=6Mpc (with $H_0$=100 km
548: s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$),
549: which is the
550: smallest and faintest galaxy in their sample, and could be a true dwarf galaxy.
551: Similarly, our LSB galaxy J121811.0+465501.2 has a scale length of $\sim$0.4\,kpc,
552: $M_B=-13.51$ and $D_L\sim$9.16Mpc (with $H_0$=70 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$).
553: The difference between these two objects is that $F564-V3$ is amorphous and diffuse,
554: and its surface brightness profile could not be matched by a perfectly exponential disc,
555: while our galaxy J121811.0+465501.2 does show a perfectly exponential disc (almost without bulge).
556: These analyses show that this new LSB galaxy
557: could be a true nearby dwarf galaxy with an nearly exponential disc shown as edge-on to us.
558:
559:
560: \section{Discussions}
561:
562: It is difficult to detect LSB galaxies owing to their intrinsically low
563: global luminosities and low surface brightness. Several samples of LSB objects, identified
564: with different criteria and on either photographic plates,
565: or on CCD images, have been published during last 20 years (for a review see Impey \& Bothun
566: 1997; Dalcanton et al. 1997).
567: Recently, Kniazev et al. (2004) developed a method to use imaging data from the SDSS to search
568: for LSB galaxies, and tested their method by using 92 galaxies from the catalog
569: of Impey et al. (1996).
570: Haberzettl et al. (2007) also reported on the photometric results of a search for LSB galaxies in
571: a 0.76 deg$^2$ field centered on the Hubble Deep Field-South.
572: In this study, we present a new LSB galaxy found from the SDSS-DR4 occasionally.
573:
574: Metallicity is an efficient indicator to probe the evolutionary status and
575: history of LSB galaxy.
576: The first measurements of the oxygen abundances in H~{\sc ii} regions of LSB galaxies were
577: presented in McGaugh (1994).
578: They found that, in general, LSB galaxies are metal-poor ($Z<1/3Z_{\odot}$),
579: which indicates that LSB galaxies evolve slowly, forming relatively few
580: stars over a Hubble time.
581: Burkholder et al. (2001)
582: also found that the average oxygen abundances
583: of their 17 LSB galaxies is one-fifth solar.
584: de Blok \& Hulst (1998) found that
585: most of the 64 H~{\sc ii} regions in 12 LSB galaxies
586: have oxygen abundances that are $\sim$0.5 to 0.1 solar.
587: The two extragalactic H~{\sc ii} regions in this study
588: have about 6 times lower oxygen abundances
589: than the solar.
590: Moreover, no strong radial oxygen abundance
591: gradients are found in the LSB galaxies, which is
592: supporting the picture of their quiescent and sporadic evolution, which is
593: different from the HSB galaxies with the steeper gradients
594: (Vila-Costas \& Edmunds 1992; Zaritsky, Kennicutt, Huchra 1994;
595: Henry \& Howard 1995; Kennicutt \& Garnett 1996).
596:
597: About the stellar populations of LSBGs,
598: Galaz et al. (2005) computed the Lick/IDS indices for the light emitted
599: by the bulges hosted by the 19 face-on LSB galaxies, compared with
600: a sample of 14 face-on HSB galaxies. Their results
601: indicate that bulges of LSBGs are metal poorer, compared to those hosted by
602: HSBGs, supporting the hypothesis that stellar formation rates have been
603: stable low during the lifetime of these galaxies.
604: Bell et al. (1999) used the NIR K$'$ and optical images of a sample of
605: five red and blue LSB disc galaxies
606: to study the stellar populations of them. They found that the blue LSBGs
607: are well described by
608: models with low, roughly constant star formation rates,
609: whereas red LSBGs are better described by a `faded disc' scenario.
610:
611: de Blok et al. (1995) studied the surface
612: brightness profiles and colors of 21 late-type LSBGs.
613: Combination of their
614: data with those of McGaugh (1992) yields median values of
615: respectively $B$-band central surface brightness $\mu_0(B)$=23.4 mag
616: arcsec$^{-2}$ and scale length $h=3.2$ kpc. The median of the surface brightness is thus
617: shifted more than 6$\sigma$ from the Freeman (1970) value
618: $\mu_0(B)$=21.65 mag arcsec$^{-2}$.
619: The favored interpretation of blue colors in LSB galaxies is that of
620: low metallicity coupled with sporadic star formation.
621: Moreover, the blue colors show that the LSB galaxies are not faded discs that have
622: no current star formation.
623: For our galaxy J121811.0+465501.2,
624: we have tried to do the same one dimension fit for its surface brightness profile
625: by using the ISOPHOTE/ELLIPSE task in IRAF package.
626: It also confirm well its exponential disc component of a LSBG without bulge.
627: But as the inclination angle is large ($>$70 degree), the integrated light
628: at a given effective radius could be a projected
629: result from slightly different radii. Therefore, we prefer to present the
630: 2D-fittings by using GIM2D on its photometry images,
631: which have been given in Sect.~\ref{sec5}.
632:
633: \section{Conclusions}
634: \label{sec7}
635:
636: We present a new Low Surface Brightness Galaxy SDSS J121811.0+465501.2
637: serendipitously found from the SDSS-DR4 database, and
638: one of its H~{\sc ii} region was classified as a star by the spectral
639: classification of SDSS.
640: This galaxy has $B$-band central surface brightness as
641: $\mu_0(B)$$\sim$ 23.68 mag arcsec$^{-2}$, which is $\sim$2\,dex fainter than
642: the Freeman limit of classifying as LSBGs, and
643: confirms that it is a LSB galaxy. It has
644: an exponential disc and almost no bulge.
645: And it could be a true nearby dwarf galaxy
646: with a scale length of 0.4\,kpc and $M_B$$\sim -$13.51, $D_L\sim$9.16Mpc
647: (with $H_0$=70 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$).
648: Its central region shows obvious optical emission lines,
649: which indicates that there exist star-forming activities presently.
650: We obtain its oxygen abundance as 12+log(O/H)$\sim$7.88
651: from electron temperature on the basis of the SDSS optical spectrum.
652: We also estimate the oxygen abundance of another
653: H~{\sc ii} region J135440.5+535309.6 located in the irregular
654: LSB galaxy UGC\,8837, which was found from the
655: same procedure from SDSS-DR4 occasionally
656: as for the object J121811.0+465501.2.
657: It has 12+log(O/H)$\sim$7.70, similar to J121811.0+465501.2.
658: Their oxygen abundances are about six times more metal-poor than
659: the solar by assuming 12+log(O/H)$_{\odot}$$\sim$8.66.
660: These low metallicities confirm other
661: studies for H~{\sc ii} regions of LSBGs,
662: in which they showed that the LSBGs have low metallicities.
663:
664: In summary, in the edge-on disc LSB galaxy and the irregular LSB galaxy UGC\,8837,
665: there are massive stars forming presently, but the metallicities there are very low.
666: These could support the picture of quiescent and sporadic evolution,
667: and the less efficient metal-enrichment of the LSBGs.
668:
669: These two extragalactic objects are among the list of 243 ``stars" with special spectra,
670: which were selected from the SDSS-DR4 database in
671: automatic recognition and classification on stellar spectra
672: to search for emission-line stars.
673: Most are identified as emission-line stars, such as CV stars and others,
674: but left some interesting objects as we studied here.
675: We will check the SDSS-DR5 to find more such interesting objects.
676:
677:
678: %#######################################################################################
679: \acknowledgments
680: We specially thank our referee Dr. Stacy McGaugh for his very valuable
681: suggestions and comments, which help well in improving this work.
682: We thank Profs. Shude Mao, Xiaoyang Xia and Zugan Deng for very interesting
683: discussions.
684: This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China
685: (NSFC) Foundation under No.10403006, 10433010, 10373005, 10573022, 10333060,
686: and 10521001.
687:
688:
689: %#######################################################################################
690:
691: \begin{thebibliography}{}
692:
693: \bibitem[2005] {A05} Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., \& Sauval, A. J. ASP conference Seriese, 2005,
694: astro-ph/0410214
695:
696: \bibitem[1999] {B99} Bell, E. F., Bower, R. G., de Jong, R. S., Hereld, M., \& Rauscher, B. J. 1999, MNRAS, 302, L55
697:
698: \bibitem[2001] {Bl01} Blanton, M. R., et al. 2001, AJ, 121, 2358
699:
700: \bibitem[2001] {B05} Blanton, M. R., et al. 2005, AJ, 129, 2562
701:
702: \bibitem[2004] {B04} Brinchmann, J., Charlot, S., White, S. D. M., Tremonti, C., Kauffmann, G., Heckman,
703: T., \& Brinkmann, J. 2004, MNRAS, 351, 1151
704:
705: \bibitem[2001] {B01} Burkholder, V., Impey, C., \& Sprayberry, D. 2001, AJ, 122, 2318
706:
707: \bibitem[2006] {C06a} Chang, R. X., Shen, S. Y., Hou, J. L., Shu, C. G., \& Shao, Z. Y. 2006, MNRAS, 372, 199
708:
709: \bibitem[2006] {C06b} Chang, R. X., Gallazzi, A., Kauffmann, G., Charlot, S., Ivezic, Z., Brinchmann, J.,
710: \& Heckman, T. 2006, MNRAS, 366, 717
711:
712: \bibitem[2006] {C99} Courteau, S. \& van den Bergh, S., 1999, AJ, 118, 337
713:
714: \bibitem[1997] {d97} Dalcanton, J. J., Spergel, D. N., Gunn, J. E., Schmidt, M., \& Schneider, D. P. 1997, AJ, 114, 635
715:
716: \bibitem[1998] {d98} de Blok, W. J. G., \& van der Hulst, J. M. 1998, A\&A, 335, 421
717:
718: \bibitem[2002] {d02} de Blok, W. J. G., \& Bosma, A. 2002, A\&A, 385, 816
719:
720: \bibitem[1995] {d95} de Blok, W. J. G., van der Hulst, J. M., \& Bothun, G. D. 1995, MNRAS, 274, 235
721:
722: \bibitem[2004] {d04} de Jong, R. S., Simard, L., Davies, R. L., Saglia, R. P., Burstein, D., Colless, M.,
723: McMahan, R., \& Wegner, G. 2004, MNRAS, 355, 1155
724:
725: \bibitem[1970] {F70} Freeman, K. C. 1970, ApJ, 168, 811
726:
727: \bibitem[1995] {G95} Galaz, G., Infante, L., Villalobos, A., Dalcanton, J. 2005, astro-ph/0501085
728:
729: \bibitem[1992] {G92} Garnett D.R. 1992, AJ, 103, 1330
730:
731: \bibitem[2007] {H07} Haberzettl, L., Bomans, D. J., Dettmar, R.-J., Pohlen, M. 2007, A\&A, 465, 95
732:
733: \bibitem[1995] {H95} Henry, R. B. C., \& Howard J. W. 1995, ApJ, 438, 170
734:
735: \bibitem[2006] {I06} Izotov, Y.I., Stasinska, G., Meynet, G., Guseva, N.G., Thuan, T.X. 2006, A\&A, 448, 955
736:
737: \bibitem[1996] {I96} Impey, C. D., Sprayberry, D., Irwin, M. J., \& Bothun, G. D. 1996, ApJS, 105, 209
738:
739: \bibitem[1997] {I97} Impey, C. D., \& Bothun, G. D. 1997, ARA\&A, 35, 267
740:
741: \bibitem[1992] {G92} Impey, C. D., Burkholder, V., \& Sprayberry, D. 2001, AJ, 122, 2341
742:
743: \bibitem[2004] {J04} James, P. A., et al. 2004, A\&A, 414, 23
744:
745: \bibitem[2003] {K03} Kauffmann, G., et al. 2003a, MNRAS, 341, 33
746:
747: \bibitem[2003] {K03} Kauffmann, G., et al. 2003b, MNRAS, 341, 54
748:
749: \bibitem[1996] {K96} Kennicutt, R. C., \& Garnett, D. R. 1996, ApJ, 456, 504
750:
751: \bibitem[2001] {K01} Kewley, L. J., Dopita, M. A., Sutherland, R. S., Heisler, C. A., \& Trevena, J. 2001, ApJ, 556, 121
752:
753: \bibitem[2007] {K07} Kewley, L. J., Brown, W. R., Geller, M. J., Kenyon, S. J., \&
754: Kurtz, M. J. 2007, AJ, 133,882
755:
756: \bibitem[2004] {K04} Kniazev, A. Y., Grebel, E. K., Pustilnik, S. A., Pramskij, A. G., Kniazeva, T. F., Prada, F., Harbeck, D. 2004, AJ, 127, 704
757:
758: \bibitem[2006] {K06} Kuzio de Naray, R., McGaugh, S. S., de Blok, W. J. G., \& Bosma, A. 2006, ApJS, 165, 461
759:
760: \bibitem[2006] {L06} Liang, Y. C., Yin, S. Y., Hammer, F., Deng, L. C., Flores, H., \& Zhang, B. 2006, ApJ, 652, 257
761:
762: \bibitem[2007] {L07} Liu, F. S., et al. 2007 (in preperation)
763:
764: \bibitem[2006] {L06} Liu, Z. T., 2006, PhD. Thesis, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of
765: Sciences
766:
767: \bibitem[1992] {M92} McGaugh, S. S. 1992, PhD. Thesis, Univ. of Michigan
768:
769: \bibitem[1994] {M94} McGaugh, S. S. 1994, ApJ, 426, 135
770:
771: \bibitem[1994] {M96} McGaugh, S. S. 1996, MNRAS, 280, 337
772:
773: \bibitem[2002] {M02} Michard, R. 2002, A\&A, 384, 763
774:
775: \bibitem[1989] {O89} Osterbrock, D. E. 1989, Astrophysics of Gaseous Nebulae and Active Galactic Nuclei.
776: Mill Valley, California: University Science Books
777:
778: \bibitem[1979] {S79} Seaton, M. J. 1979, MNRAS 187, 73
779:
780: \bibitem[1998] {S98} Schlegel, D. J., Finkberner, D. P., \& Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525
781:
782: \bibitem[2002] {S02} Simard, L., et al. 2002, ApJS, 142, 1
783:
784: \bibitem[2001] {S01} Shimasaku, K., et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 1238
785:
786: \bibitem[2005] {S05} Stasi\'{n}ska, G. 2005, A\&A, 434, 507
787:
788: \bibitem[2001] {S01} Strateva, I., et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 1861
789:
790: \bibitem[2002] {S02} Swaters, R. A., van Albada, T. S., van der Hulst, J. M., \& Sancisi, R. 2002, A\&A, 390, 829
791:
792: \bibitem[2004] {T04} Tremonti, C. A., et al. 2004, ApJ, 613, 898
793:
794: \bibitem[1992] {G92} Vila-Costas, M. B., \& Edmunds, M. G. 1992, MNRAS, 259, 121
795:
796: \bibitem[2006] {W06} Wang, J., \& Wei, J. Y. 2006, ApJ, 648, 158
797:
798: \bibitem[2005] {W05} Wu, H., Shao, Z. Y., Mo, H. J., Xia, X. Y., \& Deng, Z. G. 2005, ApJ, 622, 244
799:
800: \bibitem[2007] {Y07} Yin, S. Y., Liang, Y. C., Hammer, F., Brinchmann, J., Zhang, B., Deng, L. C., \& Flores
801: H. 2007, A\&A, 462, 535
802:
803: \bibitem[1992] {G92} York, D. G., et al. 2000, AJ, 120, 1579
804:
805: \bibitem[1994] {Z94} Zaritsky, D., Kennicutt, R. C., \& Huchra, J. P. 1994, ApJ, 420, 87
806:
807: \bibitem[2007] {Z07} Zhang, Xue-Guang, Dultzin-Hacyan, D., Wang, Ting-Gui 2007, MNRAS, in press, (astro-ph/0702672)
808:
809: \end{thebibliography}
810:
811: %\clearpage
812:
813: % Fig.1
814: \begin{figure}[b]
815: \centering
816: \input epsf
817: \epsfverbosetrue
818: \epsfxsize 6.5cm
819: \epsfbox{f1.eps}
820: %\plotone{f1.eps}
821: \caption {The SDSS optical spectra of the two H~{\sc ii} regions:
822: {\bf (a).} J121811.0 +465501.2 located in the new LSB galaxy;
823: {\bf (b).} J135440.5+535309.6 located
824: in the irregular LSB galaxy UGC\,8837.
825: }
826: \label{fig1}
827: \end{figure}
828:
829:
830: % Fig.2
831: \begin{figure} [b]
832: \centering
833: \input epsf
834: \epsfverbosetrue
835: \epsfxsize 6.2cm
836: \epsfbox{f2.eps}
837: %\epsscale{.6}
838: %\plotone{f2.eps}
839: \caption {The SDSS photometric images of the two objects:
840: {\bf the upper panel} for the galaxy J121811.0+465501.2 (in size of
841: 1.7$'$$\times$1.7$'$);
842: {\bf the lower panel} for the irregular LSB galaxy UGC\,8837(in size of
843: $\sim$6.7$'$$\times$6.7$'$). }
844: \label{fig2}
845: \end{figure}
846:
847:
848: % Fig.3
849: \begin{figure}
850: \centering
851: \input epsf
852: \epsfverbosetrue
853: \epsfxsize 6.5cm
854: \epsfbox{f3.eps}
855: %\epsscale{.6}
856: %\plotone{f3.eps}
857: \caption {The diagnostic diagrams for the two objects.
858: {\bf the large solid circle} refers to the object J121811.0 +465501.2, and
859: {\bf the square} refers to the object J135440.5 +535309.6.
860: The small points are the star-forming galaxies from the SDSS-DR2.
861: The lines diagnose the H~{\sc ii} regions and AGNs
862: with the solid from MPA/JHU group, and
863: the dashed from Kewley et al. (2001).
864: }
865: \label{figdia}
866: \end{figure}
867:
868: % Fig.4
869: \begin{figure*}
870: \centering
871: \includegraphics[width=12cm]{f4.eps}
872: \caption{ The postage $g-$ and $r-$band images with size of 1.7$'$$\times$1.7$'$
873: of the newly found LSB galaxy SDSS J121811.0+465501.2:
874: {\bf (a).} the $g$-band postage image;
875: {\bf (b).} the best-fit model image for the $g$-band image;
876: {\bf (c).} the residual image in the $g$-band;
877: {\bf (d).} the $r$-band postage image;
878: {\bf (e).} the best-fit model image for the $r$-band image;
879: {\bf (f).} the residual image in the $r$-band.
880: }
881: \label{fig4}
882: \end{figure*}
883:
884: \clearpage
885:
886: \begin{table*}
887: \centering
888: \caption{\label{tab1} \footnotesize Coordinates and redshifts of the two
889: objects. The redshift is the average value of the three
890: calculated from three strong emission lines on the spectrum,
891: H$\beta$, [O~{\sc iii}]$\lambda$5007 and H$\alpha$.}
892: \label{tab1}
893: \scriptsize
894: \begin{tabular}{lrrrrrr}
895: \hline \hline
896: \noalign{\smallskip}
897: (1) & (2) & (3) & (4) & (5) & (6) & (7) \\ \hline
898: \noalign{\smallskip}
899: MJD-PID-FID & IAU designation & R.A. (2000) & DEC. (2000) & redshift $z$ & $cz$ (km s$^{-1}$) & host galaxy \\ \hline
900: 53117-1451-181 & J121811.0+465501.2 & 12 18 11.04 (184.546) & +46 55 01.2 (46.917) & 0.00157 & 472.46 & new LSBG \\
901: 52465-1043-613 & J135440.5+535309.6 & 13 54 40.56 (208.669) & +53 53 09.6 (53.886) & 0.00067 & 210.38 & UGC 8837 \\ \hline
902: \end{tabular}
903: \end{table*}
904:
905: \begin{table}
906: \centering
907: \caption{\label{tab1} \footnotesize The flux measurements of emission lines
908: (in units of 10$^{-17}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ \AA$^{-1}$) of the two objects,
909: some related line-ratios corrected by dust extinction,
910: and the derived electron temperature and abundances are given as well.}
911: \label{tab2}
912: \scriptsize
913: \begin{tabular}{lrr}
914: \hline \hline
915: \noalign{\smallskip}
916: line & J121811.0+465501.2 & J135440.5+535309.6 \\ \hline
917: 4861 H$\beta$ & 72.51$\pm$0.52 & 670.04$\pm$3.12 \\
918: 4959 [O~{\sc iii}] & 75.20$\pm$1.69 & 347.32$\pm$1.79 \\
919: 5007 [O~{\sc iii}] & 236.78$\pm$1.88 & 1040.76$\pm$1.86 \\
920: 4363 [O~{\sc iii}] & 3.96$\pm$0.38 & 12.82$\pm$1.28 \\
921: 6563 H$\alpha$ & 239.04$\pm$0.14 & 2300.34$\pm$6.14 \\
922: 6583 [N~{\sc ii}] & 7.26$\pm$0.31 & 163.09 $\pm$1.47 \\
923: 6717 [S~{\sc ii}] & 10.53$\pm$0.01 & 272.46$\pm$0.77 \\
924: 6731 [S~{\sc ii}] & 6.46$\pm$0.01 & 199.27$\pm$0.25 \\ \hline
925: $A_V$ & 0.35$\pm$0.02 & 0.45$\pm$0.02 \\
926: log([N~{\sc ii}]$\lambda$6583/H$\alpha$) & -1.52$\pm$0.02 & -1.16$\pm$0.01 \\
927: log([S~{\sc ii}]6717,6731/H$\alpha$) & -1.15$\pm$0.01 & -0.69$\pm$0.01 \\
928: log([O~{\sc iii}]4959,5007/H$\beta$) & 0.63$\pm$0.01 & 0.30$\pm$0.01 \\ \hline
929: log(${[O~{\sc III}]4959,5007}\over [O~{\sc III}]4363$) & 1.87$\pm$0.04 & 2.00$\pm$0.04 \\
930: {[S~{\sc II}]$\lambda$6717/[S~{\sc II}]$\lambda$6731} & 1.63$\pm$0.01 & 1.37$\pm$0.01 \\
931: $n_e$ (cm$^{-3}$) & --- & 55.33$\pm$1.81 \\
932: $t_3$ (10$^{4}$K) & 1.4487$\pm$0.0536 & 1.2872$\pm$0.0500 \\
933: $t_2$ (10$^{4}$K) & 1.3141$\pm$0.0375 & 1.2011$\pm$0.0350 \\
934: 12+ log(${O^{++}}/{H^+}$) & 7.58$\pm$0.05 & 7.40$\pm$0.05 \\
935: 12+log(${O}/{H}$) & 7.88$\pm$0.30 & 7.70$\pm$0.30 \\
936: 12+log(${N}/{H}$) & 5.93$\pm$0.05 & 6.38$\pm$0.03 \\
937: log(N/O) & -1.65$\pm$0.30 & -1.01$\pm$0.30 \\ \hline
938: \end{tabular}
939: \end{table}
940:
941: \begin{table}
942: \centering \caption{\label{tab1} \footnotesize
943: The parameters of the galaxy J121811.0+465501.2
944: about its morphology, surface brightness and magnitudes etc.
945: by performing GIM2D on its SDSS $g$- and $r$-band images. }
946: \label{tab3} \scriptsize
947: \begin{tabular}{lrr}
948: \hline \hline
949: \noalign{\smallskip}
950: \multicolumn{3}{c} {J121811.0+465501.2} \\ \hline
951: & $g$-band & $r$-band \\ \hline
952: $\mu_0$ (mag arcsec$^{-2}$) & 23.39$\pm$0.05 & 23.13$\pm$0.07 \\
953: $h$ (arcsec) & 9.12$\pm$0.14 & 8.98$\pm$0.18 \\
954: $h'$ (kpc) & 0.40$\pm$0.18 & 0.40$\pm$0.18 \\
955: inclination angle (deg) & 75.5$\pm$0.3 & 74.0$\pm$0.4 \\
956: $m_T$ (total apparent mag) & 16.59$\pm$0.01 & 16.36$\pm$0.02 \\
957: $M_T$ (total absolute mag) & -13.72$\pm$0.84 & -13.81$\pm$0.84 \\ \hline
958: $\mu_0(B)$ (mag arcsec$^{-2}$) & \multicolumn{2}{c} {23.68$\pm$0.08} \\
959: $\mu_0(V)$ (mag arcsec$^{-2}$) & \multicolumn{2}{c} {22.96$\pm$0.11} \\
960: $B_T$ (total apparent B mag) & \multicolumn{2}{c} {16.87$\pm$0.02} \\
961: $V_T$ (total apparent V mag) & \multicolumn{2}{c} {16.43$\pm$0.03} \\
962: $z_{corr}$ (corrected redshift) & \multicolumn{2}{c} {0.002135$\pm$0.001000} \\
963: $D_L$ (luminosity distance in Mpc) & \multicolumn{2}{c} {9.1647$\pm$4.3023} \\
964: $D_A$ (angle distance in Mpc) & \multicolumn{2}{c} {9.1257$\pm$4.2573} \\
965: $M_B$ (total absolute B mag) & \multicolumn{2}{c} {-13.51$\pm$0.84} \\
966: $M_V$ (total absolute V mag) & \multicolumn{2}{c} {-13.80$\pm$0.84} \\ \hline
967: \end{tabular}
968: \tablenotetext{}{Notes.-The uncertainties of luminosity distance, angle distance, $h'$,
969: and absolute magnitudes come from the uncertainty of the corrected redshift,
970: which was estimated as the maximum value of the typical correction
971: for the peculiar velocity of
972: nearby galaxies, about 300 km s$^{-1}$ mentioned in Blanton et al. (2005).}
973: \end{table}
974:
975:
976: \end{document}
977:
978:
979: