1: % ****** Start of file apssamp.tex ******
2: %
3: % This file is part of the APS files in the REVTeX 4 distribution.
4: % Version 4.0 of REVTeX, August 2001
5: %
6: % Copyright (c) 2001 The American Physical Society.
7: %
8: % See the REVTeX 4 README file for restrictions and more information.
9: %
10: % TeX'ing this file requires that you have AMS-LaTeX 2.0 installed
11: % as well as the rest of the prerequisites for REVTeX 4.0
12: %
13: % See the REVTeX 4 README file
14: % It also requires running BibTeX. The commands are as follows:
15: %
16: % 1) latex apssamp.tex
17: % 2) bibtex apssamp
18: % 3) latex apssamp.tex
19: % 4) latex apssamp.tex
20: %
21: \documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb,nofootinbib]{revtex4}
22: %\documentclass[preprint,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
23:
24: % Some other (several out of many) possibilities
25: %\documentclass[preprint,aps]{revtex4}
26: %\documentclass[preprint,aps,draft]{revtex4}
27: %\documentclass[prb]{revtex4}% Physical Review B
28:
29: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
30: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
31: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
32:
33: %\nofiles
34:
35: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
36: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
37: \newcommand{\ba}{\begin{eqnarray}}
38: \newcommand{\ea}{\end{eqnarray}}
39: \newcommand{\Tr}{\mathrm{Tr}}
40:
41: \begin{document}
42:
43: \preprint{CERN-PH-TH/2007-077, ROME-1451/2007}
44:
45: \title{Theta dependence of the vacuum energy in the SU(3) gauge theory from the lattice}
46:
47: \author{Leonardo Giusti$^{a,}$\footnote{On leave from Centre de Physique Th\'eorique,
48: Case 907, CNRS Luminy, F-13288 Marseille Cedex 9, France.},
49: Silvano Petrarca$^{b,c}$, Bruno Taglienti$^c$}
50:
51: \affiliation{\vspace{0.3cm}
52: \vspace{0.1cm} $^a$ CERN, Department of Physics, TH Division, CH-1211 Geneva 23,
53: Switzerland.\\
54: $^b$ Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit\`a di Roma ``La Sapienza'',
55: P.le A. Moro 2, I-00185 Rome, Italy.\\
56: $^c$ INFN, Sezione di Roma, P.le A. Moro 2, I-00185 Rome, Italy.}
57:
58: %\date{\vspace{0.2cm} \today}% It is always \today, today, % but any date may be explicitly specified
59:
60: \begin{abstract}
61: We report on a precise computation of the topological charge
62: distribution in the SU(3) Yang--Mills theory. It is carried out on the
63: lattice with high statistics Monte Carlo simulations by employing the definition
64: of the topological charge suggested by Neuberger's fermions. We observe significant
65: deviations from a Gaussian distribution. Our results disfavour the $\theta$ behaviour of the
66: vacuum energy predicted by instanton models, while they are compatible with the
67: expectation from the large $N_c$ expansion.
68: \end{abstract}
69:
70: \pacs{
71: 11.15.Pg %Expansions for large numbers of components (e.g., 1/Nc expansions)
72: 11.15.Ha, % Lattice gauge theory (see also 12.38.Gc Lattice QCD calculations)
73: 12.38.Gc % Lattice QCD calculations (see also 11.15.Ha Lattice gauge theory)
74: \vspace{-0.25cm}
75: }% PACS, the Physics and Astronomy
76: % Classification Scheme.
77: %\keywords{Suggested keywords}%Use showkeys class option if keyword
78: %display desired
79: \maketitle
80:
81: {\em Introduction.---} The $\theta$ dependence of the vacuum
82: energy~\cite{Belavin:1975fg,'tHooft:1976up,Jackiw:1976pf,Callan:1976je}, or
83: equivalently the functional form of the topological charge distribution,
84: is a distinctive feature of the ensemble of gauge configurations
85: that dominate the path integral of a Yang--Mills theory.
86: In the Euclidean space-time the ground-state energy $F(\theta)$ is
87: defined as
88: \be
89: e^{- F(\theta)} = \langle e^{i\theta Q}\rangle\; ,
90: \ee
91: where, as usual, $\langle\dots\rangle$ indicates the path-integral
92: average (our normalization is $F(0)=0$). In the large volume regime
93: $F(\theta)$ is proportional to the size $V$ of the system,
94: a direct consequence of the fact that the topological charge operator $Q$
95: is the four-dimensional integral of a local density.
96: The function $F(\theta)$ is related to the probability
97: of finding a gauge field configuration with
98: topological charge $Q=\nu$ by the Fourier transform
99: \be\label{eq:pnu}
100: P_\nu = \int_{-\pi}^\pi \frac{d\theta}{2 \pi}
101: e^{-i\theta\nu} e^{- F(\theta)}\; .
102: \ee
103: \indent Large $N_c$ arguments~\cite{'tHooft:1973jz},
104: with $N_c$ being the number of colors, suggest that the fluctuations
105: of the topological charge are of quantum non-perturbative
106: nature~\cite{Witten:1978bc,Witten:1980sp}.
107: The $\theta$ dependence of the vacuum energy is expected
108: at leading order in $1/N_c$, and the normalized cumulants
109: \be\label{eq:cn}
110: {C}_{n} = (-1)^{n+1}\frac{1}{V}\frac{d^{2n}}{d\theta^{2n}}
111: F(\theta) \Big|_{\theta=0}\qquad n=1,2,\dots\; ,
112: \ee
113: which should scale asymptotically as
114: $N_c^{2-2n}$~\cite{Witten:1978bc,Witten:1980sp}, have to be
115: determined with a non-perturbative computation.
116: On the other hand several models, such as the dilute gas or liquid of instantons, assume
117: that the path integral is dominated by semiclassical
118: configurations~\cite{'tHooft:1976fv,Callan:1977gz,Shuryak:1981ff,Diakonov:1983hh}.
119: They predict a $\theta$ behaviour of the form
120: \be\label{eq:finst}
121: F^\mathrm{Inst} (\theta) = -V A \{\cos(\theta)-1\}\;,
122: \ee
123: with $A$ being exponentially suppressed at large $N_c$.\\
124: \indent The $\theta$ dependence of the vacuum energy plays a
125: crucial r\^ole also in the solution of the
126: so-called $U(1)_A$ problem in QCD.
127: The Witten--Veneziamo mechanism relates the cumulants of the
128: topological charge distribution in the Yang--Mills theory
129: with the leading anomalous contribution to the mass and scattering
130: amplitudes of the $\eta'$
131: meson in QCD~\cite{Witten:1979vv,Veneziano:1979ec,Seiler:1987ig,Giusti:2001xh,Seiler:2001je}.
132: The known value of ${C}_1$ in the SU(3) theory supports indeed
133: the fact that the bulk of the $\eta'$ mass is due to
134: the anomaly~\cite{DelDebbio:2004ns}.\\
135: \indent Recent theoretical developments in lattice gauge theory
136: made it possible to find an unambiguous definition of the topological charge
137: distribution with a finite and universal continuum
138: limit~\cite{Neuberger:1997fp,Luscher:1998pq,Hasenfratz:1998ri,Giusti:2001xh,Giusti:2004qd,Luscher:2004fu}.
139: The aim of this work is a precise computation of the distribution
140: of the topological charge in the SU(3) Yang--Mills theory. We observe
141: significant deviations from a Gaussian behaviour: they
142: disfavor the $\theta$ dependence given in Eq.~(\ref{eq:finst}), while
143: they are compatible with expectations from the large $N_c$ expansion.\\
144: \indent In the past the distribution of the topological charge was
145: already studied (see Ref.~\cite{DelDebbio:2004ns} and references therein).
146: These computations, however,
147: were not precise enough to observe deviations from the
148: leading Gaussian behaviour. In this respect we have exploited the
149: efficiency of the algorithm for the determination of the charge
150: developed in Ref.~\cite{Giusti:2002sm}. Properties of
151: the charge distribution have been investigated also with fermionic
152: and bosonic methods (see Refs.~\cite{DelDebbio:2002xa,Durr:2006ky} and references therein).
153: These results, however, are affected by model-dependent systematic errors that are not
154: quantifiable, and their interpretation rests on a weak theoretical ground.
155:
156: {\em Topological charge definition.---} The Neuberger--Dirac operator $D$ is defined as
157: \begin{eqnarray}
158: D & = & \frac{1}{\bar a} \Big[1 + \gamma_5 \mathrm{sign}(H)\Big]\; ,\\
159: H & = & \gamma_5 (a D_\mathrm{w} -1 -s)\, , \qquad \bar a = \frac{a}{1+s}\, ,
160: \label{eq:overlap}
161: \end{eqnarray}
162: where $D_\mathrm{w}$ is the standard Wilson--Dirac operator and
163: $s$ is an adjustable parameter in the range $|s|<1$ (for notations not
164: explained here see Ref.~\cite{Giusti:2002sm}). It satisfies
165: the Ginsparg--Wilson relation \cite{Ginsparg:1982bj}, and therefore
166: the associated fermion action preserves an exact chiral
167: symmetry at finite lattice spacing~\cite{Luscher:1998pq}.
168: The corresponding Jacobian is non-trivial, and the chiral anomaly
169: is recovered {\it \`a la} Fujikawa \cite{Luscher:1998pq,Fujikawa:1979ay} with
170: the topological charge density operator defined as~\cite{Hasenfratz:1998ri}
171: \begin{equation}\label{eq:qx}
172: a^4 q(x) = -\frac{\bar a}{2}\, \mathrm{Tr}\Big[\gamma_5 D(x,x)\Big] ,
173: \end{equation}
174: where the trace runs over spin and color indices. With this
175: definition the topological charge in a given background is given by
176: $Q \equiv \sum_x q(x) = n_+ - n_-$, with $n_+$ ($n_-$) being the
177: number of zero modes of $D$ with positive (negative) chirality.
178: The normalized cumulants ${C}_{n}$ are thus defined as the
179: integrated connected correlation functions of $n$
180: charge densities\footnote{Correlation functions
181: of an odd number of topological charges vanish thanks
182: to the invariance of the theory under parity.}
183: \be\label{eq:CnQCd}
184: {C}_{n} = \frac{a^{8n}}{V} \sum_{x_1,\dots,x_{2n}}
185: \langle q(x_1)\dots q(x_{2n})\rangle^\mathrm{con}\; .
186: \ee
187: They have an unambiguous finite continuum limit which is
188: independent of the details of the
189: regularization~\cite{Giusti:2001xh,Giusti:2004qd,Luscher:2004fu}.
190: At finite lattice spacing they are affected by discretization
191: errors which start at $O(a^2)$.
192:
193: {\em The large volume limit.---} Being $\nu$ integer-valued,
194: $F(\theta)$ is a periodic function with period $2\pi$.
195: In the interval $-\pi<\theta<\pi$ it has
196: its absolute minimum at $\theta=0$, and it may then be
197: expanded as
198: \be\label{eq:expEt}
199: F(\theta) = V \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (-1)^{n+1}
200: \frac{\theta^{2n}}{(2n)!} {C}_{n}\; .
201: \ee
202: Leading finite-size effects in the ${C}_n$ are
203: exponentially suppressed at asymptotically large volumes.
204: They are proportional to $e^{-M_g L}$,
205: with $M_g\sim 1.6$~GeV being the lightest glueball
206: mass~\cite{Chen:2005mg}, and they become rapidly negligible
207: as soon as $L$ is larger than $1$~fm or so~\cite{Giusti:2003gf}.
208: By inserting Eq.~(\ref{eq:expEt}) in
209: Eq.~(\ref{eq:pnu}), and neglecting exponentially small corrections
210: proportional to $e^{-2\pi^2\sigma^2}$, we can express the topological
211: charge distribution $P_\nu$ at large volumes by
212: a saddle point expansion (usually named Edgeworth expansion
213: in statistics\footnote{The Edgeworth expansion is usually
214: adopted in the context of the central limit theorem~\cite{Cramer:1945}.
215: In our case the volume $V$, or $(N_c^2 V)$ at large $N_c$, plays the r\^ole of
216: the number of independent degrees of freedom.}). This is
217: an asymptotic series in powers of $1/V$
218: (or $1/(N_c^2 V)$ according to large $N_c$)
219: which, up to higher order corrections, reads
220: \be\displaystyle\label{eq:pnuege}
221: P_\nu = \frac{e^{-\frac{\nu^2}{2 \sigma^2}}}{\sqrt{2 \pi \sigma^2}}
222: \left[1 + \frac{1}{4!}\frac{\tau}{\sigma^2} \mathrm{He}_\mathrm{4}\left(\nu/\sigma\right)
223: \right]\; .
224: \ee
225: The parameters are $\sigma^2 = V {C}_1$ and $\tau={C}_2/{C}_1$, and
226: the Hermite polynomial $\mathrm{He}_\mathrm{4}$ can be found in Ref.~\cite{Abramowitz:1965}.\\
227: \indent The semiclassical models provide a sharp prediction
228: of the topological charge distribution. By inserting Eq.~(\ref{eq:finst}) in
229: Eq.~(\ref{eq:pnu}), and taking into account that $\nu$ is an integer,
230: we obtain
231: \be\label{eq:pnuinst}
232: P^\mathrm{Inst}_\nu = e^{-VA} I_\nu(VA)\; ,
233: \ee
234: where $I_\nu$ are the modified Bessel functions of the first kind~\cite{Abramowitz:1965}. By
235: construction all normalized cumulants are equal to $A$.
236:
237: {\em Lattice computation.---} The numerical computation
238: is performed by standard Monte Carlo
239: techniques.
240: The ensembles of gauge configurations are generated
241: with the Wilson action and periodic boundary conditions.
242: Each update cycle consists in 1 heat-bath and several over-relaxations
243: of all link variables (more details can be found in Ref.~\cite{Giusti:2003gf}).
244: The charge density is defined as in
245: Eq.~(\ref{eq:qx}) with $s=0.4$, and the corresponding topological
246: charge has been computed by counting the number of zero modes
247: of the Neuberger--Dirac operator with the algorithm proposed
248: in Ref.~\cite{Giusti:2002sm}.\\
249: \indent The list of lattices, the
250: value of the bare coupling constant $\beta=6/g_0^2$, the linear size $L/a$
251: in each direction, and the number of independent configurations are reported in
252: Table~\ref{tab:lattices}. Lattice spacings and volumes have been chosen to have
253: normalized cumulants with small discretization and finite-size errors. To
254: estimate discretization effects we have simulated three lattices,
255: ${\rm A}_1$--${\rm A}_3$, with the same physical volume but different lattice spacings.
256: Two additional lattices, ${\rm B}_1$ and ${\rm C}_1$, have been generated to quantify the
257: magnitude of finite-size effects: they have the same bare coupling of ${\rm A}_1$
258: but larger volumes. The autocorrelation
259: function of the topological charge has been computed at the three values of $\beta$
260: by monitoring its value for several thousands of consecutive update
261: cycles of the $A$ lattices. The corresponding autocorrelation time is
262: between $20$ and $40$ cycles. Since the cost of a Monte Carlo update
263: is negligible with respect to the computation of the index of the
264: Neuberger-Dirac operator, we separated subsequent measurements on all lattices
265: by a number of update cycles between 1 and 2 orders of magnitude larger than the above estimates.
266: Statistical errors are then computed with the jackknife method by considering the
267: measurements as independent. A preliminary analysis of a subset of our results
268: was presented at the conference ``Lattice 2006''~\cite{Giusti:2007lat}.\\
269: \indent The Monte Carlo technique adopted here generates the gauge configurations
270: with a probability density proportional to $e^{-S_\mathrm{YM}}$, with
271: $S_\mathrm{YM}$ being the chosen discretization of the Yang--Mills action. This
272: algorithm performs an importance sampling of the topological charge with the
273: probability distribution given in Eq.~(\ref{eq:pnu}). A statistical signal for the
274: $n^\mathrm{th}$ cumulant is then obtained only if the number of configurations is
275: high enough for the sample to be sensitive to terms suppressed
276: as $V^{n-1}$ in the Edgeworth expansion. For instance, the estimators of the first two
277: cumulants
278: \ba
279: \overline{Q^2} & = & \frac{1}{N}
280: \sum_{i=1}^{N} \nu^2_i\; , \label{eq:est1}\\[0.125cm]
281: \overline{Q^{4,}} \,\!^\mathrm{con} & = &
282: \frac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^{N} \nu^4_i - 3 \left(\frac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^{N} \nu^2_i\right)^2\; ,
283: \label{eq:est2}
284: \ea
285: with $\nu_i$ being the value of the topological charge for a given gauge configuration
286: and $N$ the total number of configurations, have variances which, up to sub-leading
287: corrections, are $(2\sigma^4+\sigma^2\tau)/N$ and $(24\sigma^8 + 72 \sigma^6\tau)/N$
288: respectively.
289: The number of configurations on our main set of lattices, the ${\rm A}$ series,
290: has been fixed to have a precision of $15-20\%$ on the second cumulant $C_2$. For the
291: lattice ${\rm B}_1$ the number of configurations is chosen so to have a signal for
292: $\langle Q^4\rangle^\mathrm{con}$ and therefore a rough estimate
293: of finite-size effects\footnote{Given the scaling of the statistical error
294: with $V$ and $n$, it is very inefficient to compute higher cumulants at
295: large volumes with the standard sampling procedure. Once $\sigma^2$ is known, however,
296: one could devise an adaptive importance sampling algorithm which integrates
297: this information so to have a reduced $\sigma^2_\mathrm{eff}$.}.
298: Lattice ${\rm C}_1$ has been simulated to quantify finite-size
299: effects in $\langle Q^2\rangle$ with confidence.\\
300: \begin{table}[!t]
301: \begin{center}
302: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{.15pc}
303: \begin{tabular}{llcccclll}
304: \hline
305: Lat &$\beta$&$L/a$&$r_0/a$&$L$[fm]&$N$& $\chi^{2,\mathrm{Norm}}_\mathrm{dof}$
306: &$\chi^{2,\mathrm{Inst}}_\mathrm{dof}$&$\chi^{2,\mathrm{Edge}}_\mathrm{dof}$\\[0.125cm]
307: \hline
308: ${\rm A}_1$&$6.0$ &$12$& $5.368$ &$1.12$&$34800$& $\;15$ &$\;27$ &$\;1.5$\\[0.125cm]
309: ${\rm A}_2$&$6.0938$&$14$& $6.263$ &$1.12$&$30000$& $\;12$ &$\;34$ &$\;1.4$\\[0.125cm]
310: ${\rm A}_3$&$6.2623$&$18$& $8.052$ &$1.12$&$30000$& $\;13$ &$\;41$ &$\;1.1$\\[0.125cm]
311: ${\rm B}_1$&$6.0$ &$14$& $5.368$ &$1.30$&$30000$& $\;1.3$ &$\;6.7$ &$\;0.14$\\[0.125cm]
312: ${\rm C}_1$&$6.0$ &$16$& $5.368$ &$1.49$&$10000$& $\;0.67$&$\;2.4$ &$\;0.79$\\
313: \hline
314: \end{tabular}
315: \caption{Simulation parameters, number $N$ of configurations generated,
316: and values of $\chi^2_\mathrm{dof}$ for the fit of the data to a Gaussian
317: (Norm), to the instanton prediction in Eq.~(\ref{eq:pnuinst}) (Inst) and to
318: the Edgeworth expansion in Eq.~(\ref{eq:pnuege}) (Edge).\label{tab:lattices}}
319: \end{center}
320: \end{table}
321: \indent For each lattice we have compared the histogram of the topological
322: charge distribution with three functional forms: a simple Gaussian
323: centered at the origin, the Edgeworth expansion in Eq.~(\ref{eq:pnuege}),
324: and the prediction from instanton models in Eq.~(\ref{eq:pnuinst}).
325: The free parameter(s) of each function has(ve) been fixed by maximizing
326: the likelihood. For the symmetrized histograms the values of
327: $\chi^2$ per degree of freedom at the minimum are reported in
328: Table~\ref{tab:lattices}, and for the lattice
329: ${\rm A}_2$ the data points and the three curves are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:A2}.
330: The Edgeworth expansion reproduces well the behaviour
331: of the numerical data at these volumes and lattice spacings within our
332: statistical errors\footnote{We also fitted the data with the
333: functional form in Eq.~(\ref{eq:pnu}) and two non-vanishing cumulants.
334: The conclusions are analogous.}. On the ${\rm A}$ lattices the Gaussian distribution is
335: incompatible with the data, while at the two larger volumes the
336: $\chi^2_\mathrm{dof}$ is still rather good. The functional
337: form suggested by instanton models is excluded on the lattices
338: ${\rm A}_1$--${\rm A}_3$ and ${\rm B}_1$, and is off by more than two sigmas
339: on the lattice ${\rm C}_1$. On the ${\rm A}$ lattices a fit limited to $|\nu|\leq 1$ leads
340: to the same conclusions. This is one of the main results of this paper.\\
341: \begin{figure}[t]
342: \begin{center}
343: \includegraphics*[width=8.5cm]{Q4_Q2.eps}
344: \vspace{-0.25cm}
345: \caption{Number of configurations vs the topological charge for the lattice ${\rm A}_2$. To
346: guide the eye, lines connect the values of the fitted distributions: the simple
347: Gaussian (Norm), the instanton prediction in Eq.~(\ref{eq:pnuinst}) (Inst) and the
348: Edgeworth expansion in Eq.~(\ref{eq:pnuege}) (Edge). The plots on right are a blowup
349: of the top and the bottom of the distribution.\label{fig:A2}}
350: \end{center}
351: \end{figure}
352: \indent To quantify the magnitude of discretization and finite-size effects we have
353: computed the first two cumulants of the topological charge distribution
354: with the estimators given in Eqs.~(\ref{eq:est1}) and (\ref{eq:est2}).
355: The numerical results are reported in Table~\ref{tab:cumulants}.
356: The contributions from the poorly sampled tail of the distributions,
357: i.e. bins of the symmetrized histogram populated by less than 10 events,
358: have been estimated from the large volume expression in Eq.~(\ref{eq:pnuege})
359: as suggested in Ref.~\cite{Giusti:2003gf}. Within our statistical errors we do
360: not observe a signal for the higher cumulants, and correlation functions
361: of an odd number of topological charges are always compatible with zero.\\
362: \indent For the data samples that can be directly compared, the values of $\langle Q^2\rangle$
363: are in very good agreement with the results in Ref.~\cite{DelDebbio:2004ns}.
364: We confirm that discretization effects on $r_0^4 {C}_1$, where $r_0$ is a low-energy
365: reference scale well measured in the pure gauge theory~\cite{Guagnelli:1998ud},
366: are moderate (of the order of $10\%$ at our coarser lattice spacing), and finite size
367: effects are below $5\%$ at our smaller volume. Even though our errors
368: for $\langle Q^2\rangle$ are much smaller with respect to those in Ref.~\cite{DelDebbio:2004ns},
369: a significative improvement of the determination of ${C}_1$ in the continuum limit requires
370: further simulations and is left to a future publication.\\
371: \indent The second cumulant is best expressed by the adimensional ratio
372: $\langle Q^4\rangle^\mathrm{con}/\langle Q^2\rangle$ which
373: has a well defined continuum and infinite-volume limit. The numerical
374: results for the lattices ${\rm A}_1$--${\rm A}_3$ and ${\rm B}_1$ are
375: reported in Table~\ref{tab:cumulants}, and they are plotted in
376: Fig.~\ref{fig:cont} as a function of $(a/r_0)^2$. All values
377: are incompatible with $1$, the predicted value from Eq.~(\ref{eq:finst}).
378: The results from ${\rm A}_1$, ${\rm A}_2$ and ${\rm A}_3$ agree
379: within errors. No statistical-significant evidence of
380: discretization effects is thus observed. The theoretical arguments given in
381: the third section suggest small finite-size effects at these volumes.
382: A direct estimate of these effects on $\langle Q^4\rangle^\mathrm{con}$
383: would require more precise data for the lattice ${\rm C}_1$. The compatibility of the
384: results on lattices ${\rm A}_1$ and ${\rm B}_1$, however, is
385: consistent with the theoretical expectations. Our best estimate for
386: the ratio of the first two cumulants
387: is $\langle Q^4\rangle^\mathrm{con}/\langle Q^2\rangle=0.30(11)$.
388: The central value is taken from the lattice ${\rm A}_3$, the one
389: with the finer lattice spacing, and the error is the
390: sum in quadrature of the statistical error and of the difference
391: between the central values computed on the lattice ${\rm A}_1$
392: and ${\rm B}_1$.
393: \begin{table}[!t]
394: \begin{center}
395: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{.375pc}
396: \begin{tabular}{llll}
397: \hline
398: Lat &$\;\;\;\langle Q^2\rangle$& $\;\;\;\;\langle Q^4\rangle^\mathrm{con}$
399: & $\langle Q^4\rangle^\mathrm{con}/\langle Q^2\rangle$\\[0.125cm]
400: \hline
401: ${\rm A}_1$&$1.637(13)$&$\;\;\;0.60(9)$& $\;\;\;0.37(6)$\\[0.125cm]
402: ${\rm A}_2$&$1.566(13)$&$\;\;\;0.47(9)$& $\;\;\;0.30(6)$\\[0.125cm]
403: ${\rm A}_3$&$1.432(12)$&$\;\;\;0.43(7)$& $\;\;\;0.30(5)$\\[0.125cm]
404: ${\rm B}_1$&$3.09(3)$ &$\;\;\;0.8(3)$ & $\;\;\;0.27(10)$\\[0.125cm]
405: ${\rm C}_1$&$5.44(8)$ &$\;\;\;\;\;\; - $ &$\;\;\;\;\;\; - $\\
406: \hline
407: \end{tabular}
408: \caption{Results for the first two cumulants and their ratio.\label{tab:cumulants}}
409: \end{center}
410: \end{table}
411: \begin{figure}[!t]
412: \begin{center}
413: \includegraphics*[width=6.0cm]{Q4_r0a.eps}
414: \vspace{-0.25cm}
415: \caption{Ratio of the first two cumulants vs the lattice spacing.\label{fig:cont}}
416: \end{center}
417: \end{figure}
418:
419: {\em Final remarks.---} From the previous analysis we conclude that our
420: results disfavour the $\theta$ behaviour of the
421: vacuum energy predicted by instanton models.
422: Our best estimate of the ratio
423: $\langle Q^4\rangle^\mathrm{con}/\langle Q^2\rangle = 0.30(11)$
424: is incompatible with 1, which is the value predicted from Eq.~(\ref{eq:finst}).
425: This suggests that the quantum fluctuations of the topological charge
426: are of quantum non-perturbative nature in the ensemble of gauge
427: configurations that dominate the path integral.
428: The large $N_c$ expansion does not provide a sharp prediction for the value
429: of $\langle Q^4\rangle^\mathrm{con}/\langle Q^2\rangle$. Its small value,
430: however, is compatible with being a quantity suppressed in the large $N_c$ limit. The value
431: of $\langle Q^4\rangle^\mathrm{con}$ is related via the Witten--Veneziano mechanism to the leading anomalous
432: contribution to the $\eta'$--$\eta'$ elastic scattering amplitude in QCD.
433:
434: We thank L. Del Debbio, L. \'Alvarez-Gaum\'e, M.~L\"uscher, M. Testa and G. Veneziano
435: for stimulating discussions on the topic of this paper. The numerical computations
436: have been carried out on PC farms of the
437: Italian INFN Grid project. We warmly thank Giuseppe Andronico for his
438: work in the organization of Theophys, the INFN Grid virtual organization
439: for theoretical physics. Many thanks to Alessandro De Salvo and Marco Serra
440: for the continuous effort in helping us with the Grid during the
441: accomplishment of the project.
442: \bibliographystyle{apsrev}
443: \bibliography{Q4}% Produces the bibliography via BibTeX.
444: \end{document}
445:
446: