1:
2: %%
3: %% Beginning of file 'outerjets.tex'
4: %%
5:
6: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
7:
8: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
9:
10: %\usepackage{natbib}
11:
12:
13: %%\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
14:
15:
16: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
17:
18: %%\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
19:
20: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
21: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
22: %% use the longabstract style option.
23:
24: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
25:
26: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
27: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
28: %% the \begin{document} command.
29: %%
30: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
31: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
32: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
33: %% for information.
34:
35: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
36: \newcommand{\myemail}{ekellogg@cfa.harvard.edu}
37:
38: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
39:
40: %% \slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
41:
42: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
43: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
44: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
45: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
46: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
47: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
48:
49: \shorttitle{ R~Aquarii outer jets}
50: \shortauthors{Kellogg et al}
51:
52: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
53: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
54:
55: \begin{document}
56:
57: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
58: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
59: %% you desire.
60:
61: \title{Outer jet X-ray and radio emission in R~Aquarii: 1999.8 to 2004.0}
62:
63: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
64: %% author and affiliation information.
65: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
66: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
67: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
68: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
69:
70: \author{E. Kellogg, C. Anderson, K. Korreck, J. DePasquale, J. Nichols
71: and J.~L. Sokoloski\footnote{NSF Astronomy \& Astrophysics Fellow.}} \affil{Harvard/Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics,
72: 60 Garden St. Cambridge, MA 02138}
73:
74: %%\author{J. Pedelty\altaffilmark{1}}
75:
76: \author{M. Krauss} \affil{ Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space
77: Research, MIT, Cambridge MA 02139}
78:
79: \author{J. Pedelty}
80:
81: \affil{Planetary Systems Laboratory, Code 693, NASA Goddard Space
82: Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771} \email{ekellogg@cfa.harvard.edu}
83:
84: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
85: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
86: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
87: %% affiliation.
88:
89: %%\altaffiltext{1}{Absentee Professor, University of Maryland, Baltiwash.}
90:
91: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
92: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
93: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
94: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
95: %% editorial office after submission.
96:
97: \begin{abstract}
98: {\it Chandra} and VLA observations of the symbiotic star R~Aqr in 2004
99: reveal significant changes over the three to four year interval
100: between these observations and previous observations taken in with the
101: VLA in 1999 and with {\it Chandra} in 2000. This paper reports on the
102: evolution of the outer thermal X-ray lobe-jets and radio jets. The
103: emission from the outer X-ray lobe-jets lies farther away from the
104: central binary than the outer radio jets, and comes from material
105: interpreted as being shock heated to $\simeq$ 10$^{6}$K, a likely
106: result of collision between high speed material ejected from the
107: central binary and regions of enhanced gas density. Between 2000 and
108: 2004, the Northeast (NE) outer X-ray lobe-jet moved out away from the
109: central binary, with an apparent projected motion of $\simeq$ 580 km
110: s$^{-1}$. The Southwest (SW) outer X-ray lobe-jet almost disappeared
111: between 2000 and 2004, presumably due to adiabatic expansion and
112: cooling. The NE radio bright spot also moved away from the central
113: binary between 2000 and 2004, but with a smaller apparent velocity
114: than of the NE X-ray bright spot. The SW outer lobe-jet was not
115: detected in the radio in either 1999 or 2004. The density and mass of the
116: X-ray emitting material is estimated.Cooling times, shock
117: speeds, pressure and confinement are discussed.
118: \end{abstract}
119:
120: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
121: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
122: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
123: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
124:
125:
126: \keywords{ stars: individual \objectname{R Aquarii} --- binaries:
127: symbiotic --- circumstellar matter --- stars: white dwarfs --- stars:
128: winds, outflows --- radio continuum: stars --- X-rays: general}
129:
130: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
131: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
132: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
133: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
134: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
135: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
136: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
137: %% each reference.
138:
139: \section{Introduction}
140:
141: R Aquarii is a well studied symbiotic system made up of a Mira-type
142: giant star and a compact object, most likely a white dwarf. The
143: system has been observed in the radio \citep{kaf89}, optical
144: \citep{sol01,ho91,sol02,pa01,ho97}, UV \citep{ho91}, and X-rays
145: \citep{kel01}, hereafter KPL. The R Aqr system was first reported as
146: an unresolved {\em Einstein} X-ray source by \citet{ju01}. It was later
147: observed with {\em EXOSAT} \citep{vi01} and {\em ROSAT}
148: \citep{hu01}. Since this system is relatively close, about 200 pc away
149: \citep{ho97a}, there has been intense study of its evolution. R
150: Aquarii is contained in an inner nebula extending
151: $\sim$1\arcmin\,north-south and another that is
152: $\sim$2\arcmin\,east-west. One of the most interesting features of
153: the system is a bi-polar collimated outflow first observed around 1977
154: \citep{wal80, her80}.
155:
156: Collimated non-relativistic outflows have been found in accreting
157: compact stars -- symbiotic stars and supersoft X-ray sources. They
158: have also been observed in Herbig-Haro objects. X-ray jets may also be
159: produced in the fast collimated winds from the central stars or
160: binaries in some bipolar planetary nebulae \citep{sok01}, and
161: recently, a possible X-ray jet has been reported in the T Tauri star
162: DG Tau \citep{gud}, and optical spectroscopic evidence for jets in Hen
163: 3-1341 was reported by \citet{to00}. Also see Table 2 of \citet{br04}.
164:
165: The symbiotic star R~Aqr is the most dramatic example of a
166: white-dwarf collimated outflow, and it was the first white dwarf found
167: to have an X-ray jet (KPL). There are currently only two white dwarfs
168: known to have X-ray jets, R~Aqr and CH Cyg \citep{gal01}, and both are
169: in symbiotic stars. In both cases, X-rays are present due to shock
170: heating of the outflowing material as it collides with surrounding
171: nebular material. The jet in CH Cyg is not completely resolved in the
172: {\em Chandra} observation, but is visible in an HST observation shown
173: in the same publication. It is more similar to the central R~Aqr
174: source and inner jets \citep{ni01} than to the outer lobe-jets discussed
175: here. It is also possible that the CH Cyg jet spectrum contains an
176: admixture of emission from the central CH Cyg source because the jet
177: is not completely spatially resolved. That could explain the counts at
178: ~5 keV from the jet - they could be from the central source, as seen
179: in R Aqr.
180:
181: Supersoft X-ray sources (SSS) show evidence for jet outflow but jets
182: like those we observe in R Aqr have not been imaged directly. This is
183: not surprising because most SSS are much more distant, being at
184: kiloparsec distances in our galaxy, in the Magellanic Clouds, or even
185: in external galaxies, making their angular sizes likely too small to
186: be resolved. The primary evidence for jets in SSS is the observation
187: of pairs of red and blue shifted ``satellite'' optical emission lines
188: in their spectra \citep{co01,ka01}. SSS are typically close binaries
189: and are far more luminous than R Aqr in X-rays, with L$_x$ in the
190: near-Eddington range 10$^{37-38}$ erg s$^{-1}$. The radial velocities
191: of these jets range up to thousands of km s$^{-1}$, considerably
192: higher than the outer lobe-jet R Aqr velocity. These SSS jets are
193: thought to be radiation driven. However, they are likely to be
194: situated very close to the WD accretion disk, whereas the R Aqr lobe-jets
195: we study here are very far away from the central source, with an expectation of lower velocity due to various sources of drag or dissipation.
196:
197:
198: Production of X-rays from non-relativistic jets occurs in some
199: protostellar jets in Herbig-Haro objects (e.g.
200: \citet{pra01} in which there is marginal evidence for extended
201: emission in HH2 below 2 keV, but not enough detail to know if there is
202: a jet. An expanding x-ray feature was seen in HH154, moving outward at
203: $\sim500$ km s$^{-1}$ \citep{fav02,fa06}. These jets in YSOs, the
204: Herbig-Haro (HH) objects, are similar to those seen in R Aqr. HH
205: objects have been known for 50 years to be luminous condensations of
206: gas in star-forming regions, but not fully explained. A jet-induced
207: shock model is favored, with material streaming out of a young stellar
208: object, colliding with the ambient medium. HH2 was the first HH object
209: discovered as an X-ray source by \citet{pra01}. Eleven photons were
210: detected, establishing that the source was extended by about 1-2 arc
211: sec. The position of the emission is known to 1/2 arc second accuracy
212: and is at the leading edge of an H$_\alpha$ feature moving at several
213: hundred km s$^{-1}$ away from the star of origin, an obscured YSO
214: named VLA 1. The shape of the spectrum cannot be determined from so
215: few counts, but the counts are all at energies $<$2 keV, similar to
216: the R Aqr outer lobe-jets. HH154 was observed by \citet{fa06} in 2001
217: and 2005.
218:
219: The Herbig Ae star HD 163296 is also an X-ray source with a suggestion
220: of emission in the direction of a Ly$_\alpha$ emitting jet and
221: Herbig-Haro outflow \citep{sw01}. The authors fit variable abundances
222: with elements of similar first ionization potentials fixed at their
223: relative solar abundances to allow for chemical fractionation commonly
224: observed in late-type stars of this type. Most of the X-ray emission
225: comes from the central star, and is fitted to a mekal thermal plasma
226: emission model with kT = 0.49 $\pm$ 0.03 keV, a somewhat higher
227: temperature than for the outer lobe-jets in R Aqr, and qualitatively
228: different from the central R Aqr source
229: \citep{ni01}. The suggestion of X-ray emission from a jet was only
230: five counts, so not much could be learned, except that the counts are
231: at about 0.8 keV, considerably higher energy than for the R Aqr outer
232: lobe-jets.
233:
234: The remainder of this article gives a description of the 2004.0 {\it
235: Chandra} and VLA observations of the outer lobe-jets in R Aqr, comparing
236: with the earlier 2000.7 ({\it Chandra} and 1999.8 (VLA) epochs,
237: presenting images and contour maps, and giving results on X-ray
238: spectra. The X-ray data, including image and spectral analysis, are
239: presented in \S\ref{sec:chandraobs}. The radio data are presented in
240: \S\ref{sec:vlaobs}. In \S\ref{sec:interp}, we discuss the expected
241: vs. observed cooling times, the mass, mass loss rate and kinetic
242: energy in the lobe-jets, and the inferred shock speeds. We conclude
243: with a summary of our results in \S\ref{sec:concl}.
244:
245: \section{Observations and Results}
246:
247:
248: %% In this section, we use the \subsection command to set off
249: %% a subsection. \footnote is used to insert a footnote to the text.
250:
251: %% Observe the use of the LaTeX \label
252: %% command after the \subsection to give a symbolic KEY to the
253: %% subsection for cross-referencing in a \ref command.
254: %% You can use LaTeX's \ref and \label commands to keep track of
255: %% cross-references to sections, equations, tables, and figures.
256: %% That way, if you change the order of any elements, LaTeX will
257: %% automatically renumber them.
258:
259: %% This section also includes several of the displayed math environments
260: %% mentioned in the Author Guide.
261:
262:
263: \subsection{{\it Chandra} Observations\label{sec:chandraobs}}
264:
265: The new X-ray observations reported here were taken with {\it Chandra}
266: on 2003 December 31 15:05:40 UT, MJD 53004.62894 start time
267: (hereafter 2004.0) with the ACIS-S3 back illuminated detector
268: \citep{cxc01}. The dataset is sequence 300140 and obsid 4546
269: \footnote{available at
270: \dataset{http://cfa.harvard.edu/chaser/mainEntry.do}} with an exposure
271: time of 36523~s.
272:
273: In order to compare the obsid 651 observation taken in 2000.7 with the
274: new data, we reprocessed the 651 data to apply the same calibration
275: and processing techniques to both observations (see cxc.harvard.edu
276: for a description of the current calibration system). Our
277: reprocessing of the data used CALDB version 2.28, and the most current
278: correction algorithms as of Aug. 11, 2004. We applied a
279: time-dependent gain correction and the CTI correction to the original
280: level~1 event file, and created new rmf's for each observation. We
281: removed pixel randomization, and then applied the sub-pixel
282: repositioning algorithm\citep{Li01}. These new level~1 event files
283: were then filtered by grade and status, rejecting inappropriate
284: events, to create level~2 event files, used in the analysis.
285:
286: \subsubsection{X-ray images\label{sec:xrayim}}
287:
288: Figures \ref{2epXX}, \ref{2epXXred}, \ref{2epXXgreen} and
289: \ref{2epXXblue} show a general X-ray view of R~Aqr in the recent
290: 2004.0 epoch, compared with the previous 2000.7 epoch. The total
291: number of counts in 2004.0 with E$\le$8~keV from a 0.083 square arc
292: min area encompassing the region in these figures is about 1000, or
293: 0.027 counts~s$^{-1}$. The total counts from a region of the same size
294: nearby, an indication of background, is 47, or 0.0013
295: counts~s$^{-1}$.
296:
297:
298: \begin{figure}[h]
299: %%\hfill
300: %%\includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.6]{f1.eps}
301: \plotone{f1.eps}
302:
303: \caption{{\it Chandra} X-ray images of R~Aqr, 2000.7 above, 2004.0 below. This smoothed false color image represents X-ray counts in the
304: energy range 0.2-3.5 keV. North is up, west is right. The arrow points to the
305: central R Aqr binary at 23$^{\rm h} 43^{\rm m} 49\fs45 \,-15 \arcdeg \, 17\arcmin \,
306: 4\farcs2$ J2000, shown as a black dot; color bars are log intensity, in units of counts per 1/8$\arcsec$ pixel. Between 2000.7 and
307: 2004.0 the peak of the NE outer X-ray lobe-jet moved 2$\arcsec$ to the
308: northwest, away from the central binary, and the SW outer lobe-jet faded
309: significantly. \label{2epXX}}
310:
311: \end{figure}
312:
313:
314: The images in figures \ref{2epXX}, \ref{2epXXred}, \ref{2epXXgreen}
315: and \ref{2epXXblue} were created by first resampling the level~2 event
316: files to 0.25 ACIS pixels, so the resulting pixel size is 1/8$\arcsec$. A smoothing algorithm available in CIAO,
317: aconvolve, was used with a 1-$\sigma$ gaussian profile one ACIS pixel
318: in extent to create the final images. This removes graininess without
319: introducing significant blurring. The false color representation in
320: Figure \ref{2epXX} has colors assigned on the basis of source
321: brightness, with a color bar attached.Although the two observations were of different exposure times, they were adjusted for decreasing efficiency of the ACIS-S3 detector so equal numbers of counts in this 0.2-3.5 keV energy range would be expected if the source strength didn't vary.
322:
323:
324: The X-ray morphology of R Aqr consists of several distinct structures.
325: X-ray emission is detected from the central interacting binary, and
326: from a small inner jet to the SW within $\sim 5\arcsec$ of the central
327: binary (clearly present for the first time in 2004.0; see \citet{ni01}
328: for more discussion of this new X-ray jet), an outer jet to the NE and
329: an outer jet to the SW. While the inner jet and the outer NE lobe-jet are
330: largely aligned along a line at PA$\simeq 46\degr$, the peak of the
331: outer SW lobe-jet is located at PA$\simeq 211\degr$, a significant
332: difference from the position angle of $226\degr$ expected from a
333: simple opposing jet. In general, the SW outer lobe-jet is fainter and more
334: extended than the NE lobe-jet. This kind of change in position angle has
335: been interpreted as evidence for precession of the accretion disk
336: close to the binary \citep{kaf86}. Alternately, we suggest the
337: jet may be encountering a wall of material constraining its motion,
338: such as described by \citet{sok01} and \citet{sol02}.
339:
340:
341: In 2000.7, the NE outer lobe-jet emission was dominated by a bright
342: spot approximately 8$\arcsec$ from the central binary. The NE
343: lobe-jet also produced diffuse emission extending all the way from the
344: central binary out to a small, northward-curving spur-like structure
345: roughly 12$\arcsec$ away (see Fig.~\ref{2epXX}). In 2004.0, the NE
346: outer lobe-jet bright spot had moved outward by $2.0\arcsec
347: \pm0.1\arcsec$. This change in position corresponds to an apparent
348: velocity of $580d \pm 30d$ ~km s$^{-1}$ in the plane of the sky, where
349: {\it d} is the distance to R Aqr divided by 200 pc. The extent of the
350: more diffuse emission, however, remained approximately the same.
351: \citet{bod98} did a specrocoptic optical observation of R Aqr and
352: observed outward motion of the same region as our NE lobe-jet in
353: H$_\alpha$ with a tangential velocity of 550$\pm$300 km s$^{-1}$,
354: agreeing with our measurement within the errors.
355:
356: The total number of counts from the NE outer lobe-jet was about the
357: same in 2000.7 and 2004.0. Taking into account the the decrease in
358: effective area resulting from contamination buildup on the ACIS-S3
359: optical blocking filter and increased exposure time, there was also no
360: statistically significant change in total flux from the NE outer
361: lobe-jet between the two epochs (see Table \ref{netbl}). The constancy
362: of the NE lobe-jet flux is remarkable given that the morphology of the
363: source changed significantly between the two observations. If the
364: nominal change were truly occurring, it would be consistent with a
365: factor of five reduction in flux in the ten years between the
366: 1990-1991 observation \citep{hu01} and our 2000.7 epoch
367: observation. However, the \citet{hu01} observation with {\em ROSAT}
368: PSPC could not resolve the NE and SW lobe-jets and the central source
369: from each other, and did not have spectral resolution nor range
370: comparable with our {\em Chandra} observations, so more detailed
371: conclusions cannot be drawn.
372:
373: In 2000.7, the SW outer lobe-jet consisted of a series of
374: disconnected, faint emission regions (with a slightly southward
375: curvature) and a bright spot 26$\arcsec$ from the central binary. The
376: SW outer lobe-jet bright spot was $\sim$3 times fainter than the NE
377: outer lobe-jet bright spot. In 2004.0, the appearance of the SW outer
378: lobe-jet had changed dramatically. The SW outer lobe-jet X-ray
379: emission faded by 75\% overall (see Table \ref{swremtbl}). The
380: disappearance of the X-ray bright spot at the center of the SW
381: lobe-jet (see Figure \ref{2epXX}) accounted for much of this change,
382: as it was undetectable in 2004.0 The other SW outer lobe-jet emission
383: regions did not fade significantly, and some may have moved outward
384: compared to their location in 2000.7, but two images in $\sim$3 years
385: are inadequate to properly track these possible motions.
386:
387: Figures \ref{2epXXred}, \ref{2epXXgreen} and \ref{2epXXblue} are based
388: on our analysis of the energy spectrum of the outer lobe-jets, which
389: are best modeled by a thermal emission process.the figures show X-rays
390: in three energy ranges corresponding to expected dominant peaks in
391: line emission from a thermal plasma, the Si~XI complex just below the
392: C absorption edge at 0.284, N VI, at$\sim$0.43 and O VII, at 0.57 keV
393: \citep{zom}. The contour levels in figures \ref{2epXXred},
394: \ref{2epXXgreen} and \ref{2epXXblue} are 0.01, 0.025, 0.05, 0.065,
395: 0.1, 0.6 counts pixel$^{-1}$.
396:
397:
398: \begin{figure}[h]
399: %%\hfill
400: %%\includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.8]{f2.eps}
401: \plotone{f2.eps}
402: \caption{{\it Chandra} X-ray images of R~Aqr in the 0.30 keV energy
403: range. 2000.7 is above, 2004.0 below. North is up, west is right. The arrow points to the location of the central R Aqr
404: binary; the grayscale bar is log intensity, in units of counts per 1/8$\arcsec$ pixel. \label{2epXXred}}
405: \end{figure}
406:
407: \begin{figure}[h]
408: %%\hfill
409: %%\includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.8]{f3.eps}
410: \plotone{f3.eps}
411: \caption{{\it Chandra} X-ray images of R~Aqr from the 0.43 keV energy range.
412: 2000.7 is above, 2004.0 below. North is up, west is right. The arrow points to the location of the central R Aqr
413: binary; the grayscale bar is log intensity, in units of counts per 1/8$\arcsec$ pixel.\label{2epXXgreen}}
414: \end{figure}
415:
416: \begin{figure}[h]
417: %%\hfill
418: %%\includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.8]{f4.eps}
419: \plotone{f4.eps}
420: \caption{{\it Chandra} X-ray images of R~Aqr from the O~VII energy range, $\sim$0.57 keV.
421: 2000.7 is above, 2004.0 below. North is up, west is right. The arrow points to the location of the central R Aqr
422: binary; the grayscale bar is log intensity, in units of counts per 1/8$\arcsec$ pixel. \label{2epXXblue}}
423: \end{figure}
424:
425: Several interesting features are apparent. In Figure \ref{2epXXred}
426: the 0.3 keV emission in the SW lobe-jet seems to come only from the center
427: of that region. It may be cooler than the outer part.
428: Of note in Figure \ref{2epXXgreen} is the region to the north of the
429: brightest part of the lobe-jet NE of the visible star in the 2000.7
430: epoch. This suggests it is emitting strongly in this part of
431: the spectrum. In the 2004.0 epoch, the brightest part of the NE lobe-jet
432: has moved into that region. The 0.3
433: keV part of the SW outer lobe-jet has faded considerably in 2004.0 but not
434: entirely. Figure \ref{2epXXblue}, the 0.57 keV range, shows the bulk
435: of the emission from the outer lobe-jets. It also shows the north spur in
436: the earlier observation where the later emission has moved. There
437: is a noticeably larger region of emission in this energy range in the
438: outer SW lobe-jet, and the center of the SW lobe-jet disappears in the later
439: observation.
440:
441: \subsubsection{X-ray spectra}
442:
443: The spectral data were extracted from data we processed to give the
444: most up to date results, yielding level~2 event files We extracted
445: pulse height files using the CIAO {\em specextract} tool, with 10 counts per
446: bin to allow using the $\chi^2$ technique. The spectra were fit with
447: XSPEC 12.3.0e \citep{Arn96}; also see
448: http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/xanadu/xspec. The \citet{and}
449: abundances were used.
450:
451: Given the noticeable peaks in the spectrum suggesting line emission,
452: we had to decide whether to use an equilibrium thermal model in xspec
453: or a non-equilibrium collisional model (e.g. the nei model in
454: xspec). With the relatively small number of counts from the outer lobe-jets
455: in these spectra, we found we could not constrain the parameters of
456: complex models such as nei effectively, whereas the equilibrium model
457: gives an acceptable fit to the data. Given the limited number of
458: counts, we had to be careful to fit the data with as few parameters as
459: possible to obtain significant results. With the apparent thermal
460: shape of the spectrum, we chose the most up to date thermal model,
461: APEC \citep{sm01}. We also tried substituting other spectral forms
462: instead of APEC. Black body and power law models did not give an
463: acceptable fit. In all the fits we included interstellar absorption
464: fixed at the 21-cm value of N$_{H}$ = 1.85 $\times$10$^{20}$
465: \citep{Stark92}. The entries in Table \ref{netbl} entitled
466: ''Source 0.25-2.0 keV flux'' were computed with the interstellar
467: absorption set to zero.
468:
469: In KPL we had applied the more complex non-equilibrium model to
470: the data; in this work we found the simpler model gave just as
471: acceptable a fit to the data without the model complexity. We believe
472: this difference is related to the improvements in the low energy
473: calibration of the Chandra ACIS S3 detector in the interim.
474:
475:
476: \underline{NE Outer Lobe-Jet}
477:
478: No spatial variations were detectable in the 2004.0 NE outer lobe-jet
479: spectrum. We compared spectra drawn from the half of the outer lobe-jet
480: closest to the central star and the half farthest away. We also
481: compared spectra from an elliptical region centered on the NE outer
482: lobe-jet bright spot and a surrounding concentric elliptical annulus. We
483: found no significant differences in spectral parameters in the pairs
484: of regions. Therefore, we fitted spectrum models to the entire NE lobe-jet
485: for the two epochs. Figure \ref{NEoutersub} shows the spectra of the
486: NE thermal lobe-jet. In addition to the APEC model with standard abundances,
487: we had to add a continuum to obtain an acceptable fit. The simplest
488: continuum is a power law. Adding this component gave an acceptable fit
489: to the data for both epochs. (Table \ref{netbl}).
490:
491: \begin{figure}[h]
492: %%\includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=.15]{f5l.eps} \\
493: \includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=.22,bbllx=10 pt,bblly=10 pt,bburx=600 pt,bbury=650 pt]{f5c.eps} \\
494: \includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=.22,bbllx=10 pt,bblly=-80 pt,bburx=600 pt,bbury=150 pt]{f5r.eps}
495: \caption{X-ray spectrum of NE thermal lobe-jet as observed by {\it Chandra}. The plots show pulse
496: height spectra and model fits --- 2000.7 above,
497: 2004.0 below. The dotted lines show the contributions from the individual additive components of the model.
498: Nearby regions of the image with no enhanced emission were used to estimate and subtract the backgound.
499: \label{NEoutersub}}
500: \end{figure}
501:
502: There is a hint of a peak in the 2000.7 data at about 0.4 keV, which
503: we earlier interpreted as N VI emission. However, using the latest
504: calibrations we can obtain an acceptable fit to the data without
505: modeling that line.
506:
507: \underline{SW Outer Lobe-Jet}
508:
509:
510: Figure \ref{SWlobe} shows the SW outer lobe-jet {\it Chandra} pulse height
511: spectra in the two epochs, with the model fits. There is a prominent
512: peak at the energy of the O~VII line in epoch 2000.7, suggesting again
513: the APEC models as appropriate. In epoch 2004.0, the SW lobe-jet has faded
514: to about 1/4 the overall intensity. Unlike for the NE lobe-jet, a power
515: law was not required for the SW lobe-jet. The APEC model gives an
516: acceptable fit. We tested other model fits, including blackbody and
517: power law instead of APEC, but they gave unacceptable fits.See Table
518: \ref{swremtbl}.
519:
520: \begin{figure}[h]
521: \includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=.25]{f6l.eps} \\
522: \includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=.25]{f6r.eps}
523: %%\plottwo{f6l.eps}{f6r.eps}
524: \caption{X-ray spectra of the SW lobe-jet as observed by {\it Chandra}, 2000.7,
525: above and 2004.0, below. .\label{SWlobe}}
526: \end{figure}
527:
528:
529: \subsection{VLA Observations\label{sec:vlaobs}}
530:
531: To compare the radio structure of the jets in 2004.0 to the radio
532: structure in 1999.8 (KPL), we performed VLA observations on 2004 January
533: 6 with the NRAO Very Large Array in the B configuration. The receivers
534: were tuned to the U (2cm), X (3.5cm), and L (20cm) frequencies with
535: 100 MHz bandpasses. Two scans were made at X band ($\sim$18 minutes
536: each) and one scan each at U and L bands ($\sim$11 minutes each). We
537: used AlPS software for standard calibration, self-calibration, and
538: imaging.
539:
540: Figure \ref{VLAChandraCON} shows the VLA 3.5 cm (X band) observations
541: of R~Aqr in the two epochs. The beam is $1.0\arcsec\alpha\times 0.69
542: \arcsec \delta$ PA$\simeq 0\degr$ for both epochs. For the 1999.8
543: observation, the total flux was 29$\pm0.9$ mJy. For 2004.0 it was
544: 21$\pm0.6$ mJy. The faint extended radio emission in the outer NE jet
545: region that was present in 1999.8 has largely disappeared in
546: 2004.0. The brighter wisp in the southern portion of the NE jet is
547: still present. Its peak has moved east by 0.3$\pm$0.2$\arcsec$ between
548: 1999.8 and 2004.0. In 2004.0, the peak of the NE jet 3.5 cm emission
549: is about 6.3$\arcsec$ away from the position of the central binary.
550: This apparent velocity is several times smaller than the apparent bulk
551: velocity of the X-ray emitting plasma. There is no detectable emission
552: at the position of the SW X-ray lobe-jet in either epoch. This motion gives
553: an apparent bulk velocity of $\sim 90d\pm60d$~km s$^{-1}$, close to or
554: perhaps consistent with no motion at all.
555:
556:
557: \begin{figure}[h]
558: %%\includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.8]{f7.eps}
559: \plotone{f7.eps}
560: \caption{VLA radio contour plots of R~Aqr, 1999.8 on left, 2004.0 on
561: right. The arrows point to the white dots at the position of the central star,
562: with arrows pointing to them. The gray scale image is the VLA X band
563: radio intensity, emphasizing only the brightest regions. Contour
564: levels are 0.015, 0.078, 0.40, 2.10, 4.0 mJy/beam.
565: \label{VLAChandraCON}}
566: \end{figure}
567:
568:
569: %\subsection{Composite {\it Chandra} X-ray and VLA radio images}
570:
571: Figure \ref{VLAChandra} shows composite images of the {\it Chandra} and VLA
572: observations from the two epochs, with the VLA 3.5 cm contours
573: overlaid on a three color {\it Chandra} X-ray image. The NE X-ray bright
574: spot lies farther away from the central binary than the NE radio
575: bright spot at both epochs. The difference in distances from the
576: central binary is even larger in 2004.0 than in 2000.7.
577:
578:
579: \begin{figure}[h]
580: %%\includegraphics[angle=0,scale=0.8]{f8.eps}
581: \plotone{f8.eps}
582: \caption{Composite VLA radio and {\it Chandra} X-ray images of R~Aqr,
583: 1999.8/2000.7 on left, 2004.0 on right. The VLA 3.5 cm contours are
584: overlaid on a three color {\it Chandra} X-ray image. Red is the Si~XI/C~VI
585: energy range, green the N~VI range and blue the O~VII range. The location of R Aqr is indicated by the arrow pointing to the yellow dot. Coordinates are J2000. Color bars are log intensity, in units of counts per 1/8$\arcsec$ pixel.
586: \label{VLAChandra}}
587: \end{figure}
588:
589:
590: \section{Interpretation\label{sec:interp}}
591:
592: \subsection{Northeast Outer Lobe-Jet}
593:
594: We find in \S\ref{sec:xrayim} that the peak X-ray emission from the NE
595: outer lobe-jet has moved $2.0\arcsec\pm 0.1\arcsec$ in 3.3 years. This
596: motion corresponds to a velocity of at least $v_{NE} = 580d \pm 30d$
597: km~s$^{-1}$ (at an inclination angle of $20\degr$ as believed for
598: these lobe-jets \citep{ho91} it becomes $620d$).
599:
600: What are the possibilities for the origin of the X-ray emission in the
601: NE outer lobe-jet? Evidence that could be used to suggest an origin:
602:
603: \begin{itemize}
604: \item The thermal or quasi-thermal X-ray spectrum of the NE lobe-jet
605: \item The radio spectrum of the NE lobe-jet
606: \item The appearance of new nonthermal jets in the inner region close to the star
607: \item Motion of the X-ray bright spot over 3.7 years
608: \item Changes and constancies in the X-ray and radio bright spots over 3.7 years
609: \item UV and optical observations from past years
610: \end{itemize}
611:
612: Completely nonthermal emission mechanisms in this NE lobe-jet are unlikely
613: because of the shape of the X-ray spectrum. If the spatial position of
614: the peak of X-ray emission in the NE lobe-jet had not moved between our two
615: observations, we might think the origin of the thermal component is just a
616: cloud of hot gas. However, the motion of the X-ray bright spot implies
617: a high enough velocity to cause a shock, if conditions in the medium
618: it encounters are appropriate. If we can show that such a shock can
619: produce the observed emission, then other explanations are
620: unnecessary. Therefore, we will explore that possibility.
621:
622: In order to compare our observations with a shock model, we consider
623: the conditions for the model's validity. First, are we dealing with a
624: fluid? Is the mean free path for particles in the environment $\ll$
625: the size of the emitting region? This can be determined from the
626: density of the environment. We don't know the density directly, and it
627: is likely to be nonuniform as a result of the complex history of wind
628: emission from the Mira and its interaction with the compact
629: companion. We can use evidence from previous optical and UV
630: observations of the region to get an estimate of the possible range of
631: densities. Using \citet{kaf86, me01, ho91}, we obtain n$_e \sim
632: 10^{(2-4)} {\rm cm}^{-3}$. From standard gas kinetic theory, the
633: Maxwell's mean free path is then $ 3\times 10^{(10-12)}$ cm. Taking
634: the X-ray emitting region to be approximately 3$\arcsec \diameter$,
635: $600d$ AU, it is $3,000d - 300,000d$ mean free
636: paths in size. Therefore, the fluid approximation is reasonably
637: valid. However, it is easy to imagine that electromagnetic phenomena
638: may also play a role even if mechanical collissions are insufficient.
639:
640: Most of the work on interpreting astrophysical observations as shocks
641: has been done for supernova remnants, and most of that has the
642: objective of predicting the optical and UV line emission for
643: comparison with the preponderance of optical and UV
644: observations. Here, we are dealing not with a ``spherical'' blast
645: wave, but with a directed beam of material, i.e. a jet, and we are
646: interested in comparing the predictions with X-ray observations. Work
647: on interpreting jets has concentrated mostly on relativistic jets in
648: QSOs and NS or BH binaries, or nonrelativistic jets in protostars. We
649: are dealing with a binary system with a compact star that is
650: apparently not a NS nor BH, more likely a WD.
651:
652:
653: However, outflows in HH objects are analoguous to those seen in R
654: Aqr. The HH jets can be interpreted as a bow shock around an outflow
655: moving into a medium that itself is moving outward into the ISM at a
656: different speed \citep{pra01}. Similar movements in R Aqr can be
657: derived from the X-ray spectrum and the apparent velocity. The fitted
658: plasma temperature is $1.74\pm0.23\times$10$^6$ K, corresponding to a shock
659: velocity of $355\pm47$ km s$^{-1}$ \citep[eqn.~2.24]{dr93}.
660:
661: At these temperatures, we can consider the plasma as essentially
662: nonradiative, because the emissivity is very low at such temperatures,
663: compared with the emissivity at $10^4$ K. This means that we can treat
664: the problem as adiabatic, and use the Rankine-Hugoniot
665: equations. Assuming that the preshock medium is no hotter than $10^4$
666: K, its sound speed is no greater than 17 km s$^{-1}$. At a shock speed
667: of 355 km s$^{-1}$ its Mach number is $M=21$. This is the regime of
668: strong shocks, so the relation between the upstream and downstream
669: densities $\rho_0$ and $\rho_1$ and corresponding velocities $u_0$ and
670: $u_1$ is $\rho_0 u_0 = \rho_1 u_1$. Since $\rho_1 = 4 \rho_0$ for high
671: Mach number, $u_1 = u_0/4$. These relations apply in the frame where
672: the shock is at rest, with the preshock material moving inward toward
673: the front of the shock and the postshock material emitting the X-rays
674: and moving outward away from the back of the shock. In this frame,
675: adopting the convention that positive velocity means motion outward
676: from the central star, $u_0 = -355 \, {\rm km\, s}^{-1}$ and $u_1 =
677: -89\, {\rm km\, s}^{-1}$. If we now transform to a frame in which the
678: preshock medium is at rest by adding 355 km s$^{-1}$ to $u_0$ and
679: $u_1$, we have $u_0 = 0$, shock velocity $u_{s} = +355
680: \, {\rm km\, s}^{-1}$ and post-shock velocity $u_{ps} = +266 \, {\rm km\,
681: s}^{-1}$, the velocity we would expect to observe for the X-ray
682: emitting region, 3/4 of the unobserved $u_{s}$. However, the velocity
683: we actually observe for the X-ray emitting region, $580d$ km~s$^{-1}$
684: (derived in \S\ref{sec:xrayim}) implies a shock velocity in the
685: Rankine-Hugoniot frame of 4/3 that, or $773d$ km~s$^{-1}$. This
686: corresponds to a higher post-shock plasma temperature of $8.2\pm0.4
687: \times 10^6d^{2}$~K, which is incompatible with our observed
688: spectrum.
689:
690:
691: The X-ray emission from the outer lobe-jets is thus not consistent with the
692: temperature we derive from its apparent motion. Using the shock
693: scheme of \citet{pra01}, this can be resolved if the shock
694: is encountering a medium that is already moving in the observer's rest
695: frame outward ahead of the jet at $314\pm46d$ km s$^{-1}$ so that the
696: relative motion of the post shock region and the ambient medium is
697: (3/4 $u_s)=266\pm36$ km s$^{-1}$, with $u_s$ as obtained from the
698: X-ray spectrum. Incidentally, this implies the unobserved shock is
699: moving in the observer's rest frame at 670 km s$^{-1}$.
700:
701: Of course, the temperature of $8.2\times 10^{6}d^{2}$~K derived from
702: the motion of the X-ray emitting region assumes thermal
703: equilibrium, which is not always the case at a shock front. For
704: example, in bow shock models there are ways material can cool by
705: escaping perpendicular to the direction of motion
706: \citep{har01}. This leaves the alternate possibility that the ambient material is not moving outward.
707:
708: In order to characterize the density of the lobe-jets' X-ray emitting
709: material we use the unabsorbed 0.25 - 2.0 keV flux from the NE outer
710: lobe-jet (see Table \ref{netbl}) with a resulting luminosity of L$_x$ = 7.0
711: $\times10^{29}d^{2}$ ergs s$^{-1}$. Taking the X-ray emitting region
712: to be approximately 3$\arcsec \diameter$, or $600d$ AU, and assuming
713: the X-ray radiation is optically thin bremsstrahlung emission from a
714: plasma with solar abundances, the post-shock number density in the NE
715: outer X-ray lobe-jet is
716:
717: \begin{equation}\label{lumdensity}
718: n_{ps} = \left( \frac{L_x}{V\Lambda} \right)^{1/2} \\
719: = 135\, {\rm cm}^{-3} \left( \frac{f_x}{1.46\times 10^{-13} erg \, cm^{-2}s^{-1}} \right)^{1/2} \\
720: \left(\frac{\Lambda}{1 \times 10^{-22}\, {\rm erg\, cm}^3\, {\rm s}^{-1}} \right)^{-1/2} d^{-1/2}
721: \end{equation}
722:
723: \noindent where $n_{ps}$ is the 2000.7 number density, $f_x$ is the 2000.7 X-ray source flux and $\Lambda$ is the value of the radiative cooling function from \citet{bin87} at T $\sim~10^{6}$ K.
724:
725: The X-ray radiative cooling time can be found using the density and
726: the plasma temperature of 1.74 $\times 10^6$ K. This cooling time,
727: which takes into account bound-bound, free-free, bound-free,
728: free-bound and electron scattering radiation \citep{bin87} is
729:
730: \begin{equation}\label{tradcool}
731: t_{rad}=\frac{3}{2}\frac{kT}{n\Lambda} \approx 843\; {\rm yrs} \left(
732: \frac{T}{1.74\times 10^6\, {\rm K}} \right) \left( \frac{n_{ps}}{135\, {\rm cm}^{-3}} \right)^{-1} \left(
733: \frac{\Lambda}{1 \times 10^{-22}\, {\rm erg\, cm}^3\, {\rm s}^{-1}}
734: \right)^{-1}.
735: \end{equation}
736:
737:
738: \noindent This estimated radiative cooling time of the NE lobe-jet is $\sim 843 d^{1/2}$ yrs. The values of source intensity quoted for the two epochs in Table 1 are not different at 90 per cent confidence, so we cannot show any compelling evidence that the NE lobe-jet has changed its X-ray luminosity between the two observations.
739:
740: The power law component of the NE lobe-jet as seen in the fit to the energy spectrum could be related in some way to the power law emission seen in the inner jets \citep{ni01}. Perhaps we are even seeing nonthermal emission from the very jet that is heating the lobe gas to million degree temperatures.
741:
742:
743: \subsection{Southwest Outer Lobe-Jet}
744:
745: In the SW, the X-ray emission largely disappeared between 2000.7 and
746: 2004.0, presumably because the hot gas cooled to below $\sim
747: 10^{6}$~K. The roughly 3$\arcsec$ X-ray bright spot corresponds to an
748: emission region with $600d$ AU diameter, as in the NE lobe-jet. The X-ray
749: luminosity in 2000.7, using the unabsorbed 0.25 - 2.0 keV flux listed
750: in Table
751: \ref{swremtbl}, was L$_x=1.9\times 10^{29} d^2$ erg s$^{-1}$. From
752: equation~(\ref{lumdensity}), the SW outer lobe-jet density is 71$d^{-1/2}$
753: cm$^{-3}$. Using this density and Equation~(\ref{tradcool}), the
754: radiative cooling time is 1288 $d^{1/2}$ years. Of course, it is
755: always possible that the emitting region is clumped so that
756: its average density is much higher and its cooling time much
757: shorter. However, we see no evidence for that in the {\it Chandra}
758: image at a size scale of $\ge$100 AU. It could also be that X-ray
759: radiation is not the only source of cooling for the SW lobe-jet. The
760: timescale for cooling by adiabatic expansion could produce
761: an observable effect in just a few years. Assuming the X-ray
762: emitting region is expanding adiabatically at the sound speed,
763: %\sim 240 (T/(6 \times 10^6\; {\rm K}))^{1/2}$,
764: %of 270 km s$^{-1}$ (T/($7~\times 10^6\, {\rm K}))^{1/2}$,
765: %600 km s$^{-1}$,
766: in 3.3 years the radius of the emitting region increases to $R_2 = R_1 + c_s \times t$.
767: The temperature change can be calculated via the adiabatic relation:
768: \begin{equation}\label{adiabatic}
769: (\frac{V_{1}}{V_{2}})^{\gamma-1}=\frac{T_{2}}{T_{1}}.
770: \end{equation}
771: Using $\gamma$=5/3 for a monatomic gas, with c$_{s}$=$\sqrt{\frac{\gamma{kT}}{\mu m_{p}}}$=123 km s$^{-1}$ \citep[pg.~163]{os01} the final temperature after adiabatic expansion for 3.3 y is expected to be lower by 40\%. If we thus assume the lobe-jet is expanding adiabatically the plasma temperature is expected to drop from 1.39$\times 10^6$K to $8.4 \times 10^5d^{-1/2}$ K (for small changes in {\em d}) between 2000.7 and 2004.0. This temperature drop would shift the X-ray emission to lower energies, difficult for Chandra to detect.
772:
773: \subsection{Mass, Kinetic Energy and Mass Loss in the Lobe-Jets}
774: Using the density derived above, the images for size scale and the
775: assumption of a uniform spherical emitter, the mass of the lobe-jets
776: emitting X-rays in 2000.7 is estimated for the sum of the NE and SW
777: lobe-jets to be 8.3 $\times$ 10$^{-8}\,d^{5/2}$ M${_\sun}$. The mass loss
778: from the giant was estimated to be $3.7\times$10$^{-8}$ M${_\sun}$
779: yr$^{-1}$ \citep{sea90} (but see \citet{kaf82}, a much higher estimate based on assumption of a high orbital eccentricity), so the X-ray lobe-jet mass is roughly equal to the
780: total mass loss from the giant in a few years. In the NE lobe-jet we can estimate the mass loss by combining the estimated mass of the x-ray emitting material, its measured outflow velocity and its size to be $\dot{M}_{NE}= 1.1\pm0.2\times 10^{-8}d^{5/2} {\rm M_{\sun} yr^{-1}}$. We cannot make a similar estimate for the SW lobe-jet since it faded so much.
781:
782: The kinetic energy in the lobe-jet is of interest in order to determine if
783: it can provide the energy in the lobe-jet to power the X-ray emission.
784: Using the velocity of 580 {\em d} km s$^{-1}$ derived above, the
785: kinetic energy in the NE lobe-jet is 1.8$\times$ 10$^{34} d^{9/2}$ J. The
786: thermal energy needed for the X-rays at the temperature of
787: T=1.74$\times$10$^{6}$ K, is 1.9$\times$10$^{33} d^{5/2}$ J. The lobe-jet kinetic energy is about ten times its thermal energy and could power its x-ray emission for 2000-6000 yr.
788:
789:
790: \section{Conclusions\label{sec:concl}}
791:
792: The NE lobe-jet X-ray emission is interpreted as due primarily to a hot plasma witha faint power law component, indicating an energetic collmiated outflow interactin with circumstellar gas at a distance of 1600-2000{\it d} AU from the central binary. Its characteristics appear similar to those of HH objects.
793:
794: Our calculated value of the NE lobe-jet's density can be compared to
795: previous determinations \citep{kaf86, me01, ho91}. These previous
796: reports of density are derived from UV and optical emission line
797: strength measurements and modeling. They range from n$_e \sim 10^{5}$ in
798: the HII region surrounding the central star to n$_e \sim 10^{4}$ in
799: the brighter optical/UV knots, to n$_e \sim 10^{2}$ in a region near
800: our SW lobe-jet. It appears the density of the X-ray emitting region
801: is quite different from that in most of the regions emitting UV and
802: optical. However, we have examined the locations of the regions
803: emitting UV and optical in these reports and found none to be
804: coincident in position, and of course none in time with the X-ray
805: density determinations reported here. The whole of the observations
806: and modeling to date suggest a region surrounding R Aqr with density
807: and temperature varying considerably in time and space. The higher
808: density of UV emitting material may have accumulated over a longer
809: time, perhaps being hot enough originally to emit X-rays, then cooling
810: to UV temperature.
811:
812: The mass of the X-ray emitting material is found to be of order the
813: mass loss per year of the red giant. If the material emitting X-rays
814: in these lobe-jets is coming from the giant wind, it's unlikely that
815: more than of order one percent of the wind ends up in the lobe-jets,
816: because of the large separation between the giant and the compact
817: companion, and the inefficiency of capture and ejection by the compact
818: companion. Therefore, this material would have accumulated over
819: perhaps a few hundred years, unless it was ejected in an episode of
820: much greater mass loss, such as occurred in 1925 and perhaps again in
821: the 1964-1974 time frame \citep{wil81} Other symbiotics such as CH Cyg
822: and Z And have had outbursts of $\sim 10^{-6}{\rm M}{_\sun}$
823: \citep{hac86, sko02}. Another scenario to account for the mass around the NE lobe-jet is that the X-ray emitting material is not all jet material but surrounding nebula
824: heated by the jet. The compact object could eject a small amount of
825: energetic material in a tightly collimated jet. The jet then impacts
826: the dense wall \citep{sol01}, ablating material at temperatures high
827: enough to emit X-rays.
828:
829: In the NE lobe-jet region the product of density and temperature,
830: i.e. the pressure, is about the same for the UV emitting regions
831: ($10^4$ cm$^{-3}\times10^4$ K) and the X-ray lobe-jets ($10^2$
832: cm$^{-3}\times10^6$ K) . However, in the SW the pressure of the UV
833: emitting material ($10^2$ cm$^{-3}\times10^4$ K) is much lower than of
834: the X-ray material ($10^2$ cm$^{-3}\times10^6$ K). This permits
835: expansion of the X-ray emitting material in the SW, whereas in the NE
836: it would be confined by the UV emitting material.
837:
838: Radio observations of the outer lobe-jets reveal plasma moving at
839: $\sim$90 km s$^{-1}$, or even slower, considering the error estimates
840: on that velocity. This adds to the complex structure of the jet as
841: the radio emission is lagging behind the X-ray plasma. It suggests
842: that the radio source is not closely associated with these lobe-jets,
843: but may be a relic of past activity emitting thermal radiation at a
844: lower temperature.
845:
846: The conditions in R Aqr can be compared with those in another nearby
847: symbiotic binary, Mira itself (o Ceti). They both have roughly the
848: same orbital separation, 70 AU for Mira (see \citet{wo04}) and
849: $\sim$20 AU for R Aqr assuming an orbital period of 44 yr
850: \citep{wil81} and a system mass of 2 M${_\sun}$, but Mira has no
851: extensive jets. Its accretion rate onto Mira B is estimated to be 8-30
852: $\times 10^{-10}{\rm M}{_\sun}\,{\rm yr}^{-1}$ with a total mass loss
853: from Mira A of 0.4-4 $\times 10^{-7}{\rm M}{_\sun}\,{\rm yr}^{-1}$
854: \citep{wo04}. Perhaps R Aqr has jets because more of the giant's lost mass finds its way to the compact companion.
855:
856: The properties of the outer lobe-jets in R Aqr can be compared with
857: parameters of other symbiotic jets. Fifteen out of about 200
858: symbiotics are known to have optical or radio jets roughly similar to
859: the R Aqr inner jets. The only other system known to have an x-ray jet
860: is CH Cyg. The CHCyg Jet is more similar to the inner jets seen in R
861: Aqr than the outer lobe/jsets discussed in this paper. There is no
862: obvious thermal 10$^6$ K extended emission. Since CH Cyg is essentially
863: unresolved, and at the same distance from us as R Aqr, we conclude
864: that there's no counterpart to the jets discovered here. Therefore,
865: at the present state of observational knowledge, R Aqr is not a
866: typical symbiotic star jet. In fact it is the only symbiotic observed
867: to have extended lobe-jets. Future high angular resolution x-ray
868: observations may discover others, however, since there has been no
869: systematic survey of that type.
870:
871: Mass outflow rates in symbiotics have been estimated using radio
872: observations and models. A comprehensive study was done \citet{sea90}
873: resulting in mass loss estimates for 26 symbiotics. They range from
874: $4\times 10^{-9}$ to $3.7 \times 10^{-5}{\rm M}{_\sun}\,{\rm
875: yr}^{-1}$. Their estimate for R Aqr is $3.7 \times 10^{-8}{\rm
876: M}{_\sun}\,{\rm yr}^{-1}$. Therefore, one could say that R Aqr's mass
877: loss appears to be in the mid range of mass losses in symbiotics, so
878: it does not appear that the extended lobe-jets of R Aqr are caused by
879: greater mass loss than in other symbiotics.
880:
881: The {\it Chandra} X-ray data presented here complement previous UV,
882: optical, and radio investigations in that they are consistent with an
883: episodic collimated flow originating in an accretion disk system. The
884: {\it Chandra} data map similar jet structures to those seen at longer
885: wavelengths. However, they have revealed new characteristics of the
886: physics of the jet. The lobe-jets are moving much faster than previously
887: thought by at least a factor of five. However, the temperature we
888: observe in the NE lobe-jet is lower than expected for a shock generated by
889: jet material colliding with stationary material, and suggests that the
890: jet is moving into material that is itself already moving outward. It
891: appears the cooling time for the SW lobe-jet is much shorter than expected
892: from radiative cooling, so it may have cooled by adiabatic expansion
893: into a less dense surrounding medium in the 3.3 years between the two
894: observations.
895:
896: %% Included in this acknowledgments section are examples of the
897: %% AASTeX hypertext markup commands. Use \url without the optional [HREF]
898: %% argument when you want to print the url directly in the text. Otherwise,
899: %% use either \url or \anchor, with the HREF as the first argument and the
900: %% text to be printed in the second.
901:
902: \acknowledgments{We are grateful to the staff of the {\it Chandra} X-ray Center for providing the reduced data in a timely fashion, and especially to Eric Mandel and Bill Joye for the ds9 image tool with recent improvements. This work was supported by NASA grant GO4-3050A and contract NAS8-39073. The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is operated by Associated Universities, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation. J.~L.~S. was supported by the National Science Foundation.}
903:
904:
905: Facilities: \facility{CXO(ACIS)}, \facility{VLA}.
906:
907: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.
908: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.
909: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of
910: %% curly braces. If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error
911: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".
912: %%
913: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite
914: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a
915: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds
916: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).
917: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the
918: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain
919: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in
920: %% place of the \cite commands.
921:
922: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.
923: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.
924: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.
925:
926: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly
927: %% different from previous examples. The natbib system solves a host
928: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly
929: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.
930: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.
931:
932: \begin{thebibliography}{}
933:
934: \bibitem[ Anders \& Grevesse(1989)]{and} Anders,~E. \& Grevesse,~N. 1989 in ``Cosmic Abundances of Matter'' ed. C. Jake Waddington AIP Conf. Proc. 183 p.1
935: \bibitem[Arnaud(1996)]{Arn96} Arnaud,~K.~A., 1996 in ASP Conf. Ser. 101 Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V. ed. G.~H.~Jacoby \& J.~Barnes (San Francisco:~ASP), p. 17
936: \bibitem[Bodo et al(1998)]{bod98} Bodo,~G., Errico,~L., Massaglia,~S. Rossi,~P., Trussoni,~E., \& Vittone,~A. 1998, Astronomy \& Astrophysics Transactions 17 321
937: \bibitem[Brocksopp et al(2004)]{br04} Brocksopp,~C., Sokoloski,~J., Kaiser,~C., Richards,~A., Muxlow,~T., \& Seymour,~N. 2004 \mnras, 347 430
938: %%\bibitem[Burgarella, Paresce \& Vogel(1992)]{bu92} Burgarella,~D., Paresce,~F. \& Vogel,~M., in ASP conf. series, Vol. 22 Nonisotropic and Variable Outflows from Stars, ed. L. Drissen, C. Leitherer \& A Nota, 298
939: \bibitem[Cowley et al(1998)]{co01} Cowley,~A., Schmidtke,~P., Crampton,~D. \& Hutchings~J. 1998, \apj, 505, 854
940: \bibitem[{\it Chandra} X-ray Center(2003)]{cxc01} {\it Chandra} X-ray Center. 2003, The {\it Chandra} Proposers' Observatory Guide, TD 403.00.006, (Cambridge, MA:~CXC) http://asc.harvard.edu/proposer/POG/index.html.
941: \bibitem[Draine \& McKee(1993)]{dr93} Draine,~B. \& McKee,~C. ``Theory of Interstellar Shocks'' 1993 \araa, 31, 373
942: \bibitem[R. J. Edgar, in Binney \& Tremaine(1987)]{bin87} Binney, J. and Tremaine, S., ``Galactic dynamics'', Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1987
943: \bibitem[Favata et al.(2002)]{fav02} Favata,~F., Fridlund~C., Micela~G., Sciortino~S., Kaas~A. 2002, \aap, 386, 204
944: \bibitem[Favata et al(2006)] {fa06} Favata,~F., Bonito,~R., Micela,~G., Fridlund,~M., Orlando,~S., Sciortino,~S., \& Peres,~G. 2006, \aap, 450, L17
945: \bibitem[Galloway \& Sokoloski(2004)]{gal01} Galloway,~D. \& Sokoloski,~J. 2004, \apj, 613, L61
946: \bibitem[G\"{u}del et al(2005)]{gud} G\"{u}del,~M., Skinner,~S., Briggs,~K., Audard,~M., Arzner,~K., and Telleschi,~A. 2005, \apjl, 626, L53
947: \bibitem[Hack et al(1986)]{hac86} Hack,~M., Rusconi,~L., Sedmak,~G., Aydin,~C., Engin,~S., Yilmaz, N. 1986 \aap, 159, 117.
948: \bibitem[Hartigan et al(1987)]{har01} Hartigan,~P., Raymond,~J. \& Hartmann,~L. 1987, \apj, 316, 323
949: \bibitem[Herbig(1980)]{her80} Herbig, G. 1980 \iaucirc 3535
950: \bibitem[Hollis et al.(1991)]{ho91} Hollis,~J., Oliversen, R.J., Kafatos, M., Michalitsianos, A.G., \& Wagner, R.M. 1991, \apj, 377, 227
951: \bibitem[Hollis, Pedelty \& Kafatos(1997)]{ho97}Hollis,~J., Pedelty,~J. \& Kafatos, M. 1997, \apj, 490, 302
952: \bibitem[Hollis, Pedelty \& Lyon(1997)]{ho97a}Hollis,~J., Pedelty,~J. \& Lyon,~R. 1997, \apj, 482, L85
953: \bibitem[H\"{u}nsch et al(1998)] {hu01} H\"{u}nsch,~M., Schmitt,~J., Schr\"{o}der,~K., \& Zickgraf,~F. 1998, \aap, 330, 225
954: \bibitem[Jura \& Helfand(1984)] {ju01} Jura,~M., \& Helfand,~D. 1984, \apj, 287, 785
955: \bibitem[Kafatos \& Michalitsianos(1982)]{kaf82} Kafatos,~M. \& Michalitsianos,~M. 1982 \nat, 298 540
956: \bibitem[Kafatos et al.(1986)]{kaf86} Kafatos,~M., Michalitsianos,~M.\& Hollis,~J.~M. 1986 \apj, 62 853
957: \bibitem[Kafatos et al.(1989)]{kaf89} Kafatos,~M., Hollis,~J.~M., Yusef-Zadeh,~F., Michalitsianos,~A.~G., \& Elitzur,~M. 1989, \apj, 346, 991
958: \bibitem[Kahabka and van den Heuvel(2006)]{ka01} Kahabka,~P. \& van den Heuvel,~E. 2006 in ``Compact Stellar X-ray Sources'' Lewin,~W. \& van der Klis,~M. eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, p. 468
959: \bibitem[Kellogg, Pedelty \& Lyon(2001)]{kel01} Kellogg,~E., Pedelty,~J. \& Lyon,~R. 2001, \apj, 563, L151
960: \bibitem[Kenyon et al.(1988)]{ken01} Kenyon,~S., Fernandez-Castro,~T. and Stencel, R. 1988 \aj, 95, 1817
961: \bibitem[Li \& Kastner(2004)]{Li01}Li,~J., Kastner,~J.~H., Prigozhin,~G.~Y., Schulz,~N.~S., Feigelson,~E.~D. and Getman,~K.~V. 2004, \apj, 610, 1204
962: \bibitem[Meier \& Kafatos(1995)]{me01} Meier,~S. \& Kafatos,~M. 1995 \apj 451 359
963: \bibitem[Nichols et al(2007)]{ni01} Nichols,~J., Anderson,~C., DePasquale,~J., Kellogg,~E., Sokoloski,~J., Pedelty,~J. 2007, \apj, (submitted)
964: \bibitem[Osterbrock \& Ferland(2006)]{os01} Osterbrock,~D. \& Ferland,~G. 2006 ``Astrophysics of Gaseous Nebulae and Active Galactic Nuclei'' 2 ed. Univ. Sci. Books, Sausalito, California.
965: \bibitem[Paresce \& Hack(1994)]{pa01} Paresce,~F. \& Hack, W. 1994 \aap, 287, 154
966: \bibitem[Pravdo et al.(2001)]{pra01} Pravdo,~S., Feigelson,~E., Garmire,~G., Maeda,~Y., Tsuboi,~Y., Bally,~J. 2001, \nat, 413, 708
967: %\bibitem[Raga, Noriega-Crespo \& Vel\'{a}zquez(2002)]{ra01} Raga,~A., Noriega-Crespo,~A., \& Vel\'{a}zquez,~P. 2002, \apj, 576, L149
968: \bibitem[Seaquist \& Taylor(1990)]{sea90} Seaquist,~E. and Taylor,A. 1990 \apj, 349 313
969: \bibitem[Shu(1991)]{shu} Shu,~Frank~H. 1991 ``The physics of astrophysics'', v.2 ``Gas Dynamics'', p. 215 Univ. Sci. Books, Mill Valley CA
970: \bibitem[Skopal et al(2002)]{sko02}Skopal,~A., Bode,~M.~F., Crocker,~M.~M., Drechsel,~H., Eyres,~S.~P.~S., Kom\u{z}\'{i}k,~R. 2002 \mnras, 335, 1109
971: \bibitem[Smith et al(2001)]{sm01}Smith,~R., Brickhouse,~N., Liedahl,~D., Raymond,~J. 2001, \apjl, 556, L91
972: \bibitem[Soker \& Kastner(2003)]{sok01} Soker,~N. \& Kastner,~J. 2003, \apj, 583, 368
973: \bibitem[Solf(1992)]{sol02} Solf,~J. 1992, \aap, 257, 228
974: \bibitem[Solf \& Ulrich(1985)]{sol01} Solf,~J. \& Ulrich,~H. 1985, \aap, 148, 274
975: \bibitem[Stark et al(1992)]{Stark92} Stark,~A.~A., Gammie,~C.~F., Wilson,~R.~W., Bally,~J., Linke,~R.~A., Heiles,~C., \& Hurwitz,~M. 1992 \apjs, 79, 77
976: \bibitem[Swartz et al(2005)] {sw01} Swartz,~D., Drake,~J., Elsner,~R., Ghosh,~K., Grady,~C., Wassell,~E., Woodgate,~B., \& Kimble,~R. 2005 \apj, 628, 811.
977: \bibitem[Tomov, Munari \& Marrese 2000]{to00} Tomov,~T., Munari,~U. \& Marrese,~P. 2000 \aap, 354, L25
978: \bibitem[Viotti et al.(1987)] {vi01} Viotti,~R., Piro,~L., Friedjung,~M., \& Cassatella,~A. 1987, \apj, 319, L7
979: \bibitem[Wallerstein \& Greenstein(1980)]{wal80} Wallerstein,~G., Greenstein,~J.~L. 1980 \apj, 258, L35
980: \bibitem[Willson, Garnavich and Mattei(1981)]{wil81} Willson,~L.~A., Garnavich,~P. and Mattei,~J.~A. 1981 Inf. Bull. Variable Stars No. 1961
981: \bibitem[Wood \& Karovska(2004)]{wo04} Wood,~B. \& Karovska,~M. 2004 \apj, 601, 502
982: \bibitem[Zombeck(1990)] {zom} Zombeck,~M. 1990 Handbook of Space Astronomy \& Astrophysics, 2 ed.Cambridge U. Press.
983:
984:
985: \end{thebibliography}
986:
987: \clearpage
988:
989:
990: \begin{deluxetable}{lll}
991: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
992: %%\rotate
993: \tablecaption{NE outer thermal lobe-jet X-ray spectral fit parameters\label{netbl}}
994: \tablewidth{0pt}
995: \tablehead{
996: %%\colhead{} & \colhead{c}{Perimeter} & \colhead{c}{Core} \\
997: %%\tableline
998: \\[-0.07 in]
999: \colhead{Parameter}&\colhead{2000.7 }&\colhead{2004.0 } \\
1000: \\[-0.2 in] }
1001: \startdata
1002:
1003: % | 2000.7 |2004
1004: Counts, E$\ge$0.2 keV & 509 & 500 \\
1005: Exposure, s & 22717 & 36523 \\
1006: \tableline
1007: \\[-0.07 in]
1008: APEC kT (keV) & 0.15[0.13,0.17] & 0.14 [0.12,0.16] \\
1009: APEC normalization (10$^{-6}$ph~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~keV$^{-1}$)
1010: & 32[22,46] & 38[27,47] \\
1011: Power law photon index, $\Gamma$
1012: & 5.6[5.3,5.8] & 5.1[4.7,5.6] \\
1013: Power law normalization ($\times$10$^{-6}$ph~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~keV$^{-1}$)
1014: & 1.6[0.25,1.8] & 1.8[1.0,2.7] \\
1015: \tableline
1016: \\[-0.07 in]
1017: Observed 0.25-2.0 keV flux (10$^{-14}$ ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$)
1018: & 9.7[6.7,13.9] & 8.1[5.8,10.0] \\
1019: Source 0.25-2.0 keV flux (10$^{-14}$ ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$)
1020: & 14.6[10.0,21.0] & 11.7[8.3,14.5] \\
1021: \tableline
1022: \\[-0.07 in]
1023: Reduced $\chi^{2}$ & 0.98 & 0.96 \\
1024: Confidence (\%) & 49 & 52 \\
1025: \enddata
1026:
1027: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before
1028: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark
1029: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.
1030:
1031: \tablecomments{ Values are quoted as best\_fit[lower 90\% limit,upper 90\% limit]. }
1032: %%\tablenotetext{a}{steppar reveals shallow contour, lower confidence interval might be [.2,.35]}
1033:
1034: %%{Table \ref{netbl} is published in its entirety in the electronic edition of the {\it Astrophysical Journal}. A portion is shown here for guidance regarding its form and content.}
1035:
1036: \end{deluxetable}
1037:
1038: %% If you use the table environment, please indicate horizontal rules using
1039: %% \tableline, not \hline.
1040: %% Do not put multiple tabular environments within a single table.
1041: %% The optional \label should appear inside the \caption command.
1042:
1043: %%SW Remnant
1044: \begin{deluxetable}{lll}
1045: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1046: %%\rotate
1047: \tablecaption{SW outer thermal lobe-jet X-ray spectral fit parameters\label{swremtbl}}
1048: \tablewidth{0pt}
1049: \tablehead{
1050: \colhead{} &\multicolumn{2}{c}{Epoch} \\
1051: %%\\[-0.07 in]
1052: \colhead{Parameter } &\colhead{2000.7 }&\colhead{2004.0 } \\
1053: \\[-0.2 in] }
1054: \startdata
1055:
1056: Counts, E$\ge$0.2 keV & 226 & 65 \\
1057: Exposure, s & 22717 & 36523 \\
1058: \tableline
1059: \\[-0.07 in]
1060: APEC kT (keV) & 0.12[0.10,0.13] & 0.12 [0.10,0.16] \\
1061: APEC normalization (10$^{-5}$ph~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~keV$^{-1}$)
1062: & 4.6[3.5,7.0] & 1.2 [0.5, 1.8] \\
1063:
1064: \tableline
1065: \\[-0.07 in]
1066: Observed 0.25-2.0 keV flux (10$^{-14}$ ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$)
1067: &3.0[2.3,4.6] &0.83[0.33,1.76]\\
1068: %%\tableline
1069: Source 0.25-2.0 keV flux (10$^{-14}$ ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$)
1070: &4.0[3.0,6.1] &1.1[0.5,1.7] \\
1071: \tableline
1072: \\[-0.07 in]
1073: Reduced $\chi^{2}$ & 1.07 &1.12 \\
1074: Confidence (\%) &38 &34 \\
1075: \enddata
1076:
1077: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before
1078: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark
1079: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.
1080:
1081:
1082: %%{Table \ref{swremtbl} is published in its entirety in the electronic edition of the {\it Astrophysical Journal}. A portion is shown here for guidance regarding its form and content.}
1083:
1084: \tablenotetext{a}{Parameter fixed}
1085: %%\tablenotetext{b}{Another sample footnote for table~\ref{swremtbl}}
1086: \tablecomments{ Values are quoted as best\_fit[lower 90\% limit,upper 90\% limit]}
1087:
1088: \end{deluxetable}
1089:
1090: \clearpage
1091:
1092: \end{document}
1093: