1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \usepackage{graphicx}
4:
5: \newcommand{\HI}{{\sc H\,i}}
6: \newcommand{\HII}{{\sc H\,ii}}
7: \newcommand{\kms}{\rm km\ s^{-1}}
8: \newcommand{\Halpha}{H$\alpha$}
9: \newcommand{\sigpol}{$\Sigma_{pol}$}
10:
11: \shorttitle{Polarization shadows}
12: \shortauthors{Stil \& Taylor}
13:
14: \begin{document}
15:
16: \title{Polarization shadows of extragalactic sources by the local magneto-ionic ISM}
17:
18: \author{J. M. Stil\altaffilmark{1} and A. R. Taylor}
19: \affil{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary}
20: \altaffiltext{1}{stil@ras.ucalgary.ca}
21:
22: \begin{abstract}
23: We report depolarization of extragalactic sources in the NRAO VLA Sky
24: Survey (NVSS) by local structures in the interstellar medium. The sky
25: density of polarized sources drops by a factor 2 -- 4 in regions with
26: angular scales $\sim 10\degr$, implying up to 40\% depolarization on
27: average per source. Some of these polarization shadows are associated
28: with \HII\ regions, but three are associated with regions of
29: depolarized diffuse Galactic emission. The absence of a correlation
30: between the depth of polarization shadows and \Halpha\ intensity
31: suggests that some shadows are related to structure in the magnetic
32: field. At least some polarization shadows are caused by partial
33: bandwidth depolarization in the NVSS. Alternatively, some may be
34: caused by regions with small scale ($\lesssim 1\arcsec$) variations in
35: rotation measure.
36: \end{abstract}
37:
38: \keywords{ISM: magnetic fields --- ISM: structure}
39:
40: %\maketitle
41:
42: \section{Introduction}
43:
44: Observations of polarized radio emission provide a way to study
45: magnetic fields in galaxies. The observed plane of polarization of
46: optically thin, linearly polarized synchrotron emission is
47: perpendicular to the direction of the magnetic field projected on the
48: sky, unless Faraday rotation changes the plane of polarization as the
49: radiation travels through a plasma with a magnetic field component
50: along the line of sight. The plane of polarization of emission with
51: wavelength $\lambda$ (m) rotates by an angle $\Delta \theta$ (rad),
52: according to
53: \begin{equation}
54: \Delta \theta = 0.81 \lambda^2 \int_{source}^{observer} n_e B_\| dl = \lambda^2 RM
55: \label{RM-eq}
56: \end{equation}
57: with electron density $n_e$ (cm$^{-3}$), line of sight component of
58: the magnetic field $B_\|$ ($\mu$G), and line of sight distance element
59: $dl$ (pc). The rotation measure $RM$ ($\rm rad\ m^{-2}$) is a property
60: of the medium along the line of sight from the source to the observer.
61: Rotation measures can be derived from multi-frequency observations of
62: polarized emission, fitting $\Delta \theta$ as a function of
63: $\lambda^2$. Rotation measures of compact polarized sources have been
64: used to constrain models of the Galactic magnetic field,
65: e.g. \citet{han1999,brown2003}.
66:
67: Observations of diffuse polarized Galactic emission have revealed
68: structures in the magneto-ionic medium that remain undetected in total
69: intensity, because an ionized region can have negligible emission
70: measure, yet still produce measurable Faraday rotation
71: \citep{uyaniker2003}. However, interpretation of structures in
72: diffuse polarized emission is difficult, as both polarized emission
73: and Faraday rotation may occur intermixed anywhere along the line of
74: sight.
75:
76: \citet{gaensler2005} and \citet{haverkorn2006} reported depolarization
77: of extragalactic sources by regions of high emission measure in the
78: LMC and the Southern Galactic Plane Survey \citep{haverkornetal2006b}
79: respectively. In this Letter, we report detection of depolarization
80: of extragalactic sources on much larger angular scales by the local
81: magneto-ionic medium.
82:
83:
84: \section{Polarization shadows}
85:
86: The main dataset for our analysis is the NRAO VLA Sky Survey (NVSS)
87: \citep{condon1998}, a single-frequency 1.4 GHz continuum survey of the
88: sky north of declination $-40\degr$ with the VLA in D configuration
89: ($45\arcsec$ angular resolution). The NVSS bandwidth is the sum of two
90: 42 MHz wide bands, but separated by 70 MHz in frequency. The
91: principal data products are images in Stokes I, Q, and U, and a source
92: catalog of 2-dimensional Gaussians fitted to compact structures in
93: these images. The mean noise level of the NVSS in Q and U is 0.29 mJy
94: beam$^{-1}$.
95:
96: Figure~\ref{shadows-fig} shows images of the number density \sigpol\
97: (sources per square degree) of NVSS sources with polarized intensity
98: $p > 1$ mJy beam$^{-1}$, smoothed to a resolution of $2\degr$,
99: \Halpha\ intensity composed by \citet{finkbeiner2003} from the VTSS
100: \citep{dennison1998}, SHASSA \citep{gaustad2001}, and WHAM
101: \citep{haffner2003} surveys, and diffuse polarized intensity at 1.4
102: GHz from the DRAO 26-m polarization survey \citep{wolleben2006}. The
103: number density of polarized sources shows distinct depressions (dark
104: areas) on angular scales $\sim10\degr$, some of which coincide with
105: enhanced \Halpha\ emission. Most conspicuous is a ring centered on
106: $(l,b) = (-106\degr,+4\degr)$ that coincides with an \Halpha\ shell
107: associated with the Gum nebula. We refer to these structures as
108: polarization shadows.
109:
110: For the most significant features in Figure~\ref{shadows-fig}a,
111: Table~\ref{shadows-tab} lists Galactic coordinates, angular diameter,
112: minimum source density $\Sigma_{pol,min}$, \Halpha\ intensity averaged
113: over a 2 degree box at the minimum of \sigpol, identification with
114: known \HII\ regions, and distance. These features have values of
115: \sigpol\ a factor 2 -- 4 smaller than the mean background of 6.6
116: sources deg$^{-2}$. The rms noise level $\sigma$ in
117: Figure~\ref{shadows-fig}a caused by statistical fluctuations in
118: \sigpol, is 1.3 sources deg$^{-2}$. The contour in
119: Figure~\ref{shadows-fig}a at half the background source density is
120: therefore 2.5$\sigma$ below the mean value of
121: \sigpol. Table~\ref{shadows-tab} is complete for features with
122: $\Sigma_{pol,min}< 2.7$ deg$^{-2}$. A comprehensive analysis of
123: smaller structures will be deferred to a following paper.
124:
125: The association of several polarization shadows with nearby \HII\
126: regions is the strongest indication that these shadows are real. \HII\
127: regions are also known to depolarize diffuse emission
128: \citep{gray1999,gaensler2001}. We inspected NVSS images, and also
129: verified that the structures were robust against variation of the
130: threshold in $p$. The polarization shadows have no counterpart in the
131: all-sky images of total NVSS source density, or NVSS noise
132: amplitude. The structures are also visible in an image of mean
133: fractional polarization, demonstrating that the mean fractional
134: polarization is lower in these regions. Some apparent excesses in
135: \sigpol\ are seen near bright radio emission in the Galactic
136: plane. These excesses, seen in white in Figure~\ref{shadows-fig}a, are
137: the result of confusion from small-scale structure in Galactic
138: emission, and residual sidelobes around bright emission. We exclude
139: these regions from our analysis.
140:
141: The NVSS contains small areas (typically $<1\degr$ across) with
142: missing polarization data. Most of these areas exist along lines of
143: constant right ascension in the declination range $-10\degr$ to
144: $+25\degr$, which intersects the Galactic equator at $l \approx
145: +40\degr$. We have verified that the features in
146: Table~\ref{shadows-tab} are not the result of holes in the sky
147: coverage of the NVSS. We have identified these holes and their effect
148: on \sigpol\ is almost always lost in the noise.
149:
150: Three extended polarization shadows listed in Table~\ref{shadows-tab}
151: are found in regions where $I_{H\alpha}\lesssim 10$ R. Despite the low
152: \Halpha\ intensity, these shadows are among the deepest in
153: $\Sigma_{pol,min}$. These shadows coincide with minima in diffuse
154: polarized emission in the DRAO 26-m polarization survey
155: \citep{wolleben2006} shown in Figure~\ref{shadows-fig}c. One of these
156: is shown in Figure~\ref{shadows_detail-fig}. The features seen in the
157: DRAO survey also exist in the Effelsberg medium latitude survey by
158: \citet{uyaniker1999}. This polarization shadow coincides with an edge
159: in diffuse polarized emission. A diffuse polarized intensity filament
160: coincides with a higher polarized source density between the two
161: strongest shadows. Large changes in polarization angle are also seen
162: associated with the depressions in \sigpol.
163:
164: The polarization shadow in Figure~\ref{shadows_detail-fig} overlaps in
165: part with the Canadian Galactic Plane Survey
166: \citep{taylor2003}. \citet{uyaniker2003} note a diagonal band of low
167: diffuse polarized intensity extending from $(l,b) = (87\fdg6,
168: +4\fdg5)$ to $(l,b) = (94\fdg0, -2\fdg0)$, the approximate course of
169: the polarization shadow. A triangular region of depolarization noted
170: by these authors at $84\fdg5 < l < 89\fdg5$, $b = -3\degr$ coincides
171: with the deeper part of this shadow. Rotation measures of polarized
172: sources in this region are $\sim -350$ rad m$^{-2}$, with large
173: variations on the scale of a few degrees
174: \citep{brown2003}. Unpublished rotation measure data with more
175: complete longitude coverage confirm a negative excess in rotation
176: measure in the longitude range $84\degr < l < 90\degr$ (Jo-Anne Brown,
177: private communication) that appears to be associated with this
178: polarization shadow.
179:
180:
181: \section{Discussion}
182:
183: Polarization shadows in Figure~\ref{shadows-fig} indicate
184: depolarization of the background sources, leaving fewer sources with
185: polarized intensity above the threshold of 1 mJy. The mean amount of
186: depolarization can be estimated using the fact that the differential
187: polarized source counts for unresolved extragalactic sources vary
188: approximately as $dN/dp \sim p^{-2.5}$ for $1 < p < 10\ \rm mJy$
189: beam$^{-1}$ \citep{tucci2004,taylor2007}. If \sigpol\ is a fraction
190: $f_\Sigma$ of the background value, the polarized intensity per source
191: must on average be decreased by a factor $f_p = f_\Sigma^{0.4}$. The
192: value $f_\Sigma \sim$ 0.5 -- 0.25, typical for the shadows we detect,
193: corresponds to $f_p \sim$ 0.76 -- 0.57. The polarized intensity of
194: extragalactic sources in these regions is therefore decreased by up to
195: $40\%$. The large angular size of the polarization shadows suggests
196: that these structures are relatively nearby.
197:
198: Extragalactic sources may be depolarized if $|RM|$ is high enough to
199: produce differential Faraday rotation over the frequency band
200: (bandwidth depolarization), or if significant $RM$ fluctuations exist
201: over the solid angle of the source (beam depolarization). Complete
202: bandwidth depolarization for NVSS sources requires $|RM| \sim$ 340
203: $\rm rad\ m^{-2}$, but Figure 23 in \citet{condon1998} shows that
204: values of $f_p \sim 0.76$ -- $0.57$ require $|RM| \sim 150$ -- $200$
205: $\rm rad\ m^{-2}$. Most polarization shadows are poorly covered by
206: published rotation measures, but shadows near $l = 90\degr$ that
207: overlap with the CGPS, coincide with areas where $RM \sim -350$ rad
208: m$^{-2}$, enough to cause bandwidth depolarization in the NVSS. The
209: polarization shadow associated with the Gum nebula comes from a shell
210: seen in \Halpha\ emission. \citet{vallee1983} detected this shell
211: through individual rotation measures $\sim 200$ rad m$^{-2}$,
212: consistent with partial bandwidth depolarization of NVSS sources by
213: the shell.
214:
215: If the depolarization in the NVSS is bandwidth depolarization,
216: Figure~\ref{shadows-fig} shows regions of high $RM$ up to Galactic
217: latitude $\pm 20\degr$, with the contour corresponding to $|RM|
218: \approx 150$ $\rm rad\ m^{-2}$. This $RM$ amplitude map does not
219: depend on sparsely sampled rotation measures to individual sources,
220: but it provides complete sampling of the sky north of declination
221: $-40\degr$, outside the Galactic plane. We found no evidence for
222: large-scale structure in an image of $\Sigma_{pol}$ convolved to a
223: resolution of $5\degr$, providing an upper limit $f_p > 0.94$, or
224: $|RM| < 70$ $\rm rad\ m^{-2}$ for an extended component outside the
225: Galactic plane. This upper limit is in general agreement with all-sky
226: $RM$ images constructed by interpolation of rotation measures of
227: extragalactic sources \citep{frick2001,JH2004,dineen2005},
228: although these images do not show structure on angular scales
229: $\lesssim 20\degr$, because of the limited sky density of published
230: rotation measures.
231:
232: Most polarization shadows appear around $l \approx \pm 90\degr$ where
233: the line of sight is approximately along the local Galactic magnetic
234: field. Larger values of $|RM|$ are expected here, that can increase
235: the amount of bandwidth depolarization, but other depolarization
236: mechanisms may also be enhanced.
237:
238: Beam depolarization of extragalactic sources implies $RM$ fluctuations
239: over the solid angle of the source. \citet{gaensler2005} and
240: \citet{haverkorn2006} report beam depolarization of extragalactic
241: sources behind the LMC and in the SGPS. Beam depolarization is also a
242: possible mechanism for at least some of the polarization shadows
243: observed here. Polarized sources fainter than 100 mJy in total
244: intensity provide most of the signal in Figure~\ref{shadows-fig}a.
245: Beam depolarization of these sources would require $RM$ fluctuations
246: on angular scales less than their median angular size of $1\arcsec$
247: \citep{windhorst2003}. The present data do not allow us to identify
248: shadows with low $|RM|$ where bandwidth depolarization can be
249: excluded. More rotation measures of background sources in
250: polarization shadows are needed to resolve this question. If beam
251: depolarization is significant for compact sources, it must also be
252: significant for diffuse emission. Polarization shadows caused by beam
253: depolarization should therefore provide valuable information for the
254: interpretation of diffuse polarized Galactic emission.
255:
256: While some deep extended polarization shadows are located in regions
257: with low \Halpha\ intensity, Table~\ref{shadows-tab} also lists
258: shadows associated with \HII\ regions where the \Halpha\ emission is a
259: factor $\sim 10$ brighter. Inspection of Figure~\ref{shadows-fig}
260: shows that some bright \Halpha\ emission does not give rise to a
261: polarization shadow, e.g. the \HII\ region NGC 1499 at $(l,b)=$
262: $(160\degr,-13\degr)$, and the Orion region at $(l,b)\approx$
263: $(-150\degr,-15\degr)$. Some bright \Halpha\ emission from the Gum
264: nebula at negative latitudes also does not give rise to a polarization
265: shadow.
266:
267: In the absence of extinction, \Halpha\ intensity in R is related to
268: emission measure $EM$ in cm$^{-6}$ pc following
269: \begin{equation}
270: I_{H\alpha} = 2.25 \int_{\infty}^{observer} n_e^2 dl = 2.25 EM
271: \end{equation}
272: \citep{haffner2003} for gas at a temperature of 8000 K. Regardless of
273: the depolarization mechanism, $RM$ structure caused exclusively by
274: variations in electron density, would imply a correlation between
275: emission measure and the depth of polarization shadows. The lack of
276: correlation between $\Sigma_{pol,min}$ and $I_{H\alpha}$ in
277: Table~\ref{shadows-tab}, and the observation that some high $EM$
278: objects do not give rise to polarization shadows, suggests that
279: structure in the magnetic field is important in the formation of some
280: or all polarization shadows. If all polarization shadows were caused
281: by bandwidth depolarization in the NVSS, the shadows may be regions in
282: the interstellar medium where the magnetic field is more regular and
283: aligned with the large-scale magnetic field than elsewhere. If all
284: polarization shadows were caused by beam depolarization, they would
285: represent a more random magnetic field than elsewhere. Both beam
286: depolarization and bandwidth depolarization may occur, but in either
287: case polarization shadows suggest a different magnetic structure from
288: their surroundings.
289:
290: The size and $|RM|$ of the polarization shadows are of the same order
291: of magnitude as the outer outer scale ($4\degr - 5\degr$) and standard
292: deviation ($263\pm 32$ rad m$^{-2}$) of $RM$ fluctuations in interarm
293: regions in the SGPS reported by \citet{haverkornetal2006a}. The
294: polarization shadows may be nearby examples of structures
295: corresponding to this outer scale of $RM$ fluctuations.
296:
297:
298: \section{Conclusions}
299:
300: We demonstrate that nearby structures in the magneto-ionic medium
301: create polarization shadows observed as depressions in the sky density
302: of polarized sources in the NVSS. Some polarization shadows are
303: associated with \HII\ regions, but other shadows are related to
304: depolarized areas in diffuse Galactic radio emission. Partial
305: bandwidth depolarization in the NVSS is responsible for at least some
306: polarization shadows, suggesting that these shadows are local regions
307: of high $|RM|$. Such regions may affect estimates of the scale height
308: of the Galactic magnetic field from $RM$ data. If beam
309: depolarization dominates, polarization shadows constrain
310: depolarization mechanisms for diffuse polarized emission.
311:
312: \section*{Acknowledgements}
313: This Letter is based entirely on published surveys, and was made
314: possible by the combined effort of the people who made them publicly
315: available. The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of
316: the National Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement
317: by Associated Universities, Inc. The Virginia Tech Spectral-Line
318: Survey (VTSS), the Southern H-Alpha Sky Survey Atlas (SHASSA), and the
319: Wisconsin H-Alpha Mapper (WHAM) are supported by the National Science
320: Foundation. The Dominion Radio Astrophysical Observatory is operated
321: as a national Facility by the National Research Council Canada. The
322: authors thank Jo-Anne Brown for use of her extensive database of
323: published and unpublished rotation measures, and T. L. Landecker for
324: his comments on the manuscript.
325:
326: \begin{thebibliography}{}
327:
328: % Gum distance
329: \bibitem[Brandt et~al.(1971)]{brandt1971} Brandt, J. C., Stecher, T. P., Crawford, D. L., \& Maran, S. P. 1971, \apj, 163, 99
330:
331: \bibitem[Brown et~al.(2003)]{brown2003} Brown, J. C., Taylor, A. R., Wielebinski, R., \& Mueller, P. 2003, \apj 592, L29
332:
333: % Gum Nebula:
334: \bibitem[Chanot \& Sivan(1983)]{chanot1983} Chanot, A., \& Sivan, J. P. 1983, \aap, 121, 19
335:
336: \bibitem[Condon et~al.(1998)]{condon1998} Condon, J. J., Cotton, W. D., Greisen, E. W., Yin, Q. F., Perley, R. A., Taylor, G. B., \& Broderick, J. J. 1998, \aj, 115, 1693
337:
338: \bibitem[Dennison et~al.(1998)]{dennison1998} Dennison, B., Simonetti, J. H., \& Topasna, G. A. 1998, PASA, 15, 147
339:
340: \bibitem[Dineen \& Coles(2005)]{dineen2005} Dineen, P., \& Coles, P. 2005, \mnras, 362, 403
341:
342: \bibitem[Finkbeiner(2003)]{finkbeiner2003} Finkbeiner, D. 2003, \apjs, 146, 407
343:
344: \bibitem[Frick et~al.(2001)]{frick2001} Frick, P., Stepanov, R., Shukurov, A., Sokoloff, D. 2001, \mnras, 325, 649
345:
346: \bibitem[Gaensler et~al.(2005)]{gaensler2005} Gaensler, B., Haverkorn, M., Staveley-Smith, L., Dickey, J. M., McClure-Griffith, N. M., Dickel, J. R., \& Wolleben, M. 2005, Science, 307, 1610
347:
348: % SHASSA
349: \bibitem[Gaustad et~al.(2001)]{gaustad2001} Gaustad, J. E., McCullough, P. R., Rosing, W., \& Van Buren, D. 2001, \pasp, 113, 1326
350:
351: \bibitem[Gaensler et~al.(2001)]{gaensler2001} Gaensler, B. M., Dickey, J. M., McClure-Griffiths, N. M., Green, A. J., Wieringa, M. H., \& Haynes, R. F. 2001, \apj, 549, 959
352:
353: \bibitem[Gray et~al.(1999)]{gray1999} Gray, A. D., Landecker, T. L., Dewdney, P. E., Taylor, A. R., Willis, A. G., \& Normandeau, M. 1999, \apj, 514, 221
354:
355: % WHAM survey
356: \bibitem[Haffner et~al.(2003)]{haffner2003} Haffner, L. M., Reynolds, R. J., Tufte, S. L., Madsen, G. J., Jaehnig, K. P., \& Percival, J. W. 2003, \apjs, 149, 405
357:
358: \bibitem[Han et~al.(1999)]{han1999} Han, J. L., Manchester, R. N., Qiao, G. J. 1999, \mnras, 306, 371
359:
360: \bibitem[Haverkorn(2006)]{haverkorn2006} Haverkorn, M. 2006, {\tt astro-ph/0611090}
361:
362:
363: \bibitem[Haverkorn et~al.(2006a)]{haverkornetal2006a} Haverkorn, M., Gaensler, B. M., McClure-Griffiths, N. M., Dickey, J. M., \& Green, A. J. 2006a, \apj, 637, L33
364:
365:
366: \bibitem[Haverkorn et~al.(2006b)]{haverkornetal2006b} Haverkorn, M., Gaensler, B. M., Brown, J. C., Bizunok, N. S., McClure-Griffiths, N. M., Dickey, J. M., \& Green, A. J. 2006b, \apjs, 167, 230
367:
368:
369: \bibitem[Johnston-Hollitt et~al.(2004)]{JH2004} Johnston-Hollitt, M., Hollitt, C. P., \& Ekers, R. D. 2004, in The Magnetized Interstellar Medium, Proceedings of the conference, held in Antalya, Turkey, September 8 - 12, 2003, Eds: B. Uyaniker, W. Reich, and R. Wielebinski, Copernicus GmbH, Katlenburg-Lindau., 13
370:
371: %Scutum cloud:
372: \bibitem[Madsen \& Reynolds(2005)]{madsen2005} Madsen, G. J., \& Reynolds, R. J. 2005, \apj, 630, 925
373:
374: % Sivan 3
375: \bibitem[Madsen et~al.(2006)]{madsen2006} Madsen, G. J., Reynolds, R. J., \& Haffner L. M. 2005, \apj, 652, 401
376:
377: \bibitem[Markova(2002)]{markova2002} Markova, N. 2002, \aap, 385, 479
378:
379: %\bibitem[Taylor et al.(2003)]{taylor2003} Taylor, A. R., Gibson, S. J., Peracaula, M., Martin, P. G., Landecker, T. L., Brunt, C. M., Dewdney, P. E., Dougherty, S. M., Gray, A. D., Higgs, L. A., Kerton, C. R., Knee, L. B. G., Kothes, R., Purton, C. R., Uyaniker, B., Wallace, B. J., Willis, A. G., \& Durand, D. 2003, \aj, 125, 3145
380:
381: \bibitem[Taylor et al.(2003)]{taylor2003} Taylor, A. R., et~al. 2003, \aj, 125, 3145
382:
383: %\bibitem[Taylor et~al.(2007)]{taylor2007} Taylor, A. R., Stil, J. M., Grant, J. K., Landecker, T. L., Kothes, R., Reid, R., Gray, A. D., Scott, D., Martin, P. G., Boothroyd, A. I., Joncas, G., Lockman, F. J., English, J., Sajina, A., \& Bond, J. R. 2007, \apj, submitted
384:
385: \bibitem[Taylor et~al.(2007)]{taylor2007} Taylor, A. R., et~al. 2007, \apj, submitted
386:
387: \bibitem[Tucci et~al.(2004)]{tucci2004} Tucci, M., Mart\'inez-Gonz\'alez, E., Toffolatti, L., Gonz\'alez-Nuevo, J., \& De Zotti, G. 2004, \mnras, 349, 1267
388:
389: \bibitem[Uyaniker et~al.(1999)]{uyaniker1999} Uyaniker, B., F\"urst, E., Reich, W., Reich, P., \& Wielebinski, R. 1999, \aaps, 138, 31
390:
391: \bibitem[Uyaniker et~al.(2003)]{uyaniker2003} Uyaniker, B., Landecker, T. L., Gray, A. D., \& Kothes, R. 2003, \apj, 585, 785
392:
393: \bibitem[Vall\'ee \& Bignell(1983)]{vallee1983} Vall\'ee, J. P., \& Bignell, R. C. 1983, \apj, 272, 131
394:
395: \bibitem[Windhorst(2003)]{windhorst2003} Windhorst, R. A. 2003, New Astr. Rev., 47, 357.
396:
397: \bibitem[Wolleben et~al.(2006)]{wolleben2006} Wolleben, M., Landecker, T. L., Reich, W., \& Wielebinski, R. 2006, \aap, 448, 411
398:
399: % Zeta Oph
400: \bibitem[Wood et~al.(2005)]{wood2005} Wood, K., Haffner, L. M., Reynolds, R. J., Mathis, J. S., \& Madsen, G. 2005, \apj, 633, 295
401:
402: \end{thebibliography}
403:
404: \clearpage
405:
406: \begin{deluxetable}{rrrclrr}
407: \tablecolumns{7}
408: \tablewidth{0pc}
409: \tablecaption{ Polarization Shadows \label{shadows-tab} }
410: \tablehead{
411: \colhead{$l$} & \colhead{$b$} & \colhead{a $\times$ b}&\colhead{$\Sigma_{pol,min}$} &\colhead{$I_{H\alpha}$}&\colhead{ID}&\colhead{d} \\
412: \colhead{($\degr$)} & \colhead{($\degr$)} &\colhead{($\degr \times \degr$)}&\colhead{(deg$^{-2}$)}& R & \colhead{\ } &\colhead{(kpc)}
413: }
414: \startdata
415: $-$125 & $-$7 & \phantom{0}7$\times$\phantom{0}6& 1.5 & 38 & RCW 15\tablenotemark{a} & 1.5\phantom{0} \\
416: $-$106 & +4 & 32$\times$17 & 1.2 & 50 & Gum\tablenotemark{b} & 0.4\phantom{0} \\
417: 5 & +24 & \phantom{0}5$\times$\phantom{0}3 & 2.7 & 85 & $\zeta$ Oph\tablenotemark{c} & 0.14 \\
418: 28 & $-$3 & \phantom{0}6$\times$\phantom{0}4 & 2.6 & 20 & Sct cl.\tablenotemark{d} & $\gtrsim$6\phantom{.} \\
419: 47 & +5 & 14$\times$\phantom{0}6 & 1.3 & \phantom{0}3 & \ldots\tablenotemark{e} &\ldots \\
420: 64 & $-$6 & 14$\times$\phantom{0}7 & 1.5 & \phantom{0}6 & \ldots\tablenotemark{e} &\ldots \\
421: 93 & $-$6 & 16$\times$\phantom{0}4 & 1.5 & 10 & \ldots\tablenotemark{f} &\ldots \\
422: 101 & +3 & \phantom{0}4$\times$\phantom{0}4 & 2.2 & 78 & \ldots\tablenotemark{g} &\ldots \\
423: 105 & $-$2 & \phantom{0}5$\times$\phantom{0}4 & 2.5 & 27 & \ldots\tablenotemark{g} &\ldots \\
424: 145 & +15 & \phantom{0}3$\times$\phantom{0}2 & 3.3 & 19 & Sivan 3\tablenotemark{h} & 1.2\phantom{0} \\
425: \enddata
426: \tablenotetext{\ }{Notes: a. Distance by association with open cluster NGC 2362; \citet{chanot1983}; b. Position is the estimated center of the ring; dimensions are the major and minor axes. \citet{brandt1971}, \citet{chanot1983}; c. \citet{wood2005}; d. Size and location correspond with Scutum cloud described by \citet{madsen2005}; e. Associated with depolarized region in Figure~\ref{shadows-fig}c; f. Comparison with diffuse polarized emission in Figure~\ref{shadows_detail-fig}; g. No clear association with nearby \HII\ regions; h. Distance by association with $\alpha$ Cham; \citet{madsen2006}, \citet{markova2002}}
427: \end{deluxetable}
428:
429: \clearpage
430:
431: \begin{figure}
432: %\resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics[angle=0]{f1.eps}}
433: \caption{ {\bf [This Figure is provided as a separate image f1.gif]}
434: (a): Surface density of polarized sources in the NVSS with polarized
435: intensity $>1$ mJy, smoothed to a resolution of 2 degrees. Gray
436: scales are linear from 0 (black) to 9 sources deg$^{-2}$ (white).
437: (b): \Halpha\ intensity from \citet{finkbeiner2003}. Gray scales are
438: logarithmic from 1 R (white) to 250 R (black). The white contour
439: indicates \Halpha\ intensity of 25 R. The southern declination limit
440: of the NVSS is indicated by the black arc. (c): Polarized intensity of
441: the Galactic diffuse emission at 1.4 GHz from the DRAO low-resolution
442: polarization survey \citep{wolleben2006}. Gray scales are linear from
443: 0 (black) to 350 mK (white).
444: \label{shadows-fig}
445: }
446: \end{figure}
447:
448: \clearpage
449:
450: \begin{figure}
451: %\resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics[angle=-90]{f2.eps}}
452: \caption{ {\bf [This Figure is provided as a separate image f2.gif]}
453: (a): Distribution of NVSS sources with $p > 1$ mJy/beam around
454: $(l,b)=(90\degr,-10\degr)$. The size of the symbols indicates the
455: magnitude of $p$, and symbol sizes corresponding with 1, 3, 5, and 10
456: or more mJy/beam are shown in the inset. (b) Correlation of \sigpol\
457: with structure in diffuse Galactic polarized emission in the survey by
458: \citet{wolleben2006}, for the area shown in (a). The image shows
459: \sigpol\ with linear gray scale from 0 (black) to 8 (white) sources
460: deg$^{-2}$, and contours at 2.7 and 4 sources deg$^{-2}$ (3$\sigma$
461: and 2$\sigma$ below the mean density of 6.6 sources
462: deg$^{-2}$). Polarization vectors of diffuse polarized emission are
463: shown with size proportional to the diffuse polarized intensity. (c):
464: Image of diffuse polarized intensity with the same polarization
465: vectors. The region of high polarized intensity and regular
466: polarization angle crosses between the two minima in \sigpol\ in (b).
467: \label{shadows_detail-fig}
468: }
469: \end{figure}
470:
471: \end{document}
472:
473:
474: