1: \subsection{Method}
2: The number of \ttbar events in the selected data sample is
3: extracted by performing a maximum likelihood fit to the
4: discriminant distribution observed in data using templates for the
5: \ttbar signal, multijet and $W/Z$+jets ($W$+jets) backgrounds
6: in the \mujets ~(\ejets) channel.
7: The $Z$+jets contribution is added to the $W$+jets discriminant template
8: according to its fraction determined in Sect.~\ref{sec:MMresult},
9: resulting in a combined electroweak background template in the \mujets ~channel.
10: Similarly, the contributions from the
11: dilepton and $\ell$+jets \ttbar ~signals are combined into a single
12: \ttbar ~template before fitting by adding the dilepton
13: contribution to the $\ell$+jets template. Dilepton and $Z$+jets admixtures
14: introduce only small corrections to the \ttbar $\ell$+jets and $W$+jets
15: template shape, respectively.
16:
17: We consider three different contributions to the maximum likelihood fit:
18: \ttbar, $W/Z$+jets and multijet, and constrain the relative
19: fraction of the latter using Eq.\ref{eq:matrix2}.
20: This is realized by defining the following likelihood function:
21: \begin{eqnarray}
22: {\it{L}}(N_t^{t\bar{t}},N_t^{ W},N_t^{b}) =
23: \left[\prod_i {\cal{P}}(n_i^{
24: o},\mu_i)\right]{\cal{P}}(N_{\ell-t}^{o},N_{\ell-t}) \;,
25: \label{eq:lhood}
26: \end{eqnarray}
27: where ${\cal{P}}(n,\mu)$ denotes the Poisson probability density function
28: for $n$ observed events given an expectation value of $\mu$
29: and $N_t^{t\bar{t}}$, $N_t^{ W}$, $N_t^{b}$ are the
30: numbers of \ttbar, ~$W/Z$+jets and multijet events in the selected sample,
31: respectively. In the first term of Eq.~\ref{eq:lhood}, $i$ runs over all bins
32: of the discriminant histogram; $n_i^{ o}$ is the content of bin $i$
33: measured in the selected data
34: sample; and $\mu_i$ is the expectation for bin $i$, which is a function
35: of $N_t^{t\bar{t}}$, $N_t^{ W}$ and $N_t^{b}$ as given by:
36: \begin{eqnarray}
37: \mu_i(N_t^{t\bar{t}},N_t^{ W},N_t^{b}) = f_i^{t\bar{t}}N_t^{t\bar{t}} + f_i^{
38: W}N_t^{ W} + f_i^{b}N_t^{b} \;,
39: \label{eq_mui}
40: \end{eqnarray}
41: where $f_i^{t\bar{t}}$, $f_i^{ W}$, $f_i^{b}$ represent
42: the fractions in bin $i$ of the $t\bar{t}$, $W$+jets and
43: multijet discriminant templates
44: (shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:ejets_LHD_templates} for \ejets ~channel), respectively.
45: The second term of Eq.~\ref{eq:lhood} effectively implements the constraint
46: on $N_t^{b}$ via the Poisson probability of the
47: observed number of events in the ``loose$-$tight'' ($N_{\ell-t}^{o}$) sample,
48: given the expectation ($N_{\ell-t}$).
49: The latter can be expressed as:
50: \begin{eqnarray}
51: N_{\ell -t} = \frac{1-\varepsilon_{s}}{\varepsilon_{s}}N_t^{t\bar{t}}
52: + \frac{1-\varepsilon_{s}}{\varepsilon_{s}}N_t^{ W}
53: + \frac{1-\varepsilon_{b}}{\varepsilon_{b}}N_t^{ b}.
54: \label{eq_nlmt}
55: \end{eqnarray}
56: Thus, the task is to minimize the negative log-likelihood function:
57: \begin{eqnarray*}
58: & &-\log {\rm{L}} (N_t^{t\bar{t}},N_t^{ W},N_t^{ b}) \simeq \\
59: & &\sum_i(-n_i^{ o} \log \mu_i +
60: \mu_i) - N_{\ell-t}^{ o}\log N_{\ell -t} + N_{\ell -t} \;,
61: \label{eq_final}
62: \end{eqnarray*}
63: where any terms independent of the minimization parameters are dropped.
64: The fitted parameters ($N_t^{t\bar{t}}$, $N_t^{ W}$, $N_t^{b}$) are given by
65: their value at the negative log-likelihood function minimum,
66: and their uncertainties are obtained by raising the negative log-likelihood
67: by one-half unit above the minimum while all other parameters of the fit are
68: allowed to float.
69: %covariance matrix is obtained by the usual procedure of varying the
70: %negative log-likelihood by one-half unit above the minimum.
71: The results of the fits are listed in Table~\ref{tab:nevts} and the
72: corresponding correlation coefficients are summarized in Table~\ref{tab:corr}.
73:
74: %--------------------------------
75: \begin{table}[ht]
76: \newcommand\T{\rule{0pt}{2.6ex}}
77: \newcommand\B{\rule[-1.2ex]{0pt}{0pt}}
78: \begin{center}
79: \begin{tabular}{lccccccc} \hline \hline
80: channel & $N_{t}^{t\bar{t}}$ \T \B & $N_{t}^{W}$ & $N_{t}^{b}$ \\ [1pt]\hline
81: \\[-7pt]
82: \ejets & $67.5^{+13.8}_{-12.9}$ & $32.6^{+14.0}_{-13.0}$ & $19.3 \pm 2.0$ \\[4pt]
83: \mujets & $21.1^{+10.7}_{-9.7}$ & $72.6^{+13.0}_{-12.1}$ & $8.1^{+1.8}_{-1.7}$
84: \\ [2pt]\hline \hline
85: \end{tabular}
86: \caption{Fitted number of \ttbar, $W$+jets and multijet background events in the selected
87: sample in the \ejets ~and \mujets ~channels.
88: $N_{t}^{W}$ includes the $Z$+jets contribution in the \mujets ~sample. }
89: \label{tab:nevts}
90: \end{center}
91: \end{table}
92: %--------------------------------
93:
94: \begin{table}[ht]
95: \newcommand\T{\rule{0pt}{2.6ex}}
96: \newcommand\B{\rule[-1.2ex]{0pt}{0pt}}
97: \begin{center}
98: \begin{tabular}{lcccccc} \hline \hline
99: & \multicolumn{3}{c} \ejets & \multicolumn{3}{c} \mujets \\ \hline
100: & $N_{t}^{t\bar{t}}$ \T \B & $N_{t}^{W}$ & $N_{t}^{b}$ & $N_{t}^{t\bar{t}}$ & $N_{t}^{W}$ & $N_{t}^{b}$\\
101: \hline
102: $N_{t}^{t\bar{t}}$ \T \B & $+1.00$ &$-0.63$ &$-0.11$ & $+1.00$ &$-0.59$ &$-0.14$ \\
103: $N_{t}^{W}$ & & $+1.00$ &$-0.23$ & & $+1.00$ &$-0.23$ \\
104: $N_{t}^{b}$ & & &$+1.00$ & & & $+1.00$ \\ \hline \hline
105: \end{tabular}
106: \caption{\label{tab:corr} Matrices of correlation coefficients of the likelihood fit in the \ejets ~and \mujets
107: ~channels.}
108: \end{center}
109: \end{table}
110:
111:
112: One complication arises due to the fact that the shape of the discriminant
113: for the multijet background is obtained from the ``loose$-$tight'' data sample
114: which has a small contribution from \wplus and \ttbar ~events (Eq.~\ref{eq_nlmt}).
115: The contamination of the multijet template is taken into account by using the
116: corrected expected number of events in each bin of the discriminant function
117: \begin{eqnarray*}
118: & &\mu_i(N_t^{ t\bar{t}},N_t^{ W},N_t^{ b}) = \\
119: & &\left(f_i^{ t\bar{t}}N_t^{t\bar{t}} + f_i^{ W}N_t^{
120: W}\right)\times\left(1-\frac{\varepsilon_{b}}{1-\varepsilon_{b}}\frac{1-\varepsilon_{s}}{\varepsilon_{s}}\right)
121: + \\
122: & & f_i^{ b}\left(N_t^{ b}+\frac{\varepsilon_{b}}{1-\varepsilon_{b}}\frac{1-\varepsilon_{s}}{\varepsilon_{s}}\left(N_t^{
123: t\bar{t}}+N_t^{ W}\right)\right)\;,
124: \end{eqnarray*}
125: in place of the one of Eq.~\ref{eq_mui}.
126:
127: Figure~\ref{fig:topofit} shows the distributions of the discriminant functions
128: for data in \ejets ~and \mujets ~channels along with the fitted contributions from the
129: $\ttbar$ signal and $W$+jets and multijet backgrounds.
130:
131: %--------------------------------
132: \begin{figure}[tbh]
133: \epsfig{file=plots/D_ej_bw.eps, width=9cm, clip=}
134: \epsfig{file=plots/D_mj_bw.eps, width=9cm}
135: \caption{\label{fig:topofit}Discriminant distribution for data
136: overlaid with
137: the result from a fit of $\ttbar$ signal, and $W$+jets and multijet background
138: in the \ejets ~(upper plot) and \mujets ~(lower plot) channel.}
139: \end{figure}
140: %---------------
141:
142: \subsection{Cross sections in individual channels}
143:
144: The \ttbar ~production cross section for an individual channel $j$ is
145: computed as:
146: \begin{equation}
147: \sigma_j = \frac{N_{t}^{t\bar{t}}(j)}{{\varepsilon}_j \; {\cal B}_j \; {\cal L}_j} \;,
148: \label{eq_sigma}
149: \end{equation}
150: where $N_{t}^{t\bar{t}}(j)$ is the number of fitted \ttbar ~events in channel $j$,
151: ${\cal B}_j$ is the branching fraction for the \ttbar ~final state where the
152: lepton is allowed to originate either directly from a $W$ boson or from the
153: $W\rightarrow\tau\nu$ decay (${\cal B}_{\mathrm{ljets}}$),
154: ${\cal L}_j$ is the integrated luminosity and $\varepsilon_j$ is the \ttbar ~selection
155: efficiency.
156: The efficiencies $\varepsilon$ are obtained by correcting the
157: \ttbar ~$\ell$+jets selection efficiencies
158: $\varepsilon_{\mathrm{ljets}}$ for the \ttbar\ dilepton final state contribution:
159: \begin{equation}
160: \varepsilon = \varepsilon_{\mathrm{ljets}} + \frac{{\cal B}_{\ell\ell}}{{\cal B}_{\mathrm{ljets}}} \;
161: {\varepsilon_{\ell\ell}} \; ,
162: \end{equation}
163: where $\varepsilon_{\ell\ell}$ and ${\cal B}_{\ell\ell}$ are the selection efficiency
164: and the branching
165: fraction for the $t\bar t\to \ell\ell$+jets decay channel.
166:
167: The input values for the likelihood fit are summarized in
168: Table~\ref{tab:ljets}.
169: %--------------------------------
170: \begin{table}[ht]
171: \begin{center}
172: \begin{tabular}{lcccccc} \hline \hline
173: channel & $N_{l}$ & $N_{t}$ & ${\cal B}$ & ${\cal L}$ ($\rm pb^{-1}$) &
174: $\varepsilon_{\mathrm{ljets}}$ (\%) & $\varepsilon$(\%) \\ \hline
175: $e$ + jets & 242 & 119 & 0.17106 & 425 & 9.17 &
176: 9.39 \\ [3pt]
177: $\mu$ + jets & 160 & 100 & 0.17036 & 422 & 9.18 &
178: 9.36 \\ \hline \hline
179: \end{tabular}
180: \caption{Number of selected events in the loose ($N_{\ell}$) and tight ($N_t$) sample,
181: branching fraction (${\cal B}$), integrated luminosity (${\cal L}$), selection efficiency
182: for $\ttbar \rightarrow \ell$+jets ($\varepsilon_{\mathrm{ljets}}$) and total selection
183: efficiency ($\varepsilon$) in \ejets ~and \mujets ~channels.}
184: \label{tab:ljets}
185: \end{center}
186: \end{table}
187: %--------------------------------
188:
189: The \ttbar ~production cross sections at $\sqrt{s} = $1.96~TeV for a top quark mass of 175~GeV
190: in the $e$+jets and $\mu$+jets channels are measured to be:
191: \begin{eqnarray}
192: {\rm e+jets}: \sigma_{t\bar{t}} = 9.9^{+2.1}_{-1.9}\:{\rm (stat)}
193: \pm 1.0 \:{\rm (syst)}
194: \pm 0.6\:{\rm (lum)}\:{\rm pb}; \nonumber \\
195: {\rm \mu +jets}: \sigma_{t\bar{t}} = 3.1^{+1.6}_{-1.5}\:{\rm (stat)}
196: \pm 0.4\:{\rm (syst)}
197: \pm 0.2\:{\rm (lum)}\:{\rm pb}. \nonumber
198: \end{eqnarray}
199:
200: We estimate the probability to observe the cross
201: sections measured in the $\mu$+jets and $e$+jets channels by
202: generating pseudo-measurements using the expected
203: statistical and systematic uncertainties evaluated at an assumed true cross
204: section of 7\,pb. We find that the correlation between two measurements
205: is small, 3.3\%, since the dominant uncertainties are of a statistical nature and
206: therefore uncorrelated between the channels. The probability to observe the
207: \ttbar ~cross section above 9.9\,pb (below 3.1\,pb) in one of the channels given
208: the true cross section of 7\,pb is 9\% (4\%).
209:
210: We estimate the consistency of the cross sections observed
211: in the $e$+jets and $\mu$+jets channels by generating pseudo-experiments
212: that incorporate all the correlations between the different sources of
213: systematic uncertainties
214: assuming the measured cross sections in the individual channels.
215: From the distribution of the differences between the \ejets ~and $\mu$+jets
216: cross sections observed in each pseudo-experiment,
217: we conclude that the cross sections agree within 2.4 standard deviations.
218: The difference
219: observed between the measured cross sections is attributed to a statistical
220: fluctuation.
221:
222: %We conclude that the cross sections agree within 2.4 standard deviations
223: %from the distribution of the differences between the \ejets ~and $\mu$+jets
224: %cross sections observed in each pseudo-experiment. The difference
225: %Bobserved between the measured cross sections is attributed to a statistical
226: %fluctuation.
227: %and plotting the difference between the observed sections for each
228: %preudo-measurement.
229: %We perform a Gaussian fit to the
230: %latter distribution and calculate a significance of the agreement as a
231: %ratio of the central value of the fit to its width. We conclude that the
232: %measured cross sections in $e$+jets and $\mu$+jets channels agree at
233: %2.4 standard deviations level.
234:
235: \subsection{Combined cross section}
236: The combined cross section in the lepton+jets channel is estimated
237: by minimizing the sum of the
238: negative log-likelihood functions of each individual channel.
239: A total of five parameters
240: are simultaneously fitted: $\sigma_{t\bar{t}}$ (common to both lepton channels) and
241: $N_{t}^{W}(j)$ and $N_{t}^{ b}(j)$ separately for each channel.
242: Figure~\ref{fig:topofitComb} shows the distribution of the discriminant function
243: for data along with the fitted contributions from
244: $\ttbar$ signal, $W$+jets, and multijet background events which are found to be
245: $40\%$, $48\%$ and $12\%$, respectively.
246: The combined cross section for a top quark mass of $175~\rm{GeV}$ is:
247: \begin{eqnarray}
248: \sigma_{t\bar{t}}(175\ \rm{GeV}) = 6.4^{+1.3}_{-1.2}\:{\rm (stat)}
249: \pm 0.7\:{\rm (syst)}
250: \pm 0.4\:{\rm (lum)}\:{\rm pb}. \nonumber
251: \end{eqnarray}
252:
253:
254: %The probability to observe a cross section below the value measured in
255: %$\mu$+jets channel and above the one measured in $e$+jets channel
256: %given the measured combined cross section is found to
257: %be $2.2\%$.
258:
259: %--------------------------------
260: \begin{figure}[tbh]
261: \epsfig{file=plots/D_combined_bw.eps, width=9cm}
262: \caption{\label{fig:topofitComb}Discriminant distribution for data
263: overlaid with
264: the result from a fit of $\ttbar$ signal, and $W$+jets and multijet background
265: in the combined $\ljets$ channel.}
266: \end{figure}
267: %---------------
268:
269: We have studied the dependence of the measured cross section
270: on the top quark mass by using the samples of
271: simulated \ttbar ~events with different top quark masses to evaluate signal
272: efficiencies and discriminant function outputs and repeating complete analysis.
273: Figure~\ref{fig:xsec_lj_mass} shows the dependence of the combined cross section
274: in the lepton+jets channel on the top quark mass. Solid line represents the fit to the
275: measured cross sections for various masses of the top quark.
276: For 170~GeV$<m_{\rm top}<$180~GeV the cross section changes as a function of $m_{\rm top}$ as:
277: \begin{equation}
278: \sigma_{t\bar{t}}(m_{\rm top}) = \sigma_{t\bar{t}}-0.1 \frac {\rm pb}{\rm GeV} \times (m_{\rm top}-175~{\rm GeV}).
279: \end{equation}
280:
281: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
282: \begin{figure}[h]
283: \hspace{-1.5 cm}
284: \leftline
285: {
286: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth,clip=]{plots/xs_vs_mass_lj_newlumi.eps}
287: %\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth,clip=]{plots/xs_vs_mass_lj_newlumi_new.eps}
288: }
289: \caption{The combined $t\bar{t}$ production cross section in the lepton+jets channel as a function
290: of top quark mass compared to the theoretical calculations
291: \cite{SMtheory_K}.}
292: \label{fig:xsec_lj_mass}
293: \end{figure}
294: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
295:
296:
297: The kinematic distributions observed in
298: lepton+jets events are well described by the sum
299: of $\ttbar$ signal, $W/Z$+jets, and multijet background contributions.
300: An example of this agreement is
301: illustrated in Figs.~\ref{fig:lepton_pt} and \ref{fig:jet_pt} for events
302: selected requiring $\mathcal D < 0.5$,
303: i.e.,~dominated by background, and events in the $\ttbar$ signal region with
304: $\mathcal D > 0.5$.
305: The two variables shown are the lepton $p_T$ and the highest jet $p_T$ in the event and are
306: not used as input to the discriminant function.
307:
308: %--------------------------------
309: \begin{figure}
310: %\epsfig{file=plots/lepton_pt_lhlt05_bw.eps, width=9cm, clip=}
311: %\epsfig{file=plots/lepton_pt_lhgt05_bw.eps, width=9cm}
312: \hspace{-1.0 cm}
313: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth,clip=]{plots/lepton_pt_lhlt05_bw.eps}
314: \vspace{0.5 cm}
315: \hspace{-1.0 cm}
316: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth,clip=]{plots/lepton_pt_lhgt05_bw.eps}
317: \caption{\label{fig:lepton_pt} Lepton $p_T$ distribution for $\ljets$ events
318: in data with discriminant below 0.5 (upper plot) and discriminant above 0.5
319: (lower plot),
320: overlaid with the result from a fit of $\ttbar$ signal, and $W$+jets and multijet background.}
321: \end{figure}
322: %---------------
323: %--------------------------------
324: \begin{figure}[tbh]
325: %\epsfig{file=plots/leadingjet_pt_lhlt05_bw.eps, width=9cm, clip=}
326: %\epsfig{file=plots/leadingjet_pt_lhgt05_bw.eps, width=9cm}
327: \hspace{-1.0 cm}
328: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth,clip=]{plots/leadingjet_pt_lhlt05_bw.eps}
329: \vspace{0.5 cm}
330: \hspace{-1.0 cm}
331: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth,clip=]{plots/leadingjet_pt_lhgt05_bw.eps}
332: \caption{\label{fig:jet_pt} Leading jet $p_T$ distribution for $\ljets$ events
333: in data with discriminant below 0.5 (upper plot) and discriminant above 0.5
334: (lower plot), overlaid with the result from a fit of $\ttbar$ signal,
335: and $W$+jets and multijet background.}
336: \end{figure}
337: %---------------
338:
339: