1: %\documentstyle[11pt,newpasp2,twoside,natbib,graphics]{article}
2: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3: \documentclass[emulateapj]{emulateapj}
4: %\pagestyle{myheadings}
5: %\nofiles
6:
7: % Some definitions I use in these instructions.
8:
9: %\def\emphasize#1{{\sl#1\/}}
10: %\def\arg#1{{\it#1\/}}
11: %\let\prog=\arg
12:
13: %\def\edcomment#1{\iffalse\marginpar{\raggedright\sl#1\/}\else\relax\fi}
14: %\marginparwidth 1.25in
15: %\marginparsep .125in
16: %\marginparpush .25in
17: %\reversemarginpar
18:
19: \begin{document}
20: %\setcounter{page}{1}
21: \shorttitle{Pulsar Disk Evolution}
22: \shortauthors{Currie \& Hansen}
23: \title{The Evolution of Protoplanetary Disks Around Millisecond Pulsars: The PSR 1257 +12 System}
24: \author{Thayne Currie\altaffilmark{1,2}}
25: \author{Brad Hansen\altaffilmark{2}}
26: \altaffiltext{1}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St. Cambridge, MA 02140}
27: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095}
28: \email{tcurrie@cfa.harvard.edu}
29: \begin{abstract}
30: We model the evolution of protoplanetary disks surrounding millisecond pulsars, using PSR 1257+12 as a
31: test case. Initial conditions were
32: chosen to correspond to initial angular momenta expected for supernova-fallback disks and disks formed
33: from the tidal disruption of a companion star. Models were run under two models for the viscous
34: evolution of disks: fully viscous and layered accretion disk models. Supernova-fallback disks
35: result in a distribution of solids confined to within 1-2 AU and
36: produce the requisite material to form the three known planets surrounding PSR 1257+12.
37: Tidal disruption disks tend to slightly underproduce solids interior to 1 AU, required for forming
38: the pulsar planets, while overproducing the amount of solids where
39: no body, lunar mass or greater, exists.
40: Disks evolving under 'layered' accretion spread somewhat less and deposit a higher
41: column density of solids into the disk.
42: In all cases, circumpulsar gas dissipates on $\lesssim 10^{5}$ year timescales,
43: making formation of gas giant planets highly unlikely.
44: \end{abstract}
45: \keywords{planet formation: general ---
46: pulsars: general,
47: planet formation: individual
48: (\objectname{PSR 1257 +12})}
49:
50: \section{Introduction}
51: The planetary system orbiting the pulsar B1257+12 first reported
52: in 1992, (Wolszczan \& Frail, 1992) and subsequently confirmed (Wolszczan, 1994
53: \& 2000), was the first extrasolar planetary system discovered. By the time of the
54: discovery of the first planet around a solar-type star (Mayor \& Queloz 1995; Marcy \& Butler 1996)
55: the planetary nature of the system had already been confirmed and elucidated by the detection
56: of the signal of resonant perturbations between the two largest planets in the system (Wolszczan 1994).
57: The eccentricities of all three known planets are now known to be extremely low ($e < 0.026$), and
58: the orbits of the outer two planets are nearly coplanar (relative inclination
59: $< 6^{o}$) (Konacki \& Wolszczan, 2003, hereafter KW03). Table 1 lists the orbital parameters
60: the three planets (from Table 2 of KW03).
61: Wolszczan (1996) has also argued for the presence of a fourth signature from
62: the pulsar timing data, though its mass and semimajor axis are uncertain.
63:
64: However, despite this conspicuous head start, there is still very little attention devoted to the theory of
65: planet formation in systems of this type. Such neglect is no doubt due to the fact that the initial
66: conditions for planet formation around
67: a pulsar must necessarily be very different than in the case usually considered in planetary formation
68: theories. In particular, the protoplanetary disk in this case represents an adjunct to stellar death, rather than
69: stellar birth. It is important to note, however, that the very different provenances need not, in fact,
70: give rise to very different conditions. Most theories for how a millisecond pulsar might acquire a
71: protoplanetary disk (reviewed in Podsiadlowski 1993) result in a gaseous disk in orbit about a central gravitating
72: body of roughly $1 M_{\odot}$. Most such theories even describe a disk of approximately solar composition
73: (although some, such as that of Livio, Pringle \& Saffer 1992, produce a disk very poor in hydrogen
74: and helium).
75:
76: This situation is sufficiently similar to the standard picture that it may be analysed with
77: the same tools as are normally used in the study of planet formation.
78: Of course, there are still some fundamental differences
79: between the situation we discuss here and the traditional one.
80: Most importantly, the planets are formed from an expanding disk since the original extent of the
81: disk is $\lesssim$ several AU (the justification for this is described in Section 2). Only that
82: material which expands out (as the result of viscous evolution) to the distances of the current
83: planets is important for planet formation. This is different from the normal case, where much of the
84: mass is added to the disk at large radii as the result of accretion from a protostellar cloud.
85: Nevertheless, the same fundamental physics behind viscous protoplanetary disk evolution should still
86: apply.
87:
88: In this paper we investigate the evolution of the gaseous protoplanetary disk around a pulsar, incorporating
89: a detailed description of the physical state of the gas and how this affects the disk evolution.
90: This can be regarded as an extension of Phinney \& Hansen (1993) and Hansen (2000), using more
91: detailed models and incorporating modifications to the standard model for the evolution of gaseous proto
92: planetary disks, specifically the "layered disk" model (Gammie 1996; Armitage, Livio \& Pringle
93: 2001).
94:
95: The structure of our paper is as follows. In Section 2 we describe the
96: two likely scenarios for producing protoplanetary disks surrounding millisecond pulsars, the
97: supernova fallback and tidal-disruption scenarios, and discuss the initial disk conditions
98: that result from them. In Section 3 we discuss the
99: standard model for viscous
100: protoplanetary disk evolution as well as modifications to it, incorporating the layered disk
101: accretion theory. We describe the numerical procedure and initial conditions for
102: our model runs in Section 4. Section 5 details the gas and dust column density ($\Sigma_{g}$ \& $\Sigma_{d}$)
103: and disk central temperature ($T_{c}$) evolution assuming a supernova-fallback disk, comparing
104: results for a fully viscous disk model with a layered disk model. Section 6 presents results for
105: the disk evolution assuming a tidal-disruption disk. In Section 7, we summarize our results
106: describe future work to model the formation of planets around millisecond pulsars.
107:
108: \section{Sources for Protoplanetary Disks around Millisecond Pulsars}
109: Two leading formation scenarios for protoplanetary disks around pulsars are now investigated: the
110: supernova-fallback and tidal disruption scenarios. These models
111: span a wide range of initial disk angular momenta: $\sim 10^{49}$-$10^{52}$ ergs $\cdot$s.
112: \subsection{Supernova-Fallback Disks}
113: The simplest model for the formation of a protoplanetary disk around a pulsar is the supernova-fallback scenario
114: whereby some fraction of the outer shell mass of the supernova fails to escape the gravitational potential of the
115: surviving neutron star. This material then settles into a disk surrounding the pulsar. Chevalier (1989),
116: Hashimoto et al. (1989) and Lin et al. (1991) modeled
117: supernova fallback, arguing that $\lesssim 0.1$ $M_{\odot}$ of material may remain.
118: The initial angular momentum for such a disk is rather low, typically
119: $\sim 10^{49}$ ergs $\cdot$ s (Menou et al. 2001).
120:
121: Similarity solutions used to
122: describe the structure of a fallback disk were derived by Menou et al. (2001)
123: and were used to argue for confinement of the disk
124: to sub-AU scales ($\sim 10^{12}$ cm). However,
125: these solutions assume a balance between heating and cooling in determining the
126: temperature structure of fallback disks, an assumption generally more appropriate for disks
127: with far larger initial angular momenta. We take a different approach,
128: allowing for imbalance of heating and cooling as well as
129: advection in determining the disk temperature evolution.
130: The fallback material is assumed to be metal-rich, and the total mass is set at $\sim$
131: $10^{-3}$ $M_{\odot}$, consistent with the fallback mass of Type II supernovae (Chevalier 1989).
132:
133: \subsection{Tidal-disruption Disks}
134: Alternatively, the disk may form from interactions with a binary companion.
135: We base our assumption for the initial distribution of disk material on the initial angular momentum
136: expected from scenario 5 in Phinney \& Hansen (1993): the circumpulsar disk material originates
137: from a companion star that was tidally disrupted after the supernova of the primary.
138: This would occur if the off-center
139: supernova recoil either kicked it into or close to a binary companion or the post-SN orbital
140: parameters for the secondary resulted in tidal disruption.
141:
142: There are some indications that tidal disruption can be a possible explanation for the origin of a
143: circumpulsar disk.
144: An analysis of post-SN orbital parameters from Kalogera (1996) demonstrate that the survival rate of
145: post-SN binaries is much greater for small initial orbital separations. Post-SN parameters favor
146: a binary separation equal to or lesser than the initial separation and also favor more highly eccentric orbits, factors
147: which make tidal disruption possible. If tidal disruption occurred as the
148: pulsar kicked into its companion at a high velocity then such
149: a pulsar would likely have a high proper motion. The PSR 1257+12 system exhibits an extremely
150: high space velocity of
151: $\sim$ 300 km $s^{-1}$, consistent with this disk formation scenario.
152: The resulting circumpulsar disk would have an initial angular momentum
153: $J \sim 10^{51}$--$10^{52} ergs\cdot s$. The disk composition is assumed to be solar.
154:
155: \section{Viscous Disc Surface Density and Temperature Evolution}
156: Our models begin with an initial protoplanetary disk confined to small radii ($\leq 3 AU$),
157: which should be true of both scenarios for disk formation (e.g. Phinney \& Hansen 1993).
158: Viscous evolution in this disk results in the accretion of most of the material, but some of the
159: mass must flow outwards to conserve angular momentum (Lynden-Bell \& Pringle 1974). Eventually some
160: of this material condenses out into solids and may thus provide the seed material for the
161: observed planets. The goal of our calculations is to examine whether there is sufficient material
162: in the disk to plausibly explain the observed planetary mass. An additional constraint is whether
163: the conditions in the disk are appropriate for the incorporation of dust and solids into planetesimals
164: that would decouple from the gas and begin the process of planet accumulation. This
165: is primarily a temperature threshold -- if the gas temperature is too high most heavy elements
166: will remain in a gaseous form.
167:
168: Phinney \& Hansen (1993) examined these issues
169: with simple $\alpha$-disk models for a range of initial angular momenta. The results
170: were inconclusive because of two competing effects. For high angular momentum budgets there was
171: indeed enough mass on large scales, but it remained too hot to plausibly deposit solid material
172: until the disk had expanded to scales of several AU, somewhat larger than the observed planetary
173: system. On the other hand, lower angular momentum budgets resulted in the gas becoming cool and
174: depositing mass on
175: smaller scales -- too small to really explain the observed planets. Hansen (2000) observed that
176: a potential solution to this problem was to modify the disk evolution to take account of a
177: viscosity that decreases at low temperature -- a hypothesis consistent with many treatments of
178: traditional protoplanetary nebulae (Gammie 1996; Sano \& Miyama 1999). We now investigate this
179: idea in more detail.
180: \subsection{Standard Model}
181: Since the initial disk extent was probably small ($\lesssim$ several AU) we model the viscous
182: disk evolution using a full diffusion prescription instead of calculating similarity solutions
183: as in Menou et al. (2001).
184: Under the thin disk approximation, the viscous evolution of the surface density $\Sigma$ is given by
185: the following equation (e.g. Pringle 1981; Hartmann
186: 1998):
187: \begin {equation}
188: \frac{\partial \Sigma}{\partial t}
189: = \frac{3}{r} \frac{\partial}{\partial r}[r^{1/2}
190: \frac{\partial}{\partial r}(\nu \Sigma r^{1/2})], \label{Vis1}
191: \end {equation}
192: where $\nu$ is the viscosity. This viscosity is determined by the
193: microphysics of the gas and is affected by the midplane temperature.
194: The viscosity is parameterized as an $\alpha$ viscosity (Shakura and Sunyaev,1973)
195: \begin{equation}
196: \nu=\alpha c_{s}^{2}/\Omega
197: \end{equation}
198: where $\alpha$, a constant which relates the efficiency of viscous transport, is set to
199: $10^{-2}$ for MHD-driven turbulent flow.
200:
201: Viscous heating, irradiation, radiative cooling, and radial advection of material through the
202: disk determine of the disk temperature evolution
203: \begin {equation}
204: \frac{\partial T_{c}}{\partial t}
205: = \frac{2}{\Sigma c_{p}}(Q_{+} +Q_{irr} - Q_{-})
206: - v_{r}\frac{\partial T_{c}}{\partial r} \label{Temp1}
207: \end {equation}
208: where $c_{p}$ is the disc specific heat ($c_{p}\sim 2.7 \frac{\Re}{\mu}$), $\Re$ is the gas constant,
209: and $\mu\sim 2.3$ is the mean molecular weight for temperatures $\sim 10^{3}$K. $Q_{+}$ is the viscous heating rate given as
210: \begin {equation}
211: Q_{+} = \frac{9}{8}\nu \Sigma \Omega^{2}, \label{Qp1}
212: \end {equation}
213: and $Q_{irr}$ is the heating rate from irradiation (due to accretion onto the pulsar)
214: \begin{equation}
215: Q_{irr}=\frac{L_{acc}}{4\pi r^{2}}(1-\beta)cos \phi, \label{Qirr1}
216: \end{equation}
217: where cos$\phi$=$\frac{dH}{dr}-\frac{H}{r}$ and the albedo ($\beta$) is 0.5
218: (Frank, King, and Raine 2002; see also King and Ritter 1998).
219: We assume that $L_{acc}$ is the
220: minimum of the accretion luminosity onto the pulsar and the Eddington luminosity, and
221: allow for self-shadowing of outer regions of the disk by puffed-up inner regions.
222: $Q_{-}$ is the radiative cooling term given as
223: \begin {equation}
224: Q_{-} = \sigma T_{e}^{4},
225: \end {equation}
226: and the vertically averaged radial velocity of material through a cross section
227: in the disc is
228: \begin {equation}
229: v_{r}=-\frac{3}{\Sigma r^{1/2}}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}(\nu \Sigma r^{1/2}). \label{Vr1}
230: \end {equation}
231:
232: The cooling rate can be cast in terms of the midplane temperature $T_{c}$ by relating
233: $T_{c}$ to the local effective temperature ($T_{e}$) through the condition of vertical radiative transport.
234: From Hubeny (1990) we find that in the optically thick limit
235: \begin{equation}
236: T^{4}=\frac{3}{8}\tau T_{e}^{4}
237: \end{equation}
238: where $\tau = \frac{\Sigma}{2}\kappa$ and for the optically thin limit
239: \begin{equation}
240: T^{4}\sim T_{e}^{4}/\tau.
241: \end{equation}
242:
243: To complete the microphysical description of the gas, we compute the opacity $\kappa$ as a function
244: of temperature and density. We use the frequency-averaged opacities from Bell \& Lin (1994),
245: shown in Table 2 with slight modifications. The
246: analytical fits to these opacities have the form of $\kappa = \kappa_{o}\rho^{a}T^{b}$. The temperature
247: range over which a given analytical fit of $\kappa$ is valid is determined by requiring continuity of
248: the function $\kappa$ between different domains.
249: For low temperatures, the temperature range over
250: which a given power-law prescription is valid is independent of density. When the disc is partially ionized
251: there is a non-negligible dependence on the density and thus $\Sigma$ for the boundaries:
252: \begin{equation}
253: T_{max,n}
254: =[\frac{\kappa_{n}}{\kappa_{n+1}}(\Sigma\Omega(\frac{\Re}{\mu})^{1/2})^{a_{n}-a_{n-1}}]^{\frac{1}{b_{n+1}-b_{n}+1/2(a_{n}-a_{n+1})}}
255: \end{equation}
256: where the midplane gas density is given as $\rho_{c}=\Sigma c_{s}/\Omega$ and the adiabatic sound
257: speed is given as $c_{s}=\sqrt{\Re T_{c}/\mu}$. The opacities in Table 2 assume solar abundance.
258: Menou et al. (2001) note that opacities for species expected in supernova-fallback disks are similar
259: to those for a solar mixture.
260:
261: The analytical fits from Bell \& Lin (1994) compare favorably with more sophisticated numerical
262: calculations (e.g. Semenov et al. 2003; Ferguson et al. 2005) over most temperature
263: ranges. However, they underpredict the opacity by as much as three orders of magnitude in the n=4-5 regimes
264: as can be seen from Semonov et al. (2003; at log(T)$\sim$ 3.25). By the n=6 ($\kappa$$\propto$$T^{10}$, $\sim$
265: log(T)=3.5) regime, the opacities are
266: again consistent with other calculations. Semenov et al. cite an improper truncation of the molecular
267: water opacity as the likely source for this discrepancy. Because numerical calculations from several different groups
268: (e.g. Pollack et al. 1994; Alexander \& Ferguson 1994;
269: Semonov et al. 2003) all find a much higher opacity, there is strong evidence that the Bell \& Lin opacities are too low.
270: Therefore, when a disk region is in the n=4-5 opacity regimes we set a 'floor' to the opacity equal to opacity at
271: transition temperature between n=4 and 5, where the Bell \& Lin predictions are consistent with others. Thus, over
272: a small temperature range the opacity is roughly constant and comparable to the values of
273: Semenov et al. and others.
274:
275: \subsection{Modifications for Layered Disk Evolution}
276:
277: Extensive work over the last decade has shown the effectiveness of the magnetorotational instability (MRI)
278: in providing the anomalous viscosity for accretion disks in a variety of astrophysical
279: situations (Balbus \& Hawley 1991). However, one situation where its usefulness is debatable is
280: precisely the one of interest in this case -- a protoplanetary disk.
281: This may be especially true in the SN fallback case where the cooling disk may quickly become neutral and thus
282: unable to drive MHD turbulence (Lin et al. 1991; Menou et al. 2001).
283: The principal issue is the
284: ionization state of the gas which is an exponential function of the gas temperature (see Gammie 1996). When the disk gas is only partially ionized, the coupling between magnetic field
285: and disk gas is weakened and eventually the MRI ceases to operate. The gas temperatures in the outer parts
286: of protoplanetary disks are perhaps a few hundred Kelvin, so that ionization is expected to be very
287: low and the viscosity may be considerably reduced.
288:
289: This requires that we modify the disk evolution described in Section 3.1. In particular, we adopt
290: the formalism of Gammie (1996), in which accretion is assumed to occur only through a thin `active' layer on
291: the surface of the disk. Ionization is maintained by irradiation, either by cosmic rays or X-rays
292: from the central star, and so the MRI can still operate. The rest of the material is
293: assigned to an inviscid, unevolving `dead' layer.
294: Thus, at each radius we must consider both an active surface density $\Sigma_a$ as well as a total
295: surface density $\Sigma$. The relative extent of the active layer is a function of the magnetic
296: Reynolds number in the midplane (Fleming \& Stone 2003), with the transition occurring over a finite
297: temperature range.
298:
299: The ionization fraction for solar abundances is dominated by collisionally-ionized potassium (Umebayashi 1983) and varies
300: over five orders of magnitude from 1000K to 800K. Thus, for tidal disruption disks we assume that the disk is fully viscous
301: at 1000K and transitions (linear in log T space) to a layered state by 800K. The treatment for the supernova-fallback disk
302: is more difficult since such disks are unlikely to have a solar composition of elements and also may be initially hot enough
303: to trigger nucleosynthesis. To address this issue, we follow Fujimoto et al. (2001) who used the pre-SN chemical
304: composition models of a 20 $M_{\odot}$ progenitor from Nomoto \& Hashimoto (1988) to model the initial conditions and early
305: evolution of fallback disks. Nucleosynthesis in the disk is possible at stellocentric distances
306: $\le$ 3$\times10^{3}$ $r_{g}$, where r$_{g}$ is the Schwarzschild radius
307: ($\frac{2GM}{c^{2}}$), which corresponds to $\sim 2\times10^{10}$ cm for a 20$M_{\odot}$ progenitor. This distance is
308: probably too small to be relevant for planet formation from fallback disks. Regions beyond this
309: should have a similar composition to that of the ejected layers of the pre-SN star. The exact composition of these layers
310: varies strongly. Fujimoto et al. considers three layers: a silicon rich, oxygen rich, and helium-rich layer. We assume that
311: these layers are well mixed in the disk and calculate the mean composition of the disk assuming that all layers
312: contribute equally. The dominant gas-phase elements are O, Si, He, and S; $\sim 26\%$ are metals. Because a sizeable fraction
313: of metals are retained (including, presumably, potassium) we assume that the disk transitions from fully viscous to layered
314: over the same 1000 to 800K range.
315:
316: In both the fallback and tidal-disruption disk models, we assume that $\Sigma_{a}$ has a minimum of 200 g$cm^{-2}$
317: which is twice the stopping surface density for cosmic rays using interstellar medium values (100 g$cm^{-2}$ for
318: two disk faces). The stopping depth for x-rays is a much smaller $\sim 0.1 g cm^{-2}$.
319:
320: Thus, for layered accretion equations 1, 3, and 6 are now modified such that
321: \begin {equation}
322: \frac{\partial \Sigma}{\partial t}
323: = \frac{3}{r} \frac{\partial}{\partial r}[r^{1/2}
324: \frac{\partial}{\partial r}(\nu \Sigma_{a} r^{1/2})],
325: \end {equation}
326: \begin {equation}
327: Q_{+} = \frac{9}{8}\nu \Sigma_{a} \Omega^{2}
328: \end {equation}
329: and
330: \begin {equation}
331: v_{r}=-\frac{3}{\Sigma r^{1/2}}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}(\nu \Sigma_{a} r^{1/2}).
332: \end {equation}
333:
334: The vertically averaged radial velocity of the disc, $v_{r}$, becomes smaller as the disc evolves into
335: a layered state since the energy transported by the disk active layers is shared by
336: the entire disk bringing the dead zone into thermal equilibrium with the base of the active layer.
337: The temperature change due to advection is then reduced by $\Sigma_{a}/\Sigma$ in the
338: layered disk region.
339: The optical depth, $\tau$, is now given as $\tau = \frac{\Sigma_{a}}{2}\kappa$.
340:
341: The small $\Sigma_{a}$
342: value may underestimate the true column density of material transported. The cosmic-ray flux at the center
343: of a supernova remnant may in fact be significantly larger than typical interstellar medium values.
344: Furthermore, while most of the disk may be magnetically dead, it is not clear that the same column of material is
345: mechanically dead: turbulent eddies in the active region may overshoot the active/dead boundary and transport
346: some mass from the dead zone (see Fleming \& Stone 2003). Therefore, the fully viscous and layered
347: prescriptions adopted here should be seen limiting cases for viscous transport in circumpulsar disks,
348: where the viscous evolution actually manifest in circumpulsar disks is likely somewhere in between.
349:
350: \subsection{Solid Body Evolution}
351: Modeling only the gas evolution is not sufficient for investigating possible planet formation out of such
352: a disk as a fraction of the original disk mass will condense into solids once the disk cools past
353: certain temperature thresholds. Here we describe a crude model for tracking the solid body evolution
354: of an originally all-gaseous circumpulsar disk. We assume that once the disk at some stellocentric
355: distance drops below a temperature threshold it removes a fraction of its mass to solids in the next
356: timestep. This neglects dust dynamics in the evolution of the circumpulsar disk.
357: Specifically, we first have neglected the time required for grains to settle to the disk midplane. As this depends
358: critically on the grain size as well as the level of anisotropy of disk turbulence - the component of turbulence
359: acting vertically must be extremely low for complete settling (e.g. Dubrulle et al. 1995)- we make the simplifying
360: assumption that the solid bodies can settle to the disk midplane on short timescales and that turbulence is unable
361: to stir particles to large scale heights.
362: Highly anisotropic
363: hydrodynamical forms of turbulence (e.g. Youdin \& Chiang 2004) or layered disk models operating under MRI turbulence
364: (e.g. Currie 2005) should allow grains to settle to a thin scale height. Second, we neglect the effect of radial
365: migration. Such migration may alter the dust-to-gas ratio in disks, trigger planetesimal formation
366: (Youdin \& Shu 2002), and perhaps even alter the efficiency of planet formation (Currie 2005). However, as we shall
367: see, gas from circumpulsar disks typically depletes on very short, $\sim 10^{5}$ year timescales. Furthermore, as the disk
368: cools very large columns of dust, much greater than the Minimum Mass Solar Nebula (MMSN; Hayashi 1981) may be deposited for some models. Both of these conditions hasten planetesimal formation
369: by gravitational instability such that grain radial migration may not be a strong effect.
370: Therefore, while simple, this model should still allow one to get a zeroth-order understanding
371: of the expected regions of planet formation from a circumpulsar disk.
372:
373: The first temperature threshold we use occurs at $\sim 500 K$ which takes into account the condensation of metal
374: grains which should finish around $\sim 470 K$. Once a gridpoint drops below $500 K$ we remove a fraction of its
375: mass from the gas disk and place it into a solid body distribution:
376: \begin{equation}
377: \Sigma_{d,metals}=c\times \Sigma_{g}.
378: \end{equation}
379: Because the supernova fallback disk is comprised of 26\% metals, c=0.26 in the supernova fallback model.
380: For the solar-composition tidal disruption model, we set c=0.01.
381:
382: The second temperature threshold, relevant for the tidal-disruption model, occurs at the
383: water ice condensation point. This transition occurs roughly at $170 K$
384: and removes from the disk a larger fraction of mass than the condensation of metals. Specifically, when a
385: gridpoint drops below $170 K$ we then remove the following mass from the gas disk and deposit it into the solid
386: body distribution
387: \begin{equation}
388: \Sigma_{d,ice}=0.032\times \Sigma_{g}.
389: \end{equation}
390: hese temperatures are significantly less than $\sim 1000$ K, below which the disk
391: is likely magnetically dead and unable to drive turbulence in the disk midplane.
392:
393: Mass can also be added to the solid body distribution by advection of material from a hot region of the disk across
394: a temperature threshold to a cooler region. We crudely model this by ascribing a certain fraction (0.01 or 0.26 for across
395: the metal grain threshold and 0.032 for the water ice threshold) of disk material designated for solids once said
396: material crosses a threshold. We then set this fraction to be zero for all regions for which the disk is cool
397: enough to allow condensation. If, after a timestep, that grid point to the cooler side of the threshold now has
398: some 'solids' we add that amount to the solid body distribution for that grid point and subtract it
399: from the calculated gas distribution.
400:
401: We also track the amount of solid material interior to $1 AU$ and exterior to 1 (2) $AU$ for the
402: supernova fallback model (tidal disruption model). As the three known planets
403: are all within $1 AU$ of the pulsar we want to see how much mass is contained in this region as a
404: function of time. Specifically, we want to see if, in order to form the known planets, we must 'import' material
405: from beyond $1 AU$ or require that they formed much further out and migrated inward.
406: Models for the fourth signature from this system suggest the existence of a Uranian to Jovian mass body with a large
407: semimajor axis ($\sim 5 AU$ or larger). We test how likely such formation would be in a circumpulsar disk in our
408: formation scenario by tracking the mass of the disk exterior to $ 2 AU$.
409:
410: \section{Numerical Procedure}
411:
412: We solve for the evolution of the surface density and temperature profiles
413: using an explicit finite difference method over 250 equally spaced radial grid points.
414: The timestep taken is small at the beginning because of limits of the Courant
415: condition for numerical stability, but it is eventually expanded such that we cover a time evolution
416: of the disc over $10^{6}$ yrs. To guard against numerical
417: instabilities arising at the boundaries between opacity regions we smooth the
418: values for the opacity at such boundaries to be a composite of the opacity on
419: either side of the boundary.
420:
421: We follow the evolution of circumpulsar disks after the point at which it has cooled to
422: $\lesssim$ 10,000 K, prior to which it expands rapidly.
423: Formation scenarios for circumpulsar disks typically start with very compact disks
424: ($\lesssim$ 0.1 AU) and $\sim$ 10$^{49-52}$ ergs$\cdot$s.
425: Early tests found that starting the tidal-disruption disk runs with material spread over
426: $\sim$ 0.1 AU scales caused the disk to heat up to $\gtrsim$ 10$^{6}$ K until it spread to
427: $\sim$ several AU in less than 1 year, where it cooled to $\lesssim$ 10,000 K. The lower
428: mass of the supernova fallback disk results in smaller, more transient spreading such that
429: a fallback disk cools to $\lesssim$ 10,000 K after spreading for $<$ 1 AU.
430: Thus, we uniformly spread the disk material
431: for our initial surface density profile over 0.3 AU (3 AU) for the supernova-fallback
432: (tidal-disruption) models. Initial temperature for the disc is
433: set at $\sim$ 3500 K though we find that for our initial surface density
434: the temperature quickly reaches values independent of the
435: starting condition.
436:
437: We present results for the supernova-fallback scenario and then the tidal-disruption scenario.
438: For each scenario we do model runs for full viscous disk models and then layered disk models.
439: For the latter models, we use the active/
440: dead layer surface density ratios from equations 10 and 11.
441: We start with initial angular momentum values of $10^{49}$, $10^{51}$, and $10^{52} ergs\cdot s$, corresponding
442: to the supernova fallback model and two tidal-disruption models, respectively.
443: The goal is to run the disc evolution for reasonable initial models to
444: see what constraints can be put on the planet formation from such disks.
445: We compare our results with the masses and positions of the three known
446: planets in PSR 1257+12, and place constraints on the locations and positions
447: of any other planetary mass bodies in the system. Important parameters for
448: these constraints are the evolution of $\Sigma_{g}$, the gas surface density,
449: $T_{c}$, the central temperature, and $\Sigma_{d}$, the solid mass
450: surface density. We also compute the absolute value of the mass accretion rate throughout the disk ($\dot M$)
451: and track the Toomre Q parameter ($Q_{grav}$) to see the disk may periodically become gravitatonally
452: unstable.
453: \section{Supernova Fallback Models}
454: \subsection{Fully-Viscous Accretion}
455: Figure 1 shows the gas surface density ($\Sigma_{g}$) and central temperature ($T_{c}$) profile
456: evolution for the fully-viscous model, assuming that the disk originates as supernova-fallback material.
457: The disk evolves on a brisk $10^{4}$ year timescale. By $\sim 10^{5}$ years, the surface density of gas
458: drops to below 1/100th that expected for the Minimum Mass Solar Nebula. For comparison, circumstellar
459: dust and gaseous disk components are expected to evolve on longer, $\sim 10^{6}-10^{7}$ yr timescales (e.g.
460: Currie et al. 2007a; Zuckerman et al. 1995), after which only gas-poor/free debris disks remain (e.g.
461: Hernandez et al. 2006; Currie et al. 2007b).
462: Circumpulsar disks evolve on shorter timescales largely
463: because the initial angular momentum of a supernova-fallback disk is $\gtrsim$ 100-1000 times smaller.
464: A high disk temperature, and thus high rate of viscous transport, results from the compact fallback disk.
465: Furthermore, irradiation from accretion onto the neutron star heats up the inner disk regions to very high
466: ($\gtrsim$ 10$^{5}$ K) temperatures during the early evolutionary stages (t$\lesssim$ 1000 yr), causing
467: the disk to spread rapidly. Irradiation impacts the disk at very acute angles and the disk cools after
468: it spreads. This allows all but the innermost disk regions to become self shadowed quite easily after
469: $\sim$ 10$^{3}$ yr. Viscous heating is then required to maintain high disk temperatures.
470: This results in a fast cooling of the disk from $10^{3}$-$10^{5}$ years.
471:
472: Despite the fast gas accretion timescale, the column density of solids, $\Sigma_{d}$, is still large enough
473: to form approximately Earth mass bodies if the final assembly of planets is very efficient, owing to
474: the rapid cooling of disk material to below 500K (Figure 2) and advection across the 500 K threshold. Typical
475: $\Sigma_{d}$ values are $\sim$ 10 MMSN values, up to $\sim$ 100$\times$ MMSN at $\sim$ 0.1-0.5 AU,
476: even though by $\sim 10^{5}$ years the \textit{gas}
477: column density is depleted by a factor of $\gtrsim$ 1000.
478:
479: In this model, formation of Earth-sized bodies is highly unlikely outside 1 AU,
480: though it may be possible form asteroid-sized bodies at this distance.
481: There are some suggestions that the presence of such a body is consistent with the
482: pulsar frequency derivatives obtained by KW03 as suggested by Konacki \& Wolszczan, in prep.
483: About 8.6 $M_{\oplus}$ of solids exist interior to 1 AU by $\sim$$10^{4}$ years.
484: Thus, forming the known planets of PSR 1257+12 from this reservoir of solids requires that the
485: accretion process be $\gtrsim$ 95\% efficient. Since the gas dissipation timescale is fast,
486: the formation of gas giant planets from a supernova fallback disk is unlikely.
487:
488: Thus, the likely result from this formation scenario and disk model is a system of one or more Earth-mass
489: bodies, orbiting very close to the star with no planets or circumstellar debris beyond $\sim$ 1 AU. In the
490: next section we see if this result for the supernova-fallback model is sensitive to our viscosity prescription:
491: in other words, does the resulting distribution of solid mass differ if the disk spends much of its time in a
492: layered state?
493: \subsection{Layered Accretion}
494: When the disk is allowed to evolve in a layered state the resulting evolution timescale is
495: slightly longer than the fully viscous case, $\sim$
496: $10^{5}$ years (Figure 3). The disk temperature characteristically remains higher than in the
497: fully viscous model through $\sim$ 10$^{4}$ years.
498: The $\Sigma_{d}$ profile follows a very different pattern, showing pronounced peaks at $\sim$ 0.5 AU
499: and then later at 0.2 AU (Figure 4).
500: The simulation was run several times with slightly varying initial parameters, and the same peak structure
501: was reproduced each time. This peak is due to a pileup of material at the dead zone/outer active zone boundary.
502: If the disk material cools below 500K before gravitational instability
503: is triggered (e.g. Armitage, Livio, \& Pringle 2001), then a substantial mass of solids can condense out of the
504: disk. The very small disk angular momentum, high $\Sigma_{d}$, and assumption of layered accretion combine to
505: produce these peaks in the gas, and in turn dust, column densities.
506: The mass of solids deposited within 1 AU of the pulsar can be enormous under the layered accretion assumption.
507: Figure 5 suggests that 30 $M_{\oplus}$ of solids can condense out of the disk interior to 1 AU, more
508: than enough to form the known planets orbiting PSR 1257+12. Interestingly, in both the fully viscous and
509: layered disk models, most of the solid material sediments out at roughly the same place, $\sim$ 0.2-0.5 AU,
510: which is conspicuously similar to the current locations of the known pulsar planets.
511: Because a layered disk spreads so
512: slowly, far less solid material is deposited at distances $\ge$ 1 AU (Figure 5, righthand side). Under this
513: model, any large bodies forming at $\sim$ 1 AU must be $\lesssim$ 0.1-0.5 $M_{\oplus}$ in mass. In both the
514: inner ($\le$ 1 AU) and outer ($\ge$ 1 AU) disk regions, the formation of gas giant planets by core
515: accretion is highly unlikely given the very fast gas dissipation timescale (e.g. Figures 3 and 5).
516:
517: Thus, a supernova-fallback disk evolving by layered accretion will likely produce several high-mass (
518: $\sim$ 1-10 $M_{\oplus}$) bodies
519: within $\sim$ 1 AU and may form bodies the mass of asteroids or Kuiper belt objects beyond $\sim$ 1 AU.
520: This resulting architecture is consistent with the known planets in the PSR 1257+12 system
521: but inconsistent with the existence any Uranian or Jovian-mass bodies orbiting at large semimajor axes.
522: In the next section we investigate disk evolution with initial conditions set by the tidal
523: disruption models to see if a different disk formation mechanism is also consistent with the
524: PSR 1257+12 system.
525: \section{Tidal Disruption Models}
526: \subsection{Fully-Viscous Accretion}
527: The first notable difference between the supernova fallback and tidal-disruption models is that the latter tend to have
528: much larger disks, owing to their larger initial mass and angular momentum. Figures 6-8 and 9-11 respectively
529: show the results for a
530: fully viscous disk with J$\sim 10^{51}$ and $J\sim 10^{52}$ ergs$\cdot$s of initial angular momentum.
531: In the first case, by $\sim 10^{3}-10^{4}$ years,
532: the disk expands to $\sim$ 8 AU. Gas depletes on $\sim$ $10^{4}$ year timescales (Figure 6), and
533: solid body densities comparable to MMSN values emerge by $\sim$ $10^{4}$ years with most of the mass within $\sim$ 3 AU (Figure 7).
534: Initially, the disk has a very high accretion rate of
535: $\sim 10^{-6}$ $M_{\odot}$ $yr^{-1}$, similar to that for classical T Tauri stars, but falls by more than two orders of magnitude
536: within $\sim 10^{4}$ years. Just over 8 $M_{\oplus}$ of material, slightly less than needed to form the pulsar planets,
537: resides interior to 1 AU by $10^{5}$ years; a large amount $\sim 150 M_{\oplus}$ is deposited outside of 2 AU.
538:
539: A disk with $J\sim 10^{52}$ ergs$\cdot$s of initial angular momentum evolves on similar timescales (Figure 9).
540: The $\Sigma_{d}$ profile shows that slightly less (more) mass is deposited interior (exterior) to 1 (2) AU than
541: in the $J\sim 10^{51}$ ergs$\cdot$s case. This is due to a slightly longer viscous evolution. The solid mass
542: exterior to 2 AU (Figure 11) exhibits a 'sawtooth' like pattern through $10^{4}$ years,
543: owing to evaporation of solids as the outer disk heats up and then cools from expansion. The direct heating of the disk from
544: irradiation also contributed to evaporation of solids, especially in the first $\sim$ $10^{4}$ years.
545: The in-situ formation of $\gtrsim$ 5 $M_{\oplus}$-mass planets is still difficult interior to 1 AU.
546: About 300 M$_{\oplus}$ of solids exist beyond 2 AU by $\sim$ 10$^{5}$ years.
547: The formation of gas giants is, again, highly unlikely because circumpulsar
548: gas depletes to below 10 $M_{\oplus}$ by 2$\times 10^{5}$ years.
549:
550: In general, we find that the amount of solid mass interior to 1 AU is just under 8 $M_{\oplus}$ and the
551: amount exterior to 2 AU is $\sim$ 100-300 $M_{\oplus}$. It is then plausible that many 1-10 $M_{\oplus}$ bodies
552: may be able to form beyond $\sim$ 1-2 AU in the tidal-disruption scenario
553: for circumpulsar disk formation, though this formation. However, since the disk falls below
554: $\sim$ 1000K everywhere except for the innermost regions by $\sim 10^{3}-10^{4}$ years, the resulting solid body
555: profiles (Figure 7,10), and expected locations for planet formation (Figure 8,11),
556: may strongly depend on the fully viscous assumption.
557: We now investigate what happens if we allow the disk to evolve by layered accretion.
558: \subsection{Layered Accretion}
559: Differences in how $\Sigma_{g}$ and other parameters evolve in the layered (compared to fully viscous) case are more
560: pronounced for tidal-disruption disk models since the higher initial angular momentum and mass of the disk results
561: in a larger difference between the actively accreting column of gas $\Sigma_{a}$ and the total column. This is
562: evident in the $J\sim10^{51}$ ergs$\cdot$s case as shown in Figure 12. By $\sim$ 500 years, the disk between
563: 0.5 and 3 AU has evolved into a layered state. $\Sigma_{g}$ in the 'layered' region is relatively higher than
564: in the fully viscous case, owing to the pile up of gas onto the layered region/outer fully viscous region boundary
565: that is subsequently redistributed throughout the disk interior to the boundary. Over the next $\sim 10^{5}$ years
566: the size of the layered region shrinks as material piles up onto its outer edge, eventually triggering gravitational
567: instability of the disk at this region. The instability, however, is marginal and operates only long enough to
568: redistribute some mass quickly: planet formation by gravitational instability (Boss 2005) is highly unlikely. Both
569: $\Sigma_{g}$ and $T_{c}$ evolve on $\sim 10^{5}$ year timescales. The long $T_{c}$ timescale results from
570: a small advection term (from $\Sigma_{a} << \Sigma_{g}$) and a near equilibrium that is reached by the heating ($Q_{+}$)
571: and cooling ($Q_{-}$) terms in the $T_{c}$ evolution equation. It is not until the advection term becomes important
572: again that the imbalance between heating and cooling becomes upset and the central temperature declines substantially.
573:
574: The mass accretion rate through the disk follows a constant to inverted structure characteristic of layered accretion (Figure 13).
575: While the accretion rate is several orders of magnitude less than in the corresponding fully viscous case it stays above
576: $\dot M\sim10^{-10} M_{\odot} yr^{-1}$ for $\ge 10^{4}$ years, or somewhat longer than in the fully viscous model.
577: The resulting $\Sigma_{d}$ profile drops from $\sim$ 500 to 1000 yr, owing to viscous heating and irradiation.
578: Eventually the disk cools and the final $\Sigma_{d}$ value settles to a
579: median density of $\sim$ 30-40 g cm$^{-2}$ between 1 and 4 AU by $\sim$ 10$^{5}$ years (Figure 13).
580: The amount of solid material interior to
581: 1 AU and exterior to 2 AU is set by $\sim 10^{5}$ years (Figure 14). The amount of solid material
582: deposited within 1 AU is $\sim$ 7 $M_{\oplus}$, or not quite enough to account for the three known planets;
583: the bulk of the mass is deposited beyond $\sim$ 2 AU.
584: Even though up to 200 $M_{\oplus}$ of solids exist beyond 2 AU it is highly unlikely that gas giant planets can form around
585: millisecond pulsars since the gas dissipates on $\sim 10^{5}$ year timescales.
586:
587: Layered disk models initially with $J\sim 10^{52}$ ergs$\cdot$s, though with a
588: larger initial mass than $J\sim 10^{51}$ ergs$\cdot$s models, evolve on similar
589: ($\sim 10^{5}$ year) timescales (Figure 15). The disk stays in a layered state from $\sim$ 10$^{3}$ to 10$^{5}$ years.
590: $\Sigma_{d}$ evolves in a similar
591: way to the other layered disk run though the solid column density above $\sim$ 10 gcm$^{-2}$ extends to 6 AU instead of 4 AU as with the
592: previous run. The densities are
593: $\sim$ 10$\times$ MMSN column densities through 6 AU (Figure 16). This is because the disk, initially $\sim 0.1 M_{\odot}$ is
594: confined to a smaller initial radial spread than for the solar nebula.
595: The mass of solids deposited both interior to 1 AU and exterior to 2 AU is higher than in the fully viscous case by about
596: a factor of two (Figure 17). In general, it then appears that layered accretion disks
597: deposit a higher mass of solids into the disk than fully viscous disks.
598: The circumpulsar gas drops below $\sim$ 10$M_{\oplus}$ by $\sim$ 10$^{5}$ years, so that no model predicts the presence of
599: circumpulsar gas at ages comparable to those observed around pre-main sequence stars ($\sim$ 10$^{6}$-10$^{7}$ years).
600: Thus, the $\lesssim$$10^{5}$ year gas dissipation timescale in all model runs imposes
601: draconian requirements on the efficiency of gas giant planet formation even for models that swiftly form
602: the cores of gas giant planets (Rafikov 2004; Currie 2005; Alibert et al. 2005). Such planet formation is
603: effectively ruled out for both fallback and tidal disruption circumpulsar disk formation scenarios.
604: Although true gas giants are unlikely to form, there is sufficient
605: mass to allow for the formation of massive rocky or ice giant planets
606: with no gas envelopes. The persistence of circumpulsar gas may also
607: still strongly affect the dynamics of planetesimals in the feeding zones of growing
608: planets (Rafikov 2004; Currie, Kenyon, \& Bromley in prep.) and thus affect the final outcome of the pulsar planet formation
609: process.
610:
611: We can now summarize our expectations for planet formation around millisecond pulsars when the tidal-disruption model is assumed
612: for the circumpulsar disk origin. In most models not quite enough material within 1 AU forms to account for all the
613: planetary mass in the system; planet formation is preferred beyond $\sim$ 1 AU scales.
614: A Uranus-mass body orbiting at large stellocentric distances is consistent with results from pulsar timing
615: methods, but the formation of a body with a much more massive gaseous envelope (e.g. a Jovian planet) from either the supernova-fallback
616: or tidal-disruption scenarios is extremely unlikely.
617: \section{Summary \& Future Work}
618: We have modeled the evolution of protoplanetary disks surrounding millisecond pulsars. We investigated two formation
619: scenarios for these disks, supernova fallback and tidal disruption, under two models for the disk viscous evolution:
620: a fully viscous model and layered accretion model.
621:
622: For the supernova fallback scenario, the gas density drops well below MMSN values (at $\sim$ 1 AU)
623: by $\sim 10^{4}$ - $10^{5}$ years while by $\sim 10^{5}$ years the solid mass
624: is $\sim 10-100$ times that of the MMSN values within $\sim$ 0.5 AU of the pulsar.
625: The most likely outcome for supernova fallback disks
626: is a system of Earth mass bodies confined to within 1 AU of the pulsar, a system architecture consistent with the
627: PSR 1257+12 system. For the tidal disruption scenario, gas dissipates on $\lesssim$ 10$^{5}$ year timescales, and
628: the solid body distribution reaches 1-10$\times$ MMSN values by $10^{4}$ years
629: with little material extending beyond $\approx$ 6 AU. Most of the mass is deposited beyond $\sim$ 1-2 AU.
630: The most likely outcome from this scenario is a system of Earth-mass bodies between 2 and 6 AU but little material beyond
631: this distance. Not quite enough solid mass exists to form the known planets in the PSR 1257+12 system in situ.
632: While both models can account for the formation of Earth-mass planets somewhere in the disk, the supernova fallback model favors
633: formation of such planets interior to $\sim$ 1 AU, where the tidal-disruption model favors such formation exterior to
634: $\sim$ 2 AU, even though the starting column density of the fallback disk interior to 1 AU is no greater than that for the tidal
635: disruption model. On this basis, the supernova fallback model more plausibly explains the compact planetary
636: system of PSR 1257+12.
637:
638: There are several issues important to understanding the formation of pulsar planet
639: systems that have been left untreated by this paper and should be the subject of future study.
640: First, our models neglect the migration of solid grains after they
641: have sedimented out in the disk. Global migration of small grains in either a laminar (Youdin \& Shu 2002;
642: Currie 2005) or turbulent (Stepinski \& Valageas 1997) can result in a systematic redistribution of solids in a disk,
643: affecting the preferred locations for planetesimal and, eventually, planet formation. While the gas disk in
644: the supernova fallback model evolved on timescales much faster than the migration timescale for grains in the
645: solar nebula (e.g. $10^{4}$ yr vs. $\sim$ $10^{5}$-$10^{6}$ yr from Youdin \& Shu), tracking the evolution of the
646: solids (e.g. the method of Alexander \& Armitage (2007)) should be included to more accurately
647: model the evolution of the solid body distribution once the disk cools enough to allow condensation.
648: Second, given the rarity of planets around millisecond pulsars, the formation of circumpulsar disks from
649: which planets can form should be rather
650: atypical. While disks from the tidal-disruption scenario are obviously rare, the conditions for the formation
651: of supernova fallback disks capable of forming planets should be investigated more thoroughly.
652: Third, more detailed pulsar timing data to constrain the nature of the fourth body will
653: help to discriminate between the rival scenarios for forming pulsar planets. The fallback disk
654: scenario would predict that any fourth body at larger semimajor axes is small.
655: A more massive body, $\sim$ 1 M$_{\oplus}$ or greater, would be more consistent with the
656: tidal disruption model.
657:
658: Finally, a major issue neglected in this paper is how planet formation
659: would actually proceed in a circumpulsar disk. The key issues with this
660: are whether or not the final (post-oligarchic) stages of pulsar planet formation are
661: characterized by growth (by mergers) like the terrestrial planets planets, how much material
662: is needed to form the known planets, and how long the final assembly of planets takes to complete.
663: For the solar nebula, the final stages of planet formation interior to $\sim$ 2 AU
664: is primarily characterized by repeated mergers of sub-Earth mass 'oligarchs' (e.g. Kenyon \& Bromley 2006). Whether or not
665: the final stage of planet formation from supernova fallback disks is characterized by mergers or ejections
666: of these lunar-mass oligarchs depends on escape velocity
667: from their surfaces compared to the escape velocity from the system (Goldreich et al. 2004).
668: The age of PSR 1257+12 also sets some limit on the timescale for planet formation.
669: The PSR 1257+12 system is probably
670: $\sim$ $P/2\dot{P}$$\sim$ $8\times10^{8}$ years old (e.g. Miller \& Hamilton 2001).
671: Therefore, the merger timescale must be less than $\sim 10^{9}$ years. This timescale is somewhat larger than the
672: timescale for merger and cleanup of bodies in the terrestrial zone of our solar system (Goldreich et al. 2004). The merger timescale
673: will depend critically on the amount of solid mass, $\Sigma_{d}$, the final planetary mass, $M_{p}$, and the orbital frequency.
674: Numerical simulations of pulsar planet formation will help to determine the minimum $\Sigma_{d}$ allowable, and thus constrain
675: the initial disk conditions from which these planets form. We leave such simulations to future studies.
676: \acknowledgements
677: We thank Randall Cooper, Phil Armitage, Charles Gammie, Alex Wolszczan, and Scott Kenyon for fruitful discussions
678: and the anonymous referee for suggestions that improved the manuscript. T. C. is partially supported by an SAO
679: Predoctoral Fellowship.
680: \begin{thebibliography}{}
681: \bibitem[AF (1994)]{Af04} Alexander, D., Ferguson, J., 1994, ApJ, 437, 879
682: \bibitem[Al (2007)]{Al07} Alexander, R., Armitage, P., 2007, MNRAS, 375, 500
683: \bibitem[Al (2005)]{Al05} Alibert, Y., et al., 2005, ApJL, 626, 57
684: \bibitem[Ar (2001)]{Ar01} Armitage, P., Livio, M., \& Pringle, J., 2001, MNRAS, 325, 705
685: \bibitem[Ba (1991)]{Ba91} Balbus, S., Hawley, J., 1991, ApJ, 376, 214
686: \bibitem[BL (1994)]{bl94} Bell, K. R.\& Lin, D.N.C. 1994, ApJ, 427, 987
687: \bibitem[Bo (2005)]{Bo05} Boss, A., 2005, ApJ, 629, 535
688: \bibitem[Ch (1989)]{Ch89} Chevalier, R., 1989, ApJ, 346, 847
689: \bibitem[Cu (2005)]{Cu05} Currie, T., 2005, ApJ, 629, 549
690: \bibitem[Cu (2007a)]{Cu07a} Currie, T., et al., 2007(a), ApJ, 659, 599
691: \bibitem[Cu (2007b)]{Cu07b} Currie, T., et al., 2007(b), ApJL accepted, arXiv:0706.0535
692: \bibitem[Dub (1995)]{Du95}Dubrulle, B., et al., 1995, Icar, 114, 237
693: \bibitem[Fe (2005)]{Fe05} Ferguson, J., et al., 2005, ApJ, 623, 585
694: \bibitem[FS (2003)]{fs03}Fleming, T.\& Stone, J. 2003, ApJ, 585, 908
695: \bibitem[Fr (2002)]{fr02} Frank, J., King, A., \& Raine, D., 2002, Accretion Power in Astrophysics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
696: \bibitem[Fu (2001)]{fu01}Fujimoto, S.,et al., 2001, PASJ, 53, 509
697: \bibitem[Ga (1996)]{Ga96} Gammie, C., 1996, ApJ, 1996, ApJ, 457, 355
698: \bibitem[Go (2004)]{Go04} Goldreich, P., Sari, R.,\& Lithwick, Y., 2004, ARA\&A, 42, 549
699: \bibitem[Ha (2001)]{Ha01} Hansen, B., 2001, in ASP. Conf. Ser. Stellar Collisions, Mergers, and their
700: Consequences, ed. M. Shara (San Francisco: ASP), 400
701: \bibitem[Ha (1998)]{Ha98} Hartmann, L., 1998, Accretion Processes in Star Formation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
702: \bibitem[Ha (1989)]{ha89} Hashimoto, M., et al., 1989, 1989, A\&A, 210, L5
703: \bibitem[Ha (1981)]{Ha81} Hayashi, C.,1981, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl., 70, 35
704: \bibitem[He (2006)]{He06} Hernandez, J., et al., 2006, ApJ, 652, 472
705: \bibitem[Hu (1990)]{h90} Hubeny, I., 1990, ApJ, 351, 632
706: \bibitem[Ka (1996)]{k96} Kalogera, V., 1996 ApJ, 471, 352
707: \bibitem[Ke (2006)]{Ke06} Kenyon, S., Bromley, B., 2006, AJ, 131, 1837
708: \bibitem[KW (2003)]{KW03} Konacki, M., Wolszczan, A., 2003, ApJ, 589, 495
709: \bibitem[Li (1991)]{Li91} Lin, D.N.C., et al., 1991, Nature, 353, 927
710: \bibitem[Li (1992)]{Li92} Livio, M., Pringle, J., Staffer, 1992, MNRAS, 257, 15
711: \bibitem[LP (1974)]{Lp74} Lynden-Bell, D., Pringle, J., 1974, MNRAS, 168, 603
712: \bibitem[MB (1996)]{MB96} Marcy, G., Butler, R. P., 1996, BAAS, 27, 1379
713: \bibitem[Ma (1995)]{Ma95} Mayor, L., Queloz, 1995, Nature, 378, 355
714: \bibitem[Me (2001)]{Me01} Menou, K., et al., 2001, ApJ, 559, 1032
715: \bibitem[Mi (2001)]{Mi01} Miller, C., Hamilton, D., 2001, ApJ, 550, 863
716: \bibitem[No (1988)]{No88} Nomoto, K., Hashimoto, M., 1988, Phys. Rep., 163, 13
717: \bibitem[Ph (1993)]{Ph93} Phinney, S., Hansen, B., 1993, in ASP Conf. Ser. 36, Planets around Pulsars,
718: e.d. J. A. Phillips, S. E. Thorsett, \& S. R. Kulkarni (San Francisco: ASP), 371
719: \bibitem[Po (1993)]{Po93} Podsiadlowski, 1993, in ASP Conf. Ser. 36, Planets around Pulsars,
720: e.d. J. A. Phillips, S. E. Thorsett, \& S. R. Kulkarni (San Francisco: ASP), 371
721: \bibitem[Po (1994)]{Po94} Pollack, J., et al., 1994, ApJ, 421, 615
722: \bibitem[Pr (1981)]{Pr81} Pringle, J., 1981, ARA\&A, 19, 137
723: \bibitem[Raf (2004)]{RR04}Rafikov, R.,2004, AJ, 128, 1348
724: \bibitem[Sa (1999)]{Sa99} Sano, Y., Miyama, S., 1999, ApJ, 515, 776
725: \bibitem[Se (2003)]{Se03} Semenov, D., et al., 2003, A\&A, 410, 611
726: \bibitem[SS (1973)]{ss73} Shakura, N. I. \& Sunyaev, R. A. 1973, A\&A, 24,337
727: \bibitem[SV (1997)]{sv97} Stepinski, T., Valageas, P., 1997, A\&A,319, 1007
728: \bibitem[WS (1993)]{Ws93} Wetherill, G., Stewart, G., 1993, Icar, 106, 190
729: \bibitem[WF (1992)]{WF92} Wolszczan, A., Frail, 1992, Nature, 355, 145
730: \bibitem[Wo (1994)]{Wo94} Wolszczan, A., 1994, Science, 264, 538
731: \bibitem[Wo (2000)]{Wo00} Wolszczan, A., 2000, ApJ, 540, 41
732: \bibitem[YC (2004)]{YC04} Youdin, A., \& Chiang, E., 2004, ApJ, 601, 1109
733: \bibitem[YS (2002)]{YS02} Youdin, A., \& Shu, F., 2002, ApJ, 580, 494
734: \bibitem[Zu (1995)]{Zu95} Zuckerman, B., et al., 1995, Nature, 373, 494
735: \end{thebibliography}
736: \input{tab1.tex}
737: \input{tab2.tex}
738: \clearpage
739:
740: \begin{figure}
741: %\plottwo{surden_FV_fall.ps}{temp_FV_fall.ps}
742: \plottwo{f1a.eps}{f1b.eps}
743: \caption{Evolution of the gas surface density ($\Sigma_{g}$) and midplane temperature ($T_{c}$)
744: profiles for the supernova-fallback disk model, assuming fully viscous accretion. The evolution
745: timescale appears to be $\tau$ $\sim$ $10^{4}$ years, much shorter than typical
746: circumstellar disk evolution timescales ($\sim 10^{6}-10^{7}$ years).}
747: \end{figure}
748: \begin{figure}
749: %\plottwo{solid_FV_fall.ps}{Mlt1_FV_fall.ps}
750: \plottwo{f2a.eps}{f2b.eps}
751: \caption{(left)Evolution of the solid body surface density ($\Sigma_{d}$) for
752: the supernova-fallback disk model, assuming fully viscous accretion.
753: Typical $\Sigma_{d}$ are $\sim$ 10-100$\times$ Minimum Mass Solar Nebula (MMSN) values from 0.1-0.5 AU.
754: (right)Mass interior to 1 AU for the supernova-fallback disk model, assuming
755: fully viscous accretion. The gas mass (solid line) drops below 1 $M_{\oplus}$ by $\sim$ 10$^{4}$ years.
756: From $t\sim10^{3}$ yr and later, several earth masses of solids
757: (dotted line) reside interior to 1 AU, comparable to the total mass of the three known planets
758: of PSR 1257+12.
759: }
760: \end{figure}
761:
762: \begin{figure}
763: %\plottwo{surden_dead_fall.ps}{temp_dead_fall.ps}
764: \plottwo{f3a.eps}{f3b.eps}
765: \caption{Evolution of the gas surface density ($\Sigma_{g}$) and midplane temperature ($T_{c}$)
766: profiles for the supernova-fallback disk model, assuming layered accretion. The evolution
767: timescale appears to be slightly longer than the fully viscous case, $\tau$ $\sim$ $10^{5}$.}
768: \end{figure}
769: \begin{figure}
770: %\plottwo{solid_dead_fall.ps}{mdot_dead_fall.ps}
771: \plottwo{f4a.eps}{f4b.eps}
772: \caption{Evolution of the solid body surface density ($\Sigma_{d}$) and accretion rate profiles for
773: the supernova-fallback disk model, assuming layered accretion. A high mass of solids is deposited
774: near the present semimajor axes of the known pulsar planets. The accretion rate shown
775: is the absolute value of the accretion rate: the local minimums reached (e.g. at 0.7 AU for
776: t=$\sim$10$^{5}$ years) occur because the accretion rate changes sign from positive to negative.
777: }
778: \end{figure}
779: \begin{figure}
780: %\plottwo{Mlt1_dead_fall.ps}{Mgt2_dead_fall.ps}
781: \plottwo{f5a.eps}{f5b.eps}
782: \caption{Mass interior to 1 AU and exterior to 2 AU for the supernova-fallback disk model, assuming
783: layered accretion. The supernova-fallback model deposits up to $\sim$ 30 $M_{\oplus}$ of solid material
784: within 1 AU and $\sim$ 0.1-0.5 $M_{\oplus}$ beyond 2 AU. The likely result is the formation of
785: one or more $\gtrsim$ 1 $M_{\oplus}$ bodies interior to 1 AU and perhaps Mars or smaller-sized bodies
786: beyond $\sim$ 2 AU. The formation of gas giant planets is highly unlikely, owing to the fast gas
787: dissipation timescale.}
788: \end{figure}
789: \begin{figure}
790: %\plottwo{surden_FV_51.ps}{temp_FV_51.ps}
791: \plottwo{f6a.eps}{f6b.eps}
792: \caption{Evolution of the gas surface density ($\Sigma_{g}$) and central temperature profiles for
793: the tidal-disruption disk model, assuming fully viscous accretion and initial angular momentum of
794: $J\sim 10^{51}$ ergs$\cdot$s. The disk evolves on $\tau \sim 10^{4}$ year timescales.}
795: \end{figure}
796: \begin{figure}
797: %\epsscale{0.5}
798: %\plotone{solid_FV_51.ps}
799: \plotone{f7.eps}
800: \caption{Evolution of the solid surface density ($\Sigma_{d}$) and accretion rate profiles for
801: the tidal-disruption disk model, assuming fully viscous accretion and initial angular momentum of
802: $J\sim 10^{51}$ ergs$\cdot$s. Between $\sim$ 2 and 4 AU the disk attains near MMSN values but drops
803: sharply in solid content beyond $\sim$ 5 AU.
804: }
805: \end{figure}
806: \begin{figure}
807: %\plottwo{Mlt1_FV_51.ps}{Mgt2_FV_51.ps}
808: \plottwo{f8a.eps}{f8b.eps}
809: \caption{The disk mass interior to 1 AU and exterior to 2 AU for
810: the tidal-disruption disk model, assuming fully viscous accretion and initial angular momentum of
811: $J\sim 10^{51}$ ergs$\cdot$s. The gas mass $<$ 1 AU drops below 1$M_{\oplus}$ by $\sim 2\times10^{5}$ years
812: from an initial value of $\gtrsim 100 M_{\oplus}$. The mass beyond 2 AU declines on $10^{4}-10^{5}$ year timescales.
813: }
814: \end{figure}
815: %\clearpage
816: \begin{figure}
817: %\plottwo{surden_FV_52.ps}{temp_FV_52.ps}
818: \plottwo{f9a.eps}{f9b.eps}
819: \caption{Evolution of the gas surface density ($\Sigma_{g}$) and central temperature profiles for
820: the tidal-disruption disk model, assuming fully viscous accretion and an initial angular momentum of
821: $J\sim 10^{52}$ ergs$\cdot$s. The disk evolution is slightly longer but similar to that for the $J\sim 10^{51}$ model,
822: despite the order-of-magnitude increase in mass.}
823: \end{figure}
824: \begin{figure}
825: %\epsscale{0.5}
826: %\plotone{solid_FV_52.ps}
827: \plotone{f10.eps}
828: \caption{Evolution of the solid surface density ($\Sigma_{d}$) for
829: the tidal-disruption disk model, assuming fully viscous accretion and initial angular momentum of
830: $J\sim 10^{52}$ ergs$\cdot$s. $\Sigma_{d}$ is slightly larger than MMSN through $\sim$ 8 AU.}
831:
832: \end{figure}
833: \begin{figure}
834: %\plottwo{Mlt1_FV_52.ps}{Mgt2_FV_52.ps}
835: \plottwo{f11a.eps}{f11b.eps}
836: \caption{The disk mass interior to 1 AU and exterior to 2 AU for
837: the tidal-disruption disk model, assuming fully viscous accretion and initial angular momentum of
838: $J\sim 10^{52}$ ergs$\cdot$s. The inner disk does not cool sufficiently to deposit solids until its mass has significantly
839: dropped. The outer ($\ge$ 2 AU) regions of the disk cools fast initially and then heats up again as more material is
840: transported into the outer disk regions. About 200 $M_{\oplus}$ of solids are
841: deposited by $\sim 10^{5}$ years. However, the gas mass drops to $\sim 10 M_{\oplus}$ by $10^{5}$ years, making
842: gas giant planet formation highly unlikely.}
843: \end{figure}
844: \begin{figure}
845: %\plottwo{surden_dead_51.ps}{temp_dead_51.ps}
846: \plottwo{f12a.eps}{f12b.eps}
847: \caption{Evolution of the gas surface density ($\Sigma_{g}$) and central temperature profiles for
848: the tidal-disruption disk model, assuming layered accretion and an initial angular momentum of
849: $J\sim 10^{51}$ ergs$\cdot$s. The disk assumes a layered state for $t \lesssim 10^{5}$ years and the
850: overall evolution timescale is longer than for the fully viscous models and all supernova-fallback models.}
851: \end{figure}
852: \begin{figure}
853: %\plottwo{solid_dead_51.ps}{mdot_dead_51.ps}
854: \plottwo{f13a.eps}{f13b.eps}
855: \caption{Evolution of the solid surface density ($\Sigma_{d}$) and accretion rate profiles for
856: the tidal-disruption disk model, assuming layered accretion and initial angular momentum of
857: $J\sim 10^{51}$ ergs$\cdot$s. A substantial solid column density forms by $\sim$ 10$^{5}$ years
858: and fluctuates between 10 and 100 g cm$^{-2}$, with a median value of $\sim$ 30-40 g cm$^{-2}$.
859: During the layered accretion state the disk typically has a flat or
860: inverted mass accretion rate profile throughout the disk, consistent with that expected for a layered,
861: episodically accreting disk (Armitage, Livio, \& Pringle 2001).}
862: \end{figure}
863: \begin{figure}
864: %\plottwo{Mlt1_dead_51.ps}{Mgt2_dead_51.ps}
865: \plottwo{f14a.eps}{f14b.eps}
866: \caption{The disk mass interior to 1 AU and exterior to 2 AU for the tidal-disruption disk model, assuming layered
867: accretion an an initial angular momentum of $J\sim 10^{51}$ ergs$\cdot$s. The final solid mass is reached very fast,
868: within $2\times10^{5}$ and $10^{4}$ years for material $\le$ 1 and $\ge$ 2 AU, respectively. The disk gas mass
869: drops precipitously after 10$^{4}$ years.}
870: \end{figure}
871: %\clearpage
872: \begin{figure}
873: %\plottwo{surden_dead_52.ps}{temp_dead_52.ps}
874: \plottwo{f15a.eps}{f15b.eps}
875: \caption{Evolution of the gas surface density ($\Sigma_{g}$) and central temperature profiles for
876: the tidal-disruption disk model, assuming layered accretion and an initial angular momentum of
877: $J\sim 10^{52}$ ergs$\cdot$s. The disk stays in a layered state from $10^{3}$ to $10^{5}$ years and evolves on
878: $\sim$ $10^{5}$ year timescales. }
879: \end{figure}
880: \begin{figure}
881: %\plottwo{solid_dead_52.ps}{mdot_dead_52.ps}
882: \plottwo{f16a.eps}{f16b.eps}
883: \caption{Evolution of the solid surface density ($\Sigma_{d}$) and accretion rate profiles for
884: the tidal-disruption disk model, assuming layered accretion and initial angular momentum of
885: $J\sim 10^{52}$ ergs$\cdot$s. The solid surface density ranges from $\sim$ 10-100 gcm$^{-2}$ from
886: 1-6 AU. Less material is deposited beyond 6 AU and from 0.2-1 AU.
887: While the disk is in a layered state, the mass accretion rate also appears to be generally flat or increasing with
888: distance as with the $J\sim 10^{51}$ case.}
889: \end{figure}
890: \begin{figure}
891: %\plottwo{Mlt1_dead_52.ps}{Mgt2_dead_52.ps}
892: \plottwo{f17a.eps}{f17b.eps}
893: \caption{The disk mass interior to 1 AU and exterior to 2 AU for the tidal-disruption disk model, assuming layered
894: accretion an an initial angular momentum of $J\sim 10^{52}$ ergs$\cdot$s. About 10 and 500 $M_{\odot}$ of solids
895: emerge by $\sim$$10^{5}$ years interior to 1 AU and exterior to 2 AU, respectively. However,
896: by $\sim$ $10^{5}$ most of the gas has depleted where solids exist ($\lesssim$ 6 AU), making formation
897: of gas giant planets highly unlikely.}
898: \end{figure}
899:
900:
901: \end{document}
902:
903: