1: %% This is to emulate the later appearance of the paper
2: \documentclass{emulateapj}
3: \usepackage{apjfonts}
4: \usepackage{natbib}
5: \usepackage{graphicx}
6:
7: %% The command below calls the preprint style
8: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
9: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
10: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
11: %%
12: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
13:
14: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
15:
16: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
17:
18: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
19:
20: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
21:
22: %\usepackage{graphicx,amssymb,amsmath,times}
23: \setcounter{page}{1}
24: %
25: \begin{document}
26: %Title of paper
27: \title{Discovery of VHE Gamma Radiation from IC~443 with
28: the MAGIC Telescope}
29:
30:
31: \newcommand{\commentOut}[1]{}
32: \newcommand{\commentOn}[2]{{\emph #1}{\em {(\footnotesize Comment: #2)}}}
33:
34:
35: \author{
36: J.~Albert\altaffilmark{a},
37: E.~Aliu\altaffilmark{b},
38: H.~Anderhub\altaffilmark{c},
39: P.~Antoranz\altaffilmark{d},
40: A.~Armada\altaffilmark{b},
41: C.~Baixeras\altaffilmark{e},
42: J.~A.~Barrio\altaffilmark{d},
43: H.~Bartko\altaffilmark{f,}\altaffilmark{*},
44: D.~Bastieri\altaffilmark{g},
45: J.~K.~Becker\altaffilmark{h},
46: W.~Bednarek\altaffilmark{i},
47: K.~Berger\altaffilmark{a},
48: C.~Bigongiari\altaffilmark{g},
49: A.~Biland\altaffilmark{c},
50: R.~K.~Bock\altaffilmark{f,}\altaffilmark{g},
51: P.~Bordas\altaffilmark{j},
52: V.~Bosch-Ramon\altaffilmark{j},
53: T.~Bretz\altaffilmark{a},
54: I.~Britvitch\altaffilmark{c},
55: M.~Camara\altaffilmark{d},
56: E.~Carmona\altaffilmark{f},
57: A.~Chilingarian\altaffilmark{k},
58: J.~A.~Coarasa\altaffilmark{f},
59: S.~Commichau\altaffilmark{c},
60: J.~L.~Contreras\altaffilmark{d},
61: J.~Cortina\altaffilmark{b},
62: M.T.~Costado\altaffilmark{m,}\altaffilmark{v},
63: V.~Curtef\altaffilmark{h},
64: V.~Danielyan\altaffilmark{k},
65: F.~Dazzi\altaffilmark{g},
66: A.~De Angelis\altaffilmark{n},
67: C.~Delgado\altaffilmark{m,}\altaffilmark{*},
68: R.~de~los~Reyes\altaffilmark{d},
69: B.~De Lotto\altaffilmark{n},
70: E.~Domingo-Santamar\'\i a\altaffilmark{b},
71: D.~Dorner\altaffilmark{a},
72: M.~Doro\altaffilmark{g},
73: M.~Errando\altaffilmark{b},
74: M.~Fagiolini\altaffilmark{o},
75: D.~Ferenc\altaffilmark{p},
76: E.~Fern\'andez\altaffilmark{b},
77: R.~Firpo\altaffilmark{b},
78: J.~Flix\altaffilmark{b},
79: M.~V.~Fonseca\altaffilmark{d},
80: L.~Font\altaffilmark{e},
81: M.~Fuchs\altaffilmark{f},
82: N.~Galante\altaffilmark{f},
83: R.J.~Garc\'{\i}a-L\'opez\altaffilmark{m,}\altaffilmark{v},
84: M.~Garczarczyk\altaffilmark{f},
85: M.~Gaug\altaffilmark{m},
86: M.~Giller\altaffilmark{i},
87: F.~Goebel\altaffilmark{f},
88: D.~Hakobyan\altaffilmark{k},
89: M.~Hayashida\altaffilmark{f},
90: T.~Hengstebeck\altaffilmark{q},
91: A.~Herrero\altaffilmark{m,}\altaffilmark{v},
92: D.~H\"ohne\altaffilmark{a},
93: J.~Hose\altaffilmark{f},
94: C.~C.~Hsu\altaffilmark{f},
95: P.~Jacon\altaffilmark{i},
96: T.~Jogler\altaffilmark{f},
97: R.~Kosyra\altaffilmark{f},
98: D.~Kranich\altaffilmark{c},
99: R.~Kritzer\altaffilmark{a},
100: A.~Laille\altaffilmark{p},
101: E.~Lindfors\altaffilmark{l},
102: S.~Lombardi\altaffilmark{g},
103: F.~Longo\altaffilmark{n},
104: J.~L\'opez\altaffilmark{b},
105: M.~L\'opez\altaffilmark{d},
106: E.~Lorenz\altaffilmark{c,}\altaffilmark{f},
107: P.~Majumdar\altaffilmark{f},
108: G.~Maneva\altaffilmark{r},
109: K.~Mannheim\altaffilmark{a},
110: O.~Mansutti\altaffilmark{n},
111: M.~Mariotti\altaffilmark{g},
112: M.~Mart\'\i nez\altaffilmark{b},
113: D.~Mazin\altaffilmark{b},
114: C.~Merck\altaffilmark{f},
115: M.~Meucci\altaffilmark{o},
116: M.~Meyer\altaffilmark{a},
117: J.~M.~Miranda\altaffilmark{d},
118: R.~Mirzoyan\altaffilmark{f},
119: S.~Mizobuchi\altaffilmark{f},
120: A.~Moralejo\altaffilmark{b},
121: D.~Nieto\altaffilmark{d},
122: K.~Nilsson\altaffilmark{l},
123: J.~Ninkovic\altaffilmark{f},
124: E.~O\~na-Wilhelmi\altaffilmark{b},
125: N.~Otte\altaffilmark{f,}\altaffilmark{q},
126: I.~Oya\altaffilmark{d},
127: D.~Paneque\altaffilmark{f},
128: M.~Panniello\altaffilmark{m,}\altaffilmark{x},
129: R.~Paoletti\altaffilmark{o},
130: J.~M.~Paredes\altaffilmark{j},
131: M.~Pasanen\altaffilmark{l},
132: D.~Pascoli\altaffilmark{g},
133: F.~Pauss\altaffilmark{c},
134: R.~Pegna\altaffilmark{o},
135: M.~Persic\altaffilmark{n,}\altaffilmark{s},
136: L.~Peruzzo\altaffilmark{g},
137: A.~Piccioli\altaffilmark{o},
138: E.~Prandini\altaffilmark{g},
139: N.~Puchades\altaffilmark{b},
140: A.~Raymers\altaffilmark{k},
141: W.~Rhode\altaffilmark{h},
142: M.~Rib\'o\altaffilmark{j},
143: J.~Rico\altaffilmark{b},
144: M.~Rissi\altaffilmark{c},
145: A.~Robert\altaffilmark{e},
146: S.~R\"ugamer\altaffilmark{a},
147: A.~Saggion\altaffilmark{g},
148: T.~Saito\altaffilmark{f},
149: A.~S\'anchez\altaffilmark{e},
150: P.~Sartori\altaffilmark{g},
151: V.~Scalzotto\altaffilmark{g},
152: V.~Scapin\altaffilmark{n},
153: R.~Schmitt\altaffilmark{a},
154: T.~Schweizer\altaffilmark{f},
155: M.~Shayduk\altaffilmark{q,}\altaffilmark{f},
156: K.~Shinozaki\altaffilmark{f},
157: S.~N.~Shore\altaffilmark{t},
158: N.~Sidro\altaffilmark{b},
159: A.~Sillanp\"a\"a\altaffilmark{l},
160: D.~Sobczynska\altaffilmark{i},
161: A.~Stamerra\altaffilmark{o},
162: L.~S.~Stark\altaffilmark{c},
163: L.~Takalo\altaffilmark{l},
164: P.~Temnikov\altaffilmark{r},
165: D.~Tescaro\altaffilmark{b},
166: M.~Teshima\altaffilmark{f},
167: D.~F.~Torres\altaffilmark{u},
168: N.~Turini\altaffilmark{o},
169: H.~Vankov\altaffilmark{r},
170: V.~Vitale\altaffilmark{n},
171: R.~M.~Wagner\altaffilmark{f},
172: T.~Wibig\altaffilmark{i},
173: W.~Wittek\altaffilmark{f},
174: F.~Zandanel\altaffilmark{g},
175: R.~Zanin\altaffilmark{b},
176: J.~Zapatero\altaffilmark{e}
177: }
178: \altaffiltext{a} {Universit\"at W\"urzburg, D-97074 W\"urzburg, Germany}
179: \altaffiltext{b} {IFAE, Edifici Cn., E-08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain}
180: \altaffiltext{c} {ETH Zurich, CH-8093 Switzerland}
181: \altaffiltext{d} {Universidad Complutense, E-28040 Madrid, Spain}
182: \altaffiltext{e} {Universitat Aut\`onoma de Barcelona, E-08193 Bellaterra, Spain}
183: \altaffiltext{f} {Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Physik, D-80805 M\"unchen, Germany}
184: \altaffiltext{g} {Universit\`a di Padova and INFN, I-35131 Padova, Italy}
185: \altaffiltext{h} {Universit\"at Dortmund, D-44227 Dortmund, Germany}
186: \altaffiltext{i} {University of \L\'od\'z, PL-90236 Lodz, Poland}
187: \altaffiltext{j} {Universitat de Barcelona, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain}
188: \altaffiltext{k} {Yerevan Physics Institute, AM-375036 Yerevan, Armenia}
189: \altaffiltext{l} {Tuorla Observatory, Turku University, FI-21500 Piikki\"o, Finland}
190: \altaffiltext{m} {Inst. de Astrofisica de Canarias, E-38200, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain}
191: \altaffiltext{n} {Universit\`a di Udine, and INFN Trieste, I-33100 Udine, Italy}
192: \altaffiltext{o} {Universit\`a di Siena, and INFN Pisa, I-53100 Siena, Italy}
193: \altaffiltext{p} {University of California, Davis, CA-95616-8677, USA}
194: \altaffiltext{q} {Humboldt-Universit\"at zu Berlin, D-12489 Berlin, Germany}
195: \altaffiltext{r} {Inst. for Nucl. Research and Nucl. Energy, BG-1784 Sofia, Bulgaria}
196: \altaffiltext{s} {INAF/Osservatorio Astronomico and INFN, I-34131 Trieste, Italy}
197: \altaffiltext{t} {Universit\`a di Pisa, and INFN Pisa, I-56126 Pisa, Italy}
198: \altaffiltext{u} {ICREA \& Institut de Cienci\`es de l'Espai (IEEC-CSIC), E-08193 Bellaterra, Spain}
199: \altaffiltext{v} {Depto. de Astrofísica, Universidad, E-38206 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain}
200: \altaffiltext{x} {deceased}
201: \altaffiltext{*} {correspondence: H.~Bartko, hbartko@mppmu.mpg.de, C.~Delgado, delgadom@iac.es}
202:
203:
204:
205:
206:
207:
208: %% abstract %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
209:
210: \begin{abstract}
211:
212:
213: We report the detection of a new source of very high energy (VHE, $E_{\gamma}\geq 100$~GeV)
214: $\gamma$-ray emission
215: %above hundred GeV from a new source
216: located close to the Galactic Plane, MAGIC~J0616+225,
217: which is spatially coincident with SNR IC~443.
218: The observations were carried out with the MAGIC telescope
219: in the periods
220: December 2005 - January 2006 and December 2006 - January 2007.
221: Here we present results from this source, leading to a
222: VHE $\gamma$-ray signal with a statistical significance of
223: 5.7 sigma in the 2006/7 data and a measured
224: %we present MAGIC observations of this source, resulting in the
225: %detection of a
226: differential $\gamma$-ray flux consistent with a
227: power law, described as $\mathrm{d}N_{\gamma}/(\mathrm{d}A
228: \mathrm{d}t \mathrm{d}E) = (1.0 \pm 0.2) \times 10^{-11}
229: (E/\mathrm{0.4 TeV})^{-3.1 \pm 0.3} \ \mathrm{cm}^{-2}\mathrm{s}^{-1}
230: \mathrm{TeV}^{-1}$.
231: %The source is slightly extended beyond the MAGIC PSF.
232: We briefly discuss the observational technique used and the
233: procedure implemented for the data analysis.
234: The results are
235: %put in the perspective
236: placed in the context
237: of the multiwavelength emission and the
238: molecular environment found in
239: the region of IC~443.
240: %We present $^{13}$CO and $^{12}$CO emission maps showing the existence of a massive molecular cloud in spatial superposition with the MAGIC detection.
241:
242: \end{abstract}
243:
244: \keywords{gamma rays: observations --- supernovae remnants --- ISM:individual (MAGIC~J 0616+225, IC~443)}
245:
246:
247: \section{Introduction}
248:
249:
250:
251: %%%%%%%%%%% radio prop. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
252: IC~443 is an asymmetric shell-type SNR with a diameter of 45 arc
253: minutes at a distance of about 1.5~kpc \citep{Fesen1984,Claussen1997}.
254: It is included in Green's catalog \citep{Green2004},
255: and it has a spectral index of 0.36, and a flux density of 160~Jy at
256: 1~GHz. It was mapped in radio with the VLA at 90~cm \citep{Claussen1997}
257: and at 20, 6 and 3.5~cm \citep{Olbert2001,Condon1998}. Moreover, \citet{Claussen1997}
258: reported the presence of maser emission at 1720~MHz from four sources, the strongest of which is located at $(l,b)\sim(-171.0,\, 2.9)$.
259: %following earlier studies (see, e.g., ..., and references therein).
260: % age: 10^3 years (AsaokaAschenbach1994)
261: % X-ray data on IC~443
262: IC~443 is a prominent X-ray source, with data available from Rosat \citep{AsaokaAschenbach1994}, ASCA \citep{Keohane1997}, XMM \citep{BocchinoBykov2000,BocchinoBykov2001,BocchinoBykov2003,Bykov2005,Troja2006}, and Chandra \citep{Olbert2001,Gaensler2006}.
263: The EGRET has detected a $\gamma$-ray source above 100 MeV in the IC~443 SNR, 3EG J0617+2238 \citep{Eposito1996,Hartman1999}.
264: %Previous VHE $\gamma$-ray upper limits:
265: %There have been previous u
266: Upper limits to the very high energy (VHE) $\gamma$-ray emission from IC~443 were reported by the Whipple collaboration: $\mathrm{d}N_{\gamma}/(\mathrm{d}A \mathrm{d}t) < 6 \times 10^{-12} \mathrm{cm}^{-2}\mathrm{s}^{-1}$ (0.11 Crab) above 500~GeV \citep{Holder2005} and by the CAT collaboration $\mathrm{d}N_{\gamma} / (\mathrm{d}A \mathrm{d}t) < 9 \times 10^{-12} \mathrm{cm}^{-2}\mathrm{s}^{-1}$ above 250~GeV \citep{Khelifi2003}.
267: %Claims on the 3$\sigma$ level for emission from HEGRA \citep{Puehlhofer2003}.
268:
269:
270: Here we present observations of the SNR IC~443 with the Major Atmospheric
271: Gamma Imaging Cherenkov (MAGIC) telescope
272: resulting in the detection of a new source of VHE
273: $\gamma$-rays, named MAGIC~J0616+225. We briefly
274: discuss the observational technique used and the procedure
275: implemented for the data analysis, derive a VHE
276: $\gamma$-ray spectrum, and analyze it in comparison
277: with other observations, including the molecular environment found
278: in the region of IC~443.
279:
280: \newpage
281:
282: \section{Observations}
283:
284: MAGIC (see e.g., \citet{MAGIC-commissioning,CortinaICRC} for a
285: detailed description) is the largest single dish Imaging Air
286: Cherenkov Telescope (IACT) in operation\footnote{%For a technical description see also \newline
287: see also http://wwwmagic.mppmu.mpg.de/magic/factsheet/}. It is located on the Canary Island
288: La Palma ($28.8^\circ$N, $17.8^\circ$W, 2200~m a.s.l.).
289: %Located on the Canary
290: %Island La Palma ($28.8^\circ$N, $17.8^\circ$W, 2200~m a.s.l.), the
291: %telescope has a 17-m diameter tessellated parabolic mirror
292: %supported by a light-weight space frame of carbon fiber reinforced
293: %plastic tubes.
294: %The camera of $3.5^\circ$ diameter field-of-view comprises 576 pixels,
295: %each composed of a light catcher and a hemispherical photomultiplier
296: % (PMT). The PMT quantum efficiency was enhanced by a diffuse lacquer doped
297: %with a wavelength shifter.
298: %% It is equipped with a 576-pixel $3.5^\circ$
299: %% field-of-view camera with photomultipliers (PMT) of
300: %% enhanced quantum efficiency.
301: %The fast analogue PMT signals are transmitted by optical multimode
302: %fibers to the trigger and read-out electronics.
303: %The signals were digitized by a 300 MSamples/s FADC system and in
304: %parallel since spring 2006 by a novel fiber-optic multiplexed 2~GSamples/s FADC system \citep{MUX_tests}.
305: %%and are read out by a 300 MSamples/s FADC system (until January 2007). In spring 2006, a 2~GSamples/s FADC system \citep{MUX_tests} was installed in the MAGIC telescope and commissioned in parallel to the 300 MSamples/s FADC system.%the 300 MHz FADC readout.
306: %The data taken with the 300 MSamples/s FADC system, which is read out in parallel to the 2~GSamples/s FADC system, have slightly different signal to noise ratios compared to the data obtained with the single 300 MSamples/s FADC system.
307: %% In the present analysis the data from these two epochs are therefore not combined. All results presented are from the second epoch, obtained with the 300 MSamples/s FADC system.
308: %% for the spectral analysis.
309:
310: %%Data taken before and after the installation of this new FADC system have different signal to noise ratios and are therefore not combined for the spectral analysis of the source.
311:
312: The SNR IC~443 was observed for a total of 10 hours in the period December 2005 - January 2006 (period I), with the telescope pointing to the SNR center. % in the ON/OFF mode.
313: The VHE $\gamma$-ray sky map showed
314: %an excess
315: evidence for a VHE $\gamma$-ray signal
316: with a statistical significance of 3$\sigma$ (before trials were taken into account).
317: To test the hypothesis that this excess is due to a VHE $\gamma$-ray source, MAGIC~J0616+225, the excess center was observed for a total of 37 hours in
318: the period December 2006 - January 2007 (period II). Therefore, in the analysis of the period II data no trial factors needed to be taken into account to compute the statistical significance of the source detection.
319: % Based on this excess,
320: % MAGIC~J0616+225 was observed for a total of 37 hours in
321: % the period December 2006 - January 2007 (period II). % at ZA$\leq 30^{\circ}$.
322: Changes in the readout chain in spring 2006
323: due to the installation of a novel 2~GSamples/s FADC system \citep{MUX_tests, MUX_ICRC}
324: in parallel to the existing 300~MSamples/s FADC system
325: % introduced to allow the testing of a novel 2GSamples/s FADC system \citep{MUX_tests},
326: made it advisable (on grounds of simplicity of the analysis) to select only the second part of the dataset, period II,
327: % (December 2006 - January 2007)
328: for the %spectral and morphology
329: studies presented here. However, within statistics the data from period I provide
330: %first dataset provides
331: %entirely
332: compatible results.
333: %In order to keep independent sets of data
334: %In this letter only the results of the second, larger sample are presented. Although the first samples provides entirely compatible measurements.
335:
336:
337: %The intermediate large ZA implies a higher to about 250~GeV
338: At La Palma, IC~443 culminates at about $6^\circ$ zenith angle
339: (ZA).
340: %The sky region % (see for example \citet{LZA-sensitivity})
341: %around the location of MAGIC~J0616+225 has a relatively high and
342: %non-uniform level of background light. Within a distance of
343: %1$^{\circ}$ from MAGIC~J0616+225, there is one star brighter than 8 mag, eta Gem with 3.28 mag.
344: %% HR Number Starname RA(2000) DECL(2000) Spectraltype mag(V) B-V
345: %% -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
346: %% 2216 eta GEM 6 14 52.6 +22 30 24 M3III 3.28 1.60
347: %% 2286 mu GEM 6 22 57.6 +22 30 49 M3IIIab 2.88 1.64
348: %% from http://www.maa.agleia.de/Maps/Const/Data/gemini_tab.html
349: %% galactic star coordinates: l=188:51:11.7; b=2:31:05.7
350: %The star mu Gem with 2.88 mag is located about 1.5$^{\circ}$ away from MAGIC~J0616+225.
351: %%displaced from MAGIC~J0616+225 by about 1.5$^{\circ}$.
352: %
353: %
354: The
355: %latter
356: observations
357: %presented
358: were carried out in the false-source tracking
359: (wobble) mode \citep{wobble}. The sky directions (W1, W2) to be
360: tracked were on two opposite sides of the source direction, at a distance of
361: $0.4^\circ$ from the source. They were chosen
362: such that in the camera the sky brightness distribution
363: relative to W1 was similar to the one relative to W2.
364: % The source direction is in both cases $0.4^\circ$ offset from the camera center.
365: %These two tracking positions are shown by white stars in figure \ref{fig:disp_map}.
366: For each
367: tracking position three circular background control regions were defined,
368: %which are
369: located symmetrically to the source region
370: % (denoted by the central white circle)
371: with respect to the
372: camera center. During wobble mode data taking, 50\% of
373: the data was taken at W1 and 50\% at W2, switching (wobbling)
374: between the 2 directions every 20 minutes.
375: %
376: %This observation mode
377: %allowed a reliable background estimation least affected by the
378: %inhomogeneous star field. % of the observations
379: %
380: %
381: %
382: In total, about 8 million triggers were recorded in period I
383: %the period December 2005 - January 2006
384: and about 30 million triggers were recorded in
385: period II.
386: %the period December 2006 - January 2007.
387: There are two bright stars in the field of view: $\eta$~Gem ($\mathrm{mag(V)}=3.28$ and $\mathrm{B}-\mathrm{V} = 1.60$) at a distance to MAGIC J0616+225 of $0.4^{\circ}$ and $\mu$~Gem ($\mathrm{mag(V)}=2.88$ and $\mathrm{B}-\mathrm{V} = 1.64$) at a distance of $1.9^{\circ}$ to MAGIC J0616+225. Both stars are rather red such that the increase in the pixel anode currents is still sustainable at nominal pixel high voltage \citep{MAGIC_moon,Paneque2004}. The discriminator thresholds of the channels included in the trigger are dynamically regulated to keep the individual pixel rates at a constant level \citep{CortinaICRC}.
388:
389: %In Spring 2006 was the data acquisition system of the MAGIC telescope upgraded to a 2 GSamples/s speed \citep{MUX_tests}. Data taken before and after the installation of this system have different signal to noise ratios and are therefore not combined for the spectral analysis of the source.
390:
391:
392:
393: \section{Data Analysis}
394:
395:
396: %\clearpage
397:
398: \begin{figure}[t]
399: \begin{center}
400: \includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{f1.eps}%totalheight=7cm width=\columnwidth
401: \end{center}
402: \caption{Sky map of $\gamma$-ray candidate events (background
403: subtracted) in the direction of MAGIC~J0616+225 for an energy threshold
404: of about 150~GeV in galactic coordinates.
405: %The source is clearly extended with respect to the MAGIC PSF (about $0.1^{\circ}$).
406: %The two white stars denote the tracking positions in the wobble mode.
407: Overlayed are $^{12}$CO emission contours
408: (cyan) from \citet{Dame2001}, contours of 20 cm VLA radio data
409: from \citet{Condon1998} (green), X-ray contours from Rosat \citep{AsaokaAschenbach1994} (purple) and $\gamma$-ray contours from EGRET \citep{Hartman1999} (black).
410: {The $^{12}$CO contours are at
411: 7 and 14 K km/s, integrated from -20 to 20 km/s in velocity, the
412: range that best defines the molecular cloud associated with IC~443.
413: The contours of the radio emission are at
414: 5 mJy/beam, chosen for best showing
415: both the SNR IC~443.
416: The X-ray contours are at 700 and 1200 counts / $6 \cdot 10^{-7}$ sr. The EGRET contours represent a 68\% and 95\% statistical probability that a single source lies within the given contour.
417: The white star denotes the position of the pulsar CXOU J061705.3+222127 \citep{Olbert2001}. The black dot shows the position of the 1720 MHz OH maser \citep{Claussen1997}.} The white circle shows the MAGIC PSF of $\sigma = 0.1^{\circ}$.
418: %The central white circle denotes the source region integrated for the spectral analysis.
419: }
420: % and the dashed circles the background control regions, which are located symmetrically
421: %to the source region with respect to the camera center.
422: \label{fig:disp_map}
423: \end{figure}
424:
425: %\clearpage
426:
427: \begin{figure}[!h]
428: \begin{center}
429: \includegraphics[totalheight=5cm]{f2.eps}
430: \end{center}
431: \caption{Distribution of excess $\gamma$-ray candidate events (figure \ref{fig:disp_map}) as a function of the squared angular distance from the excess center of MAGIC~J0616+225 (points), compared to the expected distribution for a point-like source (blue line) corresponding to the MAGIC PSF.
432: % of $\sigma^2 = 0.01 \, \mathrm{deg}^2$.
433: %Distributions of $\theta^2$ values for the source (full
434: %circles), background control region (open circles, see
435: %text) and a background model determined from the VHE $\gamma$-ray acceptance of the camera, for an energy threshold of about 150~GeV. Within errors, MAGIC~J0616+225 is %has a point-like core
436: %point-like (the MAGIC PSF has a $\sigma^2 \sim 0.01 \mathrm{deg}^2$).
437: %% and may have some extended tails.
438: %%\commentOn{It is seen also
439: %%here that the source is clearly extended with respect to the MAGIC
440: %%PSF ($\sigma^2 \sim 0.01 \mathrm{deg}^2$).}{Carlos: Unless a reference
441: %%plot is added with the $\theta^2$ expected for a point like source,
442: %%I would not say ``clearly extended''. Maybe it is a good idea to state
443: %%that ``The distribution is compatible with the point-like core with tails observed in
444: %%figure \ref{fig:disp_map}.'' or something similar}
445: } \label{fig:theta2}
446: \end{figure}
447:
448: %\clearpage
449:
450: %
451: %\begin{figure*}
452: %\epsscale{1.18} \plotone{three_disp_maps.eps}
453: %\caption{Morphology
454: %of J0616+225 above three different lower cuts in SIZE (200, 300,
455: %600 ph.el.), corresponding to energy thresholds of 250, 360, 590
456: %GeV. The color scale shows the excess significance. Overlayed are
457: %contours of 20 cm VLA radio data from \citet{White2005} (green)
458: %and $^{13}$CO emission contours (black) from \citet{Jackson2006}.
459: %The contours of the radio emission are at 0.0035 Jy/beam. The
460: %$^{13}$CO contours are at 10/20/30 K km/s, integrated from 70 to
461: %85 km/s in velocity, as was the $^{12}$CO data in figure
462: %\ref{fig:disp_map}. The white circle indicates the MAGIC PSF which
463: %is about 0.1 deg for all three lower SIZE cuts.} \label{fig:three_disp_maps}
464: %\end{figure*}
465:
466: %\clearpage
467:
468: \begin{figure}[!h]
469: \begin{center}
470: \includegraphics[totalheight=5cm]{f3.eps}
471: \end{center}
472: \caption{VHE $\gamma$-ray spectrum of MAGIC~J0616+225 (statistical errors only).
473: The full line shows the result of a simple power law fit to the % measured
474: spectral points taking into account correlations between the spectral points that are introduced by the unfolding procedure.
475: %forward unfolding
476: %procedure: A simple power law spectrum was fitted to the measured
477: %spectrum taking the full instrumental energy migration into account (see text).
478: %%The solid line shows the result of a power-law fit to the data points.
479: The dashed line shows the spectrum of the Crab Nebula as measured by MAGIC
480: \citep{Crab_MAGIC}.
481: } \label{fig:spectrum}
482: \end{figure}
483:
484:
485: %\begin{figure}[!h]
486: %\begin{center}
487: %\includegraphics[totalheight=5cm]{multi.eps}
488: %\end{center}
489: %\caption{Multiwavelength spectral energy distribution of MAGIC~J0616+225. The X-ray data are from \citet{BocchinoBykov2001} the EGRET data are from \citet{Hartman1999}.
490: % } \label{fig:spectrum1}
491: %\end{figure}
492:
493:
494: Data runs with anomalous trigger rates due to bad observation conditions (three nights of data taking) were rejected from further analysis. In addition, data with ZA$> 30^{\circ}$ (2~h) were excluded.
495: %not included in the analysis. After such selection, t
496: The remaining data set corresponded to an effective observation time (including
497: a dead-time correction)
498: %the additional correction for small dead-times in the data acquisition)
499: of 29 h.
500:
501: The data analysis was carried out using the standard MAGIC
502: analysis and reconstruction software \citep{Magic-software}, the
503: first step of which involves the FADC signal reconstruction using
504: a digital filter and the calibration of the raw data
505: \citep{MAGIC_signal_reco,MAGIC_calibration}.
506: %The subsequent steps were \citep{MAGIC_1813,MAGIC_GC}:
507: %It follows the general steps presented in \citep{MAGIC_1813,MAGIC_GC}:
508: %after calibration,
509: Thereafter,
510: shower images were cleaned by applying a cut of 10 photoelectrons (ph.~el.)
511: for image core pixels and 5 ph.~el. for boundary pixels, respectively
512: %image cleaning
513: %tail cuts of 10 photoelectrons (ph.~el.) for image core pixels and
514: %5 ph.~el. (boundary pixels) were applied
515: (see e.g. \citep{Fegan1997}). These tail
516: cuts were
517: %accordingly
518: scaled for the larger size of the outer
519: pixels of the MAGIC camera. The camera images were characterized by
520: image parameters \citep{Hillas_parameters}. In this analysis, the
521: Random Forest method (see \citet{RF,Breiman2001} for a detailed
522: description) was applied for the $\gamma$/hadron separation (for a
523: review see e.g. \citet{Fegan1997}) as well as for the energy estimation, see e.g. \citet{MAGIC_1813,MAGIC_GC,MAGIC_1834,Crab_MAGIC}.
524: %For the training of the Random Forest a sample of Monte Carlo (MC)
525: %generated $\gamma$-ray showers \citep{Majumdar2005} was used
526: %%together with about
527: %to represent the $\gamma$-ray signal
528: %and a sample of
529: %1\% randomly selected events from the measured wobble
530: %data was used to represent the background.
531: %The MC $\gamma$-ray
532: %showers were generated between 6$^\circ$
533: %and 30$^\circ$ ZA with energies between 10~GeV and 30~TeV with a
534: %SIZE distribution equal to that of the data events used
535: %for the training. The
536: %source-position independent image parameters SIZE, WIDTH, LENGTH,
537: %CONC \citep{Hillas_parameters} and the third moment of the ph.~el.
538: %distribution along the major image axis were selected to
539: %characterize the shower images.
540: %After training, the Random
541: %Forest method allows to calculate a parameter for every event,
542: %the so-called hadronness, which is a measure of the probability that
543: %the event is not a $\gamma$-ray. The $\gamma$-ray sample was defined by
544: %selecting showers with a hadronness below a specified value.
545: Above the
546: %the low energy turn-on,
547: analysis energy threshold,
548: the cut efficiency reaches about 50\%
549: corresponding to an effective collection area for $\gamma$-ray
550: showers of about 50000 m$^2$.
551: %An
552: %independent sample of MC $\gamma$-ray showers was used to determine
553: %the cut efficiency. % of the cuts. % applied
554:
555: %The analysis at similar ZA angles was developed and verified using Crab nebula data taken in September 2005, see also \citep{MAGIC_1959}. The Crab energy spectrum, as determined by our studies, was consistent with measurements from other experiments (see Fig. \ref{fig:spectrum}, dot-dashed line).
556:
557: For each event the arrival direction of the primary $\gamma$-ray
558: candidate in sky coordinates was estimated using the DISP-method
559: \citep{wobble,Lessard2001,MAGIC_disp}. A conservative % SIZE
560: cut of SIZE$\geq 200$~ph.~el. was applied to select a subset of events with
561: superior angular resolution. For these events the effect of the bright stars in the field of view is negligible. The corresponding analysis energy
562: threshold (the energy corresponding to the maximum of the differential
563: $\gamma$-ray rate after all analysis cuts %, see e.g. \citep{Mirzoyan1994}
564: ) was about 150~GeV.
565:
566:
567: Figure \ref{fig:disp_map} shows the sky map of $\gamma$-ray
568: candidates (background subtracted) %, see e.g. \citep{Rowell2003})
569: from the direction of MAGIC~J0616+225 in galactic coordinates.
570: It was folded with a
571: two-dimensional Gaussian with a standard deviation of
572: $0.072^{\circ}$.% and a maximum of one.
573: The MAGIC $\gamma$-ray PSF (standard deviation of a two-dimensional
574: Gaussian fit to the non-folded brightness profile of a point source)
575: is $(0.10\pm0.01)^{\circ}$ for SIZE$\geq 200$~ph.el. \citep{MAGIC_disp}. The folding of the sky map serves
576: to increase the signal-to-noise ratio by smoothing out
577: statistical fluctuations. However, it correlates the values of neighbouring bins
578: and somewhat degrades
579: the spatial resolution. The sky map is overlayed with contours
580: of $^{12}$CO emission
581: (cyan) from \citet{Dame2001}, contours of 20 cm VLA radio data
582: from \citet{Condon1998} (green), X-ray contours from Rosat (purple) \citep{AsaokaAschenbach1994} and $\gamma$-ray contours from EGRET \citep{Hartman1999} (black).
583: Also XMM-Newton and Chandra X-ray observations of IC~443 exist; they will be discussed below.
584: %\commentOn{The $^{12}$CO contours are at
585: %7 and 14 K km/s, integrated from -20 to 20 km/s in velocity, the
586: %range that best defines the molecular cloud associated with IC~443.
587: %The contours of the radio emission are at 5 mJy/beam.
588: % The X-ray contours are at 700 and 1200 counts / $6 \cdot 10^{-7}$ sr. The EGRET contours represent 68\% and 95\% statistical probability that a single source lies within the given contour.
589: The white star denotes the position of the pulsar CXOU J061705.3+222127 \citep{Olbert2001}. The black dot shows the position of the 1720 MHz OH maser \citep{Claussen1997}.
590: % {Carlos: this is included in the figure caption,
591: % thus should be removed from here to avoid being too redundant.}
592: %
593: The VHE $\gamma$-ray sky map shows a clear excess centered at (RA,
594: DEC)=(06$^\mathrm{h}$16$^\mathrm{m}$43$^\mathrm{s}$,
595: +22$^\circ$31'48''), MAGIC~J0616+225. The statistical position error is 1.5',
596: the systematic error due to background determination and
597: pointing uncertainty is estimated to be 1' \citep{Crab_MAGIC}. %for description of the MAGIC telescope drive system
598: Within errors MAGIC~J0616+225 is point-like. %has a point-like core.
599: % and may have some extended tails.
600: The center of gravity of the excess in the period II data presented here agrees with the center of gravity of the excess in the period I data not shown here.
601: %is result agrees with the excess in the 2005/6 data not shown here.
602: %A fit of a two dimensional Gaussian brightness
603: %profile to the non-folded sky map yields after subtraction the MAGIC
604: %$\gamma$-ray PSF in quadrature an intrinsic source extension of
605: %$\sigma = (0.14 \pm 0.04)^{\circ}$.
606: % Both, position and extension, coincide well with the shell-type SNR G23.3-0.3 (IC~443).
607:
608: Figure \ref{fig:theta2} shows for the excess $\gamma$-ray-like events in figure \ref{fig:disp_map} the distribution of the squared
609: angular distance, $\theta^2$, with respect to the
610: %of excess $\gamma$-ray like events
611: %between the reconstructed shower direction and the
612: excess center together with the expected distribution for a point-like source.%, determined from the VHE $\gamma$-ray sky map.
613: %In addition, it shows OFF data from the background control regions and a background model determined from the VHE $\gamma$-ray acceptance of the camera.
614: Chosing a conservative $\theta^2$ cut of $\theta^2 \leq 0.05 \, \mathrm{deg}^2$, as appropriate for unidentified sources, the observed excess in the period II data set in the
615: direction of MAGIC~J0616+225 has a significance of 5.7$\sigma$.
616: The period I data showed an excess of about 3$\sigma$ significance at a position less then $3'=0.05^{\circ}$ away from period II data set.
617: Computing the significance of the period II data set with respect to the period I position yields only a negligible difference for the chosen large signal region $\theta^2 \leq 0.05 \, \mathrm{deg}^2$.
618: Chosing smaller $\theta^2$ cuts, one obtains a higher significance for the period II excess center.
619: %both the period 1 and period 2 positions yield the same significance.
620: %The observed excess in the
621: %direction of MAGIC~J0616+225 has a significance of 5.7$\sigma$ for
622: %$\theta^2 \leq 0.05 \, \mathrm{deg}^2$ for the period II data set. The $\theta^2$ cut was chosen conservatively for an unidentified source and not optimized for point-like sources.
623: %December 2006 - January 2007 data set. The December 2005 - January 2006
624:
625:
626: %However, an extended tail
627: %towards positive galactic latitudes is apparent when the larger
628: %the SIZE cuts are imposed. This tail is not significant, however,
629: %it is spatially consistent with a similar tail feature in the MAGIC
630: %sky map \citep{Aharonian2005b}. The fact that the two telescopes
631: %see the same putative tail, despite when neither claimed its
632: %significance alone, may support the reality of the feature.
633:
634:
635: For the spectral analysis the excess data from a sky region of maximum angular distance
636: of $\theta^2 = 0.05 \, \mathrm{deg}^2$ around the excess center
637: % (indicated by the white circle in Figure \ref{fig:disp_map})
638: were integrated. Figure \ref{fig:spectrum} shows the reconstructed
639: VHE $\gamma$-ray spectrum
640: ($\mathrm{dN}_{\gamma}/(\mathrm{dE}_{\gamma} \mathrm{dA}
641: \mathrm{dt})$ vs. true $\mathrm{E}_{\gamma}$) of MAGIC~J0616+225 after
642: correcting (unfolding) for the instrumental energy resolution
643: \citep{Anykeev1991,Bertero1989}. The horizontal bars indicate the bin size in
644: energy.
645: %, the marker is placed in the bin center on a logarithmic scale.
646: %The full line shows the result of a forward unfolding procedure:
647: A simple power law was fitted to the % measured
648: spectral points taking into account correlations between the spectral points that are introduced by the unfolding procedure.
649: %spectrum ($\mathrm{dN}_{\gamma}/(\mathrm{dE}_{\gamma} \mathrm{dA}
650: %\mathrm{dt})$ vs. estimated $\mathrm{E}_{\gamma}$) taking the full
651: %instrumental energy migration (true $\mathrm{E}_{\gamma}$ vs.
652: %estimated $\mathrm{E}_{\gamma}$) into account.
653: % as described in \citet{Mizobuchi2005}.
654: The result is given by
655: ($\chi^2/\mathrm{n.d.f}=1.1$):
656: \begin{eqnarray*}
657: \frac{ \mathrm{d}N_{\gamma}}{\mathrm{d}A \mathrm{d}t \mathrm{d}E}
658: = (1.0 \pm 0.2) \times 10^{-11}
659: \left(\frac{E}{\mathrm{0.4 TeV}}\right)^{-3.1 \pm 0.3}% \nonumber
660: % \hspace{4cm}
661: \mathrm{cm}^{-2}\mathrm{s}^{-1}
662: \mathrm{TeV}^{-1}.
663: \end{eqnarray*}
664: The quoted errors are statistical. The systematic error is
665: estimated to be 35\% in the flux level determination and 0.2 in
666: the spectral index, see also \citet{MAGIC_GC,Crab_MAGIC}.
667: The integral flux of MAGIC~J0616+225 above 100~GeV is about 6.5\%
668: and above 300~GeV about 2.8\%
669: of the Crab Nebula flux.
670: The integral flux of MAGIC~J0616+225 in the observation period II
671: %2006/2007
672: is compatible
673: within errors with that of period I. % 2005/2006.
674: Within the two observation periods
675: (two months each) no flux variations exceeding the
676: measurement errors were observed.
677: %
678: All data analysis steps were cross-checked by a second, independent analysis, yielding compatible results.
679:
680:
681:
682: \section{Discussion and concluding remarks}
683:
684:
685: If, due to the spatial association shown in Figure \ref{fig:disp_map},
686: we accept that
687: MAGIC~J0616+225 is associated with SNR IC~443, located at a distance of
688: $\sim 1.5$ kpc, then it has a luminosity between 100~GeV and
689: 1~TeV of about $ 2.7 \times 10^{33}$ erg s$^{-1}$.
690: This is roughly one order of magnitude below the luminosity of
691: the sources HESS J1813-178 and J1834-087 \citep{Aharonian2005b}, both also detected by MAGIC \citep{MAGIC_1813,MAGIC_1834}.
692: In addition, the $\gamma$-ray spectrum of
693: MAGIC~J0616+225 is steeper than those of J1813-178 and J1834-087.
694:
695: Figure \ref{fig:disp_map} indeed shows a very interesting multi-frequency
696: phenomenology.
697: First, it can be noted that the MAGIC VHE $\gamma$-ray source is slightly displaced
698: with respect to the central position of the EGRET source 3EG~J0617+2238,
699: although still consistent with it, within errors.
700: %The position of the latter is also consistent with the
701: An independent analysis of GeV photons measured by EGRET resulted
702: in the source GeV~J0617+2237 \citep{Lamb1997},
703: %by \citet{Lamb1997},
704: %which resulted in the source GeV~0617+2237,
705: that is at
706: the same location of 3EG~J0617+2238.
707: \citet{Gaisser1998,Baring1999} and \citet{Kaul2001} extrapolate the energy spectrum of 3EG~J0617+2238 into the VHE $\gamma$-ray range. The predicted fluxes are higher with a harder energy spectrum than MAGIC~J0616+225. This supports the view that a direct extrapolation of the EGRET source to the MAGIC energy range is not valid.
708:
709: %
710: The EGRET source is located in the center of the
711: SNR, whereas the VHE $\gamma$-ray source is
712: displaced to the
713: south, in direct correlation with a molecular cloud.
714: The molecular cloud environment surrounding IC~443 and its possible
715: connection with the EGRET $\gamma$-ray source was studied by \citet{Torres2002},
716: who also provided a review of previous measurements
717: regarding this SNR environment.
718: There is a large amount of molecular mass ($\lesssim 10^{4}$
719: M$_{\odot}$) consistent with the distance to the SNR IC~443,
720: corresponding to a velocity range of $-20$ to 20 km/s, as shown in
721: Figure \ref{fig:disp_map}. The highest CO intensity detected is directly
722: superimposed on
723: the central position of the MAGIC source. Moreover, \citet{Claussen1997}
724: reported the presence of maser emission from $(l,b)\sim(-171.0,
725: \, 2.9)$, spatially correlated with the MAGIC source (see also \citet{Hewitt2006}).
726: %The presence of maser
727: %emission at this same spot \citep{Claussen1997} from $(l,b)\sim(-171.0,
728: %\, 2.9)$, directly correlated with the MAGIC source,
729: The maser emission is an indication for a shock in a high matter density environment. It is assumed to be due to collisionally excited H$_2$ molecules heated by the shock.
730: %This supports the
731: %idea of a high matter density, for which the maser emission is collisionally excited
732: %by H$_2$ molecules heated by a shock.
733: %Recently, \citet{Hewitt2006}
734: %have confirmed Claussen's et al. measurements and discovered new,
735: %weaker maser sources in the region.
736:
737:
738: An electronic bremsstrahlung hypothesis for the origin
739: of the EGRET source
740: (e.g., \citet{BykovEtAl2000}) is difficult to reconcile with the fact
741: that the radio
742: synchrotron, X-rays, and optical emission is concentrated towards the
743: rim of the remnant, whereas
744: the EGRET source is located in the center.
745: On the other hand, the optical
746: emission seems to fade in regions where CO emission increases and where the
747: MAGIC source is located (see \citet{Lasker1990}). This
748: %which
749: perhaps indicates that the molecular material, which absorbs
750: the optical radiation, is at the remnant's nearest side.
751: The report by \citet{Cornett1977} also argues that the molecular mass is
752: located between us and the SNR. Similarly, the recent analysis of XMM
753: observations by \citet{Troja2006} reached the same conclusions.
754: The observed VHE $\gamma$-radiation may be due to $\pi^0$-decays from
755: interactions between cosmic rays accelerated in IC~443 and the dense
756: molecular cloud.
757: A possible distance of this cloud from IC~443
758: %, considered as a cosmic ray accelerator,
759: could explain the steepness of the VHE $\gamma$-ray spectrum measured.
760: As has been emphasized by \citet{Aharonian1996}, the
761: observed $\gamma$-rays %flux
762: %$F_{\gamma}(E_{\gamma})\propto E_{\gamma}^{-(\Gamma+\delta)}$
763: can have a significantly different
764: spectrum from that expected from the particle population at the
765: source (the SNR shock).
766: %For instance, a standard diffusion coefficients $\delta\sim
767: %0.3-0.6$ can explain $\gamma$-ray spectra as steep as $\Gamma\sim
768: %2.3-2.6$ in sources with particles accelerated to a power-law
769: %$J_p(E_p)\propto E^{-2}$ if the target is illuminated by the
770: %$\pi^0$-decays are at sufficient distance from the accelerator.
771:
772: % PWN discussion
773: %The position of the pulsar wind nebula (PWN) CXOU~J061705.3+222127 \citep{Olbert2001,BocchinoBykov2001} is inconsistent with that of the EGRET and the MAGIC source. However, VHE $\gamma$-rays from PWNe were found
774: %to be sometimes significantly shifted with respect
775: %to the positions of the PWN, e.g. in the case of the Vela X nebula
776: % (see Fig. 1 in Aharonian et al. 2006).
777: %The age of the pulsar in IC~443 is estimated to be $3\times 10^4$ years
778: %\citep{Olbert2001}, much larger than the age of the Vela pulsar
779: % ($\sim 1.1\times 10^4$ years).
780: %Leptons accelerated
781: %during the life of a pulsar can produce $\gamma$-rays in
782: %the IC scattering of the MBR, interstellar, and local radiation
783: %field produced by dust and gas heated by the supernova or in
784: %the bremsstrahlung process by leptons captured in dense regions of
785: %the molecular clouds (e.g. de Jager \& Mastichiadis~1997). These
786: %leptons will
787: %mainly interact in the place where the soft radiation or matter
788: %density is the largest, not necessarly at the present position of
789: %the pulsar.
790: %Nevertheless, a high ratio of $\mathrm{CO}(J=2-1)/\mathrm{CO}(J=1-0)$ at the position of the PWN indicates a high matter density at the present pulsar position (see \citet{Seta1998}) such that in this scenario also VHE $\gamma$-ray emission may be expected from the pulsar postion.
791:
792: % original PWN discussion
793: %In another scenario, the $\gamma$-ray emission may be related to the pulsar wind nebula (PWN) CXOU~J061705.3+222127 \citep{Olbert2001,BocchinoBykov2001}.
794:
795: The positions of 3EG~J0617+2238, GeV~J0617+2237,
796: and MAGIC~J0616+225 are all different from that of
797: the pulsar wind nebula (PWN) CXOU~J061705.3+222127 \citep{Olbert2001,BocchinoBykov2001}. The PWN is now co-located
798: with a high density molecular material region \citep{Seta1998}, which in addition
799: is excited, as measured by a high $\mathrm{CO}(J=2-1)/\mathrm{CO}(J=1-0)$ ratio. If
800: the VHE $\gamma$-ray emission were related to the PWN, one may expect
801: some spatial overlap between the PWN and the $\gamma$-ray sources.
802: %We see a point like source far
803: %apart from the pulsar and see no explanation of why there is no GeV or
804: %TeV emission there.
805: %This fact compromises the
806: %assumption that the latter, a pulsar wind nebulae co-spatial with a
807: %high ratio of CO(J=2-1)/CO(J=1-0) (see \citet{Seta1998}), is related
808: %to the high energy emission.
809: % end of PWN discussion
810:
811: %% from Wlodek
812:
813:
814:
815: % So one cannot exclude a relation between the pulsar in IC 443 and the VHE source.
816: %% end from Wlodek
817:
818: %In closing, it is to be mentioned that a
819: A complete coverage of the X-ray
820: emission from the region was made with XMM \citep{BocchinoBykov2003},
821: resulting in the detection of 12 X-ray sources with fluxes larger than
822: $5\times 10^{-14}$
823: erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$. None of these sources is spatially coincident
824: with the
825: %position of the
826: MAGIC detection reported here. Rather, they are mostly
827: located in the
828: relatively small, 15 arcmin $\times$ 15 arcmin region, for which the
829: analysis of the 2MASS data reveals strong 2.2 $\mu$m emission
830: indicating interaction with
831: a molecular cloud. The MAGIC source, uncorrelated with X-ray sources,
832: is, however, also co-spatial with a region of high 2.2 $\mu$m emission,
833: but farther away from the shock.
834:
835: In summary, the observation of IC~443 using the MAGIC Telescope has
836: led to the discovery of a new source of VHE $\gamma$-rays, MAGIC~J0616+225,
837: near the Galactic Plane. A reasonably large data set was collected
838: and the spectrum of this source was measured up to energies of 1.6~TeV.
839: The differential energy spectrum can be fitted with a power
840: law of slope $\Gamma=-3.1\pm 0.3$. The coincidence
841: of the VHE $\gamma$-ray source with SNR IC~443 poses this
842: SNR as a natural counterpart, and although the mechanism
843: responsible for the high energy radiation remains yet to be
844: clarified, a massive molecular cloud and OH maser emissions are located at
845: the same sky position as that of MAGIC~J0616+225, and suggest that a
846: nucleonic origin
847: of the VHE $\gamma$-rays is possible.
848:
849:
850:
851: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
852: %\section*{Acknowledgements}
853:
854: %\acknowledgements
855: We would
856: like to thank the IAC for the excellent working conditions at the
857: Observatory de los Muchachos in La Palma. The support of the
858: German BMBF and MPG, the Italian INFN and the Spanish CICYT is
859: gratefully acknowledged. This work was also supported by ETH
860: Research Grant TH~34/04~3 and the Polish MNiI Grant 1P03D01028.
861: %
862: %This paper is dedicated to the memory of Nicolaj Pavel.
863:
864:
865:
866: \begin{thebibliography}{10}
867:
868: \bibitem[Aharonian \& Atoyan(1996)]{Aharonian1996}
869: Aharonian, F.~A. \& Atoyan, A.~M.,
870: \newblock 1996, A\&A, 309, 917.
871:
872: \bibitem[Aharonian et~al.(2006)]{Aharonian2005b}
873: Aharonian, F. et~al.,
874: \newblock 2006, ApJ, 636, 777.
875:
876: \bibitem[Albert et~al.(2006a)]{MAGIC_1813}
877: Albert, J. et~al.,
878: \newblock 2006a, ApJ, 637, L41.
879:
880: \bibitem[Albert et~al.(2006b)]{MAGIC_GC}
881: Albert, J. et~al.,
882: \newblock 2006b, ApJ, 638, L101.
883:
884: \bibitem[Albert et~al.(2006c)]{MAGIC_1834}
885: Albert, J. et~al.,
886: \newblock 2006c, ApJ, 643, L53.
887:
888: \bibitem[Albert et~al.(2006d)]{MAGIC_signal_reco}
889: Albert, J. et~al.,
890: \newblock 2006d, astro-ph/0612385.
891:
892: \bibitem[Albert et~al.(2007b)]{MAGIC_moon}
893: Albert, J. et~al.,
894: \newblock 2007b, astro-ph/0702475. % include astro-ph number
895:
896: \bibitem[Albert et~al.(2007b)]{Crab_MAGIC}
897: Albert, J. et~al.,
898: \newblock 2007b, arXiv:0705.3244. % include astro-ph number
899:
900: \bibitem[Anykeev et~al.(1991)]{Anykeev1991}
901: Anykeev, V.~B., Spiridonov, A.~A. \& Zhigunov, V.B.,
902: \newblock 1991, NIM, A303, 350.
903:
904: \bibitem[Asaoka \& Aschenbach(1994)]{AsaokaAschenbach1994}
905: Asaoka, I. \& Aschenbach, B.,
906: %An X-ray study of IC~443 and the discovery of a new supernova remnant by ROSAT
907: \newblock 1994, A\&A, 284, 573.
908:
909: \bibitem[Baixeras et~al.(2004)]{MAGIC-commissioning}
910: Baixeras, C. et~al.,
911: \newblock 2004, NIM, A518, 188.
912:
913: \bibitem[Baring et~al.(1999)]{Baring1999}
914: Baring, M.~G. et~al.,
915: \newblock 1999, ApJ, 513, 311.
916:
917: \bibitem[Bartko et~al.(2005)]{MUX_tests}
918: Bartko, H. et~al.,
919: \newblock 2005, NIM, A548, 464.
920:
921: \bibitem[Bertero(1989)]{Bertero1989}
922: Bertero, M.,
923: \newblock 1989, Adv. Elect. and Elect. Phys., 75, 1.
924:
925: \bibitem[Bocchino \& Bykov(2000)]{BocchinoBykov2000}
926: Bocchino, F. \& Bykov, A.~M.,
927: %Hard X-ray emission from IC~443: evidence for a shocked molecular clump?
928: \newblock 2000, A\&A, 362, L29.
929:
930: \bibitem[Bocchino \& Bykov(2001)]{BocchinoBykov2001}
931: Bocchino, F. \& Bykov, A.~M.,
932: %The plerion nebula in IC~443: The XMM-Newton view
933: \newblock 2001, A\&A, 376, 248.
934:
935: \bibitem[Bocchino \& Bykov(2003)]{BocchinoBykov2003}
936: Bocchino, F. \& Bykov, A.~M.,
937: %XMM-Newton study of hard X-ray sources in IC~443
938: \newblock 2003, A\&A, 400, 203.
939:
940: \bibitem[Bock et~al.(2004)]{RF}
941: Bock, R.~K. et~al.,
942: \newblock 2004, NIM, A516, 511.
943:
944: \bibitem[Breiman(2001)]{Breiman2001}
945: Breiman, L.,
946: \newblock 2001, Machine Learning, 45, 5.
947:
948: %\bibitem[Bretz et~al.(2003)]{Bretz2003}
949: %Bretz, T. et~al. (MAGIC Collab.),
950: %\newblock 2003, Proc. of the 28th ICRC, Tsukuba, Japan, 2943.
951:
952: \bibitem[Bretz \& Wagner(2003)]{Magic-software}
953: Bretz, T. \& R.~Wagner (MAGIC Collab.),
954: \newblock 2003, Proc. of the 28th ICRC, Tsukuba, Japan, 2947.
955:
956: %\bibitem[Buckley et~al.(1998)]{Buckley1998}
957: %Buckley, J.~ et~al.,
958: %%Constraints on cosmic-ray origin from TeV gamma-ray observations of supernova remnants
959: %\newblock 1998, A\&A, 329, 639.
960:
961: %\bibitem[Butt et~al.(2003)]{Butt2003}
962: %Butt, Y.~M. et~al.,
963: %%Molecular Beam Dumps as Tracers of Hadronic Cosmic Ray Sources: the Case of SNR IC~443
964: %\newblock 2003, Proc. XXII Moriond Astrophysics Meeting, 323 Mora Meeting, astro-ph/0206132.
965:
966: \bibitem[Bykov et~al.(2000)]{BykovEtAl2000}
967: Bykov, A.~M. et~al.,
968: %Nonthermal Emission from a Supernova Remnant in a Molecular Cloud
969: \newblock 2000, ApJ, 538, 203.
970:
971: %\bibitem[Bykov(2000)]{Bykov2000}
972: %Bykov, A.~M.,
973: %%Interaction of cosmic rays with interstellar matter
974: %\newblock 2000, Proceedings of the Fourth INTEGRAL Workshop, 4-8 September 2000, Alicante, Spain., 123.
975:
976: \bibitem[Bykov et~al.(2005)]{Bykov2005}
977: Bykov, A.~M., Bocchino, F. \& Pavlov, G.~G.,
978: %A Hard Extended X-Ray Source in the IC~443 Supernova Remnant Resolved by Chandra: A Fast Ejecta Fragment or a New Pulsar Wind Nebula?
979: \newblock 2005, ApJ, 624, L41.
980:
981: \bibitem[Claussen et~al.(1997)]{Claussen1997}
982: Claussen, M.~J. et~al.,
983: %Polarization Observations of 1720 MHz OH Masers toward the Three Supernova Remnants W28, W44, and IC~443
984: \newblock 1997, ApJ, 489, 143.
985:
986: \bibitem[Condon et~al.(1998)]{Condon1998}
987: Condon, J.~J. et~al.,
988: % The NRAO VLA Sky Survey
989: \newblock 1998, AJ, 115, 1693.
990:
991: \bibitem[Cornett(1977)]{Cornett1977}
992: Cornett, R.~H., Chin G. \& Knapp G.~R.,
993: \newblock 1977, A\&A 54, 889.
994:
995: \bibitem[Cortina et~al.(2005)]{CortinaICRC}
996: Cortina, J. et~al. (MAGIC Collab.),
997: \newblock 2005, Proc. of the 29th ICRC, Pune, India, 5-359, astro-ph/0508274.
998:
999: %\bibitem[Dame et~al.(1986)]{Dame1986}
1000: %Dame, T.~M., Elmegreen, B. G., Cohen, R. S. \& Thaddeus, P.,
1001: %\newblock 1986, ApJ, 305, 892.
1002:
1003: \bibitem[Dame et~al.(2001)]{Dame2001}
1004: Dame, T.~M., Hartmann, D. \& Thaddeus, P.,
1005: \newblock 2001, ApJ, 547, 792.
1006:
1007: \bibitem[Domingo-Santamaria et~al.(2005)]{MAGIC_disp}
1008: Domingo-Santamaria, E. et~al. (MAGIC Collab.),
1009: \newblock 2005, Proc. of the 29th ICRC, Pune, India, 5-363, astro-ph/0508274.
1010:
1011: \bibitem[Eposito et~al.(1996)]{Eposito1996}
1012: Esposito, J.~A. et~al.,
1013: \newblock 1996, ApJ, 461, 820.
1014:
1015: \bibitem[Fegan(1997)]{Fegan1997}
1016: Fegan, D.~J.,
1017: \newblock 1997, J Phys G, 23, 1013.
1018:
1019: \bibitem[Fesen(1984)]{Fesen1984}
1020: Fesen, R. A.,
1021: %The nature of the filaments northeast of the supernova remnant IC~443
1022: \newblock 1984, ApJ, 281, 658.
1023:
1024: \bibitem[Fomin et~al.(1994)]{wobble}
1025: Fomin, V.~P. et~al.,
1026: \newblock 1994, Astroparticle Physics, 2, 137.
1027:
1028: \bibitem[Gaensler et~al.(2006)]{Gaensler2006}
1029: Gaensler, B.~M. et~al.,
1030: %The X-Ray Structure of the Pulsar Bow Shock G189.22+2.90 in the Supernova Remnant IC~443
1031: \newblock 2006, ApJ, 648, 1037.
1032:
1033: \bibitem[Gaisser et~al.(1998)]{Gaisser1998}
1034: Gaisser, T.~K., Protheroe, R.~J. \& Stanev, T.
1035: \newblock 1998, ApJ, 492, 219.
1036:
1037: \bibitem[Gaug et~al.(2005)]{MAGIC_calibration}
1038: Gaug, M. et~al. (MAGIC Collab.),
1039: \newblock 2005, Proc. of the 29th ICRC, Pune, India, 5-375, astro-ph/0508274.
1040:
1041: \bibitem[Goebel et~al.(2007)]{MUX_ICRC}
1042: Goebel, F. et~al. (MAGIC Collab.),
1043: \newblock 2007, Upgrade of the MAGIC Telescope with a Multiplexed Fiber-Optic 2 GSamples/s FADC DAQ system, Proc. of the 30th ICRC, Merida, Mexico, to be submitted.
1044:
1045: \bibitem[Green(2004)]{Green2004}
1046: Green, D.~A.,
1047: \newblock 2004, BASI, 32, 335G.
1048:
1049: \bibitem[Hartman et~al.(1999)]{Hartman1999}
1050: Hartman, R.~C. et~al.,
1051: %The Third EGRET Catalog of High-Energy Gamma-Ray Sources
1052: \newblock 1999, ApJS, 123, 79.
1053:
1054: \bibitem[Hewitt et~al.(2006)]{Hewitt2006}
1055: Hewitt, J.~W. et al.,
1056: \newblock 2006, ApJ, 652, 1288.
1057:
1058: \bibitem[Hillas(1985)]{Hillas_parameters}
1059: Hillas, A.~M.,
1060: \newblock 1985, Proc. of the 19th ICRC, La Jolla, 3, 445.
1061:
1062: \bibitem[Holder(2005)]{Holder2005}
1063: Holder, J. et~al.,
1064: %Recent Observations of IC~443 with the Whipple 10m Telescope
1065: \newblock 2006, AIP Conf. Proc., 745, 275.
1066:
1067: \bibitem[Kaul(2001)]{Kaul2001}
1068: Kaul, R.~K.,
1069: \newblock 2001, BASI, 29, 371.
1070:
1071: \bibitem[Keohane et~al.(1997)]{Keohane1997}
1072: %%A Possible Site of Cosmic Ray Acceleration in the Supernova Remnant IC 443, ASCA data
1073: Keohane, J.~W. et~al,
1074: \newblock 1997, ApJ, 484, 350.
1075:
1076: \bibitem[Khelifi(2003)]{Khelifi2003}
1077: Khelifi, B.,
1078: \newblock 2003, Ph.D. thesis, available at \newline
1079: http://lpnp90.in2p3.fr/\%7Ecat/Thesis/khelifi.pdf.
1080:
1081: \bibitem[Lamb \& Macomb(1997)]{Lamb1997}
1082: Lamb, R.~C. \& Macomb, D.~J.,
1083: \newblock 1997, ApJ, 488, 872.
1084:
1085: \bibitem[Lasker et~al.(1990)]{Lasker1990}
1086: Lasker, B.~M. et al.,
1087: \newblock 1990, AJ, 99, 2019.
1088:
1089: \bibitem[Lessard et~al.(2001)]{Lessard2001}
1090: Lessard, R.~W. et~al.,
1091: \newblock 2001, Astroparticle Physics, 15, 1.
1092:
1093: %\bibitem[Majumdar et~al.(2005)]{Majumdar2005}
1094: %Majumdar, P. et~al. (MAGIC Collab.),
1095: %\newblock 2005, Proc. of the 29th ICRC, Pune, India, 5-203, astro-ph/0508274.
1096:
1097: %\bibitem[Mirzoyan et~al.(1994)]{Mirzoyan1994} %CT1 NIM paper, reference for energy threshold definition
1098: %Mirzoyan, R. et~al.,
1099: %\newblock 1994, NIM, 351, 513.
1100:
1101: %\bibitem[Mizobuchi et~al.(2005)]{Mizobuchi2005}
1102: %Mizobuchi, S. et~al. (MAGIC Collab.),
1103: %\newblock 2005, Proc. of the 29th ICRC, Pune, India, 5-323, astro-ph/0508274.
1104:
1105: %\bibitem[Riegel et~al.(2005)]{starguider}
1106: %Riegel, B. et~al. (MAGIC Collab.),
1107: %\newblock 2005, Proc. of the 29th ICRC, Pune, India, astro-ph/0508274.
1108:
1109: \bibitem[Olbert et~al.(2001)]{Olbert2001}
1110: Olbert, Ch.~M. et~al.,
1111: %A Bow Shock Nebula around a Compact X-Ray Source in the Supernova Remnant IC~443
1112: \newblock 2001, ApJ, 554, L205.
1113:
1114: \bibitem[Paneque et~al.(2004)]{Paneque2004}
1115: Paneque et~al.,
1116: \newblock 2004, NIM, A518, 619.
1117:
1118: %\bibitem[Puehlhofer et~al.(2003)]{Puehlhofer2003}
1119: %Puehlhofer, G. et~al.,
1120: %\newblock 2003, Proc. of the 28th ICRC, Tskuba, 4, 231.
1121:
1122: %\bibitem[Rowell(2003)]{Rowell2003}
1123: %Rowell, G.~P.,
1124: %\newblock 2003, A\&A, 410, 398.
1125:
1126: \bibitem[Seta et~al.(1998)]{Seta1998}
1127: Seta, M., et al.,
1128: \newblock 1998, ApJ, 505, 286.
1129:
1130: \bibitem[Torres et~al.(2003)]{Torres2002}
1131: Torres, D.~F. et~al.,
1132: \newblock 2003, Phys. Rept., 382, 303.
1133:
1134: \bibitem[Troja et~al.(2006)]{Troja2006}
1135: Troja, E., Bocchino, F. \& Reale, F.,
1136: %XMM-Newton Observations of the Supernova Remnant IC~443. I. Soft X-Ray Emission from Shocked Interstellar Medium
1137: \newblock 2006, ApJ, 649, 258.
1138:
1139: %\bibitem[Wagner et~al.(2005)]{Crab_MAGIC}
1140: %Wagner, R. et~al. (MAGIC Collab.),
1141: %\newblock 2005, Proc. of the 29th ICRC, Pune, India, 4-163, astro-ph/0508244.
1142:
1143: \end{thebibliography}
1144:
1145:
1146:
1147:
1148:
1149: \end{document}
1150:
1151:
1152: On the Combining Significances
1153: Authors: Sergey Bityukov, Nikolai Krasnikov, Alexander Nikitenko
1154: Comments: 12 pages, 8 figures
1155: Subj-class: Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability
1156:
1157: We present the statistical approach to the combining of signal significances.
1158:
1159:
1160:
1161:
1162:
1163: