1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

2: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint2]{aastex}

3: %\usepackage{psfig,natbib}

4: \usepackage{natbib}

5: \shortauthors{Bower et al.}

6: \shorttitle{Radio Transients}

7: \begin{document}

8: 

9: \def\gsim{\;\rlap{\lower 2.5pt

10:  \hbox{$\sim$}}\raise 1.5pt\hbox{$>$}\;}

11: \def\lsim{\;\rlap{\lower 2.5pt

12:    \hbox{$\sim$}}\raise 1.5pt\hbox{$<$}\;}

13: 

14: \newcommand\degd{\ifmmode^{\circ}\!\!\!.\,\else$^{\circ}\!\!\!.\,$\fi}

15: \newcommand{\etal}{{\it et al.\ }}

16: \newcommand{\uv}{(u,v)}

17: \newcommand{\rdm}{{\rm\ rad\ m^{-2}}}

18: \newcommand{\msuny}{{\rm\ M_{\sun}\ y^{-1}}}

19: \newcommand{\mylesssim}{\stackrel{\scriptstyle <}{\scriptstyle \sim}}

20: \newcommand{\sci}{Science}

21: 

22: %\slugcomment{Accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal}

23: 

24: \title{SubmilliJansky Transients in Archival Radio Observations}

25: 

26: \author{Geoffrey C. Bower, Destry Saul, Joshua S. Bloom\altaffilmark{1}, 

27: Alberto Bolatto, Alexei V. Filippenko, Ryan J. Foley, and Daniel Perley \\

28: Department of Astronomy \& Radio Astronomy Laboratory,

29: University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3411; gbower@astro.berkeley.edu}

30: \altaffiltext{1}{Sloan Research Fellow.}

31: 

32: \begin{abstract}

33: We report the results of a 944-epoch survey for 

34: transient sources with archival data from the Very Large

35: Array spanning 22 years with a typical epoch separation

36: of 7 days.  Observations were obtained at 5 or 8.4~GHz

37: for a single field of view with a full-width at half-maximum 

38: of $8.6^\prime$ and $5.1^\prime$, respectively,

39: and achieved a typical point-source detection threshold at the beam center of

40: $\lsim 300 \ \mu$Jy per epoch. The angular resolution ranged from $\sim 1''$ 

41: to $15''$. Ten transient sources were detected with a significance

42: threshold such that only one false positive would be expected.  

43: Of these transients, eight

44: were detected in only a single epoch.  Two transients were

45: too faint to be detected in individual epochs but were detected in

46: two-month averages.  None of the 

47: ten transients was detected in longer-term averages or associated 

48: with persistent emission in the deep image produced from the combination 

49: of all epochs.  The cumulative

50: rate for the short timescale radio transients above 370 $\mu$Jy at 5

51: and 8.4 GHz is

52: $0.07 \lsim R \lsim 40 {\rm\ deg^{-2} yr^{-1}}$, where the uncertainty

53: is due to the unknown duration of the transients,

54: $20 {\rm\ min} \lsim t_{char} \lsim 7 {\rm\ d}$.  A two-epoch 

55: survey

56: for transients will detect $1.5 \pm 0.4$ transient per square degrees above

57: a flux density of 370 $\mu$Jy.

58: One transient is located $\sim 3$ kpc in projection from the nucleus of 

59: a spiral galaxy at a redshift $z = 0.040$.  Based on the

60: duration of the transient, its luminosity ($L \approx 2 \times 10^{38}$

61: erg s$^{-1}$), and its location in the galaxy, we suggest

62: that it may be similar to the peculiar Type Ib/c radio supernova 

63: SN 1998bw associated with GRB 980428.  The implied Type Ib/c rate is 

64: consistent to an order of magnitude

65: with rates determined optically.  A second transient is associated

66: with a blue galaxy at $z = 0.249$ and may also be a luminous radio

67: supernova or gamma-ray burst afterglow.  Two other transient

68: sources are possibly associated with the outer parts of 

69: faint, optically detected galaxies.  The remaining six transients

70: have no counterparts in the optical or infrared to limiting magnitudes

71: of $R \approx 27$ and $K_s \approx 18$ and show no faint persistent

72: radio flux.  For the eight transients without clear associations, 

73: known source classes of radio transients

74: including radio supernovae, gamma-ray burst afterglows, 

75: active galactic nuclei, and stellar flares do not provide natural 

76: fits to the observed parameters. The hosts and progenitors of these 

77: transients are unknown.

78: 

79: \end{abstract}

80: \keywords{radio continuum:  general --- radio continuum:  stars ---

81: supernovae:  general --- gamma rays: bursts --- surveys}

82: 

83: \section{Introduction}

84: 

85: Radio transient sources have primarily been studied 

86: through follow-up observations after discovery at optical, 

87: X-ray, or $\gamma$-ray wavelengths

88: %(e.g., Berger et al. 2005)

89: \citep[e.g.,][]{1971Natur.234..138H,1973A&A....26..105D,

90: 1997Natur.389..261F,2002ApJ...573..306E,1999Natur.398..127F,

91: 2005Natur.434.1104G}, or through serendipitous discovery 

92: \citep[e.g.,][]{1976Natur.261..476D,1992Sci...255.1538Z,2003ApJ...598.1140B}.

93: This is principally due to the high cost of observing

94: time to survey large areas of sky to significant depth at radio

95: wavelengths \citep{2004NewAR..48.1459C}.  

96: Moreover, existing blind surveys have typically been performed at

97: low frequencies, where

98: survey time is shorter but the effect of synchrotron self-absorption

99: may hide certain source classes.  

100: The available parameter space for radio transient surveys is extensive:

101: transients have been detected at, and are predicted for all, radio 

102: wavelengths; timescales of transient and variable behavior range

103: from nanoseconds \citep{2003Natur.422..141H} to the longest timescales 

104: probed \citep{1992ApJ...396..469H}; and transients may originate from 

105: nearly all astrophysical environments including the solar system 

106: \citep{2003PASP..115..675K}, star-forming regions

107: \citep{2003ApJ...598.1140B}, the Galactic

108: Center \citep{1992Sci...255.1538Z,2005ApJ...633..218B}, and other

109: galaxies \citep{1997Natur.389..261F}.

110: 

111: Nevertheless, extensive surveys have been carried out, exploring different

112: volumes of the parameter space, and, in some cases, discovering new phenomena.

113: Roughly, one can separate transients surveys into two classes: (a) burst

114: searches that probe timescales of less than $\sim 1$ second, are

115: often performed with low angular resolution instruments, and are most often

116: performed at low frequencies; and (b) imaging surveys

117: conducted with interferometers which typically probe timescales of tens of

118: seconds and longer.  Examples of burst searches include

119: STARE, a 611-MHz all-sky survey \citep{2003PASP..115..675K} sensitive

120: to timescales of 0.1~s to a few minutes; a 843-MHz survey with

121: the Molonglo Observatory synthesis Telescope (MOST) 

122: sensitive to timescales of 1 $\mu$s

123: to 800 ms \citep{1989PASAu...8..172A}; 

124: and the Parkes 1.4-GHz multi-beam pulsar survey.

125: STARE used dipole antennas with a sensitivity threshold

126: of 27 kJy simultaneously over a significant fraction of the sky

127: and found no extra-solar transients on timescales of 0.125~s

128: to a few minutes in 18 months of observations.  The MOST survey

129: determined an upper limit to the transient rate of 5 events 

130: ${\rm s^{-1}\ deg^{-2}}$ for 10~ms events at a flux density

131: limit of 1~Jy.  The Parkes multi-beam survey has been used for extensive

132: searches for periodic emission as well as 

133: for pulsed emission.  The latter search led to the discovery of

134: rotating radio transients (RRATs), which appear to be pulsars with

135: erratic emission \citep{2006Nature...mcl}.  

136: 

137: Imaging surveys for transients have focused on individual fields

138: and on large-scale surveys.

139: Recently, a blind survey of the Galactic center at 330 MHz

140: has discovered an unusual radio transient that displays 

141: quasi-periodic emission on a timescale of 70 min

142: \citep{2005Natur.434...50H}.  \citet{2003ApJ...590..192C} 

143: used $\sim 30$~hr of observation of the Lockman hole to characterize 

144: variability on a timescale of 19~d and 17 mon at 1.4 GHz.  They found

145: no transients above 100 $\mu$Jy and conclude that the transient density

146: on these timescales is fewer than 18 per square degree.  

147: Similarly,

148: \citet{2003AJ....125.2299F} identified 4 highly variable sources but no

149: transient sources at 5 and

150: 8.4 GHz using VLA observations of fields in which gamma-ray bursts are

151: present.  They set an upper limit to the variable source population of 6

152: deg$^{-2}$ at sub-mJy sensitivity, comparable to the limit set by

153: \citet{2003ApJ...590..192C}.  Recently, drift scan interferometric

154: observations have identified several transients of unknown origin, 

155: including a 3-Jy transient with a duration of 72

156: hr and three $>1$ Jy transients  of $i\lsim 1$~d duration

157: \citep{2007ApJ...657L..37N,2007PASP..119..122K,2007AJ....133.1441M}.

158: 

159: 

160: The most extensive imaging search for transients derives from a comparison

161: of the FIRST and NVSS 1.4~GHz catalogs

162: %(Levinson et al. 2002, Gal-Yam et al. 2006) 

163: \citep{2002ApJ...576..923L,2006ApJ...639..331G}. The search covered

164: 2400 square degrees at a flux density threshold of 6 mJy.  This search

165: generated a number of transient candidates. Of these, one 

166: source was identified as a radio supernova in a nearby galaxy and another

167: was seen only once in the radio and could not be 

168: associated with any known optical source.  Transient identification

169: in this survey suffers from the 

170: methodological problem of the extremely mismatched resolutions (FIRST:  

171: $5^{\prime\prime}$, NVSS:  $45^{\prime\prime}$)  of the 

172: two surveys.

173: 

174: In addition to radio supernovae (RSNe), a number of highly variable and

175: transient sources are expected to be detectable in significant

176: numbers at radio wavelengths.  One example is 

177: gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglows associated with GRBs which are beamed

178: in a direction away from Earth, and therefore not observable at

179: high-energy wavelengths \citep{1997ApJ...487L...1R}.  

180: These so-called ``orphan gamma-ray burst afterglows'' (OGRBAs)

181: are expected to outnumber GRBs by a factor of 10 to 1000,

182: the specific value depending on the characteristics of the relativistic

183: outflow of the GRB and the surrounding medium.  There may be related 

184: phenomena such as those associated with X-ray flashes

185: %(Sakamoto et al. 2005)

186: \citep{2005ApJ...629..311S}, supernovae (SNe)

187: %(Berger et al. 2003)

188: \citep{2003ApJ...599..408B}, and short-duration GRBs 

189: %(Gehrels et al. 2005)

190: \citep{2005Natur.437..851G}.

191: Activity from stars and compact objects in the

192: Galaxy may also be detected as transients 

193: \citep[e.g.,][]{2001Natur.410..338B,2005ApJ...633..218B,Osten06}.

194: 

195: A range of active galactic nucleus (AGN) phenomena is also

196: anticipated, including intra-day variability and other short-term 

197: variability driven by the effect of interstellar scintillation 

198: on compact components of extragalactic radio sources 

199: %(e.g., Lovell et al. 2003).  

200: \citep[e.g.,][]{2003AJ....126.1699L}.

201: Intrinsic AGN variability is also expected.  Sudden increases in 

202: the mass accretion rate following the tidal disruption of an orbiting 

203: star, for instance, will produce a transient soft X-ray flare and

204: possibly radio emission \citep{1988Natur.333..523R,2006IAUS..238E..97G}.

205: 

206: Significant numbers of RSNe, OGRBAs, and tidal flares 

207: are predicted for surveys that achieve a sensitivity $\sim 0.1$~mJy and 

208: cover an area of $\sim 10$ square degrees.  These phenomena all

209: produce self-absorbed synchrotron radiation and, therefore, are more

210: likely to be observed at high radio frequencies.

211: 

212: We describe here the results of a search for extragalactic radio transients

213: using 5 and 8.4 GHz observations from the Very Large Array data archives.  

214: The survey includes 944 epochs over 22 years consisting of observations

215: of the same field.  At a sensitivity threshold of $370$ $\mu$Jy,

216: the survey has an effective survey area comparable to that of a 

217: survey consisting of two epochs of 10 square degrees each,

218: making this thus far the largest-area sub-mJy imaging survey of 

219: radio transient phenomena.

220: 

221: \section{Observations and Analysis}

222: 

223: \subsection{The Archival Survey}

224: 

225: Between 1983 and 2005, the VLA performed calibration and system check 

226: observations 

227: of the same blank field with a typical interval of $\sim 7$~d.  

228: Each epoch typically was 20 min in duration and consisted of 10~s 

229: integrations. The field is centered at 

230: $\alpha =15^{h}02^{m}20.53^{s}$,  $\delta = +78^\circ16'14.905''$ 

231: (J2000).  The field is

232: out of the plane of the Galaxy ($l = 115^\circ$, $b = 36^\circ$).

233: 626 epochs of observations were obtained at a frequency of 

234: 5 GHz between 1983 and 1999.

235: 599 epochs were obtained at a frequency of 8.4 GHz between 1989 and 2005.

236: VLA observations of this field ceased in 2005.

237: Between 1989 and 1999, there was overlap between some of the 5 and 8.4 GHz

238: observations.  281 of the 8.4 GHz epochs were simultaneously observed

239: at 5 GHz, giving a total of 944 independent epochs at either frequency.

240: 

241: Data were all obtained in standard continuum mode with 50 MHz of bandwidth

242: in each of two intermediate-frequency bands (with centers separated by

243: 100 MHz) and two circular polarizations.

244: We used a pipeline procedure for flagging, calibrating, and imaging.

245: Phase calibration was made based on 

246: brief observations of the compact source J1803+784.  Since no

247: standard flux density calibrator was used in these observations, we 

248: set the amplitude scale of the observations by assuming the mean

249: flux density for J1803+784

250: as measured in the University of Michigan Radio Astronomy Observatory 

251: database over the same period \citep[2.2 Jy and 2.8 Jy 

252: at 5 and 8.4 GHz, respectively][]{1999ApJ...512..601A}.

253: The assumption of constant flux density introduces 

254: less than 15\% uncertainty in

255: the flux-density scale for individual epochs.  Images of the target 

256: field typically had a root-mean-square (rms) error in the flux density 

257: of 40 to 50 $\mu$Jy.

258: Images from two successive epochs (19840613 and 19840620) 

259: are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:typicalimage}.  Throughout the paper, we 

260: use the notation of YYYYMMDD to denote epoch date and refer to specific

261: transients as RT YYYYMMDD, based on the epoch of detection.

262: 

263: Images were obtained in all configurations of the Very Large Array.   

264: For the extended configurations, bandwidth smearing within the primary

265: beam can become significant.  We compensated for this effect by

266: applying a Gaussian taper with a full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) 

267: of 150 $k\lambda$

268: to the $\uv$ data before imaging, which reduces sensitivity and

269: angular resolution but

270: provides imaging to large radii without bandwidth distortions.  

271: Images were made using natural

272: weighting to achieve maximal sensitivity and were deconvolved using

273: the CLEAN algorithm \citep{1980A&A....89..377C}.  We imaged a region slightly larger

274: than the region containing

275: a circle of radius equal to twice the half-power radius, which is $9.0'$

276: at 5 GHz and $5.4'$ at 8.4 GHz.

277: 

278: A deep image of the region at 5 and 8.4 GHz was also constructed through 

279: merging of

280: all visibilities and imaging with a $\uv$ taper of 150 $k\lambda$

281: using the MIRIAD software package.  The resulting images had resolutions

282: of $\sim 5''$ and $\sim 3''$, and an rms of 2.6 $\mu$Jy 

283: and 2.8 $\mu$Jy at 5 and 8.4 GHz, respectively.   The location

284: of steady and transient radio sources on the deep image is shown

285: in Figure~\ref{fig:deep}.  Fluxes in the deep image are typically lower

286: than the average of detections since our high detection threshold and

287: the low flux densities of the sources bias

288: the mean.  Further details of the deep images will be

289: published separately.  

290: 

291: \subsubsection{Transient Identification}

292: 

293: Sources were identified using AIPS task SAD (search and destroy), which

294: identifies peaks in the image above a flux-density threshold and fits

295: point sources.  For the relatively uncluttered images that we have, SAD

296: is efficient and accurate.

297: We identified sources within twice the half-power radius and corrected

298: their flux densities for primary beam losses.

299: 

300: The detection threshold for each image was chosen such that the probability

301: of a false detection (PFD) in the full imaged region was $10^{-3}$, or

302: a single false source for 1000 identical epochs, assuming Gaussian statistics

303: for noise in the image.  

304: Since the synthesized beam changes with array configuration while

305: the primary beam remains the same, the number

306: of independent pixels in the field of view varied substantially.

307: Detection thresholds were in the range $\sim 5\sigma$ to $6\sigma$, 

308: dependent on array configuration.  The typical flux density threshold at

309: the center of the image was $\sim 300$ $\mu$Jy. For the number of epochs 

310: observed and the circular area of the region searched for sources, we have

311: an expectation of $\sim 1$ false source in the entire survey.

312: Inverting the sign of the intensity in each image 

313: and searching for sources with the same thresholds and methods revealed

314: one significant source, consistent with our expectations of one or fewer

315: false detections in the entire survey.

316: 

317: Wider-field images ($\sim 40'$ at 5 GHz, $\sim 27'$ at 8.4 GHz)

318: were made for all epochs in which a transient was detected.

319: A number of transients that were detected on the western and northern edges 

320: of the individual epoch image were determined to be aliased power from two

321: bright radio sources ($\sim 50$ mJy) at radii greater than two

322: primary beam widths (NVSS J1457+7817, J1500+7827).  

323: One source above the detection threshold was rejected on the basis of

324: a non-pointlike image and deep negative stripes in the image.

325: 

326: Detected sources and their measured properties are listed in 

327: Tables~\ref{tab:steady} and \ref{tab:transients}.

328: Table~\ref{tab:steady} identifies persistent sources above or near

329: the detection threshold and not multiple-epoch transients.

330: Six persistent sources at 5 GHz and 2 persistent sources at 8.4 GHz

331: were detected in multiple epochs.  The epochs of detection were

332: distributed over the entire survey.  

333: Of these persistent sources,

334: three radio sources with flux densities $> 500$ $\mu$Jy were

335: detected hundreds of times.  

336: One radio source (J150123+781806) was detected with

337: our pipeline software at 5 GHz in 

338: 452 of 626 epochs, and at 8.4 GHz in 159 of 599 epochs

339: (Figure~\ref{fig:standardlightcurve}); with a reduced source detection

340: threshold of $3\sigma$, we find that this source was present in 602 epochs 

341: at 5 GHz and in 445 epochs at 8.4 GHz.  The results for this source indicate

342: the overall quality of the data.

343: Variations in the flux density of this source are caused by the 

344: changing sensitivity of the VLA

345: in different configurations, variability in the 

346: amplitude calibrator J1803+784,

347: and possibly intrinsic variability in the source.

348: 

349: Seven sources at 5 GHz and 

350: 1 source at 8.4 GHz were detected in individual epochs

351: (Table~\ref{tab:transients}).

352: These sources were detected

353: only once and are classified as transients.

354: We plot the light curves of each transient for the year

355: surrounding their detection (Figure~\ref{fig:lct}). 

356: 

357: We searched for time variability for each transient by splitting the

358: data into four-minute segments and comparing the flux densities.  

359: The reduced $\chi^2$ for the hypothesis of no variability is less than 1.4 

360: for all the transients, implying no strong evidence for variability.  We

361: also imaged each transient in Stokes V and found no evidence for circular

362: polarization above $\sim 30\%$.  Finally, we differenced images

363: between the intermediate frequency bands and found no evidence for 

364: a large spectral index.

365: 

366: The radial distribution of sources is consistent with a real source population

367: rather than imaging defects.  Imaging defects 

368: would be uniformly distributed throughout the image, without regard 

369: for the decline in sensitivity due to the primary beam.  

370: Four of the eight transients are contained within the

371: half-power radius.  This number is 

372: inconsistent with the expectation of a uniform

373: distribution within the same region, $2.0 \pm 1.4$.

374: On the other hand,

375: a source population with a power-law distribution of flux densities 

376: $N(S) \propto

377: S^{-3/2}$ in a flux-density limited sample has an expectation of 

378: $3.6 \pm 1.3$ within the half-power radius, in better agreement with the 

379: observed number.

380: 

381: 

382: Images were also constructed in a search for faint radiation from the 

383: transients and for new transients using all data from two-month, 

384: one-year, and one-decade time spans.  We found two new transients in 

385: the two-month averages (Table~\ref{tab:transientsmonths}) 

386: and no transients in the year and decade images.

387: Light curves for these sources are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:lct}.  Given

388: the smaller number of epochs, the expected number of false sources in 

389: the two-month average data is $\sim 0.1$.  Further searches on different

390: time scales or with filters matched to light curve shapes

391: are possible with the same data but are beyond the scope of this paper.

392: 

393: Dual frequency observations were made only after 1989 and not at every

394: epoch.  Of the remaining 5 GHz transients, only 1 (RT 19920826)

395: is located within the imaged region of the 8.4 GHz survey.  

396: Unfortunately, there were no 8.4 GHz observations 

397: for this epoch.  Similarly, for RT 19970205 which

398: was detected at 8.4 GHz, there was not a simultaneous 5 GHz observation.

399: 

400: \subsection{Keck Imaging}

401: 

402: On 25 July 2006 (UT dates are used throughout this paper), 

403: we observed the central portion of the

404: radio field with the Low-Resolution Imaging Spectrometer

405: \citep[LRIS;][]{Oke95} on the Keck-I 10-m telescope. Eight of the

406: radio transient positions (see Figure 6) were observed in two separate

407: pointing centers (each covered by the LRIS field-of-view of $6' \times

408: 7.8'$). At each pointing center we obtained six dithered

409: 10-min exposures. The instrument is outfitted with a beam splitter,

410: allowing us to observe simultaneously in the $g$ and $R$ bands. The data

411: were reduced following standard optical imaging reduction

412: procedures. After fitting a world coordinate system (tied to the USNO

413: B1.0) to each reduced frame, we made a mosaic for a given filter using

414: {\sc SWARP} \citep{2002ASPC..281..228B}.  The final astrometric 

415: uncertainty relative to the International

416: Celestial Reference System (ICRS) is 250 mas in each axis. 

417: 

418: On the night of the Keck/LRIS imaging, we observed the  Landolt 

419: standard star field PG1633+099 \citep{1992AJ....104..340L} in  

420: both filters at an airmass of $\sec z = 1.04$. The catalog 

421: magnitudes  were converted to the $g$ band from the $V$-band

422: magnitude and the $B-V$ 

423: color using the prescription in Bilir et al.\ (2005) 

424: \nocite{2005AN....326..321B}.  From the observed photometry of 

425: four PG1633+099 stars, the zeropoint  conversion from flux in both 

426: filters was determined in an $0.6''$ aperture. The flux 

427: of  $3\sigma$-detected sources in both the $R$ and $g$ stacked 

428: image of the radio field were determined in the same-sized  

429: aperture. Accounting for the average extinction per unit airmass at 

430: Mauna Kea, we determine that the non-detections of some of the 

431: counterparts correspond to upper limits of 

432: $g({\rm lim}) \approx 27.6$ and 

433: $R ({\rm lim}) \approx 26.55$ mag. 

434: These limits assume an unresolved  source and a color 

435: similar to those of the Landolt field stars.

436: 

437: \subsection{Keck Spectroscopy}

438: 

439: An optical spectrum of the counterpart of RT 19840613 was taken 

440: on 2005 Dec. 4

441: with the DEIMOS spectrograph \citep{Faber03} mounted on the Keck-II

442: telescope, using a 600 line mm$^{-1}$ grating and the GG400 order-blocking

443: filter. Spectra of the

444: counterparts and nearby companions of 

445: RTs 19860115, 19870422, 19920826, and 19970528 were taken on

446: 2006 June 26 with LRIS using the 600/4000 grism, the 400/8500

447: grating, and the D560 dichroic.

448: 

449: All spectral data were reduced using standard techniques 

450: \citep[e.g.,][]{2003PASP..115.1220F}.  Standard CCD

451: processing and spectrum extraction were completed with IRAF\footnote{IRAF

452: is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatory, which is

453: operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy,

454: Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.}.

455: The data were extracted with the optimal algorithm of \citet{Horne86}.

456: We obtained the wavelength scale from low-order polynomial fits to

457: calibration-lamp spectra.  Small wavelength shifts were applied after

458: cross-correlating night-sky lines extracted with the object to a template

459: sky.  Using our own IDL routines, we fit spectrophotometric standard star

460: spectra to flux calibrate our data and remove telluric lines \citep{Wade88,

461: Matheson00}.  

462: 

463: We give redshifts for the counterparts and nearby companions in 

464: Table~\ref{tab:redshift}.  In the cases of RTs 19840613, 19870422, 19920826,

465: and 19970528, the redshift is for the galaxy that the RT is situated in

466: or closest to.  RT 19860115 has two possible hosts in the Keck image;  

467: Objects 1 and 2 are located to the northeast and southwest of the RT,

468: respectively.

469: 

470: 

471: \subsection{PAIRITEL Observations}

472: 

473: Data were obtained with PAIRITEL \citep{2006ASPC..351..751B}

474: on 16 Feb. 2006. Images were taken

475: simultaneously in the $J$, $H$, and $K_s$ bands in four different pointings 

476: with a total integration time of about 1120~s per pointing.  

477: Additionally, to get a deep infrared (IR) image in one

478: portion of the radio field, several hours of imaging in June and July

479: 2006 were obtained centered at J2000 position $\alpha$ = 

480: $15^{h}02^{m}36.0^{s}$, $\delta$ = $+78^{\circ}16'39''$. The 

481: approximate  $3\sigma$ upper limits

482: in the shallow, wide-angle map are $J = 19.2$ mag, $H = 18.5$ mag,

483: and $K_s = 18.0$ mag (the limits are significantly worse toward the

484: edges of the mosaic). 

485: The pointings were stitched together using SWARP after

486: finding preliminary WCS solutions in all bands. The result is

487: a $1050 \times 1050$ pixel set of mosaic images with $1'' \times 1''$

488: resolution that overlaps most of the radio image.  

489: An astrometric solution for

490: the mosaic images was found through a

491: cross-correlation with 43 stars in common with the USNO B1.0

492: catalog. Typical rms uncertainty of the astrometric tie to the ICRS

493: is 250 mas.

494: 

495: 

496: \section{Results}

497: 

498: We have detected a total of 8 transient radio sources in single epochs 

499: of this survey (Figure~\ref{fig:lct}).  Additionally, we have detected

500: two transients in two-month averages of the data.

501: Our source identification methods described previously

502: argue that no more than one of these sources is a false

503: detection.   All of these sources 

504: are adequately fit as point sources.  None of the transients is

505: detected in epochs other than the detection epoch, or in longer-term

506: averages with the possible exception of RT 19840613, in which the

507: host galaxy is detected in the full 20-year image.

508: 

509:  In Figures~\ref{fig:deepradio} and ~\ref{fig:keck} we show 

510: images of the transients overlaid on the deep radio image, on

511: multi-color images from the Keck imaging, and, where Keck data

512: are missing for two objects, on $K_s$-band images from PAIRITEL.

513: 

514: We identify several hosts or potential hosts to the RTs using 

515: the Minnesota Palomar Plate Survey 

516: \citep[MAPS, http://aps.umn.edu;][]{1993PASP..105..521P}.  MAPS

517: is a catalog of sources found with and characterized by

518: plate-measuring equipment surveying

519: the Palomar Sky Survey I (POSS I).  MAPS

520: coordinates are consistent with the radio reference frame with an

521: accuracy of $0.3''$.  We confirmed this by comparison of the position of

522: two bright reference stars in the MAPS catalog with positions in

523: the Tycho catalog.  Referring the Tycho positions to epoch 1950 (appropriate

524: for POSS), we find

525: agreement of $\sim 0.1''$ for GSC 04562-00668 and $\sim 1''$ for

526: GSC 04562-00458.

527: 

528: \subsection{A Transient Associated with a Spiral Galaxy: RT 19840613}

529: 

530: 

531:    One transient is of particular interest because it is coincident with

532: a spiral galaxy at a redshift $z = 0.040$ (a distance of $\sim 170$ Mpc

533: using $H_0 = 72 {\rm km ^{-1} Mpc^{-1}}$).  The galaxy, identified as 

534: MAPS-P023-0189928, has $R=16.5$ mag, $B-R=1.8$ mag, and a major axis 

535: of $\sim 20''$. The transient is clearly non-nuclear; it is offset to 

536: the southwest of the optical nucleus by $2.7'' \pm 0.4''$, corresponding 

537: to a projected distance of $2.3 \pm 0.3$ kpc.  The optical nucleus

538: is coincident with the infrared nucleus as identified in the 2MASS

539: catalog at an accuracy of $0.2''$.  The probability of a single chance

540: association with an optical source in the POSS at a few arcsecond 

541: precision is $\lsim 1\%$.  We calculate an isotropic radio luminosity of 

542: $2 \times 10^{28}$ erg s$^{-1}$ Hz$^{-1}$, or $2 \times 10^{38}$ erg s$^{-1}$

543: for a bandwidth of 10 GHz.

544: 

545: The transient is not detected in any other individual epoch, even with

546: reduced detection thresholds.  The transient is also not detected in any

547: two-month average in the year surrounding its detection, nor is it detected

548: in any annual average from the entire data set. It is also not detected 

549: in the year prior to detection, nor in the six years following detection.  

550: The absence of a detection in other light curves at 5 GHz 

551: is consistent with a rapid rise and a decline

552: in the flux density with a power law of $t^{-\alpha},\alpha > 0.5$.  

553: 

554: The deep image of the region surrounding the transient shows extended

555: radio continuum emission associated with the spiral galaxy 

556: and a companion galaxy

557: (Figure~\ref{fig:840613deep}).  The location of the transient coincides with

558: a region of peak emission, but it is not possible to conclude whether that

559: emission is the result of the transient or a peak in the galactic 

560: emission.  The peak of emission

561: near the position of the transient is $\sim 28~ \mu$Jy, which corresponds to 

562: a star-formation rate of $<0.1 M_\sun\ {\rm yr}^{-1}$

563: %(e.g., Yun \& Carilli 2002)

564: \citep[e.g.,][]{2002ApJ...568...88Y}.

565: 

566: The association of the transient with the non-nuclear region of a spiral

567: galaxy, together with its luminosity, suggest that the transient may 

568: be a RSN. The transient is very unlikely to be a Type II RSN, as these

569: sources exhibit rise and decay timescales of months to years, implying

570: that a Type II RSN would be detected multiple times in our survey

571: %(Eck, Cowan \& Branch 2002)

572: \citep{2002ApJ...573..306E}.

573: Type Ia RSN have never been detected at radio wavelengths

574: \citep{2004NewAR..48.1377W}.  Type Ib/c

575: RSN, on the other hand, evolve on timescales of days to months.  The

576: anomalous Type Ib/c RSN associated with SN~1998bw and GRB~980425

577: doubled its flux density during its rise and halved its flux density

578: following the peak in $<10$~d 

579: \citep{1998Natur.395..663K}.

580: The light curve declined as $t^{-1}$

581: with the exception of a brief period of increase attributed to

582: clumpiness in the circumstellar medium.  The luminosity of

583: RT 19840613 places it among the brightest SNe~Ib/c,

584: although a factor of a few fainter than SN~1998bw

585: %(Berger et al. 2003)

586: \citep{2003ApJ...599..408B}.  

587: The luminosity of SN 2002ap, also a SN~Ib/c,

588: is four orders of magnitude less than that of SN 1998bw

589: \citep{2003ApJ...599..408B}.  

590: The luminosity of RT 19840613 is three orders

591: of magnitude less than the typical radio luminosity of a GRB

592: afterglow.

593: 

594: 

595: \subsection{A Transient Associated with a Blue Galaxy: RT 19870422}

596: 

597: RT 19870422 is located within $\sim 1.5''$ of the centroid of

598: MAPS-P023-0189613.  The Keck image shows that this 

599: RT is clearly associated 

600: with a blue galaxy and is significantly offset from the nucleus.  

601: The integrated $R$ magnitude of the galaxy is 20.2, 

602: with $B-R = 2.5$ mag, and the

603: redshift is determined to be $z = 0.249$ (or a distance of 1050 Mpc).  

604: Galaxy-template matching to the Keck spectrum

605: shows it to most likely be an Sc galaxy with 

606: strong [\ion{O}{2}] and [\ion{O}{3}] emission, indicating current

607: star formation.

608: 

609: The inferred isotropic radio luminosity is 

610: $L_\nu \approx 7 \times 10^{29} {\rm\ erg\ s^{-1}\ Hz^{-1}}$, or 

611: $L \approx 7 \times 10^{39} {\rm\ erg\ s^{-1}}$ for a bandwidth of

612: 10 GHz.  

613: RT 19870422 was detected in a two-month integration, implying a 

614: total energy release

615: $E \approx 4 \times 10^{46}$ erg.  We see no evidence for detection

616: in other epochs, implying a source that fades with a timescale of 

617: two months or less following its peak.

618: In the deep integration, we see that the galaxy is detected

619: with an irregular morphology (Figure~\ref{fig:870422deep}).  

620: The faint radio emission, however, is offset from the position of

621: RT 19870422.

622: 

623: RT 19870422 shares many characteristics with RT 19840613.  

624: The RT position is clearly separated from the peak of the optical emission, 

625: ruling out the possibility of an AGN event.  Its longer duration

626: and higher luminosity, however, differentiate it.  

627: The luminosity is nearly an order of magnitude greater 

628: than that of SN 1998bw, and two orders of magnitude more luminous

629: than the bright Type II SN 1979C \citep{2002ApJ...573..306E}.  

630: Thus, the luminosity falls in between the maximum observed

631: luminosity of a RSN and the typical luminosity of a

632: GRB afterglow.  The two-month duration of RT 19870422 is more consistent 

633: with known RSNe of both Type Ib/c or Type II, as well as GRB afterglows.  

634: 

635: \subsection{Transients Possibly Associated with Galaxies or 

636: Galaxy Groups:  RT 19920826 \& 19970528 }

637: 

638: RT 19920826 is located $\sim 5''$ to the southeast of

639: a red galaxy identified in the Keck image, which is not identified

640: in the MAPS catalog.

641: The host is a red object with no clear emission or absorption

642: lines.

643: 

644: RT 19970528 is located $\sim 5''$ to the northwest of 

645: MAPS-P023-0189499, which has $R=19.6$ mag and $B-R=2.4$ mag.  

646: Two other galaxies are identified within a radius

647: of $30''$.  

648: The nearest one is a red, early-type galaxy at $z = 0.245$.

649: Galaxy-template matching shows it is most likely an elliptical galaxy,

650: but it is also well fit by an S0 spectrum.

651: 

652: We computed

653: the probability of false association of these galaxies with 

654: transients through Monte Carlo simulations.  We randomly distributed 100,000

655: radio sources over the field and then measured the distance to

656: the nearest galaxy as identified in the MAPS catalog.  The probability

657: of a false association at a distance of less than $5''$ is only 2\%.

658: The probability of a false association at a distance of $15''$ is

659: $\sim 20$\%.  The probability for any one of the 10 RTs being randomly 

660: associated with

661: a galaxy at a distance of $5''$ is $\sim 20\%$, and at a distance of

662: $15''$ the probability is nearly unity.  The probability of multiple sources

663: located within $5''$ is $\lsim 5\%$.  Thus, the association of 

664: either RT 19970528 or RT 19920826 or both RTs with a galaxy is 

665: probable but not certain.

666: 

667: 

668: 

669: \subsection{Sources without Radio or Optical Counterparts:  RT 19840502, 

670: 19860115, 19860122, 19970205, 19990504, \& 20010331}

671: 

672: There is no evidence for faint radio, optical, or infrared counterparts 

673: for six of our sources: RT 19840502, 19860115, 19860122, 19970205, 

674: 19990504, \and 20010331. There are no sources apparent in the image 

675: obtained by averaging the succeeding two months of data, as well as 

676: in the year-long and decade-long averages.  

677: These results require a rapidly decreasing light curve, proportional

678: to $t^{-1}$ or steeper.

679: 

680: RT 19860115 has two possible hosts. The first possible host, Object 1, 

681: is located $\sim 15''$ to the northeast of the RT and is a

682: starburst galaxy at $z = 0.1297$ with strong emission lines and a blue

683: continuum.  

684: Object 1 is identified as 

685: MAPS-P023-0190130, a galaxy with $R=19.2$ mag and $B-R=1.3$ mag,  and

686: is also detected as a faint, extended radio source.

687: The other possible host, Object 2, is located $\sim 20''$ to

688: the southwest of the RT and is an early-type galaxy at

689: $z = 0.242$.  Galaxy-template matching shows the spectrum is best fit by

690: either an elliptical or S0 galaxy spectrum.

691: Several other objects, likely to be galaxies,

692: are in the field.  

693: The physical separation of RT 19860115 from the two objects is 

694: $\sim 50$--100 kpc, which is still within a radius at which the

695: galaxy may contain stars.

696: Nevertheless, given the Monte Carlo simulations discussed above, we conclude 

697: that this transient is likely associated only by chance with these galaxies.

698: 

699: For the remainder of sources, there are no obvious associations with galaxies

700: or stars.  The absence of optical or infrared counterparts only eliminates 

701: host candidates; the non-simultaneity of radio and optical observations 

702: implies that we place no limits on optical transients.

703: 

704: \section{Radio Transient Rates}

705: 

706: We can compute rates of transients in several different

707: ways.  We are limited in the accuracy of estimating transient rates 

708: by our lack of knowledge of the characteristic time scale, $t_{char}$, of

709: the transient sources.  This characteristic

710: time falls between the duration of the observations ($\sim 20$ min)

711: and the typical separation between epochs (7 days).  

712: 

713: The two-epoch survey sensitivity is independent of $t_{char}$.

714: The effective area for a two-epoch survey for a given flux-density limit is

715: just the sum of the areas in each epoch in which a source above 

716: the flux-density

717: limit is detectable.  For a set of $N_e$ images with uniform sensitivity over

718: a solid angle $\Omega$ in which $N_t$ transients are detected, 

719: the two-epoch source density is $N_t (N_e-1)^{-1} \Omega^{-1}$.  

720: For a sample with varying image properties,

721: we can compute the two-epoch source density 

722: given the image noise statistics, the synthesized beam size, 

723: and the primary beam shape.  The ratio of the primary beam solid angle to the 

724: synthesized beam solid angle gives the number of independent pixels in the 

725: image.  The source detection threshold per image is then set based on

726: the number of independent pixels and the rms noise.

727: We combine the 5 GHz and 8.4 GHz survey limits

728: and transient detections together.

729: The accumulated results as a function of flux-density threshold are 

730: listed in Table~\ref{tab:areasearched}.  

731: 

732: 

733: We use a non-parametric 

734: Kaplan-Meier method \citep{1985ApJ...293..192F},

735: for estimating the cumulative source-count distribution

736: and then compute transient rates (Figure~\ref{fig:snapshotrate}).  

737: Seven transients are detected above a flux density of 370 $\mu$Jy, giving a

738: two-epoch source density of $1.5 \pm 0.4 {\rm\ deg^{-2}}$.  The 

739: transient rates 

740: are reasonably fit by a distribution with $S^{-\gamma}$ and $\gamma=1.5$, 

741: which corresponds to a non-evolving, volume-limited sample.  However,

742: the constraints on $\gamma$ are not very strong.  A larger $\gamma$ appears to

743: be required to achieve agreement between the rate determined from this

744: survey and the NVSS-FIRST survey

745: \citep{2006ApJ...639..331G}.  

746: Different event rates at 1.4 and 5 GHz due to synchrotron self-absorption

747: or other spectral index effects may also influence this comparison.

748: Additionally, the FIRST-NVSS survey may be incomplete due to confusion

749: from the mismatched resolution of these surveys.

750: 

751: We detected no transients in the 17 annual average images.  The typical

752: flux detection threshold at the half-power radius is 90 $\mu$Jy.  The total

753: two-epoch area surveyed at this sensitivity is 0.3 deg$^2$, implying a

754: $2\sigma$ upper

755: limit to the two-epoch density for year-long transients at 90 $\mu$Jy of 

756: $\sim 6\ {\rm deg^{-2}}$.  In 96 images composed of two-month averages, 

757: we found two transients.  At a flux-density threshold

758: of 200 $\mu$Jy, the effective area surveyed is 1.9 deg$^2$, giving a 

759: $2\sigma$ upper limit to the two-month transient rate 

760: of $\sim 2\ {\rm deg^{-2}}$.

761: 

762: We can also determine a rate as a function of area and time.  The

763: precision of this rate is limited by our lack of measurement of

764: the characteristic time of the transient events.  

765: The rate for sources brighter than 370 $\mu$Jy is then 

766: $0.07 < R < 40 {\rm\ deg^{-2} yr^{-1}}$.

767: 

768: If we assume that RTs 19840613 and 19870422 belong to a distinct 

769: transient class based on their association with blue galaxies, 

770: we can estimate a rate for such transients as a function of volume and time.  

771: We could detect this transient to a distance of $\sim 240$ Mpc, which gives

772: a total volume of $\sim 300$ Mpc$^3$.  Assuming $t_{char}=7 {\rm\ d}$,

773: we find a rate of $3 \times 10^5 {\rm\ Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1}}$.

774: Similarly for RT 19870422, we find a maximum volume of $\sim 5000$ Mpc$^3$

775: and use $t_{char}=60 {\rm\ d}$ to find a rate of

776: $4 \times 10^3 {\rm\ Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1}}$.  Jointly for RT 19840613 

777: and RT 19870422, the rate is $\sim 2 \pm 2 \times 10^5 {\rm\ Gpc^{-3} 

778: yr^{-1}}$.

779: These rates are consistent within an order of magnitude of the SN~Ib/c

780: rate determined optically, 

781: $4.8 \times 10^4  {\rm\ Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1}}$ 

782: %(Berger et al 2003)

783: \citep{2003ApJ...599..408B}.   

784: 

785: 

786: There is some evidence that our VLA field contains an overdensity 

787: of galaxies at $z \approx 0.25$ (Table~\ref{tab:redshift}).  

788: Additionally, the cluster Abell 2047 is located within $9'$ of the

789: center of the VLA field \citep{1989ApJS...70....1A}.  A2047 is a low-density

790: cluster (richness class 0) with a radius $\sim 5'$ 

791: and a distance class of 6.  The distance class is an estimate of distance

792: based on visual inspection of photographic plates.  The distance class 

793: of 6 is consistent with a redshift of 0.25 for the cluster 

794: \citep{1987AJ.....93.1035S}.  If all 

795: the RTs are extragalactic, then the 

796: RT rates may be overestimated relative to the rate for the 

797: field by no more than a factor of a few.

798: 

799: \section{Discussion}

800: 

801: Two of the transients are reasonably identified as RSNe, possibly

802: Type Ib/c or II and similar to known RSNe associated with GRBs.

803: We consider now whether the eight transients not clearly

804: identified with nearby galaxies

805: are examples of known or expected

806: classes of radio transients.  These transients are unlikely to be RSNe

807: unless they are associated with faint and/or low surface brightness galaxies.

808: As we demonstrate below, the observed transient

809: parameters do not easily fit into any expected class.  

810: 

811: The known and anticipated sources of radio transients are very broad.  

812: Since we have no evidence for variability on a timescale of less than

813: 20 min,

814: we exclude from further discussion transient sources that have characteristic 

815: timescales of less than 1~s.  These include pulsars and related

816: phenomena such as RRATS and giant pulses 

817: \citep{2006Nature...mcl,2003Natur.422..141H,2003ApJ...596.1142C},

818: as well as flares from 

819: extrasolar planets \citep{2000ApJ...545.1058B,2004ApJ...612..511L}.

820: 

821: \subsection{X-ray Sources}

822: 

823: Information on the X-ray properties of the transients and transient hosts

824: is very limited.

825: The ROSAT catalog of bright sources does not identify any sources

826: in the field of our survey \citep{1999A&A...349..389V}.

827: There are also no sources in the RXTE All Sky Monitor catalog in the field,

828: indicating an upper limit to the X-ray flux of events between 1997

829: and 2001 of $\sim 10$ mCrab \citep{1999NuPhS..69...12S}.

830: No observations of the field have been made with the Chandra 

831: or XMM Newton X-ray Observatories.

832: 

833: \subsection{Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows}

834: 

835: Higher-energy counterparts to these transients have not been clearly 

836: detected. There are no known optically discovered SNe in the field of view

837: of our survey, nor have there been any optical variability campaigns in this

838: field.  There are no GRBs which are uniquely localized

839: to this field, although there are bursts with large positional uncertainties

840: that could have originated in the field of view of our survey.  We identify

841: 7 BATSE events that occurred within $1\sigma$ of our field center between

842: 1991 and 1999. Uncertainties in the BATSE positions, however, are 

843: $\sim 10^\circ$,

844: indicating a probability of $<0.1\%$ for even one of these GRBs to have 

845: occurred within our field

846: of view.  Of the GRBs, one event (GRB 990508) occurred 4~d after 

847: RT 19990504.  Given the low probability of concurrence and the

848: lack (in other GRBs) of radio emission before gamma-ray emission, 

849: we conclude that this is almost certainly a coincidence.  There is no 

850: systematic relationship between the remainder of the events and the 

851: radio transients.

852: 

853: 

854: \subsection{Orphan Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows}

855: 

856: In the standard paradigm of GRBs and GRB afterglows, the gamma-ray emission is

857: highly anisotropic while the afterglow emission is less anisotropic or even 

858: isotropic. Thus, the observed GRBs and their afterglows from Earth are a 

859: subset of the total number of

860: GRBs. Afterglows detected without gamma-ray emission are known as orphan 

861: gamma-ray burst afterglows. The ratio of OGRBAs to GRBs is the 

862: inverse of the

863: beaming fraction, $f_b^{-1}$ \citep[e.g.,][]{2002ApJ...564..209D}. The 

864: phenomenon of a GRB afterglow without a corresponding gamma-ray burst has 

865: not been conclusively detected.

866: 

867: 

868: Detailed models of OGRBAs predict $\sim$1 per square degree at 

869: sensitivity thresholds

870: of 0.1 mJy, which is consistent with our number of transient detections 

871: \citep{2002ApJ...576..923L,2002ApJ...576..120T}.

872: Whereas the canonical radio afterglow  for the forward shock rises on a 

873: timescale of days and decays slowly, the majority of the radio 

874: transients found in the present survey occur on timescales 

875: less than 1 week.  One possible explanation in the context of 

876: GRB orphans is that the emission is due to the reverse shock, which is 

877: known, in the few cases where follow-up observations occurred 

878: soon after the GRB, to produce a bright and rapid ($<3$~d) radio signature 

879: \citep[e.g.,]{1999ApJ...522L..97K,2003astro.ph..9557F}.

880: Strong scintillation \citep[e.g.,]{1997Natur.389..261F}

881: of a standard, faint afterglow could also be responsible for producing 

882: short-term amplification that leads to an apparent fast transient, but then 

883: we might see marginal evidence for the forward shock in 

884: the epochs following the transient --- yet this is not seen 

885: in individual sources.

886: 

887: The single long-timescale transient (RT 20010331) could be consistent with 

888: having arisen from the long-lived forward shock (as it transitions from 

889: mildly relativistic to nonrelativistic).

890: Levinson et al. (2002) \citet{2002ApJ...576..923L}

891: calculate the expected number of forward-shock dominated OGRBAs for 

892: radio surveys. Taking the canonical interstellar medium density

893: of $n_0 = 1$ cm$^{-3}$, it is 

894: reasonable to expect that we only find 1 viable forward-shock candidate 

895: with the nominal beaming of $f_b^{-1} = 500$. Nevertheless, since for the 

896: parameters of our survey we probe only to $z \approx 0.6$, the 

897: non-detection of an apparent host galaxy in deep Keck imaging of

898: RT 20010331 would seem to suggest that our basic model assumptions 

899: for the radio afterglow are suspect. 

900: 

901: Thus, the transients that we have detected can be considered consistent 

902: with the expectations of OGRBAs.   There is, however, a large diversity 

903: of high-energy phenomena with poorly explored electromagnetic

904: signatures beyond the classical GRB afterglow picture, including

905: X-ray flashes, X-ray rich GRBs

906: %(Sakamoto et al. 2005)

907: \citep{2005ApJ...629..311S},

908: GRBs associated with SNe~Ib/c 

909: %(Berger et al. 2003)

910: \citep{2003ApJ...599..408B}, and short-duration GRBs 

911: %(e.g., Gehrels et al. 2005)

912: \citep{2005Natur.437..851G}.  The richness

913: of this phenomenology suggests that the radio transients we have discovered

914: could reflect the continuum of stellar collapse events.

915: 

916: \subsection{Active Galactic Nuclei}

917: 

918: AGNs are highly variable and common. 

919: With the appropriate selection technique, AGNs can be found with a

920: number density of $> 100$ per square degree 

921: \citep{2005ApJ...631..163S}.  If our

922: transients are AGNs, then the absence of deep, static detections indicates

923: they are associated with radio-quiet objects,

924: which constitute the majority of AGNs.  Short-timescale variability of

925: AGNs is often associated with interstellar scintillation and 

926: extreme scattering events, and typically has amplitudes of $\sim 10\%$ 

927: %(Lovell et al. 2003)

928: \citep{2003AJ....126.1699L}.

929: Variations of a factor of a few on timescales of hours 

930: have been seen in the most

931: extreme cases such as PKS 0405-385 and J1819+3845, 

932: which is not sufficient to account for the observed

933: transients given the very large amplitude of variation observed

934: %(Rickett, Kedziora-Chudczer \& Jauncey 2002; Dennet-Thorpe \& de Bruyn 2000).

935: \citep{2002ApJ...581..103R,2000ApJ...529L..65D}.

936: 

937: Intrinsic variations among luminous AGNs

938: are observed to have a 

939: timescale of months to years at radio frequencies 

940: \citep{1992ApJ...396..469H}.

941: Variations are rarely larger than a factor of a few in radio-loud objects.

942: A survey of variable background sources in the direction of M31 found

943: a small number of objects with variability of a factor of a few to 10 

944: on timescales of years \citep{2005ApJS..159..242G}.

945: An interesting example is the nucleus  of the

946: nearby spiral galaxy III~Zw~2, which has exhibited factor of 20 fluctuations

947: in its radio luminosity on timescales of months to years

948: %(Brunthaler et al. 2005).  

949: \citep{2005A&A...435..497B}.

950: The TeV blazar Mrk 421 shows 50\% variations on

951: a timescale of $\sim 10$~d \citep{2005ApJ...630..130B}.

952: %(Blazejowski 2005).  

953: Sudden increases

954: in the accretion rate, or shocks in the jet,

955: could lead to a dramatic flare at radio wavelengths;

956: however, these flares are expected to have timescales on the order of

957: months to a year, inconsistent with our observations.

958: 

959: Recently discovered evidence for tidal disruption events in AGNs observed

960: in the ultraviolet indicate the possibility for large-amplitude AGN

961: transients \citep{2006IAUS..238E..97G}.  

962: However, the timescale for the observed UV transients

963: are months to a year rather than days.  Without a mechanism for a short

964: timescale in the radio, tidal disruption events are unlikely to account

965: for the observed radio transients.

966: 

967: \subsection{Stellar Sources}

968: 

969: We cannot exclude a Galactic origin for these transients.  A wide range of

970: stars and stellar systems are known to flare on timescales of minutes to 

971: hours to days.  However, no known stellar types closely fit the properties 

972: of these transients.  Our field ($b=36^\circ$, $l=115^\circ$)

973: is out of the plane of the Galaxy,

974: away from the Galactic center and bulge,

975: and is not near any known star cluster or star-forming region.

976: It is likely, therefore, that any stellar origin for these transients would

977: be even more numerous in one of these more favored directions.

978: 

979: \subsubsection{Known Luminous Transients}

980: 

981: The luminosity of the observed 

982: transients is $L_\nu \approx 10^{18} (d/{\rm 1\ kpc})^2

983: {\rm\ erg\ s^{-1}\ Hz^{-1}}$.  This is near the upper limit of 

984: the known stellar radio luminosity distribution 

985: %(G\"{u}del 2002).  

986: \citep{2002ARA&A..40..217G}.

987: RS CVn binaries, FK Com class stars, Algol-class stars, and T Tauri

988: stars have been observed to radiate at this luminosity 

989: \citep[e.g.,][]{2003ApJ...598.1140B}.  

990: The total number of known RS CVn, FK Com stars, and Algol stars 

991: discovered at X-ray wavelengths is

992: $<1000$, indicating that we are unlikely to detect any such objects  by

993: chance, even if the distance cutoff in our survey is 10~kpc 

994: \citep{1993ApJS...86..599D}.

995: T Tauri stars are more common but are

996: unlikely to be found outside regions of active star formation.

997: 

998: \subsubsection{Late-Type Stars}

999: 

1000: M-type dwarfs at distances as large as 1~kpc

1001: have been identified as an important contribution to optical

1002: transient rates \citep{Becker04,Kulkarni06}.

1003: Due to the typical low radio luminosity 

1004: ($L_\nu \approx 10^{12}$ -- $10^{14} {\rm\ erg\ s^{-1}\ Hz^{-1}}$) of known

1005: dMe stars and brown dwarfs, they are likely to be detected at 

1006: distances of 30~pc or less.  In an extreme case, the dMe star

1007: EV Lac was observed to undergo a flare of

1008: a factor of $\sim 150$ to a maximum luminosity

1009: $L_\nu \approx 10^{15} {\rm\ erg\ s^{-1}\ Hz^{-1}}$, 

1010: with a rise time of minutes and a 

1011: decay time of hours 

1012: \citep{Osten06}.  Such a flare would be observed in our survey

1013: to a distance of 100~pc.  

1014: The local space density of stars with $M< 0.3~M_\sun$ is 

1015: 0.035 pc$^{-3}$, implying only a small chance of a low-mass star

1016: or brown dwarf within the volume to which we are sensitive 

1017: %(Reid et al. 1999).

1018: \citep{1999ApJ...521..613R}.

1019: Any stellar origin for these transients must come from a faint

1020: source, since we have no detection of stellar counterparts in Keck,

1021: 2MASS, or PAIRITEL images.  

1022: The 2MASS magnitude limit of $K_s = 15$ implies that

1023: any L dwarf ($M_K \approx 10$ mag) or earlier-type star must be at

1024: a distance $> 100$~pc to remain undetected. PAIRITEL limits require 

1025: such stars to be at a distance $>500$ pc.  

1026: The limiting Keck magnitude requires late-type M stars to 

1027: be at a distance $>1000$ pc.

1028: 

1029: The probability distribution of radio activity in low-mass stars 

1030: is not well quantified.  Few stars have been observed at radio 

1031: wavelengths for more than a few hours or a few days.  

1032: Despite the lack of long-term monitoring of dMe

1033: stars, one can estimate the probability distribution

1034: of flares by comparison with the properties of the Sun.  The 

1035: probability of a solar flare at centimeter wavelengths

1036: of a given flux density $S$ scales as $S^{-1.7}$ \citep{Nita04}.  

1037: >From observations of a large sample of late-type stars

1038: \citep{Berger06}, we estimate a probability of $\sim 0.01$ 

1039: for a late-type star to exhibit a  luminosity

1040: $L_\nu \approx 10^{15} {\rm\ erg\ s^{-1}\ Hz^{-1}}$.  

1041: If the probability of stellar flares scales with the same relation as

1042: solar flares, a flare of $L_\nu \approx 10^{18}

1043: {\rm\ erg\ s^{-1}\ Hz^{-1}}$ from a late-type star at a distance of 

1044: 1~kpc would be visible in our radio survey but 

1045: missing in the Keck image, and it would occur with a probability

1046: of $<10^{-7}$.  Assuming a constant density of stars set to the local 

1047: value, the total number of M dwarfs out to 1~kpc within our field

1048: of view is $<5 \times 10^3$.  Given our $\sim 1000$ observations, the expected

1049: number of flares of this magnitude detected is $\lsim 1$.  This is an upper

1050: limit since the statistics for the observed stars are biased by selection

1051: for activity at other wavelengths.  Within an order of

1052: magnitude, though, this matches the number of transients that we detect, 

1053: suggesting that

1054: low-mass stars at 1~kpc or greater distance may contribute to, but are

1055: unlikely to dominate, the observed radio-transient rate.

1056: 

1057: Very large radio flares might be accompanied by luminous X-ray flares.  

1058: If the transients follow the radio/X-ray correlation 

1059: \citep{2002ARA&A..40..217G}, then

1060: a radio flare of $10^{18} {\rm\ erg\ s^{-1}\ Hz^{-1}}$ at a distance

1061: of 1~kpc would have an X-ray luminosity of 

1062: $10^{-9 \pm 1}{\rm\ erg\ s^{-1}}$, which exceeds the RXTE ASM detection 

1063: threshold of $\sim  10^{-10} {\rm\ erg\ s^{-1}}$.  However, many sources

1064: do not closely follow this relationship, including many low-mass

1065: stars \citep[e.g.,][]{2001Natur.410..338B}.

1066: 

1067: \subsubsection{Soft Gamma-Ray Repeaters}

1068: 

1069: The transients share some properties with 

1070: soft gamma-ray repeaters (SGRs).  SGRs are magnetars that exhibit 

1071: dramatic flares at gamma-ray and radio wavelengths

1072: \citep[e.g.,][]{1999Natur.398..127F,2005Natur.434.1104G}.  

1073: SGR~1806--20 produced a flare that reached a luminosity of 

1074: $5 \times 10^{22} {\rm\ erg\ s^{-1}\ Hz^{-1}}$, had a characteristic

1075: timescale of days, and declined as $t^{-2.7}$.  Such a flare would be

1076: detectable in our dataset at a distance of $\sim 200$ kpc, would

1077: appear in only a single epoch, would fade away rapidly so that it is not

1078: seen in long-term averages, and would have no lasting optical counterpart.  

1079: If all of our transients are Milky Way

1080: SGRs to a distance of $\lsim 200$ kpc, the implied rate is 

1081: $\gsim 0.01 {\rm\ kpc^{-3}\ y^{-1}}$ at high

1082: Galactic latitude.  Without making any correction for Galactic population

1083: distribution, we estimate a total rate of 

1084: $\gsim 3 {\rm\ yr^{-1}}$ in the disk of the Galaxy,

1085: which is at least an order of magnitude too high relative to the number

1086: of discovered SGRs.

1087: 

1088: \subsubsection{X-ray Binaries}

1089: 

1090: X-ray binaries (XRBs) can be seen throughout the Galaxy 

1091: \citep[e.g.,][]{2005ApJ...633..218B} but are rare

1092: \citep{2005ApJ...622L.113M}.  For the extremely overdense Galactic center,

1093: the XRB detection rate in the radio is $\lsim 0.01 {\rm\ kpc^{-3}\ yr^{-1}}$.

1094: The comparable observed transient rate would imply a similar overdensity

1095: at high Galactic latitude, which is implausible.

1096: 

1097: \subsubsection{Pulsars}

1098: 

1099: Most pulsar variability occurs on time scales much shorter than our 

1100: observations and is therefore unlikely to account for our observed 

1101: transients.  There have been some examples, however, of longer timescale

1102: variability.  PSR B1931+24, for instance, has periods of

1103: activity and inactivity with characteristic times of days to tens of

1104: days \citep{2006Sci...312..549K}.  This variability is quasi-periodic, however, indicating

1105: that we would detect it and similar pulsars in multiple epochs throughout

1106: our survey.

1107: 

1108: \subsection{Propagation Effects}

1109: 

1110: We have already referred to the phenomenon of intra-day variability (IDV), 

1111: which in the most extreme cases leads to variations of a factors of a 

1112: few on a timescale of hours.  IDV of this scale has been demonstrated to 

1113: originate from interstellar scintillation of compact structure in the

1114: source.  \citet{1997A&A...325..631G} 

1115: identified a factor of 43 fluctuation in the flux density 

1116: of PSR B0655+64 at 325~MHz, which they argue originates from strong

1117: focusing in the interstellar medium --- that is, a caustic.  It is difficult

1118: to estimate the frequency with which such a phenomenon can occur, but 

1119: observational evidence is scarce.

1120: 

1121: Microlensing could also produce a transient amplification of a background

1122: source.   A simple calculation estimates that to explain all 10 RTs as 

1123: the result of microlensing requires the product

1124: $n\tau \lsim 10^{-2}$, where $n$ is the number of sources that can be lensed

1125: and $\tau$ is the lensing opacity \citep{1996ARA&A..34..419P}.  

1126: Since $\tau$ has been measured

1127: to be $\sim 10^{-7}$ by MACHO and OGLE experiments, then $n \gsim 10^9$, 

1128: which is absurdly large for any known population of Galactic or extragalactic

1129: radio sources.   

1130: 

1131: 

1132: Finally, reflected solar flares off objects in the Solar System could 

1133: produce detectable radio flares.  A 1~MJy solar flare reflecting off a 

1134: 1000~km object at a distance of 1~AU from the Earth would produce a 

1135: 0.1~mJy flare at Earth.  Our observed field is far out of the 

1136: ecliptic plane, however, and there are few known Solar-System objects 

1137: of this size outside of the ecliptic. Nearer objects could be smaller 

1138: but would move significantly during the course of the observation.

1139: 

1140: \section{Conclusions}

1141: 

1142: We have conducted a 944-epoch, 20-yr-long survey for radio transients

1143: with archival 5 and 8.4 GHz Very Large Array data.  Ten radio transients

1144: are apparent in this data set. Eight transients appear in only a single epoch

1145: and disappear completely thereafter.  Two transients appear in two-month

1146: integrations and also never reappear.  We estimate the rate of radio

1147: transients below 1~mJy with a large uncertainty due to the wide range

1148: of characteristic times possible for these sources.

1149: 

1150: Two of the transients may be peculiar 

1151: Type Ib/c and/or Type II radio SNe in nearby galaxies.  

1152: All of these transients share some characteristics with those expected

1153: of orphan gamma-ray burst afterglows, but they cannot be conclusively

1154: identified as such.  The diversity of high-energy stellar-death

1155: phenomena makes it difficult to

1156: place specific limits on the nature of GRBs based on these results.

1157: The absence of persistent counterparts to these sources indicate that

1158: they are unlikely to be AGNs.

1159: Galactic sources appear unlikely to be an explanation, but

1160: they certainly cannot be ruled out.  In particular, late-type stars could

1161: contribute to the number of radio transients if their luminosity distribution

1162: can be extrapolated by several orders of magnitude beyond the most

1163: luminous observed M-dwarf flare.

1164: Deeper multi-wavelength imaging is critical for identifying the hosts

1165: of these events.

1166: 

1167: In the near future, the Allen Telescope Array \citep{2004SPIE.5489.1021D}

1168: will be efficient at

1169: discovering transients of this sort.  The wide field of view of this

1170: telescope makes it a powerful instrument for large solid angle radio

1171: surveys.  Given the apparently short timescale of these

1172: phenomena, rapid response to transient discovery at radio and other

1173: wavelengths will be critical for determining the nature of these 

1174: transients.

1175: 

1176: \acknowledgements

1177: 

1178: These observations made use of archival data from the Very Large Array.

1179: The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the National 

1180: Science Foundation (NSF) operated under cooperative agreement by 

1181: Associated Universities, Inc.  This research utilized the NASA/IPAC 

1182: Extragalactic Database (NED), which is operated by the Jet 

1183: Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under 

1184: contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). 

1185: It also used the SIMBAD database, operated at CDS, 

1186: Strasbourg, France, as well as data from the University of Michigan 

1187: Radio Astronomy Observatory, which has been supported by the 

1188: University of Michigan and the NSF.

1189: Some of the data presented here were obtained at the W. M. Keck

1190: Observatory, which is operated as a scientific partnership among the

1191: California Institute of Technology, the University of California,

1192: and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The Observatory

1193: was made possible by the generous financial support of the W. M. Keck

1194: Foundation. We thank the Keck staff for their assistance.

1195: The Peters Automated Infrared 

1196: Imaging Telescope (PAIRITEL) is operated by the Smithsonian 

1197: Astrophysical Observatory (SAO) and was made possible by a grant 

1198: from the Harvard University Milton Fund, a camera loan from the 

1199: University of Virginia, and the continued support of the SAO,

1200: M. Skrutskie, and UC Berkeley. The PAIRITEL project and D.P. are 

1201: further supported by NASA/Swift Guest Investigator Grant NNG06GH50G.

1202: A.V.F. acknowledges NSF grant AST--0607485 and NASA/Swift grant 

1203: NNG06GI86G. We thank Daniel Stern, Mark Dickinson, and Hyron Spinrad 

1204: for assistance with some of the Keck observations and analysis.

1205: 

1206: %\bibliographystyle{apj}

1207: %\bibliography{../../myrefs}

1208: 

1209: 

1210: \begin{thebibliography}{79}

1211: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi

1212: 

1213: \bibitem[{{Abell} {et~al.}(1989){Abell}, {Corwin}, \&

1214:   {Olowin}}]{1989ApJS...70....1A}

1215: {Abell}, G.~O., {Corwin}, H.~G., \& {Olowin}, R.~P. 1989, \apjs, 70, 1

1216: 

1217: \bibitem[{{Aller} {et~al.}(1999){Aller}, {Aller}, {Hughes}, \&

1218:   {Latimer}}]{1999ApJ...512..601A}

1219: {Aller}, M.~F., {Aller}, H.~D., {Hughes}, P.~A., \& {Latimer}, G.~E. 1999,

1220:   \apj, 512, 601

1221: 

1222: \bibitem[{{Amy} {et~al.}(1989){Amy}, {Large}, \&

1223:   {Vaughan}}]{1989PASAu...8..172A}

1224: {Amy}, S.~W., {Large}, M.~I., \& {Vaughan}, A.~E. 1989, Proceedings of the

1225:   Astronomical Society of Australia, 8, 172

1226: 

1227: \bibitem[{{Bastian} {et~al.}(2000){Bastian}, {Dulk}, \&

1228:   {Leblanc}}]{2000ApJ...545.1058B}

1229: {Bastian}, T.~S., {Dulk}, G.~A., \& {Leblanc}, Y. 2000, \apj, 545, 1058

1230: 

1231: \bibitem[{{Becker} {et~al.}(2004){Becker}, {Wittman}, {Boeshaar},

1232:   {Clocchiatti}, {Dell'Antonio}, {Frail}, {Halpern}, {Margoniner}, {Norman},

1233:   {Tyson}, \& {Schommer}}]{Becker04}

1234: {Becker}, A.~C., {Wittman}, D.~M., {Boeshaar}, P.~C., {Clocchiatti}, A.,

1235:   {Dell'Antonio}, I.~P., {Frail}, D.~A., {Halpern}, J., {Margoniner}, V.~E.,

1236:   {Norman}, D., {Tyson}, J.~A., \& {Schommer}, R.~A. 2004, \apj, 611, 418

1237: 

1238: \bibitem[{{Berger}(2006)}]{Berger06}

1239: {Berger}, E. 2006, \apj, 648, 629

1240: 

1241: \bibitem[{{Berger} {et~al.}(2001){Berger}, {Ball}, {Becker}, {Clarke}, {Frail},

1242:   {Fukuda}, {Hoffman}, {Mellon}, {Momjian}, {Murphy}, {Teng}, {Woodruff},

1243:   {Zauderer}, \& {Zavala}}]{2001Natur.410..338B}

1244: {Berger}, E., {Ball}, S., {Becker}, K.~M., {Clarke}, M., {Frail}, D.~A.,

1245:   {Fukuda}, T.~A., {Hoffman}, I.~M., {Mellon}, R., {Momjian}, E., {Murphy},

1246:   N.~W., {Teng}, S.~H., {Woodruff}, T., {Zauderer}, B.~A., \& {Zavala}, R.~T.

1247:   2001, \nat, 410, 338

1248: 

1249: \bibitem[{{Berger} {et~al.}(2003){Berger}, {Kulkarni}, {Frail}, \&

1250:   {Soderberg}}]{2003ApJ...599..408B}

1251: {Berger}, E., {Kulkarni}, S.~R., {Frail}, D.~A., \& {Soderberg}, A.~M. 2003,

1252:   \apj, 599, 408

1253: 

1254: \bibitem[{{Bertin} {et~al.}(2002){Bertin}, {Mellier}, {Radovich}, {Missonnier},

1255:   {Didelon}, \& {Morin}}]{2002ASPC..281..228B}

1256: {Bertin}, E., {Mellier}, Y., {Radovich}, M., {Missonnier}, G., {Didelon}, P.,

1257:   \& {Morin}, B. 2002, in ASP Conf. Ser. 281: Astronomical Data Analysis

1258:   Software and Systems XI, ed. D.~A. {Bohlender}, D.~{Durand}, \& T.~H.

1259:   {Handley}, 228--+

1260: 

1261: \bibitem[{{Bilir} {et~al.}(2005){Bilir}, {Karaali}, \& {Tun{\c

1262:   c}el}}]{2005AN....326..321B}

1263: {Bilir}, S., {Karaali}, S., \& {Tun{\c c}el}, S. 2005, Astronomische

1264:   Nachrichten, 326, 321

1265: 

1266: \bibitem[{{B{\l}a{\.z}ejowski} {et~al.}(2005){B{\l}a{\.z}ejowski}, {Blaylock},

1267:   {Bond}, {Bradbury}, {Buckley}, {Carter-Lewis}, {Celik}, {Cogan}, {Cui},

1268:   {Daniel}, {Duke}, {Falcone}, {Fegan}, {Fegan}, {Finley}, {Fortson},

1269:   {Gammell}, {Gibbs}, {Gillanders}, {Grube}, {Gutierrez}, {Hall}, {Hanna},

1270:   {Holder}, {Horan}, {Humensky}, {Kenny}, {Kertzman}, {Kieda}, {Kildea},

1271:   {Knapp}, {Kosack}, {Krawczynski}, {Krennrich}, {Lang}, {LeBohec}, {Linton},

1272:   {Lloyd-Evans}, {Maier}, {Mendoza}, {Milovanovic}, {Moriarty}, {Nagai}, {Ong},

1273:   {Power-Mooney}, {Quinn}, {Quinn}, {Ragan}, {Reynolds}, {Rebillot}, {Rose},

1274:   {Schroedter}, {Sembroski}, {Swordy}, {Syson}, {Valcarel}, {Vassiliev},

1275:   {Wakely}, {Walker}, {Weekes}, {White}, {Zweerink}, {Mochejska}, {Smith},

1276:   {Aller}, {Aller}, {Ter{\"a}sranta}, {Boltwood}, {Sadun}, {Stanek}, {Adams},

1277:   {Foster}, {Hartman}, {Lai}, {B{\"o}ttcher}, {Reimer}, \&

1278:   {Jung}}]{2005ApJ...630..130B}

1279: {B{\l}a{\.z}ejowski}, M., {Blaylock}, G., {Bond}, I.~H., {Bradbury}, S.~M.,

1280:   {Buckley}, J.~H., {Carter-Lewis}, D.~A., {Celik}, O., {Cogan}, P., {Cui}, W.,

1281:   {Daniel}, M., {Duke}, C., {Falcone}, A., {Fegan}, D.~J., {Fegan}, S.~J.,

1282:   {Finley}, J.~P., {Fortson}, L., {Gammell}, S., {Gibbs}, K., {Gillanders},

1283:   G.~G., {Grube}, J., {Gutierrez}, K., {Hall}, J., {Hanna}, D., {Holder}, J.,

1284:   {Horan}, D., {Humensky}, B., {Kenny}, G., {Kertzman}, M., {Kieda}, D.,

1285:   {Kildea}, J., {Knapp}, J., {Kosack}, K., {Krawczynski}, H., {Krennrich}, F.,

1286:   {Lang}, M., {LeBohec}, S., {Linton}, E., {Lloyd-Evans}, J., {Maier}, G.,

1287:   {Mendoza}, D., {Milovanovic}, A., {Moriarty}, P., {Nagai}, T.~N., {Ong},

1288:   R.~A., {Power-Mooney}, B., {Quinn}, J., {Quinn}, M., {Ragan}, K., {Reynolds},

1289:   P.~T., {Rebillot}, P., {Rose}, H.~J., {Schroedter}, M., {Sembroski}, G.~H.,

1290:   {Swordy}, S.~P., {Syson}, A., {Valcarel}, L., {Vassiliev}, V.~V., {Wakely},

1291:   S.~P., {Walker}, G., {Weekes}, T.~C., {White}, R., {Zweerink}, J.,

1292:   {Mochejska}, B., {Smith}, B., {Aller}, M., {Aller}, H., {Ter{\"a}sranta}, H.,

1293:   {Boltwood}, P., {Sadun}, A., {Stanek}, K., {Adams}, E., {Foster}, J.,

1294:   {Hartman}, J., {Lai}, K., {B{\"o}ttcher}, M., {Reimer}, A., \& {Jung}, I.

1295:   2005, \apj, 630, 130

1296: 

1297: \bibitem[{{Bloom} {et~al.}(2006){Bloom}, {Starr}, {Blake}, {Skrutskie}, \&

1298:   {Falco}}]{2006ASPC..351..751B}

1299: {Bloom}, J.~S., {Starr}, D.~L., {Blake}, C.~H., {Skrutskie}, M.~F., \& {Falco},

1300:   E.~E. 2006, in ASP Conf. Ser. 351: Astronomical Data Analysis Software and

1301:   Systems XV, ed. C.~{Gabriel}, C.~{Arviset}, D.~{Ponz}, \& S.~{Enrique},

1302:   751--+

1303: 

1304: \bibitem[{{Bower} {et~al.}(2003){Bower}, {Plambeck}, {Bolatto}, {McCrady},

1305:   {Graham}, {de Pater}, {Liu}, \& {Baganoff}}]{2003ApJ...598.1140B}

1306: {Bower}, G.~C., {Plambeck}, R.~L., {Bolatto}, A., {McCrady}, N., {Graham},

1307:   J.~R., {de Pater}, I., {Liu}, M.~C., \& {Baganoff}, F.~K. 2003, \apj, 598,

1308:   1140

1309: 

1310: \bibitem[{{Bower} {et~al.}(2005){Bower}, {Roberts}, {Yusef-Zadeh}, {Backer},

1311:   {Cotton}, {Goss}, {Lang}, \& {Lithwick}}]{2005ApJ...633..218B}

1312: {Bower}, G.~C., {Roberts}, D.~A., {Yusef-Zadeh}, F., {Backer}, D.~C., {Cotton},

1313:   W.~D., {Goss}, W.~M., {Lang}, C.~C., \& {Lithwick}, Y. 2005, \apj, 633, 218

1314: 

1315: \bibitem[{{Brunthaler} {et~al.}(2005){Brunthaler}, {Falcke}, {Bower}, {Aller},

1316:   {Aller}, \& {Ter{\"a}sranta}}]{2005A&A...435..497B}

1317: {Brunthaler}, A., {Falcke}, H., {Bower}, G.~C., {Aller}, M.~F., {Aller}, H.~D.,

1318:   \& {Ter{\"a}sranta}, H. 2005, \aap, 435, 497

1319: 

1320: \bibitem[{{Carilli} {et~al.}(2003){Carilli}, {Ivison}, \&

1321:   {Frail}}]{2003ApJ...590..192C}

1322: {Carilli}, C.~L., {Ivison}, R.~J., \& {Frail}, D.~A. 2003, \apj, 590, 192

1323: 

1324: \bibitem[{{Clark}(1980)}]{1980A&A....89..377C}

1325: {Clark}, B.~G. 1980, \aap, 89, 377

1326: 

1327: \bibitem[{{Cordes} {et~al.}(2004){Cordes}, {Lazio}, \&

1328:   {McLaughlin}}]{2004NewAR..48.1459C}

1329: {Cordes}, J.~M., {Lazio}, T.~J.~W., \& {McLaughlin}, M.~A. 2004, New Astronomy

1330:   Review, 48, 1459

1331: 

1332: \bibitem[{{Cordes} \& {McLaughlin}(2003)}]{2003ApJ...596.1142C}

1333: {Cordes}, J.~M., \& {McLaughlin}, M.~A. 2003, \apj, 596, 1142

1334: 

1335: \bibitem[{{Dalal} {et~al.}(2002){Dalal}, {Griest}, \&

1336:   {Pruet}}]{2002ApJ...564..209D}

1337: {Dalal}, N., {Griest}, K., \& {Pruet}, J. 2002, \apj, 564, 209

1338: 

1339: \bibitem[{{Davies} {et~al.}(1976){Davies}, {Walsh}, {Browne}, {Edwards}, \&

1340:   {Noble}}]{1976Natur.261..476D}

1341: {Davies}, R.~D., {Walsh}, D., {Browne}, I.~W.~A., {Edwards}, M.~R., \& {Noble},

1342:   R.~C. 1976, \nat, 261, 476

1343: 

1344: \bibitem[{{de Bruyn}(1973)}]{1973A&A....26..105D}

1345: {de Bruyn}, A.~G. 1973, \aap, 26, 105

1346: 

1347: \bibitem[{{DeBoer} {et~al.}(2004){DeBoer}, {Welch}, {Dreher}, {Tarter},

1348:   {Blitz}, {Davis}, {Fleming}, {Bock}, {Bower}, {Lugten}, {Girmay-Keleta},

1349:   {D'Addario}, {Harp}, {Ackermann}, {Weinreb}, {Engargiola}, {Thornton}, \&

1350:   {Wadefalk}}]{2004SPIE.5489.1021D}

1351: {DeBoer}, D.~R., {Welch}, W.~J., {Dreher}, J., {Tarter}, J., {Blitz}, L.,

1352:   {Davis}, M., {Fleming}, M., {Bock}, D., {Bower}, G., {Lugten}, J.,

1353:   {Girmay-Keleta}, G., {D'Addario}, L.~R., {Harp}, G.~R., {Ackermann}, R.,

1354:   {Weinreb}, S., {Engargiola}, G., {Thornton}, D., \& {Wadefalk}, N. 2004, in

1355:   Ground-based Telescopes. Edited by Oschmann, Jacobus M., Jr. Proceedings of

1356:   the SPIE, Volume 5489, pp. 1021-1028 (2004)., ed. J.~M. {Oschmann}, Jr.,

1357:   1021--1028

1358: 

1359: \bibitem[{{Dempsey} {et~al.}(1993){Dempsey}, {Linsky}, {Fleming}, \&

1360:   {Schmitt}}]{1993ApJS...86..599D}

1361: {Dempsey}, R.~C., {Linsky}, J.~L., {Fleming}, T.~A., \& {Schmitt}, J.~H.~M.~M.

1362:   1993, \apjs, 86, 599

1363: 

1364: \bibitem[{{Dennett-Thorpe} \& {de Bruyn}(2000)}]{2000ApJ...529L..65D}

1365: {Dennett-Thorpe}, J., \& {de Bruyn}, A.~G. 2000, \apjl, 529, L65

1366: 

1367: \bibitem[{{Eck} {et~al.}(2002){Eck}, {Cowan}, \&

1368:   {Branch}}]{2002ApJ...573..306E}

1369: {Eck}, C.~R., {Cowan}, J.~J., \& {Branch}, D. 2002, \apj, 573, 306

1370: 

1371: \bibitem[{{Faber} {et~al.}(2003){Faber}, {Phillips}, {Kibrick}, {Alcott},

1372:   {Allen}, {Burrous}, {Cantrall}, {Clarke}, {Coil}, {Cowley}, {Davis}, {Deich},

1373:   {Dietsch}, {Gilmore}, {Harper}, {Hilyard}, {Lewis}, {McVeigh}, {Newman},

1374:   {Osborne}, {Schiavon}, {Stover}, {Tucker}, {Wallace}, {Wei}, {Wirth}, \&

1375:   {Wright}}]{Faber03}

1376: {Faber}, S.~M., {Phillips}, A.~C., {Kibrick}, R.~I., {Alcott}, B., {Allen},

1377:   S.~L., {Burrous}, J., {Cantrall}, T., {Clarke}, D., {Coil}, A.~L., {Cowley},

1378:   D.~J., {Davis}, M., {Deich}, W.~T.~S., {Dietsch}, K., {Gilmore}, D.~K.,

1379:   {Harper}, C.~A., {Hilyard}, D.~F., {Lewis}, J.~P., {McVeigh}, M., {Newman},

1380:   J., {Osborne}, J., {Schiavon}, R., {Stover}, R.~J., {Tucker}, D., {Wallace},

1381:   V., {Wei}, M., {Wirth}, G., \& {Wright}, C.~A. 2003, in Instrument Design and

1382:   Performance for Optical/Infrared Ground-based Telescopes. Edited by Iye,

1383:   Masanori; Moorwood, Alan F. M. Proceedings of the SPIE, Volume 4841, pp.

1384:   1657-1669 (2003)., ed. M.~{Iye} \& A.~F.~M. {Moorwood}, 1657--1669

1385: 

1386: \bibitem[{{Feigelson} \& {Nelson}(1985)}]{1985ApJ...293..192F}

1387: {Feigelson}, E.~D., \& {Nelson}, P.~I. 1985, \apj, 293, 192

1388: 

1389: \bibitem[{{Foley} {et~al.}(2003){Foley}, {Papenkova}, {Swift}, {Filippenko},

1390:   {Li}, {Mazzali}, {Chornock}, {Leonard}, \& {Van Dyk}}]{2003PASP..115.1220F}

1391: {Foley}, R.~J., {Papenkova}, M.~S., {Swift}, B.~J., {Filippenko}, A.~V., {Li},

1392:   W., {Mazzali}, P.~A., {Chornock}, R., {Leonard}, D.~C., \& {Van Dyk}, S.~D.

1393:   2003, \pasp, 115, 1220

1394: 

1395: \bibitem[{{Frail}(2003)}]{2003astro.ph..9557F}

1396: {Frail}, D.~A. 2003, astro-ph/0309557

1397: 

1398: \bibitem[{{Frail} {et~al.}(2003){Frail}, {Kulkarni}, {Berger}, \&

1399:   {Wieringa}}]{2003AJ....125.2299F}

1400: {Frail}, D.~A., {Kulkarni}, S.~R., {Berger}, E., \& {Wieringa}, M.~H. 2003,

1401:   \aj, 125, 2299

1402: 

1403: \bibitem[{{Frail} {et~al.}(1999){Frail}, {Kulkarni}, \&

1404:   {Bloom}}]{1999Natur.398..127F}

1405: {Frail}, D.~A., {Kulkarni}, S.~R., \& {Bloom}, J.~S. 1999, \nat, 398, 127

1406: 

1407: \bibitem[{{Frail} {et~al.}(1997){Frail}, {Kulkarni}, {Nicastro}, {Feroci}, \&

1408:   {Taylor}}]{1997Natur.389..261F}

1409: {Frail}, D.~A., {Kulkarni}, S.~R., {Nicastro}, S.~R., {Feroci}, M., \&

1410:   {Taylor}, G.~B. 1997, \nat, 389, 261

1411: 

1412: \bibitem[{{Gaensler} {et~al.}(2005){Gaensler}, {Kouveliotou}, {Gelfand},

1413:   {Taylor}, {Eichler}, {Wijers}, {Granot}, {Ramirez-Ruiz}, {Lyubarsky},

1414:   {Hunstead}, {Campbell-Wilson}, {van der Horst}, {McLaughlin}, {Fender},

1415:   {Garrett}, {Newton-McGee}, {Palmer}, {Gehrels}, \&

1416:   {Woods}}]{2005Natur.434.1104G}

1417: {Gaensler}, B.~M., {Kouveliotou}, C., {Gelfand}, J.~D., {Taylor}, G.~B.,

1418:   {Eichler}, D., {Wijers}, R.~A.~M.~J., {Granot}, J., {Ramirez-Ruiz}, E.,

1419:   {Lyubarsky}, Y.~E., {Hunstead}, R.~W., {Campbell-Wilson}, D., {van der

1420:   Horst}, A.~J., {McLaughlin}, M.~A., {Fender}, R.~P., {Garrett}, M.~A.,

1421:   {Newton-McGee}, K.~J., {Palmer}, D.~M., {Gehrels}, N., \& {Woods}, P.~M.

1422:   2005, \nat, 434, 1104

1423: 

1424: \bibitem[{{Gal-Yam} {et~al.}(2006){Gal-Yam}, {Ofek}, {Poznanski}, {Levinson},

1425:   {Waxman}, {Frail}, {Soderberg}, {Nakar}, {Li}, \&

1426:   {Filippenko}}]{2006ApJ...639..331G}

1427: {Gal-Yam}, A., {Ofek}, E.~O., {Poznanski}, D., {Levinson}, A., {Waxman}, E.,

1428:   {Frail}, D.~A., {Soderberg}, A.~M., {Nakar}, E., {Li}, W., \& {Filippenko},

1429:   A.~V. 2006, \apj, 639, 331

1430: 

1431: \bibitem[{{Galama} {et~al.}(1997){Galama}, {de Bruyn}, {van Paradijs},

1432:   {Hanlon}, \& {Bennett}}]{1997A&A...325..631G}

1433: {Galama}, T.~J., {de Bruyn}, A.~G., {van Paradijs}, J., {Hanlon}, L., \&

1434:   {Bennett}, K. 1997, \aap, 325, 631

1435: 

1436: \bibitem[{{Gehrels} {et~al.}(2005){Gehrels}, {Sarazin}, {O'Brien}, {Zhang},

1437:   {Barbier}, {Barthelmy}, {Blustin}, {Burrows}, {Cannizzo}, {Cummings}, {Goad},

1438:   {Holland}, {Hurkett}, {Kennea}, {Levan}, {Markwardt}, {Mason}, {Meszaros},

1439:   {Page}, {Palmer}, {Rol}, {Sakamoto}, {Willingale}, {Angelini}, {Beardmore},

1440:   {Boyd}, {Breeveld}, {Campana}, {Chester}, {Chincarini}, {Cominsky},

1441:   {Cusumano}, {de Pasquale}, {Fenimore}, {Giommi}, {Gronwall}, {Grupe}, {Hill},

1442:   {Hinshaw}, {Hjorth}, {Hullinger}, {Hurley}, {Klose}, {Kobayashi},

1443:   {Kouveliotou}, {Krimm}, {Mangano}, {Marshall}, {McGowan}, {Moretti},

1444:   {Mushotzky}, {Nakazawa}, {Norris}, {Nousek}, {Osborne}, {Page}, {Parsons},

1445:   {Patel}, {Perri}, {Poole}, {Romano}, {Roming}, {Rosen}, {Sato}, {Schady},

1446:   {Smale}, {Sollerman}, {Starling}, {Still}, {Suzuki}, {Tagliaferri},

1447:   {Takahashi}, {Tashiro}, {Tueller}, {Wells}, {White}, \&

1448:   {Wijers}}]{2005Natur.437..851G}

1449: {Gehrels}, N., {Sarazin}, C.~L., {O'Brien}, P.~T., {Zhang}, B., {Barbier}, L.,

1450:   {Barthelmy}, S.~D., {Blustin}, A., {Burrows}, D.~N., {Cannizzo}, J.,

1451:   {Cummings}, J.~R., {Goad}, M., {Holland}, S.~T., {Hurkett}, C.~P., {Kennea},

1452:   J.~A., {Levan}, A., {Markwardt}, C.~B., {Mason}, K.~O., {Meszaros}, P.,

1453:   {Page}, M., {Palmer}, D.~M., {Rol}, E., {Sakamoto}, T., {Willingale}, R.,

1454:   {Angelini}, L., {Beardmore}, A., {Boyd}, P.~T., {Breeveld}, A., {Campana},

1455:   S., {Chester}, M.~M., {Chincarini}, G., {Cominsky}, L.~R., {Cusumano}, G.,

1456:   {de Pasquale}, M., {Fenimore}, E.~E., {Giommi}, P., {Gronwall}, C., {Grupe},

1457:   D., {Hill}, J.~E., {Hinshaw}, D., {Hjorth}, J., {Hullinger}, D., {Hurley},

1458:   K.~C., {Klose}, S., {Kobayashi}, S., {Kouveliotou}, C., {Krimm}, H.~A.,

1459:   {Mangano}, V., {Marshall}, F.~E., {McGowan}, K., {Moretti}, A., {Mushotzky},

1460:   R.~F., {Nakazawa}, K., {Norris}, J.~P., {Nousek}, J.~A., {Osborne}, J.~P.,

1461:   {Page}, K., {Parsons}, A.~M., {Patel}, S., {Perri}, M., {Poole}, T.,

1462:   {Romano}, P., {Roming}, P.~W.~A., {Rosen}, S., {Sato}, G., {Schady}, P.,

1463:   {Smale}, A.~P., {Sollerman}, J., {Starling}, R., {Still}, M., {Suzuki}, M.,

1464:   {Tagliaferri}, G., {Takahashi}, T., {Tashiro}, M., {Tueller}, J., {Wells},

1465:   A.~A., {White}, N.~E., \& {Wijers}, R.~A.~M.~J. 2005, \nat, 437, 851

1466: 

1467: \bibitem[{{Gelfand} {et~al.}(2005){Gelfand}, {Lazio}, \&

1468:   {Gaensler}}]{2005ApJS..159..242G}

1469: {Gelfand}, J.~D., {Lazio}, T.~J.~W., \& {Gaensler}, B.~M. 2005, \apjs, 159, 242

1470: 

1471: \bibitem[{{Gezari} {et~al.}(2006){Gezari}, {Milliard}, {Martin}, {Halpern}, \&

1472:   {Basa}}]{2006IAUS..238E..97G}

1473: {Gezari}, S., {Milliard}, B., {Martin}, C., {Halpern}, J.~P., \& {Basa}, S.

1474:   2006, in IAU Symposium

1475: 

1476: \bibitem[{{G{\"u}del}(2002)}]{2002ARA&A..40..217G}

1477: {G{\"u}del}, M. 2002, \araa, 40, 217

1478: 

1479: \bibitem[{{Hankins} {et~al.}(2003){Hankins}, {Kern}, {Weatherall}, \&

1480:   {Eilek}}]{2003Natur.422..141H}

1481: {Hankins}, T.~H., {Kern}, J.~S., {Weatherall}, J.~C., \& {Eilek}, J.~A. 2003,

1482:   \nat, 422, 141

1483: 

1484: \bibitem[{{Hjellming} {et~al.}(1971){Hjellming}, {Wade}, {Hughes}, \&

1485:   {Woodsworth}}]{1971Natur.234..138H}

1486: {Hjellming}, R.~M., {Wade}, C.~M., {Hughes}, V.~A., \& {Woodsworth}, A. 1971,

1487:   \nat, 234, 138

1488: 

1489: \bibitem[{{Horne}(1986)}]{Horne86}

1490: {Horne}, K. 1986, \pasp, 98, 609

1491: 

1492: \bibitem[{{Hughes} {et~al.}(1992){Hughes}, {Aller}, \&

1493:   {Aller}}]{1992ApJ...396..469H}

1494: {Hughes}, P.~A., {Aller}, H.~D., \& {Aller}, M.~F. 1992, \apj, 396, 469

1495: 

1496: \bibitem[{{Hyman} {et~al.}(2005){Hyman}, {Lazio}, {Kassim}, {Ray}, {Markwardt},

1497:   \& {Yusef-Zadeh}}]{2005Natur.434...50H}

1498: {Hyman}, S.~D., {Lazio}, T.~J.~W., {Kassim}, N.~E., {Ray}, P.~S., {Markwardt},

1499:   C.~B., \& {Yusef-Zadeh}, F. 2005, \nat, 434, 50

1500: 

1501: \bibitem[{{Katz} {et~al.}(2003){Katz}, {Hewitt}, {Corey}, \&

1502:   {Moore}}]{2003PASP..115..675K}

1503: {Katz}, C.~A., {Hewitt}, J.~N., {Corey}, B.~E., \& {Moore}, C.~B. 2003, \pasp,

1504:   115, 675

1505: 

1506: \bibitem[{{Kramer} {et~al.}(2006){Kramer}, {Lyne}, {O'Brien}, {Jordan}, \&

1507:   {Lorimer}}]{2006Sci...312..549K}

1508: {Kramer}, M., {Lyne}, A.~G., {O'Brien}, J.~T., {Jordan}, C.~A., \& {Lorimer},

1509:   D.~R. 2006, Science, 312, 549

1510: 

1511: \bibitem[{{Kulkarni} {et~al.}(1999){Kulkarni}, {Frail}, {Sari},

1512:   {Moriarty-Schieven}, {Shepherd}, {Udomprasert}, {Readhead}, {Bloom},

1513:   {Feroci}, \& {Costa}}]{1999ApJ...522L..97K}

1514: {Kulkarni}, S.~R., {Frail}, D.~A., {Sari}, R., {Moriarty-Schieven}, G.~H.,

1515:   {Shepherd}, D.~S., {Udomprasert}, P., {Readhead}, A.~C.~S., {Bloom}, J.~S.,

1516:   {Feroci}, M., \& {Costa}, E. 1999, \apjl, 522, L97

1517: 

1518: \bibitem[{{Kulkarni} {et~al.}(1998){Kulkarni}, {Frail}, {Wieringa}, {Ekers},

1519:   {Sadler}, {Wark}, {Higdon}, {Phinney}, \& {Bloom}}]{1998Natur.395..663K}

1520: {Kulkarni}, S.~R., {Frail}, D.~A., {Wieringa}, M.~H., {Ekers}, R.~D., {Sadler},

1521:   E.~M., {Wark}, R.~M., {Higdon}, J.~L., {Phinney}, E.~S., \& {Bloom}, J.~S.

1522:   1998, \nat, 395, 663

1523: 

1524: \bibitem[{{Kulkarni} \& {Rau}(2006)}]{Kulkarni06}

1525: {Kulkarni}, S.~R., \& {Rau}, A. 2006, \apjl, 644, L63

1526: 

1527: \bibitem[{{Kuniyoshi} {et~al.}(2007){Kuniyoshi}, {Matsumura}, {Takefuji},

1528:   {Niinuma}, {Kida}, {Takeuchi}, {Nakamura}, {Suzuki}, {Tanaka}, {Asuma}, \&

1529:   {Daishido}}]{2007PASP..119..122K}

1530: {Kuniyoshi}, M., {Matsumura}, N., {Takefuji}, K., {Niinuma}, K., {Kida}, S.,

1531:   {Takeuchi}, A., {Nakamura}, R., {Suzuki}, S., {Tanaka}, T., {Asuma}, K., \&

1532:   {Daishido}, T. 2007, \pasp, 119, 122

1533: 

1534: \bibitem[{{Landolt}(1992)}]{1992AJ....104..340L}

1535: {Landolt}, A.~U. 1992, \aj, 104, 340

1536: 

1537: \bibitem[{{Lazio} {et~al.}(2004){Lazio}, {Joseph}, {Farrell}, {Dietrick},

1538:   {Greenlees}, {Hogan}, {Jones}, \& {Hennig}}]{2004ApJ...612..511L}

1539: {Lazio}, T., {Joseph}, W., {Farrell}, W.~M., {Dietrick}, J., {Greenlees}, E.,

1540:   {Hogan}, E., {Jones}, C., \& {Hennig}, L.~A. 2004, \apj, 612, 511

1541: 

1542: \bibitem[{{Levinson} {et~al.}(2002){Levinson}, {Ofek}, {Waxman}, \&

1543:   {Gal-Yam}}]{2002ApJ...576..923L}

1544: {Levinson}, A., {Ofek}, E.~O., {Waxman}, E., \& {Gal-Yam}, A. 2002, \apj, 576,

1545:   923

1546: 

1547: \bibitem[{{Lovell} {et~al.}(2003){Lovell}, {Jauncey}, {Bignall},

1548:   {Kedziora-Chudczer}, {Macquart}, {Rickett}, \&

1549:   {Tzioumis}}]{2003AJ....126.1699L}

1550: {Lovell}, J.~E.~J., {Jauncey}, D.~L., {Bignall}, H.~E., {Kedziora-Chudczer},

1551:   L., {Macquart}, J.-P., {Rickett}, B.~J., \& {Tzioumis}, A.~K. 2003, \aj, 126,

1552:   1699

1553: 

1554: \bibitem[{{Matheson} {et~al.}(2000){Matheson}, {Filippenko}, {Ho}, {Barth}, \&

1555:   {Leonard}}]{Matheson00}

1556: {Matheson}, T., {Filippenko}, A.~V., {Ho}, L.~C., {Barth}, A.~J., \& {Leonard},

1557:   D.~C. 2000, \aj, 120, 1499

1558: 

1559: \bibitem[{{Matsumura} {et~al.}(2007){Matsumura}, {Daishido}, {Kuniyoshi},

1560:   {Asuma}, {Takefuji}, {Niinuma}, {Kida}, {Takeuchi}, {Nakamura}, {Shigehiro},

1561:   \& {Tanaka}}]{2007AJ....133.1441M}

1562: {Matsumura}, N., {Daishido}, T., {Kuniyoshi}, M., {Asuma}, K., {Takefuji}, K.,

1563:   {Niinuma}, K., {Kida}, S., {Takeuchi}, A., {Nakamura}, R., {Shigehiro}, S.,

1564:   \& {Tanaka}, T. 2007, \aj, 133, 1441

1565: 

1566: \bibitem[{{McLaughlin} {et~al.}(2006){McLaughlin}, {Lyne}, {Lorimer}, {Kramer},

1567:   {Faulkner}, {Manchester}, {Cordes}, {Camilo}, {Possenti}, {Stairs}, {Hobbs},

1568:   {D'Amico}, {Burgay}, \& {O'Brien}}]{2006Nature...mcl}

1569: {McLaughlin}, M., {Lyne}, A., {Lorimer}, D., {Kramer}, M., {Faulkner}, A.,

1570:   {Manchester}, R., {Cordes}, J., {Camilo}, F., {Possenti}, A., {Stairs}, I.,

1571:   {Hobbs}, G., {D'Amico}, N., {Burgay}, M., \& {O'Brien}, J. 2006, \nat, 439,

1572:   817

1573: 

1574: \bibitem[{{Muno} {et~al.}(2005){Muno}, {Pfahl}, {Baganoff}, {Brandt}, {Ghez},

1575:   {Lu}, \& {Morris}}]{2005ApJ...622L.113M}

1576: {Muno}, M.~P., {Pfahl}, E., {Baganoff}, F.~K., {Brandt}, W.~N., {Ghez}, A.,

1577:   {Lu}, J., \& {Morris}, M.~R. 2005, \apjl, 622, L113

1578: 

1579: \bibitem[{{Niinuma} {et~al.}(2007){Niinuma}, {Asuma}, {Kuniyoshi}, {Matsumura},

1580:   {Takefuji}, {Kida}, {Takeuchi}, {Nakamura}, {Tanaka}, {Suzuki}, \&

1581:   {Daishido}}]{2007ApJ...657L..37N}

1582: {Niinuma}, K., {Asuma}, K., {Kuniyoshi}, M., {Matsumura}, N., {Takefuji}, K.,

1583:   {Kida}, S., {Takeuchi}, A., {Nakamura}, R., {Tanaka}, T., {Suzuki}, S., \&

1584:   {Daishido}, T. 2007, \apjl, 657, L37

1585: 

1586: \bibitem[{{Nita} {et~al.}(2004){Nita}, {Gary}, \& {Lee}}]{Nita04}

1587: {Nita}, G.~M., {Gary}, D.~E., \& {Lee}, J. 2004, \apj, 605, 528

1588: 

1589: \bibitem[{{Oke} {et~al.}(1995){Oke}, {Cohen}, {Carr}, {Cromer}, {Dingizian},

1590:   {Harris}, {Labrecque}, {Lucinio}, {Schaal}, {Epps}, \& {Miller}}]{Oke95}

1591: {Oke}, J.~B., {Cohen}, J.~G., {Carr}, M., {Cromer}, J., {Dingizian}, A.,

1592:   {Harris}, F.~H., {Labrecque}, S., {Lucinio}, R., {Schaal}, W., {Epps}, H., \&

1593:   {Miller}, J. 1995, \pasp, 107, 375

1594: 

1595: \bibitem[{{Osten} {et~al.}(2006){Osten}, {Hawley}, {Allred}, {Johns-Krull},

1596:   {Brown}, \& {Harper}}]{Osten06}

1597: {Osten}, R.~A., {Hawley}, S.~L., {Allred}, J., {Johns-Krull}, C.~M., {Brown},

1598:   A., \& {Harper}, G.~M. 2006, \apj, 647, 1349

1599: 

1600: \bibitem[{{Paczynski}(1996)}]{1996ARA&A..34..419P}

1601: {Paczynski}, B. 1996, \araa, 34, 419

1602: 

1603: \bibitem[{{Pennington} {et~al.}(1993){Pennington}, {Humphreys}, {Odewahn},

1604:   {Zumach}, \& {Thurmes}}]{1993PASP..105..521P}

1605: {Pennington}, R.~L., {Humphreys}, R.~M., {Odewahn}, S.~C., {Zumach}, W., \&

1606:   {Thurmes}, P.~M. 1993, \pasp, 105, 521

1607: 

1608: \bibitem[{{Rees}(1988)}]{1988Natur.333..523R}

1609: {Rees}, M.~J. 1988, \nat, 333, 523

1610: 

1611: \bibitem[{{Reid} {et~al.}(1999){Reid}, {Kirkpatrick}, {Liebert}, {Burrows},

1612:   {Gizis}, {Burgasser}, {Dahn}, {Monet}, {Cutri}, {Beichman}, \&

1613:   {Skrutskie}}]{1999ApJ...521..613R}

1614: {Reid}, I.~N., {Kirkpatrick}, J.~D., {Liebert}, J., {Burrows}, A., {Gizis},

1615:   J.~E., {Burgasser}, A., {Dahn}, C.~C., {Monet}, D., {Cutri}, R., {Beichman},

1616:   C.~A., \& {Skrutskie}, M. 1999, \apj, 521, 613

1617: 

1618: \bibitem[{{Rhoads}(1997)}]{1997ApJ...487L...1R}

1619: {Rhoads}, J.~E. 1997, \apjl, 487, L1+

1620: 

1621: \bibitem[{{Rickett} {et~al.}(2002){Rickett}, {Kedziora-Chudczer}, \&

1622:   {Jauncey}}]{2002ApJ...581..103R}

1623: {Rickett}, B.~J., {Kedziora-Chudczer}, L., \& {Jauncey}, D.~L. 2002, \apj, 581,

1624:   103

1625: 

1626: \bibitem[{{Sakamoto} {et~al.}(2005){Sakamoto}, {Lamb}, {Kawai}, {Yoshida},

1627:   {Graziani}, {Fenimore}, {Donaghy}, {Matsuoka}, {Suzuki}, {Ricker}, {Atteia},

1628:   {Shirasaki}, {Tamagawa}, {Torii}, {Galassi}, {Doty}, {Vanderspek}, {Crew},

1629:   {Villasenor}, {Butler}, {Prigozhin}, {Jernigan}, {Barraud}, {Boer},

1630:   {Dezalay}, {Olive}, {Hurley}, {Levine}, {Monnelly}, {Martel}, {Morgan},

1631:   {Woosley}, {Cline}, {Braga}, {Manchanda}, {Pizzichini}, {Takagishi}, \&

1632:   {Yamauchi}}]{2005ApJ...629..311S}

1633: {Sakamoto}, T., {Lamb}, D.~Q., {Kawai}, N., {Yoshida}, A., {Graziani}, C.,

1634:   {Fenimore}, E.~E., {Donaghy}, T.~Q., {Matsuoka}, M., {Suzuki}, M., {Ricker},

1635:   G., {Atteia}, J.-L., {Shirasaki}, Y., {Tamagawa}, T., {Torii}, K., {Galassi},

1636:   M., {Doty}, J., {Vanderspek}, R., {Crew}, G.~B., {Villasenor}, J., {Butler},

1637:   N., {Prigozhin}, G., {Jernigan}, J.~G., {Barraud}, C., {Boer}, M., {Dezalay},

1638:   J.-P., {Olive}, J.-F., {Hurley}, K., {Levine}, A., {Monnelly}, G., {Martel},

1639:   F., {Morgan}, E., {Woosley}, S.~E., {Cline}, T., {Braga}, J., {Manchanda},

1640:   R., {Pizzichini}, G., {Takagishi}, K., \& {Yamauchi}, M. 2005, \apj, 629, 311

1641: 

1642: \bibitem[{{Stern} {et~al.}(2005){Stern}, {Eisenhardt}, {Gorjian}, {Kochanek},

1643:   {Caldwell}, {Eisenstein}, {Brodwin}, {Brown}, {Cool}, {Dey}, {Green},

1644:   {Jannuzi}, {Murray}, {Pahre}, \& {Willner}}]{2005ApJ...631..163S}

1645: {Stern}, D., {Eisenhardt}, P., {Gorjian}, V., {Kochanek}, C.~S., {Caldwell},

1646:   N., {Eisenstein}, D., {Brodwin}, M., {Brown}, M.~J.~I., {Cool}, R., {Dey},

1647:   A., {Green}, P., {Jannuzi}, B.~T., {Murray}, S.~S., {Pahre}, M.~A., \&

1648:   {Willner}, S.~P. 2005, \apj, 631, 163

1649: 

1650: \bibitem[{{Struble} \& {Rood}(1987)}]{1987AJ.....93.1035S}

1651: {Struble}, M.~F., \& {Rood}, H.~J. 1987, \aj, 93, 1035

1652: 

1653: \bibitem[{{Swank}(1999)}]{1999NuPhS..69...12S}

1654: {Swank}, J.~H. 1999, Nuclear Physics B Proceedings Supplements, 69, 12

1655: 

1656: \bibitem[{{Totani} \& {Panaitescu}(2002)}]{2002ApJ...576..120T}

1657: {Totani}, T., \& {Panaitescu}, A. 2002, \apj, 576, 120

1658: 

1659: \bibitem[{{Voges} {et~al.}(1999){Voges}, {Aschenbach}, {Boller},

1660:   {Br{\"a}uninger}, {Briel}, {Burkert}, {Dennerl}, {Englhauser}, {Gruber},

1661:   {Haberl}, {Hartner}, {Hasinger}, {K{\"u}rster}, {Pfeffermann}, {Pietsch},

1662:   {Predehl}, {Rosso}, {Schmitt}, {Tr{\"u}mper}, \&

1663:   {Zimmermann}}]{1999A&A...349..389V}

1664: {Voges}, W., {Aschenbach}, B., {Boller}, T., {Br{\"a}uninger}, H., {Briel}, U.,

1665:   {Burkert}, W., {Dennerl}, K., {Englhauser}, J., {Gruber}, R., {Haberl}, F.,

1666:   {Hartner}, G., {Hasinger}, G., {K{\"u}rster}, M., {Pfeffermann}, E.,

1667:   {Pietsch}, W., {Predehl}, P., {Rosso}, C., {Schmitt}, J.~H.~M.~M.,

1668:   {Tr{\"u}mper}, J., \& {Zimmermann}, H.~U. 1999, \aap, 349, 389

1669: 

1670: \bibitem[{{Wade} \& {Horne}(1988)}]{Wade88}

1671: {Wade}, R.~A., \& {Horne}, K. 1988, \apj, 324, 411

1672: 

1673: \bibitem[{{Weiler} {et~al.}(2004){Weiler}, {van Dyk}, {Sramek}, \&

1674:   {Panagia}}]{2004NewAR..48.1377W}

1675: {Weiler}, K.~W., {van Dyk}, S.~D., {Sramek}, R.~A., \& {Panagia}, N. 2004, New

1676:   Astronomy Review, 48, 1377

1677: 

1678: \bibitem[{{Yun} \& {Carilli}(2002)}]{2002ApJ...568...88Y}

1679: {Yun}, M.~S., \& {Carilli}, C.~L. 2002, \apj, 568, 88

1680: 

1681: \bibitem[{{Zhao} {et~al.}(1992){Zhao}, {Roberts}, {Goss}, {Frail}, {Lo},

1682:   {Subrahmanyan}, {Kesteven}, {Ekers}, {Allen}, \&

1683:   {Burton}}]{1992Sci...255.1538Z}

1684: {Zhao}, J., {Roberts}, D.~A., {Goss}, W.~M., {Frail}, D.~A., {Lo}, K.~Y.,

1685:   {Subrahmanyan}, R., {Kesteven}, M.~J., {Ekers}, R.~D., {Allen}, D.~A., \&

1686:   {Burton}, M.~G. 1992, Science, 255, 1538

1687: 

1688: \end{thebibliography}

1689: 

1690: 

1691: \begin{deluxetable}{rrrrr}

1692: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1693: %\rotate

1694: \tablecaption{Steady Sources Detected in at Least One Epoch}

1695: \tablehead{\colhead{RA} & \colhead{Dec.} & \colhead{$N_{det}$} &

1696: \colhead{$<S>$} & \colhead{$S_{deep}$} \\

1697: \colhead{(J2000)} & \colhead{(J2000)} &                              &

1698: \colhead{($\mu$Jy)} & \colhead{($\mu$Jy)}  

1699: \label{tab:steady}}

1700: \startdata

1701: %\cline

1702: \multicolumn{5}{c}{5 GHz} \\

1703: %\cline

1704: %\input Sources_ed_full_steady.tex

1705: 15 00 11.48 $\pm$ 0.10 & 78 12 42.26 $\pm$ 00.13 & 26 & 2380 $\pm$ 73 & 502 $\pm$ 17 \\

1706: 15 00 44.87 $\pm$ 0.10 & 78 18 39.04 $\pm$ 00.32 & 4 & 874 $\pm$ 36 & 180 $\pm$ 7 \\

1707: 15 01 11.70 $\pm$ 0.10 & 78 15 20.23 $\pm$ 00.10 & 141 & 504 $\pm$ 6 & 307 $\pm$ 4 \\

1708: 15 01 16.19 $\pm$ 0.10 & 78 12 45.88 $\pm$ 00.10 & 363 & 1146 $\pm$ 14 & 741 $\pm$ 5 \\

1709: 15 01 22.67 $\pm$ 0.10 & 78 18 05.66 $\pm$ 00.10 & 452 & 880 $\pm$ 9 & 634 $\pm$ 3 \\

1710: 15 02 51.40 $\pm$ 0.10 & 78 18 12.46 $\pm$ 00.10 & 23 & 351 $\pm$ 19 & 155 $\pm$ 3 \\

1711: 15 03 24.83 $\pm$ 0.14 & 78 17 37.62 $\pm$ 00.46 & 1 & 318 $\pm$ 54 & 166 $\pm$ 4 \\

1712: 15 03 28.07 $\pm$ 0.30 & 78 09 21.50 $\pm$ 01.04 & 1 & 2045 $\pm$ 301 & $2650 \pm 8 $ \\

1713: %\cline

1714: \multicolumn{5}{c}{8.4 GHz} \\

1715: %\cline

1716: %\input SourcesXband_steady.tex

1717: 15 01 11.13 $\pm$ 0.12 & 78 15 22.45 $\pm$ 00.32 & 1 &1081 $\pm$ 154 & 291 $\pm$ 9 \\

1718: 15 01 22.58 $\pm$ 0.10 & 78 18 05.80 $\pm$ 00.10 & 159 & 1099 $\pm$ 36 & 794 $\pm$ 8 \\

1719: 15 02 51.38 $\pm$ 0.10 & 78 18 13.14 $\pm$ 00.18 & 3 & 518 $\pm$ 31 & 225 $\pm$ 4 \\

1720: 15 03 23.41 $\pm$ 0.41 & 78 17 35.74 $\pm$ 00.64 & 1 & 840 $\pm$ 157 & 212 $\pm$ 8 \\

1721: \enddata

1722: \tablecomments{Columns are (1) right ascension, (2) declination, (3)

1723: the number of epochs in which the source is detected,

1724: (4) mean flux density of detections, and (5) flux density in the deep image.}

1725: \end{deluxetable}

1726: 

1727: 

1728: \begin{deluxetable}{rrrrrrrrr}

1729: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1730: %\rotate

1731: \tablecaption{Transient Sources from a Single Epoch}

1732: \tablehead{\colhead{Epoch} &\colhead{RA} & \colhead{Dec.} & 

1733: \colhead{$S$} & \colhead{$S_{deep}$} & \colhead{$t_{next}$} & \colhead{$S_{next}$} & \colhead{$-\log_{10}{PFD}$} & \colhead{Host} \\

1734:  &  \colhead{(J2000)} & \colhead{(J2000)} &

1735: \colhead{($\mu$Jy)} & \colhead{($\mu$Jy)} & \colhead{(days)} & \colhead{($\mu$Jy)} 

1736: \label{tab:transients}}

1737: \startdata

1738: \multicolumn{8}{c}{5 GHz} \\

1739: 19840502 & 15 02 24.61 $\pm$ 0.21 & 78 16 10.08 $\pm$ 00.46 & 448 $\pm$ 74 & $< 8$ & 7 & $ -10 \pm 68 $& 4.5 & X\\

1740: 19840613 & 15 01 38.07 $\pm$ 0.21 & 78 18 40.75 $\pm$ 00.39 & 566 $\pm$ 81 & $< 28$ & 7 & $ 86 \pm 89 $& 7.5 & G\\

1741: 19860115 & 15 02 26.40 $\pm$ 0.44 & 78 17 32.39 $\pm$ 01.59 & 370 $\pm$ 67 & $< 8$ & 7 & $ 199 \pm 121 $& 3.6 & X \\

1742: 19860122 & 15 00 50.15 $\pm$ 0.34 & 78 15 39.37 $\pm$ 01.38 & 1586 $\pm$ 248 & $< 15$ & 7 & $ -59 \pm 164 $& 6.4 & X\\

1743: 19920826 & 15 02 59.89 $\pm$ 0.35 & 78 16 10.82 $\pm$ 02.44 & 642 $\pm$ 101 & $< 9$ & 56 & $ 37 \pm 83 $& 6.3 & ?\\

1744: 19970528 & 15 00 23.55 $\pm$ 0.10 & 78 13 01.37 $\pm$ 00.17 & 1731 $\pm$ 232 & $< 36$ & 7 & $ 90 \pm 206 $& 7.9 & ? \\

1745: 19990504 & 14 59 46.42 $\pm$ 0.56 & 78 20 29.03 $\pm$ 00.74 & 7042 $\pm$ 963 & $< 117$ & 21 & $ -313 \pm 1020 $& 9.1 & X\\

1746: %\input Sources_ed_full_transient.tex

1747: \multicolumn{8}{c}{8.4 GHz} \\

1748: %\input SourcesXband_transient.tex

1749: 19970205 & 15 01 29.35 $\pm$ 0.10 & 78 19 49.20 $\pm$ 00.10 & 2234 $\pm$ 288 & $<646$ & 5 & $857 \pm 323$ & 8.0 & X\\

1750: \enddata

1751: \tablecomments{Columns are (1) RT epoch, (2) right ascension, (3) declination, 

1752: (4) mean flux density of detection, (5) flux density in the deep image, 

1753: (6) separation in days between next epoch and epoch of transient, 

1754: (7) flux density in the next epoch, 

1755: (8) the negative logarithm of the probability of false detection in 

1756: the single epoch, and (9) optical/IR host identification, where ``G'' 

1757: indicates galaxy, ``?'' indicates possible galaxy association, and ``X'' 

1758: indicates no host.}

1759: \end{deluxetable}

1760: 

1761: \begin{deluxetable}{rrrrrrrrr}

1762: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1763: %\rotate

1764: \tablecaption{Transient Sources with $T_{\rm char}=2$ months}

1765: \tablehead{\colhead{Epoch} &\colhead{RA} & \colhead{Dec.} & 

1766: \colhead{$S$} & \colhead{$S_{deep}$} & \colhead{$t_{next}$} & \colhead{$S_{next}$} & \colhead{$-\log_{10}{PFD}$} & \colhead{Host} \\

1767:  &  \colhead{(J2000)} & \colhead{(J2000)} &

1768: \colhead{($\mu$Jy)} & \colhead{($\mu$Jy)} & \colhead{(days)} & \colhead{($\mu$Jy)} 

1769: \label{tab:transientsmonths}}

1770: \startdata

1771: \multicolumn{8}{c}{5 GHz} \\

1772: %\input SourcesMonths_ed_full.tex

1773: 19870422 & 15 00 50.01 $\pm$ 0.35 & 78 09 45.49 $\pm$ 0.97 & $505 \pm 83$ & $<36$ & 96 & $-154 \pm 65$ & 3.0 & G\\

1774: \multicolumn{8}{c}{8.4 GHz} \\

1775: %\input SourcesXbandMonths_ed_full.tex

1776: 20010331 & 15 03 46.18 $\pm$ 0.10 & 78 15 41.68 $\pm$ 00.11 & 697 $\pm$ 94 & $<37$ & 59 & 85 $\pm$ 85 & 3.4 & X\\

1777: \enddata

1778: \tablecomments{Columns are (1) RT epoch, (2) right ascension, (3) declination, 

1779: (4) mean flux density of detection, (5) flux density in the deep image, 

1780: (6) separation in days between next epoch and epoch of transient, 

1781: (7) flux density in the next epoch, (8) the negative logarithm of 

1782: the probability of false detection in the single epoch, and (9) 

1783: optical/IR host identification, where ``G'' indicates galaxy, 

1784: ``?'' indicates possible galaxy association, and ``X'' indicates no host.}

1785: \end{deluxetable}

1786: 

1787: 

1788: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrr}

1789: \tablecaption{Magnitudes, Colors, and Redshifts of Transient Host Galaxies}

1790: \tablehead{\colhead{RT Epoch} & \colhead{MAPS Counterpart} & \colhead{Host Offset} & \colhead{$R$} & \colhead{$B-R$} & \colhead{$z$}  \\

1791:                               &                &                  & \colhead{(mag)} & \colhead{(mag)} 

1792: \label{tab:redshift}}

1793: \startdata

1794: 19840613 & P023-0189928 & 2.7$^{\prime\prime}$ NW & 16.5 & 1.8 & 0.040 \\

1795: 19860115-1 & P023-0190130 & 15$^{\prime\prime}$ NE & 19.2 & 1.3 & 0.130 \\

1796: 19860115-2 & \dots        & 20$^{\prime\prime}$ SW &      &     & 0.242 \\

1797: 19870422 & P023-0189613 & 1.5$^{\prime\prime}$ SE & 20.2 & 2.5 & 0.249 \\

1798: 19920826 & \dots        & 5$^{\prime\prime}$ NW &        &     & unknown \\

1799: 19970528 & P023-0189499 & 5$^{\prime\prime}$ SE & 19.6   & 2.4 & 0.245 \\

1800: \enddata

1801: \tablecomments{Host offset is position relative to the transient.

1802: Magnitudes and colors are from MAPS catalog.}

1803: \end{deluxetable}

1804: 

1805: \begin{deluxetable}{rrrrrrr}

1806: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1807: %\rotate

1808: \tablecaption{Effective Area Searched for a Comparable Two-Epoch Survey}

1809: \tablehead{            & \multicolumn{2}{c}{5 GHz} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{8.4 GHz} & Total \\

1810: \colhead{Flux Density} & \colhead{Number of Epochs} & \colhead{Area} & \colhead{Number of Epochs} & \colhead{Area} & \colhead{Number of Epochs} & \colhead{Area} \\

1811: \colhead{($\mu$Jy)} &  & \colhead{(deg$^2$)}&  & \colhead{(deg$^2$)}&  & \colhead{(deg$^2$)} 

1812: \label{tab:areasearched}}

1813: \startdata

1814: %\input area.tex

1815:   70 &    9 &  0.16 &	0	&	0.0 &	9 & 0.16\\ 

1816:  100 &   10 &  0.24 &	0	&	0.0 &	10 & 0.24\\ 

1817:  140 &   12 &  0.34 &	0	&	0.0 &	12 & 0.34\\ 

1818:  200 &   35 &  0.50 &	0	&	0.0 &	35 & 0.50\\ 

1819:  280 &  201 &  1.42 &	442	&	1.45&	435 & 2.19\\ 

1820:  400 &  464 &  4.57 &	560	&	3.08&	761 & 6.20\\ 

1821:  560 &  561 &  9.14 &	584	&	4.79&  873 & 11.68\\ 

1822:  800 &  596 & 14.56 &	591	&	6.64&  910 & 18.09\\ 

1823: 1120 &  606 & 19.85 &	591	&	8.40&  924 & 24.31\\ 

1824: 1600 &  607 & 25.51 &	598	&      10.28&  925 & 30.97\\ 

1825: \enddata

1826: \end{deluxetable}

1827: 

1828: \begin{deluxetable}{rrrrrrr}

1829: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1830: %\rotate

1831: \tablecaption{Effective Area Searched for a Comparable Two-Epoch Survey for $T_{\rm char}=2$ months}

1832: \tablehead{            & \multicolumn{2}{c}{5 GHz} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{8.4 GHz} & Total \\

1833: \colhead{Flux Density} & \colhead{Number of Epochs} & \colhead{Area} & \colhead{Number of Epochs} & \colhead{Area} & \colhead{Number of Epochs} & \colhead{Area} \\

1834: \colhead{($\mu$Jy)} &  & \colhead{(deg$^2$)}&  & \colhead{(deg$^2$)}&  & \colhead{(deg$^2$)} 

1835: \label{tab:areasearchedmonths}}

1836: \startdata

1837: %\input AreaMonthsFinal.tex

1838:   70 &   24 &  0.10 &    9 &  0.02 &  26  &  0.1  \\

1839:  100 &   41 &  0.49 &   38 &  0.22 &  54  &  0.56  \\

1840:  140 &   55 &  0.91 &   61 &  0.67 &  73  &  1.11  \\

1841:  200 &   75 &  1.51 &   74 &  1.31 &  99  &  1.91  \\

1842:  280 &   90 &  2.24 &   78 &  1.97 &  115  &  2.84  \\

1843:  400 &   95 &  3.11 &   78 &  2.69 &  120  &  3.94  \\

1844:  560 &   95 &  3.93 &   78 &  3.37 &  120  &  4.97  \\

1845:  800 &   95 &  4.81 &   78 &  4.09 &  120  &  6.07  \\

1846: 1120 &   95 &  5.64 &   78 &  4.77 &  120  &  7.11  \\

1847: 1600 &   95 &  6.52 &   78 &  5.48 &  120  &  8.22  \\

1848: \enddata

1849: \end{deluxetable}

1850: 

1851: \begin{deluxetable}{rrrrrrr}

1852: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}

1853: %\rotate

1854: \tablecaption{Effective Area Searched  for a Comparable Two-Epoch Survey for $T_{\rm char}=1$ year}

1855: \tablehead{            & \multicolumn{2}{c}{5 GHz} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{8.4 GHz} & Total \\

1856: \colhead{Flux Density} & \colhead{Number of Epochs} & \colhead{Area} & \colhead{Number of Epochs} & \colhead{Area} & \colhead{Number of Epochs} & \colhead{Area} \\

1857: \colhead{($\mu$Jy)} &  & \colhead{(deg$^2$)}&  & \colhead{(deg$^2$)}&  & \colhead{(deg$^2$)} 

1858: \label{tab:areasearchedyears}}

1859: \startdata

1860: %\input AreaMonthsFinal.tex

1861:   50 &    5 &  0.02 & 10 & 0.02 & 15 & 0.04\\

1862:   70 &   13 &  0.09 & 14 & 0.05 & 15 & 0.10\\

1863:  100 &   17 &  0.24 & 15 & 0.08 & 20 & 0.26\\

1864:  140 &   17 &  0.38 & 15 & 0.14 & 20 & 0.42\\

1865:  200 &   17 &  0.53 & 16 & 0.18 & 21 & 0.57\\

1866:  280 &   17 &  0.67 & 16 & 0.23 & 21 & 0.73\\

1867:  400 &   17 &  0.82 & 16 & 0.27 & 21 & 0.89\\

1868:  560 &   17 &  0.96 & 16 & 0.32 & 21 & 1.14\\

1869:  800 &   17 &  1.09 & 16 & 0.35 & 21 & 1.19\\

1870: 1120 &   17 &  1.15 & 16 & 0.36 & 21 & 1.24\\

1871: 1600 &   17 &  1.16 & 16 & 0.36 & 21 & 1.25\\

1872: \enddata

1873: \end{deluxetable}

1874: 

1875: \includegraphics[width=3in,angle=-90]{f1a.ps}\includegraphics[width=3in,angle=-90]{f1b.ps}

1876: %\includegraphics[width=3in,angle=-90]{19840613.NOLABEL.PS}\includegraphics[width=3in,angle=-90]{19840620.PS}

1877: \figcaption{Image from epochs 19840613 (left) and 19840620 (right) at 5~GHz.  

1878: The two westernmost sources are steady

1879: sources J150112+781520 and J150123+781806. The northernmost source is a

1880: transient, J150138+781841, detectable only in epoch 19840613. 

1881: Contours are 5, 6, and 7 times the image rms of 57 and 63 $\mu$Jy.

1882: \label{fig:typicalimage}}

1883: 

1884: 

1885: \plotone{f2.eps}

1886: %\plotone{sources2000_ed_notag_legend.eps}

1887: \figcaption[]{Deep image obtained at 5~GHz.  We show the positions 

1888: of single-epoch transient sources at 5~GHz (squares), single-epoch 

1889: transient source at 8.4 GHz (triangle), two-month epoch transient

1890: sources (diamonds), and steady sources detected at least once in 

1891: an individual epoch (circles). The two large circles indicate the 

1892: half-power radius and twice the half-power radius of the 5-GHz field.

1893: The grey scale stretches from $-$2.5 to 30 $\mu$Jy.  The image has not been

1894: corrected for primary beam attenuation.

1895: \label{fig:deep}}

1896: 

1897: \plotone{f3.eps}

1898: %\plotone{lightcurvesteadysource.eps}

1899: \figcaption[]{Light curve of J150123+781806 at 5 GHz (top) and 

1900: 8.4 GHz (bottom) from the entire data set.

1901: \label{fig:standardlightcurve}}

1902: 

1903: 

1904: \mbox{\includegraphics[width=3in]{f4a.eps}\includegraphics[width=3in]{f4b.eps}}

1905: \mbox{\includegraphics[width=3in]{f4c.eps}\includegraphics[width=3in]{f4d.eps}}

1906: \mbox{\includegraphics[width=3in]{f4e.eps}\includegraphics[width=3in]{f4f.eps}}

1907: \mbox{\includegraphics[width=3in]{f4g.eps}\includegraphics[width=3in]{f4h.eps}}

1908: \mbox{\includegraphics[width=3in]{f4i.eps}\includegraphics[width=3in]{f4j.eps}}

1909: \figcaption{Light curves of the transient sources for the year surrounding 

1910: detection.  A circle around the point denotes the epoch  of detection.  Other

1911: points for all sources are all non-detections; values given are best-fit 

1912: Gaussians at the position of the transient.

1913: \label{fig:lct}}

1914: 

1915: 

1916: \parbox[b]{\textwidth}{\includegraphics[width=2in]{f5a.eps}\includegraphics[width=2in]{f5b.eps}\includegraphics[width=2in]{f5c.eps} \\

1917: \includegraphics[width=2in]{f5d.eps}\includegraphics[width=2in]{f5e.eps}\includegraphics[width=2in]{f5f.eps} \\

1918: \includegraphics[width=2in]{f5g.eps}\includegraphics[width=2in]{f5h.eps}\includegraphics[width=2in]{f5i.eps} \\

1919: \includegraphics[width=2in]{f5j.eps}}

1920: %\parbox[b]{\textwidth}{\includegraphics[width=2in]{overlay_pub.deep.19840502.eps}\includegraphics[width=2in]{overlay_pub.deep.19840613.eps}\includegraphics[width=2in]{overlay_pub.deep.19860115.eps} \\

1921: %\includegraphics[width=2in]{overlay_pub.deep.19860122.eps}\includegraphics[width=2in]{overlay_pub.deep.19870422.eps}\includegraphics[width=2in]{overlay_pub.deep.19920826.eps} \\

1922: %\includegraphics[width=2in]{overlay_pub.deep.19970205.eps}\includegraphics[width=2in]{overlay_pub.deep.19970528.eps}\includegraphics[width=2in]{overlay_pub.deep.19990504.eps} \\

1923: %\includegraphics[width=2in]{overlay_pub.deep.20010331.eps}}

1924: \figcaption{Contour plots of transients overlaid on color images from 

1925: the deep radio image. Each image is $1'$ in scale. Contours are 3, 4, 5, 6, 

1926: and 7 times the image rms.  The synthesized beam for each image is 

1927: displayed in blue in the lower left-hand corner.  The color

1928: scale of the deep radio image has a range of 0 to 100 $\mu$Jy.

1929: \label{fig:deepradio}}

1930: 

1931: 

1932: \parbox[b]{\textwidth}{\includegraphics[width=2in]{f6a.ps}\includegraphics[width=2in]{f6b.ps}\includegraphics[width=2in]{f6c.ps} \\

1933: \includegraphics[width=2in]{f6d.ps}\includegraphics[width=2in]{f6e.ps}\includegraphics[width=2in]{f6f.ps} \\

1934: \includegraphics[width=2in]{f6g.ps}\includegraphics[width=2in]{f6h.ps}\includegraphics[width=2in]{f6i.ps} \\

1935: \includegraphics[width=2in]{f6j.ps}}

1936: %\parbox[b]{\textwidth}{\includegraphics[width=2in]{Figs/fig19840502.ps}\includegraphics[width=2in]{Figs/fig19840613.ps}\includegraphics[width=2in]{Figs/fig19860115.ps} \\

1937: %\includegraphics[width=2in]{Figs/fig19860122.ps}\includegraphics[width=2in]{Figs/fig19870422.ps}\includegraphics[width=2in]{Figs/fig19920826.ps} \\

1938: %\includegraphics[width=2in]{Figs/fig19970205.ps}\includegraphics[width=2in]{Figs/fig19970528.ps}\includegraphics[width=2in]{Figs/figm19990504.ps}}

1939: %\includegraphics[width=2in]{Figs/figm20010331.ps}

1940: \figcaption{Optical and infrared images at the positions of transient 

1941: sources.  The white circle indicates the uncertainty in the position 

1942: of the RT.  Images are from Keck except for RTs 19990504 and 20010331,

1943: which are from PAIRITEL.  The color composite for the Keck images

1944: was made by using the $g$-band image for the blue channel, $R$ band 

1945: for the red channel, and the geometric mean of the two images for the 

1946: green channel.  Keck images are $38''$ on a side. The PAIRITEL image 

1947: is in the $K$ band and is $73''$ on a side.  The orientation and 

1948: location of the spectroscopic slit is indicated with blue bars.

1949: North is up and east is to the left.  The bright streak in the image of 

1950: RT 19860122 is a diffraction spike from a nearby bright star.

1951: \label{fig:keck}}

1952: 

1953: %\plotone{f7.ps}

1954: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=6in]{f7.ps}

1955: %\plotone{19840613.DEEP.PS}

1956: \figcaption{Deep image of the region centered on the transient 

1957: 19840613.  The small cross marks the position and $3\sigma$ uncertainty 

1958: in its position.  The position is clearly offset from the centroid of 

1959: the radio emission and from the centroid of the optical emission, marked 

1960: with the large cross.  The extent of the large cross delineates the 

1961: major and minor axes of the galaxy as measured in 2MASS. Contours are 

1962: 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 times the image rms of 2.6 $\mu$Jy.

1963: \label{fig:840613deep}}

1964: 

1965: 

1966: %\plotone{f8.ps}

1967: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=6in]{f8.ps}

1968: %\plotone{19870422.PS}

1969: \figcaption{Deep image of the region centered on the transient 

1970: 19870422.  We mark the position and $3\sigma$ uncertainty of the 

1971: RT (plus sign) and the position of the optical centroid (star).  

1972: The RT position is offset from any peak of the radio emission 

1973: but is consistent with the peak of the optical emission.   

1974: Contours are $-2$, 2, 3, and 4 times the image rms of 14~$\mu$Jy 

1975: at the location of the transient.

1976: \label{fig:870422deep}}

1977: 

1978: 

1979: \plotone{f9.eps}

1980: \figcaption[]{The cumulative

1981: two-epoch source density for radio transients as a function of 

1982: flux density.  The solid black line shows the rate while the 

1983: dotted lines show the $2\sigma$ upper and lower bounds. The red 

1984: dashed lines show $S^{-1.5}$ and $S^{-2.2}$ curves.  Both are 

1985: reasonable fits to these data, while the latter shows greater 

1986: consistency with lower-frequency results. The arrows show 

1987: $2\sigma$ upper limits for transients from this survey with a 

1988: 1-year timescale, two-month timescale, and for transients 

1989: from the comparison of the 1.4~GHz NVSS and FIRST surveys 

1990: \citep{2006ApJ...639..331G}, from the \citet{2003ApJ...590..192C} 

1991: survey (labeled C2003), and from the \citet{2003AJ....125.2299F} 

1992: survey (labeled F2003).  See the main text for details of these 

1993: surveys.

1994: \label{fig:snapshotrate}}

1995: 

1996: 

1997: \end{document}

1998: 

1999: