1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \documentclass{emulateapj}
3: %\usepackage{psfig}
4: \usepackage{apjfonts,times}
5: %\usepackage[figuresright]{rotating}
6:
7: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
8: % AUTHOR'S MACROS
9: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
10: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}
11: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}
12: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
13: % AUTHOR'S SYMBOLS
14: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
15: \newcommand{\gapprox}{$\stackrel {>}{_{\sim}}$}
16: \newcommand{\lapprox}{$\stackrel {<}{_{\sim}}$}
17: \def\alp{\mbox{$\alpha$}}
18: \def\farcd{\hbox{$.\mkern-4mu^\circ$}}
19: \def\farcm{\hbox{$.\mkern-4mu^\prime$}}
20: \def\farcs{\hbox{$.\!\!^{\prime\prime}$}}
21: \def\earth{\hbox{$\oplus$}}
22: \def\arcmin{\hbox{$^\prime$}}
23: \def\arcsec{\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$}}
24: \def\solar{\mbox{$_{\normalsize\odot}$}}
25: \def\fs{\hbox{$.\!\!^{\rm s}$}}
26: \def\deg{\hbox{$^\circ$}}
27: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
28: \newcommand{\ttbs}{\char'134}
29: \newcommand{\AmS}{{\protect\the\textfont2
30: A\kern-.1667em\lower.5ex\hbox{M}\kern-.125emS}}
31: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
32: \newcommand{\lsim}{\ \raise
33: -2.truept\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{$\sim$}}\raise5.truept\hbox{$<$}\ }}
34: \newcommand{\gsim}{\ \raise
35: -2.truept\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{$\sim$}}\raise5.truept\hbox{$>$}\ }}
36: \newcommand{\simsim}{\ \raise
37: -2.truept\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{$\sim$}}\raise5.truept\hbox{$\sim$}\ }}
38: \newcommand{\FeH}{\mbox{[Fe/H]}\,}
39: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
40:
41: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
42: % add words to TeX's hyphenation exception list
43: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
44: \hyphenation{author another re-commend-ed Post-Script}
45:
46: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
47: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command
48: %% below.
49: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
50: %\slugcomment{Submitted to ApJL October 4, 2006}
51: \slugcomment{Accepted for Publication in ApJ, May 1, 2007}
52:
53: %\righthead{}
54: %\lefthead{Gouliermis D., et al.}
55:
56: \shorttitle{Clustered Star Formation in NGC~602/N~90 in the SMC
57: with Spitzer/IRAC Photometry}
58: \shortauthors{D. A. Gouliermis, S. P. Quanz, \& Th. Henning}
59:
60: \begin{document}
61:
62: \title{Clustered Star Formation in the Small Magellanic Cloud. A
63: {\em Spitzer}/IRAC View of the Star-Forming Region
64: NGC~602/N~90\altaffilmark{1}}
65:
66: %\footnotemark[1] %\footnotetext[1]{}
67:
68: \author{Dimitrios A. Gouliermis, Sascha P. Quanz, \& Thomas Henning}
69: \affil{Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy, K\"onigstuhl 17, 69117
70: Heidelberg, Germany}
71:
72: \email{[dgoulier], [quanz], [henning]@mpia-hd.mpg.de}
73:
74: \altaffiltext{1}{Research supported by the Deutsche
75: Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation)}
76:
77: \begin{abstract}
78:
79: We present {\em Spitzer}/IRAC photometry on the star-forming {\sc H~ii}
80: region N~90, related to the young stellar association NGC~602 in the
81: Small Magellanic Cloud. Our photometry revealed bright mid-infrared
82: sources, which we classify with the use of a scheme based on templates
83: and models of red sources in the Milky Way, and criteria recently
84: developed from the {\em Spitzer} Survey of the SMC (Bolatto et al. 2007)
85: for the selection of candidate Young Stellar Objects (YSOs). We detected
86: 57 sources in all four IRAC channels in a 6\farcm2 $\times$ 4\farcm8
87: field-of-view centered on N~90; 22 of these sources are classified as
88: candidate YSOs. We compare the locations of these objects with the
89: position of optical sources recently found in the same region with
90: high-resolution HST/ACS imaging of NGC~602 by Schmalzl et al. (2007),
91: and we find that 17 candidate YSOs have one or more optical
92: counterparts. All of these optical sources are identified as pre-main
93: sequence stars, indicating, thus, ongoing clustered star formation
94: events in the region. The positions of the detected YSOs and their
95: related PMS clusters give a clear picture of the current star formation
96: in N~90, according to which the young stellar association photo-ionizes
97: the surrounding interstellar medium, revealing the {\sc H~ii} nebula,
98: and triggering sequential star formation events mainly along the eastern
99: and southern rims of the formed cavity of the parental molecular cloud.
100:
101: \end{abstract}
102:
103: \keywords{Magellanic Clouds --- HII regions --- open clusters and
104: associations: individual (NGC 602) --- stars: formation ---
105: stars: pre-main sequence --- Hertzsprung-Russell diagram}
106:
107: %\clearpage
108: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIGURE %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
109: \begin{figure*}[t!]
110: %\epsscale{.87}
111: %\plotone{f1r.eps}
112: \vspace*{2.5truecm}
113: \begin{center}
114: {\large The postscript file is removed due to size limitations. \\
115: To see the figure download the corresponding JPG file: ``f1.jpg''}
116: \end{center}
117: \vspace*{2.5truecm}
118: \caption{{\em Spitzer} image of the region surrounding NGC~602/N~90.
119: IRAC three-color image is shown, with IRAC-1 3.6 \micron\ in blue,
120: IRAC-2 4.5 \micron\ in green, and IRAC-4 8 \micron\ in red.}
121: \label{irac-maps}
122: \end{figure*}
123: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
124:
125: \section{Introduction}
126:
127: The {\em Spitzer} Space Telescope opens a unique mid- and far-infrared
128: window to the exploration of massive star formation not only in our
129: galaxy but also in our neighboring dwarf galaxies, the Large and Small
130: Magellanic Cloud (LMC, SMC). Stellar associations in both the Magellanic
131: Clouds (MCs) contain the richest sample of young bright stars in these
132: galaxies, and consequently our knowledge on their young massive stars
133: has been collected from studies of such stellar systems (see e.g. Massey
134: 2002). Furthermore, almost every MCs association coincide with one or
135: more {\sc H~ii} regions, as they have been earlier cataloged (Henize
136: 1956; Davies et al. 1976), and it has been shown that the measured
137: H\alp\ fluxes are in excellent agreement with those expected from the
138: ionizing flux of the detected massive stars (Massey 1993). However, MCs
139: associations are not mere aggregates of young bright stars alone, but
140: they also host large numbers of faint pre-main sequence (PMS) stars, as
141: recent HST studies showed for both the LMC (Gouliermis et al. 2006) and
142: the SMC (Nota et al. 2006). Both, the existence of {\sc H~ii} regions
143: and PMS stars in stellar associations of the MCs indicate that star
144: formation may be still active in their vicinity, and {\em Spitzer}
145: offers a unique opportunity to test this hypothesis.
146:
147: Indeed, using {\em Spitzer} observations, Jones et al. (2005) reported
148: four Young Stellar Objects (YSOs) in the {\sc H~ii} complex N 159
149: (located in the vicinity of the association LH 105; Lucke \& Hodge 1970)
150: in the LMC. Chu et al. (2005) obtained {\em Spitzer} observations of the
151: super-bubble N 51D (associations LH~51/54) in the LMC and they found
152: three YSOs projected within the super-bubble. Images from the {\em
153: Hubble} Space Telescope (HST) in H\alp\ and [{\sc S ii}] allowed them to
154: identify dust globules associated with two of them. The third YSO was
155: associated with the first Herbig-Haro object detected outside the
156: Galaxy. Furthermore, Meixner et al. (2006) in their presentation of the
157: first results from the {\em Spitzer} Space Telescope Survey of the LMC
158: Legacy Project {\em Surveying the Agents of a Galaxy's Evolution}
159: (SAGE), show as a test-case epoch 1 data of the area of two {\sc H~ii}
160: regions, N 79/N 83 (associations LH 2/LH 5). They found that MIPS 70
161: \micron\ and 160 \micron\ images of the diffuse dust emission of the
162: regions reveal a distribution similar to the gas emissions, especially
163: the {\sc H i} 21 cm emission, and they note that the measured
164: point-source sensitivity for the epoch 1 data is consistent with
165: expectations for the survey.
166:
167: Bolatto et al. (2007), recently, presented their results from the {\em
168: Spitzer} Survey of the Small Magellanic Cloud (S$^3$MC), which imaged
169: the star-forming body of the SMC in all seven MIPS and IRAC wave bands.
170: These authors compiled a photometric catalog of 400,000 mid- and
171: far-infrared point sources in the SMC, from which they identified 282
172: bright candidate YSOs as bright 5.8 \micron\ sources with very faint
173: optical counterparts and very red mid-infrared colors ([5.8]$-$[8.0] $>$
174: 1.2 mag). More recently, Simon et al. (2007) used the same observations
175: and applied spectral energy distribution (SED) fits based on models by
176: Whitney et al. (2003a, b, 2004) to enhance the catalog of candidate YSOs
177: in the brightest {\sc H~ii} region in the SMC, N~66.
178:
179: The present paper deals with mid-infrared imaging from the {\em Spitzer}
180: Space Telescope of the {\sc H~ii} region LHA~115-N90 (Henize 1956) or in
181: short N~90, located in the wing of the SMC. This region, also cataloged by
182: Davies et al. (1976) and named DEM~S~166, is related to the young star
183: cluster NGC~602, which was classified as a stellar association by Hodge
184: (1985; system No 68 in his catalog). We present the results of our
185: investigation on the candidate YSOs in the region of NGC~602/N~90,
186: identified with our photometry according to criteria based on galactic
187: templates and recent {\em Spitzer} observations of other star forming
188: regions in the SMC.
189:
190: Specifically, in \S 2 we discuss the retrieval of the {\em Spitzer} data
191: used in our study and their photometry. General description of the
192: mid-infrared characteristics of the region is given in \S 3, and in \S 4
193: the point sources detected with our photometry, and the selection of
194: candidate YSOs are presented. The recent release of high-resolution data
195: on NGC~602/N~90 obtained with the {\em Advanced Camera for Surveys} on
196: {\em Hubble} Space Telescope allowed us a detailed photometric study of
197: the stellar association and its surroundings down to the faint red
198: pre-main sequence stars of the system (Schmalzl et al. 2007). In \S 4 we
199: also combine the results from both {\em Hubble} and {\em Spitzer}
200: photometries to identify the optical counterparts of the candidate YSOs
201: found in the region. Based on our findings we discuss the current star
202: forming process that probably took place in the region of NGC~602/N~90
203: with emphasis to the clustered behavior of star formation in \S 5.
204: Finally, general conclusions of this study are given in \S 6.
205:
206: %\clearpage
207: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIGURE %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
208: \begin{figure*}[t!]
209: \epsscale{1.}
210: \plotone{f2r.eps}
211: \caption{{\em Left}: IRAC CMD of template/model photometry of Cohen (1993)
212: and Whitney et al. (2004) for IR sources in the Milky Way. Symbols code
213: different types of sources throughout the SMC: Main-sequence O stars,
214: RSGs, O-rich and C-rich AGB stars, {\sc H~ii} regions, and YSOs. {\em
215: Right}: The corresponding CMD of sources found in the region of
216: NGC~602/N~90 with our IRAC photometry. The comparison of these CMDs
217: denotes that there are 27 objects in our photometry (located at the right
218: part of the CMD on the right with colors ${\rm [3.6]}-{\rm [8.0]} >
219: 2$~mag) that match the type of galactic YSOs.
220: \label{iractempl}}
221: \end{figure*}
222: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
223:
224:
225: \section{Data Retrieval and Photometry}
226:
227: The imaging data of our study have been obtained with the {\em Infrared
228: Array Camera} (IRAC; Fazio et al. 2004) on-board {\em Spitzer} Space
229: Telescope (Werner et al. 2004). The images are publicly available and
230: are downloaded from the {\em Spitzer} Space Telescope Archive using the
231: {\tt Leopard} package\footnote{{\tt Leopard} can be downloaded from {\tt
232: http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/propkit/spot/}.}. These observations
233: (dataset archive ID: AOR 12485120) were obtained within the GTO Science
234: Program 125 (PI: G. Fazio) on 28 November 2004. We retrieved the Post
235: Basic Calibrated Data ({\tt pbcd}) for all four IRAC channels (3.6
236: \micron, 4.5 \micron, 5.8 \micron\ and 8.0 \micron), which are already
237: fully co-added and calibrated. After visual inspection of the images we
238: carried out PSF-photometry with the {\tt daophot} package provided
239: within the {\tt IRAF\footnote{{\tt IRAF} is distributed by the National
240: Optical Astronomy Observatories, which are operated by the Association
241: of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative
242: agreement with the National Science Foundation. ({\tt
243: http://iraf.noao.edu/})}} environment. In the case of the region of
244: NGC~602/N~90, PSF photometry is required as the field is too crowded for
245: aperture photometry to be appropriately applied. Consequently, for each
246: filter we constructed a reference PSF by combining the PSF of at least 5
247: objects with a high signal to noise ratio and we used this PSF to fit
248: all objects identified with a 3-$\sigma$ confidence level over the local
249: background.
250:
251: We converted the pixel values in each filter from MJy\,sr$^{-1}$ to
252: DN\,s$^{-1}$ according to ``IRAC Data Handbook'' version 5.1.1 and we
253: computed the corresponding magnitudes as $m~=-2.5\,\log{(f)}+\Delta_{\rm
254: ZP}$ with $f$ denoting the flux measured in DN\,s$^{-1}$ and
255: $\Delta_{\rm ZP}$ being the zero point for each filter. Zero points were
256: taken from Hartmann et al. (2005): 19.66 (3.6 \micron), 18.94 (4.5
257: \micron), 16.88 (5.8 \micron) and 17.39 (8.0 \micron). For the initial
258: PSF fit we used a PSF size of 2 pixel, and applied aperture corrections
259: as described in the ``IRAC Data Handbook'' to obtain the final
260: magnitudes. Finally, we cross-matched the obtained catalogs for each
261: filter to identify the sources that are detected in more than one IRAC
262: bands, by allowing a maximum offset of 2 pixels for the center of each
263: point source.
264:
265: \section{Description of the Mid-Infrared Observations of NGC~602/N~90}
266:
267: {\em Spitzer} covers a suitable wavelength range (3.6 - 160 \micron) for
268: defining the dust properties of the interstellar medium (ISM). The
269: mid-infrared channels of IRAC (3.6, 4.5, 5.8 and 8 \micron) are good
270: tracers of the smallest grains through Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon
271: (PAH) emission. Very small grains (typical sizes 12 - 150 \AA) and PAHs
272: (typical sizes 4 - 12 \AA; Desert et al. 1990) are very efficient in
273: heating the gas through the photoelectric effect (Bakes \& Tielens 1994)
274: and therefore their analysis is very important for understanding the
275: thermodynamics of the ISM.
276:
277: IRAS data on both LMC and SMC suggest a deficit of the smallest dust
278: grains in the low-metallicity environments of these galaxies due to the
279: lower 12 \micron\ emission in comparison to the Milky Way and other higher
280: metallicity galaxies (Schwering 1989; Sauvage et al. 1990). A study in the
281: SMC by Stanimirovi\'{c} et al. (2000) concluded that the dust in the SMC
282: is dominated by large grains. The lower abundance of PAHs and very small
283: grains in the SMC is also supported by detailed modeling of SMC UV
284: absorption and FIR emission data by Weingartner \& Draine (2001), Li \&
285: Draine (2002), and Clayton et al. (2003). A different grain size
286: distribution with respect to the Galaxy, or grain destruction, possibly
287: due to the intense UV radiation and/or by supernova shocks have been
288: proposed to explain the very small grain paucity in both galaxies. The
289: absence of PAHs and very small grains has a profound influence on the gas
290: heating and the existence of cold and warm phases in the interstellar
291: medium (Wolfire et al. 1995).
292:
293: The images of NGC~602/N~90 taken with {\em Spitzer}, which we present
294: here, can be used for a qualitative analysis on the dust properties and
295: its relation to stellar sources of radiation in the region of NGC~602. A
296: color composite image from IRAC channels 1, 2 and 4 is shown in Fig.
297: \ref{irac-maps}. The 3.6 and 4.5 \micron\ wave-bands are mostly
298: sensitive to stellar photospheres and very hot circumstellar dust, and
299: therefore the blue (3.6 \micron) and green colors (4.5 \micron) in Fig.
300: \ref{irac-maps} reveal the stars, whereas the red color (8 \micron)
301: shows mainly the diffuse dust emission. Specifically, the origin of
302: diffuse emission at 3.6 \micron\ is likely to originate partly from
303: bound-free transitions in the ionized gas with some contribution from
304: the 3.29 \micron\ emission near molecular clouds (thought to be due to
305: C$-$H bond stretching in PAHs) and very small dust grain emission (e.g.
306: Engelbracht et al. 2006). The 4.5 \micron\ diffuse emission is a
307: combination of bound-free continuum and Brackett-$\alpha$ recombination
308: emission in {\sc H~ii} regions. Both the 5.8 and 8.0 \micron\ bands show
309: molecular material in the interstellar medium (ISM) and circumstellar
310: envelopes, as well as increasingly faint stellar photospheres. The
311: origin of the 5.8 \micron\ diffuse emission is most likely very warm
312: dust emission ($T \sim 600$ K). It encompass the 5.6 and 6.2 \micron\
313: PAH band emission. The origin of the 8 \micron\ diffuse emission is
314: most likely the very bright emission complex at 7 - 9 \micron\ thought
315: to be dominated by C$-$C stretching modes (with some contribution from
316: in-plane C$-$H bending) of the bonds in PAHs and very small carbonaceous
317: dust grains (J{\"a}ger et al. 2006).
318:
319: %The far-infrared channels of {\em MIPS} (observations from which are
320: %not available for this region) trace small (24 \micron) and large (70
321: %and 160 \micron) grains, while the ...
322:
323: %\clearpage
324: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIGURE %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
325: \begin{figure}[t!]
326: \epsscale{1.05}
327: \plotone{f3.ps}
328: \caption{{\em Spitzer}/IRAC Color-color diagram of the sources detected
329: in our photometry in the region of NGC~602/N~90. The vertical dashed
330: line corresponds to the limit [3.6]$-$[8.0]$=$1.2 mag, set by Bolatto et
331: al. (2007) as a criterion for the selection of candidate YSOs similar to
332: those modeled by Whitney et al. (2003). We refine our selection of
333: candidate YSOs in the region to 22 point-sources, which are redder than
334: this limit.
335: \label{fig-ccd}}
336: \end{figure}
337: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
338:
339: %\clearpage
340: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIGURE %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
341: \begin{figure*}[t!]
342: %\epsscale{.8}
343: %\plotone{f4.eps}
344: \vspace*{2.5truecm}
345: \begin{center}
346: {\large The postscript file is removed due to size limitations. \\
347: To see the figure download the corresponding JPG file: ``f4.jpg''}
348: \end{center}
349: \vspace*{2.5truecm}
350: \caption{Color composite image of separate exposures made by ACS/WFC on
351: {\em Hubble} Space Telescope in two broad-band filters, $F555W$ ($V$) and
352: $F814W$ ($I$), and one narrow-band filter, $F658N$ (H\alp\ $+$ [N II]) of
353: the region NGC~602/N~90. North is up and east to the left. The data of
354: these observations are the subject of an investigation of the young
355: stellar populations in the region (Schmalzl et al. 2007). Red boxes
356: indicate the positions of the candidate YSOs detected with our IRAC
357: photometry. This picture clearly indicates that current star formation
358: takes place at the periphery of the central association NGC~602. Probably,
359: star formation started at the association (where the highest concentration
360: of PMS stars has been found; Schmalzl et al. 2007) and propagated
361: outwards, mainly to the east and south, with events of ongoing clustered
362: star formation still taking place along the dust ridges.\label{fig-ysomap}}
363: \end{figure*}
364: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
365:
366:
367: \section{Point-Sources Detected with {\em Spitzer} in NGC~602/N~90}
368:
369: Our photometry revealed 57 objects detected in all four IRAC channels.
370: 44 sources were identified in channels 1, 2 and 3, but not in channel 4,
371: while only two in channels 2,3 and 4 and not in channel 1. For the
372: classification of the sources we make use of the [3.6]$-$[8.0], [8.0]
373: color-magnitude diagram (CMD) in comparison with templates and models
374: compiled for a wide range of IR sources in the Milky Way. These
375: templates have been developed by Cohen (1993) for IRAS data on galactic
376: IR sources, adapted for the IRAC and 2MASS color classification scheme
377: for the Galactic Legacy Infrared Mid-Plane Survey Extraordinaire
378: (GLIMPSE) {\em Spitzer} project (Benjamin et al. 2003). We also make
379: use of the YSO models that have been developed by Whitney et al. (2004)
380: also for GLIMPSE. Both papers include several types of IR sources such
381: as main-sequence stars, red giants, O-rich and C-rich AGB stars, {\sc
382: H~ii} regions, and YSOs. In Fig. \ref{iractempl} ({\em left}), we show
383: the position of such sources in the [3.6]$-$[8.0], [8.0] CMD according
384: to the templates and models. We also show the corresponding CMD for the
385: point-sources we found in all four IRAC channels in the region of
386: NGC~602/N~90 (Fig. \ref{iractempl}, {\em right}). From the comparison
387: of the CMDs of Fig. \ref{iractempl} it is shown that there are 27
388: objects in our photometry with positions in the [3.6]$-$[8.0], [8.0]
389: CMD similar to galactic YSOs of class 0, I and II. However, Class 0
390: YSOs are very rare due to their short evolutionary phase, and such
391: objects would be extremely faint in the IRAC bands at the distance of
392: the SMC. Consequently, one should consider that, although few of our
393: sources match the positions of Class 0 YSOs in the CMD according to the
394: models, probably there are no YSOs of this class in our sample.
395:
396: A criterion adopted by Bolatto et al. (2007) within the S$^3$MC Survey
397: (see also \S 1) for the selection of YSOs in their sample is based on
398: very red [5.8]$-$[8.0] color index ($>$~1.2 mag) of bright 5.8 \micron\
399: sources. Support for their selection is lent by the location of these
400: sources in the [3.6] $-$ [8.0], [8.0] CMD, and the color-color diagrams
401: in near-, mid- and far-infrared wavelengths as modeled by Whitney et al.
402: (2003) for different objects. Bolatto et al. note that the highly
403: reddened 8.0 \micron\ sources occupy the region in those plots that is
404: predicted for late Class 0 to Class II YSOs with different geometrical
405: parameters. We further select the most probable YSOs in the region of
406: NGC~602/N~90 by applying this criterion to the sources detected with our
407: photometry. The [5.8]$-$[8.0], [3.6]$-$[4.5] color-color diagram of our
408: sources is shown in Fig. \ref{fig-ccd} with the limit of Bolatto et al.
409: (2007) for candidate YSOs overplotted as a vertical dashed line. There
410: are 24 sources in our photometry that have colors [5.8]$-$[8.0] $>$ 1.2
411: mag, meeting this selection criterion. All, except two of them, have
412: been selected as candidate YSOs also according to their positions in the
413: [3.6]$-$[8.0], [8.0] CMD (Fig. \ref{iractempl}). Consequently, we refine
414: the number of candidate YSOs in the region of NGC~602/N~90 to 22
415: sources, which meet both criteria.
416:
417: The classification scheme of Bolatto et al. predicts only $\sim$ 2\%
418: contamination of this part of the mid-infrared color-color diagram by B
419: stars with 24 \micron\ emission (their Figure 12). Other types of evolved
420: sources, such as carbon stars, RSGs and O-rich AGB stars, are located to
421: bluer colors. In addition, Bolatto et al. estimated the contamination by
422: background, unresolved galaxies, which can be seen throughout the SMC at
423: infrared wavelengths. They expect 20 contaminants in their sample of 282
424: candidate YSOs ($\simeq$ 7\%), which translates to 1.5 sources in our
425: sample. However, detailed inspection of the candidate YSOs on the ACS
426: image of NGC~602/N~90 revealed no suspicious background galaxies in our
427: sample. The characteristics of the candidate YSOs revealed with our
428: photometry in the region of NGC~602/N~90 are presented in Table
429: \ref{tab-yso}, where we give the ID number (from our IRAC photometric
430: catalog), the position and the magnitudes and corresponding photometric
431: uncertainties in the four IRAC channels for each candidate YSO.
432:
433: It should be noted that the classification of candidate YSOs cannot, in
434: any case, be reduced to a single criterion, and therefore the technique
435: described above should be considered a first-order selection. Moreover,
436: taking into account that the selection of objects with
437: [5.8]$-$[8.0]~$>$~1.2~mag may compromise the actual number of YSOs, this
438: limit should be considered a tentative one. Indeed, Allen et al. (2004)
439: plot known stars with YSO classifications in the IRAC color-color diagram
440: (their Fig. 4) and their Class I YSOs clearly stretch to red [3.6]$-$[4.5]
441: colors with [5.8]$-$[8.0] colors less than 1.2 mag. Our selection, based
442: on Bolatto et al. (2007) scheme, apparently causes such sources to be left
443: out, but its use is being considered in order to reduce as much as
444: possible the number of misidentifications. Furthermore, sources with
445: colors [3.6]$-$[4.5]~$\approx$~0.0~mag and [5.8]$-$[8.0]~$>$~1.2~mag are
446: not well represented in Whitney et al. (2003, 2004) nor in Allen et al.
447: (2004). Based on their colors, some of them are suspected to be small {\sc
448: H~ii} regions, but there are no high resolution radio observations of N~90
449: (unlike N~159 in the LMC; Jones et al. 2005), which would provide
450: information on the ionizing flux for these sources and help us clarify
451: their nature.
452:
453: %\clearpage
454: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIGURE %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
455: \begin{figure*}[t!]
456: %\epsscale{.95}
457: %\plotone{figs/fig4textr.eps}
458: %\centerline{\hbox{
459: %\includegraphics[width=.995\textwidth,angle=270]{f5.eps}
460: %}}
461: \vspace*{2.5truecm}
462: \begin{center}
463: {\large The postscript file is removed due to size limitations. \\
464: To see the figure download the corresponding JPG file: ``f5.jpg''}
465: \end{center}
466: \vspace*{2.5truecm}
467: \caption{Color composite images constructed from our ACS observations of
468: regions $18\arcsec~\times~18\arcsec$ wide centered on the loci where
469: candidate YSOs have been detected. Characteristic examples of 13 candidate
470: YSOs from Table \ref{tab-yso} have been selected. The drawn circles,
471: corresponding to radius 1\farcs2 indicate the positions of the candidate
472: YSOs. Blue circles denote candidate YSOs for which optical sources have
473: been found to coincide with, while red circles the ones for which no
474: optical sources have been identified.\label{fig-ysosamples}}
475: \end{figure*}
476: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
477:
478: %\clearpage
479: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
480: \begin{deluxetable*}{cccccccccccccccc}
481:
482: %\rotate
483:
484: \tablecolumns{16}
485: \tablewidth{0pt}
486: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
487:
488: \tablecaption{Candidate YSOs detected in all four IRAC channels in the
489: region of NGC~602/N~90. The numbering system of the YSOs is from our
490: photometric IRAC catalog. Celestial coordinates are given in J2000. The
491: magnitudes of each candidate YSO in all channels with the corresponding
492: errors are given in columns 4 through 11. The last five columns refer to
493: the optical sources found with ACS to form possible compact clusters
494: within a radial distance of 1\farcs2 around each of the candidate YSOs.
495: The numbers of the detected optical sources, the magnitudes of the
496: brightest source (${\rm F555W}_{\rm bri}$, ${\rm F814W}_{\rm bri}$), as
497: well as the cumulative magnitudes of all stars around each candidate YSO
498: (${\rm F555W}_{\rm tot}$, ${\rm F814W}_{\rm tot}$) are given in columns
499: 13, 14, 15 and 16 respectively. \label{tab-yso}}
500:
501: %\tablenum{1}
502:
503: \tablehead{
504: \colhead{ID} &
505: \colhead{RA} &
506: \colhead{DEC} &
507: \colhead{[3.6]} &
508: \colhead{$\pm$} &
509: \colhead{[4.5]} &
510: \colhead{$\pm$} &
511: \colhead{[5.8]} &
512: \colhead{$\pm$} &
513: \colhead{[8.0]} &
514: \colhead{$\pm$} &
515: \colhead{No} &
516: \colhead{${\rm F555W}_{\rm bri}$} &
517: \colhead{${\rm F814W}_{\rm bri}$} &
518: \colhead{${\rm F555W}_{\rm tot}$} &
519: \colhead{${\rm F814W}_{\rm tot}$} \\
520: \colhead{(1)} &
521: \colhead{(2)} &
522: \colhead{(3)} &
523: \colhead{(4)} &
524: \colhead{(5)} &
525: \colhead{(6)} &
526: \colhead{(7)} &
527: \colhead{(8)} &
528: \colhead{(9)} &
529: \colhead{(10)} &
530: \colhead{(11)} &
531: \colhead{(12)} &
532: \colhead{(13)} &
533: \colhead{(14)} &
534: \colhead{(15)} &
535: \colhead{(16)}
536: }
537:
538: \startdata
539:
540: 1 &01:29:35.66&$-$73:33:39.61&15.90&0.22&16.24&0.30&13.64&0.24&11.99&0.15&
541: 2&24.62 &22.85 &24.46 &22.63 \\
542: 2 &01:29:25.95&$-$73:34:46.69&16.52&0.23&16.82&0.32&14.17&0.31&12.50&0.19&
543: 5&25.45 &23.62 &24.66 &22.45 \\
544: 5 &01:29:26.52&$-$73:32:30.31&16.27&0.15&16.45&0.21&14.57&0.29&12.91&0.15&
545: 2&17.84 &17.72 &17.82 &17.66 \\
546: 22&01:29:44.77&$-$73:33:25.31&16.46&0.21&16.50&0.26&14.70&0.32&13.06&0.17&15&23.26
547: &21.76 &21.82 &20.28 \\
548: 24&01:29:39.23&$-$73:33:18.80&16.66&0.20&16.69&0.31&14.45&0.36&12.79&0.22&
549: 5&24.54 &21.85 &23.12 &20.93 \\
550: 26&01:29:19.80&$-$73:33:12.46&16.06&0.23&16.04&0.29&13.84&0.30&12.17&0.17&
551: & & & & \\
552: 29&01:29:35.55&$-$73:33:30.20&14.13&0.09&14.09&0.11&12.22&0.13&10.61&0.08&
553: 8&17.49 &17.30 &16.73 &16.65 \\
554: 34&01:29:23.08&$-$73:32:51.51&16.00&0.16&15.93&0.17&14.28&0.26&12.88&0.13&
555: 4&22.82 &20.95 &22.06 &20.13 \\
556: 35&01:29:22.34&$-$73:32:48.17&16.67&0.27&16.60&0.36&14.63&0.35&12.95&0.22&
557: & & & & \\
558: 36&01:29:28.61&$-$73:34:12.14&16.88&0.31&16.80&0.42&15.32&0.50&13.68&0.29&
559: 1&25.15 &24.08 & & \\
560: 38&01:29:34.08&$-$73:34:11.66&16.67&0.28&16.58&0.39&14.84&0.39&13.10&0.18&
561: & & & & \\
562: 42&01:28:47.20&$-$73:31:31.69&16.70&0.24&16.54&0.32&15.37&0.51&14.02&0.29&
563: & & & & \\
564: 43&01:29:41.38&$-$73:36:24.53&15.92&0.11&15.71&0.15&14.67&0.33&12.87&0.11&
565: & & & & \\
566: 45&01:29:43.34&$-$73:33:43.21&16.50&0.20&16.21&0.20&14.19&0.29&12.97&0.18&
567: 2&21.90 &21.22 &21.89 &21.16 \\
568: 46&01:29:30.92&$-$73:34:05.74&16.51&0.23&16.17&0.27&14.80&0.38&13.36&0.21&
569: 1&22.45 &20.92 & & \\
570: 49&01:29:20.44&$-$73:33:16.90&16.68&0.21&16.19&0.23&15.16&0.50&13.65&0.21&
571: 1&23.16 &21.55 & & \\
572: 50&01:29:37.52&$-$73:33:51.34&15.00&0.18&14.50&0.20&13.09&0.22&11.70&0.19&
573: 1&20.96 &20.42 & & \\
574: 51&01:29:06.45&$-$73:33:48.73&13.91&0.08&13.35&0.10&12.15&0.11&10.69&0.06&10&20.16
575: &19.56 &20.05 &19.19 \\
576: 52&01:29:30.21&$-$73:33:10.55&15.49&0.09&14.87&0.09&13.83&0.16&12.53&0.09&
577: 1&19.30 &18.62 & & \\
578: 53&01:29:31.67&$-$73:34:09.39&15.36&0.14&14.60&0.13&13.42&0.17&11.94&0.07&
579: 1&26.44 &24.28 & &\\
580: 54&01:29:35.67&$-$73:33:02.11&13.07&0.07&12.26&0.05&11.18&0.08& 9.86&0.06&
581: 9&19.34 &18.54 &19.29 &18.42\\
582: 57&01:29:35.62&$-$73:33:01.52&15.14&0.20&12.26&0.05&11.18&0.08& 9.86&0.06&
583: 7&24.20 &22.37 &22.67 &20.78\\
584:
585: \enddata
586:
587: %% Include any \tablenotetext{key}{text}
588: %% TEXT\tablenotemark{key}
589:
590: %% \tablecomments{text} between the \enddata and
591: %% \end{deluxetable} commands
592:
593: \tablecomments{Objects No 54 and 57 being very close to each other, have
594: been identified as distinct sources only in the 3.6 \micron\ band. Our
595: photometry could not resolve them in IRAC channels 2,3 and 4, and
596: therefore they appear with the same corresponding magnitudes. Inspection
597: of their ACS image (Fig. \ref{fig-ysosamples}) shows indeed the existence
598: of multiple objects very close to each other. Around each of the
599: candidate YSOs 54 and 57 different PMS stars have been found with only
600: four common stars. Objects No 42 and 43 are located outside the field
601: observed by ACS, and consequently it was not possible to identify any
602: optical sources for them.}
603:
604: %\tablerefs{ref list}
605:
606: \end{deluxetable*}
607: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
608:
609:
610:
611: %\clearpage
612: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIGURE %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
613: \begin{figure}[]
614: \epsscale{1.25}
615: \plotone{f6.ps}
616: \caption{$V-I$, $V$ Color-Magnitude Diagram of all the optical sources
617: from our ACS photometry, the loci of which are found to coincide (within
618: a radial distance 1\farcs2) with the location of the candidate YSOs
619: identified with our IRAC photometry in the region of NGC~602/N~90.
620: Evolutionary tracks for PMS stars from Palla \& Stahler (1999) for
621: masses 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 5.0
622: and 6.0 M\solar\ are overplotted. This diagram shows that these optical
623: sources are PMS stars, which cover a wide range of masses. PMS isochrone
624: models for 0.1 and 5 Myr and the ZAMS are also plotted with thick solid
625: lines. These models limit the age of the PMS stars, and consequently the
626: timescale for the corresponding star formation events, to \lsim 5 Myr.
627: \label{fig-cmdpms}}
628: \end{figure}
629: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
630:
631:
632: \subsection{Optical Counterparts of the Candidate YSOs}
633:
634: We use the results of the photometry by Schmalzl et al. (2007) on
635: ACS/WFC imaging of NGC~602 to identify the optical counterparts of the
636: candidate YSOs found with {\em Spitzer} located in this region. We
637: cross-correlate the positions of the candidate YSOs with the ones of all
638: stars found with ACS. For the comparison of the two catalogs we take
639: into account the fact that the resolution provided by IRAC is almost 25
640: times lower than the one of WFC, and therefore the selected area around
641: each candidate YSO to be searched for optical counterparts in most of
642: the cases revealed more than one optical sources. Specifically, we
643: selected a search circle with diameter of 2\farcs4, which corresponds to
644: the size of two IRAC pixels, a typical FWHM of the point-sources found
645: with our PSF photometry. In Table \ref{tab-yso} the results of this
646: search are given. Specifically, in the last five columns of this table
647: we give the number of stars from the ACS photometry, found within a
648: radial distance of 1\farcs2 (2 IRAC pixels) around the center of each
649: candidate YSO. We also give the magnitude of the brightest optical
650: source in the filters $F555W$ ($V$) and $F814W$ ($I$) respectively, as
651: well as the corresponding total magnitudes from all optical sources
652: found within the searched area around each candidate YSO. In Table
653: \ref{tab-yso} there are five candidate YSOs for which no optical
654: counterpart was found. However, only three of them (No 26, 35 and 38)
655: are located within the ACS/WFC field-of-view for which the
656: cross-corelation was possible. The remaining two candidate YSOs (No 42
657: and 43) are located outside this field-of-view, since the selected area
658: observed by IRAC (Fig. \ref{irac-maps}) is a bit larger than the one
659: covered by ACS.
660:
661: \section{Current Star Formation in the area of NGC~602/N~90}
662:
663: \subsection{Clustered Star Formation Events}
664:
665: As shown in Table \ref{tab-yso}, almost all of the detected candidate
666: YSOs in the area of NGC~602/N~90 are related to stars visible at optical
667: wavelengths. In half of the cases there are more than two optical
668: sources related to each candidate YSO (within a region corresponding to
669: two IRAC pixels). The loci of the detected candidate YSOs are shown
670: marked with red squares on a color composite image from the observations
671: taken with ACS/WFC of the area of NGC~602/N~90 in Fig. \ref{fig-ysomap}.
672: In this figure it is shown that there is a higher concentration of
673: candidate YSOs to the east and south, where also the nebula is brighter
674: and where the brighter 8\micron\ emission is found in the {\em Spitzer}
675: images (Fig. \ref{irac-maps}). More detailed color composite images
676: from ACS imaging of the loci around 13 selected candidate YSOs are shown
677: in Fig. \ref{fig-ysosamples}. Circles of radius corresponding to
678: 1\farcs2 mark the centers of the candidate YSOs. In this figure it can
679: be seen that there are candidate YSOs coinciding with stellar
680: clusterings, which could be true compact clusters (objects No 22, 24,
681: 29, 54/57). The nature of these compact clusters and if they are
682: signatures of on-going clustered star formation are two very important
683: issues.
684:
685: We attempt to address these issues by plotting the CMD of all stars from
686: our ACS photometry, that are associated with the candidate YSOs found with
687: IRAC. The part of a $V-I$, $V$ CMD, which is expected to be occupied by
688: pre-main sequence (PMS) stars of star-forming regions in the MCs observed
689: with {\em Hubble} is fairly known (e.g. Gouliermis et al. 2006, Nota et
690: al. 2006). This CMD for the optical sources related to the candidate YSOs
691: in the region of NGC~602/N~90, plotted in Fig. \ref{fig-cmdpms}, shows
692: that all of the stars found to coincide with the candidate YSOs in our
693: sample are actually PMS stars, suggesting that either we probably observe
694: the existence of compact PMS star clusters recently formed (or currently
695: under formation) around typical YSOs, or that the sources identified as
696: candidate YSOs {\em are} themselves unresolved young PMS clusters. In
697: either case it is almost certain that these stellar concentrations
698: demonstrate possible events of extragalactic clustered star formation on
699: the act. If so, it would be interesting to know how long ago this
700: formation took place.
701:
702: To answer this question, on the CMD of Fig. \ref{fig-cmdpms} we also plot
703: PMS evolutionary tracks from the models by Palla \& Stahler (1999), and
704: two indicative isochrones (for 0.1 and 5 Myr) and the Zero Age Main
705: Sequence (ZAMS) from the same models. Simulations of the positions at the
706: $V-I$, $V$ CMD of all PMS stars found in the region of NGC~602/N~90 by
707: Schmalzl et al. (2007) indicate that reddening, variability and binarity
708: are important factors, which cause a spread of the loci of PMS stars in
709: this CMD and that even modest interstellar reddening (Schmalzl et al. find
710: $E(B-V)\simeq$~0.04~-~0.06~mag for the association NGC~602) can make these
711: stars appear younger (being ``pushed'' to redder colors). Considering
712: these results and the plot of Fig. \ref{fig-cmdpms}, one may conclude that
713: the PMS stars, which coincide with the candidate YSOs of our sample do not
714: seem to be older than about 5 Myr, giving an upper limit to the time-scale
715: within which these clusters were formed.
716:
717: For a more detailed analysis one should concentrate on the stellar content
718: of each of the individual clusters, but in most of the cases very low
719: numbers of stars per cluster do not allow such an analysis. We selected
720: the most populous among the identified clusters (the ones corresponding to
721: candidate YSOs No 22, 29, 51 and 54) to plot their individual CMDs, but
722: the stellar numbers were still not enough to define a more narrow age
723: range. PMS stars are mainly red sources, and therefore near-infrared
724: imaging with cameras equipped with Adaptive Optics (AO) systems would
725: provide the necessary resolution for a richer sample of PMS stellar
726: members in these clusters. Indeed, high resolution near-infrared
727: observations of these clusters would certainly be very useful, because
728: they would 1) provide better statistics with higher numbers of detected
729: members, enough to plot the CMDs of individual clusters and 2) fill the
730: gap between optical and mid-infrared wavelengths, providing near-infrared
731: magnitudes for these PMS stars. The later information will offer the
732: opportunity to construct accurate spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of
733: candidate YSOs, to be compared to models.
734:
735: As far as candidate YSOs that coincide with no more than two PMS stars
736: concerns, in Fig. \ref{fig-ysosamples} we also show several different
737: cases of ``single'' candidate YSOs (e.g. objects No 1, 5, 49, 53), but as
738: their images show it is unclear if such sources are indeed single isolated
739: objects or embedded clusters (as the faint magnitudes given in Table
740: \ref{tab-yso} suggest), or even one massive embedded protostar. Modeling
741: of the SEDs of such objects is quite difficult, in the sense that many
742: different models seem to fit the SEDs, due to their small number of
743: points, and near-infrared AO observations would certainly add three more
744: points to the SEDs, throwing more light toward this direction as well. It
745: is worth noting that Fig. \ref{fig-ysosamples} also demonstrates few
746: interesting cases of candidate YSOs (objects No 26, 49, 34, 35, 46 and
747: 53), both with and without optical counterparts, which are located at the
748: edge of features similar to the ``Pillars of Creation'' or ``Elephant
749: Trunks'' in the galactic {\sc H~ii} region M~16 (the Eagle Nebula; Hester
750: et al. 1996).
751:
752: \subsection{Star-Formation Scenario for the Region of NGC~602/N~90}
753:
754: The sample of candidate YSOs derived from our IRAC photometry in the
755: region of NGC~602/N~90 (Table \ref{tab-yso}) is based on a single
756: classification scheme. As a consequence, although it is almost certain
757: that this sample does include true YSOs, there is always a possibility
758: that it also includes sources misidentified as YSOs, like small {\sc H~ii}
759: regions, or that it is quite incomplete not including all possible true
760: YSOs, like the Class I YSOs in the sample of Allen et al. (2004). The
761: identification of PMS stars in the areas of the candidate YSOs as their
762: optical counterparts indicates that half of these objects are not single
763: sources. But, considering the difficulty of modeling the SEDs of these
764: objects, it is not straightforward to clarify which of them represent
765: embedded proto-clusters. In the case of candidate YSOs coinciding with one
766: or two PMS stars, there is no information if there should be more optical
767: counterparts, which simply were not detected in our ACS photometry, or if
768: these are indeed single proto-stellar objects.
769:
770: In any case, the composite ACS image of the area of NGC~602/N~90 shown in
771: Fig. \ref{fig-ysomap} provides evidence that sequential star formation
772: does take place in the area and especially on the dust ridges of a cavity,
773: which seems to extend outwards. This feature is most probably the product
774: of photoionization by the young association, NGC~602, located almost at
775: its center. The combination of both ACS (Fig. \ref{fig-ysomap}) and IRAC
776: (Fig. \ref{irac-maps}) observations provides a more complete image of the
777: star formation in the area. Specifically, taking into account the loci of
778: the sources classified as candidate YSOs, the ISM features shown in the
779: image from ACS, and the 8 \micron\ emission shown in the IRAC image, one
780: may conclude that in the observed area the stellar association NGC~602
781: ionizes the surrounding material giving birth to the {\sc H~ii} region,
782: N~90, and producing a cavity in the remaining of its parental molecular
783: cloud. This event triggers sequential star formation not later than
784: $\sim$~5~Myr ago, which seems to propagate mostly to the east and south.
785: This second star formation event may be characterized by higher a
786: concentration of YSOs, most of which may be related to compact PMS
787: clusters. This scenario is also supported by the study of the PMS
788: population in NGC~602 and its surroundings by Schmalzl et al. (2007).
789:
790:
791: \section{Conclusions}
792:
793: We present our results from {\em Spitzer}/IRAC photometry on the
794: star-forming region NGC~602/N~90 in the Small Magellanic Cloud.
795:
796: We performed PSF photometry on IRAC images taken in four mid-infrared
797: channels (3.6 \micron, 4.5 \micron, 5.8 \micron\ and 8.0 \micron) centered
798: on the {\sc H~ii} region N~90. We identified 57 objects in all four
799: channels and 44 in channels 1, 2 and 3. We classified the sources found in
800: all four IRAC channels from their loci in the [3.6]$-$[8.0], [8.0]
801: color-magnitude diagram, based on templates and models for different red
802: sources in the Milky Way, and the [5.8]$-$[8.0], [3.6]$-$[4.5] color-color
803: diagram, according to the classification scheme developed by Bolatto et
804: al. (2007) for SMC YSOs.
805:
806: According to our classification there are 22 candidate YSOs in the region
807: of NGC~602/N~90. We use our results from PSF photometry in the filters $V$
808: and $I$ of the same region from imaging with the Wide-Field Channel of ACS
809: on-board the {\em Hubble} Space Telescope (Schmalzl et al. 2007) to
810: identify optical sources, which coincide with the candidate YSOs. All
811: these optical sources are identified as PMS stars. We found that almost
812: half of the candidate YSOs match with no more than two PMS stars, but
813: examination of their loci on the ACS images does not exclude the
814: possibility that there may be more highly embedded sources or not well
815: resolved also in the optical. The remaining candidate YSOs coincide with
816: more than 3 PMS stars, and four of them seem to include small compact PMS
817: clusters of 7 (or more) stars. We found that these stars are probably
818: formed earlier than 5 Myr ago, according to PMS evolutionary models. We
819: could not find any optical counterpart for five YSOs, two of which are
820: located outside the field observed with ACS.
821:
822: From the positions of the detected candidate YSOs, we conclude that they
823: are probably the products of a sequential star formation process, which
824: presumably propagates mostly to the east and south, on the ridges of the
825: molecular cloud, as they formed from the photo-ionizing process of the
826: stellar association NGC~602 located in the center of the apparent cavity
827: of the cloud.
828:
829: Finally, it should be mentioned that our sample of candidate YSOs
830: may be contaminated by other objects like small {\sc H~ii} regions, or it
831: may not include some true YSOs. Based on our results we stress the
832: importance of high-resolution near-infrared imaging of the candidate YSOs
833: in order 1) to resolve more faint red stellar sources and detect a higher
834: number of related PMS stars, and 2) to fill the wavelength gap between
835: optical and mid-infrared by providing near-infrared measurements of all
836: detected sources, so that their SEDs will be thoroughly modeled, as well
837: as of high-resolution radio observations, which will provide additional
838: information on the ionizing flux for the identified objects.
839:
840: \acknowledgments
841:
842: Dimitrios A. Gouliermis kindly acknowledges the support of the German
843: Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft - DFG) through the
844: individual grant 1659/1-1. Sascha P. Quanz kindly acknowledges financial
845: support from the German Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. This paper is based on
846: observations made with the Spitzer Space Telescope, which is operated by
847: the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology under a
848: contract with NASA, and on observations made with the NASA/ESA Hubble
849: Space Telescope, obtained from the data archive at the Space Telescope
850: Science Institute. STScI is operated by the Association of Universities
851: for Research in Astronomy, Inc. under NASA contract NAS 5-26555. This
852: research has made use of NASA's Astrophysics Data System, {\em Aladin}
853: (Bonnarel et al. 2000), {\em WCSTools} (Mink 2001), and the SIMBAD
854: database, operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France.
855:
856:
857: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% BIBLIOGRAPHY %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
858: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
859: %\newpage
860: \begin{references}
861: \reference{} Allen, L.~E., et al.\ 2004, \apjs, 154, 363
862: \reference{} Bakes, E., \& Tielens, A. G. G. M. 1994, ApJ, 427, 822
863: \reference{} Benjamin, R. A., et al. 2003, PASP, 115, 953
864: \reference{} Bolatto, A.~D., et al.\ 2007, ApJ, 655, 212
865: \reference{} Bonnarel, F., et al.\ 2000, A\&AS, 143, 33
866: \reference{} Clayton, G. C., Wolff, M. J., Sofia, U. J., Gordon, K. D., \&
867: Misselt, K. A. 2003, ApJ, 588, 871
868: \reference{} Cohen, M. 1993, AJ, 105, 1860
869: \reference{} Davies, R.~D., Elliott, K.~H., \& Meaburn, J.\ 1976, MmRAS,
870: 81, 89
871: \reference{} Desert, F.-X., Boulanger, F., \& Puget, J. L. 1990, A\&A, 237, 215
872: \reference{} Engelbracht, C. W., et al. 2006, ApJ, 642, L127
873: \reference{} Fazio, G., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 10
874: \reference{} Gouliermis, D., Brandner, W., \& Henning, T.\ 2006, \apjl,
875: 636, L133
876: \reference{} Hartmann, L., et al.\ 2005, ApJ, 629, 881
877: \reference{} Henize, K.~G.\ 1956, ApJS, 2, 315
878: \reference{} Hester, J.~J., et al.\ 1996, \aj, 111, 2349
879: \reference{} J{\"a}ger, C., Krasnokutski, S., Staicu, A., Huisken, F.,
880: Mutschke, H., Henning, T., Poppitz, W., \& Voicu, I.\ 2006, ApJS, 166,
881: 557
882: \reference{} Jones, T.~J., Woodward, C.~E., Boyer, M.~L., Gehrz, R.~D., \&
883: Polomski, E.\ 2005, \apj, 620, 731
884: \reference{} Hodge, P.\ 1985, PASP, 97, 530
885: \reference{} Li, A., \& Draine, B. T. 2002, ApJ, 576, 762
886: \reference{} Massey, P.\ 1993, Massive Stars: Their Lives in the
887: Interstellar Medium, 35, 168
888: \reference{} Massey, P.\ 2002, \apjs, 141, 81
889: \reference{} Mink, D.~J.\ 2002, ASP Conf.~Ser.~281: Astronomical Data
890: Analysis Software and Systems XI, 281, 169
891: \reference{} Palla, F., \& Stahler, S. W. 1999, ApJ, 525, 772
892: \reference{} Sauvage, M., Vigroux, L., \& Thuan, T. X. 1990, A\&A, 237, 296
893: \reference{} Schwering, P. B. W. 1989, A\&AS, 79, 105
894: \reference{} Simon, J. D., et al.\ 2007, submitted to ApJ
895: \reference{} Schmalzl, M. et al.\ 2007, to be submitted to ApJ
896: \reference{} Stanimirovi\'{c}, S., Staveley-Smith, L., van der Hulst, J.
897: M., Bontekoe, T. R., Kester, D. J. M., \& Jones, P. A. 2000, MNRAS, 315,
898: 791
899: \reference{} Weingartner, J. C., \& Draine, B. T. 2001, ApJ, 548, 296
900: \reference{} Werner, M., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 1
901: \reference{} Whitney, B. A., Wood, K., Bjorkman, J. E., \& Cohen, M. 2003,
902: ApJ, 598, 1079
903: \reference{} Whitney, B., Indebetouw, R., Bjorkman, J. E., \& Wood, K.
904: 2004, ApJ, 617, 1177
905: \reference{} Wolfire, M., Hollenbach, D., McKee, C. F., Tielens, A. G. G.
906: M., \& Bakes, E. L. O. 1995, ApJ, 443, 152
907: \end{references}
908: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
909:
910:
911: \end{document}
912: